WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:02.590 align:start position:0% okay<00:00:00.719> okay<00:00:01.199> maybe<00:00:01.439> we<00:00:01.560> need<00:00:01.760> to<00:00:02.000> start<00:00:02.320> and<00:00:02.440> see 00:00:02.590 --> 00:00:02.600 align:start position:0% okay okay maybe we need to start and see 00:00:02.600 --> 00:00:08.030 align:start position:0% okay okay maybe we need to start and see if<00:00:02.720> we<00:00:02.840> can<00:00:03.040> still<00:00:03.399> work<00:00:03.679> him<00:00:03.879> in<00:00:04.240> if<00:00:04.480> as<00:00:04.640> we 00:00:08.030 --> 00:00:08.040 align:start position:0% 00:00:08.040 --> 00:00:14.549 align:start position:0% can<00:00:09.040> so<00:00:09.480> Alex<00:00:09.840> are<00:00:10.120> you<00:00:11.000> um<00:00:11.599> online<00:00:12.599> with 00:00:14.549 --> 00:00:14.559 align:start position:0% can so Alex are you um online with 00:00:14.559 --> 00:00:18.950 align:start position:0% can so Alex are you um online with us 00:00:18.950 --> 00:00:18.960 align:start position:0% 00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:24.230 align:start position:0% yes<00:00:20.199> maybe<00:00:21.199> I<00:00:21.640> Alex<00:00:21.960> are<00:00:22.080> you<00:00:22.320> able<00:00:23.000> to<00:00:24.000> speak 00:00:24.230 --> 00:00:24.240 align:start position:0% yes maybe I Alex are you able to speak 00:00:24.240 --> 00:00:25.550 align:start position:0% yes maybe I Alex are you able to speak to 00:00:25.550 --> 00:00:25.560 align:start position:0% to 00:00:25.560 --> 00:00:30.230 align:start position:0% to us<00:00:26.560> uh<00:00:26.800> yep<00:00:27.160> we<00:00:27.320> are<00:00:27.760> going<00:00:28.359> on<00:00:28.679> YouTube<00:00:29.279> now<00:00:30.080> if 00:00:30.230 --> 00:00:30.240 align:start position:0% us uh yep we are going on YouTube now if 00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:32.389 align:start position:0% us uh yep we are going on YouTube now if you<00:00:30.439> guys<00:00:30.599> are<00:00:30.800> ready<00:00:31.000> to<00:00:31.160> go<00:00:31.840> can<00:00:31.960> you<00:00:32.079> give<00:00:32.239> us 00:00:32.389 --> 00:00:32.399 align:start position:0% you guys are ready to go can you give us 00:00:32.399 --> 00:00:33.869 align:start position:0% you guys are ready to go can you give us two<00:00:32.559> minutes<00:00:32.880> just<00:00:33.000> to<00:00:33.160> organize<00:00:33.640> really 00:00:33.869 --> 00:00:33.879 align:start position:0% two minutes just to organize really 00:00:33.879 --> 00:00:37.510 align:start position:0% two minutes just to organize really quick<00:00:34.719> yep<00:00:35.640> when<00:00:35.960> when<00:00:36.160> chair<00:00:36.719> Booth<00:00:37.200> comes 00:00:37.510 --> 00:00:37.520 align:start position:0% quick yep when when chair Booth comes 00:00:37.520 --> 00:00:40.229 align:start position:0% quick yep when when chair Booth comes back<00:00:37.760> on<00:00:38.760> um<00:00:39.040> I'm<00:00:39.200> wondering<00:00:39.559> if<00:00:39.719> someone<00:00:40.000> can 00:00:40.229 --> 00:00:40.239 align:start position:0% back on um I'm wondering if someone can 00:00:40.239 --> 00:00:41.950 align:start position:0% back on um I'm wondering if someone can give<00:00:40.480> him<00:00:40.840> a 00:00:41.950 --> 00:00:41.960 align:start position:0% give him a 00:00:41.960 --> 00:00:44.670 align:start position:0% give him a quick<00:00:42.960> I<00:00:43.039> wonder<00:00:43.239> how<00:00:43.399> we<00:00:43.480> can<00:00:43.760> like<00:00:44.200> find<00:00:44.440> out 00:00:44.670 --> 00:00:44.680 align:start position:0% quick I wonder how we can like find out 00:00:44.680 --> 00:00:46.150 align:start position:0% quick I wonder how we can like find out where<00:00:44.840> they're<00:00:45.079> at<00:00:45.399> because<00:00:45.520> they're<00:00:45.719> both<00:00:45.960> on 00:00:46.150 --> 00:00:46.160 align:start position:0% where they're at because they're both on 00:00:46.160 --> 00:00:48.549 align:start position:0% where they're at because they're both on teams<00:00:46.840> know<00:00:47.039> what<00:00:47.399> I<00:00:47.600> I<00:00:47.719> got<00:00:47.920> another<00:00:48.280> way<00:00:48.399> for 00:00:48.549 --> 00:00:48.559 align:start position:0% teams know what I I got another way for 00:00:48.559 --> 00:00:52.110 align:start position:0% teams know what I I got another way for you<00:00:48.680> to<00:00:48.840> get<00:00:49.199> on<00:00:50.199> yeah<00:00:50.800> uh<00:00:51.039> we're<00:00:51.719> we're<00:00:51.920> trying 00:00:52.110 --> 00:00:52.120 align:start position:0% you to get on yeah uh we're we're trying 00:00:52.120 --> 00:00:54.069 align:start position:0% you to get on yeah uh we're we're trying to<00:00:52.280> get<00:00:52.399> him<00:00:52.520> in<00:00:52.760> through<00:00:53.039> the<00:00:53.359> phone<00:00:53.800> right 00:00:54.069 --> 00:00:54.079 align:start position:0% to get him in through the phone right 00:00:54.079 --> 00:00:56.110 align:start position:0% to get him in through the phone right now<00:00:54.480> trying<00:00:54.719> to<00:00:54.840> get<00:00:54.960> him<00:00:55.120> in<00:00:55.280> through<00:00:55.520> other 00:00:56.110 --> 00:00:56.120 align:start position:0% now trying to get him in through other 00:00:56.120 --> 00:01:00.189 align:start position:0% now trying to get him in through other ways<00:00:57.120> oh<00:00:57.359> okay<00:00:57.640> through<00:00:58.120> a<00:00:58.320> phone<00:00:59.000> yeah<00:00:59.199> can<00:00:59.399> he 00:01:00.189 --> 00:01:00.199 align:start position:0% ways oh okay through a phone yeah can he 00:01:00.199 --> 00:01:02.910 align:start position:0% ways oh okay through a phone yeah can he can<00:01:00.359> he<00:01:00.559> come<00:01:00.719> on<00:01:01.199> with 00:01:02.910 --> 00:01:02.920 align:start position:0% can he come on with 00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:06.070 align:start position:0% can he come on with voice<00:01:03.920> uh<00:01:04.280> yep<00:01:04.600> we<00:01:04.799> are<00:01:05.360> currently<00:01:05.760> working 00:01:06.070 --> 00:01:06.080 align:start position:0% voice uh yep we are currently working 00:01:06.080 --> 00:01:07.310 align:start position:0% voice uh yep we are currently working through<00:01:06.360> that<00:01:06.600> right 00:01:07.310 --> 00:01:07.320 align:start position:0% through that right 00:01:07.320 --> 00:01:12.950 align:start position:0% through that right now<00:01:08.320> hey<00:01:08.479> do<00:01:08.600> you<00:01:08.680> want<00:01:08.840> us<00:01:08.960> to<00:01:09.360> wait<00:01:10.360> 930<00:01:11.320> it 00:01:12.950 --> 00:01:12.960 align:start position:0% now hey do you want us to wait 930 it 00:01:12.960 --> 00:01:15.950 align:start position:0% now hey do you want us to wait 930 it sound<00:01:13.960> um<00:01:14.200> whenever<00:01:15.000> you<00:01:15.200> guys<00:01:15.360> are<00:01:15.600> ready<00:01:15.799> to 00:01:15.950 --> 00:01:15.960 align:start position:0% sound um whenever you guys are ready to 00:01:15.960 --> 00:01:17.830 align:start position:0% sound um whenever you guys are ready to go<00:01:16.200> you<00:01:16.280> can<00:01:16.479> start<00:01:16.759> going<00:01:17.080> and<00:01:17.280> we<00:01:17.360> will<00:01:17.640> try 00:01:17.830 --> 00:01:17.840 align:start position:0% go you can start going and we will try 00:01:17.840 --> 00:01:21.270 align:start position:0% go you can start going and we will try and<00:01:18.000> Patch<00:01:18.200> them<00:01:18.360> in<00:01:18.560> as<00:01:18.680> soon<00:01:18.880> as<00:01:19.080> we<00:01:19.720> can<00:01:20.720> okay 00:01:21.270 --> 00:01:21.280 align:start position:0% and Patch them in as soon as we can okay 00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:24.510 align:start position:0% and Patch them in as soon as we can okay just<00:01:21.720> I<00:01:21.920> the<00:01:22.040> only<00:01:22.280> thing<00:01:22.799> I<00:01:23.799> I<00:01:23.960> think<00:01:24.159> we<00:01:24.360> might 00:01:24.510 --> 00:01:24.520 align:start position:0% just I the only thing I I think we might 00:01:24.520 --> 00:01:26.910 align:start position:0% just I the only thing I I think we might want<00:01:24.640> to<00:01:24.840> talk<00:01:25.240> guidance<00:01:25.759> document<00:01:26.320> before<00:01:26.640> we 00:01:26.910 --> 00:01:26.920 align:start position:0% want to talk guidance document before we 00:01:26.920 --> 00:01:30.550 align:start position:0% want to talk guidance document before we actually<00:01:27.680> talk<00:01:28.680> rule<00:01:29.600> so<00:01:29.960> that<00:01:30.040> we<00:01:30.159> make<00:01:30.280> sure 00:01:30.550 --> 00:01:30.560 align:start position:0% actually talk rule so that we make sure 00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:32.590 align:start position:0% actually talk rule so that we make sure they<00:01:31.479> they<00:01:31.600> coordinate<00:01:32.040> do<00:01:32.119> you<00:01:32.200> know<00:01:32.320> what 00:01:32.590 --> 00:01:32.600 align:start position:0% they they coordinate do you know what 00:01:32.600 --> 00:01:35.670 align:start position:0% they they coordinate do you know what does<00:01:32.720> that<00:01:32.840> make<00:01:33.479> sense<00:01:34.479> just<00:01:34.720> so<00:01:34.920> that<00:01:35.079> the 00:01:35.670 --> 00:01:35.680 align:start position:0% does that make sense just so that the 00:01:35.680 --> 00:01:38.950 align:start position:0% does that make sense just so that the one<00:01:36.680> you<00:01:36.840> know<00:01:37.840> okay<00:01:38.280> coordinates<00:01:38.720> with<00:01:38.840> the 00:01:38.950 --> 00:01:38.960 align:start position:0% one you know okay coordinates with the 00:01:38.960 --> 00:01:40.830 align:start position:0% one you know okay coordinates with the other<00:01:39.840> and<00:01:39.920> we're<00:01:40.079> not<00:01:40.240> having<00:01:40.399> to<00:01:40.560> do<00:01:40.720> the 00:01:40.830 --> 00:01:40.840 align:start position:0% other and we're not having to do the 00:01:40.840 --> 00:01:42.830 align:start position:0% other and we're not having to do the rule<00:01:41.200> then<00:01:41.399> go<00:01:41.600> back<00:01:41.840> and<00:01:42.079> and 00:01:42.830 --> 00:01:42.840 align:start position:0% rule then go back and and 00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:45.429 align:start position:0% rule then go back and and modify<00:01:43.840> so<00:01:44.040> what<00:01:44.159> we<00:01:44.240> can<00:01:44.399> do<00:01:44.640> is<00:01:44.840> Elise<00:01:45.280> if 00:01:45.429 --> 00:01:45.439 align:start position:0% modify so what we can do is Elise if 00:01:45.439 --> 00:01:47.590 align:start position:0% modify so what we can do is Elise if you'll<00:01:45.600> show<00:01:46.000> the<00:01:46.360> um<00:01:46.560> guidance<00:01:47.079> document 00:01:47.590 --> 00:01:47.600 align:start position:0% you'll show the um guidance document 00:01:47.600 --> 00:01:51.030 align:start position:0% you'll show the um guidance document first<00:01:48.000> do<00:01:48.280> would<00:01:48.399> you<00:01:48.600> like<00:01:48.920> for<00:01:49.680> um<00:01:50.640> anyone<00:01:50.920> to 00:01:51.030 --> 00:01:51.040 align:start position:0% first do would you like for um anyone to 00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:53.429 align:start position:0% first do would you like for um anyone to start<00:01:51.280> speaking<00:01:51.600> to<00:01:51.799> it<00:01:51.920> or<00:01:52.159> just<00:01:52.399> show<00:01:53.200> show 00:01:53.429 --> 00:01:53.439 align:start position:0% start speaking to it or just show show 00:01:53.439 --> 00:01:54.270 align:start position:0% start speaking to it or just show show it<00:01:53.640> and 00:01:54.270 --> 00:01:54.280 align:start position:0% it and 00:01:54.280 --> 00:01:58.149 align:start position:0% it and then<00:01:55.280> it's<00:01:55.560> just<00:01:55.799> not<00:01:56.759> into<00:01:56.960> my<00:01:57.320> yeah<00:01:57.479> I<00:01:57.600> Emily 00:01:58.149 --> 00:01:58.159 align:start position:0% then it's just not into my yeah I Emily 00:01:58.159 --> 00:02:01.270 align:start position:0% then it's just not into my yeah I Emily Pro<00:01:58.600> I<00:01:59.479> I<00:01:59.560> mean<00:02:00.119> put<00:02:00.240> it<00:02:00.640> together<00:02:00.960> for<00:02:01.079> the 00:02:01.270 --> 00:02:01.280 align:start position:0% Pro I I mean put it together for the 00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:03.749 align:start position:0% Pro I I mean put it together for the most<00:02:01.560> part<00:02:02.159> but<00:02:02.399> who<00:02:02.799> you<00:02:02.920> know<00:02:03.280> however<00:02:03.439> Emily 00:02:03.749 --> 00:02:03.759 align:start position:0% most part but who you know however Emily 00:02:03.759 --> 00:02:05.950 align:start position:0% most part but who you know however Emily wants<00:02:03.960> to<00:02:04.119> direct<00:02:04.560> that<00:02:04.920> yeah<00:02:05.560> Vice<00:02:05.759> chair 00:02:05.950 --> 00:02:05.960 align:start position:0% wants to direct that yeah Vice chair 00:02:05.960 --> 00:02:07.429 align:start position:0% wants to direct that yeah Vice chair Booth<00:02:06.240> how<00:02:06.360> would<00:02:06.479> you<00:02:06.640> like<00:02:06.799> for<00:02:06.920> us<00:02:07.079> to<00:02:07.200> start 00:02:07.429 --> 00:02:07.439 align:start position:0% Booth how would you like for us to start 00:02:07.439 --> 00:02:09.830 align:start position:0% Booth how would you like for us to start would<00:02:07.560> you<00:02:07.719> like<00:02:07.960> for<00:02:08.160> us<00:02:08.319> to<00:02:08.520> when<00:02:08.679> we<00:02:08.840> do<00:02:09.119> the 00:02:09.830 --> 00:02:09.840 align:start position:0% would you like for us to when we do the 00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:11.550 align:start position:0% would you like for us to when we do the instructional<00:02:10.360> materials<00:02:10.879> guidance<00:02:11.280> we<00:02:11.400> can 00:02:11.550 --> 00:02:11.560 align:start position:0% instructional materials guidance we can 00:02:11.560 --> 00:02:14.470 align:start position:0% instructional materials guidance we can put<00:02:11.720> it<00:02:11.879> up<00:02:12.319> and<00:02:12.760> then<00:02:12.959> you<00:02:13.160> can<00:02:13.480> just<00:02:13.760> speak<00:02:14.160> to 00:02:14.470 --> 00:02:14.480 align:start position:0% put it up and then you can just speak to 00:02:14.480 --> 00:02:15.910 align:start position:0% put it up and then you can just speak to the<00:02:14.879> um<00:02:15.040> that<00:02:15.120> we're<00:02:15.239> going<00:02:15.360> to<00:02:15.440> be<00:02:15.560> going 00:02:15.910 --> 00:02:15.920 align:start position:0% the um that we're going to be going 00:02:15.920 --> 00:02:18.309 align:start position:0% the um that we're going to be going through<00:02:16.800> that<00:02:17.080> which<00:02:17.200> is<00:02:17.440> incorporated<00:02:18.200> and 00:02:18.309 --> 00:02:18.319 align:start position:0% through that which is incorporated and 00:02:18.319 --> 00:02:20.470 align:start position:0% through that which is incorporated and then<00:02:18.440> we<00:02:18.560> will<00:02:18.680> be<00:02:18.840> going<00:02:19.040> into<00:02:19.280> the<00:02:19.400> draft<00:02:19.760> too 00:02:20.470 --> 00:02:20.480 align:start position:0% then we will be going into the draft too 00:02:20.480 --> 00:02:23.750 align:start position:0% then we will be going into the draft too and<00:02:20.560> then<00:02:20.720> Elise<00:02:21.120> we'll<00:02:21.480> um<00:02:21.680> pop<00:02:21.959> those<00:02:22.200> up<00:02:22.599> and 00:02:23.750 --> 00:02:23.760 align:start position:0% and then Elise we'll um pop those up and 00:02:23.760 --> 00:02:27.150 align:start position:0% and then Elise we'll um pop those up and um<00:02:24.760> maybe<00:02:25.360> start<00:02:25.760> talking<00:02:26.400> through<00:02:26.640> it<00:02:27.000> and 00:02:27.150 --> 00:02:27.160 align:start position:0% um maybe start talking through it and 00:02:27.160 --> 00:02:30.949 align:start position:0% um maybe start talking through it and then<00:02:27.720> uh<00:02:28.000> we<00:02:28.120> can<00:02:28.280> wait<00:02:28.440> for<00:02:28.720> chair<00:02:29.040> booth<00:02:29.400> for 00:02:30.949 --> 00:02:30.959 align:start position:0% then uh we can wait for chair booth for 00:02:30.959 --> 00:02:34.190 align:start position:0% then uh we can wait for chair booth for voting<00:02:31.680> I<00:02:31.720> don't 00:02:34.190 --> 00:02:34.200 align:start position:0% 00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:38.350 align:start position:0% know<00:02:35.200> Michelle<00:02:35.800> are<00:02:36.800> are<00:02:37.000> there<00:02:37.599> strict<00:02:38.000> rules 00:02:38.350 --> 00:02:38.360 align:start position:0% know Michelle are are there strict rules 00:02:38.360 --> 00:02:40.070 align:start position:0% know Michelle are are there strict rules with<00:02:38.519> that<00:02:38.959> uh<00:02:39.040> should<00:02:39.239> we<00:02:39.400> just<00:02:39.519> start<00:02:39.800> going 00:02:40.070 --> 00:02:40.080 align:start position:0% with that uh should we just start going 00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:43.270 align:start position:0% with that uh should we just start going through<00:02:40.519> with<00:02:40.680> the<00:02:40.840> voting<00:02:41.720> uh<00:02:42.599> or<00:02:42.879> wait<00:02:43.080> for 00:02:43.270 --> 00:02:43.280 align:start position:0% through with the voting uh or wait for 00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:44.869 align:start position:0% through with the voting uh or wait for chair<00:02:43.560> booth<00:02:43.840> on<00:02:43.959> that 00:02:44.869 --> 00:02:44.879 align:start position:0% chair booth on that 00:02:44.879 --> 00:02:47.990 align:start position:0% chair booth on that end<00:02:45.879> we<00:02:46.040> have<00:02:46.200> we<00:02:46.319> just<00:02:46.400> need<00:02:46.560> a 00:02:47.990 --> 00:02:48.000 align:start position:0% end we have we just need a 00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:50.110 align:start position:0% end we have we just need a majority 00:02:50.110 --> 00:02:50.120 align:start position:0% majority 00:02:50.120 --> 00:02:52.670 align:start position:0% majority yeah<00:02:51.120> you<00:02:51.280> just<00:02:51.400> need<00:02:51.560> a<00:02:51.720> qu<00:02:52.040> to<00:02:52.159> be<00:02:52.280> able<00:02:52.480> to 00:02:52.670 --> 00:02:52.680 align:start position:0% yeah you just need a qu to be able to 00:02:52.680 --> 00:02:55.229 align:start position:0% yeah you just need a qu to be able to vote<00:02:53.360> if<00:02:53.519> he's<00:02:53.720> working<00:02:54.159> on<00:02:54.640> something<00:02:55.000> else 00:02:55.229 --> 00:02:55.239 align:start position:0% vote if he's working on something else 00:02:55.239 --> 00:02:56.630 align:start position:0% vote if he's working on something else and<00:02:55.360> he's<00:02:55.519> not<00:02:55.720> able<00:02:55.920> to<00:02:56.080> listen<00:02:56.319> to<00:02:56.480> the 00:02:56.630 --> 00:02:56.640 align:start position:0% and he's not able to listen to the 00:02:56.640 --> 00:02:58.110 align:start position:0% and he's not able to listen to the discussion<00:02:57.080> it's<00:02:57.480> difficult<00:02:57.599> for<00:02:57.760> him<00:02:57.879> to<00:02:58.000> be 00:02:58.110 --> 00:02:58.120 align:start position:0% discussion it's difficult for him to be 00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:01.390 align:start position:0% discussion it's difficult for him to be able<00:02:58.319> to<00:02:58.640> vote<00:02:59.640> Yes<00:02:59.879> yes<00:03:00.720> okay<00:03:00.920> well<00:03:01.120> I<00:03:01.200> will 00:03:01.390 --> 00:03:01.400 align:start position:0% able to vote Yes yes okay well I will 00:03:01.400 --> 00:03:04.869 align:start position:0% able to vote Yes yes okay well I will wait<00:03:01.560> for<00:03:01.760> direction<00:03:02.360> from<00:03:03.000> Vice<00:03:03.360> chair<00:03:03.879> green 00:03:04.869 --> 00:03:04.879 align:start position:0% wait for direction from Vice chair green 00:03:04.879 --> 00:03:07.190 align:start position:0% wait for direction from Vice chair green and<00:03:05.400> um<00:03:05.640> if<00:03:05.879> whenever<00:03:06.159> you<00:03:06.280> tell<00:03:06.480> us<00:03:06.640> to<00:03:06.799> begin 00:03:07.190 --> 00:03:07.200 align:start position:0% and um if whenever you tell us to begin 00:03:07.200 --> 00:03:08.789 align:start position:0% and um if whenever you tell us to begin we<00:03:07.280> will<00:03:07.480> begin<00:03:07.840> we<00:03:07.959> are 00:03:08.789 --> 00:03:08.799 align:start position:0% we will begin we are 00:03:08.799 --> 00:03:13.229 align:start position:0% we will begin we are ready<00:03:09.799> all<00:03:10.000> right<00:03:10.720> I<00:03:10.799> mean<00:03:11.040> we<00:03:11.640> can<00:03:12.640> uh<00:03:12.799> we<00:03:12.920> can 00:03:13.229 --> 00:03:13.239 align:start position:0% ready all right I mean we can uh we can 00:03:13.239 --> 00:03:15.509 align:start position:0% ready all right I mean we can uh we can start<00:03:13.840> so<00:03:14.159> let<00:03:14.319> me<00:03:14.519> just<00:03:14.760> make<00:03:14.920> sure<00:03:15.239> we<00:03:15.400> just 00:03:15.509 --> 00:03:15.519 align:start position:0% start so let me just make sure we just 00:03:15.519 --> 00:03:16.949 align:start position:0% start so let me just make sure we just want<00:03:15.799> to<00:03:16.000> open<00:03:16.239> the 00:03:16.949 --> 00:03:16.959 align:start position:0% want to open the 00:03:16.959 --> 00:03:19.430 align:start position:0% want to open the meeting<00:03:17.959> and<00:03:18.120> then<00:03:18.360> direct<00:03:18.799> that<00:03:19.000> to<00:03:19.239> the 00:03:19.430 --> 00:03:19.440 align:start position:0% meeting and then direct that to the 00:03:19.440 --> 00:03:22.030 align:start position:0% meeting and then direct that to the guidance<00:03:20.280> document<00:03:20.840> is<00:03:21.000> this 00:03:22.030 --> 00:03:22.040 align:start position:0% guidance document is this 00:03:22.040 --> 00:03:25.229 align:start position:0% guidance document is this correct<00:03:23.159> okay<00:03:24.159> yeah<00:03:24.519> just<00:03:24.720> make<00:03:24.920> sure<00:03:25.080> you 00:03:25.229 --> 00:03:25.239 align:start position:0% correct okay yeah just make sure you 00:03:25.239 --> 00:03:26.550 align:start position:0% correct okay yeah just make sure you speak<00:03:25.480> to<00:03:25.640> the<00:03:25.799> fact<00:03:26.000> we've<00:03:26.200> had<00:03:26.360> some 00:03:26.550 --> 00:03:26.560 align:start position:0% speak to the fact we've had some 00:03:26.560 --> 00:03:28.470 align:start position:0% speak to the fact we've had some technical<00:03:27.080> difficulties<00:03:27.599> and<00:03:27.799> apologize<00:03:28.319> to 00:03:28.470 --> 00:03:28.480 align:start position:0% technical difficulties and apologize to 00:03:28.480 --> 00:03:33.309 align:start position:0% technical difficulties and apologize to the<00:03:28.640> public<00:03:29.360> so 00:03:33.309 --> 00:03:33.319 align:start position:0% 00:03:33.319 --> 00:03:36.190 align:start position:0% okay<00:03:34.000> yeah<00:03:34.319> whenever<00:03:35.000> whenever<00:03:35.319> we're<00:03:35.560> ready 00:03:36.190 --> 00:03:36.200 align:start position:0% okay yeah whenever whenever we're ready 00:03:36.200 --> 00:03:38.949 align:start position:0% okay yeah whenever whenever we're ready here<00:03:37.200> okay<00:03:37.480> Alex<00:03:37.879> if<00:03:38.000> you<00:03:38.080> want<00:03:38.200> to<00:03:38.400> and<00:03:38.840> uh 00:03:38.949 --> 00:03:38.959 align:start position:0% here okay Alex if you want to and uh 00:03:38.959 --> 00:03:40.390 align:start position:0% here okay Alex if you want to and uh Jerry<00:03:39.280> if<00:03:39.360> you<00:03:39.439> want<00:03:39.519> to<00:03:39.720> get<00:03:39.840> us<00:03:40.040> started 00:03:40.390 --> 00:03:40.400 align:start position:0% Jerry if you want to get us started 00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:42.229 align:start position:0% Jerry if you want to get us started we'll<00:03:40.680> we'll<00:03:40.840> go<00:03:41.000> ahead<00:03:41.200> and<00:03:41.599> have<00:03:41.799> Vice<00:03:42.040> chair 00:03:42.229 --> 00:03:42.239 align:start position:0% we'll we'll go ahead and have Vice chair 00:03:42.239 --> 00:03:45.869 align:start position:0% we'll we'll go ahead and have Vice chair green<00:03:42.519> start<00:03:42.760> the 00:03:45.869 --> 00:03:45.879 align:start position:0% 00:03:45.879 --> 00:03:48.509 align:start position:0% meeting<00:03:46.879> all<00:03:47.000> right<00:03:47.200> we<00:03:47.319> are<00:03:47.519> good<00:03:47.640> to 00:03:48.509 --> 00:03:48.519 align:start position:0% meeting all right we are good to 00:03:48.519 --> 00:03:51.429 align:start position:0% meeting all right we are good to go 00:03:51.429 --> 00:03:51.439 align:start position:0% go 00:03:51.439 --> 00:03:53.630 align:start position:0% go okay<00:03:52.439> all 00:03:53.630 --> 00:03:53.640 align:start position:0% okay all 00:03:53.640 --> 00:04:03.509 align:start position:0% okay all right<00:03:54.640> are<00:03:54.799> we<00:03:55.079> ready 00:04:03.509 --> 00:04:03.519 align:start position:0% 00:04:03.519 --> 00:04:04.750 align:start position:0% we<00:04:03.640> are<00:04:03.799> good<00:04:03.959> to 00:04:04.750 --> 00:04:04.760 align:start position:0% we are good to 00:04:04.760 --> 00:04:09.229 align:start position:0% we are good to go<00:04:05.760> okay<00:04:06.640> all<00:04:06.840> right<00:04:07.360> um<00:04:08.159> I'd<00:04:08.360> like<00:04:08.480> to<00:04:08.640> welcome 00:04:09.229 --> 00:04:09.239 align:start position:0% go okay all right um I'd like to welcome 00:04:09.239 --> 00:04:12.149 align:start position:0% go okay all right um I'd like to welcome everybody<00:04:09.879> here<00:04:10.319> we've<00:04:11.280> had<00:04:11.439> a<00:04:11.560> little<00:04:11.760> bit<00:04:11.920> of 00:04:12.149 --> 00:04:12.159 align:start position:0% everybody here we've had a little bit of 00:04:12.159 --> 00:04:14.069 align:start position:0% everybody here we've had a little bit of technical<00:04:12.680> difficulties<00:04:13.400> this<00:04:13.560> morning<00:04:13.959> and 00:04:14.069 --> 00:04:14.079 align:start position:0% technical difficulties this morning and 00:04:14.079 --> 00:04:17.469 align:start position:0% technical difficulties this morning and so<00:04:14.280> we're<00:04:14.519> just<00:04:15.479> um<00:04:16.479> uh<00:04:16.600> finishing<00:04:17.040> ironing 00:04:17.469 --> 00:04:17.479 align:start position:0% so we're just um uh finishing ironing 00:04:17.479 --> 00:04:19.870 align:start position:0% so we're just um uh finishing ironing out<00:04:17.880> some<00:04:18.560> some<00:04:18.759> little<00:04:19.000> hiccups<00:04:19.440> that<00:04:19.600> we've 00:04:19.870 --> 00:04:19.880 align:start position:0% out some some little hiccups that we've 00:04:19.880 --> 00:04:21.430 align:start position:0% out some some little hiccups that we've had<00:04:20.160> but<00:04:20.440> thank<00:04:20.600> you<00:04:20.720> for<00:04:20.880> everybody<00:04:21.199> working 00:04:21.430 --> 00:04:21.440 align:start position:0% had but thank you for everybody working 00:04:21.440 --> 00:04:24.270 align:start position:0% had but thank you for everybody working on<00:04:21.600> their<00:04:21.759> end<00:04:21.959> to<00:04:22.120> make<00:04:22.320> that<00:04:22.639> happen<00:04:23.639> um<00:04:24.040> and 00:04:24.270 --> 00:04:24.280 align:start position:0% on their end to make that happen um and 00:04:24.280 --> 00:04:26.310 align:start position:0% on their end to make that happen um and also<00:04:24.639> for<00:04:25.040> all<00:04:25.199> the<00:04:25.280> working<00:04:25.639> parts<00:04:25.919> to<00:04:26.120> have 00:04:26.310 --> 00:04:26.320 align:start position:0% also for all the working parts to have 00:04:26.320 --> 00:04:27.950 align:start position:0% also for all the working parts to have this<00:04:26.440> meeting<00:04:26.800> today<00:04:27.080> for<00:04:27.360> standards<00:04:27.720> and 00:04:27.950 --> 00:04:27.960 align:start position:0% this meeting today for standards and 00:04:27.960 --> 00:04:30.629 align:start position:0% this meeting today for standards and assessment<00:04:28.960> we<00:04:29.080> will<00:04:29.280> first<00:04:29.800> start<00:04:30.160> with<00:04:30.400> our 00:04:30.629 --> 00:04:30.639 align:start position:0% assessment we will first start with our 00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:33.230 align:start position:0% assessment we will first start with our sensitive<00:04:31.120> materials<00:04:31.639> guidance<00:04:32.240> document 00:04:33.230 --> 00:04:33.240 align:start position:0% sensitive materials guidance document 00:04:33.240 --> 00:04:35.350 align:start position:0% sensitive materials guidance document and<00:04:33.440> open<00:04:33.720> the<00:04:34.000> floor<00:04:34.320> up<00:04:34.440> for<00:04:34.680> discussion<00:04:35.120> for 00:04:35.350 --> 00:04:35.360 align:start position:0% and open the floor up for discussion for 00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:39.189 align:start position:0% and open the floor up for discussion for that<00:04:36.320> and<00:04:36.520> then<00:04:37.039> um<00:04:37.440> bring<00:04:37.800> forward<00:04:38.240> any<00:04:39.039> U 00:04:39.189 --> 00:04:39.199 align:start position:0% that and then um bring forward any U 00:04:39.199 --> 00:04:43.590 align:start position:0% that and then um bring forward any U motions<00:04:39.840> or<00:04:40.840> that<00:04:40.960> we<00:04:41.120> need<00:04:41.320> to<00:04:41.800> or<00:04:42.440> um<00:04:43.440> and 00:04:43.590 --> 00:04:43.600 align:start position:0% motions or that we need to or um and 00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:45.870 align:start position:0% motions or that we need to or um and then<00:04:43.960> take<00:04:44.199> votes<00:04:44.479> for<00:04:44.759> that<00:04:45.080> when<00:04:45.680> when 00:04:45.870 --> 00:04:45.880 align:start position:0% then take votes for that when when 00:04:45.880 --> 00:04:49.230 align:start position:0% then take votes for that when when member<00:04:46.759> when<00:04:46.919> ter<00:04:47.199> Booth<00:04:47.520> gets<00:04:48.360> here<00:04:48.639> with<00:04:48.800> us 00:04:49.230 --> 00:04:49.240 align:start position:0% member when ter Booth gets here with us 00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:51.990 align:start position:0% member when ter Booth gets here with us officially<00:04:50.080> so<00:04:51.080> let's<00:04:51.280> go<00:04:51.400> ahead<00:04:51.600> and<00:04:51.759> open 00:04:51.990 --> 00:04:52.000 align:start position:0% officially so let's go ahead and open 00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:56.870 align:start position:0% officially so let's go ahead and open the<00:04:52.120> floor<00:04:52.440> for 00:04:56.870 --> 00:04:56.880 align:start position:0% 00:04:56.880 --> 00:04:59.110 align:start position:0% discussion<00:04:57.880> and<00:04:58.080> what<00:04:58.240> is<00:04:58.360> in<00:04:58.520> front<00:04:58.720> of<00:04:58.840> us<00:04:58.960> is 00:04:59.110 --> 00:04:59.120 align:start position:0% discussion and what is in front of us is 00:04:59.120 --> 00:05:03.029 align:start position:0% discussion and what is in front of us is the<00:04:59.240> instruction<00:04:59.960> materials<00:05:00.560> guidance 00:05:03.029 --> 00:05:03.039 align:start position:0% the instruction materials guidance 00:05:03.039 --> 00:05:08.909 align:start position:0% the instruction materials guidance document<00:05:04.039> okay<00:05:04.520> are<00:05:04.680> we<00:05:04.800> looking<00:05:05.080> at<00:05:05.320> draft 00:05:08.909 --> 00:05:08.919 align:start position:0% 00:05:08.919 --> 00:05:12.950 align:start position:0% two<00:05:10.400> I<00:05:11.400> I<00:05:11.520> don't<00:05:11.960> think<00:05:12.240> so<00:05:12.560> I<00:05:12.639> don't<00:05:12.800> think 00:05:12.950 --> 00:05:12.960 align:start position:0% two I I don't think so I don't think 00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:16.710 align:start position:0% two I I don't think so I don't think there's<00:05:13.160> two<00:05:13.400> drafts<00:05:13.960> up<00:05:14.440> would<00:05:14.639> that<00:05:14.800> be 00:05:16.710 --> 00:05:16.720 align:start position:0% there's two drafts up would that be 00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:18.749 align:start position:0% there's two drafts up would that be accurate<00:05:17.720> I<00:05:17.800> would<00:05:18.000> have<00:05:18.120> to<00:05:18.240> look<00:05:18.479> back<00:05:18.600> at 00:05:18.749 --> 00:05:18.759 align:start position:0% accurate I would have to look back at 00:05:18.759 --> 00:05:20.150 align:start position:0% accurate I would have to look back at the<00:05:18.880> thing<00:05:19.120> I<00:05:19.240> just<00:05:19.400> think<00:05:19.600> there<00:05:19.720> was<00:05:19.960> just 00:05:20.150 --> 00:05:20.160 align:start position:0% the thing I just think there was just 00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:22.189 align:start position:0% the thing I just think there was just one<00:05:20.400> that<00:05:20.520> was 00:05:22.189 --> 00:05:22.199 align:start position:0% one that was 00:05:22.199 --> 00:05:25.029 align:start position:0% one that was posted<00:05:23.199> so<00:05:23.919> would<00:05:24.080> you<00:05:24.400> like<00:05:24.600> me<00:05:24.759> just<00:05:24.880> to 00:05:25.029 --> 00:05:25.039 align:start position:0% posted so would you like me just to 00:05:25.039 --> 00:05:26.870 align:start position:0% posted so would you like me just to speak<00:05:25.280> to<00:05:25.479> kind<00:05:25.600> of<00:05:25.720> the<00:05:25.880> thoughts<00:05:26.400> process 00:05:26.870 --> 00:05:26.880 align:start position:0% speak to kind of the thoughts process 00:05:26.880 --> 00:05:28.510 align:start position:0% speak to kind of the thoughts process behind<00:05:27.240> this<00:05:27.639> would<00:05:27.840> that<00:05:27.960> be<00:05:28.120> the<00:05:28.240> best<00:05:28.400> thing 00:05:28.510 --> 00:05:28.520 align:start position:0% behind this would that be the best thing 00:05:28.520 --> 00:05:32.590 align:start position:0% behind this would that be the best thing to<00:05:28.680> do<00:05:29.479> yeah<00:05:29.800> let's<00:05:30.000> start<00:05:30.360> there<00:05:31.039> yeah<00:05:31.360> so<00:05:32.360> um 00:05:32.590 --> 00:05:32.600 align:start position:0% to do yeah let's start there yeah so um 00:05:32.600 --> 00:05:35.390 align:start position:0% to do yeah let's start there yeah so um in<00:05:32.759> looking<00:05:33.039> at<00:05:33.199> our<00:05:33.360> model<00:05:33.880> policy<00:05:34.880> and<00:05:35.039> then 00:05:35.390 --> 00:05:35.400 align:start position:0% in looking at our model policy and then 00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:36.870 align:start position:0% in looking at our model policy and then this<00:05:35.520> is<00:05:35.720> just<00:05:35.880> last<00:05:36.080> week<00:05:36.280> I<00:05:36.360> spent<00:05:36.560> a<00:05:36.680> lot<00:05:36.759> of 00:05:36.870 --> 00:05:36.880 align:start position:0% this is just last week I spent a lot of 00:05:36.880 --> 00:05:38.870 align:start position:0% this is just last week I spent a lot of time<00:05:37.039> looking<00:05:37.240> at<00:05:37.319> our<00:05:37.440> model<00:05:37.840> policy<00:05:38.680> because 00:05:38.870 --> 00:05:38.880 align:start position:0% time looking at our model policy because 00:05:38.880 --> 00:05:40.710 align:start position:0% time looking at our model policy because there<00:05:39.000> was<00:05:39.240> discussion<00:05:39.680> about<00:05:39.960> updating<00:05:40.600> the 00:05:40.710 --> 00:05:40.720 