WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:04.230 align:start position:0% meeting.<00:00:01.199> Um<00:00:01.439> it's<00:00:01.760> Monday<00:00:02.000> the<00:00:02.240> 18th<00:00:02.800> of<00:00:03.120> May 00:00:04.230 --> 00:00:04.240 align:start position:0% meeting. Um it's Monday the 18th of May 00:00:04.240 --> 00:00:06.390 align:start position:0% meeting. Um it's Monday the 18th of May and<00:00:04.880> um<00:00:05.040> we're<00:00:05.279> just<00:00:05.440> trying<00:00:05.520> to<00:00:05.680> finish<00:00:05.920> up<00:00:06.080> a 00:00:06.390 --> 00:00:06.400 align:start position:0% and um we're just trying to finish up a 00:00:06.400 --> 00:00:08.230 align:start position:0% and um we're just trying to finish up a few<00:00:06.480> things<00:00:06.640> that<00:00:06.879> we<00:00:07.040> started<00:00:07.359> last<00:00:07.680> week.<00:00:08.000> So 00:00:08.230 --> 00:00:08.240 align:start position:0% few things that we started last week. So 00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:09.350 align:start position:0% few things that we started last week. So as<00:00:08.480> we<00:00:08.639> get<00:00:08.720> to<00:00:08.880> those 00:00:09.350 --> 00:00:09.360 align:start position:0% as we get to those 00:00:09.360 --> 00:00:10.790 align:start position:0% as we get to those >> already<00:00:09.760> go<00:00:09.840> ahead<00:00:10.000> and<00:00:10.160> go. 00:00:10.790 --> 00:00:10.800 align:start position:0% >> already go ahead and go. 00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:14.870 align:start position:0% >> already go ahead and go. >> Okay.<00:00:11.280> Thank<00:00:11.440> you.<00:00:12.160> Uh<00:00:12.800> this<00:00:13.040> is 00:00:14.870 --> 00:00:14.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Thank you. Uh this is 00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:17.590 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Thank you. Uh this is okay.<00:00:15.120> Am<00:00:15.280> I<00:00:15.440> still<00:00:15.599> good? 00:00:17.590 --> 00:00:17.600 align:start position:0% okay. Am I still good? 00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:21.109 align:start position:0% okay. Am I still good? It<00:00:17.840> was<00:00:17.920> just<00:00:18.080> the<00:00:18.320> delay,<00:00:18.720> right?<00:00:19.680> Okay.<00:00:21.119> All 00:00:21.109 --> 00:00:21.119 align:start position:0% It was just the delay, right? Okay. All 00:00:21.119 --> 00:00:23.830 align:start position:0% It was just the delay, right? Okay. All right.<00:00:21.520> I<00:00:21.760> don't<00:00:21.920> have<00:00:22.000> to<00:00:22.160> start<00:00:22.400> over.<00:00:23.359> Okay. 00:00:23.830 --> 00:00:23.840 align:start position:0% right. I don't have to start over. Okay. 00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:27.029 align:start position:0% right. I don't have to start over. Okay. Um<00:00:24.560> let's<00:00:24.880> see<00:00:25.119> who's<00:00:25.519> first<00:00:25.840> on<00:00:26.160> my<00:00:26.560> screen. 00:00:27.029 --> 00:00:27.039 align:start position:0% Um let's see who's first on my screen. 00:00:27.039 --> 00:00:29.109 align:start position:0% Um let's see who's first on my screen. Uh<00:00:27.359> board<00:00:27.599> member<00:00:27.920> real.<00:00:28.400> do<00:00:28.560> you<00:00:28.720> want<00:00:28.880> to 00:00:29.109 --> 00:00:29.119 align:start position:0% Uh board member real. do you want to 00:00:29.119 --> 00:00:32.150 align:start position:0% Uh board member real. do you want to introduce<00:00:29.519> yourself?<00:00:30.160> And<00:00:30.320> then 00:00:32.150 --> 00:00:32.160 align:start position:0% introduce yourself? And then 00:00:32.160 --> 00:00:34.229 align:start position:0% introduce yourself? And then Emily<00:00:32.559> Green,<00:00:32.880> I<00:00:33.040> have<00:00:33.200> you<00:00:33.360> after<00:00:33.600> that.<00:00:34.079> And 00:00:34.229 --> 00:00:34.239 align:start position:0% Emily Green, I have you after that. And 00:00:34.239 --> 00:00:38.389 align:start position:0% Emily Green, I have you after that. And then<00:00:34.480> Joanne<00:00:34.960> Brenton,<00:00:35.520> you're<00:00:35.760> after<00:00:36.000> that. 00:00:38.389 --> 00:00:38.399 align:start position:0% then Joanne Brenton, you're after that. 00:00:38.399 --> 00:00:40.709 align:start position:0% then Joanne Brenton, you're after that. >> Hi,<00:00:38.879> my<00:00:39.040> name<00:00:39.120> is<00:00:39.280> Sarah<00:00:39.600> Real.<00:00:40.079> I<00:00:40.239> represent 00:00:40.709 --> 00:00:40.719 align:start position:0% >> Hi, my name is Sarah Real. I represent 00:00:40.719 --> 00:00:45.430 align:start position:0% >> Hi, my name is Sarah Real. I represent district<00:00:41.120> 5<00:00:41.440> here<00:00:41.600> in<00:00:41.760> Salt<00:00:41.920> Lake<00:00:42.160> County. 00:00:45.430 --> 00:00:45.440 align:start position:0% 00:00:45.440 --> 00:00:47.190 align:start position:0% >> Hey,<00:00:45.680> I'm<00:00:45.840> Emily<00:00:46.160> Green.<00:00:46.559> I<00:00:46.800> represent 00:00:47.190 --> 00:00:47.200 align:start position:0% >> Hey, I'm Emily Green. I represent 00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:49.270 align:start position:0% >> Hey, I'm Emily Green. I represent district<00:00:47.680> 14.<00:00:48.079> I'm<00:00:48.239> the<00:00:48.480> middle<00:00:48.800> area, 00:00:49.270 --> 00:00:49.280 align:start position:0% district 14. I'm the middle area, 00:00:49.280 --> 00:00:53.430 align:start position:0% district 14. I'm the middle area, midsection<00:00:49.840> of<00:00:50.000> Utah. 00:00:53.430 --> 00:00:53.440 align:start position:0% 00:00:53.440 --> 00:00:56.310 align:start position:0% Hi,<00:00:53.840> I'm<00:00:54.399> Jo<00:00:54.960> Joanne<00:00:55.360> Brenton<00:00:55.840> and<00:00:56.079> I 00:00:56.310 --> 00:00:56.320 align:start position:0% Hi, I'm Jo Joanne Brenton and I 00:00:56.320 --> 00:00:58.470 align:start position:0% Hi, I'm Jo Joanne Brenton and I represent<00:00:56.640> the<00:00:56.960> southern<00:00:57.600> area<00:00:57.840> of<00:00:58.000> Utah, 00:00:58.470 --> 00:00:58.480 align:start position:0% represent the southern area of Utah, 00:00:58.480 --> 00:01:01.590 align:start position:0% represent the southern area of Utah, District<00:00:58.879> 15. 00:01:01.590 --> 00:01:01.600 align:start position:0% District 15. 00:01:01.600 --> 00:01:04.310 align:start position:0% District 15. >> Thank<00:01:01.840> you.<00:01:02.719> Um,<00:01:03.440> appreciate<00:01:03.920> everybody 00:01:04.310 --> 00:01:04.320 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. Um, appreciate everybody 00:01:04.320 --> 00:01:06.149 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. Um, appreciate everybody willing<00:01:04.559> to<00:01:05.040> spend<00:01:05.280> a<00:01:05.519> little<00:01:05.680> extra<00:01:06.000> time 00:01:06.149 --> 00:01:06.159 align:start position:0% willing to spend a little extra time 00:01:06.159 --> 00:01:07.510 align:start position:0% willing to spend a little extra time this<00:01:06.400> month<00:01:06.560> to<00:01:06.720> get<00:01:06.880> through<00:01:07.040> a<00:01:07.200> couple<00:01:07.360> more 00:01:07.510 --> 00:01:07.520 align:start position:0% this month to get through a couple more 00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:10.070 align:start position:0% this month to get through a couple more items<00:01:07.840> that<00:01:08.080> we<00:01:08.240> had.<00:01:09.360> We<00:01:09.600> are<00:01:09.760> going<00:01:09.840> to<00:01:10.000> go 00:01:10.070 --> 00:01:10.080 align:start position:0% items that we had. We are going to go 00:01:10.080 --> 00:01:12.789 align:start position:0% items that we had. We are going to go ahead<00:01:10.320> and<00:01:10.479> get<00:01:10.640> started.<00:01:11.280> I<00:01:11.520> don't<00:01:12.320> we<00:01:12.560> didn't 00:01:12.789 --> 00:01:12.799 align:start position:0% ahead and get started. I don't we didn't 00:01:12.799 --> 00:01:14.630 align:start position:0% ahead and get started. I don't we didn't really<00:01:12.960> list<00:01:13.280> public<00:01:13.600> comment.<00:01:14.080> Did<00:01:14.320> we<00:01:14.479> have 00:01:14.630 --> 00:01:14.640 align:start position:0% really list public comment. Did we have 00:01:14.640 --> 00:01:16.950 align:start position:0% really list public comment. Did we have anybody<00:01:15.119> call<00:01:15.360> in<00:01:15.520> with<00:01:15.680> any<00:01:15.920> public<00:01:16.240> comment, 00:01:16.950 --> 00:01:16.960 align:start position:0% anybody call in with any public comment, 00:01:16.960 --> 00:01:17.990 align:start position:0% anybody call in with any public comment, Andrea? 00:01:17.990 --> 00:01:18.000 align:start position:0% Andrea? 00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:20.390 align:start position:0% Andrea? >> No,<00:01:18.400> nobody<00:01:18.799> has<00:01:19.040> requested<00:01:19.600> public<00:01:19.920> comment. 00:01:20.390 --> 00:01:20.400 align:start position:0% >> No, nobody has requested public comment. 00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.109 align:start position:0% >> No, nobody has requested public comment. So<00:01:20.720> you<00:01:20.960> can<00:01:21.119> go<00:01:21.360> to<00:01:22.240> um 00:01:23.109 --> 00:01:23.119 align:start position:0% So you can go to um 00:01:23.119 --> 00:01:25.270 align:start position:0% So you can go to um >> our<00:01:23.600> next<00:01:23.920> agenda<00:01:24.320> item<00:01:24.720> which<00:01:24.960> is<00:01:25.040> the 00:01:25.270 --> 00:01:25.280 align:start position:0% >> our next agenda item which is the 00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:27.670 align:start position:0% >> our next agenda item which is the standards<00:01:25.759> update<00:01:26.400> 1.2. 00:01:27.670 --> 00:01:27.680 align:start position:0% standards update 1.2. 00:01:27.680 --> 00:01:32.069 align:start position:0% standards update 1.2. >> Perfect.<00:01:28.400> Okay.<00:01:29.360> Um<00:01:29.840> let's<00:01:30.159> go<00:01:30.320> ahead<00:01:31.600> and<00:01:31.920> do 00:01:32.069 --> 00:01:32.079 align:start position:0% >> Perfect. Okay. Um let's go ahead and do 00:01:32.079 --> 00:01:34.069 align:start position:0% >> Perfect. Okay. Um let's go ahead and do just<00:01:32.320> a<00:01:32.560> quick<00:01:32.799> review<00:01:33.200> of<00:01:33.439> some<00:01:33.680> of<00:01:33.759> those 00:01:34.069 --> 00:01:34.079 align:start position:0% just a quick review of some of those 00:01:34.079 --> 00:01:36.230 align:start position:0% just a quick review of some of those changes<00:01:34.479> we<00:01:34.720> had<00:01:34.880> on<00:01:35.119> there<00:01:35.600> or<00:01:35.840> we<00:01:36.079> had 00:01:36.230 --> 00:01:36.240 align:start position:0% changes we had on there or we had 00:01:36.240 --> 00:01:37.670 align:start position:0% changes we had on there or we had recommended<00:01:36.799> and<00:01:36.960> we<00:01:37.119> had<00:01:37.280> actually 00:01:37.670 --> 00:01:37.680 align:start position:0% recommended and we had actually 00:01:37.680 --> 00:01:40.149 align:start position:0% recommended and we had actually suggested.<00:01:39.040> Sorry<00:01:39.280> I'm<00:01:39.520> in<00:01:39.680> between<00:01:39.920> two 00:01:40.149 --> 00:01:40.159 align:start position:0% suggested. Sorry I'm in between two 00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:42.230 align:start position:0% suggested. Sorry I'm in between two screens<00:01:40.479> if<00:01:40.640> I'm<00:01:40.880> going<00:01:41.040> back<00:01:41.200> and<00:01:41.439> forth<00:01:41.920> with 00:01:42.230 --> 00:01:42.240 align:start position:0% screens if I'm going back and forth with 00:01:42.240 --> 00:01:46.710 align:start position:0% screens if I'm going back and forth with looking<00:01:42.880> just<00:01:43.280> so<00:01:43.439> the<00:01:43.680> public<00:01:43.920> knows.<00:01:44.960> Um<00:01:46.399> we 00:01:46.710 --> 00:01:46.720 align:start position:0% looking just so the public knows. Um we 00:01:46.720 --> 00:01:50.550 align:start position:0% looking just so the public knows. Um we had<00:01:47.040> made<00:01:47.360> some<00:01:48.479> um<00:01:48.960> revisions.<00:01:49.759> We<00:01:50.000> had<00:01:50.159> a<00:01:50.399> few 00:01:50.550 --> 00:01:50.560 align:start position:0% had made some um revisions. We had a few 00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:53.429 align:start position:0% had made some um revisions. We had a few other<00:01:51.840> pieces<00:01:52.320> that<00:01:52.640> we<00:01:52.880> were<00:01:53.040> still 00:01:53.429 --> 00:01:53.439 align:start position:0% other pieces that we were still 00:01:53.439 --> 00:01:55.030 align:start position:0% other pieces that we were still considering 00:01:55.030 --> 00:01:55.040 align:start position:0% considering 00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:57.190 align:start position:0% considering and<00:01:55.280> I'm<00:01:55.600> going<00:01:55.680> to<00:01:56.000> open<00:01:56.240> it<00:01:56.399> up<00:01:56.560> for<00:01:56.799> this 00:01:57.190 --> 00:01:57.200 align:start position:0% and I'm going to open it up for this 00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:00.389 align:start position:0% and I'm going to open it up for this body<00:01:58.079> to<00:01:58.880> um<00:01:59.119> see<00:01:59.360> if<00:01:59.520> there<00:01:59.680> was<00:01:59.840> anybody<00:02:00.159> that 00:02:00.389 --> 00:02:00.399 align:start position:0% body to um see if there was anybody that 00:02:00.399 --> 00:02:03.990 align:start position:0% body to um see if there was anybody that had<00:02:00.640> some<00:02:00.880> additional<00:02:01.360> recommendations<00:02:02.399> or 00:02:03.990 --> 00:02:04.000 align:start position:0% had some additional recommendations or 00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:06.469 align:start position:0% had some additional recommendations or if<00:02:04.240> this<00:02:04.399> is<00:02:04.640> something<00:02:04.880> we<00:02:05.200> want<00:02:05.360> to<00:02:05.920> well<00:02:06.079> I 00:02:06.469 --> 00:02:06.479 align:start position:0% if this is something we want to well I 00:02:06.479 --> 00:02:07.910 align:start position:0% if this is something we want to well I actually<00:02:06.640> see<00:02:06.799> it<00:02:06.960> as<00:02:07.119> two<00:02:07.280> options<00:02:07.600> and<00:02:07.759> that 00:02:07.910 --> 00:02:07.920 align:start position:0% actually see it as two options and that 00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:09.510 align:start position:0% actually see it as two options and that may<00:02:08.080> depend<00:02:08.319> on<00:02:08.560> what<00:02:08.640> we<00:02:08.800> do<00:02:08.879> with<00:02:09.039> the<00:02:09.200> social 00:02:09.510 --> 00:02:09.520 align:start position:0% may depend on what we do with the social 00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:12.470 align:start position:0% may depend on what we do with the social studies<00:02:09.920> standards.<00:02:11.039> And<00:02:11.200> let<00:02:11.440> me<00:02:11.599> explain. 00:02:12.470 --> 00:02:12.480 align:start position:0% studies standards. And let me explain. 00:02:12.480 --> 00:02:14.229 align:start position:0% studies standards. And let me explain. If<00:02:12.720> we<00:02:12.879> choose<00:02:13.120> to<00:02:13.280> move<00:02:13.360> the<00:02:13.599> social<00:02:13.840> studies 00:02:14.229 --> 00:02:14.239 align:start position:0% If we choose to move the social studies 00:02:14.239 --> 00:02:17.030 align:start position:0% If we choose to move the social studies standards<00:02:14.640> forward<00:02:14.959> for<00:02:15.840> um<00:02:16.560> a<00:02:16.800> full 00:02:17.030 --> 00:02:17.040 align:start position:0% standards forward for um a full 00:02:17.040 --> 00:02:19.750 align:start position:0% standards forward for um a full revision,<00:02:18.239> then<00:02:18.480> we<00:02:18.720> may<00:02:18.959> want<00:02:19.120> to<00:02:19.280> make<00:02:19.520> a 00:02:19.750 --> 00:02:19.760 align:start position:0% revision, then we may want to make a 00:02:19.760 --> 00:02:21.270 align:start position:0% revision, then we may want to make a handful<00:02:20.000> of<00:02:20.080> these<00:02:20.400> changes<00:02:20.720> that<00:02:20.959> we<00:02:21.120> can 00:02:21.270 --> 00:02:21.280 align:start position:0% handful of these changes that we can 00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:25.270 align:start position:0% handful of these changes that we can make<00:02:21.440> that<00:02:21.680> are<00:02:21.840> not<00:02:22.000> in<00:02:22.319> law<00:02:23.440> prior<00:02:23.840> to<00:02:24.720> um 00:02:25.270 --> 00:02:25.280 align:start position:0% make that are not in law prior to um 00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:27.830 align:start position:0% make that are not in law prior to um starting<00:02:25.680> that<00:02:25.920> revision.<00:02:26.879> If<00:02:27.040> we're<00:02:27.280> not, 00:02:27.830 --> 00:02:27.840 align:start position:0% starting that revision. If we're not, 00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:30.070 align:start position:0% starting that revision. If we're not, then<00:02:28.160> we<00:02:28.480> we<00:02:28.800> can<00:02:29.040> continue<00:02:29.280> to<00:02:29.520> work<00:02:29.680> on<00:02:29.840> this. 00:02:30.070 --> 00:02:30.080 align:start position:0% then we we can continue to work on this. 00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:31.670 align:start position:0% then we we can continue to work on this. Some<00:02:30.239> of<00:02:30.319> these<00:02:30.560> items<00:02:30.959> are<00:02:31.120> going<00:02:31.200> to<00:02:31.360> need<00:02:31.520> to 00:02:31.670 --> 00:02:31.680 align:start position:0% Some of these items are going to need to 00:02:31.680 --> 00:02:34.790 align:start position:0% Some of these items are going to need to be<00:02:32.400> um<00:02:33.360> revised<00:02:33.760> during<00:02:34.000> the<00:02:34.160> legislative 00:02:34.790 --> 00:02:34.800 align:start position:0% be um revised during the legislative 00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:37.589 align:start position:0% be um revised during the legislative session<00:02:35.599> in<00:02:35.840> order<00:02:36.080> to<00:02:36.319> be<00:02:36.480> put<00:02:36.640> into<00:02:36.959> law<00:02:37.280> or 00:02:37.589 --> 00:02:37.599 align:start position:0% session in order to be put into law or 00:02:37.599 --> 00:02:40.790 align:start position:0% session in order to be put into law or to<00:02:38.080> update<00:02:38.480> the<00:02:38.800> the<00:02:39.200> code<00:02:39.680> related<00:02:40.080> to<00:02:40.319> this 00:02:40.790 --> 00:02:40.800 align:start position:0% to update the the code related to this 00:02:40.800 --> 00:02:43.030 align:start position:0% to update the the code related to this particular<00:02:41.280> item. 00:02:43.030 --> 00:02:43.040 align:start position:0% particular item. 00:02:43.040 --> 00:02:45.910 align:start position:0% particular item. So<00:02:43.519> I<00:02:43.840> think<00:02:44.000> I<00:02:44.319> will 00:02:45.910 --> 00:02:45.920 align:start position:0% So I think I will 00:02:45.920 --> 00:02:47.270 align:start position:0% So I think I will let<00:02:46.160> me<00:02:46.239> see<00:02:46.400> if<00:02:46.480> I<00:02:46.640> can<00:02:46.720> go<00:02:46.879> through<00:02:47.040> a<00:02:47.200> couple 00:02:47.270 --> 00:02:47.280 align:start position:0% let me see if I can go through a couple 00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:48.869 align:start position:0% let me see if I can go through a couple of<00:02:47.360> the<00:02:47.519> recommended<00:02:48.000> changes<00:02:48.319> just<00:02:48.560> so<00:02:48.720> we 00:02:48.869 --> 00:02:48.879 align:start position:0% of the recommended changes just so we 00:02:48.879 --> 00:02:50.229 align:start position:0% of the recommended changes just so we can<00:02:49.040> kind<00:02:49.120> of<00:02:49.200> catch<00:02:49.519> each<00:02:49.680> other<00:02:49.840> up<00:02:50.080> and 00:02:50.229 --> 00:02:50.239 align:start position:0% can kind of catch each other up and 00:02:50.239 --> 00:02:55.830 align:start position:0% can kind of catch each other up and review.<00:02:51.440> So<00:02:51.680> on<00:02:52.480> um<00:02:52.879> number<00:02:53.200> one<00:02:54.400> we<00:02:54.879> have<00:02:55.599> uh 00:02:55.830 --> 00:02:55.840 align:start position:0% review. So on um number one we have uh 00:02:55.840 --> 00:02:57.830 align:start position:0% review. So on um number one we have uh the<00:02:56.080> core<00:02:56.400> standards<00:02:56.800> review<00:02:57.120> rubric<00:02:57.599> may 00:02:57.830 --> 00:02:57.840 align:start position:0% the core standards review rubric may 00:02:57.840 --> 00:02:59.430 align:start position:0% the core standards review rubric may only<00:02:58.080> be<00:02:58.239> brought<00:02:58.480> before<00:02:58.720> the<00:02:58.959> revision 00:02:59.430 --> 00:02:59.440 align:start position:0% only be brought before the revision 00:02:59.440 --> 00:03:01.589 align:start position:0% only be brought before the revision consideration<00:03:00.000> after<00:03:00.319> a<00:03:00.480> minimum<00:03:00.800> of<00:03:01.040> 5year 00:03:01.589 --> 00:03:01.599 align:start position:0% consideration after a minimum of 5year 00:03:01.599 --> 00:03:03.750 align:start position:0% consideration after a minimum of 5year standards<00:03:02.080> implementation. 00:03:03.750 --> 00:03:03.760 align:start position:0% standards implementation. 00:03:03.760 --> 00:03:05.589 align:start position:0% standards implementation. That<00:03:04.000> is<00:03:04.159> one<00:03:04.400> recommendation<00:03:05.040> that<00:03:05.280> we<00:03:05.440> had 00:03:05.589 --> 00:03:05.599 align:start position:0% That is one recommendation that we had 00:03:05.599 --> 00:03:07.509 align:start position:0% That is one recommendation that we had made. 00:03:07.509 --> 00:03:07.519 align:start position:0% made. 00:03:07.519 --> 00:03:10.149 align:start position:0% made. Look<00:03:07.760> down<00:03:08.000> my<00:03:08.239> list<00:03:08.480> here.<00:03:09.599> And<00:03:09.760> that<00:03:10.000> the 00:03:10.149 --> 00:03:10.159 align:start position:0% Look down my list here. And that the 00:03:10.159 --> 00:03:12.070 align:start position:0% Look down my list here. And that the writing<00:03:10.480> committee<00:03:11.040> applicants<00:03:11.519> are<00:03:11.680> invited 00:03:12.070 --> 00:03:12.080 align:start position:0% writing committee applicants are invited 00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:14.229 align:start position:0% writing committee applicants are invited to<00:03:12.239> apply<00:03:12.560> through<00:03:12.720> a<00:03:12.879> formal<00:03:13.280> public<00:03:13.599> request 00:03:14.229 --> 00:03:14.239 align:start position:0% to apply through a formal public request 00:03:14.239 --> 00:03:15.750 align:start position:0% to apply through a formal public request outlining<00:03:14.800> qualifications<00:03:15.440> and 00:03:15.750 --> 00:03:15.760 align:start position:0% outlining qualifications and 00:03:15.760 --> 00:03:18.070 align:start position:0% outlining qualifications and expectations.<00:03:17.120> So<00:03:17.360> there's<00:03:17.680> more<00:03:17.840> of<00:03:17.920> a 00:03:18.070 --> 00:03:18.080 align:start position:0% expectations. So there's more of a 00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:20.790 align:start position:0% expectations. So there's more of a formal<00:03:18.959> process<00:03:19.360> there<00:03:19.519> that<00:03:19.760> we<00:03:19.920> can<00:03:20.080> accept 00:03:20.790 --> 00:03:20.800 align:start position:0% formal process there that we can accept 00:03:20.800 --> 00:03:23.509 align:start position:0% formal process there that we can accept um<00:03:21.040> applications. 00:03:23.509 --> 00:03:23.519 align:start position:0% um applications. 00:03:23.519 --> 00:03:26.630 align:start position:0% um applications. And<00:03:23.760> then<00:03:24.000> on<00:03:24.400> on<00:03:25.200> item<00:03:25.599> seven,<00:03:26.000> members<00:03:26.400> will 00:03:26.630 --> 00:03:26.640 align:start position:0% And then on on item seven, members will 00:03:26.640 --> 00:03:28.790 align:start position:0% And then on on item seven, members will meet<00:03:26.800> with<00:03:27.040> stakeholders<00:03:27.599> and<00:03:28.080> member<00:03:28.480> board 00:03:28.790 --> 00:03:28.800 align:start position:0% meet with stakeholders and member board 00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:30.630 align:start position:0% meet with stakeholders and member board members<00:03:29.280> may<00:03:29.519> meet<00:03:29.760> with<00:03:29.920> stakeholders<00:03:30.400> and 00:03:30.630 --> 00:03:30.640 align:start position:0% members may meet with stakeholders and 00:03:30.640 --> 00:03:32.949 align:start position:0% members may meet with stakeholders and community<00:03:31.360> members<00:03:32.159> while<00:03:32.480> considering 00:03:32.949 --> 00:03:32.959 align:start position:0% community members while considering 00:03:32.959 --> 00:03:34.710 align:start position:0% community members while considering recommendations.<00:03:34.080> That<00:03:34.319> was<00:03:34.400> another 00:03:34.710 --> 00:03:34.720 align:start position:0% recommendations. That was another 00:03:34.720 --> 00:03:37.430 align:start position:0% recommendations. That was another recommendation<00:03:35.200> we<00:03:35.519> had. 00:03:37.430 --> 00:03:37.440 align:start position:0% recommendation we had. 00:03:37.440 --> 00:03:39.910 align:start position:0% recommendation we had. And<00:03:37.920> then<00:03:38.560> seemed<00:03:38.799> like<00:03:39.040> we<00:03:39.200> had<00:03:39.360> one<00:03:39.599> more. 00:03:39.910 --> 00:03:39.920 align:start position:0% And then seemed like we had one more. 00:03:39.920 --> 00:03:44.149 align:start position:0% And then seemed like we had one more. Was<00:03:40.080> it<00:03:40.720> it<00:03:41.040> was<00:03:41.120> the<00:03:41.360> number<00:03:41.599> of<00:03:42.319> days.<00:03:43.680> Did<00:03:43.920> I 00:03:44.149 --> 00:03:44.159 align:start position:0% Was it it was the number of days. Did I 00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:46.710 align:start position:0% Was it it was the number of days. Did I skip<00:03:44.400> past<00:03:44.720> it 00:03:46.710 --> 00:03:46.720 align:start position:0% skip past it 00:03:46.720 --> 00:03:52.470 align:start position:0% skip past it for<00:03:47.040> public<00:03:47.360> comment? 00:03:52.470 --> 00:03:52.480 align:start position:0% 00:03:52.480 --> 00:03:54.789 align:start position:0% >> Is<00:03:52.640> that<00:03:52.879> the<00:03:53.120> 45day? 00:03:54.789 --> 00:03:54.799 align:start position:0% >> Is that the 45day? 00:03:54.799 --> 00:03:57.589 align:start position:0% >> Is that the 45day? >> Yes.<00:03:55.120> I'm<00:03:55.360> just<00:03:55.599> looking<00:03:56.319> where<00:03:56.640> I 00:03:57.589 --> 00:03:57.599 align:start position:0% >> Yes. I'm just looking where I 00:03:57.599 --> 00:04:00.550 align:start position:0% >> Yes. I'm just looking where I >> too.<00:03:58.640> So<00:03:58.879> you<00:03:59.120> can<00:03:59.280> see<00:03:59.439> the<00:03:59.680> 45<00:04:00.080> is 00:04:00.550 --> 00:04:00.560 align:start position:0% >> too. So you can see the 45 is 00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:01.509 align:start position:0% >> too. So you can see the 45 is >> it's<00:04:00.720> on. 00:04:01.509 --> 00:04:01.519 align:start position:0% >> it's on. 00:04:01.519 --> 00:04:03.110 align:start position:0% >> it's on. >> Yeah,<00:04:01.760> it<00:04:02.000> just<00:04:02.159> with<00:04:02.400> that<00:04:02.560> green<00:04:02.799> it<00:04:02.959> was 00:04:03.110 --> 00:04:03.120 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, it just with that green it was 00:04:03.120 --> 00:04:04.309 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, it just with that green it was harder<00:04:03.360> to<00:04:03.439> pull<00:04:03.599> out.<00:04:03.840> So<00:04:04.000> it's<00:04:04.159> a 00:04:04.309 --> 00:04:04.319 align:start position:0% harder to pull out. So it's a 00:04:04.319 --> 00:04:07.509 align:start position:0% harder to pull out. So it's a recommendation<00:04:04.720> of<00:04:04.879> a<00:04:05.120> 45day<00:04:05.840> public<00:04:06.239> review 00:04:07.509 --> 00:04:07.519 align:start position:0% recommendation of a 45day public review 00:04:07.519 --> 00:04:09.830 align:start position:0% recommendation of a 45day public review >> period.<00:04:08.480> Um<00:04:08.959> and<00:04:09.120> that<00:04:09.360> would<00:04:09.519> need<00:04:09.680> to<00:04:09.760> be 00:04:09.830 --> 00:04:09.840 align:start position:0% >> period. Um and that would need to be 00:04:09.840 --> 00:04:13.190 align:start position:0% >> period. Um and that would need to be changed<00:04:10.159> in<00:04:10.400> code<00:04:10.720> if<00:04:10.879> I<00:04:11.040> remember<00:04:11.360> correctly. 00:04:13.190 --> 00:04:13.200 align:start position:0% changed in code if I remember correctly. 00:04:13.200 --> 00:04:15.110 align:start position:0% changed in code if I remember correctly. Correct.<00:04:13.680> And<00:04:13.840> we<00:04:14.080> put<00:04:14.239> it<00:04:14.400> on<00:04:14.480> the<00:04:14.720> list, 00:04:15.110 --> 00:04:15.120 align:start position:0% Correct. And we put it on the list, 00:04:15.120 --> 00:04:16.949 align:start position:0% Correct. And we put it on the list, Chair<00:04:15.439> Earl.<00:04:15.840> Yes.<00:04:16.079> And<00:04:16.320> this<00:04:16.479> is<00:04:16.639> Deputy 00:04:16.949 --> 00:04:16.959 align:start position:0% Chair Earl. Yes. And this is Deputy 00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:18.710 align:start position:0% Chair Earl. Yes. And this is Deputy Borhees.<00:04:17.519> We<00:04:17.680> did<00:04:17.840> put<00:04:17.919> it<00:04:18.079> on<00:04:18.160> the<00:04:18.320> policy 00:04:18.710 --> 00:04:18.720 align:start position:0% Borhees. We did put it on the policy 00:04:18.720 --> 00:04:20.150 align:start position:0% Borhees. We did put it on the policy request<00:04:19.199> list. 00:04:20.150 --> 00:04:20.160 align:start position:0% request list. 00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:22.550 align:start position:0% request list. >> Thank<00:04:20.400> you.<00:04:21.120> Uh<00:04:21.359> so<00:04:21.519> the<00:04:21.759> the<00:04:22.160> other 00:04:22.550 --> 00:04:22.560 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. Uh so the the other 00:04:22.560 --> 00:04:25.590 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. Uh so the the other discussion<00:04:23.040> item<00:04:23.360> that<00:04:23.600> we<00:04:23.759> had<00:04:24.800> was<00:04:25.120> related 00:04:25.590 --> 00:04:25.600 align:start position:0% discussion item that we had was related 00:04:25.600 --> 00:04:31.110 align:start position:0% discussion item that we had was related to<00:04:26.560> um<00:04:26.720> a<00:04:27.199> subcommittee<00:04:28.639> who<00:04:29.199> would<00:04:29.840> maybe<00:04:30.880> be 00:04:31.110 --> 00:04:31.120 align:start position:0% to um a subcommittee who would maybe be 00:04:31.120 --> 00:04:33.189 align:start position:0% to um a subcommittee who would maybe be part<00:04:31.280> of<00:04:31.440> that<00:04:31.759> initial<00:04:32.240> process.<00:04:32.800> They<00:04:33.040> would 00:04:33.189 --> 00:04:33.199 align:start position:0% part of that initial process. They would 00:04:33.199 --> 00:04:35.350 align:start position:0% part of that initial process. They would review<00:04:33.520> the<00:04:33.759> research.<00:04:34.720> they<00:04:34.960> would<00:04:35.120> bring 00:04:35.350 --> 00:04:35.360 align:start position:0% review the research. they would bring 00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:38.150 align:start position:0% review the research. they would bring recommendations<00:04:36.080> to<00:04:36.320> the<00:04:36.560> board<00:04:37.440> and<00:04:37.759> then 00:04:38.150 --> 00:04:38.160 align:start position:0% recommendations to the board and then 00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:39.909 align:start position:0% recommendations to the board and then there<00:04:38.400> was<00:04:38.639> consideration<00:04:39.120> or<00:04:39.440> at<00:04:39.440> least<00:04:39.680> some 00:04:39.909 --> 00:04:39.919 align:start position:0% there was consideration or at least some 00:04:39.919 --> 00:04:41.270 align:start position:0% there was consideration or at least some discussion<00:04:40.240> around<00:04:40.479> that<00:04:40.800> particular 00:04:41.270 --> 00:04:41.280 align:start position:0% discussion around that particular 00:04:41.280 --> 00:04:43.350 align:start position:0% discussion around that particular subcommittee<00:04:42.320> kind<00:04:42.560> of<00:04:42.639> following<00:04:43.040> through 00:04:43.350 --> 00:04:43.360 align:start position:0% subcommittee kind of following through 00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:47.189 align:start position:0% subcommittee kind of following through the<00:04:43.600> process<00:04:44.880> and<00:04:45.120> at<00:04:45.360> maybe<00:04:45.680> key<00:04:46.320> key<00:04:46.720> places 00:04:47.189 --> 00:04:47.199 align:start position:0% the process and at maybe key key places 00:04:47.199 --> 00:04:49.990 align:start position:0% the process and at maybe key key places being<00:04:47.520> able<00:04:47.759> to<00:04:48.479> um<00:04:48.880> re-engage<00:04:49.440> with<00:04:49.600> the<00:04:49.840> work 00:04:49.990 --> 00:04:50.000 align:start position:0% being able to um re-engage with the work 00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:52.230 align:start position:0% being able to um re-engage with the work in<00:04:50.240> the<00:04:50.400> board<00:04:50.560> itself. 00:04:52.230 --> 00:04:52.240 align:start position:0% in the board itself. 00:04:52.240 --> 00:04:55.510 align:start position:0% in the board itself. I<00:04:52.479> have<00:04:52.720> not<00:04:52.960> taken<00:04:53.199> the<00:04:53.440> time<00:04:54.000> to<00:04:55.120> have 00:04:55.510 --> 00:04:55.520 align:start position:0% I have not taken the time to have 00:04:55.520 --> 00:04:57.830 align:start position:0% I have not taken the time to have additional<00:04:56.080> discussion<00:04:56.400> on<00:04:56.639> this<00:04:56.880> one<00:04:57.520> with 00:04:57.830 --> 00:04:57.840 align:start position:0% additional discussion on this one with 00:04:57.840 --> 00:04:59.350 align:start position:0% additional discussion on this one with other<00:04:58.080> people,<00:04:58.320> but<00:04:58.560> I'm<00:04:58.720> just<00:04:58.880> curious<00:04:59.120> if 00:04:59.350 --> 00:04:59.360 align:start position:0% other people, but I'm just curious if 00:04:59.360 --> 00:05:01.510 align:start position:0% other people, but I'm just curious if other<00:04:59.600> board<00:04:59.840> members<00:05:00.240> have<00:05:00.639> some<00:05:00.880> additional 00:05:01.510 --> 00:05:01.520 align:start position:0% other board members have some additional 00:05:01.520 --> 00:05:08.310 align:start position:0% other board members have some additional recommendations<00:05:02.240> at<00:05:02.479> this<00:05:02.720> point. 00:05:08.310 --> 00:05:08.320 align:start position:0% 00:05:08.320 --> 00:05:13.830 align:start position:0% Okay.<00:05:09.360> I<00:05:10.160> just<00:05:10.880> I've<00:05:11.600> kind<00:05:11.919> of<00:05:12.240> wondered<00:05:13.600> how 00:05:13.830 --> 00:05:13.840 align:start position:0% Okay. I just I've kind of wondered how 00:05:13.840 --> 00:05:15.749 align:start position:0% Okay. I just I've kind of wondered how much<00:05:14.240> needs<00:05:14.560> to<00:05:14.800> be<00:05:14.960> done<00:05:15.199> with<00:05:15.440> all<00:05:15.600> the 00:05:15.749 --> 00:05:15.759 align:start position:0% much needs to be done with all the 00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:17.590 align:start position:0% much needs to be done with all the civics<00:05:16.320> that's<00:05:16.639> kind<00:05:16.720> of<00:05:16.880> all<00:05:17.039> over<00:05:17.199> the<00:05:17.360> place 00:05:17.590 --> 00:05:17.600 align:start position:0% civics that's kind of all over the place 00:05:17.600 --> 00:05:22.790 align:start position:0% civics that's kind of all over the place and<00:05:18.080> and<00:05:18.560> should<00:05:18.880> we<00:05:19.039> be<00:05:19.680> waiting<00:05:21.039> since<00:05:21.680> it<00:05:21.919> is 00:05:22.790 --> 00:05:22.800 align:start position:0% and and should we be waiting since it is 00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:24.310 align:start position:0% and and should we be waiting since it is this<00:05:23.039> has<00:05:23.199> a<00:05:23.360> lot<00:05:23.440> to<00:05:23.600> do<00:05:23.680> with<00:05:23.840> the<00:05:24.080> social 00:05:24.310 --> 00:05:24.320 align:start position:0% this has a lot to do with the social 00:05:24.320 --> 00:05:26.070 align:start position:0% this has a lot to do with the social studies<00:05:24.720> standards.<00:05:25.199> Does<00:05:25.440> that<00:05:25.600> affect<00:05:25.840> this 00:05:26.070 --> 00:05:26.080 align:start position:0% studies standards. Does that affect this 00:05:26.080 --> 00:05:27.990 align:start position:0% studies standards. Does that affect this at<00:05:26.320> all? 00:05:27.990 --> 00:05:28.000 align:start position:0% at all? 00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:31.510 align:start position:0% at all? If<00:05:28.240> we<00:05:28.479> were<00:05:28.639> to<00:05:29.840> put<00:05:30.000> the<00:05:30.560> social<00:05:30.880> studies<00:05:31.280> out 00:05:31.510 --> 00:05:31.520 align:start position:0% If we were to put the social studies out 00:05:31.520 --> 00:05:34.710 align:start position:0% If we were to put the social studies out for<00:05:32.400> um<00:05:32.560> full<00:05:32.960> revision, 00:05:34.710 --> 00:05:34.720 align:start position:0% for um full revision, 00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:37.189 align:start position:0% for um full revision, then<00:05:35.120> it<00:05:35.360> it<00:05:35.680> could<00:05:35.840> have<00:05:36.080> some<00:05:36.320> impact<00:05:36.720> there. 00:05:37.189 --> 00:05:37.199 align:start position:0% then it it could have some impact there. 00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:40.710 align:start position:0% then it it could have some impact there. If<00:05:37.360> we<00:05:37.520> were<00:05:37.680> to<00:05:37.840> just<00:05:38.160> do<00:05:38.800> um<00:05:39.120> targeted 00:05:40.710 --> 00:05:40.720 align:start position:0% If we were to just do um targeted 00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:41.510 align:start position:0% If we were to just do um targeted uh 00:05:41.510 --> 00:05:41.520 align:start position:0% uh 00:05:41.520 --> 00:05:42.310 align:start position:0% uh >> yeah, 00:05:42.310 --> 00:05:42.320 align:start position:0% >> yeah, 00:05:42.320 --> 00:05:44.550 align:start position:0% >> yeah, >> modifications. 00:05:44.550 --> 00:05:44.560 align:start position:0% >> modifications. 00:05:44.560 --> 00:05:47.029 align:start position:0% >> modifications. So, 00:05:47.029 --> 00:05:47.039 align:start position:0% So, 00:05:47.039 --> 00:05:47.749 align:start position:0% So, >> okay. 00:05:47.749 --> 00:05:47.759 align:start position:0% >> okay. 00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:49.590 align:start position:0% >> okay. >> Okay.<00:05:48.320> But<00:05:48.479> it's<00:05:48.720> not<00:05:48.880> I<00:05:49.039> mean<00:05:49.199> this<00:05:49.360> would<00:05:49.440> be 00:05:49.590 --> 00:05:49.600 align:start position:0% >> Okay. But it's not I mean this would be 00:05:49.600 --> 00:05:51.350 align:start position:0% >> Okay. But it's not I mean this would be any<00:05:49.840> of<00:05:49.919> those<00:05:50.160> core<00:05:50.400> standards.<00:05:50.880> This<00:05:51.039> isn't 00:05:51.350 --> 00:05:51.360 align:start position:0% any of those core standards. This isn't 00:05:51.360 --> 00:05:53.270 align:start position:0% any of those core standards. This isn't just<00:05:51.680> related<00:05:52.080> to<00:05:52.320> social<00:05:52.639> studies.<00:05:52.960> So<00:05:53.120> it 00:05:53.270 --> 00:05:53.280 align:start position:0% just related to social studies. So it 00:05:53.280 --> 00:05:55.029 align:start position:0% just related to social studies. So it would<00:05:53.440> be<00:05:53.600> anything<00:05:53.919> that's 00:05:55.029 --> 00:05:55.039 align:start position:0% would be anything that's 00:05:55.039 --> 00:05:57.029 align:start position:0% would be anything that's >> you<00:05:55.199> know<00:05:55.360> currently<00:05:55.759> moving<00:05:56.080> forward 00:05:57.029 --> 00:05:57.039 align:start position:0% >> you know currently moving forward 00:05:57.039 --> 00:05:58.870 align:start position:0% >> you know currently moving forward >> right 00:05:58.870 --> 00:05:58.880 align:start position:0% >> right 00:05:58.880 --> 00:06:01.749 align:start position:0% >> right >> just<00:05:59.280> have<00:05:59.520> a<00:05:59.759> quick<00:05:59.919> clarification<00:06:00.639> on<00:06:01.039> one 00:06:01.749 --> 00:06:01.759 align:start position:0% >> just have a quick clarification on one 00:06:01.759 --> 00:06:04.710 align:start position:0% >> just have a quick clarification on one >> on<00:06:02.000> the<00:06:02.160> green<00:06:02.479> that's<00:06:02.800> added<00:06:03.600> um 00:06:04.710 --> 00:06:04.720 align:start position:0% >> on the green that's added um 00:06:04.720 --> 00:06:08.550 align:start position:0% >> on the green that's added um >> the<00:06:05.039> the<00:06:05.440> minimum<00:06:05.840> of<00:06:06.080> five<00:06:06.400> years 00:06:08.550 --> 00:06:08.560 align:start position:0% >> the the minimum of five years 00:06:08.560 --> 00:06:11.350 align:start position:0% >> the the minimum of five years >> ask<00:06:09.120> is<00:06:09.360> is<00:06:09.759> that<00:06:10.240> um<00:06:10.560> that's<00:06:10.880> something<00:06:11.120> that 00:06:11.350 --> 00:06:11.360 align:start position:0% >> ask is is that um that's something that 00:06:11.360 --> 00:06:13.670 align:start position:0% >> ask is is that um that's something that we're<00:06:11.600> asking<00:06:12.000> for<00:06:12.639> is<00:06:12.880> that<00:06:13.039> right<00:06:13.520> because 00:06:13.670 --> 00:06:13.680 align:start position:0% we're asking for is that right because 00:06:13.680 --> 00:06:15.990 align:start position:0% we're asking for is that right because what<00:06:13.919> we're<00:06:14.160> trying<00:06:14.319> to<00:06:14.479> do<00:06:14.639> is<00:06:15.120> maybe<00:06:15.520> prevent 00:06:15.990 --> 00:06:16.000 align:start position:0% what we're trying to do is maybe prevent 00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:18.230 align:start position:0% what we're trying to do is maybe prevent the 00:06:18.230 --> 00:06:18.240 align:start position:0% the 00:06:18.240 --> 00:06:20.790 align:start position:0% the like<00:06:18.720> um<00:06:18.880> the<00:06:19.120> revisions<00:06:19.680> from<00:06:19.919> happening<00:06:20.400> as 00:06:20.790 --> 00:06:20.800 align:start position:0% like um the revisions from happening as 00:06:20.800 --> 00:06:23.590 align:start position:0% like um the revisions from happening as what<00:06:21.039> seems<00:06:21.360> as<00:06:21.680> often 00:06:23.590 --> 00:06:23.600 align:start position:0% what seems as often 00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:24.629 align:start position:0% what seems as often Is<00:06:23.840> that<00:06:24.080> correct? 00:06:24.629 --> 00:06:24.639 align:start position:0% Is that correct? 00:06:24.639 --> 00:06:27.029 align:start position:0% Is that correct? >> That<00:06:24.880> is<00:06:25.039> correct.<00:06:25.520> And<00:06:25.680> I<00:06:26.000> It<00:06:26.240> would<00:06:26.400> be 00:06:27.029 --> 00:06:27.039 align:start position:0% >> That is correct. And I It would be 00:06:27.039 --> 00:06:28.469 align:start position:0% >> That is correct. And I It would be >> Oh,<00:06:27.360> sorry.<00:06:27.600> Go<00:06:27.759> ahead. 00:06:28.469 --> 00:06:28.479 align:start position:0% >> Oh, sorry. Go ahead. 00:06:28.479 --> 00:06:31.830 align:start position:0% >> Oh, sorry. Go ahead. >> Oh,<00:06:28.720> that's<00:06:29.039> just<00:06:29.199> us<00:06:29.440> trying<00:06:29.680> to<00:06:29.840> address 00:06:31.830 --> 00:06:31.840 align:start position:0% >> Oh, that's just us trying to address 00:06:31.840 --> 00:06:33.510 align:start position:0% >> Oh, that's just us trying to address that<00:06:32.400> issue. 00:06:33.510 --> 00:06:33.520 align:start position:0% that issue. 00:06:33.520 --> 00:06:35.430 align:start position:0% that issue. >> Yes,<00:06:33.759> that's<00:06:34.080> exactly<00:06:34.479> right.<00:06:34.800> It's<00:06:34.960> It's<00:06:35.280> to 00:06:35.430 --> 00:06:35.440 align:start position:0% >> Yes, that's exactly right. It's It's to 00:06:35.440 --> 00:06:36.950 align:start position:0% >> Yes, that's exactly right. It's It's to spread<00:06:35.680> that<00:06:35.840> out<00:06:36.080> a<00:06:36.240> little<00:06:36.400> bit<00:06:36.560> further 00:06:36.950 --> 00:06:36.960 align:start position:0% spread that out a little bit further 00:06:36.960 --> 00:06:38.629 align:start position:0% spread that out a little bit further before<00:06:37.199> it's<00:06:37.440> put<00:06:37.600> on<00:06:37.759> the<00:06:37.840> rubric<00:06:38.240> to<00:06:38.479> be 00:06:38.629 --> 00:06:38.639 align:start position:0% before it's put on the rubric to be 00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:40.070 align:start position:0% before it's put on the rubric to be considered.<00:06:39.199> Doesn't<00:06:39.440> mean<00:06:39.600> it<00:06:39.759> will<00:06:39.919> be 00:06:40.070 --> 00:06:40.080 align:start position:0% considered. Doesn't mean it will be 00:06:40.080 --> 00:06:41.670 align:start position:0% considered. Doesn't mean it will be immediately<00:06:40.639> considered,<00:06:41.039> but<00:06:41.199> it<00:06:41.280> it 00:06:41.670 --> 00:06:41.680 align:start position:0% immediately considered, but it it 00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:43.670 align:start position:0% immediately considered, but it it spreads<00:06:42.000> that<00:06:42.160> out<00:06:42.319> a<00:06:42.479> little<00:06:42.639> further. 00:06:43.670 --> 00:06:43.680 align:start position:0% spreads that out a little further. 00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:46.790 align:start position:0% spreads that out a little further. >> Okay.<00:06:44.479> And<00:06:44.720> then<00:06:45.120> when<00:06:45.440> we<00:06:45.840> trigger<00:06:46.160> that<00:06:46.800> at 00:06:46.790 --> 00:06:46.800 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And then when we trigger that at 00:06:46.800 --> 00:06:48.870 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And then when we trigger that at at<00:06:47.120> five<00:06:47.440> years,<00:06:47.680> say<00:06:47.840> the<00:06:48.000> minimum<00:06:48.319> at<00:06:48.560> five 00:06:48.870 --> 00:06:48.880 align:start position:0% at five years, say the minimum at five 00:06:48.880 --> 00:06:51.350 align:start position:0% at five years, say the minimum at five years,<00:06:49.280> then<00:06:49.680> we<00:06:50.000> go<00:06:50.160> through<00:06:50.479> that<00:06:50.800> process. 00:06:51.350 --> 00:06:51.360 align:start position:0% years, then we go through that process. 00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:53.990 align:start position:0% years, then we go through that process. So<00:06:52.319> just<00:06:52.560> so<00:06:52.800> people<00:06:53.120> that<00:06:53.440> might<00:06:53.759> be 00:06:53.990 --> 00:06:54.000 align:start position:0% So just so people that might be 00:06:54.000 --> 00:06:57.110 align:start position:0% So just so people that might be following<00:06:54.560> this,<00:06:55.120> that<00:06:55.440> means<00:06:55.680> that<00:06:56.560> it<00:06:56.880> would 00:06:57.110 --> 00:06:57.120 align:start position:0% following this, that means that it would 00:06:57.120 --> 00:06:59.350 align:start position:0% following this, that means that it would be<00:06:57.520> up<00:06:57.759> to 00:06:59.350 --> 00:06:59.360 align:start position:0% be up to 00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:02.870 align:start position:0% be up to seven<00:06:59.680> years<00:07:00.080> before<00:07:01.280> certain<00:07:01.680> standards<00:07:02.240> are 00:07:02.870 --> 00:07:02.880 align:start position:0% seven years before certain standards are 00:07:02.880 --> 00:07:05.990 align:start position:0% seven years before certain standards are updated<00:07:03.599> or,<00:07:04.240> you<00:07:04.400> know,<00:07:04.639> finalized. 00:07:05.990 --> 00:07:06.000 align:start position:0% updated or, you know, finalized. 00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:07.749 align:start position:0% updated or, you know, finalized. >> It<00:07:06.160> could<00:07:06.319> be. 00:07:07.749 --> 00:07:07.759 align:start position:0% >> It could be. 00:07:07.759 --> 00:07:09.589 align:start position:0% >> It could be. >> The<00:07:08.080> only<00:07:08.319> exception<00:07:08.720> to<00:07:08.880> that<00:07:09.120> is<00:07:09.280> if<00:07:09.440> there 00:07:09.589 --> 00:07:09.599 align:start position:0% >> The only exception to that is if there 00:07:09.599 --> 00:07:11.830 align:start position:0% >> The only exception to that is if there was<00:07:09.759> some<00:07:10.000> legislation<00:07:10.639> that<00:07:10.960> required<00:07:11.520> more 00:07:11.830 --> 00:07:11.840 align:start position:0% was some legislation that required more 00:07:11.840 --> 00:07:14.230 align:start position:0% was some legislation that required more immediate<00:07:12.240> action 00:07:14.230 --> 00:07:14.240 align:start position:0% immediate action 00:07:14.240 --> 00:07:16.710 align:start position:0% immediate action is<00:07:14.960> that<00:07:15.199> would<00:07:15.360> be,<00:07:15.599> unless<00:07:15.919> I'm<00:07:16.160> wrong, 00:07:16.710 --> 00:07:16.720 align:start position:0% is that would be, unless I'm wrong, 00:07:16.720 --> 00:07:18.629 align:start position:0% is that would be, unless I'm wrong, staff<00:07:17.039> can<00:07:17.199> correct<00:07:17.440> me<00:07:17.520> if<00:07:17.680> I'm<00:07:17.840> wrong.<00:07:18.080> I<00:07:18.319> I 00:07:18.629 --> 00:07:18.639 align:start position:0% staff can correct me if I'm wrong. I I 00:07:18.639 --> 00:07:20.870 align:start position:0% staff can correct me if I'm wrong. I I read<00:07:18.800> this<00:07:18.960> as<00:07:19.680> if<00:07:19.919> there's<00:07:20.160> some<00:07:20.400> legislation 00:07:20.870 --> 00:07:20.880 align:start position:0% read this as if there's some legislation 00:07:20.880 --> 00:07:22.710 align:start position:0% read this as if there's some legislation that<00:07:21.120> required<00:07:21.520> a<00:07:21.680> more<00:07:21.840> immediate<00:07:22.240> action<00:07:22.560> of 00:07:22.710 --> 00:07:22.720 align:start position:0% that required a more immediate action of 00:07:22.720 --> 00:07:26.070 align:start position:0% that required a more immediate action of some<00:07:22.960> kind<00:07:23.199> for<00:07:23.599> a<00:07:23.919> full<00:07:24.160> revision,<00:07:25.440> then<00:07:25.759> that 00:07:26.070 --> 00:07:26.080 align:start position:0% some kind for a full revision, then that 00:07:26.080 --> 00:07:28.870 align:start position:0% some kind for a full revision, then that could<00:07:26.319> be<00:07:26.560> instigated<00:07:27.199> or<00:07:27.599> started<00:07:28.080> earlier. 00:07:28.870 --> 00:07:28.880 align:start position:0% could be instigated or started earlier. 00:07:28.880 --> 00:07:30.390 align:start position:0% could be instigated or started earlier. Otherwise,<00:07:29.280> it<00:07:29.520> would<00:07:29.680> spread<00:07:29.919> that<00:07:30.080> out<00:07:30.240> a 00:07:30.390 --> 00:07:30.400 align:start position:0% Otherwise, it would spread that out a 00:07:30.400 --> 00:07:33.430 align:start position:0% Otherwise, it would spread that out a little<00:07:30.560> further. 00:07:33.430 --> 00:07:33.440 align:start position:0% little further. 00:07:33.440 --> 00:07:34.629 align:start position:0% little further. >> Question.<00:07:34.080> Yeah. 00:07:34.629 --> 00:07:34.639 align:start position:0% >> Question. Yeah. 00:07:34.639 --> 00:07:36.870 align:start position:0% >> Question. Yeah. >> Yes.<00:07:34.960> And<00:07:35.199> then<00:07:35.360> just<00:07:35.919> one<00:07:36.160> more<00:07:36.400> level<00:07:36.639> of 00:07:36.870 --> 00:07:36.880 align:start position:0% >> Yes. And then just one more level of 00:07:36.880 --> 00:07:39.270 align:start position:0% >> Yes. And then just one more level of clarification<00:07:37.599> then.<00:07:37.919> So,<00:07:38.160> with<00:07:38.400> the<00:07:38.639> new<00:07:39.039> um 00:07:39.270 --> 00:07:39.280 align:start position:0% clarification then. So, with the new um 00:07:39.280 --> 00:07:42.070 align:start position:0% clarification then. So, with the new um civics<00:07:40.639> legislation<00:07:41.120> that<00:07:41.360> was<00:07:41.599> passed,<00:07:41.919> they 00:07:42.070 --> 00:07:42.080 align:start position:0% civics legislation that was passed, they 00:07:42.080 --> 00:07:43.510 align:start position:0% civics legislation that was passed, they had<00:07:42.319> originally<00:07:42.720> asked<00:07:42.960> for<00:07:43.120> it<00:07:43.280> to<00:07:43.360> be 00:07:43.510 --> 00:07:43.520 align:start position:0% had originally asked for it to be 00:07:43.520 --> 00:07:46.629 align:start position:0% had originally asked for it to be implemented<00:07:44.000> at<00:07:44.160> this<00:07:44.400> fall<00:07:45.680> and<00:07:45.919> and<00:07:46.319> we 00:07:46.629 --> 00:07:46.639 align:start position:0% implemented at this fall and and we 00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:49.189 align:start position:0% implemented at this fall and and we realized<00:07:47.199> that<00:07:47.840> that<00:07:48.160> was 00:07:49.189 --> 00:07:49.199 align:start position:0% realized that that was 00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:50.710 align:start position:0% realized that that was >> we<00:07:49.440> just<00:07:49.599> had<00:07:49.759> to<00:07:49.840> let<00:07:49.919> them<00:07:50.080> know<00:07:50.319> that's<00:07:50.560> not 00:07:50.710 --> 00:07:50.720 align:start position:0% >> we just had to let them know that's not 00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:53.589 align:start position:0% >> we just had to let them know that's not quite<00:07:50.880> how<00:07:51.039> the<00:07:51.280> process<00:07:51.680> works<00:07:52.160> like<00:07:52.400> within 00:07:53.589 --> 00:07:53.599 align:start position:0% quite how the process works like within 00:07:53.599 --> 00:07:56.869 align:start position:0% quite how the process works like within within<00:07:54.000> our<00:07:54.240> work<00:07:55.120> and<00:07:56.080> I<00:07:56.160> I<00:07:56.400> think<00:07:56.479> we<00:07:56.720> had 00:07:56.869 --> 00:07:56.879 align:start position:0% within our work and I I think we had 00:07:56.879 --> 00:07:59.270 align:start position:0% within our work and I I think we had that<00:07:57.120> implemented<00:07:58.000> next<00:07:58.400> year<00:07:59.039> to 00:07:59.270 --> 00:07:59.280 align:start position:0% that implemented next year to 00:07:59.280 --> 00:08:01.029 align:start position:0% that implemented next year to accommodate<00:07:59.759> for<00:08:00.000> what<00:08:00.400> what<00:08:00.639> would<00:08:00.800> be 00:08:01.029 --> 00:08:01.039 align:start position:0% accommodate for what what would be 00:08:01.039 --> 00:08:02.390 align:start position:0% accommodate for what what would be required 00:08:02.390 --> 00:08:02.400 align:start position:0% required 00:08:02.400 --> 00:08:03.350 align:start position:0% required >> through<00:08:02.560> our<00:08:02.800> standard. 00:08:03.350 --> 00:08:03.360 align:start position:0% >> through our standard. 00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:05.589 align:start position:0% >> through our standard. >> That's<00:08:03.599> accurate.<00:08:04.240> Sorry,<00:08:04.639> that<00:08:04.960> is<00:08:05.120> accurate 00:08:05.589 --> 00:08:05.599 align:start position:0% >> That's accurate. Sorry, that is accurate 00:08:05.599 --> 00:08:07.990 align:start position:0% >> That's accurate. Sorry, that is accurate except<00:08:05.919> for<00:08:06.080> it<00:08:06.240> isn't<00:08:06.560> a<00:08:06.720> full<00:08:06.960> revision. 00:08:07.990 --> 00:08:08.000 align:start position:0% except for it isn't a full revision. 00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:09.670 align:start position:0% except for it isn't a full revision. Those<00:08:08.319> would<00:08:08.479> be 00:08:09.670 --> 00:08:09.680 align:start position:0% Those would be 00:08:09.680 --> 00:08:11.589 align:start position:0% Those would be >> Yeah,<00:08:10.080> it<00:08:10.319> would<00:08:10.400> be<00:08:10.560> the<00:08:10.960> more<00:08:11.199> targeted 00:08:11.589 --> 00:08:11.599 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, it would be the more targeted 00:08:11.599 --> 00:08:12.869 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, it would be the more targeted revision. 00:08:12.869 --> 00:08:12.879 align:start position:0% revision. 00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:14.629 align:start position:0% revision. >> Okay.<00:08:13.280> Yep. 00:08:14.629 --> 00:08:14.639 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Yep. 00:08:14.639 --> 00:08:17.589 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Yep. >> Yeah.<00:08:15.599> Okay. 00:08:17.589 --> 00:08:17.599 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Okay. 00:08:17.599 --> 00:08:22.070 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Okay. Uh<00:08:18.560> I'm<00:08:19.039> I'm<00:08:20.160> I<00:08:20.479> have<00:08:20.560> a<00:08:20.879> couple<00:08:21.120> of<00:08:21.360> questions. 00:08:22.070 --> 00:08:22.080 align:start position:0% Uh I'm I'm I have a couple of questions. 00:08:22.080 --> 00:08:22.790 align:start position:0% Uh I'm I'm I have a couple of questions. >> Yes.<00:08:22.319> Go<00:08:22.479> ahead. 00:08:22.790 --> 00:08:22.800 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Go ahead. 00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:24.550 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Go ahead. >> Or<00:08:22.960> ideas<00:08:23.199> here<00:08:23.440> that<00:08:23.680> I<00:08:23.840> don't<00:08:24.000> it<00:08:24.240> it's<00:08:24.400> not 00:08:24.550 --> 00:08:24.560 align:start position:0% >> Or ideas here that I don't it it's not 00:08:24.560 --> 00:08:29.830 align:start position:0% >> Or ideas here that I don't it it's not necessarily<00:08:24.960> in<00:08:25.199> this<00:08:25.360> section.<00:08:25.759> Um,<00:08:27.039> one<00:08:27.360> is 00:08:29.830 --> 00:08:29.840 align:start position:0% necessarily in this section. Um, one is 00:08:29.840 --> 00:08:32.149 align:start position:0% necessarily in this section. Um, one is I<00:08:30.160> was<00:08:30.319> thinking<00:08:30.639> about,<00:08:31.199> so<00:08:31.520> we've<00:08:31.840> talked<00:08:32.000> a 00:08:32.149 --> 00:08:32.159 align:start position:0% I was thinking about, so we've talked a 00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:34.310 align:start position:0% I was thinking about, so we've talked a lot<00:08:32.320> at<00:08:32.560> length<00:08:32.880> about<00:08:33.360> um,<00:08:33.519> access<00:08:33.919> to<00:08:34.159> the 00:08:34.310 --> 00:08:34.320 align:start position:0% lot at length about um, access to the 00:08:34.320 --> 00:08:38.870 align:start position:0% lot at length about um, access to the committee,<00:08:35.200> writing<00:08:35.599> committee,<00:08:36.640> and<00:08:37.440> uh,<00:08:38.640> I 00:08:38.870 --> 00:08:38.880 align:start position:0% committee, writing committee, and uh, I 00:08:38.880 --> 00:08:40.949 align:start position:0% committee, writing committee, and uh, I see<00:08:39.039> the<00:08:39.279> benefit<00:08:39.519> in<00:08:39.760> that<00:08:40.080> for<00:08:40.320> sure,<00:08:40.640> but 00:08:40.949 --> 00:08:40.959 align:start position:0% see the benefit in that for sure, but 00:08:40.959 --> 00:08:44.389 align:start position:0% see the benefit in that for sure, but I'm<00:08:41.120> wondering<00:08:41.440> if<00:08:41.680> we<00:08:42.320> narrow<00:08:42.800> it<00:08:43.039> a<00:08:43.279> bit<00:08:43.680> to 00:08:44.389 --> 00:08:44.399 align:start position:0% I'm wondering if we narrow it a bit to 00:08:44.399 --> 00:08:46.790 align:start position:0% I'm wondering if we narrow it a bit to just<00:08:44.720> say<00:08:45.519> that<00:08:45.839> within<00:08:46.240> the<00:08:46.399> writing 00:08:46.790 --> 00:08:46.800 align:start position:0% just say that within the writing 00:08:46.800 --> 00:08:48.949 align:start position:0% just say that within the writing committee<00:08:47.360> there's<00:08:47.760> like<00:08:48.080> designated 00:08:48.949 --> 00:08:48.959 align:start position:0% committee there's like designated 00:08:48.959 --> 00:08:51.829 align:start position:0% committee there's like designated spokespeople.<00:08:50.240> So<00:08:50.560> those<00:08:50.880> people<00:08:51.200> sign<00:08:51.519> up 00:08:51.829 --> 00:08:51.839 align:start position:0% spokespeople. So those people sign up 00:08:51.839 --> 00:08:53.990 align:start position:0% spokespeople. So those people sign up knowing<00:08:52.560> I'm<00:08:52.800> on<00:08:52.959> the<00:08:53.120> writing<00:08:53.440> committee<00:08:53.760> and 00:08:53.990 --> 00:08:54.000 align:start position:0% knowing I'm on the writing committee and 00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:56.150 align:start position:0% knowing I'm on the writing committee and I've<00:08:54.240> been<00:08:54.399> designated<00:08:54.880> the<00:08:55.120> spokesperson. 00:08:56.150 --> 00:08:56.160 align:start position:0% I've been designated the spokesperson. 00:08:56.160 --> 00:08:57.750 align:start position:0% I've been designated the spokesperson. And<00:08:56.320> it<00:08:56.480> can<00:08:56.560> be<00:08:56.720> like<00:08:56.880> two<00:08:57.040> to<00:08:57.279> three<00:08:57.440> people 00:08:57.750 --> 00:08:57.760 align:start position:0% And it can be like two to three people 00:08:57.760 --> 00:08:59.509 align:start position:0% And it can be like two to three people per<00:08:58.080> writing<00:08:58.399> committee<00:08:58.720> who<00:08:59.040> can<00:08:59.200> be<00:08:59.360> the 00:08:59.509 --> 00:08:59.519 align:start position:0% per writing committee who can be the 00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:01.990 align:start position:0% per writing committee who can be the ones<00:08:59.760> that<00:08:59.920> we<00:09:00.160> can<00:09:00.320> meet<00:09:00.480> with<00:09:00.880> rather<00:09:01.200> than 00:09:01.990 --> 00:09:02.000 align:start position:0% ones that we can meet with rather than 00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:04.070 align:start position:0% ones that we can meet with rather than trying<00:09:02.240> to<00:09:02.480> coordinate<00:09:03.200> the<00:09:03.440> whole<00:09:03.680> writing 00:09:04.070 --> 00:09:04.080 align:start position:0% trying to coordinate the whole writing 00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:05.430 align:start position:0% trying to coordinate the whole writing committee<00:09:04.399> which<00:09:04.640> can<00:09:04.800> be<00:09:04.959> hard<00:09:05.200> and 00:09:05.430 --> 00:09:05.440 align:start position:0% committee which can be hard and 00:09:05.440 --> 00:09:06.710 align:start position:0% committee which can be hard and difficult<00:09:05.760> since<00:09:06.080> a<00:09:06.240> lot<00:09:06.320> of<00:09:06.399> them<00:09:06.560> are 00:09:06.710 --> 00:09:06.720 align:start position:0% difficult since a lot of them are 00:09:06.720 --> 00:09:08.230 align:start position:0% difficult since a lot of them are educators 00:09:08.230 --> 00:09:08.240 align:start position:0% educators 00:09:08.240 --> 00:09:10.150 align:start position:0% educators um<00:09:08.480> and<00:09:08.800> don't<00:09:09.040> have<00:09:09.200> that<00:09:09.600> time<00:09:09.839> in<00:09:10.000> the 00:09:10.150 --> 00:09:10.160 align:start position:0% um and don't have that time in the 00:09:10.160 --> 00:09:11.430 align:start position:0% um and don't have that time in the middle<00:09:10.240> of<00:09:10.320> the<00:09:10.399> day<00:09:10.480> on<00:09:10.640> a<00:09:10.800> Wednesday<00:09:11.040> to<00:09:11.279> meet 00:09:11.430 --> 00:09:11.440 align:start position:0% middle of the day on a Wednesday to meet 00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:15.430 align:start position:0% middle of the day on a Wednesday to meet with<00:09:11.600> us.<00:09:12.240> But<00:09:12.480> then<00:09:12.800> also<00:09:13.680> because<00:09:14.240> then<00:09:15.120> I 00:09:15.430 --> 00:09:15.440 align:start position:0% with us. But then also because then I 00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:18.870 align:start position:0% with us. But then also because then I think<00:09:15.600> that<00:09:16.000> unfortunately<00:09:17.200> we've<00:09:17.600> seen<00:09:18.560> not 00:09:18.870 --> 00:09:18.880 align:start position:0% think that unfortunately we've seen not 00:09:18.880 --> 00:09:20.870 align:start position:0% think that unfortunately we've seen not recently<00:09:19.279> but<00:09:19.519> in<00:09:19.760> years<00:09:20.080> past<00:09:20.320> these<00:09:20.560> writing 00:09:20.870 --> 00:09:20.880 align:start position:0% recently but in years past these writing 00:09:20.880 --> 00:09:22.870 align:start position:0% recently but in years past these writing committee<00:09:21.200> feel<00:09:21.360> a<00:09:21.600> little<00:09:21.680> bit<00:09:22.320> um<00:09:22.560> worried 00:09:22.870 --> 00:09:22.880 align:start position:0% committee feel a little bit um worried 00:09:22.880 --> 00:09:24.310 align:start position:0% committee feel a little bit um worried about<00:09:23.120> their<00:09:23.440> identity<00:09:23.680> and<00:09:23.920> want<00:09:24.080> to<00:09:24.240> have 00:09:24.310 --> 00:09:24.320 align:start position:0% about their identity and want to have 00:09:24.320 --> 00:09:26.070 align:start position:0% about their identity and want to have that<00:09:24.560> protected.<00:09:25.040> I've<00:09:25.360> heard<00:09:25.519> that<00:09:25.760> shared 00:09:26.070 --> 00:09:26.080 align:start position:0% that protected. I've heard that shared 00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:28.310 align:start position:0% that protected. I've heard that shared to<00:09:26.240> me.<00:09:26.880> Uh<00:09:27.040> I've<00:09:27.279> had<00:09:27.440> that<00:09:27.600> shared<00:09:27.839> to<00:09:27.920> me<00:09:28.080> and 00:09:28.310 --> 00:09:28.320 align:start position:0% to me. Uh I've had that shared to me and 00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:30.630 align:start position:0% to me. Uh I've had that shared to me and so<00:09:28.720> I<00:09:28.959> think<00:09:29.120> maybe<00:09:29.360> if<00:09:29.600> these<00:09:29.920> people<00:09:30.160> sign<00:09:30.399> up 00:09:30.630 --> 00:09:30.640 align:start position:0% so I think maybe if these people sign up 00:09:30.640 --> 00:09:33.110 align:start position:0% so I think maybe if these people sign up as<00:09:31.120> designated<00:09:32.080> spokespeople<00:09:32.640> for<00:09:32.880> the 00:09:33.110 --> 00:09:33.120 align:start position:0% as designated spokespeople for the 00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:35.910 align:start position:0% as designated spokespeople for the writing<00:09:33.440> committee<00:09:34.240> then<00:09:34.720> it<00:09:34.959> will<00:09:35.200> make<00:09:35.600> it<00:09:35.760> a 00:09:35.910 --> 00:09:35.920 align:start position:0% writing committee then it will make it a 00:09:35.920 --> 00:09:37.350 align:start position:0% writing committee then it will make it a lot<00:09:36.080> easier<00:09:36.320> to<00:09:36.480> coordinate<00:09:36.800> and<00:09:37.040> meet<00:09:37.200> with 00:09:37.350 --> 00:09:37.360 align:start position:0% lot easier to coordinate and meet with 00:09:37.360 --> 00:09:40.230 align:start position:0% lot easier to coordinate and meet with them.<00:09:37.519> But<00:09:37.760> then<00:09:38.000> also<00:09:38.560> it<00:09:38.959> gives<00:09:39.839> uh<00:09:40.000> the 00:09:40.230 --> 00:09:40.240 align:start position:0% them. But then also it gives uh the 00:09:40.240 --> 00:09:41.990 align:start position:0% them. But then also it gives uh the educators<00:09:40.800> that<00:09:41.040> protection<00:09:41.440> knowing<00:09:41.760> like 00:09:41.990 --> 00:09:42.000 align:start position:0% educators that protection knowing like 00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:43.430 align:start position:0% educators that protection knowing like I'm<00:09:42.240> not<00:09:42.320> going<00:09:42.399> to<00:09:42.480> be<00:09:42.720> the<00:09:42.959> person<00:09:43.200> that's 00:09:43.430 --> 00:09:43.440 align:start position:0% I'm not going to be the person that's 00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:45.110 align:start position:0% I'm not going to be the person that's going<00:09:43.519> to<00:09:43.680> be<00:09:43.839> coming<00:09:44.080> to<00:09:44.560> the<00:09:44.800> committee 00:09:45.110 --> 00:09:45.120 align:start position:0% going to be coming to the committee 00:09:45.120 --> 00:09:48.310 align:start position:0% going to be coming to the committee meeting<00:09:45.360> to<00:09:45.600> talk<00:09:45.760> about<00:09:45.920> it<00:09:46.320> for<00:09:46.480> example.<00:09:47.279> Um 00:09:48.310 --> 00:09:48.320 align:start position:0% meeting to talk about it for example. Um 00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:50.070 align:start position:0% meeting to talk about it for example. Um and<00:09:48.560> I<00:09:48.720> think<00:09:48.800> that<00:09:49.040> that<00:09:49.279> will<00:09:49.519> help<00:09:49.839> make 00:09:50.070 --> 00:09:50.080 align:start position:0% and I think that that will help make 00:09:50.080 --> 00:09:51.750 align:start position:0% and I think that that will help make sure<00:09:50.240> that<00:09:50.399> if<00:09:50.560> we<00:09:50.720> open<00:09:50.880> up<00:09:50.959> to<00:09:51.120> everyone<00:09:51.600> I 00:09:51.750 --> 00:09:51.760 align:start position:0% sure that if we open up to everyone I 00:09:51.760 --> 00:09:53.590 align:start position:0% sure that if we open up to everyone I worry<00:09:52.000> that<00:09:52.240> some<00:09:52.560> teachers<00:09:52.959> or<00:09:53.279> people<00:09:53.440> on 00:09:53.590 --> 00:09:53.600 align:start position:0% worry that some teachers or people on 00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:54.630 align:start position:0% worry that some teachers or people on the<00:09:53.760> writing<00:09:54.000> committee<00:09:54.240> aren't<00:09:54.480> going<00:09:54.560> to 00:09:54.630 --> 00:09:54.640 align:start position:0% the writing committee aren't going to 00:09:54.640 --> 00:09:55.509 align:start position:0% the writing committee aren't going to want<00:09:54.720> to<00:09:54.800> do<00:09:54.880> it<00:09:54.959> because<00:09:55.120> they<00:09:55.279> don't<00:09:55.360> want<00:09:55.440> to 00:09:55.509 --> 00:09:55.519 align:start position:0% want to do it because they don't want to 00:09:55.519 --> 00:10:01.509 align:start position:0% want to do it because they don't want to be<00:09:55.680> open<00:09:55.920> to<00:09:56.080> that<00:09:56.959> uh<00:09:57.279> piece<00:09:57.600> of<00:09:57.760> the<00:09:58.080> process. 00:10:01.509 --> 00:10:01.519 align:start position:0% 00:10:01.519 --> 00:10:03.430 align:start position:0% >> Are<00:10:01.760> you<00:10:02.080> and<00:10:02.320> when<00:10:02.560> you<00:10:02.640> say<00:10:02.880> come<00:10:03.120> talk<00:10:03.279> to 00:10:03.430 --> 00:10:03.440 align:start position:0% >> Are you and when you say come talk to 00:10:03.440 --> 00:10:04.949 align:start position:0% >> Are you and when you say come talk to us,<00:10:03.680> you're<00:10:03.839> talking<00:10:04.000> like<00:10:04.160> this<00:10:04.399> the<00:10:04.720> state 00:10:04.949 --> 00:10:04.959 align:start position:0% us, you're talking like this the state 00:10:04.959 --> 00:10:06.150 align:start position:0% us, you're talking like this the state board<00:10:05.440> or 00:10:06.150 --> 00:10:06.160 align:start position:0% board or 00:10:06.160 --> 00:10:08.470 align:start position:0% board or >> Yeah.<00:10:06.640> Yeah.<00:10:07.040> So<00:10:07.279> like<00:10:07.600> when<00:10:07.839> we've<00:10:08.080> wanted<00:10:08.320> to 00:10:08.470 --> 00:10:08.480 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. So like when we've wanted to 00:10:08.480 --> 00:10:10.070 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. So like when we've wanted to meet<00:10:08.560> with<00:10:08.720> the<00:10:08.880> writing<00:10:09.200> committee,<00:10:09.839> I<00:10:10.000> think 00:10:10.070 --> 00:10:10.080 align:start position:0% meet with the writing committee, I think 00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:11.350 align:start position:0% meet with the writing committee, I think there's<00:10:10.320> been<00:10:10.399> hesitation.<00:10:10.959> We've<00:10:11.200> heard 00:10:11.350 --> 00:10:11.360 align:start position:0% there's been hesitation. We've heard 00:10:11.360 --> 00:10:13.430 align:start position:0% there's been hesitation. We've heard that.<00:10:11.600> So<00:10:11.920> my<00:10:12.240> idea<00:10:12.640> is<00:10:12.800> that<00:10:13.040> we<00:10:13.200> just 00:10:13.430 --> 00:10:13.440 align:start position:0% that. So my idea is that we just 00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:15.430 align:start position:0% that. So my idea is that we just designate<00:10:14.160> like<00:10:14.399> each<00:10:14.640> writing<00:10:15.040> committee 00:10:15.430 --> 00:10:15.440 align:start position:0% designate like each writing committee 00:10:15.440 --> 00:10:17.269 align:start position:0% designate like each writing committee has<00:10:15.680> two<00:10:15.920> to<00:10:16.079> three<00:10:16.320> people<00:10:16.560> designated<00:10:17.120> as 00:10:17.269 --> 00:10:17.279 align:start position:0% has two to three people designated as 00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:19.110 align:start position:0% has two to three people designated as the<00:10:17.519> spokespeople<00:10:18.320> and<00:10:18.560> they're<00:10:18.800> the<00:10:18.959> ones 00:10:19.110 --> 00:10:19.120 align:start position:0% the spokespeople and they're the ones 00:10:19.120 --> 00:10:20.630 align:start position:0% the spokespeople and they're the ones that<00:10:19.279> we<00:10:19.440> coordinate<00:10:19.839> and<00:10:20.079> communicate<00:10:20.399> and 00:10:20.630 --> 00:10:20.640 align:start position:0% that we coordinate and communicate and 00:10:20.640 --> 00:10:22.790 align:start position:0% that we coordinate and communicate and ask<00:10:20.959> questions<00:10:21.279> to<00:10:21.839> and<00:10:22.000> they<00:10:22.240> can<00:10:22.320> go<00:10:22.480> back<00:10:22.640> to 00:10:22.790 --> 00:10:22.800 align:start position:0% ask questions to and they can go back to 00:10:22.800 --> 00:10:24.069 align:start position:0% ask questions to and they can go back to their<00:10:22.959> writing<00:10:23.200> committee<00:10:23.440> if<00:10:23.600> there's,<00:10:23.920> you 00:10:24.069 --> 00:10:24.079 align:start position:0% their writing committee if there's, you 00:10:24.079 --> 00:10:25.670 align:start position:0% their writing committee if there's, you know what<00:10:24.240> I<00:10:24.399> mean?<00:10:24.800> But<00:10:24.959> rather<00:10:25.200> than<00:10:25.440> trying 00:10:25.670 --> 00:10:25.680 align:start position:0% know what I mean? But rather than trying 00:10:25.680 --> 00:10:27.430 align:start position:0% know what I mean? But rather than trying to<00:10:25.839> have<00:10:25.920> the<00:10:26.160> whole<00:10:26.320> committee<00:10:26.640> open<00:10:26.880> up<00:10:27.120> to 00:10:27.430 --> 00:10:27.440 align:start position:0% to have the whole committee open up to 00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:30.310 align:start position:0% to have the whole committee open up to being<00:10:28.399> accessible<00:10:29.040> for<00:10:29.519> board<00:10:29.839> members<00:10:30.079> to 00:10:30.310 --> 00:10:30.320 align:start position:0% being accessible for board members to 00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:33.829 align:start position:0% being accessible for board members to reach<00:10:30.480> out<00:10:30.640> to. 00:10:33.829 --> 00:10:33.839 align:start position:0% 00:10:33.839 --> 00:10:35.590 align:start position:0% So<00:10:34.000> it's<00:10:34.240> just<00:10:34.399> narrowing<00:10:34.800> that<00:10:35.040> section<00:10:35.360> a 00:10:35.590 --> 00:10:35.600 align:start position:0% So it's just narrowing that section a 00:10:35.600 --> 00:10:36.790 align:start position:0% So it's just narrowing that section a little<00:10:35.680> bit. 00:10:36.790 --> 00:10:36.800 align:start position:0% little bit. 00:10:36.800 --> 00:10:39.190 align:start position:0% little bit. Okay,<00:10:37.600> I<00:10:37.760> I'm<00:10:38.079> pondering<00:10:38.480> that<00:10:38.720> a<00:10:38.880> little<00:10:38.959> bit. 00:10:39.190 --> 00:10:39.200 align:start position:0% Okay, I I'm pondering that a little bit. 00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:41.670 align:start position:0% Okay, I I'm pondering that a little bit. I<00:10:39.440> I<00:10:39.839> do<00:10:40.079> think<00:10:40.480> one<00:10:40.720> of<00:10:40.800> the<00:10:40.959> things<00:10:41.120> we<00:10:41.440> want 00:10:41.670 --> 00:10:41.680 align:start position:0% I I do think one of the things we want 00:10:41.680 --> 00:10:43.910 align:start position:0% I I do think one of the things we want to<00:10:41.839> do<00:10:42.079> though<00:10:42.240> is<00:10:42.480> when<00:10:43.040> we<00:10:43.279> need<00:10:43.360> to<00:10:43.519> be<00:10:43.680> a 00:10:43.910 --> 00:10:43.920 align:start position:0% to do though is when we need to be a 00:10:43.920 --> 00:10:47.110 align:start position:0% to do though is when we need to be a when<00:10:44.480> someone<00:10:44.959> applies<00:10:45.519> to<00:10:45.839> be<00:10:46.160> or<00:10:46.560> submits<00:10:46.959> a 00:10:47.110 --> 00:10:47.120 align:start position:0% when someone applies to be or submits a 00:10:47.120 --> 00:10:48.550 align:start position:0% when someone applies to be or submits a recommendation,<00:10:47.760> they<00:10:48.000> need<00:10:48.079> to<00:10:48.240> know<00:10:48.399> what 00:10:48.550 --> 00:10:48.560 align:start position:0% recommendation, they need to know what 00:10:48.560 --> 00:10:51.750 align:start position:0% recommendation, they need to know what that<00:10:49.440> relationship<00:10:50.079> is.<00:10:50.480> So,<00:10:50.640> I<00:10:50.800> do<00:10:50.959> think<00:10:51.519> I 00:10:51.750 --> 00:10:51.760 align:start position:0% that relationship is. So, I do think I 00:10:51.760 --> 00:10:53.190 align:start position:0% that relationship is. So, I do think I think<00:10:51.920> there<00:10:52.079> is<00:10:52.240> a<00:10:52.399> possibility<00:10:52.800> there<00:10:53.040> that 00:10:53.190 --> 00:10:53.200 align:start position:0% think there is a possibility there that 00:10:53.200 --> 00:10:55.829 align:start position:0% think there is a possibility there that we<00:10:53.440> could<00:10:53.600> do<00:10:54.560> um<00:10:55.120> I<00:10:55.360> don't<00:10:55.440> know<00:10:55.440> if<00:10:55.600> you<00:10:55.680> call 00:10:55.829 --> 00:10:55.839 align:start position:0% we could do um I don't know if you call 00:10:55.839 --> 00:10:57.269 align:start position:0% we could do um I don't know if you call them<00:10:56.000> spokespersons.<00:10:56.640> I<00:10:56.800> guess<00:10:56.959> they<00:10:57.200> could 00:10:57.269 --> 00:10:57.279 align:start position:0% them spokespersons. I guess they could 00:10:57.279 --> 00:10:59.030 align:start position:0% them spokespersons. I guess they could be,<00:10:57.519> but<00:10:57.839> maybe<00:10:58.079> a<00:10:58.320> lead<00:10:58.640> for 00:10:59.030 --> 00:10:59.040 align:start position:0% be, but maybe a lead for 00:10:59.040 --> 00:11:02.550 align:start position:0% be, but maybe a lead for >> that<00:10:59.200> was<00:10:59.279> just<00:10:59.440> a<00:11:00.000> name<00:11:00.240> I<00:11:00.320> made<00:11:00.480> up.<00:11:01.440> Yeah.<00:11:02.399> or 00:11:02.550 --> 00:11:02.560 align:start position:0% >> that was just a name I made up. Yeah. or 00:11:02.560 --> 00:11:04.790 align:start position:0% >> that was just a name I made up. Yeah. or >> the<00:11:02.720> sixth<00:11:02.959> grade<00:11:03.200> writing<00:11:03.680> that<00:11:04.079> would<00:11:04.640> you 00:11:04.790 --> 00:11:04.800 align:start position:0% >> the sixth grade writing that would you 00:11:04.800 --> 00:11:07.030 align:start position:0% >> the sixth grade writing that would you know<00:11:04.959> be<00:11:05.120> the<00:11:05.360> contact<00:11:05.760> person.<00:11:06.320> So<00:11:06.720> I<00:11:06.880> do 00:11:07.030 --> 00:11:07.040 align:start position:0% know be the contact person. So I do 00:11:07.040 --> 00:11:07.509 align:start position:0% know be the contact person. So I do think<00:11:07.120> there<00:11:07.279> is 00:11:07.509 --> 00:11:07.519 align:start position:0% think there is 00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:09.350 align:start position:0% think there is >> and<00:11:07.680> we<00:11:07.839> could<00:11:08.079> we<00:11:08.399> could<00:11:08.560> even<00:11:08.720> have<00:11:08.959> like<00:11:09.279> you 00:11:09.350 --> 00:11:09.360 align:start position:0% >> and we could we could even have like you 00:11:09.360 --> 00:11:11.269 align:start position:0% >> and we could we could even have like you know<00:11:09.440> if<00:11:09.600> it's<00:11:09.839> if<00:11:10.079> it's<00:11:10.240> K<00:11:10.480> through<00:11:10.720> 12<00:11:11.040> we 00:11:11.269 --> 00:11:11.279 align:start position:0% know if it's if it's K through 12 we 00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:13.590 align:start position:0% know if it's if it's K through 12 we could<00:11:11.440> have<00:11:11.600> like 00:11:13.590 --> 00:11:13.600 align:start position:0% could have like 00:11:13.600 --> 00:11:16.790 align:start position:0% could have like you<00:11:13.760> know<00:11:14.959> different<00:11:15.440> spokesperson<00:11:16.079> for<00:11:16.399> each 00:11:16.790 --> 00:11:16.800 align:start position:0% you know different spokesperson for each 00:11:16.800 --> 00:11:18.069 align:start position:0% you know different spokesperson for each you<00:11:16.959> know<00:11:17.120> level<00:11:17.440> like<00:11:17.600> there<00:11:17.760> could<00:11:17.920> be 00:11:18.069 --> 00:11:18.079 align:start position:0% you know level like there could be 00:11:18.079 --> 00:11:19.509 align:start position:0% you know level like there could be multiple<00:11:18.560> depending<00:11:18.880> on<00:11:19.040> how<00:11:19.200> big<00:11:19.360> the 00:11:19.509 --> 00:11:19.519 align:start position:0% multiple depending on how big the 00:11:19.519 --> 00:11:21.350 align:start position:0% multiple depending on how big the standards<00:11:19.920> review<00:11:20.160> and<00:11:20.320> the<00:11:20.800> committee<00:11:21.120> is 00:11:21.350 --> 00:11:21.360 align:start position:0% standards review and the committee is 00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:23.269 align:start position:0% standards review and the committee is like<00:11:21.519> so<00:11:21.680> that<00:11:21.839> they're<00:11:22.160> the<00:11:22.320> experts<00:11:22.720> in<00:11:22.959> that 00:11:23.269 --> 00:11:23.279 align:start position:0% like so that they're the experts in that 00:11:23.279 --> 00:11:25.829 align:start position:0% like so that they're the experts in that part<00:11:23.440> of<00:11:23.600> the<00:11:23.839> standards<00:11:24.800> for<00:11:25.040> sure<00:11:25.440> but<00:11:25.680> I 00:11:25.829 --> 00:11:25.839 align:start position:0% part of the standards for sure but I 00:11:25.839 --> 00:11:27.430 align:start position:0% part of the standards for sure but I just<00:11:26.000> I<00:11:26.160> feel<00:11:26.240> like<00:11:26.399> it<00:11:26.560> will<00:11:26.720> be<00:11:27.040> better<00:11:27.279> to 00:11:27.430 --> 00:11:27.440 align:start position:0% just I feel like it will be better to 00:11:27.440 --> 00:11:29.110 align:start position:0% just I feel like it will be better to narrow<00:11:27.680> it<00:11:27.839> down<00:11:28.000> and<00:11:28.160> then<00:11:28.399> people<00:11:28.640> can<00:11:28.880> still 00:11:29.110 --> 00:11:29.120 align:start position:0% narrow it down and then people can still 00:11:29.120 --> 00:11:30.710 align:start position:0% narrow it down and then people can still volunteer<00:11:29.680> to<00:11:29.839> be<00:11:30.000> on<00:11:30.160> the<00:11:30.240> writing<00:11:30.480> committee 00:11:30.710 --> 00:11:30.720 align:start position:0% volunteer to be on the writing committee 00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:31.910 align:start position:0% volunteer to be on the writing committee or<00:11:30.959> sign<00:11:31.120> up<00:11:31.200> to<00:11:31.360> be<00:11:31.440> on<00:11:31.519> the<00:11:31.600> writing 00:11:31.910 --> 00:11:31.920 align:start position:0% or sign up to be on the writing 00:11:31.920 --> 00:11:34.150 align:start position:0% or sign up to be on the writing committee<00:11:32.480> and<00:11:32.800> not<00:11:33.040> have<00:11:33.200> to<00:11:33.440> worry<00:11:33.680> about 00:11:34.150 --> 00:11:34.160 align:start position:0% committee and not have to worry about 00:11:34.160 --> 00:11:35.509 align:start position:0% committee and not have to worry about some<00:11:34.399> of<00:11:34.480> the<00:11:34.640> things<00:11:34.800> that<00:11:34.959> I've<00:11:35.200> had 00:11:35.509 --> 00:11:35.519 align:start position:0% some of the things that I've had 00:11:35.519 --> 00:11:37.590 align:start position:0% some of the things that I've had expressed<00:11:36.000> to<00:11:36.160> me<00:11:36.320> from<00:11:36.480> other<00:11:36.640> folks,<00:11:37.200> but<00:11:37.440> at 00:11:37.590 --> 00:11:37.600 align:start position:0% expressed to me from other folks, but at 00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:39.190 align:start position:0% expressed to me from other folks, but at the<00:11:37.760> same<00:11:37.839> time,<00:11:38.079> it<00:11:38.320> still<00:11:38.480> gives<00:11:38.640> us<00:11:38.880> access 00:11:39.190 --> 00:11:39.200 align:start position:0% the same time, it still gives us access 00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:40.710 align:start position:0% the same time, it still gives us access to<00:11:39.360> ask<00:11:39.600> those<00:11:39.839> questions<00:11:40.160> to<00:11:40.320> the<00:11:40.480> people 00:11:40.710 --> 00:11:40.720 align:start position:0% to ask those questions to the people 00:11:40.720 --> 00:11:44.870 align:start position:0% to ask those questions to the people directly<00:11:41.120> writing<00:11:41.440> the<00:11:41.600> standards. 00:11:44.870 --> 00:11:44.880 align:start position:0% 00:11:44.880 --> 00:11:48.150 align:start position:0% >> And<00:11:45.120> can<00:11:45.360> I<00:11:45.519> ask<00:11:45.760> how<00:11:46.000> that<00:11:46.320> might<00:11:47.120> like<00:11:47.760> um<00:11:48.000> how 00:11:48.150 --> 00:11:48.160 align:start position:0% >> And can I ask how that might like um how 00:11:48.160 --> 00:11:51.110 align:start position:0% >> And can I ask how that might like um how that<00:11:48.399> looks?<00:11:49.120> Do<00:11:49.279> we<00:11:49.519> email<00:11:49.920> them?<00:11:50.720> Would<00:11:50.880> it 00:11:51.110 --> 00:11:51.120 align:start position:0% that looks? Do we email them? Would it 00:11:51.120 --> 00:11:53.030 align:start position:0% that looks? Do we email them? Would it be<00:11:51.279> transparent?<00:11:52.079> Like<00:11:52.320> I'm<00:11:52.480> I'm<00:11:52.800> worried 00:11:53.030 --> 00:11:53.040 align:start position:0% be transparent? Like I'm I'm worried 00:11:53.040 --> 00:11:54.630 align:start position:0% be transparent? Like I'm I'm worried also<00:11:53.279> about<00:11:53.440> the<00:11:53.680> transparency<00:11:54.240> and<00:11:54.399> the 00:11:54.630 --> 00:11:54.640 align:start position:0% also about the transparency and the 00:11:54.640 --> 00:11:57.829 align:start position:0% also about the transparency and the accessibility<00:11:55.200> of<00:11:55.519> of<00:11:56.160> this<00:11:56.480> committee<00:11:57.519> to 00:11:57.829 --> 00:11:57.839 align:start position:0% accessibility of of this committee to 00:11:57.839 --> 00:12:00.949 align:start position:0% accessibility of of this committee to help<00:11:58.320> as<00:11:58.720> we<00:11:59.040> go<00:11:59.200> through<00:12:00.079> the<00:12:00.399> development<00:12:00.800> of 00:12:00.949 --> 00:12:00.959 align:start position:0% help as we go through the development of 00:12:00.959 --> 00:12:02.630 align:start position:0% help as we go through the development of this.<00:12:01.279> I<00:12:01.440> think<00:12:01.600> feedback<00:12:02.000> is<00:12:02.240> always 00:12:02.630 --> 00:12:02.640 align:start position:0% this. I think feedback is always 00:12:02.640 --> 00:12:05.110 align:start position:0% this. I think feedback is always helpful.<00:12:03.680> I<00:12:03.920> like<00:12:04.079> the<00:12:04.320> idea<00:12:04.480> of<00:12:04.720> being<00:12:04.880> able 00:12:05.110 --> 00:12:05.120 align:start position:0% helpful. I like the idea of being able 00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:07.110 align:start position:0% helpful. I like the idea of being able to<00:12:05.279> streamline<00:12:05.760> that<00:12:06.000> communication<00:12:06.880> a 00:12:07.110 --> 00:12:07.120 align:start position:0% to streamline that communication a 00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:08.629 align:start position:0% to streamline that communication a little<00:12:07.279> bit<00:12:07.440> better<00:12:07.600> than<00:12:07.920> maybe<00:12:08.160> what<00:12:08.399> it's 00:12:08.629 --> 00:12:08.639 align:start position:0% little bit better than maybe what it's 00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:12.150 align:start position:0% little bit better than maybe what it's been<00:12:08.800> before.<00:12:09.839> So,<00:12:10.240> are<00:12:10.480> you<00:12:10.639> envisioning<00:12:11.839> us 00:12:12.150 --> 00:12:12.160 align:start position:0% been before. So, are you envisioning us 00:12:12.160 --> 00:12:15.670 align:start position:0% been before. So, are you envisioning us being<00:12:12.399> able<00:12:12.720> to<00:12:13.760> email<00:12:14.160> those<00:12:14.639> contacts 00:12:15.670 --> 00:12:15.680 align:start position:0% being able to email those contacts 00:12:15.680 --> 00:12:17.670 align:start position:0% being able to email those contacts directly<00:12:16.320> or<00:12:16.639> would<00:12:16.880> that<00:12:17.040> go<00:12:17.200> through<00:12:17.360> staff? 00:12:17.670 --> 00:12:17.680 align:start position:0% directly or would that go through staff? 00:12:17.680 --> 00:12:19.430 align:start position:0% directly or would that go through staff? Like<00:12:17.920> what<00:12:18.079> is<00:12:18.240> the<00:12:18.399> what<00:12:18.560> are<00:12:18.720> the<00:12:18.880> logistics 00:12:19.430 --> 00:12:19.440 align:start position:0% Like what is the what are the logistics 00:12:19.440 --> 00:12:21.350 align:start position:0% Like what is the what are the logistics look<00:12:19.600> like<00:12:19.760> on<00:12:19.920> that? 00:12:21.350 --> 00:12:21.360 align:start position:0% look like on that? 00:12:21.360 --> 00:12:23.269 align:start position:0% look like on that? >> I<00:12:21.519> I'm<00:12:21.839> open<00:12:22.000> to<00:12:22.160> that<00:12:22.320> piece<00:12:22.560> of<00:12:22.639> it,<00:12:22.880> but<00:12:23.040> I 00:12:23.269 --> 00:12:23.279 align:start position:0% >> I I'm open to that piece of it, but I 00:12:23.279 --> 00:12:25.190 align:start position:0% >> I I'm open to that piece of it, but I think<00:12:23.360> like<00:12:23.920> the<00:12:24.160> way<00:12:24.240> that<00:12:24.399> I<00:12:24.560> see<00:12:24.639> it<00:12:24.800> is<00:12:25.040> the 00:12:25.190 --> 00:12:25.200 align:start position:0% think like the way that I see it is the 00:12:25.200 --> 00:12:26.949 align:start position:0% think like the way that I see it is the writing<00:12:25.440> committee<00:12:25.839> you<00:12:26.079> they<00:12:26.399> people<00:12:26.560> apply, 00:12:26.949 --> 00:12:26.959 align:start position:0% writing committee you they people apply, 00:12:26.959 --> 00:12:28.069 align:start position:0% writing committee you they people apply, they<00:12:27.120> get<00:12:27.200> chosen<00:12:27.440> to<00:12:27.519> be<00:12:27.600> on<00:12:27.760> the<00:12:27.839> writing 00:12:28.069 --> 00:12:28.079 align:start position:0% they get chosen to be on the writing 00:12:28.079 --> 00:12:29.590 align:start position:0% they get chosen to be on the writing committee.<00:12:28.480> And<00:12:28.720> maybe<00:12:29.040> I<00:12:29.200> don't<00:12:29.279> know,<00:12:29.440> is 00:12:29.590 --> 00:12:29.600 align:start position:0% committee. And maybe I don't know, is 00:12:29.600 --> 00:12:31.350 align:start position:0% committee. And maybe I don't know, is Megan<00:12:29.920> on?<00:12:30.160> Maybe<00:12:30.399> she<00:12:30.560> has<00:12:30.720> some<00:12:30.880> ideas<00:12:31.120> here 00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:31.360 align:start position:0% Megan on? Maybe she has some ideas here 00:12:31.360 --> 00:12:32.550 align:start position:0% Megan on? Maybe she has some ideas here too<00:12:31.440> of<00:12:31.600> how<00:12:31.760> that<00:12:31.920> works<00:12:32.079> because<00:12:32.240> she's<00:12:32.399> the 00:12:32.550 --> 00:12:32.560 align:start position:0% too of how that works because she's the 00:12:32.560 --> 00:12:34.310 align:start position:0% too of how that works because she's the one<00:12:32.639> doing<00:12:32.800> a<00:12:32.959> lot<00:12:33.040> of<00:12:33.120> the<00:12:33.279> coordinating,<00:12:33.680> but 00:12:34.310 --> 00:12:34.320 align:start position:0% one doing a lot of the coordinating, but 00:12:34.320 --> 00:12:36.629 align:start position:0% one doing a lot of the coordinating, but they<00:12:34.959> they<00:12:35.519> are<00:12:35.839> we<00:12:36.000> have<00:12:36.160> the<00:12:36.320> writing 00:12:36.629 --> 00:12:36.639 align:start position:0% they they are we have the writing 00:12:36.639 --> 00:12:38.550 align:start position:0% they they are we have the writing committee<00:12:37.360> decided<00:12:37.839> and<00:12:38.000> then<00:12:38.160> from<00:12:38.399> there 00:12:38.550 --> 00:12:38.560 align:start position:0% committee decided and then from there 00:12:38.560 --> 00:12:42.949 align:start position:0% committee decided and then from there they<00:12:38.880> ask<00:12:39.279> we<00:12:39.519> need<00:12:40.160> x<00:12:40.560> amount<00:12:40.959> of<00:12:41.680> leads<00:12:42.560> to<00:12:42.800> be 00:12:42.949 --> 00:12:42.959 align:start position:0% they ask we need x amount of leads to be 00:12:42.959 --> 00:12:45.829 align:start position:0% they ask we need x amount of leads to be the<00:12:43.120> ones<00:12:43.360> who<00:12:43.519> will<00:12:43.760> be<00:12:44.480> available<00:12:45.200> for 00:12:45.829 --> 00:12:45.839 align:start position:0% the ones who will be available for 00:12:45.839 --> 00:12:48.949 align:start position:0% the ones who will be available for questions<00:12:46.399> from<00:12:47.120> the<00:12:47.440> board<00:12:48.399> who<00:12:48.639> will<00:12:48.800> be 00:12:48.949 --> 00:12:48.959 align:start position:0% questions from the board who will be 00:12:48.959 --> 00:12:51.829 align:start position:0% questions from the board who will be available<00:12:49.600> to<00:12:50.480> potentially<00:12:50.959> attend<00:12:51.360> a<00:12:51.680> couple 00:12:51.829 --> 00:12:51.839 align:start position:0% available to potentially attend a couple 00:12:51.839 --> 00:12:53.430 align:start position:0% available to potentially attend a couple meetings<00:12:52.240> if<00:12:52.399> there<00:12:52.639> are<00:12:52.959> additional 00:12:53.430 --> 00:12:53.440 align:start position:0% meetings if there are additional 00:12:53.440 --> 00:12:55.030 align:start position:0% meetings if there are additional questions<00:12:53.760> or<00:12:54.079> things<00:12:54.160> they<00:12:54.399> want<00:12:54.560> to<00:12:54.720> the 00:12:55.030 --> 00:12:55.040 align:start position:0% questions or things they want to the 00:12:55.040 --> 00:12:56.389 align:start position:0% questions or things they want to the board<00:12:55.360> the<00:12:55.600> committee<00:12:55.920> wants<00:12:56.079> to<00:12:56.240> work 00:12:56.389 --> 00:12:56.399 align:start position:0% board the committee wants to work 00:12:56.399 --> 00:12:58.870 align:start position:0% board the committee wants to work through<00:12:56.720> with<00:12:56.959> the<00:12:57.200> writing<00:12:57.519> committee.<00:12:58.480> And 00:12:58.870 --> 00:12:58.880 align:start position:0% through with the writing committee. And 00:12:58.880 --> 00:13:02.069 align:start position:0% through with the writing committee. And those<00:12:59.200> people<00:12:59.519> volunteer<00:13:00.079> as<00:13:00.480> like<00:13:00.880> the 00:13:02.069 --> 00:13:02.079 align:start position:0% those people volunteer as like the 00:13:02.079 --> 00:13:04.870 align:start position:0% those people volunteer as like the writing<00:13:02.399> committee<00:13:02.800> leads<00:13:03.200> or<00:13:04.000> whatever<00:13:04.560> to 00:13:04.870 --> 00:13:04.880 align:start position:0% writing committee leads or whatever to 00:13:04.880 --> 00:13:07.509 align:start position:0% writing committee leads or whatever to then<00:13:05.839> work<00:13:06.079> with<00:13:06.240> us.<00:13:06.560> And<00:13:06.800> how<00:13:07.040> that<00:13:07.279> works 00:13:07.509 --> 00:13:07.519 align:start position:0% then work with us. And how that works 00:13:07.519 --> 00:13:09.590 align:start position:0% then work with us. And how that works from<00:13:07.839> our<00:13:08.079> end<00:13:08.240> is,<00:13:08.560> you<00:13:08.639> know,<00:13:08.720> if<00:13:08.880> we<00:13:09.120> say, 00:13:09.590 --> 00:13:09.600 align:start position:0% from our end is, you know, if we say, 00:13:09.600 --> 00:13:11.269 align:start position:0% from our end is, you know, if we say, "Hey,<00:13:10.000> like<00:13:10.240> with<00:13:10.480> math,<00:13:10.800> we<00:13:10.959> had<00:13:11.120> some 00:13:11.269 --> 00:13:11.279 align:start position:0% "Hey, like with math, we had some 00:13:11.279 --> 00:13:12.470 align:start position:0% "Hey, like with math, we had some moments<00:13:11.519> where<00:13:11.760> we<00:13:11.920> were<00:13:12.000> like,<00:13:12.160> we<00:13:12.320> would 00:13:12.470 --> 00:13:12.480 align:start position:0% moments where we were like, we would 00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:13.509 align:start position:0% moments where we were like, we would love<00:13:12.560> to<00:13:12.720> talk<00:13:12.800> to<00:13:12.880> the<00:13:12.959> writing<00:13:13.200> committee." 00:13:13.509 --> 00:13:13.519 align:start position:0% love to talk to the writing committee." 00:13:13.519 --> 00:13:14.870 align:start position:0% love to talk to the writing committee." It<00:13:13.600> would<00:13:13.680> be<00:13:13.760> a<00:13:13.920> lot<00:13:14.079> easier<00:13:14.240> to<00:13:14.399> say,<00:13:14.480> "Okay, 00:13:14.870 --> 00:13:14.880 align:start position:0% It would be a lot easier to say, "Okay, 00:13:14.880 --> 00:13:16.790 align:start position:0% It would be a lot easier to say, "Okay, we'll<00:13:15.120> get<00:13:15.279> the<00:13:15.760> writing<00:13:16.079> committee<00:13:16.480> leads 00:13:16.790 --> 00:13:16.800 align:start position:0% we'll get the writing committee leads 00:13:16.800 --> 00:13:18.550 align:start position:0% we'll get the writing committee leads together<00:13:17.279> and<00:13:17.519> set<00:13:17.680> up<00:13:17.760> a<00:13:18.000> time<00:13:18.079> for<00:13:18.240> them<00:13:18.399> to 00:13:18.550 --> 00:13:18.560 align:start position:0% together and set up a time for them to 00:13:18.560 --> 00:13:20.389 align:start position:0% together and set up a time for them to come<00:13:18.639> to<00:13:18.800> your<00:13:19.040> committee<00:13:19.360> meeting<00:13:19.680> or<00:13:20.000> have<00:13:20.240> a 00:13:20.389 --> 00:13:20.399 align:start position:0% come to your committee meeting or have a 00:13:20.399 --> 00:13:22.550 align:start position:0% come to your committee meeting or have a separate<00:13:20.720> meeting<00:13:21.440> rather<00:13:21.760> than<00:13:22.079> trying<00:13:22.320> to 00:13:22.550 --> 00:13:22.560 align:start position:0% separate meeting rather than trying to 00:13:22.560 --> 00:13:27.110 align:start position:0% separate meeting rather than trying to just<00:13:22.880> have<00:13:23.120> it<00:13:23.360> fully<00:13:23.600> open." 00:13:27.110 --> 00:13:27.120 align:start position:0% 00:13:27.120 --> 00:13:29.829 align:start position:0% Is<00:13:27.279> it<00:13:27.519> fully<00:13:27.839> open<00:13:28.079> right<00:13:28.320> now?<00:13:29.360> Sorry<00:13:29.600> for 00:13:29.829 --> 00:13:29.839 align:start position:0% Is it fully open right now? Sorry for 00:13:29.839 --> 00:13:32.069 align:start position:0% Is it fully open right now? Sorry for that<00:13:30.079> question.<00:13:31.519> I'm<00:13:31.680> just 00:13:32.069 --> 00:13:32.079 align:start position:0% that question. I'm just 00:13:32.079 --> 00:13:33.990 align:start position:0% that question. I'm just >> No.<00:13:32.240> And<00:13:32.639> it's<00:13:32.959> not<00:13:33.120> fully<00:13:33.440> open.<00:13:33.680> And<00:13:33.839> that's 00:13:33.990 --> 00:13:34.000 align:start position:0% >> No. And it's not fully open. And that's 00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:35.750 align:start position:0% >> No. And it's not fully open. And that's what<00:13:34.160> we're<00:13:34.399> changing<00:13:34.800> here<00:13:35.040> is<00:13:35.279> allowing 00:13:35.750 --> 00:13:35.760 align:start position:0% what we're changing here is allowing 00:13:35.760 --> 00:13:37.509 align:start position:0% what we're changing here is allowing access<00:13:36.160> because<00:13:36.480> currently<00:13:36.880> we<00:13:37.200> don't<00:13:37.360> have 00:13:37.509 --> 00:13:37.519 align:start position:0% access because currently we don't have 00:13:37.519 --> 00:13:39.430 align:start position:0% access because currently we don't have access<00:13:38.240> to<00:13:38.399> the<00:13:38.560> writing<00:13:38.880> committee.<00:13:39.120> So<00:13:39.279> this 00:13:39.430 --> 00:13:39.440 align:start position:0% access to the writing committee. So this 00:13:39.440 --> 00:13:41.829 align:start position:0% access to the writing committee. So this is<00:13:39.600> allowing<00:13:39.920> access<00:13:40.320> and<00:13:41.200> and<00:13:41.519> I<00:13:41.680> think 00:13:41.829 --> 00:13:41.839 align:start position:0% is allowing access and and I think 00:13:41.839 --> 00:13:43.430 align:start position:0% is allowing access and and I think rather<00:13:42.079> than<00:13:42.320> just<00:13:42.480> full<00:13:42.800> open,<00:13:43.040> it's<00:13:43.279> just 00:13:43.430 --> 00:13:43.440 align:start position:0% rather than just full open, it's just 00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:45.110 align:start position:0% rather than just full open, it's just having<00:13:43.760> these<00:13:44.079> leads.<00:13:44.480> And<00:13:44.639> then<00:13:44.880> I<00:13:45.040> think 00:13:45.110 --> 00:13:45.120 align:start position:0% having these leads. And then I think 00:13:45.120 --> 00:13:47.110 align:start position:0% having these leads. And then I think that<00:13:45.360> will<00:13:45.519> help<00:13:45.680> the<00:13:45.839> folks<00:13:46.079> who<00:13:46.320> are<00:13:46.880> working 00:13:47.110 --> 00:13:47.120 align:start position:0% that will help the folks who are working 00:13:47.120 --> 00:13:48.470 align:start position:0% that will help the folks who are working on<00:13:47.279> these<00:13:47.519> standards<00:13:47.920> feel<00:13:48.079> a<00:13:48.240> little<00:13:48.320> bit 00:13:48.470 --> 00:13:48.480 align:start position:0% on these standards feel a little bit 00:13:48.480 --> 00:13:49.990 align:start position:0% on these standards feel a little bit more<00:13:48.639> comfortable<00:13:49.040> knowing<00:13:49.360> like<00:13:49.680> I<00:13:49.920> don't 00:13:49.990 --> 00:13:50.000 align:start position:0% more comfortable knowing like I don't 00:13:50.000 --> 00:13:51.030 align:start position:0% more comfortable knowing like I don't have<00:13:50.079> to<00:13:50.240> be<00:13:50.320> the<00:13:50.399> one<00:13:50.560> that<00:13:50.639> goes<00:13:50.800> to<00:13:50.880> the 00:13:51.030 --> 00:13:51.040 align:start position:0% have to be the one that goes to the 00:13:51.040 --> 00:13:52.310 align:start position:0% have to be the one that goes to the committee<00:13:51.200> meeting<00:13:51.440> and<00:13:51.600> sits<00:13:51.839> in<00:13:51.920> a<00:13:52.079> public 00:13:52.310 --> 00:13:52.320 align:start position:0% committee meeting and sits in a public 00:13:52.320 --> 00:13:54.389 align:start position:0% committee meeting and sits in a public meeting<00:13:52.639> talking<00:13:52.880> about<00:13:53.040> it.<00:13:53.279> I<00:13:53.440> can<00:13:53.680> have<00:13:54.160> our 00:13:54.389 --> 00:13:54.399 align:start position:0% meeting talking about it. I can have our 00:13:54.399 --> 00:13:55.990 align:start position:0% meeting talking about it. I can have our lead<00:13:54.639> is<00:13:55.040> comfortable<00:13:55.440> doing<00:13:55.680> that<00:13:55.839> and 00:13:55.990 --> 00:13:56.000 align:start position:0% lead is comfortable doing that and 00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:57.509 align:start position:0% lead is comfortable doing that and they're<00:13:56.160> the<00:13:56.320> ones<00:13:56.480> that<00:13:56.639> are<00:13:56.880> designated<00:13:57.360> for 00:13:57.509 --> 00:13:57.519 align:start position:0% they're the ones that are designated for 00:13:57.519 --> 00:14:00.470 align:start position:0% they're the ones that are designated for that<00:13:57.760> part. 00:14:00.470 --> 00:14:00.480 align:start position:0% that part. 00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:02.710 align:start position:0% that part. >> I<00:14:00.720> do<00:14:00.959> think<00:14:01.120> I<00:14:01.279> I<00:14:01.600> had<00:14:01.760> also<00:14:02.000> wondered<00:14:02.320> if<00:14:02.480> that 00:14:02.710 --> 00:14:02.720 align:start position:0% >> I do think I I had also wondered if that 00:14:02.720 --> 00:14:04.629 align:start position:0% >> I do think I I had also wondered if that if<00:14:02.959> we<00:14:03.120> do<00:14:03.360> end<00:14:03.519> up<00:14:03.600> with<00:14:03.760> that<00:14:04.000> subcommittee 00:14:04.629 --> 00:14:04.639 align:start position:0% if we do end up with that subcommittee 00:14:04.639 --> 00:14:06.069 align:start position:0% if we do end up with that subcommittee that<00:14:04.880> kind<00:14:05.040> of<00:14:05.199> follows<00:14:05.519> at<00:14:05.760> different 00:14:06.069 --> 00:14:06.079 align:start position:0% that kind of follows at different 00:14:06.079 --> 00:14:08.629 align:start position:0% that kind of follows at different processes<00:14:07.040> or<00:14:07.279> at<00:14:07.519> different<00:14:07.760> points<00:14:08.399> that 00:14:08.629 --> 00:14:08.639 align:start position:0% processes or at different points that 00:14:08.639 --> 00:14:10.629 align:start position:0% processes or at different points that they<00:14:08.880> may<00:14:09.279> also<00:14:09.920> engage<00:14:10.240> with<00:14:10.480> those 00:14:10.629 --> 00:14:10.639 align:start position:0% they may also engage with those 00:14:10.639 --> 00:14:12.949 align:start position:0% they may also engage with those individuals<00:14:11.760> if<00:14:12.000> we<00:14:12.160> wanted<00:14:12.399> to<00:14:12.560> do<00:14:12.720> that 00:14:12.949 --> 00:14:12.959 align:start position:0% individuals if we wanted to do that 00:14:12.959 --> 00:14:15.750 align:start position:0% individuals if we wanted to do that because<00:14:13.199> I<00:14:13.360> do<00:14:13.600> think<00:14:14.639> um<00:14:14.880> if<00:14:15.120> they<00:14:15.360> start<00:14:15.519> with 00:14:15.750 --> 00:14:15.760 align:start position:0% because I do think um if they start with 00:14:15.760 --> 00:14:17.750 align:start position:0% because I do think um if they start with in<00:14:15.920> the<00:14:16.079> process<00:14:16.399> and<00:14:16.639> be<00:14:16.800> able<00:14:16.959> to<00:14:17.360> provide 00:14:17.750 --> 00:14:17.760 align:start position:0% in the process and be able to provide 00:14:17.760 --> 00:14:21.670 align:start position:0% in the process and be able to provide feedback<00:14:19.120> along<00:14:19.440> the<00:14:19.680> way. 00:14:21.670 --> 00:14:21.680 align:start position:0% feedback along the way. 00:14:21.680 --> 00:14:23.670 align:start position:0% feedback along the way. So<00:14:21.920> the<00:14:22.079> way<00:14:22.240> that<00:14:22.560> that<00:14:22.880> we<00:14:23.120> it<00:14:23.360> seems<00:14:23.519> that 00:14:23.670 --> 00:14:23.680 align:start position:0% So the way that that we it seems that 00:14:23.680 --> 00:14:27.350 align:start position:0% So the way that that we it seems that we've<00:14:24.000> been<00:14:24.160> doing<00:14:24.320> this<00:14:24.560> is<00:14:25.279> um<00:14:25.680> we<00:14:26.000> have<00:14:26.160> our 00:14:27.350 --> 00:14:27.360 align:start position:0% we've been doing this is um we have our 00:14:27.360 --> 00:14:29.910 align:start position:0% we've been doing this is um we have our uh<00:14:27.519> members<00:14:27.839> of<00:14:28.079> staff<00:14:28.399> that<00:14:28.639> are<00:14:28.880> on<00:14:29.440> that 00:14:29.910 --> 00:14:29.920 align:start position:0% uh members of staff that are on that 00:14:29.920 --> 00:14:32.470 align:start position:0% uh members of staff that are on that committee<00:14:30.320> over<00:14:30.560> that<00:14:30.800> department<00:14:31.920> and<00:14:32.160> they 00:14:32.470 --> 00:14:32.480 align:start position:0% committee over that department and they 00:14:32.480 --> 00:14:33.910 align:start position:0% committee over that department and they they<00:14:32.880> you<00:14:33.040> know<00:14:33.279> it's<00:14:33.440> like<00:14:33.519> the<00:14:33.680> math 00:14:33.910 --> 00:14:33.920 align:start position:0% they you know it's like the math 00:14:33.920 --> 00:14:35.750 align:start position:0% they you know it's like the math department<00:14:34.240> and<00:14:34.399> we<00:14:34.480> we<00:14:34.880> hear<00:14:35.040> from<00:14:35.199> them<00:14:35.600> we 00:14:35.750 --> 00:14:35.760 align:start position:0% department and we we hear from them we 00:14:35.760 --> 00:14:37.990 align:start position:0% department and we we hear from them we give<00:14:35.920> them<00:14:36.079> feedback<00:14:36.560> they<00:14:36.800> take<00:14:36.959> that<00:14:37.199> to<00:14:37.440> the 00:14:37.990 --> 00:14:38.000 align:start position:0% give them feedback they take that to the 00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:41.030 align:start position:0% give them feedback they take that to the the<00:14:38.399> committee<00:14:39.279> if<00:14:39.519> I<00:14:40.000> am<00:14:40.320> understanding<00:14:40.800> that 00:14:41.030 --> 00:14:41.040 align:start position:0% the committee if I am understanding that 00:14:41.040 --> 00:14:43.430 align:start position:0% the committee if I am understanding that correctly.<00:14:41.920> So<00:14:42.160> this<00:14:42.399> would<00:14:42.560> add<00:14:42.880> maybe<00:14:43.120> a 00:14:43.430 --> 00:14:43.440 align:start position:0% correctly. So this would add maybe a 00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:45.110 align:start position:0% correctly. So this would add maybe a different<00:14:43.920> level<00:14:44.240> of<00:14:44.480> engagement.<00:14:44.959> What 00:14:45.110 --> 00:14:45.120 align:start position:0% different level of engagement. What 00:14:45.120 --> 00:14:46.389 align:start position:0% different level of engagement. What would<00:14:45.279> that<00:14:45.440> relationship<00:14:46.000> look<00:14:46.160> like 00:14:46.389 --> 00:14:46.399 align:start position:0% would that relationship look like 00:14:46.399 --> 00:14:49.430 align:start position:0% would that relationship look like between<00:14:47.440> that<00:14:47.920> person<00:14:48.320> and<00:14:48.720> staff<00:14:49.199> where 00:14:49.430 --> 00:14:49.440 align:start position:0% between that person and staff where 00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:56.470 align:start position:0% between that person and staff where staff<00:14:49.839> has<00:14:50.079> kind<00:14:50.160> of<00:14:50.320> let<00:14:50.560> out<00:14:50.720> on<00:14:50.880> that<00:14:51.040> role 00:14:56.470 --> 00:14:56.480 align:start position:0% 00:14:56.480 --> 00:15:00.230 align:start position:0% >> is<00:14:56.959> ever<00:14:58.320> maybe<00:14:58.720> she<00:14:59.040> has<00:14:59.199> some<00:14:59.519> expertise 00:15:00.230 --> 00:15:00.240 align:start position:0% >> is ever maybe she has some expertise 00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:04.069 align:start position:0% >> is ever maybe she has some expertise having<00:15:00.639> coordinated<00:15:01.120> so<00:15:01.360> many<00:15:01.440> of<00:15:01.600> these. 00:15:04.069 --> 00:15:04.079 align:start position:0% having coordinated so many of these. 00:15:04.079 --> 00:15:06.310 align:start position:0% having coordinated so many of these. >> I'm<00:15:04.399> here 00:15:06.310 --> 00:15:06.320 align:start position:0% >> I'm here 00:15:06.320 --> 00:15:08.790 align:start position:0% >> I'm here um<00:15:07.360> Megan<00:15:07.680> Everett,<00:15:08.160> director<00:15:08.399> of<00:15:08.560> teaching 00:15:08.790 --> 00:15:08.800 align:start position:0% um Megan Everett, director of teaching 00:15:08.800 --> 00:15:11.350 align:start position:0% um Megan Everett, director of teaching and<00:15:08.959> learning.<00:15:09.760> So<00:15:10.480> I<00:15:10.720> think<00:15:10.800> you<00:15:11.040> could<00:15:11.199> do 00:15:11.350 --> 00:15:11.360 align:start position:0% and learning. So I think you could do 00:15:11.360 --> 00:15:13.829 align:start position:0% and learning. So I think you could do this<00:15:11.519> in<00:15:11.680> a<00:15:11.839> couple<00:15:12.000> of<00:15:12.160> ways.<00:15:13.120> One<00:15:13.360> thing<00:15:13.519> that 00:15:13.829 --> 00:15:13.839 align:start position:0% this in a couple of ways. One thing that 00:15:13.839 --> 00:15:16.389 align:start position:0% this in a couple of ways. One thing that was 00:15:16.389 --> 00:15:16.399 align:start position:0% was 00:15:16.399 --> 00:15:19.670 align:start position:0% was discussed<00:15:16.880> as<00:15:17.199> an<00:15:17.440> idea<00:15:18.880> um<00:15:19.199> going<00:15:19.440> back<00:15:19.600> to 00:15:19.670 --> 00:15:19.680 align:start position:0% discussed as an idea um going back to 00:15:19.680 --> 00:15:22.310 align:start position:0% discussed as an idea um going back to what<00:15:19.920> member<00:15:20.399> Earl<00:15:20.800> or<00:15:21.519> chair<00:15:21.839> Earl<00:15:22.160> was 00:15:22.310 --> 00:15:22.320 align:start position:0% what member Earl or chair Earl was 00:15:22.320 --> 00:15:26.069 align:start position:0% what member Earl or chair Earl was saying<00:15:22.560> about<00:15:22.880> the<00:15:23.519> um<00:15:24.560> subcommittee<00:15:25.440> I<00:15:25.680> think 00:15:26.069 --> 00:15:26.079 align:start position:0% saying about the um subcommittee I think 00:15:26.079 --> 00:15:28.069 align:start position:0% saying about the um subcommittee I think if<00:15:26.320> I<00:15:26.480> understood<00:15:27.040> what<00:15:27.279> what<00:15:27.600> you<00:15:27.760> were<00:15:27.920> going 00:15:28.069 --> 00:15:28.079 align:start position:0% if I understood what what you were going 00:15:28.079 --> 00:15:31.430 align:start position:0% if I understood what what you were going towards<00:15:28.399> there<00:15:28.639> was<00:15:28.880> that<00:15:29.199> up<00:15:29.920> in<00:15:30.320> the 00:15:31.430 --> 00:15:31.440 align:start position:0% towards there was that up in the 00:15:31.440 --> 00:15:33.509 align:start position:0% towards there was that up in the committee<00:15:31.760> that<00:15:32.079> right<00:15:32.320> now<00:15:32.560> is<00:15:32.800> assembled<00:15:33.279> as 00:15:33.509 --> 00:15:33.519 align:start position:0% committee that right now is assembled as 00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:35.430 align:start position:0% committee that right now is assembled as the<00:15:33.760> review<00:15:34.079> committee<00:15:34.560> before<00:15:34.959> everything 00:15:35.430 --> 00:15:35.440 align:start position:0% the review committee before everything 00:15:35.440 --> 00:15:38.150 align:start position:0% the review committee before everything gets<00:15:35.760> started.<00:15:36.720> you<00:15:36.959> were<00:15:37.120> considering<00:15:37.680> that 00:15:38.150 --> 00:15:38.160 align:start position:0% gets started. you were considering that 00:15:38.160 --> 00:15:41.750 align:start position:0% gets started. you were considering that as<00:15:38.480> being<00:15:38.800> more<00:15:39.120> of<00:15:39.360> a<00:15:39.839> committee<00:15:40.240> that 00:15:41.750 --> 00:15:41.760 align:start position:0% as being more of a committee that 00:15:41.760 --> 00:15:43.670 align:start position:0% as being more of a committee that is<00:15:41.920> a<00:15:42.079> sub<00:15:42.399> functions<00:15:42.720> as<00:15:42.880> a<00:15:43.040> subcommittee 00:15:43.670 --> 00:15:43.680 align:start position:0% is a sub functions as a subcommittee 00:15:43.680 --> 00:15:45.750 align:start position:0% is a sub functions as a subcommittee throughout<00:15:44.079> the<00:15:44.399> process.<00:15:45.040> So<00:15:45.279> they're<00:15:45.600> not 00:15:45.750 --> 00:15:45.760 align:start position:0% throughout the process. So they're not 00:15:45.760 --> 00:15:47.430 align:start position:0% throughout the process. So they're not just<00:15:45.920> at<00:15:46.160> the<00:15:46.320> beginning<00:15:46.560> but<00:15:46.800> they<00:15:47.040> have<00:15:47.199> like 00:15:47.430 --> 00:15:47.440 align:start position:0% just at the beginning but they have like 00:15:47.440 --> 00:15:49.030 align:start position:0% just at the beginning but they have like key 00:15:49.030 --> 00:15:49.040 align:start position:0% key 00:15:49.040 --> 00:15:52.949 align:start position:0% key points<00:15:49.440> along<00:15:49.759> the<00:15:49.920> way.<00:15:51.360> So<00:15:51.600> that<00:15:52.399> if<00:15:52.639> that's 00:15:52.949 --> 00:15:52.959 align:start position:0% points along the way. So that if that's 00:15:52.959 --> 00:15:54.949 align:start position:0% points along the way. So that if that's the<00:15:53.199> case<00:15:53.519> that<00:15:53.839> could<00:15:54.079> be<00:15:54.320> that<00:15:54.560> writing 00:15:54.949 --> 00:15:54.959 align:start position:0% the case that could be that writing 00:15:54.959 --> 00:15:57.910 align:start position:0% the case that could be that writing committee<00:15:55.279> that<00:15:56.079> or<00:15:56.480> that<00:15:56.800> could<00:15:56.959> be<00:15:57.120> the<00:15:57.680> um 00:15:57.910 --> 00:15:57.920 align:start position:0% committee that or that could be the um 00:15:57.920 --> 00:15:59.910 align:start position:0% committee that or that could be the um spokespeople<00:15:58.480> for<00:15:58.720> this<00:15:58.880> writing<00:15:59.279> committee 00:15:59.910 --> 00:15:59.920 align:start position:0% spokespeople for this writing committee 00:15:59.920 --> 00:16:02.310 align:start position:0% spokespeople for this writing committee that<00:16:00.320> have<00:16:00.560> more 00:16:02.310 --> 00:16:02.320 align:start position:0% that have more 00:16:02.320 --> 00:16:04.470 align:start position:0% that have more interaction<00:16:02.959> or<00:16:03.279> availability<00:16:04.160> for 00:16:04.470 --> 00:16:04.480 align:start position:0% interaction or availability for 00:16:04.480 --> 00:16:07.430 align:start position:0% interaction or availability for discussion.<00:16:05.600> Um,<00:16:06.240> another<00:16:06.720> place<00:16:06.959> that<00:16:07.199> you 00:16:07.430 --> 00:16:07.440 align:start position:0% discussion. Um, another place that you 00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:09.509 align:start position:0% discussion. Um, another place that you could<00:16:07.680> consider<00:16:08.160> putting<00:16:08.480> that<00:16:08.720> might<00:16:09.040> be<00:16:09.279> in 00:16:09.509 --> 00:16:09.519 align:start position:0% could consider putting that might be in 00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:12.310 align:start position:0% could consider putting that might be in step<00:16:09.839> six<00:16:10.240> where<00:16:11.279> we're<00:16:11.600> asking<00:16:11.920> people<00:16:12.160> to 00:16:12.310 --> 00:16:12.320 align:start position:0% step six where we're asking people to 00:16:12.320 --> 00:16:14.069 align:start position:0% step six where we're asking people to apply<00:16:12.560> to<00:16:12.720> the<00:16:12.880> writing<00:16:13.199> committee.<00:16:13.920> And 00:16:14.069 --> 00:16:14.079 align:start position:0% apply to the writing committee. And 00:16:14.079 --> 00:16:15.749 align:start position:0% apply to the writing committee. And right<00:16:14.240> now<00:16:14.480> it<00:16:14.639> says<00:16:14.800> that<00:16:15.040> staff<00:16:15.360> organize 00:16:15.749 --> 00:16:15.759 align:start position:0% right now it says that staff organize 00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:17.509 align:start position:0% right now it says that staff organize that<00:16:16.079> writing<00:16:16.399> committee<00:16:16.880> according<00:16:17.199> to<00:16:17.360> a 00:16:17.509 --> 00:16:17.519 align:start position:0% that writing committee according to a 00:16:17.519 --> 00:16:19.269 align:start position:0% that writing committee according to a standard<00:16:17.920> operating<00:16:18.399> procedure<00:16:18.800> that<00:16:19.040> gets 00:16:19.269 --> 00:16:19.279 align:start position:0% standard operating procedure that gets 00:16:19.279 --> 00:16:22.389 align:start position:0% standard operating procedure that gets approved<00:16:20.639> um<00:16:20.800> by<00:16:21.040> the<00:16:21.279> superintendent.<00:16:22.160> we 00:16:22.389 --> 00:16:22.399 align:start position:0% approved um by the superintendent. we 00:16:22.399 --> 00:16:28.069 align:start position:0% approved um by the superintendent. we could<00:16:22.800> have<00:16:23.680> included<00:16:24.240> in<00:16:24.639> that<00:16:25.360> procedure<00:16:26.639> or 00:16:28.069 --> 00:16:28.079 align:start position:0% could have included in that procedure or 00:16:28.079 --> 00:16:32.949 align:start position:0% could have included in that procedure or somewhere<00:16:28.560> in<00:16:28.880> step<00:16:29.199> six<00:16:30.240> um<00:16:30.880> kind<00:16:31.120> of<00:16:31.279> the 00:16:32.949 --> 00:16:32.959 align:start position:0% somewhere in step six um kind of the 00:16:32.959 --> 00:16:34.629 align:start position:0% somewhere in step six um kind of the what<00:16:33.279> those<00:16:33.600> committee<00:16:34.000> members<00:16:34.399> different 00:16:34.629 --> 00:16:34.639 align:start position:0% what those committee members different 00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:37.590 align:start position:0% what those committee members different roles<00:16:35.040> are<00:16:35.680> how<00:16:35.920> that<00:16:36.240> communication<00:16:36.959> works. 00:16:37.590 --> 00:16:37.600 align:start position:0% roles are how that communication works. 00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:39.910 align:start position:0% roles are how that communication works. I<00:16:37.839> think<00:16:38.000> we<00:16:38.160> had<00:16:38.399> also<00:16:39.040> at<00:16:39.279> one<00:16:39.440> point<00:16:39.680> there 00:16:39.910 --> 00:16:39.920 align:start position:0% I think we had also at one point there 00:16:39.920 --> 00:16:41.509 align:start position:0% I think we had also at one point there was<00:16:40.000> a<00:16:40.240> discussion<00:16:40.560> about<00:16:40.880> maybe<00:16:41.120> that's<00:16:41.360> more 00:16:41.509 --> 00:16:41.519 align:start position:0% was a discussion about maybe that's more 00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:44.310 align:start position:0% was a discussion about maybe that's more of<00:16:41.680> like<00:16:41.759> anou<00:16:42.480> that's<00:16:42.800> created<00:16:43.279> or<00:16:44.000> I<00:16:44.240> don't 00:16:44.310 --> 00:16:44.320 align:start position:0% of like anou that's created or I don't 00:16:44.320 --> 00:16:48.230 align:start position:0% of like anou that's created or I don't know if<00:16:45.040> is<00:16:45.120> the<00:16:45.279> right<00:16:45.440> word<00:16:45.759> but 00:16:48.230 --> 00:16:48.240 align:start position:0% know if is the right word but 00:16:48.240 --> 00:16:50.069 align:start position:0% know if is the right word but when<00:16:48.480> we<00:16:48.639> tell<00:16:48.959> when<00:16:49.279> we<00:16:49.440> bring<00:16:49.600> people<00:16:49.759> on<00:16:50.000> the 00:16:50.069 --> 00:16:50.079 align:start position:0% when we tell when we bring people on the 00:16:50.079 --> 00:16:51.829 align:start position:0% when we tell when we bring people on the writing<00:16:50.399> committee<00:16:50.639> and<00:16:50.800> we<00:16:51.040> tell<00:16:51.120> them<00:16:51.680> you 00:16:51.829 --> 00:16:51.839 align:start position:0% writing committee and we tell them you 00:16:51.839 --> 00:16:54.230 align:start position:0% writing committee and we tell them you know<00:16:52.000> their<00:16:52.240> responsibility<00:16:52.959> is<00:16:53.680> um<00:16:54.000> getting 00:16:54.230 --> 00:16:54.240 align:start position:0% know their responsibility is um getting 00:16:54.240 --> 00:16:56.470 align:start position:0% know their responsibility is um getting them<00:16:54.399> to<00:16:54.639> kind<00:16:54.720> of<00:16:54.800> commit<00:16:55.120> to<00:16:55.279> that<00:16:56.000> in 00:16:56.470 --> 00:16:56.480 align:start position:0% them to kind of commit to that in 00:16:56.480 --> 00:16:58.230 align:start position:0% them to kind of commit to that in writing<00:16:56.800> in<00:16:57.040> some<00:16:57.199> way<00:16:57.360> where<00:16:57.600> it's<00:16:57.839> mostly 00:16:58.230 --> 00:16:58.240 align:start position:0% writing in some way where it's mostly 00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:00.629 align:start position:0% writing in some way where it's mostly been<00:16:58.800> staff<00:16:59.199> conveying<00:16:59.600> that<00:16:59.920> to<00:17:00.160> to<00:17:00.480> them 00:17:00.629 --> 00:17:00.639 align:start position:0% been staff conveying that to to them 00:17:00.639 --> 00:17:02.389 align:start position:0% been staff conveying that to to them that<00:17:00.959> their<00:17:01.120> names<00:17:01.440> wouldn't<00:17:01.759> be<00:17:01.839> shared<00:17:02.160> but 00:17:02.389 --> 00:17:02.399 align:start position:0% that their names wouldn't be shared but 00:17:02.399 --> 00:17:04.309 align:start position:0% that their names wouldn't be shared but there's<00:17:02.639> no<00:17:02.800> real<00:17:03.199> formal<00:17:03.759> thing<00:17:03.920> written 00:17:04.309 --> 00:17:04.319 align:start position:0% there's no real formal thing written 00:17:04.319 --> 00:17:07.429 align:start position:0% there's no real formal thing written down.<00:17:04.880> So<00:17:05.120> it<00:17:05.280> could<00:17:05.439> look<00:17:05.679> something<00:17:06.000> like 00:17:07.429 --> 00:17:07.439 align:start position:0% down. So it could look something like 00:17:07.439 --> 00:17:09.270 align:start position:0% down. So it could look something like contract<00:17:08.000> probably<00:17:08.240> is<00:17:08.480> too<00:17:08.640> formal<00:17:08.959> of<00:17:09.120> a 00:17:09.270 --> 00:17:09.280 align:start position:0% contract probably is too formal of a 00:17:09.280 --> 00:17:12.390 align:start position:0% contract probably is too formal of a word,<00:17:09.600> but<00:17:10.079> an<00:17:10.400> agreement<00:17:10.880> where<00:17:11.199> it<00:17:11.439> states 00:17:12.390 --> 00:17:12.400 align:start position:0% word, but an agreement where it states 00:17:12.400 --> 00:17:14.710 align:start position:0% word, but an agreement where it states what<00:17:12.640> the<00:17:12.880> interaction<00:17:13.439> looks<00:17:13.760> like<00:17:14.400> um<00:17:14.480> that 00:17:14.710 --> 00:17:14.720 align:start position:0% what the interaction looks like um that 00:17:14.720 --> 00:17:17.510 align:start position:0% what the interaction looks like um that the<00:17:14.959> board<00:17:15.280> and<00:17:15.839> the<00:17:16.799> writing<00:17:17.199> committee 00:17:17.510 --> 00:17:17.520 align:start position:0% the board and the writing committee 00:17:17.520 --> 00:17:20.870 align:start position:0% the board and the writing committee members<00:17:17.839> would<00:17:18.079> have. 00:17:20.870 --> 00:17:20.880 align:start position:0% members would have. 00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:22.630 align:start position:0% members would have. >> Thank<00:17:21.120> you.<00:17:21.439> at<00:17:21.679> Cheryl.<00:17:22.079> I<00:17:22.319> almost<00:17:22.480> think 00:17:22.630 --> 00:17:22.640 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. at Cheryl. I almost think 00:17:22.640 --> 00:17:24.470 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. at Cheryl. I almost think it's<00:17:22.880> just<00:17:23.039> as<00:17:23.280> simple<00:17:23.520> in<00:17:23.839> this<00:17:24.079> process 00:17:24.470 --> 00:17:24.480 align:start position:0% it's just as simple in this process 00:17:24.480 --> 00:17:26.630 align:start position:0% it's just as simple in this process where<00:17:24.720> we're<00:17:24.799> at<00:17:25.039> now<00:17:25.199> of<00:17:25.520> saying<00:17:26.000> because<00:17:26.240> I 00:17:26.630 --> 00:17:26.640 align:start position:0% where we're at now of saying because I 00:17:26.640 --> 00:17:29.029 align:start position:0% where we're at now of saying because I based<00:17:26.880> on<00:17:27.039> now<00:17:27.280> what<00:17:27.439> Megan's<00:17:27.919> explained<00:17:28.799> with 00:17:29.029 --> 00:17:29.039 align:start position:0% based on now what Megan's explained with 00:17:29.039 --> 00:17:32.390 align:start position:0% based on now what Megan's explained with the<00:17:29.360> operating<00:17:30.320> uh<00:17:31.039> operational<00:17:31.760> plans<00:17:32.160> being 00:17:32.390 --> 00:17:32.400 align:start position:0% the operating uh operational plans being 00:17:32.400 --> 00:17:34.150 align:start position:0% the operating uh operational plans being included.<00:17:32.960> That's<00:17:33.280> probably<00:17:33.600> what<00:17:33.840> member 00:17:34.150 --> 00:17:34.160 align:start position:0% included. That's probably what member 00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:35.750 align:start position:0% included. That's probably what member Green<00:17:34.480> is<00:17:34.640> wondering<00:17:34.880> about<00:17:35.120> like<00:17:35.360> do<00:17:35.520> we<00:17:35.679> have 00:17:35.750 --> 00:17:35.760 align:start position:0% Green is wondering about like do we have 00:17:35.760 --> 00:17:37.350 align:start position:0% Green is wondering about like do we have a<00:17:36.000> process<00:17:36.320> in<00:17:36.480> place<00:17:36.720> which<00:17:36.880> it<00:17:37.120> sounds<00:17:37.280> like 00:17:37.350 --> 00:17:37.360 align:start position:0% a process in place which it sounds like 00:17:37.360 --> 00:17:39.830 align:start position:0% a process in place which it sounds like we<00:17:37.520> do<00:17:37.600> with<00:17:37.840> operational<00:17:38.400> planning<00:17:39.120> that<00:17:39.600> we 00:17:39.830 --> 00:17:39.840 align:start position:0% we do with operational planning that we 00:17:39.840 --> 00:17:41.830 align:start position:0% we do with operational planning that we just<00:17:40.160> add<00:17:40.400> in<00:17:40.640> there<00:17:40.799> the<00:17:41.039> writing<00:17:41.440> committee 00:17:41.830 --> 00:17:41.840 align:start position:0% just add in there the writing committee 00:17:41.840 --> 00:17:47.029 align:start position:0% just add in there the writing committee meets<00:17:43.039> you<00:17:43.120> know<00:17:43.360> comma<00:17:44.320> they 00:17:47.029 --> 00:17:47.039 align:start position:0% meets you know comma they 00:17:47.039 --> 00:17:49.029 align:start position:0% meets you know comma they appoint<00:17:47.440> or 00:17:49.029 --> 00:17:49.039 align:start position:0% appoint or 00:17:49.039 --> 00:17:51.830 align:start position:0% appoint or designate<00:17:49.679> the<00:17:50.160> committee<00:17:50.559> leads<00:17:51.440> review<00:17:51.679> the 00:17:51.830 --> 00:17:51.840 align:start position:0% designate the committee leads review the 00:17:51.840 --> 00:17:52.950 align:start position:0% designate the committee leads review the state<00:17:52.240> you<00:17:52.320> know<00:17:52.320> what<00:17:52.400> I<00:17:52.480> mean<00:17:52.640> like<00:17:52.799> that's 00:17:52.950 --> 00:17:52.960 align:start position:0% state you know what I mean like that's 00:17:52.960 --> 00:17:55.669 align:start position:0% state you know what I mean like that's just<00:17:53.120> part<00:17:53.280> of<00:17:53.440> what<00:17:53.600> they're<00:17:53.919> doing<00:17:55.120> in<00:17:55.360> there 00:17:55.669 --> 00:17:55.679 align:start position:0% just part of what they're doing in there 00:17:55.679 --> 00:17:57.190 align:start position:0% just part of what they're doing in there it's<00:17:55.919> just<00:17:56.000> a<00:17:56.240> simple<00:17:56.480> line<00:17:56.640> that<00:17:56.880> just<00:17:57.039> says 00:17:57.190 --> 00:17:57.200 align:start position:0% it's just a simple line that just says 00:17:57.200 --> 00:17:58.549 align:start position:0% it's just a simple line that just says that<00:17:57.360> they'll<00:17:57.600> designate<00:17:58.000> that<00:17:58.160> and<00:17:58.320> then<00:17:58.480> on 00:17:58.549 --> 00:17:58.559 align:start position:0% that they'll designate that and then on 00:17:58.559 --> 00:17:59.990 align:start position:0% that they'll designate that and then on the<00:17:58.720> operational<00:17:59.200> planning<00:17:59.520> and<00:17:59.760> on<00:17:59.840> the 00:17:59.990 --> 00:18:00.000 align:start position:0% the operational planning and on the 00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:01.590 align:start position:0% the operational planning and on the other<00:18:00.160> side<00:18:00.320> is<00:18:00.640> like<00:18:00.799> more<00:18:00.960> the<00:18:01.120> logistical 00:18:01.590 --> 00:18:01.600 align:start position:0% other side is like more the logistical 00:18:01.600 --> 00:18:02.950 align:start position:0% other side is like more the logistical piece<00:18:01.760> of<00:18:01.919> that<00:18:02.000> that<00:18:02.240> doesn't<00:18:02.480> need<00:18:02.640> to<00:18:02.799> be 00:18:02.950 --> 00:18:02.960 align:start position:0% piece of that that doesn't need to be 00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:06.070 align:start position:0% piece of that that doesn't need to be included<00:18:03.200> in<00:18:03.440> this. 00:18:06.070 --> 00:18:06.080 align:start position:0% included in this. 00:18:06.080 --> 00:18:08.549 align:start position:0% included in this. >> I<00:18:06.240> just<00:18:06.480> know<00:18:06.880> uh<00:18:07.679> Deputy<00:18:08.080> Superintendent 00:18:08.549 --> 00:18:08.559 align:start position:0% >> I just know uh Deputy Superintendent 00:18:08.559 --> 00:18:11.190 align:start position:0% >> I just know uh Deputy Superintendent Borhees,<00:18:09.039> did<00:18:09.200> you<00:18:09.360> have<00:18:09.679> a<00:18:09.919> comment<00:18:10.400> or<00:18:10.960> did 00:18:11.190 --> 00:18:11.200 align:start position:0% Borhees, did you have a comment or did 00:18:11.200 --> 00:18:13.029 align:start position:0% Borhees, did you have a comment or did that<00:18:11.600> get 00:18:13.029 --> 00:18:13.039 align:start position:0% that get 00:18:13.039 --> 00:18:14.710 align:start position:0% that get >> Yeah,<00:18:13.280> I<00:18:13.520> was<00:18:13.600> just<00:18:13.760> going<00:18:13.840> to<00:18:13.919> say<00:18:14.160> we<00:18:14.400> already 00:18:14.710 --> 00:18:14.720 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, I was just going to say we already 00:18:14.720 --> 00:18:17.110 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, I was just going to say we already create<00:18:15.039> a<00:18:15.360> professional<00:18:15.840> services<00:18:16.320> agreement 00:18:17.110 --> 00:18:17.120 align:start position:0% create a professional services agreement 00:18:17.120 --> 00:18:19.190 align:start position:0% create a professional services agreement with<00:18:17.760> um<00:18:17.840> the<00:18:18.080> writing<00:18:18.400> committee<00:18:18.720> members<00:18:19.039> so 00:18:19.190 --> 00:18:19.200 align:start position:0% with um the writing committee members so 00:18:19.200 --> 00:18:21.830 align:start position:0% with um the writing committee members so that<00:18:19.440> we<00:18:19.600> can<00:18:19.760> pay<00:18:20.080> them<00:18:20.640> for<00:18:20.960> their<00:18:21.280> time<00:18:21.600> and 00:18:21.830 --> 00:18:21.840 align:start position:0% that we can pay them for their time and 00:18:21.840 --> 00:18:23.510 align:start position:0% that we can pay them for their time and we<00:18:22.080> could<00:18:22.240> just<00:18:22.480> include<00:18:22.799> that.<00:18:23.039> I<00:18:23.200> mean,<00:18:23.360> to 00:18:23.510 --> 00:18:23.520 align:start position:0% we could just include that. I mean, to 00:18:23.520 --> 00:18:26.070 align:start position:0% we could just include that. I mean, to Megan's<00:18:23.919> point,<00:18:24.160> it<00:18:24.320> wouldn't<00:18:24.480> need<00:18:24.640> to<00:18:24.799> be<00:18:25.760> We 00:18:26.070 --> 00:18:26.080 align:start position:0% Megan's point, it wouldn't need to be We 00:18:26.080 --> 00:18:27.590 align:start position:0% Megan's point, it wouldn't need to be We already<00:18:26.320> have<00:18:26.480> a<00:18:26.720> document<00:18:27.039> that<00:18:27.280> we<00:18:27.440> could 00:18:27.590 --> 00:18:27.600 align:start position:0% already have a document that we could 00:18:27.600 --> 00:18:31.029 align:start position:0% already have a document that we could include<00:18:27.919> that<00:18:28.160> in.<00:18:28.640> That<00:18:28.880> was<00:18:29.039> it. 00:18:31.029 --> 00:18:31.039 align:start position:0% include that in. That was it. 00:18:31.039 --> 00:18:32.950 align:start position:0% include that in. That was it. I<00:18:31.280> just<00:18:31.520> know<00:18:31.679> there's<00:18:32.080> been<00:18:32.320> a<00:18:32.559> a<00:18:32.799> little<00:18:32.880> bit 00:18:32.950 --> 00:18:32.960 align:start position:0% I just know there's been a a little bit 00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:35.590 align:start position:0% I just know there's been a a little bit of<00:18:33.120> push<00:18:33.280> back<00:18:33.520> on<00:18:34.400> not<00:18:34.799> knowing<00:18:35.120> who's<00:18:35.360> on<00:18:35.520> the 00:18:35.590 --> 00:18:35.600 align:start position:0% of push back on not knowing who's on the 00:18:35.600 --> 00:18:38.870 align:start position:0% of push back on not knowing who's on the writing<00:18:36.000> committee<00:18:36.320> from<00:18:36.559> the<00:18:37.280> public.<00:18:38.559> Um 00:18:38.870 --> 00:18:38.880 align:start position:0% writing committee from the public. Um 00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:40.789 align:start position:0% writing committee from the public. Um and<00:18:39.039> if<00:18:39.280> I<00:18:39.520> mean<00:18:39.600> I<00:18:39.760> I<00:18:40.080> it<00:18:40.320> sounds<00:18:40.480> like<00:18:40.640> there 00:18:40.789 --> 00:18:40.799 align:start position:0% and if I mean I I it sounds like there 00:18:40.799 --> 00:18:44.390 align:start position:0% and if I mean I I it sounds like there might<00:18:41.039> be<00:18:41.120> a<00:18:41.280> balance<00:18:41.600> in<00:18:41.760> that<00:18:41.919> that<00:18:42.880> um<00:18:44.240> you 00:18:44.390 --> 00:18:44.400 align:start position:0% might be a balance in that that um you 00:18:44.400 --> 00:18:46.710 align:start position:0% might be a balance in that that um you know<00:18:44.480> if<00:18:44.720> we<00:18:44.880> have<00:18:45.039> leads<00:18:45.919> those<00:18:46.160> leads<00:18:46.559> would 00:18:46.710 --> 00:18:46.720 align:start position:0% know if we have leads those leads would 00:18:46.720 --> 00:18:48.470 align:start position:0% know if we have leads those leads would know<00:18:46.880> that<00:18:47.039> their<00:18:47.440> names<00:18:47.679> would<00:18:47.840> be<00:18:48.000> disclosed 00:18:48.470 --> 00:18:48.480 align:start position:0% know that their names would be disclosed 00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:51.590 align:start position:0% know that their names would be disclosed others<00:18:48.720> would<00:18:48.880> be<00:18:49.039> just<00:18:49.200> be<00:18:49.440> working<00:18:50.240> um<00:18:51.360> on 00:18:51.590 --> 00:18:51.600 align:start position:0% others would be just be working um on 00:18:51.600 --> 00:18:53.909 align:start position:0% others would be just be working um on the<00:18:51.840> project.<00:18:52.720> It<00:18:52.880> it<00:18:53.200> just<00:18:53.360> brings<00:18:53.679> I<00:18:53.840> mean 00:18:53.909 --> 00:18:53.919 align:start position:0% the project. It it just brings I mean 00:18:53.919 --> 00:18:55.590 align:start position:0% the project. It it just brings I mean it's<00:18:54.160> just<00:18:54.240> a<00:18:54.480> question<00:18:54.640> I<00:18:54.880> have<00:18:55.039> is<00:18:55.200> if<00:18:55.520> you 00:18:55.590 --> 00:18:55.600 align:start position:0% it's just a question I have is if you 00:18:55.600 --> 00:18:57.350 align:start position:0% it's just a question I have is if you know<00:18:55.679> if<00:18:55.840> we<00:18:56.160> have<00:18:56.320> upfront<00:18:56.880> what<00:18:57.120> the 00:18:57.350 --> 00:18:57.360 align:start position:0% know if we have upfront what the 00:18:57.360 --> 00:19:01.590 align:start position:0% know if we have upfront what the relationship<00:18:57.919> is<00:18:58.880> so<00:18:59.120> they<00:18:59.360> know<00:18:59.520> upfront<00:19:00.640> um 00:19:01.590 --> 00:19:01.600 align:start position:0% relationship is so they know upfront um 00:19:01.600 --> 00:19:03.110 align:start position:0% relationship is so they know upfront um just<00:19:01.840> because<00:19:02.000> I<00:19:02.160> do<00:19:02.320> have<00:19:02.400> a<00:19:02.559> concern<00:19:02.720> if<00:19:02.960> we 00:19:03.110 --> 00:19:03.120 align:start position:0% just because I do have a concern if we 00:19:03.120 --> 00:19:04.710 align:start position:0% just because I do have a concern if we don't<00:19:03.280> know<00:19:03.440> anybody<00:19:03.760> that's<00:19:04.080> on<00:19:04.240> the<00:19:04.400> writing 00:19:04.710 --> 00:19:04.720 align:start position:0% don't know anybody that's on the writing 00:19:04.720 --> 00:19:08.789 align:start position:0% don't know anybody that's on the writing committee<00:19:05.120> and<00:19:06.080> it's<00:19:06.799> it<00:19:07.120> just<00:19:07.280> seems<00:19:07.679> very 00:19:08.789 --> 00:19:08.799 align:start position:0% committee and it's it just seems very 00:19:08.799 --> 00:19:11.270 align:start position:0% committee and it's it just seems very there's<00:19:09.039> just<00:19:09.280> lack<00:19:09.520> of<00:19:09.679> transparency.<00:19:10.880> I<00:19:11.200> can 00:19:11.270 --> 00:19:11.280 align:start position:0% there's just lack of transparency. I can 00:19:11.280 --> 00:19:13.510 align:start position:0% there's just lack of transparency. I can see<00:19:11.440> that<00:19:11.600> if<00:19:12.000> you<00:19:12.160> know<00:19:12.400> if<00:19:12.640> if<00:19:12.960> we<00:19:13.200> said<00:19:13.360> that 00:19:13.510 --> 00:19:13.520 align:start position:0% see that if you know if if we said that 00:19:13.520 --> 00:19:15.909 align:start position:0% see that if you know if if we said that the<00:19:13.760> leads<00:19:14.080> of<00:19:14.160> this<00:19:14.400> would<00:19:14.640> be<00:19:15.440> leading<00:19:15.760> out 00:19:15.909 --> 00:19:15.919 align:start position:0% the leads of this would be leading out 00:19:15.919 --> 00:19:18.630 align:start position:0% the leads of this would be leading out and<00:19:16.160> would<00:19:16.400> have<00:19:16.559> a<00:19:16.720> public<00:19:17.120> face<00:19:18.160> um<00:19:18.240> and<00:19:18.480> they 00:19:18.630 --> 00:19:18.640 align:start position:0% and would have a public face um and they 00:19:18.640 --> 00:19:20.710 align:start position:0% and would have a public face um and they knew<00:19:18.799> that<00:19:18.960> upfront.<00:19:19.440> I<00:19:19.679> can<00:19:19.840> see<00:19:20.000> where<00:19:20.480> we 00:19:20.710 --> 00:19:20.720 align:start position:0% knew that upfront. I can see where we 00:19:20.720 --> 00:19:23.029 align:start position:0% knew that upfront. I can see where we could<00:19:21.679> you<00:19:21.840> know<00:19:22.000> kind<00:19:22.160> of<00:19:22.320> maybe<00:19:22.640> balance 00:19:23.029 --> 00:19:23.039 align:start position:0% could you know kind of maybe balance 00:19:23.039 --> 00:19:24.870 align:start position:0% could you know kind of maybe balance those<00:19:23.280> two<00:19:23.520> pieces<00:19:23.840> out. 00:19:24.870 --> 00:19:24.880 align:start position:0% those two pieces out. 00:19:24.880 --> 00:19:26.310 align:start position:0% those two pieces out. >> Yeah,<00:19:25.120> that's<00:19:25.360> exactly<00:19:25.760> what<00:19:26.000> you're<00:19:26.240> saying 00:19:26.310 --> 00:19:26.320 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's exactly what you're saying 00:19:26.320 --> 00:19:27.750 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's exactly what you're saying there<00:19:26.559> at<00:19:26.640> the<00:19:26.720> end<00:19:26.880> is<00:19:27.039> that<00:19:27.200> balance.<00:19:27.520> I 00:19:27.750 --> 00:19:27.760 align:start position:0% there at the end is that balance. I 00:19:27.760 --> 00:19:29.909 align:start position:0% there at the end is that balance. I think 00:19:29.909 --> 00:19:29.919 align:start position:0% think 00:19:29.919 --> 00:19:31.990 align:start position:0% think and<00:19:30.160> I<00:19:30.559> I<00:19:30.799> mean<00:19:30.880> I<00:19:31.120> wish<00:19:31.280> that<00:19:31.440> that<00:19:31.679> that 00:19:31.990 --> 00:19:32.000 align:start position:0% and I I mean I wish that that that 00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:33.430 align:start position:0% and I I mean I wish that that that writing<00:19:32.400> committee<00:19:32.720> folks<00:19:32.960> didn't<00:19:33.200> feel 00:19:33.430 --> 00:19:33.440 align:start position:0% writing committee folks didn't feel 00:19:33.440 --> 00:19:35.110 align:start position:0% writing committee folks didn't feel worried<00:19:33.760> about<00:19:34.080> their<00:19:34.480> identity<00:19:34.799> in<00:19:34.960> some 00:19:35.110 --> 00:19:35.120 align:start position:0% worried about their identity in some 00:19:35.120 --> 00:19:36.630 align:start position:0% worried about their identity in some way.<00:19:35.280> I<00:19:35.440> wish<00:19:35.600> that<00:19:35.679> that<00:19:35.840> wasn't<00:19:36.080> a<00:19:36.240> reality, 00:19:36.630 --> 00:19:36.640 align:start position:0% way. I wish that that wasn't a reality, 00:19:36.640 --> 00:19:38.310 align:start position:0% way. I wish that that wasn't a reality, but<00:19:37.039> feels<00:19:37.280> like<00:19:37.440> there<00:19:37.760> some<00:19:37.919> of<00:19:38.000> them<00:19:38.160> do 00:19:38.310 --> 00:19:38.320 align:start position:0% but feels like there some of them do 00:19:38.320 --> 00:19:40.070 align:start position:0% but feels like there some of them do feel<00:19:38.480> uncomfortable<00:19:38.880> and<00:19:39.120> it<00:19:39.280> might<00:19:39.440> be<00:19:39.520> why 00:19:40.070 --> 00:19:40.080 align:start position:0% feel uncomfortable and it might be why 00:19:40.080 --> 00:19:41.909 align:start position:0% feel uncomfortable and it might be why some<00:19:40.480> amazing<00:19:40.960> experts<00:19:41.360> are<00:19:41.600> not 00:19:41.909 --> 00:19:41.919 align:start position:0% some amazing experts are not 00:19:41.919 --> 00:19:43.430 align:start position:0% some amazing experts are not volunteering<00:19:42.480> or<00:19:42.720> signing<00:19:42.960> up<00:19:43.039> to<00:19:43.200> do<00:19:43.280> the 00:19:43.430 --> 00:19:43.440 align:start position:0% volunteering or signing up to do the 00:19:43.440 --> 00:19:45.590 align:start position:0% volunteering or signing up to do the writing<00:19:43.760> committee.<00:19:44.160> So,<00:19:44.720> this<00:19:44.960> maybe<00:19:45.360> gives 00:19:45.590 --> 00:19:45.600 align:start position:0% writing committee. So, this maybe gives 00:19:45.600 --> 00:19:50.710 align:start position:0% writing committee. So, this maybe gives us<00:19:45.760> a<00:19:45.919> little<00:19:46.000> bit<00:19:46.160> of<00:19:46.240> a<00:19:46.400> balance. 00:19:50.710 --> 00:19:50.720 align:start position:0% 00:19:50.720 --> 00:19:53.430 align:start position:0% >> So,<00:19:51.120> being<00:19:51.600> taking<00:19:51.840> on<00:19:52.080> the<00:19:52.240> the<00:19:52.799> title<00:19:53.200> of 00:19:53.430 --> 00:19:53.440 align:start position:0% >> So, being taking on the the title of 00:19:53.440 --> 00:19:55.190 align:start position:0% >> So, being taking on the the title of spokesperson,<00:19:54.160> does<00:19:54.400> that<00:19:54.559> give<00:19:54.880> does<00:19:55.039> that 00:19:55.190 --> 00:19:55.200 align:start position:0% spokesperson, does that give does that 00:19:55.200 --> 00:19:57.110 align:start position:0% spokesperson, does that give does that elevate<00:19:55.679> them<00:19:55.840> to<00:19:56.000> a<00:19:56.160> different<00:19:56.400> level<00:19:56.720> of 00:19:57.110 --> 00:19:57.120 align:start position:0% elevate them to a different level of 00:19:57.120 --> 00:19:59.750 align:start position:0% elevate them to a different level of like<00:19:57.520> authority?<00:19:58.320> Are<00:19:58.480> they<00:19:58.720> able<00:19:59.440> does<00:19:59.600> that 00:19:59.750 --> 00:19:59.760 align:start position:0% like authority? Are they able does that 00:19:59.760 --> 00:20:01.909 align:start position:0% like authority? Are they able does that give<00:19:59.919> them<00:20:00.080> the<00:20:00.320> role<00:20:00.559> of<00:20:00.799> speaking<00:20:01.120> to<00:20:01.440> the 00:20:01.909 --> 00:20:01.919 align:start position:0% give them the role of speaking to the 00:20:01.919 --> 00:20:06.630 align:start position:0% give them the role of speaking to the the<00:20:02.320> press?<00:20:03.760> um<00:20:05.120> coming<00:20:05.440> in<00:20:05.760> the<00:20:05.919> full<00:20:06.240> board 00:20:06.630 --> 00:20:06.640 align:start position:0% the press? um coming in the full board 00:20:06.640 --> 00:20:09.669 align:start position:0% the press? um coming in the full board like<00:20:06.880> does<00:20:07.120> that<00:20:08.160> what<00:20:08.400> does<00:20:08.559> that<00:20:08.880> do<00:20:09.280> is 00:20:09.669 --> 00:20:09.679 align:start position:0% like does that what does that do is 00:20:09.679 --> 00:20:11.669 align:start position:0% like does that what does that do is because<00:20:10.080> it<00:20:10.320> does<00:20:10.880> create<00:20:11.120> a<00:20:11.360> level<00:20:11.520> of 00:20:11.669 --> 00:20:11.679 align:start position:0% because it does create a level of 00:20:11.679 --> 00:20:15.190 align:start position:0% because it does create a level of formality<00:20:12.480> and 00:20:15.190 --> 00:20:15.200 align:start position:0% formality and 00:20:15.200 --> 00:20:17.190 align:start position:0% formality and I<00:20:15.440> don't<00:20:15.520> know<00:20:15.760> just<00:20:16.000> a<00:20:16.160> a<00:20:16.559> different<00:20:16.799> type<00:20:16.960> of 00:20:17.190 --> 00:20:17.200 align:start position:0% I don't know just a a different type of 00:20:17.200 --> 00:20:18.789 align:start position:0% I don't know just a a different type of position 00:20:18.789 --> 00:20:18.799 align:start position:0% position 00:20:18.799 --> 00:20:20.630 align:start position:0% position and<00:20:19.039> I'm<00:20:19.280> just<00:20:19.440> thinking<00:20:19.760> through<00:20:20.080> logistics 00:20:20.630 --> 00:20:20.640 align:start position:0% and I'm just thinking through logistics 00:20:20.640 --> 00:20:22.950 align:start position:0% and I'm just thinking through logistics I<00:20:20.799> don't<00:20:20.960> necessarily<00:20:21.760> dislike<00:20:22.160> the<00:20:22.400> idea<00:20:22.799> you 00:20:22.950 --> 00:20:22.960 align:start position:0% I don't necessarily dislike the idea you 00:20:22.960 --> 00:20:26.230 align:start position:0% I don't necessarily dislike the idea you know<00:20:23.039> I'm<00:20:23.200> intrigued<00:20:23.520> by<00:20:23.760> that<00:20:24.320> um<00:20:25.120> I<00:20:25.440> think 00:20:26.230 --> 00:20:26.240 align:start position:0% know I'm intrigued by that um I think 00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:28.470 align:start position:0% know I'm intrigued by that um I think serving<00:20:26.480> on<00:20:26.640> the<00:20:26.799> writing<00:20:27.200> committee<00:20:27.520> is<00:20:28.000> is<00:20:28.320> a 00:20:28.470 --> 00:20:28.480 align:start position:0% serving on the writing committee is is a 00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:30.149 align:start position:0% serving on the writing committee is is a great<00:20:28.720> opportunity<00:20:29.280> I<00:20:29.440> know<00:20:29.600> teachers<00:20:29.919> that 00:20:30.149 --> 00:20:30.159 align:start position:0% great opportunity I know teachers that 00:20:30.159 --> 00:20:31.590 align:start position:0% great opportunity I know teachers that have<00:20:30.320> personally<00:20:30.640> that<00:20:30.880> have<00:20:31.120> served<00:20:31.360> on 00:20:31.590 --> 00:20:31.600 align:start position:0% have personally that have served on 00:20:31.600 --> 00:20:33.510 align:start position:0% have personally that have served on writing<00:20:31.919> committees<00:20:32.320> and<00:20:32.960> they<00:20:33.200> were<00:20:33.360> very 00:20:33.510 --> 00:20:33.520 align:start position:0% writing committees and they were very 00:20:33.520 --> 00:20:35.909 align:start position:0% writing committees and they were very proud<00:20:33.760> to<00:20:34.000> say<00:20:34.159> that<00:20:34.400> they<00:20:34.559> were<00:20:35.280> they<00:20:35.520> were<00:20:35.679> on 00:20:35.909 --> 00:20:35.919 align:start position:0% proud to say that they were they were on 00:20:35.919 --> 00:20:38.870 align:start position:0% proud to say that they were they were on those<00:20:36.080> committees.<00:20:36.640> So,<00:20:37.840> um<00:20:38.000> I<00:20:38.240> think<00:20:38.559> push 00:20:38.870 --> 00:20:38.880 align:start position:0% those committees. So, um I think push 00:20:38.880 --> 00:20:41.750 align:start position:0% those committees. So, um I think push back<00:20:39.120> is<00:20:39.520> in<00:20:39.760> a<00:20:39.919> healthy<00:20:40.320> way<00:20:40.559> is<00:20:40.880> a<00:20:41.360> healthy 00:20:41.750 --> 00:20:41.760 align:start position:0% back is in a healthy way is a healthy 00:20:41.760 --> 00:20:45.029 align:start position:0% back is in a healthy way is a healthy thing<00:20:42.000> and<00:20:42.320> helps<00:20:42.720> make<00:20:42.960> better<00:20:43.360> product<00:20:44.640> and 00:20:45.029 --> 00:20:45.039 align:start position:0% thing and helps make better product and 00:20:45.039 --> 00:20:46.789 align:start position:0% thing and helps make better product and you<00:20:45.200> know<00:20:45.440> like<00:20:45.600> I've<00:20:45.840> said<00:20:46.000> before<00:20:46.320> words<00:20:46.640> are 00:20:46.789 --> 00:20:46.799 align:start position:0% you know like I've said before words are 00:20:46.799 --> 00:20:50.470 align:start position:0% you know like I've said before words are a<00:20:46.960> product<00:20:47.360> on<00:20:47.600> a<00:20:47.760> page.<00:20:48.240> So,<00:20:49.440> but<00:20:49.760> but<00:20:50.080> back<00:20:50.320> to 00:20:50.470 --> 00:20:50.480 align:start position:0% a product on a page. So, but but back to 00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:52.470 align:start position:0% a product on a page. So, but but back to my<00:20:50.799> question 00:20:52.470 --> 00:20:52.480 align:start position:0% my question 00:20:52.480 --> 00:20:55.590 align:start position:0% my question would<00:20:52.720> that<00:20:53.039> elevate<00:20:53.520> their<00:20:54.080> role<00:20:54.640> in<00:20:54.960> any<00:20:55.200> way 00:20:55.590 --> 00:20:55.600 align:start position:0% would that elevate their role in any way 00:20:55.600 --> 00:20:57.990 align:start position:0% would that elevate their role in any way and<00:20:55.919> how<00:20:56.080> would<00:20:56.240> they<00:20:56.480> present<00:20:56.799> to<00:20:57.600> the<00:20:57.840> state 00:20:57.990 --> 00:20:58.000 align:start position:0% and how would they present to the state 00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:00.710 align:start position:0% and how would they present to the state of<00:20:58.159> Utah<00:20:59.120> being<00:20:59.360> a<00:20:59.520> spokesperson? 00:21:00.710 --> 00:21:00.720 align:start position:0% of Utah being a spokesperson? 00:21:00.720 --> 00:21:02.070 align:start position:0% of Utah being a spokesperson? >> I<00:21:00.880> mean,<00:21:01.039> I<00:21:01.200> don't<00:21:01.360> know.<00:21:01.520> I'm<00:21:01.679> just<00:21:01.840> speaking 00:21:02.070 --> 00:21:02.080 align:start position:0% >> I mean, I don't know. I'm just speaking 00:21:02.080 --> 00:21:04.630 align:start position:0% >> I mean, I don't know. I'm just speaking for<00:21:02.240> myself.<00:21:02.720> I<00:21:02.880> would<00:21:03.039> view<00:21:03.280> that<00:21:03.600> as<00:21:04.159> I<00:21:04.480> don't 00:21:04.630 --> 00:21:04.640 align:start position:0% for myself. I would view that as I don't 00:21:04.640 --> 00:21:06.789 align:start position:0% for myself. I would view that as I don't see<00:21:04.799> them<00:21:05.039> as<00:21:05.280> a 00:21:06.789 --> 00:21:06.799 align:start position:0% see them as a 00:21:06.799 --> 00:21:09.830 align:start position:0% see them as a um<00:21:07.840> like<00:21:08.080> they're<00:21:08.320> the<00:21:08.480> media<00:21:08.880> people.<00:21:09.520> That's 00:21:09.830 --> 00:21:09.840 align:start position:0% um like they're the media people. That's 00:21:09.840 --> 00:21:12.549 align:start position:0% um like they're the media people. That's not<00:21:10.080> that's<00:21:10.400> not<00:21:10.559> their<00:21:10.720> role.<00:21:11.200> I<00:21:11.440> see<00:21:11.600> them<00:21:11.840> as 00:21:12.549 --> 00:21:12.559 align:start position:0% not that's not their role. I see them as 00:21:12.559 --> 00:21:15.350 align:start position:0% not that's not their role. I see them as uh<00:21:13.280> working<00:21:13.520> with<00:21:13.840> either<00:21:14.400> the<00:21:14.720> subcommittee 00:21:15.350 --> 00:21:15.360 align:start position:0% uh working with either the subcommittee 00:21:15.360 --> 00:21:17.990 align:start position:0% uh working with either the subcommittee or<00:21:15.679> even<00:21:16.480> reporting<00:21:16.880> out<00:21:17.039> and<00:21:17.280> engaging<00:21:17.679> with 00:21:17.990 --> 00:21:18.000 align:start position:0% or even reporting out and engaging with 00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:20.630 align:start position:0% or even reporting out and engaging with the<00:21:18.320> standards<00:21:18.720> and<00:21:18.880> assessment<00:21:19.360> committee 00:21:20.630 --> 00:21:20.640 align:start position:0% the standards and assessment committee 00:21:20.640 --> 00:21:22.149 align:start position:0% the standards and assessment committee um<00:21:20.799> or<00:21:21.120> board<00:21:21.360> members<00:21:21.679> in<00:21:21.840> whatever 00:21:22.149 --> 00:21:22.159 align:start position:0% um or board members in whatever 00:21:22.159 --> 00:21:25.029 align:start position:0% um or board members in whatever capacity.<00:21:22.640> I<00:21:22.880> see<00:21:23.039> them<00:21:23.200> as<00:21:23.840> that<00:21:24.240> as<00:21:24.559> well<00:21:24.640> as 00:21:25.029 --> 00:21:25.039 align:start position:0% capacity. I see them as that as well as 00:21:25.039 --> 00:21:27.590 align:start position:0% capacity. I see them as that as well as the<00:21:25.280> knowledge<00:21:25.600> that<00:21:25.840> they<00:21:26.080> will<00:21:26.240> not<00:21:26.400> be<00:21:27.360> that 00:21:27.590 --> 00:21:27.600 align:start position:0% the knowledge that they will not be that 00:21:27.600 --> 00:21:29.430 align:start position:0% the knowledge that they will not be that they<00:21:27.760> will<00:21:28.159> will<00:21:28.480> publicly<00:21:28.880> know<00:21:29.039> who<00:21:29.280> they 00:21:29.430 --> 00:21:29.440 align:start position:0% they will will publicly know who they 00:21:29.440 --> 00:21:31.430 align:start position:0% they will will publicly know who they are,<00:21:29.840> right?<00:21:30.400> That<00:21:30.559> kind<00:21:30.720> of<00:21:30.799> a<00:21:30.960> thing.<00:21:31.120> it's 00:21:31.430 --> 00:21:31.440 align:start position:0% are, right? That kind of a thing. it's 00:21:31.440 --> 00:21:34.870 align:start position:0% are, right? That kind of a thing. it's not<00:21:32.640> um<00:21:33.280> you<00:21:33.440> know<00:21:33.600> very<00:21:33.840> transparent<00:21:34.400> on<00:21:34.640> who 00:21:34.870 --> 00:21:34.880 align:start position:0% not um you know very transparent on who 00:21:34.880 --> 00:21:36.390 align:start position:0% not um you know very transparent on who these<00:21:35.120> people<00:21:35.360> are<00:21:35.520> and<00:21:35.840> what<00:21:36.080> their 00:21:36.390 --> 00:21:36.400 align:start position:0% these people are and what their 00:21:36.400 --> 00:21:38.710 align:start position:0% these people are and what their engagement<00:21:36.880> is.<00:21:37.679> So<00:21:37.840> I<00:21:38.000> see<00:21:38.080> it<00:21:38.240> that<00:21:38.400> way.<00:21:38.559> I 00:21:38.710 --> 00:21:38.720 align:start position:0% engagement is. So I see it that way. I 00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:41.190 align:start position:0% engagement is. So I see it that way. I don't<00:21:38.799> see<00:21:38.960> it<00:21:39.120> as<00:21:39.280> a<00:21:39.840> spokesperson<00:21:40.480> for<00:21:40.960> going 00:21:41.190 --> 00:21:41.200 align:start position:0% don't see it as a spokesperson for going 00:21:41.200 --> 00:21:42.630 align:start position:0% don't see it as a spokesperson for going out<00:21:41.360> and<00:21:41.600> advocating<00:21:42.000> for<00:21:42.159> the<00:21:42.320> standards 00:21:42.630 --> 00:21:42.640 align:start position:0% out and advocating for the standards 00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:44.470 align:start position:0% out and advocating for the standards because<00:21:42.799> I<00:21:42.960> don't<00:21:43.120> that's<00:21:43.360> not<00:21:43.520> their<00:21:43.679> role 00:21:44.470 --> 00:21:44.480 align:start position:0% because I don't that's not their role 00:21:44.480 --> 00:21:47.190 align:start position:0% because I don't that's not their role and<00:21:44.799> shouldn't<00:21:45.039> be<00:21:45.200> their<00:21:45.440> role.<00:21:46.720> We<00:21:46.960> probably 00:21:47.190 --> 00:21:47.200 align:start position:0% and shouldn't be their role. We probably 00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:49.350 align:start position:0% and shouldn't be their role. We probably need<00:21:47.360> to<00:21:47.520> somehow<00:21:48.000> clarify<00:21:48.400> that<00:21:48.640> because<00:21:48.960> I<00:21:49.039> I 00:21:49.350 --> 00:21:49.360 align:start position:0% need to somehow clarify that because I I 00:21:49.360 --> 00:21:52.149 align:start position:0% need to somehow clarify that because I I think<00:21:49.520> we've<00:21:49.840> seen<00:21:50.240> how<00:21:50.480> some<00:21:51.440> we<00:21:51.679> sometimes 00:21:52.149 --> 00:21:52.159 align:start position:0% think we've seen how some we sometimes 00:21:52.159 --> 00:21:53.590 align:start position:0% think we've seen how some we sometimes we<00:21:52.320> don't<00:21:52.480> even<00:21:52.640> know<00:21:52.799> why<00:21:53.039> it's<00:21:53.280> going<00:21:53.360> to<00:21:53.440> get 00:21:53.590 --> 00:21:53.600 align:start position:0% we don't even know why it's going to get 00:21:53.600 --> 00:21:54.870 align:start position:0% we don't even know why it's going to get big,<00:21:53.840> but<00:21:54.080> it<00:21:54.240> does 00:21:54.870 --> 00:21:54.880 align:start position:0% big, but it does 00:21:54.880 --> 00:21:57.350 align:start position:0% big, but it does >> and<00:21:55.520> agree,<00:21:56.000> you<00:21:56.159> know,<00:21:56.320> the<00:21:56.640> questions<00:21:57.039> start 00:21:57.350 --> 00:21:57.360 align:start position:0% >> and agree, you know, the questions start 00:21:57.360 --> 00:22:00.070 align:start position:0% >> and agree, you know, the questions start getting<00:21:57.600> asked<00:21:57.919> and<00:21:58.159> if<00:21:58.320> they<00:21:58.480> have<00:21:58.720> that<00:21:59.360> um 00:22:00.070 --> 00:22:00.080 align:start position:0% getting asked and if they have that um 00:22:00.080 --> 00:22:02.549 align:start position:0% getting asked and if they have that um that<00:22:00.640> thing<00:22:00.880> associated<00:22:01.440> with<00:22:01.679> their<00:22:01.919> name, 00:22:02.549 --> 00:22:02.559 align:start position:0% that thing associated with their name, 00:22:02.559 --> 00:22:03.990 align:start position:0% that thing associated with their name, I'm<00:22:02.799> sure<00:22:02.960> that<00:22:03.120> they<00:22:03.280> would<00:22:03.440> be<00:22:03.600> reached<00:22:03.840> out 00:22:03.990 --> 00:22:04.000 align:start position:0% I'm sure that they would be reached out 00:22:04.000 --> 00:22:08.549 align:start position:0% I'm sure that they would be reached out to<00:22:04.240> and<00:22:04.480> and<00:22:04.799> take<00:22:05.039> on<00:22:05.200> a<00:22:05.440> public<00:22:06.640> role<00:22:07.679> just<00:22:08.159> by 00:22:08.549 --> 00:22:08.559 align:start position:0% to and and take on a public role just by 00:22:08.559 --> 00:22:11.590 align:start position:0% to and and take on a public role just by by<00:22:08.880> its<00:22:09.120> very<00:22:09.360> nature.<00:22:09.840> So<00:22:11.039> anyway,<00:22:11.440> just 00:22:11.590 --> 00:22:11.600 align:start position:0% by its very nature. So anyway, just 00:22:11.600 --> 00:22:13.909 align:start position:0% by its very nature. So anyway, just something<00:22:11.840> to<00:22:12.000> think<00:22:12.080> about<00:22:12.480> that<00:22:12.720> I<00:22:12.960> see<00:22:13.679> kind 00:22:13.909 --> 00:22:13.919 align:start position:0% something to think about that I see kind 00:22:13.919 --> 00:22:18.310 align:start position:0% something to think about that I see kind of<00:22:15.120> looking<00:22:15.520> down<00:22:15.679> the<00:22:15.919> road<00:22:16.159> happening 00:22:18.310 --> 00:22:18.320 align:start position:0% of looking down the road happening 00:22:18.320 --> 00:22:20.390 align:start position:0% of looking down the road happening >> and<00:22:18.480> and<00:22:18.880> maybe<00:22:19.120> that<00:22:19.440> those<00:22:19.679> pieces<00:22:20.080> are 00:22:20.390 --> 00:22:20.400 align:start position:0% >> and and maybe that those pieces are 00:22:20.400 --> 00:22:21.909 align:start position:0% >> and and maybe that those pieces are designated<00:22:20.880> in<00:22:21.039> the<00:22:21.200> operational<00:22:21.600> planning 00:22:21.909 --> 00:22:21.919 align:start position:0% designated in the operational planning 00:22:21.919 --> 00:22:23.190 align:start position:0% designated in the operational planning or<00:22:22.080> the<00:22:22.240> other<00:22:22.400> piece,<00:22:22.559> but<00:22:22.799> for<00:22:22.960> this 00:22:23.190 --> 00:22:23.200 align:start position:0% or the other piece, but for this 00:22:23.200 --> 00:22:24.870 align:start position:0% or the other piece, but for this document,<00:22:23.600> we<00:22:23.840> can<00:22:23.919> just,<00:22:24.240> you<00:22:24.400> know,<00:22:24.559> put<00:22:24.720> in 00:22:24.870 --> 00:22:24.880 align:start position:0% document, we can just, you know, put in 00:22:24.880 --> 00:22:27.430 align:start position:0% document, we can just, you know, put in there<00:22:25.200> that<00:22:25.520> that's<00:22:25.760> one<00:22:26.000> of<00:22:26.080> their<00:22:26.799> um<00:22:27.039> tasks 00:22:27.430 --> 00:22:27.440 align:start position:0% there that that's one of their um tasks 00:22:27.440 --> 00:22:29.110 align:start position:0% there that that's one of their um tasks in<00:22:27.679> the<00:22:27.840> description<00:22:28.320> to<00:22:28.559> say<00:22:28.640> that<00:22:28.799> they'll 00:22:29.110 --> 00:22:29.120 align:start position:0% in the description to say that they'll 00:22:29.120 --> 00:22:36.950 align:start position:0% in the description to say that they'll also<00:22:29.360> designate<00:22:30.559> writing<00:22:30.960> committee<00:22:31.280> leads. 00:22:36.950 --> 00:22:36.960 align:start position:0% 00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:41.669 align:start position:0% Are<00:22:37.200> you<00:22:37.440> making<00:22:37.679> a<00:22:38.000> motion<00:22:38.320> then<00:22:38.559> on<00:22:38.799> that? 00:22:41.669 --> 00:22:41.679 align:start position:0% Are you making a motion then on that? 00:22:41.679 --> 00:22:43.669 align:start position:0% Are you making a motion then on that? >> Yeah.