moms4all

G-Rated School presents its device and privacy claims

September 10, 2026; stated 2027 intentions · Utah; national comparison data

On September 10, 2026, Davis County Conservatives hosted a "Tech in Public Schools" talk by Liz and Allie of G-Rated School. They called for limits on school-issued devices, closer review of school software and student data privacy, and more software legislation in 2027.

Show the dated details

A presenter said a BYU and Internet Safety Labs review of 100 school apps found that 97 percent broke their data privacy agreements (DPAs). She also cited 52 percent collecting disallowed data and 36 percent sharing data with advertisers. The August 20, 2025 USBE/BYU/Internet Safety Labs report tested 100 selected apps. It found that 44 of the 85 apps with relevant DPAs (52 percent) collected data their agreements did not allow. The report does not give the claimed 97-percent result; its source is unknown.

In another excerpt, the presenter associated a flattening and then decline in reading scores with classroom computers and one device per student. She said the relationship is not known for sure, while calling the data conclusive, and described the chart as Utah data. The slide is labeled "NAEP Test Scores 8th Grade / READING" and ends at 256, with a four-point decrease from 2020 to 2023. The site notes that those values match the national NAEP long-term trend results for 13-year-olds, not a Utah state series.

A presenter said district accounts let students privately email others in the district. She raised concern about that ability but said she had no evidence of such a conversation.

The host thanked the presenters, offered help with lobbying lawmakers and said the group would email the talk to its members.

Documented

Who and what is involved

Institutions
Davis County Conservatives talk; USBE/BYU report context
People and recorded roles
Liz; Allie
Organizations, bodies and vendors
G-Rated School/Group; Davis County Conservatives; USBE; BYU; Internet Safety Labs
Laws, rules and procedures
Future proposed initiatives; none enacted by this talk
Products and information systems
Devices; school software; privacy/filtering; NAEP charts

Sources (13)

Earlier research pages

Open question

What policy proposal followed, and what sampling/risk definitions explain claims?

Where this appears

Evidence relationships that use it