align:start position:0% there was discussion about updating the 00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:44.510 align:start position:0% there was discussion about updating the model<00:05:41.120> policy<00:05:41.440> to<00:05:41.680> reflect<00:05:42.639> current<00:05:43.000> law<00:05:44.000> um 00:05:44.510 --> 00:05:44.520 align:start position:0% model policy to reflect current law um 00:05:44.520 --> 00:05:45.990 align:start position:0% model policy to reflect current law um spent<00:05:44.759> a<00:05:44.880> lot<00:05:45.000> of<00:05:45.120> time<00:05:45.240> looking<00:05:45.479> at<00:05:45.600> a<00:05:45.759> lot<00:05:45.880> of 00:05:45.990 --> 00:05:46.000 align:start position:0% spent a lot of time looking at a lot of 00:05:46.000 --> 00:05:48.550 align:start position:0% spent a lot of time looking at a lot of other<00:05:46.240> districts<00:05:46.680> model<00:05:47.319> policies<00:05:48.319> and 00:05:48.550 --> 00:05:48.560 align:start position:0% other districts model policies and 00:05:48.560 --> 00:05:50.469 align:start position:0% other districts model policies and realized<00:05:49.280> there's<00:05:49.520> just<00:05:49.680> some<00:05:50.000> interesting 00:05:50.469 --> 00:05:50.479 align:start position:0% realized there's just some interesting 00:05:50.479 --> 00:05:52.309 align:start position:0% realized there's just some interesting nuances<00:05:51.000> depending<00:05:51.360> on<00:05:51.479> a<00:05:51.600> large<00:05:51.960> District 00:05:52.309 --> 00:05:52.319 align:start position:0% nuances depending on a large District 00:05:52.319 --> 00:05:54.950 align:start position:0% nuances depending on a large District versus<00:05:52.600> a<00:05:52.759> small<00:05:53.080> District<00:05:53.520> versus<00:05:54.520> a<00:05:54.680> lot<00:05:54.800> of 00:05:54.950 --> 00:05:54.960 align:start position:0% versus a small District versus a lot of 00:05:54.960 --> 00:05:57.629 align:start position:0% versus a small District versus a lot of moving<00:05:55.360> Parts<00:05:56.120> um<00:05:56.680> so<00:05:56.880> to<00:05:57.039> try<00:05:57.199> to<00:05:57.319> create<00:05:57.520> a 00:05:57.629 --> 00:05:57.639 align:start position:0% moving Parts um so to try to create a 00:05:57.639 --> 00:05:59.390 align:start position:0% moving Parts um so to try to create a model<00:05:58.000> policy<00:05:58.400> that<00:05:58.560> people<00:05:58.800> don't<00:05:59.120> have<00:05:59.240> to 00:05:59.390 --> 00:05:59.400 align:start position:0% model policy that people don't have to 00:05:59.400 --> 00:06:03.790 align:start position:0% model policy that people don't have to use<00:05:59.720> use<00:06:00.720> um<00:06:00.880> is<00:06:01.039> a<00:06:01.160> lot<00:06:01.280> of<00:06:01.479> time<00:06:01.800> spent<00:06:02.800> so<00:06:03.600> the 00:06:03.790 --> 00:06:03.800 align:start position:0% use use um is a lot of time spent so the 00:06:03.800 --> 00:06:06.629 align:start position:0% use use um is a lot of time spent so the recommendation<00:06:04.560> I<00:06:04.680> would<00:06:05.319> recommend<00:06:06.319> is<00:06:06.479> that 00:06:06.629 --> 00:06:06.639 align:start position:0% recommendation I would recommend is that 00:06:06.639 --> 00:06:09.430 align:start position:0% recommendation I would recommend is that the<00:06:06.759> committee<00:06:07.599> actually<00:06:08.599> move<00:06:08.880> forward<00:06:09.240> this 00:06:09.430 --> 00:06:09.440 align:start position:0% the committee actually move forward this 00:06:09.440 --> 00:06:10.510 align:start position:0% the committee actually move forward this guidance 00:06:10.510 --> 00:06:10.520 align:start position:0% guidance 00:06:10.520 --> 00:06:12.749 align:start position:0% guidance document<00:06:11.520> um<00:06:11.759> and<00:06:11.919> in<00:06:12.120> this<00:06:12.280> guidance 00:06:12.749 --> 00:06:12.759 align:start position:0% document um and in this guidance 00:06:12.759 --> 00:06:14.110 align:start position:0% document um and in this guidance document<00:06:13.240> to 00:06:14.110 --> 00:06:14.120 align:start position:0% document to 00:06:14.120 --> 00:06:17.909 align:start position:0% document to actually<00:06:15.479> um<00:06:16.479> this<00:06:16.680> just<00:06:16.960> breaks<00:06:17.400> down<00:06:17.720> the 00:06:17.909 --> 00:06:17.919 align:start position:0% actually um this just breaks down the 00:06:17.919 --> 00:06:21.070 align:start position:0% actually um this just breaks down the parts<00:06:18.560> of<00:06:19.120> um<00:06:19.800> instruction<00:06:20.319> materials 00:06:21.070 --> 00:06:21.080 align:start position:0% parts of um instruction materials 00:06:21.080 --> 00:06:22.830 align:start position:0% parts of um instruction materials Library<00:06:21.560> materials<00:06:22.240> and<00:06:22.319> then<00:06:22.440> it<00:06:22.599> goes 00:06:22.830 --> 00:06:22.840 align:start position:0% Library materials and then it goes 00:06:22.840 --> 00:06:24.670 align:start position:0% Library materials and then it goes through<00:06:23.080> the<00:06:23.280> key<00:06:23.599> pieces<00:06:23.960> of<00:06:24.120> the<00:06:24.280> law<00:06:24.560> that 00:06:24.670 --> 00:06:24.680 align:start position:0% through the key pieces of the law that 00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:27.430 align:start position:0% through the key pieces of the law that have<00:06:24.880> just<00:06:25.080> passed<00:06:25.479> and<00:06:25.680> previous<00:06:26.120> laws<00:06:27.120> so<00:06:27.280> it 00:06:27.430 --> 00:06:27.440 align:start position:0% have just passed and previous laws so it 00:06:27.440 --> 00:06:29.309 align:start position:0% have just passed and previous laws so it kind<00:06:27.560> of<00:06:27.720> has<00:06:28.120> all<00:06:28.360> those<00:06:28.639> pieces<00:06:29.000> all 00:06:29.309 --> 00:06:29.319 align:start position:0% kind of has all those pieces all 00:06:29.319 --> 00:06:32.029 align:start position:0% kind of has all those pieces all together<00:06:29.720> in<00:06:29.919> one<00:06:30.759> and<00:06:30.960> districts<00:06:31.440> can<00:06:31.639> go<00:06:31.960> I 00:06:32.029 --> 00:06:32.039 align:start position:0% together in one and districts can go I 00:06:32.039 --> 00:06:33.430 align:start position:0% together in one and districts can go I don't<00:06:32.199> know<00:06:32.319> if<00:06:32.400> we<00:06:32.520> want<00:06:32.639> to<00:06:32.759> set<00:06:32.960> this<00:06:33.120> up<00:06:33.280> as 00:06:33.430 --> 00:06:33.440 align:start position:0% don't know if we want to set this up as 00:06:33.440 --> 00:06:35.469 align:start position:0% don't know if we want to set this up as kind<00:06:33.560> of<00:06:33.680> like<00:06:33.800> that<00:06:34.000> idea<00:06:34.240> of<00:06:34.319> a<00:06:34.479> checklist 00:06:35.469 --> 00:06:35.479 align:start position:0% kind of like that idea of a checklist 00:06:35.479 --> 00:06:37.830 align:start position:0% kind of like that idea of a checklist that's<00:06:35.639> why<00:06:35.759> I<00:06:35.919> have<00:06:36.120> these<00:06:36.599> circles<00:06:37.199> here<00:06:37.479> but 00:06:37.830 --> 00:06:37.840 align:start position:0% that's why I have these circles here but 00:06:37.840 --> 00:06:41.629 align:start position:0% that's why I have these circles here but however<00:06:38.039> we<00:06:38.160> want<00:06:38.280> to<00:06:39.240> reference<00:06:39.919> that<00:06:40.639> um 00:06:41.629 --> 00:06:41.639 align:start position:0% however we want to reference that um 00:06:41.639 --> 00:06:43.270 align:start position:0% however we want to reference that um that's<00:06:42.000> that<00:06:42.120> was<00:06:42.319> the<00:06:42.479> thought<00:06:42.840> process 00:06:43.270 --> 00:06:43.280 align:start position:0% that's that was the thought process 00:06:43.280 --> 00:06:44.870 align:start position:0% that's that was the thought process behind<00:06:43.639> this<00:06:43.840> so<00:06:44.039> just<00:06:44.280> that's<00:06:44.479> kind<00:06:44.599> of<00:06:44.759> the 00:06:44.870 --> 00:06:44.880 align:start position:0% behind this so just that's kind of the 00:06:44.880 --> 00:06:47.110 align:start position:0% behind this so just that's kind of the behind<00:06:45.199> the<00:06:45.319> scenes<00:06:46.319> and<00:06:46.440> then<00:06:46.639> people<00:06:46.880> can 00:06:47.110 --> 00:06:47.120 align:start position:0% behind the scenes and then people can 00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:48.670 align:start position:0% behind the scenes and then people can actually<00:06:47.400> look<00:06:47.599> and<00:06:47.720> say<00:06:48.000> look<00:06:48.199> I<00:06:48.280> need<00:06:48.479> this 00:06:48.670 --> 00:06:48.680 align:start position:0% actually look and say look I need this 00:06:48.680 --> 00:06:52.150 align:start position:0% actually look and say look I need this according<00:06:49.080> to<00:06:50.000> the<00:06:50.199> law<00:06:51.000> um<00:06:51.599> you<00:06:51.680> know<00:06:51.840> or<00:06:52.000> a 00:06:52.150 --> 00:06:52.160 align:start position:0% according to the law um you know or a 00:06:52.160 --> 00:06:54.790 align:start position:0% according to the law um you know or a rule<00:06:52.960> do<00:06:53.160> we<00:06:53.400> have<00:06:53.720> that<00:06:54.160> and<00:06:54.240> then<00:06:54.599> however 00:06:54.790 --> 00:06:54.800 align:start position:0% rule do we have that and then however 00:06:54.800 --> 00:06:55.950 align:start position:0% rule do we have that and then however they<00:06:54.880> want<00:06:55.000> to<00:06:55.160> structure<00:06:55.560> the<00:06:55.720> other 00:06:55.950 --> 00:06:55.960 align:start position:0% they want to structure the other 00:06:55.960 --> 00:06:58.070 align:start position:0% they want to structure the other components<00:06:56.599> they<00:06:56.720> can<00:06:57.440> you<00:06:57.560> know<00:06:57.720> bring<00:06:57.919> in 00:06:58.070 --> 00:06:58.080 align:start position:0% components they can you know bring in 00:06:58.080 --> 00:07:00.150 align:start position:0% components they can you know bring in their<00:06:58.280> uniqueness<00:06:58.960> depending<00:06:59.240> on<00:06:59.400> their<00:06:59.879> size 00:07:00.150 --> 00:07:00.160 align:start position:0% their uniqueness depending on their size 00:07:00.160 --> 00:07:02.150 align:start position:0% their uniqueness depending on their size of<00:07:00.360> District<00:07:00.840> or 00:07:02.150 --> 00:07:02.160 align:start position:0% of District or 00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:05.510 align:start position:0% of District or Charter<00:07:03.280> um<00:07:04.280> then<00:07:04.440> the<00:07:04.599> other<00:07:04.960> the<00:07:05.120> structure 00:07:05.510 --> 00:07:05.520 align:start position:0% Charter um then the other the structure 00:07:05.520 --> 00:07:08.550 align:start position:0% Charter um then the other the structure of<00:07:05.720> this<00:07:06.160> is<00:07:07.160> really<00:07:07.560> this<00:07:07.720> starts<00:07:08.080> with 00:07:08.550 --> 00:07:08.560 align:start position:0% of this is really this starts with 00:07:08.560 --> 00:07:10.550 align:start position:0% of this is really this starts with vetting<00:07:09.000> instruction<00:07:09.479> materials<00:07:10.039> so<00:07:10.280> this<00:07:10.360> is 00:07:10.550 --> 00:07:10.560 align:start position:0% vetting instruction materials so this is 00:07:10.560 --> 00:07:13.950 align:start position:0% vetting instruction materials so this is the<00:07:10.759> law<00:07:11.240> for<00:07:11.479> both<00:07:11.680> Charters<00:07:12.360> and<00:07:12.960> districts 00:07:13.950 --> 00:07:13.960 align:start position:0% the law for both Charters and districts 00:07:13.960 --> 00:07:18.629 align:start position:0% the law for both Charters and districts relevant<00:07:14.520> to<00:07:15.680> um<00:07:16.680> just<00:07:16.919> that<00:07:17.360> the<00:07:17.879> the<00:07:18.280> the<00:07:18.440> key 00:07:18.629 --> 00:07:18.639 align:start position:0% relevant to um just that the the the key 00:07:18.639 --> 00:07:20.790 align:start position:0% relevant to um just that the the the key pieces<00:07:19.000> from<00:07:19.199> the<00:07:19.360> law<00:07:19.919> regard<00:07:20.400> regarding 00:07:20.790 --> 00:07:20.800 align:start position:0% pieces from the law regard regarding 00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:23.230 align:start position:0% pieces from the law regard regarding instructional<00:07:21.319> materials<00:07:21.919> so<00:07:22.919> is<00:07:23.039> it 00:07:23.230 --> 00:07:23.240 align:start position:0% instructional materials so is it 00:07:23.240 --> 00:07:24.790 align:start position:0% instructional materials so is it beneficial<00:07:23.759> to<00:07:23.879> read<00:07:24.080> each<00:07:24.240> piece<00:07:24.440> or<00:07:24.560> if<00:07:24.680> you 00:07:24.790 --> 00:07:24.800 align:start position:0% beneficial to read each piece or if you 00:07:24.800 --> 00:07:27.550 align:start position:0% beneficial to read each piece or if you guys<00:07:24.960> already<00:07:25.199> read<00:07:25.440> it<00:07:25.879> is<00:07:26.000> there<00:07:26.560> anything 00:07:27.550 --> 00:07:27.560 align:start position:0% guys already read it is there anything 00:07:27.560 --> 00:07:29.710 align:start position:0% guys already read it is there anything maybe<00:07:27.879> in<00:07:28.280> just<00:07:28.520> this<00:07:28.759> instructional 00:07:29.710 --> 00:07:29.720 align:start position:0% maybe in just this instructional 00:07:29.720 --> 00:07:32.909 align:start position:0% maybe in just this instructional materials<00:07:30.400> materials<00:07:31.280> piece<00:07:31.599> that<00:07:31.720> you<00:07:31.919> would 00:07:32.909 --> 00:07:32.919 align:start position:0% materials materials piece that you would 00:07:32.919 --> 00:07:35.670 align:start position:0% materials materials piece that you would alter<00:07:33.280> the<00:07:33.479> language<00:07:34.240> or<00:07:34.479> change<00:07:34.800> it<00:07:35.360> most<00:07:35.520> of 00:07:35.670 --> 00:07:35.680 align:start position:0% alter the language or change it most of 00:07:35.680 --> 00:07:37.990 align:start position:0% alter the language or change it most of it<00:07:35.879> taken<00:07:36.240> directly<00:07:36.680> from<00:07:37.120> the<00:07:37.240> law<00:07:37.759> I<00:07:37.840> may 00:07:37.990 --> 00:07:38.000 align:start position:0% it taken directly from the law I may 00:07:38.000 --> 00:07:39.510 align:start position:0% it taken directly from the law I may have<00:07:38.160> adjusted<00:07:38.680> the<00:07:38.800> language<00:07:39.160> just<00:07:39.280> a<00:07:39.360> little 00:07:39.510 --> 00:07:39.520 align:start position:0% have adjusted the language just a little 00:07:39.520 --> 00:07:40.790 align:start position:0% have adjusted the language just a little bit<00:07:39.639> so<00:07:39.800> it<00:07:39.879> would<00:07:40.039> read<00:07:40.280> a<00:07:40.360> little<00:07:40.560> better 00:07:40.790 --> 00:07:40.800 align:start position:0% bit so it would read a little better 00:07:40.800 --> 00:07:44.629 align:start position:0% bit so it would read a little better than<00:07:41.039> legal<00:07:41.720> e<00:07:42.919> um<00:07:43.919> should<00:07:44.120> we<00:07:44.280> just<00:07:44.440> kind<00:07:44.560> of 00:07:44.629 --> 00:07:44.639 align:start position:0% than legal e um should we just kind of 00:07:44.639 --> 00:07:46.909 align:start position:0% than legal e um should we just kind of leave<00:07:44.800> it<00:07:44.919> at<00:07:45.039> that<00:07:45.159> for<00:07:45.280> a<00:07:45.360> minute 00:07:46.909 --> 00:07:46.919 align:start position:0% leave it at that for a minute 00:07:46.919 --> 00:07:51.589 align:start position:0% leave it at that for a minute and<00:07:47.919> remember<00:07:48.759> okay<00:07:49.440> yeah 00:07:51.589 --> 00:07:51.599 align:start position:0% and remember okay yeah 00:07:51.599 --> 00:07:53.950 align:start position:0% and remember okay yeah um<00:07:52.599> we<00:07:52.759> talked<00:07:53.000> about<00:07:53.120> this<00:07:53.240> a<00:07:53.319> little<00:07:53.520> bit<00:07:53.759> but 00:07:53.950 --> 00:07:53.960 align:start position:0% um we talked about this a little bit but 00:07:53.960 --> 00:07:56.149 align:start position:0% um we talked about this a little bit but one<00:07:54.199> part<00:07:54.400> of<00:07:54.720> when<00:07:54.879> I<00:07:55.039> talked<00:07:55.280> to<00:07:55.479> some<00:07:55.800> local 00:07:56.149 --> 00:07:56.159 align:start position:0% one part of when I talked to some local 00:07:56.159 --> 00:07:58.629 align:start position:0% one part of when I talked to some local leas<00:07:57.159> they<00:07:57.280> had<00:07:57.440> mentioned<00:07:57.960> that<00:07:58.159> you<00:07:58.280> know 00:07:58.629 --> 00:07:58.639 align:start position:0% leas they had mentioned that you know 00:07:58.639 --> 00:08:00.710 align:start position:0% leas they had mentioned that you know they<00:07:59.000> they<00:07:59.159> have<00:07:59.759> Council<00:08:00.159> so<00:08:00.319> they<00:08:00.440> know<00:08:00.639> how 00:08:00.710 --> 00:08:00.720 align:start position:0% they they have Council so they know how 00:08:00.720 --> 00:08:02.510 align:start position:0% they they have Council so they know how to<00:08:01.199> interpret<00:08:01.680> the<00:08:01.800> law<00:08:02.039> and<00:08:02.159> they<00:08:02.280> read 00:08:02.510 --> 00:08:02.520 align:start position:0% to interpret the law and they read 00:08:02.520 --> 00:08:05.270 align:start position:0% to interpret the law and they read through<00:08:02.800> that<00:08:03.360> and<00:08:03.479> their<00:08:03.720> Council<00:08:04.080> does<00:08:04.479> but 00:08:05.270 --> 00:08:05.280 align:start position:0% through that and their Council does but 00:08:05.280 --> 00:08:08.110 align:start position:0% through that and their Council does but highlighting<00:08:05.800> in<00:08:06.000> some<00:08:06.280> way<00:08:07.159> um<00:08:07.479> the<00:08:07.639> new 00:08:08.110 --> 00:08:08.120 align:start position:0% highlighting in some way um the new 00:08:08.120 --> 00:08:11.830 align:start position:0% highlighting in some way um the new pieces<00:08:09.120> of<00:08:09.759> the<00:08:10.639> so<00:08:11.039> everyone<00:08:11.319> has<00:08:11.479> created 00:08:11.830 --> 00:08:11.840 align:start position:0% pieces of the so everyone has created 00:08:11.840 --> 00:08:13.430 align:start position:0% pieces of the so everyone has created their 00:08:13.430 --> 00:08:13.440 align:start position:0% their 00:08:13.440 --> 00:08:16.390 align:start position:0% their policies<00:08:14.440> now<00:08:15.000> what<00:08:15.120> do<00:08:15.319> they<00:08:15.560> need<00:08:15.759> to<00:08:16.159> in 00:08:16.390 --> 00:08:16.400 align:start position:0% policies now what do they need to in 00:08:16.400 --> 00:08:18.270 align:start position:0% policies now what do they need to in regards<00:08:16.680> to<00:08:16.840> instructional<00:08:17.319> materials<00:08:17.919> what 00:08:18.270 --> 00:08:18.280 align:start position:0% regards to instructional materials what 00:08:18.280 --> 00:08:21.110 align:start position:0% regards to instructional materials what changes<00:08:19.080> in<00:08:19.280> regards<00:08:19.599> to<00:08:19.800> the<00:08:19.919> new<00:08:20.120> law<00:08:20.919> and 00:08:21.110 --> 00:08:21.120 align:start position:0% changes in regards to the new law and 00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:23.309 align:start position:0% changes in regards to the new law and denoting<00:08:21.599> that<00:08:21.840> somehow<00:08:22.599> in<00:08:22.919> a<00:08:23.080> different 00:08:23.309 --> 00:08:23.319 align:start position:0% denoting that somehow in a different 00:08:23.319 --> 00:08:26.749 align:start position:0% denoting that somehow in a different color<00:08:23.639> or<00:08:23.800> Bolding<00:08:24.199> it<00:08:24.599> or<00:08:25.360> something<00:08:26.000> that<00:08:26.560> uh 00:08:26.749 --> 00:08:26.759 align:start position:0% color or Bolding it or something that uh 00:08:26.759 --> 00:08:28.110 align:start position:0% color or Bolding it or something that uh because<00:08:26.919> I<00:08:27.039> like<00:08:27.199> the<00:08:27.319> way<00:08:27.440> that<00:08:27.599> this<00:08:27.720> is<00:08:27.840> laid 00:08:28.110 --> 00:08:28.120 align:start position:0% because I like the way that this is laid 00:08:28.120 --> 00:08:30.629 align:start position:0% because I like the way that this is laid out<00:08:28.319> with<00:08:28.440> the<00:08:28.599> different<00:08:28.919> sections 00:08:30.629 --> 00:08:30.639 align:start position:0% out with the different sections 00:08:30.639 --> 00:08:32.909 align:start position:0% out with the different sections um<00:08:30.960> but<00:08:31.240> doing<00:08:31.560> something<00:08:31.840> to<00:08:32.240> differentiate 00:08:32.909 --> 00:08:32.919 align:start position:0% um but doing something to differentiate 00:08:32.919 --> 00:08:34.469 align:start position:0% um but doing something to differentiate between<00:08:33.560> here<00:08:33.680> are<00:08:33.839> the<00:08:33.959> things<00:08:34.159> that<00:08:34.279> you 00:08:34.469 --> 00:08:34.479 align:start position:0% between here are the things that you 00:08:34.479 --> 00:08:36.070 align:start position:0% between here are the things that you probably<00:08:34.800> already<00:08:35.039> have<00:08:35.360> you<00:08:35.519> should<00:08:35.800> have<00:08:35.959> in 00:08:36.070 --> 00:08:36.080 align:start position:0% probably already have you should have in 00:08:36.080 --> 00:08:37.750 align:start position:0% probably already have you should have in your<00:08:36.279> policies<00:08:36.719> already<00:08:37.039> based<00:08:37.279> on<00:08:37.399> the<00:08:37.519> Old 00:08:37.750 --> 00:08:37.760 align:start position:0% your policies already based on the Old 00:08:37.760 --> 00:08:40.670 align:start position:0% your policies already based on the Old Law<00:08:38.479> here<00:08:38.800> are<00:08:39.240> all<00:08:39.519> the<00:08:39.719> new<00:08:40.000> pieces<00:08:40.360> that<00:08:40.479> you 00:08:40.670 --> 00:08:40.680 align:start position:0% Law here are all the new pieces that you 00:08:40.680 --> 00:08:42.430 align:start position:0% Law here are all the new pieces that you may<00:08:40.880> need<00:08:41.039> to<00:08:41.200> make<00:08:41.360> sure<00:08:41.560> you<00:08:41.760> add<00:08:41.959> into<00:08:42.200> your 00:08:42.430 --> 00:08:42.440 align:start position:0% may need to make sure you add into your 00:08:42.440 --> 00:08:46.509 align:start position:0% may need to make sure you add into your policy<00:08:43.120> is<00:08:44.600> um<00:08:45.600> with<00:08:45.720> the<00:08:45.839> changes<00:08:46.240> with<00:08:46.399> the 00:08:46.509 --> 00:08:46.519 align:start position:0% policy is um with the changes with the 00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:48.269 align:start position:0% policy is um with the changes with the new<00:08:46.720> law 00:08:48.269 --> 00:08:48.279 align:start position:0% new law 00:08:48.279 --> 00:08:50.949 align:start position:0% new law okay<00:08:49.279> and<00:08:49.640> I<00:08:49.760> think<00:08:50.000> that's<00:08:50.240> great<00:08:50.560> I<00:08:50.720> actually 00:08:50.949 --> 00:08:50.959 align:start position:0% okay and I think that's great I actually 00:08:50.959 --> 00:08:52.670 align:start position:0% okay and I think that's great I actually went<00:08:51.200> through<00:08:51.600> my<00:08:51.760> document<00:08:52.120> after<00:08:52.320> I<00:08:52.440> talked 00:08:52.670 --> 00:08:52.680 align:start position:0% went through my document after I talked 00:08:52.680 --> 00:08:54.509 align:start position:0% went through my document after I talked with<00:08:52.800> you<00:08:53.000> yesterday<00:08:53.600> board<00:08:53.839> member<00:08:54.080> real<00:08:54.360> and 00:08:54.509 --> 00:08:54.519 align:start position:0% with you yesterday board member real and 00:08:54.519 --> 00:08:55.990 align:start position:0% with you yesterday board member real and kind<00:08:54.640> of<00:08:54.800> highlighted<00:08:55.279> those<00:08:55.480> Provisions<00:08:55.880> so 00:08:55.990 --> 00:08:56.000 align:start position:0% kind of highlighted those Provisions so 00:08:56.000 --> 00:08:58.710 align:start position:0% kind of highlighted those Provisions so as<00:08:56.120> we<00:08:56.240> get<00:08:56.399> to<00:08:56.519> each<00:08:56.720> one<00:08:56.839> of<00:08:57.560> those<00:08:58.560> um 00:08:58.710 --> 00:08:58.720 align:start position:0% as we get to each one of those um 00:08:58.720 --> 00:09:00.550 align:start position:0% as we get to each one of those um instruction<00:08:59.120> material<00:08:59.800> section<00:09:00.279> I<00:09:00.360> don't 00:09:00.550 --> 00:09:00.560 align:start position:0% instruction material section I don't 00:09:00.560 --> 00:09:02.710 align:start position:0% instruction material section I don't believe<00:09:00.880> has<00:09:01.040> any<00:09:01.279> new<00:09:01.480> changes<00:09:02.160> according<00:09:02.519> to 00:09:02.710 --> 00:09:02.720 align:start position:0% believe has any new changes according to 00:09:02.720 --> 00:09:05.750 align:start position:0% believe has any new changes according to the<00:09:03.279> law<00:09:04.279> the<00:09:04.440> current<00:09:04.920> the<00:09:05.120> new<00:09:05.320> law<00:09:05.600> that 00:09:05.750 --> 00:09:05.760 align:start position:0% the law the current the new law that 00:09:05.760 --> 00:09:08.110 align:start position:0% the law the current the new law that came<00:09:05.959> in<00:09:06.120> so<00:09:06.440> this<00:09:06.640> what's<00:09:06.920> here<00:09:07.600> I<00:09:07.720> think<00:09:07.920> has 00:09:08.110 --> 00:09:08.120 align:start position:0% came in so this what's here I think has 00:09:08.120 --> 00:09:09.949 align:start position:0% came in so this what's here I think has been<00:09:08.440> here<00:09:08.800> and<00:09:09.040> someone<00:09:09.320> could<00:09:09.560> correct<00:09:09.839> me 00:09:09.949 --> 00:09:09.959 align:start position:0% been here and someone could correct me 00:09:09.959 --> 00:09:12.630 align:start position:0% been here and someone could correct me if<00:09:10.120> I'm<00:09:10.360> wrong<00:09:10.720> on<00:09:10.959> that<00:09:11.240> I<00:09:11.320> don't 00:09:12.630 --> 00:09:12.640 align:start position:0% if I'm wrong on that I don't 00:09:12.640 --> 00:09:16.110 align:start position:0% if I'm wrong on that I don't know<00:09:13.640> basically<00:09:14.560> the<00:09:15.560> definition<00:09:15.959> of 00:09:16.110 --> 00:09:16.120 align:start position:0% know basically the definition of 00:09:16.120 --> 00:09:17.350 align:start position:0% know basically the definition of instructional 00:09:17.350 --> 00:09:17.360 align:start position:0% instructional 00:09:17.360 --> 00:09:20.110 align:start position:0% instructional materials<00:09:18.360> and<00:09:18.560> guidance<00:09:18.880> on<00:09:19.079> that<00:09:19.279> within 00:09:20.110 --> 00:09:20.120 align:start position:0% materials and guidance on that within 00:09:20.120 --> 00:09:23.110 align:start position:0% materials and guidance on that within the<00:09:20.279> law<00:09:20.760> the<00:09:21.079> code<00:09:22.079> yeah<00:09:22.399> except<00:09:22.640> for<00:09:22.839> this 00:09:23.110 --> 00:09:23.120 align:start position:0% the law the code yeah except for this 00:09:23.120 --> 00:09:25.350 align:start position:0% the law the code yeah except for this isn't<00:09:23.480> where<00:09:23.680> we<00:09:23.920> find<00:09:24.240> that<00:09:24.480> definition<00:09:25.000> from 00:09:25.350 --> 00:09:25.360 align:start position:0% isn't where we find that definition from 00:09:25.360 --> 00:09:27.750 align:start position:0% isn't where we find that definition from that<00:09:25.560> definition<00:09:26.000> is<00:09:26.240> found<00:09:27.240> I<00:09:27.320> think<00:09:27.560> this 00:09:27.750 --> 00:09:27.760 align:start position:0% that definition is found I think this 00:09:27.760 --> 00:09:30.150 align:start position:0% that definition is found I think this might<00:09:28.000> have<00:09:28.240> an<00:09:28.519> another<00:09:28.920> reference 00:09:30.150 --> 00:09:30.160 align:start position:0% might have an another reference 00:09:30.160 --> 00:09:32.509 align:start position:0% might have an another reference am<00:09:30.760> am<00:09:30.880> I<00:09:31.120> right<00:09:31.560> does<00:09:31.760> anybody<00:09:32.079> want<00:09:32.200> to 00:09:32.509 --> 00:09:32.519 align:start position:0% am am I right does anybody want to 00:09:32.519 --> 00:09:33.990 align:start position:0% am am I right does anybody want to correct<00:09:32.800> me<00:09:32.920> on 00:09:33.990 --> 00:09:34.000 align:start position:0% correct me on 00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:36.670 align:start position:0% correct me on that<00:09:35.000> I<00:09:35.079> think<00:09:35.320> that<00:09:35.560> part<00:09:35.839> is<00:09:36.079> actually<00:09:36.360> down 00:09:36.670 --> 00:09:36.680 align:start position:0% that I think that part is actually down 00:09:36.680 --> 00:09:38.350 align:start position:0% that I think that part is actually down where<00:09:36.839> we<00:09:36.959> do<00:09:37.160> the<00:09:37.360> vetting<00:09:37.920> that<00:09:38.120> that's 00:09:38.350 --> 00:09:38.360 align:start position:0% where we do the vetting that that's 00:09:38.360 --> 00:09:40.310 align:start position:0% where we do the vetting that that's referencing<00:09:38.920> a<00:09:39.160> specific 00:09:40.310 --> 00:09:40.320 align:start position:0% referencing a specific 00:09:40.320 --> 00:09:42.670 align:start position:0% referencing a specific definition<00:09:41.320> so<00:09:41.839> if<00:09:41.920> you<00:09:42.040> go<00:09:42.200> down<00:09:42.399> just<00:09:42.560> a 00:09:42.670 --> 00:09:42.680 align:start position:0% definition so if you go down just a 00:09:42.680 --> 00:09:44.590 align:start position:0% definition so if you go down just a little<00:09:42.880> bit<00:09:43.040> more<00:09:43.399> is<00:09:43.560> Andrea<00:09:43.959> driving<00:09:44.279> it<00:09:44.440> so 00:09:44.590 --> 00:09:44.600 align:start position:0% little bit more is Andrea driving it so 00:09:44.600 --> 00:09:45.949 align:start position:0% little bit more is Andrea driving it so under<00:09:44.800> the<00:09:44.920> general<00:09:45.360> Provisions<00:09:45.720> for 00:09:45.949 --> 00:09:45.959 align:start position:0% under the general Provisions for 00:09:45.959 --> 00:09:48.069 align:start position:0% under the general Provisions for sensitive<00:09:46.600> materials<00:09:47.600> that's<00:09:47.800> where<00:09:47.920> you're 00:09:48.069 --> 00:09:48.079 align:start position:0% sensitive materials that's where you're 00:09:48.079 --> 00:09:50.470 align:start position:0% sensitive materials that's where you're going<00:09:48.160> to<00:09:48.320> find<00:09:48.680> that<00:09:49.200> the<00:09:49.800> these<00:09:50.040> things<00:09:50.279> here 00:09:50.470 --> 00:09:50.480 align:start position:0% going to find that the these things here 00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:52.150 align:start position:0% going to find that the these things here would<00:09:50.640> have<00:09:50.760> to<00:09:50.920> almost<00:09:51.240> all<00:09:51.399> be<00:09:51.600> highlighted 00:09:52.150 --> 00:09:52.160 align:start position:0% would have to almost all be highlighted 00:09:52.160 --> 00:09:54.150 align:start position:0% would have to almost all be highlighted because<00:09:52.279> they're<00:09:52.480> relevant<00:09:52.880> to<00:09:53.079> the<00:09:53.839> pieces 00:09:54.150 --> 00:09:54.160 align:start position:0% because they're relevant to the pieces 00:09:54.160 --> 00:09:56.750 align:start position:0% because they're relevant to the pieces of<00:09:54.360> the<00:09:54.600> the<00:09:54.720> new<00:09:55.000> law<00:09:56.000> but<00:09:56.160> the<00:09:56.279> instruction 00:09:56.750 --> 00:09:56.760 align:start position:0% of the the new law but the instruction 00:09:56.760 --> 00:10:00.269 align:start position:0% of the the new law but the instruction materials<00:09:57.279> up<00:09:57.839> above<00:09:58.839> is<00:09:59.040> our<00:09:59.800> it's<00:09:59.959> just<00:10:00.079> a 00:10:00.269 --> 00:10:00.279 align:start position:0% materials up above is our it's just a 00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:02.870 align:start position:0% materials up above is our it's just a piece<00:10:00.480> of<00:10:00.720> what<00:10:01.320> responsibilities<00:10:02.240> that<00:10:02.640> um<00:10:02.760> a 00:10:02.870 --> 00:10:02.880 align:start position:0% piece of what responsibilities that um a 00:10:02.880 --> 00:10:05.870 align:start position:0% piece of what responsibilities that um a local<00:10:03.200> Elia<00:10:03.680> or<00:10:03.839> a<00:10:03.959> charter<00:10:04.399> would<00:10:04.640> have<00:10:05.640> um<00:10:05.760> a 00:10:05.870 --> 00:10:05.880 align:start position:0% local Elia or a charter would have um a 00:10:05.880 --> 00:10:07.069 align:start position:0% local Elia or a charter would have um a district<00:10:06.160> or<00:10:06.279> a<00:10:06.360> charter<00:10:06.640> would<00:10:06.800> have<00:10:06.959> and 00:10:07.069 --> 00:10:07.079 align:start position:0% district or a charter would have and 00:10:07.079 --> 00:10:08.590 align:start position:0% district or a charter would have and those<00:10:07.200> are<00:10:07.360> the<00:10:07.519> two<00:10:07.720> pieces<00:10:08.000> of<00:10:08.200> law<00:10:08.440> that 00:10:08.590 --> 00:10:08.600 align:start position:0% those are the two pieces of law that 00:10:08.600 --> 00:10:09.990 align:start position:0% those are the two pieces of law that reference 00:10:09.990 --> 00:10:10.000 align:start position:0% reference 00:10:10.000 --> 00:10:13.470 align:start position:0% reference those<00:10:11.440> so<00:10:12.440> so<00:10:12.640> I<00:10:12.720> don't<00:10:12.880> think<00:10:13.079> there's<00:10:13.360> there 00:10:13.470 --> 00:10:13.480 align:start position:0% those so so I don't think there's there 00:10:13.480 --> 00:10:16.389 align:start position:0% those so so I don't think there's there isn't<00:10:13.760> anything<00:10:14.360> I<00:10:14.480> would<00:10:15.160> highlight<00:10:15.680> here<00:10:16.279> is 00:10:16.389 --> 00:10:16.399 align:start position:0% isn't anything I would highlight here is 00:10:16.399 --> 00:10:18.150 align:start position:0% isn't anything I would highlight here is that<00:10:16.600> what<00:10:17.079> if<00:10:17.200> that's<00:10:17.360> what<00:10:17.480> you're<00:10:17.680> asking 00:10:18.150 --> 00:10:18.160 align:start position:0% that what if that's what you're asking 00:10:18.160 --> 00:10:19.949 align:start position:0% that what if that's what you're asking board<00:10:18.399> member<00:10:18.959> yeah<00:10:19.040> I<00:10:19.120> mean<00:10:19.440> yeah<00:10:19.640> well<00:10:19.720> I<00:10:19.839> was 00:10:19.949 --> 00:10:19.959 align:start position:0% board member yeah I mean yeah well I was 00:10:19.959 --> 00:10:22.230 align:start position:0% board member yeah I mean yeah well I was just<00:10:20.200> saying<00:10:20.560> generally<00:10:21.040> as<00:10:21.160> we<00:10:21.279> talked<00:10:21.600> about 00:10:22.230 --> 00:10:22.240 align:start position:0% just saying generally as we talked about 00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:28.030 align:start position:0% just saying generally as we talked about the<00:10:22.399> whole<00:10:22.680> document<00:10:23.160> but<00:10:24.160> that<00:10:24.320> makes 00:10:28.030 --> 00:10:28.040 align:start position:0% 00:10:28.040 --> 00:10:31.190 align:start position:0% sense<00:10:29.040> I<00:10:29.720> um<00:10:30.240> mentioned<00:10:30.640> this<00:10:30.800> but<00:10:30.920> it's<00:10:31.040> sort 