<00:22:41.919> I<00:22:42.080> mean<00:22:42.240> I<00:22:42.480> the<00:22:42.720> way<00:22:42.799> I<00:22:42.960> see<00:22:43.120> it<00:22:43.280> is<00:22:43.440> that 00:22:43.669 --> 00:22:43.679 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I mean I the way I see it is that 00:22:43.679 --> 00:22:47.350 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I mean I the way I see it is that like<00:22:44.320> you<00:22:44.480> know<00:22:44.720> this<00:22:44.880> is<00:22:45.120> like<00:22:45.760> the 00:22:47.350 --> 00:22:47.360 align:start position:0% like you know this is like the 00:22:47.360 --> 00:22:49.350 align:start position:0% like you know this is like the if<00:22:47.600> we're<00:22:47.760> doing<00:22:47.840> an<00:22:48.000> inverted<00:22:48.480> pyramid<00:22:49.039> like 00:22:49.350 --> 00:22:49.360 align:start position:0% if we're doing an inverted pyramid like 00:22:49.360 --> 00:22:51.350 align:start position:0% if we're doing an inverted pyramid like this<00:22:49.600> is<00:22:49.760> like<00:22:49.919> the<00:22:50.080> big<00:22:50.320> picture<00:22:50.880> and<00:22:51.120> then<00:22:51.200> we 00:22:51.350 --> 00:22:51.360 align:start position:0% this is like the big picture and then we 00:22:51.360 --> 00:22:52.870 align:start position:0% this is like the big picture and then we get<00:22:51.520> more<00:22:51.679> granular<00:22:52.080> when<00:22:52.320> we<00:22:52.400> go<00:22:52.559> down<00:22:52.720> and 00:22:52.870 --> 00:22:52.880 align:start position:0% get more granular when we go down and 00:22:52.880 --> 00:22:54.070 align:start position:0% get more granular when we go down and get<00:22:52.960> into<00:22:53.120> the<00:22:53.280> operational<00:22:53.679> planning<00:22:53.919> and 00:22:54.070 --> 00:22:54.080 align:start position:0% get into the operational planning and 00:22:54.080 --> 00:22:56.390 align:start position:0% get into the operational planning and the<00:22:54.400> day-to-day<00:22:54.880> and<00:22:55.039> tactics<00:22:55.440> of<00:22:55.600> how<00:22:55.760> staff 00:22:56.390 --> 00:22:56.400 align:start position:0% the day-to-day and tactics of how staff 00:22:56.400 --> 00:22:57.909 align:start position:0% the day-to-day and tactics of how staff manages<00:22:56.799> these<00:22:57.039> writing<00:22:57.360> committees<00:22:57.600> and<00:22:57.760> how 00:22:57.909 --> 00:22:57.919 align:start position:0% manages these writing committees and how 00:22:57.919 --> 00:22:59.830 align:start position:0% manages these writing committees and how they're<00:22:58.159> coordinated.<00:22:58.880> And<00:22:59.039> so<00:22:59.200> for<00:22:59.440> this<00:22:59.679> I 00:22:59.830 --> 00:22:59.840 align:start position:0% they're coordinated. And so for this I 00:22:59.840 --> 00:23:01.029 align:start position:0% they're coordinated. And so for this I just<00:23:00.000> thought<00:23:00.159> it<00:23:00.320> would<00:23:00.400> be<00:23:00.559> good<00:23:00.640> to<00:23:00.799> mention 00:23:01.029 --> 00:23:01.039 align:start position:0% just thought it would be good to mention 00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:02.549 align:start position:0% just thought it would be good to mention in<00:23:01.200> there,<00:23:01.760> you<00:23:01.840> know,<00:23:02.080> the<00:23:02.240> writing 00:23:02.549 --> 00:23:02.559 align:start position:0% in there, you know, the writing 00:23:02.559 --> 00:23:04.789 align:start position:0% in there, you know, the writing committee<00:23:02.880> meets 00:23:04.789 --> 00:23:04.799 align:start position:0% committee meets 00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:07.270 align:start position:0% committee meets designates<00:23:05.919> writing<00:23:06.320> committee<00:23:06.640> leads, 00:23:07.270 --> 00:23:07.280 align:start position:0% designates writing committee leads, 00:23:07.280 --> 00:23:08.870 align:start position:0% designates writing committee leads, reviews<00:23:07.679> the<00:23:07.919> state<00:23:08.159> board<00:23:08.480> approved 00:23:08.870 --> 00:23:08.880 align:start position:0% reviews the state board approved 00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:11.350 align:start position:0% reviews the state board approved recommendation<00:23:09.760> and<00:23:10.080> uses<00:23:10.720> those<00:23:11.039> approved 00:23:11.350 --> 00:23:11.360 align:start position:0% recommendation and uses those approved 00:23:11.360 --> 00:23:12.549 align:start position:0% recommendation and uses those approved provisions<00:23:11.760> and<00:23:11.919> review,<00:23:12.240> you<00:23:12.320> know<00:23:12.400> what<00:23:12.480> I 00:23:12.549 --> 00:23:12.559 align:start position:0% provisions and review, you know what I 00:23:12.559 --> 00:23:14.230 align:start position:0% provisions and review, you know what I mean?<00:23:12.720> Just<00:23:12.880> somewhere<00:23:13.120> in<00:23:13.360> there<00:23:13.600> that<00:23:13.919> it 00:23:14.230 --> 00:23:14.240 align:start position:0% mean? Just somewhere in there that it 00:23:14.240 --> 00:23:16.310 align:start position:0% mean? Just somewhere in there that it states<00:23:14.640> in<00:23:14.960> step<00:23:15.200> six<00:23:15.520> that<00:23:15.679> that<00:23:16.000> that<00:23:16.240> is 00:23:16.310 --> 00:23:16.320 align:start position:0% states in step six that that that is 00:23:16.320 --> 00:23:21.110 align:start position:0% states in step six that that that is also<00:23:16.559> one<00:23:16.720> of<00:23:16.799> the<00:23:16.960> steps<00:23:17.120> that<00:23:17.280> they'll<00:23:17.520> take. 00:23:21.110 --> 00:23:21.120 align:start position:0% 00:23:21.120 --> 00:23:24.070 align:start position:0% >> I<00:23:21.360> think<00:23:21.520> in<00:23:21.840> order<00:23:22.000> for<00:23:22.240> me<00:23:22.400> to 00:23:24.070 --> 00:23:24.080 align:start position:0% >> I think in order for me to 00:23:24.080 --> 00:23:25.750 align:start position:0% >> I think in order for me to well,<00:23:24.320> I'd<00:23:24.559> want<00:23:24.720> to<00:23:24.880> give<00:23:25.039> this<00:23:25.280> some<00:23:25.440> a 00:23:25.750 --> 00:23:25.760 align:start position:0% well, I'd want to give this some a 00:23:25.760 --> 00:23:28.149 align:start position:0% well, I'd want to give this some a little<00:23:25.840> bit<00:23:26.000> more<00:23:26.400> time<00:23:26.720> to<00:23:26.960> understand<00:23:27.840> um 00:23:28.149 --> 00:23:28.159 align:start position:0% little bit more time to understand um 00:23:28.159 --> 00:23:31.590 align:start position:0% little bit more time to understand um how<00:23:28.640> how<00:23:28.960> that<00:23:29.200> shows<00:23:29.520> up.<00:23:29.760> So<00:23:30.799> Sarah<00:23:31.360> I 00:23:31.590 --> 00:23:31.600 align:start position:0% how how that shows up. So Sarah I 00:23:31.600 --> 00:23:33.350 align:start position:0% how how that shows up. So Sarah I remember<00:23:31.919> real<00:23:32.240> it<00:23:32.400> does<00:23:32.559> this<00:23:32.799> show<00:23:32.960> up<00:23:33.120> the 00:23:33.350 --> 00:23:33.360 align:start position:0% remember real it does this show up the 00:23:33.360 --> 00:23:37.350 align:start position:0% remember real it does this show up the first<00:23:33.520> time<00:23:33.679> in<00:23:34.720> step<00:23:35.039> six<00:23:36.480> I<00:23:36.799> believe<00:23:37.120> because 00:23:37.350 --> 00:23:37.360 align:start position:0% first time in step six I believe because 00:23:37.360 --> 00:23:39.190 align:start position:0% first time in step six I believe because that's<00:23:37.679> when<00:23:37.919> this<00:23:38.240> happens<00:23:38.799> when<00:23:39.039> the 00:23:39.190 --> 00:23:39.200 align:start position:0% that's when this happens when the 00:23:39.200 --> 00:23:40.630 align:start position:0% that's when this happens when the writing<00:23:39.440> committee<00:23:39.760> applicants<00:23:40.240> are<00:23:40.400> invited 00:23:40.630 --> 00:23:40.640 align:start position:0% writing committee applicants are invited 00:23:40.640 --> 00:23:44.390 align:start position:0% writing committee applicants are invited to<00:23:40.799> apply<00:23:41.120> blah<00:23:41.360> blah<00:23:41.520> blah<00:23:42.159> is<00:23:42.400> that<00:23:42.559> correct 00:23:44.390 --> 00:23:44.400 align:start position:0% to apply blah blah blah is that correct 00:23:44.400 --> 00:23:45.669 align:start position:0% to apply blah blah blah is that correct >> yeah<00:23:44.640> and<00:23:44.799> actually<00:23:45.039> now<00:23:45.120> that<00:23:45.280> I'm<00:23:45.440> reading 00:23:45.669 --> 00:23:45.679 align:start position:0% >> yeah and actually now that I'm reading 00:23:45.679 --> 00:23:47.750 align:start position:0% >> yeah and actually now that I'm reading that<00:23:46.080> right<00:23:46.240> there<00:23:46.559> staff<00:23:46.880> organizer<00:23:47.440> writing 00:23:47.750 --> 00:23:47.760 align:start position:0% that right there staff organizer writing 00:23:47.760 --> 00:23:52.470 align:start position:0% that right there staff organizer writing committee<00:23:49.120> designate 00:23:52.470 --> 00:23:52.480 align:start position:0% 00:23:52.480 --> 00:23:53.909 align:start position:0% >> writing<00:23:52.880> lead<00:23:53.440> right 00:23:53.909 --> 00:23:53.919 align:start position:0% >> writing lead right 00:23:53.919 --> 00:23:55.110 align:start position:0% >> writing lead right >> writing<00:23:54.240> leads<00:23:54.480> like<00:23:54.640> right<00:23:54.720> up<00:23:54.880> there<00:23:54.960> in 00:23:55.110 --> 00:23:55.120 align:start position:0% >> writing leads like right up there in 00:23:55.120 --> 00:23:57.669 align:start position:0% >> writing leads like right up there in that<00:23:55.280> second<00:23:55.600> sentence<00:23:56.080> Leah<00:23:57.360> staff 00:23:57.669 --> 00:23:57.679 align:start position:0% that second sentence Leah staff 00:23:57.679 --> 00:24:00.549 align:start position:0% that second sentence Leah staff organized<00:23:58.080> writing<00:23:58.400> committee<00:23:58.880> comma. 00:24:00.549 --> 00:24:00.559 align:start position:0% organized writing committee comma. 00:24:00.559 --> 00:24:03.990 align:start position:0% organized writing committee comma. Got<00:24:00.799> it.<00:24:01.840> Or<00:24:02.320> you<00:24:02.400> know<00:24:02.400> what<00:24:02.559> I<00:24:02.720> mean? 00:24:03.990 --> 00:24:04.000 align:start position:0% Got it. Or you know what I mean? 00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:06.789 align:start position:0% Got it. Or you know what I mean? >> And<00:24:04.240> then<00:24:04.400> I<00:24:04.559> would<00:24:04.720> like<00:24:04.880> to<00:24:05.039> know<00:24:05.200> how 00:24:06.789 --> 00:24:06.799 align:start position:0% >> And then I would like to know how 00:24:06.799 --> 00:24:14.390 align:start position:0% >> And then I would like to know how manifests<00:24:07.600> from<00:24:08.320> step<00:24:08.640> six<00:24:09.120> onward. 00:24:14.390 --> 00:24:14.400 align:start position:0% 00:24:14.400 --> 00:24:18.950 align:start position:0% >> Okay.<00:24:14.880> So<00:24:15.360> I<00:24:15.520> get<00:24:15.600> what<00:24:15.760> you're<00:24:15.919> saying.<00:24:16.320> Yeah. 00:24:18.950 --> 00:24:18.960 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So I get what you're saying. Yeah. 00:24:18.960 --> 00:24:21.029 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So I get what you're saying. Yeah. >> This<00:24:19.120> isn't<00:24:19.360> as<00:24:19.679> granular<00:24:20.159> as<00:24:20.400> all<00:24:20.559> the<00:24:20.720> pieces 00:24:21.029 --> 00:24:21.039 align:start position:0% >> This isn't as granular as all the pieces 00:24:21.039 --> 00:24:32.310 align:start position:0% >> This isn't as granular as all the pieces that<00:24:21.279> we<00:24:22.080> we<00:24:22.159> we<00:24:23.120> see. 00:24:32.310 --> 00:24:32.320 align:start position:0% 00:24:32.320 --> 00:24:33.430 align:start position:0% Did<00:24:32.480> that<00:24:32.640> make<00:24:32.799> sense<00:24:32.960> in<00:24:33.120> the<00:24:33.279> full 00:24:33.430 --> 00:24:33.440 align:start position:0% Did that make sense in the full 00:24:33.440 --> 00:24:35.750 align:start position:0% Did that make sense in the full sentence?<00:24:33.760> I<00:24:33.919> didn't<00:24:34.080> get<00:24:34.240> a<00:24:34.400> chance<00:24:34.559> to 00:24:35.750 --> 00:24:35.760 align:start position:0% sentence? I didn't get a chance to 00:24:35.760 --> 00:24:37.510 align:start position:0% sentence? I didn't get a chance to >> I<00:24:36.000> think<00:24:36.159> so.<00:24:36.480> Hang<00:24:36.640> on<00:24:36.799> just<00:24:36.960> a<00:24:37.039> sec. 00:24:37.510 --> 00:24:37.520 align:start position:0% >> I think so. Hang on just a sec. 00:24:37.520 --> 00:24:49.110 align:start position:0% >> I think so. Hang on just a sec. >> Okay. 00:24:49.110 --> 00:24:49.120 align:start position:0% 00:24:49.120 --> 00:24:51.669 align:start position:0% The<00:24:49.360> words 00:24:51.669 --> 00:24:51.679 align:start position:0% The words 00:24:51.679 --> 00:25:00.310 align:start position:0% The words designates<00:24:52.640> writing<00:24:53.039> committee<00:24:53.520> leads 00:25:00.310 --> 00:25:00.320 align:start position:0% 00:25:00.320 --> 00:25:04.070 align:start position:0% Okay.<00:25:00.880> So,<00:25:01.760> um 00:25:04.070 --> 00:25:04.080 align:start position:0% Okay. So, um 00:25:04.080 --> 00:25:06.870 align:start position:0% Okay. So, um let<00:25:04.320> me<00:25:04.480> fix<00:25:04.799> the<00:25:05.600> font<00:25:06.000> so<00:25:06.159> that<00:25:06.400> you<00:25:06.559> can<00:25:06.720> see 00:25:06.870 --> 00:25:06.880 align:start position:0% let me fix the font so that you can see 00:25:06.880 --> 00:25:11.510 align:start position:0% let me fix the font so that you can see it. 00:25:11.510 --> 00:25:11.520 align:start position:0% 00:25:11.520 --> 00:25:14.470 align:start position:0% Okay.<00:25:12.080> So,<00:25:12.720> in<00:25:13.039> step<00:25:13.279> six,<00:25:13.679> after<00:25:14.000> the<00:25:14.159> words 00:25:14.470 --> 00:25:14.480 align:start position:0% Okay. So, in step six, after the words 00:25:14.480 --> 00:25:16.470 align:start position:0% Okay. So, in step six, after the words the<00:25:14.720> writing<00:25:15.120> committee<00:25:15.520> meets,<00:25:16.000> add<00:25:16.320> the 00:25:16.470 --> 00:25:16.480 align:start position:0% the writing committee meets, add the 00:25:16.480 --> 00:25:22.470 align:start position:0% the writing committee meets, add the words<00:25:16.880> designates<00:25:17.760> writing<00:25:18.159> committee<00:25:18.640> leads 00:25:22.470 --> 00:25:22.480 align:start position:0% 00:25:22.480 --> 00:25:26.470 align:start position:0% and<00:25:22.720> then 00:25:26.470 --> 00:25:26.480 align:start position:0% 00:25:26.480 --> 00:25:29.350 align:start position:0% I<00:25:26.799> I<00:25:27.120> mean<00:25:27.279> in<00:25:27.600> I<00:25:27.840> can<00:25:28.000> put<00:25:28.080> it<00:25:28.240> in<00:25:28.480> context<00:25:29.039> here 00:25:29.350 --> 00:25:29.360 align:start position:0% I I mean in I can put it in context here 00:25:29.360 --> 00:25:53.350 align:start position:0% I I mean in I can put it in context here so<00:25:29.600> you<00:25:29.760> can<00:25:29.919> see<00:25:30.000> it. 00:25:53.350 --> 00:25:53.360 align:start position:0% 00:25:53.360 --> 00:26:02.549 align:start position:0% like<00:25:53.679> this. 00:26:02.549 --> 00:26:02.559 align:start position:0% 00:26:02.559 --> 00:26:13.990 align:start position:0% Is<00:26:02.799> that<00:26:03.200> what<00:26:03.520> you<00:26:04.080> were<00:26:04.320> hoping<00:26:04.640> for? 00:26:13.990 --> 00:26:14.000 align:start position:0% 00:26:14.000 --> 00:26:15.110 align:start position:0% Yeah,<00:26:14.240> just<00:26:14.480> something<00:26:14.640> simple<00:26:14.880> in<00:26:15.039> there 00:26:15.110 --> 00:26:15.120 align:start position:0% Yeah, just something simple in there 00:26:15.120 --> 00:26:21.350 align:start position:0% Yeah, just something simple in there that<00:26:15.360> states<00:26:15.520> that<00:26:15.679> I<00:26:15.840> think<00:26:15.919> that<00:26:16.159> works. 00:26:21.350 --> 00:26:21.360 align:start position:0% 00:26:21.360 --> 00:26:25.190 align:start position:0% And<00:26:21.600> then<00:26:21.840> part<00:26:22.080> of<00:26:22.159> the<00:26:22.400> SOP<00:26:23.679> this<00:26:24.480> is<00:26:24.720> what<00:26:25.039> I 00:26:25.190 --> 00:26:25.200 align:start position:0% And then part of the SOP this is what I 00:26:25.200 --> 00:26:27.110 align:start position:0% And then part of the SOP this is what I think<00:26:25.360> member<00:26:25.679> green<00:26:26.000> is<00:26:26.240> asking<00:26:26.559> about<00:26:26.880> like 00:26:27.110 --> 00:26:27.120 align:start position:0% think member green is asking about like 00:26:27.120 --> 00:26:29.029 align:start position:0% think member green is asking about like that<00:26:27.360> will<00:26:27.600> outline<00:26:28.000> more<00:26:28.240> of<00:26:28.400> the<00:26:28.640> details 00:26:29.029 --> 00:26:29.039 align:start position:0% that will outline more of the details 00:26:29.039 --> 00:26:30.789 align:start position:0% that will outline more of the details that<00:26:29.279> SOP<00:26:29.760> will<00:26:29.919> outline<00:26:30.320> more<00:26:30.480> of<00:26:30.559> the 00:26:30.789 --> 00:26:30.799 align:start position:0% that SOP will outline more of the 00:26:30.799 --> 00:26:32.870 align:start position:0% that SOP will outline more of the details<00:26:31.440> about<00:26:31.840> how<00:26:32.080> those<00:26:32.400> interactions 00:26:32.870 --> 00:26:32.880 align:start position:0% details about how those interactions 00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:35.430 align:start position:0% details about how those interactions work<00:26:33.039> and<00:26:33.279> the<00:26:33.520> processes<00:26:34.159> and<00:26:34.720> we<00:26:34.960> can<00:26:35.120> put<00:26:35.279> in 00:26:35.430 --> 00:26:35.440 align:start position:0% work and the processes and we can put in 00:26:35.440 --> 00:26:37.029 align:start position:0% work and the processes and we can put in there<00:26:35.679> you<00:26:35.840> know<00:26:35.919> if<00:26:36.320> you<00:26:36.480> know<00:26:36.640> there<00:26:36.799> could 00:26:37.029 --> 00:26:37.039 align:start position:0% there you know if you know there could 00:26:37.039 --> 00:26:39.350 align:start position:0% there you know if you know there could be<00:26:37.120> something<00:26:37.360> in<00:26:37.600> there<00:26:37.760> that<00:26:38.000> says<00:26:39.039> you<00:26:39.200> know 00:26:39.350 --> 00:26:39.360 align:start position:0% be something in there that says you know 00:26:39.360 --> 00:26:40.789 align:start position:0% be something in there that says you know they<00:26:39.520> won't<00:26:39.679> go<00:26:39.760> to<00:26:39.919> the<00:26:40.000> media<00:26:40.240> or<00:26:40.480> whatever 00:26:40.789 --> 00:26:40.799 align:start position:0% they won't go to the media or whatever 00:26:40.799 --> 00:26:42.310 align:start position:0% they won't go to the media or whatever those<00:26:41.039> different<00:26:41.360> pieces<00:26:41.679> that<00:26:41.840> we<00:26:42.000> may<00:26:42.159> be 00:26:42.310 --> 00:26:42.320 align:start position:0% those different pieces that we may be 00:26:42.320 --> 00:26:45.269 align:start position:0% those different pieces that we may be worried<00:26:42.640> about<00:26:43.200> um<00:26:43.679> in<00:26:43.919> that<00:26:44.159> part<00:26:44.240> of<00:26:44.400> the<00:26:44.559> SOP 00:26:45.269 --> 00:26:45.279 align:start position:0% worried about um in that part of the SOP 00:26:45.279 --> 00:26:46.870 align:start position:0% worried about um in that part of the SOP feels<00:26:45.600> like<00:26:45.679> that's<00:26:45.919> the<00:26:46.080> place<00:26:46.480> instead<00:26:46.720> of 00:26:46.870 --> 00:26:46.880 align:start position:0% feels like that's the place instead of 00:26:46.880 --> 00:26:50.950 align:start position:0% feels like that's the place instead of in<00:26:47.039> this<00:26:47.200> document. 00:26:50.950 --> 00:26:50.960 align:start position:0% 00:26:50.960 --> 00:26:53.510 align:start position:0% >> Can<00:26:51.120> I<00:26:51.360> can<00:26:51.600> I<00:26:51.679> run<00:26:51.919> through<00:26:52.240> just<00:26:52.480> another 00:26:53.510 --> 00:26:53.520 align:start position:0% >> Can I can I run through just another 00:26:53.520 --> 00:26:57.110 align:start position:0% >> Can I can I run through just another just<00:26:53.760> kind<00:26:54.000> of<00:26:54.080> a<00:26:54.320> logistical<00:26:55.440> question<00:26:56.000> here? 00:26:57.110 --> 00:26:57.120 align:start position:0% just kind of a logistical question here? 00:26:57.120 --> 00:27:01.350 align:start position:0% just kind of a logistical question here? Um<00:26:58.400> that<00:26:58.720> if<00:26:59.039> if<00:26:59.600> we<00:26:59.840> are<00:27:00.880> if<00:27:01.120> I'm 00:27:01.350 --> 00:27:01.360 align:start position:0% Um that if if we are if I'm 00:27:01.360 --> 00:27:04.870 align:start position:0% Um that if if we are if I'm understanding<00:27:01.760> it<00:27:02.000> correctly,<00:27:03.120> these 00:27:04.870 --> 00:27:04.880 align:start position:0% understanding it correctly, these 00:27:04.880 --> 00:27:07.909 align:start position:0% understanding it correctly, these committee<00:27:05.360> leads<00:27:06.799> will<00:27:07.120> kind<00:27:07.279> of<00:27:07.440> be<00:27:07.600> like<00:27:07.760> a 00:27:07.909 --> 00:27:07.919 align:start position:0% committee leads will kind of be like a 00:27:07.919 --> 00:27:10.390 align:start position:0% committee leads will kind of be like a liazison<00:27:08.559> between<00:27:09.039> us<00:27:09.520> and<00:27:09.760> the<00:27:10.000> committee. 00:27:10.390 --> 00:27:10.400 align:start position:0% liazison between us and the committee. 00:27:10.400 --> 00:27:13.990 align:start position:0% liazison between us and the committee. Is<00:27:10.559> that<00:27:10.799> correct? 00:27:13.990 --> 00:27:14.000 align:start position:0% 00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:16.230 align:start position:0% Um,<00:27:14.320> memberel,<00:27:14.799> that's<00:27:15.039> probably<00:27:15.200> for<00:27:15.440> you. 00:27:16.230 --> 00:27:16.240 align:start position:0% Um, memberel, that's probably for you. 00:27:16.240 --> 00:27:18.149 align:start position:0% Um, memberel, that's probably for you. >> Yeah.<00:27:16.720> Yeah.<00:27:17.120> So,<00:27:17.360> they<00:27:17.600> would<00:27:17.679> be<00:27:17.760> the<00:27:17.919> ones. 00:27:18.149 --> 00:27:18.159 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. So, they would be the ones. 00:27:18.159 --> 00:27:20.630 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. So, they would be the ones. So,<00:27:18.400> like<00:27:18.799> if<00:27:19.200> for<00:27:19.360> example<00:27:19.760> during<00:27:20.080> math<00:27:20.480> when 00:27:20.630 --> 00:27:20.640 align:start position:0% So, like if for example during math when 00:27:20.640 --> 00:27:22.149 align:start position:0% So, like if for example during math when we<00:27:20.880> were<00:27:20.960> having<00:27:21.279> questions<00:27:21.520> and<00:27:21.760> we<00:27:22.000> wanted 00:27:22.149 --> 00:27:22.159 align:start position:0% we were having questions and we wanted 00:27:22.159 --> 00:27:24.630 align:start position:0% we were having questions and we wanted to<00:27:22.320> talk<00:27:22.559> through<00:27:22.799> certain<00:27:23.200> pieces,<00:27:24.240> we<00:27:24.480> would 00:27:24.630 --> 00:27:24.640 align:start position:0% to talk through certain pieces, we would 00:27:24.640 --> 00:27:26.710 align:start position:0% to talk through certain pieces, we would set<00:27:24.799> up<00:27:24.960> a<00:27:25.120> meeting<00:27:25.360> with<00:27:25.520> the<00:27:25.760> leads<00:27:26.240> and<00:27:26.559> have 00:27:26.710 --> 00:27:26.720 align:start position:0% set up a meeting with the leads and have 00:27:26.720 --> 00:27:28.950 align:start position:0% set up a meeting with the leads and have that<00:27:26.960> conversation<00:27:27.520> rather<00:27:27.840> than<00:27:28.080> saying<00:27:28.720> go 00:27:28.950 --> 00:27:28.960 align:start position:0% that conversation rather than saying go 00:27:28.960 --> 00:27:30.390 align:start position:0% that conversation rather than saying go out<00:27:29.039> there<00:27:29.200> and<00:27:29.440> talk<00:27:29.520> to<00:27:29.679> any<00:27:29.840> of<00:27:29.919> the<00:27:30.000> writing 00:27:30.390 --> 00:27:30.400 align:start position:0% out there and talk to any of the writing 00:27:30.400 --> 00:27:32.789 align:start position:0% out there and talk to any of the writing committee<00:27:30.720> members<00:27:31.039> or<00:27:31.679> try<00:27:31.919> and<00:27:32.159> organize 00:27:32.789 --> 00:27:32.799 align:start position:0% committee members or try and organize 00:27:32.799 --> 00:27:35.350 align:start position:0% committee members or try and organize that<00:27:33.120> many<00:27:33.360> people<00:27:33.679> in<00:27:34.000> one<00:27:34.240> meeting.<00:27:34.960> We<00:27:35.120> have 00:27:35.350 --> 00:27:35.360 align:start position:0% that many people in one meeting. We have 00:27:35.360 --> 00:27:36.950 align:start position:0% that many people in one meeting. We have leads<00:27:35.760> who<00:27:36.080> represent<00:27:36.480> the<00:27:36.640> writing 00:27:36.950 --> 00:27:36.960 align:start position:0% leads who represent the writing 00:27:36.960 --> 00:27:38.390 align:start position:0% leads who represent the writing committee<00:27:37.279> that<00:27:37.600> have<00:27:37.760> those<00:27:38.000> discussions 00:27:38.390 --> 00:27:38.400 align:start position:0% committee that have those discussions 00:27:38.400 --> 00:27:41.590 align:start position:0% committee that have those discussions with<00:27:38.559> us.<00:27:38.799> So,<00:27:38.960> we<00:27:39.120> can<00:27:39.200> ask<00:27:39.440> those<00:27:39.679> questions. 00:27:41.590 --> 00:27:41.600 align:start position:0% with us. So, we can ask those questions. 00:27:41.600 --> 00:27:44.789 align:start position:0% with us. So, we can ask those questions. And<00:27:41.840> then<00:27:42.559> a<00:27:42.720> as<00:27:43.039> it<00:27:43.279> stands<00:27:43.679> now<00:27:44.080> typically<00:27:44.559> I 00:27:44.789 --> 00:27:44.799 align:start position:0% And then a as it stands now typically I 00:27:44.799 --> 00:27:48.310 align:start position:0% And then a as it stands now typically I think<00:27:45.200> like<00:27:45.520> my<00:27:46.559> my<00:27:47.039> feedback<00:27:47.520> has<00:27:47.760> has<00:27:48.159> gone 00:27:48.310 --> 00:27:48.320 align:start position:0% think like my my feedback has has gone 00:27:48.320 --> 00:27:52.390 align:start position:0% think like my my feedback has has gone through<00:27:48.880> staff.<00:27:49.679> Does<00:27:50.000> that<00:27:50.720> kind<00:27:50.960> of<00:27:52.159> does 00:27:52.390 --> 00:27:52.400 align:start position:0% through staff. Does that kind of does 00:27:52.400 --> 00:27:55.990 align:start position:0% through staff. Does that kind of does that<00:27:52.640> take<00:27:52.880> them<00:27:53.840> out<00:27:54.080> of<00:27:54.159> the<00:27:54.399> loop?<00:27:55.039> Would 00:27:55.990 --> 00:27:56.000 align:start position:0% that take them out of the loop? Would 00:27:56.000 --> 00:27:58.310 align:start position:0% that take them out of the loop? Would does<00:27:56.159> that<00:27:56.399> take<00:27:56.559> them<00:27:56.720> out<00:27:56.960> of<00:27:57.039> the<00:27:57.279> loop<00:27:58.080> in 00:27:58.310 --> 00:27:58.320 align:start position:0% does that take them out of the loop in 00:27:58.320 --> 00:28:00.470 align:start position:0% does that take them out of the loop in any<00:27:58.559> way?<00:27:59.120> And<00:27:59.279> is<00:27:59.520> that<00:27:59.679> a<00:27:59.840> good<00:27:59.919> thing?<00:28:00.159> Is<00:28:00.320> it 00:28:00.470 --> 00:28:00.480 align:start position:0% any way? And is that a good thing? Is it 00:28:00.480 --> 00:28:02.789 align:start position:0% any way? And is that a good thing? Is it a<00:28:00.640> bad<00:28:00.799> thing?<00:28:01.200> Like 00:28:02.789 --> 00:28:02.799 align:start position:0% a bad thing? Like 00:28:02.799 --> 00:28:05.350 align:start position:0% a bad thing? Like >> I<00:28:03.120> don't<00:28:03.279> see<00:28:03.600> that.<00:28:03.919> I<00:28:04.159> guess<00:28:04.880> I'm<00:28:05.200> not 00:28:05.350 --> 00:28:05.360 align:start position:0% >> I don't see that. I guess I'm not 00:28:05.360 --> 00:28:06.950 align:start position:0% >> I don't see that. I guess I'm not envisioning<00:28:05.760> that,<00:28:05.919> but<00:28:06.159> I<00:28:06.320> don't<00:28:06.399> know<00:28:06.480> if<00:28:06.720> I 00:28:06.950 --> 00:28:06.960 align:start position:0% envisioning that, but I don't know if I 00:28:06.960 --> 00:28:10.149 align:start position:0% envisioning that, but I don't know if I I<00:28:07.279> may<00:28:07.520> maybe<00:28:07.840> haven't<00:28:08.720> seen<00:28:08.960> the<00:28:09.200> full,<00:28:10.000> you 00:28:10.149 --> 00:28:10.159 align:start position:0% I may maybe haven't seen the full, you 00:28:10.159 --> 00:28:11.990 align:start position:0% I may maybe haven't seen the full, you know, 00:28:11.990 --> 00:28:12.000 align:start position:0% know, 00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:14.149 align:start position:0% know, vision<00:28:12.320> of<00:28:12.480> what<00:28:13.039> um<00:28:13.279> board<00:28:13.520> member<00:28:13.760> real's 00:28:14.149 --> 00:28:14.159 align:start position:0% vision of what um board member real's 00:28:14.159 --> 00:28:16.389 align:start position:0% vision of what um board member real's talking<00:28:14.320> about.<00:28:14.559> I<00:28:14.720> I<00:28:15.120> would<00:28:15.360> see<00:28:15.600> that<00:28:15.919> as 00:28:16.389 --> 00:28:16.399 align:start position:0% talking about. I I would see that as 00:28:16.399 --> 00:28:18.310 align:start position:0% talking about. I I would see that as just<00:28:16.640> a<00:28:17.120> key<00:28:17.440> times<00:28:17.760> and<00:28:17.919> I<00:28:18.080> think<00:28:18.159> you're 00:28:18.310 --> 00:28:18.320 align:start position:0% just a key times and I think you're 00:28:18.320 --> 00:28:19.990 align:start position:0% just a key times and I think you're right,<00:28:18.559> board<00:28:18.720> member<00:28:18.960> Green,<00:28:19.440> we'll<00:28:19.679> need<00:28:19.840> to 00:28:19.990 --> 00:28:20.000 align:start position:0% right, board member Green, we'll need to 00:28:20.000 --> 00:28:21.430 align:start position:0% right, board member Green, we'll need to make<00:28:20.080> sure<00:28:20.240> those<00:28:20.480> are<00:28:20.640> in<00:28:20.799> the<00:28:20.960> process, 00:28:21.430 --> 00:28:21.440 align:start position:0% make sure those are in the process, 00:28:21.440 --> 00:28:24.950 align:start position:0% make sure those are in the process, right,<00:28:22.320> that<00:28:22.559> they<00:28:22.799> are<00:28:23.600> um<00:28:24.640> you<00:28:24.799> know, 00:28:24.950 --> 00:28:24.960 align:start position:0% right, that they are um you know, 00:28:24.960 --> 00:28:27.430 align:start position:0% right, that they are um you know, engaged<00:28:25.440> with.<00:28:26.159> So 00:28:27.430 --> 00:28:27.440 align:start position:0% engaged with. So 00:28:27.440 --> 00:28:29.190 align:start position:0% engaged with. So >> the<00:28:27.679> other<00:28:27.919> thing<00:28:28.399> and<00:28:28.640> the<00:28:28.799> one<00:28:28.960> thing<00:28:29.039> that 00:28:29.190 --> 00:28:29.200 align:start position:0% >> the other thing and the one thing that 00:28:29.200 --> 00:28:31.350 align:start position:0% >> the other thing and the one thing that I'm<00:28:29.440> thinking<00:28:29.760> here<00:28:30.000> is<00:28:30.240> that<00:28:31.039> you<00:28:31.200> know 00:28:31.350 --> 00:28:31.360 align:start position:0% I'm thinking here is that you know 00:28:31.360 --> 00:28:33.990 align:start position:0% I'm thinking here is that you know typically<00:28:31.760> when<00:28:32.000> we<00:28:32.159> go<00:28:32.399> through 00:28:33.990 --> 00:28:34.000 align:start position:0% typically when we go through 00:28:34.000 --> 00:28:36.710 align:start position:0% typically when we go through when<00:28:34.320> when<00:28:34.559> we<00:28:34.720> work<00:28:34.880> with<00:28:35.120> staff<00:28:35.520> there's<00:28:36.480> you 00:28:36.710 --> 00:28:36.720 align:start position:0% when when we work with staff there's you 00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:39.990 align:start position:0% when when we work with staff there's you know<00:28:37.919> you<00:28:38.159> can<00:28:38.320> follow<00:28:38.880> that<00:28:39.200> timeline<00:28:39.679> or 00:28:39.990 --> 00:28:40.000 align:start position:0% know you can follow that timeline or 00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:41.510 align:start position:0% know you can follow that timeline or follow<00:28:40.240> the<00:28:40.480> record<00:28:40.799> or<00:28:41.039> follow<00:28:41.279> the 00:28:41.510 --> 00:28:41.520 align:start position:0% follow the record or follow the 00:28:41.520 --> 00:28:43.110 align:start position:0% follow the record or follow the communication<00:28:42.080> like<00:28:42.320> that<00:28:42.640> happens<00:28:42.880> through 00:28:43.110 --> 00:28:43.120 align:start position:0% communication like that happens through 00:28:43.120 --> 00:28:45.430 align:start position:0% communication like that happens through an<00:28:43.279> email<00:28:43.600> it<00:28:43.840> happens<00:28:44.080> through<00:28:44.240> a<00:28:44.399> meeting. 00:28:45.430 --> 00:28:45.440 align:start position:0% an email it happens through a meeting. 00:28:45.440 --> 00:28:48.310 align:start position:0% an email it happens through a meeting. Um<00:28:45.760> so<00:28:45.919> we<00:28:46.159> can<00:28:46.399> we<00:28:46.720> can<00:28:46.880> track<00:28:47.200> that.<00:28:47.919> Do<00:28:48.159> we 00:28:48.310 --> 00:28:48.320 align:start position:0% Um so we can we can track that. Do we 00:28:48.320 --> 00:28:54.389 align:start position:0% Um so we can we can track that. Do we see<00:28:48.559> anything<00:28:48.960> that<00:28:49.440> that<00:28:49.840> could 00:28:54.389 --> 00:28:54.399 align:start position:0% 00:28:54.399 --> 00:28:57.029 align:start position:0% I<00:28:54.720> just<00:28:55.600> it's<00:28:55.919> like<00:28:56.159> everybody<00:28:56.559> kind<00:28:56.720> of<00:28:56.799> knows 00:28:57.029 --> 00:28:57.039 align:start position:0% I just it's like everybody kind of knows 00:28:57.039 --> 00:28:58.710 align:start position:0% I just it's like everybody kind of knows their<00:28:57.279> role.<00:28:57.520> So<00:28:57.679> I<00:28:57.840> just<00:28:58.080> been<00:28:58.240> wondering<00:28:58.480> if 00:28:58.710 --> 00:28:58.720 align:start position:0% their role. So I just been wondering if 00:28:58.720 --> 00:29:01.909 align:start position:0% their role. So I just been wondering if if<00:28:59.039> that<00:28:59.279> lead<00:28:59.600> would<00:28:59.840> understand<00:29:01.200> the<00:29:01.520> nuance 00:29:01.909 --> 00:29:01.919 align:start position:0% if that lead would understand the nuance 00:29:01.919 --> 00:29:04.070 align:start position:0% if that lead would understand the nuance that<00:29:02.159> exists<00:29:02.559> in<00:29:02.720> this<00:29:02.960> space,<00:29:03.679> you<00:29:03.840> know, 00:29:04.070 --> 00:29:04.080 align:start position:0% that exists in this space, you know, 00:29:04.080 --> 00:29:07.990 align:start position:0% that exists in this space, you know, through<00:29:05.200> our<00:29:05.600> standards<00:29:06.640> review<00:29:07.120> processes 00:29:07.990 --> 00:29:08.000 align:start position:0% through our standards review processes 00:29:08.000 --> 00:29:10.950 align:start position:0% through our standards review processes and<00:29:08.240> the<00:29:08.480> way<00:29:08.640> that<00:29:08.799> we<00:29:09.760> we<00:29:10.240> improve<00:29:10.640> things, 00:29:10.950 --> 00:29:10.960 align:start position:0% and the way that we we improve things, 00:29:10.960 --> 00:29:12.870 align:start position:0% and the way that we we improve things, we<00:29:11.200> give<00:29:11.360> feedback,<00:29:11.919> we<00:29:12.159> kind<00:29:12.320> of<00:29:12.399> track<00:29:12.640> our 00:29:12.870 --> 00:29:12.880 align:start position:0% we give feedback, we kind of track our 00:29:12.880 --> 00:29:15.510 align:start position:0% we give feedback, we kind of track our progress.<00:29:13.520> Like<00:29:14.480> is<00:29:14.720> is<00:29:14.960> there<00:29:15.120> anything<00:29:15.360> that 00:29:15.510 --> 00:29:15.520 align:start position:0% progress. Like is is there anything that 00:29:15.520 --> 00:29:19.110 align:start position:0% progress. Like is is there anything that we<00:29:15.679> see<00:29:15.840> there<00:29:16.080> that 00:29:19.110 --> 00:29:19.120 align:start position:0% 00:29:19.120 --> 00:29:21.830 align:start position:0% it's<00:29:19.360> it's<00:29:19.760> again<00:29:20.159> creating<00:29:20.640> a<00:29:20.799> a<00:29:21.200> different 00:29:21.830 --> 00:29:21.840 align:start position:0% it's it's again creating a a different 00:29:21.840 --> 00:29:24.870 align:start position:0% it's it's again creating a a different structure<00:29:22.399> of<00:29:23.520> authority<00:29:24.240> outside<00:29:24.559> of<00:29:24.720> being 00:29:24.870 --> 00:29:24.880 align:start position:0% structure of authority outside of being 00:29:24.880 --> 00:29:27.590 align:start position:0% structure of authority outside of being a<00:29:25.039> board<00:29:25.279> member<00:29:25.520> and<00:29:26.480> a<00:29:26.720> staff<00:29:27.039> and<00:29:27.279> then 00:29:27.590 --> 00:29:27.600 align:start position:0% a board member and a staff and then 00:29:27.600 --> 00:29:29.190 align:start position:0% a board member and a staff and then typically<00:29:28.080> the<00:29:28.240> the<00:29:28.559> writing<00:29:28.880> committee 00:29:29.190 --> 00:29:29.200 align:start position:0% typically the the writing committee 00:29:29.200 --> 00:29:32.950 align:start position:0% typically the the writing committee themselves 00:29:32.950 --> 00:29:32.960 align:start position:0% 00:29:32.960 --> 00:29:35.190 align:start position:0% if<00:29:33.120> any<00:29:33.279> if<00:29:33.520> if<00:29:33.840> staff<00:29:34.080> has<00:29:34.320> any<00:29:34.480> feedback.<00:29:35.039> I'm 00:29:35.190 --> 00:29:35.200 align:start position:0% if any if if staff has any feedback. I'm 00:29:35.200 --> 00:29:37.350 align:start position:0% if any if if staff has any feedback. I'm I'm<00:29:35.520> just<00:29:36.159> I'm<00:29:36.480> just<00:29:36.640> kind<00:29:36.799> of<00:29:36.960> looking 00:29:37.350 --> 00:29:37.360 align:start position:0% I'm just I'm just kind of looking 00:29:37.360 --> 00:29:39.830 align:start position:0% I'm just I'm just kind of looking through<00:29:37.600> the<00:29:37.919> logistics<00:29:38.399> of<00:29:38.559> it<00:29:38.799> long<00:29:39.039> term 00:29:39.830 --> 00:29:39.840 align:start position:0% through the logistics of it long term 00:29:39.840 --> 00:29:41.990 align:start position:0% through the logistics of it long term >> I<00:29:40.080> guess<00:29:40.559> and<00:29:40.799> I'm<00:29:41.039> just<00:29:41.200> thinking<00:29:41.440> out<00:29:41.679> loud 00:29:41.990 --> 00:29:42.000 align:start position:0% >> I guess and I'm just thinking out loud 00:29:42.000 --> 00:29:44.549 align:start position:0% >> I guess and I'm just thinking out loud too.<00:29:42.399> So<00:29:42.559> if<00:29:42.799> if<00:29:43.120> I'm<00:29:43.279> missing<00:29:43.600> something,<00:29:44.240> I 00:29:44.549 --> 00:29:44.559 align:start position:0% too. So if if I'm missing something, I 00:29:44.559 --> 00:29:47.029 align:start position:0% too. So if if I'm missing something, I personally<00:29:45.039> I<00:29:45.520> I<00:29:45.919> do<00:29:46.080> look<00:29:46.240> forward<00:29:46.559> to<00:29:46.720> some 00:29:47.029 --> 00:29:47.039 align:start position:0% personally I I do look forward to some 00:29:47.039 --> 00:29:48.789 align:start position:0% personally I I do look forward to some type<00:29:47.279> of<00:29:47.520> engagement<00:29:48.080> instead<00:29:48.480> of<00:29:48.559> a 00:29:48.789 --> 00:29:48.799 align:start position:0% type of engagement instead of a 00:29:48.799 --> 00:29:51.430 align:start position:0% type of engagement instead of a hands-off.<00:29:49.440> So<00:29:50.240> this<00:29:50.480> seems<00:29:50.720> to<00:29:50.880> open<00:29:51.120> that 00:29:51.430 --> 00:29:51.440 align:start position:0% hands-off. So this seems to open that 00:29:51.440 --> 00:29:53.430 align:start position:0% hands-off. So this seems to open that door<00:29:51.760> without<00:29:52.240> creating<00:29:52.559> all<00:29:52.720> the<00:29:52.880> logistic 00:29:53.430 --> 00:29:53.440 align:start position:0% door without creating all the logistic 00:29:53.440 --> 00:29:55.830 align:start position:0% door without creating all the logistic problems,<00:29:54.000> but<00:29:54.240> I<00:29:54.720> I'm<00:29:55.039> trying<00:29:55.279> to<00:29:55.440> understand 00:29:55.830 --> 00:29:55.840 align:start position:0% problems, but I I'm trying to understand 00:29:55.840 --> 00:29:57.830 align:start position:0% problems, but I I'm trying to understand if<00:29:56.080> there's<00:29:56.320> a<00:29:56.799> you<00:29:56.960> know<00:29:57.120> what<00:29:57.279> the<00:29:57.440> depth<00:29:57.679> of 00:29:57.830 --> 00:29:57.840 align:start position:0% if there's a you know what the depth of 00:29:57.840 --> 00:29:59.669 align:start position:0% if there's a you know what the depth of concern<00:29:58.240> might<00:29:58.399> be<00:29:58.559> or<00:29:58.799> maybe<00:29:58.960> it's<00:29:59.200> just<00:29:59.360> new. 00:29:59.669 --> 00:29:59.679 align:start position:0% concern might be or maybe it's just new. 00:29:59.679 --> 00:30:01.669 align:start position:0% concern might be or maybe it's just new. So<00:29:59.840> we're<00:30:00.000> trying<00:30:00.159> to<00:30:00.559> kind<00:30:00.799> of<00:30:01.039> filter<00:30:01.360> it<00:30:01.520> all 00:30:01.669 --> 00:30:01.679 align:start position:0% So we're trying to kind of filter it all 00:30:01.679 --> 00:30:02.549 align:start position:0% So we're trying to kind of filter it all out. 00:30:02.549 --> 00:30:02.559 align:start position:0% out. 00:30:02.559 --> 00:30:03.110 align:start position:0% out. >> Yep. 00:30:03.110 --> 00:30:03.120 align:start position:0% >> Yep. 00:30:03.120 --> 00:30:03.430 align:start position:0% >> Yep. >> Okay. 00:30:03.430 --> 00:30:03.440 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:05.350 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> That's<00:30:03.679> kind<00:30:03.840> of<00:30:04.159> really<00:30:04.559> that's<00:30:04.880> that's<00:30:05.200> what 00:30:05.350 --> 00:30:05.360 align:start position:0% >> That's kind of really that's that's what 00:30:05.360 --> 00:30:07.990 align:start position:0% >> That's kind of really that's that's what it<00:30:05.600> is.<00:30:06.240> Um,<00:30:06.720> and<00:30:06.880> again,<00:30:07.200> just<00:30:07.440> being<00:30:07.679> in<00:30:07.840> this 00:30:07.990 --> 00:30:08.000 align:start position:0% it is. Um, and again, just being in this 00:30:08.000 --> 00:30:11.110 align:start position:0% it is. Um, and again, just being in this committee<00:30:08.320> now<00:30:08.559> for<00:30:09.120> four<00:30:09.440> years,<00:30:09.760> it's<00:30:10.880> the 00:30:11.110 --> 00:30:11.120 align:start position:0% committee now for four years, it's the 00:30:11.120 --> 00:30:18.070 align:start position:0% committee now for four years, it's the news<00:30:11.440> happens<00:30:12.640> and,<00:30:14.000> you<00:30:14.240> know,<00:30:15.360> the<00:30:16.000> the 00:30:18.070 --> 00:30:18.080 align:start position:0% news happens and, you know, the the 00:30:18.080 --> 00:30:20.870 align:start position:0% news happens and, you know, the the debates<00:30:18.720> kind<00:30:18.960> of<00:30:19.039> happen.<00:30:19.440> I<00:30:19.600> I<00:30:19.919> want<00:30:20.000> to<00:30:20.159> know 00:30:20.870 --> 00:30:20.880 align:start position:0% debates kind of happen. I I want to know 00:30:20.880 --> 00:30:23.830 align:start position:0% debates kind of happen. I I want to know like<00:30:21.200> how<00:30:21.440> we're<00:30:21.679> going<00:30:21.840> to<00:30:23.200> handle<00:30:23.600> the 00:30:23.830 --> 00:30:23.840 align:start position:0% like how we're going to handle the 00:30:23.840 --> 00:30:25.190 align:start position:0% like how we're going to handle the logistics<00:30:24.240> of<00:30:24.399> that<00:30:24.559> because<00:30:24.799> I<00:30:24.880> don't<00:30:25.039> I 00:30:25.190 --> 00:30:25.200 align:start position:0% logistics of that because I don't I 00:30:25.200 --> 00:30:27.750 align:start position:0% logistics of that because I don't I don't<00:30:25.279> think<00:30:25.360> it's<00:30:25.520> if,<00:30:25.840> it's<00:30:26.000> when. 00:30:27.750 --> 00:30:27.760 align:start position:0% don't think it's if, it's when. 00:30:27.760 --> 00:30:30.470 align:start position:0% don't think it's if, it's when. Um,<00:30:28.960> and<00:30:29.200> we<00:30:29.440> really<00:30:29.679> haven't<00:30:30.000> been<00:30:30.080> able<00:30:30.240> to 00:30:30.470 --> 00:30:30.480 align:start position:0% Um, and we really haven't been able to 00:30:30.480 --> 00:30:32.950 align:start position:0% Um, and we really haven't been able to talk<00:30:30.720> with<00:30:30.880> the<00:30:31.120> committee 00:30:32.950 --> 00:30:32.960 align:start position:0% talk with the committee 00:30:32.960 --> 00:30:37.029 align:start position:0% talk with the committee before,<00:30:33.840> right?<00:30:34.080> The<00:30:34.320> writing<00:30:34.640> committees. 00:30:37.029 --> 00:30:37.039 align:start position:0% before, right? The writing committees. 00:30:37.039 --> 00:30:38.630 align:start position:0% before, right? The writing committees. I<00:30:37.200> I'm<00:30:37.440> looking<00:30:37.600> for<00:30:37.760> a<00:30:37.919> confirmation<00:30:38.399> on 00:30:38.630 --> 00:30:38.640 align:start position:0% I I'm looking for a confirmation on 00:30:38.640 --> 00:30:39.190 align:start position:0% I I'm looking for a confirmation on that. 00:30:39.190 --> 00:30:39.200 align:start position:0% that. 00:30:39.200 --> 00:30:42.149 align:start position:0% that. >> Yeah.<00:30:39.520> Well,<00:30:39.760> that<00:30:40.000> was<00:30:40.799> yes<00:30:41.039> and<00:30:41.360> no<00:30:41.760> because 00:30:42.149 --> 00:30:42.159 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Well, that was yes and no because 00:30:42.159 --> 00:30:42.630 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Well, that was yes and no because during 00:30:42.630 --> 00:30:42.640 align:start position:0% during 00:30:42.640 --> 00:30:44.470 align:start position:0% during >> Yeah.<00:30:42.960> Some<00:30:43.200> at<00:30:43.440> some<00:30:43.600> points<00:30:43.840> we<00:30:44.080> did<00:30:44.320> like 00:30:44.470 --> 00:30:44.480 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Some at some points we did like 00:30:44.480 --> 00:30:47.110 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Some at some points we did like during<00:30:44.799> ELA,<00:30:45.440> remember<00:30:45.840> we<00:30:46.080> had<00:30:46.720> some<00:30:46.960> of<00:30:46.960> the 00:30:47.110 --> 00:30:47.120 align:start position:0% during ELA, remember we had some of the 00:30:47.120 --> 00:30:48.549 align:start position:0% during ELA, remember we had some of the writing<00:30:47.440> committee<00:30:47.760> members<00:30:48.080> join<00:30:48.320> our 00:30:48.549 --> 00:30:48.559 align:start position:0% writing committee members join our 00:30:48.559 --> 00:30:49.669 align:start position:0% writing committee members join our committee<00:30:48.799> meeting<00:30:49.039> and<00:30:49.200> that<00:30:49.440> was<00:30:49.520> like 00:30:49.669 --> 00:30:49.679 align:start position:0% committee meeting and that was like 00:30:49.679 --> 00:30:50.950 align:start position:0% committee meeting and that was like awesome<00:30:49.919> because<00:30:50.159> they<00:30:50.399> gave<00:30:50.559> so<00:30:50.799> much 00:30:50.950 --> 00:30:50.960 align:start position:0% awesome because they gave so much 00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:53.510 align:start position:0% awesome because they gave so much clarity<00:30:51.440> on<00:30:51.679> different<00:30:52.000> pieces.<00:30:52.960> Um<00:30:53.279> I<00:30:53.440> think 00:30:53.510 --> 00:30:53.520 align:start position:0% clarity on different pieces. Um I think 00:30:53.520 --> 00:30:54.950 align:start position:0% clarity on different pieces. Um I think we<00:30:53.679> also<00:30:53.919> had<00:30:54.000> a<00:30:54.240> couple<00:30:54.399> people<00:30:54.559> during<00:30:54.799> the 00:30:54.950 --> 00:30:54.960 align:start position:0% we also had a couple people during the 00:30:54.960 --> 00:30:57.110 align:start position:0% we also had a couple people during the seed<00:30:55.279> standards<00:30:55.760> join<00:30:56.159> and<00:30:56.399> then<00:30:56.559> we<00:30:56.799> kind<00:30:56.960> of 00:30:57.110 --> 00:30:57.120 align:start position:0% seed standards join and then we kind of 00:30:57.120 --> 00:31:00.070 align:start position:0% seed standards join and then we kind of went<00:30:57.360> back<00:30:57.760> a<00:30:58.000> little<00:30:58.080> bit<00:30:58.240> to<00:30:58.480> say<00:30:58.720> let's<00:30:59.039> not 00:31:00.070 --> 00:31:00.080 align:start position:0% went back a little bit to say let's not 00:31:00.080 --> 00:31:03.269 align:start position:0% went back a little bit to say let's not have<00:31:00.320> that<00:31:00.799> sort<00:31:01.039> of<00:31:01.200> openness<00:31:02.159> and<00:31:02.399> this<00:31:02.640> is 00:31:03.269 --> 00:31:03.279 align:start position:0% have that sort of openness and this is 00:31:03.279 --> 00:31:05.269 align:start position:0% have that sort of openness and this is instead<00:31:03.679> of<00:31:03.760> going<00:31:04.000> to<00:31:04.320> full<00:31:04.559> openness<00:31:05.039> it's 00:31:05.269 --> 00:31:05.279 align:start position:0% instead of going to full openness it's 00:31:05.279 --> 00:31:06.950 align:start position:0% instead of going to full openness it's just<00:31:05.440> like<00:31:05.679> there'll<00:31:06.000> be<00:31:06.080> certain<00:31:06.480> like<00:31:06.720> what 00:31:06.950 --> 00:31:06.960 align:start position:0% just like there'll be certain like what 00:31:06.960 --> 00:31:08.950 align:start position:0% just like there'll be certain like what we<00:31:07.120> had<00:31:07.360> like<00:31:07.760> with<00:31:08.080> ELA<00:31:08.480> it<00:31:08.640> was<00:31:08.720> like<00:31:08.799> there 00:31:08.950 --> 00:31:08.960 align:start position:0% we had like with ELA it was like there 00:31:08.960 --> 00:31:10.789 align:start position:0% we had like with ELA it was like there was<00:31:09.120> two<00:31:09.760> people<00:31:10.159> there<00:31:10.320> was<00:31:10.399> like<00:31:10.559> an 00:31:10.789 --> 00:31:10.799 align:start position:0% was two people there was like an 00:31:10.799 --> 00:31:14.070 align:start position:0% was two people there was like an elementary<00:31:11.279> and<00:31:11.520> a<00:31:12.159> um 00:31:14.070 --> 00:31:14.080 align:start position:0% elementary and a um 00:31:14.080 --> 00:31:15.830 align:start position:0% elementary and a um uh<00:31:14.480> high<00:31:14.880> whatever<00:31:15.200> there<00:31:15.360> were<00:31:15.440> two<00:31:15.679> people 00:31:15.830 --> 00:31:15.840 align:start position:0% uh high whatever there were two people 00:31:15.840 --> 00:31:17.909 align:start position:0% uh high whatever there were two people that<00:31:16.240> could<00:31:16.559> talk<00:31:16.799> on<00:31:17.039> each<00:31:17.279> of<00:31:17.360> the<00:31:17.520> pieces<00:31:17.760> of 00:31:17.909 --> 00:31:17.919 align:start position:0% that could talk on each of the pieces of 00:31:17.919 --> 00:31:19.269 align:start position:0% that could talk on each of the pieces of ELA<00:31:18.320> and<00:31:18.480> I<00:31:18.640> thought<00:31:18.720> that<00:31:18.960> was<00:31:19.039> really 00:31:19.269 --> 00:31:19.279 align:start position:0% ELA and I thought that was really 00:31:19.279 --> 00:31:20.310 align:start position:0% ELA and I thought that was really helpful<00:31:19.520> and<00:31:19.679> they<00:31:19.919> were<00:31:20.080> great 00:31:20.310 --> 00:31:20.320 align:start position:0% helpful and they were great 00:31:20.320 --> 00:31:22.310 align:start position:0% helpful and they were great representations<00:31:21.120> and<00:31:21.600> of<00:31:21.840> the<00:31:22.000> writing 00:31:22.310 --> 00:31:22.320 align:start position:0% representations and of the writing 00:31:22.320 --> 00:31:24.710 align:start position:0% representations and of the writing committee<00:31:22.640> at<00:31:22.799> that<00:31:22.960> time.<00:31:23.200> So 00:31:24.710 --> 00:31:24.720 align:start position:0% committee at that time. So 00:31:24.720 --> 00:31:26.230 align:start position:0% committee at that time. So that's<00:31:25.039> what<00:31:25.120> that's<00:31:25.360> where<00:31:25.520> it<00:31:25.679> came<00:31:25.760> from.<00:31:26.000> I 00:31:26.230 --> 00:31:26.240 align:start position:0% that's what that's where it came from. I 00:31:26.240 --> 00:31:27.669 align:start position:0% that's what that's where it came from. I saw<00:31:26.399> that<00:31:26.559> work<00:31:26.799> really<00:31:27.039> well<00:31:27.200> and<00:31:27.440> I<00:31:27.600> thought 00:31:27.669 --> 00:31:27.679 align:start position:0% saw that work really well and I thought 00:31:27.679 --> 00:31:29.510 align:start position:0% saw that work really well and I thought that<00:31:27.919> potentially<00:31:28.399> this<00:31:28.640> would<00:31:28.799> work<00:31:29.039> as<00:31:29.200> well 00:31:29.510 --> 00:31:29.520 align:start position:0% that potentially this would work as well 00:31:29.520 --> 00:31:33.669 align:start position:0% that potentially this would work as well too.<00:31:29.760> And<00:31:30.399> um<00:31:31.679> I<00:31:31.919> also<00:31:32.240> think<00:31:32.320> that<00:31:32.640> the<00:31:33.360> idea 00:31:33.669 --> 00:31:33.679 align:start position:0% too. And um I also think that the idea 00:31:33.679 --> 00:31:35.750 align:start position:0% too. And um I also think that the idea of<00:31:33.919> having,<00:31:35.120> you<00:31:35.279> know,<00:31:35.440> their 00:31:35.750 --> 00:31:35.760 align:start position:0% of having, you know, their 00:31:35.760 --> 00:31:37.110 align:start position:0% of having, you know, their responsibility<00:31:36.320> to<00:31:36.559> make<00:31:36.720> sure<00:31:36.799> they're 00:31:37.110 --> 00:31:37.120 align:start position:0% responsibility to make sure they're 00:31:37.120 --> 00:31:39.269 align:start position:0% responsibility to make sure they're representing<00:31:37.679> the<00:31:38.240> the<00:31:38.559> work<00:31:38.720> of<00:31:38.799> the<00:31:38.960> writing 00:31:39.269 --> 00:31:39.279 align:start position:0% representing the the work of the writing 00:31:39.279 --> 00:31:41.669 align:start position:0% representing the the work of the writing committee<00:31:39.600> is<00:31:39.760> helpful.<00:31:40.640> And<00:31:41.039> then<00:31:41.360> also 00:31:41.669 --> 00:31:41.679 align:start position:0% committee is helpful. And then also 00:31:41.679 --> 00:31:43.590 align:start position:0% committee is helpful. And then also knowing<00:31:41.919> that<00:31:42.080> they're<00:31:42.320> comfortable<00:31:42.720> being 00:31:43.590 --> 00:31:43.600 align:start position:0% knowing that they're comfortable being 00:31:43.600 --> 00:31:46.149 align:start position:0% knowing that they're comfortable being engaging<00:31:44.399> directly<00:31:44.880> with<00:31:45.360> elected<00:31:45.840> state 00:31:46.149 --> 00:31:46.159 align:start position:0% engaging directly with elected state 00:31:46.159 --> 00:31:47.830 align:start position:0% engaging directly with elected state schoolboard<00:31:46.640> members<00:31:47.039> and<00:31:47.279> potentially 00:31:47.830 --> 00:31:47.840 align:start position:0% schoolboard members and potentially 00:31:47.840 --> 00:31:49.590 align:start position:0% schoolboard members and potentially being<00:31:48.000> in<00:31:48.399> public<00:31:48.720> meetings<00:31:49.039> and<00:31:49.360> having 00:31:49.590 --> 00:31:49.600 align:start position:0% being in public meetings and having 00:31:49.600 --> 00:31:51.430 align:start position:0% being in public meetings and having public<00:31:49.919> comment.<00:31:50.240> I<00:31:50.480> think<00:31:50.559> that's<00:31:50.960> good<00:31:51.120> to 00:31:51.430 --> 00:31:51.440 align:start position:0% public comment. I think that's good to 00:31:51.440 --> 00:31:52.789 align:start position:0% public comment. I think that's good to identify<00:31:51.840> those<00:31:52.080> folks<00:31:52.240> in<00:31:52.399> the<00:31:52.559> writing 00:31:52.789 --> 00:31:52.799 align:start position:0% identify those folks in the writing 00:31:52.799 --> 00:31:54.149 align:start position:0% identify those folks in the writing committee<00:31:53.039> and<00:31:53.200> then<00:31:53.360> just<00:31:53.519> have<00:31:53.679> them<00:31:53.840> be<00:31:54.000> the 00:31:54.149 --> 00:31:54.159 align:start position:0% committee and then just have them be the 00:31:54.159 --> 00:31:57.750 align:start position:0% committee and then just have them be the designated<00:31:54.720> folks<00:31:54.960> that<00:31:55.120> we<00:31:55.279> work<00:31:55.440> with 00:31:57.750 --> 00:31:57.760 align:start position:0% designated folks that we work with 00:31:57.760 --> 00:31:59.750 align:start position:0% designated folks that we work with >> and<00:31:57.919> and<00:31:58.240> with<00:31:58.399> the<00:31:58.720> different<00:31:59.120> like<00:31:59.360> with<00:31:59.519> the 00:31:59.750 --> 00:31:59.760 align:start position:0% >> and and with the different like with the 00:31:59.760 --> 00:32:01.509 align:start position:0% >> and and with the different like with the different<00:32:00.320> um<00:32:00.880> you<00:32:01.039> know<00:32:01.120> a<00:32:01.200> writing 00:32:01.509 --> 00:32:01.519 align:start position:0% different um you know a writing 00:32:01.519 --> 00:32:02.870 align:start position:0% different um you know a writing committee<00:32:01.840> obviously<00:32:02.240> is<00:32:02.480> going<00:32:02.559> to<00:32:02.720> have 00:32:02.870 --> 00:32:02.880 align:start position:0% committee obviously is going to have 00:32:02.880 --> 00:32:05.830 align:start position:0% committee obviously is going to have robust<00:32:03.519> conversation<00:32:04.240> and<00:32:04.640> you<00:32:04.799> know<00:32:05.279> review 00:32:05.830 --> 00:32:05.840 align:start position:0% robust conversation and you know review 00:32:05.840 --> 00:32:07.590 align:start position:0% robust conversation and you know review so<00:32:06.080> there's<00:32:06.240> going<00:32:06.320> to<00:32:06.480> be<00:32:06.559> a<00:32:06.720> lot<00:32:06.799> of 00:32:07.590 --> 00:32:07.600 align:start position:0% so there's going to be a lot of 00:32:07.600 --> 00:32:09.110 align:start position:0% so there's going to be a lot of alignment<00:32:08.080> with<00:32:08.320> each<00:32:08.559> other<00:32:08.799> there's 00:32:09.110 --> 00:32:09.120 align:start position:0% alignment with each other there's 00:32:09.120 --> 00:32:11.430 align:start position:0% alignment with each other there's probably<00:32:09.360> also<00:32:09.679> going<00:32:09.760> to<00:32:09.919> be<00:32:10.000> a<00:32:10.159> lot<00:32:10.320> of<00:32:11.279> you 00:32:11.430 --> 00:32:11.440 align:start position:0% probably also going to be a lot of you 00:32:11.440 --> 00:32:14.070 align:start position:0% probably also going to be a lot of you know<00:32:11.840> um<00:32:12.080> differing<00:32:12.480> of<00:32:12.640> opinions<00:32:13.120> on<00:32:13.440> on<00:32:13.840> what 00:32:14.070 --> 00:32:14.080 align:start position:0% know um differing of opinions on on what 00:32:14.080 --> 00:32:16.149 align:start position:0% know um differing of opinions on on what might<00:32:14.320> be<00:32:14.480> better.<00:32:14.799> I'm<00:32:15.120> wondering<00:32:15.519> if<00:32:15.840> that 00:32:16.149 --> 00:32:16.159 align:start position:0% might be better. I'm wondering if that 00:32:16.159 --> 00:32:18.710 align:start position:0% might be better. I'm wondering if that state<00:32:16.480> if<00:32:16.720> that<00:32:16.960> lead<00:32:17.360> that<00:32:17.519> committee<00:32:17.840> lead 00:32:18.710 --> 00:32:18.720 align:start position:0% state if that lead that committee lead 00:32:18.720 --> 00:32:20.549 align:start position:0% state if that lead that committee lead has<00:32:18.880> a<00:32:19.120> level<00:32:19.279> of<00:32:19.440> authority<00:32:19.919> over<00:32:20.240> other 00:32:20.549 --> 00:32:20.559 align:start position:0% has a level of authority over other 00:32:20.559 --> 00:32:23.269 align:start position:0% has a level of authority over other committees<00:32:21.840> o<00:32:22.320> over<00:32:22.559> other<00:32:22.880> committee 00:32:23.269 --> 00:32:23.279 align:start position:0% committees o over other committee 00:32:23.279 --> 00:32:24.950 align:start position:0% committees o over other committee members. 00:32:24.950 --> 00:32:24.960 align:start position:0% members. 00:32:24.960 --> 00:32:27.590 align:start position:0% members. Um,<00:32:25.279> and<00:32:25.440> I<00:32:25.679> say<00:32:25.840> that<00:32:26.000> in<00:32:26.240> regards<00:32:26.559> to<00:32:27.279> again, 00:32:27.590 --> 00:32:27.600 align:start position:0% Um, and I say that in regards to again, 00:32:27.600 --> 00:32:30.310 align:start position:0% Um, and I say that in regards to again, if<00:32:27.760> we're<00:32:27.919> structuring<00:32:28.480> some<00:32:29.039> a<00:32:29.279> different<00:32:30.159> if 00:32:30.310 --> 00:32:30.320 align:start position:0% if we're structuring some a different if 00:32:30.320 --> 00:32:31.990 align:start position:0% if we're structuring some a different if we're<00:32:30.559> implementing<00:32:30.960> a<00:32:31.200> level<00:32:31.360> of<00:32:31.519> authority 00:32:31.990 --> 00:32:32.000 align:start position:0% we're implementing a level of authority 00:32:32.000 --> 00:32:35.190 align:start position:0% we're implementing a level of authority over<00:32:32.720> a<00:32:33.039> committee<00:32:33.360> itself,<00:32:34.320> which<00:32:34.559> a<00:32:34.720> title 00:32:35.190 --> 00:32:35.200 align:start position:0% over a committee itself, which a title 00:32:35.200 --> 00:32:37.509 align:start position:0% over a committee itself, which a title sometimes<00:32:35.679> can<00:32:35.919> imply<00:32:36.240> that<00:32:36.880> is<00:32:37.120> that<00:32:37.360> going 00:32:37.509 --> 00:32:37.519 align:start position:0% sometimes can imply that is that going 00:32:37.519 --> 00:32:42.549 align:start position:0% sometimes can imply that is that going to<00:32:37.679> negatively<00:32:38.240> affect<00:32:38.640> somebody<00:32:38.960> that<00:32:39.279> is<00:32:40.720> um 00:32:42.549 --> 00:32:42.559 align:start position:0% to negatively affect somebody that is um 00:32:42.559 --> 00:32:45.269 align:start position:0% to negatively affect somebody that is um trying<00:32:42.880> to<00:32:43.600> implement<00:32:44.320> like<00:32:44.559> the<00:32:44.880> standard 00:32:45.269 --> 00:32:45.279 align:start position:0% trying to implement like the standard 00:32:45.279 --> 00:32:47.350 align:start position:0% trying to implement like the standard that<00:32:45.519> they're<00:32:45.760> looking<00:32:45.919> to<00:32:46.240> implement<00:32:46.960> and 00:32:47.350 --> 00:32:47.360 align:start position:0% that they're looking to implement and 00:32:47.360 --> 00:32:48.149 align:start position:0% that they're looking to implement and that<00:32:47.600> will<00:32:47.760> be<00:32:47.840> over. 00:32:48.149 --> 00:32:48.159 align:start position:0% that will be over. 00:32:48.159 --> 00:32:49.750 align:start position:0% that will be over. >> You're<00:32:48.399> talking<00:32:48.640> committee<00:32:49.039> members,<00:32:49.600> is 00:32:49.750 --> 00:32:49.760 align:start position:0% >> You're talking committee members, is 00:32:49.760 --> 00:32:52.230 align:start position:0% >> You're talking committee members, is that<00:32:49.919> right?<00:32:50.159> Other<00:32:50.559> Okay.<00:32:51.039> I<00:32:51.200> mean, 00:32:52.230 --> 00:32:52.240 align:start position:0% that right? Other Okay. I mean, 00:32:52.240 --> 00:32:55.669 align:start position:0% that right? Other Okay. I mean, >> I<00:32:52.480> think<00:32:52.559> that<00:32:52.799> is<00:32:52.880> a<00:32:53.039> fair<00:32:54.399> and<00:32:54.640> maybe<00:32:54.880> it's 00:32:55.669 --> 00:32:55.679 align:start position:0% >> I think that is a fair and maybe it's 00:32:55.679 --> 00:32:57.430 align:start position:0% >> I think that is a fair and maybe it's staff<00:32:56.000> don't<00:32:56.240> pick<00:32:56.480> that<00:32:56.720> person.<00:32:57.039> Maybe<00:32:57.200> it's 00:32:57.430 --> 00:32:57.440 align:start position:0% staff don't pick that person. Maybe it's 00:32:57.440 --> 00:32:59.350 align:start position:0% staff don't pick that person. Maybe it's the<00:32:57.600> the<00:32:57.919> committee<00:32:58.240> itself<00:32:58.880> picks<00:32:59.120> a 00:32:59.350 --> 00:32:59.360 align:start position:0% the the committee itself picks a 00:32:59.360 --> 00:33:02.630 align:start position:0% the the committee itself picks a spokesperson,<00:33:00.159> right?<00:33:01.600> Uh<00:33:02.080> I<00:33:02.320> don't<00:33:02.399> know. 00:33:02.630 --> 00:33:02.640 align:start position:0% spokesperson, right? Uh I don't know. 00:33:02.640 --> 00:33:04.070 align:start position:0% spokesperson, right? Uh I don't know. It's<00:33:02.960> something<00:33:03.200> to<00:33:03.360> think<00:33:03.519> about<00:33:03.679> there.<00:33:03.919> But 00:33:04.070 --> 00:33:04.080 align:start position:0% It's something to think about there. But 00:33:04.080 --> 00:33:06.230 align:start position:0% It's something to think about there. But I<00:33:04.159> think<00:33:04.240> you're<00:33:04.480> right<00:33:04.720> that<00:33:04.960> could<00:33:05.919> I<00:33:06.159> mean 00:33:06.230 --> 00:33:06.240 align:start position:0% I think you're right that could I mean 00:33:06.240 --> 00:33:08.630 align:start position:0% I think you're right that could I mean there<00:33:06.480> could<00:33:06.640> be<00:33:06.799> a<00:33:07.440> power<00:33:07.760> differential<00:33:08.480> once 00:33:08.630 --> 00:33:08.640 align:start position:0% there could be a power differential once 00:33:08.640 --> 00:33:10.549 align:start position:0% there could be a power differential once you<00:33:08.799> start<00:33:08.960> assigning<00:33:09.440> someone<00:33:09.679> to<00:33:10.080> speak<00:33:10.320> on 00:33:10.549 --> 00:33:10.559 align:start position:0% you start assigning someone to speak on 00:33:10.559 --> 00:33:13.029 align:start position:0% you start assigning someone to speak on behalf<00:33:10.799> of<00:33:10.960> others,<00:33:11.440> but<00:33:11.679> it<00:33:11.840> also<00:33:12.080> could<00:33:12.480> be<00:33:12.720> a 00:33:13.029 --> 00:33:13.039 align:start position:0% behalf of others, but it also could be a 00:33:13.039 --> 00:33:15.430 align:start position:0% behalf of others, but it also could be a voice<00:33:13.360> that<00:33:13.600> they're<00:33:13.840> bringing<00:33:14.159> to<00:33:14.320> it.<00:33:14.640> So 00:33:15.430 --> 00:33:15.440 align:start position:0% voice that they're bringing to it. So 00:33:15.440 --> 00:33:18.630 align:start position:0% voice that they're bringing to it. So right<00:33:15.679> now<00:33:15.840> we<00:33:16.080> don't<00:33:16.320> have<00:33:16.720> really<00:33:17.039> any 00:33:18.630 --> 00:33:18.640 align:start position:0% right now we don't have really any 00:33:18.640 --> 00:33:20.310 align:start position:0% right now we don't have really any so<00:33:18.960> which<00:33:19.120> we<00:33:19.279> saw<00:33:19.440> in<00:33:19.600> the<00:33:19.760> fall<00:33:19.919> when<00:33:20.159> we 00:33:20.310 --> 00:33:20.320 align:start position:0% so which we saw in the fall when we 00:33:20.320 --> 00:33:22.630 align:start position:0% so which we saw in the fall when we asked<00:33:20.559> those<00:33:21.039> you<00:33:21.200> know<00:33:21.440> questions<00:33:21.840> can<00:33:22.080> we 00:33:22.630 --> 00:33:22.640 align:start position:0% asked those you know questions can we 00:33:22.640 --> 00:33:24.149 align:start position:0% asked those you know questions can we ask<00:33:22.960> questions<00:33:23.279> about<00:33:23.519> this<00:33:23.679> and<00:33:23.840> this<00:33:24.000> and 00:33:24.149 --> 00:33:24.159 align:start position:0% ask questions about this and this and 00:33:24.159 --> 00:33:26.149 align:start position:0% ask questions about this and this and this<00:33:24.399> right<00:33:24.640> but<00:33:24.799> there<00:33:24.960> wasn't<00:33:25.279> really<00:33:25.919> an 00:33:26.149 --> 00:33:26.159 align:start position:0% this right but there wasn't really an 00:33:26.159 --> 00:33:30.070 align:start position:0% this right but there wasn't really an easy<00:33:26.399> way<00:33:26.559> to<00:33:26.720> do<00:33:26.880> that<00:33:27.120> or<00:33:27.440> formal<00:33:27.840> process 00:33:30.070 --> 00:33:30.080 align:start position:0% easy way to do that or formal process 00:33:30.080 --> 00:33:33.430 align:start position:0% easy way to do that or formal process >> and<00:33:30.320> I<00:33:30.559> think<00:33:30.720> the<00:33:31.039> SOP<00:33:31.600> will<00:33:31.840> be<00:33:32.000> good<00:33:32.320> at<00:33:33.279> you 00:33:33.430 --> 00:33:33.440 align:start position:0% >> and I think the SOP will be good at you 00:33:33.440 --> 00:33:35.269 align:start position:0% >> and I think the SOP will be good at you know<00:33:33.840> identifying<00:33:34.320> those<00:33:34.559> pieces<00:33:35.039> like 00:33:35.269 --> 00:33:35.279 align:start position:0% know identifying those pieces like 00:33:35.279 --> 00:33:37.509 align:start position:0% know identifying those pieces like that's<00:33:35.519> part<00:33:35.679> of<00:33:35.919> like<00:33:36.960> we're<00:33:37.200> looking<00:33:37.360> at 00:33:37.509 --> 00:33:37.519 align:start position:0% that's part of like we're looking at 00:33:37.519 --> 00:33:39.190 align:start position:0% that's part of like we're looking at this<00:33:37.679> at<00:33:37.840> the<00:33:38.000> big<00:33:38.159> picture<00:33:38.320> and<00:33:38.480> then<00:33:38.640> the<00:33:38.799> SOP 00:33:39.190 --> 00:33:39.200 align:start position:0% this at the big picture and then the SOP 00:33:39.200 --> 00:33:41.990 align:start position:0% this at the big picture and then the SOP and<00:33:39.440> the<00:33:39.840> the<00:33:40.240> processes<00:33:40.799> that<00:33:41.120> staff<00:33:41.519> sets<00:33:41.760> up 00:33:41.990 --> 00:33:42.000 align:start position:0% and the the processes that staff sets up 00:33:42.000 --> 00:33:43.509 align:start position:0% and the the processes that staff sets up we<00:33:42.159> can<00:33:42.320> review<00:33:42.559> those<00:33:42.799> to<00:33:42.960> make<00:33:43.120> sure<00:33:43.200> we<00:33:43.360> feel 00:33:43.509 --> 00:33:43.519 align:start position:0% we can review those to make sure we feel 00:33:43.519 --> 00:33:44.950 align:start position:0% we can review those to make sure we feel comfortable<00:33:43.760> with<00:33:43.840> it<00:33:44.000> but<00:33:44.240> including<00:33:44.799> it 00:33:44.950 --> 00:33:44.960 align:start position:0% comfortable with it but including it 00:33:44.960 --> 00:33:46.310 align:start position:0% comfortable with it but including it here<00:33:45.120> on<00:33:45.279> the<00:33:45.440> big<00:33:45.600> picture<00:33:45.919> on<00:33:46.159> this 00:33:46.310 --> 00:33:46.320 align:start position:0% here on the big picture on this 00:33:46.320 --> 00:33:49.029 align:start position:0% here on the big picture on this document.<00:33:47.200> Seems<00:33:47.519> like<00:33:48.320> there's<00:33:48.640> plenty<00:33:48.880> of 00:33:49.029 --> 00:33:49.039 align:start position:0% document. Seems like there's plenty of 00:33:49.039 --> 00:33:50.710 align:start position:0% document. Seems like there's plenty of questions<00:33:49.279> that<00:33:49.440> we<00:33:49.679> can<00:33:50.000> ask<00:33:50.320> when<00:33:50.480> we<00:33:50.640> look 00:33:50.710 --> 00:33:50.720 align:start position:0% questions that we can ask when we look 00:33:50.720 --> 00:33:54.870 align:start position:0% questions that we can ask when we look at<00:33:50.880> the<00:33:51.039> SOP<00:33:51.519> and<00:33:51.840> and<00:33:52.240> those<00:33:52.480> details<00:33:52.880> later. 00:33:54.870 --> 00:33:54.880 align:start position:0% at the SOP and and those details later. 00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:57.190 align:start position:0% at the SOP and and those details later. >> Is<00:33:55.120> there<00:33:55.360> typically<00:33:55.760> a<00:33:55.919> staff<00:33:56.240> that<00:33:56.480> meets 00:33:57.190 --> 00:33:57.200 align:start position:0% >> Is there typically a staff that meets 00:33:57.200 --> 00:34:00.950 align:start position:0% >> Is there typically a staff that meets every<00:33:57.519> time<00:33:57.679> the<00:33:58.080> committee<00:33:59.279> meets?<00:34:00.640> Okay. 00:34:00.950 --> 00:34:00.960 align:start position:0% every time the committee meets? Okay. 00:34:00.960 --> 00:34:03.430 align:start position:0% every time the committee meets? Okay. So,<00:34:01.120> that's<00:34:01.440> already<00:34:01.679> getting<00:34:02.000> tracked. 00:34:03.430 --> 00:34:03.440 align:start position:0% So, that's already getting tracked. 00:34:03.440 --> 00:34:03.990 align:start position:0% So, that's already getting tracked. >> Yeah, 00:34:03.990 --> 00:34:04.000 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, 00:34:04.000 --> 00:34:05.509 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, >> that<00:34:04.240> that<00:34:04.559> work<00:34:04.799> is<00:34:04.960> already<00:34:05.200> getting 00:34:05.509 --> 00:34:05.519 align:start position:0% >> that that work is already getting 00:34:05.519 --> 00:34:07.909 align:start position:0% >> that that work is already getting tracked<00:34:05.840> with<00:34:06.000> with<00:34:06.320> the<00:34:06.480> member<00:34:06.880> from<00:34:07.120> USB. 00:34:07.909 --> 00:34:07.919 align:start position:0% tracked with with the member from USB. 00:34:07.919 --> 00:34:09.109 align:start position:0% tracked with with the member from USB. Correct. 00:34:09.109 --> 00:34:09.119 align:start position:0% Correct. 00:34:09.119 --> 00:34:10.710 align:start position:0% Correct. >> That<00:34:09.359> would<00:34:09.520> be<00:34:09.760> accurate. 00:34:10.710 --> 00:34:10.720 align:start position:0% >> That would be accurate. 00:34:10.720 --> 00:34:13.109 align:start position:0% >> That would be accurate. >> Okay. 00:34:13.109 --> 00:34:13.119 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 00:34:13.119 --> 00:34:15.109 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I<00:34:13.359> don't<00:34:13.520> know<00:34:13.679> the<00:34:14.159> exact<00:34:14.560> tracking,<00:34:14.879> but 00:34:15.109 --> 00:34:15.119 align:start position:0% I don't know the exact tracking, but 00:34:15.119 --> 00:34:16.629 align:start position:0% I don't know the exact tracking, but yes,<00:34:15.359> they<00:34:15.520> would<00:34:15.679> be<00:34:15.760> there<00:34:15.919> and<00:34:16.079> in<00:34:16.320> that 00:34:16.629 --> 00:34:16.639 align:start position:0% yes, they would be there and in that 00:34:16.639 --> 00:34:18.869 align:start position:0% yes, they would be there and in that that<00:34:17.040> situation.<00:34:17.760> So,<00:34:18.320> okay,<00:34:18.560> I'm<00:34:18.720> going<00:34:18.800> to 00:34:18.869 --> 00:34:18.879 align:start position:0% that situation. So, okay, I'm going to 00:34:18.879 --> 00:34:21.109 align:start position:0% that situation. So, okay, I'm going to make<00:34:19.040> a<00:34:19.200> just<00:34:19.359> a<00:34:19.599> recommendation<00:34:20.399> here<00:34:20.879> just 00:34:21.109 --> 00:34:21.119 align:start position:0% make a just a recommendation here just 00:34:21.119 --> 00:34:22.710 align:start position:0% make a just a recommendation here just because<00:34:21.359> I'm<00:34:21.520> looking<00:34:21.839> at<00:34:22.079> time<00:34:22.399> trying<00:34:22.560> to 00:34:22.710 --> 00:34:22.720 align:start position:0% because I'm looking at time trying to 00:34:22.720 --> 00:34:24.869 align:start position:0% because I'm looking at time trying to gauge<00:34:23.040> time.<00:34:24.000> Seems<00:34:24.240> like<00:34:24.399> there's<00:34:24.639> probably 00:34:24.869 --> 00:34:24.879 align:start position:0% gauge time. Seems like there's probably 00:34:24.879 --> 00:34:26.629 align:start position:0% gauge time. Seems like there's probably going<00:34:24.960> to<00:34:25.119> be<00:34:25.440> additional<00:34:25.919> discussion<00:34:26.399> with 00:34:26.629 --> 00:34:26.639 align:start position:0% going to be additional discussion with 00:34:26.639 --> 00:34:28.470 align:start position:0% going to be additional discussion with this<00:34:26.879> item.<00:34:27.280> I'm<00:34:27.599> actually<00:34:27.839> going<00:34:28.000> to<00:34:28.159> suggest 00:34:28.470 --> 00:34:28.480 align:start position:0% this item. I'm actually going to suggest 00:34:28.480 --> 00:34:31.510 align:start position:0% this item. I'm actually going to suggest we<00:34:29.119> continue<00:34:29.599> this<00:34:29.839> discussion<00:34:31.280> with 00:34:31.510 --> 00:34:31.520 align:start position:0% we continue this discussion with 00:34:31.520 --> 00:34:33.190 align:start position:0% we continue this discussion with whatever<00:34:31.919> time<00:34:32.079> we<00:34:32.320> have<00:34:32.480> left<00:34:32.720> at<00:34:32.879> the<00:34:33.040> end<00:34:33.119> of 00:34:33.190 --> 00:34:33.200 align:start position:0% whatever time we have left at the end of 00:34:33.200 --> 00:34:35.109 align:start position:0% whatever time we have left at the end of the<00:34:33.359> meeting<00:34:33.599> and<00:34:33.839> maybe<00:34:34.399> it<00:34:34.639> would<00:34:34.879> continue 00:34:35.109 --> 00:34:35.119 align:start position:0% the meeting and maybe it would continue 00:34:35.119 --> 00:34:37.270 align:start position:0% the meeting and maybe it would continue at<00:34:35.359> the<00:34:35.520> next<00:34:35.760> meeting 00:34:37.270 --> 00:34:37.280 align:start position:0% at the next meeting 00:34:37.280 --> 00:34:39.990 align:start position:0% at the next meeting if<00:34:37.520> that's<00:34:37.839> if<00:34:38.079> that's<00:34:38.320> okay<00:34:38.560> with<00:34:38.800> this<00:34:38.960> body. 00:34:39.990 --> 00:34:40.000 align:start position:0% if that's if that's okay with this body. 00:34:40.000 --> 00:34:41.909 align:start position:0% if that's if that's okay with this body. Um,<00:34:40.320> we<00:34:40.560> can<00:34:40.639> go<00:34:40.800> for<00:34:41.119> maybe<00:34:41.359> another<00:34:41.679> five 00:34:41.909 --> 00:34:41.919 align:start position:0% Um, we can go for maybe another five 00:34:41.919 --> 00:34:43.589 align:start position:0% Um, we can go for maybe another five minutes<00:34:42.079> here,<00:34:42.320> but<00:34:42.480> I'<00:34:42.720> I'd<00:34:43.040> like<00:34:43.119> to<00:34:43.280> get<00:34:43.359> the 00:34:43.589 --> 00:34:43.599 align:start position:0% minutes here, but I' I'd like to get the 00:34:43.599 --> 00:34:46.149 align:start position:0% minutes here, but I' I'd like to get the other<00:34:43.760> items<00:34:44.960> finished.<00:34:45.359> And<00:34:45.520> this<00:34:45.679> one<00:34:45.919> still 00:34:46.149 --> 00:34:46.159 align:start position:0% other items finished. And this one still 00:34:46.159 --> 00:34:49.510 align:start position:0% other items finished. And this one still has<00:34:46.480> what<00:34:46.800> feels<00:34:47.119> like<00:34:47.280> a<00:34:47.440> lot<00:34:47.599> of<00:34:48.079> um<00:34:49.359> um 00:34:49.510 --> 00:34:49.520 align:start position:0% has what feels like a lot of um um 00:34:49.520 --> 00:34:52.869 align:start position:0% has what feels like a lot of um um probing<00:34:50.000> or<00:34:50.320> additional<00:34:51.440> questions. 00:34:52.869 --> 00:34:52.879 align:start position:0% probing or additional questions. 00:34:52.879 --> 00:34:54.470 align:start position:0% probing or additional questions. >> Okay.<00:34:53.200> Member<00:34:53.520> all,<00:34:53.760> can<00:34:53.839> I<00:34:54.000> throw<00:34:54.159> one<00:34:54.320> more 00:34:54.470 --> 00:34:54.480 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Member all, can I throw one more 00:34:54.480 --> 00:34:56.310 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Member all, can I throw one more in<00:34:54.720> to<00:34:54.879> for<00:34:55.119> people<00:34:55.280> to<00:34:55.520> think<00:34:55.679> about? 00:34:56.310 --> 00:34:56.320 align:start position:0% in to for people to think about? 00:34:56.320 --> 00:35:00.790 align:start position:0% in to for people to think about? >> Yeah,<00:34:56.639> then<00:34:57.200> I'm<00:34:57.440> fine<00:34:57.599> with<00:34:57.760> that.<00:34:57.920> Uh<00:34:58.560> um 00:35:00.790 --> 00:35:00.800 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, then I'm fine with that. Uh um 00:35:00.800 --> 00:35:04.390 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, then I'm fine with that. Uh um I'm<00:35:01.119> wondering<00:35:01.920> if<00:35:02.400> we 00:35:04.390 --> 00:35:04.400 align:start position:0% I'm wondering if we 00:35:04.400 --> 00:35:07.430 align:start position:0% I'm wondering if we we<00:35:04.640> kind<00:35:04.880> of<00:35:04.960> like<00:35:05.280> mentioned<00:35:05.839> that<00:35:06.400> well<00:35:06.960> I<00:35:07.119> I 00:35:07.430 --> 00:35:07.440 align:start position:0% we kind of like mentioned that well I I 00:35:07.440 --> 00:35:10.069 align:start position:0% we kind of like mentioned that well I I thought<00:35:07.599> about<00:35:07.760> the<00:35:08.000> early<00:35:08.320> review<00:35:08.640> committee 00:35:10.069 --> 00:35:10.079 align:start position:0% thought about the early review committee 00:35:10.079 --> 00:35:12.390 align:start position:0% thought about the early review committee and<00:35:10.400> just<00:35:11.119> what<00:35:11.280> if<00:35:11.440> we<00:35:11.599> just<00:35:11.839> this<00:35:12.079> is<00:35:12.160> just<00:35:12.240> an 00:35:12.390 --> 00:35:12.400 align:start position:0% and just what if we just this is just an 00:35:12.400 --> 00:35:13.910 align:start position:0% and just what if we just this is just an idea.<00:35:12.640> What<00:35:12.800> if<00:35:12.960> we<00:35:13.040> just<00:35:13.200> took<00:35:13.359> that<00:35:13.599> early 00:35:13.910 --> 00:35:13.920 align:start position:0% idea. What if we just took that early 00:35:13.920 --> 00:35:15.510 align:start position:0% idea. What if we just took that early review<00:35:14.320> committee<00:35:14.640> and<00:35:14.880> just<00:35:15.040> made<00:35:15.200> it<00:35:15.359> part 00:35:15.510 --> 00:35:15.520 align:start position:0% review committee and just made it part 00:35:15.520 --> 00:35:18.470 align:start position:0% review committee and just made it part of<00:35:15.680> the<00:35:15.920> regular<00:35:16.560> committee<00:35:17.839> and<00:35:18.079> then<00:35:18.240> it 00:35:18.470 --> 00:35:18.480 align:start position:0% of the regular committee and then it 00:35:18.480 --> 00:35:21.190 align:start position:0% of the regular committee and then it would<00:35:19.200> free<00:35:19.440> up<00:35:19.599> some<00:35:19.920> time<00:35:20.240> trying<00:35:20.480> to<00:35:20.640> find 00:35:21.190 --> 00:35:21.200 align:start position:0% would free up some time trying to find 00:35:21.200 --> 00:35:26.069 align:start position:0% would free up some time trying to find people<00:35:21.520> for<00:35:21.839> both<00:35:22.160> and<00:35:22.800> on<00:35:23.040> the<00:35:23.200> front<00:35:23.440> end 00:35:26.069 --> 00:35:26.079 align:start position:0% people for both and on the front end 00:35:26.079 --> 00:35:28.550 align:start position:0% people for both and on the front end >> you're<00:35:26.400> talking<00:35:26.960> that's<00:35:27.520> possible<00:35:28.000> suggested 00:35:28.550 --> 00:35:28.560 align:start position:0% >> you're talking that's possible suggested 00:35:28.560 --> 00:35:30.870 align:start position:0% >> you're talking that's possible suggested subcommittee<00:35:29.200> kind<00:35:29.359> of<00:35:29.440> a<00:35:29.680> thing 00:35:30.870 --> 00:35:30.880 align:start position:0% subcommittee kind of a thing 00:35:30.880 --> 00:35:33.030 align:start position:0% subcommittee kind of a thing >> no<00:35:31.119> the<00:35:31.359> early<00:35:31.680> review<00:35:32.160> the<00:35:32.400> early<00:35:32.720> review 00:35:33.030 --> 00:35:33.040 align:start position:0% >> no the early review the early review 00:35:33.040 --> 00:35:34.069 align:start position:0% >> no the early review the early review committee 00:35:34.069 --> 00:35:34.079 align:start position:0% committee 00:35:34.079 --> 00:35:37.030 align:start position:0% committee >> yeah<00:35:34.400> my<00:35:34.640> my<00:35:34.960> recommendation<00:35:36.000> but<00:35:36.560> we<00:35:36.720> it 00:35:37.030 --> 00:35:37.040 align:start position:0% >> yeah my my recommendation but we it 00:35:37.040 --> 00:35:40.069 align:start position:0% >> yeah my my recommendation but we it isn't<00:35:37.359> formalized<00:35:38.000> yet<00:35:38.800> is<00:35:39.040> to<00:35:39.520> replace<00:35:39.839> that 00:35:40.069 --> 00:35:40.079 align:start position:0% isn't formalized yet is to replace that 00:35:40.079 --> 00:35:41.510 align:start position:0% isn't formalized yet is to replace that review<00:35:40.400> committee<00:35:40.720> with<00:35:40.960> some<00:35:41.119> kind<00:35:41.280> of<00:35:41.359> a 00:35:41.510 --> 00:35:41.520 align:start position:0% review committee with some kind of a 00:35:41.520 --> 00:35:42.630 align:start position:0% review committee with some kind of a subcommittee<00:35:42.240> that 00:35:42.630 --> 00:35:42.640 align:start position:0% subcommittee that 00:35:42.640 --> 00:35:43.270 align:start position:0% subcommittee that >> okay 00:35:43.270 --> 00:35:43.280 align:start position:0% >> okay 00:35:43.280 --> 00:35:46.710 align:start position:0% >> okay >> has<00:35:43.599> a<00:35:43.920> different<00:35:44.240> engagement.<00:35:45.200> They<00:35:45.599> they 00:35:46.710 --> 00:35:46.720 align:start position:0% >> has a different engagement. They they 00:35:46.720 --> 00:35:49.109 align:start position:0% >> has a different engagement. They they research<00:35:47.760> recommendation.<00:35:48.320> Yeah, 00:35:49.109 --> 00:35:49.119 align:start position:0% research recommendation. Yeah, 00:35:49.119 --> 00:35:50.870 align:start position:0% research recommendation. Yeah, >> it<00:35:49.359> just<00:35:49.520> was<00:35:49.680> like<00:35:49.839> another<00:35:50.240> step<00:35:50.480> and<00:35:50.640> I<00:35:50.800> was 00:35:50.870 --> 00:35:50.880 align:start position:0% >> it just was like another step and I was 00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:52.550 align:start position:0% >> it just was like another step and I was like<00:35:51.040> what<00:35:51.200> if<00:35:51.359> we<00:35:51.520> just<00:35:51.760> put<00:35:51.920> those<00:35:52.160> together? 00:35:52.550 --> 00:35:52.560 align:start position:0% like what if we just put those together? 00:35:52.560 --> 00:35:54.710 align:start position:0% like what if we just put those together? So<00:35:52.720> or<00:35:53.040> that<00:35:53.359> idea<00:35:53.760> would<00:35:54.000> work<00:35:54.160> too.<00:35:54.480> Okay, 00:35:54.710 --> 00:35:54.720 align:start position:0% So or that idea would work too. Okay, 00:35:54.720 --> 00:35:55.829 align:start position:0% So or that idea would work too. Okay, I'm<00:35:54.960> fine<00:35:55.119> with<00:35:55.280> that. 00:35:55.829 --> 00:35:55.839 align:start position:0% I'm fine with that. 00:35:55.839 --> 00:35:57.430 align:start position:0% I'm fine with that. >> I<00:35:56.000> don't<00:35:56.079> know.<00:35:56.240> And<00:35:56.400> I<00:35:56.560> haven't<00:35:57.040> I<00:35:57.280> don't<00:35:57.359> have 00:35:57.430 --> 00:35:57.440 align:start position:0% >> I don't know. And I haven't I don't have 00:35:57.440 --> 00:35:59.910 align:start position:0% >> I don't know. And I haven't I don't have that<00:35:57.680> all<00:35:57.839> fleshed<00:35:58.240> out<00:35:58.320> yet<00:35:58.560> either.<00:35:58.960> So<00:35:59.599> my 00:35:59.910 --> 00:35:59.920 align:start position:0% that all fleshed out yet either. So my 00:35:59.920 --> 00:36:01.109 align:start position:0% that all fleshed out yet either. So my apologies. 00:36:01.109 --> 00:36:01.119 align:start position:0% apologies. 00:36:01.119 --> 00:36:02.950 align:start position:0% apologies. >> Is<00:36:01.280> that<00:36:01.440> the<00:36:01.599> parent<00:36:02.000> committee<00:36:02.480> that<00:36:02.720> you 00:36:02.950 --> 00:36:02.960 align:start position:0% >> Is that the parent committee that you 00:36:02.960 --> 00:36:04.950 align:start position:0% >> Is that the parent committee that you are<00:36:03.119> trying<00:36:03.359> to<00:36:03.599> merge<00:36:03.920> into?<00:36:04.480> Is<00:36:04.640> that<00:36:04.800> what 00:36:04.950 --> 00:36:04.960 align:start position:0% are trying to merge into? Is that what 00:36:04.960 --> 00:36:07.430 align:start position:0% are trying to merge into? Is that what you<00:36:05.119> mean<00:36:05.200> by<00:36:06.000> the<00:36:06.240> early<00:36:06.560> committee?<00:36:07.119> Is<00:36:07.280> that 00:36:07.430 --> 00:36:07.440 align:start position:0% you mean by the early committee? Is that 00:36:07.440 --> 00:36:09.270 align:start position:0% you mean by the early committee? Is that what<00:36:07.599> you<00:36:07.760> mean?<00:36:08.079> that<00:36:08.320> initial<00:36:08.800> parent 00:36:09.270 --> 00:36:09.280 align:start position:0% what you mean? that initial parent 00:36:09.280 --> 00:36:11.109 align:start position:0% what you mean? that initial parent committee 00:36:11.109 --> 00:36:11.119 align:start position:0% committee 00:36:11.119 --> 00:36:12.710 align:start position:0% committee >> like<00:36:11.359> merging<00:36:11.760> them<00:36:11.920> together<00:36:12.240> to<00:36:12.560> just 00:36:12.710 --> 00:36:12.720 align:start position:0% >> like merging them together to just 00:36:12.720 --> 00:36:14.150 align:start position:0% >> like merging them together to just remove<00:36:12.960> a<00:36:13.200> step 00:36:14.150 --> 00:36:14.160 align:start position:0% remove a step 00:36:14.160 --> 00:36:16.230 align:start position:0% remove a step >> but<00:36:14.480> having<00:36:14.720> that<00:36:14.960> voice<00:36:15.200> still<00:36:15.520> there. 00:36:16.230 --> 00:36:16.240 align:start position:0% >> but having that voice still there. 00:36:16.240 --> 00:36:17.910 align:start position:0% >> but having that voice still there. >> I<00:36:16.480> think<00:36:16.560> that's<00:36:16.800> a<00:36:16.960> great<00:36:17.200> idea 00:36:17.910 --> 00:36:17.920 align:start position:0% >> I think that's a great idea 00:36:17.920 --> 00:36:19.910 align:start position:0% >> I think that's a great idea >> and<00:36:18.160> I<00:36:18.320> think<00:36:18.480> that<00:36:18.720> could<00:36:18.960> also<00:36:19.200> include 00:36:19.910 --> 00:36:19.920 align:start position:0% >> and I think that could also include 00:36:19.920 --> 00:36:22.470 align:start position:0% >> and I think that could also include possibility<00:36:20.560> of<00:36:21.200> um<00:36:21.680> a<00:36:21.920> couple<00:36:22.079> of<00:36:22.240> board 00:36:22.470 --> 00:36:22.480 align:start position:0% possibility of um a couple of board 00:36:22.480 --> 00:36:24.310 align:start position:0% possibility of um a couple of board members<00:36:22.800> on<00:36:22.960> there<00:36:23.200> as<00:36:23.440> well<00:36:23.599> as<00:36:23.760> a<00:36:24.000> couple<00:36:24.079> of 00:36:24.310 --> 00:36:24.320 align:start position:0% members on there as well as a couple of 00:36:24.320 --> 00:36:26.870 align:start position:0% members on there as well as a couple of legislators<00:36:25.040> as<00:36:25.280> well.<00:36:25.599> So<00:36:25.839> it<00:36:26.000> could<00:36:26.079> be<00:36:26.160> a 00:36:26.870 --> 00:36:26.880 align:start position:0% legislators as well. So it could be a 00:36:26.880 --> 00:36:28.390 align:start position:0% legislators as well. So it could be a >> lot<00:36:26.960> of<00:36:27.280> that<00:36:27.520> part. 00:36:28.390 --> 00:36:28.400 align:start position:0% >> lot of that part. 00:36:28.400 --> 00:36:32.230 align:start position:0% >> lot of that part. >> Yeah.<00:36:29.280> I<00:36:29.520> just<00:36:29.680> worry<00:36:29.920> about<00:36:30.240> when<00:36:30.480> we<00:36:30.800> include 00:36:32.230 --> 00:36:32.240 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I just worry about when we include 00:36:32.240 --> 00:36:33.589 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I just worry about when we include board<00:36:32.480> members<00:36:32.720> or<00:36:32.960> legislators.<00:36:33.440> It 00:36:33.589 --> 00:36:33.599 align:start position:0% board members or legislators. It 00:36:33.599 --> 00:36:37.270 align:start position:0% board members or legislators. It sometimes<00:36:34.000> slows<00:36:34.240> it<00:36:34.400> down.<00:36:34.880> But 00:36:37.270 --> 00:36:37.280 align:start position:0% sometimes slows it down. But 00:36:37.280 --> 00:36:39.670 align:start position:0% sometimes slows it down. But I<00:36:37.520> want<00:36:37.599> to<00:36:37.680> get<00:36:37.760> it<00:36:37.920> right<00:36:38.160> too.<00:36:38.400> So<00:36:39.520> once 00:36:39.670 --> 00:36:39.680 align:start position:0% I want to get it right too. So once 00:36:39.680 --> 00:36:40.950 align:start position:0% I want to get it right too. So once again,<00:36:39.920> I'm<00:36:40.079> going<00:36:40.160> to<00:36:40.320> recommend<00:36:40.720> we 00:36:40.950 --> 00:36:40.960 align:start position:0% again, I'm going to recommend we 00:36:40.960 --> 00:36:42.710 align:start position:0% again, I'm going to recommend we continue<00:36:41.280> to<00:36:41.520> have<00:36:41.680> this<00:36:41.920> discussion.<00:36:42.480> I'm 00:36:42.710 --> 00:36:42.720 align:start position:0% continue to have this discussion. I'm 00:36:42.720 --> 00:36:44.150 align:start position:0% continue to have this discussion. I'm going<00:36:42.800> to<00:36:42.880> put<00:36:43.040> it<00:36:43.200> towards<00:36:43.599> the<00:36:43.760> back<00:36:44.000> because 00:36:44.150 --> 00:36:44.160 align:start position:0% going to put it towards the back because 00:36:44.160 --> 00:36:46.870 align:start position:0% going to put it towards the back because I<00:36:44.400> think<00:36:44.800> Megan,<00:36:45.119> you're<00:36:45.359> smiling. 00:36:46.870 --> 00:36:46.880 align:start position:0% I think Megan, you're smiling. 00:36:46.880 --> 00:36:48.630 align:start position:0% I think Megan, you're smiling. We've<00:36:47.119> been<00:36:47.280> having<00:36:47.440> this<00:36:47.839> discussion<00:36:48.240> for<00:36:48.480> a 00:36:48.630 --> 00:36:48.640 align:start position:0% We've been having this discussion for a 00:36:48.640 --> 00:36:50.630 align:start position:0% We've been having this discussion for a while.<00:36:48.880> But<00:36:49.440> I<00:36:49.680> mean<00:36:49.760> as<00:36:49.920> we<00:36:50.079> vet<00:36:50.320> these<00:36:50.560> things 00:36:50.630 --> 00:36:50.640 align:start position:0% while. But I mean as we vet these things 00:36:50.640 --> 00:36:52.710 align:start position:0% while. But I mean as we vet these things out<00:36:50.880> and<00:36:51.040> I<00:36:51.200> think<00:36:51.599> you<00:36:51.760> know<00:36:52.079> bringing<00:36:52.480> forth 00:36:52.710 --> 00:36:52.720 align:start position:0% out and I think you know bringing forth 00:36:52.720 --> 00:36:54.950 align:start position:0% out and I think you know bringing forth an<00:36:53.280> idea<00:36:53.680> then<00:36:53.920> it<00:36:54.079> has<00:36:54.160> to<00:36:54.400> we<00:36:54.560> kind<00:36:54.720> of<00:36:54.800> have 00:36:54.950 --> 00:36:54.960 align:start position:0% an idea then it has to we kind of have 00:36:54.960 --> 00:36:56.390 align:start position:0% an idea then it has to we kind of have to<00:36:55.040> balance<00:36:55.280> it<00:36:55.440> all<00:36:55.599> out.<00:36:55.839> What's<00:36:56.079> what 00:36:56.390 --> 00:36:56.400 align:start position:0% to balance it all out. What's what 00:36:56.400 --> 00:36:58.230 align:start position:0% to balance it all out. What's what happens<00:36:56.560> to<00:36:56.720> the<00:36:56.880> damics<00:36:57.680> and<00:36:57.839> what<00:36:58.000> happens 00:36:58.230 --> 00:36:58.240 align:start position:0% happens to the damics and what happens 00:36:58.240 --> 00:37:00.870 align:start position:0% happens to the damics and what happens to<00:36:58.400> the<00:36:59.040> implications<00:36:59.680> there<00:36:59.920> and<00:37:00.160> welcome 00:37:00.870 --> 00:37:00.880 align:start position:0% to the implications there and welcome 00:37:00.880 --> 00:37:03.670 align:start position:0% to the implications there and welcome vice<00:37:01.200> chair<00:37:01.440> Wood.<00:37:01.920> Thank<00:37:02.079> you<00:37:02.240> for<00:37:03.280> chiming 00:37:03.670 --> 00:37:03.680 align:start position:0% vice chair Wood. Thank you for chiming 00:37:03.680 --> 00:37:05.910 align:start position:0% vice chair Wood. Thank you for chiming in<00:37:03.920> there.<00:37:04.240> So 00:37:05.910 --> 00:37:05.920 align:start position:0% in there. So 00:37:05.920 --> 00:37:07.589 align:start position:0% in there. So >> do<00:37:06.160> you<00:37:06.320> is<00:37:06.480> that<00:37:06.640> all<00:37:06.800> right<00:37:06.880> with<00:37:07.119> this<00:37:07.280> body 00:37:07.589 --> 00:37:07.599 align:start position:0% >> do you is that all right with this body 00:37:07.599 --> 00:37:10.150 align:start position:0% >> do you is that all right with this body if<00:37:07.839> we<00:37:08.000> move<00:37:08.160> it<00:37:08.480> to<00:37:08.720> the<00:37:09.440> end<00:37:09.599> of<00:37:09.680> the<00:37:09.839> agenda 00:37:10.150 --> 00:37:10.160 align:start position:0% if we move it to the end of the agenda 00:37:10.160 --> 00:37:11.910 align:start position:0% if we move it to the end of the agenda and<00:37:10.400> if<00:37:10.480> we<00:37:10.640> have<00:37:10.800> time<00:37:10.960> we<00:37:11.200> continue<00:37:11.520> this 00:37:11.910 --> 00:37:11.920 align:start position:0% and if we have time we continue this 00:37:11.920 --> 00:37:14.310 align:start position:0% and if we have time we continue this discussion<00:37:12.480> then 00:37:14.310 --> 00:37:14.320 align:start position:0% discussion then 00:37:14.320 --> 00:37:18.550 align:start position:0% discussion then >> yeah<00:37:14.480> do<00:37:14.640> you<00:37:14.720> want<00:37:14.800> to<00:37:14.960> do<00:37:15.119> this<00:37:15.359> amendment? 00:37:18.550 --> 00:37:18.560 align:start position:0% 00:37:18.560 --> 00:37:21.430 align:start position:0% >> Um<00:37:19.839> I<00:37:20.079> think<00:37:20.240> I<00:37:20.400> want<00:37:20.640> to<00:37:20.880> have<00:37:21.040> some<00:37:21.200> more 00:37:21.430 --> 00:37:21.440 align:start position:0% >> Um I think I want to have some more 00:37:21.440 --> 00:37:23.430 align:start position:0% >> Um I think I want to have some more discussion<00:37:21.839> about<00:37:22.000> it<00:37:22.240> before<00:37:22.480> we<00:37:22.640> move<00:37:22.800> it 00:37:23.430 --> 00:37:23.440 align:start position:0% discussion about it before we move it 00:37:23.440 --> 00:37:26.470 align:start position:0% discussion about it before we move it before<00:37:23.760> we<00:37:23.920> formally<00:37:24.560> vote<00:37:24.880> on<00:37:25.040> it<00:37:26.000> if<00:37:26.240> that's 00:37:26.470 --> 00:37:26.480 align:start position:0% before we formally vote on it if that's 00:37:26.480 --> 00:37:26.950 align:start position:0% before we formally vote on it if that's okay. 00:37:26.950 --> 00:37:26.960 align:start position:0% okay. 00:37:26.960 --> 00:37:28.310 align:start position:0% okay. >> You're<00:37:27.119> the<00:37:27.280> chair. 00:37:28.310 --> 00:37:28.320 align:start position:0% >> You're the chair. 00:37:28.320 --> 00:37:32.230 align:start position:0% >> You're the chair. >> Well<00:37:28.640> I<00:37:28.880> I<00:37:29.119> am<00:37:29.200> but<00:37:29.440> I'm<00:37:29.599> asking<00:37:29.920> this<00:37:30.160> body. 00:37:32.230 --> 00:37:32.240 align:start position:0% >> Well I I am but I'm asking this body. 00:37:32.240 --> 00:37:33.670 align:start position:0% >> Well I I am but I'm asking this body. Is<00:37:32.480> that<00:37:32.640> all<00:37:32.720> right<00:37:32.880> if<00:37:33.040> we<00:37:33.119> move<00:37:33.280> it<00:37:33.359> to<00:37:33.520> the 00:37:33.670 --> 00:37:33.680 align:start position:0% Is that all right if we move it to the 00:37:33.680 --> 00:37:35.589 align:start position:0% Is that all right if we move it to the end<00:37:33.839> and<00:37:34.000> we<00:37:34.240> will<00:37:34.800> continue<00:37:35.119> with<00:37:35.359> where 00:37:35.589 --> 00:37:35.599 align:start position:0% end and we will continue with where 00:37:35.599 --> 00:37:37.829 align:start position:0% end and we will continue with where we're<00:37:35.760> at?<00:37:36.400> We're<00:37:36.640> kind<00:37:36.800> of<00:37:36.880> leaving<00:37:37.599> hanging 00:37:37.829 --> 00:37:37.839 align:start position:0% we're at? We're kind of leaving hanging 00:37:37.839 --> 00:37:39.270 align:start position:0% we're at? We're kind of leaving hanging a<00:37:38.079> little<00:37:38.160> bit,<00:37:38.320> but 00:37:39.270 --> 00:37:39.280 align:start position:0% a little bit, but 00:37:39.280 --> 00:37:42.230 align:start position:0% a little bit, but >> it's<00:37:39.520> fine.<00:37:40.720> I'm<00:37:40.960> okay<00:37:41.200> with<00:37:41.440> that. 00:37:42.230 --> 00:37:42.240 align:start position:0% >> it's fine. I'm okay with that. 00:37:42.240 --> 00:37:44.790 align:start position:0% >> it's fine. I'm okay with that. >> Okay.<00:37:43.359> Okay.<00:37:43.680> We're<00:37:43.920> going<00:37:44.000> to<00:37:44.160> move<00:37:44.320> to<00:37:44.560> the 00:37:44.790 --> 00:37:44.800 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. We're going to move to the 00:37:44.800 --> 00:37:47.109 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. We're going to move to the second<00:37:45.200> agenda<00:37:45.680> item.<00:37:46.160> So,<00:37:46.400> I<00:37:46.560> wonder<00:37:46.880> do<00:37:46.960> I 00:37:47.109 --> 00:37:47.119 align:start position:0% second agenda item. So, I wonder do I 00:37:47.119 --> 00:37:48.630 align:start position:0% second agenda item. So, I wonder do I need<00:37:47.200> to<00:37:47.359> make<00:37:47.440> a<00:37:47.599> formal<00:37:47.920> vote<00:37:48.079> on<00:37:48.240> that<00:37:48.400> that 00:37:48.630 --> 00:37:48.640 align:start position:0% need to make a formal vote on that that 00:37:48.640 --> 00:37:51.670 align:start position:0% need to make a formal vote on that that we<00:37:48.720> postpone<00:37:49.200> this<00:37:49.359> till<00:37:49.599> the<00:37:49.760> end<00:37:49.920> of<00:37:50.000> the 00:37:51.670 --> 00:37:51.680 align:start position:0% we postpone this till the end of the 00:37:51.680 --> 00:37:53.510 align:start position:0% we postpone this till the end of the our<00:37:52.000> meeting? 00:37:53.510 --> 00:37:53.520 align:start position:0% our meeting? 00:37:53.520 --> 00:37:55.349 align:start position:0% our meeting? Let<00:37:53.760> me<00:37:53.839> just<00:37:54.000> do<00:37:54.160> that.<00:37:54.400> I<00:37:54.560> I<00:37:54.880> I'm<00:37:55.200> going<00:37:55.280> to 00:37:55.349 --> 00:37:55.359 align:start position:0% Let me just do that. I I I'm going to 00:37:55.359 --> 00:37:57.990 align:start position:0% Let me just do that. I I I'm going to make<00:37:55.440> a<00:37:55.599> motion<00:37:55.839> that<00:37:56.079> we<00:37:56.240> postpone<00:37:57.599> um<00:37:57.680> the 00:37:57.990 --> 00:37:58.000 align:start position:0% make a motion that we postpone um the 00:37:58.000 --> 00:38:02.390 align:start position:0% make a motion that we postpone um the first<00:37:58.160> item<00:37:58.720> 1.2<00:38:00.079> to<00:38:00.320> to<00:38:00.720> the<00:38:01.359> conclusion<00:38:02.000> of 00:38:02.390 --> 00:38:02.400 align:start position:0% first item 1.2 to to the conclusion of 00:38:02.400 --> 00:38:05.910 align:start position:0% first item 1.2 to to the conclusion of our<00:38:03.839> meeting<00:38:04.079> and<00:38:04.400> pick<00:38:04.560> it<00:38:04.720> up<00:38:05.040> with<00:38:05.440> whatever 00:38:05.910 --> 00:38:05.920 align:start position:0% our meeting and pick it up with whatever 00:38:05.920 --> 00:38:10.230 align:start position:0% our meeting and pick it up with whatever time<00:38:06.079> we<00:38:06.320> have<00:38:06.480> left. 00:38:10.230 --> 00:38:10.240 align:start position:0% 00:38:10.240 --> 00:38:13.190 align:start position:0% Okay.<00:38:10.640> All<00:38:10.800> those<00:38:11.040> in<00:38:11.280> favor? 00:38:13.190 --> 00:38:13.200 align:start position:0% Okay. All those in favor? 00:38:13.200 --> 00:38:15.030 align:start position:0% Okay. All those in favor? I 00:38:15.030 --> 00:38:15.040 align:start position:0% I 00:38:15.040 --> 00:38:17.349 align:start position:0% I >> I 00:38:17.349 --> 00:38:17.359 align:start position:0% >> I 00:38:17.359 --> 00:38:19.270 align:start position:0% >> I >> Joanne, 00:38:19.270 --> 00:38:19.280 align:start position:0% >> Joanne, 00:38:19.280 --> 00:38:23.829 align:start position:0% >> Joanne, you<00:38:20.480> are<00:38:20.640> you<00:38:20.800> with<00:38:20.960> us?<00:38:22.240> Okay.<00:38:22.720> I'm<00:38:23.599> saying 00:38:23.829 --> 00:38:23.839 align:start position:0% you are you with us? Okay. I'm saying 00:38:23.839 --> 00:38:26.950 align:start position:0% you are you with us? Okay. I'm saying that<00:38:24.240> it's<00:38:24.560> unanimous,<00:38:25.520> but<00:38:25.760> I'm<00:38:26.000> not<00:38:26.160> sure<00:38:26.320> if 00:38:26.950 --> 00:38:26.960 align:start position:0% that it's unanimous, but I'm not sure if 00:38:26.960 --> 00:38:28.950 align:start position:0% that it's unanimous, but I'm not sure if board<00:38:27.200> member 00:38:28.950 --> 00:38:28.960 align:start position:0% board member 00:38:28.960 --> 00:38:31.109 align:start position:0% board member >> Sorry,<00:38:29.200> I<00:38:29.359> couldn't<00:38:29.680> get<00:38:29.920> the<00:38:30.320> it<00:38:30.480> to<00:38:30.720> go. 00:38:31.109 --> 00:38:31.119 align:start position:0% >> Sorry, I couldn't get the it to go. 00:38:31.119 --> 00:38:31.349 align:start position:0% >> Sorry, I couldn't get the it to go. Okay. 00:38:31.349 --> 00:38:31.359 align:start position:0% Okay. 00:38:31.359 --> 00:38:33.190 align:start position:0% Okay. >> The<00:38:31.599> volume<00:38:32.000> thing.<00:38:32.320> Yes.<00:38:32.720> I 00:38:33.190 --> 00:38:33.200 align:start position:0% >> The volume thing. Yes. I 00:38:33.200 --> 00:38:34.870 align:start position:0% >> The volume thing. Yes. I >> Okay.<00:38:33.680> And<00:38:33.920> we're<00:38:34.160> going<00:38:34.240> to<00:38:34.320> move<00:38:34.480> to<00:38:34.640> the 00:38:34.870 --> 00:38:34.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And we're going to move to the 00:38:34.880 --> 00:38:37.349 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And we're going to move to the second<00:38:35.119> item<00:38:35.599> on<00:38:35.920> our<00:38:36.400> agenda.<00:38:36.880> So,<00:38:37.040> we<00:38:37.200> can 00:38:37.349 --> 00:38:37.359 align:start position:0% second item on our agenda. So, we can 00:38:37.359 --> 00:38:38.550 align:start position:0% second item on our agenda. So, we can keep<00:38:37.520> moving<00:38:37.680> through<00:38:37.839> a<00:38:38.000> few<00:38:38.079> of<00:38:38.160> these<00:38:38.400> that 00:38:38.550 --> 00:38:38.560 align:start position:0% keep moving through a few of these that 00:38:38.560 --> 00:38:42.470 align:start position:0% keep moving through a few of these that need<00:38:38.640> to<00:38:38.800> get<00:38:39.040> moved<00:38:39.359> out<00:38:39.680> by<00:38:40.320> June<00:38:40.720> for<00:38:40.960> sure. 00:38:42.470 --> 00:38:42.480 align:start position:0% need to get moved out by June for sure. 00:38:42.480 --> 00:38:45.990 align:start position:0% need to get moved out by June for sure. Okay.<00:38:42.880> The<00:38:43.119> next<00:38:43.280> item<00:38:43.680> is<00:38:44.160> um<00:38:44.320> agenda<00:38:44.720> item<00:38:45.680> uh 00:38:45.990 --> 00:38:46.000 align:start position:0% Okay. The next item is um agenda item uh 00:38:46.000 --> 00:38:49.510 align:start position:0% Okay. The next item is um agenda item uh 1.3,<00:38:46.720> which<00:38:46.960> is<00:38:47.040> the<00:38:47.280> R277917. 00:38:49.510 --> 00:38:49.520 align:start position:0% 1.3, which is the R277917. 00:38:49.520 --> 00:38:51.670 align:start position:0% 1.3, which is the R277917. This<00:38:49.680> is<00:38:49.839> a<00:38:50.000> new<00:38:50.720> rule.<00:38:51.040> that's<00:38:51.280> related<00:38:51.520> to 00:38:51.670 --> 00:38:51.680 align:start position:0% This is a new rule. that's related to 00:38:51.680 --> 00:38:55.190 align:start position:0% This is a new rule. that's related to the<00:38:51.839> gold<00:38:52.079> medal<00:38:52.400> schools<00:38:52.800> pilot<00:38:53.280> program<00:38:54.720> and 00:38:55.190 --> 00:38:55.200 align:start position:0% the gold medal schools pilot program and 00:38:55.200 --> 00:38:59.349 align:start position:0% the gold medal schools pilot program and we<00:38:55.440> had<00:38:55.680> made<00:38:55.920> some<00:38:56.160> revisions.<00:38:56.640> We<00:38:56.800> ex<00:38:57.520> um<00:38:58.880> we 00:38:59.349 --> 00:38:59.359 align:start position:0% we had made some revisions. We ex um we 00:38:59.359 --> 00:39:02.550 align:start position:0% we had made some revisions. We ex um we voted<00:38:59.760> on<00:39:00.000> accepting 00:39:02.550 --> 00:39:02.560 align:start position:0% voted on accepting 00:39:02.560 --> 00:39:06.230 align:start position:0% voted on accepting a<00:39:02.880> draft 00:39:06.230 --> 00:39:06.240 align:start position:0% 00:39:06.240 --> 00:39:09.270 align:start position:0% right<00:39:06.480> so<00:39:06.800> Earl<00:39:07.119> draft<00:39:07.520> one<00:39:08.480> and<00:39:08.800> there<00:39:09.040> were 00:39:09.270 --> 00:39:09.280 align:start position:0% right so Earl draft one and there were 00:39:09.280 --> 00:39:12.230 align:start position:0% right so Earl draft one and there were some<00:39:09.520> revisions<00:39:10.160> already<00:39:10.560> made. 00:39:12.230 --> 00:39:12.240 align:start position:0% some revisions already made. 00:39:12.240 --> 00:39:14.310 align:start position:0% some revisions already made. Did<00:39:12.400> we<00:39:12.560> make<00:39:12.720> any<00:39:12.960> re<00:39:13.359> someone<00:39:13.680> help<00:39:13.839> me 00:39:14.310 --> 00:39:14.320 align:start position:0% Did we make any re someone help me 00:39:14.320 --> 00:39:15.109 align:start position:0% Did we make any re someone help me really<00:39:14.640> quick? 00:39:15.109 --> 00:39:15.119 align:start position:0% really quick? 00:39:15.119 --> 00:39:16.710 align:start position:0% really quick? >> I<00:39:15.359> can<00:39:15.520> jump<00:39:15.599> in<00:39:15.839> and<00:39:16.000> help. 00:39:16.710 --> 00:39:16.720 align:start position:0% >> I can jump in and help. 00:39:16.720 --> 00:39:18.390 align:start position:0% >> I can jump in and help. >> Yeah,<00:39:16.960> thank<00:39:17.119> you.<00:39:17.359> I'm<00:39:17.520> like<00:39:18.160> trying<00:39:18.320> to 00:39:18.390 --> 00:39:18.400 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, thank you. I'm like trying to 00:39:18.400 --> 00:39:19.430 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, thank you. I'm like trying to remember<00:39:18.560> where<00:39:18.800> we<00:39:18.880> got<00:39:19.040> to. 00:39:19.430 --> 00:39:19.440 align:start position:0% remember where we got to. 00:39:19.440 --> 00:39:21.270 align:start position:0% remember where we got to. >> No<00:39:19.599> problem.<00:39:19.920> So,<00:39:20.160> Jennifer<00:39:20.480> Wsworth,<00:39:20.960> policy 00:39:21.270 --> 00:39:21.280 align:start position:0% >> No problem. So, Jennifer Wsworth, policy 00:39:21.280 --> 00:39:23.349 align:start position:0% >> No problem. So, Jennifer Wsworth, policy adviser.<00:39:22.000> So,<00:39:22.240> yes,<00:39:22.480> we've<00:39:22.880> officially 00:39:23.349 --> 00:39:23.359 align:start position:0% adviser. So, yes, we've officially 00:39:23.359 --> 00:39:25.670 align:start position:0% adviser. So, yes, we've officially adopted<00:39:23.680> Earl<00:39:24.079> draft<00:39:24.400> 1<00:39:24.720> as<00:39:25.040> the<00:39:25.200> draft<00:39:25.520> that 00:39:25.670 --> 00:39:25.680 align:start position:0% adopted Earl draft 1 as the draft that 00:39:25.680 --> 00:39:27.750 align:start position:0% adopted Earl draft 1 as the draft that we're<00:39:25.920> working<00:39:26.079> on<00:39:26.320> currently.<00:39:26.880> So,<00:39:27.040> the<00:39:27.599> um 00:39:27.750 --> 00:39:27.760 align:start position:0% we're working on currently. So, the um 00:39:27.760 --> 00:39:28.950 align:start position:0% we're working on currently. So, the um amendments<00:39:28.160> that<00:39:28.320> are<00:39:28.400> in<00:39:28.560> there<00:39:28.720> are<00:39:28.880> the 00:39:28.950 --> 00:39:28.960 align:start position:0% amendments that are in there are the 00:39:28.960 --> 00:39:30.390 align:start position:0% amendments that are in there are the amendments<00:39:29.280> that<00:39:29.440> were<00:39:29.599> already<00:39:29.839> accepted<00:39:30.160> by 00:39:30.390 --> 00:39:30.400 align:start position:0% amendments that were already accepted by 00:39:30.400 --> 00:39:32.470 align:start position:0% amendments that were already accepted by moving<00:39:30.640> that<00:39:30.800> draft<00:39:31.040> forward.<00:39:31.760> And<00:39:31.920> now<00:39:32.160> any 00:39:32.470 --> 00:39:32.480 align:start position:0% moving that draft forward. And now any 00:39:32.480 --> 00:39:33.750 align:start position:0% moving that draft forward. And now any amendments<00:39:32.880> we<00:39:33.040> will<00:39:33.200> make<00:39:33.359> in<00:39:33.599> this 00:39:33.750 --> 00:39:33.760 align:start position:0% amendments we will make in this 00:39:33.760 --> 00:39:35.910 align:start position:0% amendments we will make in this committee<00:39:34.079> meeting<00:39:34.560> will<00:39:34.800> be<00:39:34.960> going<00:39:35.200> to<00:39:35.520> Earl 00:39:35.910 --> 00:39:35.920 align:start position:0% committee meeting will be going to Earl 00:39:35.920 --> 00:39:38.150 align:start position:0% committee meeting will be going to Earl draft<00:39:36.240> one.<00:39:36.560> So,<00:39:36.880> we're<00:39:37.119> just<00:39:37.359> starting<00:39:37.760> from 00:39:38.150 --> 00:39:38.160 align:start position:0% draft one. So, we're just starting from 00:39:38.160 --> 00:39:40.470 align:start position:0% draft one. So, we're just starting from here.<00:39:38.800> Um<00:39:39.359> I<00:39:39.680> don't<00:39:39.760> know<00:39:39.839> if<00:39:40.000> Andrea<00:39:40.320> is 00:39:40.470 --> 00:39:40.480 align:start position:0% here. Um I don't know if Andrea is 00:39:40.480 --> 00:39:41.829 align:start position:0% here. Um I don't know if Andrea is sharing<00:39:40.720> the<00:39:40.880> screen,<00:39:41.040> but<00:39:41.200> we<00:39:41.359> are<00:39:41.520> not<00:39:41.680> on 00:39:41.829 --> 00:39:41.839 align:start position:0% sharing the screen, but we are not on 00:39:41.839 --> 00:39:43.510 align:start position:0% sharing the screen, but we are not on the<00:39:42.000> correct<00:39:42.240> draft.<00:39:42.640> We<00:39:42.800> need<00:39:42.880> the<00:39:43.119> Earl 00:39:43.510 --> 00:39:43.520 align:start position:0% the correct draft. We need the Earl 00:39:43.520 --> 00:39:46.230 align:start position:0% the correct draft. We need the Earl draft. 00:39:46.230 --> 00:39:46.240 align:start position:0% draft. 00:39:46.240 --> 00:39:50.230 align:start position:0% draft. Thank<00:39:46.560> you.<00:39:48.000> Does<00:39:48.240> that<00:39:48.400> help?<00:39:49.440> Yes. 00:39:50.230 --> 00:39:50.240 align:start position:0% Thank you. Does that help? Yes. 00:39:50.240 --> 00:39:56.710 align:start position:0% Thank you. Does that help? Yes. >> Okay. 00:39:56.710 --> 00:39:56.720 align:start position:0% 00:39:56.720 --> 00:39:59.190 align:start position:0% >> Okay.<00:39:57.119> I<00:39:57.440> have<00:39:57.599> just<00:39:57.920> a<00:39:58.240> couple<00:39:58.400> of<00:39:58.800> questions 00:39:59.190 --> 00:39:59.200 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I have just a couple of questions 00:39:59.200 --> 00:40:00.950 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I have just a couple of questions I<00:39:59.440> want<00:39:59.520> to<00:39:59.599> throw<00:39:59.839> out<00:40:00.000> there.<00:40:00.160> I<00:40:00.400> know<00:40:00.480> we<00:40:00.720> had 00:40:00.950 --> 00:40:00.960 align:start position:0% I want to throw out there. I know we had 00:40:00.960 --> 00:40:05.109 align:start position:0% I want to throw out there. I know we had discussions<00:40:01.760> around<00:40:02.720> um 00:40:05.109 --> 00:40:05.119 align:start position:0% discussions around um 00:40:05.119 --> 00:40:07.349 align:start position:0% discussions around um get<00:40:05.280> to<00:40:05.440> the<00:40:05.599> line.<00:40:06.000> It<00:40:06.160> was<00:40:06.320> 52.<00:40:06.880> And<00:40:07.040> there's 00:40:07.349 --> 00:40:07.359 align:start position:0% get to the line. It was 52. And there's 00:40:07.359 --> 00:40:10.390 align:start position:0% get to the line. It was 52. And there's another<00:40:07.760> provision<00:40:08.160> in<00:40:08.400> here<00:40:08.560> too<00:40:08.800> where 00:40:10.390 --> 00:40:10.400 align:start position:0% another provision in here too where 00:40:10.400 --> 00:40:13.109 align:start position:0% another provision in here too where I<00:40:10.640> had<00:40:10.800> asked<00:40:11.119> about<00:40:11.359> putting<00:40:11.680> in<00:40:11.839> the<00:40:12.880> Yeah, 00:40:13.109 --> 00:40:13.119 align:start position:0% I had asked about putting in the Yeah, 00:40:13.119 --> 00:40:15.270 align:start position:0% I had asked about putting in the Yeah, that's<00:40:13.359> line<00:40:13.599> 52.<00:40:14.079> So<00:40:14.320> implement<00:40:14.720> a<00:40:14.960> local 00:40:15.270 --> 00:40:15.280 align:start position:0% that's line 52. So implement a local 00:40:15.280 --> 00:40:19.270 align:start position:0% that's line 52. So implement a local school<00:40:16.320> physical<00:40:16.800> and<00:40:17.599> nutritional<00:40:18.800> wellness 00:40:19.270 --> 00:40:19.280 align:start position:0% school physical and nutritional wellness 00:40:19.280 --> 00:40:21.829 align:start position:0% school physical and nutritional wellness policy.<00:40:20.720> And<00:40:20.960> there<00:40:21.200> was<00:40:21.359> some<00:40:21.520> discussion 00:40:21.829 --> 00:40:21.839 align:start position:0% policy. And there was some discussion 00:40:21.839 --> 00:40:23.910 align:start position:0% policy. And there was some discussion that<00:40:22.000> the<00:40:22.240> schools<00:40:22.560> have<00:40:22.720> wellness<00:40:23.200> policies 00:40:23.910 --> 00:40:23.920 align:start position:0% that the schools have wellness policies 00:40:23.920 --> 00:40:25.750 align:start position:0% that the schools have wellness policies but<00:40:24.240> not<00:40:24.480> physical<00:40:24.880> and<00:40:25.119> nutritional 00:40:25.750 --> 00:40:25.760 align:start position:0% but not physical and nutritional 00:40:25.760 --> 00:40:29.829 align:start position:0% but not physical and nutritional policies.<00:40:27.119> Um<00:40:27.760> I<00:40:27.920> I<00:40:28.079> I<00:40:28.960> went<00:40:29.119> and<00:40:29.280> looked<00:40:29.520> at<00:40:29.680> a 00:40:29.829 --> 00:40:29.839 align:start position:0% policies. Um I I I went and looked at a 00:40:29.839 --> 00:40:31.430 align:start position:0% policies. Um I I I went and looked at a whole<00:40:30.000> bunch<00:40:30.160> of<00:40:30.400> policies<00:40:30.800> that<00:40:31.040> are<00:40:31.200> out 00:40:31.430 --> 00:40:31.440 align:start position:0% whole bunch of policies that are out 00:40:31.440 --> 00:40:34.390 align:start position:0% whole bunch of policies that are out there<00:40:31.760> currently<00:40:32.160> in<00:40:32.400> the<00:40:32.560> state<00:40:32.720> of<00:40:32.880> Utah. 00:40:34.390 --> 00:40:34.400 align:start position:0% there currently in the state of Utah. 00:40:34.400 --> 00:40:38.069 align:start position:0% there currently in the state of Utah. Most<00:40:34.720> of<00:40:34.880> them<00:40:35.040> do<00:40:35.359> have<00:40:35.680> a<00:40:36.000> physical 00:40:38.069 --> 00:40:38.079 align:start position:0% Most of them do have a physical 00:40:38.079 --> 00:40:40.710 align:start position:0% Most of them do have a physical uh<00:40:38.480> fitness<00:40:38.960> policy<00:40:39.359> and<00:40:39.599> a<00:40:39.920> nutritional 00:40:40.710 --> 00:40:40.720 align:start position:0% uh fitness policy and a nutritional 00:40:40.720 --> 00:40:43.349 align:start position:0% uh fitness policy and a nutritional wellness<00:40:41.280> policy.<00:40:42.480> and<00:40:42.720> they<00:40:42.880> may<00:40:43.040> have<00:40:43.200> other 00:40:43.349 --> 00:40:43.359 align:start position:0% wellness policy. and they may have other 00:40:43.359 --> 00:40:46.710 align:start position:0% wellness policy. and they may have other wellness<00:40:43.839> policies,<00:40:44.480> too.<00:40:45.520> So,<00:40:46.079> I'm<00:40:46.480> actually 00:40:46.710 --> 00:40:46.720 align:start position:0% wellness policies, too. So, I'm actually 00:40:46.720 --> 00:40:51.430 align:start position:0% wellness policies, too. So, I'm actually gonna<00:40:47.040> make<00:40:47.200> just<00:40:47.359> a<00:40:47.680> recommendation<00:40:48.800> that<00:40:49.520> um 00:40:51.430 --> 00:40:51.440 align:start position:0% gonna make just a recommendation that um 00:40:51.440 --> 00:40:53.030 align:start position:0% gonna make just a recommendation that um let<00:40:51.599> me<00:40:51.760> see<00:40:51.839> what<00:40:52.000> the<00:40:52.160> wording<00:40:52.480> was.<00:40:52.720> I<00:40:52.960> have 00:40:53.030 --> 00:40:53.040 align:start position:0% let me see what the wording was. I have 00:40:53.040 --> 00:40:55.430 align:start position:0% let me see what the wording was. I have some<00:40:53.280> wording<00:40:53.839> I<00:40:54.160> would<00:40:54.320> like<00:40:54.480> us<00:40:54.720> to<00:40:54.880> use<00:40:55.200> that 00:40:55.430 --> 00:40:55.440 align:start position:0% some wording I would like us to use that 00:40:55.440 --> 00:40:58.069 align:start position:0% some wording I would like us to use that we<00:40:55.599> would<00:40:55.839> we<00:40:56.560> use<00:40:57.200> uh<00:40:57.359> physical<00:40:57.760> and 00:40:58.069 --> 00:40:58.079 align:start position:0% we would we use uh physical and 00:40:58.079 --> 00:41:01.109 align:start position:0% we would we use uh physical and nutritional<00:40:58.720> health<00:40:59.119> provisions<00:41:00.400> as<00:41:00.720> part<00:41:00.960> of 00:41:01.109 --> 00:41:01.119 align:start position:0% nutritional health provisions as part of 00:41:01.119 --> 00:41:04.309 align:start position:0% nutritional health provisions as part of a<00:41:01.280> wellness<00:41:01.839> policy.<00:41:02.880> So,<00:41:03.200> on<00:41:03.520> 52,<00:41:03.920> it<00:41:04.160> would 00:41:04.309 --> 00:41:04.319 align:start position:0% a wellness policy. So, on 52, it would 00:41:04.319 --> 00:41:10.150 align:start position:0% a wellness policy. So, on 52, it would say<00:41:05.040> implement<00:41:05.520> a<00:41:05.920> local<00:41:06.319> school 00:41:10.150 --> 00:41:10.160 align:start position:0% 00:41:10.160 --> 00:41:13.910 align:start position:0% wellness<00:41:10.720> polic.<00:41:11.280> Oh,<00:41:11.520> no. 00:41:13.910 --> 00:41:13.920 align:start position:0% 00:41:13.920 --> 00:41:15.270 align:start position:0% Oh<00:41:14.240> goodness.<00:41:14.560> Let<00:41:14.720> me<00:41:14.880> make<00:41:14.960> sure<00:41:15.040> I've<00:41:15.200> got 00:41:15.270 --> 00:41:15.280 align:start position:0% Oh goodness. Let me make sure I've got 00:41:15.280 --> 00:41:16.630 align:start position:0% Oh goodness. Let me make sure I've got this<00:41:15.440> right.<00:41:15.680> I've<00:41:15.839> got<00:41:15.920> two<00:41:16.160> lines<00:41:16.319> here. 00:41:16.630 --> 00:41:16.640 align:start position:0% this right. I've got two lines here. 00:41:16.640 --> 00:41:18.790 align:start position:0% this right. I've got two lines here. Implement<00:41:16.960> a<00:41:17.280> local<00:41:17.680> school<00:41:18.000> wellness<00:41:18.400> policy 00:41:18.790 --> 00:41:18.800 align:start position:0% Implement a local school wellness policy 00:41:18.800 --> 00:41:21.030 align:start position:0% Implement a local school wellness policy that<00:41:19.040> includes<00:41:19.520> both<00:41:19.839> physical<00:41:20.720> and 00:41:21.030 --> 00:41:21.040 align:start position:0% that includes both physical and 00:41:21.040 --> 00:41:23.750 align:start position:0% that includes both physical and nutritional<00:41:21.760> components. 00:41:23.750 --> 00:41:23.760 align:start position:0% nutritional components. 00:41:23.760 --> 00:41:25.270 align:start position:0% nutritional components. I<00:41:24.000> don't<00:41:24.079> know<00:41:24.160> if<00:41:24.319> that's<00:41:24.560> what<00:41:24.720> I<00:41:24.880> wanted<00:41:25.040> to 00:41:25.270 --> 00:41:25.280 align:start position:0% I don't know if that's what I wanted to 00:41:25.280 --> 00:41:40.150 align:start position:0% I don't know if that's what I wanted to say.<00:41:25.599> So,<00:41:26.000> hold<00:41:26.160> on<00:41:26.319> just<00:41:26.560> one<00:41:26.800> second. 00:41:40.150 --> 00:41:40.160 align:start position:0% 00:41:40.160 --> 00:41:43.109 align:start position:0% uh<00:41:40.400> tell<00:41:40.640> me<00:41:40.880> if<00:41:41.200> how<00:41:41.599> that 00:41:43.109 --> 00:41:43.119 align:start position:0% uh tell me if how that 00:41:43.119 --> 00:41:45.990 align:start position:0% uh tell me if how that committee<00:41:43.839> if<00:41:44.079> we<00:41:44.480> if<00:41:44.800> you<00:41:44.960> wanted<00:41:45.280> to<00:41:45.440> say 00:41:45.990 --> 00:41:46.000 align:start position:0% committee if we if you wanted to say 00:41:46.000 --> 00:41:49.190 align:start position:0% committee if we if you wanted to say because<00:41:46.319> I<00:41:46.800> what<00:41:47.119> I'm<00:41:47.359> trying<00:41:47.520> to<00:41:47.760> say<00:41:48.000> is<00:41:48.240> that 00:41:49.190 --> 00:41:49.200 align:start position:0% because I what I'm trying to say is that 00:41:49.200 --> 00:41:52.470 align:start position:0% because I what I'm trying to say is that the<00:41:49.520> wellness<00:41:50.000> policy<00:41:50.880> includes<00:41:52.000> sometimes 00:41:52.470 --> 00:41:52.480 align:start position:0% the wellness policy includes sometimes 00:41:52.480 --> 00:41:55.190 align:start position:0% the wellness policy includes sometimes it<00:41:52.720> includes<00:41:53.760> there<00:41:54.000> was<00:41:54.240> like<00:41:54.640> I<00:41:54.880> don't<00:41:54.960> know 00:41:55.190 --> 00:41:55.200 align:start position:0% it includes there was like I don't know 00:41:55.200 --> 00:41:57.589 align:start position:0% it includes there was like I don't know a<00:41:55.280> hundred<00:41:55.599> things<00:41:55.839> in<00:41:56.079> the<00:41:56.319> one<00:41:57.200> it<00:41:57.440> was 00:41:57.589 --> 00:41:57.599 align:start position:0% a hundred things in the one it was 00:41:57.599 --> 00:42:02.550 align:start position:0% a hundred things in the one it was things<00:41:57.839> like<00:41:58.640> positive<00:41:59.040> behavior<00:41:59.520> plan<00:42:00.880> um<00:42:02.319> I 00:42:02.550 --> 00:42:02.560 align:start position:0% things like positive behavior plan um I 00:42:02.560 --> 00:42:04.150 align:start position:0% things like positive behavior plan um I mean<00:42:02.800> I<00:42:02.960> guess<00:42:03.280> What<00:42:03.440> I'm<00:42:03.520> saying<00:42:03.599> is<00:42:03.839> it<00:42:04.000> went 00:42:04.150 --> 00:42:04.160 align:start position:0% mean I guess What I'm saying is it went 00:42:04.160 --> 00:42:07.030 align:start position:0% mean I guess What I'm saying is it went beyond<00:42:04.400> the<00:42:04.560> physical<00:42:05.359> policy<00:42:06.480> as<00:42:06.800> far<00:42:06.880> as 00:42:07.030 --> 00:42:07.040 align:start position:0% beyond the physical policy as far as 00:42:07.040 --> 00:42:09.430 align:start position:0% beyond the physical policy as far as physical<00:42:07.440> fitness<00:42:08.079> and<00:42:08.480> it<00:42:08.720> went<00:42:08.880> beyond<00:42:09.200> the 00:42:09.430 --> 00:42:09.440 align:start position:0% physical fitness and it went beyond the 00:42:09.440 --> 00:42:11.430 align:start position:0% physical fitness and it went beyond the nutrition<00:42:09.920> to<00:42:10.240> include<00:42:10.640> all<00:42:10.800> kinds<00:42:10.960> of<00:42:11.119> things 00:42:11.430 --> 00:42:11.440 align:start position:0% nutrition to include all kinds of things 00:42:11.440 --> 00:42:17.270 align:start position:0% nutrition to include all kinds of things like<00:42:12.560> idling<00:42:12.960> your<00:42:13.200> car<00:42:14.480> um<00:42:15.920> uh<00:42:16.640> uh<00:42:16.800> suicide 00:42:17.270 --> 00:42:17.280 align:start position:0% like idling your car um uh uh suicide 00:42:17.280 --> 00:42:19.990 align:start position:0% like idling your car um uh uh suicide prevention<00:42:18.319> uh<00:42:18.480> mental<00:42:18.800> health<00:42:19.040> stuff.<00:42:19.440> It<00:42:19.680> it 00:42:19.990 --> 00:42:20.000 align:start position:0% prevention uh mental health stuff. It it 00:42:20.000 --> 00:42:21.750 align:start position:0% prevention uh mental health stuff. It it was<00:42:20.160> all<00:42:20.400> of<00:42:20.560> these<00:42:20.880> it<00:42:21.119> was<00:42:21.200> a<00:42:21.359> whole<00:42:21.440> bunch<00:42:21.599> of 00:42:21.750 --> 00:42:21.760 align:start position:0% was all of these it was a whole bunch of 00:42:21.760 --> 00:42:25.910 align:start position:0% was all of these it was a whole bunch of stuff<00:42:22.000> in<00:42:22.240> our<00:42:22.480> model<00:42:22.880> policy.<00:42:24.319> So<00:42:24.800> once<00:42:25.119> again 00:42:25.910 --> 00:42:25.920 align:start position:0% stuff in our model policy. So once again 00:42:25.920 --> 00:42:28.710 align:start position:0% stuff in our model policy. So once again I<00:42:26.240> want<00:42:26.400> to<00:42:26.560> make<00:42:26.720> sure<00:42:26.880> that<00:42:27.359> we're<00:42:27.680> not<00:42:28.240> just 00:42:28.710 --> 00:42:28.720 align:start position:0% I want to make sure that we're not just 00:42:28.720 --> 00:42:30.870 align:start position:0% I want to make sure that we're not just broadening<00:42:29.200> this<00:42:29.440> out<00:42:29.680> so<00:42:30.000> we<00:42:30.240> lose<00:42:30.640> what 00:42:30.870 --> 00:42:30.880 align:start position:0% broadening this out so we lose what 00:42:30.880 --> 00:42:33.270 align:start position:0% broadening this out so we lose what we're<00:42:31.119> actually<00:42:31.440> trying<00:42:31.599> to<00:42:31.760> do<00:42:32.000> here. 00:42:33.270 --> 00:42:33.280 align:start position:0% we're actually trying to do here. 00:42:33.280 --> 00:42:36.309 align:start position:0% we're actually trying to do here. Um,<00:42:33.839> yes.<00:42:34.640> Uh,<00:42:34.960> Specialist<00:42:35.520> Parker,<00:42:36.000> do<00:42:36.160> you 00:42:36.309 --> 00:42:36.319 align:start position:0% Um, yes. Uh, Specialist Parker, do you 00:42:36.319 --> 00:42:38.069 align:start position:0% Um, yes. Uh, Specialist Parker, do you have<00:42:36.480> something<00:42:36.800> you<00:42:37.040> want<00:42:37.119> to<00:42:37.280> add? 00:42:38.069 --> 00:42:38.079 align:start position:0% have something you want to add? 00:42:38.079 --> 00:42:41.510 align:start position:0% have something you want to add? >> Yeah,<00:42:38.319> sure.<00:42:39.040> Um,<00:42:39.680> thank<00:42:39.920> you,<00:42:40.560> Chair<00:42:40.800> Earl. 00:42:41.510 --> 00:42:41.520 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, sure. Um, thank you, Chair Earl. 00:42:41.520 --> 00:42:43.589 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, sure. Um, thank you, Chair Earl. Um,<00:42:42.000> yeah,<00:42:42.240> Jodie<00:42:42.560> Parker,<00:42:42.960> health<00:42:43.119> education 00:42:43.589 --> 00:42:43.599 align:start position:0% Um, yeah, Jodie Parker, health education 00:42:43.599 --> 00:42:46.630 align:start position:0% Um, yeah, Jodie Parker, health education specialist.<00:42:44.319> Um,<00:42:44.800> and<00:42:45.280> Cheryl,<00:42:46.079> what<00:42:46.319> I<00:42:46.560> think 00:42:46.630 --> 00:42:46.640 align:start position:0% specialist. Um, and Cheryl, what I think 00:42:46.640 --> 00:42:49.190 align:start position:0% specialist. Um, and Cheryl, what I think you<00:42:46.800> just<00:42:47.040> referred<00:42:47.280> to,<00:42:48.240> um,<00:42:48.480> staff<00:42:48.880> created 00:42:49.190 --> 00:42:49.200 align:start position:0% you just referred to, um, staff created 00:42:49.200 --> 00:42:51.510 align:start position:0% you just referred to, um, staff created a<00:42:49.440> model<00:42:49.680> policy<00:42:50.079> a<00:42:50.240> few<00:42:50.400> years<00:42:50.560> ago,<00:42:51.040> and<00:42:51.280> that 00:42:51.510 --> 00:42:51.520 align:start position:0% a model policy a few years ago, and that 00:42:51.520 --> 00:42:54.390 align:start position:0% a model policy a few years ago, and that was<00:42:51.680> based<00:42:52.000> off<00:42:52.240> of<00:42:52.400> some<00:42:52.720> input<00:42:53.200> from<00:42:53.839> several 00:42:54.390 --> 00:42:54.400 align:start position:0% was based off of some input from several 00:42:54.400 --> 00:42:58.230 align:start position:0% was based off of some input from several LEAs,<00:42:55.520> and<00:42:55.920> actually<00:42:56.480> started<00:42:56.960> through,<00:42:58.000> um, 00:42:58.230 --> 00:42:58.240 align:start position:0% LEAs, and actually started through, um, 00:42:58.240 --> 00:43:01.670 align:start position:0% LEAs, and actually started through, um, parents<00:42:59.359> um,<00:42:59.440> and<00:42:59.680> PTA<00:43:00.160> groups<00:43:01.040> that<00:43:01.359> wanted 00:43:01.670 --> 00:43:01.680 align:start position:0% parents um, and PTA groups that wanted 00:43:01.680 --> 00:43:03.589 align:start position:0% parents um, and PTA groups that wanted to<00:43:01.920> see<00:43:02.079> what<00:43:02.319> it<00:43:02.480> would<00:43:02.640> look<00:43:02.800> like<00:43:03.119> if 00:43:03.589 --> 00:43:03.599 align:start position:0% to see what it would look like if 00:43:03.599 --> 00:43:07.190 align:start position:0% to see what it would look like if everything<00:43:04.640> health<00:43:05.200> wellness<00:43:06.400> related<00:43:06.880> was 00:43:07.190 --> 00:43:07.200 align:start position:0% everything health wellness related was 00:43:07.200 --> 00:43:09.829 align:start position:0% everything health wellness related was in<00:43:07.440> one<00:43:07.760> place,<00:43:08.800> how<00:43:09.040> that<00:43:09.280> would<00:43:09.440> look.<00:43:09.680> And 00:43:09.829 --> 00:43:09.839 align:start position:0% in one place, how that would look. And 00:43:09.839 --> 00:43:12.630 align:start position:0% in one place, how that would look. And so<00:43:10.000> it<00:43:10.160> was<00:43:10.400> everything<00:43:10.800> under<00:43:12.000> um<00:43:12.079> that<00:43:12.400> has 00:43:12.630 --> 00:43:12.640 align:start position:0% so it was everything under um that has 00:43:12.640 --> 00:43:16.470 align:start position:0% so it was everything under um that has any<00:43:12.880> kind<00:43:13.119> of<00:43:13.599> state<00:43:13.920> code<00:43:14.480> or<00:43:14.800> a<00:43:15.040> rule.<00:43:15.760> Um<00:43:16.079> so 00:43:16.470 --> 00:43:16.480 align:start position:0% any kind of state code or a rule. Um so 00:43:16.480 --> 00:43:18.230 align:start position:0% any kind of state code or a rule. Um so things<00:43:16.800> like<00:43:17.040> medication<00:43:17.599> management<00:43:18.000> for 00:43:18.230 --> 00:43:18.240 align:start position:0% things like medication management for 00:43:18.240 --> 00:43:20.790 align:start position:0% things like medication management for nurses.<00:43:19.359> And<00:43:19.520> so<00:43:19.680> we<00:43:20.000> put<00:43:20.240> all<00:43:20.480> of<00:43:20.560> it 00:43:20.790 --> 00:43:20.800 align:start position:0% nurses. And so we put all of it 00:43:20.800 --> 00:43:23.109 align:start position:0% nurses. And so we put all of it together.<00:43:21.359> Um<00:43:21.680> there<00:43:22.000> are<00:43:22.160> a<00:43:22.400> couple<00:43:22.720> schools 00:43:23.109 --> 00:43:23.119 align:start position:0% together. Um there are a couple schools 00:43:23.119 --> 00:43:25.670 align:start position:0% together. Um there are a couple schools that<00:43:23.440> we<00:43:23.599> did.<00:43:23.920> We<00:43:24.160> did<00:43:24.880> two<00:43:25.359> different 00:43:25.670 --> 00:43:25.680 align:start position:0% that we did. We did two different 00:43:25.680 --> 00:43:29.109 align:start position:0% that we did. We did two different cohorts<00:43:26.319> working<00:43:26.560> with<00:43:26.800> schools<00:43:27.680> um<00:43:28.400> eleas<00:43:28.960> so 00:43:29.109 --> 00:43:29.119 align:start position:0% cohorts working with schools um eleas so 00:43:29.119 --> 00:43:33.030 align:start position:0% cohorts working with schools um eleas so either<00:43:29.359> charters<00:43:29.760> or<00:43:29.920> districts<00:43:31.280> and<00:43:32.480> a<00:43:32.800> only 00:43:33.030 --> 00:43:33.040 align:start position:0% either charters or districts and a only 00:43:33.040 --> 00:43:36.069 align:start position:0% either charters or districts and a only a<00:43:33.280> couple<00:43:33.440> of<00:43:33.520> them<00:43:33.760> adopted<00:43:35.119> um<00:43:35.520> a<00:43:35.760> similar 00:43:36.069 --> 00:43:36.079 align:start position:0% a couple of them adopted um a similar 00:43:36.079 --> 00:43:37.990 align:start position:0% a couple of them adopted um a similar look.<00:43:36.400> But<00:43:36.640> what<00:43:36.800> most<00:43:36.960> of<00:43:37.119> them<00:43:37.359> did<00:43:37.599> is 00:43:37.990 --> 00:43:38.000 align:start position:0% look. But what most of them did is 00:43:38.000 --> 00:43:40.870 align:start position:0% look. But what most of them did is created<00:43:38.400> a<00:43:38.640> place<00:43:38.880> where<00:43:39.280> everything<00:43:40.560> health 00:43:40.870 --> 00:43:40.880 align:start position:0% created a place where everything health 00:43:40.880 --> 00:43:45.109 align:start position:0% created a place where everything health or<00:43:41.359> or<00:43:42.720> wellness<00:43:43.200> related<00:43:43.680> lives<00:43:44.000> in<00:43:44.240> the<00:43:44.480> same 00:43:45.109 --> 00:43:45.119 align:start position:0% or or wellness related lives in the same 00:43:45.119 --> 00:43:47.349 align:start position:0% or or wellness related lives in the same place<00:43:45.440> on<00:43:45.680> their<00:43:45.920> website<00:43:46.560> so<00:43:46.720> that<00:43:46.960> parents 00:43:47.349 --> 00:43:47.359 align:start position:0% place on their website so that parents 00:43:47.359 --> 00:43:51.510 align:start position:0% place on their website so that parents can<00:43:47.680> find<00:43:48.240> those<00:43:48.640> things.<00:43:49.839> We<00:43:50.640> did<00:43:50.880> not<00:43:51.119> remove 00:43:51.510 --> 00:43:51.520 align:start position:0% can find those things. We did not remove 00:43:51.520 --> 00:43:55.510 align:start position:0% can find those things. We did not remove our<00:43:51.839> model<00:43:52.240> from<00:43:52.560> the<00:43:52.800> website.<00:43:53.680> Um 00:43:55.510 --> 00:43:55.520 align:start position:0% our model from the website. Um 00:43:55.520 --> 00:43:57.990 align:start position:0% our model from the website. Um but<00:43:55.760> it<00:43:56.000> was<00:43:56.160> just<00:43:56.800> a<00:43:57.119> model<00:43:57.359> that<00:43:57.599> was<00:43:57.760> related 00:43:57.990 --> 00:43:58.000 align:start position:0% but it was just a model that was related 00:43:58.000 --> 00:44:00.230 align:start position:0% but it was just a model that was related to<00:43:58.160> a<00:43:58.400> previous<00:43:58.800> strategic<00:43:59.280> plan.<00:43:59.760> So<00:44:00.000> that's 00:44:00.230 --> 00:44:00.240 align:start position:0% to a previous strategic plan. So that's 00:44:00.240 --> 00:44:04.790 align:start position:0% to a previous strategic plan. So that's where<00:44:00.400> that<00:44:00.640> piece<00:44:00.960> came<00:44:01.200> from.<00:44:01.920> the<00:44:02.960> um<00:44:04.079> the 00:44:04.790 --> 00:44:04.800 align:start position:0% where that piece came from. the um the 00:44:04.800 --> 00:44:07.430 align:start position:0% where that piece came from. the um the school<00:44:05.200> wellness<00:44:05.680> policies<00:44:06.800> which<00:44:07.119> are 00:44:07.430 --> 00:44:07.440 align:start position:0% school wellness policies which are 00:44:07.440 --> 00:44:10.309 align:start position:0% school wellness policies which are required<00:44:08.079> for<00:44:08.480> every<00:44:08.960> school<00:44:09.440> that<00:44:10.079> it 00:44:10.309 --> 00:44:10.319 align:start position:0% required for every school that it 00:44:10.319 --> 00:44:12.790 align:start position:0% required for every school that it participates<00:44:10.960> in<00:44:11.280> the<00:44:11.920> national<00:44:12.400> lunch 00:44:12.790 --> 00:44:12.800 align:start position:0% participates in the national lunch 00:44:12.800 --> 00:44:16.630 align:start position:0% participates in the national lunch program<00:44:14.000> does<00:44:14.319> already<00:44:14.880> require<00:44:15.839> physical 00:44:16.630 --> 00:44:16.640 align:start position:0% program does already require physical 00:44:16.640 --> 00:44:19.109 align:start position:0% program does already require physical activity<00:44:17.359> and<00:44:17.680> nutrition.<00:44:18.400> Those<00:44:18.800> two 00:44:19.109 --> 00:44:19.119 align:start position:0% activity and nutrition. Those two 00:44:19.119 --> 00:44:22.069 align:start position:0% activity and nutrition. Those two elements<00:44:19.760> are<00:44:20.160> required<00:44:21.280> for<00:44:21.680> wellness 00:44:22.069 --> 00:44:22.079 align:start position:0% elements are required for wellness 00:44:22.079 --> 00:44:24.710 align:start position:0% elements are required for wellness policies.<00:44:22.960> Those<00:44:23.119> are<00:44:23.280> non-negotiables. 00:44:24.710 --> 00:44:24.720 align:start position:0% policies. Those are non-negotiables. 00:44:24.720 --> 00:44:25.990 align:start position:0% policies. Those are non-negotiables. >> Yeah.<00:44:24.960> And<00:44:25.119> that's<00:44:25.280> what<00:44:25.440> I'm<00:44:25.599> saying<00:44:25.839> though 00:44:25.990 --> 00:44:26.000 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And that's what I'm saying though 00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:28.230 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And that's what I'm saying though is<00:44:26.160> that<00:44:26.400> when<00:44:26.560> you<00:44:26.720> say<00:44:26.960> wellness<00:44:27.440> policy<00:44:28.000> in 00:44:28.230 --> 00:44:28.240 align:start position:0% is that when you say wellness policy in 00:44:28.240 --> 00:44:31.510 align:start position:0% is that when you say wellness policy in here<00:44:29.200> Yes.<00:44:29.680> It<00:44:29.920> goes<00:44:30.160> beyond<00:44:30.560> the<00:44:30.800> scope<00:44:31.280> and 00:44:31.510 --> 00:44:31.520 align:start position:0% here Yes. It goes beyond the scope and 00:44:31.520 --> 00:44:33.910 align:start position:0% here Yes. It goes beyond the scope and it<00:44:31.839> not<00:44:32.079> necessarily<00:44:33.040> but<00:44:33.280> a<00:44:33.520> lot<00:44:33.599> of<00:44:33.680> them 00:44:33.910 --> 00:44:33.920 align:start position:0% it not necessarily but a lot of them 00:44:33.920 --> 00:44:36.790 align:start position:0% it not necessarily but a lot of them only<00:44:34.240> did<00:44:34.480> the<00:44:34.960> nutrition<00:44:35.680> and<00:44:36.079> the<00:44:36.400> physical 00:44:36.790 --> 00:44:36.800 align:start position:0% only did the nutrition and the physical 00:44:36.800 --> 00:44:39.670 align:start position:0% only did the nutrition and the physical fitness<00:44:37.359> piece<00:44:38.079> right<00:44:38.400> recess<00:44:38.880> and<00:44:39.280> physical 00:44:39.670 --> 00:44:39.680 align:start position:0% fitness piece right recess and physical 00:44:39.680 --> 00:44:41.190 align:start position:0% fitness piece right recess and physical activity 00:44:41.190 --> 00:44:41.200 align:start position:0% activity 00:44:41.200 --> 00:44:44.630 align:start position:0% activity but<00:44:41.680> some<00:44:41.920> of<00:44:42.079> them<00:44:42.720> were<00:44:44.079> so<00:44:44.319> when<00:44:44.400> you<00:44:44.480> say 00:44:44.630 --> 00:44:44.640 align:start position:0% but some of them were so when you say 00:44:44.640 --> 00:44:47.109 align:start position:0% but some of them were so when you say wellness<00:44:45.040> policy<00:44:45.520> it<00:44:45.680> could<00:44:45.839> be<00:44:46.079> inclusive<00:44:46.480> of 00:44:47.109 --> 00:44:47.119 align:start position:0% wellness policy it could be inclusive of 00:44:47.119 --> 00:44:48.790 align:start position:0% wellness policy it could be inclusive of all<00:44:47.359> those<00:44:47.599> other<00:44:47.839> things<00:44:48.000> that<00:44:48.240> we<00:44:48.480> talked 00:44:48.790 --> 00:44:48.800 align:start position:0% all those other things that we talked 00:44:48.800 --> 00:44:50.950 align:start position:0% all those other things that we talked about<00:44:49.520> and<00:44:49.680> what<00:44:49.920> I<00:44:50.079> found<00:44:50.240> that<00:44:50.480> most<00:44:50.640> of<00:44:50.800> them 00:44:50.950 --> 00:44:50.960 align:start position:0% about and what I found that most of them 00:44:50.960 --> 00:44:53.829 align:start position:0% about and what I found that most of them only<00:44:51.280> had<00:44:51.680> those<00:44:52.000> two<00:44:52.240> provisions 00:44:53.829 --> 00:44:53.839 align:start position:0% only had those two provisions 00:44:53.839 --> 00:44:55.670 align:start position:0% only had those two provisions >> so<00:44:54.079> that's<00:44:54.319> why<00:44:54.480> I'm<00:44:54.720> just<00:44:55.040> help<00:44:55.280> us<00:44:55.440> create 00:44:55.670 --> 00:44:55.680 align:start position:0% >> so that's why I'm just help us create 00:44:55.680 --> 00:44:57.030 align:start position:0% >> so that's why I'm just help us create the<00:44:55.839> clarity<00:44:56.160> here<00:44:56.319> because<00:44:56.480> if<00:44:56.640> we<00:44:56.720> just<00:44:56.880> do 00:44:57.030 --> 00:44:57.040 align:start position:0% the clarity here because if we just do 00:44:57.040 --> 00:44:58.950 align:start position:0% the clarity here because if we just do wellness<00:44:57.440> policy<00:44:57.920> it<00:44:58.160> does<00:44:58.319> open<00:44:58.480> the<00:44:58.720> door 00:44:58.950 --> 00:44:58.960 align:start position:0% wellness policy it does open the door 00:44:58.960 --> 00:45:01.670 align:start position:0% wellness policy it does open the door for<00:44:59.920> we<00:45:00.160> could<00:45:00.319> be<00:45:00.480> spending<00:45:01.040> money<00:45:01.280> and<00:45:01.520> time 00:45:01.670 --> 00:45:01.680 align:start position:0% for we could be spending money and time 00:45:01.680 --> 00:45:04.069 align:start position:0% for we could be spending money and time on<00:45:01.920> all<00:45:02.079> kinds<00:45:02.319> of<00:45:02.480> things<00:45:02.640> that<00:45:02.880> are<00:45:03.040> not<00:45:03.839> what 00:45:04.069 --> 00:45:04.079 align:start position:0% on all kinds of things that are not what 00:45:04.079 --> 00:45:06.230 align:start position:0% on all kinds of things that are not what the<00:45:04.319> intent<00:45:04.640> was.<00:45:05.040> So<00:45:05.200> I<00:45:05.440> just<00:45:05.599> want<00:45:05.760> to<00:45:05.920> create 00:45:06.230 --> 00:45:06.240 align:start position:0% the intent was. So I just want to create 00:45:06.240 --> 00:45:08.230 align:start position:0% the intent was. So I just want to create that<00:45:06.480> clarity<00:45:07.119> and<00:45:07.359> I<00:45:07.599> understand<00:45:07.920> they<00:45:08.160> have 00:45:08.230 --> 00:45:08.240 align:start position:0% that clarity and I understand they have 00:45:08.240 --> 00:45:10.309 align:start position:0% that clarity and I understand they have a<00:45:08.400> wellness<00:45:08.800> policy.<00:45:09.280> So 00:45:10.309 --> 00:45:10.319 align:start position:0% a wellness policy. So 00:45:10.319 --> 00:45:13.430 align:start position:0% a wellness policy. So >> and<00:45:10.560> I<00:45:10.800> think<00:45:11.839> if<00:45:12.079> you<00:45:12.240> wanted<00:45:12.480> my<00:45:12.720> opinion<00:45:13.200> I 00:45:13.430 --> 00:45:13.440 align:start position:0% >> and I think if you wanted my opinion I 00:45:13.440 --> 00:45:15.910 align:start position:0% >> and I think if you wanted my opinion I think<00:45:13.520> the<00:45:13.760> way<00:45:14.000> you<00:45:14.319> phrased<00:45:14.720> it 00:45:15.910 --> 00:45:15.920 align:start position:0% think the way you phrased it 00:45:15.920 --> 00:45:18.309 align:start position:0% think the way you phrased it >> um<00:45:16.480> that<00:45:17.040> implement<00:45:17.440> a<00:45:17.680> school<00:45:17.920> wellness 00:45:18.309 --> 00:45:18.319 align:start position:0% >> um that implement a school wellness 00:45:18.319 --> 00:45:20.790 align:start position:0% >> um that implement a school wellness policy 00:45:20.790 --> 00:45:20.800 align:start position:0% policy 00:45:20.800 --> 00:45:23.030 align:start position:0% policy >> um<00:45:21.359> and<00:45:21.520> maybe<00:45:21.760> it's<00:45:22.000> like<00:45:22.240> emphasizing 00:45:23.030 --> 00:45:23.040 align:start position:0% >> um and maybe it's like emphasizing 00:45:23.040 --> 00:45:24.870 align:start position:0% >> um and maybe it's like emphasizing nutrition<00:45:23.520> and<00:45:23.839> physical<00:45:24.319> activity<00:45:24.720> or 00:45:24.870 --> 00:45:24.880 align:start position:0% nutrition and physical activity or 00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:25.829 align:start position:0% nutrition and physical activity or something<00:45:25.040> like<00:45:25.200> that,<00:45:25.359> right?<00:45:25.520> Or<00:45:25.680> could<00:45:25.760> it 00:45:25.829 --> 00:45:25.839 align:start position:0% something like that, right? Or could it 00:45:25.839 --> 00:45:27.589 align:start position:0% something like that, right? Or could it be?<00:45:26.160> I<00:45:26.400> I<00:45:26.560> think<00:45:26.640> you<00:45:26.800> could<00:45:26.960> call<00:45:27.200> out<00:45:27.359> that 00:45:27.589 --> 00:45:27.599 align:start position:0% be? I I think you could call out that 00:45:27.599 --> 00:45:29.349 align:start position:0% be? I I think you could call out that those<00:45:27.839> two<00:45:28.079> components<00:45:28.560> are<00:45:28.800> what<00:45:28.960> this<00:45:29.119> is 00:45:29.349 --> 00:45:29.359 align:start position:0% those two components are what this is 00:45:29.359 --> 00:45:32.230 align:start position:0% those two components are what this is about.<00:45:30.079> I<00:45:30.400> think<00:45:30.480> that's<00:45:30.800> fine.<00:45:31.520> Um<00:45:31.839> I<00:45:32.079> think 00:45:32.230 --> 00:45:32.240 align:start position:0% about. I think that's fine. Um I think 00:45:32.240 --> 00:45:33.750 align:start position:0% about. I think that's fine. Um I think that<00:45:32.400> you<00:45:32.720> would<00:45:32.880> just<00:45:33.119> need<00:45:33.280> to<00:45:33.440> say 00:45:33.750 --> 00:45:33.760 align:start position:0% that you would just need to say 00:45:33.760 --> 00:45:35.990 align:start position:0% that you would just need to say implement<00:45:34.160> a<00:45:34.400> local<00:45:35.119> school<00:45:35.440> wellness 00:45:35.990 --> 00:45:36.000 align:start position:0% implement a local school wellness 00:45:36.000 --> 00:45:38.230 align:start position:0% implement a local school wellness policy.<00:45:36.720> I<00:45:36.960> think<00:45:37.200> that's<00:45:37.520> the<00:45:37.839> part<00:45:38.000> that 00:45:38.230 --> 00:45:38.240 align:start position:0% policy. I think that's the part that 00:45:38.240 --> 00:45:39.589 align:start position:0% policy. I think that's the part that probably<00:45:38.480> has<00:45:38.640> to<00:45:38.800> stay<00:45:39.040> together<00:45:39.359> because 00:45:39.589 --> 00:45:39.599 align:start position:0% probably has to stay together because 00:45:39.599 --> 00:45:42.230 align:start position:0% probably has to stay together because that's<00:45:39.839> what<00:45:40.000> it's<00:45:40.240> called.<00:45:41.200> And<00:45:41.440> then<00:45:41.920> after 00:45:42.230 --> 00:45:42.240 align:start position:0% that's what it's called. And then after 00:45:42.240 --> 00:45:45.190 align:start position:0% that's what it's called. And then after that,<00:45:42.480> if<00:45:42.720> you<00:45:42.880> wanted<00:45:43.200> to<00:45:44.160> bring<00:45:44.480> out<00:45:44.880> that 00:45:45.190 --> 00:45:45.200 align:start position:0% that, if you wanted to bring out that 00:45:45.200 --> 00:45:47.510 align:start position:0% that, if you wanted to bring out that you<00:45:45.359> want<00:45:45.599> the<00:45:45.920> wellness<00:45:46.400> policy<00:45:47.040> that<00:45:47.280> the 00:45:47.510 --> 00:45:47.520 align:start position:0% you want the wellness policy that the 00:45:47.520 --> 00:45:49.190 align:start position:0% you want the wellness policy that the part<00:45:47.680> of<00:45:47.920> the<00:45:48.079> wellness<00:45:48.480> policy<00:45:48.800> that<00:45:48.960> they 00:45:49.190 --> 00:45:49.200 align:start position:0% part of the wellness policy that they 00:45:49.200 --> 00:45:50.390 align:start position:0% part of the wellness policy that they have<00:45:49.280> to<00:45:49.440> implement<00:45:49.680> is<00:45:49.920> the<00:45:50.079> physical 00:45:50.390 --> 00:45:50.400 align:start position:0% have to implement is the physical 00:45:50.400 --> 00:45:52.550 align:start position:0% have to implement is the physical activity<00:45:50.880> and<00:45:51.280> nutrition,<00:45:52.000> I<00:45:52.240> think<00:45:52.319> that's 00:45:52.550 --> 00:45:52.560 align:start position:0% activity and nutrition, I think that's 00:45:52.560 --> 00:45:53.030 align:start position:0% activity and nutrition, I think that's fine. 00:45:53.030 --> 00:45:53.040 align:start position:0% fine. 00:45:53.040 --> 00:45:54.870 align:start position:0% fine. >> Okay.<00:45:53.280> So<00:45:53.520> let<00:45:53.839> let<00:45:54.079> me<00:45:54.160> try<00:45:54.400> this<00:45:54.560> one<00:45:54.800> more 00:45:54.870 --> 00:45:54.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So let let me try this one more 00:45:54.880 --> 00:45:57.190 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So let let me try this one more time<00:45:55.040> then.<00:45:55.359> whoever's<00:45:55.839> running.<00:45:56.640> What<00:45:56.800> if<00:45:56.960> it 00:45:57.190 --> 00:45:57.200 align:start position:0% time then. whoever's running. What if it 00:45:57.200 --> 00:45:59.109 align:start position:0% time then. whoever's running. What if it said<00:45:57.520> implement<00:45:57.920> a<00:45:58.160> local<00:45:58.400> school<00:45:58.720> wellness 00:45:59.109 --> 00:45:59.119 align:start position:0% said implement a local school wellness 00:45:59.119 --> 00:46:01.349 align:start position:0% said implement a local school wellness policy<00:45:59.520> that<00:45:59.839> includes<00:46:00.400> both<00:46:00.800> physical 00:46:01.349 --> 00:46:01.359 align:start position:0% policy that includes both physical 00:46:01.359 --> 00:46:05.109 align:start position:0% policy that includes both physical fitness<00:46:01.760> and<00:46:02.079> nutritional<00:46:02.640> components? 00:46:05.109 --> 00:46:05.119 align:start position:0% fitness and nutritional components? 00:46:05.119 --> 00:46:07.430 align:start position:0% fitness and nutritional components? Does<00:46:05.359> that 00:46:07.430 --> 00:46:07.440 align:start position:0% Does that 00:46:07.440 --> 00:46:12.309 align:start position:0% Does that get<00:46:07.680> closer? 00:46:12.309 --> 00:46:12.319 align:start position:0% 00:46:12.319 --> 00:46:14.230 align:start position:0% >> Can<00:46:12.480> you<00:46:12.720> direct<00:46:13.119> me<00:46:13.359> to<00:46:13.520> where<00:46:13.760> that<00:46:14.000> would 00:46:14.230 --> 00:46:14.240 align:start position:0% >> Can you direct me to where that would 00:46:14.240 --> 00:46:15.910 align:start position:0% >> Can you direct me to where that would show<00:46:14.480> up<00:46:14.880> in<00:46:15.119> the<00:46:15.280> document? 00:46:15.910 --> 00:46:15.920 align:start position:0% show up in the document? 00:46:15.920 --> 00:46:22.309 align:start position:0% show up in the document? >> 51<00:46:16.640> line<00:46:16.960> 51. 00:46:22.309 --> 00:46:22.319 align:start position:0% 00:46:22.319 --> 00:46:23.990 align:start position:0% Chair<00:46:22.640> Earl,<00:46:22.960> would<00:46:23.119> it<00:46:23.280> also<00:46:23.520> be<00:46:23.599> in<00:46:23.839> the 00:46:23.990 --> 00:46:24.000 align:start position:0% Chair Earl, would it also be in the 00:46:24.000 --> 00:46:26.069 align:start position:0% Chair Earl, would it also be in the other<00:46:24.240> couple<00:46:24.560> places<00:46:24.960> that<00:46:25.280> wellness<00:46:25.680> policy 00:46:26.069 --> 00:46:26.079 align:start position:0% other couple places that wellness policy 00:46:26.079 --> 00:46:27.750 align:start position:0% other couple places that wellness policy was<00:46:26.319> brought<00:46:26.480> up?<00:46:26.720> So,<00:46:26.960> there's<00:46:27.200> like<00:46:27.359> two<00:46:27.599> or 00:46:27.750 --> 00:46:27.760 align:start position:0% was brought up? So, there's like two or 00:46:27.760 --> 00:46:29.030 align:start position:0% was brought up? So, there's like two or three<00:46:28.000> places,<00:46:28.400> right? 00:46:29.030 --> 00:46:29.040 align:start position:0% three places, right? 00:46:29.040 --> 00:46:31.349 align:start position:0% three places, right? >> Yeah.<00:46:29.680> And<00:46:30.000> would<00:46:30.240> it<00:46:30.400> be<00:46:30.640> includes<00:46:31.040> or<00:46:31.200> should 00:46:31.349 --> 00:46:31.359 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And would it be includes or should 00:46:31.359 --> 00:46:34.790 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And would it be includes or should we<00:46:31.520> put<00:46:31.760> emphasizes<00:46:32.720> both<00:46:33.040> physical<00:46:34.160> fitness 00:46:34.790 --> 00:46:34.800 align:start position:0% we put emphasizes both physical fitness 00:46:34.800 --> 00:46:37.589 align:start position:0% we put emphasizes both physical fitness and<00:46:35.520> nutritional? 00:46:37.589 --> 00:46:37.599 align:start position:0% and nutritional? 00:46:37.599 --> 00:46:39.750 align:start position:0% and nutritional? >> Or<00:46:37.839> you<00:46:37.920> could<00:46:38.079> say<00:46:38.319> focusing<00:46:38.880> on. 00:46:39.750 --> 00:46:39.760 align:start position:0% >> Or you could say focusing on. 00:46:39.760 --> 00:46:42.470 align:start position:0% >> Or you could say focusing on. >> Okay,<00:46:40.160> that<00:46:40.400> would<00:46:40.560> work.<00:46:40.880> Focusing<00:46:41.359> on 00:46:42.470 --> 00:46:42.480 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that would work. Focusing on 00:46:42.480 --> 00:46:43.990 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that would work. Focusing on >> yours<00:46:42.800> weren't<00:46:43.040> wrong.<00:46:43.359> I<00:46:43.599> was<00:46:43.680> giving 00:46:43.990 --> 00:46:44.000 align:start position:0% >> yours weren't wrong. I was giving 00:46:44.000 --> 00:46:44.950 align:start position:0% >> yours weren't wrong. I was giving another<00:46:44.319> suggestion. 00:46:44.950 --> 00:46:44.960 align:start position:0% another suggestion. 00:46:44.960 --> 00:46:47.109 align:start position:0% another suggestion. >> Yeah,<00:46:45.119> I<00:46:45.280> do<00:46:45.440> I<00:46:45.599> do<00:46:45.760> like<00:46:45.920> the<00:46:46.160> focusing 00:46:47.109 --> 00:46:47.119 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, I do I do like the focusing 00:46:47.119 --> 00:46:48.069 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, I do I do like the focusing actually 00:46:48.069 --> 00:46:48.079 align:start position:0% actually 00:46:48.079 --> 00:46:49.430 align:start position:0% actually >> because<00:46:48.319> then<00:46:48.480> that<00:46:48.640> would<00:46:48.800> draw<00:46:49.040> that<00:46:49.280> that's 00:46:49.430 --> 00:46:49.440 align:start position:0% >> because then that would draw that that's 00:46:49.440 --> 00:46:52.230 align:start position:0% >> because then that would draw that that's where<00:46:49.599> the<00:46:49.760> goal<00:46:50.000> needs<00:46:50.240> to<00:46:50.400> be.<00:46:51.440> Okay.<00:46:52.000> So, 00:46:52.230 --> 00:46:52.240 align:start position:0% where the goal needs to be. Okay. So, 00:46:52.240 --> 00:46:54.950 align:start position:0% where the goal needs to be. Okay. So, let's<00:46:52.480> see<00:46:52.640> what 00:46:54.950 --> 00:46:54.960 align:start position:0% let's see what 00:46:54.960 --> 00:46:57.510 align:start position:0% let's see what Okay.<00:46:55.280> implement<00:46:55.680> a<00:46:55.920> local<00:46:56.640> school<00:46:57.040> wellness 00:46:57.510 --> 00:46:57.520 align:start position:0% Okay. implement a local school wellness 00:46:57.520 --> 00:46:59.670 align:start position:0% Okay. implement a local school wellness policy<00:46:58.000> focusing<00:46:58.480> on<00:46:58.640> both<00:46:58.880> physical<00:46:59.280> fitness 00:46:59.670 --> 00:46:59.680 align:start position:0% policy focusing on both physical fitness 00:46:59.680 --> 00:47:05.990 align:start position:0% policy focusing on both physical fitness and<00:47:00.000> nutritional<00:47:00.800> components. 00:47:05.990 --> 00:47:06.000 align:start position:0% 00:47:06.000 --> 00:47:07.829 align:start position:0% Components.<00:47:06.560> Is<00:47:06.720> that<00:47:06.960> the<00:47:07.119> right<00:47:07.359> word 00:47:07.829 --> 00:47:07.839 align:start position:0% Components. Is that the right word 00:47:07.839 --> 00:47:09.510 align:start position:0% Components. Is that the right word committee<00:47:08.240> or<00:47:08.480> is<00:47:08.720> it<00:47:09.040> should<00:47:09.200> it<00:47:09.359> be 00:47:09.510 --> 00:47:09.520 align:start position:0% committee or is it should it be 00:47:09.520 --> 00:47:15.910 align:start position:0% committee or is it should it be provisions<00:47:10.000> or<00:47:10.240> components?<00:47:10.800> Anybody<00:47:11.200> have<00:47:11.359> a 00:47:15.910 --> 00:47:15.920 align:start position:0% 00:47:15.920 --> 00:47:18.630 align:start position:0% >> No.<00:47:16.400> May<00:47:16.560> I<00:47:16.720> suggest<00:47:17.119> a<00:47:17.839> slight 00:47:18.630 --> 00:47:18.640 align:start position:0% >> No. May I suggest a slight 00:47:18.640 --> 00:47:20.950 align:start position:0% >> No. May I suggest a slight >> Yeah.<00:47:19.040> Focusing<00:47:19.440> on<00:47:19.599> the<00:47:19.839> areas<00:47:20.240> of<00:47:20.560> physical 00:47:20.950 --> 00:47:20.960 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Focusing on the areas of physical 00:47:20.960 --> 00:47:22.710 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Focusing on the areas of physical fitness<00:47:21.280> and<00:47:21.520> nutrition. 00:47:22.710 --> 00:47:22.720 align:start position:0% fitness and nutrition. 00:47:22.720 --> 00:47:24.710 align:start position:0% fitness and nutrition. >> Okay.<00:47:23.040> Yeah,<00:47:23.200> I<00:47:23.359> like<00:47:23.520> that.<00:47:23.839> Focusing<00:47:24.319> on<00:47:24.480> the 00:47:24.710 --> 00:47:24.720 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Yeah, I like that. Focusing on the 00:47:24.720 --> 00:47:27.270 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Yeah, I like that. Focusing on the areas 00:47:27.270 --> 00:47:27.280 align:start position:0% areas 00:47:27.280 --> 00:47:29.670 align:start position:0% areas of<00:47:27.599> physical<00:47:28.079> fitness<00:47:28.560> and<00:47:28.880> nutrition.<00:47:29.440> Yep, 00:47:29.670 --> 00:47:29.680 align:start position:0% of physical fitness and nutrition. Yep, 00:47:29.680 --> 00:47:40.390 align:start position:0% of physical fitness and nutrition. Yep, I<00:47:29.839> think<00:47:30.000> that 00:47:40.390 --> 00:47:40.400 align:start position:0% 00:47:40.400 --> 00:47:41.750 align:start position:0% >> quick<00:47:40.720> question. 00:47:41.750 --> 00:47:41.760 align:start position:0% >> quick question. 00:47:41.760 --> 00:47:44.710 align:start position:0% >> quick question. >> Yes.<00:47:42.720> This<00:47:42.960> wouldn't<00:47:43.839> make<00:47:44.000> them<00:47:44.240> think<00:47:44.400> they 00:47:44.710 --> 00:47:44.720 align:start position:0% >> Yes. This wouldn't make them think they 00:47:44.720 --> 00:47:45.910 align:start position:0% >> Yes. This wouldn't make them think they have<00:47:44.800> to<00:47:44.960> do<00:47:45.119> something<00:47:45.359> different<00:47:45.680> than 00:47:45.910 --> 00:47:45.920 align:start position:0% have to do something different than 00:47:45.920 --> 00:47:48.069 align:start position:0% have to do something different than what's<00:47:46.240> already<00:47:46.560> required.<00:47:47.440> When<00:47:47.680> it<00:47:47.839> says 00:47:48.069 --> 00:47:48.079 align:start position:0% what's already required. When it says 00:47:48.079 --> 00:47:49.829 align:start position:0% what's already required. When it says implement<00:47:48.560> a<00:47:48.880> local<00:47:49.119> school<00:47:49.440> wellness 00:47:49.829 --> 00:47:49.839 align:start position:0% implement a local school wellness 00:47:49.839 --> 00:47:52.230 align:start position:0% implement a local school wellness policy,<00:47:50.560> if<00:47:50.720> if<00:47:51.040> it's<00:47:51.280> already<00:47:51.520> required<00:47:52.000> for 00:47:52.230 --> 00:47:52.240 align:start position:0% policy, if if it's already required for 00:47:52.240 --> 00:47:54.390 align:start position:0% policy, if if it's already required for those<00:47:52.480> schools<00:47:52.880> or<00:47:53.119> LEAs<00:47:53.680> that<00:47:53.839> are<00:47:54.000> having 00:47:54.390 --> 00:47:54.400 align:start position:0% those schools or LEAs that are having 00:47:54.400 --> 00:47:56.390 align:start position:0% those schools or LEAs that are having lunch<00:47:54.800> programs,<00:47:55.599> is<00:47:55.760> there<00:47:55.839> a<00:47:56.000> way<00:47:56.079> to<00:47:56.240> make 00:47:56.390 --> 00:47:56.400 align:start position:0% lunch programs, is there a way to make 00:47:56.400 --> 00:47:58.630 align:start position:0% lunch programs, is there a way to make sure<00:47:56.480> that<00:47:57.280> are<00:47:57.520> you<00:47:57.680> wanting<00:47:58.000> them<00:47:58.160> to<00:47:58.319> do<00:47:58.400> a 00:47:58.630 --> 00:47:58.640 align:start position:0% sure that are you wanting them to do a 00:47:58.640 --> 00:48:00.790 align:start position:0% sure that are you wanting them to do a different<00:47:58.880> program<00:47:59.599> or<00:47:59.839> a<00:48:00.000> different<00:48:00.319> policy 00:48:00.790 --> 00:48:00.800 align:start position:0% different program or a different policy 00:48:00.800 --> 00:48:02.710 align:start position:0% different program or a different policy or<00:48:01.040> can<00:48:01.280> this<00:48:01.520> be<00:48:01.680> coordinated<00:48:02.160> with<00:48:02.400> the<00:48:02.560> one 00:48:02.710 --> 00:48:02.720 align:start position:0% or can this be coordinated with the one 00:48:02.720 --> 00:48:04.790 align:start position:0% or can this be coordinated with the one they<00:48:03.040> already<00:48:03.280> have?<00:48:03.680> So,<00:48:03.920> we're<00:48:04.240> we're<00:48:04.640> not 00:48:04.790 --> 00:48:04.800 align:start position:0% they already have? So, we're we're not 00:48:04.800 --> 00:48:07.190 align:start position:0% they already have? So, we're we're not asking<00:48:05.119> them<00:48:05.280> to<00:48:05.520> do<00:48:06.160> over<00:48:06.400> and<00:48:06.640> above.<00:48:06.960> If 00:48:07.190 --> 00:48:07.200 align:start position:0% asking them to do over and above. If 00:48:07.200 --> 00:48:09.030 align:start position:0% asking them to do over and above. If they're<00:48:07.440> already<00:48:07.680> doing<00:48:07.920> the<00:48:08.160> right<00:48:08.319> thing, 00:48:09.030 --> 00:48:09.040 align:start position:0% they're already doing the right thing, 00:48:09.040 --> 00:48:10.870 align:start position:0% they're already doing the right thing, carry<00:48:09.359> on. 00:48:10.870 --> 00:48:10.880 align:start position:0% carry on. 00:48:10.880 --> 00:48:12.710 align:start position:0% carry on. Can<00:48:11.119> I<00:48:11.280> answer<00:48:11.520> that? 00:48:12.710 --> 00:48:12.720 align:start position:0% Can I answer that? 00:48:12.720 --> 00:48:14.390 align:start position:0% Can I answer that? >> Yes. 00:48:14.390 --> 00:48:14.400 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 00:48:14.400 --> 00:48:18.710 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> Yeah.<00:48:14.720> Um,<00:48:16.000> member<00:48:16.400> Wood,<00:48:16.960> there<00:48:17.920> all<00:48:18.160> every 00:48:18.710 --> 00:48:18.720 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Um, member Wood, there all every 00:48:18.720 --> 00:48:22.470 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Um, member Wood, there all every district<00:48:19.839> participates<00:48:20.560> in<00:48:21.040> the<00:48:22.240> school 00:48:22.470 --> 00:48:22.480 align:start position:0% district participates in the school 00:48:22.480 --> 00:48:24.470 align:start position:0% district participates in the school mills<00:48:22.800> program.<00:48:23.280> So,<00:48:23.440> they<00:48:23.680> do<00:48:23.920> all<00:48:24.160> have 00:48:24.470 --> 00:48:24.480 align:start position:0% mills program. So, they do all have 00:48:24.480 --> 00:48:27.190 align:start position:0% mills program. So, they do all have wellness<00:48:24.880> policies<00:48:25.280> right<00:48:25.520> now.