moms4all
moms4all / Book ratings and public decisions

How RatedBooks has been used

RatedBooks helps parents choose books to challenge and offers paid checks of library book lists. In York County, South Carolina, the public library board added its reviews to book-selection rules. The examples below separate private offers from official decisions.

Examples: Maryland challenges, a paid book-list screening offer, and York County library policy.

Three examples

  1. Maryland: Moms for Liberty used rating sites to choose books to challenge

    Carroll County, Maryland’s local paper reported that Moms for Liberty used BookLooks, RatedBooks and Common Sense Media to choose school books to challenge.

    By fall 2023, 56 to 59 titles were under review. The chapter’s vice chair acknowledged: “Most of the books [under review] were not read by our members.”

    Read the Maryland challenge record

  2. South Carolina: a library board added RatedBooks to its selection rules

    The York County, South Carolina, library board voted 6–1 to add “reviews by ratedbooks.org” to its official rules for choosing library books.

    The policy required consideration of those private reviews when selecting books. It gave RatedBooks a named role in the library’s selection rules.

    Read the York County policy record

  3. A paid service to screen a library’s entire book list

    In an S&S Apps tutorial, RatedBooks founder Brooke Stephens offered to compare entire library lists with NBRI, the National Book Rating Index of reviews and ratings.

    In the video, “How to Use the NBRI,” Stephens quoted a price of $100 per library, “whether it’s a school or a community.”

    A separate store check on August 17, 2026, found a pricing exception: the option for up to 1,000 schools displayed $10,000, rather than the $100,000 implied by that rate. See the recorded store prices.

    Read the book-list screening offer record

More records

Four more entries from the timeline, in date order.

  1. Incorporation email appears on a Utah Parents United page

    The email address that later appears as the contact on RatedBooks.org’s 2025 incorporation papers was already on Utah Parents United’s “LaVerna in the Library” page, months before the ratedbooks.org domain existed. (The domain itself is registered to a California app developer of record.)

    See the record

    Stephens on video: UPU board member, StoryLabs name tag

    Brooke Stephens appears in a “Laverna in The Library” video. She says she is on the Utah Parents United board. Her name tag on screen says StoryLabs.

    “…All Boys Aren't Blue. And I read that and I'm like, what? This isn't a kid's book [the channel's auto-captions garble this phrase; the two passes do not agree on it], what? And I was horrified. And I like posted it, you know, because I'm on the board of Utah Parents United. And so I posted that. I'm like, yeah, that shouldn't be happening.”

    See the record

  2. RatedBooks is introduced to Utah lawmakers

    At a Utah legislative committee meeting on H.B. 374, the presenter yields the floor: “She is a mom who then started her own website... It’s called ratedbooks.org. If you want to know what books are in your school... you can go to the website ratedbooks.org.” A committee member replies: “And rated books, I’m glad I can search for it.”

    See the record

  3. Four quotes from one April 2024 talk

    Four quotes from one talk to a national group: the source of the ratings, the price, the rule about which words to use, and the districts she keeps secret.

    “They said hey, we need ratings, because you're giving us some really bad ones, some mediocre ones. So BookLooks from Florida is the one who supplies all of our ratings. I'm going to show you her page.”
    “I just give them a page and they can say whatever they want up here. It costs $35 — I just made that price up — and one-time fee, just so I could manage if like a million people came at me at once.”
    “Not what the left has said, is a book ban or book burning. And by the way, we try really hard never to use the terms book ban[ner], book burning, because we don't want to reinforce their lies. So what we call it is appropriate limits for kids.” (Two transcriptions differ on one word: YouTube captions hear “book banner,” machine transcription hears “book ban or.” Quoted to the agreed text.)
    “We went to the school district and said, please click it so we can search the whole district at once, and they did. Now they turned it back because they're mad at us. And in other districts I went through all the schools until I found one that let me search the whole district… so I found those and keep them a secret so they don't change those settings.”