00:10:31.190 --> 00:10:31.200 align:start position:0% sense I um mentioned this but it's sort 00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:33.710 align:start position:0% sense I um mentioned this but it's sort of<00:10:31.399> like<00:10:31.680> what<00:10:31.880> can<00:10:32.279> we<00:10:32.720> create<00:10:33.200> that<00:10:33.320> will<00:10:33.480> be 00:10:33.710 --> 00:10:33.720 align:start position:0% of like what can we create that will be 00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:34.790 align:start position:0% of like what can we create that will be the<00:10:33.880> most 00:10:34.790 --> 00:10:34.800 align:start position:0% the most 00:10:34.800 --> 00:10:37.750 align:start position:0% the most useful<00:10:35.800> without 00:10:37.750 --> 00:10:37.760 align:start position:0% useful without 00:10:37.760 --> 00:10:43.550 align:start position:0% useful without being<00:10:38.760> to<00:10:39.639> um<00:10:40.519> you<00:10:41.040> know<00:10:42.040> big<00:10:42.360> br<00:10:42.639> like<00:10:42.800> parenty 00:10:43.550 --> 00:10:43.560 align:start position:0% being to um you know big br like parenty 00:10:43.560 --> 00:10:46.350 align:start position:0% being to um you know big br like parenty over<00:10:43.839> over<00:10:44.000> our<00:10:44.200> elas<00:10:44.720> to<00:10:44.880> give<00:10:45.040> them<00:10:45.360> guidance 00:10:46.350 --> 00:10:46.360 align:start position:0% over over our elas to give them guidance 00:10:46.360 --> 00:10:48.310 align:start position:0% over over our elas to give them guidance to<00:10:46.639> help<00:10:46.880> them<00:10:47.079> create<00:10:47.360> their<00:10:47.600> policies<00:10:48.079> based 00:10:48.310 --> 00:10:48.320 align:start position:0% to help them create their policies based 00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:50.670 align:start position:0% to help them create their policies based on<00:10:48.399> the<00:10:48.519> new<00:10:48.720> law<00:10:49.519> so<00:10:49.720> whatever<00:10:50.040> that<00:10:50.200> looks 00:10:50.670 --> 00:10:50.680 align:start position:0% on the new law so whatever that looks 00:10:50.680 --> 00:10:53.190 align:start position:0% on the new law so whatever that looks like<00:10:51.680> um<00:10:52.040> and<00:10:52.160> I<00:10:52.279> think<00:10:52.560> I<00:10:52.639> was<00:10:52.760> thinking<00:10:53.040> about 00:10:53.190 --> 00:10:53.200 align:start position:0% like um and I think I was thinking about 00:10:53.200 --> 00:10:54.829 align:start position:0% like um and I think I was thinking about it<00:10:53.399> and<00:10:53.639> there<00:10:53.880> actually<00:10:54.279> probably<00:10:54.639> is 00:10:54.829 --> 00:10:54.839 align:start position:0% it and there actually probably is 00:10:54.839 --> 00:10:57.389 align:start position:0% it and there actually probably is someone<00:10:55.160> who<00:10:55.320> is<00:10:55.519> like<00:10:55.959> a<00:10:56.160> technical<00:10:56.560> writer 00:10:57.389 --> 00:10:57.399 align:start position:0% someone who is like a technical writer 00:10:57.399 --> 00:10:59.350 align:start position:0% someone who is like a technical writer designer<00:10:57.839> that<00:10:57.959> could<00:10:58.160> create<00:10:58.519> some<00:10:58.760> you<00:10:58.839> know 00:10:59.350 --> 00:10:59.360 align:start position:0% designer that could create some you know 00:10:59.360 --> 00:11:02.870 align:start position:0% designer that could create some you know keep<00:10:59.600> this<00:11:00.000> format<00:11:01.000> but<00:11:01.800> create<00:11:02.120> it<00:11:02.440> design<00:11:02.720> it 00:11:02.870 --> 00:11:02.880 align:start position:0% keep this format but create it design it 00:11:02.880 --> 00:11:05.110 align:start position:0% keep this format but create it design it in<00:11:02.959> a<00:11:03.120> way<00:11:03.360> that's<00:11:03.600> super<00:11:03.880> helpful<00:11:04.800> um<00:11:04.959> the 00:11:05.110 --> 00:11:05.120 align:start position:0% in a way that's super helpful um the 00:11:05.120 --> 00:11:08.670 align:start position:0% in a way that's super helpful um the other<00:11:05.360> thing<00:11:05.760> that<00:11:06.720> I<00:11:06.800> think<00:11:07.000> would<00:11:07.320> be<00:11:08.320> and 00:11:08.670 --> 00:11:08.680 align:start position:0% other thing that I think would be and 00:11:08.680 --> 00:11:11.509 align:start position:0% other thing that I think would be and maybe<00:11:09.279> Elise<00:11:09.720> or<00:11:10.480> Michelle<00:11:10.880> can<00:11:11.040> give<00:11:11.160> us<00:11:11.279> some 00:11:11.509 --> 00:11:11.519 align:start position:0% maybe Elise or Michelle can give us some 00:11:11.519 --> 00:11:13.910 align:start position:0% maybe Elise or Michelle can give us some guidance<00:11:11.839> on<00:11:12.079> this<00:11:12.360> but<00:11:13.079> adding<00:11:13.440> something<00:11:13.760> at 00:11:13.910 --> 00:11:13.920 align:start position:0% guidance on this but adding something at 00:11:13.920 --> 00:11:15.470 align:start position:0% guidance on this but adding something at the<00:11:14.040> beginning<00:11:14.440> that<00:11:14.600> talks<00:11:14.880> about<00:11:15.120> how<00:11:15.360> this 00:11:15.470 --> 00:11:15.480 align:start position:0% the beginning that talks about how this 00:11:15.480 --> 00:11:17.389 align:start position:0% the beginning that talks about how this is<00:11:15.639> just<00:11:15.800> a<00:11:15.959> guidance<00:11:16.440> document<00:11:16.959> this<00:11:17.079> is<00:11:17.200> not 00:11:17.389 --> 00:11:17.399 align:start position:0% is just a guidance document this is not 00:11:17.399 --> 00:11:21.150 align:start position:0% is just a guidance document this is not the<00:11:17.519> rule<00:11:18.360> so<00:11:19.360> um<00:11:19.880> just<00:11:20.040> so<00:11:20.279> that<00:11:20.480> folks<00:11:20.839> know 00:11:21.150 --> 00:11:21.160 align:start position:0% the rule so um just so that folks know 00:11:21.160 --> 00:11:23.750 align:start position:0% the rule so um just so that folks know that<00:11:21.360> they're<00:11:21.839> not<00:11:22.839> because<00:11:23.440> we<00:11:23.560> don't<00:11:23.680> want 00:11:23.750 --> 00:11:23.760 align:start position:0% that they're not because we don't want 00:11:23.760 --> 00:11:26.110 align:start position:0% that they're not because we don't want to<00:11:23.839> run<00:11:24.200> into<00:11:24.399> a<00:11:24.560> situation<00:11:25.000> where<00:11:25.160> an<00:11:25.279> Lea<00:11:25.839> is 00:11:26.110 --> 00:11:26.120 align:start position:0% to run into a situation where an Lea is 00:11:26.120 --> 00:11:28.150 align:start position:0% to run into a situation where an Lea is quoting<00:11:26.519> our<00:11:26.800> guidance<00:11:27.279> document<00:11:27.800> and<00:11:27.920> not 00:11:28.150 --> 00:11:28.160 align:start position:0% quoting our guidance document and not 00:11:28.160 --> 00:11:30.629 align:start position:0% quoting our guidance document and not really<00:11:29.519> understanding<00:11:29.760> that<00:11:29.959> there<00:11:30.279> is 00:11:30.629 --> 00:11:30.639 align:start position:0% really understanding that there is 00:11:30.639 --> 00:11:33.590 align:start position:0% really understanding that there is actual<00:11:31.040> Rule<00:11:31.920> and<00:11:32.800> this<00:11:32.920> is<00:11:33.120> just<00:11:33.279> to<00:11:33.440> be 00:11:33.590 --> 00:11:33.600 align:start position:0% actual Rule and this is just to be 00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:36.870 align:start position:0% actual Rule and this is just to be helpful<00:11:33.920> for<00:11:34.079> them<00:11:34.240> in<00:11:34.360> creating<00:11:34.720> their 00:11:36.870 --> 00:11:36.880 align:start position:0% helpful for them in creating their 00:11:36.880 --> 00:11:39.269 align:start position:0% helpful for them in creating their policy<00:11:37.880> just<00:11:38.120> a<00:11:38.279> line<00:11:38.560> or<00:11:38.720> something<00:11:39.000> at<00:11:39.120> the 00:11:39.269 --> 00:11:39.279 align:start position:0% policy just a line or something at the 00:11:39.279 --> 00:11:41.069 align:start position:0% policy just a line or something at the top<00:11:39.519> it's<00:11:39.760> like<00:11:40.079> you<00:11:40.240> could<00:11:40.399> find<00:11:40.600> the<00:11:40.720> rule 00:11:41.069 --> 00:11:41.079 align:start position:0% top it's like you could find the rule 00:11:41.079 --> 00:11:43.430 align:start position:0% top it's like you could find the rule here<00:11:41.440> this<00:11:41.560> is<00:11:41.720> just<00:11:41.880> a<00:11:42.079> guidance<00:11:42.560> document<00:11:43.279> on 00:11:43.430 --> 00:11:43.440 align:start position:0% here this is just a guidance document on 00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:46.550 align:start position:0% here this is just a guidance document on the<00:11:43.639> policies<00:11:44.240> on<00:11:44.360> the<00:11:44.480> I<00:11:44.560> mean<00:11:44.680> on<00:11:44.800> the 00:11:46.550 --> 00:11:46.560 align:start position:0% the policies on the I mean on the 00:11:46.560 --> 00:11:49.110 align:start position:0% the policies on the I mean on the law<00:11:47.560> I<00:11:47.720> think<00:11:47.880> if<00:11:47.959> you<00:11:48.120> just<00:11:48.279> cite<00:11:48.560> the<00:11:48.680> rule<00:11:48.959> in 00:11:49.110 --> 00:11:49.120 align:start position:0% law I think if you just cite the rule in 00:11:49.120 --> 00:11:50.670 align:start position:0% law I think if you just cite the rule in the<00:11:49.320> introductory<00:11:50.040> paragraph<00:11:50.480> that's 00:11:50.670 --> 00:11:50.680 align:start position:0% the introductory paragraph that's 00:11:50.680 --> 00:11:52.350 align:start position:0% the introductory paragraph that's already<00:11:51.079> there<00:11:51.279> it<00:11:51.480> kind<00:11:51.600> of<00:11:51.760> serves<00:11:52.240> what 00:11:52.350 --> 00:11:52.360 align:start position:0% already there it kind of serves what 00:11:52.360 --> 00:12:00.310 align:start position:0% already there it kind of serves what you're<00:11:52.680> wanting<00:11:53.040> to<00:11:53.320> have<00:11:54.079> member<00:11:54.480> real 00:12:00.310 --> 00:12:00.320 align:start position:0% 00:12:00.320 --> 00:12:16.550 align:start position:0% sounds<00:12:00.720> good<00:12:00.880> I<00:12:01.000> can't<00:12:01.200> stop<00:12:01.480> coughing 00:12:16.550 --> 00:12:16.560 align:start position:0% 00:12:16.560 --> 00:12:18.470 align:start position:0% still 00:12:18.470 --> 00:12:18.480 align:start position:0% still 00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:21.110 align:start position:0% still okay<00:12:19.480> and<00:12:19.720> are<00:12:19.839> you<00:12:20.040> thinking<00:12:20.600> uh<00:12:20.760> that<00:12:20.839> it<00:12:20.959> may 00:12:21.110 --> 00:12:21.120 align:start position:0% okay and are you thinking uh that it may 00:12:21.120 --> 00:12:22.870 align:start position:0% okay and are you thinking uh that it may need<00:12:21.279> to<00:12:21.360> be<00:12:21.519> reworked<00:12:22.040> just<00:12:22.199> a<00:12:22.360> little<00:12:22.600> bit 00:12:22.870 --> 00:12:22.880 align:start position:0% need to be reworked just a little bit 00:12:22.880 --> 00:12:25.189 align:start position:0% need to be reworked just a little bit more<00:12:23.880> um<00:12:24.000> or<00:12:24.120> do<00:12:24.240> you<00:12:24.320> feel<00:12:24.519> like<00:12:24.639> the<00:12:24.800> language 00:12:25.189 --> 00:12:25.199 align:start position:0% more um or do you feel like the language 00:12:25.199 --> 00:12:27.189 align:start position:0% more um or do you feel like the language is<00:12:25.680> that<00:12:25.839> this<00:12:26.000> language<00:12:26.360> is<00:12:26.600> adequate<00:12:27.120> I 00:12:27.189 --> 00:12:27.199 align:start position:0% is that this language is adequate I 00:12:27.199 --> 00:12:30.750 align:start position:0% is that this language is adequate I don't<00:12:27.320> know<00:12:27.440> if<00:12:27.600> Elise<00:12:28.040> or<00:12:29.000> um<00:12:29.399> um<00:12:30.399> we<00:12:30.519> feel 00:12:30.750 --> 00:12:30.760 align:start position:0% don't know if Elise or um um we feel 00:12:30.760 --> 00:12:36.389 align:start position:0% don't know if Elise or um um we feel like<00:12:30.920> the<00:12:31.040> language<00:12:31.360> at<00:12:31.480> the<00:12:31.600> very<00:12:31.800> beginning 00:12:36.389 --> 00:12:36.399 align:start position:0% 00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:39.069 align:start position:0% is<00:12:37.399> is<00:12:37.639> okay<00:12:37.880> I<00:12:38.040> personally<00:12:38.399> think<00:12:38.560> it<00:12:38.680> serves 00:12:39.069 --> 00:12:39.079 align:start position:0% is is okay I personally think it serves 00:12:39.079 --> 00:12:40.990 align:start position:0% is is okay I personally think it serves that<00:12:39.320> purpose<00:12:39.639> of<00:12:39.800> saying<00:12:40.199> this<00:12:40.360> doesn't<00:12:40.720> have 00:12:40.990 --> 00:12:41.000 align:start position:0% that purpose of saying this doesn't have 00:12:41.000 --> 00:12:42.829 align:start position:0% that purpose of saying this doesn't have everything<00:12:41.440> and<00:12:41.560> you<00:12:41.720> need<00:12:41.920> to<00:12:42.160> rely<00:12:42.519> on<00:12:42.680> your 00:12:42.829 --> 00:12:42.839 align:start position:0% everything and you need to rely on your 00:12:42.839 --> 00:12:45.990 align:start position:0% everything and you need to rely on your own<00:12:43.079> legal<00:12:43.440> counsel<00:12:43.880> to<00:12:44.120> review<00:12:44.519> it<00:12:44.720> as<00:12:45.000> well 00:12:45.990 --> 00:12:46.000 align:start position:0% own legal counsel to review it as well 00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:48.590 align:start position:0% own legal counsel to review it as well but<00:12:46.279> refers<00:12:46.800> to<00:12:47.040> the<00:12:47.399> law<00:12:47.720> and<00:12:47.880> the<00:12:48.040> rule<00:12:48.480> we 00:12:48.590 --> 00:12:48.600 align:start position:0% but refers to the law and the rule we 00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:50.509 align:start position:0% but refers to the law and the rule we could<00:12:48.839> put<00:12:49.120> the<00:12:49.279> reference<00:12:49.680> to<00:12:49.920> both<00:12:50.120> the<00:12:50.240> law 00:12:50.509 --> 00:12:50.519 align:start position:0% could put the reference to both the law 00:12:50.519 --> 00:12:57.550 align:start position:0% could put the reference to both the law and<00:12:50.639> the<00:12:50.760> rule<00:12:51.360> there<00:12:52.360> okay 00:12:57.550 --> 00:12:57.560 align:start position:0% 00:12:57.560 --> 00:13:00.230 align:start position:0% okay<00:12:58.560> other<00:12:58.760> than<00:12:58.959> those<00:12:59.480> then<00:12:59.839> going<00:13:00.079> through 00:13:00.230 --> 00:13:00.240 align:start position:0% okay other than those then going through 00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:01.310 align:start position:0% okay other than those then going through and<00:13:00.360> highlighting<00:13:00.760> each<00:13:00.920> section<00:13:01.160> but<00:13:01.240> I 00:13:01.310 --> 00:13:01.320 align:start position:0% and highlighting each section but I 00:13:01.320 --> 00:13:02.350 align:start position:0% and highlighting each section but I think<00:13:01.440> it'd<00:13:01.560> be<00:13:01.680> good<00:13:01.800> to<00:13:01.880> go<00:13:02.000> through<00:13:02.199> each 00:13:02.350 --> 00:13:02.360 align:start position:0% think it'd be good to go through each 00:13:02.360 --> 00:13:04.910 align:start position:0% think it'd be good to go through each section<00:13:02.600> to<00:13:02.760> see<00:13:02.920> if<00:13:03.079> there's<00:13:03.959> I<00:13:04.040> mean<00:13:04.240> Jenny 00:13:04.910 --> 00:13:04.920 align:start position:0% section to see if there's I mean Jenny 00:13:04.920 --> 00:13:06.470 align:start position:0% section to see if there's I mean Jenny remember<00:13:05.199> earlier<00:13:05.560> did<00:13:05.720> such<00:13:05.839> a<00:13:06.000> great<00:13:06.160> job<00:13:06.360> of 00:13:06.470 --> 00:13:06.480 align:start position:0% remember earlier did such a great job of 00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:08.470 align:start position:0% remember earlier did such a great job of being<00:13:06.680> so<00:13:06.880> thorough<00:13:07.320> on<00:13:07.519> this<00:13:07.800> I<00:13:07.920> just<00:13:08.160> like 00:13:08.470 --> 00:13:08.480 align:start position:0% being so thorough on this I just like 00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:11.389 align:start position:0% being so thorough on this I just like the<00:13:08.600> work<00:13:09.360> into<00:13:09.560> it<00:13:09.680> I<00:13:09.800> just<00:13:09.959> applaud<00:13:10.360> you<00:13:10.560> but 00:13:11.389 --> 00:13:11.399 align:start position:0% the work into it I just applaud you but 00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:13.110 align:start position:0% the work into it I just applaud you but um<00:13:11.720> other<00:13:11.920> than<00:13:12.120> the<00:13:12.279> highlighting<00:13:12.720> the<00:13:12.839> new 00:13:13.110 --> 00:13:13.120 align:start position:0% um other than the highlighting the new 00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:15.990 align:start position:0% um other than the highlighting the new stuff<00:13:13.839> basically<00:13:14.839> and<00:13:15.160> so<00:13:15.279> that<00:13:15.399> we<00:13:15.560> make<00:13:15.720> sure 00:13:15.990 --> 00:13:16.000 align:start position:0% stuff basically and so that we make sure 00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:18.310 align:start position:0% stuff basically and so that we make sure that<00:13:16.240> they<00:13:16.600> know<00:13:17.040> here<00:13:17.199> are<00:13:17.360> the<00:13:17.480> changes<00:13:18.160> in 00:13:18.310 --> 00:13:18.320 align:start position:0% that they know here are the changes in 00:13:18.320 --> 00:13:19.949 align:start position:0% that they know here are the changes in some<00:13:18.519> way<00:13:18.839> I<00:13:18.920> think<00:13:19.160> everything<00:13:19.440> else<00:13:19.680> looks 00:13:19.949 --> 00:13:19.959 align:start position:0% some way I think everything else looks 00:13:19.959 --> 00:13:22.230 align:start position:0% some way I think everything else looks good<00:13:20.440> as<00:13:20.600> far<00:13:20.760> as<00:13:20.959> I<00:13:21.480> understand<00:13:21.680> the<00:13:21.800> law<00:13:22.120> and 00:13:22.230 --> 00:13:22.240 align:start position:0% good as far as I understand the law and 00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:24.870 align:start position:0% good as far as I understand the law and the<00:13:22.360> Old<00:13:22.800> Law<00:13:23.800> okay<00:13:24.120> and<00:13:24.279> that's<00:13:24.440> why<00:13:24.560> I<00:13:24.639> wanted 00:13:24.870 --> 00:13:24.880 align:start position:0% the Old Law okay and that's why I wanted 00:13:24.880 --> 00:13:26.150 align:start position:0% the Old Law okay and that's why I wanted to<00:13:25.000> go<00:13:25.160> down<00:13:25.360> just<00:13:25.480> through<00:13:25.680> each<00:13:25.880> piece 00:13:26.150 --> 00:13:26.160 align:start position:0% to go down just through each piece 00:13:26.160 --> 00:13:27.430 align:start position:0% to go down just through each piece because<00:13:26.279> there<00:13:26.399> are<00:13:26.560> a<00:13:26.639> couple<00:13:26.839> of<00:13:27.000> Provisions 00:13:27.430 --> 00:13:27.440 align:start position:0% because there are a couple of Provisions 00:13:27.440 --> 00:13:30.030 align:start position:0% because there are a couple of Provisions that<00:13:27.560> needed<00:13:28.120> I<00:13:28.240> didn't<00:13:28.600> do<00:13:29.399> when<00:13:29.560> I<00:13:29.680> went<00:13:29.880> back 00:13:30.030 --> 00:13:30.040 align:start position:0% that needed I didn't do when I went back 00:13:30.040 --> 00:13:31.310 align:start position:0% that needed I didn't do when I went back and<00:13:30.160> did<00:13:30.279> a<00:13:30.399> double<00:13:30.600> check<00:13:30.800> there's<00:13:30.959> a<00:13:31.079> couple 00:13:31.310 --> 00:13:31.320 align:start position:0% and did a double check there's a couple 00:13:31.320 --> 00:13:32.829 align:start position:0% and did a double check there's a couple that<00:13:31.440> need<00:13:31.600> a<00:13:31.680> little<00:13:31.839> bit<00:13:32.000> more<00:13:32.199> clarity<00:13:32.639> but 00:13:32.829 --> 00:13:32.839 align:start position:0% that need a little bit more clarity but 00:13:32.839 --> 00:13:37.350 align:start position:0% that need a little bit more clarity but if<00:13:32.959> we<00:13:33.079> went<00:13:33.360> down<00:13:34.279> so<00:13:35.199> I<00:13:35.320> guess<00:13:36.040> um<00:13:36.800> Vice<00:13:37.079> chair 00:13:37.350 --> 00:13:37.360 align:start position:0% if we went down so I guess um Vice chair 00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:39.389 align:start position:0% if we went down so I guess um Vice chair green<00:13:38.000> I<00:13:38.279> I<00:13:38.360> think<00:13:38.639> we<00:13:38.760> could<00:13:39.000> probably<00:13:39.240> look 00:13:39.389 --> 00:13:39.399 align:start position:0% green I I think we could probably look 00:13:39.399 --> 00:13:41.590 align:start position:0% green I I think we could probably look at<00:13:39.600> in<00:13:40.040> just<00:13:40.240> that<00:13:40.480> first<00:13:40.720> little<00:13:41.000> section<00:13:41.480> and 00:13:41.590 --> 00:13:41.600 align:start position:0% at in just that first little section and 00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:43.230 align:start position:0% at in just that first little section and see<00:13:41.760> if<00:13:41.880> there's<00:13:42.160> anything<00:13:42.480> there<00:13:42.680> if<00:13:42.880> not 00:13:43.230 --> 00:13:43.240 align:start position:0% see if there's anything there if not 00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:45.189 align:start position:0% see if there's anything there if not then<00:13:43.360> we<00:13:43.480> could<00:13:43.600> just<00:13:43.760> move<00:13:43.959> to<00:13:44.079> the<00:13:44.279> next 00:13:45.189 --> 00:13:45.199 align:start position:0% then we could just move to the next 00:13:45.199 --> 00:13:48.829 align:start position:0% then we could just move to the next section<00:13:46.199> yes<00:13:46.959> let<00:13:47.480> let's<00:13:48.000> yeah<00:13:48.199> let's<00:13:48.440> just<00:13:48.600> go 00:13:48.829 --> 00:13:48.839 align:start position:0% section yes let let's yeah let's just go 00:13:48.839 --> 00:13:51.230 align:start position:0% section yes let let's yeah let's just go Section<00:13:49.240> by<00:13:49.519> section<00:13:49.920> and<00:13:50.160> just<00:13:50.920> if<00:13:51.000> we<00:13:51.120> need 00:13:51.230 --> 00:13:51.240 align:start position:0% Section by section and just if we need 00:13:51.240 --> 00:13:53.829 align:start position:0% Section by section and just if we need to<00:13:51.560> rework<00:13:52.040> any<00:13:52.240> of<00:13:52.839> those<00:13:53.160> specific<00:13:53.519> bullet 00:13:53.829 --> 00:13:53.839 align:start position:0% to rework any of those specific bullet 00:13:53.839 --> 00:13:56.150 align:start position:0% to rework any of those specific bullet points<00:13:54.240> we<00:13:55.040> okay<00:13:55.480> the<00:13:55.639> time<00:13:55.759> to<00:13:55.880> do<00:13:56.000> that 00:13:56.150 --> 00:13:56.160 align:start position:0% points we okay the time to do that 00:13:56.160 --> 00:13:58.230 align:start position:0% points we okay the time to do that that'd<00:13:56.320> be<00:13:56.480> great<00:13:57.079> I<00:13:57.160> don't<00:13:57.480> have<00:13:57.680> any 00:13:58.230 --> 00:13:58.240 align:start position:0% that'd be great I don't have any 00:13:58.240 --> 00:14:00.069 align:start position:0% that'd be great I don't have any recommendations<00:13:58.880> on<00:13:59.240> this<00:13:59.399> section<00:13:59.720> unless 00:14:00.069 --> 00:14:00.079 align:start position:0% recommendations on this section unless 00:14:00.079 --> 00:14:02.470 align:start position:0% recommendations on this section unless anybody<00:14:00.480> else 00:14:02.470 --> 00:14:02.480 align:start position:0% anybody else 00:14:02.480 --> 00:14:05.550 align:start position:0% anybody else does<00:14:03.480> if<00:14:03.600> there's<00:14:03.839> any<00:14:04.160> staff<00:14:04.560> that<00:14:04.839> the 00:14:05.550 --> 00:14:05.560 align:start position:0% does if there's any staff that the 00:14:05.560 --> 00:14:09.230 align:start position:0% does if there's any staff that the wording<00:14:06.560> is<00:14:06.839> okay 00:14:09.230 --> 00:14:09.240 align:start position:0% 00:14:09.240 --> 00:14:12.189 align:start position:0% or<00:14:10.240> I<00:14:10.320> would<00:14:10.600> suggest<00:14:11.000> that<00:14:11.160> we<00:14:11.320> put<00:14:11.480> an<00:14:11.639> Lea 00:14:12.189 --> 00:14:12.199 align:start position:0% or I would suggest that we put an Lea 00:14:12.199 --> 00:14:13.749 align:start position:0% or I would suggest that we put an Lea governing<00:14:12.560> board<00:14:12.880> instead<00:14:13.199> of<00:14:13.279> a<00:14:13.440> local 00:14:13.749 --> 00:14:13.759 align:start position:0% governing board instead of a local 00:14:13.759 --> 00:14:16.470 align:start position:0% governing board instead of a local school<00:14:14.079> board<00:14:14.839> at<00:14:15.079> the<00:14:15.279> beginning<00:14:16.160> I<00:14:16.240> think 00:14:16.470 --> 00:14:16.480 align:start position:0% school board at the beginning I think 00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:23.030 align:start position:0% school board at the beginning I think that's<00:14:16.800> good 00:14:23.030 --> 00:14:23.040 align:start position:0% 00:14:23.040 --> 00:14:25.230 align:start position:0% idea<00:14:24.040> yeah<00:14:24.240> because<00:14:24.399> that<00:14:24.519> would<00:14:24.680> cover<00:14:25.000> both 00:14:25.230 --> 00:14:25.240 align:start position:0% idea yeah because that would cover both 00:14:25.240 --> 00:14:35.350 align:start position:0% idea yeah because that would cover both Provisions<00:14:25.880> right<00:14:26.639> so<00:14:27.480> thank<00:14:27.720> you 00:14:35.350 --> 00:14:35.360 align:start position:0% 00:14:35.360 --> 00:14:36.910 align:start position:0% he<00:14:35.600> if<00:14:35.759> there's 00:14:36.910 --> 00:14:36.920 align:start position:0% he if there's 00:14:36.920 --> 00:14:39.150 align:start position:0% he if there's not<00:14:37.920> I<00:14:38.000> don't<00:14:38.279> I<00:14:38.360> guess<00:14:38.519> we<00:14:38.600> wouldn't<00:14:38.880> vote 00:14:39.150 --> 00:14:39.160 align:start position:0% not I don't I guess we wouldn't vote 00:14:39.160 --> 00:14:41.910 align:start position:0% not I don't I guess we wouldn't vote till<00:14:39.600> well<00:14:39.839> I<00:14:39.920> guess<00:14:40.040> we<00:14:40.160> could<00:14:40.360> vote<00:14:40.959> right 00:14:41.910 --> 00:14:41.920 align:start position:0% till well I guess we could vote right 00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:42.870 align:start position:0% till well I guess we could vote right we're<00:14:42.079> just 00:14:42.870 --> 00:14:42.880 align:start position:0% we're just 00:14:42.880 --> 00:14:46.749 align:start position:0% we're just waiting<00:14:43.880> wondering<00:14:45.079> um<00:14:46.079> do<00:14:46.240> we<00:14:46.399> like<00:14:46.600> the 00:14:46.749 --> 00:14:46.759 align:start position:0% waiting wondering um do we like the 00:14:46.759 --> 00:14:49.389 align:start position:0% waiting wondering um do we like the bullet<00:14:47.160> points<00:14:47.959> do<00:14:48.639> does<00:14:48.800> anybody<00:14:49.120> feel<00:14:49.279> like 00:14:49.389 --> 00:14:49.399 align:start position:0% bullet points do does anybody feel like 00:14:49.399 --> 00:14:50.670 align:start position:0% bullet points do does anybody feel like we<00:14:49.519> need 00:14:50.670 --> 00:14:50.680 align:start position:0% we need 00:14:50.680 --> 00:14:55.710 align:start position:0% we need to<00:14:51.680> number<00:14:52.240> those<00:14:52.600> or<00:14:52.839> ABC<00:14:53.839> or<00:14:54.839> you 00:14:55.710 --> 00:14:55.720 align:start position:0% to number those or ABC or you 00:14:55.720 --> 00:15:00.870 align:start position:0% to number those or ABC or you know<00:14:56.720> the<00:14:57.199> alphabet<00:14:58.199> the<00:14:59.160> I<00:14:59.639> I<00:14:59.920> I<00:15:00.279> I<00:15:00.480> I<00:15:00.639> I<00:15:00.800> you 00:15:00.870 --> 00:15:00.880 align:start position:0% know the alphabet the I I I I I I you 00:15:00.880 --> 00:15:05.509 align:start position:0% know the alphabet the I I I I I I you know<00:15:01.399> Roman 00:15:05.509 --> 00:15:05.519 align:start position:0% 00:15:05.519 --> 00:15:09.350 align:start position:0% numerals<00:15:06.519> or<00:15:06.759> does<00:15:07.160> the<00:15:07.959> it's<00:15:08.079> a<00:15:08.320> minor<00:15:08.759> detail 00:15:09.350 --> 00:15:09.360 align:start position:0% numerals or does the it's a minor detail 00:15:09.360 --> 00:15:14.189 align:start position:0% numerals or does the it's a minor detail but<00:15:10.279> I<00:15:10.399> have<00:15:10.560> been<00:15:10.720> wondering<00:15:11.120> about 00:15:14.189 --> 00:15:14.199 align:start position:0% 00:15:14.199 --> 00:15:17.110 align:start position:0% it<00:15:15.199> I<00:15:15.279> don't<00:15:15.519> really<00:15:16.120> I<00:15:16.199> don't<00:15:16.480> care<00:15:16.920> I<00:15:17.000> don't 00:15:17.110 --> 00:15:17.120 align:start position:0% it I don't really I don't care I don't 00:15:17.120 --> 00:15:18.350 align:start position:0% it I don't really I don't care I don't know<00:15:17.240> if<00:15:17.360> that<00:15:17.480> makes<00:15:17.720> sense<00:15:18.000> whatever<00:15:18.240> is 00:15:18.350 --> 00:15:18.360 align:start position:0% know if that makes sense whatever is 00:15:18.360 --> 00:15:20.629 align:start position:0% know if that makes sense whatever is going<00:15:18.440> to<00:15:18.560> be<00:15:18.759> easiest<00:15:19.680> visually<00:15:20.120> for<00:15:20.360> people 00:15:20.629 --> 00:15:20.639 align:start position:0% going to be easiest visually for people 00:15:20.639 --> 00:15:24.269 align:start position:0% going to be easiest visually for people to<00:15:21.199> use<00:15:21.519> and<00:15:22.120> you<00:15:22.680> know<00:15:23.680> I<00:15:23.759> don't<00:15:23.880> know<00:15:24.000> if<00:15:24.120> we 00:15:24.269 --> 00:15:24.279 align:start position:0% to use and you know I don't know if we 00:15:24.279 --> 00:15:27.030 align:start position:0% to use and you know I don't know if we just<00:15:24.399> leave<00:15:24.639> that<00:15:24.920> stylistic<00:15:25.680> up<00:15:25.920> to<00:15:26.480> our<00:15:26.920> you 00:15:27.030 --> 00:15:27.040 align:start position:0% just leave that stylistic up to our you 00:15:27.040 --> 00:15:30.350 align:start position:0% just leave that stylistic up to our you know<00:15:27.639> uh<00:15:27.920> who<00:15:28.079> is<00:15:28.199> it<00:15:28.319> that<00:15:28.440> does<00:15:28.639> it 00:15:30.350 --> 00:15:30.360 align:start position:0% know uh who is it that does it 00:15:30.360 --> 00:15:34.269 align:start position:0% know uh who is it that does it Barbara<00:15:31.360> or<00:15:31.639> if<00:15:31.920> we<00:15:32.519> um<00:15:33.480> I<00:15:33.519> mean<00:15:33.720> if<00:15:33.880> if<00:15:34.000> someone 00:15:34.269 --> 00:15:34.279 align:start position:0% Barbara or if we um I mean if if someone 00:15:34.279 --> 00:15:36.749 align:start position:0% Barbara or if we um I mean if if someone has<00:15:34.639> a<00:15:34.880> strong<00:15:35.279> preference<00:15:36.279> I'm<00:15:36.440> good<00:15:36.600> with 00:15:36.749 --> 00:15:36.759 align:start position:0% has a strong preference I'm good with 00:15:36.759 --> 00:15:38.150 align:start position:0% has a strong preference I'm good with whatever<00:15:37.199> on 00:15:38.150 --> 00:15:38.160 align:start position:0% whatever on 00:15:38.160 --> 00:15:40.550 align:start position:0% whatever on that<00:15:39.160> Emily<00:15:39.480> do<00:15:39.560> you<00:15:39.680> have<00:15:39.800> a<00:15:40.000> strong<00:15:40.199> or<00:15:40.360> board 00:15:40.550 --> 00:15:40.560 align:start position:0% that Emily do you have a strong or board 00:15:40.560 --> 00:15:41.629 align:start position:0% that Emily do you have a strong or board member<00:15:40.800> green<00:15:41.040> do<00:15:41.120> you<00:15:41.199> have<00:15:41.319> a<00:15:41.519> strong 00:15:41.629 --> 00:15:41.639 align:start position:0% member green do you have a strong 00:15:41.639 --> 00:15:43.509 align:start position:0% member green do you have a strong preference<00:15:42.000> on 00:15:43.509 --> 00:15:43.519 align:start position:0% preference on 00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:45.150 align:start position:0% preference on that 00:15:45.150 --> 00:15:45.160 align:start position:0% that 00:15:45.160 --> 00:15:49.710 align:start position:0% that um<00:15:46.160> I<00:15:46.319> guess<00:15:46.600> I<00:15:46.800> do<00:15:47.160> a<00:15:47.800> little<00:15:48.800> not<00:15:49.040> passionate 00:15:49.710 --> 00:15:49.720 align:start position:0% um I guess I do a little not passionate 00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:53.309 align:start position:0% um I guess I do a little not passionate but<00:15:49.920> just<00:15:50.079> for<00:15:50.880> being<00:15:51.079> able<00:15:51.319> to<00:15:52.000> reference 00:15:53.309 --> 00:15:53.319 align:start position:0% but just for being able to reference 00:15:53.319 --> 00:15:56.430 align:start position:0% but just for being able to reference easier<00:15:54.319> like<00:15:54.519> if<00:15:55.000> if<00:15:55.199> they<00:15:55.360> are<00:15:55.839> in<00:15:55.959> a<00:15:56.120> meeting 00:15:56.430 --> 00:15:56.440 align:start position:0% easier like if if they are in a meeting 00:15:56.440 --> 00:15:58.550 align:start position:0% easier like if if they are in a meeting and<00:15:56.560> they're<00:15:56.720> developing<00:15:57.160> their<00:15:57.399> po<00:15:58.160> policies 00:15:58.550 --> 00:15:58.560 align:start position:0% and they're developing their po policies 00:15:58.560 --> 00:16:01.309 align:start position:0% and they're developing their po policies or<00:15:58.759> up<00:15:59.000> updating<00:15:59.360> it<00:15:59.480> it<00:15:59.639> just<00:15:59.800> seems<00:16:00.120> like<00:16:01.120> to 00:16:01.309 --> 00:16:01.319 align:start position:0% or up updating it it just seems like to 00:16:01.319 --> 00:16:04.749 align:start position:0% or up updating it it just seems like to map<00:16:01.519> it<00:16:01.639> out<00:16:01.800> would<00:16:02.199> be<00:16:03.199> easier<00:16:03.600> for<00:16:03.880> people<00:16:04.680> I 00:16:04.749 --> 00:16:04.759 align:start position:0% map it out would be easier for people I 00:16:04.759 --> 00:16:06.430 align:start position:0% map it out would be easier for people I think<00:16:04.959> you're<00:16:05.240> probably<00:16:05.880> you're<00:16:06.079> probably 00:16:06.430 --> 00:16:06.440 align:start position:0% think you're probably you're probably 00:16:06.440 --> 00:16:08.189 align:start position:0% think you're probably you're probably right<00:16:06.639> like<00:16:06.959> section<00:16:07.279> one<00:16:07.560> is<00:16:07.759> instruction 00:16:08.189 --> 00:16:08.199 align:start position:0% right like section one is instruction 00:16:08.199 --> 00:16:11.430 align:start position:0% right like section one is instruction materials<00:16:08.800> right<00:16:09.560> and<00:16:09.720> then<00:16:09.920> under<00:16:10.360> that<00:16:11.040> yeah 00:16:11.430 --> 00:16:11.440 align:start position:0% materials right and then under that yeah 00:16:11.440 --> 00:16:12.710 align:start position:0% materials right and then