<00:48:26.400> There<00:48:26.720> are<00:48:26.960> a 00:48:27.190 --> 00:48:27.200 align:start position:0% wellness policies right now. There are a 00:48:27.200 --> 00:48:29.349 align:start position:0% wellness policies right now. There are a few<00:48:27.440> charter<00:48:27.839> schools<00:48:28.240> that<00:48:28.559> currently<00:48:29.040> do 00:48:29.349 --> 00:48:29.359 align:start position:0% few charter schools that currently do 00:48:29.359 --> 00:48:34.549 align:start position:0% few charter schools that currently do not<00:48:30.720> um<00:48:31.440> have<00:48:32.720> do<00:48:32.960> not<00:48:33.200> participate<00:48:33.520> in<00:48:33.760> the 00:48:34.549 --> 00:48:34.559 align:start position:0% not um have do not participate in the 00:48:34.559 --> 00:48:36.470 align:start position:0% not um have do not participate in the nutrition<00:48:35.040> program.<00:48:35.760> That<00:48:36.000> doesn't<00:48:36.319> mean 00:48:36.470 --> 00:48:36.480 align:start position:0% nutrition program. That doesn't mean 00:48:36.480 --> 00:48:38.549 align:start position:0% nutrition program. That doesn't mean they<00:48:36.720> don't<00:48:36.800> have<00:48:36.880> a<00:48:37.040> wellness<00:48:37.440> policy,<00:48:38.400> but 00:48:38.549 --> 00:48:38.559 align:start position:0% they don't have a wellness policy, but 00:48:38.559 --> 00:48:41.990 align:start position:0% they don't have a wellness policy, but it<00:48:38.800> means<00:48:38.960> they<00:48:39.200> are<00:48:39.359> not<00:48:39.599> required<00:48:40.079> to.<00:48:40.960> So, 00:48:41.990 --> 00:48:42.000 align:start position:0% it means they are not required to. So, 00:48:42.000 --> 00:48:44.549 align:start position:0% it means they are not required to. So, theoretically,<00:48:43.040> there<00:48:43.280> are<00:48:43.680> some<00:48:44.000> schools 00:48:44.549 --> 00:48:44.559 align:start position:0% theoretically, there are some schools 00:48:44.559 --> 00:48:48.470 align:start position:0% theoretically, there are some schools that<00:48:44.880> do<00:48:45.200> not<00:48:45.440> currently<00:48:46.000> have<00:48:47.280> a<00:48:47.520> a<00:48:47.839> wellness 00:48:48.470 --> 00:48:48.480 align:start position:0% that do not currently have a a wellness 00:48:48.480 --> 00:48:54.069 align:start position:0% that do not currently have a a wellness policy.<00:48:49.520> Um,<00:48:49.920> but<00:48:51.119> um<00:48:51.359> this<00:48:52.640> the<00:48:53.200> big<00:48:53.520> chunk<00:48:53.839> of 00:48:54.069 --> 00:48:54.079 align:start position:0% policy. Um, but um this the big chunk of 00:48:54.079 --> 00:48:56.230 align:start position:0% policy. Um, but um this the big chunk of this<00:48:54.319> grant 00:48:56.230 --> 00:48:56.240 align:start position:0% this grant 00:48:56.240 --> 00:48:58.069 align:start position:0% this grant that<00:48:56.480> was<00:48:56.640> written<00:48:57.200> um<00:48:57.280> by<00:48:57.680> Department<00:48:57.920> of 00:48:58.069 --> 00:48:58.079 align:start position:0% that was written um by Department of 00:48:58.079 --> 00:48:59.589 align:start position:0% that was written um by Department of Health<00:48:58.240> and<00:48:58.400> Human<00:48:58.640> Services,<00:48:59.119> this<00:48:59.280> was<00:48:59.440> one 00:48:59.589 --> 00:48:59.599 align:start position:0% Health and Human Services, this was one 00:48:59.599 --> 00:49:01.349 align:start position:0% Health and Human Services, this was one of<00:48:59.680> the<00:48:59.839> provisions<00:49:00.240> that<00:49:00.480> is<00:49:00.640> in<00:49:01.040> their 00:49:01.349 --> 00:49:01.359 align:start position:0% of the provisions that is in their 00:49:01.359 --> 00:49:03.589 align:start position:0% of the provisions that is in their narrative<00:49:01.760> and<00:49:02.000> their<00:49:02.240> application.<00:49:03.200> And<00:49:03.440> so 00:49:03.589 --> 00:49:03.599 align:start position:0% narrative and their application. And so 00:49:03.599 --> 00:49:06.150 align:start position:0% narrative and their application. And so it<00:49:03.839> is<00:49:04.000> a<00:49:04.240> piece<00:49:04.559> that<00:49:04.800> we<00:49:05.040> have<00:49:05.200> to<00:49:05.440> ensure<00:49:05.839> is 00:49:06.150 --> 00:49:06.160 align:start position:0% it is a piece that we have to ensure is 00:49:06.160 --> 00:49:09.030 align:start position:0% it is a piece that we have to ensure is done.<00:49:06.960> Um<00:49:07.280> it<00:49:07.599> is<00:49:07.760> not<00:49:07.920> a<00:49:08.079> piece<00:49:08.319> that<00:49:08.559> we<00:49:08.800> have 00:49:09.030 --> 00:49:09.040 align:start position:0% done. Um it is not a piece that we have 00:49:09.040 --> 00:49:11.270 align:start position:0% done. Um it is not a piece that we have to<00:49:09.359> focus<00:49:09.760> and<00:49:10.079> we<00:49:10.319> have<00:49:10.400> to<00:49:10.640> require<00:49:11.040> their 00:49:11.270 --> 00:49:11.280 align:start position:0% to focus and we have to require their 00:49:11.280 --> 00:49:13.510 align:start position:0% to focus and we have to require their goals<00:49:11.599> are<00:49:11.760> around.<00:49:12.640> It<00:49:12.880> is<00:49:12.960> a<00:49:13.119> piece<00:49:13.359> though 00:49:13.510 --> 00:49:13.520 align:start position:0% goals are around. It is a piece though 00:49:13.520 --> 00:49:15.190 align:start position:0% goals are around. It is a piece though that<00:49:13.680> we<00:49:13.839> have<00:49:13.920> to<00:49:14.079> ensure<00:49:14.400> that<00:49:14.559> there<00:49:14.800> is<00:49:15.040> a 00:49:15.190 --> 00:49:15.200 align:start position:0% that we have to ensure that there is a 00:49:15.200 --> 00:49:18.470 align:start position:0% that we have to ensure that there is a wellness<00:49:15.599> policy<00:49:16.000> in<00:49:16.240> place. 00:49:18.470 --> 00:49:18.480 align:start position:0% wellness policy in place. 00:49:18.480 --> 00:49:21.190 align:start position:0% wellness policy in place. >> And<00:49:18.800> for<00:49:19.520> 99%<00:49:20.319> of<00:49:20.400> the<00:49:20.559> schools<00:49:20.800> it's<00:49:21.040> already 00:49:21.190 --> 00:49:21.200 align:start position:0% >> And for 99% of the schools it's already 00:49:21.200 --> 00:49:21.670 align:start position:0% >> And for 99% of the schools it's already done. 00:49:21.670 --> 00:49:21.680 align:start position:0% done. 00:49:21.680 --> 00:49:23.510 align:start position:0% done. >> They<00:49:21.839> already<00:49:22.000> know<00:49:22.640> it's<00:49:22.800> a<00:49:22.960> check<00:49:23.200> box, 00:49:23.510 --> 00:49:23.520 align:start position:0% >> They already know it's a check box, 00:49:23.520 --> 00:49:23.829 align:start position:0% >> They already know it's a check box, right? 00:49:23.829 --> 00:49:23.839 align:start position:0% right? 00:49:23.839 --> 00:49:25.589 align:start position:0% right? >> Yeah.<00:49:24.079> That's<00:49:24.240> what<00:49:24.400> I<00:49:24.559> want<00:49:24.720> to<00:49:24.800> say.<00:49:25.359> They 00:49:25.589 --> 00:49:25.599 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. That's what I want to say. They 00:49:25.599 --> 00:49:27.510 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. That's what I want to say. They just<00:49:25.760> know<00:49:26.000> this<00:49:26.160> is<00:49:26.319> the<00:49:26.720> the<00:49:27.040> thing<00:49:27.200> we're 00:49:27.510 --> 00:49:27.520 align:start position:0% just know this is the the thing we're 00:49:27.520 --> 00:49:29.589 align:start position:0% just know this is the the thing we're already<00:49:27.760> doing.<00:49:28.319> We<00:49:28.559> just<00:49:28.720> do<00:49:28.880> better.<00:49:29.359> like 00:49:29.589 --> 00:49:29.599 align:start position:0% already doing. We just do better. like 00:49:29.599 --> 00:49:31.430 align:start position:0% already doing. We just do better. like that.<00:49:29.839> That's<00:49:30.160> all<00:49:30.400> I<00:49:30.640> want<00:49:30.800> to<00:49:30.960> make<00:49:31.040> sure<00:49:31.200> is 00:49:31.430 --> 00:49:31.440 align:start position:0% that. That's all I want to make sure is 00:49:31.440 --> 00:49:33.190 align:start position:0% that. That's all I want to make sure is we're<00:49:31.599> not<00:49:31.839> adding<00:49:32.160> another<00:49:32.640> thing<00:49:32.880> if 00:49:33.190 --> 00:49:33.200 align:start position:0% we're not adding another thing if 00:49:33.200 --> 00:49:35.829 align:start position:0% we're not adding another thing if they're<00:49:33.520> already<00:49:33.839> doing<00:49:34.160> it. 00:49:35.829 --> 00:49:35.839 align:start position:0% they're already doing it. 00:49:35.839 --> 00:49:37.430 align:start position:0% they're already doing it. >> Yes.<00:49:36.079> And<00:49:36.240> and<00:49:36.480> I<00:49:36.640> would<00:49:36.800> say<00:49:36.960> the<00:49:37.200> word 00:49:37.430 --> 00:49:37.440 align:start position:0% >> Yes. And and I would say the word 00:49:37.440 --> 00:49:40.470 align:start position:0% >> Yes. And and I would say the word implement<00:49:38.000> was<00:49:38.880> um 00:49:40.470 --> 00:49:40.480 align:start position:0% implement was um 00:49:40.480 --> 00:49:43.270 align:start position:0% implement was um um<00:49:41.760> Jennifer,<00:49:42.240> I<00:49:42.480> think<00:49:42.559> that<00:49:42.720> you<00:49:42.880> could 00:49:43.270 --> 00:49:43.280 align:start position:0% um Jennifer, I think that you could 00:49:43.280 --> 00:49:45.589 align:start position:0% um Jennifer, I think that you could speak<00:49:43.520> because<00:49:44.079> we<00:49:44.319> met<00:49:44.640> with<00:49:44.960> one<00:49:45.200> of<00:49:45.359> our 00:49:45.589 --> 00:49:45.599 align:start position:0% speak because we met with one of our 00:49:45.599 --> 00:49:47.750 align:start position:0% speak because we met with one of our school<00:49:45.920> nutrition<00:49:46.319> coordinators.<00:49:47.280> The<00:49:47.520> word 00:49:47.750 --> 00:49:47.760 align:start position:0% school nutrition coordinators. The word 00:49:47.760 --> 00:49:50.150 align:start position:0% school nutrition coordinators. The word implement<00:49:48.319> was<00:49:48.480> was<00:49:48.960> very<00:49:49.280> intentional 00:49:50.150 --> 00:49:50.160 align:start position:0% implement was was very intentional 00:49:50.160 --> 00:49:52.309 align:start position:0% implement was was very intentional because<00:49:50.480> we<00:49:50.720> have<00:49:50.800> a<00:49:50.960> lot<00:49:51.040> of<00:49:51.280> schools<00:49:52.079> and 00:49:52.309 --> 00:49:52.319 align:start position:0% because we have a lot of schools and 00:49:52.319 --> 00:49:54.950 align:start position:0% because we have a lot of schools and when<00:49:52.480> we<00:49:52.640> were<00:49:52.720> doing<00:49:52.880> these<00:49:53.119> cohorts<00:49:53.599> for<00:49:54.400> um 00:49:54.950 --> 00:49:54.960 align:start position:0% when we were doing these cohorts for um 00:49:54.960 --> 00:49:59.030 align:start position:0% when we were doing these cohorts for um four<00:49:55.280> years,<00:49:56.160> we<00:49:56.480> found<00:49:57.839> schools<00:49:58.319> have 00:49:59.030 --> 00:49:59.040 align:start position:0% four years, we found schools have 00:49:59.040 --> 00:50:00.790 align:start position:0% four years, we found schools have wonderful<00:49:59.520> wellness<00:50:00.000> policies,<00:50:00.400> but<00:50:00.640> when 00:50:00.790 --> 00:50:00.800 align:start position:0% wonderful wellness policies, but when 00:50:00.800 --> 00:50:03.109 align:start position:0% wonderful wellness policies, but when you<00:50:00.880> get<00:50:00.960> into<00:50:01.280> a<00:50:01.599> school,<00:50:02.480> not<00:50:02.720> all<00:50:02.880> the 00:50:03.109 --> 00:50:03.119 align:start position:0% you get into a school, not all the 00:50:03.119 --> 00:50:04.470 align:start position:0% you get into a school, not all the teachers<00:50:03.680> even<00:50:03.920> know<00:50:04.000> that<00:50:04.160> they're<00:50:04.319> a 00:50:04.470 --> 00:50:04.480 align:start position:0% teachers even know that they're a 00:50:04.480 --> 00:50:06.230 align:start position:0% teachers even know that they're a wellness<00:50:04.800> policy.<00:50:05.280> So,<00:50:05.440> the<00:50:05.599> word<00:50:05.760> implement 00:50:06.230 --> 00:50:06.240 align:start position:0% wellness policy. So, the word implement 00:50:06.240 --> 00:50:08.950 align:start position:0% wellness policy. So, the word implement was<00:50:06.640> really<00:50:07.040> intentional<00:50:08.160> because<00:50:08.400> it's<00:50:08.720> not 00:50:08.950 --> 00:50:08.960 align:start position:0% was really intentional because it's not 00:50:08.960 --> 00:50:11.190 align:start position:0% was really intentional because it's not so<00:50:09.119> much<00:50:09.359> of<00:50:09.839> um<00:50:10.000> as<00:50:10.240> chair<00:50:10.480> Earl<00:50:10.800> has<00:50:10.880> said<00:50:11.040> a 00:50:11.190 --> 00:50:11.200 align:start position:0% so much of um as chair Earl has said a 00:50:11.200 --> 00:50:12.390 align:start position:0% so much of um as chair Earl has said a few<00:50:11.359> times,<00:50:11.599> it's<00:50:11.760> not<00:50:11.920> we're<00:50:12.079> going<00:50:12.160> to<00:50:12.240> spend 00:50:12.390 --> 00:50:12.400 align:start position:0% few times, it's not we're going to spend 00:50:12.400 --> 00:50:14.069 align:start position:0% few times, it's not we're going to spend all<00:50:12.480> the<00:50:12.559> time<00:50:12.720> and<00:50:12.880> money<00:50:13.200> writing<00:50:13.599> policies. 00:50:14.069 --> 00:50:14.079 align:start position:0% all the time and money writing policies. 00:50:14.079 --> 00:50:16.309 align:start position:0% all the time and money writing policies. They<00:50:14.319> have<00:50:14.400> a<00:50:14.559> policy.<00:50:15.599> is<00:50:15.920> going<00:50:16.000> to<00:50:16.160> be 00:50:16.309 --> 00:50:16.319 align:start position:0% They have a policy. is going to be 00:50:16.319 --> 00:50:18.549 align:start position:0% They have a policy. is going to be implementing<00:50:16.880> the<00:50:17.200> physical<00:50:17.839> activity<00:50:18.319> and 00:50:18.549 --> 00:50:18.559 align:start position:0% implementing the physical activity and 00:50:18.559 --> 00:50:20.790 align:start position:0% implementing the physical activity and the<00:50:18.720> nutrition<00:50:19.200> parts<00:50:19.599> of<00:50:19.839> their<00:50:20.079> policy<00:50:20.640> so 00:50:20.790 --> 00:50:20.800 align:start position:0% the nutrition parts of their policy so 00:50:20.800 --> 00:50:23.109 align:start position:0% the nutrition parts of their policy so that<00:50:20.960> the<00:50:21.200> students<00:50:21.520> are<00:50:21.760> participating<00:50:22.880> and 00:50:23.109 --> 00:50:23.119 align:start position:0% that the students are participating and 00:50:23.119 --> 00:50:27.190 align:start position:0% that the students are participating and I<00:50:23.359> think<00:50:23.520> that's<00:50:23.920> where<00:50:25.040> um<00:50:26.319> with<00:50:26.640> our<00:50:26.960> school 00:50:27.190 --> 00:50:27.200 align:start position:0% I think that's where um with our school 00:50:27.200 --> 00:50:28.790 align:start position:0% I think that's where um with our school nutrition<00:50:27.599> coordinator<00:50:28.160> that<00:50:28.319> was<00:50:28.400> the<00:50:28.640> part 00:50:28.790 --> 00:50:28.800 align:start position:0% nutrition coordinator that was the part 00:50:28.800 --> 00:50:31.910 align:start position:0% nutrition coordinator that was the part that<00:50:30.160> uh<00:50:30.400> they're<00:50:30.880> kind<00:50:31.040> of<00:50:31.200> excited<00:50:31.599> about 00:50:31.910 --> 00:50:31.920 align:start position:0% that uh they're kind of excited about 00:50:31.920 --> 00:50:34.790 align:start position:0% that uh they're kind of excited about too<00:50:32.240> is<00:50:32.640> getting<00:50:33.040> those<00:50:33.440> policies<00:50:34.240> to<00:50:34.559> be 00:50:34.790 --> 00:50:34.800 align:start position:0% too is getting those policies to be 00:50:34.800 --> 00:50:39.270 align:start position:0% too is getting those policies to be acted<00:50:35.200> on<00:50:36.079> and<00:50:36.800> have<00:50:37.119> students<00:50:37.760> really<00:50:38.240> doing 00:50:39.270 --> 00:50:39.280 align:start position:0% acted on and have students really doing 00:50:39.280 --> 00:50:41.750 align:start position:0% acted on and have students really doing the<00:50:39.599> physical<00:50:39.920> activity<00:50:40.319> and<00:50:40.559> the<00:50:40.720> nutrition 00:50:41.750 --> 00:50:41.760 align:start position:0% the physical activity and the nutrition 00:50:41.760 --> 00:50:43.990 align:start position:0% the physical activity and the nutrition um<00:50:42.000> as<00:50:42.240> intended.<00:50:43.119> And<00:50:43.280> just<00:50:43.760> hope<00:50:43.920> that 00:50:43.990 --> 00:50:44.000 align:start position:0% um as intended. And just hope that 00:50:44.000 --> 00:50:45.430 align:start position:0% um as intended. And just hope that answered<00:50:44.240> your<00:50:44.319> question.<00:50:44.720> Specific<00:50:45.119> to 00:50:45.430 --> 00:50:45.440 align:start position:0% answered your question. Specific to 00:50:45.440 --> 00:50:47.750 align:start position:0% answered your question. Specific to rural<00:50:45.920> schools,<00:50:46.559> right?<00:50:47.119> This<00:50:47.280> this 00:50:47.750 --> 00:50:47.760 align:start position:0% rural schools, right? This this 00:50:47.760 --> 00:50:49.829 align:start position:0% rural schools, right? This this particular<00:50:48.319> grant<00:50:48.640> and<00:50:48.960> program<00:50:49.280> is<00:50:49.520> specific 00:50:49.829 --> 00:50:49.839 align:start position:0% particular grant and program is specific 00:50:49.839 --> 00:50:51.030 align:start position:0% particular grant and program is specific to<00:50:50.079> rural<00:50:50.400> schools.<00:50:50.800> Okay. 00:50:51.030 --> 00:50:51.040 align:start position:0% to rural schools. Okay. 00:50:51.040 --> 00:50:54.069 align:start position:0% to rural schools. Okay. >> Uh<00:50:51.359> specific<00:50:51.680> to<00:50:52.160> uh<00:50:52.240> there's<00:50:52.640> 207<00:50:53.440> total 00:50:54.069 --> 00:50:54.079 align:start position:0% >> Uh specific to uh there's 207 total 00:50:54.079 --> 00:50:56.630 align:start position:0% >> Uh specific to uh there's 207 total rural<00:50:54.559> elementaryaries<00:50:55.119> that<00:50:55.280> would<00:50:55.440> be<00:50:56.480> part 00:50:56.630 --> 00:50:56.640 align:start position:0% rural elementaryaries that would be part 00:50:56.640 --> 00:50:57.750 align:start position:0% rural elementaryaries that would be part of<00:50:56.800> this.<00:50:57.040> Yes. 00:50:57.750 --> 00:50:57.760 align:start position:0% of this. Yes. 00:50:57.760 --> 00:51:00.230 align:start position:0% of this. Yes. >> And<00:50:58.000> let's<00:50:58.480> when<00:50:58.720> we<00:50:58.880> say<00:50:59.119> rural,<00:50:59.599> let's<00:51:00.000> be 00:51:00.230 --> 00:51:00.240 align:start position:0% >> And let's when we say rural, let's be 00:51:00.240 --> 00:51:01.990 align:start position:0% >> And let's when we say rural, let's be clear<00:51:00.400> that<00:51:00.640> it's<00:51:00.960> I<00:51:01.119> think<00:51:01.200> it's<00:51:01.440> only<00:51:01.680> five 00:51:01.990 --> 00:51:02.000 align:start position:0% clear that it's I think it's only five 00:51:02.000 --> 00:51:03.670 align:start position:0% clear that it's I think it's only five districts<00:51:02.400> that<00:51:02.640> don't<00:51:02.960> participate<00:51:03.520> in 00:51:03.670 --> 00:51:03.680 align:start position:0% districts that don't participate in 00:51:03.680 --> 00:51:08.069 align:start position:0% districts that don't participate in this.<00:51:04.960> So<00:51:06.240> Boxelder<00:51:07.200> because<00:51:07.440> it's<00:51:07.680> the<00:51:07.920> size 00:51:08.069 --> 00:51:08.079 align:start position:0% this. So Boxelder because it's the size 00:51:08.079 --> 00:51:11.670 align:start position:0% this. So Boxelder because it's the size of<00:51:08.240> the<00:51:08.480> county.<00:51:09.680> It's<00:51:10.079> four<00:51:10.559> counties<00:51:11.440> that 00:51:11.670 --> 00:51:11.680 align:start position:0% of the county. It's four counties that 00:51:11.680 --> 00:51:13.990 align:start position:0% of the county. It's four counties that are<00:51:11.920> not<00:51:12.160> participant.<00:51:13.200> So<00:51:13.359> it's<00:51:13.599> that's<00:51:13.839> more 00:51:13.990 --> 00:51:14.000 align:start position:0% are not participant. So it's that's more 00:51:14.000 --> 00:51:16.150 align:start position:0% are not participant. So it's that's more that<00:51:14.400> is<00:51:14.559> more<00:51:14.720> than<00:51:14.880> four<00:51:15.119> districts<00:51:15.599> though 00:51:16.150 --> 00:51:16.160 align:start position:0% that is more than four districts though 00:51:16.160 --> 00:51:18.150 align:start position:0% that is more than four districts though because<00:51:16.800> um<00:51:16.880> Weber<00:51:17.359> County<00:51:17.680> has<00:51:17.920> two 00:51:18.150 --> 00:51:18.160 align:start position:0% because um Weber County has two 00:51:18.160 --> 00:51:19.270 align:start position:0% because um Weber County has two districts<00:51:18.400> and<00:51:18.559> a<00:51:18.720> bunch<00:51:18.800> of<00:51:18.880> charters. 00:51:19.270 --> 00:51:19.280 align:start position:0% districts and a bunch of charters. 00:51:19.280 --> 00:51:20.470 align:start position:0% districts and a bunch of charters. >> Okay. 00:51:20.470 --> 00:51:20.480 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 00:51:20.480 --> 00:51:23.270 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Yep.<00:51:20.800> Davis<00:51:21.359> County,<00:51:22.240> Salt<00:51:22.480> Lake<00:51:22.800> County 00:51:23.270 --> 00:51:23.280 align:start position:0% >> Yep. Davis County, Salt Lake County 00:51:23.280 --> 00:51:25.270 align:start position:0% >> Yep. Davis County, Salt Lake County which<00:51:23.520> is<00:51:24.160> four<00:51:24.480> different<00:51:24.720> districts<00:51:25.119> and 00:51:25.270 --> 00:51:25.280 align:start position:0% which is four different districts and 00:51:25.280 --> 00:51:27.670 align:start position:0% which is four different districts and then<00:51:25.440> Utah<00:51:25.839> County<00:51:26.240> which<00:51:26.559> is 00:51:27.670 --> 00:51:27.680 align:start position:0% then Utah County which is 00:51:27.680 --> 00:51:29.670 align:start position:0% then Utah County which is >> three<00:51:27.920> different<00:51:28.160> districts.<00:51:28.640> So<00:51:29.119> you<00:51:29.440> have 00:51:29.670 --> 00:51:29.680 align:start position:0% >> three different districts. So you have 00:51:29.680 --> 00:51:31.829 align:start position:0% >> three different districts. So you have So<00:51:29.920> it's<00:51:30.240> Weber,<00:51:30.720> Davis,<00:51:31.119> Salt<00:51:31.359> Lake,<00:51:31.680> and 00:51:31.829 --> 00:51:31.839 align:start position:0% So it's Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, and 00:51:31.839 --> 00:51:34.549 align:start position:0% So it's Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah<00:51:32.240> counties<00:51:32.800> are<00:51:33.119> excluded.<00:51:34.000> Everywhere 00:51:34.549 --> 00:51:34.559 align:start position:0% Utah counties are excluded. Everywhere 00:51:34.559 --> 00:51:36.630 align:start position:0% Utah counties are excluded. Everywhere else<00:51:34.880> is<00:51:35.200> included. 00:51:36.630 --> 00:51:36.640 align:start position:0% else is included. 00:51:36.640 --> 00:51:38.710 align:start position:0% else is included. >> That's<00:51:36.960> right.<00:51:37.200> I<00:51:37.440> just<00:51:37.599> just<00:51:38.240> wanted<00:51:38.400> to<00:51:38.559> make 00:51:38.710 --> 00:51:38.720 align:start position:0% >> That's right. I just just wanted to make 00:51:38.720 --> 00:51:40.790 align:start position:0% >> That's right. I just just wanted to make sure<00:51:38.880> because<00:51:39.200> some<00:51:39.359> of<00:51:39.440> those<00:51:39.680> areas<00:51:40.480> are 00:51:40.790 --> 00:51:40.800 align:start position:0% sure because some of those areas are 00:51:40.800 --> 00:51:43.270 align:start position:0% sure because some of those areas are maybe<00:51:41.200> not<00:51:41.440> as<00:51:41.680> rural<00:51:42.160> as<00:51:42.559> some<00:51:42.880> people<00:51:43.040> may 00:51:43.270 --> 00:51:43.280 align:start position:0% maybe not as rural as some people may 00:51:43.280 --> 00:51:44.950 align:start position:0% maybe not as rural as some people may think,<00:51:43.440> but<00:51:43.680> it<00:51:44.000> because<00:51:44.160> of<00:51:44.319> the<00:51:44.480> size<00:51:44.640> of<00:51:44.720> the 00:51:44.950 --> 00:51:44.960 align:start position:0% think, but it because of the size of the 00:51:44.960 --> 00:51:46.790 align:start position:0% think, but it because of the size of the county,<00:51:45.200> it's<00:51:45.440> what<00:51:45.760> is<00:51:46.000> the<00:51:46.160> inclusion<00:51:46.559> or 00:51:46.790 --> 00:51:46.800 align:start position:0% county, it's what is the inclusion or 00:51:46.800 --> 00:51:48.470 align:start position:0% county, it's what is the inclusion or exclusionary<00:51:47.440> piece? 00:51:48.470 --> 00:51:48.480 align:start position:0% exclusionary piece? 00:51:48.480 --> 00:51:49.750 align:start position:0% exclusionary piece? >> Yeah.<00:51:48.800> So, 00:51:49.750 --> 00:51:49.760 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, 00:51:49.760 --> 00:51:51.190 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, >> I<00:51:49.920> have<00:51:50.000> a<00:51:50.240> quick<00:51:50.480> question. 00:51:51.190 --> 00:51:51.200 align:start position:0% >> I have a quick question. 00:51:51.200 --> 00:51:51.990 align:start position:0% >> I have a quick question. >> Yeah. 00:51:51.990 --> 00:51:52.000 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 00:51:52.000 --> 00:51:54.390 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> On<00:51:52.160> a<00:51:52.319> on<00:51:52.559> a<00:51:52.800> couple<00:51:52.960> of<00:51:53.119> these<00:51:53.760> um<00:51:54.000> just<00:51:54.160> the 00:51:54.390 --> 00:51:54.400 align:start position:0% >> On a on a couple of these um just the 00:51:54.400 --> 00:51:56.870 align:start position:0% >> On a on a couple of these um just the line<00:51:54.640> items.<00:51:55.040> So,<00:51:55.359> line<00:51:55.920> 40. 00:51:56.870 --> 00:51:56.880 align:start position:0% line items. So, line 40. 00:51:56.880 --> 00:51:58.549 align:start position:0% line items. So, line 40. >> Should<00:51:57.040> we<00:51:57.599> just<00:51:57.839> real<00:51:58.079> quick,<00:51:58.240> should<00:51:58.400> we 00:51:58.549 --> 00:51:58.559 align:start position:0% >> Should we just real quick, should we 00:51:58.559 --> 00:52:00.710 align:start position:0% >> Should we just real quick, should we vote<00:51:58.720> on<00:51:58.880> this<00:51:59.040> before<00:51:59.359> we<00:51:59.760> go<00:51:59.920> to<00:52:00.160> another<00:52:00.400> one 00:52:00.710 --> 00:52:00.720 align:start position:0% vote on this before we go to another one 00:52:00.720 --> 00:52:03.190 align:start position:0% vote on this before we go to another one or<00:52:01.040> is<00:52:01.280> this<00:52:01.520> related<00:52:01.839> to<00:52:02.000> this? 00:52:03.190 --> 00:52:03.200 align:start position:0% or is this related to this? 00:52:03.200 --> 00:52:05.349 align:start position:0% or is this related to this? >> Um<00:52:03.599> hold<00:52:03.760> on<00:52:04.000> real<00:52:04.240> quick.<00:52:04.559> Let<00:52:04.720> me 00:52:05.349 --> 00:52:05.359 align:start position:0% >> Um hold on real quick. Let me 00:52:05.359 --> 00:52:05.910 align:start position:0% >> Um hold on real quick. Let me >> Okay, 00:52:05.910 --> 00:52:05.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay, 00:52:05.920 --> 00:52:11.109 align:start position:0% >> Okay, >> it's<00:52:06.160> big<00:52:06.400> again. 00:52:11.109 --> 00:52:11.119 align:start position:0% 00:52:11.119 --> 00:52:12.950 align:start position:0% >> Oh,<00:52:11.440> I<00:52:11.680> mean<00:52:11.839> we<00:52:12.079> can<00:52:12.240> finish<00:52:12.480> that.<00:52:12.720> That's 00:52:12.950 --> 00:52:12.960 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I mean we can finish that. That's 00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:13.270 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I mean we can finish that. That's fine. 00:52:13.270 --> 00:52:13.280 align:start position:0% fine. 00:52:13.280 --> 00:52:15.190 align:start position:0% fine. >> Oh,<00:52:13.520> okay.<00:52:13.839> Let's<00:52:14.319> let's<00:52:14.640> take<00:52:14.800> a<00:52:14.960> vote<00:52:15.119> on 00:52:15.190 --> 00:52:15.200 align:start position:0% >> Oh, okay. Let's let's take a vote on 00:52:15.200 --> 00:52:17.109 align:start position:0% >> Oh, okay. Let's let's take a vote on this<00:52:15.359> and<00:52:15.520> then<00:52:15.680> we'll<00:52:16.319> go<00:52:16.480> ahead<00:52:16.720> with<00:52:16.960> the 00:52:17.109 --> 00:52:17.119 align:start position:0% this and then we'll go ahead with the 00:52:17.119 --> 00:52:19.670 align:start position:0% this and then we'll go ahead with the next<00:52:17.359> question<00:52:17.599> that<00:52:17.839> someone<00:52:18.160> has.<00:52:18.960> Um,<00:52:19.520> so 00:52:19.670 --> 00:52:19.680 align:start position:0% next question that someone has. Um, so 00:52:19.680 --> 00:52:23.430 align:start position:0% next question that someone has. Um, so the<00:52:20.400> before<00:52:20.720> the<00:52:20.880> committee<00:52:21.119> is<00:52:21.359> to<00:52:22.400> um<00:52:22.800> change 00:52:23.430 --> 00:52:23.440 align:start position:0% the before the committee is to um change 00:52:23.440 --> 00:52:25.990 align:start position:0% the before the committee is to um change line<00:52:23.839> 52<00:52:24.400> to<00:52:24.640> read,<00:52:25.119> implement<00:52:25.520> a<00:52:25.760> local 00:52:25.990 --> 00:52:26.000 align:start position:0% line 52 to read, implement a local 00:52:26.000 --> 00:52:27.910 align:start position:0% line 52 to read, implement a local school<00:52:26.319> wellness<00:52:26.720> policy<00:52:27.200> focusing<00:52:27.599> on<00:52:27.760> the 00:52:27.910 --> 00:52:27.920 align:start position:0% school wellness policy focusing on the 00:52:27.920 --> 00:52:30.870 align:start position:0% school wellness policy focusing on the areas<00:52:28.160> of<00:52:28.319> physical<00:52:28.720> fitness<00:52:29.040> and<00:52:29.359> nutrition. 00:52:30.870 --> 00:52:30.880 align:start position:0% areas of physical fitness and nutrition. 00:52:30.880 --> 00:52:33.510 align:start position:0% areas of physical fitness and nutrition. All<00:52:31.119> those<00:52:31.359> in<00:52:31.520> favor?<00:52:32.559> I 00:52:33.510 --> 00:52:33.520 align:start position:0% All those in favor? I 00:52:33.520 --> 00:52:34.150 align:start position:0% All those in favor? I >> I 00:52:34.150 --> 00:52:34.160 align:start position:0% >> I 00:52:34.160 --> 00:52:35.190 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 00:52:35.190 --> 00:52:35.200 align:start position:0% >> I 00:52:35.200 --> 00:52:38.470 align:start position:0% >> I >> passes<00:52:35.599> unanimously. 00:52:38.470 --> 00:52:38.480 align:start position:0% >> passes unanimously. 00:52:38.480 --> 00:52:40.069 align:start position:0% >> passes unanimously. Okay.<00:52:38.800> Board<00:52:39.119> member<00:52:39.359> Green,<00:52:39.680> what<00:52:39.760> was<00:52:39.920> your 00:52:40.069 --> 00:52:40.079 align:start position:0% Okay. Board member Green, what was your 00:52:40.079 --> 00:52:41.109 align:start position:0% Okay. Board member Green, what was your question? 00:52:41.109 --> 00:52:41.119 align:start position:0% question? 00:52:41.119 --> 00:52:43.349 align:start position:0% question? >> Um,<00:52:41.520> yeah.<00:52:41.760> So,<00:52:42.000> I<00:52:42.160> I<00:52:42.480> had<00:52:42.640> just<00:52:42.800> spent<00:52:43.119> some 00:52:43.349 --> 00:52:43.359 align:start position:0% >> Um, yeah. So, I I had just spent some 00:52:43.359 --> 00:52:45.510 align:start position:0% >> Um, yeah. So, I I had just spent some time<00:52:44.160> trying<00:52:44.400> to<00:52:44.559> study<00:52:44.800> the<00:52:44.960> the<00:52:45.200> rural 00:52:45.510 --> 00:52:45.520 align:start position:0% time trying to study the the rural 00:52:45.520 --> 00:52:47.750 align:start position:0% time trying to study the the rural health<00:52:45.920> transformation<00:52:46.559> program<00:52:47.119> kind<00:52:47.359> of<00:52:47.520> at 00:52:47.750 --> 00:52:47.760 align:start position:0% health transformation program kind of at 00:52:47.760 --> 00:52:50.790 align:start position:0% health transformation program kind of at large.<00:52:48.720> Um,<00:52:49.440> it's<00:52:49.760> very<00:52:50.000> broad<00:52:50.240> and<00:52:50.480> h 00:52:50.790 --> 00:52:50.800 align:start position:0% large. Um, it's very broad and h 00:52:50.800 --> 00:52:52.790 align:start position:0% large. Um, it's very broad and h actually<00:52:51.280> seems<00:52:51.520> to<00:52:51.680> have<00:52:51.839> quite<00:52:52.079> a<00:52:52.319> quite<00:52:52.640> a 00:52:52.790 --> 00:52:52.800 align:start position:0% actually seems to have quite a quite a 00:52:52.800 --> 00:52:56.630 align:start position:0% actually seems to have quite a quite a few<00:52:53.040> layers.<00:52:54.240> So,<00:52:55.280> that's<00:52:55.599> why<00:52:55.839> I'm<00:52:56.079> taking<00:52:56.319> us 00:52:56.630 --> 00:52:56.640 align:start position:0% few layers. So, that's why I'm taking us 00:52:56.640 --> 00:52:59.190 align:start position:0% few layers. So, that's why I'm taking us to<00:52:56.960> line<00:52:57.359> 44<00:52:58.160> where<00:52:58.400> it<00:52:58.640> talks<00:52:58.800> about<00:52:58.960> the 00:52:59.190 --> 00:52:59.200 align:start position:0% to line 44 where it talks about the 00:52:59.200 --> 00:53:00.870 align:start position:0% to line 44 where it talks about the application<00:52:59.760> requirements<00:53:00.240> and<00:53:00.480> selection 00:53:00.870 --> 00:53:00.880 align:start position:0% application requirements and selection 00:53:00.880 --> 00:53:02.309 align:start position:0% application requirements and selection criteria. 00:53:02.309 --> 00:53:02.319 align:start position:0% criteria. 00:53:02.319 --> 00:53:04.470 align:start position:0% criteria. This<00:53:02.480> is<00:53:02.640> a<00:53:03.040> um<00:53:03.200> they<00:53:03.440> need<00:53:03.599> to<00:53:03.839> an<00:53:04.079> application 00:53:04.470 --> 00:53:04.480 align:start position:0% This is a um they need to an application 00:53:04.480 --> 00:53:05.829 align:start position:0% This is a um they need to an application should<00:53:04.720> include<00:53:04.960> a<00:53:05.119> detailed<00:53:05.760> imp 00:53:05.829 --> 00:53:05.839 align:start position:0% should include a detailed imp 00:53:05.839 --> 00:53:07.510 align:start position:0% should include a detailed imp implementation<00:53:06.559> plan<00:53:06.720> in<00:53:06.960> alignment<00:53:07.359> with 00:53:07.510 --> 00:53:07.520 align:start position:0% implementation plan in alignment with 00:53:07.520 --> 00:53:09.270 align:start position:0% implementation plan in alignment with the<00:53:07.680> rural<00:53:08.079> health<00:53:08.319> transformation<00:53:08.960> program 00:53:09.270 --> 00:53:09.280 align:start position:0% the rural health transformation program 00:53:09.280 --> 00:53:11.030 align:start position:0% the rural health transformation program describing<00:53:09.760> how<00:53:09.920> the<00:53:10.079> school<00:53:10.240> will<00:53:10.559> do<00:53:10.800> the 00:53:11.030 --> 00:53:11.040 align:start position:0% describing how the school will do the 00:53:11.040 --> 00:53:14.549 align:start position:0% describing how the school will do the following<00:53:12.079> items.<00:53:12.720> Um<00:53:13.200> one<00:53:13.440> of<00:53:13.520> those<00:53:13.839> light 00:53:14.549 --> 00:53:14.559 align:start position:0% following items. Um one of those light 00:53:14.559 --> 00:53:18.069 align:start position:0% following items. Um one of those light items<00:53:15.040> is<00:53:15.440> on<00:53:15.920> line<00:53:16.400> 55<00:53:17.119> where<00:53:17.359> it<00:53:17.520> says<00:53:17.920> uh 00:53:18.069 --> 00:53:18.079 align:start position:0% items is on line 55 where it says uh 00:53:18.079 --> 00:53:19.990 align:start position:0% items is on line 55 where it says uh baseline<00:53:18.559> data<00:53:18.960> related<00:53:19.280> to<00:53:19.440> student<00:53:19.760> health 00:53:19.990 --> 00:53:20.000 align:start position:0% baseline data related to student health 00:53:20.000 --> 00:53:22.390 align:start position:0% baseline data related to student health or<00:53:20.240> wellness<00:53:20.880> indicators. 00:53:22.390 --> 00:53:22.400 align:start position:0% or wellness indicators. 00:53:22.400 --> 00:53:24.710 align:start position:0% or wellness indicators. Um,<00:53:22.800> can<00:53:23.119> you<00:53:23.520> what<00:53:23.839> are<00:53:24.000> people<00:53:24.319> currently 00:53:24.710 --> 00:53:24.720 align:start position:0% Um, can you what are people currently 00:53:24.720 --> 00:53:28.630 align:start position:0% Um, can you what are people currently using<00:53:25.760> for<00:53:26.000> those<00:53:26.240> that<00:53:26.559> baseline<00:53:27.040> data<00:53:28.319> and 00:53:28.630 --> 00:53:28.640 align:start position:0% using for those that baseline data and 00:53:28.640 --> 00:53:32.069 align:start position:0% using for those that baseline data and how<00:53:28.800> are<00:53:28.960> they<00:53:29.119> acquiring<00:53:29.760> that<00:53:30.400> those 00:53:32.069 --> 00:53:32.079 align:start position:0% how are they acquiring that those 00:53:32.079 --> 00:53:34.230 align:start position:0% how are they acquiring that those that<00:53:32.559> information<00:53:33.200> on<00:53:33.520> student<00:53:33.839> health<00:53:34.000> or 00:53:34.230 --> 00:53:34.240 align:start position:0% that information on student health or 00:53:34.240 --> 00:53:35.670 align:start position:0% that information on student health or wellness?<00:53:34.640> And<00:53:34.880> how<00:53:35.040> would<00:53:35.200> you<00:53:35.359> define 00:53:35.670 --> 00:53:35.680 align:start position:0% wellness? And how would you define 00:53:35.680 --> 00:53:37.430 align:start position:0% wellness? And how would you define wellness?<00:53:36.240> Like<00:53:36.559> what<00:53:36.800> is<00:53:36.960> wellness 00:53:37.430 --> 00:53:37.440 align:start position:0% wellness? Like what is wellness 00:53:37.440 --> 00:53:39.349 align:start position:0% wellness? Like what is wellness currently<00:53:37.839> described? 00:53:39.349 --> 00:53:39.359 align:start position:0% currently described? 00:53:39.359 --> 00:53:40.790 align:start position:0% currently described? Um,<00:53:40.079> in 00:53:40.790 --> 00:53:40.800 align:start position:0% Um, in 00:53:40.800 --> 00:53:42.390 align:start position:0% Um, in >> I<00:53:40.960> actually<00:53:41.200> have<00:53:41.359> an<00:53:41.520> amendment<00:53:41.920> for<00:53:42.160> that 00:53:42.390 --> 00:53:42.400 align:start position:0% >> I actually have an amendment for that 00:53:42.400 --> 00:53:44.390 align:start position:0% >> I actually have an amendment for that line.<00:53:43.040> Board<00:53:43.280> member<00:53:43.520> Green,<00:53:43.920> can<00:53:44.000> I<00:53:44.160> suggest 00:53:44.390 --> 00:53:44.400 align:start position:0% line. Board member Green, can I suggest 00:53:44.400 --> 00:53:46.950 align:start position:0% line. Board member Green, can I suggest that<00:53:44.640> and<00:53:44.880> maybe<00:53:45.119> see<00:53:45.280> if<00:53:45.440> that<00:53:45.760> might<00:53:46.240> help? 00:53:46.950 --> 00:53:46.960 align:start position:0% that and maybe see if that might help? 00:53:46.960 --> 00:53:49.109 align:start position:0% that and maybe see if that might help? get<00:53:47.119> an<00:53:47.359> answer<00:53:48.000> for. 00:53:49.109 --> 00:53:49.119 align:start position:0% get an answer for. 00:53:49.119 --> 00:53:49.750 align:start position:0% get an answer for. >> Okay,<00:53:49.359> just 00:53:49.750 --> 00:53:49.760 align:start position:0% >> Okay, just 00:53:49.760 --> 00:53:51.270 align:start position:0% >> Okay, just >> I<00:53:49.839> just<00:53:50.000> wanted<00:53:50.160> to<00:53:50.319> change<00:53:50.480> it<00:53:50.640> from<00:53:50.880> wellness 00:53:51.270 --> 00:53:51.280 align:start position:0% >> I just wanted to change it from wellness 00:53:51.280 --> 00:53:54.309 align:start position:0% >> I just wanted to change it from wellness indicators<00:53:51.920> to<00:53:52.160> something<00:53:52.400> more<00:53:53.680> scripted<00:53:54.160> or 00:53:54.309 --> 00:53:54.319 align:start position:0% indicators to something more scripted or 00:53:54.319 --> 00:53:56.230 align:start position:0% indicators to something more scripted or scoped,<00:53:54.800> but<00:53:55.119> go<00:53:55.280> ahead. 00:53:56.230 --> 00:53:56.240 align:start position:0% scoped, but go ahead. 00:53:56.240 --> 00:53:58.950 align:start position:0% scoped, but go ahead. >> Well,<00:53:56.400> I<00:53:56.559> feel<00:53:56.720> like<00:53:57.440> if<00:53:57.599> if<00:53:58.000> this<00:53:58.240> is,<00:53:58.800> you 00:53:58.950 --> 00:53:58.960 align:start position:0% >> Well, I feel like if if this is, you 00:53:58.960 --> 00:54:00.950 align:start position:0% >> Well, I feel like if if this is, you know,<00:53:59.200> how<00:53:59.440> that<00:53:59.760> is<00:53:59.920> defined<00:54:00.240> and<00:54:00.480> if<00:54:00.640> we<00:54:00.800> are 00:54:00.950 --> 00:54:00.960 align:start position:0% know, how that is defined and if we are 00:54:00.960 --> 00:54:02.870 align:start position:0% know, how that is defined and if we are follow<00:54:01.280> following<00:54:01.680> that<00:54:01.920> definition<00:54:02.480> in<00:54:02.720> the 00:54:02.870 --> 00:54:02.880 align:start position:0% follow following that definition in the 00:54:02.880 --> 00:54:04.870 align:start position:0% follow following that definition in the rural<00:54:03.280> health 00:54:04.870 --> 00:54:04.880 align:start position:0% rural health 00:54:04.880 --> 00:54:07.750 align:start position:0% rural health um<00:54:05.440> transformation<00:54:06.400> program<00:54:07.280> and<00:54:07.520> I<00:54:07.680> don't 00:54:07.750 --> 00:54:07.760 align:start position:0% um transformation program and I don't 00:54:07.760 --> 00:54:09.190 align:start position:0% um transformation program and I don't know<00:54:07.839> if<00:54:08.079> there's<00:54:08.319> someone<00:54:08.480> in<00:54:08.720> staff<00:54:08.960> that 00:54:09.190 --> 00:54:09.200 align:start position:0% know if there's someone in staff that 00:54:09.200 --> 00:54:12.630 align:start position:0% know if there's someone in staff that might<00:54:09.599> know<00:54:09.760> that. 00:54:12.630 --> 00:54:12.640 align:start position:0% might know that. 00:54:12.640 --> 00:54:13.910 align:start position:0% might know that. >> Would<00:54:12.880> you<00:54:13.040> like<00:54:13.119> me<00:54:13.280> to<00:54:13.440> answer<00:54:13.599> that? 00:54:13.910 --> 00:54:13.920 align:start position:0% >> Would you like me to answer that? 00:54:13.920 --> 00:54:16.390 align:start position:0% >> Would you like me to answer that? >> Yeah,<00:54:14.160> Jody,<00:54:14.480> do<00:54:14.720> if<00:54:14.800> you<00:54:14.960> have<00:54:15.119> that?<00:54:15.839> Yeah. 00:54:16.390 --> 00:54:16.400 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, Jody, do if you have that? Yeah. 00:54:16.400 --> 00:54:18.390 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, Jody, do if you have that? Yeah. Um,<00:54:16.720> so<00:54:16.960> we<00:54:17.119> do<00:54:17.280> have<00:54:17.440> flexibility<00:54:18.000> here.<00:54:18.240> If 00:54:18.390 --> 00:54:18.400 align:start position:0% Um, so we do have flexibility here. If 00:54:18.400 --> 00:54:21.990 align:start position:0% Um, so we do have flexibility here. If you<00:54:18.559> notice,<00:54:19.200> um,<00:54:20.079> this<00:54:20.720> part<00:54:21.119> I<00:54:21.440> believe<00:54:21.760> came 00:54:21.990 --> 00:54:22.000 align:start position:0% you notice, um, this part I believe came 00:54:22.000 --> 00:54:25.990 align:start position:0% you notice, um, this part I believe came out<00:54:22.160> of<00:54:22.319> the<00:54:22.640> the<00:54:23.680> uh,<00:54:23.920> bill<00:54:24.400> HP36. 00:54:25.990 --> 00:54:26.000 align:start position:0% out of the the uh, bill HP36. 00:54:26.000 --> 00:54:28.630 align:start position:0% out of the the uh, bill HP36. Um,<00:54:26.640> there<00:54:26.960> is<00:54:27.280> also<00:54:27.760> quite<00:54:28.000> a<00:54:28.160> bit<00:54:28.319> of 00:54:28.630 --> 00:54:28.640 align:start position:0% Um, there is also quite a bit of 00:54:28.640 --> 00:54:31.510 align:start position:0% Um, there is also quite a bit of requirement<00:54:29.440> for<00:54:29.920> data.<00:54:30.480> Um,<00:54:30.800> they<00:54:31.119> need<00:54:31.280> some 00:54:31.510 --> 00:54:31.520 align:start position:0% requirement for data. Um, they need some 00:54:31.520 --> 00:54:33.670 align:start position:0% requirement for data. Um, they need some pre<00:54:31.760> and<00:54:32.000> post<00:54:32.240> data<00:54:32.559> to<00:54:32.800> show<00:54:32.960> the<00:54:33.280> success<00:54:33.520> of 00:54:33.670 --> 00:54:33.680 align:start position:0% pre and post data to show the success of 00:54:33.680 --> 00:54:37.190 align:start position:0% pre and post data to show the success of the<00:54:33.839> program.<00:54:34.160> That's<00:54:34.400> what<00:54:34.559> will,<00:54:35.599> um, 00:54:37.190 --> 00:54:37.200 align:start position:0% the program. That's what will, um, 00:54:37.200 --> 00:54:40.549 align:start position:0% the program. That's what will, um, determine<00:54:37.839> the<00:54:38.079> funding<00:54:38.480> for<00:54:38.800> next<00:54:39.119> year.<00:54:39.680> Um, 00:54:40.549 --> 00:54:40.559 align:start position:0% determine the funding for next year. Um, 00:54:40.559 --> 00:54:42.790 align:start position:0% determine the funding for next year. Um, last<00:54:40.880> board<00:54:41.119> meeting<00:54:41.760> I<00:54:42.000> did<00:54:42.400> kind<00:54:42.640> of 00:54:42.790 --> 00:54:42.800 align:start position:0% last board meeting I did kind of 00:54:42.800 --> 00:54:45.109 align:start position:0% last board meeting I did kind of explained<00:54:43.119> that<00:54:43.599> we<00:54:43.839> have<00:54:44.079> three<00:54:44.559> 3<00:54:44.800> million 00:54:45.109 --> 00:54:45.119 align:start position:0% explained that we have three 3 million 00:54:45.119 --> 00:54:46.790 align:start position:0% explained that we have three 3 million this<00:54:45.359> year.<00:54:45.680> Next<00:54:45.839> year<00:54:46.079> that<00:54:46.240> number<00:54:46.480> can<00:54:46.640> go 00:54:46.790 --> 00:54:46.800 align:start position:0% this year. Next year that number can go 00:54:46.800 --> 00:54:50.309 align:start position:0% this year. Next year that number can go up<00:54:46.960> or<00:54:47.200> down<00:54:47.520> depending<00:54:48.000> on 00:54:50.309 --> 00:54:50.319 align:start position:0% up or down depending on 00:54:50.319 --> 00:54:53.109 align:start position:0% up or down depending on kind<00:54:50.640> of<00:54:50.960> the<00:54:51.200> the<00:54:51.520> results<00:54:51.920> and<00:54:52.079> and<00:54:52.400> how<00:54:52.559> well 00:54:53.109 --> 00:54:53.119 align:start position:0% kind of the the results and and how well 00:54:53.119 --> 00:54:55.270 align:start position:0% kind of the the results and and how well it<00:54:53.359> was<00:54:53.520> implemented<00:54:54.079> and<00:54:54.240> and<00:54:54.800> what<00:54:55.040> some<00:54:55.200> of 00:54:55.270 --> 00:54:55.280 align:start position:0% it was implemented and and what some of 00:54:55.280 --> 00:54:57.190 align:start position:0% it was implemented and and what some of the<00:54:55.440> outcomes<00:54:55.839> are.<00:54:56.160> So,<00:54:56.319> we<00:54:56.559> do<00:54:56.720> have<00:54:56.880> to<00:54:57.119> be 00:54:57.190 --> 00:54:57.200 align:start position:0% the outcomes are. So, we do have to be 00:54:57.200 --> 00:55:00.150 align:start position:0% the outcomes are. So, we do have to be able<00:54:57.359> to<00:54:57.520> show<00:54:57.760> there's<00:54:58.000> an<00:54:58.240> outcome.<00:54:59.119> So,<00:54:59.839> we 00:55:00.150 --> 00:55:00.160 align:start position:0% able to show there's an outcome. So, we 00:55:00.160 --> 00:55:03.030 align:start position:0% able to show there's an outcome. So, we do<00:55:00.400> have<00:55:00.640> flexibility.<00:55:01.839> The<00:55:02.240> the<00:55:02.640> board, 00:55:03.030 --> 00:55:03.040 align:start position:0% do have flexibility. The the board, 00:55:03.040 --> 00:55:06.150 align:start position:0% do have flexibility. The the board, y'all,<00:55:03.520> can<00:55:04.000> determine<00:55:04.880> what<00:55:05.119> some<00:55:05.359> of<00:55:05.520> those 00:55:06.150 --> 00:55:06.160 align:start position:0% y'all, can determine what some of those 00:55:06.160 --> 00:55:08.069 align:start position:0% y'all, can determine what some of those baseline<00:55:06.800> data<00:55:07.040> that<00:55:07.280> we're<00:55:07.520> going<00:55:07.599> to<00:55:07.839> use 00:55:08.069 --> 00:55:08.079 align:start position:0% baseline data that we're going to use 00:55:08.079 --> 00:55:10.390 align:start position:0% baseline data that we're going to use are.<00:55:08.640> However, 00:55:10.390 --> 00:55:10.400 align:start position:0% are. However, 00:55:10.400 --> 00:55:13.990 align:start position:0% are. However, what<00:55:11.119> some<00:55:11.359> of<00:55:11.520> it<00:55:11.760> could<00:55:12.079> be<00:55:13.440> for<00:55:13.760> some 00:55:13.990 --> 00:55:14.000 align:start position:0% what some of it could be for some 00:55:14.000 --> 00:55:15.910 align:start position:0% what some of it could be for some examples,<00:55:14.640> we<00:55:14.880> could<00:55:15.040> use<00:55:15.200> the<00:55:15.440> presidential 00:55:15.910 --> 00:55:15.920 align:start position:0% examples, we could use the presidential 00:55:15.920 --> 00:55:18.630 align:start position:0% examples, we could use the presidential fitness<00:55:16.400> test.<00:55:17.040> Uh,<00:55:17.359> we<00:55:17.599> do<00:55:17.839> now<00:55:18.160> have<00:55:18.400> the 00:55:18.630 --> 00:55:18.640 align:start position:0% fitness test. Uh, we do now have the 00:55:18.640 --> 00:55:21.109 align:start position:0% fitness test. Uh, we do now have the presidential<00:55:19.119> fitness<00:55:19.520> test,<00:55:20.400> uh,<00:55:20.720> just 00:55:21.109 --> 00:55:21.119 align:start position:0% presidential fitness test, uh, just 00:55:21.119 --> 00:55:23.109 align:start position:0% presidential fitness test, uh, just released<00:55:21.599> two<00:55:21.839> weeks<00:55:22.000> ago,<00:55:22.640> a<00:55:22.800> week<00:55:22.960> and<00:55:23.040> a 00:55:23.109 --> 00:55:23.119 align:start position:0% released two weeks ago, a week and a 00:55:23.119 --> 00:55:26.069 align:start position:0% released two weeks ago, a week and a half<00:55:23.200> ago,<00:55:24.000> new<00:55:24.880> parameters.<00:55:25.520> So,<00:55:25.680> we<00:55:25.920> have 00:55:26.069 --> 00:55:26.079 align:start position:0% half ago, new parameters. So, we have 00:55:26.079 --> 00:55:29.510 align:start position:0% half ago, new parameters. So, we have that<00:55:26.319> now.<00:55:26.960> Um<00:55:28.000> uh<00:55:28.160> Chair<00:55:28.400> Earl,<00:55:29.040> you<00:55:29.200> and<00:55:29.359> I 00:55:29.510 --> 00:55:29.520 align:start position:0% that now. Um uh Chair Earl, you and I 00:55:29.520 --> 00:55:31.589 align:start position:0% that now. Um uh Chair Earl, you and I did<00:55:29.760> meet<00:55:30.000> with<00:55:30.400> the<00:55:30.720> sponsor<00:55:31.040> of<00:55:31.200> the<00:55:31.359> bill 00:55:31.589 --> 00:55:31.599 align:start position:0% did meet with the sponsor of the bill 00:55:31.599 --> 00:55:32.950 align:start position:0% did meet with the sponsor of the bill and<00:55:31.839> at<00:55:32.000> the<00:55:32.160> time<00:55:32.400> there<00:55:32.640> were<00:55:32.800> no 00:55:32.950 --> 00:55:32.960 align:start position:0% and at the time there were no 00:55:32.960 --> 00:55:34.790 align:start position:0% and at the time there were no parameters.<00:55:33.440> So<00:55:33.520> we<00:55:33.680> took<00:55:33.839> out<00:55:34.000> the<00:55:34.160> specivity 00:55:34.790 --> 00:55:34.800 align:start position:0% parameters. So we took out the specivity 00:55:34.800 --> 00:55:37.510 align:start position:0% parameters. So we took out the specivity of<00:55:35.040> presidential<00:55:36.480> um<00:55:36.880> Department<00:55:37.200> of<00:55:37.359> Health 00:55:37.510 --> 00:55:37.520 align:start position:0% of presidential um Department of Health 00:55:37.520 --> 00:55:39.270 align:start position:0% of presidential um Department of Health and<00:55:37.680> Human<00:55:37.920> Services<00:55:38.319> knows<00:55:38.559> that<00:55:38.720> we<00:55:38.960> will<00:55:39.119> be 00:55:39.270 --> 00:55:39.280 align:start position:0% and Human Services knows that we will be 00:55:39.280 --> 00:55:42.069 align:start position:0% and Human Services knows that we will be adding<00:55:39.520> it<00:55:39.680> back<00:55:39.839> in<00:55:40.079> now<00:55:40.640> because<00:55:41.520> we<00:55:41.839> now 00:55:42.069 --> 00:55:42.079 align:start position:0% adding it back in now because we now 00:55:42.079 --> 00:55:43.910 align:start position:0% adding it back in now because we now have<00:55:42.319> parameters<00:55:42.960> for<00:55:43.200> that<00:55:43.440> presidential 00:55:43.910 --> 00:55:43.920 align:start position:0% have parameters for that presidential 00:55:43.920 --> 00:55:46.950 align:start position:0% have parameters for that presidential fitness<00:55:44.400> test.<00:55:45.440> Presidential<00:55:46.160> fitness<00:55:46.559> test. 00:55:46.950 --> 00:55:46.960 align:start position:0% fitness test. Presidential fitness test. 00:55:46.960 --> 00:55:50.710 align:start position:0% fitness test. Presidential fitness test. Woo,<00:55:47.359> those<00:55:47.599> words<00:55:47.839> got<00:55:48.079> scrambled.<00:55:48.880> Um<00:55:50.319> we 00:55:50.710 --> 00:55:50.720 align:start position:0% Woo, those words got scrambled. Um we 00:55:50.720 --> 00:55:52.630 align:start position:0% Woo, those words got scrambled. Um we can<00:55:50.960> though<00:55:51.280> use<00:55:51.520> that.<00:55:51.920> So<00:55:52.079> that<00:55:52.319> could<00:55:52.480> be 00:55:52.630 --> 00:55:52.640 align:start position:0% can though use that. So that could be 00:55:52.640 --> 00:55:55.829 align:start position:0% can though use that. So that could be baseline<00:55:53.200> data.<00:55:53.920> where<00:55:54.160> are<00:55:54.400> students<00:55:55.040> before 00:55:55.829 --> 00:55:55.839 align:start position:0% baseline data. where are students before 00:55:55.839 --> 00:55:58.470 align:start position:0% baseline data. where are students before we<00:55:56.160> implement<00:55:56.640> any<00:55:56.880> kind<00:55:57.119> of<00:55:57.359> fitness<00:55:57.839> program 00:55:58.470 --> 00:55:58.480 align:start position:0% we implement any kind of fitness program 00:55:58.480 --> 00:56:01.910 align:start position:0% we implement any kind of fitness program in<00:55:58.799> the<00:55:58.960> school<00:55:59.520> and<00:55:59.680> then<00:55:59.920> where<00:56:00.160> are<00:56:00.400> they 00:56:01.910 --> 00:56:01.920 align:start position:0% in the school and then where are they 00:56:01.920 --> 00:56:03.990 align:start position:0% in the school and then where are they 8<00:56:02.160> months<00:56:02.400> later.<00:56:03.040> So<00:56:03.280> that<00:56:03.520> could<00:56:03.760> be 00:56:03.990 --> 00:56:04.000 align:start position:0% 8 months later. So that could be 00:56:04.000 --> 00:56:05.589 align:start position:0% 8 months later. So that could be baseline<00:56:04.480> data<00:56:04.720> and<00:56:04.880> then<00:56:05.040> our<00:56:05.200> post<00:56:05.440> data 00:56:05.589 --> 00:56:05.599 align:start position:0% baseline data and then our post data 00:56:05.599 --> 00:56:08.630 align:start position:0% baseline data and then our post data that<00:56:05.760> we<00:56:05.920> use.<00:56:06.480> We<00:56:06.720> could<00:56:06.880> also<00:56:07.200> use<00:56:08.000> um<00:56:08.400> some 00:56:08.630 --> 00:56:08.640 align:start position:0% that we use. We could also use um some 00:56:08.640 --> 00:56:10.789 align:start position:0% that we use. We could also use um some kind<00:56:08.720> of<00:56:08.799> a<00:56:09.119> nutrition<00:56:09.839> assessment.<00:56:10.480> What<00:56:10.640> do 00:56:10.789 --> 00:56:10.799 align:start position:0% kind of a nutrition assessment. What do 00:56:10.799 --> 00:56:12.630 align:start position:0% kind of a nutrition assessment. What do they<00:56:11.040> already<00:56:11.440> know<00:56:11.760> about<00:56:12.079> fruits<00:56:12.480> and 00:56:12.630 --> 00:56:12.640 align:start position:0% they already know about fruits and 00:56:12.640 --> 00:56:15.510 align:start position:0% they already know about fruits and vegetables<00:56:13.200> and<00:56:13.680> proteins<00:56:14.319> and<00:56:14.559> and<00:56:15.040> fats? 00:56:15.510 --> 00:56:15.520 align:start position:0% vegetables and proteins and and fats? 00:56:15.520 --> 00:56:16.870 align:start position:0% vegetables and proteins and and fats? What<00:56:15.599> what<00:56:15.760> do<00:56:15.920> they<00:56:16.079> already<00:56:16.240> know?<00:56:16.559> And<00:56:16.720> then 00:56:16.870 --> 00:56:16.880 align:start position:0% What what do they already know? And then 00:56:16.880 --> 00:56:20.150 align:start position:0% What what do they already know? And then we<00:56:17.040> use<00:56:17.200> our<00:56:17.440> standards<00:56:18.559> for<00:56:19.359> that<00:56:19.680> nutrition 00:56:20.150 --> 00:56:20.160 align:start position:0% we use our standards for that nutrition 00:56:20.160 --> 00:56:23.109 align:start position:0% we use our standards for that nutrition education<00:56:20.720> and<00:56:21.040> any<00:56:21.280> of<00:56:21.440> the<00:56:22.559> instructional 00:56:23.109 --> 00:56:23.119 align:start position:0% education and any of the instructional 00:56:23.119 --> 00:56:26.230 align:start position:0% education and any of the instructional materials<00:56:23.599> that<00:56:23.920> the<00:56:24.319> school<00:56:24.640> chooses<00:56:25.040> to<00:56:25.280> use 00:56:26.230 --> 00:56:26.240 align:start position:0% materials that the school chooses to use 00:56:26.240 --> 00:56:29.430 align:start position:0% materials that the school chooses to use does<00:56:26.640> the<00:56:27.040> nutrition<00:56:28.240> education<00:56:28.960> for<00:56:29.280> the 00:56:29.430 --> 00:56:29.440 align:start position:0% does the nutrition education for the 00:56:29.440 --> 00:56:31.190 align:start position:0% does the nutrition education for the students<00:56:29.839> does<00:56:30.000> that<00:56:30.160> improve<00:56:30.880> and<00:56:31.040> that 00:56:31.190 --> 00:56:31.200 align:start position:0% students does that improve and that 00:56:31.200 --> 00:56:33.670 align:start position:0% students does that improve and that could<00:56:31.359> be<00:56:31.440> baseline<00:56:31.920> data.<00:56:32.480> Um<00:56:33.040> could<00:56:33.280> be<00:56:33.440> when 00:56:33.670 --> 00:56:33.680 align:start position:0% could be baseline data. Um could be when 00:56:33.680 --> 00:56:35.430 align:start position:0% could be baseline data. Um could be when you<00:56:33.839> look<00:56:34.000> at<00:56:34.160> the<00:56:34.400> other<00:56:34.640> things<00:56:34.799> that<00:56:35.040> we<00:56:35.200> are 00:56:35.430 --> 00:56:35.440 align:start position:0% you look at the other things that we are 00:56:35.440 --> 00:56:36.950 align:start position:0% you look at the other things that we are requiring<00:56:36.000> it<00:56:36.160> is<00:56:36.240> the<00:56:36.400> physical<00:56:36.640> activity 00:56:36.950 --> 00:56:36.960 align:start position:0% requiring it is the physical activity 00:56:36.960 --> 00:56:38.630 align:start position:0% requiring it is the physical activity and<00:56:37.119> fitness<00:56:37.440> assessments<00:56:38.000> the<00:56:38.240> nutrition 00:56:38.630 --> 00:56:38.640 align:start position:0% and fitness assessments the nutrition 00:56:38.640 --> 00:56:41.510 align:start position:0% and fitness assessments the nutrition education.<00:56:39.119> So<00:56:39.200> I'm<00:56:39.359> looking<00:56:39.520> on<00:56:39.680> lines<00:56:40.000> 50<00:56:40.319> 51 00:56:41.510 --> 00:56:41.520 align:start position:0% education. So I'm looking on lines 50 51 00:56:41.520 --> 00:56:46.950 align:start position:0% education. So I'm looking on lines 50 51 um<00:56:42.400> the<00:56:43.280> the<00:56:43.599> wellness<00:56:44.000> policy.<00:56:45.119> Um<00:56:46.319> so<00:56:46.559> as<00:56:46.799> a 00:56:46.950 --> 00:56:46.960 align:start position:0% um the the wellness policy. Um so as a 00:56:46.960 --> 00:56:48.950 align:start position:0% um the the wellness policy. Um so as a result<00:56:47.200> of<00:56:47.440> those<00:56:47.920> what<00:56:48.079> does<00:56:48.240> our<00:56:48.400> data<00:56:48.720> look 00:56:48.950 --> 00:56:48.960 align:start position:0% result of those what does our data look 00:56:48.960 --> 00:56:51.510 align:start position:0% result of those what does our data look like<00:56:49.520> and<00:56:49.760> how<00:56:50.000> does<00:56:50.160> it<00:56:50.319> improve<00:56:51.040> because<00:56:51.280> we 00:56:51.510 --> 00:56:51.520 align:start position:0% like and how does it improve because we 00:56:51.520 --> 00:56:54.309 align:start position:0% like and how does it improve because we do<00:56:51.760> need<00:56:51.920> to<00:56:52.079> have<00:56:52.319> actual<00:56:52.799> outcomes.<00:56:53.520> Um<00:56:53.839> I<00:56:54.000> I 00:56:54.309 --> 00:56:54.319 align:start position:0% do need to have actual outcomes. Um I I 00:56:54.319 --> 00:56:56.309 align:start position:0% do need to have actual outcomes. Um I I think<00:56:54.400> a<00:56:54.720> really<00:56:54.960> easy<00:56:55.280> one<00:56:55.599> would<00:56:55.839> be<00:56:56.000> the 00:56:56.309 --> 00:56:56.319 align:start position:0% think a really easy one would be the 00:56:56.319 --> 00:56:59.670 align:start position:0% think a really easy one would be the presidential<00:56:56.799> fitness<00:56:57.920> fitness 00:56:59.670 --> 00:56:59.680 align:start position:0% presidential fitness fitness 00:56:59.680 --> 00:57:02.630 align:start position:0% presidential fitness fitness the<00:57:00.000> presidential<00:57:00.640> fitness<00:57:01.040> test<00:57:01.839> and 00:57:02.630 --> 00:57:02.640 align:start position:0% the presidential fitness test and 00:57:02.640 --> 00:57:04.390 align:start position:0% the presidential fitness test and nutrition<00:57:03.119> education.<00:57:03.839> So,<00:57:04.000> I<00:57:04.160> think<00:57:04.240> those 00:57:04.390 --> 00:57:04.400 align:start position:0% nutrition education. So, I think those 00:57:04.400 --> 00:57:06.150 align:start position:0% nutrition education. So, I think those would<00:57:04.559> be<00:57:04.720> two<00:57:04.880> really<00:57:05.119> easy<00:57:05.359> ones<00:57:05.680> because<00:57:05.920> we 00:57:06.150 --> 00:57:06.160 align:start position:0% would be two really easy ones because we 00:57:06.160 --> 00:57:08.549 align:start position:0% would be two really easy ones because we already<00:57:06.480> have<00:57:06.640> nutrition<00:57:07.200> standards<00:57:07.760> and<00:57:08.319> now 00:57:08.549 --> 00:57:08.559 align:start position:0% already have nutrition standards and now 00:57:08.559 --> 00:57:10.470 align:start position:0% already have nutrition standards and now we<00:57:08.799> have<00:57:08.960> the<00:57:09.200> presidential<00:57:09.680> fitness<00:57:10.079> test 00:57:10.470 --> 00:57:10.480 align:start position:0% we have the presidential fitness test 00:57:10.480 --> 00:57:13.190 align:start position:0% we have the presidential fitness test parameters<00:57:11.599> public.<00:57:12.319> So,<00:57:12.559> those<00:57:12.799> would<00:57:13.040> both 00:57:13.190 --> 00:57:13.200 align:start position:0% parameters public. So, those would both 00:57:13.200 --> 00:57:15.349 align:start position:0% parameters public. So, those would both be<00:57:13.359> really<00:57:13.680> easy<00:57:13.920> ones<00:57:14.240> to<00:57:14.480> set.<00:57:14.880> Of<00:57:15.119> course, 00:57:15.349 --> 00:57:15.359 align:start position:0% be really easy ones to set. Of course, 00:57:15.359 --> 00:57:17.190 align:start position:0% be really easy ones to set. Of course, you<00:57:15.520> could<00:57:15.760> choose<00:57:16.079> any<00:57:16.400> other<00:57:16.559> ones<00:57:16.799> that<00:57:17.040> you 00:57:17.190 --> 00:57:17.200 align:start position:0% you could choose any other ones that you 00:57:17.200 --> 00:57:19.829 align:start position:0% you could choose any other ones that you wanted<00:57:17.440> to<00:57:17.599> add,<00:57:18.160> but<00:57:18.400> that's<00:57:19.119> um 00:57:19.829 --> 00:57:19.839 align:start position:0% wanted to add, but that's um 00:57:19.839 --> 00:57:20.789 align:start position:0% wanted to add, but that's um >> could<00:57:20.079> it<00:57:20.480> and 00:57:20.789 --> 00:57:20.799 align:start position:0% >> could it and 00:57:20.799 --> 00:57:22.230 align:start position:0% >> could it and >> that's<00:57:20.960> what<00:57:21.119> it<00:57:21.200> means<00:57:21.359> to<00:57:21.440> me<00:57:21.599> when<00:57:21.760> when<00:57:22.079> I 00:57:22.230 --> 00:57:22.240 align:start position:0% >> that's what it means to me when when I 00:57:22.240 --> 00:57:24.230 align:start position:0% >> that's what it means to me when when I see<00:57:22.319> that.<00:57:22.799> I<00:57:23.119> thought<00:57:23.280> a<00:57:23.440> lot<00:57:23.520> about<00:57:23.680> this<00:57:24.000> too 00:57:24.230 --> 00:57:24.240 align:start position:0% see that. I thought a lot about this too 00:57:24.240 --> 00:57:27.349 align:start position:0% see that. I thought a lot about this too because<00:57:24.559> it<00:57:24.799> could<00:57:24.960> also<00:57:25.280> be<00:57:25.599> verification 00:57:27.349 --> 00:57:27.359 align:start position:0% because it could also be verification 00:57:27.359 --> 00:57:31.109 align:start position:0% because it could also be verification that<00:57:27.839> so<00:57:28.079> many<00:57:28.319> minutes<00:57:28.720> were<00:57:29.520> spent<00:57:29.839> on 00:57:31.109 --> 00:57:31.119 align:start position:0% that so many minutes were spent on 00:57:31.119 --> 00:57:34.069 align:start position:0% that so many minutes were spent on recess<00:57:31.520> or<00:57:31.760> so<00:57:32.000> many<00:57:32.160> minutes<00:57:32.480> were<00:57:32.720> spent<00:57:33.280> on 00:57:34.069 --> 00:57:34.079 align:start position:0% recess or so many minutes were spent on 00:57:34.079 --> 00:57:36.470 align:start position:0% recess or so many minutes were spent on um<00:57:34.640> physical<00:57:35.040> education<00:57:35.599> specific<00:57:36.079> type<00:57:36.319> of 00:57:36.470 --> 00:57:36.480 align:start position:0% um physical education specific type of 00:57:36.480 --> 00:57:38.309 align:start position:0% um physical education specific type of things<00:57:36.640> in<00:57:36.880> phys<00:57:37.359> physical<00:57:37.680> education.<00:57:38.160> So, 00:57:38.309 --> 00:57:38.319 align:start position:0% things in phys physical education. So, 00:57:38.319 --> 00:57:39.829 align:start position:0% things in phys physical education. So, it<00:57:38.480> could<00:57:38.640> be<00:57:38.720> verification<00:57:39.280> from<00:57:39.520> the<00:57:39.680> school 00:57:39.829 --> 00:57:39.839 align:start position:0% it could be verification from the school 00:57:39.839 --> 00:57:42.789 align:start position:0% it could be verification from the school itself<00:57:40.160> that<00:57:40.400> they<00:57:40.559> spent<00:57:40.880> time<00:57:41.119> doing<00:57:42.400> X,<00:57:42.720> Y, 00:57:42.789 --> 00:57:42.799 align:start position:0% itself that they spent time doing X, Y, 00:57:42.799 --> 00:57:45.349 align:start position:0% itself that they spent time doing X, Y, and<00:57:43.040> Z,<00:57:43.359> right?<00:57:44.160> Um,<00:57:44.640> that<00:57:44.880> could<00:57:45.040> be<00:57:45.119> a 00:57:45.349 --> 00:57:45.359 align:start position:0% and Z, right? Um, that could be a 00:57:45.359 --> 00:57:47.109 align:start position:0% and Z, right? Um, that could be a validating<00:57:46.000> feature<00:57:46.319> because<00:57:46.559> I've,<00:57:46.880> like<00:57:46.960> I 00:57:47.109 --> 00:57:47.119 align:start position:0% validating feature because I've, like I 00:57:47.119 --> 00:57:48.390 align:start position:0% validating feature because I've, like I said,<00:57:47.280> I've<00:57:47.520> thought<00:57:47.680> a<00:57:47.839> lot<00:57:47.920> about<00:57:48.079> this. 00:57:48.390 --> 00:57:48.400 align:start position:0% said, I've thought a lot about this. 00:57:48.400 --> 00:57:49.829 align:start position:0% said, I've thought a lot about this. What<00:57:48.559> does<00:57:48.640> this<00:57:48.880> need<00:57:48.960> to<00:57:49.119> be<00:57:49.280> and<00:57:49.520> what<00:57:49.680> does 00:57:49.829 --> 00:57:49.839 align:start position:0% What does this need to be and what does 00:57:49.839 --> 00:57:53.109 align:start position:0% What does this need to be and what does it<00:57:50.000> not<00:57:50.160> need<00:57:50.319> to<00:57:50.480> be?<00:57:50.720> We<00:57:50.880> don't<00:57:51.040> want<00:57:51.119> to,<00:57:52.400> um, 00:57:53.109 --> 00:57:53.119 align:start position:0% it not need to be? We don't want to, um, 00:57:53.119 --> 00:57:54.870 align:start position:0% it not need to be? We don't want to, um, you<00:57:53.280> know,<00:57:53.440> overdo<00:57:54.000> something,<00:57:54.240> but<00:57:54.480> we<00:57:54.640> also 00:57:54.870 --> 00:57:54.880 align:start position:0% you know, overdo something, but we also 00:57:54.880 --> 00:57:57.589 align:start position:0% you know, overdo something, but we also want<00:57:55.040> to<00:57:55.119> have<00:57:55.280> some<00:57:55.520> kind<00:57:55.680> of<00:57:55.839> an<00:57:56.000> indicator. 00:57:57.589 --> 00:57:57.599 align:start position:0% want to have some kind of an indicator. 00:57:57.599 --> 00:57:58.789 align:start position:0% want to have some kind of an indicator. Board<00:57:57.839> member<00:57:58.079> Green,<00:57:58.400> did<00:57:58.480> you<00:57:58.640> have 00:57:58.789 --> 00:57:58.799 align:start position:0% Board member Green, did you have 00:57:58.799 --> 00:58:00.470 align:start position:0% Board member Green, did you have additional<00:57:59.359> questions<00:57:59.680> on<00:57:59.920> that<00:58:00.079> or 00:58:00.470 --> 00:58:00.480 align:start position:0% additional questions on that or 00:58:00.480 --> 00:58:02.950 align:start position:0% additional questions on that or comments? 00:58:02.950 --> 00:58:02.960 align:start position:0% comments? 00:58:02.960 --> 00:58:05.990 align:start position:0% comments? Um,<00:58:03.280> I<00:58:03.520> think<00:58:03.680> I'm<00:58:03.920> I'm<00:58:04.319> just<00:58:04.480> looking<00:58:04.880> to<00:58:05.760> make 00:58:05.990 --> 00:58:06.000 align:start position:0% Um, I think I'm I'm just looking to make 00:58:06.000 --> 00:58:07.990 align:start position:0% Um, I think I'm I'm just looking to make sure<00:58:06.160> that<00:58:06.640> that<00:58:07.040> I<00:58:07.280> do<00:58:07.520> have<00:58:07.680> an 00:58:07.990 --> 00:58:08.000 align:start position:0% sure that that I do have an 00:58:08.000 --> 00:58:11.430 align:start position:0% sure that that I do have an understanding<00:58:08.799> of<00:58:09.520> what<00:58:10.000> this<00:58:10.400> rule<00:58:10.720> is,<00:58:11.359> you 00:58:11.430 --> 00:58:11.440 align:start position:0% understanding of what this rule is, you 00:58:11.440 --> 00:58:14.470 align:start position:0% understanding of what this rule is, you know,<00:58:11.680> HP36<00:58:12.720> is<00:58:12.960> as<00:58:13.200> well.<00:58:13.599> And<00:58:13.839> it<00:58:13.920> it<00:58:14.319> does 00:58:14.470 --> 00:58:14.480 align:start position:0% know, HP36 is as well. And it it does 00:58:14.480 --> 00:58:16.870 align:start position:0% know, HP36 is as well. And it it does seem<00:58:14.799> I'm<00:58:15.040> reading<00:58:15.280> through,<00:58:16.079> you<00:58:16.240> know,<00:58:16.720> all 00:58:16.870 --> 00:58:16.880 align:start position:0% seem I'm reading through, you know, all 00:58:16.880 --> 00:58:19.589 align:start position:0% seem I'm reading through, you know, all the<00:58:17.119> red<00:58:17.359> on<00:58:17.599> that<00:58:17.760> bill<00:58:18.079> and<00:58:18.240> and<00:58:18.559> it<00:58:18.799> is<00:58:19.200> it 00:58:19.589 --> 00:58:19.599 align:start position:0% the red on that bill and and it is it 00:58:19.599 --> 00:58:21.510 align:start position:0% the red on that bill and and it is it seems<00:58:19.920> to<00:58:20.079> be<00:58:20.160> tailoring<00:58:20.720> to<00:58:20.880> the<00:58:21.119> physical 00:58:21.510 --> 00:58:21.520 align:start position:0% seems to be tailoring to the physical 00:58:21.520 --> 00:58:25.670 align:start position:0% seems to be tailoring to the physical education<00:58:22.960> and<00:58:23.359> the<00:58:23.680> nutrition<00:58:25.040> nutritional 00:58:25.670 --> 00:58:25.680 align:start position:0% education and the nutrition nutritional 00:58:25.680 --> 00:58:28.789 align:start position:0% education and the nutrition nutritional education.<00:58:26.319> Is<00:58:26.480> that<00:58:26.640> correct? 00:58:28.789 --> 00:58:28.799 align:start position:0% education. Is that correct? 00:58:28.799 --> 00:58:31.030 align:start position:0% education. Is that correct? Is<00:58:28.960> that<00:58:29.440> like<00:58:29.680> what<00:58:29.920> we're<00:58:30.079> seeing<00:58:30.400> here?<00:58:30.799> and 00:58:31.030 --> 00:58:31.040 align:start position:0% Is that like what we're seeing here? and 00:58:31.040 --> 00:58:33.750 align:start position:0% Is that like what we're seeing here? and the<00:58:31.200> rule<00:58:31.440> in<00:58:31.599> front<00:58:31.760> of<00:58:31.920> us.<00:58:32.319> Um,<00:58:33.040> and<00:58:33.359> this<00:58:33.520> is 00:58:33.750 --> 00:58:33.760 align:start position:0% the rule in front of us. Um, and this is 00:58:33.760 --> 00:58:36.309 align:start position:0% the rule in front of us. Um, and this is all<00:58:34.000> new<00:58:34.400> from<00:58:34.799> that<00:58:35.359> new<00:58:35.599> bill.<00:58:35.920> Is<00:58:36.079> that 00:58:36.309 --> 00:58:36.319 align:start position:0% all new from that new bill. Is that 00:58:36.319 --> 00:58:38.309 align:start position:0% all new from that new bill. Is that correct? 00:58:38.309 --> 00:58:38.319 align:start position:0% correct? 00:58:38.319 --> 00:58:40.150 align:start position:0% correct? >> That's<00:58:38.559> That's<00:58:38.960> accurate.<00:58:39.520> That's<00:58:39.760> why<00:58:39.920> we're 00:58:40.150 --> 00:58:40.160 align:start position:0% >> That's That's accurate. That's why we're 00:58:40.160 --> 00:58:41.270 align:start position:0% >> That's That's accurate. That's why we're doing<00:58:40.319> the<00:58:40.559> rule. 00:58:41.270 --> 00:58:41.280 align:start position:0% doing the rule. 00:58:41.280 --> 00:58:46.150 align:start position:0% doing the rule. >> Yeah.<00:58:42.079> So,<00:58:42.799> um 00:58:46.150 --> 00:58:46.160 align:start position:0% 00:58:46.160 --> 00:58:48.549 align:start position:0% I<00:58:46.400> we<00:58:46.799> probably<00:58:47.200> How<00:58:47.359> do<00:58:47.520> we<00:58:47.680> clarify<00:58:48.160> that<00:58:48.319> in 00:58:48.549 --> 00:58:48.559 align:start position:0% I we probably How do we clarify that in 00:58:48.559 --> 00:58:50.470 align:start position:0% I we probably How do we clarify that in the<00:58:48.640> rule<00:58:48.880> then? 00:58:50.470 --> 00:58:50.480 align:start position:0% the rule then? 00:58:50.480 --> 00:58:53.030 align:start position:0% the rule then? because<00:58:50.720> I<00:58:50.880> I<00:58:51.200> know<00:58:51.359> that<00:58:51.920> we<00:58:52.240> probably<00:58:52.480> should 00:58:53.030 --> 00:58:53.040 align:start position:0% because I I know that we probably should 00:58:53.040 --> 00:58:56.789 align:start position:0% because I I know that we probably should be<00:58:54.160> specific<00:58:54.640> on,<00:58:55.040> you<00:58:55.200> know,<00:58:55.280> data<00:58:55.680> related 00:58:56.789 --> 00:58:56.799 align:start position:0% be specific on, you know, data related 00:58:56.799 --> 00:58:59.589 align:start position:0% be specific on, you know, data related on<00:58:57.040> line<00:58:57.280> 55<00:58:58.400> baseline<00:58:58.880> data<00:58:59.119> related<00:58:59.440> to 00:58:59.589 --> 00:58:59.599 align:start position:0% on line 55 baseline data related to 00:58:59.599 --> 00:59:01.349 align:start position:0% on line 55 baseline data related to student<00:58:59.920> health<00:59:00.079> or<00:59:00.240> wellness<00:59:00.559> indicators<00:59:01.119> if 00:59:01.349 --> 00:59:01.359 align:start position:0% student health or wellness indicators if 00:59:01.359 --> 00:59:02.870 align:start position:0% student health or wellness indicators if available<00:59:01.680> and<00:59:01.920> as<00:59:02.160> determined<00:59:02.480> by<00:59:02.640> the 00:59:02.870 --> 00:59:02.880 align:start position:0% available and as determined by the 00:59:02.880 --> 00:59:06.230 align:start position:0% available and as determined by the board.<00:59:03.280> So,<00:59:03.599> we<00:59:03.920> need<00:59:04.000> to<00:59:04.240> determine<00:59:04.640> that. 00:59:06.230 --> 00:59:06.240 align:start position:0% board. So, we need to determine that. 00:59:06.240 --> 00:59:09.510 align:start position:0% board. So, we need to determine that. Um,<00:59:07.599> and<00:59:08.000> is<00:59:08.240> that<00:59:08.480> determined<00:59:08.960> anywhere<00:59:09.359> else 00:59:09.510 --> 00:59:09.520 align:start position:0% Um, and is that determined anywhere else 00:59:09.520 --> 00:59:11.109 align:start position:0% Um, and is that determined anywhere else in<00:59:09.760> the<00:59:09.920> rule<00:59:10.160> or<00:59:10.319> is<00:59:10.480> that<00:59:10.640> maybe<00:59:10.880> something 00:59:11.109 --> 00:59:11.119 align:start position:0% in the rule or is that maybe something 00:59:11.119 --> 00:59:13.270 align:start position:0% in the rule or is that maybe something that<00:59:11.280> we're<00:59:11.440> missing<00:59:11.760> here<00:59:12.640> still? 00:59:13.270 --> 00:59:13.280 align:start position:0% that we're missing here still? 00:59:13.280 --> 00:59:14.710 align:start position:0% that we're missing here still? >> Shondaanda,<00:59:13.839> I<00:59:14.079> don't<00:59:14.160> know<00:59:14.319> your<00:59:14.480> full 00:59:14.710 --> 00:59:14.720 align:start position:0% >> Shondaanda, I don't know your full 00:59:14.720 --> 00:59:17.190 align:start position:0% >> Shondaanda, I don't know your full title.<00:59:15.359> Go<00:59:15.520> ahead<00:59:15.760> and<00:59:15.920> introduce<00:59:16.319> yourself. 00:59:17.190 --> 00:59:17.200 align:start position:0% title. Go ahead and introduce yourself. 00:59:17.200 --> 00:59:18.870 align:start position:0% title. Go ahead and introduce yourself. >> Candace<00:59:17.599> Stanger,<00:59:18.079> arts<00:59:18.319> and<00:59:18.480> wellness 00:59:18.870 --> 00:59:18.880 align:start position:0% >> Candace Stanger, arts and wellness 00:59:18.880 --> 00:59:21.589 align:start position:0% >> Candace Stanger, arts and wellness coordinator.<00:59:19.920> Um,<00:59:20.319> some<00:59:20.480> of<00:59:20.559> these<00:59:20.880> will<00:59:21.119> also 00:59:21.589 --> 00:59:21.599 align:start position:0% coordinator. Um, some of these will also 00:59:21.599 --> 00:59:24.470 align:start position:0% coordinator. Um, some of these will also be<00:59:21.920> in<00:59:22.799> um<00:59:22.960> an<00:59:23.200> agreement<00:59:23.599> we're<00:59:23.920> working<00:59:24.160> on 00:59:24.470 --> 00:59:24.480 align:start position:0% be in um an agreement we're working on 00:59:24.480 --> 00:59:28.710 align:start position:0% be in um an agreement we're working on with<00:59:25.359> the<00:59:25.920> DHS<00:59:27.359> on<00:59:27.680> the<00:59:27.920> indicators<00:59:28.480> and 00:59:28.710 --> 00:59:28.720 align:start position:0% with the DHS on the indicators and 00:59:28.720 --> 00:59:30.150 align:start position:0% with the DHS on the indicators and measurements<00:59:29.280> that<00:59:29.520> we're<00:59:29.760> going<00:59:29.839> to<00:59:30.000> be 00:59:30.150 --> 00:59:30.160 align:start position:0% measurements that we're going to be 00:59:30.160 --> 00:59:33.589 align:start position:0% measurements that we're going to be tracking<00:59:30.640> around<00:59:31.040> this.<00:59:31.520> So,<00:59:32.880> that's<00:59:33.200> another 00:59:33.589 --> 00:59:33.599 align:start position:0% tracking around this. So, that's another 00:59:33.599 --> 00:59:35.190 align:start position:0% tracking around this. So, that's another place<00:59:33.920> that's<00:59:34.240> going<00:59:34.319> to<00:59:34.400> be<00:59:34.559> tracked<00:59:34.880> for 00:59:35.190 --> 00:59:35.200 align:start position:0% place that's going to be tracked for 00:59:35.200 --> 00:59:37.270 align:start position:0% place that's going to be tracked for them<00:59:35.440> to<00:59:35.760> then<00:59:36.079> report<00:59:36.400> back<00:59:36.559> to<00:59:36.720> the<00:59:36.880> Rural 00:59:37.270 --> 00:59:37.280 align:start position:0% them to then report back to the Rural 00:59:37.280 --> 00:59:39.430 align:start position:0% them to then report back to the Rural Health<00:59:37.599> Transformation<00:59:38.960> Grant 00:59:39.430 --> 00:59:39.440 align:start position:0% Health Transformation Grant 00:59:39.440 --> 00:59:40.950 align:start position:0% Health Transformation Grant specifically. 00:59:40.950 --> 00:59:40.960 align:start position:0% specifically. 00:59:40.960 --> 00:59:43.109 align:start position:0% specifically. And<00:59:41.119> so,<00:59:41.280> if<00:59:41.520> you<00:59:41.680> want,<00:59:41.920> we<00:59:42.240> can<00:59:42.720> look<00:59:42.960> at 00:59:43.109 --> 00:59:43.119 align:start position:0% And so, if you want, we can look at 00:59:43.119 --> 00:59:45.030 align:start position:0% And so, if you want, we can look at that.<00:59:43.440> It's<00:59:43.680> not<00:59:43.839> been<00:59:44.079> signed<00:59:44.400> yet.<00:59:44.640> And<00:59:44.880> so 00:59:45.030 --> 00:59:45.040 align:start position:0% that. It's not been signed yet. And so 00:59:45.040 --> 00:59:46.710 align:start position:0% that. It's not been signed yet. And so we're<00:59:45.280> waiting<00:59:45.520> for<00:59:45.680> that<00:59:45.920> signature,<00:59:46.319> but<00:59:46.559> we 00:59:46.710 --> 00:59:46.720 align:start position:0% we're waiting for that signature, but we 00:59:46.720 --> 00:59:49.510 align:start position:0% we're waiting for that signature, but we could<00:59:46.960> try<00:59:47.119> and<00:59:47.280> align<00:59:47.760> some<00:59:48.000> of<00:59:48.160> those<00:59:49.280> um 00:59:49.510 --> 00:59:49.520 align:start position:0% could try and align some of those um 00:59:49.520 --> 00:59:52.150 align:start position:0% could try and align some of those um pieces<00:59:50.079> around<00:59:50.960> um<00:59:51.119> what<00:59:51.440> that<00:59:51.680> looks<00:59:51.920> like. 00:59:52.150 --> 00:59:52.160 align:start position:0% pieces around um what that looks like. 00:59:52.160 --> 00:59:55.750 align:start position:0% pieces around um what that looks like. So<00:59:52.640> one<00:59:52.799> of<00:59:52.880> those<00:59:53.119> like<00:59:54.079> um<00:59:54.799> Jod<00:59:55.200> had<00:59:55.440> shared 00:59:55.750 --> 00:59:55.760 align:start position:0% So one of those like um Jod had shared 00:59:55.760 --> 00:59:57.990 align:start position:0% So one of those like um Jod had shared was<00:59:55.920> the<00:59:56.400> presidential<00:59:57.040> fitness,<00:59:57.440> but<00:59:57.680> it<00:59:57.839> was 00:59:57.990 --> 00:59:58.000 align:start position:0% was the presidential fitness, but it was 00:59:58.000 --> 01:00:01.750 align:start position:0% was the presidential fitness, but it was also<00:59:59.119> um<00:59:59.920> the<01:00:00.240> fruits<01:00:00.559> and<01:00:00.799> vegetables<01:00:01.440> that 01:00:01.750 --> 01:00:01.760 align:start position:0% also um the fruits and vegetables that 01:00:01.760 --> 01:00:03.589 align:start position:0% also um the fruits and vegetables that were<01:00:01.920> eaten,<01:00:02.319> you<01:00:02.480> know,<01:00:02.640> like<01:00:02.799> some<01:00:03.119> specific 01:00:03.589 --> 01:00:03.599 align:start position:0% were eaten, you know, like some specific 01:00:03.599 --> 01:00:05.589 align:start position:0% were eaten, you know, like some specific things<01:00:03.839> that<01:00:04.079> they<01:00:04.400> outlined.<01:00:05.040> So<01:00:05.200> that<01:00:05.440> might 01:00:05.589 --> 01:00:05.599 align:start position:0% things that they outlined. So that might 01:00:05.599 --> 01:00:08.150 align:start position:0% things that they outlined. So that might be<01:00:05.760> something<01:00:06.000> to<01:00:06.720> coordinate<01:00:07.280> efforts<01:00:07.839> on 01:00:08.150 --> 01:00:08.160 align:start position:0% be something to coordinate efforts on 01:00:08.160 --> 01:00:11.030 align:start position:0% be something to coordinate efforts on with<01:00:08.880> what<01:00:09.200> they<01:00:09.599> need<01:00:09.839> to<01:00:10.000> measure<01:00:10.400> for<01:00:10.720> the 01:00:11.030 --> 01:00:11.040 align:start position:0% with what they need to measure for the 01:00:11.040 --> 01:00:14.309 align:start position:0% with what they need to measure for the grant<01:00:12.000> um<01:00:12.559> process.<01:00:13.280> in<01:00:13.440> that<01:00:13.760> document 01:00:14.309 --> 01:00:14.319 align:start position:0% grant um process. in that document 01:00:14.319 --> 01:00:16.150 align:start position:0% grant um process. in that document that's<01:00:14.720> that<01:00:15.040> agreement<01:00:15.440> that's<01:00:15.760> happening 01:00:16.150 --> 01:00:16.160 align:start position:0% that's that agreement that's happening 01:00:16.160 --> 01:00:18.710 align:start position:0% that's that agreement that's happening inter<01:00:16.480> agency<01:00:16.880> agreement. 01:00:18.710 --> 01:00:18.720 align:start position:0% inter agency agreement. 01:00:18.720 --> 01:00:20.789 align:start position:0% inter agency agreement. >> So<01:00:18.960> there's<01:00:19.200> going<01:00:19.280> to<01:00:19.359> be<01:00:19.440> an<01:00:19.680> inter<01:00:20.079> agency 01:00:20.789 --> 01:00:20.799 align:start position:0% >> So there's going to be an inter agency 01:00:20.799 --> 01:00:22.870 align:start position:0% >> So there's going to be an inter agency agreement<01:00:21.280> and<01:00:21.599> this<01:00:21.760> will<01:00:21.920> be<01:00:22.079> given<01:00:22.400> to<01:00:22.640> the 01:00:22.870 --> 01:00:22.880 align:start position:0% agreement and this will be given to the 01:00:22.880 --> 01:00:25.670 align:start position:0% agreement and this will be given to the eleas<01:00:23.359> that<01:00:23.520> choose<01:00:23.760> to<01:00:24.000> participate<01:00:24.640> in<01:00:24.880> this 01:00:25.670 --> 01:00:25.680 align:start position:0% eleas that choose to participate in this 01:00:25.680 --> 01:00:27.430 align:start position:0% eleas that choose to participate in this grant.<01:00:26.079> They<01:00:26.319> don't<01:00:26.480> have<01:00:26.640> to<01:00:26.880> participate 01:00:27.430 --> 01:00:27.440 align:start position:0% grant. They don't have to participate 01:00:27.440 --> 01:00:29.589 align:start position:0% grant. They don't have to participate but<01:00:27.680> they<01:00:27.839> can<01:00:28.400> and<01:00:28.640> in<01:00:28.880> doing<01:00:29.119> so<01:00:29.280> they<01:00:29.520> get 01:00:29.589 --> 01:00:29.599 align:start position:0% but they can and in doing so they get 01:00:29.599 --> 01:00:31.589 align:start position:0% but they can and in doing so they get the<01:00:29.760> funding<01:00:30.000> for<01:00:30.240> that.<01:00:30.799> Um,<01:00:31.200> so<01:00:31.359> you're 01:00:31.589 --> 01:00:31.599 align:start position:0% the funding for that. Um, so you're 01:00:31.599 --> 01:00:33.670 align:start position:0% the funding for that. Um, so you're creating<01:00:31.839> that<01:00:32.000> inter<01:00:32.319> agency<01:00:32.799> agreement 01:00:33.670 --> 01:00:33.680 align:start position:0% creating that inter agency agreement 01:00:33.680 --> 01:00:37.030 align:start position:0% creating that inter agency agreement which<01:00:34.160> will<01:00:35.359> the<01:00:35.680> school<01:00:36.000> will<01:00:36.319> will<01:00:36.640> have<01:00:36.799> to 01:00:37.030 --> 01:00:37.040 align:start position:0% which will the school will will have to 01:00:37.040 --> 01:00:39.109 align:start position:0% which will the school will will have to communicate<01:00:37.520> to<01:00:37.680> you<01:00:38.160> probably<01:00:38.480> in<01:00:38.640> a<01:00:38.880> written 01:00:39.109 --> 01:00:39.119 align:start position:0% communicate to you probably in a written 01:00:39.119 --> 01:00:44.150 align:start position:0% communicate to you probably in a written form<01:00:40.240> on<01:00:41.119> on<01:00:41.680> what<01:00:42.000> their<01:00:42.559> like<01:00:42.799> what<01:00:43.040> their 01:00:44.150 --> 01:00:44.160 align:start position:0% form on on what their like what their 01:00:44.160 --> 01:00:46.789 align:start position:0% form on on what their like what their approach<01:00:44.559> is<01:00:44.720> for<01:00:44.960> this.<01:00:45.520> Is<01:00:45.680> that<01:00:45.920> correct? 01:00:46.789 --> 01:00:46.799 align:start position:0% approach is for this. Is that correct? 01:00:46.799 --> 01:00:48.710 align:start position:0% approach is for this. Is that correct? >> So<01:00:46.960> the<01:00:47.200> inter<01:00:47.440> agency<01:00:47.920> agreement<01:00:48.240> is<01:00:48.480> through 01:00:48.710 --> 01:00:48.720 align:start position:0% >> So the inter agency agreement is through 01:00:48.720 --> 01:00:53.349 align:start position:0% >> So the inter agency agreement is through DHS<01:00:49.440> and<01:00:49.839> USB<01:00:51.200> and<01:00:51.520> then<01:00:51.839> it<01:00:52.160> will<01:00:53.040> we're 01:00:53.349 --> 01:00:53.359 align:start position:0% DHS and USB and then it will we're 01:00:53.359 --> 01:00:55.589 align:start position:0% DHS and USB and then it will we're creating<01:00:53.680> a<01:00:54.000> grant.<01:00:54.480> So<01:00:54.799> Jod's<01:00:55.280> been<01:00:55.440> working 01:00:55.589 --> 01:00:55.599 align:start position:0% creating a grant. So Jod's been working 01:00:55.599 --> 01:00:58.150 align:start position:0% creating a grant. So Jod's been working on<01:00:55.839> a<01:00:56.000> grant<01:00:56.400> application<01:00:57.520> that<01:00:57.760> they<01:00:58.000> will 01:00:58.150 --> 01:00:58.160 align:start position:0% on a grant application that they will 01:00:58.160 --> 01:01:00.390 align:start position:0% on a grant application that they will then<01:00:58.400> set<01:00:58.720> goals<01:00:59.119> towards<01:00:59.599> that<01:00:59.839> and<01:01:00.160> that's 01:01:00.390 --> 01:01:00.400 align:start position:0% then set goals towards that and that's 01:01:00.400 --> 01:01:03.349 align:start position:0% then set goals towards that and that's still<01:01:00.640> really<01:01:00.960> much<01:01:01.200> in<01:01:01.520> draft<01:01:01.920> form.<01:01:02.880> Um 01:01:03.349 --> 01:01:03.359 align:start position:0% still really much in draft form. Um 01:01:03.359 --> 01:01:05.349 align:start position:0% still really much in draft form. Um we're<01:01:03.599> hoping<01:01:03.839> to<01:01:04.079> get<01:01:04.160> a<01:01:04.400> person<01:01:04.720> hired<01:01:05.119> for 01:01:05.349 --> 01:01:05.359 align:start position:0% we're hoping to get a person hired for 01:01:05.359 --> 01:01:06.789 align:start position:0% we're hoping to get a person hired for the<01:01:05.520> gold<01:01:05.760> medal<01:01:06.079> schools.<01:01:06.480> There's<01:01:06.640> some 01:01:06.789 --> 01:01:06.799 align:start position:0% the gold medal schools. There's some 01:01:06.799 --> 01:01:09.990 align:start position:0% the gold medal schools. There's some funding<01:01:07.119> available<01:01:07.599> for<01:01:07.920> that.<01:01:08.559> Um,<01:01:08.960> and<01:01:09.280> so 01:01:09.990 --> 01:01:10.000 align:start position:0% funding available for that. Um, and so 01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:13.109 align:start position:0% funding available for that. Um, and so there's<01:01:11.280> going<01:01:11.440> to<01:01:11.599> be<01:01:11.920> that<01:01:12.319> piece<01:01:12.640> that<01:01:12.960> goes 01:01:13.109 --> 01:01:13.119 align:start position:0% there's going to be that piece that goes 01:01:13.119 --> 01:01:15.109 align:start position:0% there's going to be that piece that goes out<01:01:13.280> to<01:01:13.440> eleas<01:01:14.000> and<01:01:14.160> they<01:01:14.400> fill<01:01:14.559> out<01:01:14.720> a<01:01:14.960> grant 01:01:15.109 --> 01:01:15.119 align:start position:0% out to eleas and they fill out a grant 01:01:15.119 --> 01:01:17.430 align:start position:0% out to eleas and they fill out a grant in<01:01:15.359> Utah<01:01:15.760> grants<01:01:16.160> management<01:01:16.799> and<01:01:17.040> then<01:01:17.280> the 01:01:17.430 --> 01:01:17.440 align:start position:0% in Utah grants management and then the 01:01:17.440 --> 01:01:19.910 align:start position:0% in Utah grants management and then the first<01:01:17.680> year<01:01:17.920> will<01:01:18.160> be<01:01:18.319> implementing<01:01:19.680> getting 01:01:19.910 --> 01:01:19.920 align:start position:0% first year will be implementing getting 01:01:19.920 --> 01:01:22.230 align:start position:0% first year will be implementing getting them<01:01:20.240> started<01:01:20.720> towards<01:01:21.119> a<01:01:21.359> designation<01:01:22.000> and 01:01:22.230 --> 01:01:22.240 align:start position:0% them started towards a designation and 01:01:22.240 --> 01:01:24.230 align:start position:0% them started towards a designation and then<01:01:22.400> the<01:01:22.640> designation<01:01:23.200> would<01:01:23.440> happen<01:01:23.839> after 01:01:24.230 --> 01:01:24.240 align:start position:0% then the designation would happen after 01:01:24.240 --> 01:01:26.230 align:start position:0% then the designation would happen after that. 01:01:26.230 --> 01:01:26.240 align:start position:0% that. 01:01:26.240 --> 01:01:29.589 align:start position:0% that. >> Does<01:01:26.559> this<01:01:27.119> extend<01:01:27.520> in<01:01:27.839> any<01:01:28.079> way<01:01:28.400> extend<01:01:28.960> into 01:01:29.589 --> 01:01:29.599 align:start position:0% >> Does this extend in any way extend into 01:01:29.599 --> 01:01:31.030 align:start position:0% >> Does this extend in any way extend into like<01:01:29.920> receiving<01:01:30.240> the<01:01:30.400> grant?<01:01:30.720> Does<01:01:30.880> that 01:01:31.030 --> 01:01:31.040 align:start position:0% like receiving the grant? Does that 01:01:31.040 --> 01:01:33.030 align:start position:0% like receiving the grant? Does that extend<01:01:31.359> into<01:01:31.599> any<01:01:31.839> of<01:01:31.920> the<01:01:32.160> other<01:01:32.400> areas<01:01:32.799> that 01:01:33.030 --> 01:01:33.040 align:start position:0% extend into any of the other areas that 01:01:33.040 --> 01:01:35.430 align:start position:0% extend into any of the other areas that fall<01:01:33.280> underneath<01:01:33.680> the<01:01:33.839> rural<01:01:34.240> health 01:01:35.430 --> 01:01:35.440 align:start position:0% fall underneath the rural health 01:01:35.440 --> 01:01:37.030 align:start position:0% fall underneath the rural health transformation 01:01:37.030 --> 01:01:37.040 align:start position:0% transformation 01:01:37.040 --> 01:01:38.470 align:start position:0% transformation program? 01:01:38.470 --> 01:01:38.480 align:start position:0% program? 01:01:38.480 --> 01:01:42.390 align:start position:0% program? The<01:01:38.720> grant<01:01:38.960> will<01:01:39.200> only<01:01:39.520> go<01:01:39.760> to<01:01:40.319> LEAs. 01:01:42.390 --> 01:01:42.400 align:start position:0% The grant will only go to LEAs. 01:01:42.400 --> 01:01:45.670 align:start position:0% The grant will only go to LEAs. Um<01:01:42.880> meaning<01:01:43.599> does<01:01:43.839> it<01:01:44.000> go<01:01:44.160> to<01:01:44.400> any<01:01:44.720> other<01:01:45.200> types 01:01:45.670 --> 01:01:45.680 align:start position:0% Um meaning does it go to any other types 01:01:45.680 --> 01:01:49.349 align:start position:0% Um meaning does it go to any other types of<01:01:46.799> initiatives<01:01:47.440> or<01:01:47.760> programs<01:01:48.640> outside<01:01:49.040> of 01:01:49.349 --> 01:01:49.359 align:start position:0% of initiatives or programs outside of 01:01:49.359 --> 01:01:52.390 align:start position:0% of initiatives or programs outside of physical<01:01:49.760> educ<01:01:50.400> physical<01:01:50.880> education 01:01:52.390 --> 01:01:52.400 align:start position:0% physical educ physical education 01:01:52.400 --> 01:01:56.150 align:start position:0% physical educ physical education or<01:01:53.520> um<01:01:53.920> nutritional<01:01:54.559> education 01:01:56.150 --> 01:01:56.160 align:start position:0% or um nutritional education 01:01:56.160 --> 01:01:58.950 align:start position:0% or um nutritional education and<01:01:56.400> I'm<01:01:56.559> looking<01:01:56.799> at<01:01:57.040> like<01:01:57.200> the<01:01:57.440> teaalth<01:01:58.240> the 01:01:58.950 --> 01:01:58.960 align:start position:0% and I'm looking at like the teaalth the 01:01:58.960 --> 01:02:00.870 align:start position:0% and I'm looking at like the teaalth the the<01:01:59.359> wellness<01:01:59.760> centers<01:02:00.160> in<01:02:00.319> the<01:02:00.480> school<01:02:00.720> like 01:02:00.870 --> 01:02:00.880 align:start position:0% the wellness centers in the school like 01:02:00.880 --> 01:02:01.910 align:start position:0% the wellness centers in the school like the 01:02:01.910 --> 01:02:01.920 align:start position:0% the 01:02:01.920 --> 01:02:03.910 align:start position:0% the >> it<01:02:02.240> should<01:02:02.400> be<01:02:02.720> that's<01:02:03.040> why<01:02:03.359> we're<01:02:03.599> trying<01:02:03.760> to 01:02:03.910 --> 01:02:03.920 align:start position:0% >> it should be that's why we're trying to 01:02:03.920 --> 01:02:05.990 align:start position:0% >> it should be that's why we're trying to narrowly<01:02:04.480> scope<01:02:04.720> it<01:02:04.880> or<01:02:05.119> at<01:02:05.119> least<01:02:05.599> I'm<01:02:05.920> trying 01:02:05.990 --> 01:02:06.000 align:start position:0% narrowly scope it or at least I'm trying 01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:07.349 align:start position:0% narrowly scope it or at least I'm trying to<01:02:06.160> make<01:02:06.240> sure<01:02:06.400> it's<01:02:06.640> narrowly<01:02:07.040> scoped 01:02:07.349 --> 01:02:07.359 align:start position:0% to make sure it's narrowly scoped 01:02:07.359 --> 01:02:09.990 align:start position:0% to make sure it's narrowly scoped because<01:02:07.599> that<01:02:07.920> that<01:02:08.720> particular 01:02:09.990 --> 01:02:10.000 align:start position:0% because that that particular 01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:11.510 align:start position:0% because that that particular >> grant<01:02:10.319> that<01:02:10.559> was<01:02:10.720> already<01:02:10.960> accept<01:02:11.119> accepted 01:02:11.510 --> 01:02:11.520 align:start position:0% >> grant that was already accept accepted 01:02:11.520 --> 01:02:13.510 align:start position:0% >> grant that was already accept accepted by<01:02:11.680> the<01:02:11.839> state<01:02:12.160> in<01:02:12.480> December<01:02:12.960> I<01:02:13.119> believe<01:02:13.280> or 01:02:13.510 --> 01:02:13.520 align:start position:0% by the state in December I believe or 01:02:13.520 --> 01:02:16.710 align:start position:0% by the state in December I believe or November<01:02:14.000> is<01:02:14.319> massive<01:02:15.359> right<01:02:15.920> but<01:02:16.240> for<01:02:16.480> this 01:02:16.710 --> 01:02:16.720 align:start position:0% November is massive right but for this 01:02:16.720 --> 01:02:18.870 align:start position:0% November is massive right but for this to<01:02:16.880> be<01:02:17.040> narrowly<01:02:17.520> scoped<01:02:17.920> to<01:02:18.160> nutrition<01:02:18.559> and 01:02:18.870 --> 01:02:18.880 align:start position:0% to be narrowly scoped to nutrition and 01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:20.950 align:start position:0% to be narrowly scoped to nutrition and physical<01:02:19.280> education<01:02:19.760> in<01:02:20.000> schools<01:02:20.640> trying<01:02:20.799> to 01:02:20.950 --> 01:02:20.960 align:start position:0% physical education in schools trying to 01:02:20.960 --> 01:02:22.870 align:start position:0% physical education in schools trying to make<01:02:21.040> sure<01:02:21.200> that<01:02:21.359> language<01:02:21.760> is<01:02:21.920> here<01:02:22.240> it<01:02:22.480> it 01:02:22.870 --> 01:02:22.880 align:start position:0% make sure that language is here it it 01:02:22.880 --> 01:02:24.390 align:start position:0% make sure that language is here it it that's<01:02:23.200> what<01:02:23.359> I'm<01:02:23.599> understanding<01:02:24.000> is<01:02:24.240> that 01:02:24.390 --> 01:02:24.400 align:start position:0% that's what I'm understanding is that 01:02:24.400 --> 01:02:25.910 align:start position:0% that's what I'm understanding is that what<01:02:24.799> you 01:02:25.910 --> 01:02:25.920 align:start position:0% what you 01:02:25.920 --> 01:02:27.589 align:start position:0% what you >> staffer<01:02:26.400> may<01:02:26.480> I<01:02:26.640> answer<01:02:26.960> that 01:02:27.589 --> 01:02:27.599 align:start position:0% >> staffer may I answer that 01:02:27.599 --> 01:02:29.190 align:start position:0% >> staffer may I answer that >> yes 01:02:29.190 --> 01:02:29.200 align:start position:0% >> yes 01:02:29.200 --> 01:02:31.190 align:start position:0% >> yes >> uh<01:02:29.440> so<01:02:30.000> there<01:02:30.319> is<01:02:30.559> already<01:02:30.799> a<01:02:31.040> different 01:02:31.190 --> 01:02:31.200 align:start position:0% >> uh so there is already a different 01:02:31.200 --> 01:02:33.190 align:start position:0% >> uh so there is already a different contract<01:02:31.599> for<01:02:31.920> the<01:02:32.160> tellaalth<01:02:32.720> and<01:02:32.960> all<01:02:33.040> of 01:02:33.190 --> 01:02:33.200 align:start position:0% contract for the tellaalth and all of 01:02:33.200 --> 01:02:34.309 align:start position:0% contract for the tellaalth and all of those<01:02:33.359> things<01:02:33.680> there<01:02:33.920> are<01:02:34.079> different 01:02:34.309 --> 01:02:34.319 align:start position:0% those things there are different 01:02:34.319 --> 01:02:36.309 align:start position:0% those things there are different agencies<01:02:34.880> already<01:02:35.200> doing<01:02:35.440> those<01:02:35.760> for<01:02:35.839> example 01:02:36.309 --> 01:02:36.319 align:start position:0% agencies already doing those for example 01:02:36.319 --> 01:02:37.990 align:start position:0% agencies already doing those for example University<01:02:36.640> of<01:02:36.799> Utah<01:02:37.200> Huntsman<01:02:37.599> cancer 01:02:37.990 --> 01:02:38.000 align:start position:0% University of Utah Huntsman cancer 01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:40.710 align:start position:0% University of Utah Huntsman cancer institute<01:02:38.640> they<01:02:38.960> have<01:02:39.920> a<01:02:40.240> whole<01:02:40.480> different 01:02:40.710 --> 01:02:40.720 align:start position:0% institute they have a whole different 01:02:40.720 --> 01:02:42.230 align:start position:0% institute they have a whole different piece<01:02:40.799> piece<01:02:41.040> of<01:02:41.200> that<01:02:41.440> funding<01:02:41.760> that<01:02:42.000> they're 01:02:42.230 --> 01:02:42.240 align:start position:0% piece piece of that funding that they're 01:02:42.240 --> 01:02:43.990 align:start position:0% piece piece of that funding that they're doing.<01:02:42.640> Department<01:02:43.040> of<01:02:43.200> Transportation<01:02:43.839> has 01:02:43.990 --> 01:02:44.000 align:start position:0% doing. Department of Transportation has 01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:45.670 align:start position:0% doing. Department of Transportation has a<01:02:44.160> different<01:02:44.319> piece<01:02:44.559> that<01:02:44.720> they're<01:02:45.040> doing. 01:02:45.670 --> 01:02:45.680 align:start position:0% a different piece that they're doing. 01:02:45.680 --> 01:02:49.510 align:start position:0% a different piece that they're doing. Um,<01:02:46.319> so<01:02:46.559> this<01:02:46.960> $3<01:02:47.200> million<01:02:48.079> is<01:02:48.480> only<01:02:48.880> for<01:02:49.280> gold 01:02:49.510 --> 01:02:49.520 align:start position:0% Um, so this $3 million is only for gold 01:02:49.520 --> 01:02:52.789 align:start position:0% Um, so this $3 million is only for gold medal<01:02:49.839> schools.<01:02:50.319> It<01:02:50.559> is<01:02:51.119> designated,<01:02:52.400> it'll 01:02:52.789 --> 01:02:52.799 align:start position:0% medal schools. It is designated, it'll 01:02:52.799 --> 01:02:55.109 align:start position:0% medal schools. It is designated, it'll only<01:02:53.119> do<01:02:53.359> gold<01:02:53.520> medal<01:02:53.839> schools.<01:02:54.480> And<01:02:54.640> this<01:02:54.880> 3 01:02:55.109 --> 01:02:55.119 align:start position:0% only do gold medal schools. And this 3 01:02:55.119 --> 01:02:59.430 align:start position:0% only do gold medal schools. And this 3 million<01:02:55.520> and<01:02:55.760> it<01:02:55.920> is<01:02:56.559> right<01:02:56.880> now<01:02:57.200> annual.<01:02:58.079> Um, 01:02:59.430 --> 01:02:59.440 align:start position:0% million and it is right now annual. Um, 01:02:59.440 --> 01:03:02.309 align:start position:0% million and it is right now annual. Um, but<01:02:59.839> as<01:03:00.079> I<01:03:00.240> had<01:03:00.400> mentioned,<01:03:01.520> we<01:03:01.760> are<01:03:01.920> set<01:03:02.160> to 01:03:02.309 --> 01:03:02.319 align:start position:0% but as I had mentioned, we are set to 01:03:02.319 --> 01:03:06.069 align:start position:0% but as I had mentioned, we are set to get<01:03:02.559> 3<01:03:02.720> million<01:03:02.960> per<01:03:03.280> year<01:03:03.440> for<01:03:03.680> 5<01:03:03.920> years.<01:03:05.119> If 01:03:06.069 --> 01:03:06.079 align:start position:0% get 3 million per year for 5 years. If 01:03:06.079 --> 01:03:08.710 align:start position:0% get 3 million per year for 5 years. If our<01:03:07.119> part<01:03:07.359> of<01:03:07.520> it<01:03:07.680> does<01:03:07.920> really<01:03:08.160> well,<01:03:08.480> it 01:03:08.710 --> 01:03:08.720 align:start position:0% our part of it does really well, it 01:03:08.720 --> 01:03:11.670 align:start position:0% our part of it does really well, it could<01:03:08.880> go<01:03:09.040> up.<01:03:09.599> If<01:03:10.319> um<01:03:10.480> our<01:03:10.799> schools<01:03:11.119> are<01:03:11.280> not 01:03:11.670 --> 01:03:11.680 align:start position:0% could go up. If um our schools are not 01:03:11.680 --> 01:03:14.390 align:start position:0% could go up. If um our schools are not utilizing<01:03:12.079> it,<01:03:12.319> it<01:03:12.480> could<01:03:12.640> go<01:03:12.799> down.<01:03:13.520> So<01:03:14.160> um 01:03:14.390 --> 01:03:14.400 align:start position:0% utilizing it, it could go down. So um 01:03:14.400 --> 01:03:17.190 align:start position:0% utilizing it, it could go down. So um there<01:03:14.640> is<01:03:15.440> it's<01:03:15.760> not<01:03:15.920> a<01:03:16.079> guaranteed<01:03:16.720> 3<01:03:16.880> million 01:03:17.190 --> 01:03:17.200 align:start position:0% there is it's not a guaranteed 3 million 01:03:17.200 --> 01:03:20.150 align:start position:0% there is it's not a guaranteed 3 million because<01:03:17.440> the<01:03:17.680> money<01:03:18.000> comes<01:03:18.400> each<01:03:18.799> year<01:03:19.200> from 01:03:20.150 --> 01:03:20.160 align:start position:0% because the money comes each year from 01:03:20.160 --> 01:03:23.349 align:start position:0% because the money comes each year from the<01:03:20.480> federal<01:03:20.880> government,<01:03:21.280> the<01:03:21.440> CMS<01:03:22.559> group. 01:03:23.349 --> 01:03:23.359 align:start position:0% the federal government, the CMS group. 01:03:23.359 --> 01:03:26.870 align:start position:0% the federal government, the CMS group. Um<01:03:23.839> they<01:03:24.799> reallocate<01:03:25.440> those<01:03:25.680> funds<01:03:26.079> annually 01:03:26.870 --> 01:03:26.880 align:start position:0% Um they reallocate those funds annually 01:03:26.880 --> 01:03:31.510 align:start position:0% Um they reallocate those funds annually and<01:03:27.119> the<01:03:27.359> amount<01:03:27.839> can<01:03:28.319> fluctuate.<01:03:29.520> Um<01:03:30.960> but<01:03:31.280> we 01:03:31.510 --> 01:03:31.520 align:start position:0% and the amount can fluctuate. Um but we 01:03:31.520 --> 01:03:33.990 align:start position:0% and the amount can fluctuate. Um but we do<01:03:31.760> anticipate<01:03:32.240> the<01:03:32.480> 3<01:03:32.720> million<01:03:33.440> being<01:03:33.680> an 01:03:33.990 --> 01:03:34.000 align:start position:0% do anticipate the 3 million being an 01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:36.710 align:start position:0% do anticipate the 3 million being an ongoing<01:03:34.480> for<01:03:34.720> the<01:03:34.960> 5<01:03:35.200> years 01:03:36.710 --> 01:03:36.720 align:start position:0% ongoing for the 5 years 01:03:36.720 --> 01:03:40.470 align:start position:0% ongoing for the 5 years and<01:03:37.920> um<01:03:38.160> it<01:03:38.559> is<01:03:39.280> earmarked.<01:03:39.920> It<01:03:40.079> is 01:03:40.470 --> 01:03:40.480 align:start position:0% and um it is earmarked. It is 01:03:40.480 --> 01:03:42.710 align:start position:0% and um it is earmarked. It is specifically<01:03:41.039> that<01:03:41.440> 3<01:03:41.599> million<01:03:41.920> is 01:03:42.710 --> 01:03:42.720 align:start position:0% specifically that 3 million is 01:03:42.720 --> 01:03:44.390 align:start position:0% specifically that 3 million is specifically<01:03:43.359> for<01:03:43.599> gold<01:03:43.760> medal<01:03:44.079> schools<01:03:44.240> and 01:03:44.390 --> 01:03:44.400 align:start position:0% specifically for gold medal schools and 01:03:44.400 --> 01:03:47.349 align:start position:0% specifically for gold medal schools and nothing<01:03:44.559> but<01:03:44.720> gold<01:03:44.960> medal<01:03:45.200> schools. 01:03:47.349 --> 01:03:47.359 align:start position:0% nothing but gold medal schools. 01:03:47.359 --> 01:03:50.789 align:start position:0% nothing but gold medal schools. >> Okay,<01:03:48.079> thank<01:03:48.240> you<01:03:48.480> so<01:03:48.720> much.<01:03:49.520> Um<01:03:49.920> and<01:03:50.240> my<01:03:50.559> next 01:03:50.789 --> 01:03:50.799 align:start position:0% >> Okay, thank you so much. Um and my next 01:03:50.799 --> 01:03:53.750 align:start position:0% >> Okay, thank you so much. Um and my next question<01:03:51.119> if<01:03:51.280> if<01:03:51.599> I<01:03:51.839> may<01:03:52.160> ask<01:03:53.280> ahead. 01:03:53.750 --> 01:03:53.760 align:start position:0% question if if I may ask ahead. 01:03:53.760 --> 01:03:54.470 align:start position:0% question if if I may ask ahead. >> Yeah. 01:03:54.470 --> 01:03:54.480 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:03:54.480 --> 01:03:58.390 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Um<01:03:54.799> is<01:03:55.039> line<01:03:55.760> 74.<01:03:57.200> So<01:03:57.440> it<01:03:57.599> it<01:03:57.920> says<01:03:58.079> are 01:03:58.390 --> 01:03:58.400 align:start position:0% >> Um is line 74. So it it says are 01:03:58.400 --> 01:04:00.789 align:start position:0% >> Um is line 74. So it it says are measurable<01:03:58.960> and<01:03:59.280> evidence-based.<01:04:00.319> And<01:04:00.559> so 01:04:00.789 --> 01:04:00.799 align:start position:0% measurable and evidence-based. And so 01:04:00.799 --> 01:04:03.190 align:start position:0% measurable and evidence-based. And so I'm<01:04:01.119> wondering<01:04:01.920> does<01:04:02.240> this<01:04:02.720> how<01:04:02.880> do<01:04:03.039> we 01:04:03.190 --> 01:04:03.200 align:start position:0% I'm wondering does this how do we 01:04:03.200 --> 01:04:05.109 align:start position:0% I'm wondering does this how do we measure<01:04:03.520> this?<01:04:03.920> Is<01:04:04.079> there<01:04:04.480> does<01:04:04.720> this<01:04:04.880> fall 01:04:05.109 --> 01:04:05.119 align:start position:0% measure this? Is there does this fall 01:04:05.119 --> 01:04:09.190 align:start position:0% measure this? Is there does this fall under<01:04:05.359> like<01:04:05.760> PE?<01:04:06.799> Does<01:04:07.039> this<01:04:07.200> fall<01:04:07.520> under 01:04:09.190 --> 01:04:09.200 align:start position:0% under like PE? Does this fall under 01:04:09.200 --> 01:04:11.349 align:start position:0% under like PE? Does this fall under um<01:04:09.599> home<01:04:09.920> economics?<01:04:10.480> Like<01:04:10.720> where<01:04:10.880> would<01:04:11.119> this 01:04:11.349 --> 01:04:11.359 align:start position:0% um home economics? Like where would this 01:04:11.359 --> 01:04:13.750 align:start position:0% um home economics? Like where would this one<01:04:11.599> fall<01:04:11.920> underneath? 01:04:13.750 --> 01:04:13.760 align:start position:0% one fall underneath? 01:04:13.760 --> 01:04:14.630 align:start position:0% one fall underneath? >> May<01:04:14.079> I? 01:04:14.630 --> 01:04:14.640 align:start position:0% >> May I? 01:04:14.640 --> 01:04:15.990 align:start position:0% >> May I? >> Yes.<01:04:15.280> Go<01:04:15.440> ahead. 01:04:15.990 --> 01:04:16.000 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Go ahead. 01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:20.710 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Go ahead. >> Yeah.<01:04:16.559> So<01:04:17.200> um<01:04:18.079> measurable<01:04:18.880> could<01:04:19.119> be<01:04:20.000> um<01:04:20.400> again 01:04:20.710 --> 01:04:20.720 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So um measurable could be um again 01:04:20.720 --> 01:04:22.069 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So um measurable could be um again we<01:04:20.880> could<01:04:21.039> use<01:04:21.119> the<01:04:21.359> presidential<01:04:21.760> fitness 01:04:22.069 --> 01:04:22.079 align:start position:0% we could use the presidential fitness 01:04:22.079 --> 01:04:24.870 align:start position:0% we could use the presidential fitness test<01:04:22.319> that<01:04:22.480> is<01:04:22.640> measurable.<01:04:23.440> We<01:04:23.760> can<01:04:23.920> use<01:04:24.559> um 01:04:24.870 --> 01:04:24.880 align:start position:0% test that is measurable. We can use um 01:04:24.880 --> 01:04:28.470 align:start position:0% test that is measurable. We can use um recess.<01:04:25.520> We<01:04:25.760> have<01:04:26.480> um<01:04:26.880> board<01:04:27.440> chair<01:04:27.760> Earlu<01:04:28.319> and 01:04:28.470 --> 01:04:28.480 align:start position:0% recess. We have um board chair Earlu and 01:04:28.480 --> 01:04:29.910 align:start position:0% recess. We have um board chair Earlu and I<01:04:28.640> have<01:04:28.799> worked<01:04:28.960> really<01:04:29.200> hard<01:04:29.280> on<01:04:29.440> a<01:04:29.599> recess 01:04:29.910 --> 01:04:29.920 align:start position:0% I have worked really hard on a recess 01:04:29.920 --> 01:04:31.670 align:start position:0% I have worked really hard on a recess guide<01:04:30.160> and<01:04:30.240> it<01:04:30.400> has<01:04:30.480> a<01:04:30.640> lot<01:04:30.720> of<01:04:30.799> evidence-based 01:04:31.670 --> 01:04:31.680 align:start position:0% guide and it has a lot of evidence-based 01:04:31.680 --> 01:04:33.109 align:start position:0% guide and it has a lot of evidence-based things<01:04:32.000> in<01:04:32.160> there<01:04:32.319> and<01:04:32.559> also<01:04:32.720> a<01:04:32.960> lot<01:04:33.039> of 01:04:33.109 --> 01:04:33.119 align:start position:0% things in there and also a lot of 01:04:33.119 --> 01:04:34.950 align:start position:0% things in there and also a lot of measurable<01:04:33.920> items<01:04:34.240> in<01:04:34.400> there<01:04:34.559> that<01:04:34.799> is 01:04:34.950 --> 01:04:34.960 align:start position:0% measurable items in there that is 01:04:34.960 --> 01:04:36.549 align:start position:0% measurable items in there that is already<01:04:35.280> that's<01:04:35.599> been<01:04:35.760> published<01:04:36.079> on<01:04:36.319> our 01:04:36.549 --> 01:04:36.559 align:start position:0% already that's been published on our 01:04:36.559 --> 01:04:40.470 align:start position:0% already that's been published on our website<01:04:37.440> um<01:04:37.599> since<01:04:38.319> January<01:04:38.799> of<01:04:39.039> 2020<01:04:39.520> when<01:04:39.839> we 01:04:40.470 --> 01:04:40.480 align:start position:0% website um since January of 2020 when we 01:04:40.480 --> 01:04:43.109 align:start position:0% website um since January of 2020 when we when<01:04:40.799> we<01:04:41.440> um<01:04:41.839> finalized<01:04:42.319> that<01:04:42.480> and<01:04:42.720> presented 01:04:43.109 --> 01:04:43.119 align:start position:0% when we um finalized that and presented 01:04:43.119 --> 01:04:45.750 align:start position:0% when we um finalized that and presented it<01:04:43.280> to<01:04:43.680> the<01:04:43.920> board<01:04:44.799> um<01:04:44.960> in<01:04:45.119> a<01:04:45.280> full<01:04:45.520> board 01:04:45.750 --> 01:04:45.760 align:start position:0% it to the board um in a full board 01:04:45.760 --> 01:04:48.549 align:start position:0% it to the board um in a full board meeting.<01:04:46.480> Um<01:04:46.880> so<01:04:47.119> we<01:04:47.359> have<01:04:47.520> a<01:04:47.760> recess<01:04:48.160> guidance 01:04:48.549 --> 01:04:48.559 align:start position:0% meeting. Um so we have a recess guidance 01:04:48.559 --> 01:04:51.670 align:start position:0% meeting. Um so we have a recess guidance bringing<01:04:48.880> that<01:04:49.039> back.<01:04:49.680> Um<01:04:50.079> we<01:04:50.400> also<01:04:50.720> have<01:04:51.039> new 01:04:51.670 --> 01:04:51.680 align:start position:0% bringing that back. Um we also have new 01:04:51.680 --> 01:04:53.829 align:start position:0% bringing that back. Um we also have new um<01:04:51.920> health<01:04:52.240> education<01:04:52.880> core<01:04:53.200> standards<01:04:53.599> which 01:04:53.829 --> 01:04:53.839 align:start position:0% um health education core standards which 01:04:53.839 --> 01:04:55.990 align:start position:0% um health education core standards which were<01:04:54.079> are<01:04:54.319> also<01:04:54.559> approved.<01:04:55.119> They<01:04:55.359> are<01:04:55.680> we<01:04:55.920> have 01:04:55.990 --> 01:04:56.000 align:start position:0% were are also approved. They are we have 01:04:56.000 --> 01:04:57.190 align:start position:0% were are also approved. They are we have those<01:04:56.160> in<01:04:56.319> kindergarten<01:04:56.799> through<01:04:57.039> sixth 01:04:57.190 --> 01:04:57.200 align:start position:0% those in kindergarten through sixth 01:04:57.200 --> 01:04:58.630 align:start position:0% those in kindergarten through sixth grade.<01:04:57.440> So<01:04:57.599> we<01:04:57.760> can<01:04:57.839> use<01:04:58.000> those<01:04:58.160> nutrition 01:04:58.630 --> 01:04:58.640 align:start position:0% grade. So we can use those nutrition 01:04:58.640 --> 01:05:00.549 align:start position:0% grade. So we can use those nutrition standards<01:04:59.200> and<01:04:59.440> there's<01:04:59.760> evidence-based 01:05:00.549 --> 01:05:00.559 align:start position:0% standards and there's evidence-based 01:05:00.559 --> 01:05:02.470 align:start position:0% standards and there's evidence-based instructional<01:05:01.119> materials<01:05:01.760> that<01:05:02.000> can<01:05:02.160> be<01:05:02.319> used 01:05:02.470 --> 01:05:02.480 align:start position:0% instructional materials that can be used 01:05:02.480 --> 01:05:06.470 align:start position:0% instructional materials that can be used to<01:05:02.640> teach<01:05:02.960> nutrition<01:05:03.839> in<01:05:04.079> that<01:05:04.319> way.<01:05:04.640> Um<01:05:05.359> the 01:05:06.470 --> 01:05:06.480 align:start position:0% to teach nutrition in that way. Um the 01:05:06.480 --> 01:05:09.670 align:start position:0% to teach nutrition in that way. Um the the<01:05:07.920> evidence-based 01:05:09.670 --> 01:05:09.680 align:start position:0% the evidence-based 01:05:09.680 --> 01:05:11.270 align:start position:0% the evidence-based uh<01:05:09.839> if<01:05:10.079> they<01:05:10.240> go<01:05:10.480> curriculum.<01:05:10.960> So<01:05:11.119> we're 01:05:11.270 --> 01:05:11.280 align:start position:0% uh if they go curriculum. So we're 01:05:11.280 --> 01:05:12.950 align:start position:0% uh if they go curriculum. So we're looking<01:05:11.440> at<01:05:11.599> physical<01:05:12.000> education<01:05:12.480> standards 01:05:12.950 --> 01:05:12.960 align:start position:0% looking at physical education standards 01:05:12.960 --> 01:05:16.309 align:start position:0% looking at physical education standards or<01:05:13.440> health<01:05:13.760> education<01:05:14.240> standards.<01:05:15.599> either<01:05:16.079> of 01:05:16.309 --> 01:05:16.319 align:start position:0% or health education standards. either of 01:05:16.319 --> 01:05:19.349 align:start position:0% or health education standards. either of those<01:05:16.880> would<01:05:17.839> um<01:05:18.319> a<01:05:18.559> school<01:05:18.799> would<01:05:19.039> choose 01:05:19.349 --> 01:05:19.359 align:start position:0% those would um a school would choose 01:05:19.359 --> 01:05:21.270 align:start position:0% those would um a school would choose their<01:05:19.680> curriculum,<01:05:20.400> but<01:05:20.640> we<01:05:20.799> would<01:05:20.960> want<01:05:21.119> it 01:05:21.270 --> 01:05:21.280 align:start position:0% their curriculum, but we would want it 01:05:21.280 --> 01:05:22.870 align:start position:0% their curriculum, but we would want it to<01:05:21.359> be<01:05:21.440> an<01:05:21.680> evidence-based<01:05:22.319> curriculum, 01:05:22.870 --> 01:05:22.880 align:start position:0% to be an evidence-based curriculum, 01:05:22.880 --> 01:05:26.069 align:start position:0% to be an evidence-based curriculum, which<01:05:23.119> we<01:05:23.440> have<01:05:23.760> on<01:05:24.640> rims<01:05:25.200> now,<01:05:25.520> and<01:05:25.760> we<01:05:25.920> show 01:05:26.069 --> 01:05:26.079 align:start position:0% which we have on rims now, and we show 01:05:26.079 --> 01:05:29.349 align:start position:0% which we have on rims now, and we show when<01:05:26.319> they're<01:05:26.480> evidence-based.<01:05:27.680> Um<01:05:28.960> and<01:05:29.200> we 01:05:29.349 --> 01:05:29.359 align:start position:0% when they're evidence-based. Um and we 01:05:29.359 --> 01:05:31.029 align:start position:0% when they're evidence-based. Um and we have<01:05:29.520> several<01:05:29.920> choices<01:05:30.480> already<01:05:30.799> in 01:05:31.029 --> 01:05:31.039 align:start position:0% have several choices already in 01:05:31.039 --> 01:05:34.150 align:start position:0% have several choices already in elementary<01:05:31.599> for<01:05:31.839> both<01:05:32.079> PE<01:05:32.799> and<01:05:33.839> health 01:05:34.150 --> 01:05:34.160 align:start position:0% elementary for both PE and health 01:05:34.160 --> 01:05:36.390 align:start position:0% elementary for both PE and health education.<01:05:34.880> Uh<01:05:35.200> both<01:05:35.359> of<01:05:35.520> them<01:05:35.760> have<01:05:36.079> several 01:05:36.390 --> 01:05:36.400 align:start position:0% education. Uh both of them have several 01:05:36.400 --> 01:05:41.109 align:start position:0% education. Uh both of them have several choices<01:05:37.119> and<01:05:38.000> um<01:05:38.720> the<01:05:40.000> vendors,<01:05:40.480> the<01:05:40.799> the 01:05:41.109 --> 01:05:41.119 align:start position:0% choices and um the vendors, the the 01:05:41.119 --> 01:05:42.710 align:start position:0% choices and um the vendors, the the curriculum<01:05:41.520> chosen,<01:05:42.000> it<01:05:42.240> tells<01:05:42.400> you<01:05:42.480> when 01:05:42.710 --> 01:05:42.720 align:start position:0% curriculum chosen, it tells you when 01:05:42.720 --> 01:05:44.549 align:start position:0% curriculum chosen, it tells you when it's<01:05:42.880> evidence-based.<01:05:43.839> And<01:05:44.079> so<01:05:44.240> we<01:05:44.400> could 01:05:44.549 --> 01:05:44.559 align:start position:0% it's evidence-based. And so we could 01:05:44.559 --> 01:05:47.829 align:start position:0% it's evidence-based. And so we could choose<01:05:44.799> that.<01:05:45.359> Um<01:05:45.839> there<01:05:46.240> is<01:05:46.799> a<01:05:47.039> plethora<01:05:47.599> of 01:05:47.829 --> 01:05:47.839 align:start position:0% choose that. Um there is a plethora of 01:05:47.839 --> 01:05:50.470 align:start position:0% choose that. Um there is a plethora of evidence-based<01:05:48.640> recess<01:05:49.119> practices.<01:05:49.920> There 01:05:50.470 --> 01:05:50.480 align:start position:0% evidence-based recess practices. There 01:05:50.480 --> 01:05:53.510 align:start position:0% evidence-based recess practices. There are<01:05:51.039> the<01:05:51.280> fitness<01:05:51.599> test<01:05:51.839> would<01:05:52.079> be<01:05:52.640> um<01:05:53.280> there 01:05:53.510 --> 01:05:53.520 align:start position:0% are the fitness test would be um there 01:05:53.520 --> 01:05:55.109 align:start position:0% are the fitness test would be um there are<01:05:53.760> evidence-based<01:05:54.400> ways<01:05:54.559> to<01:05:54.799> implement 01:05:55.109 --> 01:05:55.119 align:start position:0% are evidence-based ways to implement 01:05:55.119 --> 01:05:57.829 align:start position:0% are evidence-based ways to implement that.<01:05:55.839> A<01:05:56.079> fitness<01:05:56.400> gram<01:05:56.720> is<01:05:57.039> an<01:05:57.280> example<01:05:57.599> of 01:05:57.829 --> 01:05:57.839 align:start position:0% that. A fitness gram is an example of 01:05:57.839 --> 01:06:01.349 align:start position:0% that. A fitness gram is an example of that.<01:05:58.400> Um<01:05:59.520> so<01:05:59.839> there's 01:06:01.349 --> 01:06:01.359 align:start position:0% that. Um so there's 01:06:01.359 --> 01:06:03.510 align:start position:0% that. Um so there's there<01:06:01.760> are 01:06:03.510 --> 01:06:03.520 align:start position:0% there are 01:06:03.520 --> 01:06:05.990 align:start position:0% there are uh 01:06:05.990 --> 01:06:06.000 align:start position:0% uh 01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:09.190 align:start position:0% uh dozens<01:06:06.400> and<01:06:06.640> dozens<01:06:07.039> of<01:06:07.280> ways<01:06:07.839> that<01:06:08.400> would<01:06:08.640> be 01:06:09.190 --> 01:06:09.200 align:start position:0% dozens and dozens of ways that would be 01:06:09.200 --> 01:06:11.670 align:start position:0% dozens and dozens of ways that would be qualified<01:06:09.680> as<01:06:09.920> evidence-based<01:06:10.880> to<01:06:11.200> measure 01:06:11.670 --> 01:06:11.680 align:start position:0% qualified as evidence-based to measure 01:06:11.680 --> 01:06:13.349 align:start position:0% qualified as evidence-based to measure nutrition<01:06:12.160> and<01:06:12.400> physical<01:06:12.799> activity.<01:06:13.200> and 01:06:13.349 --> 01:06:13.359 align:start position:0% nutrition and physical activity. and 01:06:13.359 --> 01:06:15.910 align:start position:0% nutrition and physical activity. and then<01:06:13.440> the<01:06:13.599> fitness<01:06:13.920> test.<01:06:14.400> So<01:06:15.119> those<01:06:15.599> those 01:06:15.910 --> 01:06:15.920 align:start position:0% then the fitness test. So those those 01:06:15.920 --> 01:06:17.190 align:start position:0% then the fitness test. So those those are<01:06:16.000> what<01:06:16.160> I<01:06:16.240> see<01:06:16.400> as<01:06:16.559> being<01:06:16.799> your<01:06:16.960> three 01:06:17.190 --> 01:06:17.200 align:start position:0% are what I see as being your three 01:06:17.200 --> 01:06:21.430 align:start position:0% are what I see as being your three measurable<01:06:17.680> points.<01:06:18.400> Um<01:06:18.960> but<01:06:20.079> this<01:06:20.559> is<01:06:21.119> a 01:06:21.430 --> 01:06:21.440 align:start position:0% measurable points. Um but this is a 01:06:21.440 --> 01:06:23.910 align:start position:0% measurable points. Um but this is a requirement<01:06:22.319> of<01:06:22.640> the<01:06:23.039> funding<01:06:23.440> is<01:06:23.599> that<01:06:23.760> we 01:06:23.910 --> 01:06:23.920 align:start position:0% requirement of the funding is that we 01:06:23.920 --> 01:06:26.630 align:start position:0% requirement of the funding is that we have<01:06:24.079> measurable<01:06:24.400> and<01:06:24.640> evidence-based<01:06:25.599> goals 01:06:26.630 --> 01:06:26.640 align:start position:0% have measurable and evidence-based goals 01:06:26.640 --> 01:06:28.950 align:start position:0% have measurable and evidence-based goals for<01:06:26.960> the<01:06:27.280> schools<01:06:28.079> when<01:06:28.400> they<01:06:28.559> are<01:06:28.720> getting 01:06:28.950 --> 01:06:28.960 align:start position:0% for the schools when they are getting 01:06:28.960 --> 01:06:31.510 align:start position:0% for the schools when they are getting that<01:06:29.200> gold<01:06:29.520> medal<01:06:30.240> gold<01:06:30.559> medal<01:06:30.880> designation. 01:06:31.510 --> 01:06:31.520 align:start position:0% that gold medal gold medal designation. 01:06:31.520 --> 01:06:33.190 align:start position:0% that gold medal gold medal designation. So<01:06:31.680> when<01:06:31.839> they<01:06:32.000> are<01:06:32.319> working<01:06:32.559> for<01:06:32.799> that<01:06:32.960> gold 01:06:33.190 --> 01:06:33.200 align:start position:0% So when they are working for that gold 01:06:33.200 --> 01:06:35.510 align:start position:0% So when they are working for that gold medal<01:06:34.079> and<01:06:34.319> the<01:06:34.559> students<01:06:34.880> are<01:06:35.039> being<01:06:35.200> able<01:06:35.359> to 01:06:35.510 --> 01:06:35.520 align:start position:0% medal and the students are being able to 01:06:35.520 --> 01:06:36.870 align:start position:0% medal and the students are being able to do<01:06:35.680> those<01:06:35.839> things,<01:06:36.079> we're<01:06:36.319> doing<01:06:36.480> it<01:06:36.559> in<01:06:36.720> a<01:06:36.799> way 01:06:36.870 --> 01:06:36.880 align:start position:0% do those things, we're doing it in a way 01:06:36.880 --> 01:06:39.589 align:start position:0% do those things, we're doing it in a way that<01:06:37.039> is<01:06:37.280> evidence-based<01:06:37.839> and<01:06:38.000> measurable. 01:06:39.589 --> 01:06:39.599 align:start position:0% that is evidence-based and measurable. 01:06:39.599 --> 01:06:42.069 align:start position:0% that is evidence-based and measurable. >> Thank<01:06:39.839> you.<01:06:40.240> And<01:06:40.400> and<01:06:40.799> as<01:06:41.039> I<01:06:41.280> read<01:06:41.680> further 01:06:42.069 --> 01:06:42.079 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. And and as I read further 01:06:42.079 --> 01:06:46.950 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. And and as I read further down<01:06:42.400> in<01:06:42.640> in<01:06:42.960> the<01:06:43.119> rule<01:06:43.440> here,<01:06:44.640> um<01:06:45.119> line<01:06:45.440> 80, 01:06:46.950 --> 01:06:46.960 align:start position:0% down in in the rule here, um line 80, 01:06:46.960 --> 01:06:49.430 align:start position:0% down in in the rule here, um line 80, it<01:06:47.200> does<01:06:47.680> state<01:06:48.400> documented<01:06:49.039> program 01:06:49.430 --> 01:06:49.440 align:start position:0% it does state documented program 01:06:49.440 --> 01:06:51.910 align:start position:0% it does state documented program implementation,<01:06:50.720> student<01:06:51.119> participation 01:06:51.910 --> 01:06:51.920 align:start position:0% implementation, student participation 01:06:51.920 --> 01:06:54.470 align:start position:0% implementation, student participation data,<01:06:52.720> participation<01:06:53.440> in<01:06:53.760> a<01:06:54.000> fitness 01:06:54.470 --> 01:06:54.480 align:start position:0% data, participation in a fitness 01:06:54.480 --> 01:06:56.630 align:start position:0% data, participation in a fitness assessment,<01:06:55.119> and<01:06:55.359> other<01:06:55.680> evidence<01:06:56.240> required 01:06:56.630 --> 01:06:56.640 align:start position:0% assessment, and other evidence required 01:06:56.640 --> 01:06:58.230 align:start position:0% assessment, and other evidence required by<01:06:56.799> the<01:06:56.960> rural<01:06:57.280> health<01:06:57.599> transformation 01:06:58.230 --> 01:06:58.240 align:start position:0% by the rural health transformation 01:06:58.240 --> 01:07:00.230 align:start position:0% by the rural health transformation program.<01:06:58.880> And<01:06:59.039> I<01:06:59.200> guess<01:06:59.359> the<01:06:59.599> other<01:06:59.839> evidence 01:07:00.230 --> 01:07:00.240 align:start position:0% program. And I guess the other evidence 01:07:00.240 --> 01:07:01.750 align:start position:0% program. And I guess the other evidence is 01:07:01.750 --> 01:07:01.760 align:start position:0% is 01:07:01.760 --> 01:07:04.230 align:start position:0% is is<01:07:02.400> um<01:07:02.559> again,<01:07:02.799> I'm<01:07:03.039> just<01:07:03.200> intrigued<01:07:03.599> by<01:07:04.000> what 01:07:04.230 --> 01:07:04.240 align:start position:0% is um again, I'm just intrigued by what 01:07:04.240 --> 01:07:06.549 align:start position:0% is um again, I'm just intrigued by what that<01:07:04.480> other<01:07:04.799> evidence<01:07:05.200> is<01:07:05.440> and<01:07:05.680> how<01:07:06.000> how<01:07:06.319> that 01:07:06.549 --> 01:07:06.559 align:start position:0% that other evidence is and how how that 01:07:06.559 --> 01:07:09.270 align:start position:0% that other evidence is and how how that is<01:07:06.880> reported.<01:07:07.520> And<01:07:07.680> at<01:07:07.920> this<01:07:08.079> point,<01:07:08.400> are<01:07:08.640> you 01:07:09.270 --> 01:07:09.280 align:start position:0% is reported. And at this point, are you 01:07:09.280 --> 01:07:10.950 align:start position:0% is reported. And at this point, are you that<01:07:09.520> still<01:07:09.680> getting<01:07:09.920> developed<01:07:10.400> or<01:07:10.640> do<01:07:10.799> you 01:07:10.950 --> 01:07:10.960 align:start position:0% that still getting developed or do you 01:07:10.960 --> 01:07:12.870 align:start position:0% that still getting developed or do you know? 01:07:12.870 --> 01:07:12.880 align:start position:0% know? 01:07:12.880 --> 01:07:16.069 align:start position:0% know? So<01:07:13.119> most<01:07:13.359> of<01:07:13.520> that<01:07:14.160> um<01:07:14.799> there<01:07:15.280> was<01:07:15.440> also<01:07:15.680> a<01:07:15.839> line 01:07:16.069 --> 01:07:16.079 align:start position:0% So most of that um there was also a line 01:07:16.079 --> 01:07:19.029 align:start position:0% So most of that um there was also a line in<01:07:16.319> the<01:07:16.480> bill<01:07:16.640> that<01:07:16.799> that<01:07:17.200> meant<01:07:17.839> that<01:07:18.640> led<01:07:18.880> to 01:07:19.029 --> 01:07:19.039 align:start position:0% in the bill that that meant that led to 01:07:19.039 --> 01:07:22.390 align:start position:0% in the bill that that meant that led to this<01:07:19.359> but<01:07:20.240> from<01:07:20.640> what<01:07:20.880> I<01:07:21.039> understand<01:07:21.680> in<01:07:22.079> our 01:07:22.390 --> 01:07:22.400 align:start position:0% this but from what I understand in our 01:07:22.400 --> 01:07:23.829 align:start position:0% this but from what I understand in our weekly<01:07:22.799> meetings<01:07:23.200> with<01:07:23.440> department<01:07:23.680> of 01:07:23.829 --> 01:07:23.839 align:start position:0% weekly meetings with department of 01:07:23.839 --> 01:07:26.950 align:start position:0% weekly meetings with department of health<01:07:24.000> and<01:07:24.160> human<01:07:24.400> services,<01:07:25.520> CMS<01:07:26.480> may 01:07:26.950 --> 01:07:26.960 align:start position:0% health and human services, CMS may 01:07:26.960 --> 01:07:30.630 align:start position:0% health and human services, CMS may require<01:07:27.599> evidence<01:07:28.960> um<01:07:29.680> for<01:07:29.920> the<01:07:30.079> rural<01:07:30.400> health 01:07:30.630 --> 01:07:30.640 align:start position:0% require evidence um for the rural health 01:07:30.640 --> 01:07:33.670 align:start position:0% require evidence um for the rural health transformation<01:07:31.520> program<01:07:32.319> and<01:07:33.119> um<01:07:33.359> working 01:07:33.670 --> 01:07:33.680 align:start position:0% transformation program and um working 01:07:33.680 --> 01:07:38.230 align:start position:0% transformation program and um working with<01:07:33.920> other<01:07:34.160> federal<01:07:34.480> grants<01:07:35.599> um<01:07:35.920> through<01:07:37.359> USB 01:07:38.230 --> 01:07:38.240 align:start position:0% with other federal grants um through USB 01:07:38.240 --> 01:07:42.230 align:start position:0% with other federal grants um through USB now<01:07:38.559> for<01:07:38.799> several<01:07:39.200> years.<01:07:40.400> Sometimes<01:07:41.359> you<01:07:41.680> are 01:07:42.230 --> 01:07:42.240 align:start position:0% now for several years. Sometimes you are 01:07:42.240 --> 01:07:46.230 align:start position:0% now for several years. Sometimes you are asked<01:07:42.640> to<01:07:42.960> provide<01:07:44.160> a<01:07:44.319> a<01:07:44.640> data<01:07:44.960> point<01:07:45.520> and<01:07:46.000> so 01:07:46.230 --> 01:07:46.240 align:start position:0% asked to provide a a data point and so 01:07:46.240 --> 01:07:47.910 align:start position:0% asked to provide a a data point and so you<01:07:46.400> have<01:07:46.559> to<01:07:46.640> give<01:07:46.799> that<01:07:47.200> evidence<01:07:47.520> of<01:07:47.760> that 01:07:47.910 --> 01:07:47.920 align:start position:0% you have to give that evidence of that 01:07:47.920 --> 01:07:51.829 align:start position:0% you have to give that evidence of that data<01:07:48.240> point.<01:07:49.280> Um<01:07:50.000> and<01:07:50.240> it<01:07:50.480> could<01:07:50.720> be<01:07:51.200> the<01:07:51.520> the 01:07:51.829 --> 01:07:51.839 align:start position:0% data point. Um and it could be the the 01:07:51.839 --> 01:07:53.510 align:start position:0% data point. Um and it could be the the amount<01:07:52.000> of<01:07:52.160> money<01:07:52.480> spent<01:07:52.799> on<01:07:53.039> a<01:07:53.200> certain 01:07:53.510 --> 01:07:53.520 align:start position:0% amount of money spent on a certain 01:07:53.520 --> 01:07:57.510 align:start position:0% amount of money spent on a certain thing.<01:07:53.920> It<01:07:54.160> could<01:07:54.400> be<01:07:55.359> um<01:07:56.559> it<01:07:56.720> it<01:07:57.039> could<01:07:57.119> be<01:07:57.359> how 01:07:57.510 --> 01:07:57.520 align:start position:0% thing. It could be um it it could be how 01:07:57.520 --> 01:07:59.190 align:start position:0% thing. It could be um it it could be how many<01:07:57.839> schools<01:07:58.319> are<01:07:58.559> implementing<01:07:59.039> the 01:07:59.190 --> 01:07:59.200 align:start position:0% many schools are implementing the 01:07:59.200 --> 01:08:01.670 align:start position:0% many schools are implementing the presidential<01:07:59.680> fitness<01:08:00.000> test.<01:08:01.119> And<01:08:01.280> it's 01:08:01.670 --> 01:08:01.680 align:start position:0% presidential fitness test. And it's 01:08:01.680 --> 01:08:05.109 align:start position:0% presidential fitness test. And it's usually<01:08:02.880> in<01:08:03.119> my<01:08:03.359> experience<01:08:04.319> um<01:08:04.480> I've<01:08:04.720> been 01:08:05.109 --> 01:08:05.119 align:start position:0% usually in my experience um I've been 01:08:05.119 --> 01:08:07.190 align:start position:0% usually in my experience um I've been running<01:08:05.520> a<01:08:05.839> different<01:08:06.079> federal<01:08:06.480> program<01:08:06.960> for 01:08:07.190 --> 01:08:07.200 align:start position:0% running a different federal program for 01:08:07.200 --> 01:08:10.150 align:start position:0% running a different federal program for USB<01:08:07.680> now<01:08:07.839> for<01:08:08.079> six<01:08:08.319> years.<01:08:09.119> In<01:08:09.359> my<01:08:09.599> experience, 01:08:10.150 --> 01:08:10.160 align:start position:0% USB now for six years. In my experience, 01:08:10.160 --> 01:08:11.829 align:start position:0% USB now for six years. In my experience, it's<01:08:10.400> not<01:08:10.640> something<01:08:10.880> that<01:08:11.039> the<01:08:11.280> schools<01:08:11.680> have 01:08:11.829 --> 01:08:11.839 align:start position:0% it's not something that the schools have 01:08:11.839 --> 01:08:13.829 align:start position:0% it's not something that the schools have to<01:08:12.000> do.<01:08:12.480> It's<01:08:12.720> something<01:08:12.880> that<01:08:13.119> staff<01:08:13.520> has<01:08:13.680> to 01:08:13.829 --> 01:08:13.839 align:start position:0% to do. It's something that staff has to 01:08:13.839 --> 01:08:16.470 align:start position:0% to do. It's something that staff has to do<01:08:14.400> is<01:08:14.720> we<01:08:14.960> have<01:08:15.119> to<01:08:15.280> track<01:08:15.599> and<01:08:15.839> we<01:08:16.080> have<01:08:16.159> to<01:08:16.319> be 01:08:16.470 --> 01:08:16.480 align:start position:0% do is we have to track and we have to be 01:08:16.480 --> 01:08:18.709 align:start position:0% do is we have to track and we have to be able<01:08:16.640> to<01:08:16.799> say<01:08:17.120> how<01:08:17.359> many<01:08:17.679> schools<01:08:18.159> are<01:08:18.480> doing 01:08:18.709 --> 01:08:18.719 align:start position:0% able to say how many schools are doing 01:08:18.719 --> 01:08:20.950 align:start position:0% able to say how many schools are doing this<01:08:19.040> thing<01:08:19.199> that's<01:08:19.600> required.<01:08:20.400> So,<01:08:20.640> in<01:08:20.799> this 01:08:20.950 --> 01:08:20.960 align:start position:0% this thing that's required. So, in this 01:08:20.960 --> 01:08:23.110 align:start position:0% this thing that's required. So, in this case,<01:08:21.199> I<01:08:21.440> could<01:08:21.600> see<01:08:22.319> one<01:08:22.560> of<01:08:22.640> the<01:08:22.799> questions 01:08:23.110 --> 01:08:23.120 align:start position:0% case, I could see one of the questions 01:08:23.120 --> 01:08:24.630 align:start position:0% case, I could see one of the questions being<01:08:23.440> how<01:08:23.600> many<01:08:23.759> schools<01:08:24.080> are<01:08:24.239> implementing 01:08:24.630 --> 01:08:24.640 align:start position:0% being how many schools are implementing 01:08:24.640 --> 01:08:26.630 align:start position:0% being how many schools are implementing the<01:08:24.799> presidential<01:08:25.279> fitness<01:08:25.679> test.<01:08:26.239> And<01:08:26.400> we'd 01:08:26.630 --> 01:08:26.640 align:start position:0% the presidential fitness test. And we'd 01:08:26.640 --> 01:08:29.590 align:start position:0% the presidential fitness test. And we'd have<01:08:26.799> to<01:08:26.880> be<01:08:26.960> able<01:08:27.120> to<01:08:27.279> say<01:08:28.719> 150<01:08:29.040> or<01:08:29.279> whatever 01:08:29.590 --> 01:08:29.600 align:start position:0% have to be able to say 150 or whatever 01:08:29.600 --> 01:08:32.229 align:start position:0% have to be able to say 150 or whatever it<01:08:29.759> is,<01:08:29.920> right?<01:08:30.719> um<01:08:31.359> we'd<01:08:31.679> have<01:08:31.759> to<01:08:31.839> be<01:08:31.920> able<01:08:32.080> to 01:08:32.229 --> 01:08:32.239 align:start position:0% it is, right? um we'd have to be able to 01:08:32.239 --> 01:08:34.390 align:start position:0% it is, right? um we'd have to be able to say<01:08:32.400> that<01:08:33.040> or<01:08:33.279> we'd<01:08:33.520> have<01:08:33.679> to<01:08:33.759> be<01:08:33.839> able<01:08:34.000> to<01:08:34.080> say 01:08:34.390 --> 01:08:34.400 align:start position:0% say that or we'd have to be able to say 01:08:34.400 --> 01:08:36.390 align:start position:0% say that or we'd have to be able to say how<01:08:34.640> many<01:08:34.880> schools<01:08:35.440> have<01:08:35.679> started<01:08:36.159> a 01:08:36.390 --> 01:08:36.400 align:start position:0% how many schools have started a 01:08:36.400 --> 01:08:38.309 align:start position:0% how many schools have started a nutrition<01:08:36.880> education<01:08:37.359> program,<01:08:37.839> how<01:08:38.080> many 01:08:38.309 --> 01:08:38.319 align:start position:0% nutrition education program, how many 01:08:38.319 --> 01:08:41.430 align:start position:0% nutrition education program, how many schools<01:08:39.279> are<01:08:39.839> doing<01:08:40.159> active<01:08:40.560> recess,<01:08:41.199> things 01:08:41.430 --> 01:08:41.440 align:start position:0% schools are doing active recess, things 01:08:41.440 --> 01:08:43.430 align:start position:0% schools are doing active recess, things like<01:08:41.600> that.<01:08:41.920> So,<01:08:42.080> it's<01:08:42.239> it's<01:08:42.560> tracking<01:08:42.960> on<01:08:43.199> our 01:08:43.430 --> 01:08:43.440 align:start position:0% like that. So, it's it's tracking on our 01:08:43.440 --> 01:08:46.630 align:start position:0% like that. So, it's it's tracking on our end,<01:08:44.159> not<01:08:44.400> so<01:08:44.560> much<01:08:44.719> the<01:08:44.960> school<01:08:45.199> end<01:08:46.159> in<01:08:46.480> my 01:08:46.630 --> 01:08:46.640 align:start position:0% end, not so much the school end in my 01:08:46.640 --> 01:08:50.149 align:start position:0% end, not so much the school end in my experience.<01:08:47.040> That's<01:08:47.199> how<01:08:47.440> they've<01:08:47.759> been. 01:08:50.149 --> 01:08:50.159 align:start position:0% experience. That's how they've been. 01:08:50.159 --> 01:08:52.470 align:start position:0% experience. That's how they've been. Do<01:08:50.400> you<01:08:50.640> and<01:08:50.799> on<01:08:51.040> that<01:08:51.199> note<01:08:51.520> then<01:08:51.839> my<01:08:51.920> my<01:08:52.239> you 01:08:52.470 --> 01:08:52.480 align:start position:0% Do you and on that note then my my you 01:08:52.480 --> 01:08:55.189 align:start position:0% Do you and on that note then my my you triggered<01:08:53.040> this<01:08:53.440> question<01:08:53.759> which<01:08:54.080> is<01:08:54.480> um<01:08:54.719> what 01:08:55.189 --> 01:08:55.199 align:start position:0% triggered this question which is um what 01:08:55.199 --> 01:08:57.430 align:start position:0% triggered this question which is um what what<01:08:55.600> role<01:08:55.920> or<01:08:56.159> what<01:08:56.400> person<01:08:57.040> have<01:08:57.199> you 01:08:57.430 --> 01:08:57.440 align:start position:0% what role or what person have you 01:08:57.440 --> 01:08:59.110 align:start position:0% what role or what person have you typically<01:08:57.839> seen<01:08:58.000> or<01:08:58.239> are<01:08:58.400> they<01:08:58.560> seeing<01:08:58.799> or<01:08:58.960> do 01:08:59.110 --> 01:08:59.120 align:start position:0% typically seen or are they seeing or do 01:08:59.120 --> 01:09:01.430 align:start position:0% typically seen or are they seeing or do you<01:08:59.279> anticipate<01:08:59.920> taking<01:09:00.319> this<01:09:01.199> like 01:09:01.430 --> 01:09:01.440 align:start position:0% you anticipate taking this like 01:09:01.440 --> 01:09:03.590 align:start position:0% you anticipate taking this like overseeing<01:09:02.000> this<01:09:02.159> in<01:09:02.400> their<01:09:02.640> school?<01:09:03.199> Is<01:09:03.440> it 01:09:03.590 --> 01:09:03.600 align:start position:0% overseeing this in their school? Is it 01:09:03.600 --> 01:09:05.910 align:start position:0% overseeing this in their school? Is it at<01:09:03.759> a<01:09:03.920> district<01:09:04.239> level<01:09:05.120> that<01:09:05.359> they'll<01:09:05.600> go<01:09:05.759> to 01:09:05.910 --> 01:09:05.920 align:start position:0% at a district level that they'll go to 01:09:05.920 --> 01:09:07.590 align:start position:0% at a district level that they'll go to their<01:09:06.239> elementarymentaries<01:09:06.799> or<01:09:07.040> do<01:09:07.279> do<01:09:07.520> you 01:09:07.590 --> 01:09:07.600 align:start position:0% their elementarymentaries or do do you 01:09:07.600 --> 01:09:10.390 align:start position:0% their elementarymentaries or do do you see<01:09:07.839> a<01:09:08.080> role<01:09:08.400> being<01:09:08.960> created<01:09:09.679> or<01:09:09.920> absorbed 01:09:10.390 --> 01:09:10.400 align:start position:0% see a role being created or absorbed 01:09:10.400 --> 01:09:14.709 align:start position:0% see a role being created or absorbed into<01:09:10.640> another<01:09:10.960> role<01:09:11.679> to<01:09:12.080> track<01:09:12.400> this? 01:09:14.709 --> 01:09:14.719 align:start position:0% into another role to track this? 01:09:14.719 --> 01:09:16.870 align:start position:0% into another role to track this? >> It<01:09:15.679> would<01:09:15.839> you<01:09:16.000> like<01:09:16.080> me<01:09:16.159> to<01:09:16.319> answer? 01:09:16.870 --> 01:09:16.880 align:start position:0% >> It would you like me to answer? 01:09:16.880 --> 01:09:19.669 align:start position:0% >> It would you like me to answer? >> Yeah,<01:09:17.199> go<01:09:17.359> ahead<01:09:17.520> and<01:09:17.759> answer.<01:09:18.480> Um,<01:09:19.040> I<01:09:19.199> I<01:09:19.520> think 01:09:19.669 --> 01:09:19.679 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, go ahead and answer. Um, I I think 01:09:19.679 --> 01:09:21.430 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, go ahead and answer. Um, I I think you're<01:09:19.839> going<01:09:19.920> to<01:09:20.000> see<01:09:20.159> a<01:09:20.319> lot<01:09:20.480> of<01:09:20.799> variability 01:09:21.430 --> 01:09:21.440 align:start position:0% you're going to see a lot of variability 01:09:21.440 --> 01:09:23.590 align:start position:0% you're going to see a lot of variability there.<01:09:21.759> I<01:09:21.920> think<01:09:22.080> some<01:09:22.319> of<01:09:22.400> the<01:09:22.560> bigger 01:09:23.590 --> 01:09:23.600 align:start position:0% there. I think some of the bigger 01:09:23.600 --> 01:09:26.149 align:start position:0% there. I think some of the bigger districts,<01:09:24.880> um,<01:09:25.040> I'm<01:09:25.359> using<01:09:25.520> that<01:09:25.679> word<01:09:25.920> very 01:09:26.149 --> 01:09:26.159 align:start position:0% districts, um, I'm using that word very 01:09:26.159 --> 01:09:27.269 align:start position:0% districts, um, I'm using that word very specifically.<01:09:26.640> Some<01:09:26.799> of<01:09:26.880> the<01:09:26.960> bigger 01:09:27.269 --> 01:09:27.279 align:start position:0% specifically. Some of the bigger 01:09:27.279 --> 01:09:29.590 align:start position:0% specifically. Some of the bigger districts,<01:09:27.839> they<01:09:28.159> probably<01:09:28.640> have<01:09:28.960> someone 01:09:29.590 --> 01:09:29.600 align:start position:0% districts, they probably have someone 01:09:29.600 --> 01:09:32.789 align:start position:0% districts, they probably have someone that<01:09:30.400> would<01:09:30.640> take<01:09:30.799> it<01:09:31.040> on.<01:09:31.759> Um,<01:09:32.239> some<01:09:32.480> of<01:09:32.560> your 01:09:32.789 --> 01:09:32.799 align:start position:0% that would take it on. Um, some of your 01:09:32.799 --> 01:09:36.309 align:start position:0% that would take it on. Um, some of your smaller,<01:09:34.080> that<01:09:34.319> might<01:09:34.480> be<01:09:34.640> a<01:09:34.880> stretch<01:09:35.440> to<01:09:35.920> to 01:09:36.309 --> 01:09:36.319 align:start position:0% smaller, that might be a stretch to to 01:09:36.319 --> 01:09:39.269 align:start position:0% smaller, that might be a stretch to to ask<01:09:36.719> someone<01:09:37.040> to<01:09:37.279> add<01:09:37.600> something<01:09:38.000> else<01:09:38.799> when, 01:09:39.269 --> 01:09:39.279 align:start position:0% ask someone to add something else when, 01:09:39.279 --> 01:09:40.950 align:start position:0% ask someone to add something else when, you<01:09:39.440> know,<01:09:39.600> they're<01:09:39.920> already<01:09:40.319> very<01:09:40.640> very 01:09:40.950 --> 01:09:40.960 align:start position:0% you know, they're already very very 01:09:40.960 --> 01:09:43.510 align:start position:0% you know, they're already very very small.<01:09:41.600> And<01:09:41.839> so,<01:09:42.000> they<01:09:42.319> might<01:09:42.560> need<01:09:42.799> to<01:09:43.040> do<01:09:43.279> a 01:09:43.510 --> 01:09:43.520 align:start position:0% small. And so, they might need to do a 01:09:43.520 --> 01:09:45.749 align:start position:0% small. And so, they might need to do a stipen<01:09:44.080> or<01:09:44.319> bring<01:09:44.480> in<01:09:44.719> someone<01:09:45.040> to<01:09:45.279> help<01:09:45.520> run 01:09:45.749 --> 01:09:45.759 align:start position:0% stipen or bring in someone to help run 01:09:45.759 --> 01:09:47.590 align:start position:0% stipen or bring in someone to help run some<01:09:45.920> of<01:09:46.000> these<01:09:46.239> things.<01:09:46.799> Um,<01:09:47.120> as<01:09:47.279> far<01:09:47.359> as<01:09:47.440> the 01:09:47.590 --> 01:09:47.600 align:start position:0% some of these things. Um, as far as the 01:09:47.600 --> 01:09:49.749 align:start position:0% some of these things. Um, as far as the nutrition<01:09:48.080> education,<01:09:48.880> that<01:09:49.199> should<01:09:49.440> already 01:09:49.749 --> 01:09:49.759 align:start position:0% nutrition education, that should already 01:09:49.759 --> 01:09:52.470 align:start position:0% nutrition education, that should already be<01:09:50.000> done<01:09:50.239> in<01:09:50.560> the<01:09:50.719> classroom.<01:09:51.679> Um,<01:09:52.000> we<01:09:52.239> have 01:09:52.470 --> 01:09:52.480 align:start position:0% be done in the classroom. Um, we have 01:09:52.480 --> 01:09:54.630 align:start position:0% be done in the classroom. Um, we have standards,<01:09:53.520> uh,<01:09:53.759> already.<01:09:54.159> We've<01:09:54.400> had 01:09:54.630 --> 01:09:54.640 align:start position:0% standards, uh, already. We've had 01:09:54.640 --> 01:09:57.110 align:start position:0% standards, uh, already. We've had standards<01:09:55.040> for,<01:09:56.480> uh,<01:09:56.640> I've<01:09:56.800> been<01:09:56.960> in 01:09:57.110 --> 01:09:57.120 align:start position:0% standards for, uh, I've been in 01:09:57.120 --> 01:09:58.709 align:start position:0% standards for, uh, I've been in education<01:09:57.600> 19<01:09:57.840> years.<01:09:58.080> We've<01:09:58.320> always<01:09:58.480> had 01:09:58.709 --> 01:09:58.719 align:start position:0% education 19 years. We've always had 01:09:58.719 --> 01:10:00.550 align:start position:0% education 19 years. We've always had standards<01:09:59.360> in<01:09:59.679> health<01:09:59.920> education<01:10:00.320> in 01:10:00.550 --> 01:10:00.560 align:start position:0% standards in health education in 01:10:00.560 --> 01:10:02.950 align:start position:0% standards in health education in elementary.<01:10:01.280> Um,<01:10:02.080> nutrition<01:10:02.480> has<01:10:02.719> always 01:10:02.950 --> 01:10:02.960 align:start position:0% elementary. Um, nutrition has always 01:10:02.960 --> 01:10:05.030 align:start position:0% elementary. Um, nutrition has always been<01:10:03.199> a<01:10:03.520> requirement<01:10:03.920> in<01:10:04.159> elementary.<01:10:04.640> So,<01:10:04.880> I 01:10:05.030 --> 01:10:05.040 align:start position:0% been a requirement in elementary. So, I 01:10:05.040 --> 01:10:06.709 align:start position:0% been a requirement in elementary. So, I don't<01:10:05.280> think<01:10:05.360> that<01:10:05.600> that's<01:10:06.000> so<01:10:06.159> much<01:10:06.400> going<01:10:06.560> to 01:10:06.709 --> 01:10:06.719 align:start position:0% don't think that that's so much going to 01:10:06.719 --> 01:10:09.510 align:start position:0% don't think that that's so much going to be<01:10:06.880> new.<01:10:07.840> uh<01:10:08.000> it<01:10:08.239> might<01:10:08.400> be<01:10:08.560> new<01:10:08.960> as<01:10:09.199> far<01:10:09.360> as 01:10:09.510 --> 01:10:09.520 align:start position:0% be new. uh it might be new as far as 01:10:09.520 --> 01:10:10.950 align:start position:0% be new. uh it might be new as far as their<01:10:09.840> they<01:10:10.080> might<01:10:10.239> have<01:10:10.400> to<01:10:10.480> look<01:10:10.640> at<01:10:10.800> their 01:10:10.950 --> 01:10:10.960 align:start position:0% their they might have to look at their 01:10:10.960 --> 01:10:13.030 align:start position:0% their they might have to look at their curriculum<01:10:12.000> and<01:10:12.320> make<01:10:12.480> sure<01:10:12.640> that<01:10:12.800> it's 01:10:13.030 --> 01:10:13.040 align:start position:0% curriculum and make sure that it's 01:10:13.040 --> 01:10:14.390 align:start position:0% curriculum and make sure that it's aligned<01:10:13.280> to<01:10:13.440> the<01:10:13.600> standards<01:10:13.920> and<01:10:14.159> make<01:10:14.239> sure 01:10:14.390 --> 01:10:14.400 align:start position:0% aligned to the standards and make sure 01:10:14.400 --> 01:10:16.310 align:start position:0% aligned to the standards and make sure it's<01:10:14.560> evidence-based,<01:10:15.280> but<01:10:15.760> I<01:10:16.000> that 01:10:16.310 --> 01:10:16.320 align:start position:0% it's evidence-based, but I that 01:10:16.320 --> 01:10:20.390 align:start position:0% it's evidence-based, but I that shouldn't<01:10:16.640> be<01:10:17.679> that<01:10:18.080> part<01:10:18.719> shouldn't<01:10:19.120> be<01:10:19.760> new. 01:10:20.390 --> 01:10:20.400 align:start position:0% shouldn't be that part shouldn't be new. 01:10:20.400 --> 01:10:22.470 align:start position:0% shouldn't be that part shouldn't be new. The<01:10:20.719> presidential<01:10:21.199> fitness<01:10:21.600> test<01:10:21.840> is<01:10:22.159> likely 01:10:22.470 --> 01:10:22.480 align:start position:0% The presidential fitness test is likely 01:10:22.480 --> 01:10:23.990 align:start position:0% The presidential fitness test is likely going<01:10:22.640> to<01:10:22.719> be<01:10:22.880> new<01:10:23.120> in<01:10:23.280> the<01:10:23.440> elementary 01:10:23.990 --> 01:10:24.000 align:start position:0% going to be new in the elementary 01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:25.510 align:start position:0% going to be new in the elementary especially.<01:10:24.480> A<01:10:24.560> lot<01:10:24.640> of<01:10:24.719> our<01:10:24.960> secondary 01:10:25.510 --> 01:10:25.520 align:start position:0% especially. A lot of our secondary 01:10:25.520 --> 01:10:27.990 align:start position:0% especially. A lot of our secondary schools<01:10:26.080> have<01:10:26.320> always<01:10:26.719> done<01:10:26.880> it.<01:10:27.520> Even<01:10:27.760> when 01:10:27.990 --> 01:10:28.000 align:start position:0% schools have always done it. Even when 01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:29.830 align:start position:0% schools have always done it. Even when it<01:10:28.320> kind<01:10:28.560> of<01:10:28.640> went<01:10:28.880> away,<01:10:29.199> they<01:10:29.440> still<01:10:29.679> just 01:10:29.830 --> 01:10:29.840 align:start position:0% it kind of went away, they still just 01:10:29.840 --> 01:10:33.110 align:start position:0% it kind of went away, they still just kept<01:10:30.080> doing<01:10:30.320> it.<01:10:30.800> Um<01:10:31.280> I<01:10:31.520> I<01:10:31.920> don't<01:10:32.640> but<01:10:32.880> in 01:10:33.110 --> 01:10:33.120 align:start position:0% kept doing it. Um I I don't but in 01:10:33.120 --> 01:10:34.550 align:start position:0% kept doing it. Um I I don't but in elementary<01:10:33.679> I<01:10:33.840> don't<01:10:34.000> think<01:10:34.080> there's<01:10:34.320> very 01:10:34.550 --> 01:10:34.560 align:start position:0% elementary I don't think there's very 01:10:34.560 --> 01:10:35.990 align:start position:0% elementary I don't think there's very many<01:10:34.800> schools<01:10:35.120> that<01:10:35.440> participate<01:10:35.840> in 01:10:35.990 --> 01:10:36.000 align:start position:0% many schools that participate in 01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:37.669 align:start position:0% many schools that participate in presidential<01:10:36.560> fitness<01:10:36.880> assessments<01:10:37.440> right 01:10:37.669 --> 01:10:37.679 align:start position:0% presidential fitness assessments right 01:10:37.679 --> 01:10:41.430 align:start position:0% presidential fitness assessments right now.<01:10:38.400> So<01:10:38.719> that<01:10:39.040> might<01:10:39.199> be<01:10:39.440> something<01:10:39.760> new.<01:10:40.560> But 01:10:41.430 --> 01:10:41.440 align:start position:0% now. So that might be something new. But 01:10:41.440 --> 01:10:44.630 align:start position:0% now. So that might be something new. But most<01:10:41.760> schools<01:10:42.159> also<01:10:42.480> do<01:10:42.800> have<01:10:42.880> a<01:10:43.120> PE 01:10:44.630 --> 01:10:44.640 align:start position:0% most schools also do have a PE 01:10:44.640 --> 01:10:47.189 align:start position:0% most schools also do have a PE specialist<01:10:45.360> of<01:10:45.679> some<01:10:45.920> kind<01:10:46.640> whether<01:10:46.880> it's<01:10:47.040> a 01:10:47.189 --> 01:10:47.199 align:start position:0% specialist of some kind whether it's a 01:10:47.199 --> 01:10:49.510 align:start position:0% specialist of some kind whether it's a pair<01:10:47.520> professional<01:10:48.239> whether<01:10:48.640> it's<01:10:49.199> a 01:10:49.510 --> 01:10:49.520 align:start position:0% pair professional whether it's a 01:10:49.520 --> 01:10:52.070 align:start position:0% pair professional whether it's a certified<01:10:50.080> teacher.<01:10:50.800> Most<01:10:51.040> schools<01:10:51.440> do<01:10:51.760> have 01:10:52.070 --> 01:10:52.080 align:start position:0% certified teacher. Most schools do have 01:10:52.080 --> 01:10:55.030 align:start position:0% certified teacher. Most schools do have somebody<01:10:52.880> doing<01:10:53.199> PE<01:10:53.520> in<01:10:53.760> elementary.<01:10:54.560> And<01:10:54.800> so 01:10:55.030 --> 01:10:55.040 align:start position:0% somebody doing PE in elementary. And so 01:10:55.040 --> 01:10:56.709 align:start position:0% somebody doing PE in elementary. And so it<01:10:55.360> could<01:10:55.520> be<01:10:55.679> that<01:10:55.920> person<01:10:56.239> now<01:10:56.480> is 01:10:56.709 --> 01:10:56.719 align:start position:0% it could be that person now is 01:10:56.719 --> 01:10:58.950 align:start position:0% it could be that person now is implementing<01:10:57.120> the<01:10:57.280> fitness<01:10:57.600> assessment 01:10:58.950 --> 01:10:58.960 align:start position:0% implementing the fitness assessment 01:10:58.960 --> 01:11:00.870 align:start position:0% implementing the fitness assessment during<01:10:59.280> some<01:10:59.440> of<01:10:59.600> their<01:10:59.760> PE<01:11:00.159> time<01:11:00.400> that<01:11:00.640> they 01:11:00.870 --> 01:11:00.880 align:start position:0% during some of their PE time that they 01:11:00.880 --> 01:11:03.990 align:start position:0% during some of their PE time that they already<01:11:01.120> have.<01:11:01.840> So<01:11:02.400> I<01:11:02.560> I<01:11:02.880> think<01:11:03.040> that<01:11:03.679> I<01:11:03.920> think 01:11:03.990 --> 01:11:04.000 align:start position:0% already have. So I I think that I think 01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:05.669 align:start position:0% already have. So I I think that I think that<01:11:04.239> some<01:11:04.480> schools<01:11:04.719> are<01:11:04.960> going<01:11:05.040> to<01:11:05.280> be<01:11:05.440> more 01:11:05.669 --> 01:11:05.679 align:start position:0% that some schools are going to be more 01:11:05.679 --> 01:11:08.870 align:start position:0% that some schools are going to be more creative<01:11:06.080> than<01:11:06.239> others<01:11:07.360> in<01:11:07.600> in<01:11:08.000> how<01:11:08.239> they 01:11:08.870 --> 01:11:08.880 align:start position:0% creative than others in in how they 01:11:08.880 --> 01:11:11.430 align:start position:0% creative than others in in how they divide<01:11:09.600> out<01:11:10.239> who<01:11:10.400> the<01:11:10.640> person<01:11:10.800> at<01:11:11.040> the<01:11:11.199> school 01:11:11.430 --> 01:11:11.440 align:start position:0% divide out who the person at the school 01:11:11.440 --> 01:11:13.669 align:start position:0% divide out who the person at the school level<01:11:11.679> responsible.<01:11:12.880> But<01:11:13.040> I<01:11:13.280> think<01:11:13.360> there<01:11:13.600> are 01:11:13.669 --> 01:11:13.679 align:start position:0% level responsible. But I think there are 01:11:13.679 --> 01:11:15.270 align:start position:0% level responsible. But I think there are a<01:11:13.840> lot<01:11:13.920> of<01:11:14.080> schools<01:11:14.400> that<01:11:14.560> already<01:11:14.800> know<01:11:15.040> who's 01:11:15.270 --> 01:11:15.280 align:start position:0% a lot of schools that already know who's 01:11:15.280 --> 01:11:18.950 align:start position:0% a lot of schools that already know who's going<01:11:15.440> to<01:11:15.520> do<01:11:15.679> it.<01:11:16.080> Um<01:11:16.560> I<01:11:17.120> I<01:11:17.600> I'm<01:11:18.000> getting<01:11:18.560> a<01:11:18.880> lot 01:11:18.950 --> 01:11:18.960 align:start position:0% going to do it. Um I I I'm getting a lot 01:11:18.960 --> 01:11:20.550 align:start position:0% going to do it. Um I I I'm getting a lot of<01:11:19.120> calls<01:11:19.360> and<01:11:19.600> a<01:11:19.760> lot<01:11:19.840> of<01:11:19.920> emails.<01:11:20.239> There<01:11:20.480> are 01:11:20.550 --> 01:11:20.560 align:start position:0% of calls and a lot of emails. There are 01:11:20.560 --> 01:11:22.950 align:start position:0% of calls and a lot of emails. There are a<01:11:20.719> lot<01:11:20.800> of<01:11:20.960> very<01:11:21.280> excited<01:11:21.679> schools<01:11:22.080> right<01:11:22.239> now 01:11:22.950 --> 01:11:22.960 align:start position:0% a lot of very excited schools right now 01:11:22.960 --> 01:11:27.669 align:start position:0% a lot of very excited schools right now about<01:11:24.320> um<01:11:25.120> participating.<01:11:25.920> So<01:11:26.159> I<01:11:26.400> think<01:11:26.560> that 01:11:27.669 --> 01:11:27.679 align:start position:0% about um participating. So I think that 01:11:27.679 --> 01:11:29.510 align:start position:0% about um participating. So I think that I<01:11:27.840> I<01:11:28.239> think<01:11:28.320> that<01:11:28.480> they<01:11:28.719> are<01:11:28.880> less<01:11:29.199> worried 01:11:29.510 --> 01:11:29.520 align:start position:0% I I think that they are less worried 01:11:29.520 --> 01:11:32.630 align:start position:0% I I think that they are less worried about<01:11:29.760> the<01:11:30.000> person<01:11:30.239> doing<01:11:30.560> it<01:11:31.360> and<01:11:32.239> really 01:11:32.630 --> 01:11:32.640 align:start position:0% about the person doing it and really 01:11:32.640 --> 01:11:35.750 align:start position:0% about the person doing it and really anxious<01:11:33.040> to<01:11:33.360> see<01:11:34.239> what<01:11:35.040> is<01:11:35.280> going<01:11:35.440> to<01:11:35.600> be 01:11:35.750 --> 01:11:35.760 align:start position:0% anxious to see what is going to be 01:11:35.760 --> 01:11:40.149 align:start position:0% anxious to see what is going to be required<01:11:37.199> and<01:11:38.239> um<01:11:38.719> and<01:11:39.040> how<01:11:39.199> they'll<01:11:39.600> and<01:11:39.920> the 01:11:40.149 --> 01:11:40.159 align:start position:0% required and um and how they'll and the 01:11:40.159 --> 01:11:43.350 align:start position:0% required and um and how they'll and the how.<01:11:41.440> So<01:11:42.000> that's<01:11:42.239> been<01:11:42.400> my<01:11:42.640> experience.<01:11:43.120> I've 01:11:43.350 --> 01:11:43.360 align:start position:0% how. So that's been my experience. I've 01:11:43.360 --> 01:11:47.669 align:start position:0% how. So that's been my experience. I've been<01:11:43.520> on<01:11:43.760> this<01:11:44.000> now<01:11:44.239> for<01:11:45.440> about<01:11:45.840> 3<01:11:46.080> months<01:11:46.640> and 01:11:47.669 --> 01:11:47.679 align:start position:0% been on this now for about 3 months and 01:11:47.679 --> 01:11:49.990 align:start position:0% been on this now for about 3 months and there's<01:11:48.000> a<01:11:48.239> lot<01:11:48.400> of<01:11:48.560> excitement.<01:11:49.280> So<01:11:49.600> Jody, 01:11:49.990 --> 01:11:50.000 align:start position:0% there's a lot of excitement. So Jody, 01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:51.510 align:start position:0% there's a lot of excitement. So Jody, just<01:11:50.239> one<01:11:50.400> other<01:11:50.640> question<01:11:51.040> if<01:11:51.280> you<01:11:51.360> don't 01:11:51.510 --> 01:11:51.520 align:start position:0% just one other question if you don't 01:11:51.520 --> 01:11:54.470 align:start position:0% just one other question if you don't mind.<01:11:51.920> Um,<01:11:52.560> this<01:11:52.800> can<01:11:52.960> be<01:11:53.040> used<01:11:53.280> for<01:11:53.520> resources 01:11:54.470 --> 01:11:54.480 align:start position:0% mind. Um, this can be used for resources 01:11:54.480 --> 01:11:55.830 align:start position:0% mind. Um, this can be used for resources too,<01:11:54.960> right?<01:11:55.360> Yes. 01:11:55.830 --> 01:11:55.840 align:start position:0% too, right? Yes. 01:11:55.840 --> 01:11:58.390 align:start position:0% too, right? Yes. >> Like<01:11:56.080> so<01:11:56.800> playground<01:11:57.280> resources<01:11:57.760> or<01:11:58.000> physical 01:11:58.390 --> 01:11:58.400 align:start position:0% >> Like so playground resources or physical 01:11:58.400 --> 01:12:00.950 align:start position:0% >> Like so playground resources or physical education<01:11:58.960> resources<01:11:59.440> for<01:11:59.679> the<01:11:59.920> school.<01:12:00.719> Um, 01:12:00.950 --> 01:12:00.960 align:start position:0% education resources for the school. Um, 01:12:00.960 --> 01:12:03.270 align:start position:0% education resources for the school. Um, it's<01:12:01.199> not<01:12:01.360> really<01:12:01.600> meant<01:12:01.760> to<01:12:02.000> supplant<01:12:02.719> any 01:12:03.270 --> 01:12:03.280 align:start position:0% it's not really meant to supplant any 01:12:03.280 --> 01:12:05.110 align:start position:0% it's not really meant to supplant any already<01:12:03.679> ongoing<01:12:04.159> programming,<01:12:04.640> but<01:12:04.800> it's 01:12:05.110 --> 01:12:05.120 align:start position:0% already ongoing programming, but it's 01:12:05.120 --> 01:12:07.990 align:start position:0% already ongoing programming, but it's add<01:12:05.520> it's<01:12:05.840> to<01:12:06.080> accentuate<01:12:06.640> and<01:12:06.880> to<01:12:07.360> help<01:12:07.760> make 01:12:07.990 --> 01:12:08.000 align:start position:0% add it's to accentuate and to help make 01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:09.910 align:start position:0% add it's to accentuate and to help make more<01:12:08.239> effective,<01:12:08.880> right? 