moms4all

When Is a Book Decision Final?

A book review can end with removal, limits by grade or continued access. An appeal can change that result, and a board may delay its vote or seek another review. This chapter follows those steps to find out when a decision is final.

Fight Club: what the Board decided

On September 3, 2026, the State Board rejected a motion to send Fight Club back to Davis for a separate vote. The motion failed, 7 in favor and 8 opposed. The Board ordered no do-over, and the book remained removed in Davis. The failed motion was not a finding that Davis followed its policy.

Read the timeline account and final vote · Watch the recorded vote

What if families want a book back?

A local reconsideration and a statewide removal are different steps. Read USBE’s explanation of later review, including Rasmussen’s stated understanding and the public email excerpt.

When is a book ruling final? What can still change it?

Appeals produce different outcomes

March 2023–March 2024 · Utah: Davis

Davis’s Sensitive Materials Appeal Committee prepared recommendations for six board meetings between March 2023 and March 2024. Each exhibit names the book, the initial review decision and the appeal recommendation.

Show the dated details

March 7, 2023: The Bluest Eye, All Boys Aren't Blue, The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue and Red, White & Royal Blue were removed by the initial review and recommended for removal. The Clockwork Princess was retained at both stages. For All Boys Aren't Blue, the exhibit says the committee recommends removal because of the sexual content it contains, which it says violates Utah Code, and not because of the racial or transgender topics the book explores.

April 18, 2023: Monday's Not Coming, removed by the initial review, was recommended for retention in junior high and high school. Thirteen Reasons Why and Sold, retained by the initial review, were recommended for retention in high school. The exhibit anticipates board approval as a consent item.

July 18, 2023: The Lovely Bones, retained in high school by the initial review, was recommended for removal. Deogratias, A Tale of Rwanda and Lawn Boy were removed at both stages.

October 3, 2023: The Poet X, initially retained in high school, and Me and Earl and the Dying Girl, initially retained, were recommended for removal.

November 14, 2023: Crank, initially retained, and The Handmaid's Tale, initially retained in high school, were each recommended for retention in high school with parental permission required. The Kite Runner, initially retained in junior high and high school, was recommended for retention in high school. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close and The Perks of Being a Wallflower, both initially retained in high school, were recommended for removal. Looking for Alaska was removed at both stages.

March 19, 2024: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings was removed at both stages. Bodies are Cool and The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, both initially retained, were recommended for removal.

Documented
35 sources for March 2023–March 2024
Full record

January–March 2025 · Utah: Davis

On January 21, 2025, Michelle Barber moved the Sensitive Materials Appeal Committee Recommendation from consent item 8 to a separate business item. All seven members present then voted to delay it until February’s business meeting.

Show the dated details

The January 21 exhibit lists five titles: Breathless, How Beautiful the Ordinary, Lighter Than My Shadow, Lucky and The Almost Moon. Each was removed by the initial review and recommended for removal.

The February 4, 2025 exhibit lists six titles recommended for removal: Breathless, How Beautiful the Ordinary, Lighter Than My Shadow, Lucky, Storm and Fury and The Almost Moon. For each, it says the appeal committee determined the book contains objective sensitive material as defined in Utah law, so Utah law requires its removal.

The same exhibit says Drama passed only the objective review. It recommends considering an appeal after a Subjective Review Committee reviews it. The exhibit says Utah law requires that second review when a book passes the objective test.

The March 18, 2025 exhibit recommends keeping Drama after both reviews. The appeal committee found it did not contain sensitive material under Utah law. It recommends subjective review for Twisted and The Hate U Give, both initially removed by the objective committee. On appeal, the committee found neither met the objective test. Further review would decide whether they met the subjective test.

Documented
35 sources for January–March 2025
Full record

Later determinations and the Fight Club procedure

February–July 2026 · Utah: Davis

February 3, 2026: 10 Things I Can See From Here, A Spark of Light, Bronxwood, Kendra and Romeo and/or Juliet: A Chooseable-Path Adventure each carry a plausibility review decision of "Removed from student access" and an initial objective committee decision to remove. The appeals committee recommended removing all five. For Romeo and/or Juliet, the rationale says the book directs readers to a website and that its printed text includes a description of sexual intercourse or sodomy that violates the objective criteria whether or not the website is counted.

Show the dated details

The February exhibit says the committee met on December 17, 2025 to receive documents and January 20, 2026 to discuss recommendations. Board consideration was scheduled for February 3, 2026.

March 3, 2026: The initial objective committee votes for Body Talk (4:3), Rabbit and Robot (6:1), Rainbow Boys (5:2), Shadow of the Wind (5:2), Suicide Notes from Beautiful Girls (5:2) and The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo (5:2) were all to remove. The appeals committee recommended removing all six.

April 7, 2026: Fight Club was removed by the initial subjective committee, 7:0. The appeals committee recommended removal, saying that in consideration of the book's content and its literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors, the committee determines it contains subjective sensitive materials as defined by Utah law.

July 21, 2026: The initial objective committee removed Sybylline and The Sympathizer, 7:0. An appeal argued that the submitter had already reached the limit on unsuccessful requests. The appeal committee checked the dates, found the limit had not been reached and recommended removal.

Documented
35 sources for February–July 2026
Full record

April 7–September 3, 2026; May 29 reporting notation · Utah: Davis and USBE

On April 7, 2026, the Davis appeals committee recommended removing Fight Club, which the initial subjective committee had removed, 7:0.

Show the dated details

On September 3, 2026, the State Board rejected a motion to send Fight Club back to Davis for a separate vote. The motion failed, 7 in favor and 8 opposed. The Board ordered no do-over, and the book remained removed in Davis. The failed motion was not a finding that Davis followed its policy.

Documented
37 sources for April 7–September 3, 2026; May 29 reporting notation
Full record

When the outcome or record changes

2023–2026 · Utah local/state

The Davis records distinguish a recommendation to keep a book, a delayed board vote and referral for another review. The March 18, 2025 exhibit recommends keeping Drama and sending Twisted and The Hate U Give for subjective review. The January 21, 2025 minutes record a vote to delay the appeal item until February.

Show the dated details

The collected records do not establish how each outcome reached the state or whether every withdrawal reached the statewide list.

Unknown
42 sources for 2023–2026
Full record

Davis: the instructions changed over time

Research update · October 15, 2026

A Davis policy copy revised November 4, 2020 requires full-book reading at the school and district-appeal stages. It keeps books in use during the first review and allows appeals within ten school days of receiving the school committee’s decision.

The September 2022 policy copy keeps access equivalent until a final determination and sets a fifteen-school-day appeal period from website posting.

A copy revised September 6, 2023 requires parent permission for books sent to Standard review. It allows thirty school days to appeal.

These are historical document versions. Their text alone does not establish when each was adopted or took effect.

A facilitator training slide directs an initial vote based on challenged pages and supporting evidence. If reviewers find no sensitive-material violation, it directs full-book reading. That tells us the instruction, not what each member actually read.

Read the policy and training excerpts, with page images.

Open questions

What happened to books sent for further review? How do later reversals or record corrections affect a statewide removal?

Where things stand

Return to the guided story, then follow the related chapters and original records.

Continue reading →