under that yeah I<00:16:11.519> think<00:16:11.680> you're 00:16:12.710 --> 00:16:12.720 align:start position:0% I think you're 00:16:12.720 --> 00:16:14.990 align:start position:0% I think you're right<00:16:13.720> so<00:16:13.920> maybe<00:16:14.120> if<00:16:14.240> we<00:16:14.319> can<00:16:14.480> make<00:16:14.639> just<00:16:14.759> make 00:16:14.990 --> 00:16:15.000 align:start position:0% right so maybe if we can make just make 00:16:15.000 --> 00:16:20.110 align:start position:0% right so maybe if we can make just make that<00:16:15.199> minor<00:16:15.680> change 00:16:20.110 --> 00:16:20.120 align:start position:0% 00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:22.949 align:start position:0% yeah<00:16:21.120> and<00:16:21.199> then<00:16:21.399> maybe<00:16:21.639> a<00:16:21.920> Roman<00:16:22.319> numeral<00:16:22.720> for 00:16:22.949 --> 00:16:22.959 align:start position:0% yeah and then maybe a Roman numeral for 00:16:22.959 --> 00:16:24.749 align:start position:0% yeah and then maybe a Roman numeral for section<00:16:23.279> one<00:16:23.480> or<00:16:23.839> instruction<00:16:24.279> material 00:16:24.749 --> 00:16:24.759 align:start position:0% section one or instruction material 00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:26.509 align:start position:0% section one or instruction material something<00:16:25.000> like<00:16:25.160> that<00:16:25.319> so<00:16:25.480> people<00:16:25.680> are<00:16:25.920> let 00:16:26.509 --> 00:16:26.519 align:start position:0% something like that so people are let 00:16:26.519 --> 00:16:31.189 align:start position:0% something like that so people are let they<00:16:26.639> can<00:16:26.839> actually<00:16:27.800> yeah<00:16:28.279> yep<00:16:29.000> does<00:16:29.240> that 00:16:31.189 --> 00:16:31.199 align:start position:0% they can actually yeah yep does that 00:16:31.199 --> 00:16:34.550 align:start position:0% they can actually yeah yep does that work<00:16:32.199> yeah<00:16:32.399> that<00:16:32.800> works<00:16:33.800> okay<00:16:34.079> I<00:16:34.160> think<00:16:34.399> that 00:16:34.550 --> 00:16:34.560 align:start position:0% work yeah that works okay I think that 00:16:34.560 --> 00:16:36.189 align:start position:0% work yeah that works okay I think that makes<00:16:35.000> that<00:16:35.160> makes<00:16:35.399> sense<00:16:35.639> it's<00:16:35.759> not<00:16:35.959> just<00:16:36.079> a 00:16:36.189 --> 00:16:36.199 align:start position:0% makes that makes sense it's not just a 00:16:36.199 --> 00:16:37.590 align:start position:0% makes that makes sense it's not just a checklist<00:16:36.600> you<00:16:36.680> can<00:16:36.880> actually<00:16:37.120> go<00:16:37.240> and<00:16:37.360> say<00:16:37.519> we 00:16:37.590 --> 00:16:37.600 align:start position:0% checklist you can actually go and say we 00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:41.670 align:start position:0% checklist you can actually go and say we need<00:16:37.720> to<00:16:37.880> do<00:16:38.680> F<00:16:39.040> on<00:16:39.959> i1 00:16:41.670 --> 00:16:41.680 align:start position:0% need to do F on i1 00:16:41.680 --> 00:16:52.150 align:start position:0% need to do F on i1 right<00:16:42.680> I<00:16:42.759> think<00:16:43.000> that's 00:16:52.150 --> 00:16:52.160 align:start position:0% 00:16:52.160 --> 00:16:58.230 align:start position:0% good<00:16:53.160> I'm<00:16:53.959> here<00:16:55.079> yay<00:16:56.079> hi<00:16:56.600> Randy<00:16:57.600> chair<00:16:57.880> boo 00:16:58.230 --> 00:16:58.240 align:start position:0% good I'm here yay hi Randy chair boo 00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:01.110 align:start position:0% good I'm here yay hi Randy chair boo welcome 00:17:01.110 --> 00:17:01.120 align:start position:0% 00:17:01.120 --> 00:17:04.189 align:start position:0% we're<00:17:01.399> glad<00:17:01.839> you<00:17:02.079> made<00:17:02.279> it<00:17:02.800> sometimes<00:17:03.720> has 00:17:04.189 --> 00:17:04.199 align:start position:0% we're glad you made it sometimes has 00:17:04.199 --> 00:17:06.429 align:start position:0% we're glad you made it sometimes has reinvented 00:17:06.429 --> 00:17:06.439 align:start position:0% reinvented 00:17:06.439 --> 00:17:09.630 align:start position:0% reinvented Zoom<00:17:07.439> start<00:17:07.799> from<00:17:08.039> the<00:17:08.520> ground 00:17:09.630 --> 00:17:09.640 align:start position:0% Zoom start from the ground 00:17:09.640 --> 00:17:13.470 align:start position:0% Zoom start from the ground up<00:17:10.640> Jerry<00:17:11.160> has<00:17:11.360> the<00:17:11.559> skills<00:17:11.880> to<00:17:12.079> do 00:17:13.470 --> 00:17:13.480 align:start position:0% up Jerry has the skills to do 00:17:13.480 --> 00:17:16.949 align:start position:0% up Jerry has the skills to do that<00:17:14.480> and<00:17:14.600> he<00:17:14.720> had<00:17:14.880> a<00:17:15.000> helper<00:17:15.439> too<00:17:15.959> that<00:17:16.640> helped 00:17:16.949 --> 00:17:16.959 align:start position:0% that and he had a helper too that helped 00:17:16.959 --> 00:17:20.069 align:start position:0% that and he had a helper too that helped him<00:17:17.760> figure<00:17:18.120> out<00:17:18.439> why<00:17:18.600> it<00:17:18.760> was<00:17:18.919> doing<00:17:19.160> this<00:17:19.360> so 00:17:20.069 --> 00:17:20.079 align:start position:0% him figure out why it was doing this so 00:17:20.079 --> 00:17:23.390 align:start position:0% him figure out why it was doing this so we're<00:17:20.319> here<00:17:20.679> I<00:17:20.880> apologize<00:17:21.439> for<00:17:21.600> being 00:17:23.390 --> 00:17:23.400 align:start position:0% we're here I apologize for being 00:17:23.400 --> 00:17:27.630 align:start position:0% we're here I apologize for being late<00:17:24.400> we<00:17:25.000> understand<00:17:25.400> thank<00:17:25.600> you<00:17:25.799> so<00:17:26.039> much<00:17:26.640> for 00:17:27.630 --> 00:17:27.640 align:start position:0% late we understand thank you so much for 00:17:27.640 --> 00:17:29.830 align:start position:0% late we understand thank you so much for sticking<00:17:28.160> with<00:17:28.319> it<00:17:28.520> and 00:17:29.830 --> 00:17:29.840 align:start position:0% sticking with it and 00:17:29.840 --> 00:17:31.669 align:start position:0% sticking with it and and<00:17:30.039> everybody<00:17:30.440> else<00:17:30.679> that<00:17:30.880> helped<00:17:31.200> that 00:17:31.669 --> 00:17:31.679 align:start position:0% and everybody else that helped that 00:17:31.679 --> 00:17:33.909 align:start position:0% and everybody else that helped that sometimes<00:17:31.960> Tech<00:17:32.320> can<00:17:32.480> be 00:17:33.909 --> 00:17:33.919 align:start position:0% sometimes Tech can be 00:17:33.919 --> 00:17:36.390 align:start position:0% sometimes Tech can be frustrating 00:17:36.390 --> 00:17:36.400 align:start position:0% frustrating 00:17:36.400 --> 00:17:40.830 align:start position:0% frustrating and<00:17:37.400> can<00:17:37.960> uh<00:17:38.520> go<00:17:38.760> right<00:17:38.960> ahead<00:17:39.240> and<00:17:39.440> I'll<00:17:39.840> just 00:17:40.830 --> 00:17:40.840 align:start position:0% and can uh go right ahead and I'll just 00:17:40.840 --> 00:17:43.350 align:start position:0% and can uh go right ahead and I'll just jump<00:17:41.160> in<00:17:41.440> when<00:17:41.720> we<00:17:42.360> when<00:17:42.520> I<00:17:42.720> figure<00:17:43.000> out<00:17:43.200> where 00:17:43.350 --> 00:17:43.360 align:start position:0% jump in when we when I figure out where 00:17:43.360 --> 00:17:46.190 align:start position:0% jump in when we when I figure out where you're<00:17:43.919> at<00:17:44.919> chair<00:17:45.160> Booth<00:17:45.640> um<00:17:45.760> I'm<00:17:45.880> wondering 00:17:46.190 --> 00:17:46.200 align:start position:0% you're at chair Booth um I'm wondering 00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:48.590 align:start position:0% you're at chair Booth um I'm wondering if<00:17:46.480> Vice<00:17:46.760> chair<00:17:47.000> green<00:17:47.480> can<00:17:47.760> give<00:17:47.960> an<00:17:48.400> um 00:17:48.590 --> 00:17:48.600 align:start position:0% if Vice chair green can give an um 00:17:48.600 --> 00:17:50.669 align:start position:0% if Vice chair green can give an um overarching<00:17:49.240> of<00:17:49.600> where<00:17:49.760> we're<00:17:49.960> at<00:17:50.280> and<00:17:50.480> which 00:17:50.669 --> 00:17:50.679 align:start position:0% overarching of where we're at and which 00:17:50.679 --> 00:17:52.510 align:start position:0% overarching of where we're at and which document<00:17:51.080> we're<00:17:51.240> on<00:17:51.559> to<00:17:51.720> be<00:17:51.799> able<00:17:51.960> to<00:17:52.080> help<00:17:52.280> AG 00:17:52.510 --> 00:17:52.520 align:start position:0% document we're on to be able to help AG 00:17:52.520 --> 00:17:54.909 align:start position:0% document we're on to be able to help AG you<00:17:52.679> and<00:17:52.919> and<00:17:53.039> where<00:17:53.160> we're<00:17:53.320> at<00:17:53.520> right 00:17:54.909 --> 00:17:54.919 align:start position:0% you and and where we're at right 00:17:54.919 --> 00:17:59.190 align:start position:0% you and and where we're at right now<00:17:55.919> yes<00:17:56.159> so<00:17:56.600> so<00:17:56.960> we<00:17:57.520> we've<00:17:57.840> been<00:17:58.200> discussing 00:17:59.190 --> 00:17:59.200 align:start position:0% now yes so so we we've been discussing 00:17:59.200 --> 00:18:01.909 align:start position:0% now yes so so we we've been discussing the<00:17:59.720> um<00:18:00.440> sensitive<00:18:00.919> materials<00:18:01.440> guidance 00:18:01.909 --> 00:18:01.919 align:start position:0% the um sensitive materials guidance 00:18:01.919 --> 00:18:05.350 align:start position:0% the um sensitive materials guidance document<00:18:02.440> for<00:18:02.640> about<00:18:02.960> 15<00:18:03.400> minutes<00:18:03.919> now<00:18:04.919> we<00:18:05.039> are 00:18:05.350 --> 00:18:05.360 align:start position:0% document for about 15 minutes now we are 00:18:05.360 --> 00:18:07.669 align:start position:0% document for about 15 minutes now we are going<00:18:06.039> through 00:18:07.669 --> 00:18:07.679 align:start position:0% going through 00:18:07.679 --> 00:18:12.110 align:start position:0% going through um<00:18:08.679> each<00:18:09.520> section<00:18:10.520> and<00:18:10.760> just<00:18:11.120> doing<00:18:11.679> a<00:18:11.919> an 00:18:12.110 --> 00:18:12.120 align:start position:0% um each section and just doing a an 00:18:12.120 --> 00:18:15.390 align:start position:0% um each section and just doing a an overview<00:18:12.640> of<00:18:12.840> that<00:18:13.000> to<00:18:13.159> make<00:18:13.400> any<00:18:13.840> changes<00:18:14.320> or 00:18:15.390 --> 00:18:15.400 align:start position:0% overview of that to make any changes or 00:18:15.400 --> 00:18:18.590 align:start position:0% overview of that to make any changes or adjustments<00:18:16.400> um<00:18:16.960> we<00:18:17.200> added<00:18:17.799> a<00:18:18.000> reference<00:18:18.440> to 00:18:18.590 --> 00:18:18.600 align:start position:0% adjustments um we added a reference to 00:18:18.600 --> 00:18:20.669 align:start position:0% adjustments um we added a reference to the<00:18:18.720> rule<00:18:19.039> in<00:18:19.159> the<00:18:19.280> opening 00:18:20.669 --> 00:18:20.679 align:start position:0% the rule in the opening 00:18:20.679 --> 00:18:24.149 align:start position:0% the rule in the opening paragraph<00:18:21.679> and<00:18:21.919> we<00:18:22.159> just<00:18:22.400> made<00:18:22.640> the<00:18:22.840> change<00:18:23.840> so 00:18:24.149 --> 00:18:24.159 align:start position:0% paragraph and we just made the change so 00:18:24.159 --> 00:18:27.190 align:start position:0% paragraph and we just made the change so that<00:18:24.559> instead<00:18:24.880> of<00:18:25.200> bullet<00:18:25.760> points<00:18:26.760> we've<00:18:27.000> put 00:18:27.190 --> 00:18:27.200 align:start position:0% that instead of bullet points we've put 00:18:27.200 --> 00:18:29.110 align:start position:0% that instead of bullet points we've put the<00:18:27.320> letters<00:18:27.720> next<00:18:27.880> to<00:18:28.080> them<00:18:28.240> so<00:18:28.440> the<00:18:28.799> doent 00:18:29.110 --> 00:18:29.120 align:start position:0% the letters next to them so the doent 00:18:29.120 --> 00:18:31.270 align:start position:0% the letters next to them so the doent becomes<00:18:29.400> a<00:18:29.480> little<00:18:29.640> bit<00:18:29.799> more<00:18:30.000> user 00:18:31.270 --> 00:18:31.280 align:start position:0% becomes a little bit more user 00:18:31.280 --> 00:18:34.230 align:start position:0% becomes a little bit more user friendly<00:18:32.280> and<00:18:32.480> we<00:18:32.600> are<00:18:32.760> currently<00:18:33.320> on 00:18:34.230 --> 00:18:34.240 align:start position:0% friendly and we are currently on 00:18:34.240 --> 00:18:37.070 align:start position:0% friendly and we are currently on the<00:18:35.240> yeah<00:18:35.440> instructional<00:18:35.960> materials<00:18:36.760> section 00:18:37.070 --> 00:18:37.080 align:start position:0% the yeah instructional materials section 00:18:37.080 --> 00:18:39.669 align:start position:0% the yeah instructional materials section so<00:18:37.440> that<00:18:37.640> very<00:18:37.880> first<00:18:38.159> section<00:18:39.039> so<00:18:39.240> it's<00:18:39.400> open 00:18:39.669 --> 00:18:39.679 align:start position:0% so that very first section so it's open 00:18:39.679 --> 00:18:42.110 align:start position:0% so that very first section so it's open up<00:18:39.880> if<00:18:40.039> anybody<00:18:40.400> has<00:18:40.600> anything<00:18:41.000> that<00:18:41.799> we<00:18:41.919> feel 00:18:42.110 --> 00:18:42.120 align:start position:0% up if anybody has anything that we feel 00:18:42.120 --> 00:18:44.470 align:start position:0% up if anybody has anything that we feel like<00:18:42.280> we've<00:18:42.520> left<00:18:42.760> out<00:18:43.200> or<00:18:43.400> we<00:18:43.559> want<00:18:43.720> to<00:18:43.919> adjust 00:18:44.470 --> 00:18:44.480 align:start position:0% like we've left out or we want to adjust 00:18:44.480 --> 00:18:48.470 align:start position:0% like we've left out or we want to adjust then<00:18:45.039> we're<00:18:46.039> making<00:18:46.679> those<00:18:47.679> considerations 00:18:48.470 --> 00:18:48.480 align:start position:0% then we're making those considerations 00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:53.590 align:start position:0% then we're making those considerations right 00:18:53.590 --> 00:18:53.600 align:start position:0% 00:18:53.600 --> 00:18:56.110 align:start position:0% now<00:18:54.600> good<00:18:55.039> thank<00:18:55.240> you<00:18:55.400> very<00:18:55.600> much<00:18:55.799> for<00:18:55.960> the 00:18:56.110 --> 00:18:56.120 align:start position:0% now good thank you very much for the 00:18:56.120 --> 00:18:59.630 align:start position:0% now good thank you very much for the update 00:18:59.630 --> 00:18:59.640 align:start position:0% 00:18:59.640 --> 00:19:01.149 align:start position:0% does<00:18:59.840> anybody<00:19:00.159> else<00:19:00.360> see<00:19:00.600> anything<00:19:00.880> in 00:19:01.149 --> 00:19:01.159 align:start position:0% does anybody else see anything in 00:19:01.159 --> 00:19:03.590 align:start position:0% does anybody else see anything in instructional<00:19:01.840> materials<00:19:02.559> that<00:19:02.840> they<00:19:03.480> they 00:19:03.590 --> 00:19:03.600 align:start position:0% instructional materials that they they 00:19:03.600 --> 00:19:07.029 align:start position:0% instructional materials that they they wanted<00:19:03.919> to<00:19:04.600> address<00:19:05.600> and<00:19:05.760> if<00:19:06.000> not<00:19:06.640> maybe<00:19:06.919> we 00:19:07.029 --> 00:19:07.039 align:start position:0% wanted to address and if not maybe we 00:19:07.039 --> 00:19:11.149 align:start position:0% wanted to address and if not maybe we move<00:19:07.240> forward<00:19:07.520> to<00:19:07.679> the<00:19:07.840> library<00:19:08.280> materials 00:19:11.149 --> 00:19:11.159 align:start position:0% 00:19:11.159 --> 00:19:18.029 align:start position:0% section<00:19:12.159> I'm<00:19:12.600> good<00:19:13.600> good<00:19:14.039> too<00:19:15.080> okay<00:19:16.080> uh<00:19:16.200> member 00:19:18.029 --> 00:19:18.039 align:start position:0% section I'm good good too okay uh member 00:19:18.039 --> 00:19:22.510 align:start position:0% section I'm good good too okay uh member real<00:19:19.039> yep<00:19:19.240> all<00:19:19.880> good<00:19:20.880> okay 00:19:22.510 --> 00:19:22.520 align:start position:0% real yep all good okay 00:19:22.520 --> 00:19:25.270 align:start position:0% real yep all good okay and<00:19:23.520> chair<00:19:23.880> Booth<00:19:24.159> do<00:19:24.280> you<00:19:24.360> feel 00:19:25.270 --> 00:19:25.280 align:start position:0% and chair Booth do you feel 00:19:25.280 --> 00:19:27.350 align:start position:0% and chair Booth do you feel okay<00:19:26.280> about<00:19:26.480> what<00:19:26.559> you<00:19:26.679> see<00:19:26.960> I'm<00:19:27.080> just 00:19:27.350 --> 00:19:27.360 align:start position:0% okay about what you see I'm just 00:19:27.360 --> 00:19:29.950 align:start position:0% okay about what you see I'm just finishing<00:19:27.760> reading<00:19:28.360> here 00:19:29.950 --> 00:19:29.960 align:start position:0% finishing reading here 00:19:29.960 --> 00:19:34.590 align:start position:0% finishing reading here okay<00:19:30.960> no<00:19:31.080> worries<00:19:31.440> y<00:19:31.720> y<00:19:31.919> I'm<00:19:32.120> good<00:19:32.480> I'm 00:19:34.590 --> 00:19:34.600 align:start position:0% okay no worries y y I'm good I'm 00:19:34.600 --> 00:19:37.909 align:start position:0% okay no worries y y I'm good I'm good<00:19:35.600> okay<00:19:35.960> let's<00:19:36.200> move<00:19:36.400> to<00:19:36.679> library<00:19:37.000> material 00:19:37.909 --> 00:19:37.919 align:start position:0% good okay let's move to library material 00:19:37.919 --> 00:19:40.590 align:start position:0% good okay let's move to library material section<00:19:38.919> can<00:19:39.000> I<00:19:39.159> ask<00:19:39.360> a<00:19:39.559> quick<00:19:39.840> question<00:19:40.320> so 00:19:40.590 --> 00:19:40.600 align:start position:0% section can I ask a quick question so 00:19:40.600 --> 00:19:45.230 align:start position:0% section can I ask a quick question so sorry<00:19:41.720> yes<00:19:42.720> um<00:19:43.360> this<00:19:43.480> is<00:19:43.840> very<00:19:44.039> minor<00:19:44.440> can<00:19:44.679> I 00:19:45.230 --> 00:19:45.240 align:start position:0% sorry yes um this is very minor can I 00:19:45.240 --> 00:19:48.470 align:start position:0% sorry yes um this is very minor can I change<00:19:45.840> the<00:19:46.080> verbs<00:19:46.600> to<00:19:46.799> all<00:19:47.039> be<00:19:47.360> singular<00:19:48.360> just 00:19:48.470 --> 00:19:48.480 align:start position:0% change the verbs to all be singular just 00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:51.029 align:start position:0% change the verbs to all be singular just so<00:19:48.640> that<00:19:48.799> they<00:19:48.919> all<00:19:49.159> match<00:19:49.720> so<00:19:50.039> post<00:19:50.559> hold 00:19:51.029 --> 00:19:51.039 align:start position:0% so that they all match so post hold 00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:55.310 align:start position:0% so that they all match so post hold adopt<00:19:51.760> make<00:19:52.760> is<00:19:52.880> that<00:19:53.159> okay<00:19:54.080> yeah<00:19:55.080> I'll<00:19:55.200> go 00:19:55.310 --> 00:19:55.320 align:start position:0% adopt make is that okay yeah I'll go 00:19:55.320 --> 00:19:56.549 align:start position:0% adopt make is that okay yeah I'll go back<00:19:55.440> and<00:19:55.520> do<00:19:55.600> that<00:19:55.799> just<00:19:55.960> grammatical 00:19:56.549 --> 00:19:56.559 align:start position:0% back and do that just grammatical 00:19:56.559 --> 00:19:58.270 align:start position:0% back and do that just grammatical whatever<00:19:56.840> we<00:19:57.000> got<00:19:57.080> to<00:19:57.240> do<00:19:57.440> there<00:19:57.640> would<00:19:57.840> work 00:19:58.270 --> 00:19:58.280 align:start position:0% whatever we got to do there would work 00:19:58.280 --> 00:19:59.230 align:start position:0% whatever we got to do there would work so 00:19:59.230 --> 00:19:59.240 align:start position:0% so 00:19:59.240 --> 00:20:17.310 align:start position:0% so thank<00:19:59.600> you<00:20:00.600> in<00:20:00.799> my<00:20:01.000> view<00:20:01.360> I<00:20:01.480> didn't 00:20:17.310 --> 00:20:17.320 align:start position:0% 00:20:17.320 --> 00:20:21.870 align:start position:0% yeah<00:20:18.320> okay<00:20:18.679> liary<00:20:19.120> materials<00:20:20.080> it's<00:20:20.960> and<00:20:21.480> is 00:20:21.870 --> 00:20:21.880 align:start position:0% yeah okay liary materials it's and is 00:20:21.880 --> 00:20:23.830 align:start position:0% yeah okay liary materials it's and is responsible<00:20:22.760> the<00:20:22.919> governing 00:20:23.830 --> 00:20:23.840 align:start position:0% responsible the governing 00:20:23.840 --> 00:21:12.750 align:start position:0% responsible the governing board<00:20:24.840> is 00:21:12.750 --> 00:21:12.760 align:start position:0% 00:21:12.760 --> 00:21:15.029 align:start position:0% so<00:21:13.000> do<00:21:13.120> we<00:21:13.279> want<00:21:13.520> to<00:21:13.760> replace<00:21:14.240> the<00:21:14.360> bullets<00:21:14.840> on 00:21:15.029 --> 00:21:15.039 align:start position:0% so do we want to replace the bullets on 00:21:15.039 --> 00:21:18.029 align:start position:0% so do we want to replace the bullets on this<00:21:15.159> one<00:21:15.360> as<00:21:15.520> well<00:21:16.120> so<00:21:16.320> that<00:21:16.440> it's<00:21:17.039> consistent 00:21:18.029 --> 00:21:18.039 align:start position:0% this one as well so that it's consistent 00:21:18.039 --> 00:21:21.070 align:start position:0% this one as well so that it's consistent yeah<00:21:18.200> I<00:21:18.320> think 00:21:21.070 --> 00:21:21.080 align:start position:0% 00:21:21.080 --> 00:21:26.269 align:start position:0% so<00:21:22.080> so<00:21:22.320> we'd<00:21:22.600> be<00:21:22.840> a<00:21:23.159> and<00:21:23.440> b<00:21:23.960> and<00:21:24.120> then<00:21:24.400> one<00:21:24.720> two 00:21:26.269 --> 00:21:26.279 align:start position:0% so so we'd be a and b and then one two 00:21:26.279 --> 00:21:32.510 align:start position:0% so so we'd be a and b and then one two three<00:21:27.279> or<00:21:27.760> are<00:21:28.000> we<00:21:28.320> would<00:21:28.679> we<00:21:28.880> be 00:21:32.510 --> 00:21:32.520 align:start position:0% 00:21:32.520 --> 00:21:34.870 align:start position:0% um<00:21:33.520> small<00:21:33.919> letter 00:21:34.870 --> 00:21:34.880 align:start position:0% um small letter 00:21:34.880 --> 00:21:39.430 align:start position:0% um small letter I<00:21:35.880> One<00:21:36.120> Two<00:21:36.360> Three<00:21:36.960> or<00:21:37.200> how<00:21:37.440> how<00:21:38.039> what's<00:21:38.240> the 00:21:39.430 --> 00:21:39.440 align:start position:0% I One Two Three or how how what's the 00:21:39.440 --> 00:21:43.070 align:start position:0% I One Two Three or how how what's the next<00:21:40.440> oh<00:21:40.679> yeah<00:21:41.440> okay<00:21:42.440> yeah<00:21:42.600> this<00:21:42.720> is<00:21:42.799> sort<00:21:42.960> of 00:21:43.070 --> 00:21:43.080 align:start position:0% next oh yeah okay yeah this is sort of 00:21:43.080 --> 00:21:44.710 align:start position:0% next oh yeah okay yeah this is sort of what<00:21:43.200> I<00:21:43.279> was<00:21:43.400> talking<00:21:43.720> about<00:21:43.960> about<00:21:44.320> like 00:21:44.710 --> 00:21:44.720 align:start position:0% what I was talking about about like 00:21:44.720 --> 00:21:46.870 align:start position:0% what I was talking about about like there<00:21:44.880> must<00:21:45.120> be<00:21:45.400> someone<00:21:46.039> that<00:21:46.279> is<00:21:46.480> a 00:21:46.870 --> 00:21:46.880 align:start position:0% there must be someone that is a 00:21:46.880 --> 00:21:48.909 align:start position:0% there must be someone that is a technical<00:21:47.320> writer<00:21:47.840> designer<00:21:48.320> that<00:21:48.480> could<00:21:48.640> lay 00:21:48.909 --> 00:21:48.919 align:start position:0% technical writer designer that could lay 00:21:48.919 --> 00:21:50.549 align:start position:0% technical writer designer that could lay this<00:21:49.039> out<00:21:49.200> in<00:21:49.279> a<00:21:49.440> way<00:21:49.600> that<00:21:49.679> will<00:21:49.880> make<00:21:50.080> sense 00:21:50.549 --> 00:21:50.559 align:start position:0% this out in a way that will make sense 00:21:50.559 --> 00:21:52.630 align:start position:0% this out in a way that will make sense because<00:21:51.360> chair<00:21:51.679> Booth<00:21:51.919> what<00:21:52.039> I<00:21:52.120> was<00:21:52.240> saying<00:21:52.559> at 00:21:52.630 --> 00:21:52.640 align:start position:0% because chair Booth what I was saying at 00:21:52.640 --> 00:21:54.029 align:start position:0% because chair Booth what I was saying at the<00:21:52.760> beginning<00:21:53.039> of<00:21:53.120> the<00:21:53.200> meeting<00:21:53.480> is<00:21:53.640> that<00:21:53.919> oh 00:21:54.029 --> 00:21:54.039 align:start position:0% the beginning of the meeting is that oh 00:21:54.039 --> 00:21:55.830 align:start position:0% the beginning of the meeting is that oh I<00:21:54.080> don't<00:21:54.200> know<00:21:54.279> why<00:21:54.400> my<00:21:54.520> camera's<00:21:54.799> not<00:21:54.960> on<00:21:55.679> is 00:21:55.830 --> 00:21:55.840 align:start position:0% I don't know why my camera's not on is 00:21:55.840 --> 00:21:59.909 align:start position:0% I don't know why my camera's not on is that<00:21:56.520> um<00:21:57.520> it'd<00:21:57.720> be<00:21:57.960> good<00:21:58.159> to 00:21:59.909 --> 00:21:59.919 align:start position:0% that um it'd be good to 00:21:59.919 --> 00:22:02.870 align:start position:0% that um it'd be good to point<00:22:00.240> out<00:22:00.600> the<00:22:00.799> pieces<00:22:01.279> that<00:22:01.400> are<00:22:01.760> new<00:22:02.600> the 00:22:02.870 --> 00:22:02.880 align:start position:0% point out the pieces that are new the 00:22:02.880 --> 00:22:05.029 align:start position:0% point out the pieces that are new the the<00:22:03.039> new<00:22:03.320> law<00:22:03.960> so<00:22:04.159> the<00:22:04.360> changes<00:22:04.720> in<00:22:04.880> the 00:22:05.029 --> 00:22:05.039 align:start position:0% the new law so the changes in the 00:22:05.039 --> 00:22:08.390 align:start position:0% the new law so the changes in the policies<00:22:05.919> these<00:22:06.120> leas<00:22:06.640> need<00:22:06.799> to<00:22:06.960> make<00:22:07.799> so<00:22:08.080> that 00:22:08.390 --> 00:22:08.400 align:start position:0% policies these leas need to make so that 00:22:08.400 --> 00:22:10.029 align:start position:0% policies these leas need to make so that because<00:22:08.559> they<00:22:08.720> already<00:22:09.279> they<00:22:09.559> should<00:22:09.799> already 00:22:10.029 --> 00:22:10.039 align:start position:0% because they already they should already 00:22:10.039 --> 00:22:11.710 align:start position:0% because they already they should already have<00:22:10.159> a<00:22:10.279> policy<00:22:10.559> for<00:22:10.679> their<00:22:10.799> old<00:22:11.000> one<00:22:11.240> so 00:22:11.710 --> 00:22:11.720 align:start position:0% have a policy for their old one so 00:22:11.720 --> 00:22:13.149 align:start position:0% have a policy for their old one so figure<00:22:12.000> out<00:22:12.120> a<00:22:12.240> way<00:22:12.320> to<00:22:12.440> lay<00:22:12.640> out<00:22:12.840> this<00:22:12.919> is<00:22:13.039> like 00:22:13.149 --> 00:22:13.159 align:start position:0% figure out a way to lay out this is like 00:22:13.159 --> 00:22:15.870 align:start position:0% figure out a way to lay out this is like fully<00:22:13.440> a<00:22:13.600> design<00:22:14.000> thing<00:22:14.200> not<00:22:14.320> a<00:22:14.559> Content<00:22:15.039> thing 00:22:15.870 --> 00:22:15.880 align:start position:0% fully a design thing not a Content thing 00:22:15.880 --> 00:22:18.669 align:start position:0% fully a design thing not a Content thing um<00:22:16.240> I<00:22:16.520> sometimes<00:22:16.679> think<00:22:16.919> it<00:22:17.039> that<00:22:17.159> way<00:22:17.320> but<00:22:17.679> so 00:22:18.669 --> 00:22:18.679 align:start position:0% um I sometimes think it that way but so 00:22:18.679 --> 00:22:20.750 align:start position:0% um I sometimes think it that way but so making<00:22:19.039> it<00:22:19.240> bold<00:22:19.640> or<00:22:19.799> a<00:22:19.919> different<00:22:20.200> color<00:22:20.600> or 00:22:20.750 --> 00:22:20.760 align:start position:0% making it bold or a different color or 00:22:20.760 --> 00:22:22.750 align:start position:0% making it bold or a different color or something<00:22:21.200> that<00:22:21.360> says<00:22:21.840> like<00:22:22.080> this<00:22:22.200> is<00:22:22.320> the<00:22:22.559> new 00:22:22.750 --> 00:22:22.760 align:start position:0% something that says like this is the new 00:22:22.760 --> 00:22:25.029 align:start position:0% something that says like this is the new pieces<00:22:23.080> in<00:22:23.200> the<00:22:23.360> policy<00:22:23.640> you<00:22:23.760> need<00:22:23.919> to<00:22:24.120> add<00:22:24.840> but 00:22:25.029 --> 00:22:25.039 align:start position:0% pieces in the policy you need to add but 00:22:25.039 --> 00:22:26.630 align:start position:0% pieces in the policy you need to add but I<00:22:25.120> feel<00:22:25.320> like<00:22:25.480> there's<00:22:25.919> someone<00:22:26.240> that's<00:22:26.440> out 00:22:26.630 --> 00:22:26.640 align:start position:0% I feel like there's someone that's out 00:22:26.640 --> 00:22:28.269 align:start position:0% I feel like there's someone that's out there<00:22:26.840> that's<00:22:26.960> a<00:22:27.120> technical<00:22:27.679> like<00:22:27.760> a<00:22:27.919> designer 00:22:28.269 --> 00:22:28.279 align:start position:0% there that's a technical like a designer 00:22:28.279 --> 00:22:29.710 align:start position:0% there that's a technical like a designer that<00:22:28.559> could<00:22:28.679> do<00:22:28.799> something<00:22:29.120> really<00:22:29.320> fancy 00:22:29.710 --> 00:22:29.720 align:start position:0% that could do something really fancy 00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:31.710 align:start position:0% that could do something really fancy with<00:22:29.880> that<00:22:30.640> and<00:22:30.760> I<00:22:30.880> don't<00:22:31.080> think<00:22:31.279> any<00:22:31.440> of<00:22:31.559> these 00:22:31.710 --> 00:22:31.720 align:start position:0% with that and I don't think any of these 00:22:31.720 --> 00:22:34.710 align:start position:0% with that and I don't think any of these are<00:22:31.919> new<00:22:32.760> like<00:22:33.039> the<00:22:33.279> the<00:22:33.440> even<00:22:33.760> the 00:22:34.710 --> 00:22:34.720 align:start position:0% are new like the the even the 00:22:34.720 --> 00:22:36.669 align:start position:0% are new like the the even the online<00:22:35.720> yeah<00:22:35.799> I<00:22:35.840> was<00:22:35.960> just<00:22:36.120> talking<00:22:36.400> more 00:22:36.669 --> 00:22:36.679 align:start position:0% online yeah I was just talking more 00:22:36.679 --> 00:22:39.590 align:start position:0% online yeah I was just talking more broadly<00:22:37.080> about<00:22:37.440> oh<00:22:37.559> oh<00:22:37.880> yep<00:22:38.080> sorry<00:22:38.640> yeah<00:22:39.080> and 00:22:39.590 --> 00:22:39.600 align:start position:0% broadly about oh oh yep sorry yeah and 00:22:39.600 --> 00:22:41.630 align:start position:0% broadly about oh oh yep sorry yeah and um<00:22:40.159> that<00:22:40.360> is<00:22:40.520> something<00:22:40.799> that<00:22:40.960> we<00:22:41.080> can<00:22:41.240> do<00:22:41.480> just 00:22:41.630 --> 00:22:41.640 align:start position:0% um that is something that we can do just 00:22:41.640 --> 00:22:43.470 align:start position:0% um that is something that we can do just in<00:22:41.760> the<00:22:41.919> final<00:22:42.200> motion<00:22:42.600> just<00:22:42.840> put<00:22:43.080> and<00:22:43.200> make 00:22:43.470 --> 00:22:43.480 align:start position:0% in the final motion just put and make 00:22:43.480 --> 00:22:45.510 align:start position:0% in the final motion just put and make technical<00:22:43.960> edits<00:22:44.360> as<00:22:44.679> discussed<00:22:45.120> within<00:22:45.360> the 00:22:45.510 --> 00:22:45.520 align:start position:0% technical edits as discussed within the 00:22:45.520 --> 00:22:49.310 align:start position:0% technical edits as discussed within the meeting<00:22:46.520> sounds<00:22:47.000> great<00:22:47.480> very<00:22:47.760> good<00:22:48.600> and<00:22:48.799> deina 00:22:49.310 --> 00:22:49.320 align:start position:0% meeting sounds great very good and deina 00:22:49.320 --> 00:22:51.269 align:start position:0% meeting sounds great very good and deina you<00:22:49.480> had<00:22:49.640> a 00:22:51.269 --> 00:22:51.279 align:start position:0% you had a 00:22:51.279 --> 00:22:54.789 align:start position:0% you had a point<00:22:52.279> yeah<00:22:52.640> just<00:22:52.840> a<00:22:53.000> couple<00:22:53.240> of<00:22:53.480> like 00:22:54.789 --> 00:22:54.799 align:start position:0% point yeah just a couple of like 00:22:54.799 --> 00:22:57.510 align:start position:0% point yeah just a couple of like Library<00:22:55.799> you<00:22:56.159> language<00:22:56.880> that<00:22:57.159> might<00:22:57.320> be 00:22:57.510 --> 00:22:57.520 align:start position:0% Library you language that might be 00:22:57.520 --> 00:23:01.830 align:start position:0% Library you language that might be helpful<00:22:57.840> for<00:22:58.080> Ellie<00:22:58.640> a<00:22:59.240> um<00:22:59.880> so<00:23:00.279> C<00:23:00.840> says<00:23:01.360> Library 00:23:01.830 --> 00:23:01.840 align:start position:0% helpful for Ellie a um so C says Library 00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:04.750 align:start position:0% helpful for Ellie a um so C says Library maintenance<00:23:02.640> policy<00:23:03.640> we<00:23:03.840> actually<00:23:04.159> call<00:23:04.360> it<00:23:04.520> a 00:23:04.750 --> 00:23:04.760 align:start position:0% maintenance policy we actually call it a 00:23:04.760 --> 00:23:07.870 align:start position:0% maintenance policy we actually call it a collection<00:23:05.360> development<00:23:06.480> policy<00:23:07.480> um<00:23:07.760> and 00:23:07.870 --> 00:23:07.880 align:start position:0% collection development policy um and 00:23:07.880 --> 00:23:09.909 align:start position:0% collection development policy um and then<00:23:08.080> underneath<00:23:08.840> within<00:23:09.200> the<00:23:09.440> collection 00:23:09.909 --> 00:23:09.919 align:start position:0% then underneath within the collection 00:23:09.919 --> 00:23:13.190 align:start position:0% then underneath within the collection development<00:23:10.559> policy<00:23:11.520> is<00:23:11.720> the<00:23:12.000> selection 00:23:13.190 --> 00:23:13.200 align:start position:0% development policy is the selection 00:23:13.200 --> 00:23:16.590 align:start position:0% development policy is the selection criteria<00:23:14.200> and<00:23:14.840> deselection<00:23:15.840> and 00:23:16.590 --> 00:23:16.600 align:start position:0% criteria and deselection and 00:23:16.600 --> 00:23:18.830 align:start position:0% criteria and deselection and reconsideration<00:23:17.600> so<00:23:17.840> I'm<00:23:18.000> just<00:23:18.200> wondering 00:23:18.830 --> 00:23:18.840 align:start position:0% reconsideration so I'm just wondering 00:23:18.840 --> 00:23:21.269 align:start position:0% reconsideration so I'm just wondering about<00:23:19.840> um 00:23:21.269 --> 00:23:21.279 align:start position:0% about um 00:23:21.279 --> 00:23:25.230 align:start position:0% about um maybe<00:23:22.279> maybe<00:23:22.799> C<00:23:23.240> becomes<00:23:23.799> a<00:23:24.320> and<00:23:24.480> it<00:23:24.679> becomes<00:23:25.000> a 