01:12:09.910 --> 01:12:09.920 align:start position:0% more effective, right? 01:12:09.920 --> 01:12:11.990 align:start position:0% more effective, right? >> Yeah.<01:12:10.239> So,<01:12:10.880> uh,<01:12:11.040> materials<01:12:11.440> and<01:12:11.679> supplies 01:12:11.990 --> 01:12:12.000 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, uh, materials and supplies 01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:16.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, uh, materials and supplies would<01:12:12.320> be<01:12:13.280> um<01:12:14.640> an<01:12:14.880> allowable<01:12:15.440> use.<01:12:16.080> Um, 01:12:16.550 --> 01:12:16.560 align:start position:0% would be um an allowable use. Um, 01:12:16.560 --> 01:12:18.390 align:start position:0% would be um an allowable use. Um, equipment<01:12:17.199> would<01:12:17.520> not<01:12:17.679> be<01:12:17.840> because<01:12:18.080> that's<01:12:18.239> a 01:12:18.390 --> 01:12:18.400 align:start position:0% equipment would not be because that's a 01:12:18.400 --> 01:12:20.149 align:start position:0% equipment would not be because that's a $10,000<01:12:19.120> or<01:12:19.199> more,<01:12:19.440> right?<01:12:19.600> There's<01:12:19.760> a<01:12:19.920> very 01:12:20.149 --> 01:12:20.159 align:start position:0% $10,000 or more, right? There's a very 01:12:20.159 --> 01:12:22.870 align:start position:0% $10,000 or more, right? There's a very specific<01:12:21.040> rule<01:12:21.360> there,<01:12:21.760> right?<01:12:22.239> So,<01:12:22.400> it'd<01:12:22.640> be 01:12:22.870 --> 01:12:22.880 align:start position:0% specific rule there, right? So, it'd be 01:12:22.880 --> 01:12:24.630 align:start position:0% specific rule there, right? So, it'd be supplies<01:12:23.199> and<01:12:23.440> materials<01:12:23.920> is<01:12:24.080> what<01:12:24.239> the<01:12:24.400> line 01:12:24.630 --> 01:12:24.640 align:start position:0% supplies and materials is what the line 01:12:24.640 --> 01:12:26.390 align:start position:0% supplies and materials is what the line would<01:12:24.880> be<01:12:24.960> called.<01:12:25.600> Um,<01:12:25.840> and<01:12:26.080> but<01:12:26.239> that's 01:12:26.390 --> 01:12:26.400 align:start position:0% would be called. Um, and but that's 01:12:26.400 --> 01:12:27.750 align:start position:0% would be called. Um, and but that's where<01:12:26.560> you<01:12:26.640> would<01:12:26.800> put<01:12:27.040> curriculum.<01:12:27.600> That's 01:12:27.750 --> 01:12:27.760 align:start position:0% where you would put curriculum. That's 01:12:27.760 --> 01:12:30.149 align:start position:0% where you would put curriculum. That's where<01:12:27.920> you<01:12:28.080> put<01:12:28.239> any<01:12:28.800> like<01:12:28.960> if<01:12:29.199> they<01:12:29.360> need<01:12:29.840> more 01:12:30.149 --> 01:12:30.159 align:start position:0% where you put any like if they need more 01:12:30.159 --> 01:12:31.910 align:start position:0% where you put any like if they need more playground<01:12:30.560> balls<01:12:30.880> or<01:12:31.120> if<01:12:31.280> they<01:12:31.440> need<01:12:31.600> hula 01:12:31.910 --> 01:12:31.920 align:start position:0% playground balls or if they need hula 01:12:31.920 --> 01:12:33.590 align:start position:0% playground balls or if they need hula hoops<01:12:32.159> or<01:12:32.320> jump<01:12:32.560> ropes<01:12:32.880> or<01:12:33.120> whatever,<01:12:33.440> right? 01:12:33.590 --> 01:12:33.600 align:start position:0% hoops or jump ropes or whatever, right? 01:12:33.600 --> 01:12:35.430 align:start position:0% hoops or jump ropes or whatever, right? That<01:12:33.840> all<01:12:33.920> goes<01:12:34.159> into<01:12:34.320> that<01:12:34.880> into<01:12:35.199> that 01:12:35.430 --> 01:12:35.440 align:start position:0% That all goes into that into that 01:12:35.440 --> 01:12:38.950 align:start position:0% That all goes into that into that category.<01:12:36.239> We<01:12:36.480> would<01:12:36.719> also<01:12:37.120> allow<01:12:37.520> for<01:12:38.560> salary 01:12:38.950 --> 01:12:38.960 align:start position:0% category. We would also allow for salary 01:12:38.960 --> 01:12:40.470 align:start position:0% category. We would also allow for salary and<01:12:39.199> benefits.<01:12:39.520> So,<01:12:39.679> if<01:12:39.840> they<01:12:40.000> wanted<01:12:40.159> to<01:12:40.320> give 01:12:40.470 --> 01:12:40.480 align:start position:0% and benefits. So, if they wanted to give 01:12:40.480 --> 01:12:42.470 align:start position:0% and benefits. So, if they wanted to give a<01:12:40.640> teacher<01:12:40.960> a<01:12:41.120> stipen<01:12:41.600> for<01:12:41.760> doing<01:12:42.000> more<01:12:42.239> work, 01:12:42.470 --> 01:12:42.480 align:start position:0% a teacher a stipen for doing more work, 01:12:42.480 --> 01:12:44.870 align:start position:0% a teacher a stipen for doing more work, they<01:12:42.719> could<01:12:42.800> do<01:12:42.960> that.<01:12:44.080> um<01:12:44.159> or<01:12:44.400> bring<01:12:44.640> someone 01:12:44.870 --> 01:12:44.880 align:start position:0% they could do that. um or bring someone 01:12:44.880 --> 01:12:48.229 align:start position:0% they could do that. um or bring someone on<01:12:45.440> um<01:12:45.600> part-time<01:12:46.320> that<01:12:46.480> would<01:12:46.640> be<01:12:46.800> allowable. 01:12:48.229 --> 01:12:48.239 align:start position:0% on um part-time that would be allowable. 01:12:48.239 --> 01:12:49.830 align:start position:0% on um part-time that would be allowable. Um 01:12:49.830 --> 01:12:49.840 align:start position:0% Um 01:12:49.840 --> 01:12:51.430 align:start position:0% Um yeah,<01:12:50.159> so<01:12:50.320> there's<01:12:50.560> there's<01:12:50.800> a<01:12:50.960> lot<01:12:51.040> they<01:12:51.360> can 01:12:51.430 --> 01:12:51.440 align:start position:0% yeah, so there's there's a lot they can 01:12:51.440 --> 01:12:51.990 align:start position:0% yeah, so there's there's a lot they can do. 01:12:51.990 --> 01:12:52.000 align:start position:0% do. 01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:53.910 align:start position:0% do. >> Okay.<01:12:52.800> Board<01:12:53.040> member<01:12:53.199> Green,<01:12:53.520> do<01:12:53.600> you<01:12:53.760> have 01:12:53.910 --> 01:12:53.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Board member Green, do you have 01:12:53.920 --> 01:12:55.350 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Board member Green, do you have additional<01:12:54.320> questions<01:12:54.560> or<01:12:54.800> should<01:12:54.960> we<01:12:55.120> work 01:12:55.350 --> 01:12:55.360 align:start position:0% additional questions or should we work 01:12:55.360 --> 01:12:56.630 align:start position:0% additional questions or should we work kind<01:12:55.520> of<01:12:55.600> back<01:12:55.760> through<01:12:56.000> the<01:12:56.159> rule<01:12:56.320> a<01:12:56.560> little 01:12:56.630 --> 01:12:56.640 align:start position:0% kind of back through the rule a little 01:12:56.640 --> 01:12:58.390 align:start position:0% kind of back through the rule a little bit?<01:12:56.880> So<01:12:57.040> if<01:12:57.120> there's<01:12:57.360> any 01:12:58.390 --> 01:12:58.400 align:start position:0% bit? So if there's any 01:12:58.400 --> 01:13:00.149 align:start position:0% bit? So if there's any >> Thank<01:12:58.560> you.<01:12:59.120> No,<01:12:59.440> I<01:12:59.600> appreciate<01:12:59.920> you 01:13:00.149 --> 01:13:00.159 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. No, I appreciate you 01:13:00.159 --> 01:13:02.070 align:start position:0% >> Thank you. No, I appreciate you answering<01:13:00.480> those<01:13:00.719> questions<01:13:01.120> and<01:13:01.360> letting<01:13:01.679> me 01:13:02.070 --> 01:13:02.080 align:start position:0% answering those questions and letting me 01:13:02.080 --> 01:13:03.350 align:start position:0% answering those questions and letting me have<01:13:02.320> a<01:13:02.560> little<01:13:02.640> bit<01:13:02.719> of<01:13:02.880> time<01:13:03.040> because<01:13:03.199> it 01:13:03.350 --> 01:13:03.360 align:start position:0% have a little bit of time because it 01:13:03.360 --> 01:13:05.510 align:start position:0% have a little bit of time because it does<01:13:03.520> help<01:13:03.760> clarify<01:13:04.320> maybe<01:13:04.640> some<01:13:04.880> of<01:13:04.960> the<01:13:05.120> ads 01:13:05.510 --> 01:13:05.520 align:start position:0% does help clarify maybe some of the ads 01:13:05.520 --> 01:13:07.590 align:start position:0% does help clarify maybe some of the ads that<01:13:05.840> have<01:13:06.159> been,<01:13:06.880> you<01:13:07.040> know,<01:13:07.199> some<01:13:07.440> of<01:13:07.520> the 01:13:07.590 --> 01:13:07.600 align:start position:0% that have been, you know, some of the 01:13:07.600 --> 01:13:09.270 align:start position:0% that have been, you know, some of the amendments<01:13:08.000> that<01:13:08.159> we<01:13:08.320> adopted<01:13:08.719> in<01:13:08.960> that<01:13:09.120> last 01:13:09.270 --> 01:13:09.280 align:start position:0% amendments that we adopted in that last 01:13:09.280 --> 01:13:11.590 align:start position:0% amendments that we adopted in that last draft,<01:13:09.840> last<01:13:10.159> meeting.<01:13:10.640> So 01:13:11.590 --> 01:13:11.600 align:start position:0% draft, last meeting. So 01:13:11.600 --> 01:13:15.510 align:start position:0% draft, last meeting. So >> yeah.<01:13:12.239> Good.<01:13:13.199> Okay,<01:13:13.520> let's<01:13:13.840> go<01:13:14.239> up<01:13:14.719> if<01:13:15.120> can<01:13:15.360> we 01:13:15.510 --> 01:13:15.520 align:start position:0% >> yeah. Good. Okay, let's go up if can we 01:13:15.520 --> 01:13:17.350 align:start position:0% >> yeah. Good. Okay, let's go up if can we just<01:13:15.679> go<01:13:15.840> down<01:13:16.080> the<01:13:16.560> document<01:13:16.960> because<01:13:17.199> some 01:13:17.350 --> 01:13:17.360 align:start position:0% just go down the document because some 01:13:17.360 --> 01:13:18.790 align:start position:0% just go down the document because some of<01:13:17.440> these<01:13:17.600> I<01:13:17.760> highlighted<01:13:18.080> in<01:13:18.320> blue<01:13:18.480> but<01:13:18.640> I 01:13:18.790 --> 01:13:18.800 align:start position:0% of these I highlighted in blue but I 01:13:18.800 --> 01:13:20.149 align:start position:0% of these I highlighted in blue but I they<01:13:19.040> aren't<01:13:19.280> actually<01:13:19.520> changes.<01:13:19.920> They 01:13:20.149 --> 01:13:20.159 align:start position:0% they aren't actually changes. They 01:13:20.159 --> 01:13:22.550 align:start position:0% they aren't actually changes. They originally<01:13:20.560> there<01:13:20.800> and<01:13:21.040> I<01:13:21.760> just<01:13:22.000> made<01:13:22.239> the 01:13:22.550 --> 01:13:22.560 align:start position:0% originally there and I just made the 01:13:22.560 --> 01:13:24.790 align:start position:0% originally there and I just made the error.<01:13:23.520> I<01:13:23.679> don't<01:13:23.760> know<01:13:23.840> if<01:13:24.000> that<01:13:24.159> makes<01:13:24.320> any<01:13:24.560> s 01:13:24.790 --> 01:13:24.800 align:start position:0% error. I don't know if that makes any s 01:13:24.800 --> 01:13:26.229 align:start position:0% error. I don't know if that makes any s well<01:13:25.040> except<01:13:25.199> for<01:13:25.360> we<01:13:25.520> I<01:13:25.760> guess<01:13:25.840> it<01:13:26.080> doesn't 01:13:26.229 --> 01:13:26.239 align:start position:0% well except for we I guess it doesn't 01:13:26.239 --> 01:13:28.229 align:start position:0% well except for we I guess it doesn't matter<01:13:26.640> right<01:13:26.800> because<01:13:27.040> it's<01:13:27.280> all<01:13:27.920> we've 01:13:28.229 --> 01:13:28.239 align:start position:0% matter right because it's all we've 01:13:28.239 --> 01:13:30.550 align:start position:0% matter right because it's all we've accepted<01:13:28.640> what's<01:13:28.960> here<01:13:29.920> unless<01:13:30.320> someone 01:13:30.550 --> 01:13:30.560 align:start position:0% accepted what's here unless someone 01:13:30.560 --> 01:13:32.310 align:start position:0% accepted what's here unless someone wanted<01:13:30.800> to<01:13:31.040> change<01:13:31.199> it.<01:13:31.760> So 01:13:32.310 --> 01:13:32.320 align:start position:0% wanted to change it. So 01:13:32.320 --> 01:13:34.070 align:start position:0% wanted to change it. So >> it<01:13:32.480> was<01:13:32.719> already<01:13:32.960> in<01:13:33.199> the<01:13:33.360> existing<01:13:33.760> first 01:13:34.070 --> 01:13:34.080 align:start position:0% >> it was already in the existing first 01:13:34.080 --> 01:13:35.669 align:start position:0% >> it was already in the existing first draft<01:13:34.719> highlighted<01:13:35.040> in<01:13:35.199> blue.<01:13:35.440> It<01:13:35.520> will 01:13:35.669 --> 01:13:35.679 align:start position:0% draft highlighted in blue. It will 01:13:35.679 --> 01:13:36.550 align:start position:0% draft highlighted in blue. It will remain<01:13:35.920> the<01:13:36.159> same. 01:13:36.550 --> 01:13:36.560 align:start position:0% remain the same. 01:13:36.560 --> 01:13:37.990 align:start position:0% remain the same. >> Yep,<01:13:36.880> you're<01:13:37.040> right.<01:13:37.360> So<01:13:37.440> I<01:13:37.600> don't<01:13:37.760> need<01:13:37.840> to 01:13:37.990 --> 01:13:38.000 align:start position:0% >> Yep, you're right. So I don't need to 01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:39.110 align:start position:0% >> Yep, you're right. So I don't need to worry<01:13:38.159> about<01:13:38.320> that. 01:13:39.110 --> 01:13:39.120 align:start position:0% worry about that. 01:13:39.120 --> 01:13:41.590 align:start position:0% worry about that. >> Denny,<01:13:39.600> I<01:13:39.760> have<01:13:39.920> one<01:13:40.239> of<01:13:40.400> your<01:13:40.560> amenments<01:13:41.360> I 01:13:41.590 --> 01:13:41.600 align:start position:0% >> Denny, I have one of your amenments I 01:13:41.600 --> 01:13:43.270 align:start position:0% >> Denny, I have one of your amenments I would<01:13:41.760> love<01:13:41.920> to<01:13:42.080> amend.<01:13:42.560> I<01:13:42.800> think<01:13:42.880> it's<01:13:43.040> on 01:13:43.270 --> 01:13:43.280 align:start position:0% would love to amend. I think it's on 01:13:43.280 --> 01:13:44.950 align:start position:0% would love to amend. I think it's on line<01:13:43.600> 72. 01:13:44.950 --> 01:13:44.960 align:start position:0% line 72. 01:13:44.960 --> 01:13:45.910 align:start position:0% line 72. >> Okay. 01:13:45.910 --> 01:13:45.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 01:13:45.920 --> 01:13:49.510 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Nope.<01:13:46.400> Uh<01:13:46.800> 57.<01:13:47.679> Got<01:13:47.920> my 01:13:49.510 --> 01:13:49.520 align:start position:0% >> Nope. Uh 57. Got my 01:13:49.520 --> 01:13:50.950 align:start position:0% >> Nope. Uh 57. Got my >> Oh,<01:13:49.760> I<01:13:49.920> have<01:13:50.000> an<01:13:50.159> amendment<01:13:50.400> there,<01:13:50.640> too.<01:13:50.800> So, 01:13:50.950 --> 01:13:50.960 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I have an amendment there, too. So, 01:13:50.960 --> 01:13:52.790 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I have an amendment there, too. So, maybe<01:13:51.120> it's<01:13:51.280> the<01:13:51.520> same<01:13:51.600> amendment.<01:13:52.080> Go<01:13:52.239> ahead. 01:13:52.790 --> 01:13:52.800 align:start position:0% maybe it's the same amendment. Go ahead. 01:13:52.800 --> 01:13:55.830 align:start position:0% maybe it's the same amendment. Go ahead. >> Well,<01:13:53.040> I<01:13:53.199> would<01:13:53.360> I<01:13:53.600> would<01:13:53.760> like<01:13:53.920> to<01:13:54.159> put<01:13:55.040> uh<01:13:55.280> So, 01:13:55.830 --> 01:13:55.840 align:start position:0% >> Well, I would I would like to put uh So, 01:13:55.840 --> 01:13:59.430 align:start position:0% >> Well, I would I would like to put uh So, can<01:13:55.920> you<01:13:56.080> show<01:13:56.320> 57<01:13:56.960> online? 01:13:59.430 --> 01:13:59.440 align:start position:0% can you show 57 online? 01:13:59.440 --> 01:14:01.110 align:start position:0% can you show 57 online? Can<01:13:59.600> you<01:13:59.760> scroll<01:14:00.000> down<01:14:00.159> just<01:14:00.400> a<01:14:00.560> tiny<01:14:00.800> bit? 01:14:01.110 --> 01:14:01.120 align:start position:0% Can you scroll down just a tiny bit? 01:14:01.120 --> 01:14:03.030 align:start position:0% Can you scroll down just a tiny bit? Right<01:14:01.360> there.<01:14:02.000> I<01:14:02.159> would<01:14:02.320> love<01:14:02.400> for<01:14:02.560> it<01:14:02.719> to<01:14:02.880> say 01:14:03.030 --> 01:14:03.040 align:start position:0% Right there. I would love for it to say 01:14:03.040 --> 01:14:05.590 align:start position:0% Right there. I would love for it to say a<01:14:03.199> plan<01:14:03.440> for<01:14:03.760> family<01:14:04.159> engagement<01:14:04.800> within<01:14:05.280> the 01:14:05.590 --> 01:14:05.600 align:start position:0% a plan for family engagement within the 01:14:05.600 --> 01:14:07.990 align:start position:0% a plan for family engagement within the program<01:14:06.000> goals. 01:14:07.990 --> 01:14:08.000 align:start position:0% program goals. 01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:10.470 align:start position:0% program goals. um<01:14:08.560> watching<01:14:08.960> when<01:14:09.280> my<01:14:09.440> family<01:14:09.760> has<01:14:10.000> had<01:14:10.159> to<01:14:10.320> do 01:14:10.470 --> 01:14:10.480 align:start position:0% um watching when my family has had to do 01:14:10.480 --> 01:14:12.550 align:start position:0% um watching when my family has had to do I<01:14:10.640> mean<01:14:10.719> I'll<01:14:10.880> go<01:14:10.960> back<01:14:11.120> to<01:14:11.280> my<01:14:11.440> scouting<01:14:11.840> days. 01:14:12.550 --> 01:14:12.560 align:start position:0% I mean I'll go back to my scouting days. 01:14:12.560 --> 01:14:14.310 align:start position:0% I mean I'll go back to my scouting days. We<01:14:12.800> didn't<01:14:13.040> have<01:14:13.199> the<01:14:13.440> parents<01:14:13.760> doing<01:14:14.000> it<01:14:14.159> with 01:14:14.310 --> 01:14:14.320 align:start position:0% We didn't have the parents doing it with 01:14:14.320 --> 01:14:16.070 align:start position:0% We didn't have the parents doing it with the<01:14:14.480> kids.<01:14:14.719> We<01:14:14.880> had<01:14:14.960> the<01:14:15.120> whole<01:14:15.360> family<01:14:15.840> doing 01:14:16.070 --> 01:14:16.080 align:start position:0% the kids. We had the whole family doing 01:14:16.080 --> 01:14:18.310 align:start position:0% the kids. We had the whole family doing it<01:14:16.239> with<01:14:16.400> the<01:14:16.560> kids.<01:14:16.800> When<01:14:16.960> we<01:14:17.120> had<01:14:17.199> to<01:14:17.360> do<01:14:17.440> a<01:14:17.679> a 01:14:18.310 --> 01:14:18.320 align:start position:0% it with the kids. When we had to do a a 01:14:18.320 --> 01:14:20.870 align:start position:0% it with the kids. When we had to do a a fitness<01:14:18.719> merit<01:14:19.040> badge,<01:14:19.840> we<01:14:20.080> had<01:14:20.320> one<01:14:20.640> doing 01:14:20.870 --> 01:14:20.880 align:start position:0% fitness merit badge, we had one doing 01:14:20.880 --> 01:14:22.310 align:start position:0% fitness merit badge, we had one doing the<01:14:21.199> jumping<01:14:21.520> jacks,<01:14:21.840> the<01:14:22.000> other<01:14:22.080> one<01:14:22.239> doing 01:14:22.310 --> 01:14:22.320 align:start position:0% the jumping jacks, the other one doing 01:14:22.320 --> 01:14:23.510 align:start position:0% the jumping jacks, the other one doing the<01:14:22.480> jumping<01:14:22.719> jacks,<01:14:22.960> the<01:14:23.120> four-year-old 01:14:23.510 --> 01:14:23.520 align:start position:0% the jumping jacks, the four-year-old 01:14:23.520 --> 01:14:24.550 align:start position:0% the jumping jacks, the four-year-old doing<01:14:23.679> the<01:14:23.840> jumping<01:14:24.159> jacks,<01:14:24.400> the 01:14:24.550 --> 01:14:24.560 align:start position:0% doing the jumping jacks, the 01:14:24.560 --> 01:14:26.070 align:start position:0% doing the jumping jacks, the three-year-old<01:14:25.040> doing<01:14:25.199> the<01:14:25.360> jumping<01:14:25.679> jacks. 01:14:26.070 --> 01:14:26.080 align:start position:0% three-year-old doing the jumping jacks. 01:14:26.080 --> 01:14:29.270 align:start position:0% three-year-old doing the jumping jacks. So<01:14:26.480> anyway,<01:14:26.800> I'd<01:14:26.960> like<01:14:27.040> it<01:14:27.199> to<01:14:27.280> say 01:14:29.270 --> 01:14:29.280 align:start position:0% So anyway, I'd like it to say 01:14:29.280 --> 01:14:30.229 align:start position:0% So anyway, I'd like it to say >> Yep. 01:14:30.229 --> 01:14:30.239 align:start position:0% >> Yep. 01:14:30.239 --> 01:14:32.070 align:start position:0% >> Yep. >> Okay.<01:14:30.480> So<01:14:31.120> I<01:14:31.360> move<01:14:31.520> to<01:14:31.679> a 01:14:32.070 --> 01:14:32.080 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So I move to a 01:14:32.080 --> 01:14:34.229 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So I move to a >> we're<01:14:32.239> changing<01:14:32.960> parent<01:14:33.440> involvement<01:14:33.920> to 01:14:34.229 --> 01:14:34.239 align:start position:0% >> we're changing parent involvement to 01:14:34.239 --> 01:14:35.510 align:start position:0% >> we're changing parent involvement to family<01:14:34.560> engagement. 01:14:35.510 --> 01:14:35.520 align:start position:0% family engagement. 01:14:35.520 --> 01:14:37.590 align:start position:0% family engagement. >> Yes.<01:14:36.000> Within<01:14:36.400> the<01:14:36.719> program.<01:14:37.199> Yep. 01:14:37.590 --> 01:14:37.600 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Within the program. Yep. 01:14:37.600 --> 01:14:39.910 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Within the program. Yep. >> Any<01:14:37.920> additional<01:14:38.480> discussion<01:14:38.880> to<01:14:39.199> that 01:14:39.910 --> 01:14:39.920 align:start position:0% >> Any additional discussion to that 01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:42.310 align:start position:0% >> Any additional discussion to that change? 01:14:42.310 --> 01:14:42.320 align:start position:0% change? 01:14:42.320 --> 01:14:46.229 align:start position:0% change? Okay.<01:14:43.199> Um,<01:14:43.679> so<01:14:43.920> on<01:14:44.159> line<01:14:44.400> 57,<01:14:45.280> we<01:14:45.520> would<01:14:45.760> like 01:14:46.229 --> 01:14:46.239 align:start position:0% Okay. Um, so on line 57, we would like 01:14:46.239 --> 01:14:48.310 align:start position:0% Okay. Um, so on line 57, we would like board<01:14:46.480> member<01:14:47.120> uh<01:14:47.280> Wood<01:14:47.520> would<01:14:47.760> like<01:14:48.000> to 01:14:48.310 --> 01:14:48.320 align:start position:0% board member uh Wood would like to 01:14:48.320 --> 01:14:50.790 align:start position:0% board member uh Wood would like to change.<01:14:49.360> It<01:14:49.600> would<01:14:49.760> now<01:14:49.920> read<01:14:50.159> a<01:14:50.400> plan<01:14:50.560> for 01:14:50.790 --> 01:14:50.800 align:start position:0% change. It would now read a plan for 01:14:50.800 --> 01:14:52.310 align:start position:0% change. It would now read a plan for family<01:14:51.120> engagement<01:14:51.520> with<01:14:51.760> the<01:14:52.000> program 01:14:52.310 --> 01:14:52.320 align:start position:0% family engagement with the program 01:14:52.320 --> 01:14:53.990 align:start position:0% family engagement with the program goals. 01:14:53.990 --> 01:14:54.000 align:start position:0% goals. 01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:56.790 align:start position:0% goals. All<01:14:54.159> those<01:14:54.400> in<01:14:54.560> favor? 01:14:56.790 --> 01:14:56.800 align:start position:0% All those in favor? 01:14:56.800 --> 01:14:57.350 align:start position:0% All those in favor? >> I 01:14:57.350 --> 01:14:57.360 align:start position:0% >> I 01:14:57.360 --> 01:14:58.950 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 01:14:58.950 --> 01:14:58.960 align:start position:0% >> I 01:14:58.960 --> 01:15:02.149 align:start position:0% >> I >> Okay,<01:14:59.280> that<01:14:59.440> passes.<01:14:59.840> You<01:15:00.719> are 01:15:02.149 --> 01:15:02.159 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that passes. You are 01:15:02.159 --> 01:15:04.149 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that passes. You are >> sorry.<01:15:03.199> There<01:15:03.360> are<01:15:03.440> others<01:15:03.760> that<01:15:03.920> have 01:15:04.149 --> 01:15:04.159 align:start position:0% >> sorry. There are others that have 01:15:04.159 --> 01:15:07.110 align:start position:0% >> sorry. There are others that have amendments<01:15:05.440> or<01:15:05.760> suggestions.<01:15:06.640> I<01:15:06.880> have<01:15:06.960> a 01:15:07.110 --> 01:15:07.120 align:start position:0% amendments or suggestions. I have a 01:15:07.120 --> 01:15:10.870 align:start position:0% amendments or suggestions. I have a couple,<01:15:07.360> but<01:15:07.520> I'll<01:15:07.760> wait<01:15:07.920> for 01:15:10.870 --> 01:15:10.880 align:start position:0% couple, but I'll wait for 01:15:10.880 --> 01:15:13.590 align:start position:0% couple, but I'll wait for any<01:15:11.199> others<01:15:11.520> that<01:15:11.760> people<01:15:12.000> have. 01:15:13.590 --> 01:15:13.600 align:start position:0% any others that people have. 01:15:13.600 --> 01:15:16.390 align:start position:0% any others that people have. Um<01:15:14.880> I 01:15:16.390 --> 01:15:16.400 align:start position:0% Um I 01:15:16.400 --> 01:15:19.990 align:start position:0% Um I if<01:15:16.640> we<01:15:16.880> could<01:15:17.120> go<01:15:17.360> to 01:15:19.990 --> 01:15:20.000 align:start position:0% if we could go to 01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:22.149 align:start position:0% if we could go to 71.<01:15:20.880> Let<01:15:21.040> me<01:15:21.199> see<01:15:21.280> if<01:15:21.440> this<01:15:21.600> was<01:15:21.760> one<01:15:21.920> we 01:15:22.149 --> 01:15:22.159 align:start position:0% 71. Let me see if this was one we 01:15:22.159 --> 01:15:26.470 align:start position:0% 71. Let me see if this was one we already<01:15:22.400> did.<01:15:22.880> Sorry.<01:15:23.679> 71. 01:15:26.470 --> 01:15:26.480 align:start position:0% already did. Sorry. 71. 01:15:26.480 --> 01:15:29.030 align:start position:0% already did. Sorry. 71. Oh,<01:15:26.800> I<01:15:27.199> we<01:15:27.440> need<01:15:27.600> to<01:15:27.760> put<01:15:28.159> um<01:15:28.400> school<01:15:28.640> policies 01:15:29.030 --> 01:15:29.040 align:start position:0% Oh, I we need to put um school policies 01:15:29.040 --> 01:15:30.550 align:start position:0% Oh, I we need to put um school policies or<01:15:29.199> practices<01:15:29.600> that<01:15:29.840> support<01:15:30.159> student 01:15:30.550 --> 01:15:30.560 align:start position:0% or practices that support student 01:15:30.560 --> 01:15:33.750 align:start position:0% or practices that support student physical<01:15:30.960> health. 01:15:33.750 --> 01:15:33.760 align:start position:0% physical health. 01:15:33.760 --> 01:15:37.990 align:start position:0% physical health. and<01:15:34.800> nutrition, 01:15:37.990 --> 01:15:38.000 align:start position:0% 01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:41.590 align:start position:0% something<01:15:38.320> like<01:15:38.640> that. 01:15:41.590 --> 01:15:41.600 align:start position:0% something like that. 01:15:41.600 --> 01:15:44.229 align:start position:0% something like that. So,<01:15:41.840> it<01:15:42.080> would<01:15:42.320> say<01:15:42.800> school<01:15:43.520> policies<01:15:44.000> or 01:15:44.229 --> 01:15:44.239 align:start position:0% So, it would say school policies or 01:15:44.239 --> 01:15:46.070 align:start position:0% So, it would say school policies or practices<01:15:44.560> that<01:15:44.800> support<01:15:45.280> student<01:15:45.679> physical 01:15:46.070 --> 01:15:46.080 align:start position:0% practices that support student physical 01:15:46.080 --> 01:15:49.030 align:start position:0% practices that support student physical health 01:15:49.030 --> 01:15:49.040 align:start position:0% health 01:15:49.040 --> 01:15:59.669 align:start position:0% health and<01:15:49.360> nutrition. 01:15:59.669 --> 01:15:59.679 align:start position:0% 01:15:59.679 --> 01:16:01.110 align:start position:0% Yeah,<01:15:59.920> I<01:16:00.159> was<01:16:00.239> just<01:16:00.400> reading<01:16:00.640> that<01:16:00.880> line 01:16:01.110 --> 01:16:01.120 align:start position:0% Yeah, I was just reading that line 01:16:01.120 --> 01:16:02.950 align:start position:0% Yeah, I was just reading that line thinking<01:16:01.440> it<01:16:01.760> didn't<01:16:02.000> sound<01:16:02.320> quite<01:16:02.640> right. 01:16:02.950 --> 01:16:02.960 align:start position:0% thinking it didn't sound quite right. 01:16:02.960 --> 01:16:06.470 align:start position:0% thinking it didn't sound quite right. Ending<01:16:03.360> with<01:16:03.600> health<01:16:04.159> by<01:16:04.400> itself, 01:16:06.470 --> 01:16:06.480 align:start position:0% Ending with health by itself, 01:16:06.480 --> 01:16:08.470 align:start position:0% Ending with health by itself, too. 01:16:08.470 --> 01:16:08.480 align:start position:0% too. 01:16:08.480 --> 01:16:10.070 align:start position:0% too. >> And<01:16:08.719> do<01:16:08.960> you<01:16:09.120> still<01:16:09.360> want<01:16:09.520> to<01:16:09.760> remove 01:16:10.070 --> 01:16:10.080 align:start position:0% >> And do you still want to remove 01:16:10.080 --> 01:16:10.630 align:start position:0% >> And do you still want to remove wellness? 01:16:10.630 --> 01:16:10.640 align:start position:0% wellness? 01:16:10.640 --> 01:16:13.350 align:start position:0% wellness? >> I<01:16:10.800> think<01:16:10.960> wellness<01:16:11.440> can<01:16:11.679> come<01:16:11.920> out<01:16:12.960> because 01:16:13.350 --> 01:16:13.360 align:start position:0% >> I think wellness can come out because 01:16:13.360 --> 01:16:15.430 align:start position:0% >> I think wellness can come out because >> Okay.<01:16:13.600> Can<01:16:13.760> you<01:16:14.000> say<01:16:14.159> that<01:16:14.480> again? 01:16:15.430 --> 01:16:15.440 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Can you say that again? 01:16:15.440 --> 01:16:16.229 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Can you say that again? >> Yeah. 01:16:16.229 --> 01:16:16.239 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:16:16.239 --> 01:16:17.830 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> So,<01:16:16.400> it<01:16:16.560> would<01:16:16.719> say<01:16:17.199> So,<01:16:17.440> we're<01:16:17.679> just 01:16:17.830 --> 01:16:17.840 align:start position:0% >> So, it would say So, we're just 01:16:17.840 --> 01:16:19.990 align:start position:0% >> So, it would say So, we're just changing.<01:16:18.880> So,<01:16:19.120> it<01:16:19.280> says<01:16:19.440> physical<01:16:19.760> health 01:16:19.990 --> 01:16:20.000 align:start position:0% changing. So, it says physical health 01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:21.830 align:start position:0% changing. So, it says physical health already.<01:16:20.400> So,<01:16:20.640> would<01:16:20.880> strike<01:16:21.199> wellness<01:16:21.600> and 01:16:21.830 --> 01:16:21.840 align:start position:0% already. So, would strike wellness and 01:16:21.840 --> 01:16:24.870 align:start position:0% already. So, would strike wellness and put<01:16:22.000> in<01:16:22.239> and<01:16:22.560> nutrition.<01:16:23.840> Oh,<01:16:24.159> gotcha.<01:16:24.640> Thank 01:16:24.870 --> 01:16:24.880 align:start position:0% put in and nutrition. Oh, gotcha. Thank 01:16:24.880 --> 01:16:25.350 align:start position:0% put in and nutrition. Oh, gotcha. Thank you. 01:16:25.350 --> 01:16:25.360 align:start position:0% you. 01:16:25.360 --> 01:16:27.510 align:start position:0% you. >> Sorry,<01:16:25.840> I<01:16:26.080> probably<01:16:26.400> didn't<01:16:26.800> articulate<01:16:27.280> that 01:16:27.510 --> 01:16:27.520 align:start position:0% >> Sorry, I probably didn't articulate that 01:16:27.520 --> 01:16:28.550 align:start position:0% >> Sorry, I probably didn't articulate that well. 01:16:28.550 --> 01:16:28.560 align:start position:0% well. 01:16:28.560 --> 01:16:31.270 align:start position:0% well. >> No,<01:16:28.880> I<01:16:29.120> just<01:16:29.840> was<01:16:30.239> copying<01:16:30.719> pasting<01:16:31.120> and 01:16:31.270 --> 01:16:31.280 align:start position:0% >> No, I just was copying pasting and 01:16:31.280 --> 01:16:33.990 align:start position:0% >> No, I just was copying pasting and didn't<01:16:31.440> hurt<01:16:31.840> here.<01:16:33.040> And<01:16:33.199> then<01:16:33.520> that's<01:16:33.760> a 01:16:33.990 --> 01:16:34.000 align:start position:0% didn't hurt here. And then that's a 01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:34.790 align:start position:0% didn't hurt here. And then that's a period.<01:16:34.480> Okay. 01:16:34.790 --> 01:16:34.800 align:start position:0% period. Okay. 01:16:34.800 --> 01:16:36.950 align:start position:0% period. Okay. >> Yeah, 01:16:36.950 --> 01:16:36.960 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, 01:16:36.960 --> 01:16:39.270 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, >> I<01:16:37.199> think<01:16:37.360> on<01:16:37.679> the<01:16:37.920> wellness<01:16:38.320> piece,<01:16:38.560> I<01:16:38.719> I<01:16:39.040> lean 01:16:39.270 --> 01:16:39.280 align:start position:0% >> I think on the wellness piece, I I lean 01:16:39.280 --> 01:16:41.430 align:start position:0% >> I think on the wellness piece, I I lean towards<01:16:39.679> including<01:16:40.080> it<01:16:40.400> and<01:16:40.719> having<01:16:40.960> both<01:16:41.280> in 01:16:41.430 --> 01:16:41.440 align:start position:0% towards including it and having both in 01:16:41.440 --> 01:16:43.270 align:start position:0% towards including it and having both in there.<01:16:41.679> just<01:16:41.920> I<01:16:42.159> think<01:16:42.239> that's<01:16:42.560> just<01:16:42.800> the<01:16:43.040> term 01:16:43.270 --> 01:16:43.280 align:start position:0% there. just I think that's just the term 01:16:43.280 --> 01:16:46.149 align:start position:0% there. just I think that's just the term that<01:16:43.520> we<01:16:44.239> that<01:16:44.640> is<01:16:44.880> used<01:16:45.199> often<01:16:45.840> that 01:16:46.149 --> 01:16:46.159 align:start position:0% that we that is used often that 01:16:46.159 --> 01:16:48.070 align:start position:0% that we that is used often that encompasses<01:16:47.040> a<01:16:47.280> lot<01:16:47.360> of<01:16:47.440> the<01:16:47.679> nutritional 01:16:48.070 --> 01:16:48.080 align:start position:0% encompasses a lot of the nutritional 01:16:48.080 --> 01:16:52.470 align:start position:0% encompasses a lot of the nutritional pieces<01:16:48.400> and<01:16:48.560> the<01:16:48.800> physical<01:16:49.920> um 01:16:52.470 --> 01:16:52.480 align:start position:0% pieces and the physical um 01:16:52.480 --> 01:16:56.709 align:start position:0% pieces and the physical um >> physical<01:16:52.880> well<01:16:54.159> student<01:16:55.120> physical<01:16:56.080> health 01:16:56.709 --> 01:16:56.719 align:start position:0% >> physical well student physical health 01:16:56.719 --> 01:16:58.310 align:start position:0% >> physical well student physical health and<01:16:57.600> nutrition 01:16:58.310 --> 01:16:58.320 align:start position:0% and nutrition 01:16:58.320 --> 01:17:02.149 align:start position:0% and nutrition >> wellness<01:16:58.960> and<01:16:59.360> nutrition. 01:17:02.149 --> 01:17:02.159 align:start position:0% >> wellness and nutrition. 01:17:02.159 --> 01:17:05.189 align:start position:0% >> wellness and nutrition. >> Wait<01:17:02.480> one<01:17:02.719> more<01:17:02.880> time.<01:17:04.239> It<01:17:04.480> would<01:17:04.640> just<01:17:04.800> say 01:17:05.189 --> 01:17:05.199 align:start position:0% >> Wait one more time. It would just say 01:17:05.199 --> 01:17:09.590 align:start position:0% >> Wait one more time. It would just say Oh,<01:17:05.600> it<01:17:05.840> would<01:17:06.000> just<01:17:06.159> say<01:17:06.800> um 01:17:09.590 --> 01:17:09.600 align:start position:0% Oh, it would just say um 01:17:09.600 --> 01:17:10.790 align:start position:0% Oh, it would just say um physical<01:17:09.920> health,<01:17:10.239> wellness,<01:17:10.560> and 01:17:10.790 --> 01:17:10.800 align:start position:0% physical health, wellness, and 01:17:10.800 --> 01:17:18.870 align:start position:0% physical health, wellness, and nutrition. 01:17:18.870 --> 01:17:18.880 align:start position:0% 01:17:18.880 --> 01:17:20.149 align:start position:0% >> You<01:17:19.040> You<01:17:19.280> don't<01:17:19.360> have<01:17:19.520> to<01:17:19.600> accept<01:17:19.920> my 01:17:20.149 --> 01:17:20.159 align:start position:0% >> You You don't have to accept my 01:17:20.159 --> 01:17:21.430 align:start position:0% >> You You don't have to accept my >> wellness.<01:17:20.800> Yeah.<01:17:20.960> I'm<01:17:21.120> just<01:17:21.280> trying<01:17:21.360> to 01:17:21.430 --> 01:17:21.440 align:start position:0% >> wellness. Yeah. I'm just trying to 01:17:21.440 --> 01:17:23.189 align:start position:0% >> wellness. Yeah. I'm just trying to figure<01:17:21.600> out<01:17:21.679> if<01:17:21.920> wellness<01:17:22.320> is<01:17:22.640> different<01:17:22.960> or 01:17:23.189 --> 01:17:23.199 align:start position:0% figure out if wellness is different or 01:17:23.199 --> 01:17:26.470 align:start position:0% figure out if wellness is different or if<01:17:23.360> it<01:17:23.520> broadens<01:17:23.920> it<01:17:24.080> out.<01:17:24.480> That's<01:17:24.640> all<01:17:24.880> I'm 01:17:26.470 --> 01:17:26.480 align:start position:0% if it broadens it out. That's all I'm 01:17:26.480 --> 01:17:28.790 align:start position:0% if it broadens it out. That's all I'm trying<01:17:26.719> to<01:17:26.880> keep<01:17:27.120> it<01:17:27.679> scope<01:17:28.159> to<01:17:28.400> the 01:17:28.790 --> 01:17:28.800 align:start position:0% trying to keep it scope to the 01:17:28.800 --> 01:17:31.110 align:start position:0% trying to keep it scope to the parameters. 01:17:31.110 --> 01:17:31.120 align:start position:0% parameters. 01:17:31.120 --> 01:17:33.110 align:start position:0% parameters. to<01:17:31.360> me.<01:17:31.520> I<01:17:31.679> I<01:17:32.080> just<01:17:32.239> wonder<01:17:32.480> because<01:17:32.800> this 01:17:33.110 --> 01:17:33.120 align:start position:0% to me. I I just wonder because this 01:17:33.120 --> 01:17:35.030 align:start position:0% to me. I I just wonder because this section<01:17:33.520> says<01:17:33.840> it<01:17:34.080> deals<01:17:34.320> with<01:17:34.560> physical 01:17:35.030 --> 01:17:35.040 align:start position:0% section says it deals with physical 01:17:35.040 --> 01:17:37.750 align:start position:0% section says it deals with physical education<01:17:35.760> criteria. 01:17:37.750 --> 01:17:37.760 align:start position:0% education criteria. 01:17:37.760 --> 01:17:41.669 align:start position:0% education criteria. >> Um<01:17:38.719> which 01:17:41.669 --> 01:17:41.679 align:start position:0% >> Um which 01:17:41.679 --> 01:17:43.430 align:start position:0% >> Um which so<01:17:41.840> I<01:17:42.000> just<01:17:42.159> wonder<01:17:42.400> I'm<01:17:42.640> realizing<01:17:43.040> we<01:17:43.280> don't 01:17:43.430 --> 01:17:43.440 align:start position:0% so I just wonder I'm realizing we don't 01:17:43.440 --> 01:17:45.910 align:start position:0% so I just wonder I'm realizing we don't need<01:17:43.600> it<01:17:43.760> in<01:17:43.920> there<01:17:44.000> because<01:17:44.239> it's<01:17:44.560> ABC<01:17:45.360> D<01:17:45.520> and 01:17:45.910 --> 01:17:45.920 align:start position:0% need it in there because it's ABC D and 01:17:45.920 --> 01:17:47.590 align:start position:0% need it in there because it's ABC D and >> oh<01:17:46.159> then<01:17:46.320> it<01:17:46.480> just<01:17:46.640> needs<01:17:46.880> to<01:17:46.960> be<01:17:47.199> physical 01:17:47.590 --> 01:17:47.600 align:start position:0% >> oh then it just needs to be physical 01:17:47.600 --> 01:17:48.630 align:start position:0% >> oh then it just needs to be physical health<01:17:47.840> then. 01:17:48.630 --> 01:17:48.640 align:start position:0% health then. 01:17:48.640 --> 01:17:51.189 align:start position:0% health then. >> Yeah<01:17:49.440> health. 01:17:51.189 --> 01:17:51.199 align:start position:0% >> Yeah health. 01:17:51.199 --> 01:17:52.870 align:start position:0% >> Yeah health. >> No<01:17:51.520> just<01:17:51.760> physical<01:17:52.080> health<01:17:52.239> is<01:17:52.480> what<01:17:52.560> I<01:17:52.800> would 01:17:52.870 --> 01:17:52.880 align:start position:0% >> No just physical health is what I would 01:17:52.880 --> 01:17:54.229 align:start position:0% >> No just physical health is what I would put. 01:17:54.229 --> 01:17:54.239 align:start position:0% put. 01:17:54.239 --> 01:17:56.310 align:start position:0% put. >> Should<01:17:54.400> it<01:17:54.560> be<01:17:54.800> support<01:17:55.280> student<01:17:55.679> nutrition 01:17:56.310 --> 01:17:56.320 align:start position:0% >> Should it be support student nutrition 01:17:56.320 --> 01:17:58.070 align:start position:0% >> Should it be support student nutrition and<01:17:56.640> physical<01:17:56.960> health<01:17:57.280> or<01:17:57.520> is<01:17:57.679> it<01:17:57.840> just 01:17:58.070 --> 01:17:58.080 align:start position:0% and physical health or is it just 01:17:58.080 --> 01:18:00.870 align:start position:0% and physical health or is it just physical<01:17:58.560> health?<01:17:59.120> D<01:17:59.920> I'm<01:18:00.239> realizing<01:18:00.640> we 01:18:00.870 --> 01:18:00.880 align:start position:0% physical health? D I'm realizing we 01:18:00.880 --> 01:18:02.310 align:start position:0% physical health? D I'm realizing we don't<01:18:01.040> need<01:18:01.199> this<01:18:01.360> amendment<01:18:01.760> because<01:18:02.000> it's 01:18:02.310 --> 01:18:02.320 align:start position:0% don't need this amendment because it's 01:18:02.320 --> 01:18:05.189 align:start position:0% don't need this amendment because it's ABC<01:18:02.960> D<01:18:03.679> has<01:18:03.920> nutritionation. 01:18:05.189 --> 01:18:05.199 align:start position:0% ABC D has nutritionation. 01:18:05.199 --> 01:18:06.070 align:start position:0% ABC D has nutritionation. >> Yeah. 01:18:06.070 --> 01:18:06.080 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:18:06.080 --> 01:18:06.870 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Yeah. 01:18:06.870 --> 01:18:06.880 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:18:06.880 --> 01:18:09.430 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> So<01:18:07.199> I<01:18:07.360> I<01:18:07.760> don't<01:18:07.920> think<01:18:08.000> it's<01:18:08.320> necessary. 01:18:09.430 --> 01:18:09.440 align:start position:0% >> So I I don't think it's necessary. 01:18:09.440 --> 01:18:13.669 align:start position:0% >> So I I don't think it's necessary. >> So<01:18:09.679> you're<01:18:09.920> just<01:18:10.400> deleting<01:18:10.960> the<01:18:11.199> whole 01:18:13.669 --> 01:18:13.679 align:start position:0% >> So you're just deleting the whole 01:18:13.679 --> 01:18:15.830 align:start position:0% >> So you're just deleting the whole >> should<01:18:14.159> would<01:18:14.320> it<01:18:14.560> read<01:18:14.800> better<01:18:15.040> to<01:18:15.280> say<01:18:15.520> a 01:18:15.830 --> 01:18:15.840 align:start position:0% >> should would it read better to say a 01:18:15.840 --> 01:18:18.470 align:start position:0% >> should would it read better to say a student's<01:18:16.400> physical<01:18:16.880> health?<01:18:17.840> I<01:18:18.080> don't<01:18:18.159> know. 01:18:18.470 --> 01:18:18.480 align:start position:0% student's physical health? I don't know. 01:18:18.480 --> 01:18:19.830 align:start position:0% student's physical health? I don't know. Something<01:18:18.719> about<01:18:18.960> the<01:18:19.120> way<01:18:19.280> it<01:18:19.520> just<01:18:19.600> says 01:18:19.830 --> 01:18:19.840 align:start position:0% Something about the way it just says 01:18:19.840 --> 01:18:21.830 align:start position:0% Something about the way it just says that<01:18:20.080> support<01:18:20.480> student<01:18:20.960> physical<01:18:21.440> health 01:18:21.830 --> 01:18:21.840 align:start position:0% that support student physical health 01:18:21.840 --> 01:18:25.830 align:start position:0% that support student physical health doesn't<01:18:23.199> quite 01:18:25.830 --> 01:18:25.840 align:start position:0% doesn't quite 01:18:25.840 --> 01:18:28.630 align:start position:0% doesn't quite read<01:18:26.880> grammatically<01:18:27.520> to<01:18:27.679> me<01:18:27.840> but<01:18:28.080> I<01:18:28.239> could<01:18:28.400> be 01:18:28.630 --> 01:18:28.640 align:start position:0% read grammatically to me but I could be 01:18:28.640 --> 01:18:31.750 align:start position:0% read grammatically to me but I could be off 01:18:31.750 --> 01:18:31.760 align:start position:0% 01:18:31.760 --> 01:18:34.550 align:start position:0% as<01:18:32.000> students<01:18:32.400> physical<01:18:32.800> health<01:18:33.120> is<01:18:33.280> that 01:18:34.550 --> 01:18:34.560 align:start position:0% as students physical health is that 01:18:34.560 --> 01:18:38.950 align:start position:0% as students physical health is that >> board<01:18:35.040> yeah<01:18:36.239> okay<01:18:37.520> special<01:18:38.400> you<01:18:38.560> have<01:18:38.719> your 01:18:38.950 --> 01:18:38.960 align:start position:0% >> board yeah okay special you have your 01:18:38.960 --> 01:18:40.950 align:start position:0% >> board yeah okay special you have your hand<01:18:39.280> raised 01:18:40.950 --> 01:18:40.960 align:start position:0% hand raised 01:18:40.960 --> 01:18:43.910 align:start position:0% hand raised >> yes<01:18:41.520> please<01:18:42.080> um<01:18:42.960> physical<01:18:43.360> education 01:18:43.910 --> 01:18:43.920 align:start position:0% >> yes please um physical education 01:18:43.920 --> 01:18:46.950 align:start position:0% >> yes please um physical education criteria<01:18:44.560> is<01:18:44.800> defined<01:18:45.280> on<01:18:45.520> line<01:18:45.840> 27<01:18:46.640> I<01:18:46.800> just 01:18:46.950 --> 01:18:46.960 align:start position:0% criteria is defined on line 27 I just 01:18:46.960 --> 01:18:48.950 align:start position:0% criteria is defined on line 27 I just would<01:18:47.120> like<01:18:47.280> to<01:18:47.440> remind<01:18:48.080> the<01:18:48.400> committee<01:18:48.719> that 01:18:48.950 --> 01:18:48.960 align:start position:0% would like to remind the committee that 01:18:48.960 --> 01:18:51.189 align:start position:0% would like to remind the committee that it<01:18:49.280> does<01:18:49.520> have 01:18:51.189 --> 01:18:51.199 align:start position:0% it does have 01:18:51.199 --> 01:18:52.790 align:start position:0% it does have a<01:18:51.360> definition. 01:18:52.790 --> 01:18:52.800 align:start position:0% a definition. 01:18:52.800 --> 01:18:54.709 align:start position:0% a definition. >> Oh, 01:18:54.709 --> 01:18:54.719 align:start position:0% >> Oh, 01:18:54.719 --> 01:18:56.709 align:start position:0% >> Oh, >> it's<01:18:55.040> physical<01:18:55.440> education<01:18:55.920> criteria<01:18:56.400> is<01:18:56.640> kind 01:18:56.709 --> 01:18:56.719 align:start position:0% >> it's physical education criteria is kind 01:18:56.719 --> 01:18:58.310 align:start position:0% >> it's physical education criteria is kind of<01:18:56.880> weird.<01:18:57.199> It<01:18:57.440> doesn't<01:18:57.600> just<01:18:57.760> mean<01:18:58.000> physical 01:18:58.310 --> 01:18:58.320 align:start position:0% of weird. It doesn't just mean physical 01:18:58.320 --> 01:18:59.990 align:start position:0% of weird. It doesn't just mean physical education. 01:18:59.990 --> 01:19:00.000 align:start position:0% education. 01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:04.149 align:start position:0% education. It<01:19:00.239> means<01:19:01.600> the<01:19:01.920> core<01:19:02.159> standards<01:19:03.360> for<01:19:03.840> either 01:19:04.149 --> 01:19:04.159 align:start position:0% It means the core standards for either 01:19:04.159 --> 01:19:06.229 align:start position:0% It means the core standards for either health<01:19:04.400> or<01:19:04.640> PE. 01:19:06.229 --> 01:19:06.239 align:start position:0% health or PE. 01:19:06.239 --> 01:19:09.110 align:start position:0% health or PE. It's<01:19:06.560> measurable<01:19:07.040> core<01:19:07.280> standards. 01:19:09.110 --> 01:19:09.120 align:start position:0% It's measurable core standards. 01:19:09.120 --> 01:19:11.669 align:start position:0% It's measurable core standards. >> What<01:19:09.360> What<01:19:09.600> line<01:19:09.840> are<01:19:10.000> you<01:19:10.159> on?<01:19:10.400> Would<01:19:10.560> you 01:19:11.669 --> 01:19:11.679 align:start position:0% >> What What line are you on? Would you 01:19:11.679 --> 01:19:12.470 align:start position:0% >> What What line are you on? Would you >> 27? 01:19:12.470 --> 01:19:12.480 align:start position:0% >> 27? 01:19:12.480 --> 01:19:14.390 align:start position:0% >> 27? >> Oh,<01:19:12.800> 27. 01:19:14.390 --> 01:19:14.400 align:start position:0% >> Oh, 27. 01:19:14.400 --> 01:19:18.390 align:start position:0% >> Oh, 27. So<01:19:14.960> it<01:19:15.199> it's<01:19:15.600> it<01:19:16.000> it's<01:19:16.320> a<01:19:16.560> little<01:19:17.360> weird,<01:19:18.080> but 01:19:18.390 --> 01:19:18.400 align:start position:0% So it it's it it's a little weird, but 01:19:18.400 --> 01:19:20.310 align:start position:0% So it it's it it's a little weird, but physical<01:19:18.960> physical<01:19:19.600> physical<01:19:19.920> education 01:19:20.310 --> 01:19:20.320 align:start position:0% physical physical physical education 01:19:20.320 --> 01:19:21.830 align:start position:0% physical physical physical education criteria<01:19:20.880> doesn't<01:19:21.120> mean<01:19:21.280> only<01:19:21.520> physical 01:19:21.830 --> 01:19:21.840 align:start position:0% criteria doesn't mean only physical 01:19:21.840 --> 01:19:23.669 align:start position:0% criteria doesn't mean only physical education.<01:19:22.480> I<01:19:22.719> know<01:19:22.800> it's<01:19:23.040> weird. 01:19:23.669 --> 01:19:23.679 align:start position:0% education. I know it's weird. 01:19:23.679 --> 01:19:27.750 align:start position:0% education. I know it's weird. >> Okay. 01:19:27.750 --> 01:19:27.760 align:start position:0% 01:19:27.760 --> 01:19:29.990 align:start position:0% >> So<01:19:28.000> then<01:19:28.320> should<01:19:28.560> the<01:19:28.880> should<01:19:29.040> it<01:19:29.520> be<01:19:29.760> as 01:19:29.990 --> 01:19:30.000 align:start position:0% >> So then should the should it be as 01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:31.750 align:start position:0% >> So then should the should it be as written<01:19:30.480> that<01:19:30.800> school<01:19:31.120> policies<01:19:31.520> or 01:19:31.750 --> 01:19:31.760 align:start position:0% written that school policies or 01:19:31.760 --> 01:19:33.830 align:start position:0% written that school policies or practices<01:19:32.159> that<01:19:32.480> support<01:19:32.800> student<01:19:33.120> wellness 01:19:33.830 --> 01:19:33.840 align:start position:0% practices that support student wellness 01:19:33.840 --> 01:19:36.229 align:start position:0% practices that support student wellness because<01:19:34.400> is<01:19:34.640> wellness<01:19:35.440> our<01:19:35.760> physical 01:19:36.229 --> 01:19:36.239 align:start position:0% because is wellness our physical 01:19:36.239 --> 01:19:39.030 align:start position:0% because is wellness our physical education<01:19:36.880> criteria<01:19:37.520> is<01:19:37.840> beyond<01:19:38.480> just<01:19:38.719> the 01:19:39.030 --> 01:19:39.040 align:start position:0% education criteria is beyond just the 01:19:39.040 --> 01:19:41.990 align:start position:0% education criteria is beyond just the nutrition<01:19:39.440> and<01:19:39.600> the<01:19:39.760> physical<01:19:40.640> education.<01:19:41.760> Is 01:19:41.990 --> 01:19:42.000 align:start position:0% nutrition and the physical education. Is 01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:43.510 align:start position:0% nutrition and the physical education. Is that 01:19:43.510 --> 01:19:43.520 align:start position:0% that 01:19:43.520 --> 01:19:45.350 align:start position:0% that is<01:19:43.760> that<01:19:43.920> why<01:19:44.080> we<01:19:44.320> have<01:19:44.400> the<01:19:44.640> wellness<01:19:45.040> there 01:19:45.350 --> 01:19:45.360 align:start position:0% is that why we have the wellness there 01:19:45.360 --> 01:19:47.030 align:start position:0% is that why we have the wellness there is<01:19:45.600> because<01:19:45.840> we're<01:19:46.080> saying<01:19:46.320> we're<01:19:46.640> going<01:19:46.800> back 01:19:47.030 --> 01:19:47.040 align:start position:0% is because we're saying we're going back 01:19:47.040 --> 01:19:49.669 align:start position:0% is because we're saying we're going back to<01:19:47.280> that<01:19:47.679> broad<01:19:48.080> category<01:19:48.719> of<01:19:49.280> physical 01:19:49.669 --> 01:19:49.679 align:start position:0% to that broad category of physical 01:19:49.679 --> 01:19:55.189 align:start position:0% to that broad category of physical education<01:19:50.239> criteria. 01:19:55.189 --> 01:19:55.199 align:start position:0% 01:19:55.199 --> 01:19:57.510 align:start position:0% >> I<01:19:55.360> guess<01:19:56.000> we<01:19:56.159> wanted<01:19:56.480> the<01:19:56.640> broad<01:19:56.960> category. 01:19:57.510 --> 01:19:57.520 align:start position:0% >> I guess we wanted the broad category. 01:19:57.520 --> 01:19:58.790 align:start position:0% >> I guess we wanted the broad category. That's<01:19:57.840> why 01:19:58.790 --> 01:19:58.800 align:start position:0% That's why 01:19:58.800 --> 01:20:00.870 align:start position:0% That's why >> but<01:19:59.040> but<01:19:59.040> but<01:19:59.440> that's<01:19:59.600> a<01:19:59.760> Jod<01:20:00.239> question<01:20:00.640> in 01:20:00.870 --> 01:20:00.880 align:start position:0% >> but but but that's a Jod question in 01:20:00.880 --> 01:20:02.790 align:start position:0% >> but but but that's a Jod question in terms<01:20:01.040> of<01:20:01.280> the<01:20:01.679> definition<01:20:02.159> of<01:20:02.400> physical 01:20:02.790 --> 01:20:02.800 align:start position:0% terms of the definition of physical 01:20:02.800 --> 01:20:05.270 align:start position:0% terms of the definition of physical education<01:20:03.360> criteria. 01:20:05.270 --> 01:20:05.280 align:start position:0% education criteria. 01:20:05.280 --> 01:20:07.669 align:start position:0% education criteria. I<01:20:05.520> mean<01:20:05.679> I<01:20:05.840> think<01:20:05.920> you<01:20:06.159> could<01:20:06.480> right<01:20:06.800> there<01:20:07.120> is 01:20:07.669 --> 01:20:07.679 align:start position:0% I mean I think you could right there is 01:20:07.679 --> 01:20:09.750 align:start position:0% I mean I think you could right there is that<01:20:08.000> you<01:20:08.159> wanted<01:20:08.400> the<01:20:08.719> school<01:20:09.040> policies<01:20:09.520> and 01:20:09.750 --> 01:20:09.760 align:start position:0% that you wanted the school policies and 01:20:09.760 --> 01:20:13.510 align:start position:0% that you wanted the school policies and practices<01:20:10.159> to<01:20:10.400> support<01:20:11.040> student 01:20:13.510 --> 01:20:13.520 align:start position:0% practices to support student 01:20:13.520 --> 01:20:15.590 align:start position:0% practices to support student in<01:20:14.000> bring<01:20:14.320> back<01:20:14.480> the<01:20:14.719> definition<01:20:15.199> that's<01:20:15.440> the 01:20:15.590 --> 01:20:15.600 align:start position:0% in bring back the definition that's the 01:20:15.600 --> 01:20:18.310 align:start position:0% in bring back the definition that's the physical<01:20:15.920> education<01:20:16.320> criteria.<01:20:17.199> However, 01:20:18.310 --> 01:20:18.320 align:start position:0% physical education criteria. However, 01:20:18.320 --> 01:20:21.750 align:start position:0% physical education criteria. However, that<01:20:18.640> does<01:20:18.960> limit<01:20:20.000> that<01:20:20.320> it's<01:20:21.120> because<01:20:21.520> where 01:20:21.750 --> 01:20:21.760 align:start position:0% that does limit that it's because where 01:20:21.760 --> 01:20:23.990 align:start position:0% that does limit that it's because where that's<01:20:22.080> defined<01:20:22.400> as<01:20:22.719> our<01:20:22.960> core<01:20:23.199> standards 01:20:23.990 --> 01:20:24.000 align:start position:0% that's defined as our core standards 01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:25.750 align:start position:0% that's defined as our core standards that<01:20:24.239> would<01:20:24.400> not<01:20:24.560> be<01:20:24.800> recess<01:20:25.360> that<01:20:25.520> would<01:20:25.679> not 01:20:25.750 --> 01:20:25.760 align:start position:0% that would not be recess that would not 01:20:25.760 --> 01:20:27.189 align:start position:0% that would not be recess that would not necessarily<01:20:26.080> be<01:20:26.239> the<01:20:26.400> presidential<01:20:26.800> fitness 01:20:27.189 --> 01:20:27.199 align:start position:0% necessarily be the presidential fitness 01:20:27.199 --> 01:20:31.510 align:start position:0% necessarily be the presidential fitness test.<01:20:28.400> So<01:20:29.360> um<01:20:29.679> I<01:20:29.840> I<01:20:30.239> think<01:20:30.719> you<01:20:31.040> could<01:20:31.199> say<01:20:31.360> that 01:20:31.510 --> 01:20:31.520 align:start position:0% test. So um I I think you could say that 01:20:31.520 --> 01:20:33.110 align:start position:0% test. So um I I think you could say that the<01:20:31.760> policies<01:20:32.080> and<01:20:32.239> practices<01:20:32.800> support 01:20:33.110 --> 01:20:33.120 align:start position:0% the policies and practices support 01:20:33.120 --> 01:20:36.390 align:start position:0% the policies and practices support student 01:20:36.390 --> 01:20:36.400 align:start position:0% 01:20:36.400 --> 01:20:39.910 align:start position:0% I<01:20:36.560> mean<01:20:37.840> physical<01:20:38.239> health<01:20:38.480> works.<01:20:39.040> It's<01:20:39.440> but<01:20:39.760> I 01:20:39.910 --> 01:20:39.920 align:start position:0% I mean physical health works. It's but I 01:20:39.920 --> 01:20:42.470 align:start position:0% I mean physical health works. It's but I mean<01:20:40.960> nutrition 01:20:42.470 --> 01:20:42.480 align:start position:0% mean nutrition 01:20:42.480 --> 01:20:45.590 align:start position:0% mean nutrition and<01:20:43.440> fitness<01:20:44.239> are<01:20:45.199> more 01:20:45.590 --> 01:20:45.600 align:start position:0% and fitness are more 01:20:45.600 --> 01:20:47.910 align:start position:0% and fitness are more >> Yeah.<01:20:45.840> But<01:20:45.920> the<01:20:46.080> nutrition<01:20:46.400> is<01:20:47.520> that's<01:20:47.760> where 01:20:47.910 --> 01:20:47.920 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. But the nutrition is that's where 01:20:47.920 --> 01:20:50.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. But the nutrition is that's where they<01:20:48.080> I<01:20:48.320> made<01:20:48.400> the<01:20:48.640> mistake 01:20:50.550 --> 01:20:50.560 align:start position:0% they I made the mistake 01:20:50.560 --> 01:20:53.669 align:start position:0% they I made the mistake >> I<01:20:50.719> I<01:20:51.040> think<01:20:51.120> that 01:20:53.669 --> 01:20:53.679 align:start position:0% >> I I think that 01:20:53.679 --> 01:20:57.590 align:start position:0% >> I I think that and<01:20:54.000> this<01:20:54.159> is<01:20:54.480> this<01:20:54.800> is<01:20:54.960> me<01:20:55.199> as<01:20:56.239> um<01:20:56.800> being<01:20:57.120> over 01:20:57.590 --> 01:20:57.600 align:start position:0% and this is this is me as um being over 01:20:57.600 --> 01:20:59.910 align:start position:0% and this is this is me as um being over being<01:20:58.239> um<01:20:58.400> in<01:20:58.640> health<01:20:58.880> education<01:20:59.280> for<01:20:59.600> 19 01:20:59.910 --> 01:20:59.920 align:start position:0% being um in health education for 19 01:20:59.920 --> 01:21:02.070 align:start position:0% being um in health education for 19 years.<01:21:00.719> I<01:21:01.040> think<01:21:01.120> when<01:21:01.360> you<01:21:01.520> say<01:21:01.679> physical 01:21:02.070 --> 01:21:02.080 align:start position:0% years. I think when you say physical 01:21:02.080 --> 01:21:04.550 align:start position:0% years. I think when you say physical health,<01:21:02.480> it<01:21:02.800> could<01:21:03.040> be<01:21:03.199> limiting<01:21:03.840> to<01:21:04.239> the 01:21:04.550 --> 01:21:04.560 align:start position:0% health, it could be limiting to the 01:21:04.560 --> 01:21:08.149 align:start position:0% health, it could be limiting to the social<01:21:04.880> benefits<01:21:05.600> of<01:21:06.960> having<01:21:07.280> active<01:21:07.679> recess 01:21:08.149 --> 01:21:08.159 align:start position:0% social benefits of having active recess 01:21:08.159 --> 01:21:09.910 align:start position:0% social benefits of having active recess and<01:21:08.480> participating<01:21:08.960> in<01:21:09.120> physical<01:21:09.440> education 01:21:09.910 --> 01:21:09.920 align:start position:0% and participating in physical education 01:21:09.920 --> 01:21:12.310 align:start position:0% and participating in physical education programs.<01:21:10.880> Um<01:21:11.360> because<01:21:11.679> I<01:21:11.840> think<01:21:12.000> social 01:21:12.310 --> 01:21:12.320 align:start position:0% programs. Um because I think social 01:21:12.320 --> 01:21:14.070 align:start position:0% programs. Um because I think social health<01:21:12.480> is<01:21:12.640> an<01:21:12.880> absolute<01:21:13.280> benefit<01:21:13.520> for<01:21:13.840> it. 01:21:14.070 --> 01:21:14.080 align:start position:0% health is an absolute benefit for it. 01:21:14.080 --> 01:21:15.510 align:start position:0% health is an absolute benefit for it. And<01:21:14.239> then<01:21:14.480> when<01:21:14.719> we're<01:21:14.960> more<01:21:15.120> physically 01:21:15.510 --> 01:21:15.520 align:start position:0% And then when we're more physically 01:21:15.520 --> 01:21:16.790 align:start position:0% And then when we're more physically healthy,<01:21:15.760> we<01:21:15.920> have<01:21:16.080> we're<01:21:16.320> more<01:21:16.480> mentally 01:21:16.790 --> 01:21:16.800 align:start position:0% healthy, we have we're more mentally 01:21:16.800 --> 01:21:18.070 align:start position:0% healthy, we have we're more mentally healthy.<01:21:17.120> And<01:21:17.280> that<01:21:17.520> goes<01:21:17.679> back<01:21:17.760> to<01:21:17.840> our 01:21:18.070 --> 01:21:18.080 align:start position:0% healthy. And that goes back to our 01:21:18.080 --> 01:21:20.390 align:start position:0% healthy. And that goes back to our health<01:21:18.320> triangle<01:21:19.280> that<01:21:19.679> all<01:21:19.920> of<01:21:20.000> our<01:21:20.159> health 01:21:20.390 --> 01:21:20.400 align:start position:0% health triangle that all of our health 01:21:20.400 --> 01:21:23.669 align:start position:0% health triangle that all of our health standards<01:21:21.440> evolve<01:21:21.920> around.<01:21:22.480> Um<01:21:23.040> so<01:21:23.280> I<01:21:23.520> think 01:21:23.669 --> 01:21:23.679 align:start position:0% standards evolve around. Um so I think 01:21:23.679 --> 01:21:26.470 align:start position:0% standards evolve around. Um so I think that<01:21:23.920> you<01:21:24.880> you<01:21:25.199> could<01:21:25.440> say<01:21:25.920> health<01:21:26.159> and 01:21:26.470 --> 01:21:26.480 align:start position:0% that you you could say health and 01:21:26.480 --> 01:21:29.830 align:start position:0% that you you could say health and fitness.<01:21:27.679> Um,<01:21:28.320> right<01:21:28.640> there<01:21:29.120> there<01:21:29.360> there's<01:21:29.600> a 01:21:29.830 --> 01:21:29.840 align:start position:0% fitness. Um, right there there there's a 01:21:29.840 --> 01:21:31.350 align:start position:0% fitness. Um, right there there there's a lot<01:21:29.920> of<01:21:30.000> ways<01:21:30.239> that<01:21:30.400> you<01:21:30.560> could<01:21:30.800> narrow<01:21:31.120> it 01:21:31.350 --> 01:21:31.360 align:start position:0% lot of ways that you could narrow it 01:21:31.360 --> 01:21:33.350 align:start position:0% lot of ways that you could narrow it down<01:21:31.840> without<01:21:32.320> saying<01:21:32.640> only<01:21:32.960> physical 01:21:33.350 --> 01:21:33.360 align:start position:0% down without saying only physical 01:21:33.360 --> 01:21:35.430 align:start position:0% down without saying only physical health.<01:21:34.159> Um,<01:21:34.880> so<01:21:35.040> you're<01:21:35.280> saying 01:21:35.430 --> 01:21:35.440 align:start position:0% health. Um, so you're saying 01:21:35.440 --> 01:21:38.550 align:start position:0% health. Um, so you're saying >> I<01:21:35.600> like<01:21:35.840> health<01:21:36.239> and<01:21:36.480> fitness.<01:21:37.040> I<01:21:37.280> think<01:21:37.440> that 01:21:38.550 --> 01:21:38.560 align:start position:0% >> I like health and fitness. I think that 01:21:38.560 --> 01:21:40.550 align:start position:0% >> I like health and fitness. I think that could<01:21:38.880> we<01:21:39.120> just<01:21:39.280> take<01:21:39.520> out<01:21:39.679> the<01:21:39.920> physical<01:21:40.320> that 01:21:40.550 --> 01:21:40.560 align:start position:0% could we just take out the physical that 01:21:40.560 --> 01:21:43.990 align:start position:0% could we just take out the physical that support<01:21:40.960> student<01:21:41.280> health<01:21:41.520> and<01:21:41.760> fitness? 01:21:43.990 --> 01:21:44.000 align:start position:0% support student health and fitness? 01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:45.510 align:start position:0% support student health and fitness? >> Does<01:21:44.159> it<01:21:44.400> need<01:21:44.560> the<01:21:44.719> word<01:21:44.880> physical?<01:21:45.360> Because 01:21:45.510 --> 01:21:45.520 align:start position:0% >> Does it need the word physical? Because 01:21:45.520 --> 01:21:47.110 align:start position:0% >> Does it need the word physical? Because we've<01:21:45.679> got<01:21:45.840> physical<01:21:46.239> at<01:21:46.480> the<01:21:46.640> top<01:21:46.719> of<01:21:46.880> that 01:21:47.110 --> 01:21:47.120 align:start position:0% we've got physical at the top of that 01:21:47.120 --> 01:21:49.110 align:start position:0% we've got physical at the top of that section<01:21:47.520> on<01:21:47.840> 64, 01:21:49.110 --> 01:21:49.120 align:start position:0% section on 64, 01:21:49.120 --> 01:21:51.430 align:start position:0% section on 64, >> line<01:21:49.520> 64. 01:21:51.430 --> 01:21:51.440 align:start position:0% >> line 64. 01:21:51.440 --> 01:21:53.350 align:start position:0% >> line 64. >> Do<01:21:51.600> we<01:21:51.760> have<01:21:51.840> a<01:21:52.000> problem<01:21:52.159> with<01:21:52.400> wellness?<01:21:52.960> Help 01:21:53.350 --> 01:21:53.360 align:start position:0% >> Do we have a problem with wellness? Help 01:21:53.360 --> 01:21:55.110 align:start position:0% >> Do we have a problem with wellness? Help me<01:21:53.600> understand<01:21:54.080> what<01:21:54.320> I'm<01:21:54.480> missing. 01:21:55.110 --> 01:21:55.120 align:start position:0% me understand what I'm missing. 01:21:55.120 --> 01:21:57.910 align:start position:0% me understand what I'm missing. >> It<01:21:55.280> broadens<01:21:55.679> it<01:21:55.840> out.<01:21:57.040> We<01:21:57.280> I<01:21:57.440> don't<01:21:57.679> The 01:21:57.910 --> 01:21:57.920 align:start position:0% >> It broadens it out. We I don't The 01:21:57.920 --> 01:22:01.830 align:start position:0% >> It broadens it out. We I don't The wellness<01:21:58.320> policies<01:21:58.960> are<01:22:00.159> normally<01:22:01.120> they<01:22:01.520> sit 01:22:01.830 --> 01:22:01.840 align:start position:0% wellness policies are normally they sit 01:22:01.840 --> 01:22:03.669 align:start position:0% wellness policies are normally they sit with<01:22:02.080> physical<01:22:02.480> and<01:22:02.800> nutrition,<01:22:03.199> but<01:22:03.440> they 01:22:03.669 --> 01:22:03.679 align:start position:0% with physical and nutrition, but they 01:22:03.679 --> 01:22:06.870 align:start position:0% with physical and nutrition, but they also<01:22:04.000> are<01:22:05.440> parking<01:22:05.760> your<01:22:06.000> car,<01:22:06.480> letting<01:22:06.719> your 01:22:06.870 --> 01:22:06.880 align:start position:0% also are parking your car, letting your 01:22:06.880 --> 01:22:08.229 align:start position:0% also are parking your car, letting your car<01:22:07.120> run<01:22:07.360> while<01:22:07.520> you're<01:22:07.760> dropping<01:22:08.080> your 01:22:08.229 --> 01:22:08.239 align:start position:0% car run while you're dropping your 01:22:08.239 --> 01:22:10.149 align:start position:0% car run while you're dropping your student<01:22:08.560> off.<01:22:09.040> It's<01:22:09.280> I<01:22:09.520> when<01:22:09.760> I<01:22:09.840> looked<01:22:10.080> at 01:22:10.149 --> 01:22:10.159 align:start position:0% student off. It's I when I looked at 01:22:10.159 --> 01:22:11.750 align:start position:0% student off. It's I when I looked at those<01:22:10.320> and<01:22:10.560> I<01:22:10.719> understand<01:22:10.960> that<01:22:11.120> that<01:22:11.440> was<01:22:11.520> a 01:22:11.750 --> 01:22:11.760 align:start position:0% those and I understand that that was a 01:22:11.760 --> 01:22:13.910 align:start position:0% those and I understand that that was a broad<01:22:12.400> thing,<01:22:12.639> but<01:22:12.880> it<01:22:13.040> it<01:22:13.360> I<01:22:13.600> think<01:22:13.679> it 01:22:13.910 --> 01:22:13.920 align:start position:0% broad thing, but it it I think it 01:22:13.920 --> 01:22:16.310 align:start position:0% broad thing, but it it I think it broadens<01:22:14.239> it<01:22:14.400> out<01:22:14.560> where<01:22:14.800> it<01:22:14.960> it<01:22:15.920> if<01:22:16.159> we're 01:22:16.310 --> 01:22:16.320 align:start position:0% broadens it out where it it if we're 01:22:16.320 --> 01:22:18.229 align:start position:0% broadens it out where it it if we're trying<01:22:16.400> to<01:22:16.560> keep<01:22:16.719> it<01:22:16.880> narrowly<01:22:17.360> scoped,<01:22:17.920> then 01:22:18.229 --> 01:22:18.239 align:start position:0% trying to keep it narrowly scoped, then 01:22:18.239 --> 01:22:21.270 align:start position:0% trying to keep it narrowly scoped, then we<01:22:18.480> start 01:22:21.270 --> 01:22:21.280 align:start position:0% we start 01:22:21.280 --> 01:22:26.229 align:start position:0% we start opening<01:22:21.679> it<01:22:21.840> up<01:22:22.159> broader 01:22:26.229 --> 01:22:26.239 align:start position:0% 01:22:26.239 --> 01:22:27.990 align:start position:0% and<01:22:26.480> those<01:22:26.800> already<01:22:27.199> have<01:22:27.360> to<01:22:27.520> be<01:22:27.600> done<01:22:27.760> in<01:22:27.920> the 01:22:27.990 --> 01:22:28.000 align:start position:0% and those already have to be done in the 01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:29.350 align:start position:0% and those already have to be done in the school.<01:22:28.239> I'm<01:22:28.639> there<01:22:28.880> are<01:22:29.040> things<01:22:29.199> that 01:22:29.350 --> 01:22:29.360 align:start position:0% school. I'm there are things that 01:22:29.360 --> 01:22:30.629 align:start position:0% school. I'm there are things that already<01:22:29.600> have<01:22:29.760> to<01:22:29.840> be<01:22:30.000> done.<01:22:30.239> You<01:22:30.400> have<01:22:30.480> to 01:22:30.629 --> 01:22:30.639 align:start position:0% already have to be done. You have to 01:22:30.639 --> 01:22:32.310 align:start position:0% already have to be done. You have to provide<01:22:31.120> medications<01:22:31.600> a<01:22:31.840> certain<01:22:32.000> way.<01:22:32.159> You 01:22:32.310 --> 01:22:32.320 align:start position:0% provide medications a certain way. You 01:22:32.320 --> 01:22:34.310 align:start position:0% provide medications a certain way. You have<01:22:32.400> to<01:22:32.480> do<01:22:32.639> CP,<01:22:33.040> right?<01:22:33.280> Those<01:22:33.440> are<01:22:33.600> already. 01:22:34.310 --> 01:22:34.320 align:start position:0% have to do CP, right? Those are already. 01:22:34.320 --> 01:22:37.750 align:start position:0% have to do CP, right? Those are already. So<01:22:34.560> this<01:22:34.800> really<01:22:35.120> tries<01:22:35.360> to<01:22:36.239> in<01:22:36.480> my<01:22:36.719> view<01:22:37.520> stay 01:22:37.750 --> 01:22:37.760 align:start position:0% So this really tries to in my view stay 01:22:37.760 --> 01:22:39.669 align:start position:0% So this really tries to in my view stay focused<01:22:38.239> on<01:22:38.560> the<01:22:38.719> intent<01:22:39.120> so<01:22:39.280> it<01:22:39.520> doesn't 01:22:39.669 --> 01:22:39.679 align:start position:0% focused on the intent so it doesn't 01:22:39.679 --> 01:22:41.189 align:start position:0% focused on the intent so it doesn't become<01:22:39.920> so<01:22:40.080> broad<01:22:40.239> that<01:22:40.480> it<01:22:40.639> really<01:22:40.880> doesn't 01:22:41.189 --> 01:22:41.199 align:start position:0% become so broad that it really doesn't 01:22:41.199 --> 01:22:44.070 align:start position:0% become so broad that it really doesn't mean<01:22:42.320> what<01:22:42.560> we<01:22:42.719> intended<01:22:43.120> it<01:22:43.280> to<01:22:43.440> mean.<01:22:44.080> At 01:22:44.070 --> 01:22:44.080 align:start position:0% mean what we intended it to mean. At 01:22:44.080 --> 01:22:45.750 align:start position:0% mean what we intended it to mean. At least<01:22:44.400> that's<01:22:44.719> what<01:22:44.880> the<01:22:45.120> way<01:22:45.280> I<01:22:45.520> would<01:22:45.679> like 01:22:45.750 --> 01:22:45.760 align:start position:0% least that's what the way I would like 01:22:45.760 --> 01:22:48.709 align:start position:0% least that's what the way I would like to<01:22:45.920> see<01:22:46.000> it.<01:22:46.320> But<01:22:46.480> I'm<01:22:46.800> open<01:22:47.120> to 01:22:48.709 --> 01:22:48.719 align:start position:0% to see it. But I'm open to 01:22:48.719 --> 01:22:51.110 align:start position:0% to see it. But I'm open to board<01:22:49.040> members<01:22:49.360> here. 01:22:51.110 --> 01:22:51.120 align:start position:0% board members here. 01:22:51.120 --> 01:22:54.229 align:start position:0% board members here. Yes.<01:22:51.440> Go<01:22:51.600> ahead. 01:22:54.229 --> 01:22:54.239 align:start position:0% Yes. Go ahead. 01:22:54.239 --> 01:22:56.310 align:start position:0% Yes. Go ahead. Shander,<01:22:55.040> arts<01:22:55.280> and<01:22:55.440> wellness<01:22:55.760> coordinator. 01:22:56.310 --> 01:22:56.320 align:start position:0% Shander, arts and wellness coordinator. 01:22:56.320 --> 01:22:58.470 align:start position:0% Shander, arts and wellness coordinator. You<01:22:56.560> might<01:22:56.719> also<01:22:57.040> consider<01:22:57.840> saying<01:22:58.239> health 01:22:58.470 --> 01:22:58.480 align:start position:0% You might also consider saying health 01:22:58.480 --> 01:23:01.910 align:start position:0% You might also consider saying health and<01:22:58.800> physical<01:22:59.280> activity<01:23:00.480> because<01:23:00.800> that<01:23:01.440> that 01:23:01.910 --> 01:23:01.920 align:start position:0% and physical activity because that that 01:23:01.920 --> 01:23:03.750 align:start position:0% and physical activity because that that narrows<01:23:02.320> it<01:23:02.480> down<01:23:02.719> a<01:23:03.040> little<01:23:03.120> bit<01:23:03.280> more<01:23:03.440> from 01:23:03.750 --> 01:23:03.760 align:start position:0% narrows it down a little bit more from 01:23:03.760 --> 01:23:05.669 align:start position:0% narrows it down a little bit more from wellness<01:23:04.159> to<01:23:04.480> physical<01:23:04.800> activity,<01:23:05.280> but<01:23:05.440> it 01:23:05.669 --> 01:23:05.679 align:start position:0% wellness to physical activity, but it 01:23:05.679 --> 01:23:09.750 align:start position:0% wellness to physical activity, but it keeps<01:23:05.840> it<01:23:06.080> broad<01:23:06.400> to<01:23:07.440> the<01:23:07.760> recess<01:23:08.400> piece<01:23:08.880> or, 01:23:09.750 --> 01:23:09.760 align:start position:0% keeps it broad to the recess piece or, 01:23:09.760 --> 01:23:12.229 align:start position:0% keeps it broad to the recess piece or, you<01:23:10.000> know,<01:23:10.320> doing<01:23:11.440> tests<01:23:11.679> or<01:23:11.920> things<01:23:12.080> like 01:23:12.229 --> 01:23:12.239 align:start position:0% you know, doing tests or things like 01:23:12.239 --> 01:23:14.310 align:start position:0% you know, doing tests or things like that.<01:23:12.480> So,<01:23:12.719> it<01:23:12.960> it<01:23:13.360> narrows<01:23:13.679> it<01:23:13.840> down,<01:23:14.080> but 01:23:14.310 --> 01:23:14.320 align:start position:0% that. So, it it narrows it down, but 01:23:14.320 --> 01:23:16.149 align:start position:0% that. So, it it narrows it down, but still<01:23:14.560> keeps<01:23:14.800> it<01:23:15.199> a<01:23:15.440> little<01:23:15.520> bit<01:23:15.679> broad<01:23:15.920> for 01:23:16.149 --> 01:23:16.159 align:start position:0% still keeps it a little bit broad for 01:23:16.159 --> 01:23:18.149 align:start position:0% still keeps it a little bit broad for them<01:23:16.320> to<01:23:16.480> make<01:23:16.639> those<01:23:16.880> def,<01:23:17.280> you<01:23:17.440> know,<01:23:17.600> goals 01:23:18.149 --> 01:23:18.159 align:start position:0% them to make those def, you know, goals 01:23:18.159 --> 01:23:21.910 align:start position:0% them to make those def, you know, goals around<01:23:18.480> that. 01:23:21.910 --> 01:23:21.920 align:start position:0% 01:23:21.920 --> 01:23:23.350 align:start position:0% board<01:23:22.159> member<01:23:22.400> Britain.<01:23:22.719> Does<01:23:22.880> that<01:23:23.120> sound 01:23:23.350 --> 01:23:23.360 align:start position:0% board member Britain. Does that sound 01:23:23.360 --> 01:23:25.350 align:start position:0% board member Britain. Does that sound like<01:23:24.080> you<01:23:24.239> want<01:23:24.400> to? 01:23:25.350 --> 01:23:25.360 align:start position:0% like you want to? 01:23:25.360 --> 01:23:28.070 align:start position:0% like you want to? >> Yes,<01:23:25.679> I<01:23:25.840> like<01:23:26.000> that.<01:23:26.400> I<01:23:26.639> can<01:23:26.960> How?<01:23:27.520> So,<01:23:27.760> let's 01:23:28.070 --> 01:23:28.080 align:start position:0% >> Yes, I like that. I can How? So, let's 01:23:28.080 --> 01:23:29.189 align:start position:0% >> Yes, I like that. I can How? So, let's let's<01:23:28.239> do<01:23:28.560> student 01:23:29.189 --> 01:23:29.199 align:start position:0% let's do student 01:23:29.199 --> 01:23:30.070 align:start position:0% let's do student >> wording 01:23:30.070 --> 01:23:30.080 align:start position:0% >> wording 01:23:30.080 --> 01:23:32.229 align:start position:0% >> wording >> remove<01:23:30.400> physical<01:23:30.880> put<01:23:31.199> health<01:23:31.440> and<01:23:31.840> physical 01:23:32.229 --> 01:23:32.239 align:start position:0% >> remove physical put health and physical 01:23:32.239 --> 01:23:33.990 align:start position:0% >> remove physical put health and physical activity. 01:23:33.990 --> 01:23:34.000 align:start position:0% activity. 01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:35.110 align:start position:0% activity. >> Yeah. 01:23:35.110 --> 01:23:35.120 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:23:35.120 --> 01:23:37.590 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> And<01:23:35.360> I<01:23:35.440> I<01:23:35.840> think<01:23:36.000> the<01:23:36.239> the<01:23:36.800> discussion<01:23:37.280> around 01:23:37.590 --> 01:23:37.600 align:start position:0% >> And I I think the the discussion around 01:23:37.600 --> 01:23:40.550 align:start position:0% >> And I I think the the discussion around the<01:23:38.000> word<01:23:38.639> wellness<01:23:39.199> is<01:23:39.679> kind<01:23:39.920> of<01:23:40.000> stems<01:23:40.400> back 01:23:40.550 --> 01:23:40.560 align:start position:0% the word wellness is kind of stems back 01:23:40.560 --> 01:23:43.510 align:start position:0% the word wellness is kind of stems back to<01:23:40.800> where<01:23:41.360> my<01:23:41.840> original<01:23:42.400> question<01:23:42.719> was.<01:23:43.280> My 01:23:43.510 --> 01:23:43.520 align:start position:0% to where my original question was. My 01:23:43.520 --> 01:23:45.990 align:start position:0% to where my original question was. My first<01:23:43.679> one<01:23:43.840> was<01:23:44.080> about<01:23:44.320> studying<01:23:44.639> the<01:23:44.800> rural 01:23:45.990 --> 01:23:46.000 align:start position:0% first one was about studying the rural 01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:49.350 align:start position:0% first one was about studying the rural health<01:23:46.480> transformation,<01:23:47.920> you<01:23:48.159> know,<01:23:48.400> program 01:23:49.350 --> 01:23:49.360 align:start position:0% health transformation, you know, program 01:23:49.360 --> 01:23:51.990 align:start position:0% health transformation, you know, program is<01:23:49.600> that<01:23:49.840> it's<01:23:50.239> very<01:23:51.040> it's<01:23:51.440> got<01:23:51.600> a<01:23:51.840> lot<01:23:51.920> of 01:23:51.990 --> 01:23:52.000 align:start position:0% is that it's very it's got a lot of 01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:53.590 align:start position:0% is that it's very it's got a lot of stuff.<01:23:52.239> You<01:23:52.480> mentioned<01:23:52.719> that<01:23:52.960> it's<01:23:53.120> in<01:23:53.360> all 01:23:53.590 --> 01:23:53.600 align:start position:0% stuff. You mentioned that it's in all 01:23:53.600 --> 01:23:56.870 align:start position:0% stuff. You mentioned that it's in all all<01:23:53.920> different<01:23:54.239> sorts<01:23:54.560> of<01:23:55.199> um<01:23:55.840> you<01:23:56.000> know, 01:23:56.870 --> 01:23:56.880 align:start position:0% all different sorts of um you know, 01:23:56.880 --> 01:23:59.350 align:start position:0% all different sorts of um you know, agencies<01:23:57.600> and<01:23:58.239> programs<01:23:58.719> that<01:23:58.880> are<01:23:59.120> being 01:23:59.350 --> 01:23:59.360 align:start position:0% agencies and programs that are being 01:23:59.360 --> 01:24:01.350 align:start position:0% agencies and programs that are being implemented<01:23:59.920> there.<01:24:00.239> So,<01:24:00.880> I'm<01:24:01.120> just 01:24:01.350 --> 01:24:01.360 align:start position:0% implemented there. So, I'm just 01:24:01.360 --> 01:24:03.830 align:start position:0% implemented there. So, I'm just wondering<01:24:01.760> what<01:24:02.080> what<01:24:02.480> our<01:24:02.719> lane<01:24:03.040> is<01:24:03.360> here<01:24:03.600> in 01:24:03.830 --> 01:24:03.840 align:start position:0% wondering what what our lane is here in 01:24:03.840 --> 01:24:05.990 align:start position:0% wondering what what our lane is here in our<01:24:04.000> involvement<01:24:04.880> and<01:24:05.199> if<01:24:05.360> we're<01:24:05.600> making<01:24:05.840> sure 01:24:05.990 --> 01:24:06.000 align:start position:0% our involvement and if we're making sure 01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:08.149 align:start position:0% our involvement and if we're making sure that<01:24:06.239> we<01:24:06.480> are<01:24:06.719> keeping<01:24:06.960> it<01:24:07.120> aligned<01:24:07.520> to<01:24:07.679> that 01:24:08.149 --> 01:24:08.159 align:start position:0% that we are keeping it aligned to that 01:24:08.159 --> 01:24:10.390 align:start position:0% that we are keeping it aligned to that specific<01:24:08.719> lane.<01:24:09.360> So<01:24:09.600> wellness<01:24:10.080> definitely 01:24:10.390 --> 01:24:10.400 align:start position:0% specific lane. So wellness definitely 01:24:10.400 --> 01:24:12.870 align:start position:0% specific lane. So wellness definitely broadens<01:24:10.800> it<01:24:10.960> out<01:24:11.120> to<01:24:11.280> the<01:24:11.440> full<01:24:11.679> scope<01:24:12.400> in<01:24:12.719> my 01:24:12.870 --> 01:24:12.880 align:start position:0% broadens it out to the full scope in my 01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:15.270 align:start position:0% broadens it out to the full scope in my opinion<01:24:13.199> and<01:24:13.440> what<01:24:13.600> I'm<01:24:13.760> reading<01:24:14.080> from<01:24:14.880> from 01:24:15.270 --> 01:24:15.280 align:start position:0% opinion and what I'm reading from from 01:24:15.280 --> 01:24:18.629 align:start position:0% opinion and what I'm reading from from their<01:24:15.600> site<01:24:15.920> itself<01:24:16.639> is<01:24:17.120> is<01:24:17.520> that<01:24:17.840> broader 01:24:18.629 --> 01:24:18.639 align:start position:0% their site itself is is that broader 01:24:18.639 --> 01:24:21.590 align:start position:0% their site itself is is that broader application.<01:24:19.920> So 01:24:21.590 --> 01:24:21.600 align:start position:0% application. So 01:24:21.600 --> 01:24:23.830 align:start position:0% application. So anyway,<01:24:22.080> I<01:24:22.239> think<01:24:22.320> the<01:24:22.560> clarity<01:24:22.960> is<01:24:23.440> probably 01:24:23.830 --> 01:24:23.840 align:start position:0% anyway, I think the clarity is probably 01:24:23.840 --> 01:24:30.950 align:start position:0% anyway, I think the clarity is probably fruitful. 01:24:30.950 --> 01:24:30.960 align:start position:0% 01:24:30.960 --> 01:24:34.870 align:start position:0% Okay. 01:24:34.870 --> 01:24:34.880 align:start position:0% 01:24:34.880 --> 01:24:36.310 align:start position:0% >> Board<01:24:35.199> member<01:24:35.360> Britain,<01:24:35.760> are<01:24:35.840> you<01:24:35.920> good<01:24:36.080> with 01:24:36.310 --> 01:24:36.320 align:start position:0% >> Board member Britain, are you good with 01:24:36.320 --> 01:24:37.830 align:start position:0% >> Board member Britain, are you good with that<01:24:36.800> wording<01:24:37.199> then? 01:24:37.830 --> 01:24:37.840 align:start position:0% that wording then? 01:24:37.840 --> 01:24:40.870 align:start position:0% that wording then? >> Yes.<01:24:39.120> I<01:24:39.440> I<01:24:39.679> just<01:24:39.920> have<01:24:40.000> a<01:24:40.239> question<01:24:40.480> now.<01:24:40.719> What 01:24:40.870 --> 01:24:40.880 align:start position:0% >> Yes. I I just have a question now. What 01:24:40.880 --> 01:24:43.510 align:start position:0% >> Yes. I I just have a question now. What is<01:24:41.040> student<01:24:41.360> health? 01:24:43.510 --> 01:24:43.520 align:start position:0% is student health? 01:24:43.520 --> 01:24:46.629 align:start position:0% is student health? >> Sorry.<01:24:44.320> Is<01:24:44.480> that<01:24:44.719> like<01:24:45.600> nutritional<01:24:46.239> health 01:24:46.629 --> 01:24:46.639 align:start position:0% >> Sorry. Is that like nutritional health 01:24:46.639 --> 01:24:50.149 align:start position:0% >> Sorry. Is that like nutritional health or<01:24:47.440> just<01:24:48.880> health?<01:24:49.360> Like<01:24:49.520> we're<01:24:49.760> healthy, 01:24:50.149 --> 01:24:50.159 align:start position:0% or just health? Like we're healthy, 01:24:50.159 --> 01:24:51.750 align:start position:0% or just health? Like we're healthy, we're<01:24:50.480> bodies<01:24:50.880> healthy,<01:24:51.280> we're<01:24:51.520> eating 01:24:51.750 --> 01:24:51.760 align:start position:0% we're bodies healthy, we're eating 01:24:51.760 --> 01:24:54.149 align:start position:0% we're bodies healthy, we're eating healthy,<01:24:52.239> we're<01:24:52.400> physically<01:24:52.880> healthy.<01:24:53.679> Is<01:24:53.920> is 01:24:54.149 --> 01:24:54.159 align:start position:0% healthy, we're physically healthy. Is is 01:24:54.159 --> 01:24:57.430 align:start position:0% healthy, we're physically healthy. Is is student<01:24:54.560> health?<01:24:54.880> Like<01:24:55.120> also<01:24:55.440> the<01:24:56.639> um 01:24:57.430 --> 01:24:57.440 align:start position:0% student health? Like also the um 01:24:57.440 --> 01:24:59.110 align:start position:0% student health? Like also the um mentally<01:24:57.920> healthy,<01:24:58.320> psychologically 01:24:59.110 --> 01:24:59.120 align:start position:0% mentally healthy, psychologically 01:24:59.120 --> 01:25:00.310 align:start position:0% mentally healthy, psychologically healthy,<01:24:59.520> emotionally<01:24:59.920> healthy, 01:25:00.310 --> 01:25:00.320 align:start position:0% healthy, emotionally healthy, 01:25:00.320 --> 01:25:02.310 align:start position:0% healthy, emotionally healthy, spiritually<01:25:00.800> healthy.<01:25:01.280> Like<01:25:01.920> I'm<01:25:02.159> just 01:25:02.310 --> 01:25:02.320 align:start position:0% spiritually healthy. Like I'm just 01:25:02.320 --> 01:25:04.229 align:start position:0% spiritually healthy. Like I'm just wondering<01:25:02.639> how<01:25:02.880> broad<01:25:03.199> that<01:25:03.440> might<01:25:03.679> imply. 01:25:04.229 --> 01:25:04.239 align:start position:0% wondering how broad that might imply. 01:25:04.239 --> 01:25:06.470 align:start position:0% wondering how broad that might imply. And<01:25:04.400> if<01:25:04.639> it's<01:25:04.880> clear<01:25:05.120> enough,<01:25:05.600> great.<01:25:06.000> if<01:25:06.239> we 01:25:06.470 --> 01:25:06.480 align:start position:0% And if it's clear enough, great. if we 01:25:06.480 --> 01:25:10.870 align:start position:0% And if it's clear enough, great. if we feel<01:25:06.639> like<01:25:06.719> we<01:25:06.960> still<01:25:07.120> need<01:25:07.280> to<01:25:07.520> work<01:25:07.679> on<01:25:07.920> that. 01:25:10.870 --> 01:25:10.880 align:start position:0% feel like we still need to work on that. 01:25:10.880 --> 01:25:12.950 align:start position:0% feel like we still need to work on that. Just<01:25:11.199> wondering<01:25:11.520> we<01:25:11.760> might<01:25:11.920> need<01:25:12.159> to<01:25:12.320> define 01:25:12.950 --> 01:25:12.960 align:start position:0% Just wondering we might need to define 01:25:12.960 --> 01:25:15.590 align:start position:0% Just wondering we might need to define student<01:25:13.280> health 01:25:15.590 --> 01:25:15.600 align:start position:0% student health 01:25:15.600 --> 01:25:17.669 align:start position:0% student health at<01:25:15.679> least<01:25:16.480> somebody<01:25:16.800> reading<01:25:17.040> this<01:25:17.280> will<01:25:17.520> they 01:25:17.669 --> 01:25:17.679 align:start position:0% at least somebody reading this will they 01:25:17.679 --> 01:25:19.350 align:start position:0% at least somebody reading this will they understand<01:25:18.000> what<01:25:18.239> we<01:25:18.560> what<01:25:18.800> we<01:25:18.960> meant<01:25:19.120> by 01:25:19.350 --> 01:25:19.360 align:start position:0% understand what we what we meant by 01:25:19.360 --> 01:25:22.950 align:start position:0% understand what we what we meant by student<01:25:19.600> health. 01:25:22.950 --> 01:25:22.960 align:start position:0% 01:25:22.960 --> 01:25:25.350 align:start position:0% I<01:25:23.199> think<01:25:23.360> so.<01:25:23.600> As<01:25:23.840> I<01:25:24.000> keep<01:25:24.159> reading<01:25:24.639> through,<01:25:25.199> I 01:25:25.350 --> 01:25:25.360 align:start position:0% I think so. As I keep reading through, I 01:25:25.360 --> 01:25:27.110 align:start position:0% I think so. As I keep reading through, I I<01:25:25.679> don't<01:25:25.760> think<01:25:25.920> it<01:25:26.159> goes<01:25:26.400> anywhere<01:25:26.800> else 01:25:27.110 --> 01:25:27.120 align:start position:0% I don't think it goes anywhere else 01:25:27.120 --> 01:25:28.790 align:start position:0% I don't think it goes anywhere else other<01:25:27.360> than<01:25:27.600> physical<01:25:28.080> health,<01:25:28.400> physical 01:25:28.790 --> 01:25:28.800 align:start position:0% other than physical health, physical 01:25:28.800 --> 01:25:31.510 align:start position:0% other than physical health, physical activity<01:25:29.360> where<01:25:29.600> appropriate,<01:25:30.719> measurable, 01:25:31.510 --> 01:25:31.520 align:start position:0% activity where appropriate, measurable, 01:25:31.520 --> 01:25:33.350 align:start position:0% activity where appropriate, measurable, evidence-based.<01:25:32.400> If<01:25:32.560> you<01:25:32.639> look<01:25:32.800> at<01:25:32.880> the<01:25:33.040> lines 01:25:33.350 --> 01:25:33.360 align:start position:0% evidence-based. If you look at the lines 01:25:33.360 --> 01:25:35.669 align:start position:0% evidence-based. If you look at the lines that<01:25:33.600> precede<01:25:34.560> and<01:25:34.800> what's<01:25:35.040> above<01:25:35.360> where<01:25:35.520> it 01:25:35.669 --> 01:25:35.679 align:start position:0% that precede and what's above where it 01:25:35.679 --> 01:25:37.750 align:start position:0% that precede and what's above where it talks<01:25:35.920> about<01:25:36.159> nutrition,<01:25:36.960> standardsbased 01:25:37.750 --> 01:25:37.760 align:start position:0% talks about nutrition, standardsbased 01:25:37.760 --> 01:25:40.550 align:start position:0% talks about nutrition, standardsbased physical<01:25:38.159> education,<01:25:39.280> but<01:25:39.520> I<01:25:39.679> would<01:25:39.760> ask<01:25:40.000> Jod 01:25:40.550 --> 01:25:40.560 align:start position:0% physical education, but I would ask Jod 01:25:40.560 --> 01:25:43.510 align:start position:0% physical education, but I would ask Jod like<01:25:41.360> um<01:25:42.000> but<01:25:42.239> I<01:25:42.480> think<01:25:42.560> it<01:25:42.800> seems<01:25:43.040> clear<01:25:43.280> to 01:25:43.510 --> 01:25:43.520 align:start position:0% like um but I think it seems clear to 01:25:43.520 --> 01:25:49.830 align:start position:0% like um but I think it seems clear to me. 01:25:49.830 --> 01:25:49.840 align:start position:0% 01:25:49.840 --> 01:25:51.510 align:start position:0% >> Did<01:25:50.000> you<01:25:50.159> want<01:25:50.320> me<01:25:50.400> to<01:25:50.560> answer<01:25:50.800> that?<01:25:51.120> Sorry. 01:25:51.510 --> 01:25:51.520 align:start position:0% >> Did you want me to answer that? Sorry. 01:25:51.520 --> 01:25:53.830 align:start position:0% >> Did you want me to answer that? Sorry. Yes,<01:25:51.920> please.<01:25:52.480> Jody,<01:25:53.120> go<01:25:53.280> ahead.<01:25:53.520> What<01:25:53.679> would 01:25:53.830 --> 01:25:53.840 align:start position:0% Yes, please. Jody, go ahead. What would 01:25:53.840 --> 01:25:54.870 align:start position:0% Yes, please. Jody, go ahead. What would you<01:25:54.000> say? 01:25:54.870 --> 01:25:54.880 align:start position:0% you say? 01:25:54.880 --> 01:25:56.310 align:start position:0% you say? >> Well,<01:25:55.040> I<01:25:55.199> I<01:25:55.440> think<01:25:55.520> that<01:25:55.679> the<01:25:55.840> way<01:25:55.920> that<01:25:56.159> it's 01:25:56.310 --> 01:25:56.320 align:start position:0% >> Well, I I think that the way that it's 01:25:56.320 --> 01:25:57.590 align:start position:0% >> Well, I I think that the way that it's been<01:25:56.480> revised,<01:25:56.800> I<01:25:56.960> think<01:25:57.040> it's<01:25:57.199> clear.<01:25:57.440> I 01:25:57.590 --> 01:25:57.600 align:start position:0% been revised, I think it's clear. I 01:25:57.600 --> 01:26:00.550 align:start position:0% been revised, I think it's clear. I think<01:25:57.679> it's<01:25:57.920> clear<01:25:58.239> that<01:25:58.880> that<01:25:59.679> the<01:25:59.679> the<01:26:00.239> focus 01:26:00.550 --> 01:26:00.560 align:start position:0% think it's clear that that the the focus 01:26:00.560 --> 01:26:04.790 align:start position:0% think it's clear that that the the focus needs<01:26:00.880> to<01:26:01.040> be 01:26:04.790 --> 01:26:04.800 align:start position:0% 01:26:04.800 --> 01:26:06.229 align:start position:0% going<01:26:05.120> back<01:26:05.280> to<01:26:05.520> write<01:26:05.760> that<01:26:05.920> physical 01:26:06.229 --> 01:26:06.239 align:start position:0% going back to write that physical 01:26:06.239 --> 01:26:07.750 align:start position:0% going back to write that physical education<01:26:06.639> criteria.<01:26:07.199> It's<01:26:07.360> tied<01:26:07.520> to<01:26:07.679> the 01:26:07.750 --> 01:26:07.760 align:start position:0% education criteria. It's tied to the 01:26:07.760 --> 01:26:09.350 align:start position:0% education criteria. It's tied to the core<01:26:08.000> standards,<01:26:08.320> but<01:26:08.560> we're<01:26:08.719> also<01:26:08.960> saying 01:26:09.350 --> 01:26:09.360 align:start position:0% core standards, but we're also saying 01:26:09.360 --> 01:26:11.510 align:start position:0% core standards, but we're also saying physical<01:26:09.679> activity,<01:26:10.560> which<01:26:10.880> then<01:26:11.120> brings<01:26:11.360> in 01:26:11.510 --> 01:26:11.520 align:start position:0% physical activity, which then brings in 01:26:11.520 --> 01:26:13.590 align:start position:0% physical activity, which then brings in the<01:26:11.760> recess.<01:26:12.239> It<01:26:12.400> brings<01:26:12.639> in<01:26:12.880> the<01:26:13.040> the 01:26:13.590 --> 01:26:13.600 align:start position:0% the recess. It brings in the the 01:26:13.600 --> 01:26:15.669 align:start position:0% the recess. It brings in the the presidential<01:26:14.080> fitness<01:26:14.480> test<01:26:14.800> that<01:26:15.040> we're 01:26:15.669 --> 01:26:15.679 align:start position:0% presidential fitness test that we're 01:26:15.679 --> 01:26:17.750 align:start position:0% presidential fitness test that we're going<01:26:15.920> to<01:26:16.080> implement<01:26:16.480> as<01:26:16.639> well.<01:26:17.120> I<01:26:17.360> I<01:26:17.679> think 01:26:17.750 --> 01:26:17.760 align:start position:0% going to implement as well. I I think 01:26:17.760 --> 01:26:19.669 align:start position:0% going to implement as well. I I think it's<01:26:18.000> really<01:26:18.239> clear.<01:26:18.960> I<01:26:19.120> mean,<01:26:19.199> that's<01:26:19.440> my 01:26:19.669 --> 01:26:19.679 align:start position:0% it's really clear. I mean, that's my 01:26:19.679 --> 01:26:26.070 align:start position:0% it's really clear. I mean, that's my opinion.<01:26:20.239> I<01:26:20.480> think<01:26:20.560> it's<01:26:20.800> clear.<01:26:21.280> Um, 01:26:26.070 --> 01:26:26.080 align:start position:0% 01:26:26.080 --> 01:26:27.590 align:start position:0% member<01:26:26.320> Green,<01:26:26.639> do<01:26:26.719> you<01:26:26.800> have<01:26:26.960> any<01:26:27.120> suggestion 01:26:27.590 --> 01:26:27.600 align:start position:0% member Green, do you have any suggestion 01:26:27.600 --> 01:26:30.149 align:start position:0% member Green, do you have any suggestion there? 01:26:30.149 --> 01:26:30.159 align:start position:0% there? 01:26:30.159 --> 01:26:31.750 align:start position:0% there? >> No,<01:26:30.480> I'm<01:26:30.719> just<01:26:30.960> asking. 01:26:31.750 --> 01:26:31.760 align:start position:0% >> No, I'm just asking. 01:26:31.760 --> 01:26:32.070 align:start position:0% >> No, I'm just asking. >> Okay. 01:26:32.070 --> 01:26:32.080 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 01:26:32.080 --> 01:26:34.470 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> I<01:26:32.320> I'm<01:26:32.560> I'm<01:26:32.800> just<01:26:32.960> wondering<01:26:33.280> if<01:26:33.440> if<01:26:33.920> we<01:26:34.159> were 01:26:34.470 --> 01:26:34.480 align:start position:0% >> I I'm I'm just wondering if if we were 01:26:34.480 --> 01:26:35.910 align:start position:0% >> I I'm I'm just wondering if if we were trying<01:26:34.639> to<01:26:34.800> keep<01:26:34.960> it<01:26:35.120> towards,<01:26:35.600> you<01:26:35.760> know, 01:26:35.910 --> 01:26:35.920 align:start position:0% trying to keep it towards, you know, 01:26:35.920 --> 01:26:37.030 align:start position:0% trying to keep it towards, you know, nutritional<01:26:36.400> and<01:26:36.560> maybe<01:26:36.719> it<01:26:36.800> would<01:26:36.880> be 01:26:37.030 --> 01:26:37.040 align:start position:0% nutritional and maybe it would be 01:26:37.040 --> 01:26:38.790 align:start position:0% nutritional and maybe it would be student<01:26:37.360> nutritional<01:26:38.000> health<01:26:38.159> and<01:26:38.400> physical 01:26:38.790 --> 01:26:38.800 align:start position:0% student nutritional health and physical 01:26:38.800 --> 01:26:40.709 align:start position:0% student nutritional health and physical activity<01:26:39.520> if<01:26:39.760> we<01:26:39.920> wanted<01:26:40.159> to<01:26:40.320> be<01:26:40.480> that 01:26:40.709 --> 01:26:40.719 align:start position:0% activity if we wanted to be that 01:26:40.719 --> 01:26:44.149 align:start position:0% activity if we wanted to be that specific<01:26:41.920> if<01:26:42.080> we<01:26:42.320> feel<01:26:42.560> that<01:26:42.800> the<01:26:43.040> physical<01:26:43.840> or 01:26:44.149 --> 01:26:44.159 align:start position:0% specific if we feel that the physical or 01:26:44.159 --> 01:26:48.390 align:start position:0% specific if we feel that the physical or the<01:26:44.719> student<01:26:45.120> health<01:26:46.159> implies<01:26:46.719> that<01:26:47.679> um<01:26:48.159> and 01:26:48.390 --> 01:26:48.400 align:start position:0% the student health implies that um and 01:26:48.400 --> 01:26:50.149 align:start position:0% the student health implies that um and keeps<01:26:48.639> it<01:26:48.880> within<01:26:49.120> its<01:26:49.360> scope.<01:26:49.600> And<01:26:49.760> I'm<01:26:49.920> also 01:26:50.149 --> 01:26:50.159 align:start position:0% keeps it within its scope. And I'm also 01:26:50.159 --> 01:26:55.189 align:start position:0% keeps it within its scope. And I'm also seeing<01:26:51.280> uh<01:26:51.520> Miss<01:26:52.239> um<01:26:53.440> Stinger<01:26:54.639> raising<01:26:55.040> her 01:26:55.189 --> 01:26:55.199 align:start position:0% seeing uh Miss um Stinger raising her 01:26:55.199 --> 01:26:55.830 align:start position:0% seeing uh Miss um Stinger raising her hand. 01:26:55.830 --> 01:26:55.840 align:start position:0% hand. 01:26:55.840 --> 01:26:57.669 align:start position:0% hand. >> Go<01:26:55.920> ahead.<01:26:56.719> Thank<01:26:56.960> you. 01:26:57.669 --> 01:26:57.679 align:start position:0% >> Go ahead. Thank you. 01:26:57.679 --> 01:27:00.149 align:start position:0% >> Go ahead. Thank you. >> Um<01:26:57.920> I<01:26:58.239> looked<01:26:58.480> it<01:26:58.639> up<01:26:58.800> in<01:26:59.040> the<01:26:59.360> grant<01:26:59.760> just<01:26:59.920> to 01:27:00.149 --> 01:27:00.159 align:start position:0% >> Um I looked it up in the grant just to 01:27:00.159 --> 01:27:02.390 align:start position:0% >> Um I looked it up in the grant just to help<01:27:00.480> make<01:27:00.719> sure<01:27:00.960> we're<01:27:01.360> you<01:27:01.520> know<01:27:02.000> addressing 01:27:02.390 --> 01:27:02.400 align:start position:0% help make sure we're you know addressing 01:27:02.400 --> 01:27:04.390 align:start position:0% help make sure we're you know addressing that.<01:27:02.719> And<01:27:02.880> it<01:27:03.040> does<01:27:03.199> say<01:27:03.440> strengthen 01:27:04.390 --> 01:27:04.400 align:start position:0% that. And it does say strengthen 01:27:04.400 --> 01:27:06.550 align:start position:0% that. And it does say strengthen physical<01:27:04.880> activity<01:27:05.280> and<01:27:05.679> nutrition<01:27:06.159> in 01:27:06.550 --> 01:27:06.560 align:start position:0% physical activity and nutrition in 01:27:06.560 --> 01:27:09.510 align:start position:0% physical activity and nutrition in schools<01:27:06.960> as<01:27:07.280> like<01:27:07.520> the<01:27:08.080> goal<01:27:08.480> title.<01:27:09.040> And<01:27:09.199> so 01:27:09.510 --> 01:27:09.520 align:start position:0% schools as like the goal title. And so 01:27:09.520 --> 01:27:12.070 align:start position:0% schools as like the goal title. And so that<01:27:10.320> nutrition<01:27:10.880> piece<01:27:11.280> is<01:27:11.600> a<01:27:11.840> little<01:27:11.920> bit 01:27:12.070 --> 01:27:12.080 align:start position:0% that nutrition piece is a little bit 01:27:12.080 --> 01:27:14.629 align:start position:0% that nutrition piece is a little bit more<01:27:12.400> aligned<01:27:12.800> with<01:27:13.600> the<01:27:13.840> Golden<01:27:14.159> Medal 01:27:14.629 --> 01:27:14.639 align:start position:0% more aligned with the Golden Medal 01:27:14.639 --> 01:27:16.950 align:start position:0% more aligned with the Golden Medal Schools<01:27:15.360> application.<01:27:16.000> That<01:27:16.320> doesn't<01:27:16.560> mean 01:27:16.950 --> 01:27:16.960 align:start position:0% Schools application. That doesn't mean 01:27:16.960 --> 01:27:19.350 align:start position:0% Schools application. That doesn't mean there<01:27:17.199> can't<01:27:17.440> be<01:27:17.600> other<01:27:17.840> pieces<01:27:18.239> that<01:27:19.120> is 01:27:19.350 --> 01:27:19.360 align:start position:0% there can't be other pieces that is 01:27:19.360 --> 01:27:20.950 align:start position:0% there can't be other pieces that is looked<01:27:19.600> at<01:27:19.760> at<01:27:19.920> the<01:27:20.080> B,<01:27:20.400> you<01:27:20.480> know,<01:27:20.639> at<01:27:20.800> the 01:27:20.950 --> 01:27:20.960 align:start position:0% looked at at the B, you know, at the 01:27:20.960 --> 01:27:22.709 align:start position:0% looked at at the B, you know, at the board<01:27:21.199> and<01:27:21.440> adding<01:27:21.760> on<01:27:21.920> to<01:27:22.080> that,<01:27:22.239> but<01:27:22.480> that 01:27:22.709 --> 01:27:22.719 align:start position:0% board and adding on to that, but that 01:27:22.719 --> 01:27:27.910 align:start position:0% board and adding on to that, but that nutrition<01:27:23.199> piece<01:27:23.440> is<01:27:23.600> a<01:27:24.560> focus<01:27:25.199> on<01:27:25.520> that<01:27:26.400> um<01:27:27.679> in 01:27:27.910 --> 01:27:27.920 align:start position:0% nutrition piece is a focus on that um in 01:27:27.920 --> 01:27:28.470 align:start position:0% nutrition piece is a focus on that um in the<01:27:28.080> grand. 01:27:28.470 --> 01:27:28.480 align:start position:0% the grand. 01:27:28.480 --> 01:27:32.390 align:start position:0% the grand. >> Maybe<01:27:28.639> we<01:27:28.800> do<01:27:28.960> need<01:27:30.000> we've<01:27:30.320> come<01:27:30.480> full<01:27:30.719> circle 01:27:32.390 --> 01:27:32.400 align:start position:0% >> Maybe we do need we've come full circle 01:27:32.400 --> 01:27:35.430 align:start position:0% >> Maybe we do need we've come full circle support<01:27:33.840> physical<01:27:34.320> activity, 01:27:35.430 --> 01:27:35.440 align:start position:0% support physical activity, 01:27:35.440 --> 01:27:37.830 align:start position:0% support physical activity, >> right? 01:27:37.830 --> 01:27:37.840 align:start position:0% >> right? 01:27:37.840 --> 01:27:41.910 align:start position:0% >> right? So,<01:27:38.800> I<01:27:39.040> mean,<01:27:39.280> would<01:27:39.679> would<01:27:40.080> we<01:27:40.320> do 01:27:41.910 --> 01:27:41.920 align:start position:0% So, I mean, would would we do 01:27:41.920 --> 01:27:46.070 align:start position:0% So, I mean, would would we do support<01:27:42.960> um<01:27:44.239> nutritional<01:27:45.120> health<01:27:45.679> and 01:27:46.070 --> 01:27:46.080 align:start position:0% support um nutritional health and 01:27:46.080 --> 01:27:50.950 align:start position:0% support um nutritional health and physical<01:27:46.719> activity?<01:27:47.920> Is 01:27:50.950 --> 01:27:50.960 align:start position:0% 01:27:50.960 --> 01:27:54.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah,<01:27:51.520> we<01:27:51.760> could<01:27:51.920> do<01:27:52.080> that. 01:27:54.550 --> 01:27:54.560 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, we could do that. 01:27:54.560 --> 01:27:56.070 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, we could do that. >> Do<01:27:54.719> I<01:27:54.880> need<01:27:54.960> to<01:27:55.120> make<01:27:55.280> a<01:27:55.360> motion?<01:27:55.760> We<01:27:55.920> just 01:27:56.070 --> 01:27:56.080 align:start position:0% >> Do I need to make a motion? We just 01:27:56.080 --> 01:27:56.629 align:start position:0% >> Do I need to make a motion? We just change<01:27:56.320> it. 01:27:56.629 --> 01:27:56.639 align:start position:0% change it. 01:27:56.639 --> 01:27:58.950 align:start position:0% change it. >> Do<01:27:56.800> you<01:27:56.960> want<01:27:57.280> student<01:27:57.760> there<01:27:58.159> first?<01:27:58.800> You 01:27:58.950 --> 01:27:58.960 align:start position:0% >> Do you want student there first? You 01:27:58.960 --> 01:28:02.310 align:start position:0% >> Do you want student there first? You want<01:27:59.199> student<01:27:59.679> nutritional<01:28:00.400> health 01:28:02.310 --> 01:28:02.320 align:start position:0% want student nutritional health 01:28:02.320 --> 01:28:06.149 align:start position:0% want student nutritional health >> or<01:28:02.719> no<01:28:03.120> student? 01:28:06.149 --> 01:28:06.159 align:start position:0% 01:28:06.159 --> 01:28:09.270 align:start position:0% Um,<01:28:07.360> student<01:28:08.000> leave<01:28:08.400> student. 01:28:09.270 --> 01:28:09.280 align:start position:0% Um, student leave student. 01:28:09.280 --> 01:28:14.790 align:start position:0% Um, student leave student. >> Yeah,<01:28:09.520> I<01:28:09.679> think<01:28:09.840> leave<01:28:10.080> it<01:28:10.239> in. 01:28:14.790 --> 01:28:14.800 align:start position:0% 01:28:14.800 --> 01:28:16.470 align:start position:0% >> Once<01:28:15.040> again,<01:28:15.199> we've<01:28:15.440> come<01:28:15.600> full<01:28:15.840> circle<01:28:16.159> here. 01:28:16.470 --> 01:28:16.480 align:start position:0% >> Once again, we've come full circle here. 01:28:16.480 --> 01:28:17.750 align:start position:0% >> Once again, we've come full circle here. That's<01:28:16.800> good. 01:28:17.750 --> 01:28:17.760 align:start position:0% That's good. 01:28:17.760 --> 01:28:19.830 align:start position:0% That's good. >> Okay.<01:28:18.159> That's<01:28:18.320> why<01:28:18.560> we're<01:28:18.800> here. 01:28:19.830 --> 01:28:19.840 align:start position:0% >> Okay. That's why we're here. 01:28:19.840 --> 01:28:21.750 align:start position:0% >> Okay. That's why we're here. >> That's<01:28:20.080> That's<01:28:20.400> where<01:28:20.560> I<01:28:20.639> was.<01:28:20.960> Yeah,<01:28:21.440> it's 01:28:21.750 --> 01:28:21.760 align:start position:0% >> That's That's where I was. Yeah, it's 01:28:21.760 --> 01:28:25.430 align:start position:0% >> That's That's where I was. Yeah, it's good.<01:28:22.880> Okay.<01:28:23.280> Any<01:28:23.600> more<01:28:23.760> discussion<01:28:25.199> before 01:28:25.430 --> 01:28:25.440 align:start position:0% good. Okay. Any more discussion before 01:28:25.440 --> 01:28:28.229 align:start position:0% good. Okay. Any more discussion before we<01:28:25.679> vote<01:28:25.840> on<01:28:26.080> this<01:28:26.239> one? 01:28:28.229 --> 01:28:28.239 align:start position:0% we vote on this one? 01:28:28.239 --> 01:28:30.390 align:start position:0% we vote on this one? Okay.<01:28:28.480> Okay.<01:28:28.639> So,<01:28:28.800> we're<01:28:29.040> changing<01:28:29.520> line<01:28:30.000> 71 01:28:30.390 --> 01:28:30.400 align:start position:0% Okay. Okay. So, we're changing line 71 01:28:30.400 --> 01:28:33.189 align:start position:0% Okay. Okay. So, we're changing line 71 to<01:28:30.639> read<01:28:30.960> school<01:28:31.679> practices,<01:28:32.480> policies,<01:28:32.960> and 01:28:33.189 --> 01:28:33.199 align:start position:0% to read school practices, policies, and 01:28:33.199 --> 01:28:34.470 align:start position:0% to read school practices, policies, and practices<01:28:33.600> that<01:28:33.840> support<01:28:34.159> student 01:28:34.470 --> 01:28:34.480 align:start position:0% practices that support student 01:28:34.480 --> 01:28:35.990 align:start position:0% practices that support student nutritional<01:28:35.040> health<01:28:35.280> and<01:28:35.600> physical 01:28:35.990 --> 01:28:36.000 align:start position:0% nutritional health and physical 01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:37.910 align:start position:0% nutritional health and physical activity. 01:28:37.910 --> 01:28:37.920 align:start position:0% activity. 01:28:37.920 --> 01:28:40.149 align:start position:0% activity. Okay.<01:28:38.239> All<01:28:38.400> those<01:28:38.639> in<01:28:38.800> favor? 01:28:40.149 --> 01:28:40.159 align:start position:0% Okay. All those in favor? 01:28:40.159 --> 01:28:40.709 align:start position:0% Okay. All those in favor? >> I 01:28:40.709 --> 01:28:40.719 align:start position:0% >> I 01:28:40.719 --> 01:28:41.910 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 01:28:41.910 --> 01:28:41.920 align:start position:0% >> I 01:28:41.920 --> 01:28:42.790 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 01:28:42.790 --> 01:28:42.800 align:start position:0% >> I 01:28:42.800 --> 01:28:45.510 align:start position:0% >> I >> Okay,<01:28:43.040> that<01:28:43.280> passes<01:28:43.679> unanimously. 01:28:45.510 --> 01:28:45.520 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that passes unanimously. 01:28:45.520 --> 01:28:50.070 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that passes unanimously. I<01:28:45.840> have<01:28:46.080> just<01:28:46.400> one<01:28:46.719> more<01:28:47.600> on<01:28:48.080> 91 01:28:50.070 --> 01:28:50.080 align:start position:0% I have just one more on 91 01:28:50.080 --> 01:28:53.030 align:start position:0% I have just one more on 91 and<01:28:50.480> maybe<01:28:50.800> I<01:28:51.280> I'll<01:28:51.600> seek<01:28:51.840> a<01:28:52.320> clarific 01:28:53.030 --> 01:28:53.040 align:start position:0% and maybe I I'll seek a clarific 01:28:53.040 --> 01:28:55.189 align:start position:0% and maybe I I'll seek a clarific clarification<01:28:53.760> but<01:28:53.920> I<01:28:54.159> also<01:28:54.480> wanted<01:28:54.719> to<01:28:54.880> maybe 01:28:55.189 --> 01:28:55.199 align:start position:0% clarification but I also wanted to maybe 01:28:55.199 --> 01:28:56.709 align:start position:0% clarification but I also wanted to maybe make 01:28:56.709 --> 01:28:56.719 align:start position:0% make 01:28:56.719 --> 01:28:59.830 align:start position:0% make an<01:28:57.040> amendment<01:28:57.600> to<01:28:57.920> that.<01:28:58.560> So<01:28:59.280> I<01:28:59.600> would 01:28:59.830 --> 01:28:59.840 align:start position:0% an amendment to that. So I would 01:28:59.840 --> 01:29:03.590 align:start position:0% an amendment to that. So I would recommend 01:29:03.590 --> 01:29:03.600 align:start position:0% 01:29:03.600 --> 01:29:07.669 align:start position:0% that<01:29:04.480> um 01:29:07.669 --> 01:29:07.679 align:start position:0% 01:29:07.679 --> 01:29:09.030 align:start position:0% let's<01:29:07.920> see<01:29:08.159> let<01:29:08.239> me<01:29:08.400> see<01:29:08.480> where<01:29:08.639> this<01:29:08.800> is<01:29:08.880> at. 01:29:09.030 --> 01:29:09.040 align:start position:0% let's see let me see where this is at. 01:29:09.040 --> 01:29:11.510 align:start position:0% let's see let me see where this is at. So<01:29:09.280> disqual.<01:29:09.840> Okay.<01:29:10.080> So<01:29:10.239> we're<01:29:10.719> we<01:29:11.120> are 01:29:11.510 --> 01:29:11.520 align:start position:0% So disqual. Okay. So we're we are 01:29:11.520 --> 01:29:14.229 align:start position:0% So disqual. Okay. So we're we are looking<01:29:12.080> at 01:29:14.229 --> 01:29:14.239 align:start position:0% looking at 01:29:14.239 --> 01:29:17.030 align:start position:0% looking at Does<01:29:14.480> that<01:29:14.719> line<01:29:14.960> up<01:29:15.199> right? 01:29:17.030 --> 01:29:17.040 align:start position:0% Does that line up right? 01:29:17.040 --> 01:29:21.189 align:start position:0% Does that line up right? Is<01:29:17.280> it<01:29:17.440> two? 01:29:21.189 --> 01:29:21.199 align:start position:0% 01:29:21.199 --> 01:29:24.550 align:start position:0% >> There<01:29:21.440> shouldn't<01:29:21.760> be<01:29:21.920> two<01:29:22.239> E's<01:29:22.880> on<01:29:23.440> 91.<01:29:24.239> That's 01:29:24.550 --> 01:29:24.560 align:start position:0% >> There shouldn't be two E's on 91. That's 01:29:24.560 --> 01:29:28.229 align:start position:0% >> There shouldn't be two E's on 91. That's that's<01:29:24.880> a<01:29:25.280> technical. 01:29:28.229 --> 01:29:28.239 align:start position:0% that's a technical. 01:29:28.239 --> 01:29:33.910 align:start position:0% that's a technical. >> And<01:29:28.400> it<01:29:28.639> goes<01:29:29.040> it<01:29:29.440> goes<01:29:30.080> A<01:29:30.560> B<01:29:30.960> C<01:29:31.360> D<01:29:31.920> A<01:29:32.320> B<01:29:32.639> CDE<01:29:33.360> E. 01:29:33.910 --> 01:29:33.920 align:start position:0% >> And it goes it goes A B C D A B CDE E. 01:29:33.920 --> 01:29:35.830 align:start position:0% >> And it goes it goes A B C D A B CDE E. And<01:29:34.080> I<01:29:34.320> just<01:29:34.639> maybe<01:29:34.960> Oh,<01:29:35.199> maybe<01:29:35.360> your<01:29:35.600> thing's 01:29:35.830 --> 01:29:35.840 align:start position:0% And I just maybe Oh, maybe your thing's 01:29:35.840 --> 01:29:37.669 align:start position:0% And I just maybe Oh, maybe your thing's over<01:29:36.080> the<01:29:36.560> what<01:29:36.800> I'm<01:29:37.040> supposed<01:29:37.120> to<01:29:37.280> be<01:29:37.440> looking 01:29:37.669 --> 01:29:37.679 align:start position:0% over the what I'm supposed to be looking 01:29:37.679 --> 01:29:42.310 align:start position:0% over the what I'm supposed to be looking at.<01:29:38.719> Well,<01:29:38.960> the<01:29:39.280> five<01:29:40.400> the<01:29:40.719> five<01:29:40.960> is<01:29:41.280> abd. 01:29:42.310 --> 01:29:42.320 align:start position:0% at. Well, the five the five is abd. 01:29:42.320 --> 01:29:43.910 align:start position:0% at. Well, the five the five is abd. >> Sorry,<01:29:42.560> I<01:29:42.719> did<01:29:42.880> not<01:29:43.040> see<01:29:43.199> the<01:29:43.360> side<01:29:43.679> because 01:29:43.910 --> 01:29:43.920 align:start position:0% >> Sorry, I did not see the side because 01:29:43.920 --> 01:29:46.149 align:start position:0% >> Sorry, I did not see the side because you're<01:29:44.400> it<01:29:44.719> has<01:29:44.880> the 01:29:46.149 --> 01:29:46.159 align:start position:0% you're it has the 01:29:46.159 --> 01:29:48.390 align:start position:0% you're it has the >> it's<01:29:46.320> not<01:29:46.400> yours.<01:29:46.719> It's<01:29:46.880> mine.<01:29:47.280> I<01:29:47.520> have<01:29:47.679> my 01:29:48.390 --> 01:29:48.400 align:start position:0% >> it's not yours. It's mine. I have my 01:29:48.400 --> 01:29:49.830 align:start position:0% >> it's not yours. It's mine. I have my thing<01:29:48.639> over<01:29:48.880> it.<01:29:49.199> Sorry. 01:29:49.830 --> 01:29:49.840 align:start position:0% thing over it. Sorry. 01:29:49.840 --> 01:29:51.830 align:start position:0% thing over it. Sorry. >> 91<01:29:50.400> shouldn't<01:29:50.719> have<01:29:50.800> two<01:29:51.040> E's<01:29:51.360> repeating 01:29:51.830 --> 01:29:51.840 align:start position:0% >> 91 shouldn't have two E's repeating 01:29:51.840 --> 01:29:53.669 align:start position:0% >> 91 shouldn't have two E's repeating themselves.<01:29:52.400> There's<01:29:52.560> just<01:29:52.719> one<01:29:52.960> either. 01:29:53.669 --> 01:29:53.679 align:start position:0% themselves. There's just one either. 01:29:53.679 --> 01:29:56.470 align:start position:0% themselves. There's just one either. >> Okay.<01:29:54.320> So<01:29:54.960> I<01:29:55.440> So<01:29:55.679> this<01:29:55.920> is<01:29:56.080> saying<01:29:56.320> the 01:29:56.470 --> 01:29:56.480 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So I So this is saying the 01:29:56.480 --> 01:29:58.149 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So I So this is saying the superintendent<01:29:56.960> shall<01:29:57.199> award<01:29:57.520> funds<01:29:57.920> for 01:29:58.149 --> 01:29:58.159 align:start position:0% superintendent shall award funds for 01:29:58.159 --> 01:29:59.510 align:start position:0% superintendent shall award funds for participating<01:29:58.639> schools<01:29:59.040> based<01:29:59.280> on 01:29:59.510 --> 01:29:59.520 align:start position:0% participating schools based on 01:29:59.520 --> 01:30:01.350 align:start position:0% participating schools based on demonstrated<01:30:00.080> need<01:30:00.239> for<01:30:00.400> improvement,<01:30:01.120> the 01:30:01.350 --> 01:30:01.360 align:start position:0% demonstrated need for improvement, the 01:30:01.360 --> 01:30:02.709 align:start position:0% demonstrated need for improvement, the extent<01:30:01.600> to<01:30:01.760> which<01:30:02.000> proposed<01:30:02.320> goals<01:30:02.560> are 01:30:02.709 --> 01:30:02.719 align:start position:0% extent to which proposed goals are 01:30:02.719 --> 01:30:04.310 align:start position:0% extent to which proposed goals are measurable<01:30:03.040> and<01:30:03.199> achievable,<01:30:03.840> the<01:30:04.080> use<01:30:04.239> of 01:30:04.310 --> 01:30:04.320 align:start position:0% measurable and achievable, the use of 01:30:04.320 --> 01:30:05.830 align:start position:0% measurable and achievable, the use of evidence-based<01:30:05.040> strategies,<01:30:05.440> the<01:30:05.679> quality 01:30:05.830 --> 01:30:05.840 align:start position:0% evidence-based strategies, the quality 01:30:05.840 --> 01:30:07.669 align:start position:0% evidence-based strategies, the quality and<01:30:06.080> feasibility<01:30:06.480> of<01:30:06.639> the<01:30:06.800> implementation 01:30:07.669 --> 01:30:07.679 align:start position:0% and feasibility of the implementation 01:30:07.679 --> 01:30:09.430 align:start position:0% and feasibility of the implementation plan, 01:30:09.430 --> 01:30:09.440 align:start position:0% plan, 01:30:09.440 --> 01:30:12.070 align:start position:0% plan, and<01:30:09.679> I<01:30:10.000> would<01:30:10.159> suggest<01:30:11.040> two<01:30:11.280> things<01:30:11.520> here. 01:30:12.070 --> 01:30:12.080 align:start position:0% and I would suggest two things here. 01:30:12.080 --> 01:30:15.510 align:start position:0% and I would suggest two things here. One,<01:30:13.360> is<01:30:13.520> it<01:30:14.239> mandated<01:30:14.719> that<01:30:15.040> they<01:30:15.360> we're 01:30:15.510 --> 01:30:15.520 align:start position:0% One, is it mandated that they we're 01:30:15.520 --> 01:30:16.629 align:start position:0% One, is it mandated that they we're going<01:30:15.600> to<01:30:15.679> give<01:30:15.760> it<01:30:15.920> to<01:30:16.000> them<01:30:16.159> if<01:30:16.320> they<01:30:16.480> have 01:30:16.629 --> 01:30:16.639 align:start position:0% going to give it to them if they have 01:30:16.639 --> 01:30:21.669 align:start position:0% going to give it to them if they have partnerships<01:30:17.440> and<01:30:17.840> community<01:30:18.480> support? 01:30:21.669 --> 01:30:21.679 align:start position:0% 01:30:21.679 --> 01:30:23.990 align:start position:0% >> What<01:30:21.920> if<01:30:22.800> May<01:30:22.960> I<01:30:23.040> answer<01:30:23.199> that?<01:30:23.440> a<01:30:23.679> small 01:30:23.990 --> 01:30:24.000 align:start position:0% >> What if May I answer that? a small 01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:25.750 align:start position:0% >> What if May I answer that? a small school.<01:30:24.560> I<01:30:24.719> I'm<01:30:25.040> just<01:30:25.120> wondering<01:30:25.360> if<01:30:25.520> this 01:30:25.750 --> 01:30:25.760 align:start position:0% school. I I'm just wondering if this 01:30:25.760 --> 01:30:28.629 align:start position:0% school. I I'm just wondering if this needs<01:30:25.920> to<01:30:26.080> be<01:30:26.159> a<01:30:26.400> may<01:30:26.719> or<01:30:27.040> if 01:30:28.629 --> 01:30:28.639 align:start position:0% needs to be a may or if 01:30:28.639 --> 01:30:30.229 align:start position:0% needs to be a may or if does<01:30:28.719> that<01:30:28.960> make<01:30:29.040> sense?<01:30:29.280> Instead<01:30:29.600> of<01:30:29.760> a<01:30:29.920> they 01:30:30.229 --> 01:30:30.239 align:start position:0% does that make sense? Instead of a they 01:30:30.239 --> 01:30:32.310 align:start position:0% does that make sense? Instead of a they have<01:30:30.400> to<01:30:30.560> have<01:30:30.719> that<01:30:30.960> in<01:30:31.199> order<01:30:31.360> to<01:30:31.600> qualify, 01:30:32.310 --> 01:30:32.320 align:start position:0% have to have that in order to qualify, 01:30:32.320 --> 01:30:34.470 align:start position:0% have to have that in order to qualify, it<01:30:32.560> needs<01:30:32.800> to<01:30:32.960> be<01:30:33.199> a<01:30:33.440> may<01:30:33.760> depending<01:30:34.080> on<01:30:34.239> where 01:30:34.470 --> 01:30:34.480 align:start position:0% it needs to be a may depending on where 01:30:34.480 --> 01:30:38.149 align:start position:0% it needs to be a may depending on where the<01:30:34.719> school<01:30:34.880> is<01:30:35.120> located.<01:30:35.520> It<01:30:35.760> may 01:30:38.149 --> 01:30:38.159 align:start position:0% the school is located. It may 01:30:38.159 --> 01:30:40.390 align:start position:0% the school is located. It may Is<01:30:38.400> that<01:30:38.719> something<01:30:39.040> that<01:30:39.280> we<01:30:39.520> can<01:30:40.080> wiggle 01:30:40.390 --> 01:30:40.400 align:start position:0% Is that something that we can wiggle 01:30:40.400 --> 01:30:44.390 align:start position:0% Is that something that we can wiggle with<01:30:40.639> or<01:30:40.880> not? 01:30:44.390 --> 01:30:44.400 align:start position:0% 01:30:44.400 --> 01:30:48.950 align:start position:0% So,<01:30:45.120> we<01:30:45.600> can't<01:30:45.920> wiggle<01:30:46.239> a<01:30:46.480> lot.<01:30:47.360> Um 01:30:48.950 --> 01:30:48.960 align:start position:0% So, we can't wiggle a lot. Um 01:30:48.960 --> 01:30:52.149 align:start position:0% So, we can't wiggle a lot. Um but<01:30:49.760> we<01:30:50.080> are<01:30:50.320> not<01:30:50.719> saying<01:30:51.520> at<01:30:51.600> least<01:30:51.840> in<01:30:52.000> this 01:30:52.149 --> 01:30:52.159 align:start position:0% but we are not saying at least in this 01:30:52.159 --> 01:30:53.669 align:start position:0% but we are not saying at least in this rule,<01:30:52.400> right?<01:30:52.719> The<01:30:52.880> way<01:30:52.960> the<01:30:53.199> rule<01:30:53.360> reads 01:30:53.669 --> 01:30:53.679 align:start position:0% rule, right? The way the rule reads 01:30:53.679 --> 01:30:55.990 align:start position:0% rule, right? The way the rule reads right<01:30:53.840> now,<01:30:54.560> we're<01:30:54.880> not<01:30:55.040> telling<01:30:55.360> them<01:30:55.679> what 01:30:55.990 --> 01:30:56.000 align:start position:0% right now, we're not telling them what 01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:57.830 align:start position:0% right now, we're not telling them what those<01:30:56.320> partnerships<01:30:56.960> need<01:30:57.120> to<01:30:57.280> look<01:30:57.440> like<01:30:57.600> or 01:30:57.830 --> 01:30:57.840 align:start position:0% those partnerships need to look like or 01:30:57.840 --> 01:30:59.350 align:start position:0% those partnerships need to look like or what<01:30:58.000> the<01:30:58.239> community<01:30:58.560> support.<01:30:59.040> So,<01:30:59.199> we're 01:30:59.350 --> 01:30:59.360 align:start position:0% what the community support. So, we're 01:30:59.360 --> 01:31:02.390 align:start position:0% what the community support. So, we're not<01:30:59.520> saying<01:30:59.840> who<01:31:00.480> it's<01:31:00.800> with. 01:31:02.390 --> 01:31:02.400 align:start position:0% not saying who it's with. 01:31:02.400 --> 01:31:04.149 align:start position:0% not saying who it's with. We're<01:31:02.719> not<01:31:02.880> defining<01:31:03.199> that<01:31:03.440> for<01:31:03.600> them.<01:31:03.920> We're 01:31:04.149 --> 01:31:04.159 align:start position:0% We're not defining that for them. We're 01:31:04.159 --> 01:31:08.149 align:start position:0% We're not defining that for them. We're saying<01:31:04.480> you<01:31:04.719> have<01:31:04.960> to<01:31:05.199> have<01:31:06.080> engagement<01:31:06.719> with 01:31:08.149 --> 01:31:08.159 align:start position:0% saying you have to have engagement with 01:31:08.159 --> 01:31:10.390 align:start position:0% saying you have to have engagement with people<01:31:08.480> outside<01:31:08.880> of<01:31:09.040> the<01:31:09.280> school.<01:31:09.920> And<01:31:10.159> in 01:31:10.390 --> 01:31:10.400 align:start position:0% people outside of the school. And in 01:31:10.400 --> 01:31:13.510 align:start position:0% people outside of the school. And in most<01:31:10.560> cases,<01:31:10.960> it's<01:31:11.199> probably<01:31:11.600> families.<01:31:12.639> Um 01:31:13.510 --> 01:31:13.520 align:start position:0% most cases, it's probably families. Um 01:31:13.520 --> 01:31:17.510 align:start position:0% most cases, it's probably families. Um but<01:31:14.239> in<01:31:14.560> some<01:31:14.880> schools<01:31:15.520> so<01:31:15.840> for<01:31:15.920> example<01:31:16.880> Tilla 01:31:17.510 --> 01:31:17.520 align:start position:0% but in some schools so for example Tilla 01:31:17.520 --> 01:31:21.270 align:start position:0% but in some schools so for example Tilla San<01:31:17.840> Juan<01:31:18.960> um<01:31:19.280> they<01:31:19.679> will<01:31:19.920> be<01:31:20.159> required<01:31:20.960> to 01:31:21.270 --> 01:31:21.280 align:start position:0% San Juan um they will be required to 01:31:21.280 --> 01:31:24.310 align:start position:0% San Juan um they will be required to engage<01:31:21.840> with<01:31:22.239> their<01:31:22.480> tribal 01:31:24.310 --> 01:31:24.320 align:start position:0% engage with their tribal 01:31:24.320 --> 01:31:26.550 align:start position:0% engage with their tribal >> nations<01:31:24.800> because<01:31:25.120> that<01:31:25.360> is<01:31:25.440> a<01:31:25.679> requirement<01:31:26.480> uh 01:31:26.550 --> 01:31:26.560 align:start position:0% >> nations because that is a requirement uh 01:31:26.560 --> 01:31:27.990 align:start position:0% >> nations because that is a requirement uh from<01:31:26.880> CMS 01:31:27.990 --> 01:31:28.000 align:start position:0% from CMS 01:31:28.000 --> 01:31:30.229 align:start position:0% from CMS >> that<01:31:28.320> there<01:31:28.480> is<01:31:28.800> that<01:31:29.040> we<01:31:29.280> are<01:31:29.440> supporting<01:31:29.920> our 01:31:30.229 --> 01:31:30.239 align:start position:0% >> that there is that we are supporting our 01:31:30.239 --> 01:31:33.189 align:start position:0% >> that there is that we are supporting our tribal<01:31:30.719> students<01:31:31.520> with<01:31:32.159> this<01:31:32.480> as<01:31:32.719> well.<01:31:32.960> So 01:31:33.189 --> 01:31:33.199 align:start position:0% tribal students with this as well. So 01:31:33.199 --> 01:31:34.709 align:start position:0% tribal students with this as well. So that<01:31:33.360> will<01:31:33.520> be<01:31:33.600> a<01:31:33.760> requirement<01:31:34.239> in<01:31:34.560> those 01:31:34.709 --> 01:31:34.719 align:start position:0% that will be a requirement in those 01:31:34.719 --> 01:31:37.030 align:start position:0% that will be a requirement in those areas.<01:31:35.440> I<01:31:35.760> I<01:31:35.920> don't<01:31:36.000> know.<01:31:36.159> I<01:31:36.320> listed<01:31:36.639> two<01:31:36.800> and 01:31:37.030 --> 01:31:37.040 align:start position:0% areas. I I don't know. I listed two and 01:31:37.040 --> 01:31:37.830 align:start position:0% areas. I I don't know. I listed two and there's<01:31:37.199> seven,<01:31:37.440> but 01:31:37.830 --> 01:31:37.840 align:start position:0% there's seven, but 01:31:37.840 --> 01:31:39.350 align:start position:0% there's seven, but >> would<01:31:38.000> it<01:31:38.480> would<01:31:38.639> it<01:31:38.719> be<01:31:38.880> all<01:31:38.960> right<01:31:39.120> then, 01:31:39.350 --> 01:31:39.360 align:start position:0% >> would it would it be all right then, 01:31:39.360 --> 01:31:41.590 align:start position:0% >> would it would it be all right then, Jody,<01:31:39.600> if<01:31:39.840> it<01:31:40.000> were<01:31:40.560> if<01:31:40.800> we<01:31:41.040> could<01:31:41.199> put<01:31:41.360> that 01:31:41.590 --> 01:31:41.600 align:start position:0% Jody, if it were if we could put that 01:31:41.600 --> 01:31:43.590 align:start position:0% Jody, if it were if we could put that parent<01:31:41.840> engagement<01:31:42.320> piece<01:31:42.639> in<01:31:42.800> here<01:31:43.040> as<01:31:43.280> well 01:31:43.590 --> 01:31:43.600 align:start position:0% parent engagement piece in here as well 01:31:43.600 --> 01:31:45.510 align:start position:0% parent engagement piece in here as well so<01:31:43.760> that<01:31:44.159> it's<01:31:44.400> part<01:31:44.560> of<01:31:44.719> Absolutely.<01:31:45.280> track 01:31:45.510 --> 01:31:45.520 align:start position:0% so that it's part of Absolutely. track 01:31:45.520 --> 01:31:47.110 align:start position:0% so that it's part of Absolutely. track piece.<01:31:45.840> So,<01:31:45.920> it's 01:31:47.110 --> 01:31:47.120 align:start position:0% piece. So, it's 01:31:47.120 --> 01:31:49.669 align:start position:0% piece. So, it's >> so<01:31:47.440> it<01:31:47.600> would<01:31:47.760> be<01:31:48.000> partnerships,<01:31:49.120> presence<01:31:49.440> of 01:31:49.669 --> 01:31:49.679 align:start position:0% >> so it would be partnerships, presence of 01:31:49.679 --> 01:31:52.470 align:start position:0% >> so it would be partnerships, presence of partnerships, 01:31:52.470 --> 01:31:52.480 align:start position:0% partnerships, 01:31:52.480 --> 01:31:55.030 align:start position:0% partnerships, family<01:31:52.800> engagement<01:31:53.520> or<01:31:53.760> community<01:31:54.400> support 01:31:55.030 --> 01:31:55.040 align:start position:0% family engagement or community support 01:31:55.040 --> 01:31:58.149 align:start position:0% family engagement or community support maybe.<01:31:55.679> Does<01:31:55.920> that<01:31:56.080> read<01:31:56.400> right? 01:31:58.149 --> 01:31:58.159 align:start position:0% maybe. Does that read right? 01:31:58.159 --> 01:32:01.189 align:start position:0% maybe. Does that read right? Can<01:31:58.480> I<01:31:59.360> can<01:31:59.520> I<01:31:59.679> ask<01:32:00.000> clarification<01:32:00.719> on<01:32:00.960> that 01:32:01.189 --> 01:32:01.199 align:start position:0% Can I can I ask clarification on that 01:32:01.199 --> 01:32:03.110 align:start position:0% Can I can I ask clarification on that because<01:32:01.440> this<01:32:01.679> is<01:32:01.840> actually<01:32:02.159> something<01:32:02.480> that 01:32:03.110 --> 01:32:03.120 align:start position:0% because this is actually something that 01:32:03.120 --> 01:32:07.510 align:start position:0% because this is actually something that um<01:32:03.679> I<01:32:03.920> had<01:32:04.080> a<01:32:04.320> question<01:32:04.560> about<01:32:04.960> from<01:32:05.360> the<01:32:06.480> HP36 01:32:07.510 --> 01:32:07.520 align:start position:0% um I had a question about from the HP36 01:32:07.520 --> 01:32:09.030 align:start position:0% um I had a question about from the HP36 itself. 01:32:09.030 --> 01:32:09.040 align:start position:0% itself. 01:32:09.040 --> 01:32:13.189 align:start position:0% itself. >> So<01:32:09.280> it's<01:32:09.600> on<01:32:09.840> line<01:32:10.719> uh<01:32:11.280> 163. 01:32:13.189 --> 01:32:13.199 align:start position:0% >> So it's on line uh 163. 01:32:13.199 --> 01:32:17.750 align:start position:0% >> So it's on line uh 163. So<01:32:13.520> it<01:32:13.760> is<01:32:14.800> um<01:32:15.360> hold<01:32:15.600> on<01:32:16.960> backtrack<01:32:17.440> here. 01:32:17.750 --> 01:32:17.760 align:start position:0% So it is um hold on backtrack here. 01:32:17.760 --> 01:32:19.910 align:start position:0% So it is um hold on backtrack here. Anyway,<01:32:18.080> I'll<01:32:18.320> just<01:32:18.400> read<01:32:18.560> it.<01:32:18.800> Let's<01:32:19.120> see. 01:32:19.910 --> 01:32:19.920 align:start position:0% Anyway, I'll just read it. Let's see. 01:32:19.920 --> 01:32:22.070 align:start position:0% Anyway, I'll just read it. Let's see. Establish 01:32:22.070 --> 01:32:22.080 align:start position:0% Establish 01:32:22.080 --> 01:32:24.470 align:start position:0% Establish um<01:32:22.639> sorry,<01:32:23.040> it<01:32:23.199> says<01:32:23.440> select<01:32:23.920> eligible 01:32:24.470 --> 01:32:24.480 align:start position:0% um sorry, it says select eligible 01:32:24.480 --> 01:32:26.790 align:start position:0% um sorry, it says select eligible schools<01:32:24.880> to<01:32:25.120> participate<01:32:25.679> in<01:32:25.840> the<01:32:26.080> program 01:32:26.790 --> 01:32:26.800 align:start position:0% schools to participate in the program 01:32:26.800 --> 01:32:30.310 align:start position:0% schools to participate in the program prioritizing<01:32:27.760> schools<01:32:28.239> that<01:32:29.360> and<01:32:29.520> it<01:32:29.760> has<01:32:29.920> A, 01:32:30.310 --> 01:32:30.320 align:start position:0% prioritizing schools that and it has A, 01:32:30.320 --> 01:32:33.750 align:start position:0% prioritizing schools that and it has A, B,<01:32:30.560> and<01:32:30.800> C<01:32:31.840> says<01:32:32.400> establish<01:32:33.120> partnerships 01:32:33.750 --> 01:32:33.760 align:start position:0% B, and C says establish partnerships 01:32:33.760 --> 01:32:36.629 align:start position:0% B, and C says establish partnerships with<01:32:34.000> local<01:32:34.400> entities<01:32:35.360> to<01:32:35.760> support<01:32:36.239> student 01:32:36.629 --> 01:32:36.639 align:start position:0% with local entities to support student 01:32:36.639 --> 01:32:39.510 align:start position:0% with local entities to support student health<01:32:36.880> and<01:32:37.120> wellness. 01:32:39.510 --> 01:32:39.520 align:start position:0% health and wellness. 01:32:39.520 --> 01:32:42.070 align:start position:0% health and wellness. So<01:32:39.920> that's<01:32:40.239> actually<01:32:40.560> built<01:32:40.960> into<01:32:41.440> the<01:32:41.679> law 01:32:42.070 --> 01:32:42.080 align:start position:0% So that's actually built into the law 01:32:42.080 --> 01:32:44.709 align:start position:0% So that's actually built into the law and<01:32:42.320> I<01:32:42.480> was<01:32:42.639> I<01:32:42.960> was<01:32:43.120> wondering<01:32:43.440> that.<01:32:43.760> So,<01:32:44.239> at 01:32:44.709 --> 01:32:44.719 align:start position:0% and I was I was wondering that. So, at 01:32:44.719 --> 01:32:46.870 align:start position:0% and I was I was wondering that. So, at it<01:32:45.040> seems<01:32:45.280> that<01:32:45.440> if<01:32:45.679> they<01:32:45.920> were<01:32:46.239> to<01:32:46.639> be 01:32:46.870 --> 01:32:46.880 align:start position:0% it seems that if they were to be 01:32:46.880 --> 01:32:48.790 align:start position:0% it seems that if they were to be prioritized<01:32:47.600> that<01:32:47.840> they<01:32:48.000> would<01:32:48.239> have<01:32:48.480> that 01:32:48.790 --> 01:32:48.800 align:start position:0% prioritized that they would have that 01:32:48.800 --> 01:32:50.790 align:start position:0% prioritized that they would have that written<01:32:49.199> into 01:32:50.790 --> 01:32:50.800 align:start position:0% written into 01:32:50.800 --> 01:32:55.270 align:start position:0% written into their<01:32:52.239> their<01:32:52.639> application<01:32:53.120> or<01:32:53.360> whatnot.<01:32:53.920> Um, 01:32:55.270 --> 01:32:55.280 align:start position:0% their their application or whatnot. Um, 01:32:55.280 --> 01:32:57.189 align:start position:0% their their application or whatnot. Um, and<01:32:55.520> I'm<01:32:55.679> wonder<01:32:55.920> I<01:32:56.159> was<01:32:56.320> wondering<01:32:56.719> too<01:32:56.960> what 01:32:57.189 --> 01:32:57.199 align:start position:0% and I'm wonder I was wondering too what 01:32:57.199 --> 01:33:00.950 align:start position:0% and I'm wonder I was wondering too what what<01:32:57.520> would<01:32:57.679> that<01:32:57.920> look<01:32:58.080> like?<01:32:58.480> It<01:32:58.719> does<01:32:58.880> say<01:32:59.280> C 01:33:00.950 --> 01:33:00.960 align:start position:0% what would that look like? It does say C 01:33:00.960 --> 01:33:03.510 align:start position:0% what would that look like? It does say C that<01:33:01.840> established<01:33:02.400> partnerships<01:33:02.960> with<01:33:03.199> local 01:33:03.510 --> 01:33:03.520 align:start position:0% that established partnerships with local 01:33:03.520 --> 01:33:05.189 align:start position:0% that established partnerships with local entities<01:33:03.920> to<01:33:04.239> support<01:33:04.560> student<01:33:04.880> health<01:33:05.040> and 01:33:05.189 --> 01:33:05.199 align:start position:0% entities to support student health and 01:33:05.199 --> 01:33:07.590 align:start position:0% entities to support student health and wellness.<01:33:06.560> So,<01:33:06.719> I<01:33:06.880> don't<01:33:06.960> know<01:33:06.960> if<01:33:07.120> it's<01:33:07.280> local 01:33:07.590 --> 01:33:07.600 align:start position:0% wellness. So, I don't know if it's local 01:33:07.600 --> 01:33:10.470 align:start position:0% wellness. So, I don't know if it's local gyms.<01:33:08.159> I<01:33:08.320> don't<01:33:08.400> know<01:33:08.480> if<01:33:08.719> it's<01:33:10.159> food 01:33:10.470 --> 01:33:10.480 align:start position:0% gyms. I don't know if it's food 01:33:10.480 --> 01:33:14.229 align:start position:0% gyms. I don't know if it's food distributors.<01:33:11.280> I<01:33:11.520> don't<01:33:11.679> know<01:33:11.760> if<01:33:11.920> it's<01:33:12.639> um 01:33:14.229 --> 01:33:14.239 align:start position:0% distributors. I don't know if it's um 01:33:14.239 --> 01:33:15.669 align:start position:0% distributors. I don't know if it's um you<01:33:14.400> know<01:33:14.480> what<01:33:14.719> what<01:33:14.960> did<01:33:15.120> what<01:33:15.360> did<01:33:15.520> they 01:33:15.669 --> 01:33:15.679 align:start position:0% you know what what did what did they 01:33:15.679 --> 01:33:18.070 align:start position:0% you know what what did what did they mean<01:33:15.840> when<01:33:16.080> they<01:33:16.239> wrote<01:33:16.480> that<01:33:17.440> and<01:33:17.760> maybe 01:33:18.070 --> 01:33:18.080 align:start position:0% mean when they wrote that and maybe 01:33:18.080 --> 01:33:20.070 align:start position:0% mean when they wrote that and maybe somebody<01:33:18.400> knows 01:33:20.070 --> 01:33:20.080 align:start position:0% somebody knows 01:33:20.080 --> 01:33:21.430 align:start position:0% somebody knows because<01:33:20.320> it<01:33:20.480> seems<01:33:20.639> to<01:33:20.800> me<01:33:20.880> that<01:33:21.040> that<01:33:21.280> would 01:33:21.430 --> 01:33:21.440 align:start position:0% because it seems to me that that would 01:33:21.440 --> 01:33:23.430 align:start position:0% because it seems to me that that would have<01:33:21.520> to<01:33:21.679> be<01:33:22.239> that<01:33:22.480> they<01:33:22.800> like<01:33:22.960> if<01:33:23.120> they<01:33:23.280> want 01:33:23.430 --> 01:33:23.440 align:start position:0% have to be that they like if they want 01:33:23.440 --> 01:33:25.030 align:start position:0% have to be that they like if they want this<01:33:23.679> they're<01:33:23.920> going<01:33:24.000> to<01:33:24.159> have<01:33:24.239> that<01:33:24.719> built 01:33:25.030 --> 01:33:25.040 align:start position:0% this they're going to have that built 01:33:25.040 --> 01:33:26.790 align:start position:0% this they're going to have that built into 01:33:26.790 --> 01:33:26.800 align:start position:0% into 01:33:26.800 --> 01:33:28.709 align:start position:0% into their<01:33:27.120> policy.<01:33:28.239> Go<01:33:28.400> ahead. 01:33:28.709 --> 01:33:28.719 align:start position:0% their policy. Go ahead. 01:33:28.719 --> 01:33:33.350 align:start position:0% their policy. Go ahead. >> Uh<01:33:29.120> go<01:33:29.280> ahead. 01:33:33.350 --> 01:33:33.360 align:start position:0% 01:33:33.360 --> 01:33:35.910 align:start position:0% So,<01:33:33.679> I<01:33:34.159> um<01:33:34.239> I<01:33:34.480> pulled<01:33:34.719> up<01:33:34.880> the<01:33:35.120> grant 01:33:35.910 --> 01:33:35.920 align:start position:0% So, I um I pulled up the grant 01:33:35.920 --> 01:33:37.750 align:start position:0% So, I um I pulled up the grant application<01:33:36.480> to<01:33:36.800> just<01:33:36.960> make<01:33:37.120> sure<01:33:37.360> I<01:33:37.600> looked 01:33:37.750 --> 01:33:37.760 align:start position:0% application to just make sure I looked 01:33:37.760 --> 01:33:39.350 align:start position:0% application to just make sure I looked at<01:33:37.920> the<01:33:38.080> language<01:33:38.400> because<01:33:38.560> I<01:33:38.719> knew<01:33:38.880> it<01:33:39.040> was<01:33:39.120> in 01:33:39.350 --> 01:33:39.360 align:start position:0% at the language because I knew it was in 01:33:39.360 --> 01:33:41.110 align:start position:0% at the language because I knew it was in there.<01:33:40.080> And<01:33:40.239> it's<01:33:40.480> part<01:33:40.639> of<01:33:40.719> the<01:33:40.880> key 01:33:41.110 --> 01:33:41.120 align:start position:0% there. And it's part of the key 01:33:41.120 --> 01:33:44.470 align:start position:0% there. And it's part of the key performance<01:33:41.679> objectives<01:33:42.880> that<01:33:43.280> talks<01:33:43.600> about 01:33:44.470 --> 01:33:44.480 align:start position:0% performance objectives that talks about 01:33:44.480 --> 01:33:46.390 align:start position:0% performance objectives that talks about um 01:33:46.390 --> 01:33:46.400 align:start position:0% um 01:33:46.400 --> 01:33:48.310 align:start position:0% um region-based<01:33:47.040> linkages<01:33:47.600> between<01:33:48.000> health 01:33:48.310 --> 01:33:48.320 align:start position:0% region-based linkages between health 01:33:48.320 --> 01:33:51.030 align:start position:0% region-based linkages between health care<01:33:48.560> and<01:33:48.800> social<01:33:49.199> service<01:33:49.600> providers.<01:33:50.639> Um 01:33:51.030 --> 01:33:51.040 align:start position:0% care and social service providers. Um 01:33:51.040 --> 01:33:53.510 align:start position:0% care and social service providers. Um so,<01:33:51.199> it's<01:33:51.520> kind<01:33:51.679> of<01:33:51.760> those<01:33:52.320> regional<01:33:52.960> health 01:33:53.510 --> 01:33:53.520 align:start position:0% so, it's kind of those regional health 01:33:53.520 --> 01:33:56.390 align:start position:0% so, it's kind of those regional health organizations<01:33:54.320> and<01:33:54.639> partnerships<01:33:55.840> as<01:33:56.159> part 01:33:56.390 --> 01:33:56.400 align:start position:0% organizations and partnerships as part 01:33:56.400 --> 01:34:00.229 align:start position:0% organizations and partnerships as part of<01:33:56.560> that<01:33:57.760> um<01:33:58.639> alignment<01:33:59.199> with<01:33:59.440> that.<01:34:00.000> And 01:34:00.229 --> 01:34:00.239 align:start position:0% of that um alignment with that. And 01:34:00.239 --> 01:34:01.750 align:start position:0% of that um alignment with that. And again,<01:34:00.560> this<01:34:00.719> is<01:34:00.880> kind<01:34:01.040> of<01:34:01.040> a<01:34:01.360> bigger 01:34:01.750 --> 01:34:01.760 align:start position:0% again, this is kind of a bigger 01:34:01.760 --> 01:34:04.790 align:start position:0% again, this is kind of a bigger strategic<01:34:02.239> goal<01:34:02.639> about<01:34:03.920> um<01:34:04.080> making<01:34:04.400> sure<01:34:04.560> that 01:34:04.790 --> 01:34:04.800 align:start position:0% strategic goal about um making sure that 01:34:04.800 --> 01:34:07.350 align:start position:0% strategic goal about um making sure that those<01:34:05.040> are<01:34:05.280> connected<01:34:05.679> to<01:34:06.159> the<01:34:06.560> rural<01:34:07.040> health 01:34:07.350 --> 01:34:07.360 align:start position:0% those are connected to the rural health 01:34:07.360 --> 01:34:09.110 align:start position:0% those are connected to the rural health organizations 01:34:09.110 --> 01:34:09.120 align:start position:0% organizations 01:34:09.120 --> 01:34:13.110 align:start position:0% organizations um<01:34:10.560> to<01:34:10.880> help<01:34:11.199> support<01:34:11.600> that.<01:34:12.080> Um<01:34:12.480> it's<01:34:12.719> on<01:34:12.960> the 01:34:13.110 --> 01:34:13.120 align:start position:0% um to help support that. Um it's on the 01:34:13.120 --> 01:34:14.950 align:start position:0% um to help support that. Um it's on the main<01:34:13.360> strategic<01:34:13.840> goal<01:34:14.000> of<01:34:14.239> make<01:34:14.480> rural 01:34:14.950 --> 01:34:14.960 align:start position:0% main strategic goal of make rural 01:34:14.960 --> 01:34:17.750 align:start position:0% main strategic goal of make rural healthy,<01:34:15.840> make<01:34:16.239> rural<01:34:16.800> America<01:34:17.360> healthy 01:34:17.750 --> 01:34:17.760 align:start position:0% healthy, make rural America healthy 01:34:17.760 --> 01:34:22.790 align:start position:0% healthy, make rural America healthy again.<01:34:19.040> And<01:34:19.280> that's<01:34:19.600> on<01:34:19.920> page<01:34:20.719> um<01:34:21.040> 19<01:34:21.520> of<01:34:21.840> the 01:34:22.790 --> 01:34:22.800 align:start position:0% again. And that's on page um 19 of the 01:34:22.800 --> 01:34:25.030 align:start position:0% again. And that's on page um 19 of the larger<01:34:23.199> Utah<01:34:23.600> rural<01:34:24.000> health<01:34:24.320> transformation 01:34:25.030 --> 01:34:25.040 align:start position:0% larger Utah rural health transformation 01:34:25.040 --> 01:34:29.669 align:start position:0% larger Utah rural health transformation program<01:34:25.520> summary. 01:34:29.669 --> 01:34:29.679 align:start position:0% 01:34:29.679 --> 01:34:33.350 align:start position:0% Okay.<01:34:30.639> So,<01:34:31.360> do<01:34:31.600> you<01:34:31.760> see<01:34:32.239> the<01:34:32.480> need<01:34:32.800> like<01:34:33.120> have 01:34:33.350 --> 01:34:33.360 align:start position:0% Okay. So, do you see the need like have 01:34:33.360 --> 01:34:35.669 align:start position:0% Okay. So, do you see the need like have we<01:34:33.600> seen<01:34:33.840> how<01:34:34.080> that's<01:34:34.400> been<01:34:34.639> built<01:34:34.880> out<01:34:35.040> or<01:34:35.280> how 01:34:35.669 --> 01:34:35.679 align:start position:0% we seen how that's been built out or how 01:34:35.679 --> 01:34:39.270 align:start position:0% we seen how that's been built out or how they<01:34:36.080> they<01:34:36.480> recommend<01:34:37.760> like 01:34:39.270 --> 01:34:39.280 align:start position:0% they they recommend like 01:34:39.280 --> 01:34:41.510 align:start position:0% they they recommend like presenting<01:34:39.760> that<01:34:40.080> or<01:34:40.400> creating<01:34:40.800> that?<01:34:41.280> You 01:34:41.510 --> 01:34:41.520 align:start position:0% presenting that or creating that? You 01:34:41.520 --> 01:34:45.830 align:start position:0% presenting that or creating that? You you<01:34:41.760> mentioned<01:34:42.159> social<01:34:43.199> service<01:34:44.239> um<01:34:45.520> the 01:34:45.830 --> 01:34:45.840 align:start position:0% you mentioned social service um the 01:34:45.840 --> 01:34:48.709 align:start position:0% you mentioned social service um the social<01:34:46.239> service<01:34:46.560> networks<01:34:47.280> or<01:34:48.239> are<01:34:48.560> there 01:34:48.709 --> 01:34:48.719 align:start position:0% social service networks or are there 01:34:48.719 --> 01:34:50.790 align:start position:0% social service networks or are there other<01:34:48.960> ones<01:34:49.360> that<01:34:49.679> fall<01:34:49.920> underneath<01:34:50.560> kind<01:34:50.719> of 01:34:50.790 --> 01:34:50.800 align:start position:0% other ones that fall underneath kind of 01:34:50.800 --> 01:34:54.070 align:start position:0% other ones that fall underneath kind of the<01:34:51.040> out<01:34:51.679> all<01:34:51.840> the<01:34:52.080> other<01:34:52.400> places<01:34:52.800> that<01:34:53.040> this 01:34:54.070 --> 01:34:54.080 align:start position:0% the out all the other places that this 01:34:54.080 --> 01:34:57.910 align:start position:0% the out all the other places that this the<01:34:54.320> the<01:34:54.719> main<01:34:54.960> grant<01:34:55.360> is<01:34:55.600> also<01:34:56.000> going<01:34:56.320> to<01:34:57.679> and 01:34:57.910 --> 01:34:57.920 align:start position:0% the the main grant is also going to and 01:34:57.920 --> 01:35:00.070 align:start position:0% the the main grant is also going to and then<01:34:58.080> that<01:34:58.239> would<01:34:58.400> be<01:34:58.560> built<01:34:58.800> into<01:34:59.360> the<01:34:59.840> what 01:35:00.070 --> 01:35:00.080 align:start position:0% then that would be built into the what 01:35:00.080 --> 01:35:03.750 align:start position:0% then that would be built into the what the<01:35:00.320> school<01:35:00.639> is<01:35:02.000> partnering<01:35:02.480> with<01:35:02.800> as<01:35:03.040> well. 01:35:03.750 --> 01:35:03.760 align:start position:0% the school is partnering with as well. 01:35:03.760 --> 01:35:05.110 align:start position:0% the school is partnering with as well. Is<01:35:03.920> that<01:35:04.080> correct? 01:35:05.110 --> 01:35:05.120 align:start position:0% Is that correct? 01:35:05.120 --> 01:35:07.110 align:start position:0% Is that correct? >> Yeah.<01:35:05.760> And<01:35:06.000> board<01:35:06.239> member<01:35:06.400> Green,<01:35:06.719> this<01:35:06.960> might 01:35:07.110 --> 01:35:07.120 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And board member Green, this might 01:35:07.120 --> 01:35:08.950 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And board member Green, this might not<01:35:07.520> completely<01:35:08.000> answer<01:35:08.239> your<01:35:08.480> question,<01:35:08.719> but 01:35:08.950 --> 01:35:08.960 align:start position:0% not completely answer your question, but 01:35:08.960 --> 01:35:10.950 align:start position:0% not completely answer your question, but I<01:35:09.120> think<01:35:09.280> one<01:35:09.520> of<01:35:09.600> the<01:35:09.840> biggest<01:35:10.159> entities<01:35:10.719> that 01:35:10.950 --> 01:35:10.960 align:start position:0% I think one of the biggest entities that 01:35:10.960 --> 01:35:13.350 align:start position:0% I think one of the biggest entities that will<01:35:11.120> be<01:35:11.280> of<01:35:11.520> support<01:35:12.320> for<01:35:12.800> student<01:35:13.199> health 01:35:13.350 --> 01:35:13.360 align:start position:0% will be of support for student health 01:35:13.360 --> 01:35:16.310 align:start position:0% will be of support for student health and<01:35:13.600> wellness.<01:35:14.320> Um,<01:35:14.560> I<01:35:14.719> think<01:35:14.880> there's<01:35:15.120> two. 01:35:16.310 --> 01:35:16.320 align:start position:0% and wellness. Um, I think there's two. 01:35:16.320 --> 01:35:18.390 align:start position:0% and wellness. Um, I think there's two. First<01:35:16.560> is<01:35:16.800> the<01:35:16.960> Reas,<01:35:17.679> our<01:35:17.920> regional 01:35:18.390 --> 01:35:18.400 align:start position:0% First is the Reas, our regional 01:35:18.400 --> 01:35:21.110 align:start position:0% First is the Reas, our regional education<01:35:18.880> service,<01:35:20.239> whatever<01:35:20.480> the<01:35:20.639> A<01:35:20.880> stands 01:35:21.110 --> 01:35:21.120 align:start position:0% education service, whatever the A stands 01:35:21.120 --> 01:35:24.149 align:start position:0% education service, whatever the A stands for,<01:35:21.360> but<01:35:21.679> then<01:35:21.760> the<01:35:22.000> service<01:35:22.320> centers. 01:35:24.149 --> 01:35:24.159 align:start position:0% for, but then the service centers. 01:35:24.159 --> 01:35:27.189 align:start position:0% for, but then the service centers. >> Thank<01:35:24.320> you,<01:35:24.639> deputy<01:35:24.960> superintendent.<01:35:26.159> Um, 01:35:27.189 --> 01:35:27.199 align:start position:0% >> Thank you, deputy superintendent. Um, 01:35:27.199 --> 01:35:29.990 align:start position:0% >> Thank you, deputy superintendent. Um, um,<01:35:27.600> I<01:35:27.840> think<01:35:28.080> they<01:35:28.400> are<01:35:28.560> going<01:35:28.719> to<01:35:28.960> be<01:35:29.199> key.<01:35:29.679> I 01:35:29.990 --> 01:35:30.000 align:start position:0% um, I think they are going to be key. I 01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:32.790 align:start position:0% um, I think they are going to be key. I know<01:35:30.320> that<01:35:30.639> the<01:35:30.960> news<01:35:31.360> specifically<01:35:32.639> so 01:35:32.790 --> 01:35:32.800 align:start position:0% know that the news specifically so 01:35:32.800 --> 01:35:37.830 align:start position:0% know that the news specifically so northern<01:35:33.199> education<01:35:34.480> they<01:35:35.600> um<01:35:36.880> they<01:35:37.440> when<01:35:37.679> I 01:35:37.830 --> 01:35:37.840 align:start position:0% northern education they um they when I 01:35:37.840 --> 01:35:39.350 align:start position:0% northern education they um they when I mentioned<01:35:38.080> that<01:35:38.320> there<01:35:38.480> are<01:35:38.639> some<01:35:38.880> very 01:35:39.350 --> 01:35:39.360 align:start position:0% mentioned that there are some very 01:35:39.360 --> 01:35:42.950 align:start position:0% mentioned that there are some very excited<01:35:40.000> schools<01:35:41.280> news<01:35:41.679> is<01:35:42.159> one<01:35:42.480> they're<01:35:42.800> not 01:35:42.950 --> 01:35:42.960 align:start position:0% excited schools news is one they're not 01:35:42.960 --> 01:35:45.110 align:start position:0% excited schools news is one they're not a<01:35:43.280> school<01:35:43.600> they're<01:35:43.920> the<01:35:44.239> service<01:35:44.560> center<01:35:44.880> but 01:35:45.110 --> 01:35:45.120 align:start position:0% a school they're the service center but 01:35:45.120 --> 01:35:46.470 align:start position:0% a school they're the service center but they're<01:35:45.360> very<01:35:45.600> excited<01:35:45.920> about<01:35:46.080> it<01:35:46.239> and 01:35:46.470 --> 01:35:46.480 align:start position:0% they're very excited about it and 01:35:46.480 --> 01:35:48.550 align:start position:0% they're very excited about it and they've<01:35:46.719> had<01:35:46.880> a<01:35:47.040> lot<01:35:47.120> of<01:35:47.280> conversation<01:35:48.320> um 01:35:48.550 --> 01:35:48.560 align:start position:0% they've had a lot of conversation um 01:35:48.560 --> 01:35:52.149 align:start position:0% they've had a lot of conversation um looking<01:35:48.880> into<01:35:49.280> this<01:35:50.000> so<01:35:50.239> I<01:35:50.400> think<01:35:50.639> ouras<01:35:51.360> are 01:35:52.149 --> 01:35:52.159 align:start position:0% looking into this so I think ouras are 01:35:52.159 --> 01:35:53.990 align:start position:0% looking into this so I think ouras are are<01:35:52.560> one<01:35:52.800> of<01:35:52.960> those<01:35:53.120> entities<01:35:53.600> and<01:35:53.760> I<01:35:53.920> think 01:35:53.990 --> 01:35:54.000 align:start position:0% are one of those entities and I think 01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:55.189 align:start position:0% are one of those entities and I think the<01:35:54.159> other<01:35:54.239> one<01:35:54.400> is<01:35:54.560> your<01:35:54.719> local<01:35:54.960> health 01:35:55.189 --> 01:35:55.199 align:start position:0% the other one is your local health 01:35:55.199 --> 01:35:57.350 align:start position:0% the other one is your local health departments<01:35:56.400> because<01:35:56.639> the<01:35:56.880> local<01:35:57.120> health 01:35:57.350 --> 01:35:57.360 align:start position:0% departments because the local health 01:35:57.360 --> 01:35:58.709 align:start position:0% departments because the local health departments<01:35:57.760> are<01:35:57.920> also<01:35:58.159> supporting<01:35:58.480> the 01:35:58.709 --> 01:35:58.719 align:start position:0% departments are also supporting the 01:35:58.719 --> 01:35:59.910 align:start position:0% departments are also supporting the larger 01:35:59.910 --> 01:35:59.920 align:start position:0% larger 01:35:59.920 --> 01:36:04.070 align:start position:0% larger rural<01:36:00.320> health<01:36:00.719> transformation<01:36:01.360> program,<01:36:02.320> but 01:36:04.070 --> 01:36:04.080 align:start position:0% rural health transformation program, but 01:36:04.080 --> 01:36:06.390 align:start position:0% rural health transformation program, but local<01:36:04.400> health<01:36:04.719> departments<01:36:05.280> have<01:36:05.440> a<01:36:05.679> lot<01:36:05.760> of 01:36:06.390 --> 01:36:06.400 align:start position:0% local health departments have a lot of 01:36:06.400 --> 01:36:08.709 align:start position:0% local health departments have a lot of educators<01:36:07.040> as<01:36:07.360> well.<01:36:08.000> And<01:36:08.159> I<01:36:08.400> think<01:36:08.480> that 01:36:08.709 --> 01:36:08.719 align:start position:0% educators as well. And I think that 01:36:08.719 --> 01:36:10.390 align:start position:0% educators as well. And I think that they're<01:36:09.040> going<01:36:09.120> to<01:36:09.280> be<01:36:09.440> a<01:36:09.600> great<01:36:09.840> resource. 01:36:10.390 --> 01:36:10.400 align:start position:0% they're going to be a great resource. 01:36:10.400 --> 01:36:12.070 align:start position:0% they're going to be a great resource. They<01:36:10.639> also<01:36:10.800> have<01:36:10.960> a<01:36:11.120> lot<01:36:11.199> of<01:36:11.360> equipment,<01:36:11.760> and<01:36:11.920> a 01:36:12.070 --> 01:36:12.080 align:start position:0% They also have a lot of equipment, and a 01:36:12.080 --> 01:36:13.189 align:start position:0% They also have a lot of equipment, and a lot<01:36:12.159> of<01:36:12.239> people<01:36:12.400> don't<01:36:12.560> know<01:36:12.719> this.<01:36:13.040> So, 01:36:13.189 --> 01:36:13.199 align:start position:0% lot of people don't know this. So, 01:36:13.199 --> 01:36:15.189 align:start position:0% lot of people don't know this. So, anyone<01:36:13.520> who<01:36:13.679> is<01:36:13.840> listening<01:36:14.159> in,<01:36:14.560> here's<01:36:14.880> a<01:36:15.040> fun 01:36:15.189 --> 01:36:15.199 align:start position:0% anyone who is listening in, here's a fun 01:36:15.199 --> 01:36:17.110 align:start position:0% anyone who is listening in, here's a fun fact<01:36:15.440> for<01:36:15.679> you.<01:36:16.400> Our<01:36:16.639> local<01:36:16.880> health 01:36:17.110 --> 01:36:17.120 align:start position:0% fact for you. Our local health 01:36:17.120 --> 01:36:18.629 align:start position:0% fact for you. Our local health departments<01:36:17.600> have<01:36:17.760> equipment<01:36:18.159> that<01:36:18.400> can<01:36:18.480> be 01:36:18.629 --> 01:36:18.639 align:start position:0% departments have equipment that can be 01:36:18.639 --> 01:36:22.629 align:start position:0% departments have equipment that can be rented<01:36:19.600> uh<01:36:19.760> for<01:36:19.920> for<01:36:20.320> free.<01:36:20.960> Um,<01:36:21.679> so<01:36:22.239> they<01:36:22.480> will 01:36:22.629 --> 01:36:22.639 align:start position:0% rented uh for for free. Um, so they will 01:36:22.639 --> 01:36:25.830 align:start position:0% rented uh for for free. Um, so they will let<01:36:22.800> you<01:36:23.040> borrow<01:36:23.840> equipment<01:36:24.639> to<01:36:25.360> run<01:36:25.600> a 01:36:25.830 --> 01:36:25.840 align:start position:0% let you borrow equipment to run a 01:36:25.840 --> 01:36:27.510 align:start position:0% let you borrow equipment to run a physical<01:36:26.159> education<01:36:26.560> program<01:36:26.880> or<01:36:27.040> a<01:36:27.280> before 01:36:27.510 --> 01:36:27.520 align:start position:0% physical education program or a before 01:36:27.520 --> 01:36:29.990 align:start position:0% physical education program or a before or<01:36:27.840> after<01:36:28.239> school<01:36:28.480> program<01:36:28.960> or<01:36:29.600> active 01:36:29.990 --> 01:36:30.000 align:start position:0% or after school program or active 01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:34.870 align:start position:0% or after school program or active recess.<01:36:30.960> Um,<01:36:31.360> so<01:36:31.600> our<01:36:31.760> our<01:36:31.920> our<01:36:33.360> local<01:36:34.560> health 01:36:34.870 --> 01:36:34.880 align:start position:0% recess. Um, so our our our local health 01:36:34.880 --> 01:36:36.550 align:start position:0% recess. Um, so our our our local health departments<01:36:35.280> have<01:36:35.440> a<01:36:35.679> lot<01:36:35.760> of<01:36:35.920> resources 01:36:36.550 --> 01:36:36.560 align:start position:0% departments have a lot of resources 01:36:36.560 --> 01:36:39.030 align:start position:0% departments have a lot of resources available<01:36:37.120> already<01:36:37.760> and<01:36:38.000> they<01:36:38.159> have<01:36:38.239> a<01:36:38.480> lot<01:36:38.560> of 01:36:39.030 --> 01:36:39.040 align:start position:0% available already and they have a lot of 01:36:39.040 --> 01:36:40.870 align:start position:0% available already and they have a lot of very<01:36:39.440> equipped<01:36:39.920> people<01:36:40.159> that<01:36:40.400> can<01:36:40.560> help 01:36:40.870 --> 01:36:40.880 align:start position:0% very equipped people that can help 01:36:40.880 --> 01:36:43.270 align:start position:0% very equipped people that can help train.<01:36:41.520> So<01:36:41.760> I<01:36:41.920> think<01:36:42.080> that<01:36:42.400> is<01:36:42.560> another<01:36:42.960> local 01:36:43.270 --> 01:36:43.280 align:start position:0% train. So I think that is another local 01:36:43.280 --> 01:36:45.030 align:start position:0% train. So I think that is another local entity<01:36:43.600> that<01:36:43.920> supports<01:36:44.320> student<01:36:44.639> health<01:36:44.880> and 01:36:45.030 --> 01:36:45.040 align:start position:0% entity that supports student health and 01:36:45.040 --> 01:36:47.750 align:start position:0% entity that supports student health and wellness.<01:36:45.520> And<01:36:46.080> I<01:36:46.320> I<01:36:46.719> don't<01:36:46.880> know<01:36:47.119> this,<01:36:47.440> so<01:36:47.600> it 01:36:47.750 --> 01:36:47.760 align:start position:0% wellness. And I I don't know this, so it 01:36:47.760 --> 01:36:50.390 align:start position:0% wellness. And I I don't know this, so it is<01:36:47.920> a<01:36:48.080> little<01:36:48.159> of<01:36:48.320> an<01:36:48.480> assumption<01:36:49.440> that<01:36:50.000> that 01:36:50.390 --> 01:36:50.400 align:start position:0% is a little of an assumption that that 01:36:50.400 --> 01:36:52.310 align:start position:0% is a little of an assumption that that is<01:36:50.639> where<01:36:50.880> they<01:36:51.119> were<01:36:51.280> leaning<01:36:51.600> when<01:36:51.920> this<01:36:52.159> was 01:36:52.310 --> 01:36:52.320 align:start position:0% is where they were leaning when this was 01:36:52.320 --> 01:36:54.550 align:start position:0% is where they were leaning when this was written<01:36:52.639> into<01:36:53.119> their<01:36:53.840> narrative<01:36:54.239> in<01:36:54.400> the 01:36:54.550 --> 01:36:54.560 align:start position:0% written into their narrative in the 01:36:54.560 --> 01:36:56.629 align:start position:0% written into their narrative in the first<01:36:54.800> place<01:36:55.440> was<01:36:55.679> that<01:36:55.920> they<01:36:56.159> wanted<01:36:56.400> their 01:36:56.629 --> 01:36:56.639 align:start position:0% first place was that they wanted their 01:36:56.639 --> 01:36:58.709 align:start position:0% first place was that they wanted their local<01:36:56.960> health<01:36:57.199> departments<01:36:57.679> to<01:36:58.080> help<01:36:58.400> support 01:36:58.709 --> 01:36:58.719 align:start position:0% local health departments to help support 01:36:58.719 --> 01:37:01.270 align:start position:0% local health departments to help support the<01:36:58.960> program.<01:37:00.159> And<01:37:00.239> and<01:37:00.560> that<01:37:00.800> I'm<01:37:01.040> saying 01:37:01.270 --> 01:37:01.280 align:start position:0% the program. And and that I'm saying 01:37:01.280 --> 01:37:03.189 align:start position:0% the program. And and that I'm saying that<01:37:01.520> with<01:37:01.760> the<01:37:01.920> knowledge<01:37:02.239> of<01:37:02.719> I've<01:37:03.040> been 01:37:03.189 --> 01:37:03.199 align:start position:0% that with the knowledge of I've been 01:37:03.199 --> 01:37:06.070 align:start position:0% that with the knowledge of I've been working<01:37:03.440> with<01:37:04.000> our<01:37:04.639> health<01:37:04.960> department,<01:37:05.600> the 01:37:06.070 --> 01:37:06.080 align:start position:0% working with our health department, the 01:37:06.080 --> 01:37:08.790 align:start position:0% working with our health department, the state<01:37:06.400> department<01:37:06.880> and<01:37:07.199> the<01:37:07.440> local<01:37:08.320> for<01:37:08.560> the 01:37:08.790 --> 01:37:08.800 align:start position:0% state department and the local for the 01:37:08.800 --> 01:37:11.430 align:start position:0% state department and the local for the nine<01:37:09.040> years<01:37:09.199> that<01:37:09.360> I've<01:37:09.520> been<01:37:09.600> at<01:37:09.760> USB.<01:37:10.880> And<01:37:11.199> so 01:37:11.430 --> 01:37:11.440 align:start position:0% nine years that I've been at USB. And so 01:37:11.440 --> 01:37:14.229 align:start position:0% nine years that I've been at USB. And so my<01:37:11.760> knowledge<01:37:12.159> of<01:37:12.960> having<01:37:13.360> really<01:37:13.679> close 01:37:14.229 --> 01:37:14.239 align:start position:0% my knowledge of having really close 01:37:14.239 --> 01:37:16.629 align:start position:0% my knowledge of having really close working<01:37:14.719> relationships<01:37:15.360> with<01:37:16.159> the<01:37:16.320> health 01:37:16.629 --> 01:37:16.639 align:start position:0% working relationships with the health 01:37:16.639 --> 01:37:18.229 align:start position:0% working relationships with the health departments, 01:37:18.229 --> 01:37:18.239 align:start position:0% departments, 01:37:18.239 --> 01:37:22.070 align:start position:0% departments, I<01:37:18.880> would<01:37:19.360> really<01:37:20.159> put<01:37:20.320> a<01:37:20.560> lot<01:37:20.639> of<01:37:21.280> I<01:37:21.600> I<01:37:21.920> feel 01:37:22.070 --> 01:37:22.080 align:start position:0% I would really put a lot of I I feel 01:37:22.080 --> 01:37:24.470 align:start position:0% I would really put a lot of I I feel very 01:37:24.470 --> 01:37:24.480 align:start position:0% very 01:37:24.480 --> 01:37:26.390 align:start position:0% very I<01:37:24.639> I<01:37:24.960> feel<01:37:25.119> pretty<01:37:25.440> confident<01:37:25.760> that<01:37:25.920> that<01:37:26.239> it 01:37:26.390 --> 01:37:26.400 align:start position:0% I I feel pretty confident that that it 01:37:26.400 --> 01:37:27.910 align:start position:0% I I feel pretty confident that that it would<01:37:26.560> be<01:37:26.719> one<01:37:26.800> of<01:37:26.880> the<01:37:27.040> entities<01:37:27.440> that<01:37:27.600> that 01:37:27.910 --> 01:37:27.920 align:start position:0% would be one of the entities that that 01:37:27.920 --> 01:37:30.229 align:start position:0% would be one of the entities that that is<01:37:28.159> meant<01:37:28.400> on<01:37:28.639> that<01:37:28.880> line. 01:37:30.229 --> 01:37:30.239 align:start position:0% is meant on that line. 01:37:30.239 --> 01:37:31.750 align:start position:0% is meant on that line. >> Okay.<01:37:30.639> Thank<01:37:30.880> you. 01:37:31.750 --> 01:37:31.760 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Thank you. 01:37:31.760 --> 01:37:33.189 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Thank you. >> Are<01:37:32.000> we<01:37:32.159> comfortable<01:37:32.480> with<01:37:32.719> adding<01:37:32.960> the 01:37:33.189 --> 01:37:33.199 align:start position:0% >> Are we comfortable with adding the 01:37:33.199 --> 01:37:35.030 align:start position:0% >> Are we comfortable with adding the family<01:37:33.520> engagement<01:37:34.000> in?