    See the record

    (same talk)

    “God’s errand”

    Her closing words to the volunteers:

    “Celebrate your wins — 'cause right after that you'll have a loss. You just keep going. Don't worry, you're on the right path. You're doing God's errand.”

    See the record

  4. Her pitch: paid placement of ratings inside library catalogs

    On camera, Brooke Stephens says schools can pay to have RatedBooks ratings show up inside their library catalogs, priced by the size of the library. That is her description of the service. No district or school has been shown to have paid for it.

    See the record

Other records

  1. The Bible: removed, restored on appeal

    The Bible was challenged under the same Davis school district process. It was removed from elementary and junior high libraries, then put back at every level on appeal. Fourteen appeal-decision documents cover 52 title decisions; the Bible was the only book to get a written explanation weighing its “significant, serious value.”

    See the record

  2. “It can’t be pornography if it doesn’t have images”

    A 59-second video: the ALA (American Library Association) president’s page is invoked over “queer material,” “it’s not like this is banning books” is conceded, and the argument lands on images in graphic novels. The speaker is identified as Brooke Stephens by ear. No speaker-labeled record confirms it.

    Watch the video (0:48 for the close)

    See the record

Every moment above is one card in the records below, which hold all 944 dated records from 1956 to 2026.

Background 1956–2020

Utah, 2021 2021

State laws and district reviews 2022

Removals and other states 2023–2024

Counts, laws, and library rules 2025

Payments, filings, and paid services 2026

Audio and video

15 clips from the recordings behind 6 records. Each one plays here and links to its record.

  1. May 7, 2022 On tape in 2022: “I’m on the board of Utah Parents United”

    • May 2022: the label and the board seat (25s, video)

      “…All Boys Aren't Blue. And I read that and I'm like, what? This isn't a kid's book [the channel's auto-captions garble this phrase; the two passes do not agree on it], what? And I was horrified. And I like posted it, you know, because I'm on the board of Utah Parents United. And so I posted that. I'm like, yeah, that shouldn't be happening.”
  2. Jun 25, 2023 Bruce Friedman names BookLooks and RatedBooks as peer list-makers

    • “I'm the MC for all the list people” (56s)

  3. Sep 8, 2023 Her screening workflow: ask a chatbot, then keyword-search the PDF

    • The screening workflow: ask ChatGPT, then the rating sites (38s) — who is speaking is not certain

  4. Apr 5, 2024 The national webinar: BookLooks “supplies all of our ratings”

    • The introduction: “new co-chair of PCHC” (22s)

    • The messaging rule, stated as strategy (20s)

    • Where the ratings come from (14s)

    • Pricing a district page (15s)

    • The Harmer book, retold (50s)

    • The closing charge (14s)

    • Why the spreadsheet exists (20s)

    • The catalog back door (30s)

  5. Dec 5, 2025 A board member describes publishing as an industry with “no accountability”

    • “Reaching out to librarians to understand the procurement process” (38s)

  6. Aug 6, 2026 The state board adopts the amended library-review plan; the recorded vote counts disagree

    • Green reads the addendum's purpose: the review in "the industry's own working terms" (150s, video)

      viewing this review through the industry lens. Not through like the educational realm. ... translates the review's objectives into the industry's own working terms. Approval plans, standing orders, opening day collections, shelf ready processing, cooperative contracts, curated selection lists and so forth.
    • The final vote: "Ten in favor, one abstention, Chair Hymas, and two no votes" (140s, video)

      That motion passes. Ten in favor, one abstention, Chair Hymas, and two no votes being Member Reale and Member Lear.
    • After the vote: the chair on directing staff, and on what the consent calendar has become (215s, video)

      I'll say what you're not going to say, Davina. ... the vote that just passed, 10 to 5, 10 of us say, "Yes, forget this. We're doing this. This is where we're going." ... You don't belong to Molly anymore. You belong to us, all 15 of us.
ChaptersArchive