00:23:25.230 --> 00:23:25.240 align:start position:0% maybe maybe C becomes a and it becomes a 00:23:25.240 --> 00:23:27.630 align:start position:0% maybe maybe C becomes a and it becomes a shall<00:23:25.600> establish<00:23:26.000> a<00:23:26.159> library<00:23:26.640> development<00:23:27.240> or 00:23:27.630 --> 00:23:27.640 align:start position:0% shall establish a library development or 00:23:27.640 --> 00:23:29.549 align:start position:0% shall establish a library development or I'm<00:23:27.760> sorry<00:23:27.960> a<00:23:28.080> collection<00:23:28.679> development 00:23:29.549 --> 00:23:29.559 align:start position:0% I'm sorry a collection development 00:23:29.559 --> 00:23:32.990 align:start position:0% I'm sorry a collection development policy<00:23:30.559> that<00:23:30.799> includes<00:23:31.720> selection 00:23:32.990 --> 00:23:33.000 align:start position:0% policy that includes selection 00:23:33.000 --> 00:23:35.590 align:start position:0% policy that includes selection criteria<00:23:34.000> um<00:23:34.360> and<00:23:34.480> then<00:23:34.640> I<00:23:34.760> think<00:23:35.039> further 00:23:35.590 --> 00:23:35.600 align:start position:0% criteria um and then I think further 00:23:35.600 --> 00:23:37.669 align:start position:0% criteria um and then I think further down<00:23:36.200> we<00:23:36.480> also 00:23:37.669 --> 00:23:37.679 align:start position:0% down we also 00:23:37.679 --> 00:23:41.710 align:start position:0% down we also say<00:23:38.679> um<00:23:39.120> let<00:23:39.400> me 00:23:41.710 --> 00:23:41.720 align:start position:0% say um let me 00:23:41.720 --> 00:23:43.630 align:start position:0% say um let me see 00:23:43.630 --> 00:23:43.640 align:start position:0% see 00:23:43.640 --> 00:23:46.149 align:start position:0% see um<00:23:44.640> I<00:23:44.760> guess<00:23:44.880> we<00:23:45.000> don't<00:23:45.200> say 00:23:46.149 --> 00:23:46.159 align:start position:0% um I guess we don't say 00:23:46.159 --> 00:23:49.070 align:start position:0% um I guess we don't say deselection<00:23:47.159> um<00:23:48.000> but<00:23:48.200> just<00:23:48.360> so<00:23:48.559> that<00:23:48.760> it's<00:23:48.919> in 00:23:49.070 --> 00:23:49.080 align:start position:0% deselection um but just so that it's in 00:23:49.080 --> 00:23:51.789 align:start position:0% deselection um but just so that it's in order<00:23:49.480> of<00:23:49.679> like<00:23:49.880> how<00:23:50.600> a<00:23:50.799> library<00:23:51.240> and<00:23:51.360> a<00:23:51.520> school 00:23:51.789 --> 00:23:51.799 align:start position:0% order of like how a library and a school 00:23:51.799 --> 00:23:54.630 align:start position:0% order of like how a library and a school and<00:23:51.919> an<00:23:52.080> Lea<00:23:52.520> would<00:23:52.760> look<00:23:53.039> at 00:23:54.630 --> 00:23:54.640 align:start position:0% and an Lea would look at 00:23:54.640 --> 00:23:56.789 align:start position:0% and an Lea would look at um<00:23:55.640> yeah 00:23:56.789 --> 00:23:56.799 align:start position:0% um yeah 00:23:56.799 --> 00:23:59.029 align:start position:0% um yeah exactly<00:23:57.799> and<00:23:57.919> you<00:23:58.000> can<00:23:58.440> include<00:23:58.760> all<00:23:58.880> the 00:23:59.029 --> 00:23:59.039 align:start position:0% exactly and you can include all the 00:23:59.039 --> 00:24:01.750 align:start position:0% exactly and you can include all the other<00:23:59.440> parts<00:23:59.760> of<00:23:59.960> that<00:24:00.200> so<00:24:00.520> like<00:24:01.120> the<00:24:01.279> M<00:24:01.640> the 00:24:01.750 --> 00:24:01.760 align:start position:0% other parts of that so like the M the 00:24:01.760 --> 00:24:05.710 align:start position:0% other parts of that so like the M the maintenance<00:24:02.279> process<00:24:02.640> so<00:24:02.960> I<00:24:03.880> so<00:24:04.080> CI<00:24:04.840> right<00:24:05.039> now 00:24:05.710 --> 00:24:05.720 align:start position:0% maintenance process so I so CI right now 00:24:05.720 --> 00:24:07.950 align:start position:0% maintenance process so I so CI right now if<00:24:05.880> we<00:24:06.039> Chang<00:24:06.679> if<00:24:06.760> we<00:24:06.919> mooved<00:24:07.279> that<00:24:07.480> up<00:24:07.799> and 00:24:07.950 --> 00:24:07.960 align:start position:0% if we Chang if we mooved that up and 00:24:07.960 --> 00:24:09.909 align:start position:0% if we Chang if we mooved that up and that<00:24:08.159> becomes<00:24:08.559> the<00:24:08.760> collection<00:24:09.360> development 00:24:09.909 --> 00:24:09.919 align:start position:0% that becomes the collection development 00:24:09.919 --> 00:24:12.269 align:start position:0% that becomes the collection development process<00:24:10.360> may<00:24:10.559> be<00:24:10.720> used<00:24:11.000> to<00:24:11.200> just<00:24:11.480> deselect<00:24:12.080> and 00:24:12.269 --> 00:24:12.279 align:start position:0% process may be used to just deselect and 00:24:12.279 --> 00:24:15.110 align:start position:0% process may be used to just deselect and remove<00:24:13.080> materials<00:24:14.080> that<00:24:14.200> are<00:24:14.440> inconsistent 00:24:15.110 --> 00:24:15.120 align:start position:0% remove materials that are inconsistent 00:24:15.120 --> 00:24:17.430 align:start position:0% remove materials that are inconsistent with<00:24:15.240> Utah 00:24:17.430 --> 00:24:17.440 align:start position:0% with Utah 00:24:17.440 --> 00:24:21.430 align:start position:0% with Utah code<00:24:18.720> um<00:24:19.720> and<00:24:19.880> I<00:24:19.960> don't<00:24:20.120> know<00:24:20.320> if<00:24:20.440> it's 00:24:21.430 --> 00:24:21.440 align:start position:0% code um and I don't know if it's 00:24:21.440 --> 00:24:24.750 align:start position:0% code um and I don't know if it's important<00:24:22.440> necessarily<00:24:23.320> but<00:24:23.600> I<00:24:23.679> mean<00:24:24.360> we 00:24:24.750 --> 00:24:24.760 align:start position:0% important necessarily but I mean we 00:24:24.760 --> 00:24:27.029 align:start position:0% important necessarily but I mean we deselect<00:24:25.520> materials<00:24:26.080> for<00:24:26.240> a<00:24:26.440> variety<00:24:26.840> of 00:24:27.029 --> 00:24:27.039 align:start position:0% deselect materials for a variety of 00:24:27.039 --> 00:24:30.870 align:start position:0% deselect materials for a variety of reasons<00:24:27.600> besides<00:24:28.159> just<00:24:28.440> just<00:24:29.200> 53g 00:24:30.870 --> 00:24:30.880 align:start position:0% reasons besides just just 53g 00:24:30.880 --> 00:24:34.990 align:start position:0% reasons besides just just 53g 10103<00:24:31.880> um<00:24:32.399> does<00:24:32.679> d<00:24:33.039> speak<00:24:33.320> to<00:24:33.600> that<00:24:33.840> or<00:24:34.159> not 00:24:34.990 --> 00:24:35.000 align:start position:0% 10103 um does d speak to that or not 00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:37.549 align:start position:0% 10103 um does d speak to that or not let's<00:24:35.200> see<00:24:35.720> because<00:24:35.960> I<00:24:36.159> the<00:24:36.360> intent<00:24:36.799> was<00:24:37.240> that 00:24:37.549 --> 00:24:37.559 align:start position:0% let's see because I the intent was that 00:24:37.559 --> 00:24:40.110 align:start position:0% let's see because I the intent was that that's<00:24:37.840> specific<00:24:38.320> to<00:24:38.520> what's<00:24:38.720> in<00:24:38.880> the<00:24:39.120> law 00:24:40.110 --> 00:24:40.120 align:start position:0% that's specific to what's in the law 00:24:40.120 --> 00:24:43.590 align:start position:0% that's specific to what's in the law yeah<00:24:40.360> but<00:24:40.480> then<00:24:40.679> the<00:24:40.880> other<00:24:41.320> is<00:24:42.039> um<00:24:43.039> may<00:24:43.320> use 00:24:43.590 --> 00:24:43.600 align:start position:0% yeah but then the other is um may use 00:24:43.600 --> 00:24:45.909 align:start position:0% yeah but then the other is um may use criteria<00:24:44.120> found<00:24:44.440> harmful<00:24:44.760> to<00:24:44.880> minors<00:24:45.200> like<00:24:45.399> VI 00:24:45.909 --> 00:24:45.919 align:start position:0% criteria found harmful to minors like VI 00:24:45.919 --> 00:24:47.789 align:start position:0% criteria found harmful to minors like VI they<00:24:46.039> can<00:24:46.159> use<00:24:46.399> other<00:24:46.880> things<00:24:47.120> for 00:24:47.789 --> 00:24:47.799 align:start position:0% they can use other things for 00:24:47.799 --> 00:24:52.630 align:start position:0% they can use other things for deselection<00:24:48.799> I<00:24:48.960> guess<00:24:49.919> oh<00:24:50.080> sorry<00:24:50.440> I 00:24:52.630 --> 00:24:52.640 align:start position:0% 00:24:52.640 --> 00:24:55.190 align:start position:0% apologize<00:24:53.640> I<00:24:53.720> was<00:24:53.880> just<00:24:54.000> going<00:24:54.120> to<00:24:54.279> say<00:24:54.480> that 00:24:55.190 --> 00:24:55.200 align:start position:0% apologize I was just going to say that 00:24:55.200 --> 00:24:58.470 align:start position:0% apologize I was just going to say that deselection<00:24:56.200> historically<00:24:57.039> has<00:24:57.240> meant<00:24:57.799> like 00:24:58.470 --> 00:24:58.480 align:start position:0% deselection historically has meant like 00:24:58.480 --> 00:25:00.870 align:start position:0% deselection historically has meant like the<00:24:58.640> book<00:24:59.279> um<00:24:59.600> is<00:24:59.760> no<00:24:59.960> longer<00:25:00.240> being<00:25:00.520> checked 00:25:00.870 --> 00:25:00.880 align:start position:0% the book um is no longer being checked 00:25:00.880 --> 00:25:04.590 align:start position:0% the book um is no longer being checked out<00:25:01.240> or<00:25:01.559> the<00:25:01.679> book<00:25:01.880> is<00:25:02.039> falling<00:25:02.440> apart<00:25:03.320> or<00:25:04.320> um 00:25:04.590 --> 00:25:04.600 align:start position:0% out or the book is falling apart or um 00:25:04.600 --> 00:25:06.430 align:start position:0% out or the book is falling apart or um there's<00:25:04.760> a<00:25:04.919> newer<00:25:05.360> version<00:25:05.720> of<00:25:05.840> the<00:25:06.000> book<00:25:06.200> that 00:25:06.430 --> 00:25:06.440 align:start position:0% there's a newer version of the book that 00:25:06.440 --> 00:25:09.269 align:start position:0% there's a newer version of the book that appeals<00:25:06.840> to<00:25:07.039> students<00:25:07.919> you<00:25:08.039> know<00:25:08.960> it<00:25:09.159> it 00:25:09.269 --> 00:25:09.279 align:start position:0% appeals to students you know it it 00:25:09.279 --> 00:25:11.750 align:start position:0% appeals to students you know it it connects<00:25:09.600> more<00:25:09.799> with<00:25:10.000> students<00:25:10.720> um<00:25:11.320> so 00:25:11.750 --> 00:25:11.760 align:start position:0% connects more with students um so 00:25:11.760 --> 00:25:13.510 align:start position:0% connects more with students um so unrelated<00:25:12.480> to 00:25:13.510 --> 00:25:13.520 align:start position:0% unrelated to 00:25:13.520 --> 00:25:16.110 align:start position:0% unrelated to necessarily<00:25:14.520> um<00:25:15.039> content<00:25:15.679> you're<00:25:15.840> saying 00:25:16.110 --> 00:25:16.120 align:start position:0% necessarily um content you're saying 00:25:16.120 --> 00:25:17.990 align:start position:0% necessarily um content you're saying there<00:25:16.279> is<00:25:16.399> some<00:25:16.640> content<00:25:17.080> just<00:25:17.320> like<00:25:17.679> oh<00:25:17.880> this 00:25:17.990 --> 00:25:18.000 align:start position:0% there is some content just like oh this 00:25:18.000 --> 00:25:19.470 align:start position:0% there is some content just like oh this is<00:25:18.200> not<00:25:18.360> a<00:25:18.480> book<00:25:18.720> that<00:25:18.880> kids<00:25:19.039> are<00:25:19.240> really 00:25:19.470 --> 00:25:19.480 align:start position:0% is not a book that kids are really 00:25:19.480 --> 00:25:21.190 align:start position:0% is not a book that kids are really interested<00:25:19.880> in<00:25:20.080> anymore<00:25:20.559> right<00:25:20.720> like<00:25:20.919> times 00:25:21.190 --> 00:25:21.200 align:start position:0% interested in anymore right like times 00:25:21.200 --> 00:25:23.190 align:start position:0% interested in anymore right like times change<00:25:21.600> and<00:25:21.760> they<00:25:21.919> get<00:25:22.399> interested<00:25:22.760> in<00:25:22.960> other 00:25:23.190 --> 00:25:23.200 align:start position:0% change and they get interested in other 00:25:23.200 --> 00:25:26.669 align:start position:0% change and they get interested in other things<00:25:23.600> so 00:25:26.669 --> 00:25:26.679 align:start position:0% 00:25:26.679 --> 00:25:30.070 align:start position:0% um<00:25:27.679> so<00:25:28.039> what<00:25:28.399> what<00:25:28.520> would<00:25:28.679> the<00:25:28.799> words<00:25:29.200> be<00:25:29.520> de 00:25:30.070 --> 00:25:30.080 align:start position:0% um so what what would the words be de 00:25:30.080 --> 00:25:32.149 align:start position:0% um so what what would the words be de let's<00:25:30.360> get<00:25:30.559> let's<00:25:30.799> get<00:25:30.960> that<00:25:31.120> in<00:25:31.640> I'd<00:25:31.799> love<00:25:31.960> to 00:25:32.149 --> 00:25:32.159 align:start position:0% let's get let's get that in I'd love to 00:25:32.159 --> 00:25:33.310 align:start position:0% let's get let's get that in I'd love to include 00:25:33.310 --> 00:25:33.320 align:start position:0% include 00:25:33.320 --> 00:25:37.310 align:start position:0% include that<00:25:34.320> um<00:25:34.760> so<00:25:35.279> establish<00:25:35.720> a<00:25:35.960> selection<00:25:36.880> process 00:25:37.310 --> 00:25:37.320 align:start position:0% that um so establish a selection process 00:25:37.320 --> 00:25:40.950 align:start position:0% that um so establish a selection process that<00:25:37.679> includes<00:25:38.679> um<00:25:39.320> so<00:25:39.840> where<00:25:40.039> we<00:25:40.279> have<00:25:40.480> C 00:25:40.950 --> 00:25:40.960 align:start position:0% that includes um so where we have C 00:25:40.960 --> 00:25:44.310 align:start position:0% that includes um so where we have C right<00:25:41.120> now<00:25:41.440> I<00:25:41.520> think<00:25:41.679> that's<00:25:41.880> still<00:25:42.240> part<00:25:42.640> of<00:25:43.360> a 00:25:44.310 --> 00:25:44.320 align:start position:0% right now I think that's still part of a 00:25:44.320 --> 00:25:46.750 align:start position:0% right now I think that's still part of a so<00:25:44.480> it<00:25:44.559> would<00:25:44.679> be<00:25:44.799> a<00:25:44.960> sub<00:25:45.279> it'<00:25:45.480> be<00:25:45.640> I<00:25:45.880> I<00:25:46.159> so<00:25:46.320> if<00:25:46.480> C 00:25:46.750 --> 00:25:46.760 align:start position:0% so it would be a sub it' be I I so if C 00:25:46.760 --> 00:25:50.590 align:start position:0% so it would be a sub it' be I I so if C moved<00:25:47.080> up<00:25:47.200> to<00:25:47.440> I<00:25:47.760> I<00:25:48.760> and<00:25:48.919> we<00:25:49.120> change<00:25:49.640> that<00:25:49.840> to 00:25:50.590 --> 00:25:50.600 align:start position:0% moved up to I I and we change that to 00:25:50.600 --> 00:25:53.470 align:start position:0% moved up to I I and we change that to say<00:25:51.600> um<00:25:51.760> and<00:25:51.880> maybe<00:25:52.120> it's<00:25:52.440> actually<00:25:53.200> well 00:25:53.470 --> 00:25:53.480 align:start position:0% say um and maybe it's actually well 00:25:53.480 --> 00:25:55.230 align:start position:0% say um and maybe it's actually well let's<00:25:53.679> put<00:25:53.840> it<00:25:53.960> there<00:25:54.120> and<00:25:54.240> then<00:25:54.399> I<00:25:54.480> can<00:25:55.039> look 00:25:55.230 --> 00:25:55.240 align:start position:0% let's put it there and then I can look 00:25:55.240 --> 00:25:58.870 align:start position:0% let's put it there and then I can look at<00:25:55.399> it<00:25:56.120> so<00:25:56.600> it's<00:25:56.919> actually<00:25:57.760> the<00:25:58.320> collection 00:25:58.870 --> 00:25:58.880 align:start position:0% at it so it's actually the collection 00:25:58.880 --> 00:26:02.029 align:start position:0% at it so it's actually the collection development<00:26:00.279> process<00:26:01.279> as<00:26:01.440> opposed<00:26:01.760> to 00:26:02.029 --> 00:26:02.039 align:start position:0% development process as opposed to 00:26:02.039 --> 00:26:04.549 align:start position:0% development process as opposed to maintenance<00:26:03.039> may<00:26:03.200> be<00:26:03.360> used<00:26:03.600> to<00:26:03.840> deselect<00:26:04.399> and 00:26:04.549 --> 00:26:04.559 align:start position:0% maintenance may be used to deselect and 00:26:04.559 --> 00:26:06.470 align:start position:0% maintenance may be used to deselect and remove<00:26:05.000> materials<00:26:05.520> that<00:26:05.640> are<00:26:05.799> inconsistent 00:26:06.470 --> 00:26:06.480 align:start position:0% remove materials that are inconsistent 00:26:06.480 --> 00:26:07.590 align:start position:0% remove materials that are inconsistent with<00:26:06.600> Utah 00:26:07.590 --> 00:26:07.600 align:start position:0% with Utah 00:26:07.600 --> 00:26:10.909 align:start position:0% with Utah code<00:26:08.799> and 00:26:10.909 --> 00:26:10.919 align:start position:0% code and 00:26:10.919 --> 00:26:14.310 align:start position:0% code and um<00:26:11.919> I'm<00:26:12.200> trying<00:26:12.399> to<00:26:12.600> think<00:26:12.760> of<00:26:12.880> some<00:26:13.039> wording 00:26:14.310 --> 00:26:14.320 align:start position:0% um I'm trying to think of some wording 00:26:14.320 --> 00:26:18.110 align:start position:0% um I'm trying to think of some wording here<00:26:15.320> um<00:26:15.840> to<00:26:16.679> help<00:26:17.000> to<00:26:17.200> ensure<00:26:17.520> a<00:26:17.679> library 00:26:18.110 --> 00:26:18.120 align:start position:0% here um to help to ensure a library 00:26:18.120 --> 00:26:19.830 align:start position:0% here um to help to ensure a library collection<00:26:18.679> remains<00:26:18.960> current<00:26:19.279> relevant<00:26:19.720> and 00:26:19.830 --> 00:26:19.840 align:start position:0% collection remains current relevant and 00:26:19.840 --> 00:26:21.549 align:start position:0% collection remains current relevant and in<00:26:20.039> good<00:26:20.440> condition<00:26:20.799> if<00:26:20.919> we<00:26:21.039> really<00:26:21.200> want<00:26:21.320> to 00:26:21.549 --> 00:26:21.559 align:start position:0% in good condition if we really want to 00:26:21.559 --> 00:26:24.789 align:start position:0% in good condition if we really want to like<00:26:22.360> speak<00:26:22.640> to<00:26:22.919> best<00:26:23.159> practice<00:26:23.480> for 00:26:24.789 --> 00:26:24.799 align:start position:0% like speak to best practice for 00:26:24.799 --> 00:26:29.510 align:start position:0% like speak to best practice for librarianship<00:26:25.799> um 00:26:29.510 --> 00:26:29.520 align:start position:0% 00:26:29.520 --> 00:26:32.430 align:start position:0% and<00:26:29.720> that<00:26:29.840> would<00:26:30.000> cover<00:26:30.240> it<00:26:30.440> all<00:26:31.000> as<00:26:31.159> far<00:26:31.399> as<00:26:32.279> uh 00:26:32.430 --> 00:26:32.440 align:start position:0% and that would cover it all as far as uh 00:26:32.440 --> 00:26:35.029 align:start position:0% and that would cover it all as far as uh D 00:26:35.029 --> 00:26:35.039 align:start position:0% 00:26:35.039 --> 00:26:38.149 align:start position:0% selection<00:26:36.039> okay<00:26:36.640> and<00:26:36.840> what<00:26:37.000> about<00:26:37.440> C<00:26:37.919> down 00:26:38.149 --> 00:26:38.159 align:start position:0% selection okay and what about C down 00:26:38.159 --> 00:26:39.789 align:start position:0% selection okay and what about C down below<00:26:38.720> do<00:26:38.760> you<00:26:38.840> want<00:26:38.960> to<00:26:39.080> move<00:26:39.520> we<00:26:39.600> want<00:26:39.720> to 00:26:39.789 --> 00:26:39.799 align:start position:0% below do you want to move we want to 00:26:39.799 --> 00:26:41.590 align:start position:0% below do you want to move we want to move<00:26:39.960> C<00:26:40.200> up<00:26:40.399> there<00:26:40.559> as<00:26:40.760> well<00:26:41.159> it<00:26:41.240> would<00:26:41.399> seem 00:26:41.590 --> 00:26:41.600 align:start position:0% move C up there as well it would seem 00:26:41.600 --> 00:26:47.830 align:start position:0% move C up there as well it would seem like<00:26:41.840> that<00:26:41.960> would<00:26:42.120> fit 00:26:47.830 --> 00:26:47.840 align:start position:0% 00:26:47.840 --> 00:26:52.029 align:start position:0% there<00:26:48.840> yeah<00:26:49.000> I<00:26:49.080> think<00:26:49.240> it<00:26:49.360> fits<00:26:50.039> under<00:26:51.039> um<00:26:51.840> in 00:26:52.029 --> 00:26:52.039 align:start position:0% there yeah I think it fits under um in 00:26:52.039 --> 00:26:55.070 align:start position:0% there yeah I think it fits under um in that<00:26:52.279> same 00:26:55.070 --> 00:26:55.080 align:start position:0% 00:26:55.080 --> 00:26:59.230 align:start position:0% section<00:26:56.080> and<00:26:56.320> a<00:26:56.960> actually<00:26:57.520> is<00:26:58.480> a<00:26:58.640> collection 00:26:59.230 --> 00:26:59.240 align:start position:0% section and a actually is a collection 00:26:59.240 --> 00:27:01.029 align:start position:0% section and a actually is a collection development 00:27:01.029 --> 00:27:01.039 align:start position:0% development 00:27:01.039 --> 00:27:03.830 align:start position:0% development policy<00:27:02.039> yeah<00:27:02.279> there<00:27:02.399> we 00:27:03.830 --> 00:27:03.840 align:start position:0% policy yeah there we 00:27:03.840 --> 00:27:05.950 align:start position:0% policy yeah there we go<00:27:04.840> and<00:27:04.960> then<00:27:05.120> everyone<00:27:05.399> knows<00:27:05.640> what<00:27:05.760> we're 00:27:05.950 --> 00:27:05.960 align:start position:0% go and then everyone knows what we're 00:27:05.960 --> 00:27:08.029 align:start position:0% go and then everyone knows what we're talking<00:27:06.320> about<00:27:07.080> like<00:27:07.399> this<00:27:07.520> is<00:27:07.679> how<00:27:07.840> they've 00:27:08.029 --> 00:27:08.039 align:start position:0% talking about like this is how they've 00:27:08.039 --> 00:27:09.950 align:start position:0% talking about like this is how they've been<00:27:08.200> trained 00:27:09.950 --> 00:27:09.960 align:start position:0% been trained 00:27:09.960 --> 00:27:13.430 align:start position:0% been trained um<00:27:10.960> to<00:27:11.159> use<00:27:11.440> this 00:27:13.430 --> 00:27:13.440 align:start position:0% um to use this 00:27:13.440 --> 00:27:16.789 align:start position:0% um to use this language<00:27:14.440> okay<00:27:14.640> now<00:27:14.919> B 00:27:16.789 --> 00:27:16.799 align:start position:0% language okay now B 00:27:16.799 --> 00:27:21.549 align:start position:0% language okay now B becomes<00:27:17.799> so<00:27:18.200> B<00:27:18.559> is<00:27:18.880> really<00:27:19.360> part<00:27:19.720> of 00:27:21.549 --> 00:27:21.559 align:start position:0% becomes so B is really part of 00:27:21.559 --> 00:27:25.350 align:start position:0% becomes so B is really part of selection<00:27:22.559> so<00:27:23.159> using<00:27:23.640> objective<00:27:24.200> a<00:27:24.520> criteria 00:27:25.350 --> 00:27:25.360 align:start position:0% selection so using objective a criteria 00:27:25.360 --> 00:27:28.549 align:start position:0% selection so using objective a criteria and<00:27:25.520> I<00:27:25.600> don't<00:27:25.720> know<00:27:26.120> how<00:27:27.159> like<00:27:28.200> how<00:27:28.320> many 00:27:28.549 --> 00:27:28.559 align:start position:0% and I don't know how like how many 00:27:28.559 --> 00:27:30.230 align:start position:0% and I don't know how like how many levels<00:27:28.960> we<00:27:29.120> want<00:27:29.200> to<00:27:29.360> go<00:27:29.559> down<00:27:29.799> it<00:27:29.960> gets<00:27:30.120> a 00:27:30.230 --> 00:27:30.240 align:start position:0% levels we want to go down it gets a 00:27:30.240 --> 00:27:32.510 align:start position:0% levels we want to go down it gets a little<00:27:30.559> I<00:27:30.640> don't<00:27:31.559> that<00:27:31.679> was<00:27:31.880> the<00:27:32.120> problem 00:27:32.510 --> 00:27:32.520 align:start position:0% little I don't that was the problem 00:27:32.520 --> 00:27:33.870 align:start position:0% little I don't that was the problem right<00:27:32.679> when<00:27:32.799> I<00:27:32.880> looked<00:27:33.080> at<00:27:33.240> a<00:27:33.360> whole<00:27:33.480> bunch<00:27:33.679> of 00:27:33.870 --> 00:27:33.880 align:start position:0% right when I looked at a whole bunch of 00:27:33.880 --> 00:27:36.350 align:start position:0% right when I looked at a whole bunch of districts<00:27:34.440> it<00:27:34.559> was<00:27:35.120> so<00:27:35.399> this<00:27:35.559> was<00:27:35.760> just<00:27:36.039> broad 00:27:36.350 --> 00:27:36.360 align:start position:0% districts it was so this was just broad 00:27:36.360 --> 00:27:38.029 align:start position:0% districts it was so this was just broad language<00:27:36.760> one<00:27:36.960> District<00:27:37.360> had<00:27:37.600> this<00:27:37.799> and<00:27:37.919> I 00:27:38.029 --> 00:27:38.039 align:start position:0% language one District had this and I 00:27:38.039 --> 00:27:39.669 align:start position:0% language one District had this and I just<00:27:38.159> felt<00:27:38.440> like<00:27:38.760> a<00:27:38.960> broad<00:27:39.240> language<00:27:39.559> that 00:27:39.669 --> 00:27:39.679 align:start position:0% just felt like a broad language that 00:27:39.679 --> 00:27:42.630 align:start position:0% just felt like a broad language that just<00:27:39.799> says<00:27:40.200> look<00:27:41.200> you<00:27:41.320> know<00:27:41.880> there's<00:27:42.320> there's 00:27:42.630 --> 00:27:42.640 align:start position:0% just says look you know there's there's 00:27:42.640 --> 00:27:43.909 align:start position:0% just says look you know there's there's different<00:27:42.919> formats<00:27:43.399> there's<00:27:43.640> different 00:27:43.909 --> 00:27:43.919 align:start position:0% different formats there's different 00:27:43.919 --> 00:27:46.029 align:start position:0% different formats there's different genres<00:27:44.919> I<00:27:45.000> think<00:27:45.159> when<00:27:45.279> you<00:27:45.399> start<00:27:45.679> breaking 00:27:46.029 --> 00:27:46.039 align:start position:0% genres I think when you start breaking 00:27:46.039 --> 00:27:48.549 align:start position:0% genres I think when you start breaking them<00:27:46.240> out<00:27:46.600> then<00:27:46.760> it<00:27:46.960> gets<00:27:47.960> you're<00:27:48.159> trying<00:27:48.360> to 00:27:48.549 --> 00:27:48.559 align:start position:0% them out then it gets you're trying to 00:27:48.559 --> 00:27:51.710 align:start position:0% them out then it gets you're trying to cater<00:27:48.880> to<00:27:49.120> everyone<00:27:49.679> and<00:27:49.799> you're<00:27:50.039> really<00:27:50.720> not 00:27:51.710 --> 00:27:51.720 align:start position:0% cater to everyone and you're really not 00:27:51.720 --> 00:27:52.870 align:start position:0% cater to everyone and you're really not do<00:27:51.799> you<00:27:51.880> know<00:27:52.080> does<00:27:52.240> that<00:27:52.360> make<00:27:52.480> sense<00:27:52.720> not 00:27:52.870 --> 00:27:52.880 align:start position:0% do you know does that make sense not 00:27:52.880 --> 00:27:54.190 align:start position:0% do you know does that make sense not that<00:27:53.120> I<00:27:53.159> mean<00:27:53.320> districts<00:27:53.720> can<00:27:53.799> do<00:27:53.919> whatever 00:27:54.190 --> 00:27:54.200 align:start position:0% that I mean districts can do whatever 00:27:54.200 --> 00:27:55.590 align:start position:0% that I mean districts can do whatever they<00:27:54.360> want<00:27:54.720> I 00:27:55.590 --> 00:27:55.600 align:start position:0% they want I 00:27:55.600 --> 00:27:57.750 align:start position:0% they want I just<00:27:56.600> I<00:27:56.960> I<00:27:57.039> don't<00:27:57.200> know<00:27:57.320> that<00:27:57.440> we<00:27:57.559> have<00:27:57.679> to 00:27:57.750 --> 00:27:57.760 align:start position:0% just I I don't know that we have to 00:27:57.760 --> 00:27:59.470 align:start position:0% just I I don't know that we have to break<00:27:57.960> up<00:27:58.320> that<00:27:58.440> out<00:27:58.640> they<00:27:58.799> already<00:27:59.159> a<00:27:59.240> lot<00:27:59.360> of 00:27:59.470 --> 00:27:59.480 align:start position:0% break up that out they already a lot of 00:27:59.480 --> 00:28:00.909 align:start position:0% break up that out they already a lot of them<00:27:59.600> already<00:27:59.919> have<00:28:00.159> established<00:28:00.559> in<00:28:00.679> their 00:28:00.909 --> 00:28:00.919 align:start position:0% them already have established in their 00:28:00.919 --> 00:28:02.549 align:start position:0% them already have established in their policy<00:28:01.279> what<00:28:01.440> that<00:28:01.640> looks<00:28:01.919> like<00:28:02.279> this<00:28:02.399> just 00:28:02.549 --> 00:28:02.559 align:start position:0% policy what that looks like this just 00:28:02.559 --> 00:28:04.389 align:start position:0% policy what that looks like this just gives<00:28:02.799> that<00:28:03.039> General<00:28:03.320> feel<00:28:03.720> doesn't<00:28:04.159> instead 00:28:04.389 --> 00:28:04.399 align:start position:0% gives that General feel doesn't instead 00:28:04.399 --> 00:28:06.549 align:start position:0% gives that General feel doesn't instead of<00:28:04.559> getting<00:28:04.760> into<00:28:05.000> the 00:28:06.549 --> 00:28:06.559 align:start position:0% of getting into the 00:28:06.559 --> 00:28:09.990 align:start position:0% of getting into the weeds<00:28:07.559> so<00:28:08.399> thoughts<00:28:08.640> on<00:28:08.840> that 00:28:09.990 --> 00:28:10.000 align:start position:0% weeds so thoughts on that 00:28:10.000 --> 00:28:14.149 align:start position:0% weeds so thoughts on that deina<00:28:11.000> so<00:28:11.320> I<00:28:11.440> guess<00:28:11.640> I'm<00:28:11.840> wondering<00:28:12.600> if<00:28:13.600> do<00:28:13.799> we 00:28:14.149 --> 00:28:14.159 align:start position:0% deina so I guess I'm wondering if do we 00:28:14.159 --> 00:28:17.470 align:start position:0% deina so I guess I'm wondering if do we need<00:28:14.480> to<00:28:14.760> spell<00:28:15.080> out<00:28:15.320> in<00:28:15.640> I<00:28:16.080> AI<00:28:16.880> do<00:28:17.000> we<00:28:17.120> need<00:28:17.320> to 00:28:17.470 --> 00:28:17.480 align:start position:0% need to spell out in I AI do we need to 00:28:17.480 --> 00:28:19.669 align:start position:0% need to spell out in I AI do we need to spell<00:28:17.720> out<00:28:17.919> includes<00:28:18.399> liary<00:28:18.840> materials<00:28:19.440> gifts 00:28:19.669 --> 00:28:19.679 align:start position:0% spell out includes liary materials gifts 00:28:19.679 --> 00:28:21.190 align:start position:0% spell out includes liary materials gifts and<00:28:19.840> donations<00:28:20.399> did<00:28:20.600> that<00:28:20.799> come<00:28:20.960> from 00:28:21.190 --> 00:28:21.200 align:start position:0% and donations did that come from 00:28:21.200 --> 00:28:22.509 align:start position:0% and donations did that come from somewhere<00:28:21.519> else<00:28:21.760> and<00:28:21.960> that's<00:28:22.240> why<00:28:22.360> we 00:28:22.509 --> 00:28:22.519 align:start position:0% somewhere else and that's why we 00:28:22.519 --> 00:28:26.430 align:start position:0% somewhere else and that's why we included<00:28:23.200> it<00:28:24.200> I<00:28:24.519> believe<00:28:25.120> it's<00:28:25.640> I<00:28:25.720> can<00:28:25.960> look<00:28:26.320> I 00:28:26.430 --> 00:28:26.440 align:start position:0% included it I believe it's I can look I 00:28:26.440 --> 00:28:29.149 align:start position:0% included it I believe it's I can look I think<00:28:26.640> it's<00:28:26.840> in<00:28:27.679> the<00:28:27.840> law<00:28:28.399> in<00:28:28.519> other<00:28:28.679> words<00:28:28.919> you 00:28:29.149 --> 00:28:29.159 align:start position:0% think it's in the law in other words you 00:28:29.159 --> 00:28:31.630 align:start position:0% think it's in the law in other words you have<00:28:29.279> to<00:28:29.519> have<00:28:30.080> a<00:28:30.279> mechanism<00:28:30.880> for<00:28:31.159> these<00:28:31.360> other 00:28:31.630 --> 00:28:31.640 align:start position:0% have to have a mechanism for these other 00:28:31.640 --> 00:28:33.789 align:start position:0% have to have a mechanism for these other items<00:28:32.080> as<00:28:32.279> well<00:28:32.679> and<00:28:32.799> I<00:28:32.919> saw<00:28:33.159> that<00:28:33.279> in<00:28:33.440> almost 00:28:33.789 --> 00:28:33.799 align:start position:0% items as well and I saw that in almost 00:28:33.799 --> 00:28:36.110 align:start position:0% items as well and I saw that in almost every<00:28:34.159> policy<00:28:35.000> yeah<00:28:35.240> so<00:28:35.399> it's<00:28:35.559> just<00:28:35.720> not 00:28:36.110 --> 00:28:36.120 align:start position:0% every policy yeah so it's just not 00:28:36.120 --> 00:28:37.789 align:start position:0% every policy yeah so it's just not libraries<00:28:36.640> that<00:28:36.840> they<00:28:37.039> actually<00:28:37.320> know<00:28:37.600> that 00:28:37.789 --> 00:28:37.799 align:start position:0% libraries that they actually know that 00:28:37.799 --> 00:28:39.190 align:start position:0% libraries that they actually know that if<00:28:37.880> you're<00:28:38.120> gifted<00:28:38.559> something<00:28:38.919> or 00:28:39.190 --> 00:28:39.200 align:start position:0% if you're gifted something or 00:28:39.200 --> 00:28:41.750 align:start position:0% if you're gifted something or something's<00:28:40.039> donated<00:28:41.039> that<00:28:41.159> it<00:28:41.279> needs<00:28:41.480> to<00:28:41.640> go 00:28:41.750 --> 00:28:41.760 align:start position:0% something's donated that it needs to go 00:28:41.760 --> 00:28:43.350 align:start position:0% something's donated that it needs to go through<00:28:41.960> the<00:28:42.080> same<00:28:42.360> process<00:28:42.720> it<00:28:42.840> doesn't<00:28:43.159> just 00:28:43.350 --> 00:28:43.360 align:start position:0% through the same process it doesn't just 00:28:43.360 --> 00:28:45.669 align:start position:0% through the same process it doesn't just automatically<00:28:44.080> make<00:28:44.200> it<00:28:44.360> into<00:28:44.720> a 00:28:45.669 --> 00:28:45.679 align:start position:0% automatically make it into a 00:28:45.679 --> 00:28:48.590 align:start position:0% automatically make it into a collection<00:28:46.679> so<00:28:46.960> what<00:28:47.120> if<00:28:47.399> we<00:28:48.120> what<00:28:48.240> if<00:28:48.399> we 00:28:48.590 --> 00:28:48.600 align:start position:0% collection so what if we what if we 00:28:48.600 --> 00:28:51.310 align:start position:0% collection so what if we what if we change<00:28:49.039> B<00:28:49.440> to<00:28:49.679> say<00:28:49.960> something<00:28:50.360> so<00:28:50.640> do<00:28:50.760> we<00:28:50.919> add<00:28:51.120> B 00:28:51.310 --> 00:28:51.320 align:start position:0% change B to say something so do we add B 00:28:51.320 --> 00:28:52.870 align:start position:0% change B to say something so do we add B to<00:28:51.440> I<00:28:51.640> but<00:28:51.760> we<00:28:51.840> change<00:28:52.159> it<00:28:52.279> to<00:28:52.399> say<00:28:52.600> something 00:28:52.870 --> 00:28:52.880 align:start position:0% to I but we change it to say something 00:28:52.880 --> 00:28:54.750 align:start position:0% to I but we change it to say something like<00:28:53.080> this<00:28:53.240> so<00:28:53.519> I<00:28:53.720> would<00:28:53.880> be<00:28:54.159> establish<00:28:54.600> a 00:28:54.750 --> 00:28:54.760 align:start position:0% like this so I would be establish a 00:28:54.760 --> 00:28:57.110 align:start position:0% like this so I would be establish a selection<00:28:55.320> process<00:28:55.720> that<00:28:55.880> includes<00:28:56.720> Library 00:28:57.110 --> 00:28:57.120 align:start position:0% selection process that includes Library 00:28:57.120 --> 00:28:59.549 align:start position:0% selection process that includes