<01:37:34.480> Did<01:37:34.719> you<01:37:34.800> want<01:37:34.880> to 01:37:35.030 --> 01:37:35.040 align:start position:0% family engagement in? Did you want to 01:37:35.040 --> 01:37:37.350 align:start position:0% family engagement in? Did you want to make<01:37:35.199> any<01:37:35.360> other<01:37:36.480> recommendation<01:37:37.040> there, 01:37:37.350 --> 01:37:37.360 align:start position:0% make any other recommendation there, 01:37:37.360 --> 01:37:40.470 align:start position:0% make any other recommendation there, board<01:37:37.600> member<01:37:37.840> Green? 01:37:40.470 --> 01:37:40.480 align:start position:0% board member Green? 01:37:40.480 --> 01:37:42.950 align:start position:0% board member Green? No,<01:37:40.800> I<01:37:41.040> like<01:37:41.280> adding,<01:37:42.159> you<01:37:42.320> know,<01:37:42.400> the<01:37:42.639> family 01:37:42.950 --> 01:37:42.960 align:start position:0% No, I like adding, you know, the family 01:37:42.960 --> 01:37:43.990 align:start position:0% No, I like adding, you know, the family engagement.<01:37:43.520> I 01:37:43.990 --> 01:37:44.000 align:start position:0% engagement. I 01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:46.870 align:start position:0% engagement. I >> Okay. 01:37:46.870 --> 01:37:46.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 01:37:46.880 --> 01:37:51.590 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay.<01:37:48.320> Um,<01:37:49.119> so<01:37:49.360> the<01:37:49.920> the<01:37:50.320> motion<01:37:50.880> would<01:37:51.119> be<01:37:51.360> to 01:37:51.590 --> 01:37:51.600 align:start position:0% Okay. Um, so the the motion would be to 01:37:51.600 --> 01:37:55.910 align:start position:0% Okay. Um, so the the motion would be to add<01:37:52.159> on<01:37:52.480> line<01:37:53.040> 91,<01:37:53.840> family<01:37:54.239> engagement 01:37:55.910 --> 01:37:55.920 align:start position:0% add on line 91, family engagement 01:37:55.920 --> 01:37:59.510 align:start position:0% add on line 91, family engagement um<01:37:56.560> to<01:37:56.800> that<01:37:57.119> particular<01:37:57.600> line.<01:37:58.880> All<01:37:59.119> those<01:37:59.280> in 01:37:59.510 --> 01:37:59.520 align:start position:0% um to that particular line. All those in 01:37:59.520 --> 01:38:00.709 align:start position:0% um to that particular line. All those in favor? 01:38:00.709 --> 01:38:00.719 align:start position:0% favor? 01:38:00.719 --> 01:38:01.590 align:start position:0% favor? >> One<01:38:01.040> quick<01:38:01.280> question. 01:38:01.590 --> 01:38:01.600 align:start position:0% >> One quick question. 01:38:01.600 --> 01:38:02.550 align:start position:0% >> One quick question. >> Yeah,<01:38:01.760> go<01:38:01.920> ahead.<01:38:02.080> Go<01:38:02.159> ahead. 01:38:02.550 --> 01:38:02.560 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, go ahead. Go ahead. 01:38:02.560 --> 01:38:04.629 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, go ahead. Go ahead. >> I<01:38:02.719> love<01:38:02.880> the<01:38:03.119> addition.<01:38:03.600> However,<01:38:04.080> is<01:38:04.239> that<01:38:04.400> a 01:38:04.629 --> 01:38:04.639 align:start position:0% >> I love the addition. However, is that a 01:38:04.639 --> 01:38:07.910 align:start position:0% >> I love the addition. However, is that a requirement<01:38:05.280> for<01:38:05.600> either<01:38:06.000> the<01:38:07.199> like<01:38:07.440> are<01:38:07.600> you 01:38:07.910 --> 01:38:07.920 align:start position:0% requirement for either the like are you 01:38:07.920 --> 01:38:09.430 align:start position:0% requirement for either the like are you doing<01:38:08.159> something<01:38:08.480> over<01:38:08.639> and<01:38:08.880> above<01:38:09.199> the 01:38:09.430 --> 01:38:09.440 align:start position:0% doing something over and above the 01:38:09.440 --> 01:38:12.950 align:start position:0% doing something over and above the actual<01:38:09.760> requirement<01:38:10.239> of<01:38:10.400> the<01:38:10.560> law<01:38:11.360> and<01:38:11.760> the 01:38:12.950 --> 01:38:12.960 align:start position:0% actual requirement of the law and the 01:38:12.960 --> 01:38:16.149 align:start position:0% actual requirement of the law and the application<01:38:13.679> by<01:38:14.000> adding<01:38:14.239> it<01:38:14.400> in 01:38:16.149 --> 01:38:16.159 align:start position:0% application by adding it in 01:38:16.159 --> 01:38:17.669 align:start position:0% application by adding it in because<01:38:16.400> the<01:38:16.560> law<01:38:16.800> doesn't<01:38:17.040> state<01:38:17.360> family 01:38:17.669 --> 01:38:17.679 align:start position:0% because the law doesn't state family 01:38:17.679 --> 01:38:20.950 align:start position:0% because the law doesn't state family engagement.<01:38:18.239> Well,<01:38:18.400> it's<01:38:19.520> well<01:38:19.760> I<01:38:20.000> love<01:38:20.639> the 01:38:20.950 --> 01:38:20.960 align:start position:0% engagement. Well, it's well I love the 01:38:20.960 --> 01:38:23.189 align:start position:0% engagement. Well, it's well I love the act<01:38:21.199> of<01:38:21.360> it<01:38:21.679> but<01:38:21.920> you<01:38:22.159> are<01:38:22.400> now<01:38:22.639> adding<01:38:22.960> an 01:38:23.189 --> 01:38:23.199 align:start position:0% act of it but you are now adding an 01:38:23.199 --> 01:38:25.830 align:start position:0% act of it but you are now adding an additional<01:38:23.920> practice<01:38:24.480> that<01:38:24.800> I<01:38:25.040> don't<01:38:25.199> see<01:38:25.440> as 01:38:25.830 --> 01:38:25.840 align:start position:0% additional practice that I don't see as 01:38:25.840 --> 01:38:28.709 align:start position:0% additional practice that I don't see as required. 01:38:28.709 --> 01:38:28.719 align:start position:0% required. 01:38:28.719 --> 01:38:31.910 align:start position:0% required. I<01:38:29.040> think<01:38:29.119> it's<01:38:29.360> an<01:38:29.600> ore,<01:38:30.239> but<01:38:31.199> well,<01:38:31.600> we're 01:38:31.910 --> 01:38:31.920 align:start position:0% I think it's an ore, but well, we're 01:38:31.920 --> 01:38:33.910 align:start position:0% I think it's an ore, but well, we're adding<01:38:32.080> it<01:38:32.239> in<01:38:32.400> as<01:38:32.639> an<01:38:32.800> ore.<01:38:33.199> It's<01:38:33.360> those<01:38:33.760> one 01:38:33.910 --> 01:38:33.920 align:start position:0% adding it in as an ore. It's those one 01:38:33.920 --> 01:38:35.510 align:start position:0% adding it in as an ore. It's those one of<01:38:34.080> those<01:38:34.239> three<01:38:34.480> things.<01:38:34.880> But<01:38:35.040> let's<01:38:35.280> take 01:38:35.510 --> 01:38:35.520 align:start position:0% of those three things. But let's take 01:38:35.520 --> 01:38:37.590 align:start position:0% of those three things. But let's take it.<01:38:35.679> What<01:38:35.920> was<01:38:36.080> the<01:38:36.239> line<01:38:36.480> again,<01:38:37.280> Board 01:38:37.590 --> 01:38:37.600 align:start position:0% it. What was the line again, Board 01:38:37.600 --> 01:38:38.950 align:start position:0% it. What was the line again, Board Member<01:38:37.840> Green,<01:38:38.080> that<01:38:38.239> you<01:38:38.480> said<01:38:38.639> you<01:38:38.880> were 01:38:38.950 --> 01:38:38.960 align:start position:0% Member Green, that you said you were 01:38:38.960 --> 01:38:39.830 align:start position:0% Member Green, that you said you were looking<01:38:39.199> at? 01:38:39.830 --> 01:38:39.840 align:start position:0% looking at? 01:38:39.840 --> 01:38:43.270 align:start position:0% looking at? >> It<01:38:40.000> was<01:38:40.400> 163.<01:38:40.960> So<01:38:41.119> it<01:38:41.280> says<01:38:41.760> at<01:38:42.159> double<01:38:42.560> I 01:38:43.270 --> 01:38:43.280 align:start position:0% >> It was 163. So it says at double I 01:38:43.280 --> 01:38:45.270 align:start position:0% >> It was 163. So it says at double I select<01:38:43.760> eligible<01:38:44.239> schools<01:38:44.560> to<01:38:44.800> participate 01:38:45.270 --> 01:38:45.280 align:start position:0% select eligible schools to participate 01:38:45.280 --> 01:38:47.750 align:start position:0% select eligible schools to participate in<01:38:45.440> the<01:38:45.679> program<01:38:46.080> prioritizing<01:38:46.880> schools<01:38:47.280> that 01:38:47.750 --> 01:38:47.760 align:start position:0% in the program prioritizing schools that 01:38:47.760 --> 01:38:49.350 align:start position:0% in the program prioritizing schools that a<01:38:48.000> demonstrate<01:38:48.480> the<01:38:48.719> greatest<01:38:49.040> need<01:38:49.199> for 01:38:49.350 --> 01:38:49.360 align:start position:0% a demonstrate the greatest need for 01:38:49.360 --> 01:38:51.189 align:start position:0% a demonstrate the greatest need for health<01:38:49.600> improvement<01:38:50.320> b<01:38:50.639> submit<01:38:50.960> an 01:38:51.189 --> 01:38:51.199 align:start position:0% health improvement b submit an 01:38:51.199 --> 01:38:53.030 align:start position:0% health improvement b submit an application<01:38:51.600> in<01:38:51.840> accordance<01:38:52.239> with<01:38:52.400> section<01:38:52.800> 4 01:38:53.030 --> 01:38:53.040 align:start position:0% application in accordance with section 4 01:38:53.040 --> 01:38:55.109 align:start position:0% application in accordance with section 4 that<01:38:53.280> outlines<01:38:53.679> measurable<01:38:54.239> health<01:38:54.480> goals 01:38:55.109 --> 01:38:55.119 align:start position:0% that outlines measurable health goals 01:38:55.119 --> 01:38:57.990 align:start position:0% that outlines measurable health goals and<01:38:55.440> evidencebased<01:38:56.400> strategies<01:38:57.040> and<01:38:57.280> c 01:38:57.990 --> 01:38:58.000 align:start position:0% and evidencebased strategies and c 01:38:58.000 --> 01:38:59.590 align:start position:0% and evidencebased strategies and c establish<01:38:58.560> partnerships<01:38:59.040> with<01:38:59.280> local 01:38:59.590 --> 01:38:59.600 align:start position:0% establish partnerships with local 01:38:59.600 --> 01:39:01.270 align:start position:0% establish partnerships with local entities<01:39:00.000> to<01:39:00.239> support<01:39:00.639> student<01:39:00.960> health<01:39:01.119> and 01:39:01.270 --> 01:39:01.280 align:start position:0% entities to support student health and 01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:02.229 align:start position:0% entities to support student health and wellness. 01:39:02.229 --> 01:39:02.239 align:start position:0% wellness. 01:39:02.239 --> 01:39:04.149 align:start position:0% wellness. >> So<01:39:02.400> it's<01:39:02.639> that<01:39:02.880> local<01:39:03.199> entities<01:39:03.679> piece<01:39:03.920> that 01:39:04.149 --> 01:39:04.159 align:start position:0% >> So it's that local entities piece that 01:39:04.159 --> 01:39:06.629 align:start position:0% >> So it's that local entities piece that we<01:39:04.320> have<01:39:04.400> the<01:39:04.639> question<01:39:04.960> around<01:39:05.679> right? 01:39:06.629 --> 01:39:06.639 align:start position:0% we have the question around right? 01:39:06.639 --> 01:39:07.430 align:start position:0% we have the question around right? Yeah. 01:39:07.430 --> 01:39:07.440 align:start position:0% Yeah. 01:39:07.440 --> 01:39:09.189 align:start position:0% Yeah. >> Whether<01:39:07.840> family<01:39:08.159> engagement<01:39:08.639> is<01:39:08.880> local 01:39:09.189 --> 01:39:09.199 align:start position:0% >> Whether family engagement is local 01:39:09.199 --> 01:39:10.629 align:start position:0% >> Whether family engagement is local entities 01:39:10.629 --> 01:39:10.639 align:start position:0% entities 01:39:10.639 --> 01:39:13.109 align:start position:0% entities >> and<01:39:10.880> and<01:39:11.199> the<01:39:11.440> way<01:39:11.600> that<01:39:11.920> I<01:39:12.239> read<01:39:12.480> this<01:39:12.800> also, 01:39:13.109 --> 01:39:13.119 align:start position:0% >> and and the way that I read this also, 01:39:13.119 --> 01:39:16.709 align:start position:0% >> and and the way that I read this also, it<01:39:13.360> says<01:39:13.600> the<01:39:13.920> presence<01:39:14.400> of<01:39:15.040> partnerships 01:39:16.709 --> 01:39:16.719 align:start position:0% it says the presence of partnerships 01:39:16.719 --> 01:39:19.030 align:start position:0% it says the presence of partnerships and<01:39:16.960> so<01:39:17.360> presence<01:39:17.760> of<01:39:18.080> partnerships.<01:39:18.880> Does 01:39:19.030 --> 01:39:19.040 align:start position:0% and so presence of partnerships. Does 01:39:19.040 --> 01:39:21.590 align:start position:0% and so presence of partnerships. Does that<01:39:19.199> mean<01:39:19.440> that<01:39:20.000> you<01:39:20.159> know<01:39:20.800> like<01:39:21.040> our<01:39:21.280> local 01:39:21.590 --> 01:39:21.600 align:start position:0% that mean that you know like our local 01:39:21.600 --> 01:39:25.910 align:start position:0% that mean that you know like our local health<01:39:22.560> departments<01:39:23.760> have<01:39:24.639> you<01:39:24.880> know<01:39:25.760> you 01:39:25.910 --> 01:39:25.920 align:start position:0% health departments have you know you 01:39:25.920 --> 01:39:29.750 align:start position:0% health departments have you know you know<01:39:26.639> advertising<01:39:27.440> within<01:39:27.920> the<01:39:28.159> schools. 01:39:29.750 --> 01:39:29.760 align:start position:0% know advertising within the schools. 01:39:29.760 --> 01:39:34.870 align:start position:0% know advertising within the schools. Is<01:39:30.000> is<01:39:30.320> that<01:39:30.560> what<01:39:30.719> that<01:39:31.040> line<01:39:31.280> implies? 01:39:34.870 --> 01:39:34.880 align:start position:0% 01:39:34.880 --> 01:39:36.629 align:start position:0% I<01:39:35.040> I<01:39:35.360> don't<01:39:35.440> know<01:39:35.600> if<01:39:35.840> I<01:39:36.080> have<01:39:36.159> a<01:39:36.400> different 01:39:36.629 --> 01:39:36.639 align:start position:0% I I don't know if I have a different 01:39:36.639 --> 01:39:38.229 align:start position:0% I I don't know if I have a different perspective<01:39:37.119> on<01:39:37.280> this,<01:39:37.440> but<01:39:37.679> I<01:39:37.840> see<01:39:38.000> all<01:39:38.159> of 01:39:38.229 --> 01:39:38.239 align:start position:0% perspective on this, but I see all of 01:39:38.239 --> 01:39:39.750 align:start position:0% perspective on this, but I see all of these<01:39:38.560> partnerships<01:39:39.119> and<01:39:39.360> like<01:39:39.520> the 01:39:39.750 --> 01:39:39.760 align:start position:0% these partnerships and like the 01:39:39.760 --> 01:39:41.350 align:start position:0% these partnerships and like the community<01:39:40.080> groups<01:39:40.400> and<01:39:40.719> everyone<01:39:41.119> coming 01:39:41.350 --> 01:39:41.360 align:start position:0% community groups and everyone coming 01:39:41.360 --> 01:39:42.629 align:start position:0% community groups and everyone coming together<01:39:41.600> and<01:39:41.840> supporting.<01:39:42.239> It's<01:39:42.400> sort<01:39:42.560> of 01:39:42.629 --> 01:39:42.639 align:start position:0% together and supporting. It's sort of 01:39:42.639 --> 01:39:46.310 align:start position:0% together and supporting. It's sort of like,<01:39:43.360> you<01:39:43.520> know,<01:39:44.000> um<01:39:45.040> the<01:39:45.760> Inter<01:39:46.080> Mountain 01:39:46.310 --> 01:39:46.320 align:start position:0% like, you know, um the Inter Mountain 01:39:46.320 --> 01:39:47.830 align:start position:0% like, you know, um the Inter Mountain Health, 01:39:47.830 --> 01:39:47.840 align:start position:0% Health, 01:39:47.840 --> 01:39:50.629 align:start position:0% Health, they<01:39:48.639> provide<01:39:48.960> a<01:39:49.280> free<01:39:49.679> bike<01:39:50.000> helmet<01:39:50.400> to 01:39:50.629 --> 01:39:50.639 align:start position:0% they provide a free bike helmet to 01:39:50.639 --> 01:39:53.030 align:start position:0% they provide a free bike helmet to literally<01:39:51.040> anyone<01:39:51.360> who<01:39:51.600> asks.<01:39:52.560> Like<01:39:52.800> they're 01:39:53.030 --> 01:39:53.040 align:start position:0% literally anyone who asks. Like they're 01:39:53.040 --> 01:39:54.470 align:start position:0% literally anyone who asks. Like they're like,<01:39:53.199> "Hey,<01:39:53.520> if<01:39:53.679> you<01:39:53.760> want<01:39:53.840> a<01:39:53.920> bike<01:39:54.159> helmet, 01:39:54.470 --> 01:39:54.480 align:start position:0% like, "Hey, if you want a bike helmet, 01:39:54.480 --> 01:39:55.830 align:start position:0% like, "Hey, if you want a bike helmet, we<01:39:54.639> want<01:39:54.719> you<01:39:54.800> to<01:39:54.960> be<01:39:55.040> safe.<01:39:55.360> We<01:39:55.520> know<01:39:55.600> that 01:39:55.830 --> 01:39:55.840 align:start position:0% we want you to be safe. We know that 01:39:55.840 --> 01:39:57.910 align:start position:0% we want you to be safe. We know that there's<01:39:56.080> a<01:39:56.320> huge<01:39:56.560> risk<01:39:56.800> and<01:39:57.040> a<01:39:57.199> lot<01:39:57.280> of<01:39:57.360> kids 01:39:57.910 --> 01:39:57.920 align:start position:0% there's a huge risk and a lot of kids 01:39:57.920 --> 01:39:59.669 align:start position:0% there's a huge risk and a lot of kids get<01:39:58.159> hurt<01:39:58.560> by<01:39:58.800> not<01:39:58.960> wearing<01:39:59.280> helmets,<01:39:59.520> so 01:39:59.669 --> 01:39:59.679 align:start position:0% get hurt by not wearing helmets, so 01:39:59.679 --> 01:40:01.350 align:start position:0% get hurt by not wearing helmets, so we'll<01:39:59.840> give<01:39:59.920> you<01:40:00.080> free<01:40:00.320> helmets<01:40:00.880> for<01:40:01.119> every 01:40:01.350 --> 01:40:01.360 align:start position:0% we'll give you free helmets for every 01:40:01.360 --> 01:40:03.109 align:start position:0% we'll give you free helmets for every kid<01:40:01.520> who<01:40:01.760> asks<01:40:02.000> for<01:40:02.080> it."<01:40:02.320> Right?<01:40:02.560> like<01:40:02.880> those 01:40:03.109 --> 01:40:03.119 align:start position:0% kid who asks for it." Right? like those 01:40:03.119 --> 01:40:04.870 align:start position:0% kid who asks for it." Right? like those are<01:40:03.280> the<01:40:03.440> type<01:40:03.600> of<01:40:03.760> health<01:40:04.000> and<01:40:04.480> wellness 01:40:04.870 --> 01:40:04.880 align:start position:0% are the type of health and wellness 01:40:04.880 --> 01:40:06.629 align:start position:0% are the type of health and wellness partnerships<01:40:05.360> that<01:40:05.600> I<01:40:05.760> see<01:40:05.920> here.<01:40:06.239> So,<01:40:06.400> I<01:40:06.560> just 01:40:06.629 --> 01:40:06.639 align:start position:0% partnerships that I see here. So, I just 01:40:06.639 --> 01:40:08.470 align:start position:0% partnerships that I see here. So, I just want<01:40:06.719> to<01:40:06.880> make<01:40:06.960> sure<01:40:07.119> we're<01:40:07.360> not<01:40:08.159> limiting 01:40:08.470 --> 01:40:08.480 align:start position:0% want to make sure we're not limiting 01:40:08.480 --> 01:40:10.310 align:start position:0% want to make sure we're not limiting that<01:40:08.719> in<01:40:08.800> any<01:40:08.960> way,<01:40:09.119> but<01:40:09.280> I<01:40:09.440> don't<01:40:09.679> I<01:40:09.840> I<01:40:10.239> think 01:40:10.310 --> 01:40:10.320 align:start position:0% that in any way, but I don't I I think 01:40:10.320 --> 01:40:13.270 align:start position:0% that in any way, but I don't I I think that,<01:40:11.360> you<01:40:11.520> know,<01:40:11.920> it's<01:40:12.159> like<01:40:12.480> the<01:40:12.800> idea<01:40:13.040> that 01:40:13.270 --> 01:40:13.280 align:start position:0% that, you know, it's like the idea that 01:40:13.280 --> 01:40:16.790 align:start position:0% that, you know, it's like the idea that we<01:40:13.520> have<01:40:13.760> our<01:40:14.560> I<01:40:15.040> always<01:40:15.280> see<01:40:15.440> our<01:40:15.679> schools<01:40:16.159> as 01:40:16.790 --> 01:40:16.800 align:start position:0% we have our I always see our schools as 01:40:16.800 --> 01:40:19.030 align:start position:0% we have our I always see our schools as a<01:40:17.280> major<01:40:17.679> piece<01:40:17.920> of<01:40:18.080> our<01:40:18.320> community,<01:40:18.800> right? 01:40:19.030 --> 01:40:19.040 align:start position:0% a major piece of our community, right? 01:40:19.040 --> 01:40:20.629 align:start position:0% a major piece of our community, right? like<01:40:19.199> it's<01:40:19.360> a<01:40:19.520> community<01:40:19.760> epicenter<01:40:20.239> in<01:40:20.400> a<01:40:20.560> lot 01:40:20.629 --> 01:40:20.639 align:start position:0% like it's a community epicenter in a lot 01:40:20.639 --> 01:40:22.629 align:start position:0% like it's a community epicenter in a lot of<01:40:20.719> ways<01:40:20.880> and<01:40:21.119> that<01:40:21.360> includes<01:40:22.080> partnerships 01:40:22.629 --> 01:40:22.639 align:start position:0% of ways and that includes partnerships 01:40:22.639 --> 01:40:24.390 align:start position:0% of ways and that includes partnerships and<01:40:22.800> benefits<01:40:23.199> with<01:40:23.440> families<01:40:23.760> and<01:40:24.000> with 01:40:24.390 --> 01:40:24.400 align:start position:0% and benefits with families and with 01:40:24.400 --> 01:40:26.390 align:start position:0% and benefits with families and with community<01:40:24.960> organizations<01:40:25.760> and<01:40:26.080> local 01:40:26.390 --> 01:40:26.400 align:start position:0% community organizations and local 01:40:26.400 --> 01:40:27.990 align:start position:0% community organizations and local nonprofits<01:40:26.960> that<01:40:27.199> all<01:40:27.360> come<01:40:27.520> together<01:40:27.760> to 01:40:27.990 --> 01:40:28.000 align:start position:0% nonprofits that all come together to 01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:29.910 align:start position:0% nonprofits that all come together to help<01:40:28.400> fulfill<01:40:28.800> all<01:40:28.960> these<01:40:29.280> requirements<01:40:29.679> and 01:40:29.910 --> 01:40:29.920 align:start position:0% help fulfill all these requirements and 01:40:29.920 --> 01:40:31.830 align:start position:0% help fulfill all these requirements and such<01:40:30.080> in<01:40:30.239> the<01:40:30.400> in<01:40:30.639> the<01:40:31.040> grant<01:40:31.280> and<01:40:31.520> all<01:40:31.679> the 01:40:31.830 --> 01:40:31.840 align:start position:0% such in the in the grant and all the 01:40:31.840 --> 01:40:35.189 align:start position:0% such in the in the grant and all the requirements<01:40:32.239> we<01:40:32.400> have<01:40:32.480> in<01:40:32.639> the<01:40:32.800> law<01:40:33.040> too. 01:40:35.189 --> 01:40:35.199 align:start position:0% requirements we have in the law too. 01:40:35.199 --> 01:40:37.910 align:start position:0% requirements we have in the law too. >> No,<01:40:35.520> I<01:40:35.679> I<01:40:35.760> I<01:40:36.400> understand<01:40:36.960> I<01:40:37.119> I<01:40:37.440> just<01:40:37.600> want<01:40:37.760> to 01:40:37.910 --> 01:40:37.920 align:start position:0% >> No, I I I understand I I just want to 01:40:37.920 --> 01:40:41.590 align:start position:0% >> No, I I I understand I I just want to understand<01:40:39.119> what<01:40:39.520> is<01:40:39.840> being<01:40:40.159> said<01:40:40.960> and<01:40:41.360> you 01:40:41.590 --> 01:40:41.600 align:start position:0% understand what is being said and you 01:40:41.600 --> 01:40:44.629 align:start position:0% understand what is being said and you know<01:40:41.840> what<01:40:42.080> it<01:40:42.320> is<01:40:42.880> that<01:40:43.199> we're<01:40:43.440> reading<01:40:43.760> here, 01:40:44.629 --> 01:40:44.639 align:start position:0% know what it is that we're reading here, 01:40:44.639 --> 01:40:46.310 align:start position:0% know what it is that we're reading here, what<01:40:44.800> it<01:40:44.960> looks<01:40:45.119> like<01:40:45.280> when<01:40:45.520> it<01:40:45.679> gets<01:40:45.920> in<01:40:46.080> the 01:40:46.310 --> 01:40:46.320 align:start position:0% what it looks like when it gets in the 01:40:46.320 --> 01:40:49.270 align:start position:0% what it looks like when it gets in the school.<01:40:47.280> Um,<01:40:47.679> and<01:40:47.920> so<01:40:48.320> what<01:40:48.560> does<01:40:48.800> presence<01:40:49.119> of 01:40:49.270 --> 01:40:49.280 align:start position:0% school. Um, and so what does presence of 01:40:49.280 --> 01:40:50.470 align:start position:0% school. Um, and so what does presence of partnerships?<01:40:49.840> Because<01:40:50.000> then<01:40:50.159> I<01:40:50.239> have<01:40:50.400> to 01:40:50.470 --> 01:40:50.480 align:start position:0% partnerships? Because then I have to 01:40:50.480 --> 01:40:52.390 align:start position:0% partnerships? Because then I have to say,<01:40:50.639> what<01:40:50.800> does<01:40:51.199> the<01:40:51.440> presence<01:40:51.840> of<01:40:52.080> family 01:40:52.390 --> 01:40:52.400 align:start position:0% say, what does the presence of family 01:40:52.400 --> 01:40:55.590 align:start position:0% say, what does the presence of family engagement<01:40:52.960> mean<01:40:54.000> when<01:40:54.320> it<01:40:54.560> comes<01:40:54.800> to 01:40:55.590 --> 01:40:55.600 align:start position:0% engagement mean when it comes to 01:40:55.600 --> 01:40:58.470 align:start position:0% engagement mean when it comes to physical<01:40:56.400> education<01:40:57.119> and<01:40:57.360> and<01:40:58.000> uh<01:40:58.159> the 01:40:58.470 --> 01:40:58.480 align:start position:0% physical education and and uh the 01:40:58.480 --> 01:41:02.310 align:start position:0% physical education and and uh the nutrition<01:40:59.199> part<01:40:59.360> of<01:40:59.520> it?<01:41:00.960> I<01:41:01.360> obviously<01:41:01.920> like 01:41:02.310 --> 01:41:02.320 align:start position:0% nutrition part of it? I obviously like 01:41:02.320 --> 01:41:05.030 align:start position:0% nutrition part of it? I obviously like including<01:41:02.800> family<01:41:03.199> engagement.<01:41:04.159> Um,<01:41:04.560> and<01:41:04.800> I 01:41:05.030 --> 01:41:05.040 align:start position:0% including family engagement. Um, and I 01:41:05.040 --> 01:41:06.709 align:start position:0% including family engagement. Um, and I think<01:41:05.199> memberwood<01:41:05.840> gave<01:41:06.000> a<01:41:06.159> great<01:41:06.320> example<01:41:06.560> of 01:41:06.709 --> 01:41:06.719 align:start position:0% think memberwood gave a great example of 01:41:06.719 --> 01:41:08.790 align:start position:0% think memberwood gave a great example of the<01:41:06.880> why<01:41:07.199> for<01:41:07.440> that.<01:41:07.679> you<01:41:07.920> know,<01:41:08.080> it's<01:41:08.239> a<01:41:08.480> it's 01:41:08.790 --> 01:41:08.800 align:start position:0% the why for that. you know, it's a it's 01:41:08.800 --> 01:41:10.950 align:start position:0% the why for that. you know, it's a it's a<01:41:09.360> not<01:41:09.600> just<01:41:09.760> your<01:41:10.080> community,<01:41:10.400> but<01:41:10.719> your 01:41:10.950 --> 01:41:10.960 align:start position:0% a not just your community, but your 01:41:10.960 --> 01:41:12.790 align:start position:0% a not just your community, but your family,<01:41:11.679> your<01:41:11.920> immediate<01:41:12.320> family,<01:41:12.560> where 01:41:12.790 --> 01:41:12.800 align:start position:0% family, your immediate family, where 01:41:12.800 --> 01:41:15.590 align:start position:0% family, your immediate family, where that<01:41:13.040> support<01:41:13.360> can<01:41:14.560> uh<01:41:14.719> strengthen<01:41:15.199> yourself 01:41:15.590 --> 01:41:15.600 align:start position:0% that support can uh strengthen yourself 01:41:15.600 --> 01:41:17.189 align:start position:0% that support can uh strengthen yourself and<01:41:15.760> then<01:41:16.000> that<01:41:16.320> spills<01:41:16.639> out<01:41:16.719> into<01:41:16.960> our 01:41:17.189 --> 01:41:17.199 align:start position:0% and then that spills out into our 01:41:17.199 --> 01:41:19.750 align:start position:0% and then that spills out into our community.<01:41:17.600> So,<01:41:17.760> it<01:41:17.920> kind<01:41:18.080> of<01:41:19.119> sets<01:41:19.440> things 01:41:19.750 --> 01:41:19.760 align:start position:0% community. So, it kind of sets things 01:41:19.760 --> 01:41:21.350 align:start position:0% community. So, it kind of sets things right.<01:41:20.080> But<01:41:20.239> I<01:41:20.480> see, 01:41:21.350 --> 01:41:21.360 align:start position:0% right. But I see, 01:41:21.360 --> 01:41:23.189 align:start position:0% right. But I see, >> yeah,<01:41:21.920> Jennifer<01:41:22.239> Wadssworth,<01:41:22.800> do<01:41:22.960> you<01:41:23.040> have 01:41:23.189 --> 01:41:23.199 align:start position:0% >> yeah, Jennifer Wadssworth, do you have 01:41:23.199 --> 01:41:26.070 align:start position:0% >> yeah, Jennifer Wadssworth, do you have something<01:41:23.280> to<01:41:23.520> add?<01:41:24.480> So,<01:41:24.719> we<01:41:24.880> do<01:41:25.040> have<01:41:25.199> AG<01:41:25.760> Don 01:41:26.070 --> 01:41:26.080 align:start position:0% something to add? So, we do have AG Don 01:41:26.080 --> 01:41:27.750 align:start position:0% something to add? So, we do have AG Don on<01:41:26.239> the<01:41:26.400> call<01:41:26.639> if<01:41:26.880> we<01:41:26.960> want<01:41:27.040> to<01:41:27.199> check<01:41:27.280> in<01:41:27.520> just 01:41:27.750 --> 01:41:27.760 align:start position:0% on the call if we want to check in just 01:41:27.760 --> 01:41:29.430 align:start position:0% on the call if we want to check in just legally<01:41:28.080> to<01:41:28.239> see<01:41:28.320> if<01:41:28.480> we<01:41:28.639> are<01:41:28.800> going<01:41:28.960> above 01:41:29.430 --> 01:41:29.440 align:start position:0% legally to see if we are going above 01:41:29.440 --> 01:41:31.350 align:start position:0% legally to see if we are going above code<01:41:29.679> and<01:41:29.840> what<01:41:30.000> it's<01:41:30.239> requiring.<01:41:31.040> But<01:41:31.119> I 01:41:31.350 --> 01:41:31.360 align:start position:0% code and what it's requiring. But I 01:41:31.360 --> 01:41:33.189 align:start position:0% code and what it's requiring. But I think<01:41:31.760> in<01:41:32.080> my<01:41:32.239> opinion,<01:41:32.639> which<01:41:32.800> is<01:41:32.880> not<01:41:33.040> a 01:41:33.189 --> 01:41:33.199 align:start position:0% think in my opinion, which is not a 01:41:33.199 --> 01:41:35.510 align:start position:0% think in my opinion, which is not a legal<01:41:33.440> opinion,<01:41:34.159> um<01:41:34.320> the<01:41:34.719> broad<01:41:35.040> term<01:41:35.360> of 01:41:35.510 --> 01:41:35.520 align:start position:0% legal opinion, um the broad term of 01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:37.430 align:start position:0% legal opinion, um the broad term of local<01:41:35.840> entity,<01:41:36.400> I<01:41:36.560> don't<01:41:36.719> see<01:41:36.880> a<01:41:37.040> reason<01:41:37.199> why 01:41:37.430 --> 01:41:37.440 align:start position:0% local entity, I don't see a reason why 01:41:37.440 --> 01:41:39.590 align:start position:0% local entity, I don't see a reason why that<01:41:37.600> couldn't<01:41:38.000> include<01:41:38.320> our<01:41:38.560> families.<01:41:39.440> But 01:41:39.590 --> 01:41:39.600 align:start position:0% that couldn't include our families. But 01:41:39.600 --> 01:41:42.070 align:start position:0% that couldn't include our families. But again,<01:41:40.000> a<01:41:40.480> don<01:41:40.880> is<01:41:41.040> here. 01:41:42.070 --> 01:41:42.080 align:start position:0% again, a don is here. 01:41:42.080 --> 01:41:43.830 align:start position:0% again, a don is here. >> Okay, 01:41:43.830 --> 01:41:43.840 align:start position:0% >> Okay, 01:41:43.840 --> 01:41:45.430 align:start position:0% >> Okay, go<01:41:44.080> ahead.<01:41:44.480> I'm<01:41:44.719> not<01:41:44.800> seeing<01:41:44.960> you,<01:41:45.119> but<01:41:45.360> go 01:41:45.430 --> 01:41:45.440 align:start position:0% go ahead. I'm not seeing you, but go 01:41:45.440 --> 01:41:46.950 align:start position:0% go ahead. I'm not seeing you, but go ahead<01:41:45.600> and<01:41:45.679> weigh<01:41:45.920> in<01:41:46.080> if<01:41:46.239> you'd<01:41:46.480> like<01:41:46.560> to<01:41:46.800> if 01:41:46.950 --> 01:41:46.960 align:start position:0% ahead and weigh in if you'd like to if 01:41:46.960 --> 01:41:50.070 align:start position:0% ahead and weigh in if you'd like to if you've<01:41:47.119> got<01:41:47.280> a<01:41:47.760> a<01:41:48.159> thought<01:41:48.320> on<01:41:48.480> that. 01:41:50.070 --> 01:41:50.080 align:start position:0% you've got a a thought on that. 01:41:50.080 --> 01:41:53.350 align:start position:0% you've got a a thought on that. >> I'm<01:41:50.560> in<01:41:50.719> agreement.<01:41:51.440> Can<01:41:51.600> you<01:41:51.760> hear<01:41:51.920> me?<01:41:52.560> Yes, 01:41:53.350 --> 01:41:53.360 align:start position:0% >> I'm in agreement. Can you hear me? Yes, 01:41:53.360 --> 01:41:56.390 align:start position:0% >> I'm in agreement. Can you hear me? Yes, >> Cheryl.<01:41:53.920> I'm<01:41:54.159> in<01:41:54.400> agreement<01:41:54.880> with<01:41:55.920> um<01:41:56.080> Miss 01:41:56.390 --> 01:41:56.400 align:start position:0% >> Cheryl. I'm in agreement with um Miss 01:41:56.400 --> 01:41:58.470 align:start position:0% >> Cheryl. I'm in agreement with um Miss Wsworth<01:41:56.960> on<01:41:57.119> this.<01:41:57.360> I<01:41:57.520> I<01:41:57.760> think<01:41:57.920> that<01:41:58.080> you<01:41:58.320> can 01:41:58.470 --> 01:41:58.480 align:start position:0% Wsworth on this. I I think that you can 01:41:58.480 --> 01:42:00.470 align:start position:0% Wsworth on this. I I think that you can use<01:41:58.719> that<01:41:58.960> term<01:41:59.199> more<01:41:59.440> broadly<01:41:59.840> like<01:42:00.000> that<01:42:00.239> as 01:42:00.470 --> 01:42:00.480 align:start position:0% use that term more broadly like that as 01:42:00.480 --> 01:42:02.229 align:start position:0% use that term more broadly like that as well. 01:42:02.229 --> 01:42:02.239 align:start position:0% well. 01:42:02.239 --> 01:42:06.149 align:start position:0% well. >> Okay. 01:42:06.149 --> 01:42:06.159 align:start position:0% 01:42:06.159 --> 01:42:08.229 align:start position:0% >> All<01:42:06.239> right.<01:42:06.639> Any<01:42:07.040> additional<01:42:07.600> discussion<01:42:08.000> to 01:42:08.229 --> 01:42:08.239 align:start position:0% >> All right. Any additional discussion to 01:42:08.239 --> 01:42:10.709 align:start position:0% >> All right. Any additional discussion to this<01:42:08.639> or 01:42:10.709 --> 01:42:10.719 align:start position:0% this or 01:42:10.719 --> 01:42:13.510 align:start position:0% this or recommendation<01:42:11.280> on<01:42:11.440> that?<01:42:12.080> Okay.<01:42:13.119> All<01:42:13.199> right. 01:42:13.510 --> 01:42:13.520 align:start position:0% recommendation on that? Okay. All right. 01:42:13.520 --> 01:42:16.550 align:start position:0% recommendation on that? Okay. All right. So,<01:42:13.679> the<01:42:13.920> recommendation<01:42:14.719> on<01:42:14.960> line<01:42:15.360> 91<01:42:16.000> is<01:42:16.239> to 01:42:16.550 --> 01:42:16.560 align:start position:0% So, the recommendation on line 91 is to 01:42:16.560 --> 01:42:20.070 align:start position:0% So, the recommendation on line 91 is to add<01:42:16.880> family<01:42:17.360> engagement<01:42:18.639> um<01:42:18.800> to<01:42:19.040> the<01:42:19.520> to<01:42:19.840> that 01:42:20.070 --> 01:42:20.080 align:start position:0% add family engagement um to the to that 01:42:20.080 --> 01:42:23.109 align:start position:0% add family engagement um to the to that line.<01:42:21.280> All<01:42:21.520> those<01:42:21.679> in<01:42:21.920> favor? 01:42:23.109 --> 01:42:23.119 align:start position:0% line. All those in favor? 01:42:23.119 --> 01:42:23.590 align:start position:0% line. All those in favor? >> I 01:42:23.590 --> 01:42:23.600 align:start position:0% >> I 01:42:23.600 --> 01:42:25.510 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 01:42:25.510 --> 01:42:25.520 align:start position:0% >> I 01:42:25.520 --> 01:42:27.669 align:start position:0% >> I >> I. 01:42:27.669 --> 01:42:27.679 align:start position:0% >> I. 01:42:27.679 --> 01:42:29.189 align:start position:0% >> I. >> And 01:42:29.189 --> 01:42:29.199 align:start position:0% >> And 01:42:29.199 --> 01:42:31.430 align:start position:0% >> And that<01:42:29.520> passes<01:42:29.920> unanimously. 01:42:31.430 --> 01:42:31.440 align:start position:0% that passes unanimously. 01:42:31.440 --> 01:42:33.990 align:start position:0% that passes unanimously. I<01:42:31.679> do<01:42:31.920> have<01:42:32.800> this<01:42:33.040> is<01:42:33.119> my<01:42:33.360> last<01:42:33.600> question.<01:42:33.840> I 01:42:33.990 --> 01:42:34.000 align:start position:0% I do have this is my last question. I 01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:35.590 align:start position:0% I do have this is my last question. I said<01:42:34.159> I<01:42:34.320> know<01:42:34.400> I<01:42:34.560> said<01:42:34.719> the<01:42:34.880> last<01:42:34.960> one<01:42:35.119> was<01:42:35.440> so 01:42:35.590 --> 01:42:35.600 align:start position:0% said I know I said the last one was so 01:42:35.600 --> 01:42:38.229 align:start position:0% said I know I said the last one was so apologize<01:42:36.080> you<01:42:36.239> guys.<01:42:37.040> I<01:42:37.360> I<01:42:37.760> just<01:42:37.920> had<01:42:38.080> a 01:42:38.229 --> 01:42:38.239 align:start position:0% apologize you guys. I I just had a 01:42:38.239 --> 01:42:39.910 align:start position:0% apologize you guys. I I just had a question<01:42:38.480> where<01:42:38.719> this<01:42:38.960> is<01:42:39.119> the<01:42:39.360> breakdown<01:42:39.679> of 01:42:39.910 --> 01:42:39.920 align:start position:0% question where this is the breakdown of 01:42:39.920 --> 01:42:42.070 align:start position:0% question where this is the breakdown of what<01:42:40.080> we're<01:42:40.320> prioritizing.<01:42:41.199> I<01:42:41.440> wonder<01:42:41.679> if<01:42:41.920> we 01:42:42.070 --> 01:42:42.080 align:start position:0% what we're prioritizing. I wonder if we 01:42:42.080 --> 01:42:46.390 align:start position:0% what we're prioritizing. I wonder if we just<01:42:42.320> need<01:42:42.560> one<01:42:42.880> item<01:42:43.199> in<01:42:43.360> there<01:42:43.520> that<01:42:43.840> says<01:42:45.119> um 01:42:46.390 --> 01:42:46.400 align:start position:0% just need one item in there that says um 01:42:46.400 --> 01:42:48.709 align:start position:0% just need one item in there that says um that<01:42:46.639> they<01:42:47.199> Oh,<01:42:47.600> what's<01:42:47.840> the<01:42:48.080> lineup?<01:42:48.480> Okay. 01:42:48.709 --> 01:42:48.719 align:start position:0% that they Oh, what's the lineup? Okay. 01:42:48.719 --> 01:42:50.709 align:start position:0% that they Oh, what's the lineup? Okay. So,<01:42:48.880> the<01:42:49.040> superintendent<01:42:49.440> shall<01:42:49.679> award<01:42:50.080> funds 01:42:50.709 --> 01:42:50.719 align:start position:0% So, the superintendent shall award funds 01:42:50.719 --> 01:42:54.149 align:start position:0% So, the superintendent shall award funds for<01:42:51.040> participating<01:42:51.760> schools<01:42:52.159> based<01:42:52.560> on<01:42:53.920> I 01:42:54.149 --> 01:42:54.159 align:start position:0% for participating schools based on I 01:42:54.159 --> 01:42:55.510 align:start position:0% for participating schools based on I wonder<01:42:54.320> if<01:42:54.480> we<01:42:54.639> need<01:42:54.800> something<01:42:55.119> that 01:42:55.510 --> 01:42:55.520 align:start position:0% wonder if we need something that 01:42:55.520 --> 01:42:57.109 align:start position:0% wonder if we need something that actually<01:42:55.760> says<01:42:56.159> physical<01:42:56.560> fitness<01:42:56.880> and 01:42:57.109 --> 01:42:57.119 align:start position:0% actually says physical fitness and 01:42:57.119 --> 01:42:59.109 align:start position:0% actually says physical fitness and nutrition<01:42:57.440> in<01:42:57.760> schools.<01:42:58.320> Prioritizing 01:42:59.109 --> 01:42:59.119 align:start position:0% nutrition in schools. Prioritizing 01:42:59.119 --> 01:43:00.950 align:start position:0% nutrition in schools. Prioritizing physical<01:42:59.520> fitness<01:42:59.760> and<01:43:00.320> nutrition<01:43:00.719> in 01:43:00.950 --> 01:43:00.960 align:start position:0% physical fitness and nutrition in 01:43:00.960 --> 01:43:03.350 align:start position:0% physical fitness and nutrition in schools<01:43:01.280> because<01:43:01.440> this<01:43:01.679> is<01:43:01.760> the<01:43:02.960> right<01:43:03.280> this 01:43:03.350 --> 01:43:03.360 align:start position:0% schools because this is the right this 01:43:03.360 --> 01:43:04.470 align:start position:0% schools because this is the right this is<01:43:03.520> the<01:43:03.679> requirement<01:43:04.000> where<01:43:04.239> we're<01:43:04.320> going<01:43:04.400> to 01:43:04.470 --> 01:43:04.480 align:start position:0% is the requirement where we're going to 01:43:04.480 --> 01:43:07.350 align:start position:0% is the requirement where we're going to go<01:43:04.639> check<01:43:05.040> check.<01:43:06.159> We've<01:43:06.560> highlighted<01:43:07.040> it<01:43:07.199> up 01:43:07.350 --> 01:43:07.360 align:start position:0% go check check. We've highlighted it up 01:43:07.360 --> 01:43:10.149 align:start position:0% go check check. We've highlighted it up above,<01:43:07.760> but<01:43:08.880> um<01:43:09.119> where<01:43:09.360> this<01:43:09.600> is<01:43:09.679> where<01:43:09.920> we're 01:43:10.149 --> 01:43:10.159 align:start position:0% above, but um where this is where we're 01:43:10.159 --> 01:43:13.189 align:start position:0% above, but um where this is where we're going<01:43:10.239> to<01:43:10.320> be<01:43:10.480> prioritizing. 01:43:13.189 --> 01:43:13.199 align:start position:0% going to be prioritizing. 01:43:13.199 --> 01:43:14.790 align:start position:0% going to be prioritizing. Anybody<01:43:13.679> think<01:43:13.920> that<01:43:14.159> needs<01:43:14.320> to<01:43:14.400> be<01:43:14.480> there<01:43:14.639> or 01:43:14.790 --> 01:43:14.800 align:start position:0% Anybody think that needs to be there or 01:43:14.800 --> 01:43:16.790 align:start position:0% Anybody think that needs to be there or is<01:43:14.960> it<01:43:15.119> feel<01:43:15.280> like<01:43:15.440> it's<01:43:16.000> explained<01:43:16.480> enough? 01:43:16.790 --> 01:43:16.800 align:start position:0% is it feel like it's explained enough? 01:43:16.800 --> 01:43:22.470 align:start position:0% is it feel like it's explained enough? We're<01:43:16.960> good. 01:43:22.470 --> 01:43:22.480 align:start position:0% 01:43:22.480 --> 01:43:23.510 align:start position:0% No<01:43:22.719> one's<01:43:22.880> speaking.<01:43:23.199> So 01:43:23.510 --> 01:43:23.520 align:start position:0% No one's speaking. So 01:43:23.520 --> 01:43:25.350 align:start position:0% No one's speaking. So >> what<01:43:23.760> line<01:43:24.000> are<01:43:24.159> you<01:43:24.320> tell<01:43:24.639> where<01:43:24.800> are<01:43:24.960> you<01:43:25.119> at? 01:43:25.350 --> 01:43:25.360 align:start position:0% >> what line are you tell where are you at? 01:43:25.360 --> 01:43:28.229 align:start position:0% >> what line are you tell where are you at? >> I'm<01:43:25.600> just<01:43:25.679> asking<01:43:26.239> adding<01:43:26.560> a<01:43:26.880> new<01:43:27.440> like<01:43:27.920> would 01:43:28.229 --> 01:43:28.239 align:start position:0% >> I'm just asking adding a new like would 01:43:28.239 --> 01:43:31.350 align:start position:0% >> I'm just asking adding a new like would put<01:43:28.480> maybe<01:43:28.800> an<01:43:29.040> F<01:43:29.360> on<01:43:29.600> here<01:43:29.840> at<01:43:30.159> N<01:43:30.400> after<01:43:30.800> 91 01:43:31.350 --> 01:43:31.360 align:start position:0% put maybe an F on here at N after 91 01:43:31.360 --> 01:43:34.149 align:start position:0% put maybe an F on here at N after 91 that<01:43:31.600> just<01:43:31.760> says<01:43:33.040> um<01:43:33.199> prioritize<01:43:33.840> that 01:43:34.149 --> 01:43:34.159 align:start position:0% that just says um prioritize that 01:43:34.159 --> 01:43:35.669 align:start position:0% that just says um prioritize that prioritizes<01:43:34.880> physical<01:43:35.199> fitness<01:43:35.520> and 01:43:35.669 --> 01:43:35.679 align:start position:0% prioritizes physical fitness and 01:43:35.679 --> 01:43:37.590 align:start position:0% prioritizes physical fitness and nutrition<01:43:36.000> in<01:43:36.239> schools.<01:43:36.719> It's<01:43:37.040> merely<01:43:37.440> just 01:43:37.590 --> 01:43:37.600 align:start position:0% nutrition in schools. It's merely just 01:43:37.600 --> 01:43:38.950 align:start position:0% nutrition in schools. It's merely just reiterating<01:43:38.159> what<01:43:38.320> we've<01:43:38.480> been<01:43:38.639> saying<01:43:38.800> all 01:43:38.950 --> 01:43:38.960 align:start position:0% reiterating what we've been saying all 01:43:38.960 --> 01:43:41.030 align:start position:0% reiterating what we've been saying all along. 01:43:41.030 --> 01:43:41.040 align:start position:0% along. 01:43:41.040 --> 01:43:43.830 align:start position:0% along. Yes. 01:43:43.830 --> 01:43:43.840 align:start position:0% Yes. 01:43:43.840 --> 01:43:45.669 align:start position:0% Yes. Um,<01:43:44.159> so<01:43:44.400> this<01:43:44.639> gets<01:43:44.880> a<01:43:45.119> little<01:43:45.199> bit<01:43:45.360> tricky 01:43:45.669 --> 01:43:45.679 align:start position:0% Um, so this gets a little bit tricky 01:43:45.679 --> 01:43:50.790 align:start position:0% Um, so this gets a little bit tricky with<01:43:45.920> the<01:43:46.719> log<01:43:47.119> because<01:43:47.440> it<01:43:47.679> says<01:43:48.159> on<01:43:48.639> line<01:43:49.440> 164 01:43:50.790 --> 01:43:50.800 align:start position:0% with the log because it says on line 164 01:43:50.800 --> 01:43:53.990 align:start position:0% with the log because it says on line 164 of<01:43:51.040> HB36<01:43:52.159> that<01:43:52.400> the<01:43:52.719> subject<01:43:53.119> to<01:43:53.360> legislative 01:43:53.990 --> 01:43:54.000 align:start position:0% of HB36 that the subject to legislative 01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:57.270 align:start position:0% of HB36 that the subject to legislative appropriations<01:43:55.040> award<01:43:55.440> the<01:43:55.760> funds<01:43:56.159> equally 01:43:57.270 --> 01:43:57.280 align:start position:0% appropriations award the funds equally 01:43:57.280 --> 01:43:59.350 align:start position:0% appropriations award the funds equally between<01:43:57.679> each<01:43:58.000> eligible<01:43:58.560> school<01:43:58.880> the<01:43:59.119> state 01:43:59.350 --> 01:43:59.360 align:start position:0% between each eligible school the state 01:43:59.360 --> 01:44:02.390 align:start position:0% between each eligible school the state board<01:43:59.679> selects<01:44:00.159> under<01:44:00.560> subsection<01:44:01.280> 3B.<01:44:02.159> So 01:44:02.390 --> 01:44:02.400 align:start position:0% board selects under subsection 3B. So 01:44:02.400 --> 01:44:04.070 align:start position:0% board selects under subsection 3B. So that<01:44:02.639> equally<01:44:02.960> has<01:44:03.199> been<01:44:03.520> something<01:44:03.760> we've 01:44:04.070 --> 01:44:04.080 align:start position:0% that equally has been something we've 01:44:04.080 --> 01:44:07.350 align:start position:0% that equally has been something we've kind<01:44:04.239> of<01:44:04.719> had<01:44:04.960> to<01:44:05.119> navigate<01:44:05.600> through 01:44:07.350 --> 01:44:07.360 align:start position:0% kind of had to navigate through 01:44:07.360 --> 01:44:09.270 align:start position:0% kind of had to navigate through um<01:44:07.440> because<01:44:07.760> it's<01:44:07.920> an<01:44:08.159> interesting<01:44:08.560> term<01:44:08.960> in 01:44:09.270 --> 01:44:09.280 align:start position:0% um because it's an interesting term in 01:44:09.280 --> 01:44:11.669 align:start position:0% um because it's an interesting term in terms<01:44:09.440> of<01:44:09.600> like<01:44:10.000> what<01:44:10.239> you<01:44:10.400> would<01:44:10.639> grant 01:44:11.669 --> 01:44:11.679 align:start position:0% terms of like what you would grant 01:44:11.679 --> 01:44:14.470 align:start position:0% terms of like what you would grant funding<01:44:12.159> for<01:44:12.639> and<01:44:12.880> so<01:44:13.119> that's<01:44:13.600> maybe<01:44:14.000> why<01:44:14.239> it 01:44:14.470 --> 01:44:14.480 align:start position:0% funding for and so that's maybe why it 01:44:14.480 --> 01:44:16.950 align:start position:0% funding for and so that's maybe why it wasn't<01:44:14.800> included<01:44:15.360> like 01:44:16.950 --> 01:44:16.960 align:start position:0% wasn't included like 01:44:16.960 --> 01:44:20.229 align:start position:0% wasn't included like we<01:44:17.280> also<01:44:17.520> can't<01:44:17.760> do<01:44:17.920> that<01:44:18.080> with<01:44:18.320> tribal 01:44:20.229 --> 01:44:20.239 align:start position:0% we also can't do that with tribal 01:44:20.239 --> 01:44:21.350 align:start position:0% we also can't do that with tribal >> I<01:44:20.400> see<01:44:20.560> what<01:44:20.639> you're<01:44:20.880> saying 01:44:21.350 --> 01:44:21.360 align:start position:0% >> I see what you're saying 01:44:21.360 --> 01:44:26.870 align:start position:0% >> I see what you're saying >> equal<01:44:22.000> we<01:44:22.239> have<01:44:22.320> to<01:44:22.480> fund<01:44:22.800> it<01:44:22.960> equally 01:44:26.870 --> 01:44:26.880 align:start position:0% 01:44:26.880 --> 01:44:28.790 align:start position:0% >> we<01:44:27.119> couldn't<01:44:27.360> put<01:44:27.520> in<01:44:27.679> there<01:44:27.920> and<01:44:28.159> focus<01:44:28.560> it 01:44:28.790 --> 01:44:28.800 align:start position:0% >> we couldn't put in there and focus it 01:44:28.800 --> 01:44:32.070 align:start position:0% >> we couldn't put in there and focus it and<01:44:29.040> has<01:44:29.199> a<01:44:29.360> primary<01:44:29.760> focus<01:44:30.080> on<01:44:30.320> nutrition<01:44:30.800> and 01:44:32.070 --> 01:44:32.080 align:start position:0% and has a primary focus on nutrition and 01:44:32.080 --> 01:44:35.030 align:start position:0% and has a primary focus on nutrition and um<01:44:33.040> physical<01:44:33.520> fitness 01:44:35.030 --> 01:44:35.040 align:start position:0% um physical fitness 01:44:35.040 --> 01:44:35.910 align:start position:0% um physical fitness as<01:44:35.280> one<01:44:35.360> of<01:44:35.440> the 01:44:35.910 --> 01:44:35.920 align:start position:0% as one of the 01:44:35.920 --> 01:44:37.510 align:start position:0% as one of the >> answer<01:44:36.159> that 01:44:37.510 --> 01:44:37.520 align:start position:0% >> answer that 01:44:37.520 --> 01:44:39.430 align:start position:0% >> answer that >> yes 01:44:39.430 --> 01:44:39.440 align:start position:0% >> yes 01:44:39.440 --> 01:44:41.830 align:start position:0% >> yes >> uh<01:44:39.840> so<01:44:40.480> we<01:44:40.719> do<01:44:40.880> have<01:44:41.040> to<01:44:41.199> distribute<01:44:41.600> funds 01:44:41.830 --> 01:44:41.840 align:start position:0% >> uh so we do have to distribute funds 01:44:41.840 --> 01:44:45.510 align:start position:0% >> uh so we do have to distribute funds equally<01:44:42.400> that<01:44:42.639> is<01:44:43.280> that<01:44:43.520> was<01:44:43.679> added<01:44:44.080> into<01:44:45.280> um 01:44:45.510 --> 01:44:45.520 align:start position:0% equally that is that was added into um 01:44:45.520 --> 01:44:47.030 align:start position:0% equally that is that was added into um HP36 01:44:47.030 --> 01:44:47.040 align:start position:0% HP36 01:44:47.040 --> 01:44:50.310 align:start position:0% HP36 we<01:44:47.520> can<01:44:48.480> but<01:44:48.719> what<01:44:48.960> we<01:44:49.119> do<01:44:49.520> control<01:44:50.000> which<01:44:50.159> is 01:44:50.310 --> 01:44:50.320 align:start position:0% we can but what we do control which is 01:44:50.320 --> 01:44:53.590 align:start position:0% we can but what we do control which is where<01:44:50.719> this<01:44:51.040> priorit<01:44:52.000> prioritization<01:44:53.119> list 01:44:53.590 --> 01:44:53.600 align:start position:0% where this priorit prioritization list 01:44:53.600 --> 01:44:57.669 align:start position:0% where this priorit prioritization list comes<01:44:53.920> from<01:44:54.960> is<01:44:55.920> what<01:44:56.560> we<01:44:56.800> are<01:44:57.040> saying<01:44:57.440> they 01:44:57.669 --> 01:44:57.679 align:start position:0% comes from is what we are saying they 01:44:57.679 --> 01:45:01.030 align:start position:0% comes from is what we are saying they can<01:44:57.920> use<01:44:58.159> those<01:44:58.480> funds<01:44:58.800> towards.<01:45:00.080> So,<01:45:00.560> we<01:45:00.880> are 01:45:01.030 --> 01:45:01.040 align:start position:0% can use those funds towards. So, we are 01:45:01.040 --> 01:45:03.590 align:start position:0% can use those funds towards. So, we are still<01:45:01.280> prioritizing.<01:45:02.400> We're<01:45:02.639> not<01:45:03.199> changing 01:45:03.590 --> 01:45:03.600 align:start position:0% still prioritizing. We're not changing 01:45:03.600 --> 01:45:05.590 align:start position:0% still prioritizing. We're not changing the<01:45:03.840> amount<01:45:04.080> of<01:45:04.239> money<01:45:04.480> they<01:45:04.800> get.<01:45:05.199> So,<01:45:05.360> they 01:45:05.590 --> 01:45:05.600 align:start position:0% the amount of money they get. So, they 01:45:05.600 --> 01:45:06.950 align:start position:0% the amount of money they get. So, they all<01:45:05.679> get<01:45:05.920> they<01:45:06.080> all<01:45:06.239> get<01:45:06.400> the<01:45:06.560> same<01:45:06.639> amount<01:45:06.800> of 01:45:06.950 --> 01:45:06.960 align:start position:0% all get they all get the same amount of 01:45:06.960 --> 01:45:09.590 align:start position:0% all get they all get the same amount of money.<01:45:07.280> And<01:45:07.440> if<01:45:07.679> they<01:45:07.840> don't<01:45:08.000> use<01:45:08.639> if<01:45:09.440> um 01:45:09.590 --> 01:45:09.600 align:start position:0% money. And if they don't use if um 01:45:09.600 --> 01:45:11.189 align:start position:0% money. And if they don't use if um >> Am<01:45:09.760> I<01:45:09.840> on<01:45:10.000> the<01:45:10.080> right<01:45:10.239> line?<01:45:10.480> Am<01:45:10.639> I<01:45:10.800> on<01:45:10.960> the<01:45:11.040> same 01:45:11.189 --> 01:45:11.199 align:start position:0% >> Am I on the right line? Am I on the same 01:45:11.199 --> 01:45:14.629 align:start position:0% >> Am I on the right line? Am I on the same line<01:45:11.360> as<01:45:11.520> you<01:45:11.679> guys?<01:45:11.840> Are<01:45:12.000> you<01:45:12.080> on<01:45:12.320> 91? 01:45:14.629 --> 01:45:14.639 align:start position:0% line as you guys? Are you on 91? 01:45:14.639 --> 01:45:18.550 align:start position:0% line as you guys? Are you on 91? >> Okay.<01:45:15.040> Sorry.<01:45:15.920> Okay.<01:45:16.159> Go<01:45:16.320> ahead.<01:45:17.199> Um<01:45:17.840> I'm<01:45:18.080> just 01:45:18.550 --> 01:45:18.560 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Sorry. Okay. Go ahead. Um I'm just 01:45:18.560 --> 01:45:21.830 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Sorry. Okay. Go ahead. Um I'm just kind<01:45:18.800> of<01:45:18.880> going<01:45:19.199> back<01:45:19.440> to<01:45:19.840> so<01:45:20.159> we<01:45:21.040> you<01:45:21.360> could 01:45:21.830 --> 01:45:21.840 align:start position:0% kind of going back to so we you could 01:45:21.840 --> 01:45:25.669 align:start position:0% kind of going back to so we you could here<01:45:22.480> say<01:45:23.119> because<01:45:23.520> the<01:45:23.840> top<01:45:24.080> of<01:45:24.159> it<01:45:24.400> is<01:45:25.199> award 01:45:25.669 --> 01:45:25.679 align:start position:0% here say because the top of it is award 01:45:25.679 --> 01:45:28.310 align:start position:0% here say because the top of it is award funds<01:45:26.080> for<01:45:26.400> participating<01:45:26.960> schools<01:45:27.280> based<01:45:27.600> on 01:45:28.310 --> 01:45:28.320 align:start position:0% funds for participating schools based on 01:45:28.320 --> 01:45:31.430 align:start position:0% funds for participating schools based on and<01:45:28.560> then<01:45:28.719> these<01:45:29.040> things.<01:45:29.760> Um<01:45:30.159> I<01:45:30.560> think<01:45:31.040> though 01:45:31.430 --> 01:45:31.440 align:start position:0% and then these things. Um I think though 01:45:31.440 --> 01:45:33.910 align:start position:0% and then these things. Um I think though chair<01:45:31.760> Earl<01:45:32.400> you<01:45:32.719> you<01:45:33.040> are<01:45:33.199> saying<01:45:33.520> the<01:45:33.760> extent 01:45:33.910 --> 01:45:33.920 align:start position:0% chair Earl you you are saying the extent 01:45:33.920 --> 01:45:36.470 align:start position:0% chair Earl you you are saying the extent of<01:45:34.159> which<01:45:34.400> goals<01:45:34.719> are<01:45:34.960> measured<01:45:35.199> and<01:45:35.440> achieved 01:45:36.470 --> 01:45:36.480 align:start position:0% of which goals are measured and achieved 01:45:36.480 --> 01:45:38.310 align:start position:0% of which goals are measured and achieved and<01:45:36.719> achievable.<01:45:37.360> We<01:45:37.600> addressed<01:45:38.000> what<01:45:38.159> the 01:45:38.310 --> 01:45:38.320 align:start position:0% and achievable. We addressed what the 01:45:38.320 --> 01:45:40.950 align:start position:0% and achievable. We addressed what the goals<01:45:38.639> are<01:45:38.800> above.<01:45:39.360> So<01:45:39.520> I<01:45:39.679> think<01:45:39.760> we're<01:45:40.000> okay 01:45:40.950 --> 01:45:40.960 align:start position:0% goals are above. So I think we're okay 01:45:40.960 --> 01:45:43.430 align:start position:0% goals are above. So I think we're okay on<01:45:41.119> that.<01:45:41.920> Yep.<01:45:42.320> I<01:45:42.639> I<01:45:42.880> think<01:45:42.960> that<01:45:43.119> we<01:45:43.280> said 01:45:43.430 --> 01:45:43.440 align:start position:0% on that. Yep. I I think that we said 01:45:43.440 --> 01:45:45.669 align:start position:0% on that. Yep. I I think that we said what<01:45:43.600> the<01:45:43.679> goals<01:45:43.920> have<01:45:44.080> to<01:45:44.239> be<01:45:44.400> already.<01:45:45.199> Um, 01:45:45.669 --> 01:45:45.679 align:start position:0% what the goals have to be already. Um, 01:45:45.679 --> 01:45:47.669 align:start position:0% what the goals have to be already. Um, but<01:45:45.920> as<01:45:46.080> far<01:45:46.239> as<01:45:46.320> the<01:45:46.560> funding<01:45:46.880> prioritization 01:45:47.669 --> 01:45:47.679 align:start position:0% but as far as the funding prioritization 01:45:47.679 --> 01:45:49.910 align:start position:0% but as far as the funding prioritization that<01:45:48.000> was<01:45:48.159> brought<01:45:48.400> up, 01:45:49.910 --> 01:45:49.920 align:start position:0% that was brought up, 01:45:49.920 --> 01:45:52.629 align:start position:0% that was brought up, it<01:45:50.320> is<01:45:50.560> with<01:45:50.880> if<01:45:51.119> you're<01:45:51.360> eligible<01:45:51.760> or<01:45:52.000> not, 01:45:52.629 --> 01:45:52.639 align:start position:0% it is with if you're eligible or not, 01:45:52.639 --> 01:45:54.229 align:start position:0% it is with if you're eligible or not, right?<01:45:52.960> You<01:45:53.199> have<01:45:53.280> to<01:45:53.440> have<01:45:53.520> these<01:45:53.840> things<01:45:54.000> to 01:45:54.229 --> 01:45:54.239 align:start position:0% right? You have to have these things to 01:45:54.239 --> 01:45:56.310 align:start position:0% right? You have to have these things to become<01:45:54.480> eligible.<01:45:55.360> And<01:45:55.520> it's<01:45:55.679> not<01:45:55.840> that<01:45:56.080> we're 01:45:56.310 --> 01:45:56.320 align:start position:0% become eligible. And it's not that we're 01:45:56.320 --> 01:45:58.229 align:start position:0% become eligible. And it's not that we're going<01:45:56.400> to<01:45:56.560> be<01:45:56.800> saying<01:45:57.360> no,<01:45:57.679> you<01:45:57.920> can't<01:45:58.080> have 01:45:58.229 --> 01:45:58.239 align:start position:0% going to be saying no, you can't have 01:45:58.239 --> 01:46:01.030 align:start position:0% going to be saying no, you can't have the<01:45:58.480> money.<01:45:58.800> It's<01:45:59.040> you<01:45:59.360> have<01:45:59.520> to<01:45:59.679> adjust<01:46:00.320> your 01:46:01.030 --> 01:46:01.040 align:start position:0% the money. It's you have to adjust your 01:46:01.040 --> 01:46:03.510 align:start position:0% the money. It's you have to adjust your application<01:46:01.679> to<01:46:02.000> get<01:46:02.159> the<01:46:02.320> money<01:46:02.960> because<01:46:03.199> you 01:46:03.510 --> 01:46:03.520 align:start position:0% application to get the money because you 01:46:03.520 --> 01:46:05.270 align:start position:0% application to get the money because you have<01:46:03.679> to<01:46:03.840> focus<01:46:04.080> on<01:46:04.239> these<01:46:04.480> things.<01:46:04.719> If<01:46:04.880> if<01:46:05.119> a 01:46:05.270 --> 01:46:05.280 align:start position:0% have to focus on these things. If if a 01:46:05.280 --> 01:46:06.870 align:start position:0% have to focus on these things. If if a school<01:46:05.520> now<01:46:05.760> came<01:46:05.920> and<01:46:06.080> said,<01:46:06.480> well,<01:46:06.719> you 01:46:06.870 --> 01:46:06.880 align:start position:0% school now came and said, well, you 01:46:06.880 --> 01:46:10.470 align:start position:0% school now came and said, well, you know,<01:46:07.119> we<01:46:07.440> would<01:46:07.679> really<01:46:07.920> like<01:46:08.159> to<01:46:08.400> do<01:46:09.520> ABC 01:46:10.470 --> 01:46:10.480 align:start position:0% know, we would really like to do ABC 01:46:10.480 --> 01:46:12.070 align:start position:0% know, we would really like to do ABC instead.<01:46:11.119> You<01:46:11.280> said<01:46:11.440> we<01:46:11.520> have<01:46:11.600> to<01:46:11.760> do<01:46:11.840> these 01:46:12.070 --> 01:46:12.080 align:start position:0% instead. You said we have to do these 01:46:12.080 --> 01:46:13.350 align:start position:0% instead. You said we have to do these things,<01:46:12.239> but<01:46:12.480> actually<01:46:12.719> we<01:46:12.880> want<01:46:12.960> to<01:46:13.119> do<01:46:13.199> this 01:46:13.350 --> 01:46:13.360 align:start position:0% things, but actually we want to do this 01:46:13.360 --> 01:46:15.350 align:start position:0% things, but actually we want to do this whole<01:46:13.600> other<01:46:13.840> thing.<01:46:14.480> we<01:46:14.719> would<01:46:14.800> deny<01:46:15.119> that 01:46:15.350 --> 01:46:15.360 align:start position:0% whole other thing. we would deny that 01:46:15.360 --> 01:46:16.870 align:start position:0% whole other thing. we would deny that application<01:46:16.000> because<01:46:16.320> that's<01:46:16.560> not<01:46:16.719> what 01:46:16.870 --> 01:46:16.880 align:start position:0% application because that's not what 01:46:16.880 --> 01:46:18.149 align:start position:0% application because that's not what these<01:46:17.119> funds<01:46:17.360> are<01:46:17.520> for. 01:46:18.149 --> 01:46:18.159 align:start position:0% these funds are for. 01:46:18.159 --> 01:46:19.590 align:start position:0% these funds are for. >> Okay.<01:46:18.400> And<01:46:18.560> I<01:46:18.880> that's<01:46:19.119> what<01:46:19.199> I<01:46:19.360> was<01:46:19.440> just 01:46:19.590 --> 01:46:19.600 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And I that's what I was just 01:46:19.600 --> 01:46:20.870 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And I that's what I was just wondering<01:46:19.760> if<01:46:19.920> it<01:46:20.080> need<01:46:20.159> to<01:46:20.320> be<01:46:20.480> a<01:46:20.639> little<01:46:20.719> bit 01:46:20.870 --> 01:46:20.880 align:start position:0% wondering if it need to be a little bit 01:46:20.880 --> 01:46:23.510 align:start position:0% wondering if it need to be a little bit more<01:46:21.199> direct<01:46:21.600> or<01:46:21.840> if<01:46:22.560> the<01:46:22.719> goals<01:46:23.040> where<01:46:23.199> we<01:46:23.360> had 01:46:23.510 --> 01:46:23.520 align:start position:0% more direct or if the goals where we had 01:46:23.520 --> 01:46:25.669 align:start position:0% more direct or if the goals where we had articulated<01:46:24.159> above<01:46:24.719> above<01:46:25.199> does<01:46:25.440> address 01:46:25.669 --> 01:46:25.679 align:start position:0% articulated above above does address 01:46:25.679 --> 01:46:27.109 align:start position:0% articulated above above does address that.<01:46:25.920> And<01:46:26.080> I<01:46:26.159> feel<01:46:26.400> I<01:46:26.639> feel<01:46:26.719> like<01:46:26.880> you're 01:46:27.109 --> 01:46:27.119 align:start position:0% that. And I feel I feel like you're 01:46:27.119 --> 01:46:28.709 align:start position:0% that. And I feel I feel like you're probably<01:46:27.440> right<01:46:27.600> on<01:46:27.840> that.<01:46:28.159> I<01:46:28.320> think<01:46:28.480> that 01:46:28.709 --> 01:46:28.719 align:start position:0% probably right on that. I think that 01:46:28.719 --> 01:46:30.950 align:start position:0% probably right on that. I think that gets<01:46:28.880> us<01:46:29.040> to<01:46:29.119> where<01:46:29.280> we<01:46:29.440> need<01:46:29.600> to<01:46:29.679> be.<01:46:30.560> Okay. 01:46:30.950 --> 01:46:30.960 align:start position:0% gets us to where we need to be. Okay. 01:46:30.960 --> 01:46:33.350 align:start position:0% gets us to where we need to be. Okay. Any<01:46:31.199> other<01:46:31.520> recommendations<01:46:32.080> on<01:46:32.320> this<01:46:32.560> rule 01:46:33.350 --> 01:46:33.360 align:start position:0% Any other recommendations on this rule 01:46:33.360 --> 01:46:34.709 align:start position:0% Any other recommendations on this rule we've<01:46:33.679> been 01:46:34.709 --> 01:46:34.719 align:start position:0% we've been 01:46:34.719 --> 01:46:35.990 align:start position:0% we've been >> I<01:46:34.880> have<01:46:35.040> one<01:46:35.280> more 01:46:35.990 --> 01:46:36.000 align:start position:0% >> I have one more 01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:37.350 align:start position:0% >> I have one more >> board<01:46:36.239> member. 01:46:37.350 --> 01:46:37.360 align:start position:0% >> board member. 01:46:37.360 --> 01:46:39.910 align:start position:0% >> board member. >> Okay.<01:46:37.600> And<01:46:37.840> this<01:46:38.000> is<01:46:38.159> just<01:46:38.480> to<01:46:39.119> maybe<01:46:39.520> align 01:46:39.910 --> 01:46:39.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And this is just to maybe align 01:46:39.920 --> 01:46:43.430 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And this is just to maybe align I've<01:46:40.080> got<01:46:40.159> these<01:46:40.480> side<01:46:40.800> by<01:46:41.040> side.<01:46:41.440> So<01:46:42.000> HB36 01:46:43.430 --> 01:46:43.440 align:start position:0% I've got these side by side. So HB36 01:46:43.440 --> 01:46:46.310 align:start position:0% I've got these side by side. So HB36 again<01:46:43.760> in<01:46:44.000> on<01:46:44.159> line<01:46:44.639> 163<01:46:45.280> on<01:46:45.520> C<01:46:45.760> it<01:46:46.000> says 01:46:46.310 --> 01:46:46.320 align:start position:0% again in on line 163 on C it says 01:46:46.320 --> 01:46:49.669 align:start position:0% again in on line 163 on C it says establish<01:46:47.040> partnerships<01:46:48.400> in<01:46:48.639> our<01:46:48.880> rule<01:46:49.360> it 01:46:49.669 --> 01:46:49.679 align:start position:0% establish partnerships in our rule it 01:46:49.679 --> 01:46:51.430 align:start position:0% establish partnerships in our rule it says 01:46:51.430 --> 01:46:51.440 align:start position:0% says 01:46:51.440 --> 01:46:57.350 align:start position:0% says um<01:46:52.560> oh<01:46:52.719> where<01:46:52.960> we<01:46:53.119> at<01:46:54.000> the<01:46:54.480> presence<01:46:55.440> of 01:46:57.350 --> 01:46:57.360 align:start position:0% um oh where we at the presence of 01:46:57.360 --> 01:47:01.430 align:start position:0% um oh where we at the presence of so<01:46:57.840> can<01:46:58.080> you<01:46:58.320> explain<01:46:59.360> how<01:46:59.600> we<01:46:59.840> shifted<01:47:00.320> from 01:47:01.430 --> 01:47:01.440 align:start position:0% so can you explain how we shifted from 01:47:01.440 --> 01:47:04.390 align:start position:0% so can you explain how we shifted from establish<01:47:02.080> to<01:47:02.320> the<01:47:02.639> presence<01:47:03.040> of<01:47:03.360> I'm<01:47:03.679> I<01:47:04.159> I 01:47:04.390 --> 01:47:04.400 align:start position:0% establish to the presence of I'm I I 01:47:04.400 --> 01:47:07.030 align:start position:0% establish to the presence of I'm I I need<01:47:04.560> to<01:47:04.800> understand<01:47:06.080> what<01:47:06.320> we're<01:47:06.560> asking 01:47:07.030 --> 01:47:07.040 align:start position:0% need to understand what we're asking 01:47:07.040 --> 01:47:09.430 align:start position:0% need to understand what we're asking here<01:47:07.440> they're<01:47:08.000> showing<01:47:08.400> it<01:47:08.480> as<01:47:08.719> two<01:47:09.119> different 01:47:09.430 --> 01:47:09.440 align:start position:0% here they're showing it as two different 01:47:09.440 --> 01:47:11.910 align:start position:0% here they're showing it as two different actions 01:47:11.910 --> 01:47:11.920 align:start position:0% 01:47:11.920 --> 01:47:13.590 align:start position:0% Yes,<01:47:12.239> go<01:47:12.400> ahead. 01:47:13.590 --> 01:47:13.600 align:start position:0% Yes, go ahead. 01:47:13.600 --> 01:47:15.669 align:start position:0% Yes, go ahead. >> Sorry. 01:47:15.669 --> 01:47:15.679 align:start position:0% >> Sorry. 01:47:15.679 --> 01:47:17.830 align:start position:0% >> Sorry. >> Uh,<01:47:16.000> so<01:47:16.239> in<01:47:16.400> drafting<01:47:16.800> the<01:47:16.960> rule,<01:47:17.360> we<01:47:17.679> don't 01:47:17.830 --> 01:47:17.840 align:start position:0% >> Uh, so in drafting the rule, we don't 01:47:17.840 --> 01:47:19.510 align:start position:0% >> Uh, so in drafting the rule, we don't like<01:47:18.000> to<01:47:18.239> bring<01:47:18.400> the<01:47:18.560> wording<01:47:18.880> directly<01:47:19.199> from 01:47:19.510 --> 01:47:19.520 align:start position:0% like to bring the wording directly from 01:47:19.520 --> 01:47:21.350 align:start position:0% like to bring the wording directly from code.<01:47:20.080> More<01:47:20.320> often<01:47:20.560> than<01:47:20.719> not,<01:47:20.880> we<01:47:21.040> want<01:47:21.119> it<01:47:21.280> to 01:47:21.350 --> 01:47:21.360 align:start position:0% code. More often than not, we want it to 01:47:21.360 --> 01:47:22.870 align:start position:0% code. More often than not, we want it to have<01:47:21.520> similar<01:47:21.920> wording<01:47:22.239> that<01:47:22.400> is<01:47:22.560> on<01:47:22.719> that 01:47:22.870 --> 01:47:22.880 align:start position:0% have similar wording that is on that 01:47:22.880 --> 01:47:24.870 align:start position:0% have similar wording that is on that same<01:47:23.040> path.<01:47:23.679> So<01:47:23.840> the<01:47:24.080> presence<01:47:24.400> of<01:47:24.639> and 01:47:24.870 --> 01:47:24.880 align:start position:0% same path. So the presence of and 01:47:24.880 --> 01:47:27.590 align:start position:0% same path. So the presence of and establishing,<01:47:26.159> my<01:47:26.480> understanding<01:47:26.880> is<01:47:27.119> that 01:47:27.590 --> 01:47:27.600 align:start position:0% establishing, my understanding is that 01:47:27.600 --> 01:47:29.510 align:start position:0% establishing, my understanding is that code<01:47:28.000> and<01:47:28.239> legal<01:47:28.639> wise<01:47:28.960> that<01:47:29.119> does<01:47:29.360> actually 01:47:29.510 --> 01:47:29.520 align:start position:0% code and legal wise that does actually 01:47:29.520 --> 01:47:31.350 align:start position:0% code and legal wise that does actually cover<01:47:29.760> our<01:47:30.000> bases.<01:47:30.480> So<01:47:30.719> if<01:47:30.960> you<01:47:31.119> have<01:47:31.199> the 01:47:31.350 --> 01:47:31.360 align:start position:0% cover our bases. So if you have the 01:47:31.360 --> 01:47:33.109 align:start position:0% cover our bases. So if you have the presence<01:47:31.840> of<01:47:32.000> that<01:47:32.159> relationship,<01:47:32.719> it<01:47:32.880> has 01:47:33.109 --> 01:47:33.119 align:start position:0% presence of that relationship, it has 01:47:33.119 --> 01:47:34.550 align:start position:0% presence of that relationship, it has been<01:47:33.280> established.<01:47:33.840> Does<01:47:34.080> that<01:47:34.239> make<01:47:34.320> sense? 01:47:34.550 --> 01:47:34.560 align:start position:0% been established. Does that make sense? 01:47:34.560 --> 01:47:36.229 align:start position:0% been established. Does that make sense? And<01:47:34.719> we<01:47:34.880> are<01:47:35.040> welcome<01:47:35.360> to<01:47:35.520> change<01:47:35.679> it. 01:47:36.229 --> 01:47:36.239 align:start position:0% And we are welcome to change it. 01:47:36.239 --> 01:47:37.590 align:start position:0% And we are welcome to change it. Definitely<01:47:36.560> not<01:47:36.800> telling<01:47:36.960> you<01:47:37.119> not<01:47:37.280> to<01:47:37.440> change 01:47:37.590 --> 01:47:37.600 align:start position:0% Definitely not telling you not to change 01:47:37.600 --> 01:47:40.149 align:start position:0% Definitely not telling you not to change it.<01:47:37.920> But<01:47:38.320> in<01:47:38.639> terms<01:47:38.880> of<01:47:39.040> the<01:47:39.360> legal<01:47:39.679> wording<01:47:40.000> of 01:47:40.149 --> 01:47:40.159 align:start position:0% it. But in terms of the legal wording of 01:47:40.159 --> 01:47:41.590 align:start position:0% it. But in terms of the legal wording of the<01:47:40.320> rule<01:47:40.560> and<01:47:40.719> the<01:47:40.880> legal<01:47:41.119> wording<01:47:41.360> of<01:47:41.440> the 01:47:41.590 --> 01:47:41.600 align:start position:0% the rule and the legal wording of the 01:47:41.600 --> 01:47:43.430 align:start position:0% the rule and the legal wording of the code,<01:47:41.920> they<01:47:42.159> do<01:47:42.320> mean<01:47:42.480> the<01:47:42.639> same<01:47:42.800> thing.<01:47:43.280> And 01:47:43.430 --> 01:47:43.440 align:start position:0% code, they do mean the same thing. And 01:47:43.440 --> 01:47:45.350 align:start position:0% code, they do mean the same thing. And again,<01:47:43.760> a<01:47:43.920> a<01:47:44.239> Don<01:47:44.480> is<01:47:44.639> here<01:47:44.719> if<01:47:44.960> we<01:47:45.119> need<01:47:45.199> to 01:47:45.350 --> 01:47:45.360 align:start position:0% again, a a Don is here if we need to 01:47:45.360 --> 01:47:47.350 align:start position:0% again, a a Don is here if we need to check<01:47:45.520> in<01:47:45.760> with<01:47:46.080> her. 01:47:47.350 --> 01:47:47.360 align:start position:0% check in with her. 01:47:47.360 --> 01:47:49.189 align:start position:0% check in with her. >> And<01:47:47.520> I'm<01:47:47.760> wondering<01:47:48.159> does<01:47:48.400> that<01:47:48.800> does<01:47:49.040> that 01:47:49.189 --> 01:47:49.199 align:start position:0% >> And I'm wondering does that does that 01:47:49.199 --> 01:47:51.350 align:start position:0% >> And I'm wondering does that does that mean<01:47:49.360> like<01:47:49.520> a<01:47:49.760> physical<01:47:50.320> presence<01:47:50.800> again<01:47:51.119> as 01:47:51.350 --> 01:47:51.360 align:start position:0% mean like a physical presence again as 01:47:51.360 --> 01:47:53.910 align:start position:0% mean like a physical presence again as in<01:47:51.520> like<01:47:51.679> a<01:47:51.920> flyer<01:47:52.639> as<01:47:52.800> in<01:47:53.040> like<01:47:53.199> an<01:47:53.520> office 01:47:53.910 --> 01:47:53.920 align:start position:0% in like a flyer as in like an office 01:47:53.920 --> 01:47:57.430 align:start position:0% in like a flyer as in like an office space<01:47:54.880> as<01:47:55.360> you<01:47:55.520> know<01:47:55.920> a<01:47:56.239> little<01:47:56.639> clinic<01:47:57.040> like 01:47:57.430 --> 01:47:57.440 align:start position:0% space as you know a little clinic like 01:47:57.440 --> 01:47:59.830 align:start position:0% space as you know a little clinic like what<01:47:58.159> what<01:47:58.480> does<01:47:58.719> presence<01:47:59.280> mean? 01:47:59.830 --> 01:47:59.840 align:start position:0% what what does presence mean? 01:47:59.840 --> 01:48:01.350 align:start position:0% what what does presence mean? >> When<01:48:00.080> we<01:48:00.239> were<01:48:00.400> drafting<01:48:00.800> we<01:48:00.960> simply<01:48:01.199> meant 01:48:01.350 --> 01:48:01.360 align:start position:0% >> When we were drafting we simply meant 01:48:01.360 --> 01:48:03.669 align:start position:0% >> When we were drafting we simply meant that<01:48:01.600> it<01:48:01.760> it<01:48:02.159> exists.<01:48:02.880> So<01:48:03.119> it<01:48:03.360> has<01:48:03.520> been 01:48:03.669 --> 01:48:03.679 align:start position:0% that it it exists. So it has been 01:48:03.679 --> 01:48:05.590 align:start position:0% that it it exists. So it has been established<01:48:04.239> it<01:48:04.480> does<01:48:04.639> exist.<01:48:04.960> is<01:48:05.199> it<01:48:05.440> doesn't 01:48:05.590 --> 01:48:05.600 align:start position:0% established it does exist. is it doesn't 01:48:05.600 --> 01:48:07.430 align:start position:0% established it does exist. is it doesn't mean<01:48:05.760> that<01:48:05.920> there's<01:48:06.159> somebody<01:48:06.719> present<01:48:07.199> in 01:48:07.430 --> 01:48:07.440 align:start position:0% mean that there's somebody present in 01:48:07.440 --> 01:48:09.510 align:start position:0% mean that there's somebody present in the<01:48:07.679> school.<01:48:08.080> It's<01:48:08.239> the<01:48:08.480> presence<01:48:08.960> of<01:48:09.280> the 01:48:09.510 --> 01:48:09.520 align:start position:0% the school. It's the presence of the 01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:12.229 align:start position:0% the school. It's the presence of the relationship.<01:48:10.159> It<01:48:10.400> has<01:48:10.560> been<01:48:10.719> established. 01:48:12.229 --> 01:48:12.239 align:start position:0% relationship. It has been established. 01:48:12.239 --> 01:48:14.550 align:start position:0% relationship. It has been established. >> So<01:48:12.400> that<01:48:12.560> relate<01:48:13.280> no<01:48:13.600> that's<01:48:13.840> very<01:48:14.159> helpful. 01:48:14.550 --> 01:48:14.560 align:start position:0% >> So that relate no that's very helpful. 01:48:14.560 --> 01:48:17.669 align:start position:0% >> So that relate no that's very helpful. Thank<01:48:14.719> you.<01:48:14.960> So<01:48:15.520> because<01:48:15.920> we<01:48:16.239> are<01:48:16.719> because<01:48:17.280> say 01:48:17.669 --> 01:48:17.679 align:start position:0% Thank you. So because we are because say 01:48:17.679 --> 01:48:20.470 align:start position:0% Thank you. So because we are because say this<01:48:18.239> you<01:48:18.400> know<01:48:18.480> the<01:48:18.639> the<01:48:19.040> schools<01:48:19.440> will 01:48:20.470 --> 01:48:20.480 align:start position:0% this you know the the schools will 01:48:20.480 --> 01:48:21.750 align:start position:0% this you know the the schools will >> um 01:48:21.750 --> 01:48:21.760 align:start position:0% >> um 01:48:21.760 --> 01:48:26.070 align:start position:0% >> um >> be<01:48:22.320> acquiring<01:48:23.040> this<01:48:23.520> grant<01:48:24.159> then<01:48:24.560> that<01:48:25.119> that 01:48:26.070 --> 01:48:26.080 align:start position:0% >> be acquiring this grant then that that 01:48:26.080 --> 01:48:30.229 align:start position:0% >> be acquiring this grant then that that opens<01:48:26.480> up<01:48:26.800> the<01:48:27.119> door<01:48:27.440> to<01:48:28.719> formally<01:48:29.440> create<01:48:30.000> to 01:48:30.229 --> 01:48:30.239 align:start position:0% opens up the door to formally create to 01:48:30.239 --> 01:48:32.149 align:start position:0% opens up the door to formally create to start<01:48:30.480> linking<01:48:30.800> hands<01:48:31.119> with<01:48:31.360> other 01:48:32.149 --> 01:48:32.159 align:start position:0% start linking hands with other 01:48:32.159 --> 01:48:34.070 align:start position:0% start linking hands with other government<01:48:32.639> organizations<01:48:33.360> that<01:48:33.600> have<01:48:33.840> also 01:48:34.070 --> 01:48:34.080 align:start position:0% government organizations that have also 01:48:34.080 --> 01:48:35.270 align:start position:0% government organizations that have also taken<01:48:34.400> this<01:48:34.639> grant. 01:48:35.270 --> 01:48:35.280 align:start position:0% taken this grant. 01:48:35.280 --> 01:48:35.590 align:start position:0% taken this grant. >> Yes. 01:48:35.590 --> 01:48:35.600 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 01:48:35.600 --> 01:48:37.270 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> We're<01:48:35.760> coming 01:48:37.270 --> 01:48:37.280 align:start position:0% >> We're coming 01:48:37.280 --> 01:48:39.830 align:start position:0% >> We're coming full<01:48:37.600> circle<01:48:38.080> with<01:48:38.400> this<01:48:38.639> establishment. 01:48:39.830 --> 01:48:39.840 align:start position:0% full circle with this establishment. 01:48:39.840 --> 01:48:40.310 align:start position:0% full circle with this establishment. >> Yeah. 01:48:40.310 --> 01:48:40.320 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:48:40.320 --> 01:48:43.189 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Through<01:48:40.560> the<01:48:40.800> different<01:48:41.360> grant<01:48:42.159> channels. 01:48:43.189 --> 01:48:43.199 align:start position:0% >> Through the different grant channels. 01:48:43.199 --> 01:48:45.750 align:start position:0% >> Through the different grant channels. Yeah.<01:48:43.679> Thank<01:48:43.920> you. 01:48:45.750 --> 01:48:45.760 align:start position:0% Yeah. Thank you. 01:48:45.760 --> 01:48:48.950 align:start position:0% Yeah. Thank you. >> Are<01:48:46.320> you<01:48:46.560> good<01:48:46.719> with<01:48:46.880> that<01:48:47.119> then? 01:48:48.950 --> 01:48:48.960 align:start position:0% >> Are you good with that then? 01:48:48.960 --> 01:48:52.070 align:start position:0% >> Are you good with that then? Okay.<01:48:49.679> Okay.<01:48:50.239> I<01:48:50.480> am<01:48:50.719> looking<01:48:51.040> for<01:48:51.360> a<01:48:51.679> motion 01:48:52.070 --> 01:48:52.080 align:start position:0% Okay. Okay. I am looking for a motion 01:48:52.080 --> 01:48:56.709 align:start position:0% Okay. Okay. I am looking for a motion for<01:48:52.239> this<01:48:52.480> rule<01:48:52.800> then. 01:48:56.709 --> 01:48:56.719 align:start position:0% 01:48:56.719 --> 01:48:58.870 align:start position:0% I'm<01:48:56.960> happy<01:48:57.199> to<01:48:57.440> make<01:48:57.760> that.<01:48:58.239> Oops.<01:48:58.639> Let<01:48:58.800> me 01:48:58.870 --> 01:48:58.880 align:start position:0% I'm happy to make that. Oops. Let me 01:48:58.880 --> 01:49:00.629 align:start position:0% I'm happy to make that. Oops. Let me see.<01:48:59.119> I<01:48:59.360> just<01:48:59.520> need<01:48:59.600> to<01:48:59.760> get<01:48:59.920> it<01:49:00.239> big<01:49:00.480> enough 01:49:00.629 --> 01:49:00.639 align:start position:0% see. I just need to get it big enough 01:49:00.639 --> 01:49:04.229 align:start position:0% see. I just need to get it big enough that<01:49:00.880> I<01:49:01.040> can<01:49:01.199> read<01:49:01.440> it. 01:49:04.229 --> 01:49:04.239 align:start position:0% that I can read it. 01:49:04.239 --> 01:49:06.950 align:start position:0% that I can read it. Can<01:49:04.400> I<01:49:04.560> move<01:49:04.800> that<01:49:05.040> the<01:49:05.280> committee<01:49:06.239> approve 01:49:06.950 --> 01:49:06.960 align:start position:0% Can I move that the committee approve 01:49:06.960 --> 01:49:09.750 align:start position:0% Can I move that the committee approve R277-917 01:49:09.750 --> 01:49:09.760 align:start position:0% R277-917 01:49:09.760 --> 01:49:12.070 align:start position:0% R277-917 Gold<01:49:10.080> Medal<01:49:10.400> School's<01:49:10.800> pilot<01:49:11.199> program<01:49:11.760> Earl 01:49:12.070 --> 01:49:12.080 align:start position:0% Gold Medal School's pilot program Earl 01:49:12.080 --> 01:49:14.629 align:start position:0% Gold Medal School's pilot program Earl draft<01:49:12.480> 1<01:49:12.800> as<01:49:13.119> amended<01:49:13.600> on<01:49:13.840> first<01:49:14.159> reading<01:49:14.480> and 01:49:14.629 --> 01:49:14.639 align:start position:0% draft 1 as amended on first reading and 01:49:14.639 --> 01:49:17.189 align:start position:0% draft 1 as amended on first reading and forward<01:49:15.040> to<01:49:15.199> the<01:49:15.360> board<01:49:16.000> for<01:49:16.320> approval<01:49:16.880> on 01:49:17.189 --> 01:49:17.199 align:start position:0% forward to the board for approval on 01:49:17.199 --> 01:49:21.350 align:start position:0% forward to the board for approval on second<01:49:17.520> and<01:49:17.760> final<01:49:18.159> reading.<01:49:19.520> Okay,<01:49:20.480> any 01:49:21.350 --> 01:49:21.360 align:start position:0% second and final reading. Okay, any 01:49:21.360 --> 01:49:23.910 align:start position:0% second and final reading. Okay, any discussion? 01:49:23.910 --> 01:49:23.920 align:start position:0% discussion? 01:49:23.920 --> 01:49:25.510 align:start position:0% discussion? All<01:49:24.080> right.<01:49:24.400> So,<01:49:24.639> the<01:49:24.800> motion<01:49:25.119> before<01:49:25.360> the 01:49:25.510 --> 01:49:25.520 align:start position:0% All right. So, the motion before the 01:49:25.520 --> 01:49:26.950 align:start position:0% All right. So, the motion before the committee<01:49:25.760> is<01:49:25.920> that<01:49:26.080> the<01:49:26.239> committee<01:49:26.560> approve 01:49:26.950 --> 01:49:26.960 align:start position:0% committee is that the committee approve 01:49:26.960 --> 01:49:28.709 align:start position:0% committee is that the committee approve R277917 01:49:28.709 --> 01:49:28.719 align:start position:0% R277917 01:49:28.719 --> 01:49:31.030 align:start position:0% R277917 Gold<01:49:28.960> Medal<01:49:29.199> Schools<01:49:29.520> pilot<01:49:29.920> program<01:49:30.719> Earl 01:49:31.030 --> 01:49:31.040 align:start position:0% Gold Medal Schools pilot program Earl 01:49:31.040 --> 01:49:33.030 align:start position:0% Gold Medal Schools pilot program Earl draft<01:49:31.280> 1<01:49:31.520> as<01:49:31.760> amended<01:49:32.159> on<01:49:32.400> first<01:49:32.639> reading<01:49:32.880> and 01:49:33.030 --> 01:49:33.040 align:start position:0% draft 1 as amended on first reading and 01:49:33.040 --> 01:49:35.350 align:start position:0% draft 1 as amended on first reading and forward<01:49:33.280> to<01:49:33.440> the<01:49:33.600> board<01:49:33.760> for<01:49:34.000> final<01:49:35.040> for 01:49:35.350 --> 01:49:35.360 align:start position:0% forward to the board for final for 01:49:35.360 --> 01:49:37.590 align:start position:0% forward to the board for final for approval<01:49:35.840> on<01:49:36.080> second<01:49:36.320> and<01:49:36.560> final<01:49:36.880> reading. 01:49:37.590 --> 01:49:37.600 align:start position:0% approval on second and final reading. 01:49:37.600 --> 01:49:39.510 align:start position:0% approval on second and final reading. All<01:49:37.760> those<01:49:38.000> in<01:49:38.159> favor 01:49:39.510 --> 01:49:39.520 align:start position:0% All those in favor 01:49:39.520 --> 01:49:40.070 align:start position:0% All those in favor >> I 01:49:40.070 --> 01:49:40.080 align:start position:0% >> I 01:49:40.080 --> 01:49:40.550 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 01:49:40.550 --> 01:49:40.560 align:start position:0% >> I 01:49:40.560 --> 01:49:44.149 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 01:49:44.149 --> 01:49:44.159 align:start position:0% 01:49:44.159 --> 01:49:47.189 align:start position:0% >> your<01:49:44.560> name.<01:49:45.679> Okay.<01:49:46.080> So,<01:49:46.239> that<01:49:46.480> was<01:49:46.719> four<01:49:47.040> in 01:49:47.189 --> 01:49:47.199 align:start position:0% >> your name. Okay. So, that was four in 01:49:47.199 --> 01:49:49.510 align:start position:0% >> your name. Okay. So, that was four in favor<01:49:47.520> and<01:49:47.679> then<01:49:47.920> board<01:49:48.159> member<01:49:48.480> green<01:49:49.040> is<01:49:49.360> a 01:49:49.510 --> 01:49:49.520 align:start position:0% favor and then board member green is a 01:49:49.520 --> 01:49:53.030 align:start position:0% favor and then board member green is a nay. 01:49:53.030 --> 01:49:53.040 align:start position:0% 01:49:53.040 --> 01:49:55.910 align:start position:0% Okay,<01:49:53.520> let's<01:49:53.840> move<01:49:54.000> to<01:49:54.159> our<01:49:54.400> next<01:49:54.560> item.<01:49:55.679> I'm 01:49:55.910 --> 01:49:55.920 align:start position:0% Okay, let's move to our next item. I'm 01:49:55.920 --> 01:49:57.510 align:start position:0% Okay, let's move to our next item. I'm going<01:49:56.000> to<01:49:56.159> watch<01:49:56.400> the<01:49:56.560> time<01:49:56.800> on<01:49:56.960> this<01:49:57.199> one<01:49:57.280> a 01:49:57.510 --> 01:49:57.520 align:start position:0% going to watch the time on this one a 01:49:57.520 --> 01:49:58.870 align:start position:0% going to watch the time on this one a little<01:49:57.600> bit<01:49:57.760> only<01:49:58.000> because<01:49:58.239> we<01:49:58.400> do<01:49:58.560> need<01:49:58.719> to 01:49:58.870 --> 01:49:58.880 align:start position:0% little bit only because we do need to 01:49:58.880 --> 01:50:01.510 align:start position:0% little bit only because we do need to get<01:49:59.040> to<01:49:59.280> our<01:49:59.840> um 01:50:01.510 --> 01:50:01.520 align:start position:0% get to our um 01:50:01.520 --> 01:50:03.109 align:start position:0% get to our um we<01:50:01.840> have<01:50:01.920> a<01:50:02.080> couple<01:50:02.239> things<01:50:02.400> we<01:50:02.639> do<01:50:02.800> need<01:50:02.960> to 01:50:03.109 --> 01:50:03.119 align:start position:0% we have a couple things we do need to 01:50:03.119 --> 01:50:05.270 align:start position:0% we have a couple things we do need to get<01:50:03.360> to<01:50:03.679> also.<01:50:04.159> So,<01:50:04.400> let's<01:50:04.639> go<01:50:04.719> ahead<01:50:04.960> with 01:50:05.270 --> 01:50:05.280 align:start position:0% get to also. So, let's go ahead with 01:50:05.280 --> 01:50:08.550 align:start position:0% get to also. So, let's go ahead with number<01:50:05.600> four,<01:50:05.920> which<01:50:06.080> is<01:50:06.239> R277404 01:50:08.550 --> 01:50:08.560 align:start position:0% number four, which is R277404 01:50:08.560 --> 01:50:10.550 align:start position:0% number four, which is R277404 requirements<01:50:09.119> for<01:50:09.360> assessment<01:50:09.840> of<01:50:10.239> student 01:50:10.550 --> 01:50:10.560 align:start position:0% requirements for assessment of student 01:50:10.560 --> 01:50:12.229 align:start position:0% requirements for assessment of student achievement. 01:50:12.229 --> 01:50:12.239 align:start position:0% achievement. 01:50:12.239 --> 01:50:15.350 align:start position:0% achievement. And<01:50:12.560> who<01:50:12.880> is<01:50:13.119> presenting<01:50:13.679> that<01:50:14.000> one? 01:50:15.350 --> 01:50:15.360 align:start position:0% And who is presenting that one? 01:50:15.360 --> 01:50:17.590 align:start position:0% And who is presenting that one? >> I<01:50:15.600> plan<01:50:15.840> to<01:50:16.000> begin<01:50:16.320> it<01:50:16.560> and<01:50:16.800> then<01:50:17.040> pass<01:50:17.280> it<01:50:17.440> on 01:50:17.590 --> 01:50:17.600 align:start position:0% >> I plan to begin it and then pass it on 01:50:17.600 --> 01:50:18.790 align:start position:0% >> I plan to begin it and then pass it on if<01:50:17.840> that's<01:50:18.159> all<01:50:18.239> right. 01:50:18.790 --> 01:50:18.800 align:start position:0% if that's all right. 01:50:18.800 --> 01:50:19.350 align:start position:0% if that's all right. >> Perfect. 01:50:19.350 --> 01:50:19.360 align:start position:0% >> Perfect. 01:50:19.360 --> 01:50:20.870 align:start position:0% >> Perfect. >> For<01:50:19.520> the<01:50:19.679> deeper<01:50:20.000> questions.<01:50:20.320> So<01:50:20.560> again, 01:50:20.870 --> 01:50:20.880 align:start position:0% >> For the deeper questions. So again, 01:50:20.880 --> 01:50:23.669 align:start position:0% >> For the deeper questions. So again, Jennifer<01:50:21.280> Wsworth,<01:50:21.760> policy<01:50:22.080> adviser.<01:50:22.880> Um,<01:50:23.360> so 01:50:23.669 --> 01:50:23.679 align:start position:0% Jennifer Wsworth, policy adviser. Um, so 01:50:23.679 --> 01:50:25.350 align:start position:0% Jennifer Wsworth, policy adviser. Um, so this<01:50:23.920> one<01:50:24.080> was<01:50:24.320> linked<01:50:24.639> to<01:50:24.880> one<01:50:25.040> that<01:50:25.119> we 01:50:25.350 --> 01:50:25.360 align:start position:0% this one was linked to one that we 01:50:25.360 --> 01:50:28.229 align:start position:0% this one was linked to one that we passed<01:50:25.679> out<01:50:26.480> um<01:50:26.960> in<01:50:27.280> the<01:50:27.520> last<01:50:27.840> committee 01:50:28.229 --> 01:50:28.239 align:start position:0% passed out um in the last committee 01:50:28.239 --> 01:50:29.990 align:start position:0% passed out um in the last committee meeting<01:50:28.480> for<01:50:28.639> standards<01:50:28.960> and<01:50:29.119> assessment.<01:50:29.840> It 01:50:29.990 --> 01:50:30.000 align:start position:0% meeting for standards and assessment. It 01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:33.030 align:start position:0% meeting for standards and assessment. It was<01:50:30.080> a<01:50:30.320> result<01:50:30.480> of<01:50:30.639> HP502<01:50:32.080> and<01:50:32.400> talking<01:50:32.800> about 01:50:33.030 --> 01:50:33.040 align:start position:0% was a result of HP502 and talking about 01:50:33.040 --> 01:50:36.149 align:start position:0% was a result of HP502 and talking about the<01:50:33.520> test<01:50:33.840> out<01:50:34.159> classes.<01:50:35.119> Um,<01:50:35.520> so<01:50:35.760> what<01:50:35.920> we've 01:50:36.149 --> 01:50:36.159 align:start position:0% the test out classes. Um, so what we've 01:50:36.159 --> 01:50:37.669 align:start position:0% the test out classes. Um, so what we've gone<01:50:36.320> ahead<01:50:36.639> and<01:50:36.800> done<01:50:36.960> is<01:50:37.119> we<01:50:37.280> added<01:50:37.520> the 01:50:37.669 --> 01:50:37.679 align:start position:0% gone ahead and done is we added the 01:50:37.679 --> 01:50:39.669 align:start position:0% gone ahead and done is we added the definition<01:50:38.000> of<01:50:38.159> core<01:50:38.480> classes<01:50:38.880> here<01:50:39.119> as<01:50:39.360> well 01:50:39.669 --> 01:50:39.679 align:start position:0% definition of core classes here as well 01:50:39.679 --> 01:50:42.950 align:start position:0% definition of core classes here as well like<01:50:39.920> we<01:50:40.159> did<01:50:40.639> with<01:50:41.360> um<01:50:41.679> 705<01:50:42.480> which<01:50:42.719> passed 01:50:42.950 --> 01:50:42.960 align:start position:0% like we did with um 705 which passed 01:50:42.960 --> 01:50:44.870 align:start position:0% like we did with um 705 which passed through<01:50:43.199> committee<01:50:43.920> and<01:50:44.080> is<01:50:44.320> on<01:50:44.400> its<01:50:44.639> way<01:50:44.719> to 01:50:44.870 --> 01:50:44.880 align:start position:0% through committee and is on its way to 01:50:44.880 --> 01:50:47.910 align:start position:0% through committee and is on its way to the<01:50:45.040> board.<01:50:45.440> And<01:50:45.760> we<01:50:46.080> removed<01:50:46.880> the<01:50:47.679> uh 01:50:47.910 --> 01:50:47.920 align:start position:0% the board. And we removed the uh 01:50:47.920 --> 01:50:49.750 align:start position:0% the board. And we removed the uh requirement<01:50:48.400> for<01:50:48.639> our<01:50:48.880> adult<01:50:49.199> students<01:50:49.520> to 01:50:49.750 --> 01:50:49.760 align:start position:0% requirement for our adult students to 01:50:49.760 --> 01:50:52.950 align:start position:0% requirement for our adult students to take<01:50:49.920> the<01:50:50.080> civics<01:50:50.560> test.<01:50:51.520> Um<01:50:52.480> that<01:50:52.719> was<01:50:52.880> still 01:50:52.950 --> 01:50:52.960 align:start position:0% take the civics test. Um that was still 01:50:52.960 --> 01:50:54.550 align:start position:0% take the civics test. Um that was still in<01:50:53.119> here<01:50:53.280> as<01:50:53.440> well.<01:50:53.600> Oh,<01:50:53.840> actually<01:50:54.000> it<01:50:54.159> was<01:50:54.239> the 01:50:54.550 --> 01:50:54.560 align:start position:0% in here as well. Oh, actually it was the 01:50:54.560 --> 01:50:57.510 align:start position:0% in here as well. Oh, actually it was the child's.<01:50:55.040> So<01:50:55.199> this<01:50:55.360> is<01:50:55.440> on<01:50:55.600> line<01:50:56.080> 182.<01:50:57.040> Um<01:50:57.360> the 01:50:57.510 --> 01:50:57.520 align:start position:0% child's. So this is on line 182. Um the 01:50:57.520 --> 01:50:58.950 align:start position:0% child's. So this is on line 182. Um the parent<01:50:57.760> could<01:50:57.920> exempt<01:50:58.239> a<01:50:58.480> child<01:50:58.639> from<01:50:58.800> the 01:50:58.950 --> 01:50:58.960 align:start position:0% parent could exempt a child from the 01:50:58.960 --> 01:51:00.790 align:start position:0% parent could exempt a child from the basic<01:50:59.199> civic<01:50:59.520> test.<01:50:59.760> That<01:51:00.000> no<01:51:00.159> longer<01:51:00.400> exists. 01:51:00.790 --> 01:51:00.800 align:start position:0% basic civic test. That no longer exists. 01:51:00.800 --> 01:51:03.270 align:start position:0% basic civic test. That no longer exists. That<01:51:01.040> was<01:51:01.119> gone<01:51:01.360> as<01:51:01.600> of<01:51:01.760> the<01:51:02.000> 2025<01:51:02.800> legislative 01:51:03.270 --> 01:51:03.280 align:start position:0% That was gone as of the 2025 legislative 01:51:03.280 --> 01:51:05.350 align:start position:0% That was gone as of the 2025 legislative session.<01:51:03.600> So<01:51:03.760> we<01:51:03.920> removed<01:51:04.239> that.<01:51:05.040> But<01:51:05.199> the 01:51:05.350 --> 01:51:05.360 align:start position:0% session. So we removed that. But the 01:51:05.360 --> 01:51:06.629 align:start position:0% session. So we removed that. But the biggest<01:51:05.600> change<01:51:05.840> you're<01:51:06.080> going<01:51:06.159> to<01:51:06.320> see<01:51:06.480> here 01:51:06.629 --> 01:51:06.639 align:start position:0% biggest change you're going to see here 01:51:06.639 --> 01:51:09.430 align:start position:0% biggest change you're going to see here is<01:51:06.880> the<01:51:07.119> addition<01:51:07.520> of<01:51:07.760> section<01:51:08.159> 10.<01:51:09.040> And<01:51:09.280> if 01:51:09.430 --> 01:51:09.440 align:start position:0% is the addition of section 10. And if 01:51:09.440 --> 01:51:11.830 align:start position:0% is the addition of section 10. And if you'll<01:51:09.679> notice<01:51:10.080> on<01:51:10.320> the<01:51:10.480> motion<01:51:10.960> document,<01:51:11.520> I 01:51:11.830 --> 01:51:11.840 align:start position:0% you'll notice on the motion document, I 01:51:11.840 --> 01:51:14.149 align:start position:0% you'll notice on the motion document, I have<01:51:12.159> actually<01:51:12.880> a<01:51:13.119> motion<01:51:13.440> that<01:51:13.760> needs<01:51:13.920> to<01:51:14.080> be 01:51:14.149 --> 01:51:14.159 align:start position:0% have actually a motion that needs to be 01:51:14.159 --> 01:51:16.390 align:start position:0% have actually a motion that needs to be made<01:51:14.480> if<01:51:14.719> you<01:51:14.800> feel<01:51:14.960> that<01:51:15.119> it's<01:51:15.360> appropriate. 01:51:16.390 --> 01:51:16.400 align:start position:0% made if you feel that it's appropriate. 01:51:16.400 --> 01:51:19.910 align:start position:0% made if you feel that it's appropriate. Um,<01:51:17.360> what<01:51:17.679> this<01:51:18.000> section<01:51:18.320> is<01:51:18.639> outlining<01:51:19.280> is 01:51:19.910 --> 01:51:19.920 align:start position:0% Um, what this section is outlining is 01:51:19.920 --> 01:51:22.390 align:start position:0% Um, what this section is outlining is where<01:51:20.239> these<01:51:20.719> test<01:51:21.119> out<01:51:21.440> options<01:51:21.920> are<01:51:22.159> coming 01:51:22.390 --> 01:51:22.400 align:start position:0% where these test out options are coming 01:51:22.400 --> 01:51:24.950 align:start position:0% where these test out options are coming from.<01:51:23.360> And<01:51:23.520> the<01:51:23.840> way<01:51:24.000> that<01:51:24.159> this<01:51:24.400> is<01:51:24.639> currently 01:51:24.950 --> 01:51:24.960 align:start position:0% from. And the way that this is currently 01:51:24.960 --> 01:51:27.669 align:start position:0% from. And the way that this is currently worded<01:51:25.360> was<01:51:25.679> confusing<01:51:26.239> to<01:51:26.560> some<01:51:26.880> of<01:51:27.040> our<01:51:27.199> LEA 01:51:27.669 --> 01:51:27.679 align:start position:0% worded was confusing to some of our LEA 01:51:27.679 --> 01:51:30.470 align:start position:0% worded was confusing to some of our LEA in-house<01:51:28.159> counsel<01:51:28.639> and<01:51:28.960> our<01:51:29.199> superintendent. 01:51:30.470 --> 01:51:30.480 align:start position:0% in-house counsel and our superintendent. 01:51:30.480 --> 01:51:33.030 align:start position:0% in-house counsel and our superintendent. And<01:51:30.800> so<01:51:31.199> we<01:51:31.440> have<01:51:31.679> a<01:51:31.920> secondary<01:51:32.400> draft<01:51:32.800> for 01:51:33.030 --> 01:51:33.040 align:start position:0% And so we have a secondary draft for 01:51:33.040 --> 01:51:35.350 align:start position:0% And so we have a secondary draft for your<01:51:33.280> opinion<01:51:33.760> just<01:51:34.000> of<01:51:34.239> section<01:51:34.560> 10<01:51:35.119> that's 01:51:35.350 --> 01:51:35.360 align:start position:0% your opinion just of section 10 that's 01:51:35.360 --> 01:51:37.270 align:start position:0% your opinion just of section 10 that's there<01:51:35.520> on<01:51:35.679> the<01:51:35.840> motions<01:51:36.239> document<01:51:36.800> that<01:51:37.040> makes 01:51:37.270 --> 01:51:37.280 align:start position:0% there on the motions document that makes 01:51:37.280 --> 01:51:38.790 align:start position:0% there on the motions document that makes it<01:51:37.440> very<01:51:37.679> clear<01:51:37.840> that<01:51:38.080> these<01:51:38.320> test<01:51:38.639> out 01:51:38.790 --> 01:51:38.800 align:start position:0% it very clear that these test out 01:51:38.800 --> 01:51:41.109 align:start position:0% it very clear that these test out options<01:51:39.119> are<01:51:39.360> coming<01:51:39.599> directly<01:51:40.000> from<01:51:40.400> USB. 01:51:41.109 --> 01:51:41.119 align:start position:0% options are coming directly from USB. 01:51:41.119 --> 01:51:43.270 align:start position:0% options are coming directly from USB. They're<01:51:41.360> not<01:51:41.520> to<01:51:41.679> be<01:51:41.840> created<01:51:42.159> by<01:51:42.320> the<01:51:42.560> eleas. 01:51:43.270 --> 01:51:43.280 align:start position:0% They're not to be created by the eleas. 01:51:43.280 --> 01:51:44.550 align:start position:0% They're not to be created by the eleas. Uh<01:51:43.520> they're<01:51:43.760> not<01:51:43.840> to<01:51:44.000> be<01:51:44.000> altered<01:51:44.320> by<01:51:44.400> the 01:51:44.550 --> 01:51:44.560 align:start position:0% Uh they're not to be altered by the 01:51:44.560 --> 01:51:48.550 align:start position:0% Uh they're not to be altered by the eleas<01:51:45.040> and<01:51:45.119> the<01:51:45.199> eleas<01:51:45.679> need<01:51:45.840> to<01:51:46.880> um<01:51:48.159> uh<01:51:48.320> give 01:51:48.550 --> 01:51:48.560 align:start position:0% eleas and the eleas need to um uh give 01:51:48.560 --> 01:51:50.790 align:start position:0% eleas and the eleas need to um uh give those<01:51:49.040> test<01:51:49.360> out<01:51:49.520> options<01:51:49.920> in<01:51:50.239> a<01:51:50.400> specific 01:51:50.790 --> 01:51:50.800 align:start position:0% those test out options in a specific 01:51:50.800 --> 01:51:55.910 align:start position:0% those test out options in a specific way.<01:51:52.159> So<01:51:52.560> if<01:51:52.800> there's<01:51:52.960> any<01:51:53.280> questions<01:51:53.920> on<01:51:54.159> that 01:51:55.910 --> 01:51:55.920 align:start position:0% way. So if there's any questions on that 01:51:55.920 --> 01:51:57.750 align:start position:0% way. So if there's any questions on that I<01:51:56.159> am<01:51:56.400> here. 01:51:57.750 --> 01:51:57.760 align:start position:0% I am here. 01:51:57.760 --> 01:52:00.470 align:start position:0% I am here. >> Okay.<01:51:58.320> Okay.<01:51:58.800> So<01:51:59.040> you're<01:51:59.280> asking<01:51:59.599> us<01:51:59.840> to<01:52:00.080> move 01:52:00.470 --> 01:52:00.480 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. So you're asking us to move 01:52:00.480 --> 01:52:04.070 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. So you're asking us to move this<01:52:01.280> these<01:52:01.679> provisions<01:52:02.159> here.<01:52:02.880> Okay.<01:52:03.280> Let<01:52:03.360> me 01:52:04.070 --> 01:52:04.080 align:start position:0% this these provisions here. Okay. Let me 01:52:04.080 --> 01:52:05.510 align:start position:0% this these provisions here. Okay. Let me >> Yeah.<01:52:04.320> And<01:52:04.480> we<01:52:04.719> are<01:52:04.800> welcome<01:52:05.040> to<01:52:05.199> read<01:52:05.360> through 01:52:05.510 --> 01:52:05.520 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And we are welcome to read through 01:52:05.520 --> 01:52:07.350 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And we are welcome to read through it<01:52:05.679> because<01:52:05.840> it<01:52:06.080> is<01:52:06.239> more<01:52:06.560> than<01:52:06.800> what<01:52:07.040> is<01:52:07.119> in 01:52:07.350 --> 01:52:07.360 align:start position:0% it because it is more than what is in 01:52:07.360 --> 01:52:09.910 align:start position:0% it because it is more than what is in the<01:52:07.520> draft.<01:52:08.480> But<01:52:08.639> again<01:52:08.880> the<01:52:09.119> feedback<01:52:09.520> we<01:52:09.760> had 01:52:09.910 --> 01:52:09.920 align:start position:0% the draft. But again the feedback we had 01:52:09.920 --> 01:52:12.790 align:start position:0% the draft. But again the feedback we had from<01:52:10.080> the<01:52:10.320> ELEAS<01:52:10.960> was<01:52:11.520> a<01:52:11.840> lot<01:52:12.000> of<01:52:12.159> confusion<01:52:12.560> as 01:52:12.790 --> 01:52:12.800 align:start position:0% from the ELEAS was a lot of confusion as 01:52:12.800 --> 01:52:14.550 align:start position:0% from the ELEAS was a lot of confusion as to<01:52:12.960> whether<01:52:13.119> or<01:52:13.360> not<01:52:13.520> they<01:52:13.760> could<01:52:13.920> still<01:52:14.320> use 01:52:14.550 --> 01:52:14.560 align:start position:0% to whether or not they could still use 01:52:14.560 --> 01:52:15.910 align:start position:0% to whether or not they could still use their<01:52:14.800> own<01:52:15.040> options<01:52:15.440> which<01:52:15.679> they're 01:52:15.910 --> 01:52:15.920 align:start position:0% their own options which they're 01:52:15.920 --> 01:52:16.629 align:start position:0% their own options which they're currently<01:52:16.239> doing. 01:52:16.629 --> 01:52:16.639 align:start position:0% currently doing. 01:52:16.639 --> 01:52:18.550 align:start position:0% currently doing. >> And<01:52:16.880> I<01:52:17.280> would<01:52:17.520> you<01:52:17.679> mind<01:52:17.840> if<01:52:18.000> I<01:52:18.159> read<01:52:18.320> through 01:52:18.550 --> 01:52:18.560 align:start position:0% >> And I would you mind if I read through 01:52:18.560 --> 01:52:19.910 align:start position:0% >> And I would you mind if I read through it?<01:52:18.800> I'm<01:52:18.960> just<01:52:19.119> going<01:52:19.199> to<01:52:19.280> read<01:52:19.440> it<01:52:19.520> out<01:52:19.679> loud 01:52:19.910 --> 01:52:19.920 align:start position:0% it? I'm just going to read it out loud 01:52:19.920 --> 01:52:21.430 align:start position:0% it? I'm just going to read it out loud if<01:52:20.159> that's<01:52:20.400> okay<01:52:20.560> with<01:52:20.800> the<01:52:20.960> body<01:52:21.199> just 01:52:21.430 --> 01:52:21.440 align:start position:0% if that's okay with the body just 01:52:21.440 --> 01:52:23.189 align:start position:0% if that's okay with the body just because<01:52:21.599> I<01:52:21.760> want<01:52:21.920> to<01:52:22.159> this<01:52:22.400> I<01:52:22.639> have<01:52:22.800> a<01:52:23.040> number 01:52:23.189 --> 01:52:23.199 align:start position:0% because I want to this I have a number 01:52:23.199 --> 01:52:25.189 align:start position:0% because I want to this I have a number of<01:52:23.440> other<01:52:23.679> questions<01:52:24.080> and<01:52:24.400> this<01:52:24.639> may<01:52:24.880> answer 01:52:25.189 --> 01:52:25.199 align:start position:0% of other questions and this may answer 01:52:25.199 --> 01:52:26.310 align:start position:0% of other questions and this may answer those 01:52:26.310 --> 01:52:26.320 align:start position:0% those 01:52:26.320 --> 01:52:28.790 align:start position:0% those >> that<01:52:26.560> I<01:52:26.719> had<01:52:26.880> in<01:52:27.119> my<01:52:27.360> notes<01:52:27.599> from<01:52:27.920> last<01:52:28.159> week. 01:52:28.790 --> 01:52:28.800 align:start position:0% >> that I had in my notes from last week. 01:52:28.800 --> 01:52:32.149 align:start position:0% >> that I had in my notes from last week. So,<01:52:29.199> okay.<01:52:29.599> So,<01:52:30.480> uh<01:52:31.360> let's<01:52:31.599> see.<01:52:31.840> Beginning 01:52:32.149 --> 01:52:32.159 align:start position:0% So, okay. So, uh let's see. Beginning 01:52:32.159 --> 01:52:34.390 align:start position:0% So, okay. So, uh let's see. Beginning with<01:52:32.320> the<01:52:32.560> 20272028 01:52:34.390 --> 01:52:34.400 align:start position:0% with the 20272028 01:52:34.400 --> 01:52:36.149 align:start position:0% with the 20272028 school<01:52:34.719> year<01:52:35.040> and<01:52:35.280> in<01:52:35.440> accordance<01:52:35.840> with 01:52:36.149 --> 01:52:36.159 align:start position:0% school year and in accordance with 01:52:36.159 --> 01:52:38.470 align:start position:0% school year and in accordance with section<01:52:36.639> 53E4209, 01:52:38.470 --> 01:52:38.480 align:start position:0% section 53E4209, 01:52:38.480 --> 01:52:40.070 align:start position:0% section 53E4209, the<01:52:38.560> superintendent<01:52:39.119> shall<01:52:39.520> develop<01:52:39.840> and 01:52:40.070 --> 01:52:40.080 align:start position:0% the superintendent shall develop and 01:52:40.080 --> 01:52:41.990 align:start position:0% the superintendent shall develop and provide<01:52:40.960> all<01:52:41.199> assessments<01:52:41.760> and 01:52:41.990 --> 01:52:42.000 align:start position:0% provide all assessments and 01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:43.830 align:start position:0% provide all assessments and portfolio-based<01:52:42.960> demonstrations<01:52:43.599> of 01:52:43.830 --> 01:52:43.840 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstrations of 01:52:43.840 --> 01:52:46.390 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstrations of mastery<01:52:44.320> used<01:52:44.560> in<01:52:44.800> statewide<01:52:45.360> testout 01:52:46.390 --> 01:52:46.400 align:start position:0% mastery used in statewide testout 01:52:46.400 --> 01:52:49.270 align:start position:0% mastery used in statewide testout options<01:52:46.800> for<01:52:47.040> core<01:52:47.440> classes.<01:52:48.719> Establish 01:52:49.270 --> 01:52:49.280 align:start position:0% options for core classes. Establish 01:52:49.280 --> 01:52:51.270 align:start position:0% options for core classes. Establish uniform<01:52:49.760> procedures,<01:52:50.239> timeline<01:52:50.800> score 01:52:51.270 --> 01:52:51.280 align:start position:0% uniform procedures, timeline score 01:52:51.280 --> 01:52:52.870 align:start position:0% uniform procedures, timeline score scoring<01:52:51.760> criteria<01:52:52.239> and<01:52:52.480> security 01:52:52.870 --> 01:52:52.880 align:start position:0% scoring criteria and security 01:52:52.880 --> 01:52:55.270 align:start position:0% scoring criteria and security requirements<01:52:53.520> for<01:52:54.560> administration<01:52:55.119> of 01:52:55.270 --> 01:52:55.280 align:start position:0% requirements for administration of 01:52:55.280 --> 01:52:57.430 align:start position:0% requirements for administration of testout<01:52:55.760> assessments<01:52:56.239> and<01:52:56.480> portfolio-based 01:52:57.430 --> 01:52:57.440 align:start position:0% testout assessments and portfolio-based 01:52:57.440 --> 01:53:00.149 align:start position:0% testout assessments and portfolio-based demonstrations<01:52:58.080> of<01:52:58.239> mastery.<01:52:59.280> Establish 01:53:00.149 --> 01:53:00.159 align:start position:0% demonstrations of mastery. Establish 01:53:00.159 --> 01:53:02.709 align:start position:0% demonstrations of mastery. Establish academic<01:53:00.800> proficiency<01:53:01.440> standards<01:53:01.920> aligned 01:53:02.709 --> 01:53:02.719 align:start position:0% academic proficiency standards aligned 01:53:02.719 --> 01:53:04.470 align:start position:0% academic proficiency standards aligned with<01:53:02.960> the<01:53:03.119> state<01:53:03.360> core<01:53:03.679> standards<01:53:04.000> for<01:53:04.239> each 01:53:04.470 --> 01:53:04.480 align:start position:0% with the state core standards for each 01:53:04.480 --> 01:53:07.270 align:start position:0% with the state core standards for each statewide<01:53:05.360> test<01:53:05.760> out<01:53:06.000> option<01:53:06.400> and<01:53:06.719> ensure 01:53:07.270 --> 01:53:07.280 align:start position:0% statewide test out option and ensure 01:53:07.280 --> 01:53:09.270 align:start position:0% statewide test out option and ensure that<01:53:07.520> that<01:53:07.920> test<01:53:08.239> out<01:53:08.560> assessments<01:53:09.040> and 01:53:09.270 --> 01:53:09.280 align:start position:0% that that test out assessments and 01:53:09.280 --> 01:53:10.950 align:start position:0% that that test out assessments and portfolio-based<01:53:10.159> demonstrations<01:53:10.719> of 01:53:10.950 --> 01:53:10.960 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstrations of 01:53:10.960 --> 01:53:13.589 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstrations of mastery<01:53:11.840> are<01:53:12.159> applied<01:53:12.560> consistently<01:53:13.119> across 01:53:13.589 --> 01:53:13.599 align:start position:0% mastery are applied consistently across 01:53:13.599 --> 01:53:16.870 align:start position:0% mastery are applied consistently across all<01:53:13.920> LEA<01:53:14.639> or<01:53:14.880> local<01:53:15.119> education<01:53:15.599> agencies. 01:53:16.870 --> 01:53:16.880 align:start position:0% all LEA or local education agencies. 01:53:16.880 --> 01:53:18.950 align:start position:0% all LEA or local education agencies. Test<01:53:17.199> out<01:53:17.599> assessments<01:53:18.080> and<01:53:18.320> portfolio 01:53:18.950 --> 01:53:18.960 align:start position:0% Test out assessments and portfolio 01:53:18.960 --> 01:53:21.510 align:start position:0% Test out assessments and portfolio demonstrated<01:53:20.320> demonstrations<01:53:20.880> of<01:53:21.040> mastery 01:53:21.510 --> 01:53:21.520 align:start position:0% demonstrated demonstrations of mastery 01:53:21.520 --> 01:53:23.030 align:start position:0% demonstrated demonstrations of mastery developed<01:53:21.840> by<01:53:22.000> the<01:53:22.159> superintendent<01:53:22.719> under 01:53:23.030 --> 01:53:23.040 align:start position:0% developed by the superintendent under 01:53:23.040 --> 01:53:24.709 align:start position:0% developed by the superintendent under section<01:53:23.280> one<01:53:23.599> shall<01:53:23.840> be<01:53:23.920> the<01:53:24.159> exclusive 01:53:24.709 --> 01:53:24.719 align:start position:0% section one shall be the exclusive 01:53:24.719 --> 01:53:26.229 align:start position:0% section one shall be the exclusive methods<01:53:25.119> used<01:53:25.360> for<01:53:25.599> a<01:53:25.760> student<01:53:26.000> to 01:53:26.229 --> 01:53:26.239 align:start position:0% methods used for a student to 01:53:26.239 --> 01:53:28.390 align:start position:0% methods used for a student to demonstrate<01:53:26.719> proficiency<01:53:27.360> for<01:53:27.599> purposes<01:53:28.080> of 01:53:28.390 --> 01:53:28.400 align:start position:0% demonstrate proficiency for purposes of 01:53:28.400 --> 01:53:31.109 align:start position:0% demonstrate proficiency for purposes of earning<01:53:28.800> credit<01:53:29.679> without<01:53:30.239> course<01:53:30.560> enrollment 01:53:31.109 --> 01:53:31.119 align:start position:0% earning credit without course enrollment 01:53:31.119 --> 01:53:33.430 align:start position:0% earning credit without course enrollment in<01:53:31.440> a<01:53:31.679> core<01:53:32.159> class.<01:53:32.880> That's<01:53:33.040> where<01:53:33.199> I'm<01:53:33.360> going 01:53:33.430 --> 01:53:33.440 align:start position:0% in a core class. That's where I'm going 01:53:33.440 --> 01:53:35.430 align:start position:0% in a core class. That's where I'm going to<01:53:33.520> have<01:53:33.679> the<01:53:33.840> big<01:53:34.000> question<01:53:34.239> in<01:53:34.400> a<01:53:34.560> minute.<01:53:35.199> An 01:53:35.430 --> 01:53:35.440 align:start position:0% to have the big question in a minute. An 01:53:35.440 --> 01:53:38.070 align:start position:0% to have the big question in a minute. An LEA<01:53:35.920> shall<01:53:36.239> offer<01:53:36.639> students<01:53:36.960> the<01:53:37.360> statewide 01:53:38.070 --> 01:53:38.080 align:start position:0% LEA shall offer students the statewide 01:53:38.080 --> 01:53:41.910 align:start position:0% LEA shall offer students the statewide test<01:53:38.639> out<01:53:39.679> whoops<01:53:40.800> uh<01:53:41.040> options<01:53:41.520> established 01:53:41.910 --> 01:53:41.920 align:start position:0% test out whoops uh options established 01:53:41.920 --> 01:53:43.589 align:start position:0% test out whoops uh options established by<01:53:42.080> the<01:53:42.239> superintendent.<01:53:43.040> Administer<01:53:43.440> the 01:53:43.589 --> 01:53:43.599 align:start position:0% by the superintendent. Administer the 01:53:43.599 --> 01:53:45.510 align:start position:0% by the superintendent. Administer the statewide<01:53:44.000> test<01:53:44.239> out<01:53:44.480> assessments<01:53:45.280> and 01:53:45.510 --> 01:53:45.520 align:start position:0% statewide test out assessments and 01:53:45.520 --> 01:53:47.510 align:start position:0% statewide test out assessments and portfolio-based<01:53:46.639> demonstrations<01:53:47.280> of 01:53:47.510 --> 01:53:47.520 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstrations of 01:53:47.520 --> 01:53:49.109 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstrations of mastery<01:53:48.000> provided<01:53:48.320> by<01:53:48.480> the<01:53:48.639> superintendent. 01:53:49.109 --> 01:53:49.119 align:start position:0% mastery provided by the superintendent. 01:53:49.119 --> 01:53:51.270 align:start position:0% mastery provided by the superintendent. Comply<01:53:49.440> with<01:53:49.599> all<01:53:49.760> procedures,<01:53:50.239> timelines, 01:53:51.270 --> 01:53:51.280 align:start position:0% Comply with all procedures, timelines, 01:53:51.280 --> 01:53:52.629 align:start position:0% Comply with all procedures, timelines, score<01:53:51.599> criteria,<01:53:52.080> and<01:53:52.320> security 01:53:52.629 --> 01:53:52.639 align:start position:0% score criteria, and security 01:53:52.639 --> 01:53:53.910 align:start position:0% score criteria, and security requirements<01:53:53.119> established<01:53:53.599> by<01:53:53.760> the 01:53:53.910 --> 01:53:53.920 align:start position:0% requirements established by the 01:53:53.920 --> 01:53:55.109 align:start position:0% requirements established by the superintendent<01:53:54.480> and<01:53:54.639> ensure<01:53:54.960> the 01:53:55.109 --> 01:53:55.119 align:start position:0% superintendent and ensure the 01:53:55.119 --> 01:53:56.870 align:start position:0% superintendent and ensure the administration<01:53:55.679> of<01:53:55.920> test<01:53:56.239> out<01:53:56.400> assessments 01:53:56.870 --> 01:53:56.880 align:start position:0% administration of test out assessments 01:53:56.880 --> 01:53:58.790 align:start position:0% administration of test out assessments and<01:53:57.119> portfolio-based<01:53:58.000> demonstrations<01:53:58.560> of 01:53:58.790 --> 01:53:58.800 align:start position:0% and portfolio-based demonstrations of 01:53:58.800 --> 01:54:01.270 align:start position:0% and portfolio-based demonstrations of mastery<01:53:59.920> does<01:54:00.239> not<01:54:00.400> create<01:54:00.719> barrier<01:54:01.040> to 01:54:01.270 --> 01:54:01.280 align:start position:0% mastery does not create barrier to 01:54:01.280 --> 01:54:03.830 align:start position:0% mastery does not create barrier to student<01:54:01.520> participation.<01:54:02.800> Nier<01:54:03.360> may<01:54:03.599> not 01:54:03.830 --> 01:54:03.840 align:start position:0% student participation. Nier may not 01:54:03.840 --> 01:54:05.990 align:start position:0% student participation. Nier may not develop,<01:54:04.320> modify,<01:54:04.800> substitute,<01:54:05.679> or 01:54:05.990 --> 01:54:06.000 align:start position:0% develop, modify, substitute, or 01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:07.990 align:start position:0% develop, modify, substitute, or independently<01:54:06.719> score<01:54:07.040> any<01:54:07.280> assessment<01:54:07.760> or 01:54:07.990 --> 01:54:08.000 align:start position:0% independently score any assessment or 01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:09.830 align:start position:0% independently score any assessment or portfolio<01:54:08.560> demonstration<01:54:09.119> of<01:54:09.280> mastery<01:54:09.679> for 01:54:09.830 --> 01:54:09.840 align:start position:0% portfolio demonstration of mastery for 01:54:09.840 --> 01:54:12.470 align:start position:0% portfolio demonstration of mastery for the<01:54:10.000> statewide<01:54:11.119> testout<01:54:11.520> option<01:54:11.840> for<01:54:12.000> a<01:54:12.159> core 01:54:12.470 --> 01:54:12.480 align:start position:0% the statewide testout option for a core 01:54:12.480 --> 01:54:15.030 align:start position:0% the statewide testout option for a core class<01:54:13.520> or<01:54:13.760> impose<01:54:14.159> additional<01:54:14.639> requirements 01:54:15.030 --> 01:54:15.040 align:start position:0% class or impose additional requirements 01:54:15.040 --> 01:54:16.470 align:start position:0% class or impose additional requirements that<01:54:15.280> restrict<01:54:15.599> or<01:54:15.760> limit<01:54:16.000> a<01:54:16.159> student's 01:54:16.470 --> 01:54:16.480 align:start position:0% that restrict or limit a student's 01:54:16.480 --> 01:54:18.629 align:start position:0% that restrict or limit a student's ability<01:54:16.719> to<01:54:16.880> participate<01:54:17.280> in<01:54:17.440> a<01:54:17.599> statewide 01:54:18.629 --> 01:54:18.639 align:start position:0% ability to participate in a statewide 01:54:18.639 --> 01:54:20.629 align:start position:0% ability to participate in a statewide test<01:54:18.880> out<01:54:19.040> option.<01:54:19.280> An<01:54:19.520> LEA<01:54:19.920> shall<01:54:20.159> administer 01:54:20.629 --> 01:54:20.639 align:start position:0% test out option. An LEA shall administer 01:54:20.639 --> 01:54:23.669 align:start position:0% test out option. An LEA shall administer test<01:54:20.960> out<01:54:21.760> assessments<01:54:22.239> and<01:54:22.480> portfolio<01:54:23.199> based 01:54:23.669 --> 01:54:23.679 align:start position:0% test out assessments and portfolio based 01:54:23.679 --> 01:54:25.189 align:start position:0% test out assessments and portfolio based demonstration<01:54:24.159> of<01:54:24.400> mastery<01:54:24.719> in<01:54:24.880> a<01:54:25.040> manner 01:54:25.189 --> 01:54:25.199 align:start position:0% demonstration of mastery in a manner 01:54:25.199 --> 01:54:26.470 align:start position:0% demonstration of mastery in a manner that<01:54:25.440> maintains<01:54:25.760> the<01:54:25.920> validity, 01:54:26.470 --> 01:54:26.480 align:start position:0% that maintains the validity, 01:54:26.480 --> 01:54:28.229 align:start position:0% that maintains the validity, reliability,<01:54:27.119> fairness,<01:54:27.520> and<01:54:27.679> security<01:54:28.000> of 01:54:28.229 --> 01:54:28.239 align:start position:0% reliability, fairness, and security of 01:54:28.239 --> 01:54:30.070 align:start position:0% reliability, fairness, and security of the<01:54:28.480> assessment<01:54:29.040> process<01:54:29.440> consistent<01:54:29.920> with 01:54:30.070 --> 01:54:30.080 align:start position:0% the assessment process consistent with 01:54:30.080 --> 01:54:33.030 align:start position:0% the assessment process consistent with this<01:54:30.320> rule.<01:54:31.199> And<01:54:31.440> this<01:54:32.320> standard<01:54:32.719> test 01:54:33.030 --> 01:54:33.040 align:start position:0% this rule. And this standard test 01:54:33.040 --> 01:54:35.669 align:start position:0% this rule. And this standard test administration<01:54:33.760> testing<01:54:34.400> testing<01:54:34.800> ethics 01:54:35.669 --> 01:54:35.679 align:start position:0% administration testing testing ethics 01:54:35.679 --> 01:54:38.070 align:start position:0% administration testing testing ethics policy<01:54:36.080> incorporated<01:54:36.639> by<01:54:36.880> reference.<01:54:37.440> Anela 01:54:38.070 --> 01:54:38.080 align:start position:0% policy incorporated by reference. Anela 01:54:38.080 --> 01:54:41.350 align:start position:0% policy incorporated by reference. Anela shall<01:54:38.719> notify<01:54:39.440> students<01:54:40.000> and<01:54:40.880> parents 01:54:41.350 --> 01:54:41.360 align:start position:0% shall notify students and parents 01:54:41.360 --> 01:54:44.470 align:start position:0% shall notify students and parents annually<01:54:42.000> if<01:54:42.400> the<01:54:42.719> available<01:54:43.440> state<01:54:43.920> test<01:54:44.239> out 01:54:44.470 --> 01:54:44.480 align:start position:0% annually if the available state test out 01:54:44.480 --> 01:54:47.350 align:start position:0% annually if the available state test out option<01:54:44.960> of<01:54:45.199> of<01:54:45.440> the<01:54:45.679> state<01:54:46.000> test<01:54:46.320> out<01:54:46.480> options 01:54:47.350 --> 01:54:47.360 align:start position:0% option of of the state test out options 01:54:47.360 --> 01:54:48.870 align:start position:0% option of of the state test out options applicable<01:54:47.840> timelines,<01:54:48.320> deadlines<01:54:48.719> and 01:54:48.870 --> 01:54:48.880 align:start position:0% applicable timelines, deadlines and 01:54:48.880 --> 01:54:51.990 align:start position:0% applicable timelines, deadlines and procedures<01:54:49.199> for<01:54:49.520> for<01:54:50.000> participation. 01:54:51.990 --> 01:54:52.000 align:start position:0% procedures for for participation. 01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:56.149 align:start position:0% procedures for for participation. This<01:54:52.159> is<01:54:52.320> my<01:54:52.719> question<01:54:53.679> in<01:54:54.000> R27700. 01:54:56.149 --> 01:54:56.159 align:start position:0% This is my question in R27700. 01:54:56.159 --> 01:54:57.990 align:start position:0% This is my question in R27700. It<01:54:56.480> says 01:54:57.990 --> 01:54:58.000 align:start position:0% It says 01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:00.310 align:start position:0% It says a<01:54:58.320> student<01:54:58.560> may<01:54:58.800> demonstrate<01:54:59.360> competency<01:55:00.080> to 01:55:00.310 --> 01:55:00.320 align:start position:0% a student may demonstrate competency to 01:55:00.320 --> 01:55:02.470 align:start position:0% a student may demonstrate competency to satisfy<01:55:00.880> course<01:55:01.199> requirements<01:55:01.920> consistent 01:55:02.470 --> 01:55:02.480 align:start position:0% satisfy course requirements consistent 01:55:02.480 --> 01:55:05.910 align:start position:0% satisfy course requirements consistent with<01:55:02.800> section<01:55:03.760> which<01:55:04.000> is<01:55:04.159> the<01:55:04.719> core.<01:55:05.520> So<01:55:05.760> we're 01:55:05.910 --> 01:55:05.920 align:start position:0% with section which is the core. So we're 01:55:05.920 --> 01:55:07.109 align:start position:0% with section which is the core. So we're going<01:55:06.000> to<01:55:06.080> have<01:55:06.239> to<01:55:06.320> change<01:55:06.560> another<01:55:06.880> rule 01:55:07.109 --> 01:55:07.119 align:start position:0% going to have to change another rule 01:55:07.119 --> 01:55:09.030 align:start position:0% going to have to change another rule with<01:55:07.360> this. 01:55:09.030 --> 01:55:09.040 align:start position:0% with this. 01:55:09.040 --> 01:55:11.189 align:start position:0% with this. Did<01:55:09.360> we<01:55:09.599> didn't<01:55:09.679> move<01:55:10.000> did<01:55:10.159> we<01:55:10.320> move<01:55:10.560> 700<01:55:10.960> the 01:55:11.189 --> 01:55:11.199 align:start position:0% Did we didn't move did we move 700 the 01:55:11.199 --> 01:55:12.709 align:start position:0% Did we didn't move did we move 700 the other<01:55:11.280> day? 01:55:12.709 --> 01:55:12.719 align:start position:0% other day? 01:55:12.719 --> 01:55:14.470 align:start position:0% other day? >> No,<01:55:12.880> we<01:55:13.040> did<01:55:13.199> 705.<01:55:14.080> Yeah. 01:55:14.470 --> 01:55:14.480 align:start position:0% >> No, we did 705. Yeah. 01:55:14.480 --> 01:55:19.109 align:start position:0% >> No, we did 705. Yeah. >> Okay.<01:55:14.880> And<01:55:15.199> then<01:55:16.000> um<01:55:17.199> in<01:55:17.520> 705 01:55:19.109 --> 01:55:19.119 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And then um in 705 01:55:19.119 --> 01:55:21.510 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And then um in 705 it<01:55:19.360> does<01:55:19.599> say<01:55:19.760> an<01:55:19.920> LEA<01:55:20.400> shall<01:55:20.719> provide<01:55:21.040> various 01:55:21.510 --> 01:55:21.520 align:start position:0% it does say an LEA shall provide various 01:55:21.520 --> 01:55:24.470 align:start position:0% it does say an LEA shall provide various methods<01:55:21.920> for<01:55:22.080> a<01:55:22.239> student<01:55:22.480> to<01:55:22.639> earn<01:55:22.960> credit 01:55:24.470 --> 01:55:24.480 align:start position:0% methods for a student to earn credit 01:55:24.480 --> 01:55:27.669 align:start position:0% methods for a student to earn credit from<01:55:24.719> a<01:55:24.880> nonacredited<01:55:26.239> source<01:55:26.719> coursework<01:55:27.280> or 01:55:27.669 --> 01:55:27.679 align:start position:0% from a nonacredited source coursework or 01:55:27.679 --> 01:55:29.510 align:start position:0% from a nonacredited source coursework or education<01:55:28.320> provider<01:55:28.960> including 01:55:29.510 --> 01:55:29.520 align:start position:0% education provider including 01:55:29.520 --> 01:55:30.870 align:start position:0% education provider including satisfaction<01:55:30.080> of<01:55:30.239> coursework<01:55:30.639> by 01:55:30.870 --> 01:55:30.880 align:start position:0% satisfaction of coursework by 01:55:30.880 --> 01:55:33.990 align:start position:0% satisfaction of coursework by demonstrated<01:55:31.520> competency<01:55:32.639> as<01:55:32.960> evalu 01:55:33.990 --> 01:55:34.000 align:start position:0% demonstrated competency as evalu 01:55:34.000 --> 01:55:36.629 align:start position:0% demonstrated competency as evalu evaluated<01:55:34.560> by<01:55:34.639> the<01:55:34.800> LEA<01:55:35.360> assessment<01:55:35.760> is<01:55:36.000> pro 01:55:36.629 --> 01:55:36.639 align:start position:0% evaluated by the LEA assessment is pro 01:55:36.639 --> 01:55:40.149 align:start position:0% evaluated by the LEA assessment is pro procured<01:55:37.840> proctor<01:55:38.400> sorry<01:55:39.040> and<01:55:39.360> determined 01:55:40.149 --> 01:55:40.159 align:start position:0% procured proctor sorry and determined 01:55:40.159 --> 01:55:42.149 align:start position:0% procured proctor sorry and determined that<01:55:40.400> at<01:55:40.560> the<01:55:40.719> school<01:55:40.960> level<01:55:41.280> or<01:55:41.760> we're<01:55:42.000> saying 01:55:42.149 --> 01:55:42.159 align:start position:0% that at the school level or we're saying 01:55:42.159 --> 01:55:46.229 align:start position:0% that at the school level or we're saying that<01:55:42.320> that's<01:55:42.560> no<01:55:42.800> longer<01:55:43.040> available. 01:55:46.229 --> 01:55:46.239 align:start position:0% 01:55:46.239 --> 01:55:48.870 align:start position:0% Yes.<01:55:46.719> So,<01:55:47.040> it<01:55:47.280> is<01:55:47.520> still<01:55:47.920> proctored<01:55:48.480> at<01:55:48.639> that 01:55:48.870 --> 01:55:48.880 align:start position:0% Yes. So, it is still proctored at that 01:55:48.880 --> 01:55:51.589 align:start position:0% Yes. So, it is still proctored at that school<01:55:49.199> level<01:55:49.840> and<01:55:50.000> the<01:55:50.239> eleas<01:55:50.800> do<01:55:51.040> get<01:55:51.280> that 01:55:51.589 --> 01:55:51.599 align:start position:0% school level and the eleas do get that 01:55:51.599 --> 01:55:53.270 align:start position:0% school level and the eleas do get that from<01:55:51.920> us<01:55:52.239> or<01:55:52.480> they<01:55:52.639> will<01:55:52.800> be<01:55:52.960> getting<01:55:53.119> that 01:55:53.270 --> 01:55:53.280 align:start position:0% from us or they will be getting that 01:55:53.280 --> 01:55:54.950 align:start position:0% from us or they will be getting that from<01:55:53.440> us.<01:55:53.679> But<01:55:53.760> what's<01:55:54.000> changing<01:55:54.239> is<01:55:54.560> eleas 01:55:54.950 --> 01:55:54.960 align:start position:0% from us. But what's changing is eleas 01:55:54.960 --> 01:55:56.790 align:start position:0% from us. But what's changing is eleas are<01:55:55.119> no<01:55:55.280> longer<01:55:55.520> allowed<01:55:55.760> to<01:55:55.920> use<01:55:56.159> their<01:55:56.480> own 01:55:56.790 --> 01:55:56.800 align:start position:0% are no longer allowed to use their own 01:55:56.800 --> 01:55:58.390 align:start position:0% are no longer allowed to use their own test<01:55:57.040> out<01:55:57.280> option.<01:55:57.760> There<01:55:58.000> will<01:55:58.159> be<01:55:58.239> a 01:55:58.390 --> 01:55:58.400 align:start position:0% test out option. There will be a 01:55:58.400 --> 01:56:01.030 align:start position:0% test out option. There will be a statewide<01:55:58.960> test<01:55:59.280> out<01:55:59.440> option 01:56:01.030 --> 01:56:01.040 align:start position:0% statewide test out option 01:56:01.040 --> 01:56:03.430 align:start position:0% statewide test out option and<01:56:01.280> Megan<01:56:01.679> feel<01:56:01.840> free<01:56:01.920> to<01:56:02.080> jump<01:56:02.239> in<01:56:02.400> on<01:56:02.560> that. 01:56:03.430 --> 01:56:03.440 align:start position:0% and Megan feel free to jump in on that. 01:56:03.440 --> 01:56:05.430 align:start position:0% and Megan feel free to jump in on that. >> Are<01:56:03.599> we<01:56:04.000> creating<01:56:04.480> that? 01:56:05.430 --> 01:56:05.440 align:start position:0% >> Are we creating that? 01:56:05.440 --> 01:56:07.030 align:start position:0% >> Are we creating that? >> Yeah. 01:56:07.030 --> 01:56:07.040 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 01:56:07.040 --> 01:56:09.830 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Okay. 01:56:09.830 --> 01:56:09.840 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 01:56:09.840 --> 01:56:13.750 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Go.<01:56:10.159> Is<01:56:10.400> Megan<01:56:10.800> there?<01:56:12.159> I<01:56:12.480> am<01:56:13.280> um<01:56:13.440> Megan 01:56:13.750 --> 01:56:13.760 align:start position:0% Go. Is Megan there? I am um Megan 01:56:13.760 --> 01:56:15.109 align:start position:0% Go. Is Megan there? I am um Megan Everett,<01:56:14.239> director<01:56:14.480> of<01:56:14.639> teaching<01:56:14.880> and 01:56:15.109 --> 01:56:15.119 align:start position:0% Everett, director of teaching and 01:56:15.119 --> 01:56:18.470 align:start position:0% Everett, director of teaching and learning.<01:56:15.840> So,<01:56:16.400> right,<01:56:16.960> this<01:56:17.840> we<01:56:18.159> have<01:56:18.320> the 01:56:18.470 --> 01:56:18.480 align:start position:0% learning. So, right, this we have the 01:56:18.480 --> 01:56:21.750 align:start position:0% learning. So, right, this we have the obligation<01:56:19.040> by<01:56:19.280> the<01:56:19.440> fall<01:56:19.599> of<01:56:19.840> 2028.<01:56:20.880> So,<01:56:21.360> that 01:56:21.750 --> 01:56:21.760 align:start position:0% obligation by the fall of 2028. So, that 01:56:21.760 --> 01:56:24.070 align:start position:0% obligation by the fall of 2028. So, that has<01:56:22.000> not<01:56:22.159> been<01:56:22.400> fully 01:56:24.070 --> 01:56:24.080 align:start position:0% has not been fully 01:56:24.080 --> 01:56:26.790 align:start position:0% has not been fully developed,<01:56:24.639> but<01:56:24.880> the<01:56:25.119> idea<01:56:25.440> is<01:56:25.760> that<01:56:26.080> yes,<01:56:26.560> we 01:56:26.790 --> 01:56:26.800 align:start position:0% developed, but the idea is that yes, we 01:56:26.800 --> 01:56:29.510 align:start position:0% developed, but the idea is that yes, we will<01:56:26.960> be<01:56:27.119> in<01:56:27.280> charge<01:56:27.520> of<01:56:27.679> some<01:56:28.000> sort<01:56:28.400> of<01:56:29.199> test 01:56:29.510 --> 01:56:29.520 align:start position:0% will be in charge of some sort of test 01:56:29.520 --> 01:56:31.430 align:start position:0% will be in charge of some sort of test out<01:56:29.679> option<01:56:30.000> for<01:56:30.239> each<01:56:30.400> of<01:56:30.560> those<01:56:31.040> core 01:56:31.430 --> 01:56:31.440 align:start position:0% out option for each of those core 01:56:31.440 --> 01:56:34.390 align:start position:0% out option for each of those core classes<01:56:32.560> that<01:56:32.800> we<01:56:33.040> will<01:56:33.199> develop.<01:56:34.000> So,<01:56:34.159> it's 01:56:34.390 --> 01:56:34.400 align:start position:0% classes that we will develop. So, it's 01:56:34.400 --> 01:56:36.470 align:start position:0% classes that we will develop. So, it's not<01:56:34.639> just<01:56:34.960> available<01:56:35.520> for<01:56:35.760> a<01:56:35.920> test<01:56:36.239> out 01:56:36.470 --> 01:56:36.480 align:start position:0% not just available for a test out 01:56:36.480 --> 01:56:38.390 align:start position:0% not just available for a test out option,<01:56:36.880> it's<01:56:37.119> we're<01:56:37.360> the<01:56:37.599> only<01:56:37.920> test<01:56:38.239> out 01:56:38.390 --> 01:56:38.400 align:start position:0% option, it's we're the only test out 01:56:38.400 --> 01:56:40.870 align:start position:0% option, it's we're the only test out option. 01:56:40.870 --> 01:56:40.880 align:start position:0% option. 01:56:40.880 --> 01:56:41.990 align:start position:0% option. Is<01:56:41.119> that 01:56:41.990 --> 01:56:42.000 align:start position:0% Is that 01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.390 align:start position:0% Is that >> and<01:56:42.480> can<01:56:42.800> this<01:56:43.040> is<01:56:43.199> coming<01:56:43.440> about<01:56:43.840> because<01:56:44.080> the 01:56:44.390 --> 01:56:44.400 align:start position:0% >> and can this is coming about because the 01:56:44.400 --> 01:56:47.030 align:start position:0% >> and can this is coming about because the packets<01:56:44.800> have<01:56:45.040> gone<01:56:45.199> away,<01:56:45.679> right?<01:56:46.400> This<01:56:46.639> is<01:56:46.800> a 01:56:47.030 --> 01:56:47.040 align:start position:0% packets have gone away, right? This is a 01:56:47.040 --> 01:56:50.310 align:start position:0% packets have gone away, right? This is a replace<01:56:47.679> is<01:56:47.840> this<01:56:48.000> a<01:56:48.239> replacement<01:56:48.719> or<01:56:49.040> no? 01:56:50.310 --> 01:56:50.320 align:start position:0% replace is this a replacement or no? 01:56:50.320 --> 01:56:53.350 align:start position:0% replace is this a replacement or no? >> No,<01:56:50.560> this<01:56:50.719> is<01:56:50.960> from<01:56:51.280> Welton's<01:56:51.840> bill. 01:56:53.350 --> 01:56:53.360 align:start position:0% >> No, this is from Welton's bill. 01:56:53.360 --> 01:56:56.550 align:start position:0% >> No, this is from Welton's bill. >> I<01:56:53.520> shouldn't<01:56:53.679> have<01:56:53.840> jumped<01:56:54.159> in. 01:56:56.550 --> 01:56:56.560 align:start position:0% >> I shouldn't have jumped in. 01:56:56.560 --> 01:56:57.350 align:start position:0% >> I shouldn't have jumped in. >> Go<01:56:56.800> ahead. 01:56:57.350 --> 01:56:57.360 align:start position:0% >> Go ahead. 01:56:57.360 --> 01:56:59.589 align:start position:0% >> Go ahead. >> Yeah,<01:56:58.320> this<01:56:58.480> is<01:56:58.639> actually<01:56:58.960> separate<01:56:59.280> from<01:56:59.440> the 01:56:59.589 --> 01:56:59.599 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, this is actually separate from the 01:56:59.599 --> 01:57:01.510 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, this is actually separate from the packets.<01:57:00.080> So,<01:57:00.400> what<01:57:00.639> Representative<01:57:01.119> Welton 01:57:01.510 --> 01:57:01.520 align:start position:0% packets. So, what Representative Welton 01:57:01.520 --> 01:57:03.589 align:start position:0% packets. So, what Representative Welton was<01:57:02.000> um<01:57:02.320> in<01:57:02.560> listening<01:57:02.800> to<01:57:02.960> his<01:57:03.119> intent<01:57:03.440> when 01:57:03.589 --> 01:57:03.599 align:start position:0% was um in listening to his intent when 01:57:03.599 --> 01:57:04.950 align:start position:0% was um in listening to his intent when it<01:57:03.760> was<01:57:03.840> presented<01:57:04.159> to<01:57:04.320> committee<01:57:04.560> and<01:57:04.719> on<01:57:04.880> the 01:57:04.950 --> 01:57:04.960 align:start position:0% it was presented to committee and on the 01:57:04.960 --> 01:57:06.870 align:start position:0% it was presented to committee and on the floor,<01:57:05.440> what<01:57:05.679> he's<01:57:05.920> hoping<01:57:06.159> is<01:57:06.400> that<01:57:06.639> students 01:57:06.870 --> 01:57:06.880 align:start position:0% floor, what he's hoping is that students 01:57:06.880 --> 01:57:08.310 align:start position:0% floor, what he's hoping is that students who<01:57:07.040> are<01:57:07.199> not<01:57:07.360> attending<01:57:07.760> school<01:57:08.000> because 01:57:08.310 --> 01:57:08.320 align:start position:0% who are not attending school because 01:57:08.320 --> 01:57:10.390 align:start position:0% who are not attending school because they're<01:57:08.560> bored,<01:57:09.360> this<01:57:09.520> is<01:57:09.679> their<01:57:09.920> way<01:57:10.159> of 01:57:10.390 --> 01:57:10.400 align:start position:0% they're bored, this is their way of 01:57:10.400 --> 01:57:12.629 align:start position:0% they're bored, this is their way of testing<01:57:10.719> out<01:57:10.880> of<01:57:11.040> classes<01:57:11.440> that<01:57:11.760> they<01:57:12.400> don't 01:57:12.629 --> 01:57:12.639 align:start position:0% testing out of classes that they don't 01:57:12.639 --> 01:57:13.669 align:start position:0% testing out of classes that they don't feel<01:57:12.800> like<01:57:12.960> they<01:57:13.119> need<01:57:13.199> to<01:57:13.360> take<01:57:13.520> because 01:57:13.669 --> 01:57:13.679 align:start position:0% feel like they need to take because 01:57:13.679 --> 01:57:15.830 align:start position:0% feel like they need to take because they've<01:57:14.080> already<01:57:14.719> mastered<01:57:15.119> those<01:57:15.360> classes. 01:57:15.830 --> 01:57:15.840 align:start position:0% they've already mastered those classes. 01:57:15.840 --> 01:57:17.589 align:start position:0% they've already mastered those classes. So,<01:57:16.080> they'll<01:57:16.400> come<01:57:16.560> back<01:57:16.719> to<01:57:16.960> school<01:57:17.119> to<01:57:17.360> take 01:57:17.589 --> 01:57:17.599 align:start position:0% So, they'll come back to school to take 01:57:17.599 --> 01:57:19.030 align:start position:0% So, they'll come back to school to take classes<01:57:17.920> that<01:57:18.080> are<01:57:18.239> more<01:57:18.400> relevant<01:57:18.719> to<01:57:18.880> them 01:57:19.030 --> 01:57:19.040 align:start position:0% classes that are more relevant to them 01:57:19.040 --> 01:57:20.709 align:start position:0% classes that are more relevant to them because<01:57:19.280> they<01:57:19.520> can<01:57:19.679> taste<01:57:20.159> test<01:57:20.400> out<01:57:20.639> of 01:57:20.709 --> 01:57:20.719 align:start position:0% because they can taste test out of 01:57:20.719 --> 01:57:22.550 align:start position:0% because they can taste test out of classes<01:57:21.280> they<01:57:21.599> don't<01:57:21.679> feel<01:57:21.920> are<01:57:22.159> relevant<01:57:22.400> or 01:57:22.550 --> 01:57:22.560 align:start position:0% classes they don't feel are relevant or 01:57:22.560 --> 01:57:24.149 align:start position:0% classes they don't feel are relevant or they've<01:57:22.800> mastered.<01:57:23.599> So,<01:57:23.760> it's<01:57:24.000> more 01:57:24.149 --> 01:57:24.159 align:start position:0% they've mastered. So, it's more 01:57:24.159 --> 01:57:30.070 align:start position:0% they've mastered. So, it's more attendance<01:57:24.639> based<01:57:25.040> randomly. 01:57:30.070 --> 01:57:30.080 align:start position:0% 01:57:30.080 --> 01:57:32.950 align:start position:0% Okay.<01:57:31.119> I<01:57:31.440> don't<01:57:31.679> I<01:57:31.920> I<01:57:32.159> feel<01:57:32.239> like<01:57:32.400> we<01:57:32.560> now<01:57:32.800> we 01:57:32.950 --> 01:57:32.960 align:start position:0% Okay. I don't I I feel like we now we 01:57:32.960 --> 01:57:35.750 align:start position:0% Okay. I don't I I feel like we now we have<01:57:33.040> two<01:57:33.280> competing<01:57:33.679> rules, 01:57:35.750 --> 01:57:35.760 align:start position:0% have two competing rules, 01:57:35.760 --> 01:57:36.629 align:start position:0% have two competing rules, >> right? 01:57:36.629 --> 01:57:36.639 align:start position:0% >> right? 01:57:36.639 --> 01:57:39.910 align:start position:0% >> right? >> So,<01:57:36.800> we<01:57:37.040> do<01:57:37.440> have<01:57:37.920> and<01:57:38.159> again<01:57:38.400> in<01:57:38.639> 705<01:57:39.360> I<01:57:39.679> do 01:57:39.910 --> 01:57:39.920 align:start position:0% >> So, we do have and again in 705 I do 01:57:39.920 --> 01:57:41.270 align:start position:0% >> So, we do have and again in 705 I do believe<01:57:40.080> that<01:57:40.159> we<01:57:40.320> made<01:57:40.480> the<01:57:40.639> amendments<01:57:41.040> to 01:57:41.270 --> 01:57:41.280 align:start position:0% believe that we made the amendments to 01:57:41.280 --> 01:57:43.270 align:start position:0% believe that we made the amendments to change<01:57:41.440> it.<01:57:41.679> I<01:57:41.840> can<01:57:42.000> go<01:57:42.080> in<01:57:42.320> and<01:57:42.480> look<01:57:42.639> at<01:57:42.800> that. 01:57:43.270 --> 01:57:43.280 align:start position:0% change it. I can go in and look at that. 01:57:43.280 --> 01:57:45.510 align:start position:0% change it. I can go in and look at that. But<01:57:43.440> in<01:57:43.679> 700<01:57:44.320> it<01:57:44.560> will<01:57:44.719> need<01:57:44.800> to<01:57:44.960> be<01:57:45.040> amended. 01:57:45.510 --> 01:57:45.520 align:start position:0% But in 700 it will need to be amended. 01:57:45.520 --> 01:57:47.750 align:start position:0% But in 700 it will need to be amended. It<01:57:45.679> is<01:57:45.760> on<01:57:45.920> our<01:57:46.080> list<01:57:46.320> to<01:57:46.480> come<01:57:46.639> to<01:57:46.800> committee. 01:57:47.750 --> 01:57:47.760 align:start position:0% It is on our list to come to committee. 01:57:47.760 --> 01:57:51.270 align:start position:0% It is on our list to come to committee. We<01:57:48.080> are<01:57:48.320> seeing<01:57:49.119> I<01:57:49.360> think<01:57:50.159> four<01:57:50.560> five<01:57:50.880> rules 01:57:51.270 --> 01:57:51.280 align:start position:0% We are seeing I think four five rules 01:57:51.280 --> 01:57:52.870 align:start position:0% We are seeing I think four five rules are<01:57:51.520> coming<01:57:51.679> to<01:57:51.920> committee<01:57:52.239> that<01:57:52.480> are<01:57:52.719> all 01:57:52.870 --> 01:57:52.880 align:start position:0% are coming to committee that are all 01:57:52.880 --> 01:57:55.589 align:start position:0% are coming to committee that are all based<01:57:53.119> on<01:57:53.360> changes<01:57:53.599> from<01:57:53.840> HP502.<01:57:55.119> So<01:57:55.360> it's 01:57:55.589 --> 01:57:55.599 align:start position:0% based on changes from HP502. So it's 01:57:55.599 --> 01:57:57.430 align:start position:0% based on changes from HP502. So it's kind<01:57:55.760> of<01:57:55.760> a<01:57:55.920> little<01:57:56.080> domino<01:57:56.560> effect<01:57:56.800> that<01:57:57.119> as 01:57:57.430 --> 01:57:57.440 align:start position:0% kind of a little domino effect that as 01:57:57.440 --> 01:58:01.430 align:start position:0% kind of a little domino effect that as we<01:57:57.760> do<01:57:58.000> them<01:57:58.480> they<01:57:58.719> just<01:57:58.880> filter<01:57:59.280> through.<01:57:59.760> So 01:58:01.430 --> 01:58:01.440 align:start position:0% we do them they just filter through. So 01:58:01.440 --> 01:58:03.430 align:start position:0% we do them they just filter through. So >> So<01:58:01.920> what<01:58:02.159> is<01:58:02.320> the<01:58:02.480> feedback<01:58:02.880> then<01:58:03.119> you<01:58:03.280> said 01:58:03.430 --> 01:58:03.440 align:start position:0% >> So what is the feedback then you said 01:58:03.440 --> 01:58:05.669 align:start position:0% >> So what is the feedback then you said was<01:58:03.679> from<01:58:03.840> the<01:58:04.239> the<01:58:04.639> eleas? 01:58:05.669 --> 01:58:05.679 align:start position:0% was from the the eleas? 01:58:05.679 --> 01:58:07.990 align:start position:0% was from the the eleas? >> The<01:58:05.920> original<01:58:06.320> draft<01:58:06.639> that's<01:58:07.119> uploaded<01:58:07.599> to 01:58:07.990 --> 01:58:08.000 align:start position:0% >> The original draft that's uploaded to 01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.830 align:start position:0% >> The original draft that's uploaded to civic<01:58:08.400> clerk<01:58:08.800> when<01:58:09.040> we<01:58:09.199> presented<01:58:09.520> that<01:58:09.679> to 01:58:09.830 --> 01:58:09.840 align:start position:0% civic clerk when we presented that to 01:58:09.840 --> 01:58:11.750 align:start position:0% civic clerk when we presented that to the<01:58:10.000> eleas<01:58:10.560> there<01:58:10.719> was<01:58:10.880> still<01:58:11.040> some<01:58:11.280> confusion 01:58:11.750 --> 01:58:11.760 align:start position:0% the eleas there was still some confusion 01:58:11.760 --> 01:58:13.510 align:start position:0% the eleas there was still some confusion as<01:58:12.000> to<01:58:12.159> who<01:58:12.400> would<01:58:12.639> be<01:58:12.719> providing<01:58:13.119> the<01:58:13.280> test 01:58:13.510 --> 01:58:13.520 align:start position:0% as to who would be providing the test 01:58:13.520 --> 01:58:15.510 align:start position:0% as to who would be providing the test out<01:58:13.760> option<01:58:14.239> if<01:58:14.480> it<01:58:14.639> would<01:58:14.719> be<01:58:14.880> them<01:58:15.199> if<01:58:15.360> they 01:58:15.510 --> 01:58:15.520 align:start position:0% out option if it would be them if they 01:58:15.520 --> 01:58:17.669 align:start position:0% out option if it would be them if they could<01:58:15.599> still<01:58:15.760> use<01:58:16.000> what<01:58:16.159> they<01:58:16.320> had<01:58:17.199> if<01:58:17.360> it<01:58:17.520> was 01:58:17.669 --> 01:58:17.679 align:start position:0% could still use what they had if it was 01:58:17.679 --> 01:58:19.350 align:start position:0% could still use what they had if it was coming<01:58:17.840> directly<01:58:18.239> from<01:58:18.400> us.<01:58:18.639> And<01:58:18.800> so<01:58:18.960> the<01:58:19.199> hope 01:58:19.350 --> 01:58:19.360 align:start position:0% coming directly from us. And so the hope 01:58:19.360 --> 01:58:21.270 align:start position:0% coming directly from us. And so the hope with<01:58:19.599> this<01:58:19.840> new<01:58:20.080> language<01:58:20.560> presented<01:58:20.960> on<01:58:21.119> this 01:58:21.270 --> 01:58:21.280 align:start position:0% with this new language presented on this 01:58:21.280 --> 01:58:23.270 align:start position:0% with this new language presented on this motions<01:58:21.679> document<01:58:22.239> is<01:58:22.480> that<01:58:22.639> there's<01:58:22.880> no<01:58:23.040> more 01:58:23.270 --> 01:58:23.280 align:start position:0% motions document is that there's no more 01:58:23.280 --> 01:58:25.270 align:start position:0% motions document is that there's no more confusion.<01:58:24.159> It's<01:58:24.480> very<01:58:24.719> clear<01:58:24.960> it's<01:58:25.199> a 01:58:25.270 --> 01:58:25.280 align:start position:0% confusion. It's very clear it's a 01:58:25.280 --> 01:58:27.910 align:start position:0% confusion. It's very clear it's a statewide<01:58:25.760> option.<01:58:26.880> Eleas<01:58:27.440> are<01:58:27.599> meant<01:58:27.760> to 01:58:27.910 --> 01:58:27.920 align:start position:0% statewide option. Eleas are meant to 01:58:27.920 --> 01:58:29.750 align:start position:0% statewide option. Eleas are meant to proctor<01:58:28.320> it<01:58:28.480> and<01:58:28.639> to<01:58:28.880> make<01:58:29.040> parents<01:58:29.360> aware<01:58:29.679> of 01:58:29.750 --> 01:58:29.760 align:start position:0% proctor it and to make parents aware of 01:58:29.760 --> 01:58:31.910 align:start position:0% proctor it and to make parents aware of it,<01:58:30.159> but<01:58:30.480> we<01:58:30.719> will<01:58:30.960> be<01:58:31.119> providing<01:58:31.440> that<01:58:31.679> and 01:58:31.910 --> 01:58:31.920 align:start position:0% it, but we will be providing that and 01:58:31.920 --> 01:58:35.830 align:start position:0% it, but we will be providing that and they<01:58:32.239> can<01:58:32.400> get<01:58:32.480> it<01:58:32.719> directly<01:58:32.960> from<01:58:33.199> us. 01:58:35.830 --> 01:58:35.840 align:start position:0% they can get it directly from us. 01:58:35.840 --> 01:58:38.310 align:start position:0% they can get it directly from us. >> Okay. 01:58:38.310 --> 01:58:38.320 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 01:58:38.320 --> 01:58:40.950 align:start position:0% >> Okay. H.<01:58:38.880> So,<01:58:39.119> will<01:58:39.360> we<01:58:39.599> also<01:58:39.840> be<01:58:40.080> having<01:58:40.400> some<01:58:40.719> sort 01:58:40.950 --> 01:58:40.960 align:start position:0% H. So, will we also be having some sort 01:58:40.960 --> 01:58:43.109 align:start position:0% H. So, will we also be having some sort of<01:58:41.679> will<01:58:41.920> will<01:58:42.159> the<01:58:42.320> districts<01:58:42.719> have<01:58:42.880> some 01:58:43.109 --> 01:58:43.119 align:start position:0% of will will the districts have some 01:58:43.119 --> 01:58:45.270 align:start position:0% of will will the districts have some sort<01:58:43.280> of<01:58:43.520> testing<01:58:44.000> center<01:58:44.719> where<01:58:45.040> the 01:58:45.270 --> 01:58:45.280 align:start position:0% sort of testing center where the 01:58:45.280 --> 01:58:47.589 align:start position:0% sort of testing center where the students<01:58:45.679> take<01:58:45.840> the<01:58:46.080> test<01:58:47.040> kind<01:58:47.199> of<01:58:47.280> like<01:58:47.440> you 01:58:47.589 --> 01:58:47.599 align:start position:0% students take the test kind of like you 01:58:47.599 --> 01:58:49.350 align:start position:0% students take the test kind of like you do<01:58:47.760> in<01:58:48.000> college<01:58:48.480> so<01:58:48.639> that<01:58:48.800> we<01:58:48.960> know<01:58:49.119> they're 01:58:49.350 --> 01:58:49.360 align:start position:0% do in college so that we know they're 01:58:49.360 --> 01:58:52.870 align:start position:0% do in college so that we know they're not<01:58:50.080> cheating<01:58:50.480> their<01:58:50.719> way<01:58:50.800> through<01:58:51.040> it<01:58:51.599> or<01:58:52.639> is 01:58:52.870 --> 01:58:52.880 align:start position:0% not cheating their way through it or is 01:58:52.880 --> 01:58:54.550 align:start position:0% not cheating their way through it or is that<01:58:53.040> something<01:58:53.280> we<01:58:53.520> also<01:58:53.760> have<01:58:53.920> to<01:58:54.159> come<01:58:54.320> up 01:58:54.550 --> 01:58:54.560 align:start position:0% that something we also have to come up 01:58:54.560 --> 01:58:56.149 align:start position:0% that something we also have to come up with<01:58:54.719> and<01:58:55.040> decide? 01:58:56.149 --> 01:58:56.159 align:start position:0% with and decide? 01:58:56.159 --> 01:58:58.550 align:start position:0% with and decide? >> No.<01:58:56.719> So,<01:58:57.040> currently<01:58:57.440> they<01:58:57.760> do<01:58:58.000> already<01:58:58.320> have 01:58:58.550 --> 01:58:58.560 align:start position:0% >> No. So, currently they do already have 01:58:58.560 --> 01:59:00.629 align:start position:0% >> No. So, currently they do already have in<01:58:58.800> place.<01:58:59.040> A<01:58:59.199> lot<01:58:59.280> of<01:58:59.440> eleas<01:58:59.920> do<01:59:00.080> have<01:59:00.159> a<01:59:00.400> test 01:59:00.629 --> 01:59:00.639 align:start position:0% in place. A lot of eleas do have a test 01:59:00.639 --> 01:59:02.390 align:start position:0% in place. A lot of eleas do have a test out<01:59:00.800> option<01:59:01.119> that<01:59:01.360> they<01:59:01.599> are<01:59:01.760> providing<01:59:02.159> based 01:59:02.390 --> 01:59:02.400 align:start position:0% out option that they are providing based 01:59:02.400 --> 01:59:03.910 align:start position:0% out option that they are providing based on<01:59:02.560> something<01:59:02.800> they've<01:59:03.040> ever<01:59:03.280> purchased<01:59:03.599> or 01:59:03.910 --> 01:59:03.920 align:start position:0% on something they've ever purchased or 01:59:03.920 --> 01:59:07.189 align:start position:0% on something they've ever purchased or created<01:59:04.320> themselves.<01:59:04.960> Okay.<01:59:05.360> So,<01:59:05.920> um,<01:59:06.400> we<01:59:06.719> do 01:59:07.189 --> 01:59:07.199 align:start position:0% created themselves. Okay. So, um, we do 01:59:07.199 --> 01:59:09.030 align:start position:0% created themselves. Okay. So, um, we do have<01:59:07.440> in<01:59:07.760> place<01:59:07.920> and<01:59:08.239> we've<01:59:08.480> referenced<01:59:08.880> it 01:59:09.030 --> 01:59:09.040 align:start position:0% have in place and we've referenced it 01:59:09.040 --> 01:59:10.870 align:start position:0% have in place and we've referenced it here,<01:59:09.199> the<01:59:09.440> rules<01:59:09.679> that<01:59:09.920> talk<01:59:10.080> about,<01:59:10.639> um, 01:59:10.870 --> 01:59:10.880 align:start position:0% here, the rules that talk about, um, 01:59:10.880 --> 01:59:12.310 align:start position:0% here, the rules that talk about, um, what<01:59:11.119> needs<01:59:11.280> to<01:59:11.360> be<01:59:11.440> done<01:59:11.599> with<01:59:11.760> testing.<01:59:12.159> It's 01:59:12.310 --> 01:59:12.320 align:start position:0% what needs to be done with testing. It's 01:59:12.320 --> 01:59:14.470 align:start position:0% what needs to be done with testing. It's incorporated<01:59:12.719> in<01:59:12.960> reference<01:59:13.360> in<01:59:13.920> I<01:59:14.239> forgot 01:59:14.470 --> 01:59:14.480 align:start position:0% incorporated in reference in I forgot 01:59:14.480 --> 01:59:16.870 align:start position:0% incorporated in reference in I forgot the<01:59:14.639> rule<01:59:14.960> number,<01:59:15.599> but<01:59:15.840> I<01:59:16.000> know<01:59:16.080> it's<01:59:16.320> there. 01:59:16.870 --> 01:59:16.880 align:start position:0% the rule number, but I know it's there. 01:59:16.880 --> 01:59:19.990 align:start position:0% the rule number, but I know it's there. Um,<01:59:17.679> 404.<01:59:18.639> So,<01:59:18.880> there<01:59:19.040> is<01:59:19.119> a<01:59:19.280> testing<01:59:19.599> ethics 01:59:19.990 --> 01:59:20.000 align:start position:0% Um, 404. So, there is a testing ethics 01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:23.030 align:start position:0% Um, 404. So, there is a testing ethics policy.<01:59:20.880> Um,<01:59:21.760> but<01:59:22.080> in<01:59:22.320> terms<01:59:22.480> of<01:59:22.639> everything 01:59:23.030 --> 01:59:23.040 align:start position:0% policy. Um, but in terms of everything 01:59:23.040 --> 01:59:24.870 align:start position:0% policy. Um, but in terms of everything else,<01:59:23.360> I<01:59:23.520> think<01:59:23.679> our<01:59:23.920> main<01:59:24.159> lift,<01:59:24.400> and<01:59:24.639> again, 01:59:24.870 --> 01:59:24.880 align:start position:0% else, I think our main lift, and again, 01:59:24.880 --> 01:59:27.109 align:start position:0% else, I think our main lift, and again, Megan<01:59:25.280> can<01:59:25.920> give<01:59:26.159> more<01:59:26.400> information<01:59:26.719> on<01:59:26.880> this, 01:59:27.109 --> 01:59:27.119 align:start position:0% Megan can give more information on this, 01:59:27.119 --> 01:59:28.629 align:start position:0% Megan can give more information on this, the<01:59:27.280> main<01:59:27.440> lift<01:59:27.760> is<01:59:27.920> going<01:59:28.000> to<01:59:28.080> be<01:59:28.239> actually 01:59:28.629 --> 01:59:28.639 align:start position:0% the main lift is going to be actually 01:59:28.639 --> 01:59:30.229 align:start position:0% the main lift is going to be actually creating<01:59:29.199> the<01:59:29.520> test<01:59:29.760> out<01:59:29.920> and<01:59:30.080> the 01:59:30.229 --> 01:59:30.239 align:start position:0% creating the test out and the 01:59:30.239 --> 01:59:38.470 align:start position:0% creating the test out and the portfolio-based<01:59:31.040> options. 01:59:38.470 --> 01:59:38.480 align:start position:0% 01:59:38.480 --> 01:59:40.070 align:start position:0% And<01:59:38.800> the<01:59:39.040> law<01:59:39.280> said,<01:59:39.520> I'm<01:59:39.679> just<01:59:39.840> trying<01:59:39.920> to 01:59:40.070 --> 01:59:40.080 align:start position:0% And the law said, I'm just trying to 01:59:40.080 --> 01:59:41.910 align:start position:0% And the law said, I'm just trying to clarify<01:59:40.480> again<01:59:40.719> once<01:59:40.960> again,<01:59:41.199> the<01:59:41.440> law<01:59:41.679> is 01:59:41.910 --> 01:59:41.920 align:start position:0% clarify again once again, the law is 01:59:41.920 --> 01:59:44.070 align:start position:0% clarify again once again, the law is indicating<01:59:42.400> that<01:59:42.639> it's<01:59:43.040> just<01:59:43.360> going<01:59:43.599> to<01:59:43.760> be 01:59:44.070 --> 01:59:44.080 align:start position:0% indicating that it's just going to be 01:59:44.080 --> 01:59:47.189 align:start position:0% indicating that it's just going to be there<01:59:44.400> should<01:59:44.560> only<01:59:44.800> be<01:59:44.960> one<01:59:45.360> method 01:59:47.189 --> 01:59:47.199 align:start position:0% there should only be one method 01:59:47.199 --> 01:59:48.790 align:start position:0% there should only be one method or<01:59:47.360> is<01:59:47.520> the<01:59:47.679> law<01:59:47.920> just<01:59:48.080> saying<01:59:48.320> we<01:59:48.560> have<01:59:48.639> an 01:59:48.790 --> 01:59:48.800 align:start position:0% or is the law just saying we have an 01:59:48.800 --> 01:59:50.709 align:start position:0% or is the law just saying we have an available<01:59:49.360> method. 01:59:50.709 --> 01:59:50.719 align:start position:0% available method. 01:59:50.719 --> 01:59:52.629 align:start position:0% available method. >> So<01:59:50.960> in<01:59:51.199> terms<01:59:51.360> of<01:59:51.520> testing<01:59:51.840> out,<01:59:52.080> if<01:59:52.239> a<01:59:52.400> student 01:59:52.629 --> 01:59:52.639 align:start position:0% >> So in terms of testing out, if a student 01:59:52.639 --> 01:59:55.189 align:start position:0% >> So in terms of testing out, if a student comes<01:59:52.880> to<01:59:52.960> an<01:59:53.199> LEA<01:59:53.679> and<01:59:54.159> says,<01:59:54.639> I<01:59:54.880> don't<01:59:55.040> want 01:59:55.189 --> 01:59:55.199 align:start position:0% comes to an LEA and says, I don't want 01:59:55.199 --> 01:59:59.350 align:start position:0% comes to an LEA and says, I don't want to<01:59:55.360> take<01:59:55.760> English<01:59:56.480> 11,<01:59:57.360> I<01:59:57.920> have<01:59:58.639> I<01:59:58.880> am<01:59:59.040> amazing 01:59:59.350 --> 01:59:59.360 align:start position:0% to take English 11, I have I am amazing 01:59:59.360 --> 02:00:00.790 align:start position:0% to take English 11, I have I am amazing at<01:59:59.520> English.<01:59:59.840> I<02:00:00.000> feel<02:00:00.159> like<02:00:00.239> if<02:00:00.400> I<02:00:00.480> take<02:00:00.639> a 02:00:00.790 --> 02:00:00.800 align:start position:0% at English. I feel like if I take a 02:00:00.800 --> 02:00:02.470 align:start position:0% at English. I feel like if I take a test,<02:00:00.960> I<02:00:01.199> can<02:00:01.280> show<02:00:01.440> you<02:00:01.599> that<02:00:01.760> I'm<02:00:02.000> incredibly 02:00:02.470 --> 02:00:02.480 align:start position:0% test, I can show you that I'm incredibly 02:00:02.480 --> 02:00:04.550 align:start position:0% test, I can show you that I'm incredibly competent<02:00:02.880> at<02:00:03.119> this.<02:00:03.679> Then<02:00:03.920> the<02:00:04.080> ability<02:00:04.320> for 02:00:04.550 --> 02:00:04.560 align:start position:0% competent at this. Then the ability for 02:00:04.560 --> 02:00:06.550 align:start position:0% competent at this. Then the ability for them<02:00:04.639> to<02:00:04.800> take<02:00:04.960> that<02:00:05.199> test<02:00:05.440> and<02:00:05.760> not<02:00:06.080> take<02:00:06.320> the 02:00:06.550 --> 02:00:06.560 align:start position:0% them to take that test and not take the 02:00:06.560 --> 02:00:09.030 align:start position:0% them to take that test and not take the class<02:00:07.280> is<02:00:07.520> what<02:00:07.760> this<02:00:07.920> is<02:00:08.159> trying<02:00:08.320> to<02:00:08.719> to 02:00:09.030 --> 02:00:09.040 align:start position:0% class is what this is trying to to 02:00:09.040 --> 02:00:11.510 align:start position:0% class is what this is trying to to address.<02:00:09.840> Um<02:00:10.239> there<02:00:10.480> is<02:00:10.639> a<02:00:10.800> portfolio-based 02:00:11.510 --> 02:00:11.520 align:start position:0% address. Um there is a portfolio-based 02:00:11.520 --> 02:00:13.030 align:start position:0% address. Um there is a portfolio-based demonstration<02:00:11.920> and<02:00:12.159> Megan<02:00:12.480> can<02:00:12.639> maybe<02:00:12.880> speak 02:00:13.030 --> 02:00:13.040 align:start position:0% demonstration and Megan can maybe speak 02:00:13.040 --> 02:00:14.790 align:start position:0% demonstration and Megan can maybe speak more<02:00:13.199> to<02:00:13.360> that<02:00:13.520> because<02:00:13.840> my<02:00:14.239> understanding<02:00:14.639> of 02:00:14.790 --> 02:00:14.800 align:start position:0% more to that because my understanding of 02:00:14.800 --> 02:00:16.390 align:start position:0% more to that because my understanding of that<02:00:15.040> is<02:00:15.199> more<02:00:15.360> limited<02:00:15.679> than<02:00:15.840> it<02:00:16.000> is<02:00:16.080> with<02:00:16.239> the 02:00:16.390 --> 02:00:16.400 align:start position:0% that is more limited than it is with the 02:00:16.400 --> 02:00:18.149 align:start position:0% that is more limited than it is with the test<02:00:16.560> out<02:00:16.800> option,<02:00:17.360> but<02:00:17.520> from<02:00:17.760> what<02:00:17.920> I 02:00:18.149 --> 02:00:18.159 align:start position:0% test out option, but from what I 02:00:18.159 --> 02:00:20.229 align:start position:0% test out option, but from what I understand<02:00:18.560> it's<02:00:18.800> either<02:00:19.040> take<02:00:19.280> the<02:00:19.440> class<02:00:19.920> or 02:00:20.229 --> 02:00:20.239 align:start position:0% understand it's either take the class or 02:00:20.239 --> 02:00:22.709 align:start position:0% understand it's either take the class or do<02:00:20.560> one<02:00:20.880> of<02:00:21.119> those<02:00:21.440> options<02:00:21.840> to<02:00:22.159> not<02:00:22.400> have<02:00:22.560> to 02:00:22.709 --> 02:00:22.719 align:start position:0% do one of those options to not have to 02:00:22.719 --> 02:00:24.149 align:start position:0% do one of those options to not have to take<02:00:22.880> the<02:00:23.040> test<02:00:23.280> but<02:00:23.520> still<02:00:23.760> receive<02:00:24.000> the 02:00:24.149 --> 02:00:24.159 align:start position:0% take the test but still receive the 02:00:24.159 --> 02:00:29.750 align:start position:0% take the test but still receive the credit<02:00:24.400> on<02:00:24.639> your<02:00:24.800> diploma. 02:00:29.750 --> 02:00:29.760 align:start position:0% 02:00:29.760 --> 02:00:32.709 align:start position:0% Okay,<02:00:31.119> I'm<02:00:31.440> not<02:00:31.599> sure<02:00:31.760> where<02:00:31.920> I<02:00:32.320> stand<02:00:32.560> on 02:00:32.709 --> 02:00:32.719 align:start position:0% Okay, I'm not sure where I stand on 02:00:32.719 --> 02:00:36.790 align:start position:0% Okay, I'm not sure where I stand on this.<02:00:33.119> So, 02:00:36.790 --> 02:00:36.800 align:start position:0% 02:00:36.800 --> 02:00:41.030 align:start position:0% when<02:00:37.040> you<02:00:37.199> scroll<02:00:37.520> up<02:00:38.480> um<02:00:39.360> to<02:00:39.599> the<02:00:39.760> top<02:00:40.400> of<02:00:40.639> this 02:00:41.030 --> 02:00:41.040 align:start position:0% when you scroll up um to the top of this 02:00:41.040 --> 02:00:44.470 align:start position:0% when you scroll up um to the top of this policy, 02:00:44.470 --> 02:00:44.480 align:start position:0% 02:00:44.480 --> 02:00:50.870 align:start position:0% there<02:00:44.719> was 02:00:50.870 --> 02:00:50.880 align:start position:0% 02:00:50.880 --> 02:00:58.870 align:start position:0% a<02:00:51.199> question<02:00:52.400> development 02:00:58.870 --> 02:00:58.880 align:start position:0% 02:00:58.880 --> 02:01:00.470 align:start position:0% Okay,<02:00:59.199> I'm<02:00:59.440> not<02:00:59.599> sure<02:00:59.679> what<02:00:59.840> I<02:01:00.000> read<02:01:00.159> at<02:01:00.320> the 02:01:00.470 --> 02:01:00.480 align:start position:0% Okay, I'm not sure what I read at the 02:01:00.480 --> 02:01:02.149 align:start position:0% Okay, I'm not sure what I read at the top.<02:01:00.719> There<02:01:00.880> was<02:01:01.280> there<02:01:01.440> was<02:01:01.599> a<02:01:01.760> question<02:01:01.920> I 02:01:02.149 --> 02:01:02.159 align:start position:0% top. There was there was a question I 02:01:02.159 --> 02:01:03.589 align:start position:0% top. There was there was a question I had,<02:01:02.320> but<02:01:02.480> it's<02:01:02.639> not<02:01:02.800> in<02:01:02.960> there.<02:01:03.199> So,<02:01:03.360> thank 02:01:03.589 --> 02:01:03.599 align:start position:0% had, but it's not in there. So, thank 02:01:03.599 --> 02:01:08.950 align:start position:0% had, but it's not in there. So, thank you. 02:01:08.950 --> 02:01:08.960 align:start position:0% 02:01:08.960 --> 02:01:10.470 align:start position:0% I<02:01:09.199> guess<02:01:09.280> I<02:01:09.440> do<02:01:09.599> have<02:01:09.679> a<02:01:09.840> question.<02:01:10.159> How<02:01:10.320> does 02:01:10.470 --> 02:01:10.480 align:start position:0% I guess I do have a question. How does 02:01:10.480 --> 02:01:12.390 align:start position:0% I guess I do have a question. How does this<02:01:10.880> relate<02:01:11.199> as<02:01:11.440> Joan<02:01:11.840> talked<02:01:12.080> about<02:01:12.239> the 02:01:12.390 --> 02:01:12.400 align:start position:0% this relate as Joan talked about the 02:01:12.400 --> 02:01:15.030 align:start position:0% this relate as Joan talked about the packet<02:01:12.880> method?