A guide shows how to find public meeting records
September 2026 agenda; tutorial context includes 2023 notes/2024 webinar · Texas: New Braunfels example; national methods
The guide explains how to find and save records. An agenda attachment does not show a vote or purchase. Real screenshots are labeled separately from teaching illustrations, and a historical book’s claims still need their own evidence.
Documented
Who and what is involved
- Institutions
- BoardBook agenda records; research methodology
- People and recorded roles
- John Harmer as cited author; Stephens in linked webinar
- Organizations, bodies and vendors
- New Braunfels ISD; BoardBook; Internet Archive; Protect Ohio Children
- Laws, rules and procedures
- Agenda procedure only; no approval inferred
- Products and information systems
- 49-page book list; download helper; illustrated workflow
Sources (13)
- D360Open the meeting list ↗ (opens in a new window)
- D361Open the September 14 agenda directly ↗ (opens in a new window)
- D362The September 14 meeting row; Agenda is outlined in the Details column. The Details links for the September 14 row, with Agenda outlined. See full screen ↗ (opens in a new window)
- D363Item 8.C and its four attachments, with the high-school book-list link outlined. The last line of the high-school book-list link under item 8.C. See full screen ↗ (opens in a new window)
- D364Open this example’s PDF directly ↗ (opens in a new window)
- D365The book-list viewer with its menu open and Download outlined. The viewer menu, with Download outlined. See full screen ↗ (opens in a new window)
- D366curl (opens in a new window)
- D367RatedBooks Rating Scale page (opens in a new window)
- D368notes on Harmer’s book (opens in a new window)
- D369A War We Must Win on Internet Archive (opens in a new window)
- D370saved image of pages 34–35 (opens in a new window)
- D371Open the Protect Ohio Children webinar at 21:01 (opens in a new window)
- D37222:27 (opens in a new window)
Earlier research pages
Open question
What original agenda action/context is needed before treating the example as a substantive case?