Library materials<00:28:57.679> gifts<00:28:58.240> Library<00:28:58.679> materials<00:28:59.240> gifts 00:28:59.549 --> 00:28:59.559 align:start position:0% materials gifts Library materials gifts 00:28:59.559 --> 00:29:02.669 align:start position:0% materials gifts Library materials gifts and<00:29:00.120> donations<00:29:01.120> and<00:29:01.480> supports<00:29:02.000> Utah<00:29:02.399> course 00:29:02.669 --> 00:29:02.679 align:start position:0% and donations and supports Utah course 00:29:02.679 --> 00:29:04.350 align:start position:0% and donations and supports Utah course standards<00:29:03.200> and<00:29:03.360> the<00:29:03.480> interests<00:29:03.799> of<00:29:03.960> students 00:29:04.350 --> 00:29:04.360 align:start position:0% standards and the interests of students 00:29:04.360 --> 00:29:05.789 align:start position:0% standards and the interests of students staffs<00:29:04.679> and 00:29:05.789 --> 00:29:05.799 align:start position:0% staffs and 00:29:05.799 --> 00:29:07.830 align:start position:0% staffs and families<00:29:06.799> and<00:29:06.960> then 00:29:07.830 --> 00:29:07.840 align:start position:0% families and then 00:29:07.840 --> 00:29:11.590 align:start position:0% families and then that<00:29:08.840> maybe<00:29:09.519> we<00:29:09.679> don't<00:29:10.399> need<00:29:10.880> all<00:29:11.080> of<00:29:11.320> that 00:29:11.590 --> 00:29:11.600 align:start position:0% that maybe we don't need all of that 00:29:11.600 --> 00:29:15.430 align:start position:0% that maybe we don't need all of that stuff<00:29:12.159> that<00:29:12.360> kind<00:29:12.480> of<00:29:13.200> summarizes 00:29:15.430 --> 00:29:15.440 align:start position:0% stuff that kind of summarizes 00:29:15.440 --> 00:29:18.110 align:start position:0% stuff that kind of summarizes that<00:29:16.440> but<00:29:16.600> if<00:29:16.720> you<00:29:16.840> felt<00:29:17.279> strongly<00:29:17.600> about<00:29:17.880> any 00:29:18.110 --> 00:29:18.120 align:start position:0% that but if you felt strongly about any 00:29:18.120 --> 00:29:20.110 align:start position:0% that but if you felt strongly about any of<00:29:18.360> that<00:29:18.600> like<00:29:18.799> the<00:29:18.960> for<00:29:19.200> example<00:29:19.799> you<00:29:19.919> could 00:29:20.110 --> 00:29:20.120 align:start position:0% of that like the for example you could 00:29:20.120 --> 00:29:23.350 align:start position:0% of that like the for example you could add<00:29:20.320> the<00:29:20.440> for<00:29:20.720> example<00:29:21.240> there<00:29:22.200> in<00:29:22.399> that 00:29:23.350 --> 00:29:23.360 align:start position:0% add the for example there in that 00:29:23.360 --> 00:29:34.190 align:start position:0% add the for example there in that eye<00:29:24.519> um<00:29:25.519> if<00:29:25.679> we<00:29:25.840> wanted<00:29:26.279> that 00:29:34.190 --> 00:29:34.200 align:start position:0% 00:29:34.200 --> 00:29:35.630 align:start position:0% okay<00:29:34.320> let<00:29:34.440> me<00:29:34.559> read<00:29:34.760> back<00:29:34.919> through<00:29:35.120> it<00:29:35.279> now<00:29:35.480> to 00:29:35.630 --> 00:29:35.640 align:start position:0% okay let me read back through it now to 00:29:35.640 --> 00:29:40.630 align:start position:0% okay let me read back through it now to see<00:29:35.799> if<00:29:35.919> it<00:29:36.760> establish<00:29:37.120> a<00:29:37.279> selection 00:29:40.630 --> 00:29:40.640 align:start position:0% 00:29:40.640 --> 00:29:42.630 align:start position:0% process<00:29:41.640> it<00:29:41.760> doesn't<00:29:42.000> make<00:29:42.159> a<00:29:42.279> very<00:29:42.480> good 00:29:42.630 --> 00:29:42.640 align:start position:0% process it doesn't make a very good 00:29:42.640 --> 00:29:44.710 align:start position:0% process it doesn't make a very good transition<00:29:43.240> let's<00:29:43.440> see<00:29:43.760> and<00:29:44.000> donations<00:29:44.440> and 00:29:44.710 --> 00:29:44.720 align:start position:0% transition let's see and donations and 00:29:44.720 --> 00:29:48.470 align:start position:0% transition let's see and donations and supports<00:29:45.640> hold<00:29:45.799> on<00:29:45.960> maybe<00:29:46.159> it<00:29:46.279> does<00:29:46.519> gifts<00:29:46.799> and 00:29:48.470 --> 00:29:48.480 align:start position:0% supports hold on maybe it does gifts and 00:29:48.480 --> 00:29:50.590 align:start position:0% supports hold on maybe it does gifts and donations<00:29:49.480> I 00:29:50.590 --> 00:29:50.600 align:start position:0% donations I 00:29:50.600 --> 00:29:53.070 align:start position:0% donations I think<00:29:51.600> would<00:29:51.840> that<00:29:52.000> be<00:29:52.200> two<00:29:52.480> separate<00:29:52.840> things 00:29:53.070 --> 00:29:53.080 align:start position:0% think would that be two separate things 00:29:53.080 --> 00:29:55.549 align:start position:0% think would that be two separate things do<00:29:53.200> you<00:29:53.279> want<00:29:53.399> to<00:29:53.559> almost<00:29:54.120> end<00:29:54.320> it<00:29:54.919> donations 00:29:55.549 --> 00:29:55.559 align:start position:0% do you want to almost end it donations 00:29:55.559 --> 00:30:00.350 align:start position:0% do you want to almost end it donations and<00:29:55.679> then<00:29:55.840> do<00:29:56.519> a<00:29:57.519> a<00:29:57.679> new 00:30:00.350 --> 00:30:00.360 align:start position:0% 00:30:00.360 --> 00:30:02.070 align:start position:0% do<00:30:00.480> you<00:30:00.559> know<00:30:00.679> what<00:30:00.799> I 00:30:02.070 --> 00:30:02.080 align:start position:0% do you know what I 00:30:02.080 --> 00:30:08.509 align:start position:0% do you know what I mean<00:30:03.080> and<00:30:03.279> it<00:30:03.480> start 00:30:08.509 --> 00:30:08.519 align:start position:0% 00:30:08.519 --> 00:30:14.430 align:start position:0% there<00:30:09.519> I<00:30:09.919> I<00:30:10.159> I'd<00:30:10.320> like<00:30:10.559> that 00:30:14.430 --> 00:30:14.440 align:start position:0% 00:30:14.440 --> 00:30:16.590 align:start position:0% better<00:30:15.440> I'm<00:30:15.600> good<00:30:15.799> with<00:30:15.960> where<00:30:16.080> we're<00:30:16.320> at 00:30:16.590 --> 00:30:16.600 align:start position:0% better I'm good with where we're at 00:30:16.600 --> 00:30:23.230 align:start position:0% better I'm good with where we're at there 00:30:23.230 --> 00:30:23.240 align:start position:0% 00:30:23.240 --> 00:30:26.029 align:start position:0% yeah<00:30:24.240> so<00:30:24.399> then<00:30:24.519> you<00:30:24.640> don't<00:30:24.760> need<00:30:25.440> the<00:30:25.640> verbs 00:30:26.029 --> 00:30:26.039 align:start position:0% yeah so then you don't need the verbs 00:30:26.039 --> 00:30:28.950 align:start position:0% yeah so then you don't need the verbs are<00:30:26.360> kind<00:30:26.480> of 00:30:28.950 --> 00:30:28.960 align:start position:0% are kind of 00:30:28.960 --> 00:30:31.750 align:start position:0% are kind of funky<00:30:29.960> to<00:30:30.360> the<00:30:30.480> first<00:30:30.640> one<00:30:30.960> established<00:30:31.640> the 00:30:31.750 --> 00:30:31.760 align:start position:0% funky to the first one established the 00:30:31.760 --> 00:30:32.990 align:start position:0% funky to the first one established the next<00:30:31.960> one 00:30:32.990 --> 00:30:33.000 align:start position:0% next one 00:30:33.000 --> 00:30:34.460 align:start position:0% next one supports 00:30:34.460 --> 00:30:34.470 align:start position:0% supports 00:30:34.470 --> 00:30:36.430 align:start position:0% supports [Music] 00:30:36.430 --> 00:30:36.440 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:30:36.440 --> 00:30:40.350 align:start position:0% [Music] um<00:30:37.440> then<00:30:37.720> it<00:30:37.960> repeat<00:30:38.519> you<00:30:38.600> would<00:30:38.799> take<00:30:39.519> I 00:30:40.350 --> 00:30:40.360 align:start position:0% um then it repeat you would take I 00:30:40.360 --> 00:30:42.549 align:start position:0% um then it repeat you would take I think<00:30:41.360> I<00:30:41.440> think<00:30:41.559> you<00:30:41.679> would<00:30:41.840> take<00:30:42.080> established 00:30:42.549 --> 00:30:42.559 align:start position:0% think I think you would take established 00:30:42.559 --> 00:30:44.230 align:start position:0% think I think you would take established out<00:30:42.760> it<00:30:42.840> would<00:30:43.000> just<00:30:43.159> be<00:30:43.399> includes<00:30:44.080> a 00:30:44.230 --> 00:30:44.240 align:start position:0% out it would just be includes a 00:30:44.240 --> 00:30:51.830 align:start position:0% out it would just be includes a selection 00:30:51.830 --> 00:30:51.840 align:start position:0% 00:30:51.840 --> 00:30:54.509 align:start position:0% process<00:30:52.840> uh<00:30:53.000> I<00:30:53.080> don't<00:30:53.200> know<00:30:53.720> that<00:30:53.840> includes<00:30:54.240> a 00:30:54.509 --> 00:30:54.519 align:start position:0% process uh I don't know that includes a 00:30:54.519 --> 00:30:56.389 align:start position:0% process uh I don't know that includes a second<00:30:54.840> time<00:30:55.120> there<00:30:55.399> right<00:30:55.679> includes<00:30:56.240> a 00:30:56.389 --> 00:30:56.399 align:start position:0% second time there right includes a 00:30:56.399 --> 00:31:04.990 align:start position:0% second time there right includes a process<00:30:56.760> that<00:30:56.919> includes 00:31:04.990 --> 00:31:05.000 align:start position:0% 00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:08.950 align:start position:0% ah<00:31:05.440> there<00:31:05.600> you 00:31:08.950 --> 00:31:08.960 align:start position:0% 00:31:08.960 --> 00:31:12.470 align:start position:0% go<00:31:09.960> maybe<00:31:10.200> the<00:31:10.360> next<00:31:10.519> one<00:31:10.679> has<00:31:10.799> to<00:31:10.919> be<00:31:11.120> support 00:31:12.470 --> 00:31:12.480 align:start position:0% go maybe the next one has to be support 00:31:12.480 --> 00:31:15.110 align:start position:0% go maybe the next one has to be support for<00:31:13.480> I<00:31:13.559> don't<00:31:13.760> know<00:31:14.159> it<00:31:14.399> just<00:31:14.600> includes<00:31:15.000> and 00:31:15.110 --> 00:31:15.120 align:start position:0% for I don't know it just includes and 00:31:15.120 --> 00:31:16.629 align:start position:0% for I don't know it just includes and then<00:31:15.240> goes<00:31:15.440> into<00:31:15.679> supports<00:31:16.159> doesn't<00:31:16.399> work 00:31:16.629 --> 00:31:16.639 align:start position:0% then goes into supports doesn't work 00:31:16.639 --> 00:31:30.549 align:start position:0% then goes into supports doesn't work real<00:31:16.919> well 00:31:30.549 --> 00:31:30.559 align:start position:0% 00:31:30.559 --> 00:31:33.269 align:start position:0% can<00:31:30.679> I<00:31:31.159> add 00:31:33.269 --> 00:31:33.279 align:start position:0% can I add 00:31:33.279 --> 00:31:36.470 align:start position:0% can I add something<00:31:34.279> just<00:31:34.639> that<00:31:35.519> deina<00:31:36.000> mentioned 00:31:36.470 --> 00:31:36.480 align:start position:0% something just that deina mentioned 00:31:36.480 --> 00:31:39.350 align:start position:0% something just that deina mentioned adding<00:31:37.000> staff<00:31:37.559> in<00:31:37.760> there<00:31:38.120> on<00:31:38.519> the<00:31:38.720> in<00:31:38.919> supports 00:31:39.350 --> 00:31:39.360 align:start position:0% adding staff in there on the in supports 00:31:39.360 --> 00:31:42.590 align:start position:0% adding staff in there on the in supports the<00:31:39.519> interest<00:31:39.880> of<00:31:40.039> Utah<00:31:40.919> students<00:31:41.919> staff<00:31:42.320> or 00:31:42.590 --> 00:31:42.600 align:start position:0% the interest of Utah students staff or 00:31:42.600 --> 00:31:49.710 align:start position:0% the interest of Utah students staff or staff<00:31:42.960> students<00:31:43.360> and 00:31:49.710 --> 00:31:49.720 align:start position:0% 00:31:49.720 --> 00:31:51.870 align:start position:0% families<00:31:50.720> and<00:31:50.919> I<00:31:51.080> always<00:31:51.279> like<00:31:51.480> to<00:31:51.600> put 00:31:51.870 --> 00:31:51.880 align:start position:0% families and I always like to put 00:31:51.880 --> 00:31:55.029 align:start position:0% families and I always like to put students<00:31:52.559> first<00:31:53.559> that's<00:31:54.320> that<00:31:54.480> I<00:31:54.600> know<00:31:54.799> that's 00:31:55.029 --> 00:31:55.039 align:start position:0% students first that's that I know that's 00:31:55.039 --> 00:31:57.110 align:start position:0% students first that's that I know that's like<00:31:55.559> but<00:31:55.919> I<00:31:56.000> just<00:31:56.120> feel<00:31:56.320> like<00:31:56.480> that's<00:31:56.760> why<00:31:57.000> why 00:31:57.110 --> 00:31:57.120 align:start position:0% like but I just feel like that's why why 00:31:57.120 --> 00:31:59.029 align:start position:0% like but I just feel like that's why why we're<00:31:57.279> all<00:31:57.480> here 00:31:59.029 --> 00:31:59.039 align:start position:0% we're all here 00:31:59.039 --> 00:32:02.310 align:start position:0% we're all here so<00:32:00.039> um<00:32:00.559> and<00:32:00.760> just<00:32:01.000> reference<00:32:01.639> staff<00:32:01.960> is<00:32:02.120> like 00:32:02.310 --> 00:32:02.320 align:start position:0% so um and just reference staff is like 00:32:02.320 --> 00:32:05.430 align:start position:0% so um and just reference staff is like we<00:32:02.480> do<00:32:03.279> we<00:32:03.440> do<00:32:03.679> buy<00:32:04.039> materials<00:32:04.600> to<00:32:04.880> support 00:32:05.430 --> 00:32:05.440 align:start position:0% we do we do buy materials to support 00:32:05.440 --> 00:32:06.950 align:start position:0% we do we do buy materials to support staff<00:32:05.919> professional<00:32:06.360> Learning<00:32:06.720> and 00:32:06.950 --> 00:32:06.960 align:start position:0% staff professional Learning and 00:32:06.960 --> 00:32:10.190 align:start position:0% staff professional Learning and Development<00:32:07.559> for<00:32:08.519> you<00:32:08.639> know<00:32:09.000> classroom<00:32:10.000> um 00:32:10.190 --> 00:32:10.200 align:start position:0% Development for you know classroom um 00:32:10.200 --> 00:32:13.190 align:start position:0% Development for you know classroom um curricular<00:32:10.679> needs<00:32:11.120> so<00:32:11.360> that's<00:32:11.559> where<00:32:12.200> that 00:32:13.190 --> 00:32:13.200 align:start position:0% curricular needs so that's where that 00:32:13.200 --> 00:32:24.549 align:start position:0% curricular needs so that's where that comes 00:32:24.549 --> 00:32:24.559 align:start position:0% 00:32:24.559 --> 00:32:27.990 align:start position:0% from<00:32:25.559> and<00:32:25.639> so<00:32:25.840> that<00:32:25.960> means<00:32:26.279> be<00:32:26.720> can<00:32:27.039> come<00:32:27.279> out 00:32:27.990 --> 00:32:28.000 align:start position:0% from and so that means be can come out 00:32:28.000 --> 00:32:30.830 align:start position:0% from and so that means be can come out cuz<00:32:28.200> we<00:32:28.440> included<00:32:29.159> B<00:32:29.440> and<00:32:29.919> we<00:32:30.080> kind<00:32:30.200> of<00:32:30.440> changed 00:32:30.830 --> 00:32:30.840 align:start position:0% cuz we included B and we kind of changed 00:32:30.840 --> 00:32:55.389 align:start position:0% cuz we included B and we kind of changed some<00:32:31.000> things<00:32:31.240> and<00:32:31.440> made<00:32:31.720> it<00:32:32.200> I 00:32:55.389 --> 00:32:55.399 align:start position:0% 00:32:55.399 --> 00:32:59.750 align:start position:0% I<00:32:56.399> there<00:32:56.600> be<00:32:56.720> a<00:32:56.960> period<00:32:57.399> on<00:32:58.279> I<00:32:58.559> I<00:32:58.960> at<00:32:59.080> the<00:32:59.200> end 00:32:59.750 --> 00:32:59.760 align:start position:0% I there be a period on I I at the end 00:32:59.760 --> 00:33:01.669 align:start position:0% I there be a period on I I at the end personal 00:33:01.669 --> 00:33:01.679 align:start position:0% personal 00:33:01.679 --> 00:33:15.310 align:start position:0% personal growth 00:33:15.310 --> 00:33:15.320 align:start position:0% 00:33:15.320 --> 00:33:18.990 align:start position:0% yeah<00:33:16.320> oh<00:33:16.480> and<00:33:16.760> one<00:33:16.919> more<00:33:17.200> word<00:33:17.480> on<00:33:17.760> I<00:33:18.039> II 00:33:18.990 --> 00:33:19.000 align:start position:0% yeah oh and one more word on I II 00:33:19.000 --> 00:33:21.629 align:start position:0% yeah oh and one more word on I II current<00:33:19.919> relevant<00:33:20.639> and<00:33:20.799> in<00:33:21.039> good<00:33:21.399> condition 00:33:21.629 --> 00:33:21.639 align:start position:0% current relevant and in good condition 00:33:21.639 --> 00:33:23.549 align:start position:0% current relevant and in good condition if<00:33:21.880> that's 00:33:23.549 --> 00:33:23.559 align:start position:0% if that's 00:33:23.559 --> 00:33:28.909 align:start position:0% if that's okay<00:33:24.559> with<00:33:24.720> the<00:33:24.840> board 00:33:28.909 --> 00:33:28.919 align:start position:0% 00:33:28.919 --> 00:33:30.509 align:start position:0% sounds 00:33:30.509 --> 00:33:30.519 align:start position:0% sounds 00:33:30.519 --> 00:33:34.029 align:start position:0% sounds good<00:33:31.519> so<00:33:31.760> I<00:33:31.840> think<00:33:32.159> as<00:33:32.279> we<00:33:32.440> lead<00:33:32.720> into<00:33:33.120> that 00:33:34.029 --> 00:33:34.039 align:start position:0% good so I think as we lead into that 00:33:34.039 --> 00:33:37.470 align:start position:0% good so I think as we lead into that II<00:33:35.039> three<00:33:35.480> there<00:33:35.919> it's 00:33:37.470 --> 00:33:37.480 align:start position:0% II three there it's 00:33:37.480 --> 00:33:40.190 align:start position:0% II three there it's uh<00:33:38.480> we've<00:33:38.679> got<00:33:38.799> to<00:33:39.039> look<00:33:39.240> back<00:33:39.360> at<00:33:39.519> a<00:33:39.760> develop<00:33:40.080> a 00:33:40.190 --> 00:33:40.200 align:start position:0% uh we've got to look back at a develop a 00:33:40.200 --> 00:33:41.830 align:start position:0% uh we've got to look back at a develop a library<00:33:40.519> collection<00:33:40.919> development<00:33:41.440> policy 00:33:41.830 --> 00:33:41.840 align:start position:0% library collection development policy 00:33:41.840 --> 00:33:46.509 align:start position:0% library collection development policy that 00:33:46.509 --> 00:33:46.519 align:start position:0% 00:33:46.519 --> 00:33:50.310 align:start position:0% includes<00:33:47.519> you<00:33:47.679> know<00:33:48.480> a<00:33:48.840> process<00:33:49.480> that<00:33:49.679> is<00:33:49.919> used 00:33:50.310 --> 00:33:50.320 align:start position:0% includes you know a process that is used 00:33:50.320 --> 00:33:51.350 align:start position:0% includes you know a process that is used to 00:33:51.350 --> 00:33:51.360 align:start position:0% to 00:33:51.360 --> 00:33:53.789 align:start position:0% to deselect<00:33:52.360> and<00:33:52.559> remove<00:33:53.000> materials<00:33:53.480> that<00:33:53.600> are 00:33:53.789 --> 00:33:53.799 align:start position:0% deselect and remove materials that are 00:33:53.799 --> 00:33:57.830 align:start position:0% deselect and remove materials that are inconsistent<00:33:54.760> yeah<00:33:55.760> or<00:33:55.960> just<00:33:56.200> even<00:33:56.840> use<00:33:57.320> a 00:33:57.830 --> 00:33:57.840 align:start position:0% inconsistent yeah or just even use a 00:33:57.840 --> 00:34:04.190 align:start position:0% inconsistent yeah or just even use a process<00:33:58.159> used<00:33:58.440> to 00:34:04.190 --> 00:34:04.200 align:start position:0% 00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:06.750 align:start position:0% deselect<00:34:05.200> yeah<00:34:05.320> you<00:34:05.399> can<00:34:05.559> get<00:34:05.679> rid<00:34:05.840> of<00:34:06.039> that<00:34:06.240> is 00:34:06.750 --> 00:34:06.760 align:start position:0% deselect yeah you can get rid of that is 00:34:06.760 --> 00:34:13.389 align:start position:0% deselect yeah you can get rid of that is it's<00:34:06.919> the<00:34:07.039> same<00:34:07.240> thing<00:34:07.440> a<00:34:07.639> process 00:34:13.389 --> 00:34:13.399 align:start position:0% 00:34:13.399 --> 00:34:15.950 align:start position:0% used 00:34:15.950 --> 00:34:15.960 align:start position:0% used 00:34:15.960 --> 00:34:18.629 align:start position:0% used code<00:34:16.960> I<00:34:17.200> may<00:34:17.480> actually<00:34:17.679> you<00:34:17.800> might<00:34:17.960> not<00:34:18.119> even 00:34:18.629 --> 00:34:18.639 align:start position:0% code I may actually you might not even 00:34:18.639 --> 00:34:21.310 align:start position:0% code I may actually you might not even need<00:34:18.839> the<00:34:18.960> word<00:34:19.159> used<00:34:19.639> a<00:34:19.839> process<00:34:20.200> to<00:34:20.800> deselect 00:34:21.310 --> 00:34:21.320 align:start position:0% need the word used a process to deselect 00:34:21.320 --> 00:34:22.710 align:start position:0% need the word used a process to deselect and<00:34:21.480> remove 00:34:22.710 --> 00:34:22.720 align:start position:0% and remove 00:34:22.720 --> 00:34:25.669 align:start position:0% and remove materials<00:34:23.720> yeah<00:34:24.679> wow<00:34:25.000> we're<00:34:25.200> getting<00:34:25.440> better 00:34:25.669 --> 00:34:25.679 align:start position:0% materials yeah wow we're getting better 00:34:25.679 --> 00:34:33.950 align:start position:0% materials yeah wow we're getting better and<00:34:25.879> better 00:34:33.950 --> 00:34:33.960 align:start position:0% 00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:36.030 align:start position:0% it<00:34:34.159> can't<00:34:34.359> be<00:34:34.520> that<00:34:34.639> are<00:34:34.960> inconsistent<00:34:35.879> with 00:34:36.030 --> 00:34:36.040 align:start position:0% it can't be that are inconsistent with 00:34:36.040 --> 00:34:38.190 align:start position:0% it can't be that are inconsistent with the<00:34:36.200> code<00:34:36.960> it<00:34:37.119> has<00:34:37.240> to<00:34:37.359> be<00:34:37.599> consistent<00:34:38.079> that 00:34:38.190 --> 00:34:38.200 align:start position:0% the code it has to be consistent that 00:34:38.200 --> 00:34:42.270 align:start position:0% the code it has to be consistent that are<00:34:38.399> consistent<00:34:38.919> with<00:34:39.399> Utah<00:34:39.919> code 00:34:42.270 --> 00:34:42.280 align:start position:0% are consistent with Utah code 00:34:42.280 --> 00:34:44.510 align:start position:0% are consistent with Utah code right 00:34:44.510 --> 00:34:44.520 align:start position:0% right 00:34:44.520 --> 00:34:46.750 align:start position:0% right okay<00:34:45.520> I<00:34:45.720> guess<00:34:45.879> it's<00:34:46.079> because<00:34:46.280> the<00:34:46.399> way<00:34:46.520> it<00:34:46.599> was 00:34:46.750 --> 00:34:46.760 align:start position:0% okay I guess it's because the way it was 00:34:46.760 --> 00:34:48.310 align:start position:0% okay I guess it's because the way it was worded<00:34:47.119> before<00:34:47.399> it<00:34:47.480> just<00:34:47.639> said<00:34:47.839> don't<00:34:48.200> you 00:34:48.310 --> 00:34:48.320 align:start position:0% worded before it just said don't you 00:34:48.320 --> 00:34:50.310 align:start position:0% worded before it just said don't you can't<00:34:48.560> be<00:34:48.760> inconsistent<00:34:49.599> so<00:34:49.800> now<00:34:50.000> it's<00:34:50.119> got<00:34:50.240> to 00:34:50.310 --> 00:34:50.320 align:start position:0% can't be inconsistent so now it's got to 00:34:50.320 --> 00:34:56.390 align:start position:0% can't be inconsistent so now it's got to be<00:34:50.480> that<00:34:50.679> are<00:34:51.000> consistent<00:34:51.919> right 00:34:56.390 --> 00:34:56.400 align:start position:0% 00:34:56.400 --> 00:34:59.230 align:start position:0% right<00:34:57.400> okay 00:34:59.230 --> 00:34:59.240 align:start position:0% right okay 00:34:59.240 --> 00:35:01.510 align:start position:0% right okay maybe<00:34:59.599> instead<00:34:59.880> of<00:35:00.079> and<00:35:00.400> to<00:35:00.720> ensure<00:35:01.200> just 00:35:01.510 --> 00:35:01.520 align:start position:0% maybe instead of and to ensure just 00:35:01.520 --> 00:35:04.230 align:start position:0% maybe instead of and to ensure just ensuring<00:35:02.040> that<00:35:02.160> a<00:35:02.280> library<00:35:02.680> colle<00:35:03.640> uring<00:35:04.040> that 00:35:04.230 --> 00:35:04.240 align:start position:0% ensuring that a library colle uring that 00:35:04.240 --> 00:35:06.109 align:start position:0% ensuring that a library colle uring that the<00:35:04.440> library<00:35:04.920> collection<00:35:05.440> remains<00:35:05.800> current 00:35:06.109 --> 00:35:06.119 align:start position:0% the library collection remains current 00:35:06.119 --> 00:35:23.470 align:start position:0% the library collection remains current relevant<00:35:06.560> and<00:35:06.720> in<00:35:06.920> good 00:35:23.470 --> 00:35:23.480 align:start position:0% 00:35:23.480 --> 00:35:26.990 align:start position:0% condition<00:35:24.480> okay<00:35:24.839> does<00:35:25.040> that<00:35:25.200> feel<00:35:25.440> good<00:35:26.000> deina 00:35:26.990 --> 00:35:27.000 align:start position:0% condition okay does that feel good deina 00:35:27.000 --> 00:35:29.310 align:start position:0% condition okay does that feel good deina yeah<00:35:28.000> I<00:35:28.119> think<00:35:28.280> that<00:35:28.400> flows<00:35:28.760> really<00:35:28.960> well 00:35:29.310 --> 00:35:29.320 align:start position:0% yeah I think that flows really well 00:35:29.320 --> 00:35:32.430 align:start position:0% yeah I think that flows really well thank<00:35:29.520> you<00:35:30.000> for<00:35:31.000> welcome<00:35:31.280> it<00:35:31.440> still<00:35:31.720> has<00:35:32.320> yeah 00:35:32.430 --> 00:35:32.440 align:start position:0% thank you for welcome it still has yeah 00:35:32.440 --> 00:35:34.069 align:start position:0% thank you for welcome it still has yeah it<00:35:32.560> has<00:35:32.720> the<00:35:32.920> provisions<00:35:33.400> that<00:35:33.520> I<00:35:33.640> was<00:35:33.800> looking 00:35:34.069 --> 00:35:34.079 align:start position:0% it has the provisions that I was looking 00:35:34.079 --> 00:35:35.430 align:start position:0% it has the provisions that I was looking for<00:35:34.400> in<00:35:34.520> it 00:35:35.430 --> 00:35:35.440 align:start position:0% for in it 00:35:35.440 --> 00:35:45.589 align:start position:0% for in it too 00:35:45.589 --> 00:35:45.599 align:start position:0% 00:35:45.599 --> 00:35:47.630 align:start position:0% so<00:35:46.599> up 00:35:47.630 --> 00:35:47.640 align:start position:0% so up 00:35:47.640 --> 00:35:51.630 align:start position:0% so up above<00:35:48.640> so<00:35:49.240> we<00:35:49.440> need<00:35:49.640> to<00:35:49.880> lose<00:35:50.400> be's 00:35:51.630 --> 00:35:51.640 align:start position:0% above so we need to lose be's 00:35:51.640 --> 00:36:01.030 align:start position:0% above so we need to lose be's shall<00:35:52.640> and<00:35:52.800> just<00:35:52.960> make<00:35:53.160> it<00:35:53.400> provide 00:36:01.030 --> 00:36:01.040 align:start position:0% 00:36:01.040 --> 00:36:04.390 align:start position:0% in<00:36:01.400> small<00:36:01.880> three<00:36:02.880> it<00:36:03.079> still<00:36:03.560> doesn't<00:36:03.880> read 00:36:04.390 --> 00:36:04.400 align:start position:0% in small three it still doesn't read 00:36:04.400 --> 00:36:06.390 align:start position:0% in small three it still doesn't read right<00:36:04.640> when<00:36:04.800> it<00:36:04.920> says<00:36:05.200> deselect<00:36:05.800> and<00:36:05.960> remove 00:36:06.390 --> 00:36:06.400 align:start position:0% right when it says deselect and remove 00:36:06.400 --> 00:36:09.150 align:start position:0% right when it says deselect and remove materials<00:36:06.920> that<00:36:07.040> are<00:36:07.319> consistent<00:36:08.000> with<00:36:08.599> 53 00:36:09.150 --> 00:36:09.160 align:start position:0% materials that are consistent with 53 00:36:09.160 --> 00:36:11.870 align:start position:0% materials that are consistent with 53 G10<00:36:09.880> it<00:36:10.000> sounds<00:36:10.359> like<00:36:10.599> the<00:36:10.760> materials<00:36:11.240> are 00:36:11.870 --> 00:36:11.880 align:start position:0% G10 it sounds like the materials are 00:36:11.880 --> 00:36:14.109 align:start position:0% G10 it sounds like the materials are consistent<00:36:12.440> with<00:36:12.640> the<00:36:12.960> sensitive<00:36:13.480> materials 00:36:14.109 --> 00:36:14.119 align:start position:0% consistent with the sensitive materials 00:36:14.119 --> 00:36:17.030 align:start position:0% consistent with the sensitive materials could<00:36:14.280> we<00:36:14.480> just<00:36:14.640> say<00:36:15.400> deselect<00:36:16.200> and<00:36:16.440> remove 00:36:17.030 --> 00:36:17.040 align:start position:0% could we just say deselect and remove 00:36:17.040 --> 00:36:20.230 align:start position:0% could we just say deselect and remove materials<00:36:17.880> consistent<00:36:18.720> with<00:36:19.720> instead<00:36:20.040> of 00:36:20.230 --> 00:36:20.240 align:start position:0% materials consistent with instead of 00:36:20.240 --> 00:36:22.670 align:start position:0% materials consistent with instead of that<00:36:20.440> are 00:36:22.670 --> 00:36:22.680 align:start position:0% that are 00:36:22.680 --> 00:36:25.309 align:start position:0% that are consistent 00:36:25.309 --> 00:36:25.319 align:start position:0% consistent 00:36:25.319 --> 00:36:34.910 align:start position:0% consistent yeah<00:36:26.319> that's<00:36:26.680> good<00:36:27.079> Michelle<00:36:27.720> thank<00:36:27.920> you<00:36:28.680> good 00:36:34.910 --> 00:36:34.920 align:start position:0% 00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:39.589 align:start position:0% catch<00:36:35.920> he<00:36:36.119> now<00:36:36.280> under<00:36:36.599> B<00:36:37.000> we've<00:36:37.200> got<00:36:37.359> some 00:36:39.589 --> 00:36:39.599 align:start position:0% catch he now under B we've got some 00:36:39.599 --> 00:36:41.750 align:start position:0% catch he now under B we've got some bullets<00:36:40.599> I'm<00:36:40.720> wondering<00:36:41.079> going<00:36:41.319> back<00:36:41.480> to<00:36:41.599> that 00:36:41.750 --> 00:36:41.760 align:start position:0% bullets I'm wondering going back to that 00:36:41.760 --> 00:36:44.270 align:start position:0% bullets I'm wondering going back to that other<00:36:41.920> one<00:36:42.119> that<00:36:42.400> that<00:36:42.760> that<00:36:42.880> one<00:36:43.119> just<00:36:43.800> and<00:36:44.119> I 00:36:44.270 --> 00:36:44.280 align:start position:0% other one that that that one just and I 00:36:44.280 --> 00:36:46.750 align:start position:0% other one that that that one just and I apologize<00:36:44.800> for<00:36:45.160> going<00:36:45.400> in<00:36:45.640> but<00:36:46.319> um<00:36:46.560> that 00:36:46.750 --> 00:36:46.760 align:start position:0% apologize for going in but um that 00:36:46.760 --> 00:36:49.150 align:start position:0% apologize for going in but um that number<00:36:47.040> three<00:36:47.440> it<00:36:47.640> does<00:36:48.000> make<00:36:48.160> it<00:36:48.520> seem<00:36:48.839> weird 00:36:49.150 --> 00:36:49.160 align:start position:0% number three it does make it seem weird 00:36:49.160 --> 00:36:49.950 align:start position:0% number three it does make it seem weird about 00:36:49.950 --> 00:36:49.960 align:start position:0% about 00:36:49.960 --> 00:36:53.510 align:start position:0% about removing<00:36:50.960> is<00:36:51.079> it<00:36:51.240> in<00:36:51.440> order<00:36:51.839> to<00:36:52.280> ensure<00:36:53.280> or<00:36:53.400> is 00:36:53.510 --> 00:36:53.520 align:start position:0% removing is it in order to ensure or is 00:36:53.520 --> 00:36:58.030 align:start position:0% removing is it in order to ensure or is it<00:36:53.720> in<00:36:54.359> order<00:36:55.359> with<00:36:55.520> Utah<00:36:56.160> code<00:36:57.160> in<00:36:57.599> order<00:36:57.839> to 00:36:58.030 --> 00:36:58.040 align:start position:0% it in order with Utah code in order to 00:36:58.040 --> 00:37:00.109 align:start position:0% it in order with Utah code in order to ensure<00:36:58.359> that<00:36:58.480> a<00:36:58.640> library<00:36:59.640> does<00:36:59.800> that<00:36:59.960> make 00:37:00.109 --> 00:37:00.119 align:start position:0% ensure that a library does that make 00:37:00.119 --> 00:37:02.829 align:start position:0% ensure that a library does that make sense<00:37:00.319> because<00:37:00.520> and<00:37:00.720> insure<00:37:01.000> a<00:37:01.400> library<00:37:02.400> it<00:37:02.560> it 00:37:02.829 --> 00:37:02.839 align:start position:0% sense because and insure a library it it 00:37:02.839 --> 00:37:05.270 align:start position:0% sense because and insure a library it it no<00:37:02.920> I<00:37:03.040> think<00:37:03.200> they're<00:37:03.400> two<00:37:03.599> different<00:37:04.280> things 00:37:05.270 --> 00:37:05.280 align:start position:0% no I think they're two different things 00:37:05.280 --> 00:37:06.870 align:start position:0% no I think they're two different things making<00:37:05.560> sure<00:37:05.720> that<00:37:05.920> they<00:37:06.359> are<00:37:06.520> consistent 00:37:06.870 --> 00:37:06.880 align:start position:0% making sure that they are consistent 00:37:06.880 --> 00:37:08.589 align:start position:0% making sure that they are consistent with<00:37:07.040> code<00:37:07.280> is<00:37:07.440> one<00:37:07.640> thing<00:37:07.839> and<00:37:08.040> ensuring<00:37:08.440> that 00:37:08.589 --> 00:37:08.599 align:start position:0% with code is one thing and ensuring that 00:37:08.599 --> 00:37:10.390 align:start position:0% with code is one thing and ensuring that they're<00:37:09.000> current<00:37:09.400> relevant<00:37:09.839> and<00:37:10.040> good 00:37:10.390 --> 00:37:10.400 align:start position:0% they're current relevant and good 00:37:10.400 --> 00:37:11.910 align:start position:0% they're current relevant and good condition<00:37:10.839> is<00:37:11.040> another 00:37:11.910 --> 00:37:11.920 align:start position:0% condition is another 00:37:11.920 --> 00:37:14.990 align:start position:0% condition is another thing<00:37:12.920> what<00:37:13.040> if<00:37:13.200> we<00:37:13.960> two<00:37:14.160> separate<00:37:14.520> things 00:37:14.990 --> 00:37:15.000 align:start position:0% thing what if we two separate things 00:37:15.000 --> 00:37:17.109 align:start position:0% thing what if we two separate things swapped<00:37:15.480> it<00:37:15.760> so<00:37:15.960> it<00:37:16.079> says<00:37:16.319> a<00:37:16.599> process<00:37:16.920> to 00:37:17.109 --> 00:37:17.119 align:start position:0% swapped it so it says a process to 00:37:17.119 --> 00:37:20.510 align:start position:0% swapped it so it says a process to deselect<00:37:17.640> and<00:37:18.200> remove<00:37:18.760> materials<00:37:19.760> to<00:37:20.040> ensure 00:37:20.510 --> 00:37:20.520 align:start position:0% deselect and remove materials to ensure 00:37:20.520 --> 00:37:21.910 align:start position:0% deselect and remove materials to ensure that<00:37:20.640> a<00:37:20.760> library<00:37:21.119> collection<00:37:21.640> remains 00:37:21.910 --> 00:37:21.920 align:start position:0% that a library collection remains 00:37:21.920 --> 00:37:24.589 align:start position:0% that a library collection remains current<00:37:22.200> relevant<00:37:22.480> and<00:37:22.560> in<00:37:23.200> condition<00:37:23.640> and<00:37:24.240> is 00:37:24.589 --> 00:37:24.599 align:start position:0% current relevant and in condition and is 00:37:24.599 --> 00:37:28.190 align:start position:0% current relevant and in condition and is consistent<00:37:25.119> with<00:37:25.280> Utah<00:37:25.680> code 00:37:28.190 --> 00:37:28.200 align:start position:0% consistent with Utah code 00:37:28.200 --> 00:37:29.750 align:start position:0% consistent with Utah code Bo<00:37:28.480> that's 00:37:29.750 --> 00:37:29.760 align:start position:0% Bo that's 00:37:29.760 --> 00:37:31.950 align:start position:0% Bo that's nice<00:37:30.760> the<00:37:30.920> other<00:37:31.119> way<00:37:31.319> it<00:37:31.440> just<00:37:31.560> seems<00:37:31.800> like 