<02:01:13.360> Because<02:01:13.520> that<02:01:13.840> is<02:01:14.000> a<02:01:14.239> way<02:01:14.480> for 02:01:15.030 --> 02:01:15.040 align:start position:0% packet method? Because that is a way for 02:01:15.040 --> 02:01:17.270 align:start position:0% packet method? Because that is a way for them<02:01:15.280> to<02:01:15.520> get 02:01:17.270 --> 02:01:17.280 align:start position:0% them to get 02:01:17.280 --> 02:01:20.229 align:start position:0% them to get original<02:01:17.840> credit,<02:01:18.400> isn't<02:01:18.639> it? 02:01:20.229 --> 02:01:20.239 align:start position:0% original credit, isn't it? 02:01:20.239 --> 02:01:22.070 align:start position:0% original credit, isn't it? >> You<02:01:20.480> can<02:01:20.719> still<02:01:20.960> receive<02:01:21.280> original<02:01:21.760> credit 02:01:22.070 --> 02:01:22.080 align:start position:0% >> You can still receive original credit 02:01:22.080 --> 02:01:23.990 align:start position:0% >> You can still receive original credit through<02:01:22.320> a<02:01:22.560> packet.<02:01:23.199> Um,<02:01:23.520> but<02:01:23.760> it's 02:01:23.990 --> 02:01:24.000 align:start position:0% through a packet. Um, but it's 02:01:24.000 --> 02:01:25.910 align:start position:0% through a packet. Um, but it's considered<02:01:24.560> more<02:01:24.800> of<02:01:24.960> a<02:01:25.199> course,<02:01:25.599> my 02:01:25.910 --> 02:01:25.920 align:start position:0% considered more of a course, my 02:01:25.920 --> 02:01:28.070 align:start position:0% considered more of a course, my understanding,<02:01:26.880> because<02:01:27.199> you<02:01:27.520> still<02:01:27.760> have<02:01:27.920> to 02:01:28.070 --> 02:01:28.080 align:start position:0% understanding, because you still have to 02:01:28.080 --> 02:01:29.669 align:start position:0% understanding, because you still have to take<02:01:28.320> the<02:01:28.639> course<02:01:28.960> by<02:01:29.199> completing. 02:01:29.669 --> 02:01:29.679 align:start position:0% take the course by completing. 02:01:29.679 --> 02:01:31.189 align:start position:0% take the course by completing. >> Okay.<02:01:29.920> Oh,<02:01:30.080> there<02:01:30.320> was<02:01:30.400> the<02:01:30.560> line<02:01:30.719> in<02:01:30.960> start 02:01:31.189 --> 02:01:31.199 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Oh, there was the line in start 02:01:31.199 --> 02:01:32.550 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Oh, there was the line in start two<02:01:31.360> where<02:01:31.599> it<02:01:31.679> says<02:01:31.920> without<02:01:32.239> course 02:01:32.550 --> 02:01:32.560 align:start position:0% two where it says without course 02:01:32.560 --> 02:01:34.709 align:start position:0% two where it says without course enrollment.<02:01:33.360> So,<02:01:33.520> with<02:01:33.760> the<02:01:33.920> packet,<02:01:34.320> you<02:01:34.560> are 02:01:34.709 --> 02:01:34.719 align:start position:0% enrollment. So, with the packet, you are 02:01:34.719 --> 02:01:37.270 align:start position:0% enrollment. So, with the packet, you are still<02:01:35.040> enrolling<02:01:35.599> in<02:01:35.840> a<02:01:36.159> course<02:01:36.639> and<02:01:36.880> that<02:01:37.119> is 02:01:37.270 --> 02:01:37.280 align:start position:0% still enrolling in a course and that is 02:01:37.280 --> 02:01:38.870 align:start position:0% still enrolling in a course and that is giving<02:01:37.520> you<02:01:37.679> a<02:01:37.920> packet<02:01:38.239> and<02:01:38.400> that<02:01:38.639> is<02:01:38.719> how 02:01:38.870 --> 02:01:38.880 align:start position:0% giving you a packet and that is how 02:01:38.880 --> 02:01:40.790 align:start position:0% giving you a packet and that is how you're<02:01:39.199> getting<02:01:39.360> your<02:01:39.599> original<02:01:40.000> credit. 02:01:40.790 --> 02:01:40.800 align:start position:0% you're getting your original credit. 02:01:40.800 --> 02:01:41.589 align:start position:0% you're getting your original credit. >> So,<02:01:41.040> thank<02:01:41.199> you. 02:01:41.589 --> 02:01:41.599 align:start position:0% >> So, thank you. 02:01:41.599 --> 02:01:49.350 align:start position:0% >> So, thank you. >> Yeah. 02:01:49.350 --> 02:01:49.360 align:start position:0% 02:01:49.360 --> 02:01:51.510 align:start position:0% >> All<02:01:49.520> right. 02:01:51.510 --> 02:01:51.520 align:start position:0% >> All right. 02:01:51.520 --> 02:01:53.270 align:start position:0% >> All right. Also,<02:01:51.920> I'm<02:01:52.159> going<02:01:52.239> to<02:01:52.320> point<02:01:52.480> out<02:01:52.639> that<02:01:52.880> Sydney 02:01:53.270 --> 02:01:53.280 align:start position:0% Also, I'm going to point out that Sydney 02:01:53.280 --> 02:01:54.870 align:start position:0% Also, I'm going to point out that Sydney is<02:01:53.440> in<02:01:53.679> here<02:01:53.840> and<02:01:54.000> she<02:01:54.239> is<02:01:54.400> absolutely 02:01:54.870 --> 02:01:54.880 align:start position:0% is in here and she is absolutely 02:01:54.880 --> 02:01:56.629 align:start position:0% is in here and she is absolutely incredible<02:01:55.440> at<02:01:55.679> any<02:01:55.920> questions<02:01:56.239> you<02:01:56.480> may 02:01:56.629 --> 02:01:56.639 align:start position:0% incredible at any questions you may 02:01:56.639 --> 02:01:58.070 align:start position:0% incredible at any questions you may have.<02:01:56.880> So,<02:01:57.040> if<02:01:57.199> there's<02:01:57.360> anything<02:01:57.599> that<02:01:57.760> I<02:01:57.920> am 02:01:58.070 --> 02:01:58.080 align:start position:0% have. So, if there's anything that I am 02:01:58.080 --> 02:01:59.350 align:start position:0% have. So, if there's anything that I am not<02:01:58.239> reaching<02:01:58.480> that<02:01:58.639> you<02:01:58.800> feel<02:01:58.880> like<02:01:59.040> you<02:01:59.199> need 02:01:59.350 --> 02:01:59.360 align:start position:0% not reaching that you feel like you need 02:01:59.360 --> 02:02:00.790 align:start position:0% not reaching that you feel like you need more<02:01:59.520> information,<02:01:59.920> I<02:02:00.080> will<02:02:00.239> not<02:02:00.320> be<02:02:00.480> offended 02:02:00.790 --> 02:02:00.800 align:start position:0% more information, I will not be offended 02:02:00.800 --> 02:02:03.830 align:start position:0% more information, I will not be offended if<02:02:00.960> you<02:02:01.040> need<02:02:01.199> Sydney. 02:02:03.830 --> 02:02:03.840 align:start position:0% if you need Sydney. 02:02:03.840 --> 02:02:06.310 align:start position:0% if you need Sydney. >> I<02:02:04.080> guess<02:02:04.639> I<02:02:04.880> I've<02:02:05.199> just<02:02:05.360> seen<02:02:05.599> where<02:02:05.920> families 02:02:06.310 --> 02:02:06.320 align:start position:0% >> I guess I I've just seen where families 02:02:06.320 --> 02:02:11.189 align:start position:0% >> I guess I I've just seen where families have<02:02:06.560> used<02:02:06.800> the<02:02:07.040> portfolio<02:02:07.679> method<02:02:08.800> and<02:02:09.440> and<02:02:10.880> I 02:02:11.189 --> 02:02:11.199 align:start position:0% have used the portfolio method and and I 02:02:11.199 --> 02:02:14.070 align:start position:0% have used the portfolio method and and I just<02:02:11.360> don't<02:02:11.520> know<02:02:11.599> if<02:02:12.080> the<02:02:12.400> state<02:02:13.040> becomes<02:02:13.840> you 02:02:14.070 --> 02:02:14.080 align:start position:0% just don't know if the state becomes you 02:02:14.080 --> 02:02:15.910 align:start position:0% just don't know if the state becomes you only<02:02:14.320> can<02:02:14.480> do<02:02:14.560> it<02:02:14.719> this<02:02:15.040> way.<02:02:15.280> And<02:02:15.520> maybe<02:02:15.679> I'm 02:02:15.910 --> 02:02:15.920 align:start position:0% only can do it this way. And maybe I'm 02:02:15.920 --> 02:02:17.430 align:start position:0% only can do it this way. And maybe I'm just<02:02:16.080> not<02:02:16.239> understanding<02:02:16.639> that<02:02:16.880> fully<02:02:17.199> where 02:02:17.430 --> 02:02:17.440 align:start position:0% just not understanding that fully where 02:02:17.440 --> 02:02:19.270 align:start position:0% just not understanding that fully where they've<02:02:17.599> been<02:02:17.760> able<02:02:17.920> to<02:02:18.000> come<02:02:18.159> in<02:02:18.320> and<02:02:18.560> say 02:02:19.270 --> 02:02:19.280 align:start position:0% they've been able to come in and say 02:02:19.280 --> 02:02:20.870 align:start position:0% they've been able to come in and say this<02:02:19.440> is<02:02:19.599> what<02:02:19.679> I<02:02:19.920> did.<02:02:20.159> this<02:02:20.320> is<02:02:20.400> what<02:02:20.560> I've 02:02:20.870 --> 02:02:20.880 align:start position:0% this is what I did. this is what I've 02:02:20.880 --> 02:02:23.109 align:start position:0% this is what I did. this is what I've you<02:02:21.040> know<02:02:21.040> what<02:02:21.199> I<02:02:21.360> mean<02:02:22.320> but<02:02:22.560> it's<02:02:22.800> only<02:02:22.960> for 02:02:23.109 --> 02:02:23.119 align:start position:0% you know what I mean but it's only for 02:02:23.119 --> 02:02:26.310 align:start position:0% you know what I mean but it's only for these<02:02:23.440> four<02:02:23.679> classes<02:02:24.239> right 02:02:26.310 --> 02:02:26.320 align:start position:0% these four classes right 02:02:26.320 --> 02:02:28.070 align:start position:0% these four classes right there<02:02:26.560> only<02:02:26.719> four<02:02:26.960> classes<02:02:27.440> math 02:02:28.070 --> 02:02:28.080 align:start position:0% there only four classes math 02:02:28.080 --> 02:02:30.149 align:start position:0% there only four classes math >> in<02:02:28.320> the<02:02:28.480> classes<02:02:28.880> defined<02:02:29.199> as<02:02:29.440> core<02:02:29.760> classes 02:02:30.149 --> 02:02:30.159 align:start position:0% >> in the classes defined as core classes 02:02:30.159 --> 02:02:32.390 align:start position:0% >> in the classes defined as core classes in<02:02:30.400> code<02:02:31.440> um<02:02:31.599> it's<02:02:31.840> a<02:02:32.000> little<02:02:32.080> bit<02:02:32.159> tricky 02:02:32.390 --> 02:02:32.400 align:start position:0% in code um it's a little bit tricky 02:02:32.400 --> 02:02:33.830 align:start position:0% in code um it's a little bit tricky because<02:02:32.639> it<02:02:32.800> does<02:02:32.960> say<02:02:33.199> another<02:02:33.599> course 02:02:33.830 --> 02:02:33.840 align:start position:0% because it does say another course 02:02:33.840 --> 02:02:35.510 align:start position:0% because it does say another course required<02:02:34.239> for<02:02:34.400> high<02:02:34.639> school<02:02:34.800> graduation<02:02:35.280> as 02:02:35.510 --> 02:02:35.520 align:start position:0% required for high school graduation as 02:02:35.520 --> 02:02:37.030 align:start position:0% required for high school graduation as described<02:02:35.920> in<02:02:36.080> and<02:02:36.320> then<02:02:36.400> they<02:02:36.560> have<02:02:36.719> to<02:02:36.800> go<02:02:36.880> to 02:02:37.030 --> 02:02:37.040 align:start position:0% described in and then they have to go to 02:02:37.040 --> 02:02:38.950 align:start position:0% described in and then they have to go to the<02:02:37.199> code<02:02:37.440> so<02:02:37.599> if<02:02:37.679> the<02:02:37.840> code<02:02:38.080> changes<02:02:38.560> it<02:02:38.719> may 02:02:38.950 --> 02:02:38.960 align:start position:0% the code so if the code changes it may 02:02:38.960 --> 02:02:41.109 align:start position:0% the code so if the code changes it may change<02:02:39.199> with<02:02:39.440> the<02:02:39.599> code<02:02:40.080> but<02:02:40.320> currently<02:02:40.719> it<02:02:40.880> is 02:02:41.109 --> 02:02:41.119 align:start position:0% change with the code but currently it is 02:02:41.119 --> 02:02:44.550 align:start position:0% change with the code but currently it is English<02:02:41.440> math<02:02:41.840> science<02:02:42.239> social<02:02:42.480> studies 02:02:44.550 --> 02:02:44.560 align:start position:0% English math science social studies 02:02:44.560 --> 02:02:46.470 align:start position:0% English math science social studies >> okay<02:02:45.119> so<02:02:45.280> that<02:02:45.520> would<02:02:45.679> be<02:02:45.840> more<02:02:46.000> than<02:02:46.159> four 02:02:46.470 --> 02:02:46.480 align:start position:0% >> okay so that would be more than four 02:02:46.480 --> 02:02:48.229 align:start position:0% >> okay so that would be more than four because<02:02:46.800> social<02:02:47.199> studies<02:02:47.599> encompasses 02:02:48.229 --> 02:02:48.239 align:start position:0% because social studies encompasses 02:02:48.239 --> 02:02:50.070 align:start position:0% because social studies encompasses government<02:02:48.800> geography 02:02:50.070 --> 02:02:50.080 align:start position:0% government geography 02:02:50.080 --> 02:02:52.950 align:start position:0% government geography world<02:02:50.320> history,<02:02:51.360> right?<02:02:52.000> US<02:02:52.320> history 02:02:52.950 --> 02:02:52.960 align:start position:0% world history, right? US history 02:02:52.960 --> 02:02:55.350 align:start position:0% world history, right? US history >> is<02:02:53.280> required<02:02:53.679> for<02:02:53.920> graduation.<02:02:54.639> So,<02:02:54.880> yes,<02:02:55.119> it 02:02:55.350 --> 02:02:55.360 align:start position:0% >> is required for graduation. So, yes, it 02:02:55.360 --> 02:02:57.109 align:start position:0% >> is required for graduation. So, yes, it wouldn't<02:02:55.599> cover<02:02:55.840> an<02:02:56.080> elective,<02:02:56.480> but<02:02:56.719> it<02:02:56.880> would 02:02:57.109 --> 02:02:57.119 align:start position:0% wouldn't cover an elective, but it would 02:02:57.119 --> 02:03:00.550 align:start position:0% wouldn't cover an elective, but it would cover<02:02:57.599> a<02:02:58.239> graduation<02:02:58.719> requirement. 02:03:00.550 --> 02:03:00.560 align:start position:0% cover a graduation requirement. 02:03:00.560 --> 02:03:03.270 align:start position:0% cover a graduation requirement. >> So,<02:03:00.800> do<02:03:01.040> we<02:03:01.199> need<02:03:01.280> to<02:03:01.679> leave<02:03:02.080> in<02:03:02.320> 705<02:03:03.040> the 02:03:03.270 --> 02:03:03.280 align:start position:0% >> So, do we need to leave in 705 the 02:03:03.280 --> 02:03:05.830 align:start position:0% >> So, do we need to leave in 705 the provisions<02:03:03.760> that<02:03:04.000> allow<02:03:04.320> an<02:03:04.560> LEA<02:03:05.040> to<02:03:05.280> do<02:03:05.440> it 02:03:05.830 --> 02:03:05.840 align:start position:0% provisions that allow an LEA to do it 02:03:05.840 --> 02:03:08.870 align:start position:0% provisions that allow an LEA to do it with<02:03:06.080> other<02:03:06.400> courses 02:03:08.870 --> 02:03:08.880 align:start position:0% with other courses 02:03:08.880 --> 02:03:11.030 align:start position:0% with other courses to<02:03:09.119> be<02:03:09.199> able<02:03:09.360> to<02:03:09.840> have<02:03:10.000> them<02:03:10.239> earn<02:03:10.560> credit<02:03:10.800> with 02:03:11.030 --> 02:03:11.040 align:start position:0% to be able to have them earn credit with 02:03:11.040 --> 02:03:13.510 align:start position:0% to be able to have them earn credit with other<02:03:11.280> courses<02:03:12.239> that<02:03:12.480> are<02:03:12.639> not?<02:03:13.119> Does<02:03:13.360> that 02:03:13.510 --> 02:03:13.520 align:start position:0% other courses that are not? Does that 02:03:13.520 --> 02:03:14.950 align:start position:0% other courses that are not? Does that make<02:03:13.679> sense? 02:03:14.950 --> 02:03:14.960 align:start position:0% make sense? 02:03:14.960 --> 02:03:17.830 align:start position:0% make sense? >> I<02:03:15.199> think<02:03:15.360> I'm<02:03:15.599> understanding.<02:03:16.320> Um<02:03:17.280> it<02:03:17.599> does 02:03:17.830 --> 02:03:17.840 align:start position:0% >> I think I'm understanding. Um it does 02:03:17.840 --> 02:03:19.430 align:start position:0% >> I think I'm understanding. Um it does still<02:03:18.080> allow<02:03:18.320> them<02:03:18.719> when<02:03:18.960> you<02:03:19.040> mean<02:03:19.199> with 02:03:19.430 --> 02:03:19.440 align:start position:0% still allow them when you mean with 02:03:19.440 --> 02:03:21.109 align:start position:0% still allow them when you mean with other<02:03:19.760> courses 02:03:21.109 --> 02:03:21.119 align:start position:0% other courses 02:03:21.119 --> 02:03:23.030 align:start position:0% other courses >> well<02:03:21.280> like<02:03:21.440> an<02:03:21.599> elective<02:03:22.080> course<02:03:22.320> that<02:03:22.639> is<02:03:22.800> a 02:03:23.030 --> 02:03:23.040 align:start position:0% >> well like an elective course that is a 02:03:23.040 --> 02:03:25.189 align:start position:0% >> well like an elective course that is a student<02:03:23.360> maybe<02:03:23.920> uh<02:03:24.080> let's<02:03:24.400> say<02:03:24.639> singing<02:03:24.960> or 02:03:25.189 --> 02:03:25.199 align:start position:0% student maybe uh let's say singing or 02:03:25.199 --> 02:03:28.709 align:start position:0% student maybe uh let's say singing or something<02:03:25.760> where<02:03:26.080> they've<02:03:27.360> um<02:03:27.599> taken<02:03:28.000> some 02:03:28.709 --> 02:03:28.719 align:start position:0% something where they've um taken some 02:03:28.719 --> 02:03:31.030 align:start position:0% something where they've um taken some maybe<02:03:29.119> private<02:03:29.440> lessons<02:03:29.840> and<02:03:30.080> they<02:03:30.400> have 02:03:31.030 --> 02:03:31.040 align:start position:0% maybe private lessons and they have 02:03:31.040 --> 02:03:33.910 align:start position:0% maybe private lessons and they have demonstrated<02:03:32.080> you<02:03:32.239> know<02:03:32.400> in<02:03:32.639> a<02:03:32.800> different<02:03:33.119> way 02:03:33.910 --> 02:03:33.920 align:start position:0% demonstrated you know in a different way 02:03:33.920 --> 02:03:36.149 align:start position:0% demonstrated you know in a different way and<02:03:34.320> they'd<02:03:34.639> like<02:03:34.880> credit<02:03:35.119> for<02:03:35.280> the<02:03:35.520> hours<02:03:35.840> and 02:03:36.149 --> 02:03:36.159 align:start position:0% and they'd like credit for the hours and 02:03:36.159 --> 02:03:39.830 align:start position:0% and they'd like credit for the hours and things<02:03:36.320> they<02:03:36.639> put<02:03:36.719> in<02:03:36.880> for<02:03:37.040> that.<02:03:37.280> So, 02:03:39.830 --> 02:03:39.840 align:start position:0% things they put in for that. So, 02:03:39.840 --> 02:03:41.750 align:start position:0% things they put in for that. So, >> my<02:03:40.159> understanding<02:03:40.480> of<02:03:40.639> the<02:03:40.880> policy<02:03:41.199> is<02:03:41.360> that 02:03:41.750 --> 02:03:41.760 align:start position:0% >> my understanding of the policy is that 02:03:41.760 --> 02:03:43.830 align:start position:0% >> my understanding of the policy is that an<02:03:42.000> LEA<02:03:42.400> could<02:03:42.639> still<02:03:42.800> choose<02:03:43.040> to<02:03:43.280> do<02:03:43.360> that<02:03:43.599> for 02:03:43.830 --> 02:03:43.840 align:start position:0% an LEA could still choose to do that for 02:03:43.840 --> 02:03:45.669 align:start position:0% an LEA could still choose to do that for an<02:03:44.000> ele<02:03:44.400> for<02:03:44.560> an<02:03:44.719> elected<02:03:45.119> credit,<02:03:45.440> an 02:03:45.669 --> 02:03:45.679 align:start position:0% an ele for an elected credit, an 02:03:45.679 --> 02:03:48.070 align:start position:0% an ele for an elected credit, an elective<02:03:46.159> credit,<02:03:46.880> but<02:03:47.199> for<02:03:47.440> the<02:03:47.679> core 02:03:48.070 --> 02:03:48.080 align:start position:0% elective credit, but for the core 02:03:48.080 --> 02:03:49.510 align:start position:0% elective credit, but for the core classes<02:03:48.560> that<02:03:48.800> are<02:03:48.960> required<02:03:49.280> for 02:03:49.510 --> 02:03:49.520 align:start position:0% classes that are required for 02:03:49.520 --> 02:03:51.990 align:start position:0% classes that are required for graduation,<02:03:50.320> only<02:03:50.800> this<02:03:51.199> test<02:03:51.520> out<02:03:51.760> option 02:03:51.990 --> 02:03:52.000 align:start position:0% graduation, only this test out option 02:03:52.000 --> 02:03:54.709 align:start position:0% graduation, only this test out option from<02:03:52.239> the<02:03:52.400> state<02:03:52.639> would<02:03:52.880> apply.<02:03:53.760> So,<02:03:54.400> um<02:03:54.560> you 02:03:54.709 --> 02:03:54.719 align:start position:0% from the state would apply. So, um you 02:03:54.719 --> 02:03:56.070 align:start position:0% from the state would apply. So, um you do<02:03:54.880> have<02:03:54.960> to<02:03:55.040> have<02:03:55.119> an<02:03:55.280> arts<02:03:55.520> credit<02:03:55.840> to 02:03:56.070 --> 02:03:56.080 align:start position:0% do have to have an arts credit to 02:03:56.080 --> 02:03:58.470 align:start position:0% do have to have an arts credit to graduate,<02:03:57.040> but<02:03:57.280> that's<02:03:57.599> not<02:03:57.760> included<02:03:58.159> in<02:03:58.320> the 02:03:58.470 --> 02:03:58.480 align:start position:0% graduate, but that's not included in the 02:03:58.480 --> 02:04:00.149 align:start position:0% graduate, but that's not included in the core<02:03:58.719> classes.<02:03:59.199> So,<02:03:59.440> if<02:03:59.599> a<02:03:59.760> student<02:03:59.920> came<02:04:00.000> to 02:04:00.149 --> 02:04:00.159 align:start position:0% core classes. So, if a student came to 02:04:00.159 --> 02:04:01.350 align:start position:0% core classes. So, if a student came to an<02:04:00.239> LEA<02:04:00.560> and<02:04:00.719> said,<02:04:00.800> "I'm<02:04:01.040> actually<02:04:01.199> a 02:04:01.350 --> 02:04:01.360 align:start position:0% an LEA and said, "I'm actually a 02:04:01.360 --> 02:04:02.870 align:start position:0% an LEA and said, "I'm actually a professional<02:04:01.760> singer."<02:04:02.320> It<02:04:02.480> would<02:04:02.560> be<02:04:02.639> up<02:04:02.800> to 02:04:02.870 --> 02:04:02.880 align:start position:0% professional singer." It would be up to 02:04:02.880 --> 02:04:04.470 align:start position:0% professional singer." It would be up to the<02:04:03.040> LEA<02:04:03.360> to<02:04:03.520> decide<02:04:03.679> if<02:04:03.920> they<02:04:04.080> want<02:04:04.159> to<02:04:04.320> take 02:04:04.470 --> 02:04:04.480 align:start position:0% the LEA to decide if they want to take 02:04:04.480 --> 02:04:05.830 align:start position:0% the LEA to decide if they want to take portfolio-based<02:04:05.280> demonstration<02:04:05.679> of 02:04:05.830 --> 02:04:05.840 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstration of 02:04:05.840 --> 02:04:08.229 align:start position:0% portfolio-based demonstration of mastery.<02:04:06.639> But<02:04:06.719> they<02:04:06.960> could<02:04:07.119> not<02:04:07.599> apply<02:04:07.920> a 02:04:08.229 --> 02:04:08.239 align:start position:0% mastery. But they could not apply a 02:04:08.239 --> 02:04:10.550 align:start position:0% mastery. But they could not apply a state<02:04:08.480> testwide<02:04:09.360> um<02:04:09.599> test<02:04:09.920> out<02:04:10.159> option<02:04:10.400> for 02:04:10.550 --> 02:04:10.560 align:start position:0% state testwide um test out option for 02:04:10.560 --> 02:04:12.070 align:start position:0% state testwide um test out option for that.<02:04:10.880> Statewide<02:04:11.360> test<02:04:11.599> out<02:04:11.760> option. 02:04:12.070 --> 02:04:12.080 align:start position:0% that. Statewide test out option. 02:04:12.080 --> 02:04:13.669 align:start position:0% that. Statewide test out option. >> Right.<02:04:12.639> But<02:04:12.800> that's<02:04:13.040> what<02:04:13.119> I'm<02:04:13.280> saying.<02:04:13.520> We 02:04:13.669 --> 02:04:13.679 align:start position:0% >> Right. But that's what I'm saying. We 02:04:13.679 --> 02:04:15.189 align:start position:0% >> Right. But that's what I'm saying. We didn't<02:04:13.920> eliminate<02:04:14.400> any<02:04:14.639> language<02:04:14.960> that 02:04:15.189 --> 02:04:15.199 align:start position:0% didn't eliminate any language that 02:04:15.199 --> 02:04:16.629 align:start position:0% didn't eliminate any language that wouldn't<02:04:15.520> allow<02:04:15.840> that,<02:04:16.159> right? 02:04:16.629 --> 02:04:16.639 align:start position:0% wouldn't allow that, right? 02:04:16.639 --> 02:04:17.750 align:start position:0% wouldn't allow that, right? >> No,<02:04:16.800> that's<02:04:17.119> still<02:04:17.280> there. 02:04:17.750 --> 02:04:17.760 align:start position:0% >> No, that's still there. 02:04:17.760 --> 02:04:18.310 align:start position:0% >> No, that's still there. >> Okay. 02:04:18.310 --> 02:04:18.320 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:04:18.320 --> 02:04:18.950 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Yeah. 02:04:18.950 --> 02:04:18.960 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:04:18.960 --> 02:04:21.669 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Okay.<02:04:19.440> Does<02:04:19.679> anybody<02:04:21.040> want<02:04:21.199> to<02:04:21.360> move<02:04:21.520> this 02:04:21.669 --> 02:04:21.679 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Does anybody want to move this 02:04:21.679 --> 02:04:25.109 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Does anybody want to move this forward? 02:04:25.109 --> 02:04:25.119 align:start position:0% 02:04:25.119 --> 02:04:26.390 align:start position:0% Would<02:04:25.360> have<02:04:25.440> to<02:04:25.599> amend. 02:04:26.390 --> 02:04:26.400 align:start position:0% Would have to amend. 02:04:26.400 --> 02:04:28.149 align:start position:0% Would have to amend. >> Sure.<02:04:26.719> If<02:04:26.880> you<02:04:27.040> want<02:04:27.199> to<02:04:27.440> tee<02:04:27.679> up<02:04:27.920> the 02:04:28.149 --> 02:04:28.159 align:start position:0% >> Sure. If you want to tee up the 02:04:28.159 --> 02:04:34.950 align:start position:0% >> Sure. If you want to tee up the language,<02:04:28.880> you<02:04:29.119> can<02:04:29.199> do<02:04:29.360> that. 02:04:34.950 --> 02:04:34.960 align:start position:0% 02:04:34.960 --> 02:04:37.270 align:start position:0% >> So<02:04:35.119> I<02:04:35.280> think<02:04:36.239> purple<02:04:36.560> there. 02:04:37.270 --> 02:04:37.280 align:start position:0% >> So I think purple there. 02:04:37.280 --> 02:04:38.870 align:start position:0% >> So I think purple there. >> So<02:04:37.440> do<02:04:37.599> I<02:04:37.760> read<02:04:37.920> the<02:04:38.159> whole<02:04:38.320> thing<02:04:38.480> that<02:04:38.719> you 02:04:38.870 --> 02:04:38.880 align:start position:0% >> So do I read the whole thing that you 02:04:38.880 --> 02:04:39.669 align:start position:0% >> So do I read the whole thing that you already<02:04:39.199> read? 02:04:39.669 --> 02:04:39.679 align:start position:0% already read? 02:04:39.679 --> 02:04:41.589 align:start position:0% already read? >> The<02:04:39.920> whole<02:04:40.080> thing<02:04:40.239> again<02:04:40.560> or<02:04:40.880> can<02:04:41.040> we<02:04:41.199> say<02:04:41.360> as 02:04:41.589 --> 02:04:41.599 align:start position:0% >> The whole thing again or can we say as 02:04:41.599 --> 02:04:42.229 align:start position:0% >> The whole thing again or can we say as read? 02:04:42.229 --> 02:04:42.239 align:start position:0% read? 02:04:42.239 --> 02:04:44.070 align:start position:0% read? >> I<02:04:42.400> I<02:04:42.639> think<02:04:42.719> we<02:04:42.880> can<02:04:43.040> say<02:04:43.199> as<02:04:43.360> read.<02:04:43.840> I<02:04:44.000> think 02:04:44.070 --> 02:04:44.080 align:start position:0% >> I I think we can say as read. I think 02:04:44.080 --> 02:04:46.070 align:start position:0% >> I I think we can say as read. I think you<02:04:44.320> could<02:04:44.400> just<02:04:44.560> say<02:04:44.880> strike<02:04:45.360> section<02:04:45.679> 10<02:04:45.920> and 02:04:46.070 --> 02:04:46.080 align:start position:0% you could just say strike section 10 and 02:04:46.080 --> 02:04:48.550 align:start position:0% you could just say strike section 10 and replace<02:04:46.400> it<02:04:46.639> with<02:04:46.880> the<02:04:47.119> following<02:04:47.920> and<02:04:48.159> then 02:04:48.550 --> 02:04:48.560 align:start position:0% replace it with the following and then 02:04:48.560 --> 02:04:50.790 align:start position:0% replace it with the following and then we'll<02:04:48.880> indicate<02:04:49.199> that<02:04:49.440> it's<02:04:49.920> the<02:04:50.159> new<02:04:50.400> section 02:04:50.790 --> 02:04:50.800 align:start position:0% we'll indicate that it's the new section 02:04:50.800 --> 02:04:53.830 align:start position:0% we'll indicate that it's the new section 10<02:04:51.199> that<02:04:51.440> was<02:04:51.599> read<02:04:51.840> earlier. 02:04:53.830 --> 02:04:53.840 align:start position:0% 10 that was read earlier. 02:04:53.840 --> 02:04:56.070 align:start position:0% 10 that was read earlier. And<02:04:54.239> can<02:04:54.400> I<02:04:54.639> just<02:04:54.800> ask<02:04:55.119> just<02:04:55.280> to<02:04:55.440> verify<02:04:55.760> again 02:04:56.070 --> 02:04:56.080 align:start position:0% And can I just ask just to verify again 02:04:56.080 --> 02:04:58.950 align:start position:0% And can I just ask just to verify again what<02:04:57.280> what<02:04:57.599> law<02:04:57.840> is<02:04:58.000> this?<02:04:58.239> What<02:04:58.400> code<02:04:58.639> is 02:04:58.950 --> 02:04:58.960 align:start position:0% what what law is this? What code is 02:04:58.960 --> 02:05:01.189 align:start position:0% what what law is this? What code is where<02:04:59.119> is<02:04:59.280> this<02:04:59.520> coming<02:04:59.679> from<02:05:00.000> again?<02:05:00.880> I<02:05:01.040> just 02:05:01.189 --> 02:05:01.199 align:start position:0% where is this coming from again? I just 02:05:01.199 --> 02:05:02.310 align:start position:0% where is this coming from again? I just need<02:05:01.360> the<02:05:01.599> number. 02:05:02.310 --> 02:05:02.320 align:start position:0% need the number. 02:05:02.320 --> 02:05:04.149 align:start position:0% need the number. >> HB502. 02:05:04.149 --> 02:05:04.159 align:start position:0% >> HB502. 02:05:04.159 --> 02:05:09.109 align:start position:0% >> HB502. >> Thank<02:05:04.400> you.<02:05:05.040> Got<02:05:05.360> it. 02:05:09.109 --> 02:05:09.119 align:start position:0% 02:05:09.119 --> 02:05:11.030 align:start position:0% Okay.<02:05:09.520> I<02:05:09.760> move<02:05:09.920> that<02:05:10.159> the<02:05:10.320> committee<02:05:10.719> strike 02:05:11.030 --> 02:05:11.040 align:start position:0% Okay. I move that the committee strike 02:05:11.040 --> 02:05:14.470 align:start position:0% Okay. I move that the committee strike section<02:05:11.440> 10<02:05:11.760> and<02:05:12.080> replace<02:05:12.400> it<02:05:12.639> with<02:05:13.360> what<02:05:13.679> was 02:05:14.470 --> 02:05:14.480 align:start position:0% section 10 and replace it with what was 02:05:14.480 --> 02:05:20.149 align:start position:0% section 10 and replace it with what was previously<02:05:15.119> read. 02:05:20.149 --> 02:05:20.159 align:start position:0% 02:05:20.159 --> 02:05:21.830 align:start position:0% Okay.<02:05:20.639> So,<02:05:20.880> the<02:05:21.040> motion<02:05:21.280> before<02:05:21.599> the 02:05:21.830 --> 02:05:21.840 align:start position:0% Okay. So, the motion before the 02:05:21.840 --> 02:05:25.189 align:start position:0% Okay. So, the motion before the committee<02:05:23.199> is<02:05:23.440> the<02:05:23.679> committee<02:05:24.080> strike 02:05:25.189 --> 02:05:25.199 align:start position:0% committee is the committee strike 02:05:25.199 --> 02:05:28.149 align:start position:0% committee is the committee strike section<02:05:25.760> 10. 02:05:28.149 --> 02:05:28.159 align:start position:0% section 10. 02:05:28.159 --> 02:05:30.709 align:start position:0% section 10. I<02:05:28.639> can<02:05:29.360> someone<02:05:29.679> go<02:05:29.840> up<02:05:30.000> a<02:05:30.080> little<02:05:30.159> bit<02:05:30.320> so<02:05:30.480> I 02:05:30.709 --> 02:05:30.719 align:start position:0% I can someone go up a little bit so I 02:05:30.719 --> 02:05:33.990 align:start position:0% I can someone go up a little bit so I make<02:05:30.880> sure<02:05:31.040> I'm 02:05:33.990 --> 02:05:34.000 align:start position:0% make sure I'm 02:05:34.000 --> 02:05:35.669 align:start position:0% make sure I'm Oh,<02:05:34.320> sorry.<02:05:34.639> Maybe<02:05:34.800> you're<02:05:34.960> making<02:05:35.199> a<02:05:35.360> motion. 02:05:35.669 --> 02:05:35.679 align:start position:0% Oh, sorry. Maybe you're making a motion. 02:05:35.679 --> 02:05:37.510 align:start position:0% Oh, sorry. Maybe you're making a motion. Okay.<02:05:36.239> That<02:05:36.400> the<02:05:36.560> committee<02:05:36.880> strikes<02:05:37.199> section 02:05:37.510 --> 02:05:37.520 align:start position:0% Okay. That the committee strikes section 02:05:37.520 --> 02:05:39.350 align:start position:0% Okay. That the committee strikes section 10<02:05:37.760> and<02:05:38.000> replace<02:05:38.320> it<02:05:38.480> with<02:05:38.639> the<02:05:38.880> following 02:05:39.350 --> 02:05:39.360 align:start position:0% 10 and replace it with the following 02:05:39.360 --> 02:05:41.990 align:start position:0% 10 and replace it with the following which<02:05:39.599> was<02:05:39.760> read<02:05:40.480> earlier. 02:05:41.990 --> 02:05:42.000 align:start position:0% which was read earlier. 02:05:42.000 --> 02:05:43.669 align:start position:0% which was read earlier. Um, 02:05:43.669 --> 02:05:43.679 align:start position:0% Um, 02:05:43.679 --> 02:05:49.510 align:start position:0% Um, this<02:05:44.000> is<02:05:44.159> related<02:05:44.639> to<02:05:45.040> 53E4209. 02:05:49.510 --> 02:05:49.520 align:start position:0% 02:05:49.520 --> 02:05:51.830 align:start position:0% All<02:05:49.679> those<02:05:49.920> in<02:05:50.159> favor<02:05:50.800> of<02:05:51.040> adding<02:05:51.440> this 02:05:51.830 --> 02:05:51.840 align:start position:0% All those in favor of adding this 02:05:51.840 --> 02:05:53.669 align:start position:0% All those in favor of adding this language<02:05:52.159> in 02:05:53.669 --> 02:05:53.679 align:start position:0% language in 02:05:53.679 --> 02:05:55.830 align:start position:0% language in >> I 02:05:55.830 --> 02:05:55.840 align:start position:0% >> I 02:05:55.840 --> 02:05:59.189 align:start position:0% >> I >> okay<02:05:56.880> I'm<02:05:57.119> I'm<02:05:57.440> a<02:05:57.679> no 02:05:59.189 --> 02:05:59.199 align:start position:0% >> okay I'm I'm a no 02:05:59.199 --> 02:06:01.990 align:start position:0% >> okay I'm I'm a no but<02:05:59.440> I'm<02:05:59.679> just<02:06:00.080> I'm<02:06:00.480> just<02:06:00.639> still<02:06:00.880> uncertain<02:06:01.599> is 02:06:01.990 --> 02:06:02.000 align:start position:0% but I'm just I'm just still uncertain is 02:06:02.000 --> 02:06:03.910 align:start position:0% but I'm just I'm just still uncertain is my<02:06:02.239> reason<02:06:02.480> why<02:06:02.719> I'm<02:06:02.960> still<02:06:03.119> got<02:06:03.280> a<02:06:03.440> lot<02:06:03.599> I<02:06:03.760> want 02:06:03.910 --> 02:06:03.920 align:start position:0% my reason why I'm still got a lot I want 02:06:03.920 --> 02:06:05.510 align:start position:0% my reason why I'm still got a lot I want to<02:06:04.080> compare<02:06:04.400> before<02:06:04.639> next<02:06:04.880> month<02:06:05.119> but 02:06:05.510 --> 02:06:05.520 align:start position:0% to compare before next month but 02:06:05.520 --> 02:06:07.510 align:start position:0% to compare before next month but >> and<02:06:05.760> I<02:06:06.000> abstain 02:06:07.510 --> 02:06:07.520 align:start position:0% >> and I abstain 02:06:07.520 --> 02:06:11.350 align:start position:0% >> and I abstain >> okay<02:06:08.159> so<02:06:08.480> that<02:06:08.800> passed<02:06:09.440> three 02:06:11.350 --> 02:06:11.360 align:start position:0% >> okay so that passed three 02:06:11.360 --> 02:06:14.149 align:start position:0% >> okay so that passed three two<02:06:11.679> one<02:06:11.920> abstension<02:06:12.880> by<02:06:13.119> board<02:06:13.440> member<02:06:13.679> green 02:06:14.149 --> 02:06:14.159 align:start position:0% two one abstension by board member green 02:06:14.159 --> 02:06:16.390 align:start position:0% two one abstension by board member green and<02:06:14.480> one<02:06:14.719> no<02:06:14.960> by<02:06:15.199> board<02:06:15.440> member<02:06:15.679> Earl<02:06:16.080> so<02:06:16.239> it 02:06:16.390 --> 02:06:16.400 align:start position:0% and one no by board member Earl so it 02:06:16.400 --> 02:06:18.470 align:start position:0% and one no by board member Earl so it passed<02:06:16.719> with<02:06:16.880> board<02:06:17.119> member<02:06:17.360> Wood<02:06:17.840> real<02:06:18.239> and 02:06:18.470 --> 02:06:18.480 align:start position:0% passed with board member Wood real and 02:06:18.480 --> 02:06:19.990 align:start position:0% passed with board member Wood real and Brenton 02:06:19.990 --> 02:06:20.000 align:start position:0% Brenton 02:06:20.000 --> 02:06:23.589 align:start position:0% Brenton And<02:06:20.239> then<02:06:20.639> we<02:06:20.960> have<02:06:21.199> a<02:06:22.480> a<02:06:22.719> motion<02:06:23.040> for<02:06:23.280> unless 02:06:23.589 --> 02:06:23.599 align:start position:0% And then we have a a motion for unless 02:06:23.599 --> 02:06:28.070 align:start position:0% And then we have a a motion for unless there's<02:06:23.840> any<02:06:24.000> other<02:06:24.239> amendments<02:06:24.880> people<02:06:25.199> had. 02:06:28.070 --> 02:06:28.080 align:start position:0% there's any other amendments people had. 02:06:28.080 --> 02:06:31.189 align:start position:0% there's any other amendments people had. Let<02:06:28.320> me<02:06:28.480> do<02:06:28.560> a<02:06:28.719> quick<02:06:28.880> look<02:06:29.040> at<02:06:29.199> my<02:06:29.440> notes<02:06:29.840> here. 02:06:31.189 --> 02:06:31.199 align:start position:0% Let me do a quick look at my notes here. 02:06:31.199 --> 02:06:33.510 align:start position:0% Let me do a quick look at my notes here. I<02:06:31.440> did<02:06:31.679> have<02:06:31.920> one 02:06:33.510 --> 02:06:33.520 align:start position:0% I did have one 02:06:33.520 --> 02:06:36.550 align:start position:0% I did have one recommendation,<02:06:34.159> but<02:06:34.400> I<02:06:34.639> think 02:06:36.550 --> 02:06:36.560 align:start position:0% recommendation, but I think 02:06:36.560 --> 02:06:41.030 align:start position:0% recommendation, but I think I've<02:06:36.880> long<02:06:37.920> exited<02:06:38.320> out<02:06:38.480> of<02:06:38.560> wherever<02:06:38.880> I<02:06:39.119> was. 02:06:41.030 --> 02:06:41.040 align:start position:0% I've long exited out of wherever I was. 02:06:41.040 --> 02:06:43.910 align:start position:0% I've long exited out of wherever I was. So,<02:06:41.599> okay.<02:06:42.560> Is<02:06:42.800> there<02:06:42.960> a<02:06:43.119> a<02:06:43.440> motion<02:06:43.679> that 02:06:43.910 --> 02:06:43.920 align:start position:0% So, okay. Is there a a motion that 02:06:43.920 --> 02:06:47.270 align:start position:0% So, okay. Is there a a motion that anybody<02:06:44.320> wants<02:06:44.480> to<02:06:44.639> move<02:06:44.800> forward? 02:06:47.270 --> 02:06:47.280 align:start position:0% anybody wants to move forward? 02:06:47.280 --> 02:06:49.510 align:start position:0% anybody wants to move forward? motion<02:06:47.840> that<02:06:48.400> Representative<02:06:48.880> Welton<02:06:49.280> comes 02:06:49.510 --> 02:06:49.520 align:start position:0% motion that Representative Welton comes 02:06:49.520 --> 02:06:52.149 align:start position:0% motion that Representative Welton comes in<02:06:49.840> and<02:06:50.079> we<02:06:50.320> explain<02:06:50.639> to<02:06:50.719> him<02:06:50.960> how<02:06:51.199> many<02:06:51.360> rules 02:06:52.149 --> 02:06:52.159 align:start position:0% in and we explain to him how many rules 02:06:52.159 --> 02:06:54.149 align:start position:0% in and we explain to him how many rules are<02:06:52.400> impacted<02:06:52.960> every<02:06:53.199> time<02:06:53.360> he<02:06:53.599> passes<02:06:53.920> a 02:06:54.149 --> 02:06:54.159 align:start position:0% are impacted every time he passes a 02:06:54.159 --> 02:06:55.830 align:start position:0% are impacted every time he passes a bill. 02:06:55.830 --> 02:06:55.840 align:start position:0% bill. 02:06:55.840 --> 02:06:56.790 align:start position:0% bill. >> I'm<02:06:56.079> joking. 02:06:56.790 --> 02:06:56.800 align:start position:0% >> I'm joking. 02:06:56.800 --> 02:06:59.830 align:start position:0% >> I'm joking. >> I<02:06:57.599> tell<02:06:57.760> him<02:06:57.920> that<02:06:58.159> personally<02:06:58.960> out<02:06:59.040> of<02:06:59.119> order. 02:06:59.830 --> 02:06:59.840 align:start position:0% >> I tell him that personally out of order. 02:06:59.840 --> 02:07:02.870 align:start position:0% >> I tell him that personally out of order. >> I<02:07:00.079> can<02:07:00.239> tell<02:07:00.480> him<02:07:00.560> that<02:07:00.800> personally.<02:07:02.000> Um<02:07:02.639> just 02:07:02.870 --> 02:07:02.880 align:start position:0% >> I can tell him that personally. Um just 02:07:02.880 --> 02:07:05.990 align:start position:0% >> I can tell him that personally. Um just a<02:07:03.119> motion<02:07:03.920> that<02:07:04.480> the 02:07:05.990 --> 02:07:06.000 align:start position:0% a motion that the 02:07:06.000 --> 02:07:09.669 align:start position:0% a motion that the committee<02:07:06.560> approve<02:07:07.119> R277404 02:07:09.669 --> 02:07:09.679 align:start position:0% committee approve R277404 02:07:09.679 --> 02:07:11.350 align:start position:0% committee approve R277404 requirements<02:07:10.159> for<02:07:10.400> assessment<02:07:10.880> of<02:07:11.040> student 02:07:11.350 --> 02:07:11.360 align:start position:0% requirements for assessment of student 02:07:11.360 --> 02:07:13.990 align:start position:0% requirements for assessment of student achievement<02:07:12.239> draft<02:07:12.639> one<02:07:12.960> as<02:07:13.199> amended<02:07:13.760> on 02:07:13.990 --> 02:07:14.000 align:start position:0% achievement draft one as amended on 02:07:14.000 --> 02:07:15.830 align:start position:0% achievement draft one as amended on first<02:07:14.239> reading<02:07:14.560> and<02:07:14.639> forward<02:07:14.960> to<02:07:15.119> the<02:07:15.440> board 02:07:15.830 --> 02:07:15.840 align:start position:0% first reading and forward to the board 02:07:15.840 --> 02:07:17.830 align:start position:0% first reading and forward to the board for<02:07:16.159> cons<02:07:16.560> continuation<02:07:17.119> and<02:07:17.280> approval<02:07:17.599> on 02:07:17.830 --> 02:07:17.840 align:start position:0% for cons continuation and approval on 02:07:17.840 --> 02:07:19.510 align:start position:0% for cons continuation and approval on second<02:07:18.079> and<02:07:18.239> final<02:07:18.480> reading. 02:07:19.510 --> 02:07:19.520 align:start position:0% second and final reading. 02:07:19.520 --> 02:07:22.629 align:start position:0% second and final reading. >> Okay.<02:07:19.920> Any<02:07:20.239> discussion? 02:07:22.629 --> 02:07:22.639 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Any discussion? 02:07:22.639 --> 02:07:23.990 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Any discussion? Okay.<02:07:22.880> Okay.<02:07:23.119> The<02:07:23.199> motion<02:07:23.440> for<02:07:23.599> the<02:07:23.760> committee 02:07:23.990 --> 02:07:24.000 align:start position:0% Okay. Okay. The motion for the committee 02:07:24.000 --> 02:07:25.350 align:start position:0% Okay. Okay. The motion for the committee is<02:07:24.159> that<02:07:24.320> the<02:07:24.480> committee<02:07:24.800> continue<02:07:25.119> and 02:07:25.350 --> 02:07:25.360 align:start position:0% is that the committee continue and 02:07:25.360 --> 02:07:28.310 align:start position:0% is that the committee continue and approve<02:07:25.679> R277404 02:07:28.310 --> 02:07:28.320 align:start position:0% approve R277404 02:07:28.320 --> 02:07:31.030 align:start position:0% approve R277404 requirements<02:07:28.880> for<02:07:29.520> assessments<02:07:30.159> of<02:07:30.639> student 02:07:31.030 --> 02:07:31.040 align:start position:0% requirements for assessments of student 02:07:31.040 --> 02:07:33.750 align:start position:0% requirements for assessments of student achievement<02:07:31.599> draft<02:07:31.920> 1<02:07:32.239> as<02:07:32.560> amended<02:07:33.360> on<02:07:33.599> first 02:07:33.750 --> 02:07:33.760 align:start position:0% achievement draft 1 as amended on first 02:07:33.760 --> 02:07:35.030 align:start position:0% achievement draft 1 as amended on first reading<02:07:34.079> and<02:07:34.159> forward<02:07:34.400> to<02:07:34.560> the<02:07:34.639> board<02:07:34.800> for 02:07:35.030 --> 02:07:35.040 align:start position:0% reading and forward to the board for 02:07:35.040 --> 02:07:36.790 align:start position:0% reading and forward to the board for continuation<02:07:35.599> approval<02:07:36.000> on<02:07:36.239> second<02:07:36.560> and 02:07:36.790 --> 02:07:36.800 align:start position:0% continuation approval on second and 02:07:36.800 --> 02:07:39.510 align:start position:0% continuation approval on second and final<02:07:37.119> reading.<02:07:37.920> All<02:07:38.159> those<02:07:38.400> in<02:07:38.560> favor 02:07:39.510 --> 02:07:39.520 align:start position:0% final reading. All those in favor 02:07:39.520 --> 02:07:40.310 align:start position:0% final reading. All those in favor >> I 02:07:40.310 --> 02:07:40.320 align:start position:0% >> I 02:07:40.320 --> 02:07:42.229 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 02:07:42.229 --> 02:07:42.239 align:start position:0% >> I 02:07:42.239 --> 02:07:43.430 align:start position:0% >> I abstained. 02:07:43.430 --> 02:07:43.440 align:start position:0% abstained. 02:07:43.440 --> 02:07:47.669 align:start position:0% abstained. >> And<02:07:44.239> I'm<02:07:44.560> I'm<02:07:44.960> going<02:07:45.040> to<02:07:45.199> do<02:07:45.360> no.<02:07:46.560> So<02:07:47.119> that 02:07:47.669 --> 02:07:47.679 align:start position:0% >> And I'm I'm going to do no. So that 02:07:47.679 --> 02:07:49.669 align:start position:0% >> And I'm I'm going to do no. So that passes.<02:07:48.480> Three<02:07:48.800> in<02:07:48.960> favor.<02:07:49.280> Board<02:07:49.440> member 02:07:49.669 --> 02:07:49.679 align:start position:0% passes. Three in favor. Board member 02:07:49.679 --> 02:07:52.470 align:start position:0% passes. Three in favor. Board member Wood,<02:07:50.000> Real,<02:07:50.400> and<02:07:50.880> Brenton.<02:07:52.000> Board<02:07:52.239> member 02:07:52.470 --> 02:07:52.480 align:start position:0% Wood, Real, and Brenton. Board member 02:07:52.480 --> 02:07:54.550 align:start position:0% Wood, Real, and Brenton. Board member Earl<02:07:52.800> is<02:07:52.880> a<02:07:53.119> no<02:07:53.280> and<02:07:53.520> board<02:07:53.840> member<02:07:54.079> Green<02:07:54.400> is 02:07:54.550 --> 02:07:54.560 align:start position:0% Earl is a no and board member Green is 02:07:54.560 --> 02:07:56.629 align:start position:0% Earl is a no and board member Green is an<02:07:54.719> abstension.<02:07:55.679> And<02:07:55.840> I<02:07:56.000> think<02:07:56.159> I've<02:07:56.400> just<02:07:56.480> got 02:07:56.629 --> 02:07:56.639 align:start position:0% an abstension. And I think I've just got 02:07:56.639 --> 02:07:59.030 align:start position:0% an abstension. And I think I've just got to<02:07:56.719> get<02:07:56.800> a<02:07:56.960> little<02:07:57.040> bit<02:07:57.199> more<02:07:57.360> information<02:07:58.800> to 02:07:59.030 --> 02:07:59.040 align:start position:0% to get a little bit more information to 02:07:59.040 --> 02:08:01.350 align:start position:0% to get a little bit more information to make<02:07:59.199> sure.<02:08:00.159> So,<02:08:00.400> thank<02:08:00.560> you<02:08:00.719> for<02:08:00.880> the<02:08:01.040> work<02:08:01.199> on 02:08:01.350 --> 02:08:01.360 align:start position:0% make sure. So, thank you for the work on 02:08:01.360 --> 02:08:04.709 align:start position:0% make sure. So, thank you for the work on that.<02:08:01.840> Okay.<02:08:03.040> Um,<02:08:03.520> let's<02:08:03.840> see<02:08:04.000> what<02:08:04.239> is<02:08:04.480> next 02:08:04.709 --> 02:08:04.719 align:start position:0% that. Okay. Um, let's see what is next 02:08:04.719 --> 02:08:08.310 align:start position:0% that. Okay. Um, let's see what is next on<02:08:05.040> our<02:08:05.280> agenda. 02:08:08.310 --> 02:08:08.320 align:start position:0% 02:08:08.320 --> 02:08:10.470 align:start position:0% Next<02:08:08.639> item<02:08:08.960> is<02:08:09.199> the<02:08:09.440> targeted<02:08:09.920> standards 02:08:10.470 --> 02:08:10.480 align:start position:0% Next item is the targeted standards 02:08:10.480 --> 02:08:16.870 align:start position:0% Next item is the targeted standards review<02:08:11.360> secondary<02:08:12.000> social<02:08:12.400> studies. 02:08:16.870 --> 02:08:16.880 align:start position:0% 02:08:16.880 --> 02:08:22.550 align:start position:0% And<02:08:17.199> who<02:08:17.440> is<02:08:17.679> presenting<02:08:18.320> this<02:08:18.639> for<02:08:18.880> us? 02:08:22.550 --> 02:08:22.560 align:start position:0% 02:08:22.560 --> 02:08:24.229 align:start position:0% I'm<02:08:22.719> guessing<02:08:23.040> me. 02:08:24.229 --> 02:08:24.239 align:start position:0% I'm guessing me. 02:08:24.239 --> 02:08:26.149 align:start position:0% I'm guessing me. >> Okay, 02:08:26.149 --> 02:08:26.159 align:start position:0% >> Okay, 02:08:26.159 --> 02:08:27.910 align:start position:0% >> Okay, we're<02:08:26.400> gonna<02:08:26.639> say<02:08:26.800> yes<02:08:26.960> on<02:08:27.199> that. 02:08:27.910 --> 02:08:27.920 align:start position:0% we're gonna say yes on that. 02:08:27.920 --> 02:08:30.310 align:start position:0% we're gonna say yes on that. >> Okay,<02:08:28.239> great.<02:08:28.960> Um,<02:08:29.280> Megan<02:08:29.679> Ever,<02:08:30.079> director 02:08:30.310 --> 02:08:30.320 align:start position:0% >> Okay, great. Um, Megan Ever, director 02:08:30.320 --> 02:08:32.790 align:start position:0% >> Okay, great. Um, Megan Ever, director for<02:08:30.560> teaching<02:08:30.800> and<02:08:30.960> learning.<02:08:31.840> So,<02:08:32.400> due<02:08:32.639> to 02:08:32.790 --> 02:08:32.800 align:start position:0% for teaching and learning. So, due to 02:08:32.800 --> 02:08:36.149 align:start position:0% for teaching and learning. So, due to the<02:08:32.960> passage<02:08:33.360> of<02:08:33.760> HB<02:08:34.719> 312,<02:08:35.520> there<02:08:35.760> are<02:08:35.920> some 02:08:36.149 --> 02:08:36.159 align:start position:0% the passage of HB 312, there are some 02:08:36.159 --> 02:08:39.910 align:start position:0% the passage of HB 312, there are some specific<02:08:37.119> topics<02:08:37.840> and<02:08:38.320> concepts<02:08:38.960> in<02:08:39.599> social 02:08:39.910 --> 02:08:39.920 align:start position:0% specific topics and concepts in social 02:08:39.920 --> 02:08:41.750 align:start position:0% specific topics and concepts in social studies<02:08:40.320> that<02:08:40.560> need<02:08:40.719> to<02:08:40.880> be<02:08:41.040> added<02:08:41.280> to<02:08:41.440> our 02:08:41.750 --> 02:08:41.760 align:start position:0% studies that need to be added to our 02:08:41.760 --> 02:08:45.910 align:start position:0% studies that need to be added to our secondary<02:08:42.320> standards.<02:08:43.599> Um<02:08:44.400> the<02:08:44.719> reason<02:08:45.520> that 02:08:45.910 --> 02:08:45.920 align:start position:0% secondary standards. Um the reason that 02:08:45.920 --> 02:08:48.069 align:start position:0% secondary standards. Um the reason that we<02:08:46.239> are<02:08:46.480> submitting<02:08:46.880> both<02:08:47.199> what<02:08:47.440> a<02:08:47.679> full 02:08:48.069 --> 02:08:48.079 align:start position:0% we are submitting both what a full 02:08:48.079 --> 02:08:50.310 align:start position:0% we are submitting both what a full review<02:08:48.560> and<02:08:48.880> what<02:08:49.040> a<02:08:49.280> targeted<02:08:49.760> review<02:08:50.079> might 02:08:50.310 --> 02:08:50.320 align:start position:0% review and what a targeted review might 02:08:50.320 --> 02:08:54.069 align:start position:0% review and what a targeted review might look<02:08:50.560> like<02:08:51.199> is<02:08:51.520> because<02:08:52.480> the<02:08:53.599> uh<02:08:53.760> bill 02:08:54.069 --> 02:08:54.079 align:start position:0% look like is because the uh bill 02:08:54.079 --> 02:08:56.550 align:start position:0% look like is because the uh bill requires<02:08:54.560> this<02:08:54.800> to<02:08:55.040> be<02:08:55.440> ready<02:08:55.679> for<02:08:56.000> teachers 02:08:56.550 --> 02:08:56.560 align:start position:0% requires this to be ready for teachers 02:08:56.560 --> 02:09:00.069 align:start position:0% requires this to be ready for teachers in<02:08:56.960> fall<02:08:57.199> of<02:08:57.520> 2028.<02:08:58.880> Um<02:08:59.199> it<02:08:59.440> is<02:08:59.679> currently 02:09:00.069 --> 02:09:00.079 align:start position:0% in fall of 2028. Um it is currently 02:09:00.079 --> 02:09:04.229 align:start position:0% in fall of 2028. Um it is currently summer<02:09:00.400> of<02:09:00.639> 2026.<02:09:01.840> So<02:09:02.480> that<02:09:02.719> would<02:09:02.960> be<02:09:03.360> a<02:09:03.679> very 02:09:04.229 --> 02:09:04.239 align:start position:0% summer of 2026. So that would be a very 02:09:04.239 --> 02:09:09.189 align:start position:0% summer of 2026. So that would be a very fast<02:09:05.040> full<02:09:05.440> review<02:09:06.639> um<02:09:08.079> given<02:09:08.719> kind<02:09:08.880> of<02:09:08.960> the 02:09:09.189 --> 02:09:09.199 align:start position:0% fast full review um given kind of the 02:09:09.199 --> 02:09:11.350 align:start position:0% fast full review um given kind of the length<02:09:09.440> of<02:09:09.599> time<02:09:09.760> that<02:09:10.159> full<02:09:10.480> reviews<02:09:10.960> have 02:09:11.350 --> 02:09:11.360 align:start position:0% length of time that full reviews have 02:09:11.360 --> 02:09:14.709 align:start position:0% length of time that full reviews have taken<02:09:12.639> in<02:09:12.960> the<02:09:13.119> last<02:09:13.679> in<02:09:13.920> the<02:09:14.079> last<02:09:14.320> couple<02:09:14.480> of 02:09:14.709 --> 02:09:14.719 align:start position:0% taken in the last in the last couple of 02:09:14.719 --> 02:09:17.990 align:start position:0% taken in the last in the last couple of iterations.<02:09:15.760> And<02:09:16.000> so<02:09:16.159> what<02:09:16.320> we<02:09:16.560> did<02:09:16.719> was<02:09:17.040> took 02:09:17.990 --> 02:09:18.000 align:start position:0% iterations. And so what we did was took 02:09:18.000 --> 02:09:20.390 align:start position:0% iterations. And so what we did was took um<02:09:18.079> what<02:09:18.320> a<02:09:18.560> targeted<02:09:19.280> timeline<02:09:19.840> might<02:09:20.159> look 02:09:20.390 --> 02:09:20.400 align:start position:0% um what a targeted timeline might look 02:09:20.400 --> 02:09:22.149 align:start position:0% um what a targeted timeline might look like<02:09:20.560> and<02:09:20.800> what<02:09:20.960> a<02:09:21.119> full<02:09:21.360> timeline<02:09:21.760> might<02:09:22.000> look 02:09:22.149 --> 02:09:22.159 align:start position:0% like and what a full timeline might look 02:09:22.159 --> 02:09:25.030 align:start position:0% like and what a full timeline might look like<02:09:22.320> and<02:09:22.639> kind<02:09:22.800> of<02:09:22.880> put<02:09:23.920> uh<02:09:24.159> forward<02:09:24.639> both<02:09:24.880> of 02:09:25.030 --> 02:09:25.040 align:start position:0% like and kind of put uh forward both of 02:09:25.040 --> 02:09:27.910 align:start position:0% like and kind of put uh forward both of those<02:09:25.360> for<02:09:26.000> consideration.<02:09:27.199> will<02:09:27.440> obviously 02:09:27.910 --> 02:09:27.920 align:start position:0% those for consideration. will obviously 02:09:27.920 --> 02:09:30.390 align:start position:0% those for consideration. will obviously get<02:09:28.079> done<02:09:28.400> whichever<02:09:28.800> one<02:09:29.840> um<02:09:29.920> the<02:09:30.159> board 02:09:30.390 --> 02:09:30.400 align:start position:0% get done whichever one um the board 02:09:30.400 --> 02:09:33.589 align:start position:0% get done whichever one um the board decides<02:09:30.800> to<02:09:30.960> move<02:09:31.119> forward<02:09:31.440> with.<02:09:32.000> But<02:09:32.560> um<02:09:33.360> but 02:09:33.589 --> 02:09:33.599 align:start position:0% decides to move forward with. But um but 02:09:33.599 --> 02:09:35.830 align:start position:0% decides to move forward with. But um but that's<02:09:33.840> why<02:09:34.000> you<02:09:34.159> see<02:09:34.320> a<02:09:34.560> couple<02:09:34.719> different 02:09:35.830 --> 02:09:35.840 align:start position:0% that's why you see a couple different 02:09:35.840 --> 02:09:37.510 align:start position:0% that's why you see a couple different couple<02:09:36.159> different<02:09:36.480> timelines<02:09:37.040> there<02:09:37.280> to 02:09:37.510 --> 02:09:37.520 align:start position:0% couple different timelines there to 02:09:37.520 --> 02:09:39.830 align:start position:0% couple different timelines there to consider.<02:09:38.480> Um<02:09:38.880> the<02:09:39.119> social<02:09:39.440> studies 02:09:39.830 --> 02:09:39.840 align:start position:0% consider. Um the social studies 02:09:39.840 --> 02:09:42.149 align:start position:0% consider. Um the social studies standards<02:09:40.400> for<02:09:40.800> high<02:09:41.119> school<02:09:41.520> were<02:09:41.760> last 02:09:42.149 --> 02:09:42.159 align:start position:0% standards for high school were last 02:09:42.159 --> 02:09:44.629 align:start position:0% standards for high school were last reddone<02:09:42.800> about<02:09:43.119> 10<02:09:43.440> years<02:09:43.599> ago.<02:09:44.079> So<02:09:44.239> it<02:09:44.480> has 02:09:44.629 --> 02:09:44.639 align:start position:0% reddone about 10 years ago. So it has 02:09:44.639 --> 02:09:47.750 align:start position:0% reddone about 10 years ago. So it has been<02:09:44.800> a<02:09:45.040> minute.<02:09:45.599> Um<02:09:45.920> the<02:09:46.239> K6<02:09:47.040> standards<02:09:47.599> were 02:09:47.750 --> 02:09:47.760 align:start position:0% been a minute. Um the K6 standards were 02:09:47.760 --> 02:09:51.910 align:start position:0% been a minute. Um the K6 standards were done<02:09:48.159> more<02:09:48.480> recently.<02:09:49.840> Um<02:09:50.560> and<02:09:50.880> then<02:09:51.520> our 02:09:51.910 --> 02:09:51.920 align:start position:0% done more recently. Um and then our 02:09:51.920 --> 02:09:53.830 align:start position:0% done more recently. Um and then our social<02:09:52.239> studies<02:09:52.560> specialist<02:09:53.040> Joanna 02:09:53.830 --> 02:09:53.840 align:start position:0% social studies specialist Joanna 02:09:53.840 --> 02:09:57.669 align:start position:0% social studies specialist Joanna Sorenson<02:09:54.560> went<02:09:54.880> through<02:09:55.599> and<02:09:56.800> um<02:09:57.040> took<02:09:57.360> the 02:09:57.669 --> 02:09:57.679 align:start position:0% Sorenson went through and um took the 02:09:57.679 --> 02:10:00.870 align:start position:0% Sorenson went through and um took the things<02:09:57.840> that<02:09:58.079> are<02:09:58.320> required<02:09:58.880> in<02:09:59.199> the<02:09:59.360> new<02:10:00.639> uh 02:10:00.870 --> 02:10:00.880 align:start position:0% things that are required in the new uh 02:10:00.880 --> 02:10:02.709 align:start position:0% things that are required in the new uh legislation<02:10:01.599> and<02:10:01.920> looked<02:10:02.079> at<02:10:02.239> our<02:10:02.480> current 02:10:02.709 --> 02:10:02.719 align:start position:0% legislation and looked at our current 02:10:02.719 --> 02:10:04.629 align:start position:0% legislation and looked at our current standards<02:10:03.199> and<02:10:03.440> made<02:10:03.679> some<02:10:03.920> suggestions. 02:10:04.629 --> 02:10:04.639 align:start position:0% standards and made some suggestions. 02:10:04.639 --> 02:10:07.350 align:start position:0% standards and made some suggestions. They<02:10:04.880> are<02:10:05.040> not<02:10:06.000> what<02:10:06.320> the<02:10:06.560> writing<02:10:06.960> committee 02:10:07.350 --> 02:10:07.360 align:start position:0% They are not what the writing committee 02:10:07.360 --> 02:10:09.109 align:start position:0% They are not what the writing committee would<02:10:07.599> have<02:10:07.840> or<02:10:08.079> the<02:10:08.320> board<02:10:08.480> would<02:10:08.719> have<02:10:08.800> to<02:10:08.960> go 02:10:09.109 --> 02:10:09.119 align:start position:0% would have or the board would have to go 02:10:09.119 --> 02:10:12.310 align:start position:0% would have or the board would have to go with.<02:10:09.760> Um<02:10:10.480> but<02:10:10.800> what<02:10:11.040> it<02:10:11.280> could<02:10:11.520> look<02:10:11.760> like<02:10:12.000> if 02:10:12.310 --> 02:10:12.320 align:start position:0% with. Um but what it could look like if 02:10:12.320 --> 02:10:15.189 align:start position:0% with. Um but what it could look like if a<02:10:12.480> targeted<02:10:13.440> revision<02:10:14.000> were<02:10:14.239> to<02:10:14.400> happen.<02:10:15.040> um 02:10:15.189 --> 02:10:15.199 align:start position:0% a targeted revision were to happen. um 02:10:15.199 --> 02:10:16.870 align:start position:0% a targeted revision were to happen. um what<02:10:15.440> we<02:10:15.679> currently<02:10:16.000> have<02:10:16.159> in<02:10:16.320> the<02:10:16.480> standards, 02:10:16.870 --> 02:10:16.880 align:start position:0% what we currently have in the standards, 02:10:16.880 --> 02:10:19.030 align:start position:0% what we currently have in the standards, what<02:10:17.040> pieces<02:10:17.440> were<02:10:17.679> currently<02:10:18.079> missing,<02:10:18.800> and 02:10:19.030 --> 02:10:19.040 align:start position:0% what pieces were currently missing, and 02:10:19.040 --> 02:10:24.950 align:start position:0% what pieces were currently missing, and where<02:10:19.199> they<02:10:19.360> might<02:10:19.599> get<02:10:19.760> inserted. 02:10:24.950 --> 02:10:24.960 align:start position:0% 02:10:24.960 --> 02:10:30.390 align:start position:0% All right.<02:10:25.679> Um 02:10:30.390 --> 02:10:30.400 align:start position:0% 02:10:30.400 --> 02:10:33.270 align:start position:0% any<02:10:30.880> discussion<02:10:31.360> to<02:10:31.599> this?<02:10:32.159> I<02:10:32.719> have<02:10:32.880> a<02:10:33.040> pretty 02:10:33.270 --> 02:10:33.280 align:start position:0% any discussion to this? I have a pretty 02:10:33.280 --> 02:10:36.870 align:start position:0% any discussion to this? I have a pretty good<02:10:33.440> idea<02:10:33.679> where<02:10:34.000> I'd<02:10:34.320> like<02:10:34.480> to<02:10:34.639> head,<02:10:35.040> but<02:10:36.400> um 02:10:36.870 --> 02:10:36.880 align:start position:0% good idea where I'd like to head, but um 02:10:36.880 --> 02:10:38.310 align:start position:0% good idea where I'd like to head, but um I'll<02:10:37.119> kind<02:10:37.199> of<02:10:37.280> leave<02:10:37.440> it<02:10:37.599> open<02:10:37.760> if<02:10:38.000> anybody 02:10:38.310 --> 02:10:38.320 align:start position:0% I'll kind of leave it open if anybody 02:10:38.320 --> 02:10:41.830 align:start position:0% I'll kind of leave it open if anybody else<02:10:38.560> wants<02:10:38.880> to 02:10:41.830 --> 02:10:41.840 align:start position:0% else wants to 02:10:41.840 --> 02:10:46.310 align:start position:0% else wants to share<02:10:42.159> any<02:10:42.400> thoughts<02:10:42.639> here. 02:10:46.310 --> 02:10:46.320 align:start position:0% 02:10:46.320 --> 02:10:48.229 align:start position:0% Board<02:10:46.560> member<02:10:46.800> Britain,<02:10:47.280> are<02:10:47.440> you<02:10:47.920> are<02:10:48.079> you 02:10:48.229 --> 02:10:48.239 align:start position:0% Board member Britain, are you are you 02:10:48.239 --> 02:10:50.470 align:start position:0% Board member Britain, are you are you just<02:10:48.880> unmuted? 02:10:50.470 --> 02:10:50.480 align:start position:0% just unmuted? 02:10:50.480 --> 02:10:52.709 align:start position:0% just unmuted? >> Sorry.<02:10:50.880> Yeah,<02:10:51.040> I'm<02:10:51.199> just<02:10:51.360> unmuted.<02:10:52.159> Sorry. 02:10:52.709 --> 02:10:52.719 align:start position:0% >> Sorry. Yeah, I'm just unmuted. Sorry. 02:10:52.719 --> 02:10:56.629 align:start position:0% >> Sorry. Yeah, I'm just unmuted. Sorry. >> Okay.<02:10:53.520> I<02:10:54.560> I<02:10:54.719> I<02:10:55.360> would<02:10:55.520> like<02:10:55.679> to<02:10:55.840> re<02:10:56.159> make<02:10:56.400> the 02:10:56.629 --> 02:10:56.639 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I I I would like to re make the 02:10:56.639 --> 02:10:58.790 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I I I would like to re make the recommendation<02:10:57.199> that<02:10:57.520> on<02:10:57.679> the<02:10:58.159> elementary, 02:10:58.790 --> 02:10:58.800 align:start position:0% recommendation that on the elementary, 02:10:58.800 --> 02:11:02.229 align:start position:0% recommendation that on the elementary, that's<02:10:59.040> the<02:10:59.280> K<02:10:59.599> through<02:11:00.000> six,<02:11:01.440> we<02:11:01.679> look<02:11:01.840> at<02:11:02.000> a 02:11:02.229 --> 02:11:02.239 align:start position:0% that's the K through six, we look at a 02:11:02.239 --> 02:11:07.990 align:start position:0% that's the K through six, we look at a targeted<02:11:03.280> um<02:11:04.639> a<02:11:04.880> targeted<02:11:05.440> review. 02:11:07.990 --> 02:11:08.000 align:start position:0% targeted um a targeted review. 02:11:08.000 --> 02:11:13.430 align:start position:0% targeted um a targeted review. and<02:11:08.239> on<02:11:08.480> the<02:11:09.679> 7th<02:11:10.159> through<02:11:10.800> 12th<02:11:11.599> that<02:11:12.000> we 02:11:13.430 --> 02:11:13.440 align:start position:0% and on the 7th through 12th that we 02:11:13.440 --> 02:11:17.189 align:start position:0% and on the 7th through 12th that we engage<02:11:14.000> in<02:11:14.239> a<02:11:15.119> um<02:11:16.159> in<02:11:16.400> a<02:11:16.560> review<02:11:16.800> of<02:11:16.960> the 02:11:17.189 --> 02:11:17.199 align:start position:0% engage in a um in a review of the 02:11:17.199 --> 02:11:23.910 align:start position:0% engage in a um in a review of the standards,<02:11:18.079> a<02:11:18.320> more<02:11:18.560> formal<02:11:18.960> review. 02:11:23.910 --> 02:11:23.920 align:start position:0% 02:11:23.920 --> 02:11:25.669 align:start position:0% So<02:11:24.079> in<02:11:24.320> the<02:11:24.400> elementary<02:11:24.880> grades,<02:11:25.280> that's<02:11:25.520> the 02:11:25.669 --> 02:11:25.679 align:start position:0% So in the elementary grades, that's the 02:11:25.679 --> 02:11:27.430 align:start position:0% So in the elementary grades, that's the K<02:11:25.920> through 02:11:27.430 --> 02:11:27.440 align:start position:0% K through 02:11:27.440 --> 02:11:30.870 align:start position:0% K through sixth<02:11:27.760> grade 02:11:30.870 --> 02:11:30.880 align:start position:0% 02:11:30.880 --> 02:11:33.270 align:start position:0% that<02:11:31.119> we<02:11:31.280> do<02:11:31.440> a<02:11:31.599> targeted<02:11:32.079> review<02:11:32.320> and<02:11:32.480> on<02:11:32.719> the 02:11:33.270 --> 02:11:33.280 align:start position:0% that we do a targeted review and on the 02:11:33.280 --> 02:11:40.310 align:start position:0% that we do a targeted review and on the older<02:11:33.679> grades<02:11:33.920> that<02:11:34.159> we<02:11:34.320> do<02:11:34.400> a<02:11:34.639> full<02:11:35.280> review. 02:11:40.310 --> 02:11:40.320 align:start position:0% 02:11:40.320 --> 02:11:42.229 align:start position:0% Yeah,<02:11:40.560> I<02:11:40.800> would<02:11:40.880> just<02:11:41.040> like<02:11:41.199> to<02:11:41.520> I'll<02:11:41.840> speak<02:11:42.000> in 02:11:42.229 --> 02:11:42.239 align:start position:0% Yeah, I would just like to I'll speak in 02:11:42.239 --> 02:11:44.709 align:start position:0% Yeah, I would just like to I'll speak in favor<02:11:42.480> of<02:11:42.639> that.<02:11:43.040> I<02:11:43.920> think<02:11:44.079> that's<02:11:44.320> a<02:11:44.560> good 02:11:44.709 --> 02:11:44.719 align:start position:0% favor of that. I think that's a good 02:11:44.719 --> 02:11:48.149 align:start position:0% favor of that. I think that's a good plan<02:11:45.679> with<02:11:46.000> these. 02:11:48.149 --> 02:11:48.159 align:start position:0% plan with these. 02:11:48.159 --> 02:11:52.550 align:start position:0% plan with these. And<02:11:48.400> for<02:11:48.639> those<02:11:48.880> who<02:11:49.280> don't 02:11:52.550 --> 02:11:52.560 align:start position:0% 02:11:52.560 --> 02:11:54.470 align:start position:0% um<02:11:52.880> obsessively<02:11:53.520> follow<02:11:53.840> along<02:11:54.079> with<02:11:54.239> our 02:11:54.470 --> 02:11:54.480 align:start position:0% um obsessively follow along with our 02:11:54.480 --> 02:11:55.990 align:start position:0% um obsessively follow along with our exciting<02:11:54.880> content<02:11:55.199> on<02:11:55.360> the<02:11:55.520> board,<02:11:55.679> it<02:11:55.920> was 02:11:55.990 --> 02:11:56.000 align:start position:0% exciting content on the board, it was 02:11:56.000 --> 02:11:59.990 align:start position:0% exciting content on the board, it was because<02:11:56.320> we<02:11:56.639> did<02:11:57.520> just<02:11:57.920> recently<02:11:58.400> do 02:11:59.990 --> 02:12:00.000 align:start position:0% because we did just recently do 02:12:00.000 --> 02:12:01.910 align:start position:0% because we did just recently do >> Yeah.<02:12:00.400> Yeah.<02:12:00.639> Right.<02:12:01.440> I<02:12:01.520> just<02:12:01.679> want<02:12:01.760> to<02:12:01.840> make 02:12:01.910 --> 02:12:01.920 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. Right. I just want to make 02:12:01.920 --> 02:12:03.030 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. Right. I just want to make sure<02:12:02.079> people<02:12:02.320> know.<02:12:02.639> Yeah. 02:12:03.030 --> 02:12:03.040 align:start position:0% sure people know. Yeah. 02:12:03.040 --> 02:12:05.430 align:start position:0% sure people know. Yeah. >> Yep.<02:12:03.360> That<02:12:03.599> is<02:12:03.840> AC<02:12:04.159> actually<02:12:04.880> they're<02:12:05.199> just 02:12:05.430 --> 02:12:05.440 align:start position:0% >> Yep. That is AC actually they're just 02:12:05.440 --> 02:12:07.910 align:start position:0% >> Yep. That is AC actually they're just now<02:12:06.000> starting<02:12:06.400> to<02:12:06.560> implement<02:12:06.960> that<02:12:07.199> this<02:12:07.520> fall 02:12:07.910 --> 02:12:07.920 align:start position:0% now starting to implement that this fall 02:12:07.920 --> 02:12:08.870 align:start position:0% now starting to implement that this fall officially.<02:12:08.400> Right. 02:12:08.870 --> 02:12:08.880 align:start position:0% officially. Right. 02:12:08.880 --> 02:12:10.550 align:start position:0% officially. Right. >> That's<02:12:09.040> why<02:12:09.119> a<02:12:09.360> targeted<02:12:09.920> review<02:12:10.159> of<02:12:10.320> that 02:12:10.550 --> 02:12:10.560 align:start position:0% >> That's why a targeted review of that 02:12:10.560 --> 02:12:11.990 align:start position:0% >> That's why a targeted review of that would<02:12:10.800> be<02:12:10.880> better<02:12:11.119> because<02:12:11.360> then<02:12:11.520> we<02:12:11.679> can<02:12:11.840> just 02:12:11.990 --> 02:12:12.000 align:start position:0% would be better because then we can just 02:12:12.000 --> 02:12:14.069 align:start position:0% would be better because then we can just adjust<02:12:12.400> based<02:12:12.639> on<02:12:12.800> the<02:12:13.119> new<02:12:13.360> laws<02:12:13.599> that<02:12:13.920> keep 02:12:14.069 --> 02:12:14.079 align:start position:0% adjust based on the new laws that keep 02:12:14.079 --> 02:12:16.790 align:start position:0% adjust based on the new laws that keep being<02:12:14.239> passed<02:12:14.480> and<02:12:14.719> then<02:12:15.520> the<02:12:16.079> 7<02:12:16.320> through<02:12:16.639> 12 02:12:16.790 --> 02:12:16.800 align:start position:0% being passed and then the 7 through 12 02:12:16.800 --> 02:12:18.229 align:start position:0% being passed and then the 7 through 12 needs<02:12:17.040> a<02:12:17.199> full<02:12:17.360> review. 02:12:18.229 --> 02:12:18.239 align:start position:0% needs a full review. 02:12:18.239 --> 02:12:18.950 align:start position:0% needs a full review. >> Yeah,<02:12:18.560> that's 02:12:18.950 --> 02:12:18.960 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's 02:12:18.960 --> 02:12:21.750 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's >> because<02:12:19.119> that<02:12:19.360> hasn't<02:12:19.599> been<02:12:19.760> done<02:12:20.000> since 02:12:21.750 --> 02:12:21.760 align:start position:0% >> because that hasn't been done since 02:12:21.760 --> 02:12:24.390 align:start position:0% >> because that hasn't been done since >> 2016<02:12:22.639> I<02:12:22.880> believe<02:12:23.280> was<02:12:23.599> okay<02:12:24.000> last 02:12:24.390 --> 02:12:24.400 align:start position:0% >> 2016 I believe was okay last 02:12:24.400 --> 02:12:27.189 align:start position:0% >> 2016 I believe was okay last implementation. 02:12:27.189 --> 02:12:27.199 align:start position:0% implementation. 02:12:27.199 --> 02:12:29.669 align:start position:0% implementation. >> So<02:12:27.440> could<02:12:28.320> what<02:12:28.560> are<02:12:28.719> those<02:12:28.960> timelines<02:12:29.440> then? 02:12:29.669 --> 02:12:29.679 align:start position:0% >> So could what are those timelines then? 02:12:29.679 --> 02:12:31.750 align:start position:0% >> So could what are those timelines then? So<02:12:29.920> we<02:12:30.079> would<02:12:30.159> do<02:12:30.320> K<02:12:30.639> through<02:12:30.880> six<02:12:31.199> first<02:12:31.520> and 02:12:31.750 --> 02:12:31.760 align:start position:0% So we would do K through six first and 02:12:31.760 --> 02:12:34.470 align:start position:0% So we would do K through six first and then<02:12:31.920> we<02:12:32.079> would<02:12:32.320> do<02:12:33.119> then<02:12:33.440> naturally<02:12:33.840> the<02:12:34.239> 7 02:12:34.470 --> 02:12:34.480 align:start position:0% then we would do then naturally the 7 02:12:34.480 --> 02:12:36.550 align:start position:0% then we would do then naturally the 7 through<02:12:34.800> 12<02:12:35.040> would<02:12:35.199> be<02:12:35.360> triggered<02:12:36.320> just 02:12:36.550 --> 02:12:36.560 align:start position:0% through 12 would be triggered just 02:12:36.560 --> 02:12:37.750 align:start position:0% through 12 would be triggered just because<02:12:36.719> of<02:12:36.880> the<02:12:37.040> time<02:12:37.199> frame.<02:12:37.440> Is<02:12:37.599> that 02:12:37.750 --> 02:12:37.760 align:start position:0% because of the time frame. Is that 02:12:37.760 --> 02:12:41.589 align:start position:0% because of the time frame. Is that right? 02:12:41.589 --> 02:12:41.599 align:start position:0% 02:12:41.599 --> 02:12:44.149 align:start position:0% >> I<02:12:41.760> think<02:12:42.159> speak<02:12:42.320> to<02:12:42.480> that<02:12:42.639> a<02:12:42.800> little<02:12:43.040> there. 02:12:44.149 --> 02:12:44.159 align:start position:0% >> I think speak to that a little there. 02:12:44.159 --> 02:12:48.709 align:start position:0% >> I think speak to that a little there. >> Yeah.<02:12:45.360> I<02:12:46.239> with<02:12:46.480> the<02:12:46.719> targeted<02:12:47.280> review<02:12:47.679> for<02:12:48.000> K6, 02:12:48.709 --> 02:12:48.719 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I with the targeted review for K6, 02:12:48.719 --> 02:12:50.790 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I with the targeted review for K6, we'll<02:12:49.040> definitely<02:12:49.440> take<02:12:49.599> a<02:12:49.840> close<02:12:50.159> look<02:12:50.480> and 02:12:50.790 --> 02:12:50.800 align:start position:0% we'll definitely take a close look and 02:12:50.800 --> 02:12:53.030 align:start position:0% we'll definitely take a close look and make<02:12:51.040> sure<02:12:51.119> that<02:12:51.360> there's<02:12:51.599> nothing<02:12:51.920> that 02:12:53.030 --> 02:12:53.040 align:start position:0% make sure that there's nothing that 02:12:53.040 --> 02:12:55.189 align:start position:0% make sure that there's nothing that needs<02:12:53.360> to<02:12:53.599> be<02:12:53.760> inserted<02:12:54.239> there.<02:12:54.719> But<02:12:54.960> in 02:12:55.189 --> 02:12:55.199 align:start position:0% needs to be inserted there. But in 02:12:55.199 --> 02:12:58.229 align:start position:0% needs to be inserted there. But in general,<02:12:55.520> we're<02:12:55.760> thinking<02:12:56.000> that<02:12:56.159> the<02:12:56.400> K6 02:12:58.229 --> 02:12:58.239 align:start position:0% general, we're thinking that the K6 02:12:58.239 --> 02:13:00.229 align:start position:0% general, we're thinking that the K6 >> most<02:12:58.480> of<02:12:58.560> the<02:12:58.719> topics<02:12:59.119> that<02:12:59.280> were<02:12:59.520> added<02:12:59.920> are 02:13:00.229 --> 02:13:00.239 align:start position:0% >> most of the topics that were added are 02:13:00.239 --> 02:13:01.830 align:start position:0% >> most of the topics that were added are really 02:13:01.830 --> 02:13:01.840 align:start position:0% really 02:13:01.840 --> 02:13:03.109 align:start position:0% really >> um 02:13:03.109 --> 02:13:03.119 align:start position:0% >> um 02:13:03.119 --> 02:13:05.430 align:start position:0% >> um >> through<02:13:03.440> 12<02:13:03.840> specific.<02:13:04.719> They're<02:13:05.040> they're 02:13:05.430 --> 02:13:05.440 align:start position:0% >> through 12 specific. They're they're 02:13:05.440 --> 02:13:07.030 align:start position:0% >> through 12 specific. They're they're much<02:13:05.679> more<02:13:05.840> likely<02:13:06.079> to<02:13:06.320> fall<02:13:06.480> in<02:13:06.639> there.<02:13:06.880> So, 02:13:07.030 --> 02:13:07.040 align:start position:0% much more likely to fall in there. So, 02:13:07.040 --> 02:13:09.270 align:start position:0% much more likely to fall in there. So, we'll<02:13:07.280> take<02:13:07.360> a<02:13:07.520> really<02:13:07.760> close<02:13:08.000> look,<02:13:08.800> but<02:13:09.040> I 02:13:09.270 --> 02:13:09.280 align:start position:0% we'll take a really close look, but I 02:13:09.280 --> 02:13:10.790 align:start position:0% we'll take a really close look, but I would<02:13:09.440> say<02:13:09.520> that<02:13:09.760> they're<02:13:10.079> kind<02:13:10.239> of<02:13:10.320> going<02:13:10.560> at 02:13:10.790 --> 02:13:10.800 align:start position:0% would say that they're kind of going at 02:13:10.800 --> 02:13:12.550 align:start position:0% would say that they're kind of going at the<02:13:10.960> same<02:13:11.119> time<02:13:11.440> or<02:13:11.760> starting<02:13:12.000> at<02:13:12.239> the<02:13:12.400> same 02:13:12.550 --> 02:13:12.560 align:start position:0% the same time or starting at the same 02:13:12.560 --> 02:13:16.069 align:start position:0% the same time or starting at the same time<02:13:12.800> at<02:13:12.800> least.<02:13:13.679> Um<02:13:14.320> it<02:13:14.639> may<02:13:14.800> be<02:13:14.960> that<02:13:15.119> that<02:13:15.760> it 02:13:16.069 --> 02:13:16.079 align:start position:0% time at least. Um it may be that that it 02:13:16.079 --> 02:13:17.750 align:start position:0% time at least. Um it may be that that it may<02:13:16.159> be<02:13:16.239> that<02:13:16.480> an<02:13:16.639> adjustment<02:13:16.960> in<02:13:17.119> the<02:13:17.280> Ksix 02:13:17.750 --> 02:13:17.760 align:start position:0% may be that an adjustment in the Ksix 02:13:17.760 --> 02:13:19.669 align:start position:0% may be that an adjustment in the Ksix isn't<02:13:18.159> even<02:13:18.400> really<02:13:18.719> warranted<02:13:19.199> at<02:13:19.440> this 02:13:19.669 --> 02:13:19.679 align:start position:0% isn't even really warranted at this 02:13:19.679 --> 02:13:21.990 align:start position:0% isn't even really warranted at this point.<02:13:20.239> Um<02:13:20.560> because<02:13:20.800> the<02:13:21.119> topics<02:13:21.440> that<02:13:21.679> they 02:13:21.990 --> 02:13:22.000 align:start position:0% point. Um because the topics that they 02:13:22.000 --> 02:13:25.030 align:start position:0% point. Um because the topics that they ask<02:13:22.400> for,<02:13:23.280> like<02:13:23.520> I<02:13:23.679> say,<02:13:24.000> are<02:13:24.400> pretty<02:13:24.800> high 02:13:25.030 --> 02:13:25.040 align:start position:0% ask for, like I say, are pretty high 02:13:25.040 --> 02:13:31.189 align:start position:0% ask for, like I say, are pretty high school<02:13:25.360> specific. 02:13:31.189 --> 02:13:31.199 align:start position:0% 02:13:31.199 --> 02:13:32.709 align:start position:0% Okay. 02:13:32.709 --> 02:13:32.719 align:start position:0% Okay. 02:13:32.719 --> 02:13:39.430 align:start position:0% Okay. Any<02:13:33.040> other<02:13:33.360> discussion<02:13:34.639> on<02:13:34.960> this<02:13:35.119> item? 02:13:39.430 --> 02:13:39.440 align:start position:0% 02:13:39.440 --> 02:13:42.550 align:start position:0% Okay.<02:13:40.480> Um<02:13:41.199> if<02:13:41.440> you<02:13:41.599> want<02:13:41.679> to<02:13:41.760> go<02:13:41.920> to<02:13:42.079> the<02:13:42.239> motion 02:13:42.550 --> 02:13:42.560 align:start position:0% Okay. Um if you want to go to the motion 02:13:42.560 --> 02:13:43.830 align:start position:0% Okay. Um if you want to go to the motion again.<02:13:42.800> And<02:13:42.960> so<02:13:43.119> the<02:13:43.280> motion<02:13:43.520> for<02:13:43.679> the 02:13:43.830 --> 02:13:43.840 align:start position:0% again. And so the motion for the 02:13:43.840 --> 02:13:48.069 align:start position:0% again. And so the motion for the committee<02:13:45.199> is<02:13:46.079> that<02:13:46.800> um<02:13:46.960> the<02:13:47.199> board<02:13:47.440> engage<02:13:47.840> in 02:13:48.069 --> 02:13:48.079 align:start position:0% committee is that um the board engage in 02:13:48.079 --> 02:13:51.030 align:start position:0% committee is that um the board engage in a<02:13:48.239> targeted<02:13:48.719> review<02:13:49.040> of<02:13:49.280> the<02:13:49.440> elementary<02:13:50.719> K 02:13:51.030 --> 02:13:51.040 align:start position:0% a targeted review of the elementary K 02:13:51.040 --> 02:13:53.910 align:start position:0% a targeted review of the elementary K through<02:13:51.440> six<02:13:51.679> social<02:13:52.000> studies<02:13:52.480> standards<02:13:53.679> and 02:13:53.910 --> 02:13:53.920 align:start position:0% through six social studies standards and 02:13:53.920 --> 02:13:56.229 align:start position:0% through six social studies standards and a<02:13:54.079> full<02:13:54.320> review<02:13:54.560> in<02:13:54.800> the<02:13:54.960> secondary<02:13:55.520> 7<02:13:55.840> through 02:13:56.229 --> 02:13:56.239 align:start position:0% a full review in the secondary 7 through 02:13:56.239 --> 02:13:59.350 align:start position:0% a full review in the secondary 7 through 12<02:13:57.199> uh<02:13:57.440> social<02:13:57.920> skills<02:13:58.400> social<02:13:58.719> studies 02:13:59.350 --> 02:13:59.360 align:start position:0% 12 uh social skills social studies 02:13:59.360 --> 02:14:05.669 align:start position:0% 12 uh social skills social studies social<02:14:00.239> social<02:14:00.560> studies<02:14:00.880> standards.<02:14:01.360> Right 02:14:05.669 --> 02:14:05.679 align:start position:0% 02:14:05.679 --> 02:14:10.069 align:start position:0% there<02:14:05.840> we<02:14:06.000> go.<02:14:06.400> That's 02:14:10.069 --> 02:14:10.079 align:start position:0% 02:14:10.079 --> 02:14:11.990 align:start position:0% correct.<02:14:10.320> Anyone<02:14:11.119> want<02:14:11.280> to<02:14:11.520> Is<02:14:11.679> that<02:14:11.840> the 02:14:11.990 --> 02:14:12.000 align:start position:0% correct. Anyone want to Is that the 02:14:12.000 --> 02:14:13.270 align:start position:0% correct. Anyone want to Is that the That's<02:14:12.239> the<02:14:12.320> right<02:14:12.480> term,<02:14:12.719> right?<02:14:13.040> Social 02:14:13.270 --> 02:14:13.280 align:start position:0% That's the right term, right? Social 02:14:13.280 --> 02:14:18.229 align:start position:0% That's the right term, right? Social studies<02:14:13.679> standards. 02:14:18.229 --> 02:14:18.239 align:start position:0% 02:14:18.239 --> 02:14:19.990 align:start position:0% I'm<02:14:18.480> not<02:14:18.639> hearing<02:14:18.880> otherwise.<02:14:19.440> So,<02:14:19.679> it<02:14:19.760> sounds 02:14:19.990 --> 02:14:20.000 align:start position:0% I'm not hearing otherwise. So, it sounds 02:14:20.000 --> 02:14:23.669 align:start position:0% I'm not hearing otherwise. So, it sounds like<02:14:20.159> it's<02:14:20.719> we're<02:14:20.960> on<02:14:21.199> on<02:14:21.520> track<02:14:21.760> there.<02:14:22.880> Okay. 02:14:23.669 --> 02:14:23.679 align:start position:0% like it's we're on on track there. Okay. 02:14:23.679 --> 02:14:26.629 align:start position:0% like it's we're on on track there. Okay. Any<02:14:23.920> other<02:14:24.239> discussion<02:14:24.800> to<02:14:24.960> this? 02:14:26.629 --> 02:14:26.639 align:start position:0% Any other discussion to this? 02:14:26.639 --> 02:14:28.870 align:start position:0% Any other discussion to this? All<02:14:26.719> right.<02:14:27.119> All<02:14:27.280> those<02:14:27.520> in<02:14:27.679> favor? 02:14:28.870 --> 02:14:28.880 align:start position:0% All right. All those in favor? 02:14:28.880 --> 02:14:29.669 align:start position:0% All right. All those in favor? >> I 02:14:29.669 --> 02:14:29.679 align:start position:0% >> I 02:14:29.679 --> 02:14:31.669 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 02:14:31.669 --> 02:14:31.679 align:start position:0% >> I 02:14:31.679 --> 02:14:34.069 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 02:14:34.069 --> 02:14:34.079 align:start position:0% >> I 02:14:34.079 --> 02:14:36.390 align:start position:0% >> I board<02:14:34.320> member<02:14:34.560> Wood<02:14:34.880> on<02:14:35.119> still.<02:14:35.679> Did<02:14:36.079> someone 02:14:36.390 --> 02:14:36.400 align:start position:0% board member Wood on still. Did someone 02:14:36.400 --> 02:14:37.189 align:start position:0% board member Wood on still. Did someone hear<02:14:36.639> her? 02:14:37.189 --> 02:14:37.199 align:start position:0% hear her? 02:14:37.199 --> 02:14:38.709 align:start position:0% hear her? >> I<02:14:37.520> Yes.<02:14:37.840> Sorry. 02:14:38.709 --> 02:14:38.719 align:start position:0% >> I Yes. Sorry. 02:14:38.719 --> 02:14:40.069 align:start position:0% >> I Yes. Sorry. >> Sorry<02:14:38.880> if<02:14:39.040> I<02:14:39.119> did.<02:14:39.360> You<02:14:39.520> may<02:14:39.679> have<02:14:39.840> said<02:14:39.920> it 02:14:40.069 --> 02:14:40.079 align:start position:0% >> Sorry if I did. You may have said it 02:14:40.079 --> 02:14:41.510 align:start position:0% >> Sorry if I did. You may have said it when<02:14:40.239> someone<02:14:40.480> else<02:14:40.639> was<02:14:40.800> speaking.<02:14:41.119> So<02:14:41.280> that 02:14:41.510 --> 02:14:41.520 align:start position:0% when someone else was speaking. So that 02:14:41.520 --> 02:14:43.750 align:start position:0% when someone else was speaking. So that that's<02:14:41.840> unanimous<02:14:42.400> vote.<02:14:42.800> So<02:14:43.199> we<02:14:43.440> will<02:14:43.599> move 02:14:43.750 --> 02:14:43.760 align:start position:0% that's unanimous vote. So we will move 02:14:43.760 --> 02:14:46.149 align:start position:0% that's unanimous vote. So we will move that<02:14:43.920> forward<02:14:44.159> to<02:14:44.320> the<02:14:44.480> board. 02:14:46.149 --> 02:14:46.159 align:start position:0% that forward to the board. 02:14:46.159 --> 02:14:51.030 align:start position:0% that forward to the board. And<02:14:46.639> our<02:14:47.040> next<02:14:47.360> item<02:14:48.239> is<02:14:48.560> a<02:14:48.800> return 02:14:51.030 --> 02:14:51.040 align:start position:0% And our next item is a return 02:14:51.040 --> 02:14:53.510 align:start position:0% And our next item is a return to<02:14:51.599> if<02:14:51.760> I<02:14:52.159> remember<02:14:52.480> right,<02:14:52.800> we're<02:14:53.040> we're<02:14:53.360> back 02:14:53.510 --> 02:14:53.520 align:start position:0% to if I remember right, we're we're back 02:14:53.520 --> 02:14:56.870 align:start position:0% to if I remember right, we're we're back on<02:14:53.679> our<02:14:54.560> sensitive<02:14:55.040> materials<02:14:55.840> model<02:14:56.239> policy 02:14:56.870 --> 02:14:56.880 align:start position:0% on our sensitive materials model policy 02:14:56.880 --> 02:14:59.669 align:start position:0% on our sensitive materials model policy update. 02:14:59.669 --> 02:14:59.679 align:start position:0% update. 02:14:59.679 --> 02:15:02.229 align:start position:0% update. And<02:15:00.159> so<02:15:00.639> we<02:15:00.960> we'll<02:15:01.440> kind<02:15:01.599> of<02:15:01.679> just<02:15:01.920> pick<02:15:02.079> up 02:15:02.229 --> 02:15:02.239 align:start position:0% And so we we'll kind of just pick up 02:15:02.239 --> 02:15:04.149 align:start position:0% And so we we'll kind of just pick up where<02:15:02.480> we<02:15:02.639> were.<02:15:02.880> We<02:15:03.119> started<02:15:03.520> making<02:15:03.840> some 02:15:04.149 --> 02:15:04.159 align:start position:0% where we were. We started making some 02:15:04.159 --> 02:15:09.750 align:start position:0% where we were. We started making some revisions 02:15:09.750 --> 02:15:09.760 align:start position:0% 02:15:09.760 --> 02:15:15.189 align:start position:0% and<02:15:10.079> I<02:15:10.320> think<02:15:11.360> I<02:15:11.679> sent<02:15:11.920> an<02:15:12.239> email<02:15:13.520> um 02:15:15.189 --> 02:15:15.199 align:start position:0% and I think I sent an email um 02:15:15.199 --> 02:15:16.709 align:start position:0% and I think I sent an email um the<02:15:15.440> beginning<02:15:15.760> or<02:15:16.000> towards<02:15:16.320> the<02:15:16.560> beginning 02:15:16.709 --> 02:15:16.719 align:start position:0% the beginning or towards the beginning 02:15:16.719 --> 02:15:18.870 align:start position:0% the beginning or towards the beginning of<02:15:16.880> the<02:15:17.119> meeting<02:15:17.360> with<02:15:17.679> just<02:15:17.920> some<02:15:18.480> questions 02:15:18.870 --> 02:15:18.880 align:start position:0% of the meeting with just some questions 02:15:18.880 --> 02:15:21.270 align:start position:0% of the meeting with just some questions that<02:15:19.119> I<02:15:19.280> had<02:15:19.520> and<02:15:19.840> some<02:15:20.159> possible<02:15:20.719> suggestions 02:15:21.270 --> 02:15:21.280 align:start position:0% that I had and some possible suggestions 02:15:21.280 --> 02:15:24.149 align:start position:0% that I had and some possible suggestions for<02:15:21.520> some<02:15:21.760> amendments<02:15:22.800> for<02:15:23.119> some<02:15:23.360> clarity. 02:15:24.149 --> 02:15:24.159 align:start position:0% for some amendments for some clarity. 02:15:24.159 --> 02:15:26.550 align:start position:0% for some amendments for some clarity. And 02:15:26.550 --> 02:15:26.560 align:start position:0% And 02:15:26.560 --> 02:15:29.189 align:start position:0% And so<02:15:26.880> if<02:15:27.280> I<02:15:27.760> sent<02:15:27.920> it<02:15:28.079> to<02:15:28.239> everybody<02:15:28.719> on<02:15:28.960> the 02:15:29.189 --> 02:15:29.199 align:start position:0% so if I sent it to everybody on the 02:15:29.199 --> 02:15:32.069 align:start position:0% so if I sent it to everybody on the committee<02:15:30.239> and<02:15:30.880> policy<02:15:31.280> advisor<02:15:31.760> Jennifer 02:15:32.069 --> 02:15:32.079 align:start position:0% committee and policy advisor Jennifer 02:15:32.079 --> 02:15:34.310 align:start position:0% committee and policy advisor Jennifer Wadsworth<02:15:32.639> and<02:15:32.880> Andrea<02:15:33.599> if<02:15:33.840> you<02:15:33.920> want<02:15:34.079> to<02:15:34.239> look 02:15:34.310 --> 02:15:34.320 align:start position:0% Wadsworth and Andrea if you want to look 02:15:34.320 --> 02:15:45.830 align:start position:0% Wadsworth and Andrea if you want to look at<02:15:34.560> those 02:15:45.830 --> 02:15:45.840 align:start position:0% 02:15:45.840 --> 02:15:51.189 align:start position:0% okay 02:15:51.189 --> 02:15:51.199 align:start position:0% 02:15:51.199 --> 02:15:52.950 align:start position:0% >> do<02:15:51.360> you<02:15:51.520> want<02:15:51.599> me<02:15:51.679> to<02:15:51.840> read<02:15:52.079> them? 02:15:52.950 --> 02:15:52.960 align:start position:0% >> do you want me to read them? 02:15:52.960 --> 02:15:55.189 align:start position:0% >> do you want me to read them? >> Yeah.<02:15:53.199> Do<02:15:53.360> you<02:15:53.440> want<02:15:53.520> to 02:15:55.189 --> 02:15:55.199 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Do you want to 02:15:55.199 --> 02:15:57.270 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Do you want to like<02:15:55.360> I<02:15:55.520> did<02:15:55.679> some<02:15:55.920> searching<02:15:56.800> with<02:15:57.040> it 02:15:57.270 --> 02:15:57.280 align:start position:0% like I did some searching with it 02:15:57.280 --> 02:16:00.069 align:start position:0% like I did some searching with it against<02:15:57.679> Utah<02:15:58.079> law<02:15:58.400> and<02:15:58.719> also<02:15:59.599> you<02:15:59.760> know<02:15:59.920> just 02:16:00.069 --> 02:16:00.079 align:start position:0% against Utah law and also you know just 02:16:00.079 --> 02:16:02.310 align:start position:0% against Utah law and also you know just to<02:16:00.320> see<02:16:00.400> if<02:16:00.639> we<02:16:00.960> needed<02:16:01.280> some<02:16:01.520> clarity<02:16:02.079> but 02:16:02.310 --> 02:16:02.320 align:start position:0% to see if we needed some clarity but 02:16:02.320 --> 02:16:05.030 align:start position:0% to see if we needed some clarity but then<02:16:02.560> also<02:16:03.760> like<02:16:04.000> to<02:16:04.159> look<02:16:04.320> at<02:16:04.480> a<02:16:04.639> couple<02:16:04.800> of 02:16:05.030 --> 02:16:05.040 align:start position:0% then also like to look at a couple of 02:16:05.040 --> 02:16:08.709 align:start position:0% then also like to look at a couple of the<02:16:05.520> LEA<02:16:06.079> specific<02:16:06.639> policies<02:16:08.000> um<02:16:08.239> and 02:16:08.709 --> 02:16:08.719 align:start position:0% the LEA specific policies um and 02:16:08.719 --> 02:16:11.510 align:start position:0% the LEA specific policies um and contrast<02:16:09.199> with<02:16:09.440> those<02:16:09.760> as<02:16:10.000> well.<02:16:10.800> So<02:16:11.199> the 02:16:11.510 --> 02:16:11.520 align:start position:0% contrast with those as well. So the 02:16:11.520 --> 02:16:14.629 align:start position:0% contrast with those as well. So the first<02:16:12.239> um<02:16:13.040> motion<02:16:13.440> would<02:16:13.679> just<02:16:13.840> be<02:16:14.000> to<02:16:14.239> clarify 02:16:14.629 --> 02:16:14.639 align:start position:0% first um motion would just be to clarify 02:16:14.639 --> 02:16:17.510 align:start position:0% first um motion would just be to clarify with<02:16:14.960> grandma<02:16:15.440> and<02:16:15.760> challenger<02:16:16.320> privacies 02:16:17.510 --> 02:16:17.520 align:start position:0% with grandma and challenger privacies 02:16:17.520 --> 02:16:20.709 align:start position:0% with grandma and challenger privacies and<02:16:18.079> move<02:16:18.320> to<02:16:18.560> amend<02:16:18.960> section<02:16:19.599> four<02:16:20.320> which<02:16:20.560> is 02:16:20.709 --> 02:16:20.719 align:start position:0% and move to amend section four which is 02:16:20.719 --> 02:16:24.229 align:start position:0% and move to amend section four which is what<02:16:21.040> line?<02:16:21.440> Let<02:16:21.679> me<02:16:21.840> see.<02:16:22.880> So<02:16:23.040> that<02:16:23.440> if<02:16:24.000> you 02:16:24.229 --> 02:16:24.239 align:start position:0% what line? Let me see. So that if you 02:16:24.239 --> 02:16:26.470 align:start position:0% what line? Let me see. So that if you have<02:16:24.480> this 02:16:26.470 --> 02:16:26.480 align:start position:0% have this 02:16:26.480 --> 02:16:29.270 align:start position:0% have this um<02:16:26.800> section<02:16:27.360> four 02:16:29.270 --> 02:16:29.280 align:start position:0% um section four 02:16:29.280 --> 02:16:31.270 align:start position:0% um section four is<02:16:29.679> on 02:16:31.270 --> 02:16:31.280 align:start position:0% is on 02:16:31.280 --> 02:16:34.790 align:start position:0% is on page<02:16:31.679> five,<02:16:32.880> the<02:16:33.120> library<02:16:33.679> materials<02:16:34.479> review 02:16:34.790 --> 02:16:34.800 align:start position:0% page five, the library materials review 02:16:34.800 --> 02:16:44.709 align:start position:0% page five, the library materials review process. 02:16:44.709 --> 02:16:44.719 align:start position:0% 02:16:44.719 --> 02:16:47.990 align:start position:0% And<02:16:44.960> so<02:16:45.359> under<02:16:45.760> the<02:16:46.000> Utah<02:16:46.479> code,<02:16:47.519> formal 02:16:47.990 --> 02:16:48.000 align:start position:0% And so under the Utah code, formal 02:16:48.000 --> 02:16:50.389 align:start position:0% And so under the Utah code, formal appeals<02:16:48.479> and<02:16:48.719> complaints<02:16:49.439> submitted<02:16:49.920> to<02:16:50.160> a 02:16:50.389 --> 02:16:50.399 align:start position:0% appeals and complaints submitted to a 02:16:50.399 --> 02:16:52.230 align:start position:0% appeals and complaints submitted to a public<02:16:50.639> governing<02:16:51.120> body<02:16:51.439> are<02:16:51.760> considered 02:16:52.230 --> 02:16:52.240 align:start position:0% public governing body are considered 02:16:52.240 --> 02:16:55.750 align:start position:0% public governing body are considered public<02:16:52.639> records.<02:16:53.760> So<02:16:54.240> presenting<02:16:54.800> this<02:16:55.519> with 02:16:55.750 --> 02:16:55.760 align:start position:0% public records. So presenting this with 02:16:55.760 --> 02:16:57.669 align:start position:0% public records. So presenting this with our<02:16:56.000> wording<02:16:56.399> where<02:16:56.559> it<02:16:56.719> says<02:16:57.040> confidential 02:16:57.669 --> 02:16:57.679 align:start position:0% our wording where it says confidential 02:16:57.679 --> 02:16:59.990 align:start position:0% our wording where it says confidential to<02:16:57.920> the<02:16:58.080> extent<02:16:58.479> possible 02:16:59.990 --> 02:17:00.000 align:start position:0% to the extent possible 02:17:00.000 --> 02:17:02.790 align:start position:0% to the extent possible um<02:17:01.040> could<02:17:01.359> risk<02:17:01.679> misleading<02:17:02.240> parents<02:17:02.559> and 02:17:02.790 --> 02:17:02.800 align:start position:0% um could risk misleading parents and 02:17:02.800 --> 02:17:05.110 align:start position:0% um could risk misleading parents and creating<02:17:03.200> a<02:17:03.359> legal<02:17:03.599> liability<02:17:04.719> when<02:17:04.960> a 02:17:05.110 --> 02:17:05.120 align:start position:0% creating a legal liability when a 02:17:05.120 --> 02:17:08.629 align:start position:0% creating a legal liability when a grandma<02:17:05.599> request<02:17:06.000> is<02:17:06.319> filed. 02:17:08.629 --> 02:17:08.639 align:start position:0% grandma request is filed. 02:17:08.639 --> 02:17:11.830 align:start position:0% grandma request is filed. So<02:17:09.040> I<02:17:09.439> think<02:17:09.599> it<02:17:09.840> could<02:17:10.000> be<02:17:10.800> clarified<02:17:11.519> to 02:17:11.830 --> 02:17:11.840 align:start position:0% So I think it could be clarified to 02:17:11.840 --> 02:17:15.509 align:start position:0% So I think it could be clarified to amend<02:17:12.319> it<02:17:13.679> um<02:17:13.920> by<02:17:14.240> striking<02:17:14.639> the<02:17:14.880> phrase<02:17:15.280> shall 02:17:15.509 --> 02:17:15.519 align:start position:0% amend it um by striking the phrase shall 02:17:15.519 --> 02:17:17.509 align:start position:0% amend it um by striking the phrase shall be<02:17:15.679> kept<02:17:16.000> confidential<02:17:16.719> to<02:17:16.960> the<02:17:17.120> extent 02:17:17.509 --> 02:17:17.519 align:start position:0% be kept confidential to the extent 02:17:17.519 --> 02:17:21.030 align:start position:0% be kept confidential to the extent possible<02:17:18.719> and<02:17:19.040> instead<02:17:19.519> inserting<02:17:20.639> shall<02:17:20.880> be 02:17:21.030 --> 02:17:21.040 align:start position:0% possible and instead inserting shall be 02:17:21.040 --> 02:17:22.549 align:start position:0% possible and instead inserting shall be handled<02:17:21.439> in<02:17:21.679> accordance<02:17:22.080> with<02:17:22.399> the 02:17:22.549 --> 02:17:22.559 align:start position:0% handled in accordance with the 02:17:22.559 --> 02:17:24.709 align:start position:0% handled in accordance with the government<02:17:22.960> records<02:17:23.519> access<02:17:23.920> and<02:17:24.160> management 02:17:24.709 --> 02:17:24.719 align:start position:0% government records access and management 02:17:24.719 --> 02:17:26.230 align:start position:0% government records access and management act 02:17:26.230 --> 02:17:26.240 align:start position:0% act 02:17:26.240 --> 02:17:28.309 align:start position:0% act in<02:17:26.559> parenthesis<02:17:27.200> grandma<02:17:27.760> noting<02:17:28.080> that 02:17:28.309 --> 02:17:28.319 align:start position:0% in parenthesis grandma noting that 02:17:28.319 --> 02:17:30.709 align:start position:0% in parenthesis grandma noting that formal<02:17:28.800> challenge<02:17:29.439> documentation<02:17:30.319> may<02:17:30.559> be 02:17:30.709 --> 02:17:30.719 align:start position:0% formal challenge documentation may be 02:17:30.719 --> 02:17:34.790 align:start position:0% formal challenge documentation may be subject<02:17:31.120> to<02:17:31.359> public<02:17:31.679> records<02:17:32.160> requests 02:17:34.790 --> 02:17:34.800 align:start position:0% subject to public records requests 02:17:34.800 --> 02:17:37.669 align:start position:0% subject to public records requests >> and<02:17:35.679> I'm<02:17:36.000> fine<02:17:36.240> with<02:17:36.399> this<02:17:36.639> this<02:17:37.040> change<02:17:37.439> here. 02:17:37.669 --> 02:17:37.679 align:start position:0% >> and I'm fine with this this change here. 02:17:37.679 --> 02:17:40.070 align:start position:0% >> and I'm fine with this this change here. And<02:17:37.840> and<02:17:38.240> the<02:17:38.559> reason<02:17:38.719> that<02:17:39.040> I<02:17:39.519> think<02:17:39.679> we 02:17:40.070 --> 02:17:40.080 align:start position:0% And and the reason that I think we 02:17:40.080 --> 02:17:41.429 align:start position:0% And and the reason that I think we started<02:17:40.479> talking<02:17:40.719> about<02:17:40.880> last<02:17:41.040> time<02:17:41.200> about 02:17:41.429 --> 02:17:41.439 align:start position:0% started talking about last time about 02:17:41.439 --> 02:17:43.750 align:start position:0% started talking about last time about the<02:17:41.599> grammar<02:17:41.920> request<02:17:42.399> because<02:17:42.880> of<02:17:43.200> the<02:17:43.439> work 02:17:43.750 --> 02:17:43.760 align:start position:0% the grammar request because of the work 02:17:43.760 --> 02:17:47.750 align:start position:0% the grammar request because of the work it<02:17:44.080> takes<02:17:44.399> to<02:17:45.679> um<02:17:46.719> it<02:17:46.880> I<02:17:47.120> think<02:17:47.200> that<02:17:47.359> if<02:17:47.519> if 02:17:47.750 --> 02:17:47.760 align:start position:0% it takes to um it I think that if if 02:17:47.760 --> 02:17:49.589 align:start position:0% it takes to um it I think that if if someone<02:17:48.000> wants<02:17:48.240> to<02:17:48.319> know<02:17:48.399> a<02:17:48.639> list<02:17:48.719> of<02:17:48.880> all<02:17:49.120> the 02:17:49.589 --> 02:17:49.599 align:start position:0% someone wants to know a list of all the 02:17:49.599 --> 02:17:51.110 align:start position:0% someone wants to know a list of all the um<02:17:49.840> materials<02:17:50.240> that<02:17:50.399> are<02:17:50.479> in<02:17:50.639> the<02:17:50.800> library 02:17:51.110 --> 02:17:51.120 align:start position:0% um materials that are in the library 02:17:51.120 --> 02:17:52.790 align:start position:0% um materials that are in the library that<02:17:51.439> this<02:17:51.920> seemed<02:17:52.080> like<02:17:52.240> the<02:17:52.399> better<02:17:52.559> route 02:17:52.790 --> 02:17:52.800 align:start position:0% that this seemed like the better route 02:17:52.800 --> 02:17:55.589 align:start position:0% that this seemed like the better route to<02:17:52.960> go<02:17:53.599> is<02:17:53.920> they<02:17:54.240> can<02:17:54.319> request<02:17:55.120> it<02:17:55.359> through 02:17:55.589 --> 02:17:55.599 align:start position:0% to go is they can request it through 02:17:55.599 --> 02:18:02.709 align:start position:0% to go is they can request it through grandma. 02:18:02.709 --> 02:18:02.719 align:start position:0% 02:18:02.719 --> 02:18:04.309 align:start position:0% Although<02:18:03.040> that's<02:18:03.359> not<02:18:03.519> this<02:18:03.760> provision<02:18:04.160> right 02:18:04.309 --> 02:18:04.319 align:start position:0% Although that's not this provision right 02:18:04.319 --> 02:18:05.830 align:start position:0% Although that's not this provision right here. 02:18:05.830 --> 02:18:05.840 align:start position:0% here. 02:18:05.840 --> 02:18:07.429 align:start position:0% here. This<02:18:06.080> would<02:18:06.319> be<02:18:06.479> confidential 02:18:07.429 --> 02:18:07.439 align:start position:0% This would be confidential 02:18:07.439 --> 02:18:11.110 align:start position:0% This would be confidential confidentiality,<02:18:08.559> right?<02:18:09.439> That<02:18:09.760> this<02:18:10.719> this 02:18:11.110 --> 02:18:11.120 align:start position:0% confidentiality, right? That this this 02:18:11.120 --> 02:18:12.469 align:start position:0% confidentiality, right? That this this >> Oh,<02:18:11.280> I<02:18:11.439> thought<02:18:11.519> we<02:18:11.679> were<02:18:11.840> talking<02:18:12.080> on<02:18:12.240> the 02:18:12.469 --> 02:18:12.479 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I thought we were talking on the 02:18:12.479 --> 02:18:13.830 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I thought we were talking on the part<02:18:12.719> that<02:18:12.960> I 02:18:13.830 --> 02:18:13.840 align:start position:0% part that I 02:18:13.840 --> 02:18:18.070 align:start position:0% part that I >> Well,<02:18:14.080> we<02:18:14.960> it's<02:18:15.280> telling<02:18:15.679> parents,<02:18:16.800> you<02:18:16.880> know, 02:18:18.070 --> 02:18:18.080 align:start position:0% >> Well, we it's telling parents, you know, 02:18:18.080 --> 02:18:19.750 align:start position:0% >> Well, we it's telling parents, you know, >> this<02:18:18.319> I<02:18:18.479> guess<02:18:18.639> this<02:18:18.880> section<02:18:19.200> was<02:18:19.519> talking 02:18:19.750 --> 02:18:19.760 align:start position:0% >> this I guess this section was talking 02:18:19.760 --> 02:18:22.230 align:start position:0% >> this I guess this section was talking about<02:18:20.319> giving<02:18:20.719> parents<02:18:21.120> the<02:18:21.439> belief<02:18:21.679> that 02:18:22.230 --> 02:18:22.240 align:start position:0% about giving parents the belief that 02:18:22.240 --> 02:18:24.870 align:start position:0% about giving parents the belief that their<02:18:22.559> requests<02:18:23.200> or<02:18:23.519> their<02:18:23.840> challenges<02:18:24.559> would 02:18:24.870 --> 02:18:24.880 align:start position:0% their requests or their challenges would 02:18:24.880 --> 02:18:27.750 align:start position:0% their requests or their challenges would be<02:18:25.040> kept<02:18:25.439> confidential<02:18:26.080> where<02:18:26.399> possible,<02:18:27.359> but 02:18:27.750 --> 02:18:27.760 align:start position:0% be kept confidential where possible, but 02:18:27.760 --> 02:18:29.190 align:start position:0% be kept confidential where possible, but >> Oh,<02:18:28.000> I<02:18:28.160> get<02:18:28.240> what<02:18:28.399> you're<02:18:28.559> saying.<02:18:28.800> Okay. 02:18:29.190 --> 02:18:29.200 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I get what you're saying. Okay. 02:18:29.200 --> 02:18:31.190 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I get what you're saying. Okay. Yeah.<02:18:29.840> Well, 02:18:31.190 --> 02:18:31.200 align:start position:0% Yeah. Well, 02:18:31.200 --> 02:18:32.709 align:start position:0% Yeah. Well, >> so<02:18:31.439> I<02:18:31.599> don't<02:18:31.679> know.<02:18:31.840> I'm<02:18:32.000> fine<02:18:32.160> with 02:18:32.709 --> 02:18:32.719 align:start position:0% >> so I don't know. I'm fine with 02:18:32.719 --> 02:18:34.870 align:start position:0% >> so I don't know. I'm fine with >> and<02:18:33.120> like<02:18:33.519> I'm<02:18:33.840> I<02:18:34.160> sent<02:18:34.319> this<02:18:34.479> to<02:18:34.639> everybody 02:18:34.870 --> 02:18:34.880 align:start position:0% >> and like I'm I sent this to everybody 02:18:34.880 --> 02:18:36.709 align:start position:0% >> and like I'm I sent this to everybody just<02:18:35.120> for<02:18:35.359> discussion<02:18:35.840> to<02:18:36.080> see<02:18:36.240> if<02:18:36.399> you<02:18:36.559> think 02:18:36.709 --> 02:18:36.719 align:start position:0% just for discussion to see if you think 02:18:36.719 --> 02:18:38.790 align:start position:0% just for discussion to see if you think this<02:18:37.040> is<02:18:37.280> helpful 02:18:38.790 --> 02:18:38.800 align:start position:0% this is helpful 02:18:38.800 --> 02:18:39.190 align:start position:0% this is helpful >> or 02:18:39.190 --> 02:18:39.200 align:start position:0% >> or 02:18:39.200 --> 02:18:41.349 align:start position:0% >> or >> did<02:18:39.439> you<02:18:39.679> did<02:18:39.840> you<02:18:40.000> touch<02:18:40.240> base<02:18:40.479> with<02:18:40.639> the<02:18:40.800> AAG 02:18:41.349 --> 02:18:41.359 align:start position:0% >> did you did you touch base with the AAG 02:18:41.359 --> 02:18:44.150 align:start position:0% >> did you did you touch base with the AAG on<02:18:41.519> this<02:18:41.599> at<02:18:41.840> all,<02:18:42.559> Angela<02:18:43.040> Don?<02:18:43.599> Just<02:18:43.760> to<02:18:44.000> see 02:18:44.150 --> 02:18:44.160 align:start position:0% on this at all, Angela Don? Just to see 02:18:44.160 --> 02:18:48.150 align:start position:0% on this at all, Angela Don? Just to see if<02:18:45.120> it's<02:18:45.760> necessary<02:18:46.559> or 02:18:48.150 --> 02:18:48.160 align:start position:0% if it's necessary or 02:18:48.160 --> 02:18:49.589 align:start position:0% if it's necessary or >> No,<02:18:48.639> sorry,<02:18:48.960> I<02:18:49.120> did<02:18:49.280> not. 02:18:49.589 --> 02:18:49.599 align:start position:0% >> No, sorry, I did not. 02:18:49.599 --> 02:18:51.429 align:start position:0% >> No, sorry, I did not. >> Yeah,<02:18:49.760> that's<02:18:50.000> okay.<02:18:50.319> Did<02:18:50.960> do<02:18:51.120> you<02:18:51.280> have 02:18:51.429 --> 02:18:51.439 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's okay. Did do you have 02:18:51.439 --> 02:18:53.349 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's okay. Did do you have opinion<02:18:51.679> on<02:18:51.840> that,<02:18:52.080> Angela?<02:18:52.479> Are<02:18:52.559> you<02:18:52.719> on<02:18:53.120> with 02:18:53.349 --> 02:18:53.359 align:start position:0% opinion on that, Angela? Are you on with 02:18:53.359 --> 02:18:55.509 align:start position:0% opinion on that, Angela? Are you on with us? 02:18:55.509 --> 02:18:55.519 align:start position:0% us? 02:18:55.519 --> 02:18:57.509 align:start position:0% us? >> Hey,<02:18:55.920> you<02:18:56.080> don't.<02:18:56.319> I<02:18:56.639> am<02:18:56.800> on.<02:18:57.120> I<02:18:57.280> haven't 02:18:57.509 --> 02:18:57.519 align:start position:0% >> Hey, you don't. I am on. I haven't 02:18:57.519 --> 02:18:59.750 align:start position:0% >> Hey, you don't. I am on. I haven't looked<02:18:57.760> into<02:18:58.000> this.<02:18:58.319> I<02:18:58.559> wasn't<02:18:58.719> aware<02:18:58.960> that<02:18:59.439> um 02:18:59.750 --> 02:18:59.760 align:start position:0% looked into this. I wasn't aware that um 02:18:59.760 --> 02:19:01.750 align:start position:0% looked into this. I wasn't aware that um board<02:19:00.000> member<02:19:00.319> Britain<02:19:00.719> was<02:19:01.200> raising<02:19:01.519> this. 02:19:01.750 --> 02:19:01.760 align:start position:0% board member Britain was raising this. 02:19:01.760 --> 02:19:03.110 align:start position:0% board member Britain was raising this. If<02:19:01.920> you<02:19:02.000> give<02:19:02.080> me<02:19:02.160> a<02:19:02.319> few<02:19:02.399> minutes,<02:19:02.639> I<02:19:02.880> can<02:19:02.960> look 02:19:03.110 --> 02:19:03.120 align:start position:0% If you give me a few minutes, I can look 02:19:03.120 --> 02:19:04.469 align:start position:0% If you give me a few minutes, I can look into<02:19:03.280> it<02:19:03.439> and<02:19:03.599> then<02:19:03.760> circle<02:19:04.080> back. 02:19:04.469 --> 02:19:04.479 align:start position:0% into it and then circle back. 02:19:04.479 --> 02:19:05.270 align:start position:0% into it and then circle back. >> Okay. 02:19:05.270 --> 02:19:05.280 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:19:05.280 --> 02:19:06.549 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Would<02:19:05.519> that<02:19:05.679> be<02:19:05.840> all<02:19:06.000> right? 02:19:06.549 --> 02:19:06.559 align:start position:0% >> Would that be all right? 02:19:06.559 --> 02:19:07.030 align:start position:0% >> Would that be all right? >> Sure. 02:19:07.030 --> 02:19:07.040 align:start position:0% >> Sure. 02:19:07.040 --> 02:19:08.389 align:start position:0% >> Sure. >> She<02:19:07.280> take<02:19:07.439> a<02:19:07.519> minute<02:19:07.599> and<02:19:07.840> look<02:19:07.920> at<02:19:08.000> that<02:19:08.160> and 02:19:08.389 --> 02:19:08.399 align:start position:0% >> She take a minute and look at that and 02:19:08.399 --> 02:19:10.389 align:start position:0% >> She take a minute and look at that and see.<02:19:08.639> I<02:19:08.880> guess<02:19:08.960> my<02:19:09.280> other<02:19:09.519> question<02:19:09.840> too<02:19:10.000> for<02:19:10.319> a 02:19:10.389 --> 02:19:10.399 align:start position:0% see. I guess my other question too for a 02:19:10.399 --> 02:19:13.910 align:start position:0% see. I guess my other question too for a a<02:19:10.880> Don<02:19:11.280> is<02:19:11.439> is<02:19:12.319> um 02:19:13.910 --> 02:19:13.920 align:start position:0% a Don is is um 02:19:13.920 --> 02:19:17.589 align:start position:0% a Don is is um well<02:19:14.240> it<02:19:14.719> is<02:19:15.040> there 02:19:17.589 --> 02:19:17.599 align:start position:0% well it is there 02:19:17.599 --> 02:19:19.349 align:start position:0% well it is there someone<02:19:17.920> internally<02:19:18.479> has<02:19:18.719> to<02:19:18.880> be<02:19:19.040> keeping 02:19:19.349 --> 02:19:19.359 align:start position:0% someone internally has to be keeping 02:19:19.359 --> 02:19:22.870 align:start position:0% someone internally has to be keeping track<02:19:19.599> of<02:19:19.920> who's<02:19:20.880> requesting<02:19:22.160> the<02:19:22.479> process 02:19:22.870 --> 02:19:22.880 align:start position:0% track of who's requesting the process 02:19:22.880 --> 02:19:25.669 align:start position:0% track of who's requesting the process get<02:19:23.120> started<02:19:23.439> on<02:19:23.679> some<02:19:23.920> materials<02:19:24.800> because<02:19:25.359> of 02:19:25.669 --> 02:19:25.679 align:start position:0% get started on some materials because of 02:19:25.679 --> 02:19:28.230 align:start position:0% get started on some materials because of the<02:19:26.399> piece<02:19:26.639> that<02:19:26.960> says<02:19:27.200> that<02:19:27.359> you<02:19:27.599> can't<02:19:28.000> if 02:19:28.230 --> 02:19:28.240 align:start position:0% the piece that says that you can't if 02:19:28.240 --> 02:19:31.270 align:start position:0% the piece that says that you can't if you<02:19:28.319> have<02:19:28.479> three<02:19:28.719> unsuccessful 02:19:31.270 --> 02:19:31.280 align:start position:0% you have three unsuccessful 02:19:31.280 --> 02:19:33.030 align:start position:0% you have three unsuccessful >> well<02:19:31.519> and<02:19:31.760> I'm<02:19:31.920> also<02:19:32.160> kind<02:19:32.399> of<02:19:32.559> challenging 02:19:33.030 --> 02:19:33.040 align:start position:0% >> well and I'm also kind of challenging 02:19:33.040 --> 02:19:35.349 align:start position:0% >> well and I'm also kind of challenging that<02:19:33.359> too<02:19:33.599> because<02:19:33.920> I<02:19:34.160> think<02:19:34.319> that<02:19:34.880> as<02:19:35.120> I'm 02:19:35.349 --> 02:19:35.359 align:start position:0% that too because I think that as I'm 02:19:35.359 --> 02:19:37.110 align:start position:0% that too because I think that as I'm looking<02:19:35.519> at<02:19:35.679> that<02:19:36.000> it<02:19:36.160> seems<02:19:36.479> to<02:19:36.639> be<02:19:36.800> in 02:19:37.110 --> 02:19:37.120 align:start position:0% looking at that it seems to be in 02:19:37.120 --> 02:19:39.910 align:start position:0% looking at that it seems to be in conflict<02:19:37.599> with<02:19:37.760> the<02:19:38.080> law.<02:19:38.880> Um,<02:19:39.280> I<02:19:39.519> know<02:19:39.679> it's 02:19:39.910 --> 02:19:39.920 align:start position:0% conflict with the law. Um, I know it's 02:19:39.920 --> 02:19:42.469 align:start position:0% conflict with the law. Um, I know it's to<02:19:40.160> try<02:19:40.319> to<02:19:40.479> avoid<02:19:41.280> people<02:19:41.599> spamming<02:19:42.240> just 02:19:42.469 --> 02:19:42.479 align:start position:0% to try to avoid people spamming just 02:19:42.479 --> 02:19:44.709 align:start position:0% to try to avoid people spamming just tons<02:19:42.800> and<02:19:42.960> tons<02:19:43.200> and<02:19:43.359> tons<02:19:43.599> of<02:19:43.760> things,<02:19:44.000> but<02:19:44.399> I 02:19:44.709 --> 02:19:44.719 align:start position:0% tons and tons and tons of things, but I 02:19:44.719 --> 02:19:46.389 align:start position:0% tons and tons and tons of things, but I don't<02:19:44.800> think<02:19:44.960> we<02:19:45.200> can<02:19:45.280> really<02:19:45.599> limit<02:19:45.920> it<02:19:46.160> to 02:19:46.389 --> 02:19:46.399 align:start position:0% don't think we can really limit it to 02:19:46.399 --> 02:19:48.790 align:start position:0% don't think we can really limit it to three.<02:19:47.280> That<02:19:47.679> that<02:19:48.000> could<02:19:48.160> be<02:19:48.319> a<02:19:48.479> problem, 02:19:48.790 --> 02:19:48.800 align:start position:0% three. That that could be a problem, 02:19:48.800 --> 02:19:50.469 align:start position:0% three. That that could be a problem, too.<02:19:49.040> As<02:19:49.280> I<02:19:49.439> was<02:19:49.600> searching, 02:19:50.469 --> 02:19:50.479 align:start position:0% too. As I was searching, 02:19:50.479 --> 02:19:52.389 align:start position:0% too. As I was searching, >> that<02:19:50.720> is<02:19:50.880> the<02:19:51.040> law.<02:19:51.359> You<02:19:51.520> can<02:19:51.600> limit<02:19:51.920> to<02:19:52.160> three 02:19:52.389 --> 02:19:52.399 align:start position:0% >> that is the law. You can limit to three 02:19:52.399 --> 02:19:54.309 align:start position:0% >> that is the law. You can limit to three if<02:19:52.640> they're<02:19:52.800> unsuccessful. 02:19:54.309 --> 02:19:54.319 align:start position:0% if they're unsuccessful. 02:19:54.319 --> 02:19:54.870 align:start position:0% if they're unsuccessful. >> Yeah, 02:19:54.870 --> 02:19:54.880 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, 02:19:54.880 --> 02:19:57.110 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, >> that<02:19:55.120> is<02:19:55.280> the<02:19:55.439> law.<02:19:55.920> But<02:19:56.240> you<02:19:56.479> can't<02:19:56.640> limit<02:19:56.960> him 02:19:57.110 --> 02:19:57.120 align:start position:0% >> that is the law. But you can't limit him 02:19:57.120 --> 02:19:58.870 align:start position:0% >> that is the law. But you can't limit him to<02:19:57.359> three 02:19:58.870 --> 02:19:58.880 align:start position:0% to three 02:19:58.880 --> 02:19:59.590 align:start position:0% to three unless 02:19:59.590 --> 02:19:59.600 align:start position:0% unless 02:19:59.600 --> 02:20:01.750 align:start position:0% unless >> just<02:19:59.760> only<02:20:00.000> three.<02:20:00.479> If<02:20:00.720> they<02:20:00.880> have<02:20:01.120> three, 02:20:01.750 --> 02:20:01.760 align:start position:0% >> just only three. If they have three, 02:20:01.760 --> 02:20:03.590 align:start position:0% >> just only three. If they have three, three<02:20:02.080> strikes<02:20:02.399> and<02:20:02.560> you're<02:20:02.720> out<02:20:03.040> basically 02:20:03.590 --> 02:20:03.600 align:start position:0% three strikes and you're out basically 02:20:03.600 --> 02:20:07.110 align:start position:0% three strikes and you're out basically >> that<02:20:03.840> year.<02:20:04.479> Yeah. 02:20:07.110 --> 02:20:07.120 align:start position:0% >> that year. Yeah. 02:20:07.120 --> 02:20:09.429 align:start position:0% >> that year. Yeah. >> Yeah,<02:20:07.280> it's<02:20:07.520> just<02:20:07.680> that<02:20:07.920> year. 02:20:09.429 --> 02:20:09.439 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, it's just that year. 02:20:09.439 --> 02:20:12.389 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, it's just that year. >> And<02:20:10.000> it<02:20:10.240> says<02:20:10.640> erroneous<02:20:11.200> in<02:20:11.439> there.<02:20:11.760> I<02:20:12.080> I<02:20:12.319> mean 02:20:12.389 --> 02:20:12.399 align:start position:0% >> And it says erroneous in there. I I mean 02:20:12.399 --> 02:20:14.469 align:start position:0% >> And it says erroneous in there. I I mean it<02:20:12.640> implies<02:20:12.960> that<02:20:13.120> a<02:20:13.280> parent<02:20:13.520> or<02:20:13.920> stakeholder 02:20:14.469 --> 02:20:14.479 align:start position:0% it implies that a parent or stakeholder 02:20:14.479 --> 02:20:18.230 align:start position:0% it implies that a parent or stakeholder made<02:20:14.640> a<02:20:14.800> factual<02:20:15.359> error.<02:20:16.640> Um<02:20:17.600> so<02:20:17.760> do<02:20:17.920> we<02:20:18.080> need 02:20:18.230 --> 02:20:18.240 align:start position:0% made a factual error. Um so do we need 02:20:18.240 --> 02:20:19.910 align:start position:0% made a factual error. Um so do we need to<02:20:18.399> add<02:20:18.560> a<02:20:18.800> little<02:20:18.880> bit<02:20:19.040> more<02:20:19.280> language<02:20:19.680> in 02:20:19.910 --> 02:20:19.920 align:start position:0% to add a little bit more language in 02:20:19.920 --> 02:20:23.030 align:start position:0% to add a little bit more language in there? 02:20:23.030 --> 02:20:23.040 align:start position:0% 02:20:23.040 --> 02:20:24.790 align:start position:0% Yeah,<02:20:23.359> I<02:20:23.520> was<02:20:23.680> kind<02:20:23.840> of<02:20:23.920> looking<02:20:24.160> at<02:20:24.319> that<02:20:24.560> to 02:20:24.790 --> 02:20:24.800 align:start position:0% Yeah, I was kind of looking at that to 02:20:24.800 --> 02:20:27.670 align:start position:0% Yeah, I was kind of looking at that to see<02:20:24.880> if<02:20:25.040> we<02:20:25.280> could<02:20:25.359> amend<02:20:26.399> that<02:20:26.720> and<02:20:27.040> take<02:20:27.359> take 02:20:27.670 --> 02:20:27.680 align:start position:0% see if we could amend that and take take 02:20:27.680 --> 02:20:31.349 align:start position:0% see if we could amend that and take take out<02:20:27.840> the<02:20:28.080> word<02:20:28.479> strike<02:20:29.120> erroneous<02:20:30.479> and<02:20:30.800> insert 02:20:31.349 --> 02:20:31.359 align:start position:0% out the word strike erroneous and insert 02:20:31.359 --> 02:20:33.510 align:start position:0% out the word strike erroneous and insert challenges<02:20:32.000> that<02:20:32.319> result<02:20:32.640> in<02:20:32.800> a<02:20:33.120> final 02:20:33.510 --> 02:20:33.520 align:start position:0% challenges that result in a final 02:20:33.520 --> 02:20:35.830 align:start position:0% challenges that result in a final determination<02:20:34.479> to<02:20:34.800> retain<02:20:35.200> the<02:20:35.439> material 02:20:35.830 --> 02:20:35.840 align:start position:0% determination to retain the material 02:20:35.840 --> 02:20:45.349 align:start position:0% determination to retain the material without<02:20:36.319> restriction. 02:20:45.349 --> 02:20:45.359 align:start position:0% 02:20:45.359 --> 02:20:47.990 align:start position:0% I<02:20:45.680> mean,<02:20:45.920> because<02:20:46.399> you<02:20:46.560> know<02:20:47.280> I<02:20:47.359> I<02:20:47.680> just<02:20:47.760> I 02:20:47.990 --> 02:20:48.000 align:start position:0% I mean, because you know I I just I 02:20:48.000 --> 02:20:48.550 align:start position:0% I mean, because you know I I just I worry<02:20:48.240> about 02:20:48.550 --> 02:20:48.560 align:start position:0% worry about 02:20:48.560 --> 02:20:49.990 align:start position:0% worry about >> Yeah.<02:20:48.720> So,<02:20:48.960> how<02:20:49.120> do<02:20:49.200> you<02:20:49.359> want<02:20:49.439> to<02:20:49.600> clean<02:20:49.760> that 02:20:49.990 --> 02:20:50.000 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, how do you want to clean that 02:20:50.000 --> 02:20:52.070 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, how do you want to clean that up?<02:20:50.319> That's<02:20:50.640> That's<02:20:50.960> fine.<02:20:51.200> We<02:20:51.439> can<02:20:51.680> we<02:20:52.000> can 02:20:52.070 --> 02:20:52.080 align:start position:0% up? That's That's fine. We can we can 02:20:52.080 --> 02:20:53.990 align:start position:0% up? That's That's fine. We can we can clean<02:20:52.319> it<02:20:52.399> up<02:20:52.800> so<02:20:52.960> that<02:20:53.120> it's<02:20:53.359> cleaned<02:20:53.600> up 02:20:53.990 --> 02:20:54.000 align:start position:0% clean it up so that it's cleaned up 02:20:54.000 --> 02:20:56.790 align:start position:0% clean it up so that it's cleaned up closer<02:20:54.319> to<02:20:54.479> the<02:20:54.640> law. 02:20:56.790 --> 02:20:56.800 align:start position:0% closer to the law. 02:20:56.800 --> 02:20:59.510 align:start position:0% closer to the law. So,<02:20:57.040> what<02:20:57.200> did<02:20:57.359> you<02:20:57.520> say<02:20:57.760> again,<02:20:58.240> Joanne? 02:20:59.510 --> 02:20:59.520 align:start position:0% So, what did you say again, Joanne? 02:20:59.520 --> 02:21:01.190 align:start position:0% So, what did you say again, Joanne? >> Okay. 02:21:01.190 --> 02:21:01.200 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:21:01.200 --> 02:21:03.270 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Um, 02:21:03.270 --> 02:21:03.280 align:start position:0% Um, 02:21:03.280 --> 02:21:11.670 align:start position:0% Um, let<02:21:03.439> me<02:21:03.680> get<02:21:03.840> to<02:21:04.000> the<02:21:04.240> right<02:21:04.479> place. 02:21:11.670 --> 02:21:11.680 align:start position:0% 02:21:11.680 --> 02:21:13.670 align:start position:0% Okay.<02:21:12.000> I<02:21:12.319> move<02:21:12.479> to<02:21:12.640> amend<02:21:12.960> the<02:21:13.200> section 02:21:13.670 --> 02:21:13.680 align:start position:0% Okay. I move to amend the section 02:21:13.680 --> 02:21:15.750 align:start position:0% Okay. I move to amend the section limiting<02:21:14.160> annual<02:21:14.640> challenges<02:21:15.120> by<02:21:15.359> striking 02:21:15.750 --> 02:21:15.760 align:start position:0% limiting annual challenges by striking 02:21:15.760 --> 02:21:19.349 align:start position:0% limiting annual challenges by striking the<02:21:16.000> word<02:21:16.319> erroneous<02:21:17.760> and<02:21:18.080> inserting 02:21:19.349 --> 02:21:19.359 align:start position:0% the word erroneous and inserting 02:21:19.359 --> 02:21:21.670 align:start position:0% the word erroneous and inserting challenges<02:21:20.000> that<02:21:20.399> result<02:21:20.880> in<02:21:21.120> a<02:21:21.359> final 02:21:21.670 --> 02:21:21.680 align:start position:0% challenges that result in a final 02:21:21.680 --> 02:21:24.550 align:start position:0% challenges that result in a final determination<02:21:22.720> to<02:21:23.040> retain<02:21:23.680> the<02:21:24.000> material 02:21:24.550 --> 02:21:24.560 align:start position:0% determination to retain the material 02:21:24.560 --> 02:21:29.270 align:start position:0% determination to retain the material without<02:21:25.200> restriction. 02:21:29.270 --> 02:21:29.280 align:start position:0% 02:21:29.280 --> 02:21:31.910 align:start position:0% >> Okay.<02:21:30.240> And<02:21:30.399> that<02:21:30.640> just<02:21:30.800> uses<02:21:31.120> precise 02:21:31.910 --> 02:21:31.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And that just uses precise 02:21:31.920 --> 02:21:38.630 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And that just uses precise statutory<02:21:32.560> language 02:21:38.630 --> 02:21:38.640 align:start position:0% 02:21:38.640 --> 02:21:39.910 align:start position:0% since<02:21:38.960> the<02:21:39.200> committee 02:21:39.910 --> 02:21:39.920 align:start position:0% since the committee 02:21:39.920 --> 02:21:42.469 align:start position:0% since the committee >> is<02:21:40.160> the<02:21:40.319> word<02:21:40.560> erroneous<02:21:41.120> in<02:21:41.359> the<02:21:41.520> law.<02:21:41.920> Am<02:21:42.080> I 02:21:42.469 --> 02:21:42.479 align:start position:0% >> is the word erroneous in the law. Am I 02:21:42.479 --> 02:21:43.429 align:start position:0% >> is the word erroneous in the law. Am I >> is<02:21:42.720> it 02:21:43.429 --> 02:21:43.439 align:start position:0% >> is it 02:21:43.439 --> 02:21:48.790 align:start position:0% >> is it >> or<02:21:43.760> is<02:21:44.000> it<02:21:44.160> in<02:21:44.399> the<02:21:45.359> is<02:21:45.520> it<02:21:45.680> in<02:21:45.920> the<02:21:46.080> rule?<02:21:47.200> No,<02:21:47.359> I 02:21:48.790 --> 02:21:48.800 align:start position:0% >> or is it in the is it in the rule? No, I 02:21:48.800 --> 02:21:51.990 align:start position:0% >> or is it in the is it in the rule? No, I >> I'm<02:21:49.200> looking. 02:21:51.990 --> 02:21:52.000 align:start position:0% >> I'm looking. 02:21:52.000 --> 02:21:54.309 align:start position:0% >> I'm looking. >> Is<02:21:52.880> De<02:21:52.960> Stavina<02:21:53.439> around?<02:21:53.760> She's<02:21:54.000> probably 02:21:54.309 --> 02:21:54.319 align:start position:0% >> Is De Stavina around? She's probably 02:21:54.319 --> 02:21:55.830 align:start position:0% >> Is De Stavina around? She's probably knows<02:21:54.640> even<02:21:54.960> better<02:21:55.120> than 02:21:55.830 --> 02:21:55.840 align:start position:0% knows even better than 02:21:55.840 --> 02:21:57.349 align:start position:0% knows even better than >> Yeah.<02:21:56.000> Is<02:21:56.160> Deina 02:21:57.349 --> 02:21:57.359 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Is Deina 02:21:57.359 --> 02:21:59.510 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Is Deina >> but<02:21:57.520> or<02:21:57.840> Jenny<02:21:58.240> probably<02:21:58.399> knows<02:21:58.720> too<02:21:58.960> as<02:21:59.200> much. 02:21:59.510 --> 02:21:59.520 align:start position:0% >> but or Jenny probably knows too as much. 02:21:59.520 --> 02:22:01.349 align:start position:0% >> but or Jenny probably knows too as much. But<02:21:59.760> I<02:21:59.920> don't<02:22:00.000> know<02:22:00.080> about<02:22:00.240> that<02:22:00.960> word. 02:22:01.349 --> 02:22:01.359 align:start position:0% But I don't know about that word. 02:22:01.359 --> 02:22:02.870 align:start position:0% But I don't know about that word. >> Let's<02:22:01.600> see.<02:22:01.760> So<02:22:01.920> this<02:22:02.000> is<02:22:02.160> what<02:22:02.240> it<02:22:02.399> says.<02:22:02.640> As 02:22:02.870 --> 02:22:02.880 align:start position:0% >> Let's see. So this is what it says. As 02:22:02.880 --> 02:22:04.630 align:start position:0% >> Let's see. So this is what it says. As used<02:22:03.120> in<02:22:03.280> this<02:22:03.439> section,<02:22:03.840> unsuccessful 02:22:04.630 --> 02:22:04.640 align:start position:0% used in this section, unsuccessful 02:22:04.640 --> 02:22:06.469 align:start position:0% used in this section, unsuccessful challenge<02:22:04.960> means<02:22:05.200> an<02:22:05.359> allegation<02:22:05.760> that<02:22:06.080> is 02:22:06.469 --> 02:22:06.479 align:start position:0% challenge means an allegation that is 02:22:06.479 --> 02:22:08.070 align:start position:0% challenge means an allegation that is that<02:22:06.720> a<02:22:06.960> given<02:22:07.200> instructional<02:22:07.680> material 02:22:08.070 --> 02:22:08.080 align:start position:0% that a given instructional material 02:22:08.080 --> 02:22:09.510 align:start position:0% that a given instructional material constitutes<02:22:08.560> sensitive<02:22:08.960> material<02:22:09.200> that<02:22:09.359> the 02:22:09.510 --> 02:22:09.520 align:start position:0% constitutes sensitive material that the 02:22:09.520 --> 02:22:13.110 align:start position:0% constitutes sensitive material that the LEA<02:22:09.920> concludes<02:22:10.319> to<02:22:10.479> be<02:22:10.720> erroneous.<02:22:11.280> It<02:22:11.439> is 02:22:13.110 --> 02:22:13.120 align:start position:0% LEA concludes to be erroneous. It is 02:22:13.120 --> 02:22:17.110 align:start position:0% LEA concludes to be erroneous. It is >> either<02:22:13.600> on<02:22:13.920> direct<02:22:15.359> or<02:22:15.680> review<02:22:16.080> or<02:22:16.319> on<02:22:16.560> appeal 02:22:17.110 --> 02:22:17.120 align:start position:0% >> either on direct or review or on appeal 02:22:17.120 --> 02:22:20.630 align:start position:0% >> either on direct or review or on appeal to<02:22:17.359> the<02:22:17.760> LEA<02:22:18.160> governing<02:22:18.560> board<02:22:20.000> resulting<02:22:20.479> in 02:22:20.630 --> 02:22:20.640 align:start position:0% to the LEA governing board resulting in 02:22:20.640 --> 02:22:22.550 align:start position:0% to the LEA governing board resulting in the<02:22:20.800> retention<02:22:21.200> of<02:22:21.359> a<02:22:21.520> given<02:22:21.920> instructional 02:22:22.550 --> 02:22:22.560 align:start position:0% the retention of a given instructional 02:22:22.560 --> 02:22:25.110 align:start position:0% the retention of a given instructional material. 02:22:25.110 --> 02:22:25.120 align:start position:0% material. 02:22:25.120 --> 02:22:27.510 align:start position:0% material. >> Okay.<02:22:25.600> I 02:22:27.510 --> 02:22:27.520 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I 02:22:27.520 --> 02:22:29.429 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I I<02:22:27.840> thought<02:22:27.920> I<02:22:28.080> had<02:22:28.240> heard<02:22:28.399> that<02:22:28.560> word<02:22:28.800> before. 02:22:29.429 --> 02:22:29.439 align:start position:0% I thought I had heard that word before. 02:22:29.439 --> 02:22:31.590 align:start position:0% I thought I had heard that word before. >> Erroneous.<02:22:30.080> Doesn't<02:22:30.479> erroneous<02:22:31.040> imply<02:22:31.439> the 02:22:31.590 --> 02:22:31.600 align:start position:0% >> Erroneous. Doesn't erroneous imply the 02:22:31.600 --> 02:22:34.630 align:start position:0% >> Erroneous. Doesn't erroneous imply the parent<02:22:31.920> made<02:22:32.160> a<02:22:32.319> factual<02:22:32.800> mistake<02:22:34.000> where<02:22:34.399> the 02:22:34.630 --> 02:22:34.640 align:start position:0% parent made a factual mistake where the 02:22:34.640 --> 02:22:36.790 align:start position:0% parent made a factual mistake where the committee<02:22:35.760> ag. 02:22:36.790 --> 02:22:36.800 align:start position:0% committee ag. 02:22:36.800 --> 02:22:37.190 align:start position:0% committee ag. >> Okay. 02:22:37.190 --> 02:22:37.200 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:22:37.200 --> 02:22:38.550 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Yeah. 02:22:38.550 --> 02:22:38.560 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:22:38.560 --> 02:22:40.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Yeah.<02:22:38.800> So<02:22:38.960> the<02:22:39.200> term<02:22:39.600> erroneous<02:22:40.080> is<02:22:40.319> used 02:22:40.550 --> 02:22:40.560 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So the term erroneous is used 02:22:40.560 --> 02:22:42.309 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So the term erroneous is used within<02:22:40.960> the<02:22:41.120> code<02:22:41.359> and<02:22:41.520> it<02:22:41.680> is<02:22:41.840> for<02:22:42.000> when 02:22:42.309 --> 02:22:42.319 align:start position:0% within the code and it is for when 02:22:42.319 --> 02:22:44.790 align:start position:0% within the code and it is for when there's<02:22:42.560> an<02:22:42.720> unsuccessful<02:22:43.520> challenge<02:22:44.000> by<02:22:44.240> the 02:22:44.790 --> 02:22:44.800 align:start position:0% there's an unsuccessful challenge by the 02:22:44.800 --> 02:22:47.590 align:start position:0% there's an unsuccessful challenge by the the<02:22:45.200> parent<02:22:45.600> asking<02:22:46.000> for<02:22:46.399> review<02:22:47.120> or<02:22:47.439> an 02:22:47.590 --> 02:22:47.600 align:start position:0% the parent asking for review or an 02:22:47.600 --> 02:22:49.830 align:start position:0% the parent asking for review or an appeal<02:22:48.000> of<02:22:48.240> the<02:22:48.479> sensitive<02:22:48.960> material<02:22:49.520> book. 02:22:49.830 --> 02:22:49.840 align:start position:0% appeal of the sensitive material book. 02:22:49.840 --> 02:22:52.070 align:start position:0% appeal of the sensitive material book. And<02:22:50.000> so<02:22:50.560> if<02:22:50.800> it<02:22:50.960> was<02:22:51.120> determined<02:22:51.520> that<02:22:51.760> it<02:22:51.920> was 02:22:52.070 --> 02:22:52.080 align:start position:0% And so if it was determined that it was 02:22:52.080 --> 02:22:54.309 align:start position:0% And so if it was determined that it was not<02:22:52.399> erroneous,<02:22:53.040> it<02:22:53.200> was<02:22:53.280> unsuccessful.<02:22:54.160> So 02:22:54.309 --> 02:22:54.319 align:start position:0% not erroneous, it was unsuccessful. So 02:22:54.319 --> 02:22:56.150 align:start position:0% not erroneous, it was unsuccessful. So it<02:22:54.479> was<02:22:54.640> not<02:22:55.040> erroneous.<02:22:55.520> It's<02:22:55.680> almost<02:22:55.920> like<02:22:56.000> a 02:22:56.150 --> 02:22:56.160 align:start position:0% it was not erroneous. It's almost like a 02:22:56.160 --> 02:22:58.230 align:start position:0% it was not erroneous. It's almost like a double<02:22:56.399> negative<02:22:56.800> that's<02:22:57.120> being<02:22:57.359> used<02:22:57.600> here. 02:22:58.230 --> 02:22:58.240 align:start position:0% double negative that's being used here. 02:22:58.240 --> 02:23:00.150 align:start position:0% double negative that's being used here. And<02:22:58.479> I<02:22:58.640> would<02:22:58.800> say<02:22:58.960> to<02:22:59.200> keep<02:22:59.359> the<02:22:59.680> word 02:23:00.150 --> 02:23:00.160 align:start position:0% And I would say to keep the word 02:23:00.160 --> 02:23:03.270 align:start position:0% And I would say to keep the word erroneous<02:23:00.640> in<02:23:00.960> the<02:23:01.120> model<02:23:01.520> policy.<02:23:02.800> And<02:23:02.960> then 02:23:03.270 --> 02:23:03.280 align:start position:0% erroneous in the model policy. And then 02:23:03.280 --> 02:23:06.710 align:start position:0% erroneous in the model policy. And then second<02:23:04.080> um<02:23:04.560> what<02:23:05.200> um<02:23:05.439> board<02:23:05.680> member<02:23:06.000> Brit<02:23:06.319> had 02:23:06.710 --> 02:23:06.720 align:start position:0% second um what um board member Brit had 02:23:06.720 --> 02:23:08.950 align:start position:0% second um what um board member Brit had Britain<02:23:07.120> had<02:23:07.359> asked<02:23:07.840> previously<02:23:08.399> related<02:23:08.800> to 02:23:08.950 --> 02:23:08.960 align:start position:0% Britain had asked previously related to 02:23:08.960 --> 02:23:11.510 align:start position:0% Britain had asked previously related to the<02:23:09.200> grammar<02:23:10.000> language<02:23:10.479> that<02:23:10.720> is<02:23:10.880> acceptable. 02:23:11.510 --> 02:23:11.520 align:start position:0% the grammar language that is acceptable. 02:23:11.520 --> 02:23:13.429 align:start position:0% the grammar language that is acceptable. Um<02:23:11.840> that<02:23:12.080> would<02:23:12.160> be<02:23:12.319> fine<02:23:12.479> to<02:23:12.720> be<02:23:12.880> changed<02:23:13.200> as 02:23:13.429 --> 02:23:13.439 align:start position:0% Um that would be fine to be changed as 02:23:13.439 --> 02:23:15.510 align:start position:0% Um that would be fine to be changed as well. 02:23:15.510 --> 02:23:15.520 align:start position:0% well. 02:23:15.520 --> 02:23:17.110 align:start position:0% well. >> Okay.<02:23:15.840> So<02:23:16.000> let's<02:23:16.160> deal<02:23:16.319> with<02:23:16.640> erroneous<02:23:16.960> and 02:23:17.110 --> 02:23:17.120 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So let's deal with erroneous and 02:23:17.120 --> 02:23:18.309 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So let's deal with erroneous and then<02:23:17.280> we'll<02:23:17.439> go<02:23:17.520> back<02:23:17.680> up<02:23:17.840> to<02:23:18.000> the 02:23:18.309 --> 02:23:18.319 align:start position:0% then we'll go back up to the 02:23:18.319 --> 02:23:20.389 align:start position:0% then we'll go back up to the >> So<02:23:18.560> you're<02:23:18.720> saying<02:23:19.359> strike<02:23:19.680> that<02:23:19.920> just<02:23:20.160> keep 02:23:20.389 --> 02:23:20.399 align:start position:0% >> So you're saying strike that just keep 02:23:20.399 --> 02:23:22.150 align:start position:0% >> So you're saying strike that just keep erroneous<02:23:20.880> and<02:23:21.120> don't<02:23:21.359> change<02:23:21.600> the<02:23:21.760> language. 02:23:22.150 --> 02:23:22.160 align:start position:0% erroneous and don't change the language. 02:23:22.160 --> 02:23:25.429 align:start position:0% erroneous and don't change the language. There<02:23:22.399> is<02:23:22.640> this 02:23:25.429 --> 02:23:25.439 align:start position:0% 02:23:25.439 --> 02:23:28.150 align:start position:0% All<02:23:25.520> right.<02:23:26.319> Okay. 02:23:28.150 --> 02:23:28.160 align:start position:0% All right. Okay. 02:23:28.160 --> 02:23:29.990 align:start position:0% All right. Okay. >> Okay.<02:23:28.640> So,<02:23:28.880> let's<02:23:29.120> go<02:23:29.280> back<02:23:29.439> up<02:23:29.600> to<02:23:29.840> the 02:23:29.990 --> 02:23:30.000 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, let's go back up to the 02:23:30.000 --> 02:23:32.950 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, let's go back up to the original<02:23:30.960> motion<02:23:31.439> then<02:23:31.680> that<02:23:31.920> you<02:23:32.080> had<02:23:32.319> or<02:23:32.640> the 02:23:32.950 --> 02:23:32.960 align:start position:0% original motion then that you had or the 02:23:32.960 --> 02:23:34.950 align:start position:0% original motion then that you had or the the<02:23:33.359> amendment<02:23:33.840> that<02:23:34.000> you<02:23:34.160> had<02:23:34.319> given<02:23:34.640> which 02:23:34.950 --> 02:23:34.960 align:start position:0% the amendment that you had given which 02:23:34.960 --> 02:23:37.750 align:start position:0% the amendment that you had given which had<02:23:35.200> to<02:23:35.359> do<02:23:35.520> with<02:23:36.000> There<02:23:36.160> we<02:23:36.319> go.<02:23:37.200> So,<02:23:37.520> board 02:23:37.750 --> 02:23:37.760 align:start position:0% had to do with There we go. So, board 02:23:37.760 --> 02:23:39.990 align:start position:0% had to do with There we go. So, board member<02:23:38.000> Britain<02:23:38.319> had<02:23:38.560> moved<02:23:39.120> to<02:23:39.359> amend<02:23:39.840> the 02:23:39.990 --> 02:23:40.000 align:start position:0% member Britain had moved to amend the 02:23:40.000 --> 02:23:42.150 align:start position:0% member Britain had moved to amend the section<02:23:40.399> limiting<02:23:40.880> annual<02:23:41.359> challenges<02:23:41.920> by 02:23:42.150 --> 02:23:42.160 align:start position:0% section limiting annual challenges by 02:23:42.160 --> 02:23:44.790 align:start position:0% section limiting annual challenges by inserting 02:23:44.790 --> 02:23:44.800 align:start position:0% inserting 02:23:44.800 --> 02:23:48.950 align:start position:0% inserting is<02:23:45.040> that<02:23:45.280> where<02:23:45.439> we<02:23:45.680> are? 02:23:48.950 --> 02:23:48.960 align:start position:0% 02:23:48.960 --> 02:23:50.309 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:23:50.309 --> 02:23:50.319 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:23:50.319 --> 02:23:52.389 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Okay.<02:23:50.720> You<02:23:50.960> wanted<02:23:51.200> to<02:23:51.359> change<02:23:51.600> that.<02:23:51.920> So<02:23:52.240> we 02:23:52.389 --> 02:23:52.399 align:start position:0% >> Okay. You wanted to change that. So we 02:23:52.399 --> 02:23:53.110 align:start position:0% >> Okay. You wanted to change that. So we take<02:23:52.479> out<02:23:52.560> a 02:23:53.110 --> 02:23:53.120 align:start position:0% take out a 02:23:53.120 --> 02:23:55.270 align:start position:0% take out a >> we<02:23:53.760> know<02:23:53.920> that<02:23:54.160> we're<02:23:54.399> striking<02:23:54.800> the<02:23:54.960> phrase 02:23:55.270 --> 02:23:55.280 align:start position:0% >> we know that we're striking the phrase 02:23:55.280 --> 02:23:57.670 align:start position:0% >> we know that we're striking the phrase shall<02:23:55.600> be<02:23:55.760> kept<02:23:56.160> confidential<02:23:56.880> to<02:23:57.120> the<02:23:57.359> extent 02:23:57.670 --> 02:23:57.680 align:start position:0% shall be kept confidential to the extent 02:23:57.680 --> 02:23:58.630 align:start position:0% shall be kept confidential to the extent possible. 02:23:58.630 --> 02:23:58.640 align:start position:0% possible. 02:23:58.640 --> 02:24:01.990 align:start position:0% possible. >> So<02:23:58.960> go<02:23:59.120> up<02:23:59.439> one<02:23:59.760> more<02:24:00.800> motion.<02:24:01.280> Yep.<02:24:01.680> There<02:24:01.760> we 02:24:01.990 --> 02:24:02.000 align:start position:0% >> So go up one more motion. Yep. There we 02:24:02.000 --> 02:24:06.150 align:start position:0% >> So go up one more motion. Yep. There we go.<02:24:03.359> There<02:24:03.600> we<02:24:03.760> go.<02:24:04.319> Um 02:24:06.150 --> 02:24:06.160 align:start position:0% go. There we go. Um 02:24:06.160 --> 02:24:07.990 align:start position:0% go. There we go. Um okay.<02:24:06.560> So<02:24:06.880> board<02:24:07.120> member<02:24:07.359> Britain<02:24:07.680> moved<02:24:07.840> to 02:24:07.990 --> 02:24:08.000 align:start position:0% okay. So board member Britain moved to 02:24:08.000 --> 02:24:10.309 align:start position:0% okay. So board member Britain moved to amend<02:24:08.399> section<02:24:08.880> four<02:24:09.680> regarding<02:24:10.080> the 02:24:10.309 --> 02:24:10.319 align:start position:0% amend section four regarding the 02:24:10.319 --> 02:24:13.349 align:start position:0% amend section four regarding the confidentiality<02:24:11.280> of<02:24:11.520> the<02:24:11.840> challenger 02:24:13.349 --> 02:24:13.359 align:start position:0% confidentiality of the challenger 02:24:13.359 --> 02:24:15.030 align:start position:0% confidentiality of the challenger by<02:24:13.600> striking<02:24:14.000> the<02:24:14.160> phrase<02:24:14.399> shall<02:24:14.640> be<02:24:14.800> kept 02:24:15.030 --> 02:24:15.040 align:start position:0% by striking the phrase shall be kept 02:24:15.040 --> 02:24:16.710 align:start position:0% by striking the phrase shall be kept confidential<02:24:15.520> to<02:24:15.680> the<02:24:15.920> extent<02:24:16.160> possible<02:24:16.479> and 02:24:16.710 --> 02:24:16.720 align:start position:0% confidential to the extent possible and 02:24:16.720 --> 02:24:18.550 align:start position:0% confidential to the extent possible and inserting<02:24:17.200> shall<02:24:17.520> be<02:24:17.680> handled<02:24:18.000> in<02:24:18.160> accordance 02:24:18.550 --> 02:24:18.560 align:start position:0% inserting shall be handled in accordance 02:24:18.560 --> 02:24:21.750 align:start position:0% inserting shall be handled in accordance with<02:24:18.720> the<02:24:18.960> government<02:24:20.000> records<02:24:20.960> access<02:24:21.439> and 02:24:21.750 --> 02:24:21.760 align:start position:0% with the government records access and 02:24:21.760 --> 02:24:25.670 align:start position:0% with the government records access and management<02:24:22.479> act.<02:24:22.960> Grandma<02:24:24.319> um<02:24:24.560> noting<02:24:25.359> that 02:24:25.670 --> 02:24:25.680 align:start position:0% management act. Grandma um noting that 02:24:25.680 --> 02:24:28.150 align:start position:0% management act. Grandma um noting that formal<02:24:26.160> challenge<02:24:27.120> challenge<02:24:27.520> documentation 02:24:28.150 --> 02:24:28.160 align:start position:0% formal challenge challenge documentation 02:24:28.160 --> 02:24:29.830 align:start position:0% formal challenge challenge documentation may<02:24:28.399> be<02:24:28.479> subject<02:24:28.800> to<02:24:29.040> public<02:24:29.359> records 02:24:29.830 --> 02:24:29.840 align:start position:0% may be subject to public records 02:24:29.840 --> 02:24:31.830 align:start position:0% may be subject to public records requests. 02:24:31.830 --> 02:24:31.840 align:start position:0% requests. 02:24:31.840 --> 02:24:34.870 align:start position:0% requests. Any<02:24:32.080> more<02:24:32.319> discussion<02:24:32.720> to<02:24:32.960> that? 02:24:34.870 --> 02:24:34.880 align:start position:0% Any more discussion to that? 02:24:34.880 --> 02:24:38.150 align:start position:0% Any more discussion to that? Okay.<02:24:35.359> All<02:24:35.520> those<02:24:35.760> in<02:24:35.920> favor?<02:24:37.359> I 02:24:38.150 --> 02:24:38.160 align:start position:0% Okay. All those in favor? I 02:24:38.160 --> 02:24:38.950 align:start position:0% Okay. All those in favor? I >> I 02:24:38.950 --> 02:24:38.960 align:start position:0% >> I 02:24:38.960 --> 02:24:40.550 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 02:24:40.550 --> 02:24:40.560 align:start position:0% >> I 02:24:40.560 --> 02:24:42.230 align:start position:0% >> I >> I<02:24:40.800> think<02:24:40.880> that<02:24:41.120> passed<02:24:41.439> unanimously.<02:24:42.080> I 02:24:42.230 --> 02:24:42.240 align:start position:0% >> I think that passed unanimously. I 02:24:42.240 --> 02:24:47.429 align:start position:0% >> I think that passed unanimously. I didn't<02:24:43.040> hear<02:24:43.280> any<02:24:43.600> opposition. 02:24:47.429 --> 02:24:47.439 align:start position:0% 02:24:47.439 --> 02:24:48.790 align:start position:0% >> All right.<02:24:47.760> And<02:24:47.920> then<02:24:48.080> the<02:24:48.240> other<02:24:48.399> one<02:24:48.560> needs 02:24:48.790 --> 02:24:48.800 align:start position:0% >> All right. And then the other one needs 02:24:48.800 --> 02:24:50.790 align:start position:0% >> All right. And then the other one needs to<02:24:48.880> be<02:24:49.040> left<02:24:49.200> the<02:24:49.439> way<02:24:49.520> it<02:24:49.680> is<02:24:49.840> if<02:24:50.080> I<02:24:50.240> understood 02:24:50.790 --> 02:24:50.800 align:start position:0% to be left the way it is if I understood 02:24:50.800 --> 02:24:54.389 align:start position:0% to be left the way it is if I understood our<02:24:51.200> discussion.<02:24:51.760> Is<02:24:52.000> that<02:24:52.160> correct 02:24:54.389 --> 02:24:54.399 align:start position:0% our discussion. Is that correct 02:24:54.399 --> 02:24:56.550 align:start position:0% our discussion. Is that correct with<02:24:54.640> the<02:24:54.800> unsuccessful<02:24:55.439> challenges?<02:24:56.080> Okay. 02:24:56.550 --> 02:24:56.560 align:start position:0% with the unsuccessful challenges? Okay. 02:24:56.560 --> 02:24:57.270 align:start position:0% with the unsuccessful challenges? Okay. You<02:24:56.720> put<02:24:56.880> another 02:24:57.270 --> 02:24:57.280 align:start position:0% You put another 02:24:57.280 --> 02:24:57.830 align:start position:0% You put another >> correct. 02:24:57.830 --> 02:24:57.840 align:start position:0% >> correct. 02:24:57.840 --> 02:25:00.950 align:start position:0% >> correct. >> You<02:24:58.080> have<02:24:58.240> another<02:24:58.560> suggestion<02:24:59.120> then. 02:25:00.950 --> 02:25:00.960 align:start position:0% >> You have another suggestion then. 02:25:00.960 --> 02:25:03.110 align:start position:0% >> You have another suggestion then. Um<02:25:01.359> well<02:25:01.680> and<02:25:01.840> I<02:25:02.080> was<02:25:02.160> wondering<02:25:02.560> as<02:25:02.800> I<02:25:02.960> was 02:25:03.110 --> 02:25:03.120 align:start position:0% Um well and I was wondering as I was 02:25:03.120 --> 02:25:05.750 align:start position:0% Um well and I was wondering as I was looking<02:25:03.359> at<02:25:04.000> at<02:25:04.319> streamlining<02:25:04.880> the<02:25:05.120> policy<02:25:05.600> if 02:25:05.750 --> 02:25:05.760 align:start position:0% looking at at streamlining the policy if 02:25:05.760 --> 02:25:10.070 align:start position:0% looking at at streamlining the policy if there<02:25:06.720> um<02:25:07.280> could<02:25:07.520> I<02:25:07.680> just<02:25:08.000> ask<02:25:08.319> about 02:25:10.070 --> 02:25:10.080 align:start position:0% there um could I just ask about 02:25:10.080 --> 02:25:11.830 align:start position:0% there um could I just ask about combining<02:25:10.560> the<02:25:10.800> subjective<02:25:11.359> sensitive 02:25:11.830 --> 02:25:11.840 align:start position:0% combining the subjective sensitive 02:25:11.840 --> 02:25:13.750 align:start position:0% combining the subjective sensitive materials<02:25:12.319> committee<02:25:12.720> and<02:25:13.040> the<02:25:13.359> age 02:25:13.750 --> 02:25:13.760 align:start position:0% materials committee and the age 02:25:13.760 --> 02:25:15.830 align:start position:0% materials committee and the age appropriate<02:25:14.319> review<02:25:14.720> committee<02:25:15.200> into<02:25:15.600> a 02:25:15.830 --> 02:25:15.840 align:start position:0% appropriate review committee into a 02:25:15.840 --> 02:25:18.630 align:start position:0% appropriate review committee into a single<02:25:16.960> materials<02:25:17.680> reconsideration 02:25:18.630 --> 02:25:18.640 align:start position:0% single materials reconsideration 02:25:18.640 --> 02:25:22.950 align:start position:0% single materials reconsideration committee.<02:25:19.200> Do<02:25:19.439> we<02:25:19.600> really<02:25:19.840> need<02:25:20.080> two? 02:25:22.950 --> 02:25:22.960 align:start position:0% committee. Do we really need two? 02:25:22.960 --> 02:25:24.710 align:start position:0% committee. Do we really need two? >> I<02:25:23.200> don't<02:25:23.359> think<02:25:23.600> I<02:25:23.840> think<02:25:24.000> it<02:25:24.160> needs<02:25:24.399> to<02:25:24.560> be 02:25:24.710 --> 02:25:24.720 align:start position:0% >> I don't think I think it needs to be 02:25:24.720 --> 02:25:27.030 align:start position:0% >> I don't think I think it needs to be sensitive<02:25:25.359> materials.<02:25:26.080> You<02:25:26.319> either<02:25:26.640> go 02:25:27.030 --> 02:25:27.040 align:start position:0% sensitive materials. You either go 02:25:27.040 --> 02:25:30.230 align:start position:0% sensitive materials. You either go objective<02:25:27.760> or<02:25:28.479> subjective.<02:25:29.200> I<02:25:29.520> think<02:25:29.920> adding 02:25:30.230 --> 02:25:30.240 align:start position:0% objective or subjective. I think adding 02:25:30.240 --> 02:25:32.309 align:start position:0% objective or subjective. I think adding a<02:25:30.479> new<02:25:30.640> name<02:25:30.880> in<02:25:31.120> there,<02:25:31.760> it's<02:25:32.080> already 02:25:32.309 --> 02:25:32.319 align:start position:0% a new name in there, it's already 02:25:32.319 --> 02:25:34.070 align:start position:0% a new name in there, it's already confusing<02:25:32.800> with<02:25:33.040> two, 02:25:34.070 --> 02:25:34.080 align:start position:0% confusing with two, 02:25:34.080 --> 02:25:34.710 align:start position:0% confusing with two, >> right? 02:25:34.710 --> 02:25:34.720 align:start position:0% >> right? 02:25:34.720 --> 02:25:35.190 align:start position:0% >> right? >> And<02:25:34.880> that's 02:25:35.190 --> 02:25:35.200 align:start position:0% >> And that's 02:25:35.200 --> 02:25:36.790 align:start position:0% >> And that's >> I<02:25:35.359> mean<02:25:35.439> it<02:25:35.680> doesn't<02:25:35.840> have<02:25:36.000> to<02:25:36.080> be<02:25:36.240> that<02:25:36.479> name. 02:25:36.790 --> 02:25:36.800 align:start position:0% >> I mean it doesn't have to be that name. 02:25:36.800 --> 02:25:39.349 align:start position:0% >> I mean it doesn't have to be that name. I<02:25:36.960> just<02:25:37.200> wonder<02:25:37.439> about<02:25:37.760> a<02:25:38.080> single<02:25:38.880> committee 02:25:39.349 --> 02:25:39.359 align:start position:0% I just wonder about a single committee 02:25:39.359 --> 02:25:41.670 align:start position:0% I just wonder about a single committee versus<02:25:39.760> having<02:25:39.920> the<02:25:40.160> two<02:25:40.399> separate.<02:25:40.960> So<02:25:41.439> if 02:25:41.670 --> 02:25:41.680 align:start position:0% versus having the two separate. So if 02:25:41.680 --> 02:25:43.590 align:start position:0% versus having the two separate. So if there's<02:25:41.920> a<02:25:42.080> better<02:25:42.319> way<02:25:42.399> to<02:25:42.640> do<02:25:42.800> that,<02:25:43.040> I<02:25:43.359> just 02:25:43.590 --> 02:25:43.600 align:start position:0% there's a better way to do that, I just 02:25:43.600 --> 02:25:45.510 align:start position:0% there's a better way to do that, I just wanted<02:25:43.920> to<02:25:44.000> pose<02:25:44.319> that.<02:25:44.880> So,<02:25:45.120> board<02:25:45.359> member 02:25:45.510 --> 02:25:45.520 align:start position:0% wanted to pose that. So, board member 02:25:45.520 --> 02:25:46.950 align:start position:0% wanted to pose that. So, board member Britain,<02:25:45.920> maybe<02:25:46.080> you<02:25:46.240> missed<02:25:46.399> it<02:25:46.560> in<02:25:46.720> my 02:25:46.950 --> 02:25:46.960 align:start position:0% Britain, maybe you missed it in my 02:25:46.960 --> 02:25:48.790 align:start position:0% Britain, maybe you missed it in my recommended<02:25:47.439> changes,<02:25:47.840> but<02:25:48.080> I<02:25:48.240> took<02:25:48.399> out<02:25:48.560> the 02:25:48.790 --> 02:25:48.800 align:start position:0% recommended changes, but I took out the 02:25:48.800 --> 02:25:50.950 align:start position:0% recommended changes, but I took out the age<02:25:49.120> appropriate<02:25:49.680> and<02:25:49.920> I<02:25:50.160> actually<02:25:50.560> made<02:25:50.720> it 02:25:50.950 --> 02:25:50.960 align:start position:0% age appropriate and I actually made it 02:25:50.960 --> 02:25:53.670 align:start position:0% age appropriate and I actually made it into<02:25:51.280> just<02:25:51.840> subjective<02:25:52.560> materials<02:25:53.200> once<02:25:53.520> it 02:25:53.670 --> 02:25:53.680 align:start position:0% into just subjective materials once it 02:25:53.680 --> 02:25:55.990 align:start position:0% into just subjective materials once it doesn't<02:25:53.920> meet<02:25:54.080> the<02:25:54.319> threshold<02:25:54.800> of<02:25:54.960> objective, 02:25:55.990 --> 02:25:56.000 align:start position:0% doesn't meet the threshold of objective, 02:25:56.000 --> 02:25:58.070 align:start position:0% doesn't meet the threshold of objective, >> which<02:25:56.319> would<02:25:56.560> include<02:25:56.880> the<02:25:57.040> age<02:25:57.359> appropriate 02:25:58.070 --> 02:25:58.080 align:start position:0% >> which would include the age appropriate 02:25:58.080 --> 02:25:59.510 align:start position:0% >> which would include the age appropriate provisions. 02:25:59.510 --> 02:25:59.520 align:start position:0% provisions. 02:25:59.520 --> 02:26:01.429 align:start position:0% provisions. >> Okay.<02:25:59.840> So,<02:26:00.000> that<02:26:00.319> we<02:26:00.479> did<02:26:00.640> that<02:26:00.880> last<02:26:01.120> time. 02:26:01.429 --> 02:26:01.439 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, that we did that last time. 02:26:01.439 --> 02:26:02.230 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, that we did that last time. That's<02:26:01.680> right. 02:26:02.230 --> 02:26:02.240 align:start position:0% That's right. 02:26:02.240 --> 02:26:03.510 align:start position:0% That's right. >> Well,<02:26:02.479> we<02:26:02.720> haven't<02:26:02.880> discussed<02:26:03.280> it 02:26:03.510 --> 02:26:03.520 align:start position:0% >> Well, we haven't discussed it 02:26:03.520 --> 02:26:05.270 align:start position:0% >> Well, we haven't discussed it thoroughly.<02:26:04.319> We<02:26:04.560> were<02:26:04.720> going<02:26:04.800> to<02:26:04.960> discuss 02:26:05.270 --> 02:26:05.280 align:start position:0% thoroughly. We were going to discuss 02:26:05.280 --> 02:26:06.950 align:start position:0% thoroughly. We were going to discuss that<02:26:05.439> a<02:26:05.600> little<02:26:05.680> bit<02:26:05.840> more,<02:26:06.000> but<02:26:06.240> that<02:26:06.479> was<02:26:06.640> a 02:26:06.950 --> 02:26:06.960 align:start position:0% that a little bit more, but that was a 02:26:06.960 --> 02:26:10.070 align:start position:0% that a little bit more, but that was a recommendation<02:26:07.760> this 02:26:10.070 --> 02:26:10.080 align:start position:0% recommendation this 02:26:10.080 --> 02:26:12.070 align:start position:0% recommendation this if<02:26:10.319> you<02:26:10.479> wanted<02:26:10.880> if<02:26:11.359> if<02:26:11.600> you're<02:26:11.760> good. 02:26:12.070 --> 02:26:12.080 align:start position:0% if you wanted if if you're good. 02:26:12.080 --> 02:26:16.309 align:start position:0% if you wanted if if you're good. >> That's<02:26:12.319> okay.<02:26:12.479> We<02:26:12.720> could<02:26:12.880> wait<02:26:13.120> on<02:26:13.359> that.<02:26:13.840> Um, 02:26:16.309 --> 02:26:16.319 align:start position:0% >> That's okay. We could wait on that. Um, 02:26:16.319 --> 02:26:18.230 align:start position:0% >> That's okay. We could wait on that. Um, >> did<02:26:16.560> you<02:26:16.720> have<02:26:16.880> another<02:26:17.520> recommendation? 02:26:18.230 --> 02:26:18.240 align:start position:0% >> did you have another recommendation? 02:26:18.240 --> 02:26:22.630 align:start position:0% >> did you have another recommendation? >> There<02:26:18.479> was,<02:26:19.280> um,<02:26:20.640> let's<02:26:20.960> see.<02:26:22.160> I'm<02:26:22.479> just 02:26:22.630 --> 02:26:22.640 align:start position:0% >> There was, um, let's see. I'm just 02:26:22.640 --> 02:26:24.550 align:start position:0% >> There was, um, let's see. I'm just wondering<02:26:23.040> about<02:26:23.359> an<02:26:23.600> initial<02:26:24.080> review 02:26:24.550 --> 02:26:24.560 align:start position:0% wondering about an initial review 02:26:24.560 --> 02:26:26.710 align:start position:0% wondering about an initial review section<02:26:25.040> to<02:26:25.359> require<02:26:25.760> the<02:26:25.920> implementation<02:26:26.560> of 02:26:26.710 --> 02:26:26.720 align:start position:0% section to require the implementation of 02:26:26.720 --> 02:26:28.469 align:start position:0% section to require the implementation of a<02:26:26.960> standardized<02:26:27.520> intake<02:26:28.000> assessment 02:26:28.469 --> 02:26:28.479 align:start position:0% a standardized intake assessment 02:26:28.479 --> 02:26:31.349 align:start position:0% a standardized intake assessment checklist<02:26:29.920> to<02:26:30.240> determine<02:26:30.640> a<02:26:30.880> plausible 02:26:31.349 --> 02:26:31.359 align:start position:0% checklist to determine a plausible 02:26:31.359 --> 02:26:33.670 align:start position:0% checklist to determine a plausible claim.<02:26:32.800> Um, 02:26:33.670 --> 02:26:33.680 align:start position:0% claim. Um, 02:26:33.680 --> 02:26:36.230 align:start position:0% claim. Um, >> I<02:26:33.920> think<02:26:34.080> it's<02:26:34.319> there,<02:26:35.200> but 02:26:36.230 --> 02:26:36.240 align:start position:0% >> I think it's there, but 02:26:36.240 --> 02:26:39.429 align:start position:0% >> I think it's there, but >> is<02:26:36.479> that<02:26:37.040> initial<02:26:37.520> review?<02:26:38.160> Yeah, 02:26:39.429 --> 02:26:39.439 align:start position:0% >> is that initial review? Yeah, 02:26:39.439 --> 02:26:43.830 align:start position:0% >> is that initial review? Yeah, >> let<02:26:39.680> me<02:26:39.840> look<02:26:40.000> back<02:26:40.160> up<02:26:40.319> at<02:26:40.479> the<02:26:40.640> top. 02:26:43.830 --> 02:26:43.840 align:start position:0% 02:26:43.840 --> 02:26:45.590 align:start position:0% because<02:26:44.080> it<02:26:44.240> says<02:26:44.479> the<02:26:44.640> current<02:26:44.880> text<02:26:45.280> leaves 02:26:45.590 --> 02:26:45.600 align:start position:0% because it says the current text leaves 02:26:45.600 --> 02:26:47.750 align:start position:0% because it says the current text leaves the<02:26:45.840> plausible<02:26:46.319> claim<02:26:46.640> determination<02:26:47.359> highly 02:26:47.750 --> 02:26:47.760 align:start position:0% the plausible claim determination highly 02:26:47.760 --> 02:26:50.469 align:start position:0% the plausible claim determination highly subjective<02:26:48.479> for<02:26:48.720> the<02:26:48.880> initial<02:26:49.359> administrator 02:26:50.469 --> 02:26:50.479 align:start position:0% subjective for the initial administrator 02:26:50.479 --> 02:26:53.270 align:start position:0% subjective for the initial administrator a<02:26:50.720> binary<02:26:51.280> checklist 02:26:53.270 --> 02:26:53.280 align:start position:0% a binary checklist 02:26:53.280 --> 02:26:58.710 align:start position:0% a binary checklist um<02:26:53.439> as<02:26:53.760> defined<02:26:54.160> in<02:26:54.479> code 02:26:58.710 --> 02:26:58.720 align:start position:0% 02:26:58.720 --> 02:27:00.790 align:start position:0% I<02:26:58.960> don't<02:26:59.040> know<02:26:59.200> I<02:26:59.439> just<02:26:59.600> would<02:26:59.760> it<02:27:00.000> create<02:27:00.240> a<02:27:00.479> a 02:27:00.790 --> 02:27:00.800 align:start position:0% I don't know I just would it create a a 02:27:00.800 --> 02:27:02.389 align:start position:0% I don't know I just would it create a a paper<02:27:01.040> trail<02:27:01.359> that<02:27:01.520> would<02:27:01.680> speed<02:27:01.920> up<02:27:02.160> the 02:27:02.389 --> 02:27:02.399 align:start position:0% paper trail that would speed up the 02:27:02.399 --> 02:27:05.270 align:start position:0% paper trail that would speed up the process<02:27:02.800> if<02:27:03.040> there<02:27:03.280> was<02:27:03.439> a 02:27:05.270 --> 02:27:05.280 align:start position:0% process if there was a 02:27:05.280 --> 02:27:15.990 align:start position:0% process if there was a an<02:27:05.600> an<02:27:06.399> initial<02:27:06.800> assessment<02:27:07.359> checklist<02:27:07.680> list. 02:27:15.990 --> 02:27:16.000 align:start position:0% 02:27:16.000 --> 02:27:35.110 align:start position:0% I'm<02:27:16.319> just<02:27:16.479> looking<02:27:16.720> back<02:27:16.960> up<02:27:17.200> to<02:27:17.359> see. 02:27:35.110 --> 02:27:35.120 align:start position:0% 02:27:35.120 --> 02:27:37.030 align:start position:0% Am<02:27:35.359> I<02:27:35.520> missing<02:27:35.760> something?<02:27:36.160> The<02:27:36.319> lot<02:27:36.640> has<02:27:36.800> that 02:27:37.030 --> 02:27:37.040 align:start position:0% Am I missing something? The lot has that 02:27:37.040 --> 02:27:39.750 align:start position:0% Am I missing something? The lot has that initial<02:27:37.359> piece<02:27:37.680> and<02:27:37.840> in<02:27:38.080> our<02:27:38.240> other 02:27:39.750 --> 02:27:39.760 align:start position:0% initial piece and in our other 02:27:39.760 --> 02:27:43.270 align:start position:0% initial piece and in our other model<02:27:40.160> policy<02:27:40.560> it<02:27:40.720> does<02:27:40.960> is<02:27:41.439> or<02:27:42.479> am<02:27:42.720> I<02:27:42.880> missing 02:27:43.270 --> 02:27:43.280 align:start position:0% model policy it does is or am I missing 02:27:43.280 --> 02:27:45.830 align:start position:0% model policy it does is or am I missing something<02:27:43.600> here<02:27:44.399> in<02:27:44.560> our 02:27:45.830 --> 02:27:45.840 align:start position:0% something here in our 02:27:45.840 --> 02:27:49.990 align:start position:0% something here in our >> let's<02:27:46.160> see<02:27:47.600> Deina<02:27:48.160> are<02:27:48.319> you<02:27:48.479> on<02:27:49.200> isn't<02:27:49.600> there<02:27:49.840> a 02:27:49.990 --> 02:27:50.000 align:start position:0% >> let's see Deina are you on isn't there a 02:27:50.000 --> 02:27:52.309 align:start position:0% >> let's see Deina are you on isn't there a provision<02:27:50.399> for<02:27:50.560> that<02:27:50.800> initial 02:27:52.309 --> 02:27:52.319 align:start position:0% provision for that initial 02:27:52.319 --> 02:27:53.990 align:start position:0% provision for that initial review<02:27:52.720> and<02:27:52.880> it<02:27:53.040> has<02:27:53.120> to<02:27:53.280> be<02:27:53.359> by<02:27:53.600> a<02:27:53.760> couple<02:27:53.840> of 02:27:53.990 --> 02:27:54.000 align:start position:0% review and it has to be by a couple of 02:27:54.000 --> 02:27:56.389 align:start position:0% review and it has to be by a couple of people<02:27:54.160> from<02:27:54.399> our<02:27:54.640> rule<02:27:55.760> that<02:27:56.000> it's<02:27:56.160> not 02:27:56.389 --> 02:27:56.399 align:start position:0% people from our rule that it's not 02:27:56.399 --> 02:27:58.870 align:start position:0% people from our rule that it's not >> Yes<02:27:56.560> I<02:27:56.720> am<02:27:56.880> this<02:27:57.120> Deina<02:27:57.600> Southoff 02:27:58.870 --> 02:27:58.880 align:start position:0% >> Yes I am this Deina Southoff 02:27:58.880 --> 02:28:00.389 align:start position:0% >> Yes I am this Deina Southoff >> library<02:27:59.200> media<02:27:59.520> specialist<02:27:59.920> teaching<02:28:00.160> and 02:28:00.389 --> 02:28:00.399 align:start position:0% >> library media specialist teaching and 02:28:00.399 --> 02:28:05.110 align:start position:0% >> library media specialist teaching and learning<02:28:01.520> um<02:28:01.760> yes<02:28:02.080> the<02:28:02.319> initial<02:28:02.880> review<02:28:03.920> is<02:28:04.319> in 02:28:05.110 --> 02:28:05.120 align:start position:0% learning um yes the initial review is in 02:28:05.120 --> 02:28:07.750 align:start position:0% learning um yes the initial review is in section 02:28:07.750 --> 02:28:07.760 align:start position:0% 02:28:07.760 --> 02:28:10.630 align:start position:0% four 02:28:10.630 --> 02:28:10.640 align:start position:0% four 02:28:10.640 --> 02:28:13.830 align:start position:0% four process<02:28:11.200> review<02:28:11.600> process.<02:28:12.080> Let's<02:28:12.319> see. 02:28:13.830 --> 02:28:13.840 align:start position:0% process review process. Let's see. 02:28:13.840 --> 02:28:15.590 align:start position:0% process review process. Let's see. I'm<02:28:14.080> looking<02:28:14.319> at<02:28:14.479> your<02:28:14.720> screen.<02:28:15.040> Let<02:28:15.200> me<02:28:15.359> look 02:28:15.590 --> 02:28:15.600 align:start position:0% I'm looking at your screen. Let me look 02:28:15.600 --> 02:28:17.910 align:start position:0% I'm looking at your screen. Let me look up. 02:28:17.910 --> 02:28:17.920 align:start position:0% up. 02:28:17.920 --> 02:28:22.150 align:start position:0% up. So,<02:28:19.040> it<02:28:19.280> would<02:28:19.520> be<02:28:19.760> section<02:28:20.240> four. 02:28:22.150 --> 02:28:22.160 align:start position:0% So, it would be section four. 02:28:22.160 --> 02:28:24.870 align:start position:0% So, it would be section four. Uh<02:28:22.960> it<02:28:23.359> starts<02:28:23.840> so<02:28:24.080> where<02:28:24.240> it<02:28:24.319> says<02:28:24.560> library 02:28:24.870 --> 02:28:24.880 align:start position:0% Uh it starts so where it says library 02:28:24.880 --> 02:28:27.030 align:start position:0% Uh it starts so where it says library materials<02:28:25.520> review<02:28:25.920> process<02:28:26.479> and<02:28:26.720> then<02:28:26.880> the 02:28:27.030 --> 02:28:27.040 align:start position:0% materials review process and then the 02:28:27.040 --> 02:28:33.270 align:start position:0% materials review process and then the initial<02:28:27.520> review<02:28:28.080> starts<02:28:28.560> on<02:28:28.880> number<02:28:30.319> four. 02:28:33.270 --> 02:28:33.280 align:start position:0% initial review starts on number four. 02:28:33.280 --> 02:28:39.429 align:start position:0% initial review starts on number four. 4A<02:28:34.240> talks<02:28:34.560> about<02:28:34.800> it. 02:28:39.429 --> 02:28:39.439 align:start position:0% 02:28:39.439 --> 02:28:41.270 align:start position:0% >> That's<02:28:39.760> that's<02:28:40.000> the<02:28:40.240> beginning<02:28:40.479> and<02:28:40.720> then<02:28:40.960> it 02:28:41.270 --> 02:28:41.280 align:start position:0% >> That's that's the beginning and then it 02:28:41.280 --> 02:28:42.630 align:start position:0% >> That's that's the beginning and then it continues. 02:28:42.630 --> 02:28:42.640 align:start position:0% continues. 02:28:42.640 --> 02:28:45.349 align:start position:0% continues. >> I<02:28:42.880> think<02:28:42.960> it's<02:28:43.280> missing<02:28:43.600> that<02:28:43.840> initial. 02:28:45.349 --> 02:28:45.359 align:start position:0% >> I think it's missing that initial. 02:28:45.359 --> 02:28:47.670 align:start position:0% >> I think it's missing that initial. I<02:28:45.600> mean<02:28:45.760> it<02:28:46.000> says<02:28:46.319> yes<02:28:46.640> but<02:28:46.880> it's<02:28:47.120> not<02:28:47.359> what<02:28:47.520> we 02:28:47.670 --> 02:28:47.680 align:start position:0% I mean it says yes but it's not what we 02:28:47.680 --> 02:28:49.349 align:start position:0% I mean it says yes but it's not what we have.<02:28:47.920> What<02:28:48.160> do<02:28:48.240> we<02:28:48.399> have<02:28:48.479> in<02:28:48.640> rule?<02:28:49.040> Does<02:28:49.200> it 02:28:49.349 --> 02:28:49.359 align:start position:0% have. What do we have in rule? Does it 02:28:49.359 --> 02:28:57.750 align:start position:0% have. What do we have in rule? Does it rule?<02:28:50.479> Let<02:28:50.640> me<02:28:50.800> look.<02:28:52.240> It's<02:28:52.640> a<02:28:52.800> number<02:28:53.120> eight. 02:28:57.750 --> 02:28:57.760 align:start position:0% 02:28:57.760 --> 02:29:02.950 align:start position:0% Number<02:28:58.160> eight, 02:29:02.950 --> 02:29:02.960 align:start position:0% 02:29:02.960 --> 02:29:04.950 align:start position:0% >> would<02:29:03.200> it<02:29:03.439> be<02:29:03.600> helpful<02:29:03.920> to<02:29:04.160> have<02:29:04.319> an<02:29:04.479> intake 02:29:04.950 --> 02:29:04.960 align:start position:0% >> would it be helpful to have an intake 02:29:04.960 --> 02:29:08.070 align:start position:0% >> would it be helpful to have an intake form<02:29:05.359> that<02:29:05.600> just<02:29:05.840> is<02:29:06.000> a<02:29:06.160> checklist<02:29:06.800> for 02:29:08.070 --> 02:29:08.080 align:start position:0% form that just is a checklist for 02:29:08.080 --> 02:29:10.070 align:start position:0% form that just is a checklist for >> those<02:29:08.319> that<02:29:08.560> are<02:29:08.720> assigned<02:29:09.120> to<02:29:09.359> to<02:29:09.680> bring<02:29:09.840> in 02:29:10.070 --> 02:29:10.080 align:start position:0% >> those that are assigned to to bring in 02:29:10.080 --> 02:29:16.389 align:start position:0% >> those that are assigned to to bring in these<02:29:10.319> reviews<02:29:10.720> to<02:29:10.960> go<02:29:11.120> through<02:29:11.359> quicker? 02:29:16.389 --> 02:29:16.399 align:start position:0% 02:29:16.399 --> 02:29:19.990 align:start position:0% So,<02:29:17.200> um,<02:29:17.520> may<02:29:17.760> may<02:29:18.000> I<02:29:18.160> answer<02:29:18.399> that?<02:29:18.640> Is<02:29:18.800> that 02:29:19.990 --> 02:29:20.000 align:start position:0% So, um, may may I answer that? Is that 02:29:20.000 --> 02:29:23.190 align:start position:0% So, um, may may I answer that? Is that okay?<02:29:20.720> Just<02:29:20.880> want<02:29:21.040> to<02:29:21.200> make<02:29:21.359> sure.<02:29:21.920> Um<02:29:22.640> so<02:29:22.880> we 02:29:23.190 --> 02:29:23.200 align:start position:0% okay? Just want to make sure. Um so we 02:29:23.200 --> 02:29:26.150 align:start position:0% okay? Just want to make sure. Um so we actually<02:29:23.520> do<02:29:23.840> have<02:29:24.000> a<02:29:24.160> checklist<02:29:25.040> that<02:29:25.760> staff 02:29:26.150 --> 02:29:26.160 align:start position:0% actually do have a checklist that staff 02:29:26.160 --> 02:29:29.590 align:start position:0% actually do have a checklist that staff made<02:29:26.720> as<02:29:27.439> part<02:29:27.760> of<02:29:28.240> you<02:29:28.479> know<02:29:28.800> resources<02:29:29.280> and 02:29:29.590 --> 02:29:29.600 align:start position:0% made as part of you know resources and 02:29:29.600 --> 02:29:33.590 align:start position:0% made as part of you know resources and supports<02:29:30.080> for<02:29:31.200> um<02:29:31.439> eleas<02:29:32.000> to<02:29:32.240> use.<02:29:33.120> So<02:29:33.439> there 02:29:33.590 --> 02:29:33.600 align:start position:0% supports for um eleas to use. So there 02:29:33.600 --> 02:29:35.670 align:start position:0% supports for um eleas to use. So there is<02:29:33.840> something<02:29:34.160> like<02:29:34.399> that<02:29:34.640> out<02:29:34.800> there<02:29:35.120> on<02:29:35.439> our 02:29:35.670 --> 02:29:35.680 align:start position:0% is something like that out there on our 02:29:35.680 --> 02:29:39.510 align:start position:0% is something like that out there on our website<02:29:36.160> currently.<02:29:37.600> Um<02:29:38.240> and<02:29:38.640> they<02:29:39.120> I<02:29:39.439> would 02:29:39.510 --> 02:29:39.520 align:start position:0% website currently. Um and they I would 02:29:39.520 --> 02:29:43.510 align:start position:0% website currently. Um and they I would say<02:29:40.000> all<02:29:40.640> 41<02:29:41.760> LEAs<02:29:42.399> have<02:29:42.720> been<02:29:42.960> trained<02:29:43.280> on 02:29:43.510 --> 02:29:43.520 align:start position:0% say all 41 LEAs have been trained on 02:29:43.520 --> 02:29:46.870 align:start position:0% say all 41 LEAs have been trained on that<02:29:43.760> and<02:29:44.080> shown<02:29:44.479> those<02:29:44.880> resources.<02:29:45.520> So,<02:29:46.479> um, 02:29:46.870 --> 02:29:46.880 align:start position:0% that and shown those resources. So, um, 02:29:46.880 --> 02:29:48.630 align:start position:0% that and shown those resources. So, um, the<02:29:47.040> feedback<02:29:47.439> I<02:29:47.760> have<02:29:47.920> received<02:29:48.240> is<02:29:48.479> that 02:29:48.630 --> 02:29:48.640 align:start position:0% the feedback I have received is that 02:29:48.640 --> 02:29:52.230 align:start position:0% the feedback I have received is that it's<02:29:48.880> been<02:29:49.120> very<02:29:49.359> helpful. 02:29:52.230 --> 02:29:52.240 align:start position:0% it's been very helpful. 02:29:52.240 --> 02:29:53.750 align:start position:0% it's been very helpful. >> Okay.<02:29:52.560> So,<02:29:52.640> it's<02:29:52.880> eight<02:29:53.040> and<02:29:53.200> nine<02:29:53.439> that<02:29:53.600> we're 02:29:53.750 --> 02:29:53.760 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, it's eight and nine that we're 02:29:53.760 --> 02:29:56.070 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, it's eight and nine that we're looking<02:29:53.920> at<02:29:54.160> under<02:29:54.479> that<02:29:54.720> section.<02:29:55.600> I<02:29:55.840> knew<02:29:56.000> it 02:29:56.070 --> 02:29:56.080 align:start position:0% looking at under that section. I knew it 02:29:56.080 --> 02:29:57.270 align:start position:0% looking at under that section. I knew it was<02:29:56.240> there.<02:29:56.399> I'm<02:29:56.560> like,<02:29:56.720> I<02:29:56.880> know<02:29:56.960> it<02:29:57.120> was<02:29:57.200> there 02:29:57.270 --> 02:29:57.280 align:start position:0% was there. I'm like, I know it was there 02:29:57.280 --> 02:30:01.510 align:start position:0% was there. I'm like, I know it was there because<02:29:57.439> I've<02:29:57.680> read<02:29:57.760> it<02:29:57.920> once,<02:29:58.240> but 02:30:01.510 --> 02:30:01.520 align:start position:0% 02:30:01.520 --> 02:30:03.030 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:30:03.030 --> 02:30:03.040 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:30:03.040 --> 02:30:04.710 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> And<02:30:03.280> they'll<02:30:03.600> create<02:30:03.760> a<02:30:03.920> case<02:30:04.240> number<02:30:04.399> for<02:30:04.560> the 02:30:04.710 --> 02:30:04.720 align:start position:0% >> And they'll create a case number for the 02:30:04.720 --> 02:30:06.630 align:start position:0% >> And they'll create a case number for the review.<02:30:04.960> So,<02:30:05.120> there<02:30:05.280> is<02:30:05.520> documentation.<02:30:06.479> Is 02:30:06.630 --> 02:30:06.640 align:start position:0% review. So, there is documentation. Is 02:30:06.640 --> 02:30:08.070 align:start position:0% review. So, there is documentation. Is that<02:30:06.880> kind<02:30:07.040> of<02:30:07.120> where<02:30:07.359> you<02:30:07.520> were<02:30:07.680> concerned 02:30:08.070 --> 02:30:08.080 align:start position:0% that kind of where you were concerned 02:30:08.080 --> 02:30:09.349 align:start position:0% that kind of where you were concerned maybe,<02:30:08.399> Joan,<02:30:08.640> that<02:30:08.800> that<02:30:09.040> wasn't<02:30:09.200> going<02:30:09.280> to 02:30:09.349 --> 02:30:09.359 align:start position:0% maybe, Joan, that that wasn't going to 02:30:09.359 --> 02:30:10.309 align:start position:0% maybe, Joan, that that wasn't going to be<02:30:09.520> there? 02:30:10.309 --> 02:30:10.319 align:start position:0% be there? 02:30:10.319 --> 02:30:12.630 align:start position:0% be there? >> Yeah.<02:30:10.640> that<02:30:10.880> maybe<02:30:11.200> that<02:30:11.600> because<02:30:11.840> I<02:30:12.000> I<02:30:12.399> talked 02:30:12.630 --> 02:30:12.640 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. that maybe that because I I talked 02:30:12.640 --> 02:30:14.630 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. that maybe that because I I talked to<02:30:13.200> um<02:30:13.359> somebody<02:30:13.600> at<02:30:13.840> our<02:30:14.000> district<02:30:14.319> who<02:30:14.560> was 02:30:14.630 --> 02:30:14.640 align:start position:0% to um somebody at our district who was 02:30:14.640 --> 02:30:16.630 align:start position:0% to um somebody at our district who was over<02:30:14.880> this<02:30:15.120> and<02:30:15.280> he<02:30:15.520> said<02:30:15.680> it<02:30:15.920> took<02:30:16.160> so<02:30:16.399> much 02:30:16.630 --> 02:30:16.640 align:start position:0% over this and he said it took so much 02:30:16.640 --> 02:30:19.110 align:start position:0% over this and he said it took so much time.<02:30:16.960> It<02:30:17.200> pretty<02:30:17.359> much<02:30:17.520> was<02:30:18.319> took<02:30:18.640> all<02:30:18.800> of<02:30:18.880> his 02:30:19.110 --> 02:30:19.120 align:start position:0% time. It pretty much was took all of his 02:30:19.120 --> 02:30:20.950 align:start position:0% time. It pretty much was took all of his time<02:30:19.439> just<02:30:19.760> dealing<02:30:20.080> with<02:30:20.240> all.<02:30:20.560> So<02:30:20.640> I<02:30:20.800> just 02:30:20.950 --> 02:30:20.960 align:start position:0% time just dealing with all. So I just 02:30:20.960 --> 02:30:21.990 align:start position:0% time just dealing with all. So I just thought<02:30:21.120> if<02:30:21.280> there<02:30:21.439> was<02:30:21.520> anything<02:30:21.760> to 02:30:21.990 --> 02:30:22.000 align:start position:0% thought if there was anything to 02:30:22.000 --> 02:30:25.030 align:start position:0% thought if there was anything to simplify<02:30:22.399> and<02:30:22.640> help<02:30:22.880> them<02:30:23.200> have<02:30:24.319> a<02:30:24.640> clearer 02:30:25.030 --> 02:30:25.040 align:start position:0% simplify and help them have a clearer 02:30:25.040 --> 02:30:26.469 align:start position:0% simplify and help them have a clearer process,<02:30:25.439> but<02:30:25.600> if<02:30:25.760> there<02:30:26.000> already<02:30:26.160> is 02:30:26.469 --> 02:30:26.479 align:start position:0% process, but if there already is 02:30:26.479 --> 02:30:28.710 align:start position:0% process, but if there already is something<02:30:26.720> in<02:30:26.960> place 02:30:28.710 --> 02:30:28.720 align:start position:0% something in place 02:30:28.720 --> 02:30:29.349 align:start position:0% something in place then 02:30:29.349 --> 02:30:29.359 align:start position:0% then 02:30:29.359 --> 02:30:31.349 align:start position:0% then >> yeah<02:30:29.600> this<02:30:29.840> that<02:30:30.160> addresses<02:30:30.640> nine<02:30:30.960> addresses 02:30:31.349 --> 02:30:31.359 align:start position:0% >> yeah this that addresses nine addresses 02:30:31.359 --> 02:30:33.349 align:start position:0% >> yeah this that addresses nine addresses the<02:30:31.600> plausible<02:30:32.080> claim<02:30:32.560> that<02:30:32.800> the<02:30:32.960> material 02:30:33.349 --> 02:30:33.359 align:start position:0% the plausible claim that the material 02:30:33.359 --> 02:30:35.190 align:start position:0% the plausible claim that the material constant<02:30:34.160> materials. 02:30:35.190 --> 02:30:35.200 align:start position:0% constant materials. 02:30:35.200 --> 02:30:37.670 align:start position:0% constant materials. >> Okay. 02:30:37.670 --> 02:30:37.680 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:30:37.680 --> 02:30:44.469 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Um, 02:30:44.469 --> 02:30:44.479 align:start position:0% 02:30:44.479 --> 02:30:48.630 align:start position:0% and<02:30:44.720> then<02:30:45.120> another,<02:30:46.160> um,<02:30:47.439> in<02:30:47.680> the<02:30:47.920> analysis<02:30:48.399> I 02:30:48.630 --> 02:30:48.640 align:start position:0% and then another, um, in the analysis I 02:30:48.640 --> 02:30:50.230 align:start position:0% and then another, um, in the analysis I was<02:30:48.800> doing,<02:30:49.040> it<02:30:49.200> just<02:30:49.359> said<02:30:49.600> we<02:30:49.760> maybe<02:30:50.000> could 02:30:50.230 --> 02:30:50.240 align:start position:0% was doing, it just said we maybe could 02:30:50.240 --> 02:30:52.389 align:start position:0% was doing, it just said we maybe could have<02:30:50.399> some<02:30:50.640> operational<02:30:51.280> clarity<02:30:52.080> and 02:30:52.389 --> 02:30:52.399 align:start position:0% have some operational clarity and 02:30:52.399 --> 02:30:55.510 align:start position:0% have some operational clarity and separation<02:30:52.880> of<02:30:53.120> duties<02:30:54.319> if<02:30:54.640> we<02:30:54.880> restructured 02:30:55.510 --> 02:30:55.520 align:start position:0% separation of duties if we restructured 02:30:55.520 --> 02:30:57.670 align:start position:0% separation of duties if we restructured it<02:30:55.760> into<02:30:56.080> two<02:30:56.319> distinct<02:30:56.880> sections<02:30:57.359> with 02:30:57.670 --> 02:30:57.680 align:start position:0% it into two distinct sections with 02:30:57.680 --> 02:30:59.590 align:start position:0% it into two distinct sections with library<02:30:58.080> acquisition<02:30:58.640> and<02:30:58.960> curation 02:30:59.590 --> 02:30:59.600 align:start position:0% library acquisition and curation 02:30:59.600 --> 02:31:02.150 align:start position:0% library acquisition and curation protocols<02:31:00.720> and<02:31:00.880> then<02:31:01.040> a<02:31:01.280> section<02:31:01.600> B<02:31:01.840> of 02:31:02.150 --> 02:31:02.160 align:start position:0% protocols and then a section B of 02:31:02.160 --> 02:31:04.790 align:start position:0% protocols and then a section B of reconsideration<02:31:02.960> of<02:31:03.200> challenged<02:31:03.680> materials. 02:31:04.790 --> 02:31:04.800 align:start position:0% reconsideration of challenged materials. 02:31:04.800 --> 02:31:06.950 align:start position:0% reconsideration of challenged materials. So<02:31:04.960> I<02:31:05.200> would<02:31:05.280> just<02:31:05.439> ask<02:31:05.680> Deina<02:31:06.319> is<02:31:06.560> that 02:31:06.950 --> 02:31:06.960 align:start position:0% So I would just ask Deina is that 02:31:06.960 --> 02:31:09.590 align:start position:0% So I would just ask Deina is that something<02:31:07.439> that<02:31:07.760> would<02:31:08.000> be<02:31:08.800> would<02:31:09.120> provide 02:31:09.590 --> 02:31:09.600 align:start position:0% something that would be would provide 02:31:09.600 --> 02:31:11.429 align:start position:0% something that would be would provide clarity. 02:31:11.429 --> 02:31:11.439 align:start position:0% clarity. 02:31:11.439 --> 02:31:13.670 align:start position:0% clarity. Um<02:31:12.080> and<02:31:12.319> the<02:31:12.560> rationale<02:31:12.960> it<02:31:13.120> was<02:31:13.280> given<02:31:13.439> was 02:31:13.670 --> 02:31:13.680 align:start position:0% Um and the rationale it was given was 02:31:13.680 --> 02:31:16.070 align:start position:0% Um and the rationale it was given was that<02:31:13.840> draft<02:31:14.240> 2<02:31:14.640> it<02:31:14.880> it<02:31:15.120> intertwines<02:31:15.680> the<02:31:15.920> rules 02:31:16.070 --> 02:31:16.080 align:start position:0% that draft 2 it it intertwines the rules 02:31:16.080 --> 02:31:17.670 align:start position:0% that draft 2 it it intertwines the rules for<02:31:16.319> buying<02:31:16.560> new<02:31:16.720> books<02:31:16.960> with<02:31:17.200> rules<02:31:17.520> for 02:31:17.670 --> 02:31:17.680 align:start position:0% for buying new books with rules for 02:31:17.680 --> 02:31:20.230 align:start position:0% for buying new books with rules for dealing<02:31:18.000> with<02:31:18.240> complaints<02:31:19.439> on<02:31:19.760> existing 02:31:20.230 --> 02:31:20.240 align:start position:0% dealing with complaints on existing 02:31:20.240 --> 02:31:23.510 align:start position:0% dealing with complaints on existing books.<02:31:20.560> So<02:31:20.720> if<02:31:20.880> we<02:31:21.120> separated<02:31:21.680> them<02:31:22.800> um<02:31:23.280> would 02:31:23.510 --> 02:31:23.520 align:start position:0% books. So if we separated them um would 02:31:23.520 --> 02:31:25.030 align:start position:0% books. So if we separated them um would that<02:31:23.680> ensure<02:31:24.000> that<02:31:24.160> everyday<02:31:24.560> library 02:31:25.030 --> 02:31:25.040 align:start position:0% that ensure that everyday library 02:31:25.040 --> 02:31:27.030 align:start position:0% that ensure that everyday library operations<02:31:25.600> are<02:31:25.840> not<02:31:26.000> choked<02:31:26.399> by<02:31:26.560> highly 02:31:27.030 --> 02:31:27.040 align:start position:0% operations are not choked by highly 02:31:27.040 --> 02:31:30.230 align:start position:0% operations are not choked by highly specific<02:31:27.439> legal<02:31:27.840> requirements<02:31:28.560> of<02:31:29.840> um 02:31:30.230 --> 02:31:30.240 align:start position:0% specific legal requirements of um 02:31:30.240 --> 02:31:34.710 align:start position:0% specific legal requirements of um challenges. 02:31:34.710 --> 02:31:34.720 align:start position:0% 02:31:34.720 --> 02:31:37.030 align:start position:0% >> Yeah.<02:31:34.960> Go<02:31:35.120> ahead.<02:31:35.359> Are<02:31:35.600> you<02:31:36.160> you're<02:31:36.479> muted<02:31:36.800> if 02:31:37.030 --> 02:31:37.040 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Go ahead. Are you you're muted if 02:31:37.040 --> 02:31:37.750 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Go ahead. Are you you're muted if you're<02:31:37.200> speaking? 02:31:37.750 --> 02:31:37.760 align:start position:0% you're speaking? 02:31:37.760 --> 02:31:40.230 align:start position:0% you're speaking? >> Yeah.<02:31:38.160> Um<02:31:38.720> so 02:31:40.230 --> 02:31:40.240 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Um so 02:31:40.240 --> 02:31:42.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Um so and<02:31:40.479> in<02:31:40.800> looking<02:31:40.960> at<02:31:41.200> that<02:31:41.520> request<02:31:42.240> so<02:31:42.399> it 02:31:42.550 --> 02:31:42.560 align:start position:0% and in looking at that request so it 02:31:42.560 --> 02:31:45.190 align:start position:0% and in looking at that request so it looks<02:31:42.800> like<02:31:43.120> section<02:31:43.600> A<02:31:44.240> library<02:31:44.720> acquisition 02:31:45.190 --> 02:31:45.200 align:start position:0% looks like section A library acquisition 02:31:45.200 --> 02:31:47.910 align:start position:0% looks like section A library acquisition and<02:31:45.439> curation<02:31:45.920> protocols<02:31:46.479> would<02:31:46.720> then<02:31:46.960> house 02:31:47.910 --> 02:31:47.920 align:start position:0% and curation protocols would then house 02:31:47.920 --> 02:31:51.510 align:start position:0% and curation protocols would then house li<02:31:48.800> uh<02:31:49.120> number<02:31:49.600> I<02:31:50.000> library<02:31:50.399> policy<02:31:50.960> II 02:31:51.510 --> 02:31:51.520 align:start position:0% li uh number I library policy II 02:31:51.520 --> 02:31:53.830 align:start position:0% li uh number I library policy II selection<02:31:51.920> and<02:31:52.160> I<02:31:52.399> III<02:31:52.880> library<02:31:53.280> collection 02:31:53.830 --> 02:31:53.840 align:start position:0% selection and I III library collection 02:31:53.840 --> 02:31:56.950 align:start position:0% selection and I III library collection maintenance.<02:31:54.800> And<02:31:54.960> then<02:31:55.200> your<02:31:55.439> new<02:31:55.680> section<02:31:56.160> B 02:31:56.950 --> 02:31:56.960 align:start position:0% maintenance. And then your new section B 02:31:56.960 --> 02:31:58.950 align:start position:0% maintenance. And then your new section B would<02:31:57.200> be<02:31:57.439> reconsideration<02:31:58.160> of<02:31:58.399> challenged 02:31:58.950 --> 02:31:58.960 align:start position:0% would be reconsideration of challenged 02:31:58.960 --> 02:32:02.469 align:start position:0% would be reconsideration of challenged materials<02:31:59.600> which<02:31:59.840> would<02:32:00.080> then<02:32:00.319> be<02:32:01.600> uh<02:32:01.840> IV 02:32:02.469 --> 02:32:02.479 align:start position:0% materials which would then be uh IV 02:32:02.479 --> 02:32:04.790 align:start position:0% materials which would then be uh IV library<02:32:02.880> materials<02:32:03.280> review<02:32:03.600> process<02:32:04.399> B 02:32:04.790 --> 02:32:04.800 align:start position:0% library materials review process B 02:32:04.800 --> 02:32:06.870 align:start position:0% library materials review process B appeals<02:32:05.280> process<02:32:05.680> and<02:32:06.000> BI<02:32:06.479> statewide 02:32:06.870 --> 02:32:06.880 align:start position:0% appeals process and BI statewide 02:32:06.880 --> 02:32:08.790 align:start position:0% appeals process and BI statewide removal.<02:32:07.280> So<02:32:07.680> reconsideration<02:32:08.479> would<02:32:08.640> be 02:32:08.790 --> 02:32:08.800 align:start position:0% removal. So reconsideration would be 02:32:08.800 --> 02:32:11.270 align:start position:0% removal. So reconsideration would be those<02:32:09.120> second<02:32:09.359> three<02:32:09.680> sections<02:32:10.240> and<02:32:10.720> library 02:32:11.270 --> 02:32:11.280 align:start position:0% those second three sections and library 02:32:11.280 --> 02:32:13.030 align:start position:0% those second three sections and library acquisition<02:32:11.840> and<02:32:12.080> protocols<02:32:12.560> would<02:32:12.720> be<02:32:12.800> the 02:32:13.030 --> 02:32:13.040 align:start position:0% acquisition and protocols would be the 02:32:13.040 --> 02:32:15.429 align:start position:0% acquisition and protocols would be the first<02:32:13.200> three<02:32:13.439> sections.<02:32:14.720> Um<02:32:15.040> is<02:32:15.200> that<02:32:15.359> what 02:32:15.429 --> 02:32:15.439 align:start position:0% first three sections. Um is that what 02:32:15.439 --> 02:32:17.910 align:start position:0% first three sections. Um is that what you're<02:32:15.680> asking?<02:32:16.080> Just<02:32:16.319> separate<02:32:16.720> it<02:32:17.359> into<02:32:17.680> the 02:32:17.910 --> 02:32:17.920 align:start position:0% you're asking? Just separate it into the 02:32:17.920 --> 02:32:20.950 align:start position:0% you're asking? Just separate it into the two.<02:32:19.120> Um<02:32:19.359> that<02:32:19.600> would<02:32:19.680> be<02:32:19.840> a<02:32:20.000> simple<02:32:20.319> thing<02:32:20.720> to 02:32:20.950 --> 02:32:20.960 align:start position:0% two. Um that would be a simple thing to 02:32:20.960 --> 02:32:23.349 align:start position:0% two. Um that would be a simple thing to do. 02:32:23.349 --> 02:32:23.359 align:start position:0% do. 02:32:23.359 --> 02:32:25.110 align:start position:0% do. So<02:32:23.520> I<02:32:23.760> just<02:32:23.920> present<02:32:24.160> it<02:32:24.319> to<02:32:24.640> I<02:32:24.800> guess<02:32:24.880> the 02:32:25.110 --> 02:32:25.120 align:start position:0% So I just present it to I guess the 02:32:25.120 --> 02:32:27.670 align:start position:0% So I just present it to I guess the committee<02:32:25.439> for<02:32:26.160> feedback<02:32:26.800> to<02:32:27.040> see<02:32:27.200> what<02:32:27.439> you 02:32:27.670 --> 02:32:27.680 align:start position:0% committee for feedback to see what you 02:32:27.680 --> 02:32:33.590 align:start position:0% committee for feedback to see what you think<02:32:28.160> about<02:32:28.479> that.<02:32:28.960> And 02:32:33.590 --> 02:32:33.600 align:start position:0% 02:32:33.600 --> 02:32:35.510 align:start position:0% >> so<02:32:33.920> are<02:32:34.080> you<02:32:34.240> looking<02:32:34.479> at<02:32:34.640> changing<02:32:35.040> the<02:32:35.280> just 02:32:35.510 --> 02:32:35.520 align:start position:0% >> so are you looking at changing the just 02:32:35.520 --> 02:32:39.349 align:start position:0% >> so are you looking at changing the just the<02:32:35.760> titles 02:32:39.349 --> 02:32:39.359 align:start position:0% 02:32:39.359 --> 02:32:40.469 align:start position:0% >> I'm<02:32:39.600> just<02:32:39.760> trying<02:32:39.840> to 02:32:40.469 --> 02:32:40.479 align:start position:0% >> I'm just trying to 02:32:40.479 --> 02:32:42.309 align:start position:0% >> I'm just trying to >> from<02:32:40.640> my<02:32:40.800> perspective<02:32:41.280> it<02:32:41.520> does<02:32:41.680> get<02:32:42.000> pretty 02:32:42.309 --> 02:32:42.319 align:start position:0% >> from my perspective it does get pretty 02:32:42.319 --> 02:32:44.550 align:start position:0% >> from my perspective it does get pretty blurry.<02:32:42.720> I<02:32:42.960> see<02:32:43.280> where<02:32:43.840> member<02:32:44.160> Britain's 02:32:44.550 --> 02:32:44.560 align:start position:0% blurry. I see where member Britain's 02:32:44.560 --> 02:32:45.830 align:start position:0% blurry. I see where member Britain's coming<02:32:44.720> from<02:32:44.880> because<02:32:45.120> it<02:32:45.280> does<02:32:45.359> get<02:32:45.520> blurry 02:32:45.830 --> 02:32:45.840 align:start position:0% coming from because it does get blurry 02:32:45.840 --> 02:32:47.750 align:start position:0% coming from because it does get blurry and<02:32:46.000> the<02:32:46.160> law<02:32:46.319> is<02:32:46.479> so<02:32:46.720> confusing<02:32:47.120> and<02:32:47.439> as<02:32:47.600> we 02:32:47.750 --> 02:32:47.760 align:start position:0% and the law is so confusing and as we 02:32:47.760 --> 02:32:49.910 align:start position:0% and the law is so confusing and as we know<02:32:47.920> we<02:32:48.080> spent<02:32:48.240> a<02:32:48.479> lot<02:32:48.560> of<02:32:48.640> time<02:32:48.800> on<02:32:48.960> the<02:32:49.120> rule 02:32:49.910 --> 02:32:49.920 align:start position:0% know we spent a lot of time on the rule 02:32:49.920 --> 02:32:52.309 align:start position:0% know we spent a lot of time on the rule and<02:32:50.160> so 02:32:52.309 --> 02:32:52.319 align:start position:0% and so 02:32:52.319 --> 02:32:56.070 align:start position:0% and so because<02:32:52.800> there<02:32:53.120> are 02:32:56.070 --> 02:32:56.080 align:start position:0% because there are 02:32:56.080 --> 02:32:58.070 align:start position:0% because there are um<02:32:56.560> because<02:32:56.800> it<02:32:57.040> is<02:32:57.280> very<02:32:57.520> different.<02:32:57.840> They're 02:32:58.070 --> 02:32:58.080 align:start position:0% um because it is very different. They're 02:32:58.080 --> 02:32:59.429 align:start position:0% um because it is very different. They're very<02:32:58.240> distinct<02:32:58.640> and<02:32:58.880> different<02:32:59.040> in<02:32:59.280> some 02:32:59.429 --> 02:32:59.439 align:start position:0% very distinct and different in some 02:32:59.439 --> 02:33:01.510 align:start position:0% very distinct and different in some ways.<02:32:59.760> I<02:32:59.840> I<02:33:00.240> think<02:33:00.319> it<02:33:00.560> might<02:33:00.800> be<02:33:00.960> a<02:33:01.120> good<02:33:01.280> idea 02:33:01.510 --> 02:33:01.520 align:start position:0% ways. I I think it might be a good idea 02:33:01.520 --> 02:33:03.349 align:start position:0% ways. I I think it might be a good idea if<02:33:01.920> it's<02:33:02.080> not<02:33:02.240> too<02:33:02.479> much<02:33:02.640> for<02:33:02.880> staff<02:33:03.120> to 02:33:03.349 --> 02:33:03.359 align:start position:0% if it's not too much for staff to 02:33:03.359 --> 02:33:06.070 align:start position:0% if it's not too much for staff to reorganize<02:33:04.000> it<02:33:04.160> in<02:33:04.319> that<02:33:04.479> way.<02:33:05.280> Um<02:33:05.680> and<02:33:05.840> it 02:33:06.070 --> 02:33:06.080 align:start position:0% reorganize it in that way. Um and it 02:33:06.080 --> 02:33:07.750 align:start position:0% reorganize it in that way. Um and it might<02:33:06.240> make<02:33:06.319> it<02:33:06.560> easier<02:33:06.800> for<02:33:06.960> eleas<02:33:07.439> to<02:33:07.600> follow 02:33:07.750 --> 02:33:07.760 align:start position:0% might make it easier for eleas to follow 02:33:07.760 --> 02:33:09.670 align:start position:0% might make it easier for eleas to follow and<02:33:08.000> understand<02:33:08.399> as<02:33:08.640> well<02:33:09.120> and<02:33:09.280> be<02:33:09.359> like<02:33:09.520> what 02:33:09.670 --> 02:33:09.680 align:start position:0% and understand as well and be like what 02:33:09.680 --> 02:33:10.630 align:start position:0% and understand as well and be like what are<02:33:09.760> we<02:33:09.920> doing<02:33:10.000> right<02:33:10.160> now?<02:33:10.319> We're<02:33:10.560> doing 02:33:10.630 --> 02:33:10.640 align:start position:0% are we doing right now? We're doing 02:33:10.640 --> 02:33:12.550 align:start position:0% are we doing right now? We're doing this.<02:33:10.800> for<02:33:11.120> how<02:33:11.359> to<02:33:11.520> figure<02:33:11.680> out<02:33:12.160> of<02:33:12.399> a 02:33:12.550 --> 02:33:12.560 align:start position:0% this. for how to figure out of a 02:33:12.560 --> 02:33:15.030 align:start position:0% this. for how to figure out of a removal,<02:33:13.200> a<02:33:13.439> purchase,<02:33:13.840> or<02:33:14.080> whatever<02:33:14.319> it<02:33:14.560> is 02:33:15.030 --> 02:33:15.040 align:start position:0% removal, a purchase, or whatever it is 02:33:15.040 --> 02:33:16.790 align:start position:0% removal, a purchase, or whatever it is in<02:33:15.359> different<02:33:15.600> areas<02:33:16.000> rather<02:33:16.319> than<02:33:16.479> blending 02:33:16.790 --> 02:33:16.800 align:start position:0% in different areas rather than blending 02:33:16.800 --> 02:33:23.270 align:start position:0% in different areas rather than blending them<02:33:16.960> all<02:33:17.120> together. 02:33:23.270 --> 02:33:23.280 align:start position:0% 02:33:23.280 --> 02:33:26.230 align:start position:0% >> I'm<02:33:23.520> happy<02:33:23.760> to<02:33:24.000> make<02:33:24.240> that<02:33:24.560> change. 02:33:26.230 --> 02:33:26.240 align:start position:0% >> I'm happy to make that change. 02:33:26.240 --> 02:33:27.670 align:start position:0% >> I'm happy to make that change. >> Okay.<02:33:26.560> I'm<02:33:26.880> still<02:33:27.040> trying<02:33:27.200> to<02:33:27.280> understand<02:33:27.520> the 02:33:27.670 --> 02:33:27.680 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I'm still trying to understand the 02:33:27.680 --> 02:33:29.270 align:start position:0% >> Okay. I'm still trying to understand the change.<02:33:27.920> Do<02:33:28.080> you<02:33:28.160> mind<02:33:28.319> just<02:33:28.560> reiterating<02:33:29.120> it 02:33:29.270 --> 02:33:29.280 align:start position:0% change. Do you mind just reiterating it 02:33:29.280 --> 02:33:31.030 align:start position:0% change. Do you mind just reiterating it one<02:33:29.520> more<02:33:29.600> time<02:33:29.840> so<02:33:30.080> I'm<02:33:30.240> very<02:33:30.479> clear<02:33:30.640> on<02:33:30.880> what 02:33:31.030 --> 02:33:31.040 align:start position:0% one more time so I'm very clear on what 02:33:31.040 --> 02:33:33.190 align:start position:0% one more time so I'm very clear on what it<02:33:31.280> looks<02:33:31.520> like? 02:33:33.190 --> 02:33:33.200 align:start position:0% it looks like? 02:33:33.200 --> 02:33:34.630 align:start position:0% it looks like? So,<02:33:33.439> what<02:33:33.680> would<02:33:33.840> it<02:33:33.920> be?<02:33:34.160> You've<02:33:34.399> got<02:33:34.479> it 02:33:34.630 --> 02:33:34.640 align:start position:0% So, what would it be? You've got it 02:33:34.640 --> 02:33:36.309 align:start position:0% So, what would it be? You've got it listed<02:33:35.040> here,<02:33:35.200> but<02:33:35.359> what<02:33:35.520> would<02:33:35.680> it<02:33:35.760> be<02:33:35.920> on<02:33:36.080> our 02:33:36.309 --> 02:33:36.319 align:start position:0% listed here, but what would it be on our 02:33:36.319 --> 02:33:39.110 align:start position:0% listed here, but what would it be on our document?<02:33:36.720> What<02:33:36.960> would<02:33:37.120> it<02:33:38.399> look<02:33:38.560> like?<02:33:38.880> We 02:33:39.110 --> 02:33:39.120 align:start position:0% document? What would it look like? We 02:33:39.120 --> 02:33:43.349 align:start position:0% document? What would it look like? We would<02:33:39.359> separate<02:33:39.760> out 02:33:43.349 --> 02:33:43.359 align:start position:0% 02:33:43.359 --> 02:33:45.990 align:start position:0% because<02:33:43.600> we've<02:33:43.920> got<02:33:44.160> right<02:33:44.399> now<02:33:44.560> we<02:33:44.880> have<02:33:45.439> um 02:33:45.990 --> 02:33:46.000 align:start position:0% because we've got right now we have um 02:33:46.000 --> 02:33:47.590 align:start position:0% because we've got right now we have um selection<02:33:46.399> of<02:33:46.560> materials<02:33:46.960> for<02:33:47.200> library 02:33:47.590 --> 02:33:47.600 align:start position:0% selection of materials for library 02:33:47.600 --> 02:33:50.950 align:start position:0% selection of materials for library collection 02:33:50.950 --> 02:33:50.960 align:start position:0% 02:33:50.960 --> 02:33:55.030 align:start position:0% and<02:33:51.280> we<02:33:51.520> have<02:33:52.240> um<02:33:52.479> then<02:33:52.720> after<02:33:53.040> that<02:33:54.080> we<02:33:54.399> have 02:33:55.030 --> 02:33:55.040 align:start position:0% and we have um then after that we have 02:33:55.040 --> 02:33:59.190 align:start position:0% and we have um then after that we have sorry<02:33:55.680> library<02:33:56.080> collection<02:33:56.640> maintenance. 02:33:59.190 --> 02:33:59.200 align:start position:0% sorry library collection maintenance. 02:33:59.200 --> 02:34:00.309 align:start position:0% sorry library collection maintenance. So<02:33:59.439> what<02:33:59.680> is<02:33:59.840> what<02:34:00.000> is 02:34:00.309 --> 02:34:00.319 align:start position:0% So what is what is 02:34:00.319 --> 02:34:02.469 align:start position:0% So what is what is >> I<02:34:00.479> think<02:34:00.640> it<02:34:00.800> would<02:34:00.960> be<02:34:01.600> in<02:34:01.840> the<02:34:02.000> library<02:34:02.319> I 02:34:02.469 --> 02:34:02.479 align:start position:0% >> I think it would be in the library I 02:34:02.479 --> 02:34:03.750 align:start position:0% >> I think it would be in the library I guess<02:34:02.560> the<02:34:02.800> li<02:34:03.040> does<02:34:03.200> the<02:34:03.359> library 02:34:03.750 --> 02:34:03.760 align:start position:0% guess the li does the library 02:34:03.760 --> 02:34:06.389 align:start position:0% guess the li does the library maintenance<02:34:04.319> section<02:34:05.280> do<02:34:05.520> that<02:34:06.000> already 02:34:06.389 --> 02:34:06.399 align:start position:0% maintenance section do that already 02:34:06.399 --> 02:34:11.510 align:start position:0% maintenance section do that already enough<02:34:07.439> from<02:34:07.680> the<02:34:07.920> intake. 02:34:11.510 --> 02:34:11.520 align:start position:0% 02:34:11.520 --> 02:34:15.110 align:start position:0% So<02:34:12.800> uh<02:34:13.359> let<02:34:13.520> me<02:34:13.840> may<02:34:14.000> I<02:34:14.160> ask<02:34:14.319> a<02:34:14.560> clarifying 02:34:15.110 --> 02:34:15.120 align:start position:0% So uh let me may I ask a clarifying 02:34:15.120 --> 02:34:17.030 align:start position:0% So uh let me may I ask a clarifying question<02:34:15.600> just<02:34:15.760> to<02:34:15.920> make<02:34:16.080> sure<02:34:16.240> I<02:34:16.479> understand 02:34:17.030 --> 02:34:17.040 align:start position:0% question just to make sure I understand 02:34:17.040 --> 02:34:19.429 align:start position:0% question just to make sure I understand the<02:34:17.359> request.<02:34:17.840> So<02:34:18.319> we<02:34:18.560> want<02:34:18.640> to<02:34:18.800> make<02:34:18.960> sure 02:34:19.429 --> 02:34:19.439 align:start position:0% the request. So we want to make sure 02:34:19.439 --> 02:34:22.950 align:start position:0% the request. So we want to make sure that<02:34:19.840> it's<02:34:20.160> clear<02:34:21.040> when<02:34:21.439> a<02:34:22.160> library<02:34:22.640> staff 02:34:22.950 --> 02:34:22.960 align:start position:0% that it's clear when a library staff 02:34:22.960 --> 02:34:24.950 align:start position:0% that it's clear when a library staff andor<02:34:23.439> admin,<02:34:23.920> you<02:34:24.080> know,<02:34:24.240> LEA 02:34:24.950 --> 02:34:24.960 align:start position:0% andor admin, you know, LEA 02:34:24.960 --> 02:34:27.990 align:start position:0% andor admin, you know, LEA administration<02:34:25.840> are,<02:34:27.200> you<02:34:27.280> know,<02:34:27.520> navigating 02:34:27.990 --> 02:34:28.000 align:start position:0% administration are, you know, navigating 02:34:28.000 --> 02:34:30.150 align:start position:0% administration are, you know, navigating the<02:34:28.240> library,<02:34:28.880> selecting<02:34:29.359> materials,<02:34:29.920> and 02:34:30.150 --> 02:34:30.160 align:start position:0% the library, selecting materials, and 02:34:30.160 --> 02:34:32.469 align:start position:0% the library, selecting materials, and maintaining<02:34:30.640> the<02:34:30.880> collection.<02:34:31.920> And<02:34:32.080> then<02:34:32.240> we 02:34:32.469 --> 02:34:32.479 align:start position:0% maintaining the collection. And then we 02:34:32.479 --> 02:34:35.910 align:start position:0% maintaining the collection. And then we also<02:34:32.640> want<02:34:32.880> them<02:34:33.040> to<02:34:33.280> have<02:34:33.600> a<02:34:34.560> clear<02:34:35.359> like<02:34:35.680> this 02:34:35.910 --> 02:34:35.920 align:start position:0% also want them to have a clear like this 02:34:35.920 --> 02:34:37.030 align:start position:0% also want them to have a clear like this is<02:34:36.000> what<02:34:36.240> we're<02:34:36.479> doing<02:34:36.640> when<02:34:36.800> we're 02:34:37.030 --> 02:34:37.040 align:start position:0% is what we're doing when we're 02:34:37.040 --> 02:34:39.830 align:start position:0% is what we're doing when we're reconsider,<02:34:38.160> we're<02:34:38.479> reconsidering<02:34:39.520> the 02:34:39.830 --> 02:34:39.840 align:start position:0% reconsider, we're reconsidering the 02:34:39.840 --> 02:34:41.830 align:start position:0% reconsider, we're reconsidering the materials.<02:34:40.720> So<02:34:40.880> that'd<02:34:41.200> be<02:34:41.280> two<02:34:41.520> different 02:34:41.830 --> 02:34:41.840 align:start position:0% materials. So that'd be two different 02:34:41.840 --> 02:34:45.110 align:start position:0% materials. So that'd be two different sections.<02:34:42.960> And<02:34:43.280> the<02:34:43.520> way<02:34:43.680> I<02:34:43.920> read<02:34:44.240> the<02:34:44.560> policy, 02:34:45.110 --> 02:34:45.120 align:start position:0% sections. And the way I read the policy, 02:34:45.120 --> 02:34:47.349 align:start position:0% sections. And the way I read the policy, the<02:34:45.359> model<02:34:45.680> policy<02:34:46.160> draft<02:34:46.479> as<02:34:46.720> it<02:34:46.960> is<02:34:47.120> right 02:34:47.349 --> 02:34:47.359 align:start position:0% the model policy draft as it is right 02:34:47.359 --> 02:34:50.309 align:start position:0% the model policy draft as it is right now,<02:34:48.800> that<02:34:49.120> first<02:34:49.439> section<02:34:49.760> would<02:34:50.160> which 02:34:50.309 --> 02:34:50.319 align:start position:0% now, that first section would which 02:34:50.319 --> 02:34:51.670 align:start position:0% now, that first section would which would<02:34:50.479> be<02:34:50.640> maintaining<02:34:51.040> the<02:34:51.280> library 02:34:51.670 --> 02:34:51.680 align:start position:0% would be maintaining the library 02:34:51.680 --> 02:34:53.590 align:start position:0% would be maintaining the library collection,<02:34:52.240> selecting<02:34:52.720> the<02:34:53.040> collection 02:34:53.590 --> 02:34:53.600 align:start position:0% collection, selecting the collection 02:34:53.600 --> 02:34:56.630 align:start position:0% collection, selecting the collection would<02:34:53.840> be<02:34:54.479> the<02:34:54.800> first<02:34:55.200> three<02:34:55.600> sections<02:34:56.080> of<02:34:56.319> our 02:34:56.630 --> 02:34:56.640 align:start position:0% would be the first three sections of our 02:34:56.640 --> 02:35:01.429 align:start position:0% would be the first three sections of our current<02:34:56.960> draft.<02:34:57.680> So<02:34:58.399> I<02:34:58.960> I<02:34:59.040> I<02:34:59.680> and<02:34:59.920> I<02:35:00.160> I<02:35:00.399> I<02:35:01.040> not<02:35:01.280> to 02:35:01.429 --> 02:35:01.439 align:start position:0% current draft. So I I I and I I I not to 02:35:01.439 --> 02:35:03.190 align:start position:0% current draft. So I I I and I I I not to quote<02:35:01.680> sensitive<02:35:02.160> materials<02:35:02.640> legislation 02:35:03.190 --> 02:35:03.200 align:start position:0% quote sensitive materials legislation 02:35:03.200 --> 02:35:05.750 align:start position:0% quote sensitive materials legislation because<02:35:04.160> one,<02:35:04.399> two,<02:35:04.640> and<02:35:04.800> three<02:35:05.359> that<02:35:05.600> that 02:35:05.750 --> 02:35:05.760 align:start position:0% because one, two, and three that that 02:35:05.760 --> 02:35:07.910 align:start position:0% because one, two, and three that that that's<02:35:06.160> Roman<02:35:06.560> numerals,<02:35:07.120> right?<02:35:07.359> One,<02:35:07.600> two, 02:35:07.910 --> 02:35:07.920 align:start position:0% that's Roman numerals, right? One, two, 02:35:07.920 --> 02:35:08.950 align:start position:0% that's Roman numerals, right? One, two, three.<02:35:08.479> Okay. 02:35:08.950 --> 02:35:08.960 align:start position:0% three. Okay. 02:35:08.960 --> 02:35:14.150 align:start position:0% three. Okay. >> Yep.<02:35:09.840> So<02:35:10.319> I<02:35:10.640> is<02:35:10.960> library<02:35:12.080> policy,<02:35:12.880> I<02:35:13.120> I<02:35:13.520> is 02:35:14.150 --> 02:35:14.160 align:start position:0% >> Yep. So I is library policy, I I is 02:35:14.160 --> 02:35:16.630 align:start position:0% >> Yep. So I is library policy, I I is selection<02:35:14.640> for<02:35:14.880> materials<02:35:15.439> and<02:35:15.680> I<02:35:15.920> II<02:35:16.399> is 02:35:16.630 --> 02:35:16.640 align:start position:0% selection for materials and I II is 02:35:16.640 --> 02:35:18.389 align:start position:0% selection for materials and I II is library<02:35:17.040> collection<02:35:17.439> maintenance.<02:35:17.920> So<02:35:18.080> those 02:35:18.389 --> 02:35:18.399 align:start position:0% library collection maintenance. So those 02:35:18.399 --> 02:35:22.070 align:start position:0% library collection maintenance. So those first<02:35:18.640> three<02:35:18.960> sections<02:35:19.840> would<02:35:20.160> be<02:35:21.040> subheaded 02:35:22.070 --> 02:35:22.080 align:start position:0% first three sections would be subheaded 02:35:22.080 --> 02:35:25.110 align:start position:0% first three sections would be subheaded not<02:35:22.240> a<02:35:22.479> word<02:35:23.120> underneath<02:35:23.840> the<02:35:24.160> section<02:35:24.720> A 02:35:25.110 --> 02:35:25.120 align:start position:0% not a word underneath the section A 02:35:25.120 --> 02:35:27.830 align:start position:0% not a word underneath the section A titled<02:35:26.000> library<02:35:26.479> acquisition<02:35:27.040> and<02:35:27.359> curation 02:35:27.830 --> 02:35:27.840 align:start position:0% titled library acquisition and curation 02:35:27.840 --> 02:35:29.510 align:start position:0% titled library acquisition and curation protocols<02:35:28.319> or<02:35:28.479> something<02:35:28.720> similar<02:35:29.200> however 02:35:29.510 --> 02:35:29.520 align:start position:0% protocols or something similar however 02:35:29.520 --> 02:35:32.070 align:start position:0% protocols or something similar however you<02:35:29.760> want<02:35:30.080> all<02:35:30.399> want<02:35:30.640> to<02:35:30.800> title<02:35:31.040> that.<02:35:31.840> And 02:35:32.070 --> 02:35:32.080 align:start position:0% you want all want to title that. And 02:35:32.080 --> 02:35:36.150 align:start position:0% you want all want to title that. And then<02:35:32.240> our<02:35:33.120> second<02:35:33.600> new<02:35:34.000> section,<02:35:34.960> section<02:35:35.520> B 02:35:36.150 --> 02:35:36.160 align:start position:0% then our second new section, section B 02:35:36.160 --> 02:35:37.910 align:start position:0% then our second new section, section B would<02:35:36.399> be<02:35:36.560> the<02:35:36.720> reconsideration<02:35:37.600> of 02:35:37.910 --> 02:35:37.920 align:start position:0% would be the reconsideration of 02:35:37.920 --> 02:35:40.469 align:start position:0% would be the reconsideration of materials.<02:35:39.200> And<02:35:39.359> that's<02:35:39.680> where<02:35:39.840> we<02:35:40.080> would 02:35:40.469 --> 02:35:40.479 align:start position:0% materials. And that's where we would 02:35:40.479 --> 02:35:43.030 align:start position:0% materials. And that's where we would house<02:35:40.880> the<02:35:41.200> last<02:35:41.600> three<02:35:42.080> pieces<02:35:42.560> of<02:35:42.720> our 02:35:43.030 --> 02:35:43.040 align:start position:0% house the last three pieces of our 02:35:43.040 --> 02:35:48.150 align:start position:0% house the last three pieces of our current<02:35:43.359> draft<02:35:43.920> model<02:35:44.319> policy,<02:35:45.359> which<02:35:45.680> is<02:35:46.640> IV, 02:35:48.150 --> 02:35:48.160 align:start position:0% current draft model policy, which is IV, 02:35:48.160 --> 02:35:50.309 align:start position:0% current draft model policy, which is IV, Roman<02:35:48.560> numeral<02:35:49.040> 4,<02:35:49.439> library<02:35:49.840> materials 02:35:50.309 --> 02:35:50.319 align:start position:0% Roman numeral 4, library materials 02:35:50.319 --> 02:35:53.349 align:start position:0% Roman numeral 4, library materials review<02:35:50.720> process,<02:35:51.280> Roman<02:35:51.600> numeral<02:35:52.080> 5,<02:35:52.720> appeals 02:35:53.349 --> 02:35:53.359 align:start position:0% review process, Roman numeral 5, appeals 02:35:53.359 --> 02:35:56.389 align:start position:0% review process, Roman numeral 5, appeals process,<02:35:54.240> and<02:35:54.479> n<02:35:55.200> Roman<02:35:55.520> numeral<02:35:56.000> 6, 02:35:56.389 --> 02:35:56.399 align:start position:0% process, and n Roman numeral 6, 02:35:56.399 --> 02:35:59.670 align:start position:0% process, and n Roman numeral 6, statewide<02:35:56.960> removal<02:35:57.359> and<02:35:57.680> reporting. 02:35:59.670 --> 02:35:59.680 align:start position:0% statewide removal and reporting. 02:35:59.680 --> 02:36:01.670 align:start position:0% statewide removal and reporting. So,<02:36:00.000> we're<02:36:00.240> basically<02:36:00.800> breaking<02:36:01.200> up<02:36:01.439> the 02:36:01.670 --> 02:36:01.680 align:start position:0% So, we're basically breaking up the 02:36:01.680 --> 02:36:03.750 align:start position:0% So, we're basically breaking up the model<02:36:02.080> policy<02:36:02.640> draft<02:36:02.880> that<02:36:03.120> we're<02:36:03.359> looking<02:36:03.520> at 02:36:03.750 --> 02:36:03.760 align:start position:0% model policy draft that we're looking at 02:36:03.760 --> 02:36:06.550 align:start position:0% model policy draft that we're looking at today<02:36:04.319> into<02:36:04.800> two<02:36:05.040> pieces.<02:36:05.760> The<02:36:06.000> first<02:36:06.240> half 02:36:06.550 --> 02:36:06.560 align:start position:0% today into two pieces. The first half 02:36:06.560 --> 02:36:09.510 align:start position:0% today into two pieces. The first half would<02:36:06.880> be<02:36:07.920> basically<02:36:08.479> maintaining<02:36:09.120> selecting 02:36:09.510 --> 02:36:09.520 align:start position:0% would be basically maintaining selecting 02:36:09.520 --> 02:36:11.110 align:start position:0% would be basically maintaining selecting and<02:36:09.760> maintaining<02:36:10.080> a<02:36:10.319> collection<02:36:10.720> and<02:36:10.960> the 02:36:11.110 --> 02:36:11.120 align:start position:0% and maintaining a collection and the 02:36:11.120 --> 02:36:12.870 align:start position:0% and maintaining a collection and the second<02:36:11.359> half<02:36:11.680> would<02:36:11.920> be<02:36:12.080> reconsidering 02:36:12.870 --> 02:36:12.880 align:start position:0% second half would be reconsidering 02:36:12.880 --> 02:36:15.510 align:start position:0% second half would be reconsidering materials<02:36:13.520> that<02:36:13.760> are<02:36:13.840> in<02:36:14.080> the<02:36:14.240> library.<02:36:15.280> Does 02:36:15.510 --> 02:36:15.520 align:start position:0% materials that are in the library. Does 02:36:15.520 --> 02:36:18.469 align:start position:0% materials that are in the library. Does that<02:36:16.000> sound<02:36:16.479> like<02:36:16.720> what<02:36:16.960> you're<02:36:17.200> looking<02:36:17.359> for? 02:36:18.469 --> 02:36:18.479 align:start position:0% that sound like what you're looking for? 02:36:18.479 --> 02:36:20.230 align:start position:0% that sound like what you're looking for? Yeah. 02:36:20.230 --> 02:36:20.240 align:start position:0% Yeah. 02:36:20.240 --> 02:36:21.990 align:start position:0% Yeah. Okay. 02:36:21.990 --> 02:36:22.000 align:start position:0% Okay. 02:36:22.000 --> 02:36:24.710 align:start position:0% Okay. If<02:36:22.240> you<02:36:22.479> think<02:36:22.640> that's<02:36:22.880> a<02:36:23.120> a<02:36:23.520> clarity,<02:36:24.240> I<02:36:24.399> mean, 02:36:24.710 --> 02:36:24.720 align:start position:0% If you think that's a a clarity, I mean, 02:36:24.720 --> 02:36:26.389 align:start position:0% If you think that's a a clarity, I mean, you<02:36:24.880> know,<02:36:25.040> as<02:36:25.200> I<02:36:25.439> was<02:36:25.520> looking<02:36:25.680> at<02:36:25.920> analysis 02:36:26.389 --> 02:36:26.399 align:start position:0% you know, as I was looking at analysis 02:36:26.399 --> 02:36:28.070 align:start position:0% you know, as I was looking at analysis and<02:36:26.560> running<02:36:26.800> it<02:36:26.960> through,<02:36:27.280> like<02:36:27.520> it<02:36:27.680> that<02:36:28.000> was 02:36:28.070 --> 02:36:28.080 align:start position:0% and running it through, like it that was 02:36:28.080 --> 02:36:31.670 align:start position:0% and running it through, like it that was a<02:36:28.319> suggestion<02:36:29.600> that<02:36:29.920> I<02:36:30.560> thought<02:36:30.800> could<02:36:31.040> be 02:36:31.670 --> 02:36:31.680 align:start position:0% a suggestion that I thought could be 02:36:31.680 --> 02:36:33.510 align:start position:0% a suggestion that I thought could be made<02:36:31.920> more<02:36:32.080> clear,<02:36:32.399> but<02:36:32.560> if<02:36:32.800> you<02:36:32.880> feel<02:36:33.120> like 02:36:33.510 --> 02:36:33.520 align:start position:0% made more clear, but if you feel like 02:36:33.520 --> 02:36:34.950 align:start position:0% made more clear, but if you feel like the<02:36:33.760> feedback<02:36:34.080> you're<02:36:34.399> getting<02:36:34.560> from<02:36:34.720> the 02:36:34.950 --> 02:36:34.960 align:start position:0% the feedback you're getting from the 02:36:34.960 --> 02:36:36.870 align:start position:0% the feedback you're getting from the field<02:36:35.200> is<02:36:35.439> this<02:36:35.600> is<02:36:35.760> all<02:36:36.000> fine<02:36:36.160> and<02:36:36.479> it's<02:36:36.720> not 02:36:36.870 --> 02:36:36.880 align:start position:0% field is this is all fine and it's not 02:36:36.880 --> 02:36:40.469 align:start position:0% field is this is all fine and it's not too<02:36:37.120> muddied,<02:36:38.399> um<02:36:39.439> I<02:36:39.680> think<02:36:39.840> I<02:36:40.160> think<02:36:40.240> that's 02:36:40.469 --> 02:36:40.479 align:start position:0% too muddied, um I think I think that's 02:36:40.479 --> 02:36:42.550 align:start position:0% too muddied, um I think I think that's okay<02:36:40.720> to<02:36:40.880> do.<02:36:41.120> I<02:36:41.280> think<02:36:41.359> that<02:36:41.600> would<02:36:41.760> give<02:36:42.000> some 02:36:42.550 --> 02:36:42.560 align:start position:0% okay to do. I think that would give some 02:36:42.560 --> 02:36:44.790 align:start position:0% okay to do. I think that would give some like<02:36:42.960> higher<02:36:43.439> level<02:36:43.680> headings<02:36:44.080> to<02:36:44.319> what<02:36:44.560> we're 02:36:44.790 --> 02:36:44.800 align:start position:0% like higher level headings to what we're 02:36:44.800 --> 02:36:47.349 align:start position:0% like higher level headings to what we're kind<02:36:44.960> of<02:36:45.120> looking<02:36:45.280> at.<02:36:45.760> So<02:36:46.319> I<02:36:46.560> think<02:36:46.720> on<02:36:46.960> my<02:36:47.200> in 02:36:47.349 --> 02:36:47.359 align:start position:0% kind of looking at. So I think on my in 02:36:47.359 --> 02:36:49.349 align:start position:0% kind of looking at. So I think on my in my<02:36:47.520> opinion<02:36:47.840> that<02:36:48.080> would<02:36:48.160> be<02:36:48.399> fine.<02:36:48.720> And<02:36:48.960> I<02:36:49.120> did 02:36:49.349 --> 02:36:49.359 align:start position:0% my opinion that would be fine. And I did 02:36:49.359 --> 02:36:52.070 align:start position:0% my opinion that would be fine. And I did you<02:36:49.600> did<02:36:49.760> mention<02:36:50.880> um<02:36:51.200> maybe<02:36:51.520> just<02:36:51.840> making 02:36:52.070 --> 02:36:52.080 align:start position:0% you did mention um maybe just making 02:36:52.080 --> 02:36:54.550 align:start position:0% you did mention um maybe just making sure<02:36:52.240> that<02:36:52.479> anything<02:36:52.800> with<02:36:53.120> buying<02:36:53.439> new<02:36:53.760> books 02:36:54.550 --> 02:36:54.560 align:start position:0% sure that anything with buying new books 02:36:54.560 --> 02:36:57.030 align:start position:0% sure that anything with buying new books isn't<02:36:54.960> part<02:36:55.200> of<02:36:55.359> the<02:36:55.520> reconsideration.<02:36:56.479> I<02:36:56.720> I 02:36:57.030 --> 02:36:57.040 align:start position:0% isn't part of the reconsideration. I I 02:36:57.040 --> 02:36:58.870 align:start position:0% isn't part of the reconsideration. I I definitely<02:36:57.439> can<02:36:57.680> re-review<02:36:58.240> and<02:36:58.479> make<02:36:58.640> sure 02:36:58.870 --> 02:36:58.880 align:start position:0% definitely can re-review and make sure 02:36:58.880 --> 02:37:00.710 align:start position:0% definitely can re-review and make sure that<02:36:59.120> we're<02:36:59.359> not<02:36:59.520> seeing<02:36:59.760> any<02:36:59.920> of<02:37:00.080> that<02:37:00.240> in<02:37:00.479> the 02:37:00.710 --> 02:37:00.720 align:start position:0% that we're not seeing any of that in the 02:37:00.720 --> 02:37:03.110 align:start position:0% that we're not seeing any of that in the reconsideration<02:37:01.600> section<02:37:02.000> and<02:37:02.240> it's<02:37:02.479> only 02:37:03.110 --> 02:37:03.120 align:start position:0% reconsideration section and it's only 02:37:03.120 --> 02:37:05.830 align:start position:0% reconsideration section and it's only showing<02:37:03.439> up<02:37:03.680> in<02:37:03.920> the<02:37:04.080> selection<02:37:04.640> of<02:37:04.880> materials 02:37:05.830 --> 02:37:05.840 align:start position:0% showing up in the selection of materials 02:37:05.840 --> 02:37:08.150 align:start position:0% showing up in the selection of materials section.<02:37:07.040> And<02:37:07.200> as<02:37:07.439> they're<02:37:07.680> buying<02:37:07.920> new 02:37:08.150 --> 02:37:08.160 align:start position:0% section. And as they're buying new 02:37:08.160 --> 02:37:09.670 align:start position:0% section. And as they're buying new books,<02:37:08.399> that's<02:37:08.640> already<02:37:08.960> defined<02:37:09.359> that 02:37:09.670 --> 02:37:09.680 align:start position:0% books, that's already defined that 02:37:09.680 --> 02:37:11.110 align:start position:0% books, that's already defined that they're<02:37:09.920> not<02:37:10.080> putting<02:37:10.240> in<02:37:10.479> any<02:37:10.640> books<02:37:10.960> that 02:37:11.110 --> 02:37:11.120 align:start position:0% they're not putting in any books that 02:37:11.120 --> 02:37:13.030 align:start position:0% they're not putting in any books that are<02:37:11.680> off<02:37:11.920> limits,<02:37:12.319> right?<02:37:12.479> I<02:37:12.640> mean,<02:37:12.720> that's 02:37:13.030 --> 02:37:13.040 align:start position:0% are off limits, right? I mean, that's 02:37:13.040 --> 02:37:15.910 align:start position:0% are off limits, right? I mean, that's already<02:37:13.760> clear.<02:37:14.240> So<02:37:14.479> I<02:37:14.640> think<02:37:14.800> that's<02:37:15.520> to<02:37:15.760> me 02:37:15.910 --> 02:37:15.920 align:start position:0% already clear. So I think that's to me 02:37:15.920 --> 02:37:18.950 align:start position:0% already clear. So I think that's to me that<02:37:16.160> seems<02:37:16.399> to<02:37:16.560> provide<02:37:16.880> more<02:37:17.040> clarity. 02:37:18.950 --> 02:37:18.960 align:start position:0% that seems to provide more clarity. 02:37:18.960 --> 02:37:21.190 align:start position:0% that seems to provide more clarity. makes<02:37:19.200> it<02:37:19.359> easier<02:37:19.520> to<02:37:19.760> follow.<02:37:20.319> Member<02:37:20.960> Chair 02:37:21.190 --> 02:37:21.200 align:start position:0% makes it easier to follow. Member Chair 02:37:21.200 --> 02:37:25.510 align:start position:0% makes it easier to follow. Member Chair Earl.<02:37:22.000> Yes.<02:37:23.200> Um<02:37:23.520> I'm<02:37:23.840> wondering<02:37:25.120> what<02:37:25.359> our 02:37:25.510 --> 02:37:25.520 align:start position:0% Earl. Yes. Um I'm wondering what our 02:37:25.520 --> 02:37:26.710 align:start position:0% Earl. Yes. Um I'm wondering what our timeline<02:37:25.840> is<02:37:26.000> on<02:37:26.160> this<02:37:26.319> because<02:37:26.479> it<02:37:26.560> feels 02:37:26.710 --> 02:37:26.720 align:start position:0% timeline is on this because it feels 02:37:26.720 --> 02:37:28.230 align:start position:0% timeline is on this because it feels like<02:37:26.880> there's<02:37:27.120> a<02:37:27.200> couple<02:37:27.439> parts.<02:37:27.680> So<02:37:27.920> like<02:37:28.080> I 02:37:28.230 --> 02:37:28.240 align:start position:0% like there's a couple parts. So like I 02:37:28.240 --> 02:37:30.389 align:start position:0% like there's a couple parts. So like I had<02:37:28.399> a<02:37:28.560> bunch<02:37:28.720> of<02:37:28.880> amendments.<02:37:29.600> Um<02:37:30.080> member 02:37:30.389 --> 02:37:30.399 align:start position:0% had a bunch of amendments. Um member 02:37:30.399 --> 02:37:32.870 align:start position:0% had a bunch of amendments. Um member Britain<02:37:30.880> has<02:37:31.200> some<02:37:31.439> amendments<02:37:32.399> and<02:37:32.640> some 02:37:32.870 --> 02:37:32.880 align:start position:0% Britain has some amendments and some 02:37:32.880 --> 02:37:36.150 align:start position:0% Britain has some amendments and some adjustments<02:37:33.439> and<02:37:34.160> we<02:37:34.479> also<02:37:34.800> like<02:37:35.040> I<02:37:35.359> took<02:37:35.600> out 02:37:36.150 --> 02:37:36.160 align:start position:0% adjustments and we also like I took out 02:37:36.160 --> 02:37:38.309 align:start position:0% adjustments and we also like I took out I<02:37:36.479> kept<02:37:36.720> in<02:37:36.880> the<02:37:37.040> age<02:37:37.359> appropriateness<02:37:38.000> but 02:37:38.309 --> 02:37:38.319 align:start position:0% I kept in the age appropriateness but 02:37:38.319 --> 02:37:39.990 align:start position:0% I kept in the age appropriateness but then<02:37:38.479> you<02:37:39.200> took<02:37:39.439> out<02:37:39.600> the<02:37:39.760> age 02:37:39.990 --> 02:37:40.000 align:start position:0% then you took out the age 02:37:40.000 --> 02:37:41.990 align:start position:0% then you took out the age appropriateness.<02:37:40.640> So,<02:37:40.800> I<02:37:41.040> wonder<02:37:41.200> if<02:37:41.359> we<02:37:41.520> like 02:37:41.990 --> 02:37:42.000 align:start position:0% appropriateness. So, I wonder if we like 02:37:42.000 --> 02:37:44.150 align:start position:0% appropriateness. So, I wonder if we like have<02:37:42.240> it<02:37:42.479> reconstructed<02:37:43.280> without<02:37:43.600> the<02:37:43.840> age 02:37:44.150 --> 02:37:44.160 align:start position:0% have it reconstructed without the age 02:37:44.160 --> 02:37:46.230 align:start position:0% have it reconstructed without the age appropriateness 02:37:46.230 --> 02:37:46.240 align:start position:0% appropriateness 02:37:46.240 --> 02:37:47.429 align:start position:0% appropriateness with<02:37:46.479> the<02:37:46.640> things<02:37:46.800> that<02:37:46.960> we've<02:37:47.200> already 02:37:47.429 --> 02:37:47.439 align:start position:0% with the things that we've already 02:37:47.439 --> 02:37:49.830 align:start position:0% with the things that we've already amended 02:37:49.830 --> 02:37:49.840 align:start position:0% amended 02:37:49.840 --> 02:37:52.870 align:start position:0% amended and<02:37:50.080> then<02:37:50.399> work<02:37:50.640> from<02:37:50.880> that<02:37:52.319> at<02:37:52.560> another 02:37:52.870 --> 02:37:52.880 align:start position:0% and then work from that at another 02:37:52.880 --> 02:37:54.550 align:start position:0% and then work from that at another meeting<02:37:53.120> with<02:37:53.359> it<02:37:53.520> all<02:37:53.760> reorganized<02:37:54.319> and 02:37:54.550 --> 02:37:54.560 align:start position:0% meeting with it all reorganized and 02:37:54.560 --> 02:37:57.670 align:start position:0% meeting with it all reorganized and cleaned<02:37:54.880> up.<02:37:56.160> Um, 02:37:57.670 --> 02:37:57.680 align:start position:0% cleaned up. Um, 02:37:57.680 --> 02:37:59.349 align:start position:0% cleaned up. Um, we<02:37:57.920> got<02:37:58.000> to<02:37:58.240> do<02:37:58.399> we<02:37:58.560> have<02:37:58.640> to<02:37:58.800> have<02:37:58.880> this<02:37:59.120> by 02:37:59.349 --> 02:37:59.359 align:start position:0% we got to do we have to have this by 02:37:59.359 --> 02:38:03.030 align:start position:0% we got to do we have to have this by July?<02:38:00.560> That's<02:38:00.800> the<02:38:01.040> question. 02:38:03.030 --> 02:38:03.040 align:start position:0% July? That's the question. 02:38:03.040 --> 02:38:04.870 align:start position:0% July? That's the question. >> No.<02:38:03.680> Yes. 02:38:04.870 --> 02:38:04.880 align:start position:0% >> No. Yes. 02:38:04.880 --> 02:38:07.429 align:start position:0% >> No. Yes. >> No.<02:38:05.359> Deina<02:38:05.760> is<02:38:05.920> saying<02:38:06.160> no<02:38:06.720> with<02:38:06.960> her<02:38:07.200> head 02:38:07.429 --> 02:38:07.439 align:start position:0% >> No. Deina is saying no with her head 02:38:07.439 --> 02:38:12.469 align:start position:0% >> No. Deina is saying no with her head movement<02:38:07.760> unless<02:38:08.240> my<02:38:08.399> eyes<02:38:08.640> are<02:38:08.800> shaking. 02:38:12.469 --> 02:38:12.479 align:start position:0% 02:38:12.479 --> 02:38:13.990 align:start position:0% because<02:38:12.720> I<02:38:12.880> I<02:38:13.120> just<02:38:13.280> think<02:38:13.439> we're<02:38:13.600> like<02:38:13.840> now 02:38:13.990 --> 02:38:14.000 align:start position:0% because I I just think we're like now 02:38:14.000 --> 02:38:15.910 align:start position:0% because I I just think we're like now we're<02:38:14.160> kind<02:38:14.319> of<02:38:14.720> updating<02:38:15.200> all<02:38:15.359> their<02:38:15.600> stuff 02:38:15.910 --> 02:38:15.920 align:start position:0% we're kind of updating all their stuff 02:38:15.920 --> 02:38:19.670 align:start position:0% we're kind of updating all their stuff now,<02:38:16.960> right? 02:38:19.670 --> 02:38:19.680 align:start position:0% now, right? 02:38:19.680 --> 02:38:22.150 align:start position:0% now, right? >> So<02:38:19.920> that<02:38:20.240> does<02:38:20.399> add<02:38:20.640> a<02:38:21.200> interesting<02:38:21.760> provision 02:38:22.150 --> 02:38:22.160 align:start position:0% >> So that does add a interesting provision 02:38:22.160 --> 02:38:23.990 align:start position:0% >> So that does add a interesting provision there.<02:38:22.560> So 02:38:23.990 --> 02:38:24.000 align:start position:0% there. So 02:38:24.000 --> 02:38:26.070 align:start position:0% there. So >> yeah. 02:38:26.070 --> 02:38:26.080 align:start position:0% >> yeah. 02:38:26.080 --> 02:38:30.950 align:start position:0% >> yeah. >> Yeah.<02:38:26.399> Go<02:38:26.640> ahead.<02:38:27.600> Um<02:38:28.560> so<02:38:29.520> the<02:38:29.840> majority<02:38:30.640> I 02:38:30.950 --> 02:38:30.960 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Go ahead. Um so the majority I 02:38:30.960 --> 02:38:34.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Go ahead. Um so the majority I would<02:38:31.120> say<02:38:31.840> okay<02:38:32.319> so<02:38:33.120> 2024<02:38:33.920> we<02:38:34.160> had<02:38:34.240> the<02:38:34.399> new 02:38:34.550 --> 02:38:34.560 align:start position:0% would say okay so 2024 we had the new 02:38:34.560 --> 02:38:36.870 align:start position:0% would say okay so 2024 we had the new legis<02:38:34.960> the<02:38:35.200> new<02:38:35.359> the<02:38:35.680> the<02:38:36.000> new<02:38:36.160> legislation 02:38:36.870 --> 02:38:36.880 align:start position:0% legis the new the the new legislation 02:38:36.880 --> 02:38:38.630 align:start position:0% legis the new the the new legislation HB29 02:38:38.630 --> 02:38:38.640 align:start position:0% HB29 02:38:38.640 --> 02:38:41.830 align:start position:0% HB29 and<02:38:38.960> after<02:38:39.359> that<02:38:39.680> time<02:38:40.080> I<02:38:40.640> held<02:38:40.960> one-on-<02:38:41.439> ons 02:38:41.830 --> 02:38:41.840 align:start position:0% and after that time I held one-on- ons 02:38:41.840 --> 02:38:44.790 align:start position:0% and after that time I held one-on- ons with<02:38:42.240> every<02:38:42.560> LEA<02:38:43.120> across<02:38:43.520> the<02:38:43.760> state<02:38:44.240> every<02:38:44.640> I 02:38:44.790 --> 02:38:44.800 align:start position:0% with every LEA across the state every I 02:38:44.800 --> 02:38:47.190 align:start position:0% with every LEA across the state every I would<02:38:44.960> say<02:38:45.120> district<02:38:45.520> and<02:38:45.680> then<02:38:46.000> the<02:38:46.640> a<02:38:46.960> fair 02:38:47.190 --> 02:38:47.200 align:start position:0% would say district and then the a fair 02:38:47.200 --> 02:38:49.590 align:start position:0% would say district and then the a fair amount<02:38:47.439> of<02:38:47.600> charter<02:38:48.000> schools<02:38:48.880> and<02:38:49.120> we<02:38:49.359> went 02:38:49.590 --> 02:38:49.600 align:start position:0% amount of charter schools and we went 02:38:49.600 --> 02:38:51.429 align:start position:0% amount of charter schools and we went through<02:38:49.920> all<02:38:50.160> of<02:38:50.319> the<02:38:50.560> things<02:38:50.720> that<02:38:51.040> they<02:38:51.280> need 02:38:51.429 --> 02:38:51.439 align:start position:0% through all of the things that they need 02:38:51.439 --> 02:38:54.309 align:start position:0% through all of the things that they need to<02:38:51.680> change<02:38:52.800> um<02:38:53.040> based<02:38:53.280> on<02:38:53.439> that<02:38:53.680> legislation 02:38:54.309 --> 02:38:54.319 align:start position:0% to change um based on that legislation 02:38:54.319 --> 02:38:56.309 align:start position:0% to change um based on that legislation and<02:38:54.560> they<02:38:54.800> updated<02:38:55.200> their<02:38:55.439> policies.<02:38:56.000> we<02:38:56.160> had 02:38:56.309 --> 02:38:56.319 align:start position:0% and they updated their policies. we had 02:38:56.319 --> 02:38:58.630 align:start position:0% and they updated their policies. we had the<02:38:56.479> statute<02:38:56.880> code<02:38:57.200> changes<02:38:57.760> and<02:38:58.080> all<02:38:58.319> of<02:38:58.399> the 02:38:58.630 --> 02:38:58.640 align:start position:0% the statute code changes and all of the 02:38:58.640 --> 02:39:01.030 align:start position:0% the statute code changes and all of the things<02:38:58.720> that<02:38:58.960> happened<02:38:59.200> at<02:38:59.439> that<02:38:59.680> time.<02:39:00.000> So 02:39:01.030 --> 02:39:01.040 align:start position:0% things that happened at that time. So 02:39:01.040 --> 02:39:04.070 align:start position:0% things that happened at that time. So the<02:39:01.280> majority<02:39:01.840> of<02:39:02.479> LEAs<02:39:03.200> already<02:39:03.600> updated 02:39:04.070 --> 02:39:04.080 align:start position:0% the majority of LEAs already updated 02:39:04.080 --> 02:39:07.030 align:start position:0% the majority of LEAs already updated their<02:39:04.319> policies.<02:39:05.359> And<02:39:05.520> so<02:39:06.319> what<02:39:06.640> happened 02:39:07.030 --> 02:39:07.040 align:start position:0% their policies. And so what happened 02:39:07.040 --> 02:39:09.510 align:start position:0% their policies. And so what happened this<02:39:07.680> legislative<02:39:08.240> session<02:39:08.479> that<02:39:08.800> changes<02:39:09.200> is 02:39:09.510 --> 02:39:09.520 align:start position:0% this legislative session that changes is 02:39:09.520 --> 02:39:12.790 align:start position:0% this legislative session that changes is the<02:39:09.840> obscene<02:39:10.319> animal<02:39:10.720> abuse<02:39:11.200> piece.<02:39:12.160> And<02:39:12.479> so 02:39:12.790 --> 02:39:12.800 align:start position:0% the obscene animal abuse piece. And so 02:39:12.800 --> 02:39:14.790 align:start position:0% the obscene animal abuse piece. And so that<02:39:13.200> information's<02:39:13.840> going<02:39:14.160> gone<02:39:14.479> out<02:39:14.560> to 02:39:14.790 --> 02:39:14.800 align:start position:0% that information's going gone out to 02:39:14.800 --> 02:39:16.710 align:start position:0% that information's going gone out to LEAs<02:39:15.359> that<02:39:15.439> they<02:39:15.600> need<02:39:15.840> like<02:39:16.080> if<02:39:16.240> they<02:39:16.479> already 02:39:16.710 --> 02:39:16.720 align:start position:0% LEAs that they need like if they already 02:39:16.720 --> 02:39:19.670 align:start position:0% LEAs that they need like if they already have<02:39:16.960> quoted<02:39:18.000> cited<02:39:18.479> the<02:39:18.720> code<02:39:19.040> the<02:39:19.280> statute 02:39:19.670 --> 02:39:19.680 align:start position:0% have quoted cited the code the statute 02:39:19.680 --> 02:39:22.469 align:start position:0% have quoted cited the code the statute in<02:39:20.000> their<02:39:20.160> current<02:39:20.479> LEA<02:39:21.040> policy,<02:39:21.840> then<02:39:22.160> really 02:39:22.469 --> 02:39:22.479 align:start position:0% in their current LEA policy, then really 02:39:22.479 --> 02:39:24.950 align:start position:0% in their current LEA policy, then really it's<02:39:22.800> just<02:39:23.120> a<02:39:23.359> a<02:39:23.680> matter<02:39:23.840> of<02:39:24.160> me<02:39:24.479> making<02:39:24.800> sure 02:39:24.950 --> 02:39:24.960 align:start position:0% it's just a a matter of me making sure 02:39:24.960 --> 02:39:27.030 align:start position:0% it's just a a matter of me making sure that<02:39:25.200> they<02:39:25.520> understand<02:39:26.000> that<02:39:26.240> this<02:39:26.479> is<02:39:26.560> now<02:39:26.800> a 02:39:27.030 --> 02:39:27.040 align:start position:0% that they understand that this is now a 02:39:27.040 --> 02:39:28.550 align:start position:0% that they understand that this is now a piece<02:39:27.200> that<02:39:27.439> they<02:39:27.600> need<02:39:27.760> to<02:39:27.920> think<02:39:28.080> about<02:39:28.319> when 02:39:28.550 --> 02:39:28.560 align:start position:0% piece that they need to think about when 02:39:28.560 --> 02:39:29.670 align:start position:0% piece that they need to think about when they're<02:39:28.720> thinking<02:39:28.960> about<02:39:29.200> sensitive 02:39:29.670 --> 02:39:29.680 align:start position:0% they're thinking about sensitive 02:39:29.680 --> 02:39:31.990 align:start position:0% they're thinking about sensitive materials.<02:39:30.160> It's<02:39:30.399> one<02:39:31.120> small<02:39:31.520> change<02:39:31.760> that 02:39:31.990 --> 02:39:32.000 align:start position:0% materials. It's one small change that 02:39:32.000 --> 02:39:34.950 align:start position:0% materials. It's one small change that happened<02:39:32.240> in<02:39:32.479> this<02:39:32.640> legislative<02:39:33.200> session.<02:39:34.240> So 02:39:34.950 --> 02:39:34.960 align:start position:0% happened in this legislative session. So 02:39:34.960 --> 02:39:39.429 align:start position:0% happened in this legislative session. So I<02:39:35.280> don't<02:39:35.600> anticipate<02:39:36.479> that<02:39:37.520> many<02:39:38.000> if<02:39:38.319> any<02:39:38.720> leas 02:39:39.429 --> 02:39:39.439 align:start position:0% I don't anticipate that many if any leas 02:39:39.439 --> 02:39:41.110 align:start position:0% I don't anticipate that many if any leas are<02:39:39.680> going<02:39:39.840> to<02:39:40.000> be<02:39:40.160> updating<02:39:40.560> their<02:39:40.800> model 02:39:41.110 --> 02:39:41.120 align:start position:0% are going to be updating their model 02:39:41.120 --> 02:39:44.070 align:start position:0% are going to be updating their model polic<02:39:41.439> or<02:39:41.680> their<02:39:41.920> policies<02:39:43.040> this<02:39:43.359> summer 02:39:44.070 --> 02:39:44.080 align:start position:0% polic or their policies this summer 02:39:44.080 --> 02:39:46.309 align:start position:0% polic or their policies this summer because<02:39:44.560> they<02:39:44.960> made<02:39:45.200> so<02:39:45.520> many<02:39:45.760> changes 02:39:46.309 --> 02:39:46.319 align:start position:0% because they made so many changes 02:39:46.319 --> 02:39:48.309 align:start position:0% because they made so many changes according<02:39:46.880> you<02:39:47.040> know<02:39:47.120> to<02:39:47.280> to<02:39:47.600> be<02:39:47.760> aligned<02:39:48.080> with 02:39:48.309 --> 02:39:48.319 align:start position:0% according you know to to be aligned with 02:39:48.319 --> 02:39:51.349 align:start position:0% according you know to to be aligned with HB29.<02:39:49.680> So<02:39:50.000> if<02:39:50.240> the<02:39:50.399> committee<02:39:50.800> feels<02:39:51.120> like 02:39:51.349 --> 02:39:51.359 align:start position:0% HB29. So if the committee feels like 02:39:51.359 --> 02:39:53.590 align:start position:0% HB29. So if the committee feels like they<02:39:51.680> want<02:39:51.840> to<02:39:52.000> take<02:39:52.240> some<02:39:52.479> extra<02:39:52.800> time<02:39:53.040> to<02:39:53.280> get 02:39:53.590 --> 02:39:53.600 align:start position:0% they want to take some extra time to get 02:39:53.600 --> 02:39:56.710 align:start position:0% they want to take some extra time to get you<02:39:53.840> know<02:39:54.080> to<02:39:54.240> to<02:39:54.560> do<02:39:55.120> the<02:39:55.280> model<02:39:55.600> policy<02:39:56.080> to 02:39:56.710 --> 02:39:56.720 align:start position:0% you know to to do the model policy to 02:39:56.720 --> 02:39:58.870 align:start position:0% you know to to do the model policy to the<02:39:57.040> degree<02:39:57.280> that<02:39:57.520> you<02:39:57.680> would<02:39:57.760> like<02:39:57.920> to<02:39:58.319> then<02:39:58.560> I 02:39:58.870 --> 02:39:58.880 align:start position:0% the degree that you would like to then I 02:39:58.880 --> 02:40:00.710 align:start position:0% the degree that you would like to then I wouldn't<02:39:59.120> feel<02:39:59.359> rushed<02:39:59.840> given<02:40:00.240> all<02:40:00.399> of<02:40:00.560> that 02:40:00.710 --> 02:40:00.720 align:start position:0% wouldn't feel rushed given all of that 02:40:00.720 --> 02:40:02.710 align:start position:0% wouldn't feel rushed given all of that that's<02:40:01.040> happened<02:40:01.280> up<02:40:01.520> until<02:40:01.760> this<02:40:02.000> moment. 02:40:02.710 --> 02:40:02.720 align:start position:0% that's happened up until this moment. 02:40:02.720 --> 02:40:04.230 align:start position:0% that's happened up until this moment. Now,<02:40:02.880> I<02:40:03.120> just<02:40:03.200> have<02:40:03.439> I<02:40:03.680> do<02:40:03.840> have<02:40:03.920> a<02:40:04.080> question 02:40:04.230 --> 02:40:04.240 align:start position:0% Now, I just have I do have a question 02:40:04.240 --> 02:40:07.510 align:start position:0% Now, I just have I do have a question because<02:40:04.560> on<02:40:04.960> ours<02:40:05.280> there<02:40:05.520> was<02:40:05.600> a<02:40:05.840> pretty<02:40:06.160> big 02:40:07.510 --> 02:40:07.520 align:start position:0% because on ours there was a pretty big 02:40:07.520 --> 02:40:09.750 align:start position:0% because on ours there was a pretty big we<02:40:07.840> didn't<02:40:08.240> fix<02:40:08.479> it<02:40:08.880> kind<02:40:09.040> of<02:40:09.200> thing<02:40:09.359> and<02:40:09.520> that 02:40:09.750 --> 02:40:09.760 align:start position:0% we didn't fix it kind of thing and that 02:40:09.760 --> 02:40:12.550 align:start position:0% we didn't fix it kind of thing and that had<02:40:10.000> to<02:40:10.080> do<02:40:10.240> with<02:40:10.479> the<02:40:11.200> who<02:40:11.520> can<02:40:11.680> challenge. 02:40:12.550 --> 02:40:12.560 align:start position:0% had to do with the who can challenge. 02:40:12.560 --> 02:40:14.469 align:start position:0% had to do with the who can challenge. Are<02:40:12.800> you<02:40:12.960> finding<02:40:13.280> that<02:40:13.520> everybody<02:40:13.920> got<02:40:14.160> that 02:40:14.469 --> 02:40:14.479 align:start position:0% Are you finding that everybody got that 02:40:14.479 --> 02:40:16.150 align:start position:0% Are you finding that everybody got that right<02:40:14.720> on<02:40:15.040> theirs<02:40:15.359> and<02:40:15.600> they're<02:40:15.840> not<02:40:16.000> looking 02:40:16.150 --> 02:40:16.160 align:start position:0% right on theirs and they're not looking 02:40:16.160 --> 02:40:21.030 align:start position:0% right on theirs and they're not looking to<02:40:16.399> ours<02:40:16.800> to<02:40:17.760> at<02:40:18.000> ours<02:40:18.240> to<02:40:18.560> influence<02:40:19.120> that? 02:40:21.030 --> 02:40:21.040 align:start position:0% to ours to at ours to influence that? 02:40:21.040 --> 02:40:22.630 align:start position:0% to ours to at ours to influence that? >> I'm<02:40:21.280> sorry,<02:40:21.600> which<02:40:21.840> piece<02:40:22.160> were<02:40:22.319> you<02:40:22.479> talking 02:40:22.630 --> 02:40:22.640 align:start position:0% >> I'm sorry, which piece were you talking 02:40:22.640 --> 02:40:24.950 align:start position:0% >> I'm sorry, which piece were you talking about?<02:40:22.800> It's<02:40:23.040> the<02:40:23.200> piece<02:40:23.439> about<02:40:24.319> um<02:40:24.479> a<02:40:24.720> student 02:40:24.950 --> 02:40:24.960 align:start position:0% about? It's the piece about um a student 02:40:24.960 --> 02:40:27.510 align:start position:0% about? It's the piece about um a student in<02:40:25.200> the<02:40:25.359> LEA,<02:40:26.000> not<02:40:26.240> a<02:40:26.399> student<02:40:26.640> in<02:40:26.880> the<02:40:27.040> school 02:40:27.510 --> 02:40:27.520 align:start position:0% in the LEA, not a student in the school 02:40:27.520 --> 02:40:29.270 align:start position:0% in the LEA, not a student in the school can<02:40:27.760> actually<02:40:28.080> challenge<02:40:28.479> or<02:40:28.720> a<02:40:28.880> parent<02:40:29.120> in 02:40:29.270 --> 02:40:29.280 align:start position:0% can actually challenge or a parent in 02:40:29.280 --> 02:40:32.389 align:start position:0% can actually challenge or a parent in the<02:40:29.840> in<02:40:30.160> the<02:40:30.720> LEA,<02:40:31.439> not<02:40:31.680> necessarily<02:40:32.160> the 02:40:32.389 --> 02:40:32.399 align:start position:0% the in the LEA, not necessarily the 02:40:32.399 --> 02:40:35.590 align:start position:0% the in the LEA, not necessarily the school.<02:40:33.520> Our<02:40:33.840> our<02:40:34.160> current<02:40:34.479> policy<02:40:35.120> did<02:40:35.359> not 02:40:35.590 --> 02:40:35.600 align:start position:0% school. Our our current policy did not 02:40:35.600 --> 02:40:38.150 align:start position:0% school. Our our current policy did not reflect<02:40:35.920> that<02:40:36.240> accurately. 02:40:38.150 --> 02:40:38.160 align:start position:0% reflect that accurately. 02:40:38.160 --> 02:40:41.349 align:start position:0% reflect that accurately. >> I<02:40:38.479> I<02:40:38.960> believe<02:40:39.280> that<02:40:39.600> LEAs<02:40:40.240> are<02:40:40.560> aware<02:40:40.880> that<02:40:41.120> a 02:40:41.349 --> 02:40:41.359 align:start position:0% >> I I believe that LEAs are aware that a 02:40:41.359 --> 02:40:44.230 align:start position:0% >> I I believe that LEAs are aware that a student<02:40:41.680> in<02:40:42.080> their<02:40:43.200> correct<02:40:43.600> a<02:40:43.840> challenge 02:40:44.230 --> 02:40:44.240 align:start position:0% student in their correct a challenge 02:40:44.240 --> 02:40:45.590 align:start position:0% student in their correct a challenge correct.<02:40:44.880> Yes. 02:40:45.590 --> 02:40:45.600 align:start position:0% correct. Yes. 02:40:45.600 --> 02:40:46.309 align:start position:0% correct. Yes. >> Well,<02:40:45.840> I 02:40:46.309 --> 02:40:46.319 align:start position:0% >> Well, I 02:40:46.319 --> 02:40:49.270 align:start position:0% >> Well, I >> Oh,<02:40:46.479> it's<02:40:46.720> it's<02:40:47.040> a<02:40:47.280> parent<02:40:47.680> of<02:40:47.920> a<02:40:48.160> student<02:40:48.960> in 02:40:49.270 --> 02:40:49.280 align:start position:0% >> Oh, it's it's a parent of a student in 02:40:49.280 --> 02:40:51.590 align:start position:0% >> Oh, it's it's a parent of a student in the<02:40:49.439> LEA<02:40:50.000> period.<02:40:50.399> It<02:40:50.640> does<02:40:50.880> not<02:40:51.040> have<02:40:51.280> to<02:40:51.439> be 02:40:51.590 --> 02:40:51.600 align:start position:0% the LEA period. It does not have to be 02:40:51.600 --> 02:40:52.950 align:start position:0% the LEA period. It does not have to be at<02:40:51.920> that<02:40:52.160> school<02:40:52.399> where<02:40:52.640> they're 02:40:52.950 --> 02:40:52.960 align:start position:0% at that school where they're 02:40:52.960 --> 02:40:54.710 align:start position:0% at that school where they're challenging,<02:40:53.439> but<02:40:53.680> it<02:40:53.920> wasn't<02:40:54.160> written<02:40:54.479> that 02:40:54.710 --> 02:40:54.720 align:start position:0% challenging, but it wasn't written that 02:40:54.720 --> 02:40:55.429 align:start position:0% challenging, but it wasn't written that way. 02:40:55.429 --> 02:40:55.439 align:start position:0% way. 02:40:55.439 --> 02:40:57.030 align:start position:0% way. >> Yeah.<02:40:55.680> But<02:40:55.840> you're<02:40:56.080> saying<02:40:56.240> that<02:40:56.319> that<02:40:56.800> you 02:40:57.030 --> 02:40:57.040 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. But you're saying that that you 02:40:57.040 --> 02:40:58.870 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. But you're saying that that you feel<02:40:57.200> like<02:40:57.439> they<02:40:57.760> did<02:40:57.920> get<02:40:58.080> that<02:40:58.319> right.<02:40:58.640> They 02:40:58.870 --> 02:40:58.880 align:start position:0% feel like they did get that right. They 02:40:58.880 --> 02:41:01.429 align:start position:0% feel like they did get that right. They weren't<02:40:59.120> just<02:40:59.280> relying<02:40:59.680> on<02:40:59.840> our 02:41:01.429 --> 02:41:01.439 align:start position:0% weren't just relying on our 02:41:01.439 --> 02:41:01.990 align:start position:0% weren't just relying on our model. 02:41:01.990 --> 02:41:02.000 align:start position:0% model. 02:41:02.000 --> 02:41:04.150 align:start position:0% model. >> I<02:41:02.160> have<02:41:02.319> had<02:41:02.720> numerous<02:41:03.280> conversations<02:41:03.840> with 02:41:04.150 --> 02:41:04.160 align:start position:0% >> I have had numerous conversations with 02:41:04.160 --> 02:41:07.429 align:start position:0% >> I have had numerous conversations with LEAs<02:41:04.800> where<02:41:05.040> that<02:41:05.280> question<02:41:05.680> has<02:41:05.920> come<02:41:06.160> up<02:41:06.880> and 02:41:07.429 --> 02:41:07.439 align:start position:0% LEAs where that question has come up and 02:41:07.439 --> 02:41:10.469 align:start position:0% LEAs where that question has come up and that<02:41:08.399> the<02:41:08.640> one<02:41:08.880> of<02:41:08.960> the<02:41:09.600> recommendations<02:41:10.319> has 02:41:10.469 --> 02:41:10.479 align:start position:0% that the one of the recommendations has 02:41:10.479 --> 02:41:12.309 align:start position:0% that the one of the recommendations has been<02:41:10.640> that<02:41:10.880> it's<02:41:11.120> no<02:41:11.280> longer<02:41:11.439> a<02:41:11.680> school-based 02:41:12.309 --> 02:41:12.319 align:start position:0% been that it's no longer a school-based 02:41:12.319 --> 02:41:14.150 align:start position:0% been that it's no longer a school-based challenge.<02:41:12.880> It<02:41:13.040> now<02:41:13.280> is<02:41:13.439> a<02:41:13.680> district 02:41:14.150 --> 02:41:14.160 align:start position:0% challenge. It now is a district 02:41:14.160 --> 02:41:15.910 align:start position:0% challenge. It now is a district challenge.<02:41:14.880> If<02:41:14.960> a<02:41:15.120> book<02:41:15.280> is<02:41:15.520> challenged 02:41:15.910 --> 02:41:15.920 align:start position:0% challenge. If a book is challenged 02:41:15.920 --> 02:41:18.150 align:start position:0% challenge. If a book is challenged anywhere<02:41:16.240> in<02:41:16.479> the<02:41:16.640> district,<02:41:17.439> it<02:41:17.600> needs<02:41:17.840> to<02:41:18.000> be 02:41:18.150 --> 02:41:18.160 align:start position:0% anywhere in the district, it needs to be 02:41:18.160 --> 02:41:20.630 align:start position:0% anywhere in the district, it needs to be reviewed<02:41:19.040> at<02:41:19.280> a<02:41:19.439> district<02:41:19.760> level<02:41:20.080> because<02:41:20.399> it 02:41:20.630 --> 02:41:20.640 align:start position:0% reviewed at a district level because it 02:41:20.640 --> 02:41:22.230 align:start position:0% reviewed at a district level because it now<02:41:20.800> affects<02:41:21.200> the<02:41:21.439> entire<02:41:21.760> district.<02:41:22.080> The 02:41:22.230 --> 02:41:22.240 align:start position:0% now affects the entire district. The 02:41:22.240 --> 02:41:23.990 align:start position:0% now affects the entire district. The book<02:41:22.479> the<02:41:22.640> title<02:41:22.960> would<02:41:23.200> now<02:41:23.520> would<02:41:23.760> then 02:41:23.990 --> 02:41:24.000 align:start position:0% book the title would now would then 02:41:24.000 --> 02:41:25.510 align:start position:0% book the title would now would then effectively<02:41:24.479> be<02:41:24.640> removed<02:41:25.040> across<02:41:25.280> the 02:41:25.510 --> 02:41:25.520 align:start position:0% effectively be removed across the 02:41:25.520 --> 02:41:27.910 align:start position:0% effectively be removed across the district,<02:41:25.920> not<02:41:26.080> in<02:41:26.240> just<02:41:26.399> the<02:41:26.640> school.<02:41:27.040> So,<02:41:27.760> I 02:41:27.910 --> 02:41:27.920 align:start position:0% district, not in just the school. So, I 02:41:27.920 --> 02:41:29.510 align:start position:0% district, not in just the school. So, I feel<02:41:28.160> confident<02:41:28.479> that<02:41:28.720> those<02:41:28.960> conversations 02:41:29.510 --> 02:41:29.520 align:start position:0% feel confident that those conversations 02:41:29.520 --> 02:41:32.950 align:start position:0% feel confident that those conversations have<02:41:29.760> been<02:41:29.920> had<02:41:30.880> um<02:41:31.439> sufficiently. 02:41:32.950 --> 02:41:32.960 align:start position:0% have been had um sufficiently. 02:41:32.960 --> 02:41:35.270 align:start position:0% have been had um sufficiently. Okay.<02:41:33.520> I<02:41:33.840> think<02:41:34.080> we<02:41:34.319> can<02:41:34.479> keep<02:41:34.720> moving<02:41:34.960> forward 02:41:35.270 --> 02:41:35.280 align:start position:0% Okay. I think we can keep moving forward 02:41:35.280 --> 02:41:37.030 align:start position:0% Okay. I think we can keep moving forward with<02:41:35.520> recommendations<02:41:36.240> and<02:41:36.479> when<02:41:36.640> we<02:41:36.880> get 02:41:37.030 --> 02:41:37.040 align:start position:0% with recommendations and when we get 02:41:37.040 --> 02:41:39.349 align:start position:0% with recommendations and when we get close<02:41:37.200> to<02:41:37.359> our<02:41:37.600> time,<02:41:38.080> I<02:41:38.319> could<02:41:38.479> I<02:41:38.640> I<02:41:39.040> do<02:41:39.200> feel 02:41:39.349 --> 02:41:39.359 align:start position:0% close to our time, I could I I do feel 02:41:39.359 --> 02:41:40.950 align:start position:0% close to our time, I could I I do feel like<02:41:39.520> we<02:41:39.680> could<02:41:39.840> get<02:41:39.920> a<02:41:40.080> cleaned<02:41:40.319> up<02:41:40.479> copy<02:41:40.800> then 02:41:40.950 --> 02:41:40.960 align:start position:0% like we could get a cleaned up copy then 02:41:40.960 --> 02:41:42.630 align:start position:0% like we could get a cleaned up copy then for<02:41:41.200> next<02:41:41.359> month<02:41:41.680> based<02:41:41.840> on<02:41:42.000> what<02:41:42.240> was<02:41:42.399> said 02:41:42.630 --> 02:41:42.640 align:start position:0% for next month based on what was said 02:41:42.640 --> 02:41:45.670 align:start position:0% for next month based on what was said here.<02:41:43.600> Is<02:41:43.840> the<02:41:44.160> do<02:41:44.479> you<02:41:44.720> as<02:41:44.960> a<02:41:45.120> committee<02:41:45.439> feel 02:41:45.670 --> 02:41:45.680 align:start position:0% here. Is the do you as a committee feel 02:41:45.680 --> 02:41:47.590 align:start position:0% here. Is the do you as a committee feel that<02:41:46.160> is<02:41:46.399> that<02:41:46.640> the<02:41:46.800> direction<02:41:47.120> you<02:41:47.280> want<02:41:47.439> to 02:41:47.590 --> 02:41:47.600 align:start position:0% that is that the direction you want to 02:41:47.600 --> 02:41:52.389 align:start position:0% that is that the direction you want to go?<02:41:48.720> Can<02:41:48.960> I<02:41:49.120> just<02:41:49.280> get<02:41:49.439> some<02:41:49.600> feedback<02:41:50.000> from 02:41:52.389 --> 02:41:52.399 align:start position:0% go? Can I just get some feedback from 02:41:52.399 --> 02:41:52.870 align:start position:0% go? Can I just get some feedback from committee<02:41:52.640> members? 02:41:52.870 --> 02:41:52.880 align:start position:0% committee members? 02:41:52.880 --> 02:41:54.550 align:start position:0% committee members? >> I<02:41:53.040> know<02:41:53.120> Sarah<02:41:53.520> said<02:41:53.680> she<02:41:53.840> had<02:41:54.160> a<02:41:54.319> lot<02:41:54.399> of 02:41:54.550 --> 02:41:54.560 align:start position:0% >> I know Sarah said she had a lot of 02:41:54.560 --> 02:41:55.830 align:start position:0% >> I know Sarah said she had a lot of amendments,<02:41:55.040> too.<02:41:55.280> And<02:41:55.439> we're<02:41:55.600> only 02:41:55.830 --> 02:41:55.840 align:start position:0% amendments, too. And we're only 02:41:55.840 --> 02:41:57.910 align:start position:0% amendments, too. And we're only scheduled<02:41:56.160> to<02:41:56.319> go<02:41:56.479> for<02:41:56.640> another<02:41:56.960> 15<02:41:57.359> minutes. 02:41:57.910 --> 02:41:57.920 align:start position:0% scheduled to go for another 15 minutes. 02:41:57.920 --> 02:42:00.550 align:start position:0% scheduled to go for another 15 minutes. So,<02:41:58.720> you<02:41:58.960> guys<02:41:59.120> tell<02:41:59.359> me.<02:41:59.520> I<02:41:59.760> don't<02:41:59.840> want<02:42:00.240> to 02:42:00.550 --> 02:42:00.560 align:start position:0% So, you guys tell me. I don't want to 02:42:00.560 --> 02:42:02.870 align:start position:0% So, you guys tell me. I don't want to dominate.<02:42:01.200> I<02:42:01.439> don't<02:42:01.520> need<02:42:01.680> to<02:42:01.840> dominate,<02:42:02.399> but 02:42:02.870 --> 02:42:02.880 align:start position:0% dominate. I don't need to dominate, but 02:42:02.880 --> 02:42:03.750 align:start position:0% dominate. I don't need to dominate, but um 02:42:03.750 --> 02:42:03.760 align:start position:0% um 02:42:03.760 --> 02:42:05.670 align:start position:0% um >> I<02:42:03.920> just<02:42:04.160> think<02:42:04.479> Oh,<02:42:04.720> go<02:42:04.800> ahead,<02:42:05.040> John. 02:42:05.670 --> 02:42:05.680 align:start position:0% >> I just think Oh, go ahead, John. 02:42:05.680 --> 02:42:07.349 align:start position:0% >> I just think Oh, go ahead, John. >> No,<02:42:05.920> go<02:42:06.080> ahead.<02:42:06.800> Well,<02:42:06.960> I<02:42:07.120> was<02:42:07.120> just<02:42:07.200> going<02:42:07.280> to 02:42:07.349 --> 02:42:07.359 align:start position:0% >> No, go ahead. Well, I was just going to 02:42:07.359 --> 02:42:08.870 align:start position:0% >> No, go ahead. Well, I was just going to say<02:42:07.520> I<02:42:07.600> just<02:42:07.760> think<02:42:07.840> it'll<02:42:08.080> be<02:42:08.240> easier<02:42:08.479> to<02:42:08.720> look 02:42:08.870 --> 02:42:08.880 align:start position:0% say I just think it'll be easier to look 02:42:08.880 --> 02:42:11.990 align:start position:0% say I just think it'll be easier to look at<02:42:09.680> with<02:42:09.920> a<02:42:10.080> cleaned<02:42:10.399> up<02:42:10.640> version<02:42:11.439> to<02:42:11.680> take<02:42:11.840> it 02:42:11.990 --> 02:42:12.000 align:start position:0% at with a cleaned up version to take it 02:42:12.000 --> 02:42:14.710 align:start position:0% at with a cleaned up version to take it all<02:42:12.160> in<02:42:12.399> for<02:42:12.560> as<02:42:12.800> a<02:42:12.960> whole.<02:42:14.160> That<02:42:14.319> may<02:42:14.479> just<02:42:14.640> be 02:42:14.710 --> 02:42:14.720 align:start position:0% all in for as a whole. That may just be 02:42:14.720 --> 02:42:17.590 align:start position:0% all in for as a whole. That may just be how<02:42:14.880> my<02:42:15.040> brain<02:42:15.280> works.<02:42:15.680> But 02:42:17.590 --> 02:42:17.600 align:start position:0% how my brain works. But 02:42:17.600 --> 02:42:19.910 align:start position:0% how my brain works. But >> otherwise<02:42:18.160> really<02:42:18.399> quick<02:42:18.560> on<02:42:18.880> amendments. 02:42:19.910 --> 02:42:19.920 align:start position:0% >> otherwise really quick on amendments. 02:42:19.920 --> 02:42:21.270 align:start position:0% >> otherwise really quick on amendments. >> Yeah,<02:42:20.080> unless<02:42:20.399> I<02:42:20.479> hear<02:42:20.640> otherwise,<02:42:21.040> we'll 02:42:21.270 --> 02:42:21.280 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, unless I hear otherwise, we'll 02:42:21.280 --> 02:42:22.790 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, unless I hear otherwise, we'll just<02:42:21.439> keep<02:42:21.600> going<02:42:21.840> and<02:42:22.000> when<02:42:22.080> we<02:42:22.319> when<02:42:22.560> we're 02:42:22.790 --> 02:42:22.800 align:start position:0% just keep going and when we when we're 02:42:22.800 --> 02:42:24.230 align:start position:0% just keep going and when we when we're done<02:42:22.880> with<02:42:23.040> our<02:42:23.280> time,<02:42:23.439> we'll<02:42:23.680> end<02:42:23.920> here<02:42:24.080> and 02:42:24.230 --> 02:42:24.240 align:start position:0% done with our time, we'll end here and 02:42:24.240 --> 02:42:27.750 align:start position:0% done with our time, we'll end here and then<02:42:24.399> we'll<02:42:24.720> continue<02:42:25.120> at<02:42:25.439> our<02:42:25.680> next<02:42:25.920> meeting. 02:42:27.750 --> 02:42:27.760 align:start position:0% then we'll continue at our next meeting. 02:42:27.760 --> 02:42:29.750 align:start position:0% then we'll continue at our next meeting. Okay.<02:42:28.000> I'm<02:42:28.160> not<02:42:28.319> hearing<02:42:28.640> anybody<02:42:29.520> say 02:42:29.750 --> 02:42:29.760 align:start position:0% Okay. I'm not hearing anybody say 02:42:29.760 --> 02:42:31.030 align:start position:0% Okay. I'm not hearing anybody say otherwise,<02:42:30.160> so<02:42:30.319> we're<02:42:30.479> going<02:42:30.560> to<02:42:30.640> just<02:42:30.880> keep 02:42:31.030 --> 02:42:31.040 align:start position:0% otherwise, so we're going to just keep 02:42:31.040 --> 02:42:32.550 align:start position:0% otherwise, so we're going to just keep going. 02:42:32.550 --> 02:42:32.560 align:start position:0% going. 02:42:32.560 --> 02:42:34.950 align:start position:0% going. Okay.<02:42:32.880> So,<02:42:33.280> you<02:42:33.520> had<02:42:33.680> a<02:42:33.920> recommendation, 02:42:34.950 --> 02:42:34.960 align:start position:0% Okay. So, you had a recommendation, 02:42:34.960 --> 02:42:38.710 align:start position:0% Okay. So, you had a recommendation, board<02:42:35.280> member<02:42:35.600> Brenton. 02:42:38.710 --> 02:42:38.720 align:start position:0% 02:42:38.720 --> 02:42:39.349 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:42:39.349 --> 02:42:39.359 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:42:39.359 --> 02:42:41.670 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Want<02:42:39.520> to<02:42:39.680> move<02:42:39.840> that<02:42:40.240> that<02:42:40.800> it<02:42:41.120> cleans<02:42:41.439> up 02:42:41.670 --> 02:42:41.680 align:start position:0% >> Want to move that that it cleans up 02:42:41.680 --> 02:42:43.910 align:start position:0% >> Want to move that that it cleans up those<02:42:42.160> headings?<02:42:42.640> Maybe.<02:42:42.960> Is<02:42:43.120> that<02:42:43.280> the<02:42:43.680> Is 02:42:43.910 --> 02:42:43.920 align:start position:0% those headings? Maybe. Is that the Is 02:42:43.920 --> 02:42:45.429 align:start position:0% those headings? Maybe. Is that the Is that<02:42:44.080> kind<02:42:44.160> of<02:42:44.240> the<02:42:44.479> idea<02:42:44.720> there? 02:42:45.429 --> 02:42:45.439 align:start position:0% that kind of the idea there? 02:42:45.439 --> 02:42:46.230 align:start position:0% that kind of the idea there? >> Yes. 02:42:46.230 --> 02:42:46.240 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 02:42:46.240 --> 02:42:47.910 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> Okay. 02:42:47.910 --> 02:42:47.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:42:47.920 --> 02:42:51.190 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Okay.<02:42:48.240> So,<02:42:48.399> I<02:42:48.640> move<02:42:48.960> that. 02:42:51.190 --> 02:42:51.200 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, I move that. 02:42:51.200 --> 02:42:52.870 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, I move that. Let's<02:42:51.439> see.<02:42:51.600> Do<02:42:51.760> I<02:42:51.920> need<02:42:52.000> to<02:42:52.080> wait<02:42:52.240> for<02:42:52.560> better 02:42:52.870 --> 02:42:52.880 align:start position:0% Let's see. Do I need to wait for better 02:42:52.880 --> 02:42:54.870 align:start position:0% Let's see. Do I need to wait for better language<02:42:53.200> or<02:42:53.600> read 02:42:54.870 --> 02:42:54.880 align:start position:0% language or read 02:42:54.880 --> 02:42:56.150 align:start position:0% language or read >> or<02:42:55.120> maybe<02:42:55.359> tell<02:42:55.520> them<02:42:55.680> what<02:42:55.760> you<02:42:55.920> want<02:42:56.000> the 02:42:56.150 --> 02:42:56.160 align:start position:0% >> or maybe tell them what you want the 02:42:56.160 --> 02:42:57.990 align:start position:0% >> or maybe tell them what you want the language<02:42:56.479> to<02:42:56.640> be?<02:42:57.120> They'll<02:42:57.439> type<02:42:57.600> it<02:42:57.760> as<02:42:57.920> you 02:42:57.990 --> 02:42:58.000 align:start position:0% language to be? They'll type it as you 02:42:58.000 --> 02:43:00.950 align:start position:0% language to be? They'll type it as you go.<02:42:58.720> Um,<02:42:59.200> I<02:42:59.439> just<02:42:59.680> I<02:43:00.000> move<02:43:00.240> that<02:43:00.560> we 02:43:00.950 --> 02:43:00.960 align:start position:0% go. Um, I just I move that we 02:43:00.960 --> 02:43:03.830 align:start position:0% go. Um, I just I move that we restructure<02:43:01.520> the<02:43:01.760> policy<02:43:02.399> into<02:43:02.880> two 02:43:03.830 --> 02:43:03.840 align:start position:0% restructure the policy into two 02:43:03.840 --> 02:43:08.150 align:start position:0% restructure the policy into two standalone<02:43:04.640> sections.<02:43:05.920> Section<02:43:06.399> A,<02:43:07.439> library 02:43:08.150 --> 02:43:08.160 align:start position:0% standalone sections. Section A, library 02:43:08.160 --> 02:43:13.349 align:start position:0% standalone sections. Section A, library acquisition<02:43:08.880> and<02:43:09.200> curation<02:43:09.840> protocols. 02:43:13.349 --> 02:43:13.359 align:start position:0% 02:43:13.359 --> 02:43:15.510 align:start position:0% Do<02:43:13.520> I<02:43:13.680> read<02:43:13.840> that<02:43:14.080> whole?<02:43:14.479> And<02:43:14.800> section<02:43:15.120> B, 02:43:15.510 --> 02:43:15.520 align:start position:0% Do I read that whole? And section B, 02:43:15.520 --> 02:43:19.110 align:start position:0% Do I read that whole? And section B, reconsideration<02:43:16.240> of<02:43:16.479> challenged<02:43:17.040> materials. 02:43:19.110 --> 02:43:19.120 align:start position:0% reconsideration of challenged materials. 02:43:19.120 --> 02:43:21.190 align:start position:0% reconsideration of challenged materials. Okay. 02:43:21.190 --> 02:43:21.200 align:start position:0% Okay. 02:43:21.200 --> 02:43:23.190 align:start position:0% Okay. Any<02:43:21.520> discussion<02:43:22.080> to<02:43:22.319> that<02:43:22.560> or<02:43:22.800> additional 02:43:23.190 --> 02:43:23.200 align:start position:0% Any discussion to that or additional 02:43:23.200 --> 02:43:26.150 align:start position:0% Any discussion to that or additional discussion? 02:43:26.150 --> 02:43:26.160 align:start position:0% discussion? 02:43:26.160 --> 02:43:28.870 align:start position:0% discussion? Okay.<02:43:27.280> The<02:43:27.600> motion<02:43:28.080> that<02:43:28.399> board<02:43:28.640> member 02:43:28.870 --> 02:43:28.880 align:start position:0% Okay. The motion that board member 02:43:28.880 --> 02:43:30.950 align:start position:0% Okay. The motion that board member Britain<02:43:29.439> has<02:43:29.680> moved<02:43:29.920> is<02:43:30.080> to<02:43:30.319> restructure<02:43:30.720> the 02:43:30.950 --> 02:43:30.960 align:start position:0% Britain has moved is to restructure the 02:43:30.960 --> 02:43:32.950 align:start position:0% Britain has moved is to restructure the policy<02:43:31.280> into<02:43:31.600> two<02:43:31.840> distinct<02:43:32.319> standalone 02:43:32.950 --> 02:43:32.960 align:start position:0% policy into two distinct standalone 02:43:32.960 --> 02:43:35.190 align:start position:0% policy into two distinct standalone sections.<02:43:33.439> Section<02:43:33.760> A,<02:43:34.240> library<02:43:34.640> acquisition 02:43:35.190 --> 02:43:35.200 align:start position:0% sections. Section A, library acquisition 02:43:35.200 --> 02:43:38.309 align:start position:0% sections. Section A, library acquisition and<02:43:35.439> curation<02:43:36.160> protocols.<02:43:37.600> Um,<02:43:38.000> which<02:43:38.160> would 02:43:38.309 --> 02:43:38.319 align:start position:0% and curation protocols. Um, which would 02:43:38.319 --> 02:43:40.070 align:start position:0% and curation protocols. Um, which would be<02:43:38.479> governing<02:43:38.800> new<02:43:38.960> purchases<02:43:39.359> and<02:43:39.680> 30-day 02:43:40.070 --> 02:43:40.080 align:start position:0% be governing new purchases and 30-day 02:43:40.080 --> 02:43:43.830 align:start position:0% be governing new purchases and 30-day public<02:43:40.560> review<02:43:40.960> window.<02:43:41.840> And<02:43:42.960> section<02:43:43.359> B, 02:43:43.830 --> 02:43:43.840 align:start position:0% public review window. And section B, 02:43:43.840 --> 02:43:47.030 align:start position:0% public review window. And section B, reconsideration<02:43:44.720> of<02:43:44.960> challenged<02:43:45.520> materials. 02:43:47.030 --> 02:43:47.040 align:start position:0% reconsideration of challenged materials. 02:43:47.040 --> 02:43:48.309 align:start position:0% reconsideration of challenged materials. I'll<02:43:47.279> just<02:43:47.439> leave<02:43:47.520> it<02:43:47.680> at<02:43:47.840> that<02:43:48.000> because<02:43:48.160> we 02:43:48.309 --> 02:43:48.319 align:start position:0% I'll just leave it at that because we 02:43:48.319 --> 02:43:49.990 align:start position:0% I'll just leave it at that because we didn't<02:43:48.560> we<02:43:48.800> actually<02:43:48.960> took<02:43:49.120> out<02:43:49.279> the<02:43:49.439> 30-day 02:43:49.990 --> 02:43:50.000 align:start position:0% didn't we actually took out the 30-day 02:43:50.000 --> 02:43:52.309 align:start position:0% didn't we actually took out the 30-day public<02:43:50.399> review<02:43:51.040> window.<02:43:51.520> We've<02:43:51.760> just<02:43:52.000> made<02:43:52.160> it 02:43:52.309 --> 02:43:52.319 align:start position:0% public review window. We've just made it 02:43:52.319 --> 02:43:54.710 align:start position:0% public review window. We've just made it so<02:43:52.479> that<02:43:53.120> all<02:43:53.520> materials<02:43:53.920> can<02:43:54.160> be<02:43:54.240> reviewed<02:43:54.560> in 02:43:54.710 --> 02:43:54.720 align:start position:0% so that all materials can be reviewed in 02:43:54.720 --> 02:43:57.269 align:start position:0% so that all materials can be reviewed in our<02:43:54.960> last<02:43:55.359> last<02:43:55.760> meeting. 02:43:57.269 --> 02:43:57.279 align:start position:0% our last last meeting. 02:43:57.279 --> 02:43:58.550 align:start position:0% our last last meeting. So,<02:43:57.520> we're<02:43:57.760> just<02:43:57.840> going<02:43:57.920> to<02:43:58.000> make<02:43:58.160> it<02:43:58.319> into 02:43:58.550 --> 02:43:58.560 align:start position:0% So, we're just going to make it into 02:43:58.560 --> 02:44:01.110 align:start position:0% So, we're just going to make it into these<02:43:58.800> two<02:43:58.960> sections.<02:43:59.840> Is<02:44:00.000> that 02:44:01.110 --> 02:44:01.120 align:start position:0% these two sections. Is that 02:44:01.120 --> 02:44:03.349 align:start position:0% these two sections. Is that >> without<02:44:01.520> the<02:44:01.680> parentheticals,<02:44:02.720> right?<02:44:03.120> The 02:44:03.349 --> 02:44:03.359 align:start position:0% >> without the parentheticals, right? The 02:44:03.359 --> 02:44:05.269 align:start position:0% >> without the parentheticals, right? The the<02:44:03.600> parenthetical 02:44:05.269 --> 02:44:05.279 align:start position:0% the parenthetical 02:44:05.279 --> 02:44:06.309 align:start position:0% the parenthetical >> You<02:44:05.520> don't<02:44:05.680> want<02:44:05.840> to<02:44:06.000> keep<02:44:06.080> the 02:44:06.309 --> 02:44:06.319 align:start position:0% >> You don't want to keep the 02:44:06.319 --> 02:44:06.870 align:start position:0% >> You don't want to keep the parenthetical. 02:44:06.870 --> 02:44:06.880 align:start position:0% parenthetical. 02:44:06.880 --> 02:44:09.110 align:start position:0% parenthetical. >> I<02:44:07.040> don't<02:44:07.200> think<02:44:07.279> we<02:44:07.439> want<02:44:07.680> those.<02:44:08.080> No.<02:44:08.560> Okay. 02:44:09.110 --> 02:44:09.120 align:start position:0% >> I don't think we want those. No. Okay. 02:44:09.120 --> 02:44:09.990 align:start position:0% >> I don't think we want those. No. Okay. >> Is<02:44:09.279> that<02:44:09.439> okay? 02:44:09.990 --> 02:44:10.000 align:start position:0% >> Is that okay? 02:44:10.000 --> 02:44:11.030 align:start position:0% >> Is that okay? >> Yeah,<02:44:10.160> that's<02:44:10.399> fine. 02:44:11.030 --> 02:44:11.040 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's fine. 02:44:11.040 --> 02:44:15.990 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's fine. >> Okay. 02:44:15.990 --> 02:44:16.000 align:start position:0% 02:44:16.000 --> 02:44:16.469 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:44:16.469 --> 02:44:16.479 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:44:16.479 --> 02:44:18.630 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> Okay.<02:44:17.120> Is<02:44:17.279> that<02:44:17.520> accurate<02:44:17.920> now? 02:44:18.630 --> 02:44:18.640 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Is that accurate now? 02:44:18.640 --> 02:44:19.750 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Is that accurate now? >> Yes. 02:44:19.750 --> 02:44:19.760 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 02:44:19.760 --> 02:44:24.870 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> Okay.<02:44:20.720> Any<02:44:21.120> additional<02:44:21.600> discussion<02:44:22.240> to<02:44:22.640> this? 02:44:24.870 --> 02:44:24.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Any additional discussion to this? 02:44:24.880 --> 02:44:27.590 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Any additional discussion to this? All<02:44:24.960> right.<02:44:25.439> Um,<02:44:25.840> all<02:44:26.080> those<02:44:26.319> in<02:44:26.479> favor? 02:44:27.590 --> 02:44:27.600 align:start position:0% All right. Um, all those in favor? 02:44:27.600 --> 02:44:30.070 align:start position:0% All right. Um, all those in favor? >> I<02:44:28.319> I 02:44:30.070 --> 02:44:30.080 align:start position:0% >> I I 02:44:30.080 --> 02:44:31.990 align:start position:0% >> I I >> Okay,<02:44:31.120> sounds<02:44:31.439> like<02:44:31.520> that<02:44:31.760> passed 02:44:31.990 --> 02:44:32.000 align:start position:0% >> Okay, sounds like that passed 02:44:32.000 --> 02:44:34.870 align:start position:0% >> Okay, sounds like that passed unanimously. 02:44:34.870 --> 02:44:34.880 align:start position:0% unanimously. 02:44:34.880 --> 02:44:37.349 align:start position:0% unanimously. All right.<02:44:35.279> Did<02:44:35.439> you<02:44:35.680> have<02:44:35.920> another<02:44:36.319> one? 02:44:37.349 --> 02:44:37.359 align:start position:0% All right. Did you have another one? 02:44:37.359 --> 02:44:40.550 align:start position:0% All right. Did you have another one? Yeah.<02:44:37.600> I<02:44:37.920> was<02:44:38.080> wondering<02:44:38.399> about<02:44:39.600> us.<02:44:40.319> Should 02:44:40.550 --> 02:44:40.560 align:start position:0% Yeah. I was wondering about us. Should 02:44:40.560 --> 02:44:42.790 align:start position:0% Yeah. I was wondering about us. Should we<02:44:40.720> be<02:44:40.960> defining<02:44:41.520> what<02:44:41.760> the<02:44:42.000> committee 02:44:42.790 --> 02:44:42.800 align:start position:0% we be defining what the committee 02:44:42.800 --> 02:44:46.150 align:start position:0% we be defining what the committee composition<02:44:43.520> should<02:44:43.840> look<02:44:44.080> like? 02:44:46.150 --> 02:44:46.160 align:start position:0% composition should look like? 02:44:46.160 --> 02:44:47.670 align:start position:0% composition should look like? Because<02:44:46.560> if<02:44:46.800> we<02:44:46.960> leave<02:44:47.279> committee 02:44:47.670 --> 02:44:47.680 align:start position:0% Because if we leave committee 02:44:47.680 --> 02:44:49.750 align:start position:0% Because if we leave committee composition<02:44:48.479> open-ended<02:44:49.200> in<02:44:49.359> the<02:44:49.520> model 02:44:49.750 --> 02:44:49.760 align:start position:0% composition open-ended in the model 02:44:49.760 --> 02:44:51.349 align:start position:0% composition open-ended in the model policy, 02:44:51.349 --> 02:44:51.359 align:start position:0% policy, 02:44:51.359 --> 02:44:53.910 align:start position:0% policy, um,<02:44:51.840> each<02:44:52.240> LEA<02:44:52.720> is<02:44:52.880> left<02:44:53.120> to<02:44:53.279> kind<02:44:53.439> of<02:44:53.520> reinvent 02:44:53.910 --> 02:44:53.920 align:start position:0% um, each LEA is left to kind of reinvent 02:44:53.920 --> 02:44:56.550 align:start position:0% um, each LEA is left to kind of reinvent the<02:44:54.160> wheel.<02:44:54.640> So,<02:44:55.359> should<02:44:55.600> we<02:44:55.840> specify<02:44:56.319> that 02:44:56.550 --> 02:44:56.560 align:start position:0% the wheel. So, should we specify that 02:44:56.560 --> 02:44:58.389 align:start position:0% the wheel. So, should we specify that it's<02:44:56.800> balanced,<02:44:57.279> that<02:44:57.439> it<02:44:57.600> has<02:44:58.000> several 02:44:58.389 --> 02:44:58.399 align:start position:0% it's balanced, that it has several 02:44:58.399 --> 02:45:00.389 align:start position:0% it's balanced, that it has several parents<02:44:58.880> from<02:44:59.120> the<02:44:59.359> LEA 02:45:00.389 --> 02:45:00.399 align:start position:0% parents from the LEA 02:45:00.399 --> 02:45:01.590 align:start position:0% parents from the LEA >> or<02:45:00.560> what<02:45:00.720> is 02:45:01.590 --> 02:45:01.600 align:start position:0% >> or what is 02:45:01.600 --> 02:45:02.710 align:start position:0% >> or what is >> Yeah,<02:45:01.920> go<02:45:02.000> ahead.<02:45:02.319> Sorry. 02:45:02.710 --> 02:45:02.720 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, go ahead. Sorry. 02:45:02.720 --> 02:45:05.190 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, go ahead. Sorry. >> No,<02:45:02.960> no.<02:45:03.200> I<02:45:03.359> mean,<02:45:03.520> I'm<02:45:03.680> just<02:45:04.720> putting<02:45:05.040> that 02:45:05.190 --> 02:45:05.200 align:start position:0% >> No, no. I mean, I'm just putting that 02:45:05.200 --> 02:45:07.110 align:start position:0% >> No, no. I mean, I'm just putting that out<02:45:05.359> there<02:45:05.600> to<02:45:05.920> discuss. 02:45:07.110 --> 02:45:07.120 align:start position:0% out there to discuss. 02:45:07.120 --> 02:45:10.230 align:start position:0% out there to discuss. >> I<02:45:07.359> think<02:45:07.439> our<02:45:07.760> rule<02:45:08.160> requires<02:45:08.960> certain 02:45:10.230 --> 02:45:10.240 align:start position:0% >> I think our rule requires certain 02:45:10.240 --> 02:45:13.030 align:start position:0% >> I think our rule requires certain provisions<02:45:10.800> already.<02:45:12.240> Can<02:45:12.479> you<02:45:12.640> speak<02:45:12.880> to 02:45:13.030 --> 02:45:13.040 align:start position:0% provisions already. Can you speak to 02:45:13.040 --> 02:45:14.710 align:start position:0% provisions already. Can you speak to those<02:45:13.279> or<02:45:13.520> or<02:45:13.840> maybe<02:45:14.160> do<02:45:14.319> you<02:45:14.399> want<02:45:14.560> more 02:45:14.710 --> 02:45:14.720 align:start position:0% those or or maybe do you want more 02:45:14.720 --> 02:45:17.910 align:start position:0% those or or maybe do you want more detail<02:45:15.040> on<02:45:15.200> that?<02:45:15.439> But<02:45:15.600> it<02:45:15.760> does<02:45:16.000> speak<02:45:16.240> to<02:45:17.600> the 02:45:17.910 --> 02:45:17.920 align:start position:0% detail on that? But it does speak to the 02:45:17.920 --> 02:45:20.230 align:start position:0% detail on that? But it does speak to the rule<02:45:18.160> requires<02:45:18.640> certain<02:45:18.960> things.<02:45:19.279> ELEAs<02:45:19.840> can 02:45:20.230 --> 02:45:20.240 align:start position:0% rule requires certain things. ELEAs can 02:45:20.240 --> 02:45:22.469 align:start position:0% rule requires certain things. ELEAs can use<02:45:20.560> those<02:45:20.880> that<02:45:21.200> rule<02:45:21.520> and<02:45:21.680> then<02:45:21.920> expound<02:45:22.319> on 02:45:22.469 --> 02:45:22.479 align:start position:0% use those that rule and then expound on 02:45:22.479 --> 02:45:24.070 align:start position:0% use those that rule and then expound on it<02:45:22.640> or<02:45:22.960> whatever<02:45:23.279> as<02:45:23.439> long<02:45:23.520> as<02:45:23.600> it<02:45:23.760> meets<02:45:23.920> the 02:45:24.070 --> 02:45:24.080 align:start position:0% it or whatever as long as it meets the 02:45:24.080 --> 02:45:25.349 align:start position:0% it or whatever as long as it meets the requirements<02:45:24.479> of<02:45:24.560> the<02:45:24.720> rule. 02:45:25.349 --> 02:45:25.359 align:start position:0% requirements of the rule. 02:45:25.359 --> 02:45:27.750 align:start position:0% requirements of the rule. >> And<02:45:25.600> maybe<02:45:25.920> maybe<02:45:26.240> I'm<02:45:26.479> getting<02:45:26.720> too<02:45:27.040> far<02:45:27.200> into 02:45:27.750 --> 02:45:27.760 align:start position:0% >> And maybe maybe I'm getting too far into 02:45:27.760 --> 02:45:29.670 align:start position:0% >> And maybe maybe I'm getting too far into like<02:45:28.080> what<02:45:28.399> should<02:45:28.560> be<02:45:28.720> local<02:45:29.120> control<02:45:29.439> and 02:45:29.670 --> 02:45:29.680 align:start position:0% like what should be local control and 02:45:29.680 --> 02:45:31.429 align:start position:0% like what should be local control and that's<02:45:29.920> already 02:45:31.429 --> 02:45:31.439 align:start position:0% that's already 02:45:31.439 --> 02:45:33.269 align:start position:0% that's already >> well<02:45:31.680> this<02:45:31.840> is<02:45:31.920> a<02:45:32.160> model<02:45:32.479> policy.<02:45:33.040> So 02:45:33.269 --> 02:45:33.279 align:start position:0% >> well this is a model policy. So 02:45:33.279 --> 02:45:33.990 align:start position:0% >> well this is a model policy. So >> yeah. 02:45:33.990 --> 02:45:34.000 align:start position:0% >> yeah. 02:45:34.000 --> 02:45:36.790 align:start position:0% >> yeah. >> Yeah.<02:45:35.040> Deina,<02:45:35.520> do<02:45:35.680> you<02:45:35.840> have<02:45:35.920> any<02:45:36.399> you<02:45:36.640> want 02:45:36.790 --> 02:45:36.800 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Deina, do you have any you want 02:45:36.800 --> 02:45:38.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Deina, do you have any you want thing<02:45:36.960> you<02:45:37.120> want<02:45:37.279> to<02:45:37.359> say<02:45:37.520> on<02:45:37.680> that? 02:45:38.550 --> 02:45:38.560 align:start position:0% thing you want to say on that? 02:45:38.560 --> 02:45:41.750 align:start position:0% thing you want to say on that? >> Yes.<02:45:39.040> Um<02:45:39.520> board<02:45:39.920> rule<02:45:40.960> uh<02:45:41.279> seems<02:45:41.600> to 02:45:41.750 --> 02:45:41.760 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Um board rule uh seems to 02:45:41.760 --> 02:45:43.670 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Um board rule uh seems to intentionally<02:45:42.399> be<02:45:42.560> flexible<02:45:43.040> to<02:45:43.279> accommodate 02:45:43.670 --> 02:45:43.680 align:start position:0% intentionally be flexible to accommodate 02:45:43.680 --> 02:45:47.269 align:start position:0% intentionally be flexible to accommodate different<02:45:44.000> LEA<02:45:44.479> sizes.<02:45:45.520> So<02:45:46.080> the<02:45:46.399> board<02:45:46.960> board 02:45:47.269 --> 02:45:47.279 align:start position:0% different LEA sizes. So the board board 02:45:47.279 --> 02:45:50.230 align:start position:0% different LEA sizes. So the board board rule<02:45:47.520> al<02:45:47.840> says<02:45:48.160> three<02:45:48.399> or<02:45:48.640> more<02:45:48.800> members<02:45:50.160> um 02:45:50.230 --> 02:45:50.240 align:start position:0% rule al says three or more members um 02:45:50.240 --> 02:45:52.389 align:start position:0% rule al says three or more members um and<02:45:50.560> must<02:45:50.800> include<02:45:51.200> at<02:45:51.200> least<02:45:51.520> one<02:45:51.840> parent<02:45:52.160> for 02:45:52.389 --> 02:45:52.399 align:start position:0% and must include at least one parent for 02:45:52.399 --> 02:45:55.590 align:start position:0% and must include at least one parent for objective<02:45:52.880> reviews<02:45:53.680> and<02:45:54.000> include<02:45:55.200> school 02:45:55.590 --> 02:45:55.600 align:start position:0% objective reviews and include school 02:45:55.600 --> 02:45:57.269 align:start position:0% objective reviews and include school community<02:45:56.080> parents<02:45:56.399> for<02:45:56.720> subjective 02:45:57.269 --> 02:45:57.279 align:start position:0% community parents for subjective 02:45:57.279 --> 02:46:00.550 align:start position:0% community parents for subjective reviews.<02:45:57.760> So<02:45:57.920> parents<02:45:58.240> are<02:45:58.479> included<02:45:58.880> in<02:45:59.200> both 02:46:00.550 --> 02:46:00.560 align:start position:0% reviews. So parents are included in both 02:46:00.560 --> 02:46:03.510 align:start position:0% reviews. So parents are included in both um<02:46:01.279> both<02:46:01.600> objective<02:46:02.160> reviews<02:46:02.560> and<02:46:02.880> subjective 02:46:03.510 --> 02:46:03.520 align:start position:0% um both objective reviews and subjective 02:46:03.520 --> 02:46:06.550 align:start position:0% um both objective reviews and subjective reviews<02:46:04.240> according<02:46:04.560> to<02:46:04.720> board<02:46:04.960> rule.<02:46:06.080> Okay, 02:46:06.550 --> 02:46:06.560 align:start position:0% reviews according to board rule. Okay, 02:46:06.560 --> 02:46:08.389 align:start position:0% reviews according to board rule. Okay, then<02:46:06.880> that<02:46:07.120> seems<02:46:07.359> like<02:46:07.520> it's<02:46:07.840> sufficient. 02:46:08.389 --> 02:46:08.399 align:start position:0% then that seems like it's sufficient. 02:46:08.399 --> 02:46:11.269 align:start position:0% then that seems like it's sufficient. Probably<02:46:08.800> I<02:46:08.960> I'll<02:46:09.200> withdraw<02:46:09.600> that<02:46:09.840> motion. 02:46:11.269 --> 02:46:11.279 align:start position:0% Probably I I'll withdraw that motion. 02:46:11.279 --> 02:46:13.670 align:start position:0% Probably I I'll withdraw that motion. >> Okay,<02:46:12.160> go<02:46:12.399> ahead. 02:46:13.670 --> 02:46:13.680 align:start position:0% >> Okay, go ahead. 02:46:13.680 --> 02:46:16.469 align:start position:0% >> Okay, go ahead. >> Um<02:46:13.920> and<02:46:14.080> then<02:46:14.319> I<02:46:14.479> also<02:46:14.800> wondered<02:46:15.279> if<02:46:15.600> we<02:46:15.840> should 02:46:16.469 --> 02:46:16.479 align:start position:0% >> Um and then I also wondered if we should 02:46:16.479 --> 02:46:20.309 align:start position:0% >> Um and then I also wondered if we should amend<02:46:17.920> um<02:46:18.080> and<02:46:18.399> restrict<02:46:18.800> the<02:46:18.960> immediate<02:46:19.520> rule 02:46:20.309 --> 02:46:20.319 align:start position:0% amend um and restrict the immediate rule 02:46:20.319 --> 02:46:23.110 align:start position:0% amend um and restrict the immediate rule or<02:46:20.640> immediate<02:46:21.200> removal<02:46:21.840> of<02:46:22.240> materials<02:46:22.720> to<02:46:22.960> the 02:46:23.110 --> 02:46:23.120 align:start position:0% or immediate removal of materials to the 02:46:23.120 --> 02:46:27.750 align:start position:0% or immediate removal of materials to the objective<02:46:23.680> statutory<02:46:24.399> violations. 02:46:27.750 --> 02:46:27.760 align:start position:0% 02:46:27.760 --> 02:46:29.349 align:start position:0% >> I<02:46:28.080> think<02:46:28.160> it's<02:46:28.560> in<02:46:28.800> there<02:46:28.960> if<02:46:29.200> I'm 02:46:29.349 --> 02:46:29.359 align:start position:0% >> I think it's in there if I'm 02:46:29.359 --> 02:46:31.750 align:start position:0% >> I think it's in there if I'm understanding<02:46:29.840> this,<02:46:30.160> but<02:46:30.960> explain<02:46:31.359> that<02:46:31.600> a 02:46:31.750 --> 02:46:31.760 align:start position:0% understanding this, but explain that a 02:46:31.760 --> 02:46:34.630 align:start position:0% understanding this, but explain that a little<02:46:31.840> bit<02:46:31.920> more.<02:46:32.319> Well,<02:46:32.640> so<02:46:32.800> that<02:46:33.600> um<02:46:34.479> so 02:46:34.630 --> 02:46:34.640 align:start position:0% little bit more. Well, so that um so 02:46:34.640 --> 02:46:37.830 align:start position:0% little bit more. Well, so that um so that<02:46:34.960> things<02:46:35.200> that<02:46:35.520> are<02:46:36.640> deemed,<02:46:37.520> you<02:46:37.680> know, 02:46:37.830 --> 02:46:37.840 align:start position:0% that things that are deemed, you know, 02:46:37.840 --> 02:46:39.510 align:start position:0% that things that are deemed, you know, pornographic,<02:46:38.560> really<02:46:38.880> sensitive,<02:46:39.279> that 02:46:39.510 --> 02:46:39.520 align:start position:0% pornographic, really sensitive, that 02:46:39.520 --> 02:46:41.910 align:start position:0% pornographic, really sensitive, that those<02:46:39.760> are<02:46:39.920> placed<02:46:40.160> on<02:46:40.319> a<02:46:40.479> hold<02:46:40.800> while<02:46:41.040> it<02:46:41.520> pens 02:46:41.910 --> 02:46:41.920 align:start position:0% those are placed on a hold while it pens 02:46:41.920 --> 02:46:45.590 align:start position:0% those are placed on a hold while it pens the<02:46:42.160> review<02:46:43.120> rather<02:46:43.439> than<02:46:44.160> um<02:46:45.040> so<02:46:45.279> that<02:46:45.359> they 02:46:45.590 --> 02:46:45.600 align:start position:0% the review rather than um so that they 02:46:45.600 --> 02:46:46.870 align:start position:0% the review rather than um so that they could<02:46:45.760> still<02:46:45.920> be<02:46:46.000> checked<02:46:46.240> out<02:46:46.399> with<02:46:46.560> parent 02:46:46.870 --> 02:46:46.880 align:start position:0% could still be checked out with parent 02:46:46.880 --> 02:46:50.389 align:start position:0% could still be checked out with parent approval<02:46:47.279> or<02:46:47.520> something,<02:46:48.080> but<02:46:48.880> not<02:46:50.080> anything 02:46:50.389 --> 02:46:50.399 align:start position:0% approval or something, but not anything 02:46:50.399 --> 02:46:52.070 align:start position:0% approval or something, but not anything or<02:46:50.640> is<02:46:50.800> that<02:46:50.960> there<02:46:51.359> already?<02:46:51.680> Is<02:46:51.920> that 02:46:52.070 --> 02:46:52.080 align:start position:0% or is that there already? Is that 02:46:52.080 --> 02:46:52.550 align:start position:0% or is that there already? Is that already? 02:46:52.550 --> 02:46:52.560 align:start position:0% already? 02:46:52.560 --> 02:46:53.830 align:start position:0% already? >> Yeah,<02:46:52.720> am<02:46:52.880> I<02:46:53.040> right?<02:46:53.279> That's<02:46:53.520> it's 02:46:53.830 --> 02:46:53.840 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, am I right? That's it's 02:46:53.840 --> 02:46:55.510 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, am I right? That's it's immediately<02:46:54.319> removed,<02:46:54.720> but<02:46:54.960> you'd<02:46:55.279> have<02:46:55.359> to 02:46:55.510 --> 02:46:55.520 align:start position:0% immediately removed, but you'd have to 02:46:55.520 --> 02:46:57.030 align:start position:0% immediately removed, but you'd have to go<02:46:55.600> through<02:46:55.760> a<02:46:56.000> process<02:46:56.399> until<02:46:56.720> it<02:46:56.880> goes 02:46:57.030 --> 02:46:57.040 align:start position:0% go through a process until it goes 02:46:57.040 --> 02:46:58.950 align:start position:0% go through a process until it goes through<02:46:57.200> the<02:46:57.359> full,<02:46:58.240> right?<02:46:58.479> You'd<02:46:58.720> have<02:46:58.880> to 02:46:58.950 --> 02:46:58.960 align:start position:0% through the full, right? You'd have to 02:46:58.960 --> 02:47:01.429 align:start position:0% through the full, right? You'd have to get<02:46:59.120> parent<02:46:59.439> consent.<02:47:00.240> Is<02:47:00.399> that<02:47:00.720> accurate? 02:47:01.429 --> 02:47:01.439 align:start position:0% get parent consent. Is that accurate? 02:47:01.439 --> 02:47:04.710 align:start position:0% get parent consent. Is that accurate? >> Yes.<02:47:01.840> Statute<02:47:02.560> 53G103 02:47:04.710 --> 02:47:04.720 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Statute 53G103 02:47:04.720 --> 02:47:07.269 align:start position:0% >> Yes. Statute 53G103 um<02:47:04.960> says<02:47:05.279> that<02:47:05.600> with<02:47:05.920> a<02:47:06.080> plausible<02:47:06.640> claim<02:47:07.040> of 02:47:07.269 --> 02:47:07.279 align:start position:0% um says that with a plausible claim of 02:47:07.279 --> 02:47:09.510 align:start position:0% um says that with a plausible claim of sensitive<02:47:07.840> materials<02:47:08.640> re<02:47:08.960> regardless<02:47:09.359> of 02:47:09.510 --> 02:47:09.520 align:start position:0% sensitive materials re regardless of 02:47:09.520 --> 02:47:11.990 align:start position:0% sensitive materials re regardless of objective<02:47:10.000> or<02:47:10.160> subjective<02:47:11.200> the<02:47:11.439> material<02:47:11.760> is 02:47:11.990 --> 02:47:12.000 align:start position:0% objective or subjective the material is 02:47:12.000 --> 02:47:13.830 align:start position:0% objective or subjective the material is immediately<02:47:12.479> removed<02:47:12.960> from<02:47:13.279> the<02:47:13.520> school 02:47:13.830 --> 02:47:13.840 align:start position:0% immediately removed from the school 02:47:13.840 --> 02:47:16.550 align:start position:0% immediately removed from the school setting<02:47:14.640> and<02:47:14.800> then<02:47:15.120> if<02:47:15.520> there's<02:47:15.840> a<02:47:16.080> potential 02:47:16.550 --> 02:47:16.560 align:start position:0% setting and then if there's a potential 02:47:16.560 --> 02:47:18.469 align:start position:0% setting and then if there's a potential subjective 02:47:18.469 --> 02:47:18.479 align:start position:0% subjective 02:47:18.479 --> 02:47:21.269 align:start position:0% subjective claim<02:47:19.120> then<02:47:19.439> it<02:47:19.680> can<02:47:19.920> be<02:47:20.160> allowed<02:47:20.800> to<02:47:21.040> have 02:47:21.269 --> 02:47:21.279 align:start position:0% claim then it can be allowed to have 02:47:21.279 --> 02:47:23.830 align:start position:0% claim then it can be allowed to have student<02:47:21.600> access<02:47:22.000> with<02:47:22.240> a<02:47:22.399> parent<02:47:22.720> approval. 02:47:23.830 --> 02:47:23.840 align:start position:0% student access with a parent approval. 02:47:23.840 --> 02:47:26.550 align:start position:0% student access with a parent approval. Okay.<02:47:24.160> So<02:47:24.319> that's<02:47:24.560> already<02:47:24.800> in<02:47:25.040> there.<02:47:26.479> All 02:47:26.550 --> 02:47:26.560 align:start position:0% Okay. So that's already in there. All 02:47:26.560 --> 02:47:29.910 align:start position:0% Okay. So that's already in there. All right.<02:47:26.960> I'll<02:47:27.359> withdraw<02:47:27.760> that<02:47:28.080> too<02:47:28.560> and<02:47:29.600> and<02:47:29.760> go 02:47:29.910 --> 02:47:29.920 align:start position:0% right. I'll withdraw that too and and go 02:47:29.920 --> 02:47:35.590 align:start position:0% right. I'll withdraw that too and and go to<02:47:30.080> board<02:47:30.399> member<02:47:30.640> green.<02:47:32.080> Okay. 02:47:35.590 --> 02:47:35.600 align:start position:0% 02:47:35.600 --> 02:47:38.710 align:start position:0% >> Oh,<02:47:35.840> I'm<02:47:36.080> good.<02:47:36.319> I'm<02:47:37.040> I'm<02:47:37.359> following<02:47:37.760> along. 02:47:38.710 --> 02:47:38.720 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I'm good. I'm I'm following along. 02:47:38.720 --> 02:47:41.030 align:start position:0% >> Oh, I'm good. I'm I'm following along. >> Okay.<02:47:39.279> Can<02:47:39.520> I<02:47:39.760> just<02:47:39.920> add<02:47:40.160> in<02:47:40.319> there?<02:47:40.640> Can<02:47:40.880> we 02:47:41.030 --> 02:47:41.040 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Can I just add in there? Can we 02:47:41.040 --> 02:47:43.190 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Can I just add in there? Can we add<02:47:41.200> in<02:47:41.439> this<02:47:41.680> should<02:47:41.840> be<02:47:41.920> a<02:47:42.080> quick<02:47:42.319> one<02:47:42.560> that 02:47:43.190 --> 02:47:43.200 align:start position:0% add in this should be a quick one that 02:47:43.200 --> 02:47:46.710 align:start position:0% add in this should be a quick one that obscene<02:47:44.640> animal 02:47:46.710 --> 02:47:46.720 align:start position:0% obscene animal 02:47:46.720 --> 02:47:48.870 align:start position:0% obscene animal uh<02:47:46.960> abuse<02:47:47.520> material.<02:47:48.160> So,<02:47:48.319> it's<02:47:48.560> not<02:47:48.720> just 02:47:48.870 --> 02:47:48.880 align:start position:0% uh abuse material. So, it's not just 02:47:48.880 --> 02:47:51.830 align:start position:0% uh abuse material. So, it's not just abuse<02:47:49.359> animal<02:47:49.680> abuse<02:47:51.040> that<02:47:51.279> it's<02:47:51.520> the 02:47:51.830 --> 02:47:51.840 align:start position:0% abuse animal abuse that it's the 02:47:51.840 --> 02:47:54.070 align:start position:0% abuse animal abuse that it's the language<02:47:52.240> from<02:47:52.399> the<02:47:52.560> law. 02:47:54.070 --> 02:47:54.080 align:start position:0% language from the law. 02:47:54.080 --> 02:47:56.230 align:start position:0% language from the law. >> Yeah.<02:47:54.479> And<02:47:54.640> can<02:47:54.880> I<02:47:54.960> ask<02:47:55.279> because<02:47:55.600> I<02:47:55.840> felt<02:47:56.080> like 02:47:56.230 --> 02:47:56.240 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And can I ask because I felt like 02:47:56.240 --> 02:47:58.070 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. And can I ask because I felt like board<02:47:56.479> member<02:47:56.720> real<02:47:57.040> had<02:47:57.200> a<02:47:57.359> good<02:47:57.520> point<02:47:57.760> in 02:47:58.070 --> 02:47:58.080 align:start position:0% board member real had a good point in 02:47:58.080 --> 02:48:01.510 align:start position:0% board member real had a good point in talking<02:47:58.240> to<02:47:58.479> her<02:47:58.800> like<02:47:59.200> a<02:47:59.439> lot<02:47:59.600> of<02:47:59.680> the<02:47:59.920> books 02:48:01.510 --> 02:48:01.520 align:start position:0% talking to her like a lot of the books 02:48:01.520 --> 02:48:04.710 align:start position:0% talking to her like a lot of the books are<02:48:01.840> not<02:48:02.640> um<02:48:02.960> glorifying<02:48:03.760> animal<02:48:04.160> abuse<02:48:04.479> but 02:48:04.710 --> 02:48:04.720 align:start position:0% are not um glorifying animal abuse but 02:48:04.720 --> 02:48:05.990 align:start position:0% are not um glorifying animal abuse but they're<02:48:04.880> actually<02:48:05.120> trying<02:48:05.359> to<02:48:05.520> teach<02:48:05.760> a 02:48:05.990 --> 02:48:06.000 align:start position:0% they're actually trying to teach a 02:48:06.000 --> 02:48:08.950 align:start position:0% they're actually trying to teach a lesson<02:48:06.960> so<02:48:07.200> that<02:48:07.600> it's<02:48:07.920> not<02:48:08.160> done.<02:48:08.479> So<02:48:08.640> how<02:48:08.800> do 02:48:08.950 --> 02:48:08.960 align:start position:0% lesson so that it's not done. So how do 02:48:08.960 --> 02:48:10.870 align:start position:0% lesson so that it's not done. So how do we<02:48:09.120> differentiate 02:48:10.870 --> 02:48:10.880 align:start position:0% we differentiate 02:48:10.880 --> 02:48:11.269 align:start position:0% we differentiate the<02:48:11.040> law? 02:48:11.269 --> 02:48:11.279 align:start position:0% the law? 02:48:11.279 --> 02:48:13.110 align:start position:0% the law? >> What<02:48:11.359> does<02:48:11.520> the<02:48:11.680> law<02:48:12.000> specifically<02:48:12.640> say<02:48:12.880> that 02:48:13.110 --> 02:48:13.120 align:start position:0% >> What does the law specifically say that 02:48:13.120 --> 02:48:15.429 align:start position:0% >> What does the law specifically say that new<02:48:13.279> law<02:48:13.520> that<02:48:13.760> was<02:48:13.920> passed? 02:48:15.429 --> 02:48:15.439 align:start position:0% new law that was passed? 02:48:15.439 --> 02:48:17.910 align:start position:0% new law that was passed? >> It<02:48:15.760> has<02:48:16.080> two<02:48:16.399> provisions.<02:48:16.880> I<02:48:17.120> think<02:48:17.200> I<02:48:17.439> exited 02:48:17.910 --> 02:48:17.920 align:start position:0% >> It has two provisions. I think I exited 02:48:17.920 --> 02:48:20.550 align:start position:0% >> It has two provisions. I think I exited out<02:48:18.240> though.<02:48:18.560> Let<02:48:18.720> me<02:48:18.880> see<02:48:18.960> if<02:48:19.040> I<02:48:19.200> can<02:48:19.359> find<02:48:19.520> it. 02:48:20.550 --> 02:48:20.560 align:start position:0% out though. Let me see if I can find it. 02:48:20.560 --> 02:48:23.030 align:start position:0% out though. Let me see if I can find it. This<02:48:20.800> is<02:48:20.960> what<02:48:21.200> it<02:48:21.520> says.<02:48:22.080> It<02:48:22.319> says<02:48:22.560> obscene 02:48:23.030 --> 02:48:23.040 align:start position:0% This is what it says. It says obscene 02:48:23.040 --> 02:48:25.269 align:start position:0% This is what it says. It says obscene animal<02:48:23.279> abuse<02:48:23.680> material<02:48:24.160> means<02:48:24.880> material 02:48:25.269 --> 02:48:25.279 align:start position:0% animal abuse material means material 02:48:25.279 --> 02:48:28.630 align:start position:0% animal abuse material means material that<02:48:25.680> depicts<02:48:26.319> animal<02:48:26.800> crushing.<02:48:28.000> And<02:48:28.160> I<02:48:28.399> can 02:48:28.630 --> 02:48:28.640 align:start position:0% that depicts animal crushing. And I can 02:48:28.640 --> 02:48:30.469 align:start position:0% that depicts animal crushing. And I can def<02:48:28.960> tell<02:48:29.120> you<02:48:29.200> what<02:48:29.359> animal<02:48:29.680> crushing<02:48:30.080> is.<02:48:30.319> It 02:48:30.469 --> 02:48:30.479 align:start position:0% def tell you what animal crushing is. It 02:48:30.479 --> 02:48:33.190 align:start position:0% def tell you what animal crushing is. It means<02:48:30.880> actual<02:48:31.359> conduct<02:48:31.680> in<02:48:31.920> which<02:48:32.080> the<02:48:32.720> living 02:48:33.190 --> 02:48:33.200 align:start position:0% means actual conduct in which the living 02:48:33.200 --> 02:48:36.309 align:start position:0% means actual conduct in which the living nonhuman<02:48:34.560> mammal,<02:48:35.359> reptile,<02:48:35.840> bird<02:48:36.160> and 02:48:36.309 --> 02:48:36.319 align:start position:0% nonhuman mammal, reptile, bird and 02:48:36.319 --> 02:48:37.990 align:start position:0% nonhuman mammal, reptile, bird and amphibian<02:48:36.880> is<02:48:37.040> intentionally<02:48:37.600> crushed, 02:48:37.990 --> 02:48:38.000 align:start position:0% amphibian is intentionally crushed, 02:48:38.000 --> 02:48:40.230 align:start position:0% amphibian is intentionally crushed, burned,<02:48:38.319> drowned,<02:48:38.720> suffocated,<02:48:39.279> impulled<02:48:40.000> or 02:48:40.230 --> 02:48:40.240 align:start position:0% burned, drowned, suffocated, impulled or 02:48:40.240 --> 02:48:42.389 align:start position:0% burned, drowned, suffocated, impulled or otherwise<02:48:40.720> subjected<02:48:41.120> to<02:48:41.600> serious<02:48:42.000> bodily 02:48:42.389 --> 02:48:42.399 align:start position:0% otherwise subjected to serious bodily 02:48:42.399 --> 02:48:45.190 align:start position:0% otherwise subjected to serious bodily injury. 02:48:45.190 --> 02:48:45.200 align:start position:0% injury. 02:48:45.200 --> 02:48:45.830 align:start position:0% injury. Okay.<02:48:45.600> And 02:48:45.830 --> 02:48:45.840 align:start position:0% Okay. And 02:48:45.840 --> 02:48:47.990 align:start position:0% Okay. And >> this<02:48:46.000> was<02:48:46.240> specifically<02:48:46.800> added<02:48:47.040> in<02:48:47.279> law<02:48:47.680> with 02:48:47.990 --> 02:48:48.000 align:start position:0% >> this was specifically added in law with 02:48:48.000 --> 02:48:49.670 align:start position:0% >> this was specifically added in law with regards<02:48:48.319> to<02:48:48.479> literature. 02:48:49.670 --> 02:48:49.680 align:start position:0% regards to literature. 02:48:49.680 --> 02:48:50.230 align:start position:0% regards to literature. >> Yes. 02:48:50.230 --> 02:48:50.240 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 02:48:50.240 --> 02:48:51.670 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> Okay. 02:48:51.670 --> 02:48:51.680 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:48:51.680 --> 02:48:53.429 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And<02:48:51.920> then<02:48:52.080> there's<02:48:52.399> things<02:48:52.560> that<02:48:52.800> do<02:48:53.040> not<02:48:53.279> fall 02:48:53.429 --> 02:48:53.439 align:start position:0% And then there's things that do not fall 02:48:53.439 --> 02:48:55.030 align:start position:0% And then there's things that do not fall into<02:48:53.680> that<02:48:53.920> like<02:48:54.160> hunting,<02:48:54.560> trapping, 02:48:55.030 --> 02:48:55.040 align:start position:0% into that like hunting, trapping, 02:48:55.040 --> 02:48:57.990 align:start position:0% into that like hunting, trapping, fishing,<02:48:56.479> um<02:48:56.640> killing<02:48:56.960> animals<02:48:57.279> for<02:48:57.520> food, 02:48:57.990 --> 02:48:58.000 align:start position:0% fishing, um killing animals for food, 02:48:58.000 --> 02:48:59.429 align:start position:0% fishing, um killing animals for food, medical<02:48:58.240> or<02:48:58.399> scientific<02:48:58.800> re<02:48:59.120> there's<02:48:59.279> some 02:48:59.429 --> 02:48:59.439 align:start position:0% medical or scientific re there's some 02:48:59.439 --> 02:49:01.110 align:start position:0% medical or scientific re there's some other<02:48:59.600> provisions<02:48:59.920> in<02:49:00.080> there.<02:49:00.240> So<02:49:00.399> it<02:49:00.640> it<02:49:00.800> does 02:49:01.110 --> 02:49:01.120 align:start position:0% other provisions in there. So it it does 02:49:01.120 --> 02:49:02.870 align:start position:0% other provisions in there. So it it does >> nobody's<02:49:01.520> going<02:49:01.600> to<02:49:01.680> look<02:49:01.840> at<02:49:01.920> old<02:49:02.160> yeller<02:49:02.640> and 02:49:02.870 --> 02:49:02.880 align:start position:0% >> nobody's going to look at old yeller and 02:49:02.880 --> 02:49:04.790 align:start position:0% >> nobody's going to look at old yeller and shooting<02:49:03.200> the<02:49:03.439> dog<02:49:03.680> because<02:49:03.920> it<02:49:04.080> had<02:49:04.240> rabies 02:49:04.790 --> 02:49:04.800 align:start position:0% shooting the dog because it had rabies 02:49:04.800 --> 02:49:07.190 align:start position:0% shooting the dog because it had rabies as<02:49:05.040> animal<02:49:05.439> abuse,<02:49:05.920> right?<02:49:06.319> Like 02:49:07.190 --> 02:49:07.200 align:start position:0% as animal abuse, right? Like 02:49:07.200 --> 02:49:12.230 align:start position:0% as animal abuse, right? Like >> no,<02:49:07.920> I<02:49:08.240> think<02:49:08.319> that<02:49:08.640> would<02:49:08.880> fall<02:49:09.200> under<02:49:10.399> what? 02:49:12.230 --> 02:49:12.240 align:start position:0% >> no, I think that would fall under what? 02:49:12.240 --> 02:49:14.790 align:start position:0% >> no, I think that would fall under what? Animal<02:49:12.640> management<02:49:13.200> practice.<02:49:14.080> Maybe<02:49:14.319> if<02:49:14.560> the 02:49:14.790 --> 02:49:14.800 align:start position:0% Animal management practice. Maybe if the 02:49:14.800 --> 02:49:17.429 align:start position:0% Animal management practice. Maybe if the animal's<02:49:15.200> sick,<02:49:15.520> right?<02:49:15.840> And<02:49:16.720> put<02:49:16.960> down<02:49:17.279> that 02:49:17.429 --> 02:49:17.439 align:start position:0% animal's sick, right? And put down that 02:49:17.439 --> 02:49:20.550 align:start position:0% animal's sick, right? And put down that that<02:49:17.760> falls<02:49:18.000> under<02:49:18.240> these<02:49:18.800> does<02:49:18.960> not<02:49:19.200> include. 02:49:20.550 --> 02:49:20.560 align:start position:0% that falls under these does not include. 02:49:20.560 --> 02:49:22.550 align:start position:0% that falls under these does not include. You<02:49:20.720> know,<02:49:20.880> I<02:49:21.040> just<02:49:21.200> think<02:49:21.359> there's<02:49:22.240> there 02:49:22.550 --> 02:49:22.560 align:start position:0% You know, I just think there's there 02:49:22.560 --> 02:49:25.110 align:start position:0% You know, I just think there's there should<02:49:22.720> be<02:49:22.880> a<02:49:23.040> distinction.<02:49:23.760> Sometimes<02:49:24.319> books 02:49:25.110 --> 02:49:25.120 align:start position:0% should be a distinction. Sometimes books 02:49:25.120 --> 02:49:27.110 align:start position:0% should be a distinction. Sometimes books try<02:49:25.359> to<02:49:25.520> highlight<02:49:25.920> the<02:49:26.080> grotesque<02:49:26.720> or<02:49:26.880> their 02:49:27.110 --> 02:49:27.120 align:start position:0% try to highlight the grotesque or their 02:49:27.120 --> 02:49:30.309 align:start position:0% try to highlight the grotesque or their horror<02:49:27.680> and<02:49:28.479> but<02:49:28.720> then<02:49:29.279> sometimes<02:49:29.840> it's 02:49:30.309 --> 02:49:30.319 align:start position:0% horror and but then sometimes it's 02:49:30.319 --> 02:49:32.150 align:start position:0% horror and but then sometimes it's teaching<02:49:30.640> a<02:49:30.880> lesson<02:49:31.200> about<02:49:31.520> why<02:49:31.760> you<02:49:31.920> wouldn't 02:49:32.150 --> 02:49:32.160 align:start position:0% teaching a lesson about why you wouldn't 02:49:32.160 --> 02:49:34.230 align:start position:0% teaching a lesson about why you wouldn't want<02:49:32.319> to<02:49:32.560> do<02:49:32.720> that.<02:49:33.200> So,<02:49:33.600> I<02:49:33.840> don't<02:49:33.920> know<02:49:34.080> if 02:49:34.230 --> 02:49:34.240 align:start position:0% want to do that. So, I don't know if 02:49:34.240 --> 02:49:36.630 align:start position:0% want to do that. So, I don't know if there's<02:49:34.479> a<02:49:34.720> way<02:49:34.800> to 02:49:36.630 --> 02:49:36.640 align:start position:0% there's a way to 02:49:36.640 --> 02:49:38.150 align:start position:0% there's a way to differentiate. 02:49:38.150 --> 02:49:38.160 align:start position:0% differentiate. 02:49:38.160 --> 02:49:40.389 align:start position:0% differentiate. >> Well,<02:49:38.399> maybe<02:49:38.720> I<02:49:38.960> I'll<02:49:39.200> send<02:49:39.359> you<02:49:39.600> the<02:49:40.160> I'll 02:49:40.389 --> 02:49:40.399 align:start position:0% >> Well, maybe I I'll send you the I'll 02:49:40.399 --> 02:49:41.510 align:start position:0% >> Well, maybe I I'll send you the I'll tell<02:49:40.479> you<02:49:40.640> where<02:49:40.800> the<02:49:40.960> law<02:49:41.040> is<02:49:41.200> and<02:49:41.359> you<02:49:41.439> can 02:49:41.510 --> 02:49:41.520 align:start position:0% tell you where the law is and you can 02:49:41.520 --> 02:49:42.950 align:start position:0% tell you where the law is and you can look<02:49:41.680> and<02:49:41.840> see<02:49:42.000> if<02:49:42.160> you<02:49:42.240> feel<02:49:42.399> like<02:49:42.560> it<02:49:42.800> breaks 02:49:42.950 --> 02:49:42.960 align:start position:0% look and see if you feel like it breaks 02:49:42.960 --> 02:49:45.269 align:start position:0% look and see if you feel like it breaks it<02:49:43.120> out<02:49:43.279> enough<02:49:43.600> because<02:49:43.840> it<02:49:44.000> it<02:49:44.399> does<02:49:44.720> now.<02:49:45.040> it 02:49:45.269 --> 02:49:45.279 align:start position:0% it out enough because it it does now. it 02:49:45.279 --> 02:49:47.110 align:start position:0% it out enough because it it does now. it is<02:49:45.439> in<02:49:45.600> the<02:49:45.760> law<02:49:45.920> as<02:49:46.160> far<02:49:46.240> as<02:49:46.399> that<02:49:46.720> specific 02:49:47.110 --> 02:49:47.120 align:start position:0% is in the law as far as that specific 02:49:47.120 --> 02:49:53.269 align:start position:0% is in the law as far as that specific term<02:49:47.920> 76-5C-101 02:49:53.269 --> 02:49:53.279 align:start position:0% 02:49:53.279 --> 02:49:55.670 align:start position:0% >> and<02:49:53.439> maybe<02:49:53.760> for<02:49:53.920> this<02:49:54.160> the<02:49:54.399> best<02:49:54.640> policy<02:49:55.279> for<02:49:55.520> a 02:49:55.670 --> 02:49:55.680 align:start position:0% >> and maybe for this the best policy for a 02:49:55.680 --> 02:49:58.389 align:start position:0% >> and maybe for this the best policy for a model<02:49:55.920> policy<02:49:56.319> is<02:49:56.560> to<02:49:56.720> refer<02:49:57.040> to<02:49:57.200> that<02:49:57.439> law. 02:49:58.389 --> 02:49:58.399 align:start position:0% model policy is to refer to that law. 02:49:58.399 --> 02:49:59.349 align:start position:0% model policy is to refer to that law. Yeah, 02:49:59.349 --> 02:49:59.359 align:start position:0% Yeah, 02:49:59.359 --> 02:50:02.070 align:start position:0% Yeah, >> because<02:49:59.840> it<02:50:00.160> is<02:50:00.479> pretty<02:50:01.279> like<02:50:01.600> Yeah,<02:50:01.760> I<02:50:02.000> think 02:50:02.070 --> 02:50:02.080 align:start position:0% >> because it is pretty like Yeah, I think 02:50:02.080 --> 02:50:04.790 align:start position:0% >> because it is pretty like Yeah, I think I<02:50:02.319> had<02:50:02.479> a<02:50:02.640> bunch<02:50:02.800> of<02:50:02.960> librarians<02:50:03.680> be<02:50:04.479> a<02:50:04.720> little 02:50:04.790 --> 02:50:04.800 align:start position:0% I had a bunch of librarians be a little 02:50:04.800 --> 02:50:07.030 align:start position:0% I had a bunch of librarians be a little bit<02:50:04.960> concerned<02:50:05.359> about<02:50:05.840> black<02:50:06.080> beauty<02:50:06.479> or<02:50:06.800> old 02:50:07.030 --> 02:50:07.040 align:start position:0% bit concerned about black beauty or old 02:50:07.040 --> 02:50:10.550 align:start position:0% bit concerned about black beauty or old old<02:50:07.359> yeller<02:50:07.920> of<02:50:08.080> mice<02:50:08.319> and<02:50:08.560> men<02:50:08.880> and<02:50:09.120> so 02:50:10.550 --> 02:50:10.560 align:start position:0% old yeller of mice and men and so 02:50:10.560 --> 02:50:11.269 align:start position:0% old yeller of mice and men and so >> and<02:50:10.720> I<02:50:10.880> think<02:50:10.960> it 02:50:11.269 --> 02:50:11.279 align:start position:0% >> and I think it 02:50:11.279 --> 02:50:13.110 align:start position:0% >> and I think it >> as<02:50:11.439> long<02:50:11.520> as<02:50:11.680> the<02:50:11.840> reviewers<02:50:12.399> are<02:50:12.800> being 02:50:13.110 --> 02:50:13.120 align:start position:0% >> as long as the reviewers are being 02:50:13.120 --> 02:50:14.309 align:start position:0% >> as long as the reviewers are being critical<02:50:13.520> about<02:50:13.760> their<02:50:13.920> their 02:50:14.309 --> 02:50:14.319 align:start position:0% critical about their their 02:50:14.319 --> 02:50:16.309 align:start position:0% critical about their their thoughtfulness<02:50:14.800> on<02:50:14.960> that<02:50:15.120> law<02:50:15.840> that's<02:50:16.080> what's 02:50:16.309 --> 02:50:16.319 align:start position:0% thoughtfulness on that law that's what's 02:50:16.319 --> 02:50:17.670 align:start position:0% thoughtfulness on that law that's what's important<02:50:16.720> but 02:50:17.670 --> 02:50:17.680 align:start position:0% important but 02:50:17.680 --> 02:50:19.349 align:start position:0% important but >> well<02:50:17.920> I<02:50:18.080> think<02:50:18.160> it<02:50:18.399> needs<02:50:18.560> to<02:50:18.640> be<02:50:18.720> in<02:50:18.880> there<02:50:19.120> to 02:50:19.349 --> 02:50:19.359 align:start position:0% >> well I think it needs to be in there to 02:50:19.359 --> 02:50:20.710 align:start position:0% >> well I think it needs to be in there to people<02:50:19.600> know<02:50:19.760> that<02:50:19.920> it's<02:50:20.240> been<02:50:20.399> changed 02:50:20.710 --> 02:50:20.720 align:start position:0% people know that it's been changed 02:50:20.720 --> 02:50:22.070 align:start position:0% people know that it's been changed though<02:50:20.960> that's<02:50:21.120> the<02:50:21.279> only<02:50:21.439> reason<02:50:21.600> why<02:50:21.760> I<02:50:21.920> put 02:50:22.070 --> 02:50:22.080 align:start position:0% though that's the only reason why I put 02:50:22.080 --> 02:50:23.670 align:start position:0% though that's the only reason why I put it<02:50:22.160> in<02:50:22.319> there<02:50:22.640> because<02:50:22.880> to<02:50:23.120> say<02:50:23.359> well<02:50:23.520> we'll 02:50:23.670 --> 02:50:23.680 align:start position:0% it in there because to say well we'll 02:50:23.680 --> 02:50:25.510 align:start position:0% it in there because to say well we'll just<02:50:23.920> refer<02:50:24.240> to<02:50:24.399> the<02:50:24.560> law 02:50:25.510 --> 02:50:25.520 align:start position:0% just refer to the law 02:50:25.520 --> 02:50:27.030 align:start position:0% just refer to the law >> if<02:50:25.840> people<02:50:26.080> don't<02:50:26.319> realize<02:50:26.640> it's<02:50:26.800> in<02:50:26.880> there 02:50:27.030 --> 02:50:27.040 align:start position:0% >> if people don't realize it's in there 02:50:27.040 --> 02:50:28.309 align:start position:0% >> if people don't realize it's in there because<02:50:27.200> I<02:50:27.359> didn't<02:50:27.520> even<02:50:27.600> realize<02:50:28.000> This<02:50:28.160> was 02:50:28.309 --> 02:50:28.319 align:start position:0% because I didn't even realize This was 02:50:28.319 --> 02:50:29.670 align:start position:0% because I didn't even realize This was moving<02:50:28.560> forward<02:50:28.800> during<02:50:29.040> the<02:50:29.200> legislative 02:50:29.670 --> 02:50:29.680 align:start position:0% moving forward during the legislative 02:50:29.680 --> 02:50:32.790 align:start position:0% moving forward during the legislative session<02:50:30.080> until<02:50:30.640> got<02:50:30.880> close<02:50:31.120> to<02:50:31.200> the<02:50:31.439> end. 02:50:32.790 --> 02:50:32.800 align:start position:0% session until got close to the end. 02:50:32.800 --> 02:50:35.269 align:start position:0% session until got close to the end. >> Yeah.<02:50:33.359> Um<02:50:33.680> but<02:50:34.160> maybe<02:50:34.560> just<02:50:34.800> for<02:50:35.040> that 02:50:35.269 --> 02:50:35.279 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Um but maybe just for that 02:50:35.279 --> 02:50:38.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Um but maybe just for that specific<02:50:35.920> one,<02:50:36.319> I<02:50:36.560> mean 02:50:38.550 --> 02:50:38.560 align:start position:0% specific one, I mean 02:50:38.560 --> 02:50:40.230 align:start position:0% specific one, I mean that<02:50:38.960> standard, 02:50:40.230 --> 02:50:40.240 align:start position:0% that standard, 02:50:40.240 --> 02:50:43.110 align:start position:0% that standard, >> you<02:50:40.479> put<02:50:40.720> abscene<02:50:41.359> animal<02:50:42.000> as<02:50:42.399> referenced<02:50:42.800> in 02:50:43.110 --> 02:50:43.120 align:start position:0% >> you put abscene animal as referenced in 02:50:43.120 --> 02:50:44.630 align:start position:0% >> you put abscene animal as referenced in or<02:50:43.439> as 02:50:44.630 --> 02:50:44.640 align:start position:0% or as 02:50:44.640 --> 02:50:46.230 align:start position:0% or as >> Yeah,<02:50:44.960> I<02:50:45.200> think<02:50:45.279> that's<02:50:45.520> a<02:50:45.760> good<02:50:45.840> way<02:50:45.920> to<02:50:46.080> do 02:50:46.230 --> 02:50:46.240 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, I think that's a good way to do 02:50:46.240 --> 02:50:50.070 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, I think that's a good way to do it.<02:50:47.439> Animal<02:50:48.240> abuse<02:50:48.720> material<02:50:49.200> as<02:50:49.520> referenced 02:50:50.070 --> 02:50:50.080 align:start position:0% it. Animal abuse material as referenced 02:50:50.080 --> 02:50:53.990 align:start position:0% it. Animal abuse material as referenced in<02:50:51.040> 50<02:50:52.000> or<02:50:52.240> 76 02:50:53.990 --> 02:50:54.000 align:start position:0% in 50 or 76 02:50:54.000 --> 02:50:57.750 align:start position:0% in 50 or 76 5C<02:50:55.120> 101.<02:50:56.399> See,<02:50:56.720> what<02:50:56.880> happens<02:50:57.120> is<02:50:57.279> I<02:50:57.600> say 02:50:57.750 --> 02:50:57.760 align:start position:0% 5C 101. See, what happens is I say 02:50:57.760 --> 02:50:59.510 align:start position:0% 5C 101. See, what happens is I say something<02:50:58.080> and<02:50:58.319> then<02:50:58.479> Leanne<02:50:58.880> says<02:50:59.120> it<02:50:59.279> way 02:50:59.510 --> 02:50:59.520 align:start position:0% something and then Leanne says it way 02:50:59.520 --> 02:51:02.950 align:start position:0% something and then Leanne says it way better<02:50:59.680> and<02:50:59.920> more<02:51:00.160> clear.<02:51:01.200> And<02:51:01.439> so<02:51:02.000> that's<02:51:02.640> why 02:51:02.950 --> 02:51:02.960 align:start position:0% better and more clear. And so that's why 02:51:02.960 --> 02:51:06.550 align:start position:0% better and more clear. And so that's why this<02:51:03.120> is<02:51:03.359> a<02:51:03.600> board 02:51:06.550 --> 02:51:06.560 align:start position:0% this is a board 02:51:06.560 --> 02:51:09.190 align:start position:0% this is a board called<02:51:06.800> teamwork.<02:51:08.240> So,<02:51:08.800> okay, 02:51:09.190 --> 02:51:09.200 align:start position:0% called teamwork. So, okay, 02:51:09.200 --> 02:51:11.750 align:start position:0% called teamwork. So, okay, >> you<02:51:09.439> do<02:51:09.520> a<02:51:09.680> good<02:51:09.840> job,<02:51:10.160> Sarah. 02:51:11.750 --> 02:51:11.760 align:start position:0% >> you do a good job, Sarah. 02:51:11.760 --> 02:51:14.389 align:start position:0% >> you do a good job, Sarah. >> It's<02:51:12.000> It<02:51:12.240> is<02:51:12.560> It<02:51:12.800> has<02:51:12.960> added<02:51:13.439> animal<02:51:13.840> abuse<02:51:14.160> in 02:51:14.389 --> 02:51:14.399 align:start position:0% >> It's It is It has added animal abuse in 02:51:14.399 --> 02:51:16.389 align:start position:0% >> It's It is It has added animal abuse in several<02:51:14.800> places,<02:51:15.200> right?<02:51:15.520> With<02:51:15.760> regards<02:51:16.080> to 02:51:16.389 --> 02:51:16.399 align:start position:0% several places, right? With regards to 02:51:16.399 --> 02:51:17.910 align:start position:0% several places, right? With regards to >> Yeah.<02:51:16.720> Just<02:51:16.880> make<02:51:17.040> sure<02:51:17.200> wherever<02:51:17.600> it<02:51:17.760> has 02:51:17.910 --> 02:51:17.920 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Just make sure wherever it has 02:51:17.920 --> 02:51:20.230 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Just make sure wherever it has that<02:51:18.160> that<02:51:18.399> it's<02:51:19.040> that<02:51:19.279> it's<02:51:19.520> changed<02:51:19.840> to 02:51:20.230 --> 02:51:20.240 align:start position:0% that that it's that it's changed to 02:51:20.240 --> 02:51:21.349 align:start position:0% that that it's that it's changed to >> through<02:51:20.479> that<02:51:20.720> section. 02:51:21.349 --> 02:51:21.359 align:start position:0% >> through that section. 02:51:21.359 --> 02:51:24.710 align:start position:0% >> through that section. >> Yep. 02:51:24.710 --> 02:51:24.720 align:start position:0% 02:51:24.720 --> 02:51:26.150 align:start position:0% >> Okay.<02:51:24.880> Okay,<02:51:25.120> hang<02:51:25.200> on<02:51:25.359> just<02:51:25.520> a<02:51:25.600> sec<02:51:25.760> to<02:51:26.000> make 02:51:26.150 --> 02:51:26.160 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay, hang on just a sec to make 02:51:26.160 --> 02:51:28.790 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay, hang on just a sec to make sure<02:51:26.319> I'm<02:51:26.720> getting<02:51:27.040> what<02:51:27.279> you're 02:51:28.790 --> 02:51:28.800 align:start position:0% sure I'm getting what you're 02:51:28.800 --> 02:51:33.030 align:start position:0% sure I'm getting what you're asking.<02:51:29.279> So,<02:51:29.760> you<02:51:30.000> want<02:51:30.240> this<02:51:30.720> wherever 02:51:33.030 --> 02:51:33.040 align:start position:0% asking. So, you want this wherever 02:51:33.040 --> 02:51:33.750 align:start position:0% asking. So, you want this wherever >> animal 02:51:33.750 --> 02:51:33.760 align:start position:0% >> animal 02:51:33.760 --> 02:51:36.309 align:start position:0% >> animal >> animal<02:51:34.160> abuse<02:51:34.800> is<02:51:35.439> referenced. 02:51:36.309 --> 02:51:36.319 align:start position:0% >> animal abuse is referenced. 02:51:36.319 --> 02:51:37.030 align:start position:0% >> animal abuse is referenced. >> Yes. 02:51:37.030 --> 02:51:37.040 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 02:51:37.040 --> 02:51:37.990 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> Is<02:51:37.200> that<02:51:37.359> correct?<02:51:37.680> Okay. 02:51:37.990 --> 02:51:38.000 align:start position:0% >> Is that correct? Okay. 02:51:38.000 --> 02:51:39.190 align:start position:0% >> Is that correct? Okay. >> Then<02:51:38.160> we<02:51:38.240> don't<02:51:38.399> have<02:51:38.479> to<02:51:38.560> go<02:51:38.720> find<02:51:38.880> all<02:51:39.040> the 02:51:39.190 --> 02:51:39.200 align:start position:0% >> Then we don't have to go find all the 02:51:39.200 --> 02:51:39.590 align:start position:0% >> Then we don't have to go find all the lines, 02:51:39.590 --> 02:51:39.600 align:start position:0% lines, 02:51:39.600 --> 02:51:43.190 align:start position:0% lines, >> right?<02:51:40.000> Yeah.<02:51:40.399> Great.<02:51:40.800> Okay. 02:51:43.190 --> 02:51:43.200 align:start position:0% >> right? Yeah. Great. Okay. 02:51:43.200 --> 02:51:45.670 align:start position:0% >> right? Yeah. Great. Okay. In<02:51:43.439> the<02:51:43.680> model<02:51:44.080> policy.<02:51:44.800> Is<02:51:44.960> that<02:51:45.279> what<02:51:45.520> you 02:51:45.670 --> 02:51:45.680 align:start position:0% In the model policy. Is that what you 02:51:45.680 --> 02:51:46.389 align:start position:0% In the model policy. Is that what you want? 02:51:46.389 --> 02:51:46.399 align:start position:0% want? 02:51:46.399 --> 02:51:49.830 align:start position:0% want? >> Yes. 02:51:49.830 --> 02:51:49.840 align:start position:0% 02:51:49.840 --> 02:51:53.269 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 02:51:53.269 --> 02:51:53.279 align:start position:0% 02:51:53.279 --> 02:51:55.030 align:start position:0% Okay.<02:51:53.680> That<02:51:53.920> would<02:51:54.080> be<02:51:54.399> that<02:51:54.560> would<02:51:54.720> be<02:51:54.800> my 02:51:55.030 --> 02:51:55.040 align:start position:0% Okay. That would be that would be my 02:51:55.040 --> 02:51:58.870 align:start position:0% Okay. That would be that would be my motion<02:51:55.279> on<02:51:55.520> that. 02:51:58.870 --> 02:51:58.880 align:start position:0% 02:51:58.880 --> 02:52:00.950 align:start position:0% So<02:51:59.120> it's<02:51:59.359> clear<02:51:59.760> and<02:52:00.080> not<02:52:00.240> just<02:52:00.479> anything, 02:52:00.950 --> 02:52:00.960 align:start position:0% So it's clear and not just anything, 02:52:00.960 --> 02:52:04.870 align:start position:0% So it's clear and not just anything, right?<02:52:01.279> So<02:52:01.439> it's<02:52:01.680> not<02:52:01.840> just 02:52:04.870 --> 02:52:04.880 align:start position:0% 02:52:04.880 --> 02:52:07.429 align:start position:0% Okay.<02:52:05.600> All<02:52:05.600> right.<02:52:05.920> So<02:52:06.080> the<02:52:06.319> recommendation 02:52:07.429 --> 02:52:07.439 align:start position:0% Okay. All right. So the recommendation 02:52:07.439 --> 02:52:09.910 align:start position:0% Okay. All right. So the recommendation is<02:52:07.840> that<02:52:08.080> we 02:52:09.910 --> 02:52:09.920 align:start position:0% is that we 02:52:09.920 --> 02:52:12.389 align:start position:0% is that we to<02:52:10.160> add<02:52:10.319> the<02:52:10.479> words<02:52:11.120> obscene<02:52:11.680> animal<02:52:12.000> abuse 02:52:12.389 --> 02:52:12.399 align:start position:0% to add the words obscene animal abuse 02:52:12.399 --> 02:52:17.429 align:start position:0% to add the words obscene animal abuse material<02:52:12.800> as<02:52:13.040> referenced<02:52:13.520> in<02:52:14.319> 76-5C-101 02:52:17.429 --> 02:52:17.439 align:start position:0% 02:52:17.439 --> 02:52:21.110 align:start position:0% section<02:52:17.920> 765C<02:52:19.120> 101<02:52:19.920> wherever<02:52:20.399> animal<02:52:20.800> abuse 02:52:21.110 --> 02:52:21.120 align:start position:0% section 765C 101 wherever animal abuse 02:52:21.120 --> 02:52:24.870 align:start position:0% section 765C 101 wherever animal abuse is<02:52:21.359> referenced<02:52:21.680> in<02:52:21.840> the<02:52:22.000> model<02:52:22.240> policy. 02:52:24.870 --> 02:52:24.880 align:start position:0% is referenced in the model policy. 02:52:24.880 --> 02:52:26.950 align:start position:0% is referenced in the model policy. All<02:52:25.120> those<02:52:25.359> in<02:52:25.600> favor? 02:52:26.950 --> 02:52:26.960 align:start position:0% All those in favor? 02:52:26.960 --> 02:52:30.309 align:start position:0% All those in favor? >> I<02:52:27.600> I 02:52:30.309 --> 02:52:30.319 align:start position:0% >> I I 02:52:30.319 --> 02:52:32.870 align:start position:0% >> I I >> Okay,<02:52:30.720> I<02:52:30.960> think<02:52:31.040> that<02:52:31.279> was<02:52:31.359> unanimous. 02:52:32.870 --> 02:52:32.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay, I think that was unanimous. 02:52:32.880 --> 02:52:34.070 align:start position:0% >> Okay, I think that was unanimous. I<02:52:33.120> don't<02:52:33.200> know<02:52:33.279> if<02:52:33.439> I<02:52:33.520> heard<02:52:33.760> from<02:52:33.920> board 02:52:34.070 --> 02:52:34.080 align:start position:0% I don't know if I heard from board 02:52:34.080 --> 02:52:36.710 align:start position:0% I don't know if I heard from board member<02:52:34.319> real 02:52:36.710 --> 02:52:36.720 align:start position:0% member real 02:52:36.720 --> 02:52:41.110 align:start position:0% member real >> and<02:52:38.160> Okay.<02:52:39.359> Uh<02:52:40.160> board<02:52:40.399> member<02:52:40.640> real<02:52:40.880> did 02:52:41.110 --> 02:52:41.120 align:start position:0% >> and Okay. Uh board member real did 02:52:41.120 --> 02:52:43.110 align:start position:0% >> and Okay. Uh board member real did >> you<02:52:41.359> say<02:52:41.520> I<02:52:41.760> I<02:52:41.920> said<02:52:42.080> I<02:52:42.399> was<02:52:42.479> the<02:52:42.640> first<02:52:42.880> one. 02:52:43.110 --> 02:52:43.120 align:start position:0% >> you say I I said I was the first one. 02:52:43.120 --> 02:52:43.750 align:start position:0% >> you say I I said I was the first one. Okay. 02:52:43.750 --> 02:52:43.760 align:start position:0% Okay. 02:52:43.760 --> 02:52:45.990 align:start position:0% Okay. >> Yeah,<02:52:44.160> we<02:52:44.399> have<02:52:44.560> just<02:52:44.800> about<02:52:45.040> six<02:52:45.359> minutes.<02:52:45.760> Do 02:52:45.990 --> 02:52:46.000 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, we have just about six minutes. Do 02:52:46.000 --> 02:52:50.389 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, we have just about six minutes. Do you<02:52:46.160> have<02:52:47.600> um<02:52:47.760> some<02:52:48.160> others<02:52:48.640> that<02:52:48.880> are<02:52:50.160> you 02:52:50.389 --> 02:52:50.399 align:start position:0% you have um some others that are you 02:52:50.399 --> 02:52:53.750 align:start position:0% you have um some others that are you would<02:52:50.560> like<02:52:50.800> to<02:52:51.120> move<02:52:51.359> or<02:52:51.600> consider? 02:52:53.750 --> 02:52:53.760 align:start position:0% would like to move or consider? 02:52:53.760 --> 02:52:55.349 align:start position:0% would like to move or consider? Yeah.<02:52:54.080> Sorry,<02:52:54.399> I'm<02:52:54.640> moving<02:52:54.880> around<02:52:55.040> because<02:52:55.200> I 02:52:55.349 --> 02:52:55.359 align:start position:0% Yeah. Sorry, I'm moving around because I 02:52:55.359 --> 02:52:56.630 align:start position:0% Yeah. Sorry, I'm moving around because I have<02:52:55.439> another<02:52:55.680> board<02:52:55.920> meeting<02:52:56.160> after<02:52:56.399> this. 02:52:56.630 --> 02:52:56.640 align:start position:0% have another board meeting after this. 02:52:56.640 --> 02:53:03.750 align:start position:0% have another board meeting after this. Okay.<02:52:57.520> Um, 02:53:03.750 --> 02:53:03.760 align:start position:0% 02:53:03.760 --> 02:53:05.910 align:start position:0% I<02:53:04.080> believe<02:53:04.240> the<02:53:04.560> age<02:53:04.880> appropriateness<02:53:05.600> we've 02:53:05.910 --> 02:53:05.920 align:start position:0% I believe the age appropriateness we've 02:53:05.920 --> 02:53:10.309 align:start position:0% I believe the age appropriateness we've kind<02:53:06.080> of<02:53:06.160> covered<02:53:06.479> already 02:53:10.309 --> 02:53:10.319 align:start position:0% 02:53:10.319 --> 02:53:13.590 align:start position:0% and<02:53:10.640> removing<02:53:10.960> the<02:53:11.200> 30<02:53:11.520> days 02:53:13.590 --> 02:53:13.600 align:start position:0% and removing the 30 days 02:53:13.600 --> 02:53:18.469 align:start position:0% and removing the 30 days and<02:53:13.840> the<02:53:14.080> animal<02:53:15.200> piece. 02:53:18.469 --> 02:53:18.479 align:start position:0% 02:53:18.479 --> 02:53:32.230 align:start position:0% Just<02:53:18.720> double<02:53:19.040> checking<02:53:19.279> my<02:53:19.439> notes. 02:53:32.230 --> 02:53:32.240 align:start position:0% 02:53:32.240 --> 02:53:38.070 align:start position:0% Oh,<02:53:33.040> the<02:53:33.439> last<02:53:33.600> one<02:53:33.760> was<02:53:34.000> the<02:53:34.240> inventory<02:53:34.880> piece 02:53:38.070 --> 02:53:38.080 align:start position:0% 02:53:38.080 --> 02:53:41.349 align:start position:0% >> and<02:53:38.399> you<02:53:38.640> wanted<02:53:38.880> to<02:53:39.040> put<02:53:39.279> it<02:53:39.600> with<02:53:40.160> uh<02:53:41.120> you 02:53:41.349 --> 02:53:41.359 align:start position:0% >> and you wanted to put it with uh you 02:53:41.359 --> 02:53:43.830 align:start position:0% >> and you wanted to put it with uh you wanted<02:53:41.600> to<02:53:41.760> have<02:53:41.920> like<02:53:42.560> a<02:53:42.960> gra<02:53:43.200> a<02:53:43.439> grandma 02:53:43.830 --> 02:53:43.840 align:start position:0% wanted to have like a gra a grandma 02:53:43.840 --> 02:53:46.630 align:start position:0% wanted to have like a gra a grandma request<02:53:44.160> on<02:53:44.319> that<02:53:44.560> in<02:53:44.880> place<02:53:45.040> of 02:53:46.630 --> 02:53:46.640 align:start position:0% request on that in place of 02:53:46.640 --> 02:53:51.110 align:start position:0% request on that in place of >> Yeah.