00:37:31.950 --> 00:37:31.960 align:start position:0% nice the other way it just seems like 00:37:31.960 --> 00:37:34.990 align:start position:0% nice the other way it just seems like you're<00:37:32.119> removing<00:37:32.880> um<00:37:33.319> materials<00:37:34.319> that<00:37:34.440> are 00:37:34.990 --> 00:37:35.000 align:start position:0% you're removing um materials that are 00:37:35.000 --> 00:37:37.030 align:start position:0% you're removing um materials that are consistent<00:37:35.480> with<00:37:35.640> code<00:37:35.880> but<00:37:36.000> there's<00:37:36.160> not<00:37:36.280> a 00:37:37.030 --> 00:37:37.040 align:start position:0% consistent with code but there's not a 00:37:37.040 --> 00:37:48.030 align:start position:0% consistent with code but there's not a yeah<00:37:38.040> that's<00:37:38.280> very 00:37:48.030 --> 00:37:48.040 align:start position:0% 00:37:48.040 --> 00:37:52.349 align:start position:0% good<00:37:49.040> it<00:37:49.200> should<00:37:49.359> it<00:37:49.520> be<00:37:49.920> that<00:37:50.319> a<00:37:51.119> library<00:37:52.119> to 00:37:52.349 --> 00:37:52.359 align:start position:0% good it should it be that a library to 00:37:52.359 --> 00:37:54.630 align:start position:0% good it should it be that a library to ensure<00:37:52.760> that<00:37:52.960> the<00:37:53.160> library<00:37:53.640> collection 00:37:54.630 --> 00:37:54.640 align:start position:0% ensure that the library collection 00:37:54.640 --> 00:38:06.109 align:start position:0% ensure that the library collection should<00:37:54.920> be<00:37:55.200> the<00:37:55.560> instead<00:37:55.880> of<00:37:56.440> a 00:38:06.109 --> 00:38:06.119 align:start position:0% 00:38:06.119 --> 00:38:08.470 align:start position:0% teamwork<00:38:07.119> love 00:38:08.470 --> 00:38:08.480 align:start position:0% teamwork love 00:38:08.480 --> 00:38:13.150 align:start position:0% teamwork love it<00:38:09.640> okay<00:38:10.640> B<00:38:11.119> provide<00:38:11.440> an<00:38:11.599> online<00:38:12.480> platform<00:38:12.920> for 00:38:13.150 --> 00:38:13.160 align:start position:0% it okay B provide an online platform for 00:38:13.160 --> 00:38:18.150 align:start position:0% it okay B provide an online platform for Library 00:38:18.150 --> 00:38:18.160 align:start position:0% 00:38:18.160 --> 00:38:24.870 align:start position:0% materials<00:38:19.160> which<00:38:19.280> a<00:38:19.680> parent<00:38:20.680> is<00:38:20.960> able<00:38:21.240> to<00:38:21.680> view 00:38:24.870 --> 00:38:24.880 align:start position:0% 00:38:24.880 --> 00:38:27.710 align:start position:0% uh<00:38:25.880> and<00:38:26.040> this<00:38:26.200> is<00:38:26.359> language<00:38:26.880> right<00:38:27.119> from<00:38:27.560> the 00:38:27.710 --> 00:38:27.720 align:start position:0% uh and this is language right from the 00:38:27.720 --> 00:38:30.670 align:start position:0% uh and this is language right from the law<00:38:28.160> this<00:38:28.280> is<00:38:28.920> actually<00:38:29.920> I<00:38:30.040> can<00:38:30.200> tell<00:38:30.400> you<00:38:30.520> the 00:38:30.670 --> 00:38:30.680 align:start position:0% law this is actually I can tell you the 00:38:30.680 --> 00:38:32.270 align:start position:0% law this is actually I can tell you the code<00:38:31.040> well<00:38:31.200> it's<00:38:31.319> written<00:38:31.640> right<00:38:31.839> there<00:38:32.160> I 00:38:32.270 --> 00:38:32.280 align:start position:0% code well it's written right there I 00:38:32.280 --> 00:38:33.430 align:start position:0% code well it's written right there I tried<00:38:32.480> to<00:38:32.599> include<00:38:32.839> the<00:38:32.920> law<00:38:33.119> at<00:38:33.200> the<00:38:33.280> end 00:38:33.430 --> 00:38:33.440 align:start position:0% tried to include the law at the end 00:38:33.440 --> 00:38:34.630 align:start position:0% tried to include the law at the end there<00:38:33.560> I<00:38:33.640> don't<00:38:33.760> know<00:38:33.880> that<00:38:34.040> we<00:38:34.160> have<00:38:34.280> to<00:38:34.440> do 00:38:34.630 --> 00:38:34.640 align:start position:0% there I don't know that we have to do 00:38:34.640 --> 00:38:37.230 align:start position:0% there I don't know that we have to do that<00:38:34.760> on<00:38:34.960> each<00:38:35.359> piece<00:38:36.359> I<00:38:36.480> just<00:38:36.599> wanted<00:38:36.880> you<00:38:37.000> to 00:38:37.230 --> 00:38:37.240 align:start position:0% that on each piece I just wanted you to 00:38:37.240 --> 00:38:39.430 align:start position:0% that on each piece I just wanted you to know<00:38:37.480> where<00:38:37.640> it<00:38:37.839> came<00:38:38.079> from<00:38:38.599> as<00:38:38.760> board<00:38:39.040> members 00:38:39.430 --> 00:38:39.440 align:start position:0% know where it came from as board members 00:38:39.440 --> 00:38:41.390 align:start position:0% know where it came from as board members and<00:38:39.599> as<00:38:39.760> the<00:38:39.920> public<00:38:40.480> but<00:38:40.760> we<00:38:40.960> probably<00:38:41.280> just 00:38:41.390 --> 00:38:41.400 align:start position:0% and as the public but we probably just 00:38:41.400 --> 00:38:43.630 align:start position:0% and as the public but we probably just need<00:38:41.560> to<00:38:41.720> reference<00:38:42.079> it<00:38:42.319> once<00:38:43.160> in<00:38:43.359> this 00:38:43.630 --> 00:38:43.640 align:start position:0% need to reference it once in this 00:38:43.640 --> 00:38:46.109 align:start position:0% need to reference it once in this section<00:38:44.160> does<00:38:44.319> that<00:38:44.520> make 00:38:46.109 --> 00:38:46.119 align:start position:0% section does that make 00:38:46.119 --> 00:38:49.230 align:start position:0% section does that make sense<00:38:47.119> I<00:38:47.240> don't<00:38:47.359> know<00:38:47.520> that<00:38:47.640> we<00:38:47.760> need<00:38:48.240> to 00:38:49.230 --> 00:38:49.240 align:start position:0% sense I don't know that we need to 00:38:49.240 --> 00:38:51.990 align:start position:0% sense I don't know that we need to reference<00:38:49.680> it<00:38:50.400> at<00:38:50.640> the<00:38:50.920> line<00:38:51.200> end<00:38:51.480> of<00:38:51.720> every 00:38:51.990 --> 00:38:52.000 align:start position:0% reference it at the line end of every 00:38:52.000 --> 00:38:54.710 align:start position:0% reference it at the line end of every line<00:38:52.720> but<00:38:52.880> I<00:38:53.000> just<00:38:53.119> wanted<00:38:53.440> people<00:38:53.640> to<00:38:53.800> know 00:38:54.710 --> 00:38:54.720 align:start position:0% line but I just wanted people to know 00:38:54.720 --> 00:39:03.069 align:start position:0% line but I just wanted people to know where<00:38:54.880> it<00:38:55.000> was<00:38:55.599> located 00:39:03.069 --> 00:39:03.079 align:start position:0% 00:39:03.079 --> 00:39:05.950 align:start position:0% so<00:39:04.079> so<00:39:04.400> do<00:39:04.560> we<00:39:04.720> want<00:39:04.839> to<00:39:04.960> do<00:39:05.119> that<00:39:05.280> up<00:39:05.480> on<00:39:05.680> the 00:39:05.950 --> 00:39:05.960 align:start position:0% so so do we want to do that up on the 00:39:05.960 --> 00:39:08.790 align:start position:0% so so do we want to do that up on the top<00:39:06.319> the<00:39:06.520> very<00:39:06.839> first<00:39:07.480> line<00:39:07.760> of<00:39:07.960> B<00:39:08.359> provide<00:39:08.680> an 00:39:08.790 --> 00:39:08.800 align:start position:0% top the very first line of B provide an 00:39:08.800 --> 00:39:11.990 align:start position:0% top the very first line of B provide an online<00:39:09.640> platform<00:39:10.000> for<00:39:10.200> Library<00:39:10.920> materials<00:39:11.680> as 00:39:11.990 --> 00:39:12.000 align:start position:0% online platform for Library materials as 00:39:12.000 --> 00:39:16.589 align:start position:0% online platform for Library materials as per<00:39:12.520> 53g<00:39:13.520> D4<00:39:14.400> d402<00:39:15.400> or<00:39:15.640> something<00:39:15.920> or<00:39:16.240> as 00:39:16.589 --> 00:39:16.599 align:start position:0% per 53g D4 d402 or something or as 00:39:16.599 --> 00:39:18.230 align:start position:0% per 53g D4 d402 or something or as something<00:39:16.839> like<00:39:17.040> that<00:39:17.359> it<00:39:17.640> yeah<00:39:17.960> however<00:39:18.119> it 00:39:18.230 --> 00:39:18.240 align:start position:0% something like that it yeah however it 00:39:18.240 --> 00:39:19.829 align:start position:0% something like that it yeah however it needs<00:39:18.440> to<00:39:18.560> be<00:39:18.839> referen<00:39:19.319> there<00:39:19.520> that<00:39:19.640> could 00:39:19.829 --> 00:39:19.839 align:start position:0% needs to be referen there that could 00:39:19.839 --> 00:39:22.030 align:start position:0% needs to be referen there that could just<00:39:20.000> be<00:39:20.200> a<00:39:20.440> probably<00:39:20.680> a<00:39:20.800> tech<00:39:21.520> technical 00:39:22.030 --> 00:39:22.040 align:start position:0% just be a probably a tech technical 00:39:22.040 --> 00:39:23.470 align:start position:0% just be a probably a tech technical change<00:39:22.319> or<00:39:22.480> whatever<00:39:22.720> and<00:39:22.839> then<00:39:22.960> taking<00:39:23.280> off 00:39:23.470 --> 00:39:23.480 align:start position:0% change or whatever and then taking off 00:39:23.480 --> 00:39:24.670 align:start position:0% change or whatever and then taking off each<00:39:23.599> of<00:39:23.760> those 00:39:24.670 --> 00:39:24.680 align:start position:0% each of those 00:39:24.680 --> 00:39:27.150 align:start position:0% each of those others<00:39:25.680> this<00:39:25.800> is<00:39:25.960> not<00:39:26.200> none<00:39:26.359> of<00:39:26.520> this<00:39:26.680> is<00:39:26.839> new 00:39:27.150 --> 00:39:27.160 align:start position:0% others this is not none of this is new 00:39:27.160 --> 00:39:29.829 align:start position:0% others this is not none of this is new so<00:39:27.400> so<00:39:27.640> just<00:39:27.760> to<00:39:27.960> Sarah's<00:39:28.960> request<00:39:29.319> or<00:39:29.480> board 00:39:29.829 --> 00:39:29.839 align:start position:0% so so just to Sarah's request or board 00:39:29.839 --> 00:39:33.430 align:start position:0% so so just to Sarah's request or board member<00:39:30.839> Real's<00:39:31.359> request<00:39:32.000> earlier<00:39:33.000> this<00:39:33.160> is 00:39:33.430 --> 00:39:33.440 align:start position:0% member Real's request earlier this is 00:39:33.440 --> 00:39:36.230 align:start position:0% member Real's request earlier this is this<00:39:33.560> is<00:39:33.760> last<00:39:34.400> year's<00:39:35.400> so<00:39:35.640> but<00:39:35.760> it<00:39:35.880> just<00:39:36.079> was 00:39:36.230 --> 00:39:36.240 align:start position:0% this is last year's so but it just was 00:39:36.240 --> 00:39:37.510 align:start position:0% this is last year's so but it just was it's<00:39:36.440> relevant<00:39:36.839> to<00:39:37.000> what<00:39:37.079> we're<00:39:37.280> talking 00:39:37.510 --> 00:39:37.520 align:start position:0% it's relevant to what we're talking 00:39:37.520 --> 00:39:39.870 align:start position:0% it's relevant to what we're talking about<00:39:37.760> it's<00:39:37.960> that<00:39:38.359> preemptive<00:39:39.359> protection 00:39:39.870 --> 00:39:39.880 align:start position:0% about it's that preemptive protection 00:39:39.880 --> 00:39:42.710 align:start position:0% about it's that preemptive protection thing<00:39:40.160> before<00:39:40.440> we<00:39:40.560> get<00:39:40.720> to<00:39:41.200> the<00:39:42.200> you<00:39:42.319> know<00:39:42.520> any 00:39:42.710 --> 00:39:42.720 align:start position:0% thing before we get to the you know any 00:39:42.720 --> 00:39:44.109 align:start position:0% thing before we get to the you know any of<00:39:42.839> the<00:39:42.960> content<00:39:43.359> that<00:39:43.440> would<00:39:43.560> be<00:39:43.680> concerning 00:39:44.109 --> 00:39:44.119 align:start position:0% of the content that would be concerning 00:39:44.119 --> 00:39:45.750 align:start position:0% of the content that would be concerning we're<00:39:44.240> going<00:39:44.319> to<00:39:44.640> preempt<00:39:45.040> it<00:39:45.200> by<00:39:45.520> going 00:39:45.750 --> 00:39:45.760 align:start position:0% we're going to preempt it by going 00:39:45.760 --> 00:39:48.990 align:start position:0% we're going to preempt it by going through<00:39:46.000> these<00:39:46.280> processes<00:39:46.920> which<00:39:47.400> will<00:39:48.400> help 00:39:48.990 --> 00:39:49.000 align:start position:0% through these processes which will help 00:39:49.000 --> 00:39:49.829 align:start position:0% through these processes which will help at<00:39:49.160> the 00:39:49.829 --> 00:39:49.839 align:start position:0% at the 00:39:49.839 --> 00:40:00.069 align:start position:0% at the beginning<00:39:50.839> protective<00:39:51.800> right 00:40:00.069 --> 00:40:00.079 align:start position:0% 00:40:00.079 --> 00:40:03.270 align:start position:0% so 00:40:03.270 --> 00:40:03.280 align:start position:0% 00:40:03.280 --> 00:40:09.030 align:start position:0% um<00:40:04.280> uh<00:40:05.119> I<00:40:05.960> there<00:40:06.280> under<00:40:06.760> b<00:40:07.359> bi<00:40:08.359> starts<00:40:08.720> out<00:40:08.920> with 00:40:09.030 --> 00:40:09.040 align:start position:0% um uh I there under b bi starts out with 00:40:09.040 --> 00:40:10.670 align:start position:0% um uh I there under b bi starts out with through<00:40:09.359> which<00:40:09.520> app<00:40:09.760> parent 00:40:10.670 --> 00:40:10.680 align:start position:0% through which app parent 00:40:10.680 --> 00:40:15.230 align:start position:0% through which app parent now<00:40:11.680> I<00:40:12.160> I<00:40:13.160> is 00:40:15.230 --> 00:40:15.240 align:start position:0% now I I is 00:40:15.240 --> 00:40:17.829 align:start position:0% now I I is um<00:40:16.240> doesn't<00:40:16.560> flow<00:40:16.920> quite<00:40:17.160> so<00:40:17.400> provide<00:40:17.680> an 00:40:17.829 --> 00:40:17.839 align:start position:0% um doesn't flow quite so provide an 00:40:17.839 --> 00:40:19.750 align:start position:0% um doesn't flow quite so provide an online<00:40:18.240> platform<00:40:18.599> for<00:40:18.800> Library<00:40:19.119> materials<00:40:19.560> as 00:40:19.750 --> 00:40:19.760 align:start position:0% online platform for Library materials as 00:40:19.760 --> 00:40:23.910 align:start position:0% online platform for Library materials as per<00:40:20.000> 53g 00:40:23.910 --> 00:40:23.920 align:start position:0% 00:40:23.920 --> 00:40:26.589 align:start position:0% d442<00:40:24.920> it<00:40:25.079> may<00:40:25.240> need<00:40:25.400> to<00:40:25.560> say<00:40:25.839> including<00:40:26.400> a 00:40:26.589 --> 00:40:26.599 align:start position:0% d442 it may need to say including a 00:40:26.599 --> 00:40:29.069 align:start position:0% d442 it may need to say including a history<00:40:26.920> of<00:40:27.040> Bor<00:40:27.599> materials<00:40:28.599> you<00:40:28.800> took<00:40:29.000> the 00:40:29.069 --> 00:40:29.079 align:start position:0% history of Bor materials you took the 00:40:29.079 --> 00:40:34.550 align:start position:0% history of Bor materials you took the words<00:40:29.359> right<00:40:29.520> out<00:40:29.599> of<00:40:29.720> my<00:40:29.839> mouth<00:40:30.119> there<00:40:30.240> you<00:40:30.480> go 00:40:34.550 --> 00:40:34.560 align:start position:0% 00:40:34.560 --> 00:40:36.950 align:start position:0% perfect<00:40:35.560> it<00:40:35.640> might<00:40:35.839> need<00:40:35.960> to<00:40:36.119> say<00:40:36.400> that 00:40:36.950 --> 00:40:36.960 align:start position:0% perfect it might need to say that 00:40:36.960 --> 00:40:40.190 align:start position:0% perfect it might need to say that includes<00:40:37.960> to<00:40:38.240> just<00:40:38.480> flow<00:40:38.920> with<00:40:39.160> the<00:40:39.640> The 00:40:40.190 --> 00:40:40.200 align:start position:0% includes to just flow with the The 00:40:40.200 --> 00:40:41.349 align:start position:0% includes to just flow with the The Heading 00:40:41.349 --> 00:40:41.359 align:start position:0% Heading 00:40:41.359 --> 00:40:43.589 align:start position:0% Heading sentence<00:40:42.359> provide<00:40:42.640> an<00:40:42.800> online<00:40:43.079> platform<00:40:43.480> from 00:40:43.589 --> 00:40:43.599 align:start position:0% sentence provide an online platform from 00:40:43.599 --> 00:40:46.750 align:start position:0% sentence provide an online platform from library<00:40:43.960> materials<00:40:44.599> that<00:40:44.800> includes<00:40:45.359> a 00:40:46.750 --> 00:40:46.760 align:start position:0% library materials that includes a 00:40:46.760 --> 00:40:50.670 align:start position:0% library materials that includes a history<00:40:47.760> what<00:40:47.880> are<00:40:48.079> you<00:40:48.280> a<00:40:48.480> technical 00:40:50.670 --> 00:40:50.680 align:start position:0% history what are you a technical 00:40:50.680 --> 00:40:52.910 align:start position:0% history what are you a technical writer<00:40:51.680> good<00:40:52.079> good 00:40:52.910 --> 00:40:52.920 align:start position:0% writer good good 00:40:52.920 --> 00:40:55.589 align:start position:0% writer good good job<00:40:53.920> and<00:40:54.040> then<00:40:54.319> probably<00:40:54.640> the<00:40:54.839> i<00:40:55.079> i<00:40:55.280> i 00:40:55.589 --> 00:40:55.599 align:start position:0% job and then probably the i i i 00:40:55.599 --> 00:40:57.990 align:start position:0% job and then probably the i i i something<00:40:55.920> like<00:40:56.119> and<00:40:56.359> shall<00:40:56.640> be<00:40:56.839> completed<00:40:57.599> by 00:40:57.990 --> 00:40:58.000 align:start position:0% something like and shall be completed by 00:40:58.000 --> 00:41:00.510 align:start position:0% something like and shall be completed by something<00:40:58.359> like<00:40:58.599> that<00:40:59.079> right<00:41:00.079> because<00:41:00.280> that's 00:41:00.510 --> 00:41:00.520 align:start position:0% something like that right because that's 00:41:00.520 --> 00:41:08.790 align:start position:0% something like that right because that's the<00:41:00.680> time<00:41:00.920> frames<00:41:01.240> in<00:41:01.440> the 00:41:08.790 --> 00:41:08.800 align:start position:0% 00:41:08.800 --> 00:41:10.910 align:start position:0% law 00:41:10.910 --> 00:41:10.920 align:start position:0% law 00:41:10.920 --> 00:41:16.910 align:start position:0% law yep<00:41:11.920> it's<00:41:12.040> a<00:41:12.200> thing<00:41:12.359> of<00:41:12.560> beauty<00:41:12.960> there<00:41:13.079> you 00:41:16.910 --> 00:41:16.920 align:start position:0% 00:41:16.920 --> 00:41:22.270 align:start position:0% go<00:41:17.920> all<00:41:18.480> right<00:41:19.480> Emily<00:41:19.880> did<00:41:20.040> you<00:41:20.200> have<00:41:20.359> a 00:41:22.270 --> 00:41:22.280 align:start position:0% go all right Emily did you have a 00:41:22.280 --> 00:41:25.470 align:start position:0% go all right Emily did you have a comment<00:41:23.560> um<00:41:24.560> I<00:41:24.760> I'm<00:41:24.920> like<00:41:25.079> I<00:41:25.160> don't<00:41:25.280> know<00:41:25.400> if 00:41:25.470 --> 00:41:25.480 align:start position:0% comment um I I'm like I don't know if 00:41:25.480 --> 00:41:28.390 align:start position:0% comment um I I'm like I don't know if you<00:41:25.640> heard<00:41:25.920> my 00:41:28.390 --> 00:41:28.400 align:start position:0% you heard my 00:41:28.400 --> 00:41:30.630 align:start position:0% you heard my well<00:41:28.640> done<00:41:29.560> I<00:41:29.800> I<00:41:29.880> was<00:41:30.119> actually<00:41:30.400> just 00:41:30.630 --> 00:41:30.640 align:start position:0% well done I I was actually just 00:41:30.640 --> 00:41:32.950 align:start position:0% well done I I was actually just wondering<00:41:31.079> on<00:41:31.400> three<00:41:31.960> there<00:41:32.480> could<00:41:32.640> someone 00:41:32.950 --> 00:41:32.960 align:start position:0% wondering on three there could someone 00:41:32.960 --> 00:41:35.430 align:start position:0% wondering on three there could someone just<00:41:33.400> briefly<00:41:33.839> explain<00:41:34.319> the<00:41:34.640> uh<00:41:34.839> the<00:41:34.960> numbers 00:41:35.430 --> 00:41:35.440 align:start position:0% just briefly explain the uh the numbers 00:41:35.440 --> 00:41:37.390 align:start position:0% just briefly explain the uh the numbers for<00:41:35.640> the<00:41:35.880> thousand<00:41:36.599> more<00:41:36.800> than<00:41:36.960> a<00:41:37.079> thousand 00:41:37.390 --> 00:41:37.400 align:start position:0% for the thousand more than a thousand 00:41:37.400 --> 00:41:40.190 align:start position:0% for the thousand more than a thousand enrolled<00:41:38.400> students<00:41:39.400> or<00:41:39.720> less<00:41:39.920> than<00:41:40.079> a 00:41:40.190 --> 00:41:40.200 align:start position:0% enrolled students or less than a 00:41:40.200 --> 00:41:42.870 align:start position:0% enrolled students or less than a thousand<00:41:40.480> enrolled<00:41:41.079> students<00:41:42.079> someone<00:41:42.400> just 00:41:42.870 --> 00:41:42.880 align:start position:0% thousand enrolled students someone just 00:41:42.880 --> 00:41:45.270 align:start position:0% thousand enrolled students someone just just<00:41:43.040> what<00:41:43.160> it<00:41:43.280> says<00:41:43.480> in<00:41:43.599> the<00:41:43.760> law<00:41:44.599> yeah<00:41:44.839> it<00:41:44.960> is 00:41:45.270 --> 00:41:45.280 align:start position:0% just what it says in the law yeah it is 00:41:45.280 --> 00:41:46.870 align:start position:0% just what it says in the law yeah it is and<00:41:45.400> I<00:41:45.520> think<00:41:45.680> it's<00:41:45.920> just<00:41:46.119> for<00:41:46.400> smaller 00:41:46.870 --> 00:41:46.880 align:start position:0% and I think it's just for smaller 00:41:46.880 --> 00:41:49.870 align:start position:0% and I think it's just for smaller districts<00:41:47.599> to<00:41:47.839> making<00:41:48.119> sure<00:41:48.400> they<00:41:48.599> have<00:41:48.880> the 00:41:49.870 --> 00:41:49.880 align:start position:0% districts to making sure they have the 00:41:49.880 --> 00:41:51.910 align:start position:0% districts to making sure they have the funding<00:41:50.240> and<00:41:50.640> resources<00:41:51.280> to<00:41:51.440> actually<00:41:51.680> meet 00:41:51.910 --> 00:41:51.920 align:start position:0% funding and resources to actually meet 00:41:51.920 --> 00:41:53.870 align:start position:0% funding and resources to actually meet the<00:41:52.040> law<00:41:52.480> that<00:41:52.599> was<00:41:52.760> more<00:41:52.880> or<00:41:53.040> less<00:41:53.359> why<00:41:53.520> it<00:41:53.640> was 00:41:53.870 --> 00:41:53.880 align:start position:0% the law that was more or less why it was 00:41:53.880 --> 00:41:56.710 align:start position:0% the law that was more or less why it was that<00:41:54.040> way<00:41:54.440> for<00:41:54.640> my<00:41:55.440> understanding<00:41:56.440> okay<00:41:56.560> so 00:41:56.710 --> 00:41:56.720 align:start position:0% that way for my understanding okay so 00:41:56.720 --> 00:41:59.069 align:start position:0% that way for my understanding okay so it's<00:41:56.800> like<00:41:56.920> a<00:41:57.000> thre<00:41:57.200> threshold<00:41:57.680> for<00:41:58.520> yeah 00:41:59.069 --> 00:41:59.079 align:start position:0% it's like a thre threshold for yeah 00:41:59.079 --> 00:42:00.910 align:start position:0% it's like a thre threshold for yeah numbers<00:41:59.599> and<00:41:59.880> and<00:42:00.000> checking<00:42:00.359> in<00:42:00.560> with<00:42:00.720> their 00:42:00.910 --> 00:42:00.920 align:start position:0% numbers and and checking in with their 00:42:00.920 --> 00:42:03.990 align:start position:0% numbers and and checking in with their ability<00:42:01.560> to<00:42:02.560> create<00:42:02.920> something<00:42:03.280> like<00:42:03.480> this 00:42:03.990 --> 00:42:04.000 align:start position:0% ability to create something like this 00:42:04.000 --> 00:42:06.790 align:start position:0% ability to create something like this yeah<00:42:04.160> or<00:42:04.319> Implement<00:42:05.119> okay<00:42:05.800> thank<00:42:06.000> you<00:42:06.640> thank 00:42:06.790 --> 00:42:06.800 align:start position:0% yeah or Implement okay thank you thank 00:42:06.800 --> 00:42:10.069 align:start position:0% yeah or Implement okay thank you thank you<00:42:06.920> chair 00:42:10.069 --> 00:42:10.079 align:start position:0% 00:42:10.079 --> 00:42:13.270 align:start position:0% Bo<00:42:11.079> all<00:42:11.280> right<00:42:11.880> I'm<00:42:12.079> good<00:42:12.280> with<00:42:12.480> this 00:42:13.270 --> 00:42:13.280 align:start position:0% Bo all right I'm good with this 00:42:13.280 --> 00:42:16.829 align:start position:0% Bo all right I'm good with this section<00:42:14.280> good<00:42:14.720> let's<00:42:14.960> move 00:42:16.829 --> 00:42:16.839 align:start position:0% section good let's move 00:42:16.839 --> 00:42:20.030 align:start position:0% section good let's move on<00:42:17.839> okay<00:42:18.319> speak<00:42:18.560> to<00:42:18.920> board<00:42:19.160> member<00:42:19.480> Real's 00:42:20.030 --> 00:42:20.040 align:start position:0% on okay speak to board member Real's 00:42:20.040 --> 00:42:23.190 align:start position:0% on okay speak to board member Real's Point<00:42:20.599> almost<00:42:21.240> every<00:42:21.680> piece<00:42:22.520> in<00:42:22.720> this<00:42:22.920> next 00:42:23.190 --> 00:42:23.200 align:start position:0% Point almost every piece in this next 00:42:23.200 --> 00:42:25.349 align:start position:0% Point almost every piece in this next section<00:42:23.760> is<00:42:24.040> new<00:42:24.400> in<00:42:24.559> the 00:42:25.349 --> 00:42:25.359 align:start position:0% section is new in the 00:42:25.359 --> 00:42:28.390 align:start position:0% section is new in the law<00:42:26.359> so<00:42:26.599> I<00:42:26.680> don't<00:42:27.240> we<00:42:27.359> want<00:42:27.440> to<00:42:27.640> just<00:42:28.000> ask<00:42:28.280> that 00:42:28.390 --> 00:42:28.400 align:start position:0% law so I don't we want to just ask that 00:42:28.400 --> 00:42:30.109 align:start position:0% law so I don't we want to just ask that it<00:42:28.480> be<00:42:28.640> in<00:42:28.720> a<00:42:28.880> different<00:42:29.240> color<00:42:29.720> so<00:42:29.920> that<00:42:30.000> it 00:42:30.109 --> 00:42:30.119 align:start position:0% it be in a different color so that it 00:42:30.119 --> 00:42:31.910 align:start position:0% it be in a different color so that it can<00:42:30.240> be<00:42:30.440> identified<00:42:30.960> at<00:42:31.079> least<00:42:31.240> at<00:42:31.440> this<00:42:31.640> point 00:42:31.910 --> 00:42:31.920 align:start position:0% can be identified at least at this point 00:42:31.920 --> 00:42:34.030 align:start position:0% can be identified at least at this point because<00:42:32.400> that<00:42:32.520> was<00:42:32.680> the<00:42:32.800> big<00:42:33.000> thing<00:42:33.200> is<00:42:33.800> some 00:42:34.030 --> 00:42:34.040 align:start position:0% because that was the big thing is some 00:42:34.040 --> 00:42:36.750 align:start position:0% because that was the big thing is some districts<00:42:34.440> wanted<00:42:34.760> somehow<00:42:35.119> to<00:42:35.240> be<00:42:35.359> able<00:42:35.520> to 00:42:36.750 --> 00:42:36.760 align:start position:0% districts wanted somehow to be able to 00:42:36.760 --> 00:42:39.790 align:start position:0% districts wanted somehow to be able to identify<00:42:37.760> current<00:42:38.160> changes<00:42:38.640> in<00:42:38.800> the<00:42:38.960> law<00:42:39.720> I 00:42:39.790 --> 00:42:39.800 align:start position:0% identify current changes in the law I 00:42:39.800 --> 00:42:42.030 align:start position:0% identify current changes in the law I don't<00:42:39.960> know<00:42:40.119> how<00:42:40.240> we<00:42:40.359> want<00:42:40.480> to<00:42:41.480> do<00:42:41.680> that<00:42:41.839> if<00:42:41.920> we 00:42:42.030 --> 00:42:42.040 align:start position:0% don't know how we want to do that if we 00:42:42.040 --> 00:42:43.470 align:start position:0% don't know how we want to do that if we want<00:42:42.119> to<00:42:42.240> put<00:42:42.359> it<00:42:42.440> in<00:42:42.559> another<00:42:42.880> color<00:42:43.200> just<00:42:43.359> so 00:42:43.470 --> 00:42:43.480 align:start position:0% want to put it in another color just so 00:42:43.480 --> 00:42:44.990 align:start position:0% want to put it in another color just so we<00:42:43.559> can<00:42:43.720> identify<00:42:44.160> it<00:42:44.319> now<00:42:44.520> and<00:42:44.640> then<00:42:44.760> I<00:42:44.839> don't 00:42:44.990 --> 00:42:45.000 align:start position:0% we can identify it now and then I don't 00:42:45.000 --> 00:42:48.309 align:start position:0% we can identify it now and then I don't know<00:42:45.119> if<00:42:45.760> it's<00:42:46.760> bolded<00:42:47.160> or<00:42:47.359> italicized<00:42:48.119> or<00:42:48.240> I 00:42:48.309 --> 00:42:48.319 align:start position:0% know if it's bolded or italicized or I 00:42:48.319 --> 00:42:51.470 align:start position:0% know if it's bolded or italicized or I don't<00:42:48.480> know<00:42:48.720> what<00:42:49.720> yeah<00:42:50.000> leave<00:42:50.160> it<00:42:50.280> up<00:42:50.400> to<00:42:50.599> the 00:42:51.470 --> 00:42:51.480 align:start position:0% don't know what yeah leave it up to the 00:42:51.480 --> 00:42:53.069 align:start position:0% don't know what yeah leave it up to the designer<00:42:51.960> to<00:42:52.119> figure<00:42:52.359> out<00:42:52.440> a<00:42:52.559> way<00:42:52.680> to<00:42:52.800> make<00:42:52.920> it 00:42:53.069 --> 00:42:53.079 align:start position:0% designer to figure out a way to make it 00:42:53.079 --> 00:42:55.829 align:start position:0% designer to figure out a way to make it look<00:42:53.880> different<00:42:54.480> or<00:42:54.640> laid<00:42:54.880> out<00:42:55.440> in<00:42:55.520> a<00:42:55.680> way 00:42:55.829 --> 00:42:55.839 align:start position:0% look different or laid out in a way 00:42:55.839 --> 00:42:57.910 align:start position:0% look different or laid out in a way that's<00:42:56.559> um 00:42:57.910 --> 00:42:57.920 align:start position:0% that's um 00:42:57.920 --> 00:43:01.710 align:start position:0% that's um for<00:42:58.160> that 00:43:01.710 --> 00:43:01.720 align:start position:0% 00:43:01.720 --> 00:43:04.829 align:start position:0% purpose<00:43:02.720> I<00:43:02.800> mean<00:43:03.000> for<00:43:03.200> the<00:43:03.480> first<00:43:04.400> uh 00:43:04.829 --> 00:43:04.839 align:start position:0% purpose I mean for the first uh 00:43:04.839 --> 00:43:08.270 align:start position:0% purpose I mean for the first uh iteration<00:43:05.520> that<00:43:05.720> we<00:43:06.040> provide<00:43:06.640> to<00:43:06.960> the<00:43:07.680> I<00:43:07.760> mean 00:43:08.270 --> 00:43:08.280 align:start position:0% iteration that we provide to the I mean 00:43:08.280 --> 00:43:11.270 align:start position:0% iteration that we provide to the I mean we<00:43:08.440> might<00:43:08.760> as<00:43:09.760> we<00:43:10.000> could<00:43:10.680> you<00:43:10.800> know<00:43:11.000> have<00:43:11.119> a 00:43:11.270 --> 00:43:11.280 align:start position:0% we might as we could you know have a 00:43:11.280 --> 00:43:13.870 align:start position:0% we might as we could you know have a cover<00:43:11.720> memo<00:43:12.119> and<00:43:12.280> say<00:43:12.760> we've<00:43:13.040> highlighted<00:43:13.720> all 00:43:13.870 --> 00:43:13.880 align:start position:0% cover memo and say we've highlighted all 00:43:13.880 --> 00:43:16.750 align:start position:0% cover memo and say we've highlighted all of<00:43:14.040> the<00:43:14.200> new<00:43:14.480> things<00:43:15.280> yep<00:43:15.880> just<00:43:16.079> like<00:43:16.240> a<00:43:16.400> yellow 00:43:16.750 --> 00:43:16.760 align:start position:0% of the new things yep just like a yellow 00:43:16.760 --> 00:43:18.430 align:start position:0% of the new things yep just like a yellow highlighter<00:43:17.280> or<00:43:17.480> something<00:43:17.800> you<00:43:17.920> know<00:43:18.200> here's 00:43:18.430 --> 00:43:18.440 align:start position:0% highlighter or something you know here's 00:43:18.440 --> 00:43:21.430 align:start position:0% highlighter or something you know here's all<00:43:18.640> the<00:43:18.720> new<00:43:19.000> places<00:43:20.000> and<00:43:20.680> and<00:43:21.000> the<00:43:21.200> real 00:43:21.430 --> 00:43:21.440 align:start position:0% all the new places and and the real 00:43:21.440 --> 00:43:23.109 align:start position:0% all the new places and and the real document<00:43:21.880> doesn't<00:43:22.200> really<00:43:22.520> have<00:43:22.800> something 00:43:23.109 --> 00:43:23.119 align:start position:0% document doesn't really have something 00:43:23.119 --> 00:43:27.270 align:start position:0% document doesn't really have something like<00:43:23.319> that<00:43:23.559> in<00:43:23.760> it<00:43:24.599> but<00:43:24.880> for<00:43:25.559> your<00:43:26.559> interest 00:43:27.270 --> 00:43:27.280 align:start position:0% like that in it but for your interest 00:43:27.280 --> 00:43:29.190 align:start position:0% like that in it but for your interest information<00:43:28.240> here's<00:43:28.680> I<00:43:28.760> think<00:43:28.920> that's<00:43:29.040> a 00:43:29.190 --> 00:43:29.200 align:start position:0% information here's I think that's a 00:43:29.200 --> 00:43:31.030 align:start position:0% information here's I think that's a great<00:43:29.359> idea<00:43:29.720> the<00:43:29.839> Highlight<00:43:30.319> part<00:43:30.599> instead<00:43:30.839> of 00:43:31.030 --> 00:43:31.040 align:start position:0% great idea the Highlight part instead of 00:43:31.040 --> 00:43:32.430 align:start position:0% great idea the Highlight part instead of changing<00:43:31.359> the<00:43:31.480> color<00:43:31.760> just<00:43:31.920> highlight<00:43:32.319> these 00:43:32.430 --> 00:43:32.440 align:start position:0% changing the color just highlight these 00:43:32.440 --> 00:43:34.670 align:start position:0% changing the color just highlight these are<00:43:32.599> new<00:43:32.800> Provisions<00:43:33.480> right<00:43:34.000> I<00:43:34.079> think<00:43:34.440> it's 00:43:34.670 --> 00:43:34.680 align:start position:0% are new Provisions right I think it's 00:43:34.680 --> 00:43:36.710 align:start position:0% are new Provisions right I think it's brilliant 00:43:36.710 --> 00:43:36.720 align:start position:0% brilliant 00:43:36.720 --> 00:43:39.230 align:start position:0% brilliant so<00:43:37.720> well<00:43:37.880> it's<00:43:38.040> far<00:43:38.240> from<00:43:38.480> brilliant<00:43:38.920> at<00:43:39.079> this 00:43:39.230 --> 00:43:39.240 align:start position:0% so well it's far from brilliant at this 00:43:39.240 --> 00:43:42.470 align:start position:0% so well it's far from brilliant at this hour<00:43:39.480> of<00:43:39.599> the<00:43:39.720> morning<00:43:40.040> but<00:43:40.800> but<00:43:41.800> functional 00:43:42.470 --> 00:43:42.480 align:start position:0% hour of the morning but but functional 00:43:42.480 --> 00:43:45.470 align:start position:0% hour of the morning but but functional maybe<00:43:43.319> okay<00:43:43.480> it's<00:43:44.119> functional<00:43:45.119> I<00:43:45.200> would<00:43:45.359> have 00:43:45.470 --> 00:43:45.480 align:start position:0% maybe okay it's functional I would have 00:43:45.480 --> 00:43:47.870 align:start position:0% maybe okay it's functional I would have taken<00:43:45.720> the<00:43:45.839> other<00:43:46.079> compliment 00:43:47.870 --> 00:43:47.880 align:start position:0% taken the other compliment 00:43:47.880 --> 00:43:51.870 align:start position:0% taken the other compliment but<00:43:48.880> so<00:43:49.240> how<00:43:49.520> about<00:43:50.359> let's<00:43:51.359> the<00:43:51.520> general 00:43:51.870 --> 00:43:51.880 align:start position:0% but so how about let's the general 00:43:51.880 --> 00:43:54.790 align:start position:0% but so how about let's the general Provisions<00:43:52.240> for<00:43:52.400> sensitive<00:43:52.839> materials<00:43:53.800> it 00:43:54.790 --> 00:43:54.800 align:start position:0% Provisions for sensitive materials it 