<02:53:47.120> Uh<02:53:48.560> what<02:53:48.800> I<02:53:48.960> heard<02:53:49.279> from 02:53:51.110 --> 02:53:51.120 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Uh what I heard from 02:53:51.120 --> 02:54:03.910 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Uh what I heard from folks<02:53:52.000> was<02:53:52.399> that<02:53:53.760> they're 02:54:03.910 --> 02:54:03.920 align:start position:0% 02:54:03.920 --> 02:54:07.190 align:start position:0% the<02:54:04.240> request<02:54:04.720> to<02:54:04.960> have<02:54:05.200> the<02:54:05.439> list 02:54:07.190 --> 02:54:07.200 align:start position:0% the request to have the list 02:54:07.200 --> 02:54:09.910 align:start position:0% the request to have the list so<02:54:07.520> readily<02:54:07.920> available 02:54:09.910 --> 02:54:09.920 align:start position:0% so readily available 02:54:09.920 --> 02:54:12.550 align:start position:0% so readily available um 02:54:12.550 --> 02:54:12.560 align:start position:0% um 02:54:12.560 --> 02:54:15.670 align:start position:0% um was<02:54:12.800> a<02:54:12.960> lot<02:54:13.120> of<02:54:13.279> work<02:54:13.520> for<02:54:13.760> them<02:54:14.240> and<02:54:15.040> they<02:54:15.359> felt 02:54:15.670 --> 02:54:15.680 align:start position:0% was a lot of work for them and they felt 02:54:15.680 --> 02:54:17.030 align:start position:0% was a lot of work for them and they felt like 02:54:17.030 --> 02:54:17.040 align:start position:0% like 02:54:17.040 --> 02:54:22.550 align:start position:0% like Um, 02:54:22.550 --> 02:54:22.560 align:start position:0% 02:54:22.560 --> 02:54:27.510 align:start position:0% >> sorry. 02:54:27.510 --> 02:54:27.520 align:start position:0% 02:54:27.520 --> 02:54:30.309 align:start position:0% Is<02:54:28.000> do<02:54:28.240> they<02:54:28.479> not<02:54:28.720> have<02:54:29.040> and<02:54:29.200> maybe<02:54:29.600> this<02:54:29.840> is<02:54:30.000> a 02:54:30.309 --> 02:54:30.319 align:start position:0% Is do they not have and maybe this is a 02:54:30.319 --> 02:54:33.670 align:start position:0% Is do they not have and maybe this is a question<02:54:30.640> for<02:54:31.600> Deina.<02:54:32.240> Most<02:54:32.479> of<02:54:32.640> those<02:54:32.960> are 02:54:33.670 --> 02:54:33.680 align:start position:0% question for Deina. Most of those are 02:54:33.680 --> 02:54:35.590 align:start position:0% question for Deina. Most of those are online<02:54:34.080> databases.<02:54:34.880> I<02:54:35.120> don't<02:54:35.279> believe 02:54:35.590 --> 02:54:35.600 align:start position:0% online databases. I don't believe 02:54:35.600 --> 02:54:37.590 align:start position:0% online databases. I don't believe they're<02:54:36.479> I<02:54:36.720> have<02:54:36.800> to<02:54:36.960> write<02:54:37.279> down. 02:54:37.590 --> 02:54:37.600 align:start position:0% they're I have to write down. 02:54:37.600 --> 02:54:39.910 align:start position:0% they're I have to write down. >> Well,<02:54:37.760> they<02:54:37.920> wanted<02:54:38.160> them<02:54:38.399> posted<02:54:39.040> like<02:54:39.520> and<02:54:39.760> I 02:54:39.910 --> 02:54:39.920 align:start position:0% >> Well, they wanted them posted like and I 02:54:39.920 --> 02:54:43.349 align:start position:0% >> Well, they wanted them posted like and I I<02:54:40.240> just<02:54:40.720> I<02:54:41.040> didn't<02:54:41.760> it<02:54:42.000> felt<02:54:42.479> icky<02:54:42.720> to<02:54:42.880> me<02:54:43.040> that 02:54:43.349 --> 02:54:43.359 align:start position:0% I just I didn't it felt icky to me that 02:54:43.359 --> 02:54:45.349 align:start position:0% I just I didn't it felt icky to me that piece.<02:54:44.000> Aren't<02:54:44.240> they<02:54:44.479> already<02:54:44.800> having<02:54:45.040> to<02:54:45.200> be 02:54:45.349 --> 02:54:45.359 align:start position:0% piece. Aren't they already having to be 02:54:45.359 --> 02:54:46.950 align:start position:0% piece. Aren't they already having to be posted 02:54:46.950 --> 02:54:46.960 align:start position:0% posted 02:54:46.960 --> 02:54:49.190 align:start position:0% posted by<02:54:47.279> law?<02:54:47.600> Don't<02:54:47.760> they<02:54:48.000> have<02:54:48.080> to<02:54:48.240> have<02:54:48.479> posted 02:54:49.190 --> 02:54:49.200 align:start position:0% by law? Don't they have to have posted 02:54:49.200 --> 02:54:51.110 align:start position:0% by law? Don't they have to have posted what's 02:54:51.110 --> 02:54:51.120 align:start position:0% what's 02:54:51.120 --> 02:54:52.550 align:start position:0% what's available<02:54:51.520> in<02:54:51.760> their<02:54:51.920> library?<02:54:52.240> I<02:54:52.479> thought 02:54:52.550 --> 02:54:52.560 align:start position:0% available in their library? I thought 02:54:52.560 --> 02:54:55.349 align:start position:0% available in their library? I thought that<02:54:52.800> was<02:54:52.960> part<02:54:53.120> of<02:54:53.200> the<02:54:53.439> law<02:54:54.720> in<02:54:54.960> order<02:54:55.120> for 02:54:55.349 --> 02:54:55.359 align:start position:0% that was part of the law in order for 02:54:55.359 --> 02:55:00.070 align:start position:0% that was part of the law in order for parents<02:54:55.680> to<02:54:55.920> go<02:54:56.960> look.<02:54:57.760> Am<02:54:57.920> I<02:54:58.080> wrong<02:54:58.240> in<02:54:58.479> that? 02:55:00.070 --> 02:55:00.080 align:start position:0% parents to go look. Am I wrong in that? 02:55:00.080 --> 02:55:02.630 align:start position:0% parents to go look. Am I wrong in that? Deina<02:55:00.800> South<02:55:01.040> off<02:55:01.279> library<02:55:01.520> media<02:55:01.840> specialist 02:55:02.630 --> 02:55:02.640 align:start position:0% Deina South off library media specialist 02:55:02.640 --> 02:55:05.349 align:start position:0% Deina South off library media specialist here.<02:55:03.120> Um<02:55:03.600> yes. 02:55:05.349 --> 02:55:05.359 align:start position:0% here. Um yes. 02:55:05.359 --> 02:55:07.990 align:start position:0% here. Um yes. Uh<02:55:06.080> the<02:55:06.560> transparency<02:55:07.359> legislation, 02:55:07.990 --> 02:55:08.000 align:start position:0% Uh the transparency legislation, 02:55:08.000 --> 02:55:09.590 align:start position:0% Uh the transparency legislation, transparency<02:55:08.640> in<02:55:08.880> school<02:55:09.040> libraries 02:55:09.590 --> 02:55:09.600 align:start position:0% transparency in school libraries 02:55:09.600 --> 02:55:11.110 align:start position:0% transparency in school libraries legislation<02:55:10.160> requires<02:55:10.640> that<02:55:10.880> their 02:55:11.110 --> 02:55:11.120 align:start position:0% legislation requires that their 02:55:11.120 --> 02:55:14.870 align:start position:0% legislation requires that their databases<02:55:11.760> be<02:55:12.479> visible<02:55:13.200> to 02:55:14.870 --> 02:55:14.880 align:start position:0% databases be visible to 02:55:14.880 --> 02:55:19.110 align:start position:0% databases be visible to uh<02:55:15.200> parents<02:55:15.760> or<02:55:17.040> of<02:55:17.279> the<02:55:17.760> of<02:55:18.000> the<02:55:18.160> LEA<02:55:18.640> to 02:55:19.110 --> 02:55:19.120 align:start position:0% uh parents or of the of the LEA to 02:55:19.120 --> 02:55:22.389 align:start position:0% uh parents or of the of the LEA to review<02:55:19.520> the<02:55:19.840> materials.<02:55:20.800> Um<02:55:21.200> it<02:55:21.439> does<02:55:21.600> not 02:55:22.389 --> 02:55:22.399 align:start position:0% review the materials. Um it does not 02:55:22.399 --> 02:55:24.710 align:start position:0% review the materials. Um it does not require<02:55:22.800> a<02:55:23.040> spreadsheet.<02:55:24.160> I<02:55:24.399> don't<02:55:24.479> know<02:55:24.479> if 02:55:24.710 --> 02:55:24.720 align:start position:0% require a spreadsheet. I don't know if 02:55:24.720 --> 02:55:26.630 align:start position:0% require a spreadsheet. I don't know if that<02:55:24.880> was<02:55:25.040> what<02:55:25.279> the<02:55:25.520> question<02:55:25.840> was,<02:55:26.160> but 02:55:26.630 --> 02:55:26.640 align:start position:0% that was what the question was, but 02:55:26.640 --> 02:55:29.910 align:start position:0% that was what the question was, but >> that<02:55:26.880> was<02:55:27.040> it.<02:55:27.600> Yeah.<02:55:28.000> So,<02:55:28.640> so<02:55:29.040> in<02:55:29.279> in<02:55:29.680> your 02:55:29.910 --> 02:55:29.920 align:start position:0% >> that was it. Yeah. So, so in in your 02:55:29.920 --> 02:55:33.910 align:start position:0% >> that was it. Yeah. So, so in in your draft,<02:55:31.040> um,<02:55:31.200> Chair<02:55:31.520> Earl,<02:55:31.920> you<02:55:32.160> had<02:55:33.600> the 02:55:33.910 --> 02:55:33.920 align:start position:0% draft, um, Chair Earl, you had the 02:55:33.920 --> 02:55:37.750 align:start position:0% draft, um, Chair Earl, you had the requirement<02:55:34.560> of<02:55:34.800> having<02:55:35.040> that<02:55:35.359> and<02:55:35.600> I, 02:55:37.750 --> 02:55:37.760 align:start position:0% requirement of having that and I, 02:55:37.760 --> 02:55:42.389 align:start position:0% requirement of having that and I, um, 02:55:42.389 --> 02:55:42.399 align:start position:0% 02:55:42.399 --> 02:55:43.830 align:start position:0% >> yeah,<02:55:42.640> I'm<02:55:42.880> looking<02:55:43.040> for<02:55:43.200> it<02:55:43.359> to 02:55:43.830 --> 02:55:43.840 align:start position:0% >> yeah, I'm looking for it to 02:55:43.840 --> 02:55:45.349 align:start position:0% >> yeah, I'm looking for it to >> the<02:55:44.000> inventory. 02:55:45.349 --> 02:55:45.359 align:start position:0% >> the inventory. 02:55:45.359 --> 02:55:46.150 align:start position:0% >> the inventory. >> Yeah. 02:55:46.150 --> 02:55:46.160 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:55:46.160 --> 02:55:47.910 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> Uh, 02:55:47.910 --> 02:55:47.920 align:start position:0% >> Uh, 02:55:47.920 --> 02:55:54.790 align:start position:0% >> Uh, I<02:55:48.240> think<02:55:48.399> it's<02:55:48.960> towards<02:55:49.439> the<02:55:49.760> end<02:55:50.000> here. 02:55:54.790 --> 02:55:54.800 align:start position:0% 02:55:54.800 --> 02:55:56.870 align:start position:0% I<02:55:55.120> don't<02:55:55.200> know<02:55:55.359> where<02:55:55.520> it<02:55:55.680> is.<02:55:55.920> Sorry.<02:55:56.319> It<02:55:56.720> it 02:55:56.870 --> 02:55:56.880 align:start position:0% I don't know where it is. Sorry. It it 02:55:56.880 --> 02:55:58.070 align:start position:0% I don't know where it is. Sorry. It it referenced<02:55:57.200> the<02:55:57.359> national<02:55:57.680> book<02:55:57.840> rating 02:55:58.070 --> 02:55:58.080 align:start position:0% referenced the national book rating 02:55:58.080 --> 02:56:00.230 align:start position:0% referenced the national book rating index.<02:55:58.479> It<02:55:58.640> was<02:55:58.720> just<02:55:58.880> like<02:55:59.040> it<02:55:59.279> felt<02:55:59.520> like<02:56:00.000> if 02:56:00.230 --> 02:56:00.240 align:start position:0% index. It was just like it felt like if 02:56:00.240 --> 02:56:02.230 align:start position:0% index. It was just like it felt like if they<02:56:00.479> want<02:56:00.640> to<02:56:00.800> ask<02:56:01.040> for<02:56:01.359> an<02:56:01.600> inventory<02:56:02.000> of 02:56:02.230 --> 02:56:02.240 align:start position:0% they want to ask for an inventory of 02:56:02.240 --> 02:56:04.550 align:start position:0% they want to ask for an inventory of every<02:56:02.479> book<02:56:02.640> in<02:56:02.800> the<02:56:02.960> school<02:56:03.200> library,<02:56:04.240> they 02:56:04.550 --> 02:56:04.560 align:start position:0% every book in the school library, they 02:56:04.560 --> 02:56:07.030 align:start position:0% every book in the school library, they can<02:56:05.040> submit<02:56:05.279> a<02:56:05.439> grammar<02:56:05.760> request<02:56:06.160> to<02:56:06.399> get<02:56:06.800> all 02:56:07.030 --> 02:56:07.040 align:start position:0% can submit a grammar request to get all 02:56:07.040 --> 02:56:09.910 align:start position:0% can submit a grammar request to get all that<02:56:07.359> information.<02:56:08.000> But<02:56:09.200> that<02:56:09.520> additional 02:56:09.910 --> 02:56:09.920 align:start position:0% that information. But that additional 02:56:09.920 --> 02:56:11.830 align:start position:0% that information. But that additional requirement<02:56:10.560> just<02:56:10.720> to<02:56:10.880> have<02:56:10.960> the<02:56:11.200> list<02:56:11.520> felt 02:56:11.830 --> 02:56:11.840 align:start position:0% requirement just to have the list felt 02:56:11.840 --> 02:56:14.070 align:start position:0% requirement just to have the list felt unnecessary. 02:56:14.070 --> 02:56:14.080 align:start position:0% unnecessary. 02:56:14.080 --> 02:56:16.150 align:start position:0% unnecessary. >> All right,<02:56:14.399> let<02:56:14.560> me<02:56:14.720> look<02:56:14.800> at<02:56:14.960> the<02:56:15.200> actual<02:56:15.920> Did 02:56:16.150 --> 02:56:16.160 align:start position:0% >> All right, let me look at the actual Did 02:56:16.160 --> 02:56:18.469 align:start position:0% >> All right, let me look at the actual Did we<02:56:16.479> find<02:56:16.800> where<02:56:17.040> it<02:56:17.200> was<02:56:17.359> at<02:56:17.680> yet? 02:56:18.469 --> 02:56:18.479 align:start position:0% we find where it was at yet? 02:56:18.479 --> 02:56:19.670 align:start position:0% we find where it was at yet? >> I'm<02:56:18.800> trying<02:56:19.120> to. 02:56:19.670 --> 02:56:19.680 align:start position:0% >> I'm trying to. 02:56:19.680 --> 02:56:29.110 align:start position:0% >> I'm trying to. >> I<02:56:19.920> am<02:56:20.160> too. 02:56:29.110 --> 02:56:29.120 align:start position:0% 02:56:29.120 --> 02:56:34.469 align:start position:0% Uh<02:56:30.080> so<02:56:30.319> it<02:56:30.640> would<02:56:30.800> be<02:56:31.920> uh<02:56:32.240> F<02:56:32.720> under<02:56:33.279> section 02:56:34.469 --> 02:56:34.479 align:start position:0% Uh so it would be uh F under section 02:56:34.479 --> 02:56:39.030 align:start position:0% Uh so it would be uh F under section right<02:56:34.720> above<02:56:35.120> section<02:56:35.520> three<02:56:36.160> on<02:56:36.479> page<02:56:37.840> oh 02:56:39.030 --> 02:56:39.040 align:start position:0% right above section three on page oh 02:56:39.040 --> 02:56:42.389 align:start position:0% right above section three on page oh five<02:56:39.439> maybe<02:56:40.560> let<02:56:40.800> me<02:56:40.960> read<02:56:41.120> it.<02:56:41.520> So<02:56:41.760> an<02:56:42.000> LEA 02:56:42.389 --> 02:56:42.399 align:start position:0% five maybe let me read it. So an LEA 02:56:42.399 --> 02:56:44.230 align:start position:0% five maybe let me read it. So an LEA shall<02:56:42.640> provide<02:56:42.880> an<02:56:43.120> online<02:56:43.520> platform<02:56:44.000> for 02:56:44.230 --> 02:56:44.240 align:start position:0% shall provide an online platform for 02:56:44.240 --> 02:56:45.670 align:start position:0% shall provide an online platform for library<02:56:44.560> materials<02:56:44.960> through<02:56:45.120> which<02:56:45.279> a<02:56:45.439> parent 02:56:45.670 --> 02:56:45.680 align:start position:0% library materials through which a parent 02:56:45.680 --> 02:56:47.990 align:start position:0% library materials through which a parent is<02:56:45.840> able<02:56:46.000> to<02:56:46.160> view<02:56:46.399> the<02:56:46.720> author<02:56:47.120> title<02:56:47.439> and<02:56:47.760> a 02:56:47.990 --> 02:56:48.000 align:start position:0% is able to view the author title and a 02:56:48.000 --> 02:56:50.710 align:start position:0% is able to view the author title and a description<02:56:48.319> of<02:56:48.479> any<02:56:48.800> material<02:56:49.840> the<02:56:50.080> parents 02:56:50.710 --> 02:56:50.720 align:start position:0% description of any material the parents 02:56:50.720 --> 02:56:52.550 align:start position:0% description of any material the parents child<02:56:51.040> borrows<02:56:51.520> for<02:56:51.680> the<02:56:51.840> from<02:56:52.080> the<02:56:52.319> school 02:56:52.550 --> 02:56:52.560 align:start position:0% child borrows for the from the school 02:56:52.560 --> 02:56:54.309 align:start position:0% child borrows for the from the school library<02:56:52.960> including<02:56:53.200> a<02:56:53.359> history<02:56:53.600> of<02:56:53.840> borrowed 02:56:54.309 --> 02:56:54.319 align:start position:0% library including a history of borrowed 02:56:54.319 --> 02:56:56.950 align:start position:0% library including a history of borrowed materials<02:56:55.200> and<02:56:55.520> provide<02:56:55.760> a<02:56:56.080> complete<02:56:56.560> book 02:56:56.950 --> 02:56:56.960 align:start position:0% materials and provide a complete book 02:56:56.960 --> 02:56:59.349 align:start position:0% materials and provide a complete book inventory<02:56:57.520> list<02:56:58.240> on<02:56:58.479> a<02:56:58.640> spreadsheet<02:56:59.120> when 02:56:59.349 --> 02:56:59.359 align:start position:0% inventory list on a spreadsheet when 02:56:59.359 --> 02:57:01.590 align:start position:0% inventory list on a spreadsheet when requested<02:56:59.840> if<02:57:00.160> possible.<02:57:01.040> So<02:57:01.279> maybe 02:57:01.590 --> 02:57:01.600 align:start position:0% requested if possible. So maybe 02:57:01.600 --> 02:57:03.269 align:start position:0% requested if possible. So maybe spreadsheet's<02:57:02.240> not<02:57:02.399> the<02:57:02.560> right<02:57:02.720> word.<02:57:03.040> So 02:57:03.269 --> 02:57:03.279 align:start position:0% spreadsheet's not the right word. So 02:57:03.279 --> 02:57:04.150 align:start position:0% spreadsheet's not the right word. So maybe<02:57:03.520> it<02:57:03.840> is. 02:57:04.150 --> 02:57:04.160 align:start position:0% maybe it is. 02:57:04.160 --> 02:57:06.550 align:start position:0% maybe it is. >> Yeah. 02:57:06.550 --> 02:57:06.560 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. 02:57:06.560 --> 02:57:12.469 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. >> What<02:57:06.720> would<02:57:06.960> that<02:57:07.120> need<02:57:07.279> to<02:57:07.439> be? 02:57:12.469 --> 02:57:12.479 align:start position:0% 02:57:12.479 --> 02:57:14.230 align:start position:0% Maybe<02:57:12.720> it's<02:57:12.960> not<02:57:13.120> a<02:57:13.279> spreadsheet.<02:57:13.760> What<02:57:14.000> how 02:57:14.230 --> 02:57:14.240 align:start position:0% Maybe it's not a spreadsheet. What how 02:57:14.240 --> 02:57:17.750 align:start position:0% Maybe it's not a spreadsheet. What how would<02:57:14.399> that<02:57:14.640> be<02:57:14.800> accessible?<02:57:15.680> Is<02:57:15.920> there<02:57:16.960> what 02:57:17.750 --> 02:57:17.760 align:start position:0% would that be accessible? Is there what 02:57:17.760 --> 02:57:20.230 align:start position:0% would that be accessible? Is there what accessible<02:57:18.240> term 02:57:20.230 --> 02:57:20.240 align:start position:0% accessible term 02:57:20.240 --> 02:57:21.910 align:start position:0% accessible term >> and<02:57:20.399> I<02:57:20.640> only<02:57:20.800> said<02:57:20.960> grammar<02:57:21.359> request<02:57:21.680> because 02:57:21.910 --> 02:57:21.920 align:start position:0% >> and I only said grammar request because 02:57:21.920 --> 02:57:23.510 align:start position:0% >> and I only said grammar request because that<02:57:22.080> was<02:57:22.240> what<02:57:22.399> the<02:57:22.560> librarians<02:57:23.040> recommended 02:57:23.510 --> 02:57:23.520 align:start position:0% that was what the librarians recommended 02:57:23.520 --> 02:57:25.349 align:start position:0% that was what the librarians recommended to<02:57:23.680> me<02:57:24.000> that<02:57:24.240> that's<02:57:24.560> how<02:57:24.720> they<02:57:24.960> could<02:57:25.120> they 02:57:25.349 --> 02:57:25.359 align:start position:0% to me that that's how they could they 02:57:25.359 --> 02:57:26.630 align:start position:0% to me that that's how they could they could<02:57:25.439> say<02:57:25.600> if<02:57:25.680> they<02:57:25.840> if<02:57:26.000> we<02:57:26.080> get<02:57:26.240> a<02:57:26.319> grammar 02:57:26.630 --> 02:57:26.640 align:start position:0% could say if they if we get a grammar 02:57:26.640 --> 02:57:27.990 align:start position:0% could say if they if we get a grammar request,<02:57:26.960> we<02:57:27.200> can<02:57:27.279> give<02:57:27.439> them<02:57:27.600> that<02:57:27.840> full 02:57:27.990 --> 02:57:28.000 align:start position:0% request, we can give them that full 02:57:28.000 --> 02:57:31.030 align:start position:0% request, we can give them that full inventory. 02:57:31.030 --> 02:57:31.040 align:start position:0% 02:57:31.040 --> 02:57:32.950 align:start position:0% >> Shouldn't<02:57:31.359> that<02:57:31.600> inventory<02:57:32.080> be<02:57:32.319> accessible 02:57:32.950 --> 02:57:32.960 align:start position:0% >> Shouldn't that inventory be accessible 02:57:32.960 --> 02:57:36.550 align:start position:0% >> Shouldn't that inventory be accessible for<02:57:33.279> transparency<02:57:33.920> reasons<02:57:34.319> already? 02:57:36.550 --> 02:57:36.560 align:start position:0% for transparency reasons already? 02:57:36.560 --> 02:57:38.710 align:start position:0% for transparency reasons already? >> That's<02:57:37.359> my<02:57:37.600> question.<02:57:38.000> I<02:57:38.160> put<02:57:38.319> that<02:57:38.479> on<02:57:38.640> there, 02:57:38.710 --> 02:57:38.720 align:start position:0% >> That's my question. I put that on there, 02:57:38.720 --> 02:57:46.550 align:start position:0% >> That's my question. I put that on there, but<02:57:38.960> if<02:57:39.120> they<02:57:39.279> wanted<02:57:39.520> to<02:57:39.920> access<02:57:40.399> it. 02:57:46.550 --> 02:57:46.560 align:start position:0% 02:57:46.560 --> 02:57:48.230 align:start position:0% >> So,<02:57:47.200> I<02:57:47.279> don't<02:57:47.359> know.<02:57:47.520> Do<02:57:47.680> you<02:57:47.760> have<02:57:47.920> a<02:57:48.080> thought 02:57:48.230 --> 02:57:48.240 align:start position:0% >> So, I don't know. Do you have a thought 02:57:48.240 --> 02:57:48.550 align:start position:0% >> So, I don't know. Do you have a thought on<02:57:48.399> that? 02:57:48.550 --> 02:57:48.560 align:start position:0% on that? 02:57:48.560 --> 02:57:50.710 align:start position:0% on that? >> We<02:57:48.640> have<02:57:48.720> a<02:57:48.880> motion<02:57:49.200> or<02:57:49.439> something<02:57:49.680> that<02:57:50.399> I'm 02:57:50.710 --> 02:57:50.720 align:start position:0% >> We have a motion or something that I'm 02:57:50.720 --> 02:57:53.110 align:start position:0% >> We have a motion or something that I'm sorry<02:57:51.040> that<02:57:51.279> we're<02:57:51.680> we're<02:57:52.080> discussing<02:57:52.560> or<02:57:52.880> are 02:57:53.110 --> 02:57:53.120 align:start position:0% sorry that we're we're discussing or are 02:57:53.120 --> 02:57:54.710 align:start position:0% sorry that we're we're discussing or are we<02:57:53.279> just<02:57:53.600> trying<02:57:53.840> to<02:57:54.000> figure<02:57:54.240> out<02:57:54.479> kind<02:57:54.640> of 02:57:54.710 --> 02:57:54.720 align:start position:0% we just trying to figure out kind of 02:57:54.720 --> 02:57:56.230 align:start position:0% we just trying to figure out kind of what's<02:57:55.120> our<02:57:55.439> policy<02:57:55.840> here? 02:57:56.230 --> 02:57:56.240 align:start position:0% what's our policy here? 02:57:56.240 --> 02:57:57.349 align:start position:0% what's our policy here? >> Well,<02:57:56.479> what<02:57:56.640> I<02:57:56.720> had<02:57:56.880> asked 02:57:57.349 --> 02:57:57.359 align:start position:0% >> Well, what I had asked 02:57:57.359 --> 02:57:58.710 align:start position:0% >> Well, what I had asked >> still<02:57:57.520> a<02:57:57.600> little<02:57:57.760> lost. 02:57:58.710 --> 02:57:58.720 align:start position:0% >> still a little lost. 02:57:58.720 --> 02:58:00.469 align:start position:0% >> still a little lost. >> Yeah.<02:57:58.960> what<02:57:59.200> I<02:57:59.279> had<02:57:59.439> asked<02:57:59.760> because<02:58:00.000> I<02:58:00.240> have<02:58:00.319> it 02:58:00.469 --> 02:58:00.479 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. what I had asked because I have it 02:58:00.479 --> 02:58:02.630 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. what I had asked because I have it on<02:58:00.640> my<02:58:00.800> draft<02:58:01.040> and<02:58:01.359> provide<02:58:01.600> a<02:58:01.840> complete<02:58:02.319> book 02:58:02.630 --> 02:58:02.640 align:start position:0% on my draft and provide a complete book 02:58:02.640 --> 02:58:04.790 align:start position:0% on my draft and provide a complete book inventory<02:58:03.200> list<02:58:03.680> in<02:58:03.920> a<02:58:04.080> spreadsheet<02:58:04.560> when 02:58:04.790 --> 02:58:04.800 align:start position:0% inventory list in a spreadsheet when 02:58:04.800 --> 02:58:07.910 align:start position:0% inventory list in a spreadsheet when requested<02:58:05.600> and<02:58:05.920> possible<02:58:07.200> that<02:58:07.439> if<02:58:07.600> a<02:58:07.760> parent 02:58:07.910 --> 02:58:07.920 align:start position:0% requested and possible that if a parent 02:58:07.920 --> 02:58:09.349 align:start position:0% requested and possible that if a parent went<02:58:08.080> in<02:58:08.240> and<02:58:08.399> asked<02:58:08.560> for<02:58:08.720> that<02:58:08.960> but<02:58:09.120> I'm 02:58:09.349 --> 02:58:09.359 align:start position:0% went in and asked for that but I'm 02:58:09.359 --> 02:58:11.510 align:start position:0% went in and asked for that but I'm trying<02:58:09.520> to<02:58:09.680> understand<02:58:10.319> how<02:58:10.640> that<02:58:11.120> currently 02:58:11.510 --> 02:58:11.520 align:start position:0% trying to understand how that currently 02:58:11.520 --> 02:58:13.990 align:start position:0% trying to understand how that currently is<02:58:11.840> accessible<02:58:12.960> and<02:58:13.200> if<02:58:13.359> it<02:58:13.520> is<02:58:13.680> already 02:58:13.990 --> 02:58:14.000 align:start position:0% is accessible and if it is already 02:58:14.000 --> 02:58:16.550 align:start position:0% is accessible and if it is already accessible<02:58:14.560> this<02:58:14.800> may<02:58:14.960> not<02:58:15.120> be<02:58:15.279> necessary<02:58:16.399> and 02:58:16.550 --> 02:58:16.560 align:start position:0% accessible this may not be necessary and 02:58:16.560 --> 02:58:18.870 align:start position:0% accessible this may not be necessary and if<02:58:16.800> it's<02:58:16.960> not<02:58:17.279> we<02:58:17.520> can<02:58:17.680> we<02:58:18.000> can<02:58:18.080> put<02:58:18.240> it<02:58:18.399> as<02:58:18.560> a 02:58:18.870 --> 02:58:18.880 align:start position:0% if it's not we can we can put it as a 02:58:18.880 --> 02:58:21.670 align:start position:0% if it's not we can we can put it as a through<02:58:19.120> an<02:58:19.840> yeah<02:58:20.479> through<02:58:20.880> Utah's<02:58:21.359> open 02:58:21.670 --> 02:58:21.680 align:start position:0% through an yeah through Utah's open 02:58:21.680 --> 02:58:24.150 align:start position:0% through an yeah through Utah's open public<02:58:21.920> meetings<02:58:22.319> request<02:58:22.720> or<02:58:23.680> in<02:58:23.920> an 02:58:24.150 --> 02:58:24.160 align:start position:0% public meetings request or in an 02:58:24.160 --> 02:58:27.590 align:start position:0% public meetings request or in an accessible<02:58:24.640> manner<02:58:24.960> for<02:58:25.439> parents.<02:58:26.479> So<02:58:27.120> Deina, 02:58:27.590 --> 02:58:27.600 align:start position:0% accessible manner for parents. So Deina, 02:58:27.600 --> 02:58:29.990 align:start position:0% accessible manner for parents. So Deina, do<02:58:27.680> you<02:58:27.840> have<02:58:27.920> a<02:58:28.560> thought<02:58:28.800> on<02:58:28.960> that? 02:58:29.990 --> 02:58:30.000 align:start position:0% do you have a thought on that? 02:58:30.000 --> 02:58:33.110 align:start position:0% do you have a thought on that? >> So<02:58:30.640> if<02:58:31.120> if<02:58:31.600> parents<02:58:32.000> are<02:58:32.319> already<02:58:32.720> able<02:58:32.960> to 02:58:33.110 --> 02:58:33.120 align:start position:0% >> So if if parents are already able to 02:58:33.120 --> 02:58:35.670 align:start position:0% >> So if if parents are already able to access<02:58:33.439> the<02:58:33.680> online<02:58:34.080> database 02:58:35.670 --> 02:58:35.680 align:start position:0% access the online database 02:58:35.680 --> 02:58:39.269 align:start position:0% access the online database now,<02:58:37.040> I'm<02:58:37.439> wondering<02:58:38.000> what<02:58:38.319> the<02:58:38.720> added 02:58:39.269 --> 02:58:39.279 align:start position:0% now, I'm wondering what the added 02:58:39.279 --> 02:58:42.469 align:start position:0% now, I'm wondering what the added spreadsheet<02:58:40.319> like<02:58:40.560> what<02:58:40.720> would<02:58:40.880> that<02:58:41.200> add<02:58:41.520> to 02:58:42.469 --> 02:58:42.479 align:start position:0% spreadsheet like what would that add to 02:58:42.479 --> 02:58:44.550 align:start position:0% spreadsheet like what would that add to parents<02:58:42.880> when<02:58:43.120> they<02:58:43.279> can<02:58:43.520> already<02:58:43.920> access<02:58:44.240> the 02:58:44.550 --> 02:58:44.560 align:start position:0% parents when they can already access the 02:58:44.560 --> 02:58:48.550 align:start position:0% parents when they can already access the database<02:58:44.880> and<02:58:45.200> this<02:58:45.439> the<02:58:45.760> titles<02:58:46.240> online?<02:58:46.800> Now 02:58:48.550 --> 02:58:48.560 align:start position:0% database and this the titles online? Now 02:58:48.560 --> 02:58:51.990 align:start position:0% database and this the titles online? Now it<02:58:49.200> I'm<02:58:49.520> just<02:58:50.240> wondering<02:58:50.960> just<02:58:51.200> for<02:58:51.359> more<02:58:51.680> so<02:58:51.840> I 02:58:51.990 --> 02:58:52.000 align:start position:0% it I'm just wondering just for more so I 02:58:52.000 --> 02:58:53.590 align:start position:0% it I'm just wondering just for more so I can<02:58:52.080> help<02:58:52.399> understand<02:58:52.880> like<02:58:53.200> what<02:58:53.439> would 02:58:53.590 --> 02:58:53.600 align:start position:0% can help understand like what would 02:58:53.600 --> 02:58:55.269 align:start position:0% can help understand like what would maybe<02:58:53.840> be<02:58:54.000> a<02:58:54.160> good<02:58:54.240> suggestion.<02:58:54.560> Okay.<02:58:54.880> So<02:58:55.040> my 02:58:55.269 --> 02:58:55.279 align:start position:0% maybe be a good suggestion. Okay. So my 02:58:55.279 --> 02:58:57.429 align:start position:0% maybe be a good suggestion. Okay. So my question<02:58:55.520> would<02:58:55.840> be<02:58:56.560> online<02:58:56.960> platform 02:58:57.429 --> 02:58:57.439 align:start position:0% question would be online platform 02:58:57.439 --> 02:58:58.790 align:start position:0% question would be online platform materials<02:58:57.840> throughout<02:58:58.160> the<02:58:58.319> parent<02:58:58.479> is<02:58:58.720> able 02:58:58.790 --> 02:58:58.800 align:start position:0% materials throughout the parent is able 02:58:58.800 --> 02:59:00.550 align:start position:0% materials throughout the parent is able to<02:58:58.960> view<02:58:59.120> the<02:58:59.279> title<02:58:59.600> author.<02:59:00.000> So<02:59:00.240> are<02:59:00.319> they 02:59:00.550 --> 02:59:00.560 align:start position:0% to view the title author. So are they 02:59:00.560 --> 02:59:02.630 align:start position:0% to view the title author. So are they only<02:59:00.800> able<02:59:01.040> to<02:59:01.200> view<02:59:01.680> the<02:59:02.000> description<02:59:02.319> of<02:59:02.479> the 02:59:02.630 --> 02:59:02.640 align:start position:0% only able to view the description of the 02:59:02.640 --> 02:59:05.910 align:start position:0% only able to view the description of the materials<02:59:03.120> their<02:59:03.520> student<02:59:04.479> their<02:59:04.800> child<02:59:05.120> has 02:59:05.910 --> 02:59:05.920 align:start position:0% materials their student their child has 02:59:05.920 --> 02:59:07.750 align:start position:0% materials their student their child has or<02:59:06.240> all<02:59:06.479> materials?<02:59:06.960> And<02:59:07.040> I<02:59:07.200> guess<02:59:07.359> that's<02:59:07.600> the 02:59:07.750 --> 02:59:07.760 align:start position:0% or all materials? And I guess that's the 02:59:07.760 --> 02:59:11.349 align:start position:0% or all materials? And I guess that's the clarification,<02:59:08.640> right?<02:59:09.600> Yeah.<02:59:10.479> So<02:59:10.960> the 02:59:11.349 --> 02:59:11.359 align:start position:0% clarification, right? Yeah. So the 02:59:11.359 --> 02:59:13.269 align:start position:0% clarification, right? Yeah. So the transparent<02:59:11.920> the<02:59:12.240> transparency<02:59:12.880> and<02:59:13.040> public 02:59:13.269 --> 02:59:13.279 align:start position:0% transparent the transparency and public 02:59:13.279 --> 02:59:16.550 align:start position:0% transparent the transparency and public libraries<02:59:14.720> um<02:59:15.120> legislation<02:59:15.920> required<02:59:16.399> that 02:59:16.550 --> 02:59:16.560 align:start position:0% libraries um legislation required that 02:59:16.560 --> 02:59:19.269 align:start position:0% libraries um legislation required that the<02:59:16.800> parents<02:59:17.920> that<02:59:18.319> provided<02:59:18.720> an<02:59:18.960> online 02:59:19.269 --> 02:59:19.279 align:start position:0% the parents that provided an online 02:59:19.279 --> 02:59:21.190 align:start position:0% the parents that provided an online platform<02:59:19.680> for<02:59:20.080> like<02:59:20.399> anything<02:59:20.720> that<02:59:20.880> was<02:59:21.040> in 02:59:21.190 --> 02:59:21.200 align:start position:0% platform for like anything that was in 02:59:21.200 --> 02:59:22.870 align:start position:0% platform for like anything that was in the<02:59:21.359> database<02:59:21.680> and<02:59:22.000> what<02:59:22.240> their<02:59:22.479> student 02:59:22.870 --> 02:59:22.880 align:start position:0% the database and what their student 02:59:22.880 --> 02:59:27.750 align:start position:0% the database and what their student checkouts<02:59:23.439> were<02:59:24.399> specifically.<02:59:25.760> So,<02:59:27.120> LEAs 02:59:27.750 --> 02:59:27.760 align:start position:0% checkouts were specifically. So, LEAs 02:59:27.760 --> 02:59:30.950 align:start position:0% checkouts were specifically. So, LEAs have<02:59:28.399> their<02:59:28.880> their<02:59:29.439> cataloges.<02:59:30.240> The<02:59:30.479> entire 02:59:30.950 --> 02:59:30.960 align:start position:0% have their their cataloges. The entire 02:59:30.960 --> 02:59:34.389 align:start position:0% have their their cataloges. The entire catalog<02:59:31.600> is<02:59:31.920> available<02:59:32.560> online<02:59:33.120> for<02:59:34.000> parents 02:59:34.389 --> 02:59:34.399 align:start position:0% catalog is available online for parents 02:59:34.399 --> 02:59:36.790 align:start position:0% catalog is available online for parents to<02:59:34.720> review<02:59:35.200> what<02:59:35.760> whatever<02:59:36.240> titles<02:59:36.640> are 02:59:36.790 --> 02:59:36.800 align:start position:0% to review what whatever titles are 02:59:36.800 --> 02:59:38.870 align:start position:0% to review what whatever titles are within<02:59:37.279> the<02:59:37.600> school<02:59:38.000> catalog<02:59:38.479> or<02:59:38.720> the 02:59:38.870 --> 02:59:38.880 align:start position:0% within the school catalog or the 02:59:38.880 --> 02:59:40.950 align:start position:0% within the school catalog or the district<02:59:39.200> catalog.<02:59:40.080> But<02:59:40.240> if<02:59:40.399> they<02:59:40.560> wanted<02:59:40.800> to 02:59:40.950 --> 02:59:40.960 align:start position:0% district catalog. But if they wanted to 02:59:40.960 --> 02:59:42.710 align:start position:0% district catalog. But if they wanted to see<02:59:41.200> their<02:59:41.439> students<02:59:41.920> checkouts,<02:59:42.399> that<02:59:42.560> would 02:59:42.710 --> 02:59:42.720 align:start position:0% see their students checkouts, that would 02:59:42.720 --> 02:59:45.349 align:start position:0% see their students checkouts, that would require<02:59:43.040> a<02:59:43.279> login<02:59:44.240> for<02:59:44.479> them<02:59:44.640> to<02:59:44.880> see<02:59:45.040> only 02:59:45.349 --> 02:59:45.359 align:start position:0% require a login for them to see only 02:59:45.359 --> 02:59:47.830 align:start position:0% require a login for them to see only their<02:59:45.600> students.<02:59:46.080> But<02:59:46.240> they<02:59:46.479> can<02:59:46.720> see<02:59:47.520> all<02:59:47.760> of 02:59:47.830 --> 02:59:47.840 align:start position:0% their students. But they can see all of 02:59:47.840 --> 02:59:49.590 align:start position:0% their students. But they can see all of the<02:59:48.080> titles 02:59:49.590 --> 02:59:49.600 align:start position:0% the titles 02:59:49.600 --> 02:59:51.910 align:start position:0% the titles that<02:59:49.920> a<02:59:50.240> school<02:59:50.560> or<02:59:50.800> district<02:59:51.200> has<02:59:51.439> within<02:59:51.760> the 02:59:51.910 --> 02:59:51.920 align:start position:0% that a school or district has within the 02:59:51.920 --> 02:59:55.429 align:start position:0% that a school or district has within the catalog<02:59:52.319> without<02:59:52.720> logging<02:59:53.120> in. 02:59:55.429 --> 02:59:55.439 align:start position:0% catalog without logging in. 02:59:55.439 --> 02:59:58.070 align:start position:0% catalog without logging in. Okay. 02:59:58.070 --> 02:59:58.080 align:start position:0% Okay. 02:59:58.080 --> 03:00:01.750 align:start position:0% Okay. >> Can<02:59:58.240> I<02:59:58.560> Is<02:59:58.800> it<02:59:58.960> not<02:59:59.520> policy<03:00:00.240> that<03:00:01.279> is<03:00:01.439> it<03:00:01.600> a 03:00:01.750 --> 03:00:01.760 align:start position:0% >> Can I Is it not policy that is it a 03:00:01.760 --> 03:00:03.590 align:start position:0% >> Can I Is it not policy that is it a state<03:00:02.080> policy<03:00:02.399> that<03:00:02.720> districts<03:00:03.200> send<03:00:03.359> an 03:00:03.590 --> 03:00:03.600 align:start position:0% state policy that districts send an 03:00:03.600 --> 03:00:05.590 align:start position:0% state policy that districts send an email<03:00:03.920> when<03:00:04.160> their<03:00:04.720> student<03:00:05.040> checks<03:00:05.279> out<03:00:05.439> a 03:00:05.590 --> 03:00:05.600 align:start position:0% email when their student checks out a 03:00:05.600 --> 03:00:07.349 align:start position:0% email when their student checks out a book<03:00:05.760> and<03:00:06.000> just<03:00:06.160> lets<03:00:06.479> the<03:00:06.640> parent<03:00:06.960> know<03:00:07.120> what 03:00:07.349 --> 03:00:07.359 align:start position:0% book and just lets the parent know what 03:00:07.359 --> 03:00:08.630 align:start position:0% book and just lets the parent know what book<03:00:07.520> is<03:00:07.680> being<03:00:07.840> checked<03:00:08.080> out<03:00:08.160> or<03:00:08.399> is<03:00:08.479> that 03:00:08.630 --> 03:00:08.640 align:start position:0% book is being checked out or is that 03:00:08.640 --> 03:00:11.110 align:start position:0% book is being checked out or is that just<03:00:08.800> a<03:00:08.960> district<03:00:09.279> level<03:00:09.600> policy<03:00:10.720> because 03:00:11.110 --> 03:00:11.120 align:start position:0% just a district level policy because 03:00:11.120 --> 03:00:12.870 align:start position:0% just a district level policy because Washington<03:00:11.600> County<03:00:11.920> does<03:00:12.160> that<03:00:12.319> and<03:00:12.479> I<03:00:12.640> really 03:00:12.870 --> 03:00:12.880 align:start position:0% Washington County does that and I really 03:00:12.880 --> 03:00:14.070 align:start position:0% Washington County does that and I really appreciate<03:00:13.359> that. 03:00:14.070 --> 03:00:14.080 align:start position:0% appreciate that. 03:00:14.080 --> 03:00:16.309 align:start position:0% appreciate that. >> Yeah.<03:00:14.399> There's<03:00:14.640> no<03:00:15.040> state<03:00:15.439> requirement<03:00:16.000> to 03:00:16.309 --> 03:00:16.319 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. There's no state requirement to 03:00:16.319 --> 03:00:18.630 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. There's no state requirement to send<03:00:16.479> an<03:00:16.800> email<03:00:17.359> for<03:00:17.520> when<03:00:17.760> your<03:00:18.000> child<03:00:18.319> checks 03:00:18.630 --> 03:00:18.640 align:start position:0% send an email for when your child checks 03:00:18.640 --> 03:00:24.469 align:start position:0% send an email for when your child checks out.<03:00:18.960> Yeah. 03:00:24.469 --> 03:00:24.479 align:start position:0% 03:00:24.479 --> 03:00:26.309 align:start position:0% So,<03:00:24.720> if<03:00:24.880> I'm<03:00:25.120> understanding<03:00:25.760> you,<03:00:26.080> you're 03:00:26.309 --> 03:00:26.319 align:start position:0% So, if I'm understanding you, you're 03:00:26.319 --> 03:00:28.150 align:start position:0% So, if I'm understanding you, you're saying<03:00:26.479> that<03:00:26.720> this<03:00:26.960> provision<03:00:27.600> is<03:00:27.920> not 03:00:28.150 --> 03:00:28.160 align:start position:0% saying that this provision is not 03:00:28.160 --> 03:00:29.670 align:start position:0% saying that this provision is not necessary<03:00:28.560> because<03:00:28.880> parents<03:00:29.200> can<03:00:29.439> already 03:00:29.670 --> 03:00:29.680 align:start position:0% necessary because parents can already 03:00:29.680 --> 03:00:32.469 align:start position:0% necessary because parents can already access<03:00:30.080> that. 03:00:32.469 --> 03:00:32.479 align:start position:0% access that. 03:00:32.479 --> 03:00:36.309 align:start position:0% access that. >> That<03:00:32.800> would<03:00:32.960> be<03:00:33.120> my<03:00:34.399> uh<03:00:35.439> suggestion.<03:00:36.080> Yeah. 03:00:36.309 --> 03:00:36.319 align:start position:0% >> That would be my uh suggestion. Yeah. 03:00:36.319 --> 03:00:38.469 align:start position:0% >> That would be my uh suggestion. Yeah. That<03:00:36.560> parents<03:00:36.960> can<03:00:37.200> access<03:00:37.600> what<03:00:37.840> titles<03:00:38.240> are 03:00:38.469 --> 03:00:38.479 align:start position:0% That parents can access what titles are 03:00:38.479 --> 03:00:41.190 align:start position:0% That parents can access what titles are already<03:00:38.640> in<03:00:38.880> a<03:00:39.040> school<03:00:39.200> or<03:00:39.439> district<03:00:39.760> catalog. 03:00:41.190 --> 03:00:41.200 align:start position:0% already in a school or district catalog. 03:00:41.200 --> 03:00:43.510 align:start position:0% already in a school or district catalog. >> Can<03:00:41.439> the<03:00:41.680> community<03:00:42.080> or<03:00:42.240> is<03:00:42.399> it<03:00:42.560> only<03:00:42.800> a<03:00:42.960> parent 03:00:43.510 --> 03:00:43.520 align:start position:0% >> Can the community or is it only a parent 03:00:43.520 --> 03:00:46.950 align:start position:0% >> Can the community or is it only a parent initiated<03:00:44.319> piece? 03:00:46.950 --> 03:00:46.960 align:start position:0% initiated piece? 03:00:46.960 --> 03:00:48.630 align:start position:0% initiated piece? Well,<03:00:47.359> Jenny,<03:00:47.840> you<03:00:48.000> can't<03:00:48.240> have<03:00:48.399> the 03:00:48.630 --> 03:00:48.640 align:start position:0% Well, Jenny, you can't have the 03:00:48.640 --> 03:00:50.870 align:start position:0% Well, Jenny, you can't have the community<03:00:49.439> getting<03:00:49.840> access<03:00:50.240> but<03:00:50.479> then<03:00:50.640> not 03:00:50.870 --> 03:00:50.880 align:start position:0% community getting access but then not 03:00:50.880 --> 03:00:52.150 align:start position:0% community getting access but then not being<03:00:51.120> able<03:00:51.279> to<03:00:51.359> be<03:00:51.520> on<03:00:51.680> the<03:00:51.840> review 03:00:52.150 --> 03:00:52.160 align:start position:0% being able to be on the review 03:00:52.160 --> 03:00:55.349 align:start position:0% being able to be on the review committees. 03:00:55.349 --> 03:00:55.359 align:start position:0% 03:00:55.359 --> 03:00:59.030 align:start position:0% >> Well,<03:00:55.680> to<03:00:55.920> be<03:00:56.080> honest,<03:00:56.880> I<03:00:57.279> as<03:00:57.600> a<03:00:58.479> staff<03:00:58.800> member 03:00:59.030 --> 03:00:59.040 align:start position:0% >> Well, to be honest, I as a staff member 03:00:59.040 --> 03:01:02.150 align:start position:0% >> Well, to be honest, I as a staff member of<03:00:59.279> USB<03:01:00.160> have<03:01:00.479> gone<03:01:00.720> on<03:01:00.960> to<03:01:01.200> school<03:01:01.520> cataloges, 03:01:02.150 --> 03:01:02.160 align:start position:0% of USB have gone on to school cataloges, 03:01:02.160 --> 03:01:03.670 align:start position:0% of USB have gone on to school cataloges, district<03:01:02.479> cataloges,<03:01:03.040> and<03:01:03.200> looked<03:01:03.439> at 03:01:03.670 --> 03:01:03.680 align:start position:0% district cataloges, and looked at 03:01:03.680 --> 03:01:06.469 align:start position:0% district cataloges, and looked at material<03:01:04.319> even<03:01:04.560> though<03:01:05.120> I'm<03:01:05.439> not<03:01:05.840> a<03:01:06.080> parent<03:01:06.319> in 03:01:06.469 --> 03:01:06.479 align:start position:0% material even though I'm not a parent in 03:01:06.479 --> 03:01:07.990 align:start position:0% material even though I'm not a parent in that<03:01:06.640> community.<03:01:06.960> So,<03:01:07.120> it<03:01:07.359> is<03:01:07.439> possible 03:01:07.990 --> 03:01:08.000 align:start position:0% that community. So, it is possible 03:01:08.000 --> 03:01:11.990 align:start position:0% that community. So, it is possible depending<03:01:08.319> on<03:01:08.479> the<03:01:08.640> LEA.<03:01:09.920> Um<03:01:10.479> I<03:01:10.800> think<03:01:11.520> in<03:01:11.760> an 03:01:11.990 --> 03:01:12.000 align:start position:0% depending on the LEA. Um I think in an 03:01:12.000 --> 03:01:13.990 align:start position:0% depending on the LEA. Um I think in an email<03:01:12.240> I<03:01:12.560> shared<03:01:12.800> with<03:01:13.359> I<03:01:13.600> can't<03:01:13.760> remember 03:01:13.990 --> 03:01:14.000 align:start position:0% email I shared with I can't remember 03:01:14.000 --> 03:01:16.710 align:start position:0% email I shared with I can't remember what<03:01:14.240> one<03:01:14.399> of<03:01:14.560> you<03:01:14.800> that<03:01:15.040> I<03:01:15.359> that<03:01:15.760> some<03:01:16.160> eleas 03:01:16.710 --> 03:01:16.720 align:start position:0% what one of you that I that some eleas 03:01:16.720 --> 03:01:19.269 align:start position:0% what one of you that I that some eleas put<03:01:16.880> it<03:01:17.040> behind<03:01:17.439> their<03:01:17.840> like<03:01:18.080> parent<03:01:18.399> login<03:01:19.040> so 03:01:19.269 --> 03:01:19.279 align:start position:0% put it behind their like parent login so 03:01:19.279 --> 03:01:21.510 align:start position:0% put it behind their like parent login so that<03:01:20.160> you<03:01:20.399> have<03:01:20.479> to<03:01:20.640> log<03:01:20.880> into<03:01:21.040> the<03:01:21.200> parent 03:01:21.510 --> 03:01:21.520 align:start position:0% that you have to log into the parent 03:01:21.520 --> 03:01:24.389 align:start position:0% that you have to log into the parent portal<03:01:21.840> to<03:01:22.080> see<03:01:22.479> the<03:01:22.720> catalog<03:01:23.279> and<03:01:23.600> some<03:01:23.840> eleas 03:01:24.389 --> 03:01:24.399 align:start position:0% portal to see the catalog and some eleas 03:01:24.399 --> 03:01:26.870 align:start position:0% portal to see the catalog and some eleas just<03:01:24.560> have<03:01:24.720> it<03:01:24.880> on<03:01:25.040> their<03:01:25.279> website.<03:01:26.479> So<03:01:26.720> it 03:01:26.870 --> 03:01:26.880 align:start position:0% just have it on their website. So it 03:01:26.880 --> 03:01:28.870 align:start position:0% just have it on their website. So it would<03:01:27.040> be<03:01:27.200> dependent<03:01:27.600> upon<03:01:27.840> how<03:01:28.080> the<03:01:28.240> LEA<03:01:28.640> has 03:01:28.870 --> 03:01:28.880 align:start position:0% would be dependent upon how the LEA has 03:01:28.880 --> 03:01:31.110 align:start position:0% would be dependent upon how the LEA has it<03:01:29.040> structured<03:01:29.600> whether<03:01:29.920> it<03:01:30.080> was<03:01:30.319> open<03:01:30.560> to<03:01:30.800> the 03:01:31.110 --> 03:01:31.120 align:start position:0% it structured whether it was open to the 03:01:31.120 --> 03:01:34.309 align:start position:0% it structured whether it was open to the community<03:01:31.520> or<03:01:31.840> whether<03:01:32.160> it<03:01:32.399> was<03:01:33.520> um<03:01:33.920> only 03:01:34.309 --> 03:01:34.319 align:start position:0% community or whether it was um only 03:01:34.319 --> 03:01:37.190 align:start position:0% community or whether it was um only available<03:01:34.800> to<03:01:35.040> parents<03:01:35.359> of<03:01:35.520> the<03:01:35.680> LEA 03:01:37.190 --> 03:01:37.200 align:start position:0% available to parents of the LEA 03:01:37.200 --> 03:01:41.990 align:start position:0% available to parents of the LEA of<03:01:37.359> a<03:01:37.600> student<03:01:37.760> in<03:01:37.920> the<03:01:38.000> LEA.<03:01:39.279> Okay. 03:01:41.990 --> 03:01:42.000 align:start position:0% of a student in the LEA. Okay. 03:01:42.000 --> 03:01:47.110 align:start position:0% of a student in the LEA. Okay. Sarah,<03:01:42.399> did<03:01:42.479> you<03:01:42.640> want<03:01:42.720> to<03:01:42.800> make<03:01:42.960> a<03:01:43.120> motion? 03:01:47.110 --> 03:01:47.120 align:start position:0% 03:01:47.120 --> 03:01:48.870 align:start position:0% >> Well,<03:01:47.680> I<03:01:47.920> want<03:01:48.080> to<03:01:48.160> make<03:01:48.240> a<03:01:48.399> motion<03:01:48.640> you're 03:01:48.870 --> 03:01:48.880 align:start position:0% >> Well, I want to make a motion you're 03:01:48.880 --> 03:01:50.070 align:start position:0% >> Well, I want to make a motion you're comfortable<03:01:49.120> with,<03:01:49.279> but<03:01:49.520> which<03:01:49.760> would<03:01:49.920> be 03:01:50.070 --> 03:01:50.080 align:start position:0% comfortable with, but which would be 03:01:50.080 --> 03:01:54.550 align:start position:0% comfortable with, but which would be that<03:01:51.279> um<03:01:52.080> shall<03:01:52.399> provide<03:01:52.800> we<03:01:53.040> just 03:01:54.550 --> 03:01:54.560 align:start position:0% that um shall provide we just 03:01:54.560 --> 03:01:57.750 align:start position:0% that um shall provide we just go<03:01:54.880> back<03:01:55.120> to<03:01:55.359> the<03:01:55.600> original<03:01:56.240> draft<03:01:57.040> policy<03:01:57.520> of 03:01:57.750 --> 03:01:57.760 align:start position:0% go back to the original draft policy of 03:01:57.760 --> 03:02:00.790 align:start position:0% go back to the original draft policy of that<03:01:58.000> section. 03:02:00.790 --> 03:02:00.800 align:start position:0% that section. 03:02:00.800 --> 03:02:02.469 align:start position:0% that section. >> Uh 03:02:02.469 --> 03:02:02.479 align:start position:0% >> Uh 03:02:02.479 --> 03:02:04.790 align:start position:0% >> Uh I<03:02:02.720> think<03:02:02.880> we<03:02:03.120> I<03:02:03.200> I<03:02:03.680> do<03:02:03.840> like<03:02:04.080> your<03:02:04.399> language 03:02:04.790 --> 03:02:04.800 align:start position:0% I think we I I do like your language 03:02:04.800 --> 03:02:05.750 align:start position:0% I think we I I do like your language that<03:02:05.040> you<03:02:05.200> have<03:02:05.359> here. 03:02:05.750 --> 03:02:05.760 align:start position:0% that you have here. 03:02:05.760 --> 03:02:07.349 align:start position:0% that you have here. >> Okay.<03:02:06.000> Well,<03:02:06.160> then<03:02:06.399> great.<03:02:06.880> Okay,<03:02:07.120> then<03:02:07.200> we'll 03:02:07.349 --> 03:02:07.359 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Well, then great. Okay, then we'll 03:02:07.359 --> 03:02:08.870 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Well, then great. Okay, then we'll just<03:02:07.439> do<03:02:07.600> that<03:02:07.920> book<03:02:08.160> inventory<03:02:08.640> through 03:02:08.870 --> 03:02:08.880 align:start position:0% just do that book inventory through 03:02:08.880 --> 03:02:09.269 align:start position:0% just do that book inventory through Utah. 03:02:09.269 --> 03:02:09.279 align:start position:0% Utah. 03:02:09.279 --> 03:02:09.990 align:start position:0% Utah. >> That's<03:02:09.439> fine<03:02:09.600> then. 03:02:09.990 --> 03:02:10.000 align:start position:0% >> That's fine then. 03:02:10.000 --> 03:02:12.469 align:start position:0% >> That's fine then. >> Meetings<03:02:10.399> request. 03:02:12.469 --> 03:02:12.479 align:start position:0% >> Meetings request. 03:02:12.479 --> 03:02:15.590 align:start position:0% >> Meetings request. So,<03:02:12.640> I'll<03:02:12.880> make<03:02:13.040> a<03:02:13.200> motion<03:02:13.520> that<03:02:13.920> we<03:02:14.720> amend 03:02:15.590 --> 03:02:15.600 align:start position:0% So, I'll make a motion that we amend 03:02:15.600 --> 03:02:19.110 align:start position:0% So, I'll make a motion that we amend section<03:02:16.160> 2F, 03:02:19.110 --> 03:02:19.120 align:start position:0% section 2F, 03:02:19.120 --> 03:02:23.269 align:start position:0% section 2F, even<03:02:19.279> though<03:02:19.359> it<03:02:19.520> says<03:02:19.760> A<03:02:20.000> right<03:02:20.160> there, 03:02:23.269 --> 03:02:23.279 align:start position:0% 03:02:23.279 --> 03:02:25.110 align:start position:0% to 03:02:25.110 --> 03:02:25.120 align:start position:0% to 03:02:25.120 --> 03:02:28.550 align:start position:0% to change<03:02:25.520> the<03:02:25.840> word<03:02:26.080> request<03:02:26.960> or<03:02:27.680> to<03:02:28.080> remove<03:02:28.399> the 03:02:28.550 --> 03:02:28.560 align:start position:0% change the word request or to remove the 03:02:28.560 --> 03:02:31.349 align:start position:0% change the word request or to remove the word<03:02:28.800> provide<03:02:29.359> and<03:02:29.600> add<03:02:29.760> the<03:02:30.000> word<03:02:30.240> request 03:02:31.349 --> 03:02:31.359 align:start position:0% word provide and add the word request 03:02:31.359 --> 03:02:34.150 align:start position:0% word provide and add the word request and<03:02:31.600> then<03:02:31.840> add<03:02:32.240> a<03:02:32.560> complete<03:02:33.040> book<03:02:33.359> inventory 03:02:34.150 --> 03:02:34.160 align:start position:0% and then add a complete book inventory 03:02:34.160 --> 03:02:36.710 align:start position:0% and then add a complete book inventory through<03:02:34.560> Utah's<03:02:35.439> open<03:02:35.760> and<03:02:35.920> public<03:02:36.240> meetings 03:02:36.710 --> 03:02:36.720 align:start position:0% through Utah's open and public meetings 03:02:36.720 --> 03:02:39.510 align:start position:0% through Utah's open and public meetings request<03:02:37.680> and<03:02:37.920> then<03:02:38.240> remove<03:02:38.880> list<03:02:39.200> in<03:02:39.359> a 03:02:39.510 --> 03:02:39.520 align:start position:0% request and then remove list in a 03:02:39.520 --> 03:02:41.510 align:start position:0% request and then remove list in a spreadsheet<03:02:39.920> when<03:02:40.240> requested<03:02:40.720> and<03:02:40.960> possible. 03:02:41.510 --> 03:02:41.520 align:start position:0% spreadsheet when requested and possible. 03:02:41.520 --> 03:02:44.309 align:start position:0% spreadsheet when requested and possible. Could<03:02:42.240> could<03:02:42.399> I<03:02:42.640> just<03:02:42.880> ask<03:02:43.439> a<03:02:43.840> question? 03:02:44.309 --> 03:02:44.319 align:start position:0% Could could I just ask a question? 03:02:44.319 --> 03:02:48.230 align:start position:0% Could could I just ask a question? Because<03:02:45.760> being<03:02:46.160> a<03:02:46.399> person<03:02:46.640> who's<03:02:47.200> never<03:02:48.000> gone 03:02:48.230 --> 03:02:48.240 align:start position:0% Because being a person who's never gone 03:02:48.240 --> 03:02:49.990 align:start position:0% Because being a person who's never gone through<03:02:48.479> the<03:02:48.800> open<03:02:49.120> and<03:02:49.359> public<03:02:49.600> meetings 03:02:49.990 --> 03:02:50.000 align:start position:0% through the open and public meetings 03:02:50.000 --> 03:02:51.910 align:start position:0% through the open and public meetings request,<03:02:50.479> is<03:02:50.640> that<03:02:50.800> a<03:02:51.040> difficult<03:02:51.439> process 03:02:51.910 --> 03:02:51.920 align:start position:0% request, is that a difficult process 03:02:51.920 --> 03:02:54.389 align:start position:0% request, is that a difficult process that's<03:02:52.240> going<03:02:52.319> to<03:02:52.479> be<03:02:52.640> limiting<03:02:53.439> because<03:02:54.000> many 03:02:54.389 --> 03:02:54.399 align:start position:0% that's going to be limiting because many 03:02:54.399 --> 03:02:56.389 align:start position:0% that's going to be limiting because many districts<03:02:54.880> already<03:02:55.279> do<03:02:55.520> just<03:02:55.840> provide<03:02:56.080> a<03:02:56.240> list 03:02:56.389 --> 03:02:56.399 align:start position:0% districts already do just provide a list 03:02:56.399 --> 03:02:58.070 align:start position:0% districts already do just provide a list of<03:02:56.560> all<03:02:56.720> their<03:02:56.880> books,<03:02:57.359> right,<03:02:57.520> where<03:02:57.840> it's 03:02:58.070 --> 03:02:58.080 align:start position:0% of all their books, right, where it's 03:02:58.080 --> 03:03:01.510 align:start position:0% of all their books, right, where it's already<03:02:59.359> online?<03:03:00.160> So,<03:03:00.399> is<03:03:00.560> that<03:03:00.720> going<03:03:00.800> to<03:03:00.960> pro 03:03:01.510 --> 03:03:01.520 align:start position:0% already online? So, is that going to pro 03:03:01.520 --> 03:03:03.830 align:start position:0% already online? So, is that going to pro have<03:03:01.760> them<03:03:02.160> not<03:03:02.399> wanting<03:03:02.720> to<03:03:03.040> make<03:03:03.279> that<03:03:03.600> open? 03:03:03.830 --> 03:03:03.840 align:start position:0% have them not wanting to make that open? 03:03:03.840 --> 03:03:05.590 align:start position:0% have them not wanting to make that open? I<03:03:04.080> just<03:03:04.240> don't<03:03:04.319> want<03:03:04.399> to<03:03:04.560> make<03:03:04.720> it<03:03:04.960> harder<03:03:05.279> to 03:03:05.590 --> 03:03:05.600 align:start position:0% I just don't want to make it harder to 03:03:05.600 --> 03:03:08.230 align:start position:0% I just don't want to make it harder to find<03:03:05.920> what<03:03:06.240> books<03:03:06.560> are<03:03:07.200> in<03:03:07.439> the<03:03:07.600> districts<03:03:08.000> if 03:03:08.230 --> 03:03:08.240 align:start position:0% find what books are in the districts if 03:03:08.240 --> 03:03:11.030 align:start position:0% find what books are in the districts if it's<03:03:08.479> already<03:03:08.800> up<03:03:09.120> and 03:03:11.030 --> 03:03:11.040 align:start position:0% it's already up and 03:03:11.040 --> 03:03:12.790 align:start position:0% it's already up and just<03:03:12.080> curious. 03:03:12.790 --> 03:03:12.800 align:start position:0% just curious. 03:03:12.800 --> 03:03:15.349 align:start position:0% just curious. >> I<03:03:13.040> believe<03:03:13.200> that<03:03:13.520> in<03:03:13.920> some<03:03:14.160> circumstances<03:03:15.120> you 03:03:15.349 --> 03:03:15.359 align:start position:0% >> I believe that in some circumstances you 03:03:15.359 --> 03:03:18.150 align:start position:0% >> I believe that in some circumstances you you<03:03:15.760> have<03:03:15.920> to 03:03:18.150 --> 03:03:18.160 align:start position:0% you have to 03:03:18.160 --> 03:03:20.710 align:start position:0% you have to um<03:03:19.600> see<03:03:19.840> you're<03:03:20.000> going<03:03:20.000> to<03:03:20.160> test<03:03:20.319> me<03:03:20.479> on<03:03:20.560> my 03:03:20.710 --> 03:03:20.720 align:start position:0% um see you're going to test me on my 03:03:20.720 --> 03:03:21.830 align:start position:0% um see you're going to test me on my knowledge.<03:03:20.960> I<03:03:21.200> think<03:03:21.279> there's<03:03:21.520> fees 03:03:21.830 --> 03:03:21.840 align:start position:0% knowledge. I think there's fees 03:03:21.840 --> 03:03:23.910 align:start position:0% knowledge. I think there's fees sometimes<03:03:22.240> associated<03:03:22.800> with<03:03:23.040> it<03:03:23.439> and<03:03:23.680> then 03:03:23.910 --> 03:03:23.920 align:start position:0% sometimes associated with it and then 03:03:23.920 --> 03:03:25.670 align:start position:0% sometimes associated with it and then sometimes<03:03:24.319> there<03:03:24.479> has<03:03:24.640> to<03:03:24.800> be 03:03:25.670 --> 03:03:25.680 align:start position:0% sometimes there has to be 03:03:25.680 --> 03:03:27.670 align:start position:0% sometimes there has to be >> there's<03:03:26.000> a<03:03:26.240> requirement<03:03:26.880> that 03:03:27.670 --> 03:03:27.680 align:start position:0% >> there's a requirement that 03:03:27.680 --> 03:03:30.469 align:start position:0% >> there's a requirement that >> if<03:03:27.920> it's<03:03:28.160> a<03:03:28.560> public<03:03:29.040> interest<03:03:29.920> you<03:03:30.000> know<03:03:30.240> great 03:03:30.469 --> 03:03:30.479 align:start position:0% >> if it's a public interest you know great 03:03:30.479 --> 03:03:32.150 align:start position:0% >> if it's a public interest you know great public<03:03:30.800> interest<03:03:31.120> then<03:03:31.359> that<03:03:31.520> fee<03:03:31.760> will<03:03:32.000> be 03:03:32.150 --> 03:03:32.160 align:start position:0% public interest then that fee will be 03:03:32.160 --> 03:03:33.990 align:start position:0% public interest then that fee will be waved.<03:03:32.560> If<03:03:32.720> not<03:03:32.880> there<03:03:33.040> is<03:03:33.120> a<03:03:33.200> fee.<03:03:33.439> associated 03:03:33.990 --> 03:03:34.000 align:start position:0% waved. If not there is a fee. associated 03:03:34.000 --> 03:03:34.710 align:start position:0% waved. If not there is a fee. associated with<03:03:34.160> it. 03:03:34.710 --> 03:03:34.720 align:start position:0% with it. 03:03:34.720 --> 03:03:36.710 align:start position:0% with it. >> Yeah.<03:03:34.880> I<03:03:35.040> think<03:03:35.120> that<03:03:35.359> might<03:03:35.840> make<03:03:36.080> it<03:03:36.319> too 03:03:36.710 --> 03:03:36.720 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I think that might make it too 03:03:36.720 --> 03:03:38.550 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I think that might make it too hard<03:03:37.120> and<03:03:37.359> it<03:03:37.600> might<03:03:37.840> make<03:03:38.000> it<03:03:38.160> feel<03:03:38.399> like 03:03:38.550 --> 03:03:38.560 align:start position:0% hard and it might make it feel like 03:03:38.560 --> 03:03:40.389 align:start position:0% hard and it might make it feel like we're<03:03:38.800> just<03:03:38.960> not<03:03:39.120> being<03:03:39.439> transparent<03:03:40.000> if<03:03:40.240> we 03:03:40.389 --> 03:03:40.399 align:start position:0% we're just not being transparent if we 03:03:40.399 --> 03:03:43.510 align:start position:0% we're just not being transparent if we have<03:03:40.560> it<03:03:40.720> have<03:03:40.880> to<03:03:41.120> go<03:03:41.279> through<03:03:42.640> the<03:03:42.960> grandma. 03:03:43.510 --> 03:03:43.520 align:start position:0% have it have to go through the grandma. 03:03:43.520 --> 03:03:45.510 align:start position:0% have it have to go through the grandma. >> Yeah.<03:03:43.760> Yeah.<03:03:44.080> So,<03:03:44.319> I<03:03:44.800> really<03:03:45.040> if<03:03:45.279> it's 03:03:45.510 --> 03:03:45.520 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. So, I really if it's 03:03:45.520 --> 03:03:47.510 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. Yeah. So, I really if it's accessible<03:03:45.920> already<03:03:46.160> to<03:03:46.399> parents<03:03:46.800> that<03:03:47.200> if 03:03:47.510 --> 03:03:47.520 align:start position:0% accessible already to parents that if 03:03:47.520 --> 03:03:49.110 align:start position:0% accessible already to parents that if someone<03:03:47.760> from<03:03:48.000> the<03:03:48.160> public,<03:03:48.640> there<03:03:48.880> should<03:03:49.040> be 03:03:49.110 --> 03:03:49.120 align:start position:0% someone from the public, there should be 03:03:49.120 --> 03:03:50.790 align:start position:0% someone from the public, there should be a<03:03:49.279> way<03:03:49.359> for<03:03:49.600> them<03:03:49.760> just<03:03:49.920> to<03:03:50.240> come<03:03:50.399> in<03:03:50.560> and 03:03:50.790 --> 03:03:50.800 align:start position:0% a way for them just to come in and 03:03:50.800 --> 03:03:54.710 align:start position:0% a way for them just to come in and request<03:03:52.160> access<03:03:52.720> to<03:03:52.960> the<03:03:53.120> book<03:03:53.439> inventory.<03:03:54.479> Is 03:03:54.710 --> 03:03:54.720 align:start position:0% request access to the book inventory. Is 03:03:54.720 --> 03:03:55.110 align:start position:0% request access to the book inventory. Is that 03:03:55.110 --> 03:03:55.120 align:start position:0% that 03:03:55.120 --> 03:03:56.790 align:start position:0% that >> I<03:03:55.200> think<03:03:55.359> a<03:03:55.520> lot<03:03:55.600> of<03:03:55.680> them<03:03:55.920> have<03:03:56.080> it<03:03:56.319> online 03:03:56.790 --> 03:03:56.800 align:start position:0% >> I think a lot of them have it online 03:03:56.800 --> 03:04:01.269 align:start position:0% >> I think a lot of them have it online where<03:03:57.040> you<03:03:57.279> can<03:03:57.359> just<03:03:57.600> log<03:03:57.920> in.<03:03:58.800> Do<03:03:59.040> they<03:03:59.200> not? 03:04:01.269 --> 03:04:01.279 align:start position:0% where you can just log in. Do they not? 03:04:01.279 --> 03:04:02.550 align:start position:0% where you can just log in. Do they not? >> Um 03:04:02.550 --> 03:04:02.560 align:start position:0% >> Um 03:04:02.560 --> 03:04:04.230 align:start position:0% >> Um >> yeah.<03:04:02.880> So<03:04:03.120> there's<03:04:03.279> not<03:04:03.600> I<03:04:03.840> guess<03:04:03.920> there's 03:04:04.230 --> 03:04:04.240 align:start position:0% >> yeah. So there's not I guess there's 03:04:04.240 --> 03:04:05.990 align:start position:0% >> yeah. So there's not I guess there's really<03:04:04.479> I<03:04:04.640> I<03:04:04.960> guess<03:04:05.040> you're<03:04:05.279> right<03:04:05.520> that<03:04:05.840> does 03:04:05.990 --> 03:04:06.000 align:start position:0% really I I guess you're right that does 03:04:06.000 --> 03:04:08.309 align:start position:0% really I I guess you're right that does add<03:04:06.160> a<03:04:06.560> layer<03:04:06.720> of<03:04:07.040> complexity<03:04:07.600> and<03:04:07.920> maybe<03:04:08.160> even 03:04:08.309 --> 03:04:08.319 align:start position:0% add a layer of complexity and maybe even 03:04:08.319 --> 03:04:11.910 align:start position:0% add a layer of complexity and maybe even a<03:04:08.560> charge<03:04:08.960> for<03:04:09.680> parents. 03:04:11.910 --> 03:04:11.920 align:start position:0% a charge for parents. 03:04:11.920 --> 03:04:13.670 align:start position:0% a charge for parents. Uh<03:04:12.160> is<03:04:12.399> there<03:04:12.479> a<03:04:12.640> way<03:04:12.720> to<03:04:12.960> word<03:04:13.120> that<03:04:13.359> so<03:04:13.520> that 03:04:13.670 --> 03:04:13.680 align:start position:0% Uh is there a way to word that so that 03:04:13.680 --> 03:04:17.510 align:start position:0% Uh is there a way to word that so that it's<03:04:13.920> the<03:04:14.080> public<03:04:14.319> may<03:04:14.640> request 03:04:17.510 --> 03:04:17.520 align:start position:0% it's the public may request 03:04:17.520 --> 03:04:19.910 align:start position:0% it's the public may request uh<03:04:17.680> complete<03:04:18.160> book<03:04:18.479> inventory<03:04:19.120> or<03:04:19.439> access<03:04:19.760> to 03:04:19.910 --> 03:04:19.920 align:start position:0% uh complete book inventory or access to 03:04:19.920 --> 03:04:21.429 align:start position:0% uh complete book inventory or access to the<03:04:20.080> book<03:04:20.399> maybe<03:04:20.560> it's<03:04:20.720> just<03:04:20.880> access<03:04:21.120> to<03:04:21.279> the 03:04:21.429 --> 03:04:21.439 align:start position:0% the book maybe it's just access to the 03:04:21.439 --> 03:04:26.309 align:start position:0% the book maybe it's just access to the book<03:04:21.680> inventory.<03:04:22.479> Is<03:04:22.720> that 03:04:26.309 --> 03:04:26.319 align:start position:0% 03:04:26.319 --> 03:04:31.349 align:start position:0% could<03:04:26.479> that<03:04:26.800> maybe<03:04:27.040> they're<03:04:27.279> that<03:04:27.520> simple? 03:04:31.349 --> 03:04:31.359 align:start position:0% 03:04:31.359 --> 03:04:33.190 align:start position:0% Can<03:04:31.680> I<03:04:31.840> just<03:04:32.000> ask<03:04:32.160> a<03:04:32.319> clarifying<03:04:32.720> and<03:04:32.960> maybe<03:04:33.040> it 03:04:33.190 --> 03:04:33.200 align:start position:0% Can I just ask a clarifying and maybe it 03:04:33.200 --> 03:04:37.110 align:start position:0% Can I just ask a clarifying and maybe it was<03:04:33.359> said<03:04:33.600> but<03:04:34.479> um<03:04:35.439> why<03:04:35.840> why<03:04:36.240> did<03:04:36.479> we<03:04:36.640> need<03:04:36.880> to 03:04:37.110 --> 03:04:37.120 align:start position:0% was said but um why why did we need to 03:04:37.120 --> 03:04:41.349 align:start position:0% was said but um why why did we need to add<03:04:37.439> the<03:04:38.399> you<03:04:38.880> open 03:04:41.349 --> 03:04:41.359 align:start position:0% add the you open 03:04:41.359 --> 03:04:44.309 align:start position:0% add the you open there<03:04:42.800> like 03:04:44.309 --> 03:04:44.319 align:start position:0% there like 03:04:44.319 --> 03:04:44.870 align:start position:0% there like purpose 03:04:44.870 --> 03:04:44.880 align:start position:0% purpose 03:04:44.880 --> 03:04:49.510 align:start position:0% purpose >> well<03:04:45.200> board<03:04:45.439> member<03:04:45.680> rail<03:04:46.000> can<03:04:46.160> speak<03:04:46.319> to<03:04:46.479> it 03:04:49.510 --> 03:04:49.520 align:start position:0% 03:04:49.520 --> 03:04:50.389 align:start position:0% >> she's<03:04:49.840> probably 03:04:50.389 --> 03:04:50.399 align:start position:0% >> she's probably 03:04:50.399 --> 03:04:52.070 align:start position:0% >> she's probably >> um 03:04:52.070 --> 03:04:52.080 align:start position:0% >> um 03:04:52.080 --> 03:04:54.230 align:start position:0% >> um >> yeah<03:04:52.399> sorry<03:04:52.720> I'm<03:04:52.880> I'm<03:04:53.439> relooking<03:04:53.920> through<03:04:54.080> my 03:04:54.230 --> 03:04:54.240 align:start position:0% >> yeah sorry I'm I'm relooking through my 03:04:54.240 --> 03:04:57.030 align:start position:0% >> yeah sorry I'm I'm relooking through my notes<03:04:54.479> again<03:04:55.040> um<03:04:56.160> well<03:04:56.399> I<03:04:56.560> was<03:04:56.720> trying<03:04:56.800> to<03:04:56.960> find 03:04:57.030 --> 03:04:57.040 align:start position:0% notes again um well I was trying to find 03:04:57.040 --> 03:04:59.429 align:start position:0% notes again um well I was trying to find a<03:04:57.279> balance<03:04:57.520> there<03:04:57.760> between<03:04:58.080> what<03:04:58.800> member<03:04:59.120> Earl 03:04:59.429 --> 03:04:59.439 align:start position:0% a balance there between what member Earl 03:04:59.439 --> 03:05:02.389 align:start position:0% a balance there between what member Earl had<03:04:59.600> on<03:04:59.840> her<03:05:00.000> draft<03:05:00.560> and<03:05:00.960> Then<03:05:01.760> also<03:05:02.160> not 03:05:02.389 --> 03:05:02.399 align:start position:0% had on her draft and Then also not 03:05:02.399 --> 03:05:04.870 align:start position:0% had on her draft and Then also not creating<03:05:02.720> a<03:05:02.960> process<03:05:03.279> that's<03:05:03.600> too<03:05:04.560> um 03:05:04.870 --> 03:05:04.880 align:start position:0% creating a process that's too um 03:05:04.880 --> 03:05:07.110 align:start position:0% creating a process that's too um burdensome<03:05:05.439> for<03:05:05.840> librarians<03:05:06.399> to<03:05:06.640> have<03:05:06.800> random 03:05:07.110 --> 03:05:07.120 align:start position:0% burdensome for librarians to have random 03:05:07.120 --> 03:05:08.710 align:start position:0% burdensome for librarians to have random people<03:05:07.359> just<03:05:07.600> constantly<03:05:08.000> requesting<03:05:08.479> their 03:05:08.710 --> 03:05:08.720 align:start position:0% people just constantly requesting their 03:05:08.720 --> 03:05:11.590 align:start position:0% people just constantly requesting their lists. 03:05:11.590 --> 03:05:11.600 align:start position:0% lists. 03:05:11.600 --> 03:05:12.950 align:start position:0% lists. It<03:05:11.760> just<03:05:11.920> felt<03:05:12.080> like<03:05:12.160> it<03:05:12.399> kind<03:05:12.479> of<03:05:12.560> prompted 03:05:12.950 --> 03:05:12.960 align:start position:0% It just felt like it kind of prompted 03:05:12.960 --> 03:05:14.550 align:start position:0% It just felt like it kind of prompted some<03:05:13.120> bad<03:05:13.359> actors<03:05:13.680> is<03:05:13.920> what<03:05:14.000> I<03:05:14.160> was<03:05:14.319> thinking, 03:05:14.550 --> 03:05:14.560 align:start position:0% some bad actors is what I was thinking, 03:05:14.560 --> 03:05:16.790 align:start position:0% some bad actors is what I was thinking, but<03:05:15.359> well<03:05:15.600> and<03:05:15.760> I<03:05:15.840> asked<03:05:16.080> for<03:05:16.160> a<03:05:16.319> spreadsheet. 03:05:16.790 --> 03:05:16.800 align:start position:0% but well and I asked for a spreadsheet. 03:05:16.800 --> 03:05:19.030 align:start position:0% but well and I asked for a spreadsheet. I<03:05:16.960> don't<03:05:17.040> know<03:05:17.120> that<03:05:17.359> that's<03:05:17.520> how<03:05:17.680> it's<03:05:18.000> always 03:05:19.030 --> 03:05:19.040 align:start position:0% I don't know that that's how it's always 03:05:19.040 --> 03:05:21.030 align:start position:0% I don't know that that's how it's always right.<03:05:19.680> So<03:05:20.000> cleaning<03:05:20.319> that<03:05:20.560> language<03:05:20.880> up 03:05:21.030 --> 03:05:21.040 align:start position:0% right. So cleaning that language up 03:05:21.040 --> 03:05:23.429 align:start position:0% right. So cleaning that language up needed<03:05:21.359> to<03:05:21.520> be<03:05:21.600> done. 03:05:23.429 --> 03:05:23.439 align:start position:0% needed to be done. 03:05:23.439 --> 03:05:25.110 align:start position:0% needed to be done. by<03:05:23.600> a<03:05:23.760> spreadsheet.<03:05:24.160> Is<03:05:24.319> that<03:05:24.479> like<03:05:24.640> a<03:05:24.800> printed 03:05:25.110 --> 03:05:25.120 align:start position:0% by a spreadsheet. Is that like a printed 03:05:25.120 --> 03:05:27.110 align:start position:0% by a spreadsheet. Is that like a printed spreadsheet<03:05:25.600> or<03:05:25.920> is<03:05:26.080> that<03:05:26.240> like<03:05:26.399> a 03:05:27.110 --> 03:05:27.120 align:start position:0% spreadsheet or is that like a 03:05:27.120 --> 03:05:28.630 align:start position:0% spreadsheet or is that like a >> Yeah,<03:05:27.359> that's<03:05:27.600> what<03:05:27.760> I'm<03:05:27.920> saying<03:05:28.080> is<03:05:28.319> it<03:05:28.479> kind 03:05:28.630 --> 03:05:28.640 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's what I'm saying is it kind 03:05:28.640 --> 03:05:29.510 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, that's what I'm saying is it kind of<03:05:28.720> left<03:05:28.960> that 03:05:29.510 --> 03:05:29.520 align:start position:0% of left that 03:05:29.520 --> 03:05:30.389 align:start position:0% of left that >> like<03:05:29.680> a<03:05:29.920> document. 03:05:30.389 --> 03:05:30.399 align:start position:0% >> like a document. 03:05:30.399 --> 03:05:31.830 align:start position:0% >> like a document. >> Oh,<03:05:30.560> okay. 03:05:31.830 --> 03:05:31.840 align:start position:0% >> Oh, okay. 03:05:31.840 --> 03:05:34.070 align:start position:0% >> Oh, okay. >> I<03:05:32.080> did<03:05:32.240> have<03:05:32.399> one<03:05:32.720> LEA<03:05:33.120> say<03:05:33.359> that<03:05:33.520> they<03:05:33.840> talked 03:05:34.070 --> 03:05:34.080 align:start position:0% >> I did have one LEA say that they talked 03:05:34.080 --> 03:05:36.870 align:start position:0% >> I did have one LEA say that they talked to<03:05:34.240> their<03:05:35.680> attorneys<03:05:36.080> there<03:05:36.240> and<03:05:36.479> how<03:05:36.640> they've 03:05:36.870 --> 03:05:36.880 align:start position:0% to their attorneys there and how they've 03:05:36.880 --> 03:05:39.590 align:start position:0% to their attorneys there and how they've handled<03:05:37.200> that<03:05:37.359> was<03:05:37.600> through<03:05:38.640> the<03:05:39.120> open<03:05:39.439> and 03:05:39.590 --> 03:05:39.600 align:start position:0% handled that was through the open and 03:05:39.600 --> 03:05:43.030 align:start position:0% handled that was through the open and public<03:05:39.840> meeting<03:05:40.160> as<03:05:40.399> well.<03:05:41.200> Um, 03:05:43.030 --> 03:05:43.040 align:start position:0% public meeting as well. Um, 03:05:43.040 --> 03:05:45.429 align:start position:0% public meeting as well. Um, and<03:05:43.279> then<03:05:44.399> I<03:05:44.640> mean<03:05:44.800> just<03:05:44.880> to<03:05:45.040> give<03:05:45.200> you<03:05:45.279> an 03:05:45.429 --> 03:05:45.439 align:start position:0% and then I mean just to give you an 03:05:45.439 --> 03:05:48.790 align:start position:0% and then I mean just to give you an example,<03:05:45.920> Canyons<03:05:46.960> School<03:05:47.200> District<03:05:48.080> has 03:05:48.790 --> 03:05:48.800 align:start position:0% example, Canyons School District has 03:05:48.800 --> 03:05:50.389 align:start position:0% example, Canyons School District has 352,000 03:05:50.389 --> 03:05:50.399 align:start position:0% 352,000 03:05:50.399 --> 03:05:52.790 align:start position:0% 352,000 plus 03:05:52.790 --> 03:05:52.800 align:start position:0% plus 03:05:52.800 --> 03:05:56.550 align:start position:0% plus copies<03:05:53.279> of<03:05:54.000> 117,000<03:05:55.359> unique<03:05:55.760> titles<03:05:56.160> across 03:05:56.550 --> 03:05:56.560 align:start position:0% copies of 117,000 unique titles across 03:05:56.560 --> 03:05:59.429 align:start position:0% copies of 117,000 unique titles across 43<03:05:57.120> campuses.<03:05:57.920> So,<03:05:58.160> I'm<03:05:58.479> trying<03:05:58.720> to<03:05:59.040> make<03:05:59.200> it 03:05:59.429 --> 03:05:59.439 align:start position:0% 43 campuses. So, I'm trying to make it 03:05:59.439 --> 03:06:02.309 align:start position:0% 43 campuses. So, I'm trying to make it so<03:05:59.600> that<03:05:59.840> these<03:06:00.080> librarians<03:06:00.640> aren't, 03:06:02.309 --> 03:06:02.319 align:start position:0% so that these librarians aren't, 03:06:02.319 --> 03:06:04.070 align:start position:0% so that these librarians aren't, you<03:06:02.479> know,<03:06:02.880> tired<03:06:03.279> out<03:06:03.359> by<03:06:03.600> having<03:06:03.840> these 03:06:04.070 --> 03:06:04.080 align:start position:0% you know, tired out by having these 03:06:04.080 --> 03:06:05.510 align:start position:0% you know, tired out by having these requests<03:06:04.640> come<03:06:04.880> through. 03:06:05.510 --> 03:06:05.520 align:start position:0% requests come through. 03:06:05.520 --> 03:06:07.510 align:start position:0% requests come through. >> Yeah.<03:06:05.760> So,<03:06:06.000> access<03:06:06.319> to<03:06:06.479> the<03:06:06.640> book<03:06:06.880> inventory, 03:06:07.510 --> 03:06:07.520 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, access to the book inventory, 03:06:07.520 --> 03:06:09.269 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. So, access to the book inventory, however<03:06:07.840> that<03:06:08.160> they<03:06:08.399> want<03:06:08.479> to<03:06:08.640> do<03:06:08.800> that.<03:06:09.040> And 03:06:09.269 --> 03:06:09.279 align:start position:0% however that they want to do that. And 03:06:09.279 --> 03:06:10.870 align:start position:0% however that they want to do that. And maybe<03:06:09.439> they<03:06:09.680> do<03:06:09.840> request<03:06:10.240> that<03:06:10.479> there's<03:06:10.720> a 03:06:10.870 --> 03:06:10.880 align:start position:0% maybe they do request that there's a 03:06:10.880 --> 03:06:13.110 align:start position:0% maybe they do request that there's a form<03:06:11.200> filled<03:06:11.439> out.<03:06:11.680> I<03:06:11.840> don't<03:06:11.920> know.<03:06:12.399> But<03:06:12.800> I 03:06:13.110 --> 03:06:13.120 align:start position:0% form filled out. I don't know. But I 03:06:13.120 --> 03:06:14.870 align:start position:0% form filled out. I don't know. But I think<03:06:13.279> keeping<03:06:13.680> it<03:06:13.840> simpler,<03:06:14.240> just<03:06:14.479> access<03:06:14.720> to 03:06:14.870 --> 03:06:14.880 align:start position:0% think keeping it simpler, just access to 03:06:14.880 --> 03:06:16.230 align:start position:0% think keeping it simpler, just access to the<03:06:14.960> book<03:06:15.120> inventory.<03:06:15.600> Most<03:06:15.760> parents<03:06:16.080> can 03:06:16.230 --> 03:06:16.240 align:start position:0% the book inventory. Most parents can 03:06:16.240 --> 03:06:18.389 align:start position:0% the book inventory. Most parents can access<03:06:16.560> it.<03:06:17.200> Deina,<03:06:17.600> are<03:06:17.760> you<03:06:18.000> are<03:06:18.160> you<03:06:18.319> trying 03:06:18.389 --> 03:06:18.399 align:start position:0% access it. Deina, are you are you trying 03:06:18.399 --> 03:06:20.150 align:start position:0% access it. Deina, are you are you trying to<03:06:18.640> raise<03:06:18.880> your<03:06:19.040> hand? 03:06:20.150 --> 03:06:20.160 align:start position:0% to raise your hand? 03:06:20.160 --> 03:06:21.830 align:start position:0% to raise your hand? >> Well,<03:06:20.399> I<03:06:20.720> was<03:06:20.800> just<03:06:21.040> listening<03:06:21.279> to<03:06:21.439> you<03:06:21.600> all 03:06:21.830 --> 03:06:21.840 align:start position:0% >> Well, I was just listening to you all 03:06:21.840 --> 03:06:24.070 align:start position:0% >> Well, I was just listening to you all and<03:06:22.080> I<03:06:22.240> think<03:06:22.319> what<03:06:22.479> I'm<03:06:22.720> hearing<03:06:23.040> is<03:06:23.760> they 03:06:24.070 --> 03:06:24.080 align:start position:0% and I think what I'm hearing is they 03:06:24.080 --> 03:06:26.230 align:start position:0% and I think what I'm hearing is they need<03:06:24.479> you<03:06:24.720> want<03:06:24.880> parents<03:06:25.200> to<03:06:25.359> be<03:06:25.520> able<03:06:25.680> to<03:06:26.080> see 03:06:26.230 --> 03:06:26.240 align:start position:0% need you want parents to be able to see 03:06:26.240 --> 03:06:28.389 align:start position:0% need you want parents to be able to see their<03:06:26.479> child's<03:06:26.880> checkouts<03:06:27.439> in<03:06:27.840> including<03:06:28.160> the 03:06:28.389 --> 03:06:28.399 align:start position:0% their child's checkouts in including the 03:06:28.399 --> 03:06:30.469 align:start position:0% their child's checkouts in including the history<03:06:28.720> and<03:06:29.120> the<03:06:29.359> catalog,<03:06:29.920> the<03:06:30.160> library 03:06:30.469 --> 03:06:30.479 align:start position:0% history and the catalog, the library 03:06:30.479 --> 03:06:33.110 align:start position:0% history and the catalog, the library catalog.<03:06:31.359> So<03:06:31.680> what<03:06:31.840> if<03:06:32.000> to<03:06:32.240> that<03:06:32.479> sentence<03:06:32.880> you 03:06:33.110 --> 03:06:33.120 align:start position:0% catalog. So what if to that sentence you 03:06:33.120 --> 03:06:34.870 align:start position:0% catalog. So what if to that sentence you just<03:06:33.359> added<03:06:33.920> including<03:06:34.319> a<03:06:34.479> history<03:06:34.720> of 03:06:34.870 --> 03:06:34.880 align:start position:0% just added including a history of 03:06:34.880 --> 03:06:37.750 align:start position:0% just added including a history of borrowed<03:06:35.359> material<03:06:36.000> materials<03:06:37.120> and<03:06:37.520> the 03:06:37.750 --> 03:06:37.760 align:start position:0% borrowed material materials and the 03:06:37.760 --> 03:06:40.710 align:start position:0% borrowed material materials and the complete<03:06:38.160> library<03:06:38.640> catalog 03:06:40.710 --> 03:06:40.720 align:start position:0% complete library catalog 03:06:40.720 --> 03:06:42.790 align:start position:0% complete library catalog that<03:06:41.200> gives<03:06:41.600> that<03:06:41.840> online<03:06:42.240> platform<03:06:42.560> is 03:06:42.790 --> 03:06:42.800 align:start position:0% that gives that online platform is 03:06:42.800 --> 03:06:44.309 align:start position:0% that gives that online platform is already<03:06:43.040> there<03:06:43.359> and<03:06:43.520> now<03:06:43.680> we're<03:06:43.920> making<03:06:44.160> it 03:06:44.309 --> 03:06:44.319 align:start position:0% already there and now we're making it 03:06:44.319 --> 03:06:47.429 align:start position:0% already there and now we're making it just<03:06:44.479> a<03:06:44.640> little<03:06:44.720> bit<03:06:44.880> more<03:06:45.040> clear<03:06:46.399> um<03:06:47.040> without 03:06:47.429 --> 03:06:47.439 align:start position:0% just a little bit more clear um without 03:06:47.439 --> 03:06:49.110 align:start position:0% just a little bit more clear um without putting<03:06:47.680> the<03:06:47.920> grammar<03:06:48.319> request<03:06:48.800> and<03:06:48.960> the 03:06:49.110 --> 03:06:49.120 align:start position:0% putting the grammar request and the 03:06:49.120 --> 03:06:53.670 align:start position:0% putting the grammar request and the spreadsheet<03:06:49.760> in<03:06:50.000> there. 03:06:53.670 --> 03:06:53.680 align:start position:0% 03:06:53.680 --> 03:06:55.190 align:start position:0% Uh<03:06:54.000> just<03:06:54.160> a<03:06:54.399> suggestion. 03:06:55.190 --> 03:06:55.200 align:start position:0% Uh just a suggestion. 03:06:55.200 --> 03:06:56.630 align:start position:0% Uh just a suggestion. >> Okay.<03:06:55.439> And<03:06:55.600> you're<03:06:55.760> saying<03:06:56.000> so<03:06:56.160> we<03:06:56.399> would<03:06:56.479> put 03:06:56.630 --> 03:06:56.640 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And you're saying so we would put 03:06:56.640 --> 03:06:58.469 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And you're saying so we would put that<03:06:56.960> but<03:06:57.120> that<03:06:57.359> would<03:06:57.520> be<03:06:57.760> in<03:06:58.000> addition<03:06:58.319> to 03:06:58.469 --> 03:06:58.479 align:start position:0% that but that would be in addition to 03:06:58.479 --> 03:07:00.230 align:start position:0% that but that would be in addition to this<03:06:58.800> because<03:06:59.040> this<03:06:59.279> would<03:06:59.439> be<03:06:59.520> the<03:06:59.760> public 03:07:00.230 --> 03:07:00.240 align:start position:0% this because this would be the public 03:07:00.240 --> 03:07:01.190 align:start position:0% this because this would be the public can 03:07:01.190 --> 03:07:01.200 align:start position:0% can 03:07:01.200 --> 03:07:03.030 align:start position:0% can >> Yeah.<03:07:01.359> I'm<03:07:01.600> just<03:07:01.760> looking<03:07:02.000> at<03:07:02.240> my<03:07:02.560> students 03:07:03.030 --> 03:07:03.040 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I'm just looking at my students 03:07:03.040 --> 03:07:06.389 align:start position:0% >> Yeah. I'm just looking at my students high<03:07:03.279> school<03:07:04.080> media<03:07:04.479> center<03:07:04.960> page<03:07:06.080> and 03:07:06.389 --> 03:07:06.399 align:start position:0% high school media center page and 03:07:06.399 --> 03:07:08.469 align:start position:0% high school media center page and they've<03:07:06.640> got<03:07:06.880> Kohaa<03:07:07.600> the<03:07:07.760> library<03:07:08.160> book 03:07:08.469 --> 03:07:08.479 align:start position:0% they've got Kohaa the library book 03:07:08.479 --> 03:07:10.550 align:start position:0% they've got Kohaa the library book search<03:07:08.800> listed<03:07:09.279> Utah's<03:07:09.760> online<03:07:10.080> library 03:07:10.550 --> 03:07:10.560 align:start position:0% search listed Utah's online library 03:07:10.560 --> 03:07:13.349 align:start position:0% search listed Utah's online library resources<03:07:11.279> teaching<03:07:11.680> books<03:07:12.000> and<03:07:12.240> Sora<03:07:13.200> and 03:07:13.349 --> 03:07:13.359 align:start position:0% resources teaching books and Sora and 03:07:13.359 --> 03:07:14.950 align:start position:0% resources teaching books and Sora and then<03:07:13.520> there's<03:07:13.760> a<03:07:13.920> place<03:07:14.080> where<03:07:14.319> you<03:07:14.560> can<03:07:14.800> put 03:07:14.950 --> 03:07:14.960 align:start position:0% then there's a place where you can put 03:07:14.960 --> 03:07:17.990 align:start position:0% then there's a place where you can put in<03:07:15.200> a<03:07:15.359> new<03:07:15.520> book<03:07:15.840> request. 03:07:17.990 --> 03:07:18.000 align:start position:0% in a new book request. 03:07:18.000 --> 03:07:19.910 align:start position:0% in a new book request. Um 03:07:19.910 --> 03:07:19.920 align:start position:0% Um 03:07:19.920 --> 03:07:23.510 align:start position:0% Um okay<03:07:20.319> we're<03:07:20.640> on<03:07:21.439> time<03:07:21.840> wise.<03:07:22.160> Do<03:07:22.399> we<03:07:22.560> want<03:07:22.880> to 03:07:23.510 --> 03:07:23.520 align:start position:0% okay we're on time wise. Do we want to 03:07:23.520 --> 03:07:25.190 align:start position:0% okay we're on time wise. Do we want to try<03:07:23.760> to<03:07:23.920> vote<03:07:24.080> on<03:07:24.240> this<03:07:24.399> now<03:07:24.640> or? 03:07:25.190 --> 03:07:25.200 align:start position:0% try to vote on this now or? 03:07:25.200 --> 03:07:27.110 align:start position:0% try to vote on this now or? >> Yeah,<03:07:25.359> let's<03:07:25.600> just<03:07:25.840> vote<03:07:26.000> on<03:07:26.240> that.<03:07:26.640> I<03:07:26.880> think 03:07:27.110 --> 03:07:27.120 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, let's just vote on that. I think 03:07:27.120 --> 03:07:29.910 align:start position:0% >> Yeah, let's just vote on that. I think how<03:07:27.600> how<03:07:28.000> you<03:07:28.160> had<03:07:28.399> it,<03:07:28.800> member<03:07:29.120> Earl.<03:07:29.600> I<03:07:29.760> think 03:07:29.910 --> 03:07:29.920 align:start position:0% how how you had it, member Earl. I think 03:07:29.920 --> 03:07:33.030 align:start position:0% how how you had it, member Earl. I think that's<03:07:30.160> most<03:07:31.520> access<03:07:31.920> to<03:07:32.080> book<03:07:32.319> inventory<03:07:32.880> and 03:07:33.030 --> 03:07:33.040 align:start position:0% that's most access to book inventory and 03:07:33.040 --> 03:07:34.309 align:start position:0% that's most access to book inventory and then<03:07:33.200> this<03:07:33.439> will<03:07:33.600> come<03:07:33.680> back<03:07:33.840> to<03:07:34.000> committee 03:07:34.309 --> 03:07:34.319 align:start position:0% then this will come back to committee 03:07:34.319 --> 03:07:35.830 align:start position:0% then this will come back to committee next<03:07:34.640> month<03:07:34.800> if<03:07:35.040> there's<03:07:35.200> some<03:07:35.439> additional 03:07:35.830 --> 03:07:35.840 align:start position:0% next month if there's some additional 03:07:35.840 --> 03:07:38.950 align:start position:0% next month if there's some additional clarification<03:07:36.640> people<03:07:36.800> want. 03:07:38.950 --> 03:07:38.960 align:start position:0% clarification people want. 03:07:38.960 --> 03:07:41.830 align:start position:0% clarification people want. >> Okay.<03:07:39.279> So,<03:07:39.520> the<03:07:39.760> the<03:07:40.080> motion<03:07:40.479> would<03:07:40.720> be<03:07:41.600> to 03:07:41.830 --> 03:07:41.840 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, the the motion would be to 03:07:41.840 --> 03:07:44.790 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So, the the motion would be to amend<03:07:42.479> section<03:07:43.120> 2F<03:07:43.760> to<03:07:44.000> remove<03:07:44.240> the<03:07:44.479> word 03:07:44.790 --> 03:07:44.800 align:start position:0% amend section 2F to remove the word 03:07:44.800 --> 03:07:47.750 align:start position:0% amend section 2F to remove the word provide<03:07:45.760> and<03:07:46.000> add<03:07:46.240> the<03:07:46.399> word<03:07:46.640> request<03:07:47.120> and<03:07:47.439> add 03:07:47.750 --> 03:07:47.760 align:start position:0% provide and add the word request and add 03:07:47.760 --> 03:07:50.710 align:start position:0% provide and add the word request and add access<03:07:48.160> to<03:07:48.319> the<03:07:48.479> book<03:07:48.800> inventory. 03:07:50.710 --> 03:07:50.720 align:start position:0% access to the book inventory. 03:07:50.720 --> 03:07:52.710 align:start position:0% access to the book inventory. All<03:07:50.960> those<03:07:51.120> in<03:07:51.359> favor? 03:07:52.710 --> 03:07:52.720 align:start position:0% All those in favor? 03:07:52.720 --> 03:07:53.269 align:start position:0% All those in favor? >> I 03:07:53.269 --> 03:07:53.279 align:start position:0% >> I 03:07:53.279 --> 03:07:53.670 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 03:07:53.670 --> 03:07:53.680 align:start position:0% >> I 03:07:53.680 --> 03:07:54.469 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 03:07:54.469 --> 03:07:54.479 align:start position:0% >> I 03:07:54.479 --> 03:07:56.230 align:start position:0% >> I >> I'm<03:07:54.720> just<03:07:54.960> clarifying<03:07:55.600> that's<03:07:55.840> all<03:07:56.080> that 03:07:56.230 --> 03:07:56.240 align:start position:0% >> I'm just clarifying that's all that 03:07:56.240 --> 03:07:58.469 align:start position:0% >> I'm just clarifying that's all that you're<03:07:56.479> adding<03:07:56.880> because<03:07:57.200> the<03:07:57.359> the<03:07:57.760> letter 03:07:58.469 --> 03:07:58.479 align:start position:0% you're adding because the the letter 03:07:58.479 --> 03:08:00.389 align:start position:0% you're adding because the the letter down<03:07:58.800> below<03:07:59.120> still<03:07:59.359> has<03:07:59.520> the<03:07:59.760> green<03:08:00.000> and<03:08:00.160> the 03:08:00.389 --> 03:08:00.399 align:start position:0% down below still has the green and the 03:08:00.399 --> 03:08:00.870 align:start position:0% down below still has the green and the blue. 03:08:00.870 --> 03:08:00.880 align:start position:0% blue. 03:08:00.880 --> 03:08:03.670 align:start position:0% blue. >> No,<03:08:01.279> we're<03:08:01.600> only<03:08:02.240> that<03:08:02.479> would<03:08:02.640> end<03:08:02.960> that 03:08:03.670 --> 03:08:03.680 align:start position:0% >> No, we're only that would end that 03:08:03.680 --> 03:08:04.870 align:start position:0% >> No, we're only that would end that sentence<03:08:04.080> there. 03:08:04.870 --> 03:08:04.880 align:start position:0% sentence there. 03:08:04.880 --> 03:08:07.510 align:start position:0% sentence there. >> Okay.<03:08:05.680> Thank<03:08:05.920> you. 03:08:07.510 --> 03:08:07.520 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Thank you. 03:08:07.520 --> 03:08:08.790 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Thank you. >> So,<03:08:07.680> I'm<03:08:07.920> an<03:08:08.080> I. 03:08:08.790 --> 03:08:08.800 align:start position:0% >> So, I'm an I. 03:08:08.800 --> 03:08:10.870 align:start position:0% >> So, I'm an I. >> Okay. 03:08:10.870 --> 03:08:10.880 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 03:08:10.880 --> 03:08:12.309 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Did<03:08:11.040> I<03:08:11.200> hear<03:08:11.520> an<03:08:11.680> I? 03:08:12.309 --> 03:08:12.319 align:start position:0% Did I hear an I? 03:08:12.319 --> 03:08:15.269 align:start position:0% Did I hear an I? >> Okay.<03:08:12.720> So<03:08:12.960> that<03:08:13.200> passes<03:08:13.600> unanimously 03:08:15.269 --> 03:08:15.279 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So that passes unanimously 03:08:15.279 --> 03:08:18.469 align:start position:0% >> Okay. So that passes unanimously and<03:08:16.240> we<03:08:16.560> need<03:08:16.800> to<03:08:17.279> allow<03:08:17.600> a<03:08:17.840> couple<03:08:18.080> people<03:08:18.240> to 03:08:18.469 --> 03:08:18.479 align:start position:0% and we need to allow a couple people to 03:08:18.479 --> 03:08:21.030 align:start position:0% and we need to allow a couple people to get<03:08:18.560> to<03:08:18.800> other<03:08:19.040> meetings.<03:08:19.920> So 03:08:21.030 --> 03:08:21.040 align:start position:0% get to other meetings. So 03:08:21.040 --> 03:08:22.630 align:start position:0% get to other meetings. So >> ironically<03:08:21.600> I<03:08:21.760> have<03:08:21.840> to<03:08:22.000> go<03:08:22.080> to<03:08:22.160> a<03:08:22.319> library 03:08:22.630 --> 03:08:22.640 align:start position:0% >> ironically I have to go to a library 03:08:22.640 --> 03:08:23.590 align:start position:0% >> ironically I have to go to a library board<03:08:22.880> meeting. 03:08:23.590 --> 03:08:23.600 align:start position:0% board meeting. 03:08:23.600 --> 03:08:25.590 align:start position:0% board meeting. >> Yes.<03:08:23.840> What<03:08:24.160> did<03:08:24.319> we<03:08:24.560> are<03:08:24.720> we<03:08:25.040> did<03:08:25.279> we<03:08:25.439> get 03:08:25.590 --> 03:08:25.600 align:start position:0% >> Yes. What did we are we did we get 03:08:25.600 --> 03:08:29.269 align:start position:0% >> Yes. What did we are we did we get through<03:08:25.840> we<03:08:26.080> got<03:08:26.160> through<03:08:26.319> all<03:08:26.479> the<03:08:26.640> action<03:08:27.279> on 03:08:29.269 --> 03:08:29.279 align:start position:0% through we got through all the action on 03:08:29.279 --> 03:08:31.990 align:start position:0% through we got through all the action on so<03:08:29.520> we<03:08:29.760> we<03:08:30.080> have<03:08:30.240> information.<03:08:30.880> So<03:08:31.040> our<03:08:31.520> our 03:08:31.990 --> 03:08:32.000 align:start position:0% so we we have information. So our our 03:08:32.000 --> 03:08:35.429 align:start position:0% so we we have information. So our our >> we<03:08:32.240> did<03:08:32.399> have<03:08:32.479> a<03:08:32.720> motion<03:08:33.200> to<03:08:33.439> make<03:08:33.760> but<03:08:34.080> I<03:08:34.319> don't 03:08:35.429 --> 03:08:35.439 align:start position:0% >> we did have a motion to make but I don't 03:08:35.439 --> 03:08:37.750 align:start position:0% >> we did have a motion to make but I don't >> do<03:08:35.600> you<03:08:35.680> want<03:08:35.840> to<03:08:36.080> do<03:08:36.240> you<03:08:36.399> want<03:08:36.479> to<03:08:36.640> do<03:08:36.800> that 03:08:37.750 --> 03:08:37.760 align:start position:0% >> do you want to do you want to do that 03:08:37.760 --> 03:08:41.590 align:start position:0% >> do you want to do you want to do that right<03:08:37.840> now?<03:08:38.399> be<03:08:38.640> mindful<03:08:39.120> of<03:08:39.760> can<03:08:40.000> we<03:08:40.240> just 03:08:41.590 --> 03:08:41.600 align:start position:0% right now? be mindful of can we just 03:08:41.600 --> 03:08:46.950 align:start position:0% right now? be mindful of can we just >> take<03:08:41.920> five<03:08:42.240> minutes<03:08:43.120> or<03:08:43.600> three<03:08:44.080> or<03:08:44.399> two. 03:08:46.950 --> 03:08:46.960 align:start position:0% >> take five minutes or three or two. 03:08:46.960 --> 03:08:49.269 align:start position:0% >> take five minutes or three or two. >> Let<03:08:47.120> me<03:08:47.200> just<03:08:47.439> make<03:08:47.600> it<03:08:48.240> um<03:08:48.399> if<03:08:48.640> we<03:08:48.960> have<03:08:49.040> more 03:08:49.269 --> 03:08:49.279 align:start position:0% >> Let me just make it um if we have more 03:08:49.279 --> 03:08:51.349 align:start position:0% >> Let me just make it um if we have more time<03:08:49.439> to<03:08:49.600> think<03:08:49.760> about<03:08:49.920> it<03:08:50.160> and<03:08:50.399> it<03:08:50.800> anyway<03:08:51.200> and 03:08:51.349 --> 03:08:51.359 align:start position:0% time to think about it and it anyway and 03:08:51.359 --> 03:08:53.670 align:start position:0% time to think about it and it anyway and it<03:08:51.600> might<03:08:51.840> be<03:08:52.560> it<03:08:52.720> might<03:08:53.040> need<03:08:53.279> to<03:08:53.359> be<03:08:53.520> placed 03:08:53.670 --> 03:08:53.680 align:start position:0% it might be it might need to be placed 03:08:53.680 --> 03:08:55.590 align:start position:0% it might be it might need to be placed in<03:08:53.920> a<03:08:54.080> different<03:08:54.319> space<03:08:54.640> actually<03:08:55.040> but<03:08:55.279> let<03:08:55.520> me 03:08:55.590 --> 03:08:55.600 align:start position:0% in a different space actually but let me 03:08:55.600 --> 03:08:57.030 align:start position:0% in a different space actually but let me just<03:08:55.760> go<03:08:55.920> ahead<03:08:56.080> and<03:08:56.240> make<03:08:56.319> this<03:08:56.560> motion<03:08:56.880> and 03:08:57.030 --> 03:08:57.040 align:start position:0% just go ahead and make this motion and 03:08:57.040 --> 03:08:58.469 align:start position:0% just go ahead and make this motion and this<03:08:57.200> is<03:08:57.359> coming<03:08:57.520> from<03:08:57.680> our<03:08:57.840> meeting<03:08:58.160> last 03:08:58.469 --> 03:08:58.479 align:start position:0% this is coming from our meeting last 03:08:58.479 --> 03:09:02.389 align:start position:0% this is coming from our meeting last week<03:08:59.279> or<03:09:00.240> two<03:09:00.479> weeks<03:09:00.720> ago. 03:09:02.389 --> 03:09:02.399 align:start position:0% week or two weeks ago. 03:09:02.399 --> 03:09:04.070 align:start position:0% week or two weeks ago. um<03:09:02.880> just<03:09:03.040> move<03:09:03.279> that<03:09:03.439> the<03:09:03.600> standards<03:09:03.920> and 03:09:04.070 --> 03:09:04.080 align:start position:0% um just move that the standards and 03:09:04.080 --> 03:09:05.590 align:start position:0% um just move that the standards and assessment<03:09:04.479> committee<03:09:04.800> direct<03:09:05.040> staff<03:09:05.279> to 03:09:05.590 --> 03:09:05.600 align:start position:0% assessment committee direct staff to 03:09:05.600 --> 03:09:07.990 align:start position:0% assessment committee direct staff to conduct<03:09:05.840> a<03:09:06.080> comprehensive<03:09:06.720> review<03:09:07.439> and<03:09:07.680> audit 03:09:07.990 --> 03:09:08.000 align:start position:0% conduct a comprehensive review and audit 03:09:08.000 --> 03:09:08.950 align:start position:0% conduct a comprehensive review and audit and<03:09:08.160> again<03:09:08.399> I<03:09:08.560> don't<03:09:08.560> know<03:09:08.640> if<03:09:08.800> that's 03:09:08.950 --> 03:09:08.960 align:start position:0% and again I don't know if that's 03:09:08.960 --> 03:09:10.950 align:start position:0% and again I don't know if that's appropriate<03:09:09.359> here<03:09:09.600> or<03:09:09.840> if<03:09:10.000> this<03:09:10.160> is<03:09:10.319> what<03:09:10.560> that 03:09:10.950 --> 03:09:10.960 align:start position:0% appropriate here or if this is what that 03:09:10.960 --> 03:09:12.950 align:start position:0% appropriate here or if this is what that word<03:09:11.279> should<03:09:11.439> be<03:09:11.760> of<03:09:12.000> public<03:09:12.240> school<03:09:12.560> library 03:09:12.950 --> 03:09:12.960 align:start position:0% word should be of public school library 03:09:12.960 --> 03:09:14.710 align:start position:0% word should be of public school library material<03:09:13.359> selection<03:09:13.840> and<03:09:14.160> acquisition 03:09:14.710 --> 03:09:14.720 align:start position:0% material selection and acquisition 03:09:14.720 --> 03:09:17.110 align:start position:0% material selection and acquisition practices<03:09:15.200> in<03:09:15.439> Utah<03:09:16.399> including<03:09:16.800> funding 03:09:17.110 --> 03:09:17.120 align:start position:0% practices in Utah including funding 03:09:17.120 --> 03:09:19.590 align:start position:0% practices in Utah including funding sources<03:09:18.080> procurement<03:09:18.720> procedures<03:09:19.279> vendor 03:09:19.590 --> 03:09:19.600 align:start position:0% sources procurement procedures vendor 03:09:19.600 --> 03:09:21.590 align:start position:0% sources procurement procedures vendor and<03:09:19.760> publisher<03:09:20.240> relationships<03:09:21.120> librarian 03:09:21.590 --> 03:09:21.600 align:start position:0% and publisher relationships librarian 03:09:21.600 --> 03:09:23.590 align:start position:0% and publisher relationships librarian qualifications<03:09:22.240> and<03:09:22.479> training<03:09:22.880> collection 03:09:23.590 --> 03:09:23.600 align:start position:0% qualifications and training collection 03:09:23.600 --> 03:09:25.269 align:start position:0% qualifications and training collection development<03:09:24.080> standards<03:09:24.640> distribution 03:09:25.269 --> 03:09:25.279 align:start position:0% development standards distribution 03:09:25.279 --> 03:09:26.870 align:start position:0% development standards distribution influence<03:09:25.840> and<03:09:26.000> the<03:09:26.160> role<03:09:26.319> of<03:09:26.479> professional 03:09:26.870 --> 03:09:26.880 align:start position:0% influence and the role of professional 03:09:26.880 --> 03:09:28.469 align:start position:0% influence and the role of professional organizations<03:09:27.439> in<03:09:27.680> shaping<03:09:28.000> library 03:09:28.469 --> 03:09:28.479 align:start position:0% organizations in shaping library 03:09:28.479 --> 03:09:31.269 align:start position:0% organizations in shaping library policies<03:09:28.880> and<03:09:29.120> purchasing<03:09:29.680> decisions 03:09:31.269 --> 03:09:31.279 align:start position:0% policies and purchasing decisions 03:09:31.279 --> 03:09:34.550 align:start position:0% policies and purchasing decisions and<03:09:31.520> this<03:09:31.840> is<03:09:32.880> um<03:09:33.439> if<03:09:33.520> I<03:09:33.760> can<03:09:33.840> speak<03:09:34.000> to<03:09:34.160> it<03:09:34.319> real 03:09:34.550 --> 03:09:34.560 align:start position:0% and this is um if I can speak to it real 03:09:34.560 --> 03:09:35.429 align:start position:0% and this is um if I can speak to it real quick. 03:09:35.429 --> 03:09:35.439 align:start position:0% quick. 03:09:35.439 --> 03:09:36.070 align:start position:0% quick. >> Go<03:09:35.600> ahead. 03:09:36.070 --> 03:09:36.080 align:start position:0% >> Go ahead. 03:09:36.080 --> 03:09:39.429 align:start position:0% >> Go ahead. >> I<03:09:36.240> I<03:09:36.560> think<03:09:36.640> that<03:09:36.800> there<03:09:37.040> is<03:09:37.279> still<03:09:37.920> um<03:09:39.040> uh<03:09:39.200> just 03:09:39.429 --> 03:09:39.439 align:start position:0% >> I I think that there is still um uh just 03:09:39.439 --> 03:09:41.349 align:start position:0% >> I I think that there is still um uh just that's<03:09:39.840> that<03:09:40.319> there's<03:09:40.640> just<03:09:40.880> still<03:09:41.120> a<03:09:41.279> little 03:09:41.349 --> 03:09:41.359 align:start position:0% that's that there's just still a little 03:09:41.359 --> 03:09:43.990 align:start position:0% that's that there's just still a little bit<03:09:41.520> of<03:09:41.600> a<03:09:41.840> space<03:09:42.160> that<03:09:42.479> exists<03:09:43.279> that<03:09:43.600> I<03:09:43.840> think 03:09:43.990 --> 03:09:44.000 align:start position:0% bit of a space that exists that I think 03:09:44.000 --> 03:09:47.750 align:start position:0% bit of a space that exists that I think we<03:09:44.240> are<03:09:44.479> almost<03:09:45.200> at<03:09:45.600> where<03:09:45.920> we<03:09:46.080> can<03:09:46.240> fully<03:09:47.439> um 03:09:47.750 --> 03:09:47.760 align:start position:0% we are almost at where we can fully um 03:09:47.760 --> 03:09:49.990 align:start position:0% we are almost at where we can fully um understand<03:09:48.240> the<03:09:48.560> relationship<03:09:49.120> between<03:09:49.520> our 03:09:49.990 --> 03:09:50.000 align:start position:0% understand the relationship between our 03:09:50.000 --> 03:09:53.030 align:start position:0% understand the relationship between our our<03:09:50.399> school<03:09:50.720> libraries<03:09:51.600> and<03:09:52.560> you<03:09:52.720> know 03:09:53.030 --> 03:09:53.040 align:start position:0% our school libraries and you know 03:09:53.040 --> 03:09:55.110 align:start position:0% our school libraries and you know publishers<03:09:53.600> and<03:09:53.920> distribution<03:09:54.479> centers<03:09:54.880> and 03:09:55.110 --> 03:09:55.120 align:start position:0% publishers and distribution centers and 03:09:55.120 --> 03:09:58.070 align:start position:0% publishers and distribution centers and all<03:09:55.279> of<03:09:55.359> that<03:09:55.920> um<03:09:56.240> at<03:09:56.479> large<03:09:57.120> you<03:09:57.279> know<03:09:57.600> vendor 03:09:58.070 --> 03:09:58.080 align:start position:0% all of that um at large you know vendor 03:09:58.080 --> 03:09:59.910 align:start position:0% all of that um at large you know vendor procurement.<03:09:58.560> I<03:09:58.720> said<03:09:58.960> again,<03:09:59.200> it's<03:09:59.359> like<03:09:59.680> an 03:09:59.910 --> 03:09:59.920 align:start position:0% procurement. I said again, it's like an 03:09:59.920 --> 03:10:03.990 align:start position:0% procurement. I said again, it's like an order<03:10:00.160> is<03:10:00.880> is<03:10:01.359> procured,<03:10:02.240> it's<03:10:03.040> picked,<03:10:03.520> it's 03:10:03.990 --> 03:10:04.000 align:start position:0% order is is procured, it's picked, it's 03:10:04.000 --> 03:10:07.269 align:start position:0% order is is procured, it's picked, it's created,<03:10:04.720> it's<03:10:05.680> shipped,<03:10:06.319> it's<03:10:06.640> received, 03:10:07.269 --> 03:10:07.279 align:start position:0% created, it's shipped, it's received, 03:10:07.279 --> 03:10:11.349 align:start position:0% created, it's shipped, it's received, it's<03:10:07.600> inventoried.<03:10:08.640> And<03:10:09.120> um<03:10:09.359> I<03:10:09.760> think<03:10:09.920> that<03:10:11.040> I 03:10:11.349 --> 03:10:11.359 align:start position:0% it's inventoried. And um I think that I 03:10:11.359 --> 03:10:13.750 align:start position:0% it's inventoried. And um I think that I just<03:10:12.160> and<03:10:12.399> the<03:10:12.560> state<03:10:12.720> of<03:10:12.800> Utah<03:10:13.200> would<03:10:13.520> really 03:10:13.750 --> 03:10:13.760 align:start position:0% just and the state of Utah would really 03:10:13.760 --> 03:10:16.070 align:start position:0% just and the state of Utah would really love<03:10:14.479> to<03:10:14.960> have<03:10:15.120> an<03:10:15.359> understanding<03:10:15.680> of<03:10:15.840> what 03:10:16.070 --> 03:10:16.080 align:start position:0% love to have an understanding of what 03:10:16.080 --> 03:10:19.110 align:start position:0% love to have an understanding of what this<03:10:16.319> is.<03:10:17.120> Um<03:10:17.439> so<03:10:17.600> that<03:10:18.000> we<03:10:18.319> are<03:10:18.479> we<03:10:18.800> don't<03:10:18.960> have 03:10:19.110 --> 03:10:19.120 align:start position:0% this is. Um so that we are we don't have 03:10:19.120 --> 03:10:22.389 align:start position:0% this is. Um so that we are we don't have to<03:10:19.279> continue<03:10:19.600> to<03:10:19.840> be<03:10:20.000> reactive<03:10:21.200> to<03:10:22.080> an 03:10:22.389 --> 03:10:22.399 align:start position:0% to continue to be reactive to an 03:10:22.399 --> 03:10:26.870 align:start position:0% to continue to be reactive to an industry<03:10:23.760> um<03:10:23.920> that<03:10:24.240> has<03:10:24.479> full<03:10:24.800> access<03:10:25.359> to<03:10:26.720> you 03:10:26.870 --> 03:10:26.880 align:start position:0% industry um that has full access to you 03:10:26.880 --> 03:10:29.670 align:start position:0% industry um that has full access to you know<03:10:27.040> a<03:10:27.200> a<03:10:27.520> minority 03:10:29.670 --> 03:10:29.680 align:start position:0% know a a minority 03:10:29.680 --> 03:10:32.389 align:start position:0% know a a minority population<03:10:30.479> like<03:10:30.720> we<03:10:30.880> have<03:10:31.040> a<03:10:31.200> very<03:10:31.920> important 03:10:32.389 --> 03:10:32.399 align:start position:0% population like we have a very important 03:10:32.399 --> 03:10:35.590 align:start position:0% population like we have a very important stewardship<03:10:33.040> over<03:10:33.920> this<03:10:34.640> um<03:10:35.120> institution 03:10:35.590 --> 03:10:35.600 align:start position:0% stewardship over this um institution 03:10:35.600 --> 03:10:37.750 align:start position:0% stewardship over this um institution that<03:10:35.840> we<03:10:36.000> are<03:10:36.160> creating<03:10:36.560> public<03:10:36.880> education. 03:10:37.750 --> 03:10:37.760 align:start position:0% that we are creating public education. 03:10:37.760 --> 03:10:40.150 align:start position:0% that we are creating public education. And<03:10:37.920> so<03:10:38.000> I<03:10:38.240> just<03:10:38.399> thought<03:10:38.720> being<03:10:39.040> able<03:10:39.279> to<03:10:40.000> kind 03:10:40.150 --> 03:10:40.160 align:start position:0% And so I just thought being able to kind 03:10:40.160 --> 03:10:42.150 align:start position:0% And so I just thought being able to kind of<03:10:40.319> do<03:10:40.399> a<03:10:40.640> deep<03:10:40.800> dive<03:10:40.960> and<03:10:41.200> understand<03:10:41.920> what 03:10:42.150 --> 03:10:42.160 align:start position:0% of do a deep dive and understand what 03:10:42.160 --> 03:10:43.990 align:start position:0% of do a deep dive and understand what that<03:10:42.399> looks<03:10:42.560> like<03:10:43.040> and<03:10:43.279> what<03:10:43.520> I<03:10:43.680> want<03:10:43.760> to<03:10:43.920> do 03:10:43.990 --> 03:10:44.000 align:start position:0% that looks like and what I want to do 03:10:44.000 --> 03:10:45.750 align:start position:0% that looks like and what I want to do with<03:10:44.160> that<03:10:44.319> is<03:10:44.479> to<03:10:44.640> butt<03:10:44.800> it<03:10:44.960> up<03:10:45.120> against<03:10:45.600> you 03:10:45.750 --> 03:10:45.760 align:start position:0% with that is to butt it up against you 03:10:45.760 --> 03:10:48.550 align:start position:0% with that is to butt it up against you know<03:10:45.840> our<03:10:46.000> sensitive<03:10:46.560> materials<03:10:47.920> rule<03:10:48.399> and 03:10:48.550 --> 03:10:48.560 align:start position:0% know our sensitive materials rule and 03:10:48.560 --> 03:10:52.469 align:start position:0% know our sensitive materials rule and and<03:10:48.960> just<03:10:50.240> uh<03:10:50.640> see<03:10:50.880> what<03:10:51.040> we<03:10:51.200> can<03:10:51.359> see<03:10:52.000> and<03:10:52.319> we 03:10:52.469 --> 03:10:52.479 align:start position:0% and just uh see what we can see and we 03:10:52.479 --> 03:10:54.630 align:start position:0% and just uh see what we can see and we can<03:10:52.720> fully<03:10:53.040> speak<03:10:53.279> to<03:10:53.439> it.<03:10:53.680> So<03:10:53.840> again<03:10:54.160> like<03:10:54.319> I<03:10:54.560> I 03:10:54.630 --> 03:10:54.640 align:start position:0% can fully speak to it. So again like I I 03:10:54.640 --> 03:10:57.830 align:start position:0% can fully speak to it. So again like I I I<03:10:55.040> mentioned<03:10:55.359> last<03:10:55.680> meeting<03:10:55.920> that<03:10:57.120> it<03:10:57.439> seems 03:10:57.830 --> 03:10:57.840 align:start position:0% I mentioned last meeting that it seems 03:10:57.840 --> 03:11:00.230 align:start position:0% I mentioned last meeting that it seems that<03:10:58.160> it<03:10:58.479> would<03:10:58.640> be<03:10:59.200> our<03:10:59.520> librarians<03:11:00.000> that<03:11:00.160> are 03:11:00.230 --> 03:11:00.240 align:start position:0% that it would be our librarians that are 03:11:00.240 --> 03:11:02.790 align:start position:0% that it would be our librarians that are in<03:11:00.399> the<03:11:00.479> hot<03:11:00.720> seat<03:11:01.600> and<03:11:01.920> I<03:11:02.160> don't<03:11:02.399> I<03:11:02.720> don't 03:11:02.790 --> 03:11:02.800 align:start position:0% in the hot seat and I don't I don't 03:11:02.800 --> 03:11:04.790 align:start position:0% in the hot seat and I don't I don't think<03:11:02.960> any<03:11:03.200> of<03:11:03.279> us<03:11:03.520> want<03:11:03.840> our<03:11:04.080> librarians<03:11:04.640> to 03:11:04.790 --> 03:11:04.800 align:start position:0% think any of us want our librarians to 03:11:04.800 --> 03:11:09.590 align:start position:0% think any of us want our librarians to be<03:11:05.120> in<03:11:05.359> that<03:11:05.600> seat.<03:11:06.640> I<03:11:06.960> also<03:11:08.080> um<03:11:08.960> followed<03:11:09.279> the 03:11:09.590 --> 03:11:09.600 align:start position:0% be in that seat. I also um followed the 03:11:09.600 --> 03:11:11.190 align:start position:0% be in that seat. I also um followed the you<03:11:09.760> know<03:11:10.000> the<03:11:10.240> news<03:11:10.479> article<03:11:10.800> that<03:11:10.960> came<03:11:11.040> out 03:11:11.190 --> 03:11:11.200 align:start position:0% you know the news article that came out 03:11:11.200 --> 03:11:13.190 align:start position:0% you know the news article that came out that<03:11:11.359> said<03:11:11.600> oh<03:11:11.760> it's<03:11:11.920> just<03:11:12.640> you<03:11:12.800> know<03:11:12.960> it's 03:11:13.190 --> 03:11:13.200 align:start position:0% that said oh it's just you know it's 03:11:13.200 --> 03:11:14.790 align:start position:0% that said oh it's just you know it's just<03:11:13.600> parents<03:11:14.000> that<03:11:14.160> are<03:11:14.240> doing<03:11:14.399> this.<03:11:14.640> We 03:11:14.790 --> 03:11:14.800 align:start position:0% just parents that are doing this. We 03:11:14.800 --> 03:11:16.309 align:start position:0% just parents that are doing this. We have a<03:11:14.960> rule<03:11:15.120> that<03:11:15.359> parents<03:11:15.680> have<03:11:15.840> to<03:11:16.000> do<03:11:16.080> the 03:11:16.309 --> 03:11:16.319 align:start position:0% have a rule that parents have to do the 03:11:16.319 --> 03:11:18.309 align:start position:0% have a rule that parents have to do the work<03:11:17.040> but<03:11:17.279> we<03:11:17.439> also<03:11:17.760> are<03:11:18.000> trying<03:11:18.160> to 03:11:18.309 --> 03:11:18.319 align:start position:0% work but we also are trying to 03:11:18.319 --> 03:11:20.710 align:start position:0% work but we also are trying to acknowledge<03:11:19.120> that<03:11:19.359> we<03:11:19.600> have<03:11:19.760> professionals 03:11:20.710 --> 03:11:20.720 align:start position:0% acknowledge that we have professionals 03:11:20.720 --> 03:11:23.429 align:start position:0% acknowledge that we have professionals that<03:11:21.040> are<03:11:21.200> doing<03:11:21.359> their<03:11:21.600> job.<03:11:22.240> And<03:11:22.479> so<03:11:23.040> we<03:11:23.279> have 03:11:23.429 --> 03:11:23.439 align:start position:0% that are doing their job. And so we have 03:11:23.439 --> 03:11:26.710 align:start position:0% that are doing their job. And so we have a<03:11:23.600> lot<03:11:23.680> of<03:11:24.160> kind<03:11:24.399> of<03:11:24.560> reactive<03:11:25.279> and<03:11:26.560> things 03:11:26.710 --> 03:11:26.720 align:start position:0% a lot of kind of reactive and things 03:11:26.720 --> 03:11:28.389 align:start position:0% a lot of kind of reactive and things that<03:11:26.960> we<03:11:27.120> need<03:11:27.200> to<03:11:27.439> really<03:11:27.680> figure<03:11:27.920> out.<03:11:28.080> And<03:11:28.240> I 03:11:28.389 --> 03:11:28.399 align:start position:0% that we need to really figure out. And I 03:11:28.399 --> 03:11:31.910 align:start position:0% that we need to really figure out. And I just<03:11:28.560> think<03:11:28.640> that<03:11:28.880> this<03:11:29.200> would<03:11:29.680> help<03:11:30.960> us<03:11:31.680> um 03:11:31.910 --> 03:11:31.920 align:start position:0% just think that this would help us um 03:11:31.920 --> 03:11:34.230 align:start position:0% just think that this would help us um sort<03:11:32.240> out<03:11:32.399> the<03:11:32.640> complexities<03:11:33.200> of<03:11:33.359> this<03:11:33.920> and 03:11:34.230 --> 03:11:34.240 align:start position:0% sort out the complexities of this and 03:11:34.240 --> 03:11:37.110 align:start position:0% sort out the complexities of this and hopefully<03:11:34.640> simplify<03:11:35.600> where 03:11:37.110 --> 03:11:37.120 align:start position:0% hopefully simplify where 03:11:37.120 --> 03:11:39.429 align:start position:0% hopefully simplify where um<03:11:37.439> maybe<03:11:37.760> things<03:11:38.000> have<03:11:38.240> gone<03:11:38.399> wrong<03:11:38.880> and<03:11:39.120> we 03:11:39.429 --> 03:11:39.439 align:start position:0% um maybe things have gone wrong and we 03:11:39.439 --> 03:11:43.670 align:start position:0% um maybe things have gone wrong and we can<03:11:40.160> kind<03:11:40.399> of<03:11:41.680> maybe<03:11:42.000> even<03:11:42.800> um<03:11:43.120> communicate 03:11:43.670 --> 03:11:43.680 align:start position:0% can kind of maybe even um communicate 03:11:43.680 --> 03:11:47.030 align:start position:0% can kind of maybe even um communicate better<03:11:43.920> to<03:11:45.040> that 03:11:47.030 --> 03:11:47.040 align:start position:0% better to that 03:11:47.040 --> 03:11:50.790 align:start position:0% better to that um<03:11:47.279> I<03:11:47.520> don't<03:11:47.600> know<03:11:47.840> industry<03:11:48.240> at<03:11:48.479> large<03:11:49.840> um<03:11:50.080> and 03:11:50.790 --> 03:11:50.800 align:start position:0% um I don't know industry at large um and 03:11:50.800 --> 03:11:53.190 align:start position:0% um I don't know industry at large um and and<03:11:51.200> protect<03:11:51.520> that<03:11:51.840> relationship<03:11:52.319> we<03:11:52.640> have 03:11:53.190 --> 03:11:53.200 align:start position:0% and protect that relationship we have 03:11:53.200 --> 03:11:55.269 align:start position:0% and protect that relationship we have with<03:11:53.760> being<03:11:54.000> stewards<03:11:54.399> over<03:11:54.720> people's 03:11:55.269 --> 03:11:55.279 align:start position:0% with being stewards over people's 03:11:55.279 --> 03:11:57.990 align:start position:0% with being stewards over people's children<03:11:56.640> um<03:11:56.800> offering<03:11:57.200> the<03:11:57.359> best<03:11:57.520> that<03:11:57.760> we 03:11:57.990 --> 03:11:58.000 align:start position:0% children um offering the best that we 03:11:58.000 --> 03:12:01.190 align:start position:0% children um offering the best that we can<03:11:58.640> and<03:11:59.120> encouraging<03:12:00.080> an<03:12:00.399> industry<03:12:00.800> to<03:12:01.040> be 03:12:01.190 --> 03:12:01.200 align:start position:0% can and encouraging an industry to be 03:12:01.200 --> 03:12:04.230 align:start position:0% can and encouraging an industry to be aware<03:12:01.600> that<03:12:02.560> um<03:12:02.800> it's<03:12:03.120> not<03:12:03.520> it's<03:12:03.760> not<03:12:03.920> free 03:12:04.230 --> 03:12:04.240 align:start position:0% aware that um it's not it's not free 03:12:04.240 --> 03:12:06.230 align:start position:0% aware that um it's not it's not free reign<03:12:04.479> anymore<03:12:05.200> but<03:12:05.439> also<03:12:05.680> do<03:12:05.840> in<03:12:06.000> a 03:12:06.230 --> 03:12:06.240 align:start position:0% reign anymore but also do in a 03:12:06.240 --> 03:12:09.750 align:start position:0% reign anymore but also do in a thoughtful<03:12:06.640> and<03:12:07.200> educated<03:12:07.760> way.<03:12:09.200> So,<03:12:09.520> just 03:12:09.750 --> 03:12:09.760 align:start position:0% thoughtful and educated way. So, just 03:12:09.760 --> 03:12:12.309 align:start position:0% thoughtful and educated way. So, just one<03:12:10.000> clarification.<03:12:11.200> Okay.<03:12:11.600> I<03:12:11.840> agree.<03:12:12.240> I 03:12:12.309 --> 03:12:12.319 align:start position:0% one clarification. Okay. I agree. I 03:12:12.319 --> 03:12:14.469 align:start position:0% one clarification. Okay. I agree. I agree<03:12:12.560> with<03:12:12.720> this.<03:12:13.680> There's<03:12:14.000> not<03:12:14.160> going<03:12:14.240> to<03:12:14.319> be 03:12:14.469 --> 03:12:14.479 align:start position:0% agree with this. There's not going to be 03:12:14.479 --> 03:12:16.469 align:start position:0% agree with this. There's not going to be time<03:12:14.640> to<03:12:14.800> get<03:12:14.880> this<03:12:15.120> ready<03:12:15.279> for<03:12:15.439> June. 03:12:16.469 --> 03:12:16.479 align:start position:0% time to get this ready for June. 03:12:16.479 --> 03:12:17.349 align:start position:0% time to get this ready for June. >> No,<03:12:16.720> no,<03:12:16.880> no,<03:12:17.040> no,<03:12:17.200> no. 03:12:17.349 --> 03:12:17.359 align:start position:0% >> No, no, no, no, no. 03:12:17.359 --> 03:12:18.790 align:start position:0% >> No, no, no, no, no. >> Okay.<03:12:17.600> Okay.<03:12:17.840> I<03:12:18.000> just<03:12:18.160> wanted<03:12:18.319> to<03:12:18.399> make<03:12:18.479> sure<03:12:18.640> a 03:12:18.790 --> 03:12:18.800 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. I just wanted to make sure a 03:12:18.800 --> 03:12:20.710 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. I just wanted to make sure a backup<03:12:19.120> is<03:12:19.279> due<03:12:19.520> next<03:12:19.760> week<03:12:19.920> and<03:12:20.160> I<03:12:20.319> can<03:12:20.479> I'm 03:12:20.710 --> 03:12:20.720 align:start position:0% backup is due next week and I can I'm 03:12:20.720 --> 03:12:23.110 align:start position:0% backup is due next week and I can I'm not<03:12:20.880> sure<03:12:20.960> if<03:12:21.840> is<03:12:22.000> going<03:12:22.160> into<03:12:22.399> panic<03:12:22.720> mode<03:12:22.960> or 03:12:23.110 --> 03:12:23.120 align:start position:0% not sure if is going into panic mode or 03:12:23.120 --> 03:12:26.070 align:start position:0% not sure if is going into panic mode or not<03:12:23.279> because<03:12:23.439> I<03:12:23.680> am<03:12:23.840> a<03:12:24.000> little<03:12:24.160> bit<03:12:24.319> going 03:12:26.070 --> 03:12:26.080 align:start position:0% not because I am a little bit going 03:12:26.080 --> 03:12:28.309 align:start position:0% not because I am a little bit going >> okay<03:12:26.160> if<03:12:26.319> we<03:12:26.479> go<03:12:26.640> for<03:12:26.880> August 03:12:28.309 --> 03:12:28.319 align:start position:0% >> okay if we go for August 03:12:28.319 --> 03:12:29.590 align:start position:0% >> okay if we go for August >> on<03:12:28.720> this<03:12:29.040> information. 03:12:29.590 --> 03:12:29.600 align:start position:0% >> on this information. 03:12:29.600 --> 03:12:32.630 align:start position:0% >> on this information. >> I<03:12:29.840> I<03:12:30.080> think<03:12:30.240> we're<03:12:30.479> flexible<03:12:31.120> like<03:12:31.920> and<03:12:32.479> you 03:12:32.630 --> 03:12:32.640 align:start position:0% >> I I think we're flexible like and you 03:12:32.640 --> 03:12:34.309 align:start position:0% >> I I think we're flexible like and you know, 03:12:34.309 --> 03:12:34.319 align:start position:0% know, 03:12:34.319 --> 03:12:36.150 align:start position:0% know, >> how<03:12:34.479> about<03:12:34.720> some<03:12:34.960> feedback? 03:12:36.150 --> 03:12:36.160 align:start position:0% >> how about some feedback? 03:12:36.160 --> 03:12:38.710 align:start position:0% >> how about some feedback? >> Okay.<03:12:36.880> The<03:12:37.200> the<03:12:37.520> other<03:12:37.680> thing<03:12:37.840> is<03:12:38.160> I<03:12:38.319> it<03:12:38.560> might 03:12:38.710 --> 03:12:38.720 align:start position:0% >> Okay. The the other thing is I it might 03:12:38.720 --> 03:12:40.389 align:start position:0% >> Okay. The the other thing is I it might fall<03:12:38.960> under<03:12:39.120> an<03:12:39.359> audit.<03:12:39.680> Again,<03:12:40.000> I<03:12:40.240> don't<03:12:40.319> know 03:12:40.389 --> 03:12:40.399 align:start position:0% fall under an audit. Again, I don't know 03:12:40.399 --> 03:12:42.550 align:start position:0% fall under an audit. Again, I don't know if<03:12:40.560> if<03:12:40.880> this<03:12:41.120> is<03:12:41.200> the<03:12:41.359> right<03:12:41.600> space,<03:12:41.920> but<03:12:42.160> I<03:12:42.240> I 03:12:42.550 --> 03:12:42.560 align:start position:0% if if this is the right space, but I I 03:12:42.560 --> 03:12:44.309 align:start position:0% if if this is the right space, but I I am<03:12:42.720> looking<03:12:42.960> for<03:12:43.200> a<03:12:43.439> very<03:12:43.760> thoughtful, 03:12:44.309 --> 03:12:44.319 align:start position:0% am looking for a very thoughtful, 03:12:44.319 --> 03:12:47.670 align:start position:0% am looking for a very thoughtful, thorough<03:12:45.359> kind<03:12:45.600> of<03:12:46.880> understanding<03:12:47.439> and 03:12:47.670 --> 03:12:47.680 align:start position:0% thorough kind of understanding and 03:12:47.680 --> 03:12:50.870 align:start position:0% thorough kind of understanding and investigation<03:12:48.160> into<03:12:48.720> those<03:12:49.040> relationships. 03:12:50.870 --> 03:12:50.880 align:start position:0% investigation into those relationships. 03:12:50.880 --> 03:12:54.950 align:start position:0% investigation into those relationships. >> Okay. 03:12:54.950 --> 03:12:54.960 align:start position:0% 03:12:54.960 --> 03:12:58.870 align:start position:0% Okay.<03:12:56.000> What<03:12:57.120> uh<03:12:57.760> any<03:12:58.000> other<03:12:58.319> comments<03:12:58.640> on 03:12:58.870 --> 03:12:58.880 align:start position:0% Okay. What uh any other comments on 03:12:58.880 --> 03:13:01.510 align:start position:0% Okay. What uh any other comments on that?<03:12:59.120> If<03:12:59.279> not,<03:12:59.520> we<03:12:59.680> will<03:12:59.920> take<03:13:00.080> a<03:13:01.279> um 03:13:01.510 --> 03:13:01.520 align:start position:0% that? If not, we will take a um 03:13:01.520 --> 03:13:04.389 align:start position:0% that? If not, we will take a um >> Do<03:13:01.600> we<03:13:01.920> do<03:13:02.080> we<03:13:02.240> need<03:13:02.319> to<03:13:02.479> put<03:13:02.560> a<03:13:02.720> a<03:13:03.040> month<03:13:03.200> on<03:13:03.439> it? 03:13:04.389 --> 03:13:04.399 align:start position:0% >> Do we do we need to put a a month on it? 03:13:04.399 --> 03:13:06.309 align:start position:0% >> Do we do we need to put a a month on it? >> I<03:13:04.640> don't<03:13:04.880> I<03:13:05.200> don't<03:13:05.359> know.<03:13:05.760> I'm<03:13:06.080> kind<03:13:06.240> of 03:13:06.309 --> 03:13:06.319 align:start position:0% >> I don't I don't know. I'm kind of 03:13:06.319 --> 03:13:08.309 align:start position:0% >> I don't I don't know. I'm kind of thinking<03:13:06.640> through<03:13:06.880> this<03:13:07.120> a<03:13:07.359> little<03:13:07.439> bit. 03:13:08.309 --> 03:13:08.319 align:start position:0% thinking through this a little bit. 03:13:08.319 --> 03:13:10.150 align:start position:0% thinking through this a little bit. >> I<03:13:08.560> need<03:13:08.640> it<03:13:08.880> to<03:13:09.040> be<03:13:09.200> done<03:13:09.359> before<03:13:09.680> December. 03:13:10.150 --> 03:13:10.160 align:start position:0% >> I need it to be done before December. 03:13:10.160 --> 03:13:11.750 align:start position:0% >> I need it to be done before December. >> I<03:13:10.240> know.<03:13:10.399> I<03:13:10.560> know.<03:13:10.800> That's<03:13:11.040> That's<03:13:11.359> why<03:13:11.520> I'm 03:13:11.750 --> 03:13:11.760 align:start position:0% >> I know. I know. That's That's why I'm 03:13:11.760 --> 03:13:14.630 align:start position:0% >> I know. I know. That's That's why I'm like,<03:13:12.240> um<03:13:13.200> I<03:13:13.439> I<03:13:13.680> don't<03:13:13.920> even<03:13:14.160> see<03:13:14.319> how<03:13:14.479> this 03:13:14.630 --> 03:13:14.640 align:start position:0% like, um I I don't even see how this 03:13:14.640 --> 03:13:16.710 align:start position:0% like, um I I don't even see how this could<03:13:14.800> be<03:13:14.960> done<03:13:15.040> by<03:13:15.279> August<03:13:15.920> because<03:13:16.240> you're<03:13:16.479> I 03:13:16.710 --> 03:13:16.720 align:start position:0% could be done by August because you're I 03:13:16.720 --> 03:13:18.710 align:start position:0% could be done by August because you're I mean<03:13:16.880> I<03:13:17.120> know<03:13:17.279> Davis<03:13:17.760> School<03:13:17.920> District<03:13:18.240> is<03:13:18.479> out 03:13:18.710 --> 03:13:18.720 align:start position:0% mean I know Davis School District is out 03:13:18.720 --> 03:13:20.389 align:start position:0% mean I know Davis School District is out on<03:13:18.880> Friday.<03:13:19.439> I<03:13:19.600> don't<03:13:19.760> know<03:13:19.840> about<03:13:20.080> other 03:13:20.389 --> 03:13:20.399 align:start position:0% on Friday. I don't know about other 03:13:20.399 --> 03:13:21.670 align:start position:0% on Friday. I don't know about other districts.<03:13:20.880> But<03:13:21.040> now<03:13:21.200> you're<03:13:21.359> looking<03:13:21.520> at 03:13:21.670 --> 03:13:21.680 align:start position:0% districts. But now you're looking at 03:13:21.680 --> 03:13:23.510 align:start position:0% districts. But now you're looking at librarian<03:13:22.319> qualifications.<03:13:23.040> So<03:13:23.279> you're 03:13:23.510 --> 03:13:23.520 align:start position:0% librarian qualifications. So you're 03:13:23.520 --> 03:13:26.870 align:start position:0% librarian qualifications. So you're looking<03:13:23.680> at<03:13:25.040> I<03:13:25.279> have<03:13:25.439> what<03:13:25.760> 92<03:13:26.240> schools<03:13:26.479> in<03:13:26.720> my 03:13:26.870 --> 03:13:26.880 align:start position:0% looking at I have what 92 schools in my 03:13:26.880 --> 03:13:29.590 align:start position:0% looking at I have what 92 schools in my district<03:13:27.359> in<03:13:27.520> in<03:13:27.840> Davis<03:13:28.319> alone.<03:13:29.120> What<03:13:29.279> are<03:13:29.439> the 03:13:29.590 --> 03:13:29.600 align:start position:0% district in in Davis alone. What are the 03:13:29.600 --> 03:13:30.950 align:start position:0% district in in Davis alone. What are the library<03:13:29.920> qualifications<03:13:30.479> for<03:13:30.720> each<03:13:30.800> of 03:13:30.950 --> 03:13:30.960 align:start position:0% library qualifications for each of 03:13:30.960 --> 03:13:32.550 align:start position:0% library qualifications for each of those?<03:13:31.120> They're<03:13:31.359> going<03:13:31.520> to<03:13:31.760> having<03:13:32.080> to<03:13:32.239> do<03:13:32.399> a 03:13:32.550 --> 03:13:32.560 align:start position:0% those? They're going to having to do a 03:13:32.560 --> 03:13:36.229 align:start position:0% those? They're going to having to do a survey<03:13:32.960> into<03:13:33.359> every<03:13:34.000> school<03:13:34.399> in<03:13:34.720> the<03:13:35.680> and<03:13:35.840> and 03:13:36.229 --> 03:13:36.239 align:start position:0% survey into every school in the and and 03:13:36.239 --> 03:13:38.389 align:start position:0% survey into every school in the and and half<03:13:36.479> of<03:13:36.560> them<03:13:36.800> won't<03:13:37.040> be<03:13:37.439> will<03:13:37.760> have,<03:13:38.239> you 03:13:38.389 --> 03:13:38.399 align:start position:0% half of them won't be will have, you 03:13:38.399 --> 03:13:40.550 align:start position:0% half of them won't be will have, you know,<03:13:38.960> halftime<03:13:39.439> secretaries<03:13:40.000> for<03:13:40.239> the<03:13:40.399> next 03:13:40.550 --> 03:13:40.560 align:start position:0% know, halftime secretaries for the next 03:13:40.560 --> 03:13:43.510 align:start position:0% know, halftime secretaries for the next three<03:13:40.800> months.<03:13:41.520> Um,<03:13:41.840> I<03:13:42.000> don't<03:13:42.160> think 03:13:43.510 --> 03:13:43.520 align:start position:0% three months. Um, I don't think 03:13:43.520 --> 03:13:45.510 align:start position:0% three months. Um, I don't think >> Do<03:13:43.680> you<03:13:43.840> think<03:13:44.319> Deina<03:13:44.800> could<03:13:44.960> bring<03:13:45.120> us<03:13:45.279> back 03:13:45.510 --> 03:13:45.520 align:start position:0% >> Do you think Deina could bring us back 03:13:45.520 --> 03:13:47.910 align:start position:0% >> Do you think Deina could bring us back maybe<03:13:45.680> a<03:13:45.920> timeline<03:13:46.720> of<03:13:46.960> what<03:13:47.200> she<03:13:47.439> thinks<03:13:47.600> this 03:13:47.910 --> 03:13:47.920 align:start position:0% maybe a timeline of what she thinks this 03:13:47.920 --> 03:13:50.070 align:start position:0% maybe a timeline of what she thinks this would<03:13:48.080> take<03:13:48.319> for<03:13:48.560> next<03:13:48.880> month<03:13:49.120> and<03:13:49.359> maybe 03:13:50.070 --> 03:13:50.080 align:start position:0% would take for next month and maybe 03:13:50.080 --> 03:13:51.670 align:start position:0% would take for next month and maybe start<03:13:50.399> if<03:13:50.560> there's<03:13:50.800> pieces<03:13:51.120> that<03:13:51.359> could<03:13:51.520> be 03:13:51.670 --> 03:13:51.680 align:start position:0% start if there's pieces that could be 03:13:51.680 --> 03:13:53.269 align:start position:0% start if there's pieces that could be done? 03:13:53.269 --> 03:13:53.279 align:start position:0% done? 03:13:53.279 --> 03:13:55.190 align:start position:0% done? Does<03:13:53.439> that<03:13:53.680> sound<03:13:53.840> like<03:13:54.000> a<03:13:54.319> a<03:13:54.720> timeline<03:13:55.040> of 03:13:55.190 --> 03:13:55.200 align:start position:0% Does that sound like a a timeline of 03:13:55.200 --> 03:13:56.950 align:start position:0% Does that sound like a a timeline of what<03:13:55.359> this<03:13:55.600> might<03:13:55.760> look<03:13:55.920> like<03:13:56.160> if<03:13:56.319> we<03:13:56.479> were<03:13:56.640> to 03:13:56.950 --> 03:13:56.960 align:start position:0% what this might look like if we were to 03:13:56.960 --> 03:13:59.190 align:start position:0% what this might look like if we were to do<03:13:57.200> more<03:13:57.439> deep<03:13:57.680> dive?<03:13:58.479> that<03:13:58.640> that<03:13:59.040> would 03:13:59.190 --> 03:13:59.200 align:start position:0% do more deep dive? that that would 03:13:59.200 --> 03:14:01.190 align:start position:0% do more deep dive? that that would probably<03:13:59.680> be<03:13:59.760> better<03:14:00.319> just<03:14:00.560> because<03:14:00.880> I'm 03:14:01.190 --> 03:14:01.200 align:start position:0% probably be better just because I'm 03:14:01.200 --> 03:14:02.870 align:start position:0% probably be better just because I'm looking<03:14:01.359> at<03:14:01.600> that<03:14:01.840> just<03:14:02.080> that<03:14:02.319> single<03:14:02.640> one 03:14:02.870 --> 03:14:02.880 align:start position:0% looking at that just that single one 03:14:02.880 --> 03:14:05.510 align:start position:0% looking at that just that single one alone<03:14:03.520> that<03:14:03.840> library<03:14:04.239> qualification<03:14:04.960> is<03:14:05.120> is 03:14:05.510 --> 03:14:05.520 align:start position:0% alone that library qualification is is 03:14:05.520 --> 03:14:08.389 align:start position:0% alone that library qualification is is going<03:14:05.680> to<03:14:05.840> be<03:14:06.160> a<03:14:06.640> a<03:14:06.880> heavy<03:14:07.200> lift. 03:14:08.389 --> 03:14:08.399 align:start position:0% going to be a a heavy lift. 03:14:08.399 --> 03:14:10.710 align:start position:0% going to be a a heavy lift. >> Um 03:14:10.710 --> 03:14:10.720 align:start position:0% >> Um 03:14:10.720 --> 03:14:14.790 align:start position:0% >> Um >> okay<03:14:11.359> that<03:14:11.680> can<03:14:11.920> we<03:14:12.080> put<03:14:12.800> um<03:14:14.080> maybe<03:14:14.399> just<03:14:14.640> at 03:14:14.790 --> 03:14:14.800 align:start position:0% >> okay that can we put um maybe just at 03:14:14.800 --> 03:14:17.190 align:start position:0% >> okay that can we put um maybe just at the<03:14:14.960> end<03:14:15.040> of<03:14:15.120> that<03:14:15.760> um<03:14:16.239> staff<03:14:16.640> will<03:14:17.040> or 03:14:17.190 --> 03:14:17.200 align:start position:0% the end of that um staff will or 03:14:17.200 --> 03:14:18.710 align:start position:0% the end of that um staff will or somewhere<03:14:17.520> there<03:14:17.760> staff<03:14:18.000> will<03:14:18.239> bring<03:14:18.479> up<03:14:18.560> a 03:14:18.710 --> 03:14:18.720 align:start position:0% somewhere there staff will bring up a 03:14:18.720 --> 03:14:20.710 align:start position:0% somewhere there staff will bring up a timeline<03:14:19.520> next<03:14:19.840> month<03:14:20.080> as<03:14:20.239> to<03:14:20.399> what<03:14:20.560> they 03:14:20.710 --> 03:14:20.720 align:start position:0% timeline next month as to what they 03:14:20.720 --> 03:14:23.830 align:start position:0% timeline next month as to what they would<03:14:20.880> think<03:14:21.040> this<03:14:21.279> would<03:14:21.520> take. 03:14:23.830 --> 03:14:23.840 align:start position:0% would think this would take. 03:14:23.840 --> 03:14:25.910 align:start position:0% would think this would take. Does<03:14:24.080> that<03:14:24.319> sound 03:14:25.910 --> 03:14:25.920 align:start position:0% Does that sound 03:14:25.920 --> 03:14:27.429 align:start position:0% Does that sound Do<03:14:26.080> you<03:14:26.239> think<03:14:26.319> that's<03:14:26.560> doable<03:14:26.880> by<03:14:27.120> next<03:14:27.279> week 03:14:27.429 --> 03:14:27.439 align:start position:0% Do you think that's doable by next week 03:14:27.439 --> 03:14:31.590 align:start position:0% Do you think that's doable by next week to<03:14:27.600> get<03:14:27.680> a<03:14:27.920> rough<03:14:28.080> t<03:14:28.479> timeline<03:14:28.960> for<03:14:29.120> us? 03:14:31.590 --> 03:14:31.600 align:start position:0% to get a rough t timeline for us? 03:14:31.600 --> 03:14:34.309 align:start position:0% to get a rough t timeline for us? I<03:14:31.840> Okay,<03:14:32.080> I<03:14:32.160> see<03:14:32.239> a<03:14:32.479> thumbs<03:14:32.640> up.<03:14:32.960> Okay,<03:14:34.080> board 03:14:34.309 --> 03:14:34.319 align:start position:0% I Okay, I see a thumbs up. Okay, board 03:14:34.319 --> 03:14:36.469 align:start position:0% I Okay, I see a thumbs up. Okay, board member<03:14:34.560> Green.<03:14:34.960> Does<03:14:35.120> that<03:14:35.279> work<03:14:35.439> for<03:14:35.600> you? 03:14:36.469 --> 03:14:36.479 align:start position:0% member Green. Does that work for you? 03:14:36.479 --> 03:14:37.750 align:start position:0% member Green. Does that work for you? >> Yes. 03:14:37.750 --> 03:14:37.760 align:start position:0% >> Yes. 03:14:37.760 --> 03:14:39.910 align:start position:0% >> Yes. >> Okay.<03:14:38.560> Okay.<03:14:38.880> So,<03:14:39.040> let<03:14:39.200> me<03:14:39.359> just<03:14:39.520> read<03:14:39.760> this 03:14:39.910 --> 03:14:39.920 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. So, let me just read this 03:14:39.920 --> 03:14:41.670 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay. So, let me just read this out<03:14:40.080> real<03:14:40.319> quick.<03:14:40.640> We're<03:14:40.960> trying<03:14:41.200> to<03:14:41.359> hurry<03:14:41.520> so 03:14:41.670 --> 03:14:41.680 align:start position:0% out real quick. We're trying to hurry so 03:14:41.680 --> 03:14:44.229 align:start position:0% out real quick. We're trying to hurry so we<03:14:41.760> can<03:14:41.920> get<03:14:42.399> Sarah<03:14:42.640> to<03:14:42.880> her<03:14:43.120> meeting. 03:14:44.229 --> 03:14:44.239 align:start position:0% we can get Sarah to her meeting. 03:14:44.239 --> 03:14:45.750 align:start position:0% we can get Sarah to her meeting. uh<03:14:44.479> moved<03:14:44.720> that<03:14:44.960> the<03:14:45.040> standards<03:14:45.359> assessment 03:14:45.750 --> 03:14:45.760 align:start position:0% uh moved that the standards assessment 03:14:45.760 --> 03:14:47.429 align:start position:0% uh moved that the standards assessment committee<03:14:46.080> direct<03:14:46.399> staff<03:14:46.720> to<03:14:46.880> bring<03:14:47.040> back<03:14:47.279> a 03:14:47.429 --> 03:14:47.439 align:start position:0% committee direct staff to bring back a 03:14:47.439 --> 03:14:49.110 align:start position:0% committee direct staff to bring back a timeline<03:14:47.840> for<03:14:48.000> conducting<03:14:48.399> a<03:14:48.560> comprehensive 03:14:49.110 --> 03:14:49.120 align:start position:0% timeline for conducting a comprehensive 03:14:49.120 --> 03:14:50.950 align:start position:0% timeline for conducting a comprehensive review<03:14:49.279> and<03:14:49.520> audit<03:14:49.760> of<03:14:49.920> public<03:14:50.160> school 03:14:50.950 --> 03:14:50.960 align:start position:0% review and audit of public school 03:14:50.960 --> 03:14:53.190 align:start position:0% review and audit of public school library<03:14:51.439> materials<03:14:52.399> selection<03:14:52.880> and 03:14:53.190 --> 03:14:53.200 align:start position:0% library materials selection and 03:14:53.200 --> 03:14:55.750 align:start position:0% library materials selection and acquisition<03:14:53.760> practices<03:14:54.160> in<03:14:54.399> Utah,<03:14:55.279> including 03:14:55.750 --> 03:14:55.760 align:start position:0% acquisition practices in Utah, including 03:14:55.760 --> 03:14:58.070 align:start position:0% acquisition practices in Utah, including funding<03:14:56.160> sources,<03:14:56.560> procurement<03:14:57.120> procedures, 03:14:58.070 --> 03:14:58.080 align:start position:0% funding sources, procurement procedures, 03:14:58.080 --> 03:15:01.190 align:start position:0% funding sources, procurement procedures, vendor<03:14:58.880> and<03:14:59.200> publisher<03:14:59.680> relationships,<03:15:00.960> uh 03:15:01.190 --> 03:15:01.200 align:start position:0% vendor and publisher relationships, uh 03:15:01.200 --> 03:15:03.110 align:start position:0% vendor and publisher relationships, uh librarian<03:15:01.760> qualifications<03:15:02.399> and<03:15:02.720> training, 03:15:03.110 --> 03:15:03.120 align:start position:0% librarian qualifications and training, 03:15:03.120 --> 03:15:05.510 align:start position:0% librarian qualifications and training, collection<03:15:03.680> development,<03:15:04.800> standards, 03:15:05.510 --> 03:15:05.520 align:start position:0% collection development, standards, 03:15:05.520 --> 03:15:07.590 align:start position:0% collection development, standards, distributor<03:15:06.160> influence,<03:15:06.640> and<03:15:06.800> a<03:15:07.040> and<03:15:07.359> the 03:15:07.590 --> 03:15:07.600 align:start position:0% distributor influence, and a and the 03:15:07.600 --> 03:15:09.429 align:start position:0% distributor influence, and a and the role<03:15:07.840> of<03:15:08.080> professional<03:15:08.560> organizations<03:15:09.200> in 03:15:09.429 --> 03:15:09.439 align:start position:0% role of professional organizations in 03:15:09.439 --> 03:15:11.910 align:start position:0% role of professional organizations in shaping<03:15:10.239> library<03:15:10.640> policies<03:15:11.120> and<03:15:11.359> purchasing 03:15:11.910 --> 03:15:11.920 align:start position:0% shaping library policies and purchasing 03:15:11.920 --> 03:15:13.429 align:start position:0% shaping library policies and purchasing decisions. 03:15:13.429 --> 03:15:13.439 align:start position:0% decisions. 03:15:13.439 --> 03:15:15.750 align:start position:0% decisions. All<03:15:13.680> those<03:15:13.920> in<03:15:14.080> favor? 03:15:15.750 --> 03:15:15.760 align:start position:0% All those in favor? 03:15:15.760 --> 03:15:17.190 align:start position:0% All those in favor? I 03:15:17.190 --> 03:15:17.200 align:start position:0% I 03:15:17.200 --> 03:15:19.269 align:start position:0% I >> I 03:15:19.269 --> 03:15:19.279 align:start position:0% >> I 03:15:19.279 --> 03:15:20.389 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 03:15:20.389 --> 03:15:20.399 align:start position:0% >> I 03:15:20.399 --> 03:15:23.190 align:start position:0% >> I >> Okay,<03:15:20.800> that<03:15:21.120> passes<03:15:21.520> unanimously. 03:15:23.190 --> 03:15:23.200 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that passes unanimously. 03:15:23.200 --> 03:15:23.750 align:start position:0% >> Okay, that passes unanimously. And 03:15:23.750 --> 03:15:23.760 align:start position:0% And 03:15:23.760 --> 03:15:24.790 align:start position:0% And >> member<03:15:24.399> Earl, 03:15:24.790 --> 03:15:24.800 align:start position:0% >> member Earl, 03:15:24.800 --> 03:15:25.830 align:start position:0% >> member Earl, >> I<03:15:25.040> have<03:15:25.120> a<03:15:25.279> motion. 03:15:25.830 --> 03:15:25.840 align:start position:0% >> I have a motion. 03:15:25.840 --> 03:15:26.389 align:start position:0% >> I have a motion. >> Okay. 03:15:26.389 --> 03:15:26.399 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 03:15:26.399 --> 03:15:28.950 align:start position:0% >> Okay. >> All<03:15:26.479> right.<03:15:26.640> I<03:15:26.880> forgot.<03:15:27.439> Sorry.<03:15:28.000> Um<03:15:28.479> Lei,<03:15:28.800> I 03:15:28.950 --> 03:15:28.960 align:start position:0% >> All right. I forgot. Sorry. Um Lei, I 03:15:28.960 --> 03:15:31.750 align:start position:0% >> All right. I forgot. Sorry. Um Lei, I sent<03:15:29.120> it<03:15:29.279> to<03:15:29.359> you<03:15:29.520> over<03:15:29.840> chat<03:15:30.720> or<03:15:30.960> in<03:15:31.279> Teams<03:15:31.600> or 03:15:31.750 --> 03:15:31.760 align:start position:0% sent it to you over chat or in Teams or 03:15:31.760 --> 03:15:32.950 align:start position:0% sent it to you over chat or in Teams or whatever. 03:15:32.950 --> 03:15:32.960 align:start position:0% whatever. 03:15:32.960 --> 03:15:35.269 align:start position:0% whatever. >> It's<03:15:33.200> just<03:15:33.359> to<03:15:33.600> direct<03:15:34.000> staff 03:15:35.269 --> 03:15:35.279 align:start position:0% >> It's just to direct staff 03:15:35.279 --> 03:15:36.870 align:start position:0% >> It's just to direct staff >> um<03:15:35.520> going<03:15:35.760> back<03:15:35.920> to<03:15:36.080> what<03:15:36.239> we<03:15:36.479> started<03:15:36.720> this 03:15:36.870 --> 03:15:36.880 align:start position:0% >> um going back to what we started this 03:15:36.880 --> 03:15:39.990 align:start position:0% >> um going back to what we started this meeting<03:15:37.120> on.<03:15:37.439> It<03:15:37.680> was<03:15:37.840> just<03:15:38.000> to<03:15:38.239> direct<03:15:38.640> staff 03:15:39.990 --> 03:15:40.000 align:start position:0% meeting on. It was just to direct staff 03:15:40.000 --> 03:15:41.990 align:start position:0% meeting on. It was just to direct staff to<03:15:40.399> take<03:15:40.720> all<03:15:40.880> the<03:15:41.040> ideas<03:15:41.359> from<03:15:41.600> today's 03:15:41.990 --> 03:15:42.000 align:start position:0% to take all the ideas from today's 03:15:42.000 --> 03:15:44.389 align:start position:0% to take all the ideas from today's meeting<03:15:42.399> and<03:15:42.720> create<03:15:42.960> a<03:15:43.200> draft<03:15:43.439> of<03:15:43.680> like<03:15:44.160> what 03:15:44.389 --> 03:15:44.399 align:start position:0% meeting and create a draft of like what 03:15:44.399 --> 03:15:46.469 align:start position:0% meeting and create a draft of like what it<03:15:44.640> would<03:15:44.800> look<03:15:45.040> like<03:15:45.520> document<03:15:45.920> that<03:15:46.160> shows 03:15:46.469 --> 03:15:46.479 align:start position:0% it would look like document that shows 03:15:46.479 --> 03:15:49.190 align:start position:0% it would look like document that shows from<03:15:46.640> start<03:15:46.880> to<03:15:47.120> finish<03:15:48.239> um<03:15:48.319> the<03:15:48.640> process 03:15:49.190 --> 03:15:49.200 align:start position:0% from start to finish um the process 03:15:49.200 --> 03:15:51.110 align:start position:0% from start to finish um the process adding<03:15:49.439> in<03:15:49.680> the<03:15:49.840> ideas<03:15:50.160> of<03:15:50.319> the<03:15:50.560> seven<03:15:50.720> to<03:15:50.960> 10 03:15:51.110 --> 03:15:51.120 align:start position:0% adding in the ideas of the seven to 10 03:15:51.120 --> 03:15:54.070 align:start position:0% adding in the ideas of the seven to 10 year<03:15:51.359> review<03:15:51.760> the<03:15:52.000> subcommittee 03:15:54.070 --> 03:15:54.080 align:start position:0% year review the subcommittee 03:15:54.080 --> 03:15:54.950 align:start position:0% year review the subcommittee instead<03:15:54.399> of<03:15:54.479> the<03:15:54.560> initial 03:15:54.950 --> 03:15:54.960 align:start position:0% instead of the initial 03:15:54.960 --> 03:15:56.389 align:start position:0% instead of the initial >> you're<03:15:55.120> talking<03:15:55.359> not<03:15:55.520> about<03:15:55.680> the<03:15:55.920> library 03:15:56.389 --> 03:15:56.399 align:start position:0% >> you're talking not about the library 03:15:56.399 --> 03:15:57.910 align:start position:0% >> you're talking not about the library piece<03:15:56.800> you're<03:15:57.040> talking<03:15:57.200> about 03:15:57.910 --> 03:15:57.920 align:start position:0% piece you're talking about 03:15:57.920 --> 03:15:59.269 align:start position:0% piece you're talking about >> standards<03:15:58.399> yes<03:15:58.640> sorry<03:15:58.880> we<03:15:59.040> were<03:15:59.120> going<03:15:59.200> to 03:15:59.269 --> 03:15:59.279 align:start position:0% >> standards yes sorry we were going to 03:15:59.279 --> 03:16:00.309 align:start position:0% >> standards yes sorry we were going to come<03:15:59.359> back<03:15:59.439> to<03:15:59.520> it<03:15:59.680> at<03:15:59.760> the<03:15:59.840> end<03:15:59.920> so<03:16:00.080> I<03:16:00.239> was 03:16:00.309 --> 03:16:00.319 align:start position:0% come back to it at the end so I was 03:16:00.319 --> 03:16:01.830 align:start position:0% come back to it at the end so I was waiting<03:16:00.479> and<03:16:00.640> then<03:16:00.800> I<03:16:00.880> realized<03:16:01.359> we<03:16:01.520> are<03:16:01.680> now 03:16:01.830 --> 03:16:01.840 align:start position:0% waiting and then I realized we are now 03:16:01.840 --> 03:16:03.110 align:start position:0% waiting and then I realized we are now here<03:16:02.080> yeah 03:16:03.110 --> 03:16:03.120 align:start position:0% here yeah 03:16:03.120 --> 03:16:05.190 align:start position:0% here yeah >> um<03:16:03.200> but<03:16:03.439> just<03:16:03.680> like<03:16:03.840> I<03:16:04.160> think<03:16:04.640> member<03:16:04.880> green 03:16:05.190 --> 03:16:05.200 align:start position:0% >> um but just like I think member green 03:16:05.200 --> 03:16:06.469 align:start position:0% >> um but just like I think member green had<03:16:05.359> some<03:16:05.520> questions<03:16:05.840> about<03:16:06.000> like<03:16:06.239> what<03:16:06.399> does 03:16:06.469 --> 03:16:06.479 align:start position:0% had some questions about like what does 03:16:06.479 --> 03:16:07.670 align:start position:0% had some questions about like what does that<03:16:06.640> look<03:16:06.720> like<03:16:06.880> and<03:16:07.040> how<03:16:07.200> do<03:16:07.359> we<03:16:07.439> know<03:16:07.520> if 03:16:07.670 --> 03:16:07.680 align:start position:0% that look like and how do we know if 03:16:07.680 --> 03:16:09.429 align:start position:0% that look like and how do we know if they're<03:16:07.920> who<03:16:08.160> we're<03:16:08.399> choosing<03:16:08.720> and<03:16:08.960> all<03:16:09.200> those 03:16:09.429 --> 03:16:09.439 align:start position:0% they're who we're choosing and all those 03:16:09.439 --> 03:16:11.429 align:start position:0% they're who we're choosing and all those questions.<03:16:10.160> I<03:16:10.399> think<03:16:10.479> that<03:16:10.880> it<03:16:11.120> would<03:16:11.279> be 03:16:11.429 --> 03:16:11.439 align:start position:0% questions. I think that it would be 03:16:11.439 --> 03:16:14.790 align:start position:0% questions. I think that it would be helpful<03:16:12.319> um<03:16:13.200> to<03:16:13.520> have<03:16:13.680> just<03:16:13.920> like<03:16:14.080> a<03:16:14.399> what<03:16:14.560> it 03:16:14.790 --> 03:16:14.800 align:start position:0% helpful um to have just like a what it 03:16:14.800 --> 03:16:16.950 align:start position:0% helpful um to have just like a what it would<03:16:14.880> look<03:16:15.040> like<03:16:15.520> an<03:16:15.760> overview<03:16:16.319> document<03:16:16.720> of 03:16:16.950 --> 03:16:16.960 align:start position:0% would look like an overview document of 03:16:16.960 --> 03:16:18.950 align:start position:0% would look like an overview document of how<03:16:17.200> that<03:16:17.439> process<03:16:17.840> works<03:16:18.080> out<03:16:18.319> from<03:16:18.560> start<03:16:18.720> to 03:16:18.950 --> 03:16:18.960 align:start position:0% how that process works out from start to 03:16:18.960 --> 03:16:20.630 align:start position:0% how that process works out from start to finish<03:16:19.359> with<03:16:19.680> those<03:16:19.920> new<03:16:20.080> elements<03:16:20.399> that 03:16:20.630 --> 03:16:20.640 align:start position:0% finish with those new elements that 03:16:20.640 --> 03:16:23.590 align:start position:0% finish with those new elements that we've<03:16:20.800> been<03:16:20.960> talking<03:16:21.200> about<03:16:22.160> the<03:16:23.279> other 03:16:23.590 --> 03:16:23.600 align:start position:0% we've been talking about the other 03:16:23.600 --> 03:16:28.309 align:start position:0% we've been talking about the other committee<03:16:25.040> rem<03:16:25.760> um<03:16:26.399> having<03:16:26.800> the 03:16:28.309 --> 03:16:28.319 align:start position:0% committee rem um having the 03:16:28.319 --> 03:16:34.150 align:start position:0% committee rem um having the leads<03:16:28.800> or<03:16:29.040> the<03:16:29.600> whatever<03:16:29.920> you<03:16:30.160> call<03:16:30.319> them. 03:16:34.150 --> 03:16:34.160 align:start position:0% 03:16:34.160 --> 03:16:36.550 align:start position:0% Okay,<03:16:34.640> that<03:16:34.960> sounds<03:16:35.920> that<03:16:36.160> sounds<03:16:36.319> good. 03:16:36.550 --> 03:16:36.560 align:start position:0% Okay, that sounds that sounds good. 03:16:36.560 --> 03:16:37.670 align:start position:0% Okay, that sounds that sounds good. >> So,<03:16:36.720> basically,<03:16:36.960> it's<03:16:37.120> just<03:16:37.279> it's<03:16:37.520> just 03:16:37.670 --> 03:16:37.680 align:start position:0% >> So, basically, it's just it's just 03:16:37.680 --> 03:16:39.030 align:start position:0% >> So, basically, it's just it's just asking<03:16:38.000> staff<03:16:38.239> because<03:16:38.399> I<03:16:38.560> think<03:16:38.640> that<03:16:38.880> will 03:16:39.030 --> 03:16:39.040 align:start position:0% asking staff because I think that will 03:16:39.040 --> 03:16:40.870 align:start position:0% asking staff because I think that will help<03:16:39.279> visualize<03:16:39.600> it<03:16:39.760> and<03:16:40.000> help<03:16:40.319> answer<03:16:40.640> a<03:16:40.800> lot 03:16:40.870 --> 03:16:40.880 align:start position:0% help visualize it and help answer a lot 03:16:40.880 --> 03:16:42.070 align:start position:0% help visualize it and help answer a lot of<03:16:40.960> those<03:16:41.120> questions<03:16:41.359> that<03:16:41.600> kept<03:16:41.760> coming<03:16:41.840> up. 03:16:42.070 --> 03:16:42.080 align:start position:0% of those questions that kept coming up. 03:16:42.080 --> 03:16:43.110 align:start position:0% of those questions that kept coming up. They're<03:16:42.160> like,<03:16:42.319> well,<03:16:42.479> but<03:16:42.640> how<03:16:42.800> does<03:16:42.960> that 03:16:43.110 --> 03:16:43.120 align:start position:0% They're like, well, but how does that 03:16:43.120 --> 03:16:46.630 align:start position:0% They're like, well, but how does that work<03:16:43.279> with 03:16:46.630 --> 03:16:46.640 align:start position:0% 03:16:46.640 --> 03:16:48.550 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 03:16:48.550 --> 03:16:48.560 align:start position:0% >> Okay. 03:16:48.560 --> 03:16:51.269 align:start position:0% >> Okay. Okay.<03:16:49.040> So,<03:16:49.520> let<03:16:49.680> me<03:16:49.840> see<03:16:49.920> where<03:16:50.239> that<03:16:50.479> is<03:16:50.640> at. 03:16:51.269 --> 03:16:51.279 align:start position:0% Okay. So, let me see where that is at. 03:16:51.279 --> 03:16:53.269 align:start position:0% Okay. So, let me see where that is at. Um, 03:16:53.269 --> 03:16:53.279 align:start position:0% Um, 03:16:53.279 --> 03:16:55.190 align:start position:0% Um, and<03:16:53.520> I<03:16:53.680> I<03:16:53.840> think<03:16:54.000> we<03:16:54.160> can<03:16:54.399> just<03:16:54.640> ask<03:16:54.880> that.<03:16:55.040> I 03:16:55.190 --> 03:16:55.200 align:start position:0% and I I think we can just ask that. I 03:16:55.200 --> 03:16:56.309 align:start position:0% and I I think we can just ask that. I don't<03:16:55.279> even<03:16:55.439> know<03:16:55.520> if<03:16:55.760> does<03:16:55.920> that<03:16:56.080> need<03:16:56.160> to<03:16:56.239> be 03:16:56.309 --> 03:16:56.319 align:start position:0% don't even know if does that need to be 03:16:56.319 --> 03:16:59.269 align:start position:0% don't even know if does that need to be a<03:16:56.479> motion?<03:16:57.760> just<03:16:58.000> ask<03:16:58.239> is<03:16:58.399> that<03:16:58.800> back<03:16:59.040> next 03:16:59.269 --> 03:16:59.279 align:start position:0% a motion? just ask is that back next 03:16:59.279 --> 03:17:02.229 align:start position:0% a motion? just ask is that back next month<03:16:59.439> that<03:16:59.680> we<03:16:59.840> have<03:17:00.000> a<03:17:00.720> a<03:17:00.880> a<03:17:01.680> clean<03:17:01.920> document 03:17:02.229 --> 03:17:02.239 align:start position:0% month that we have a a a clean document 03:17:02.239 --> 03:17:03.990 align:start position:0% month that we have a a a clean document of<03:17:02.479> what<03:17:02.560> the<03:17:02.720> pro<03:17:03.040> provisions<03:17:03.520> might<03:17:03.840> look 03:17:03.990 --> 03:17:04.000 align:start position:0% of what the pro provisions might look 03:17:04.000 --> 03:17:05.510 align:start position:0% of what the pro provisions might look like<03:17:04.239> if<03:17:04.479> we<03:17:04.560> were<03:17:04.720> to<03:17:04.880> implement<03:17:05.200> some<03:17:05.359> of 03:17:05.510 --> 03:17:05.520 align:start position:0% like if we were to implement some of 03:17:05.520 --> 03:17:09.670 align:start position:0% like if we were to implement some of those<03:17:06.319> suggestions. 03:17:09.670 --> 03:17:09.680 align:start position:0% 03:17:09.680 --> 03:17:11.349 align:start position:0% Okay,<03:17:10.000> I<03:17:10.160> I<03:17:10.479> can<03:17:10.560> read<03:17:10.640> it<03:17:10.800> out<03:17:10.960> though.<03:17:11.120> We<03:17:11.279> can 03:17:11.349 --> 03:17:11.359 align:start position:0% Okay, I I can read it out though. We can 03:17:11.359 --> 03:17:13.349 align:start position:0% Okay, I I can read it out though. We can do<03:17:11.520> it.<03:17:11.920> Ideas<03:17:12.239> from<03:17:12.479> today's<03:17:12.800> meeting.<03:17:13.200> Let's 03:17:13.349 --> 03:17:13.359 align:start position:0% do it. Ideas from today's meeting. Let's 03:17:13.359 --> 03:17:15.510 align:start position:0% do it. Ideas from today's meeting. Let's see.<03:17:13.600> Drake<03:17:13.920> staff<03:17:14.800> to<03:17:14.960> the<03:17:15.120> take<03:17:15.359> the 03:17:15.510 --> 03:17:15.520 align:start position:0% see. Drake staff to the take the 03:17:15.520 --> 03:17:17.510 align:start position:0% see. Drake staff to the take the standards<03:17:15.840> and<03:17:16.160> standards<03:17:16.560> review<03:17:16.960> update 03:17:17.510 --> 03:17:17.520 align:start position:0% standards and standards review update 03:17:17.520 --> 03:17:19.190 align:start position:0% standards and standards review update ideas<03:17:17.840> from<03:17:18.080> today's<03:17:18.399> meeting<03:17:18.560> and<03:17:18.720> draft<03:17:18.960> a 03:17:19.190 --> 03:17:19.200 align:start position:0% ideas from today's meeting and draft a 03:17:19.200 --> 03:17:20.950 align:start position:0% ideas from today's meeting and draft a clean<03:17:19.680> what<03:17:19.840> would<03:17:20.000> it<03:17:20.160> look<03:17:20.319> like<03:17:20.560> document 03:17:20.950 --> 03:17:20.960 align:start position:0% clean what would it look like document 03:17:20.960 --> 03:17:22.710 align:start position:0% clean what would it look like document showing<03:17:21.279> start<03:17:21.520> and<03:17:21.680> finish<03:17:21.920> adding<03:17:22.239> in<03:17:22.560> the 03:17:22.710 --> 03:17:22.720 align:start position:0% showing start and finish adding in the 03:17:22.720 --> 03:17:25.190 align:start position:0% showing start and finish adding in the ideas<03:17:23.040> of<03:17:23.279> the<03:17:23.520> 7<03:17:23.680> to<03:17:23.920> 10<03:17:24.080> year<03:17:24.319> review<03:17:24.960> the 03:17:25.190 --> 03:17:25.200 align:start position:0% ideas of the 7 to 10 year review the 03:17:25.200 --> 03:17:26.630 align:start position:0% ideas of the 7 to 10 year review the subcommittee<03:17:25.760> instead<03:17:26.080> of<03:17:26.160> the<03:17:26.399> review 03:17:26.630 --> 03:17:26.640 align:start position:0% subcommittee instead of the review 03:17:26.640 --> 03:17:29.349 align:start position:0% subcommittee instead of the review committee<03:17:27.200> where<03:17:27.439> the<03:17:27.600> leads<03:17:28.000> could<03:17:28.319> interact 03:17:29.349 --> 03:17:29.359 align:start position:0% committee where the leads could interact 03:17:29.359 --> 03:17:32.469 align:start position:0% committee where the leads could interact um<03:17:30.080> etc<03:17:30.960> and<03:17:31.200> help<03:17:31.520> show<03:17:31.680> the<03:17:31.920> process<03:17:32.239> laid 03:17:32.469 --> 03:17:32.479 align:start position:0% um etc and help show the process laid 03:17:32.479 --> 03:17:35.190 align:start position:0% um etc and help show the process laid out<03:17:32.640> for<03:17:32.800> transparency<03:17:33.439> and<03:17:33.680> understanding. 03:17:35.190 --> 03:17:35.200 align:start position:0% out for transparency and understanding. 03:17:35.200 --> 03:17:37.429 align:start position:0% out for transparency and understanding. All<03:17:35.359> those<03:17:35.520> in<03:17:35.760> favor 03:17:37.429 --> 03:17:37.439 align:start position:0% All those in favor 03:17:37.439 --> 03:17:37.910 align:start position:0% All those in favor >> I 03:17:37.910 --> 03:17:37.920 align:start position:0% >> I 03:17:37.920 --> 03:17:38.710 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 03:17:38.710 --> 03:17:38.720 align:start position:0% >> I 03:17:38.720 --> 03:17:39.110 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 03:17:39.110 --> 03:17:39.120 align:start position:0% >> I 03:17:39.120 --> 03:17:40.229 align:start position:0% >> I >> I 03:17:40.229 --> 03:17:40.239 align:start position:0% >> I 03:17:40.239 --> 03:17:42.950 align:start position:0% >> I >> Okay.<03:17:41.120> And<03:17:41.439> we<03:17:41.680> are<03:17:42.000> we're<03:17:42.319> going<03:17:42.399> to<03:17:42.560> end<03:17:42.720> our 03:17:42.950 --> 03:17:42.960 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And we are we're going to end our 03:17:42.960 --> 03:17:44.550 align:start position:0% >> Okay. And we are we're going to end our meeting.<03:17:43.359> The<03:17:43.600> things<03:17:43.760> we<03:17:44.080> didn't<03:17:44.239> get<03:17:44.319> to 03:17:44.550 --> 03:17:44.560 align:start position:0% meeting. The things we didn't get to 03:17:44.560 --> 03:17:46.469 align:start position:0% meeting. The things we didn't get to today<03:17:44.800> will<03:17:45.120> continue.<03:17:45.520> So<03:17:45.680> we<03:17:45.840> we<03:17:46.160> have<03:17:46.239> the 03:17:46.469 --> 03:17:46.479 align:start position:0% today will continue. So we we have the 03:17:46.479 --> 03:17:49.269 align:start position:0% today will continue. So we we have the continuation<03:17:47.279> of<03:17:48.319> information<03:17:48.800> on<03:17:49.040> the 03:17:49.269 --> 03:17:49.279 align:start position:0% continuation of information on the 03:17:49.279 --> 03:17:51.190 align:start position:0% continuation of information on the physical<03:17:49.680> education<03:17:50.239> standards.<03:17:50.800> Thank<03:17:50.960> you 03:17:51.190 --> 03:17:51.200 align:start position:0% physical education standards. Thank you 03:17:51.200 --> 03:17:52.630 align:start position:0% physical education standards. Thank you staff.<03:17:51.520> I'm<03:17:51.760> sure<03:17:51.840> you've<03:17:52.080> been<03:17:52.239> on<03:17:52.399> here 03:17:52.630 --> 03:17:52.640 align:start position:0% staff. I'm sure you've been on here 03:17:52.640 --> 03:17:54.469 align:start position:0% staff. I'm sure you've been on here waiting<03:17:53.120> hoping<03:17:53.520> fingers<03:17:53.920> crossed<03:17:54.160> we<03:17:54.399> would 03:17:54.469 --> 03:17:54.479 align:start position:0% waiting hoping fingers crossed we would 03:17:54.479 --> 03:17:56.389 align:start position:0% waiting hoping fingers crossed we would get<03:17:54.640> to<03:17:54.800> it.<03:17:55.520> And<03:17:55.680> then<03:17:55.840> the<03:17:56.000> sensitive 03:17:56.389 --> 03:17:56.399 align:start position:0% get to it. And then the sensitive 03:17:56.399 --> 03:17:58.070 align:start position:0% get to it. And then the sensitive material<03:17:56.880> model<03:17:57.200> policy<03:17:57.439> will<03:17:57.680> back<03:17:57.840> in 03:17:58.070 --> 03:17:58.080 align:start position:0% material model policy will back in 03:17:58.080 --> 03:18:01.110 align:start position:0% material model policy will back in committee<03:17:58.479> next<03:17:58.720> month.<03:17:59.760> And<03:17:59.920> then<03:18:00.160> also<03:18:00.479> the 03:18:01.110 --> 03:18:01.120 align:start position:0% committee next month. And then also the 03:18:01.120 --> 03:18:05.030 align:start position:0% committee next month. And then also the the<03:18:01.680> standards<03:18:02.239> review<03:18:02.800> process.<03:18:04.080> Okay. 03:18:05.030 --> 03:18:05.040 align:start position:0% the standards review process. Okay. 03:18:05.040 --> 03:18:07.510 align:start position:0% the standards review process. Okay. Looking<03:18:05.359> for<03:18:05.439> a<03:18:05.600> final<03:18:05.920> motion. 03:18:07.510 --> 03:18:07.520 align:start position:0% Looking for a final motion. 03:18:07.520 --> 03:18:09.030 align:start position:0% Looking for a final motion. >> Motion<03:18:07.920> to<03:18:08.080> adjurnn. 03:18:09.030 --> 03:18:09.040 align:start position:0% >> Motion to adjurnn. 03:18:09.040 --> 03:18:10.630 align:start position:0% >> Motion to adjurnn. >> Okay,<03:18:09.520> the<03:18:09.680> motion<03:18:10.000> has<03:18:10.160> been<03:18:10.239> made<03:18:10.479> to 03:18:10.630 --> 03:18:10.640 align:start position:0% >> Okay, the motion has been made to 03:18:10.640 --> 03:18:13.190 align:start position:0% >> Okay, the motion has been made to adjurnn.<03:18:11.040> All<03:18:11.200> those<03:18:11.359> in<03:18:11.600> favor. 03:18:13.190 --> 03:18:13.200 align:start position:0% adjurnn. All those in favor. 03:18:13.200 --> 03:18:14.389 align:start position:0% adjurnn. All those in favor. I I 03:18:14.389 --> 03:18:14.399 align:start position:0% I I 03:18:14.399 --> 03:18:16.150 align:start position:0% I I >> Thank<03:18:14.560> you<03:18:14.800> everyone.<03:18:15.439> Have<03:18:15.600> a<03:18:15.680> good<03:18:15.840> day. 03:18:16.150 --> 03:18:16.160 align:start position:0% >> Thank you everyone. Have a good day. 03:18:16.160 --> 03:18:20.359 align:start position:0% >> Thank you everyone. Have a good day. >> Thank<03:18:16.319> you.<03:18:16.880> Thank<03:18:17.040> you<03:18:17.359> everybody.