00:43:54.800 --> 00:43:57.150 align:start position:0% Provisions for sensitive materials it how<00:43:55.000> does<00:43:55.400> that 00:43:57.150 --> 00:43:57.160 align:start position:0% how does that 00:43:57.160 --> 00:44:00.750 align:start position:0% how does that match<00:43:57.520> with<00:43:57.839> our<00:43:58.839> previous<00:43:59.680> two<00:43:59.960> headings<00:44:00.440> it 00:44:00.750 --> 00:44:00.760 align:start position:0% match with our previous two headings it 00:44:00.760 --> 00:44:05.109 align:start position:0% match with our previous two headings it the<00:44:00.920> others<00:44:01.280> were<00:44:01.800> Library<00:44:02.359> something<00:44:03.319> and<00:44:04.319> so 00:44:05.109 --> 00:44:05.119 align:start position:0% the others were Library something and so 00:44:05.119 --> 00:44:09.190 align:start position:0% the others were Library something and so is<00:44:05.319> this<00:44:05.480> number<00:44:05.800> three<00:44:06.400> instructional 00:44:09.190 --> 00:44:09.200 align:start position:0% 00:44:09.200 --> 00:44:11.790 align:start position:0% materials<00:44:10.200> so<00:44:10.440> do<00:44:10.559> we<00:44:10.760> just<00:44:10.920> need<00:44:11.280> sensitive 00:44:11.790 --> 00:44:11.800 align:start position:0% materials so do we just need sensitive 00:44:11.800 --> 00:44:14.910 align:start position:0% materials so do we just need sensitive materials<00:44:12.280> so<00:44:12.599> it<00:44:13.200> matches<00:44:14.200> the<00:44:14.400> format<00:44:14.760> of 00:44:14.910 --> 00:44:14.920 align:start position:0% materials so it matches the format of 00:44:14.920 --> 00:44:17.230 align:start position:0% materials so it matches the format of the<00:44:15.079> previous 00:44:17.230 --> 00:44:17.240 align:start position:0% the previous 00:44:17.240 --> 00:44:20.589 align:start position:0% the previous two<00:44:18.240> Library<00:44:18.720> materials<00:44:19.160> you<00:44:19.359> had<00:44:19.680> and<00:44:20.000> well<00:44:20.160> I 00:44:20.589 --> 00:44:20.599 align:start position:0% two Library materials you had and well I 00:44:20.599 --> 00:44:24.349 align:start position:0% two Library materials you had and well I broke<00:44:21.839> Perhaps<00:44:22.839> Perhaps<00:44:23.440> I<00:44:23.559> just<00:44:23.839> I<00:44:23.960> guess<00:44:24.160> I 00:44:24.349 --> 00:44:24.359 align:start position:0% broke Perhaps Perhaps I just I guess I 00:44:24.359 --> 00:44:26.270 align:start position:0% broke Perhaps Perhaps I just I guess I put<00:44:24.480> it<00:44:24.640> in<00:44:24.920> as<00:44:25.119> general<00:44:25.520> Provisions<00:44:25.960> in<00:44:26.119> other 00:44:26.270 --> 00:44:26.280 align:start position:0% put it in as general Provisions in other 00:44:26.280 --> 00:44:29.230 align:start position:0% put it in as general Provisions in other words<00:44:26.559> over<00:44:27.119> arching<00:44:27.559> things<00:44:27.760> to<00:44:27.920> be<00:44:28.079> aware<00:44:28.359> of 00:44:29.230 --> 00:44:29.240 align:start position:0% words over arching things to be aware of 00:44:29.240 --> 00:44:31.430 align:start position:0% words over arching things to be aware of and<00:44:29.400> then<00:44:29.559> broke<00:44:29.839> it<00:44:30.000> down<00:44:30.280> into<00:44:31.119> each 00:44:31.430 --> 00:44:31.440 align:start position:0% and then broke it down into each 00:44:31.440 --> 00:44:33.829 align:start position:0% and then broke it down into each component<00:44:32.200> but<00:44:32.319> it<00:44:32.480> could<00:44:32.680> just<00:44:32.839> be<00:44:33.040> sensitive 00:44:33.829 --> 00:44:33.839 align:start position:0% component but it could just be sensitive 00:44:33.839 --> 00:44:37.990 align:start position:0% component but it could just be sensitive materials<00:44:34.839> if<00:44:35.079> you<00:44:35.440> if<00:44:35.800> if<00:44:36.000> that<00:44:36.160> works<00:44:37.000> best 00:44:37.990 --> 00:44:38.000 align:start position:0% materials if you if if that works best 00:44:38.000 --> 00:44:39.829 align:start position:0% materials if you if if that works best yeah<00:44:38.200> I<00:44:38.280> was<00:44:38.440> just<00:44:38.599> looking<00:44:38.920> up<00:44:39.119> at<00:44:39.319> the<00:44:39.480> other 00:44:39.829 --> 00:44:39.839 align:start position:0% yeah I was just looking up at the other 00:44:39.839 --> 00:44:44.630 align:start position:0% yeah I was just looking up at the other two<00:44:40.440> and<00:44:40.680> they<00:44:40.800> were<00:44:41.280> just<00:44:41.640> Library<00:44:42.079> materials 00:44:44.630 --> 00:44:44.640 align:start position:0% two and they were just Library materials 00:44:44.640 --> 00:44:48.589 align:start position:0% two and they were just Library materials and<00:44:45.720> instructional<00:44:46.720> Library<00:44:47.319> materials<00:44:48.319> okay 00:44:48.589 --> 00:44:48.599 align:start position:0% and instructional Library materials okay 00:44:48.599 --> 00:44:49.589 align:start position:0% and instructional Library materials okay sensitive 00:44:49.589 --> 00:44:49.599 align:start position:0% sensitive 00:44:49.599 --> 00:44:54.589 align:start position:0% sensitive materials<00:44:50.599> okay 00:44:54.589 --> 00:44:54.599 align:start position:0% 00:44:54.599 --> 00:45:01.870 align:start position:0% yeah<00:44:55.599> okay 00:45:01.870 --> 00:45:01.880 align:start position:0% 00:45:01.880 --> 00:45:03.750 align:start position:0% so<00:45:02.280> do<00:45:02.400> we<00:45:02.520> want<00:45:02.599> to<00:45:02.760> just<00:45:02.920> read<00:45:03.280> through<00:45:03.559> each 00:45:03.750 --> 00:45:03.760 align:start position:0% so do we want to just read through each 00:45:03.760 --> 00:45:06.390 align:start position:0% so do we want to just read through each one<00:45:04.079> or<00:45:04.760> what<00:45:05.000> do<00:45:05.079> you<00:45:05.160> wantan<00:45:05.240> to<00:45:06.079> I<00:45:06.200> think 00:45:06.390 --> 00:45:06.400 align:start position:0% one or what do you wantan to I think 00:45:06.400 --> 00:45:08.270 align:start position:0% one or what do you wantan to I think that<00:45:06.520> sounds<00:45:06.880> great<00:45:07.319> okay<00:45:07.680> would<00:45:07.839> you<00:45:07.960> like 00:45:08.270 --> 00:45:08.280 align:start position:0% that sounds great okay would you like 00:45:08.280 --> 00:45:11.309 align:start position:0% that sounds great okay would you like I'll<00:45:08.520> I'll<00:45:09.040> read<00:45:09.800> okay<00:45:10.400> okay<00:45:10.839> materials 00:45:11.309 --> 00:45:11.319 align:start position:0% I'll I'll read okay okay materials 00:45:11.319 --> 00:45:13.230 align:start position:0% I'll I'll read okay okay materials determine<00:45:11.839> objective<00:45:12.319> sensitive<00:45:12.760> materials 00:45:13.230 --> 00:45:13.240 align:start position:0% determine objective sensitive materials 00:45:13.240 --> 00:45:15.430 align:start position:0% determine objective sensitive materials or<00:45:13.480> subjective<00:45:14.040> sensitive<00:45:14.480> materials<00:45:15.280> are 00:45:15.430 --> 00:45:15.440 align:start position:0% or subjective sensitive materials are 00:45:15.440 --> 00:45:17.270 align:start position:0% or subjective sensitive materials are removed<00:45:15.839> from<00:45:16.000> all<00:45:16.200> School<00:45:16.520> settings<00:45:16.960> at<00:45:17.079> an 00:45:17.270 --> 00:45:17.280 align:start position:0% removed from all School settings at an 00:45:17.280 --> 00:45:20.069 align:start position:0% removed from all School settings at an Lea<00:45:18.280> and<00:45:18.440> instruction<00:45:18.960> materials<00:45:19.400> are<00:45:19.640> not 00:45:20.069 --> 00:45:20.079 align:start position:0% Lea and instruction materials are not 00:45:20.079 --> 00:45:24.270 align:start position:0% Lea and instruction materials are not exclusively<00:45:21.079> Library 00:45:24.270 --> 00:45:24.280 align:start position:0% 00:45:24.280 --> 00:45:27.030 align:start position:0% materials<00:45:25.280> those<00:45:25.440> were<00:45:25.960> articulated<00:45:26.640> in<00:45:26.760> the 00:45:27.030 --> 00:45:27.040 align:start position:0% materials those were articulated in the 00:45:27.040 --> 00:45:29.630 align:start position:0% materials those were articulated in the law<00:45:27.400> specifically<00:45:28.240> so<00:45:29.040> I<00:45:29.119> don't<00:45:29.240> know<00:45:29.359> if<00:45:29.480> that 00:45:29.630 --> 00:45:29.640 align:start position:0% law specifically so I don't know if that 00:45:29.640 --> 00:45:32.470 align:start position:0% law specifically so I don't know if that needs<00:45:30.040> is<00:45:30.160> that 00:45:32.470 --> 00:45:32.480 align:start position:0% 00:45:32.480 --> 00:45:36.829 align:start position:0% worded<00:45:33.480> start<00:45:33.720> with<00:45:33.839> the<00:45:33.920> word<00:45:34.200> instructional 00:45:36.829 --> 00:45:36.839 align:start position:0% worded start with the word instructional 00:45:36.839 --> 00:45:39.109 align:start position:0% worded start with the word instructional materials<00:45:37.839> add<00:45:38.000> the<00:45:38.119> word<00:45:38.359> instructional<00:45:39.000> at 00:45:39.109 --> 00:45:39.119 align:start position:0% materials add the word instructional at 00:45:39.119 --> 00:45:43.470 align:start position:0% materials add the word instructional at the<00:45:39.240> beginning<00:45:39.520> of<00:45:39.680> that<00:45:39.839> first 00:45:43.470 --> 00:45:43.480 align:start position:0% 00:45:43.480 --> 00:45:48.589 align:start position:0% bullet 00:45:48.589 --> 00:45:48.599 align:start position:0% 00:45:48.599 --> 00:45:51.470 align:start position:0% okay<00:45:49.599> okay<00:45:49.839> I<00:45:49.960> think<00:45:50.119> it<00:45:50.359> does<00:45:50.480> it<00:45:50.720> say<00:45:51.119> in<00:45:51.240> a 00:45:51.470 --> 00:45:51.480 align:start position:0% okay okay I think it does it say in a 00:45:51.480 --> 00:45:53.430 align:start position:0% okay okay I think it does it say in a school<00:45:51.920> setting<00:45:52.480> so<00:45:52.800> instructional 00:45:53.430 --> 00:45:53.440 align:start position:0% school setting so instructional 00:45:53.440 --> 00:45:55.750 align:start position:0% school setting so instructional materials<00:45:53.920> are<00:45:54.160> all<00:45:54.440> materials<00:45:54.920> in<00:45:55.079> a<00:45:55.280> school 00:45:55.750 --> 00:45:55.760 align:start position:0% materials are all materials in a school 00:45:55.760 --> 00:45:57.270 align:start position:0% materials are all materials in a school setting 00:45:57.270 --> 00:45:57.280 align:start position:0% setting 00:45:57.280 --> 00:46:03.309 align:start position:0% setting oh<00:45:57.480> you<00:45:57.680> removed<00:45:58.040> it<00:45:58.319> okay<00:45:58.520> never<00:45:58.760> mind 00:46:03.309 --> 00:46:03.319 align:start position:0% 00:46:03.319 --> 00:46:06.270 align:start position:0% sorry<00:46:04.319> and<00:46:04.480> I<00:46:04.680> think<00:46:04.960> the<00:46:05.200> point<00:46:05.680> it's<00:46:05.880> worth 00:46:06.270 --> 00:46:06.280 align:start position:0% sorry and I think the point it's worth 00:46:06.280 --> 00:46:08.270 align:start position:0% sorry and I think the point it's worth pointing<00:46:06.839> out<00:46:07.319> though<00:46:07.720> I<00:46:07.800> don't<00:46:07.960> know<00:46:08.079> if<00:46:08.160> we 00:46:08.270 --> 00:46:08.280 align:start position:0% pointing out though I don't know if we 00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:10.950 align:start position:0% pointing out though I don't know if we need<00:46:08.480> another<00:46:09.240> heading<00:46:10.240> it<00:46:10.400> may<00:46:10.599> seem 00:46:10.950 --> 00:46:10.960 align:start position:0% need another heading it may seem 00:46:10.960 --> 00:46:13.430 align:start position:0% need another heading it may seem duplicative<00:46:11.839> but<00:46:12.040> they<00:46:12.200> put<00:46:12.400> it<00:46:12.520> in<00:46:12.720> the<00:46:12.960> law 00:46:13.430 --> 00:46:13.440 align:start position:0% duplicative but they put it in the law 00:46:13.440 --> 00:46:16.230 align:start position:0% duplicative but they put it in the law specifically<00:46:14.040> spelled<00:46:14.400> out<00:46:14.880> because<00:46:15.200> it<00:46:15.359> was 00:46:16.230 --> 00:46:16.240 align:start position:0% specifically spelled out because it was 00:46:16.240 --> 00:46:18.670 align:start position:0% specifically spelled out because it was people<00:46:16.480> were<00:46:16.720> missing<00:46:17.160> that<00:46:17.440> even<00:46:17.720> though<00:46:18.520> it 00:46:18.670 --> 00:46:18.680 align:start position:0% people were missing that even though it 00:46:18.680 --> 00:46:20.950 align:start position:0% people were missing that even though it says<00:46:18.960> it<00:46:19.200> it<00:46:19.359> was<00:46:19.480> said<00:46:19.680> it 00:46:20.950 --> 00:46:20.960 align:start position:0% says it it was said it 00:46:20.960 --> 00:46:22.589 align:start position:0% says it it was said it before 00:46:22.589 --> 00:46:22.599 align:start position:0% before 00:46:22.599 --> 00:46:25.349 align:start position:0% before um<00:46:23.599> does<00:46:23.800> that<00:46:24.000> make<00:46:24.240> sense<00:46:24.839> so<00:46:25.040> I<00:46:25.119> don't<00:46:25.240> know 00:46:25.349 --> 00:46:25.359 align:start position:0% um does that make sense so I don't know 00:46:25.359 --> 00:46:27.190 align:start position:0% um does that make sense so I don't know if<00:46:25.440> we<00:46:25.599> just<00:46:25.920> do<00:46:26.160> you<00:46:26.280> want<00:46:26.480> another<00:46:26.960> heading 00:46:27.190 --> 00:46:27.200 align:start position:0% if we just do you want another heading 00:46:27.200 --> 00:46:30.069 align:start position:0% if we just do you want another heading for<00:46:27.559> I<00:46:27.599> mean<00:46:27.880> another<00:46:28.880> bullet 00:46:30.069 --> 00:46:30.079 align:start position:0% for I mean another bullet 00:46:30.079 --> 00:46:32.430 align:start position:0% for I mean another bullet point<00:46:31.079> I<00:46:31.200> think<00:46:31.400> it's<00:46:31.599> important<00:46:32.000> it's<00:46:32.200> in 00:46:32.430 --> 00:46:32.440 align:start position:0% point I think it's important it's in 00:46:32.440 --> 00:46:34.670 align:start position:0% point I think it's important it's in there<00:46:32.839> I<00:46:33.000> agree<00:46:33.359> with<00:46:33.480> you<00:46:33.800> member<00:46:34.119> Earl<00:46:34.440> I<00:46:34.520> do 00:46:34.670 --> 00:46:34.680 align:start position:0% there I agree with you member Earl I do 00:46:34.680 --> 00:46:36.309 align:start position:0% there I agree with you member Earl I do think<00:46:34.920> that<00:46:35.119> that's<00:46:35.520> an<00:46:35.680> important<00:46:36.040> part<00:46:36.200> of 00:46:36.309 --> 00:46:36.319 align:start position:0% think that that's an important part of 00:46:36.319 --> 00:46:38.990 align:start position:0% think that that's an important part of the<00:46:36.480> law<00:46:36.920> the<00:46:37.240> change<00:46:37.559> in<00:46:37.720> the<00:46:37.880> law<00:46:38.599> should<00:46:38.800> we 00:46:38.990 --> 00:46:39.000 align:start position:0% the law the change in the law should we 00:46:39.000 --> 00:46:41.510 align:start position:0% the law the change in the law should we just<00:46:39.240> do<00:46:39.440> it<00:46:39.839> do<00:46:40.040> we<00:46:40.200> just<00:46:40.359> do<00:46:40.760> two<00:46:41.119> pieces 00:46:41.510 --> 00:46:41.520 align:start position:0% just do it do we just do two pieces 00:46:41.520 --> 00:46:42.950 align:start position:0% just do it do we just do two pieces instead<00:46:41.800> of<00:46:41.880> one<00:46:42.040> there<00:46:42.200> instead<00:46:42.440> of<00:46:42.520> the<00:46:42.599> end 00:46:42.950 --> 00:46:42.960 align:start position:0% instead of one there instead of the end 00:46:42.960 --> 00:46:45.750 align:start position:0% instead of one there instead of the end we<00:46:43.079> just<00:46:43.200> have<00:46:43.319> it<00:46:43.400> as<00:46:43.559> another<00:46:43.800> bullet 00:46:45.750 --> 00:46:45.760 align:start position:0% we just have it as another bullet 00:46:45.760 --> 00:46:48.870 align:start position:0% we just have it as another bullet point<00:46:46.760> I<00:46:46.920> like<00:46:47.319> that<00:46:47.640> because<00:46:48.079> I<00:46:48.160> was<00:46:48.319> wanting 00:46:48.870 --> 00:46:48.880 align:start position:0% point I like that because I was wanting 00:46:48.880 --> 00:46:52.030 align:start position:0% point I like that because I was wanting to<00:46:49.880> even<00:46:50.119> take<00:46:50.319> out<00:46:50.520> and<00:46:51.000> it<00:46:51.200> it<00:46:51.440> just<00:46:51.640> read 00:46:52.030 --> 00:46:52.040 align:start position:0% to even take out and it it just read 00:46:52.040 --> 00:46:57.069 align:start position:0% to even take out and it it just read funny<00:46:52.839> yeah<00:46:53.079> it<00:46:53.640> yeah 00:46:57.069 --> 00:46:57.079 align:start position:0% 00:46:57.079 --> 00:46:58.790 align:start position:0% and<00:46:57.200> then<00:46:57.359> we<00:46:57.440> can<00:46:57.599> take<00:46:57.800> off<00:46:58.040> the<00:46:58.240> reference 00:46:58.790 --> 00:46:58.800 align:start position:0% and then we can take off the reference 00:46:58.800 --> 00:47:00.430 align:start position:0% and then we can take off the reference there<00:46:58.960> at<00:46:59.079> the<00:46:59.240> end<00:46:59.559> I<00:46:59.640> just<00:46:59.800> wanted<00:47:00.079> people<00:47:00.280> to 00:47:00.430 --> 00:47:00.440 align:start position:0% there at the end I just wanted people to 00:47:00.440 --> 00:47:04.309 align:start position:0% there at the end I just wanted people to know<00:47:00.680> where<00:47:00.839> it<00:47:01.040> came<00:47:01.480> from<00:47:02.880> so<00:47:03.880> you<00:47:04.000> know<00:47:04.200> we 00:47:04.309 --> 00:47:04.319 align:start position:0% know where it came from so you know we 00:47:04.319 --> 00:47:06.510 align:start position:0% know where it came from so you know we can<00:47:04.559> obviously<00:47:05.200> put<00:47:05.319> it<00:47:05.440> up<00:47:05.640> above<00:47:06.000> but<00:47:06.240> just 00:47:06.510 --> 00:47:06.520 align:start position:0% can obviously put it up above but just 00:47:06.520 --> 00:47:08.030 align:start position:0% can obviously put it up above but just wanted<00:47:06.800> to<00:47:06.920> make<00:47:07.040> sure<00:47:07.280> they<00:47:07.480> understood<00:47:07.880> it 00:47:08.030 --> 00:47:08.040 align:start position:0% wanted to make sure they understood it 00:47:08.040 --> 00:47:10.270 align:start position:0% wanted to make sure they understood it came<00:47:08.160> out<00:47:08.359> of<00:47:08.520> the<00:47:08.680> actual<00:47:08.960> law<00:47:09.599> so<00:47:09.880> that's 00:47:10.270 --> 00:47:10.280 align:start position:0% came out of the actual law so that's 00:47:10.280 --> 00:47:12.309 align:start position:0% came out of the actual law so that's those<00:47:10.480> two<00:47:10.680> would<00:47:10.880> probably<00:47:11.160> need<00:47:11.319> to<00:47:11.440> be 00:47:12.309 --> 00:47:12.319 align:start position:0% those two would probably need to be 00:47:12.319 --> 00:47:14.109 align:start position:0% those two would probably need to be highlighted<00:47:12.880> or<00:47:13.040> colorcoded<00:47:13.720> or<00:47:13.839> whatever 00:47:14.109 --> 00:47:14.119 align:start position:0% highlighted or colorcoded or whatever 00:47:14.119 --> 00:47:15.470 align:start position:0% highlighted or colorcoded or whatever and<00:47:14.240> I<00:47:14.319> don't<00:47:14.440> know<00:47:14.559> if<00:47:14.640> you<00:47:14.760> want<00:47:14.839> to<00:47:15.160> do<00:47:15.359> that 00:47:15.470 --> 00:47:15.480 align:start position:0% and I don't know if you want to do that 00:47:15.480 --> 00:47:17.870 align:start position:0% and I don't know if you want to do that as<00:47:15.599> we're<00:47:15.760> going<00:47:16.160> or<00:47:17.079> just<00:47:17.280> at<00:47:17.400> the<00:47:17.480> end<00:47:17.680> I<00:47:17.760> know 00:47:17.870 --> 00:47:17.880 align:start position:0% as we're going or just at the end I know 00:47:17.880 --> 00:47:22.030 align:start position:0% as we're going or just at the end I know there's<00:47:18.079> a<00:47:18.359> a<00:47:18.520> note 00:47:22.030 --> 00:47:22.040 align:start position:0% 00:47:22.040 --> 00:47:23.829 align:start position:0% there 00:47:23.829 --> 00:47:23.839 align:start position:0% there 00:47:23.839 --> 00:47:27.430 align:start position:0% there so<00:47:24.839> okay<00:47:25.240> and<00:47:25.359> so<00:47:25.520> we're<00:47:25.680> gonna<00:47:25.920> make<00:47:26.240> these 00:47:27.430 --> 00:47:27.440 align:start position:0% so okay and so we're gonna make these 00:47:27.440 --> 00:47:40.870 align:start position:0% so okay and so we're gonna make these uh<00:47:28.440> what<00:47:29.200> ab<00:47:30.200> and<00:47:31.079> one<00:47:31.599> little<00:47:31.880> one<00:47:32.040> two<00:47:32.520> I<00:47:32.640> mean 00:47:40.870 --> 00:47:40.880 align:start position:0% 00:47:40.880 --> 00:47:42.750 align:start position:0% mhm 00:47:42.750 --> 00:47:42.760 align:start position:0% mhm 00:47:42.760 --> 00:47:46.270 align:start position:0% mhm okay<00:47:43.760> so<00:47:44.680> objective<00:47:45.240> sensitive<00:47:45.720> materials 00:47:46.270 --> 00:47:46.280 align:start position:0% okay so objective sensitive materials 00:47:46.280 --> 00:47:49.670 align:start position:0% okay so objective sensitive materials should<00:47:46.559> that<00:47:46.800> be<00:47:47.200> in<00:47:47.480> quotation<00:47:48.079> marks<00:47:48.760> or 00:47:49.670 --> 00:47:49.680 align:start position:0% should that be in quotation marks or 00:47:49.680 --> 00:47:51.390 align:start position:0% should that be in quotation marks or just 00:47:51.390 --> 00:47:51.400 align:start position:0% just 00:47:51.400 --> 00:47:53.670 align:start position:0% just objective<00:47:52.400> in<00:47:52.640> quotation<00:47:53.040> marks<00:47:53.319> sensitive 00:47:53.670 --> 00:47:53.680 align:start position:0% objective in quotation marks sensitive 00:47:53.680 --> 00:47:55.710 align:start position:0% objective in quotation marks sensitive materials<00:47:54.119> or<00:47:54.520> subjective<00:47:55.079> in<00:47:55.280> quotation 00:47:55.710 --> 00:47:55.720 align:start position:0% materials or subjective in quotation 00:47:55.720 --> 00:47:57.390 align:start position:0% materials or subjective in quotation marks 00:47:57.390 --> 00:47:57.400 align:start position:0% marks 00:47:57.400 --> 00:48:00.109 align:start position:0% marks or<00:47:57.960> or<00:47:58.240> should<00:47:58.599> the<00:47:58.760> whole<00:47:59.119> thing<00:47:59.680> objective 00:48:00.109 --> 00:48:00.119 align:start position:0% or or should the whole thing objective 00:48:00.119 --> 00:48:02.670 align:start position:0% or or should the whole thing objective sensitive<00:48:00.520> materials<00:48:00.960> in<00:48:01.119> quotation 00:48:02.670 --> 00:48:02.680 align:start position:0% sensitive materials in quotation 00:48:02.680 --> 00:48:05.950 align:start position:0% sensitive materials in quotation or<00:48:03.680> subjective<00:48:04.319> sensitive<00:48:04.800> materials<00:48:05.720> so 00:48:05.950 --> 00:48:05.960 align:start position:0% or subjective sensitive materials so 00:48:05.960 --> 00:48:11.069 align:start position:0% or subjective sensitive materials so it's<00:48:06.119> setting<00:48:06.480> them<00:48:07.000> apart<00:48:08.000> a<00:48:08.160> little<00:48:08.400> bit 00:48:11.069 --> 00:48:11.079 align:start position:0% 00:48:11.079 --> 00:48:14.910 align:start position:0% more<00:48:12.079> in<00:48:12.440> the<00:48:13.000> in<00:48:13.200> the<00:48:13.760> um<00:48:13.960> documents<00:48:14.559> from<00:48:14.760> the 00:48:14.910 --> 00:48:14.920 align:start position:0% more in the in the um documents from the 00:48:14.920 --> 00:48:17.670 align:start position:0% more in the in the um documents from the committee<00:48:15.599> like<00:48:15.720> from<00:48:15.920> Mike<00:48:16.200> Curtis<00:48:17.200> he<00:48:17.440> has 00:48:17.670 --> 00:48:17.680 align:start position:0% committee like from Mike Curtis he has 00:48:17.680 --> 00:48:20.549 align:start position:0% committee like from Mike Curtis he has them<00:48:18.000> all<00:48:18.640> all<00:48:18.839> three<00:48:19.119> words<00:48:19.599> like<00:48:19.800> bolded<00:48:20.240> or 00:48:20.549 --> 00:48:20.559 align:start position:0% them all all three words like bolded or 00:48:20.559 --> 00:48:23.230 align:start position:0% them all all three words like bolded or together<00:48:21.119> so<00:48:21.720> maybe<00:48:22.119> being<00:48:22.520> consistent<00:48:23.079> with 00:48:23.230 --> 00:48:23.240 align:start position:0% together so maybe being consistent with 00:48:23.240 --> 00:48:24.910 align:start position:0% together so maybe being consistent with that<00:48:23.400> so<00:48:23.680> objective<00:48:24.079> sensitive<00:48:24.440> materials 00:48:24.910 --> 00:48:24.920 align:start position:0% that so objective sensitive materials 00:48:24.920 --> 00:48:27.349 align:start position:0% that so objective sensitive materials either<00:48:25.119> bolded<00:48:25.559> or<00:48:25.800> quotations<00:48:26.480> either<00:48:26.839> one 00:48:27.349 --> 00:48:27.359 align:start position:0% either bolded or quotations either one 00:48:27.359 --> 00:48:30.870 align:start position:0% either bolded or quotations either one but<00:48:28.359> I've<00:48:28.520> been<00:48:28.760> copying<00:48:29.400> his<00:48:29.960> like 00:48:30.870 --> 00:48:30.880 align:start position:0% but I've been copying his like 00:48:30.880 --> 00:48:33.589 align:start position:0% but I've been copying his like formatting<00:48:31.559> when<00:48:31.800> I've<00:48:32.000> been<00:48:32.160> sharing 00:48:33.589 --> 00:48:33.599 align:start position:0% formatting when I've been sharing 00:48:33.599 --> 00:48:35.750 align:start position:0% formatting when I've been sharing information<00:48:34.599> yeah 00:48:35.750 --> 00:48:35.760 align:start position:0% information yeah 00:48:35.760 --> 00:48:38.349 align:start position:0% information yeah exactly<00:48:36.760> I<00:48:36.839> think<00:48:37.000> that's<00:48:37.280> good<00:48:38.119> I<00:48:38.200> think 00:48:38.349 --> 00:48:38.359 align:start position:0% exactly I think that's good I think 00:48:38.359 --> 00:48:40.430 align:start position:0% exactly I think that's good I think that's<00:48:38.520> a<00:48:38.640> good<00:48:38.800> point<00:48:39.000> Randy<00:48:39.440> thank 00:48:40.430 --> 00:48:40.440 align:start position:0% that's a good point Randy thank 00:48:40.440 --> 00:48:43.069 align:start position:0% that's a good point Randy thank you<00:48:41.440> because<00:48:41.599> we're<00:48:41.760> using<00:48:42.160> that<00:48:42.480> specific 00:48:43.069 --> 00:48:43.079 align:start position:0% you because we're using that specific 00:48:43.079 --> 00:48:45.549 align:start position:0% you because we're using that specific terminology<00:48:43.760> it's<00:48:43.920> not<00:48:44.200> just<00:48:44.880> materials<00:48:45.400> or 00:48:45.549 --> 00:48:45.559 align:start position:0% terminology it's not just materials or 00:48:45.559 --> 00:48:47.430 align:start position:0% terminology it's not just materials or sensitive<00:48:45.960> material<00:48:46.480> right<00:48:46.720> it's<00:48:47.079> the 00:48:47.430 --> 00:48:47.440 align:start position:0% sensitive material right it's the 00:48:47.440 --> 00:48:48.910 align:start position:0% sensitive material right it's the combination<00:48:48.000> that<00:48:48.119> means<00:48:48.480> something 00:48:48.910 --> 00:48:48.920 align:start position:0% combination that means something 00:48:48.920 --> 00:48:52.589 align:start position:0% combination that means something specific<00:48:49.920> so<00:48:50.920> so<00:48:51.200> what<00:48:51.599> what<00:48:51.720> does<00:48:52.040> settings 00:48:52.589 --> 00:48:52.599 align:start position:0% specific so so what what does settings 00:48:52.599 --> 00:48:54.470 align:start position:0% specific so so what what does settings mean<00:48:52.920> in<00:48:53.079> the<00:48:53.240> law<00:48:53.680> are<00:48:53.839> removed<00:48:54.200> from<00:48:54.319> all 00:48:54.470 --> 00:48:54.480 align:start position:0% mean in the law are removed from all 00:48:54.480 --> 00:48:57.430 align:start position:0% mean in the law are removed from all School<00:48:54.720> settings<00:48:55.160> the<00:48:55.400> cafeteria<00:48:56.400> the 00:48:57.430 --> 00:48:57.440 align:start position:0% School settings the cafeteria the 00:48:57.440 --> 00:49:01.710 align:start position:0% School settings the cafeteria the classroom<00:48:58.839> theorum<00:48:59.839> the<00:49:00.440> library<00:49:01.079> the 00:49:01.710 --> 00:49:01.720 align:start position:0% classroom theorum the library the 00:49:01.720 --> 00:49:05.150 align:start position:0% classroom theorum the library the everywhere<00:49:02.200> classroom<00:49:02.799> yep 00:49:05.150 --> 00:49:05.160 align:start position:0% everywhere classroom yep 00:49:05.160 --> 00:49:08.309 align:start position:0% everywhere classroom yep yep<00:49:06.160> even<00:49:06.640> the 00:49:08.309 --> 00:49:08.319 align:start position:0% yep even the 00:49:08.319 --> 00:49:11.750 align:start position:0% yep even the teachers's<00:49:09.319> personal<00:49:09.839> bookshelf<00:49:10.640> or<00:49:11.359> not<00:49:11.599> in 00:49:11.750 --> 00:49:11.760 align:start position:0% teachers's personal bookshelf or not in 00:49:11.760 --> 00:49:12.750 align:start position:0% teachers's personal bookshelf or not in the 00:49:12.750 --> 00:49:12.760 align:start position:0% the 00:49:12.760 --> 00:49:16.589 align:start position:0% the school<00:49:13.760> yeah<00:49:14.319> is<00:49:14.599> that<00:49:15.400> yeah<00:49:15.799> and<00:49:15.960> I<00:49:16.079> can<00:49:16.319> read 00:49:16.589 --> 00:49:16.599 align:start position:0% school yeah is that yeah and I can read 00:49:16.599 --> 00:49:20.069 align:start position:0% school yeah is that yeah and I can read the<00:49:16.760> definition<00:49:17.280> if<00:49:17.400> you'd 00:49:20.069 --> 00:49:20.079 align:start position:0% 00:49:20.079 --> 00:49:23.910 align:start position:0% like<00:49:21.079> yeah<00:49:21.960> go<00:49:22.119> ahead<00:49:23.119> setting<00:49:23.440> is<00:49:23.599> a<00:49:23.720> little 00:49:23.910 --> 00:49:23.920 align:start position:0% like yeah go ahead setting is a little 00:49:23.920 --> 00:49:26.510 align:start position:0% like yeah go ahead setting is a little bit<00:49:24.240> confusing<00:49:24.880> to<00:49:25.040> me<00:49:25.559> school<00:49:25.880> setting<00:49:26.200> means 00:49:26.510 --> 00:49:26.520 align:start position:0% bit confusing to me school setting means 00:49:26.520 --> 00:49:29.470 align:start position:0% bit confusing to me school setting means for<00:49:26.799> a<00:49:26.920> public<00:49:27.200> school<00:49:27.720> in<00:49:27.839> a<00:49:28.119> classroom<00:49:29.119> in<00:49:29.280> a 00:49:29.470 --> 00:49:29.480 align:start position:0% for a public school in a classroom in a 00:49:29.480 --> 00:49:33.750 align:start position:0% for a public school in a classroom in a school<00:49:29.799> library<00:49:30.400> or<00:49:30.760> on<00:49:31.040> school 00:49:33.750 --> 00:49:33.760 align:start position:0% 00:49:33.760 --> 00:49:36.750 align:start position:0% property<00:49:34.760> so<00:49:34.960> do<00:49:35.119> we<00:49:35.240> want<00:49:35.359> to<00:49:35.960> refer<00:49:36.280> to<00:49:36.480> that 00:49:36.750 --> 00:49:36.760 align:start position:0% property so do we want to refer to that 00:49:36.760 --> 00:49:40.990 align:start position:0% property so do we want to refer to that definition<00:49:37.680> or<00:49:38.680> for<00:49:39.040> those<00:49:39.240> of<00:49:39.440> us<00:49:39.680> who<00:49:40.640> aren't 00:49:40.990 --> 00:49:41.000 align:start position:0% definition or for those of us who aren't 00:49:41.000 --> 00:49:44.069 align:start position:0% definition or for those of us who aren't aware<00:49:41.400> that<00:49:41.559> there<00:49:41.760> is<00:49:42.040> that<00:49:42.880> additional 00:49:44.069 --> 00:49:44.079 align:start position:0% aware that there is that additional 00:49:44.079 --> 00:49:45.870 align:start position:0% aware that there is that additional clarification<00:49:45.079> well<00:49:45.240> and<00:49:45.359> it<00:49:45.480> even<00:49:45.680> goes 00:49:45.870 --> 00:49:45.880 align:start position:0% clarification well and it even goes 00:49:45.880 --> 00:49:46.990 align:start position:0% clarification well and it even goes further<00:49:46.160> than<00:49:46.280> that<00:49:46.440> sorry<00:49:46.640> I<00:49:46.720> didn't<00:49:46.880> read 00:49:46.990 --> 00:49:47.000 align:start position:0% further than that sorry I didn't read 00:49:47.000 --> 00:49:49.710 align:start position:0% further than that sorry I didn't read the<00:49:47.119> next<00:49:47.559> part<00:49:48.559> it<00:49:48.720> includes<00:49:49.119> the<00:49:49.280> following 00:49:49.710 --> 00:49:49.720 align:start position:0% the next part it includes the following 00:49:49.720 --> 00:49:51.230 align:start position:0% the next part it includes the following activities<00:49:50.240> that<00:49:50.359> an<00:49:50.520> organization<00:49:51.040> or 00:49:51.230 --> 00:49:51.240 align:start position:0% activities that an organization or 00:49:51.240 --> 00:49:53.349 align:start position:0% activities that an organization or individual<00:49:51.799> or<00:49:52.119> organization<00:49:52.760> outside<00:49:53.119> of<00:49:53.200> a 00:49:53.349 --> 00:49:53.359 align:start position:0% individual or organization outside of a 00:49:53.359 --> 00:49:55.549 align:start position:0% individual or organization outside of a public<00:49:53.599> school<00:49:53.920> conducts<00:49:54.880> if<00:49:55.040> a<00:49:55.280> public 00:49:55.549 --> 00:49:55.559 align:start position:0% public school conducts if a public 00:49:55.559 --> 00:49:57.589 align:start position:0% public school conducts if a public school<00:49:55.880> or<00:49:56.000> an<00:49:56.119> Ela<00:49:56.720> sponsors<00:49:57.040> or<00:49:57.200> requires 00:49:57.589 --> 00:49:57.599 align:start position:0% school or an Ela sponsors or requires 00:49:57.599 --> 00:49:59.950 align:start position:0% school or an Ela sponsors or requires the<00:49:57.760> activity<00:49:58.240> assembly<00:49:58.640> a<00:49:58.760> lecture<00:49:59.160> a<00:49:59.359> live 00:49:59.950 --> 00:49:59.960 align:start position:0% the activity assembly a lecture a live 00:49:59.960 --> 00:50:01.789 align:start position:0% the activity assembly a lecture a live presentation<00:50:00.680> or<00:50:00.920> an 00:50:01.789 --> 00:50:01.799 align:start position:0% presentation or an 00:50:01.799 --> 00:50:05.549 align:start position:0% presentation or an event<00:50:02.799> wow<00:50:03.079> I<00:50:03.160> think<00:50:03.359> that's<00:50:03.640> good<00:50:04.319> stuff<00:50:05.319> so 00:50:05.549 --> 00:50:05.559 align:start position:0% event wow I think that's good stuff so 00:50:05.559 --> 00:50:07.349 align:start position:0% event wow I think that's good stuff so we<00:50:05.720> could<00:50:06.000> have<00:50:06.160> a<00:50:06.400> def<00:50:06.760> I<00:50:06.839> mean<00:50:06.960> we're<00:50:07.119> doing 00:50:07.349 --> 00:50:07.359 align:start position:0% we could have a def I mean we're doing 00:50:07.359 --> 00:50:10.670 align:start position:0% we could have a def I mean we're doing that<00:50:07.480> in<00:50:07.559> the<00:50:07.720> rule<00:50:08.680> but<00:50:08.880> we<00:50:09.240> could<00:50:10.240> I<00:50:10.559> you 00:50:10.670 --> 00:50:10.680 align:start position:0% that in the rule but we could I you 00:50:10.680 --> 00:50:12.789 align:start position:0% that in the rule but we could I you could<00:50:10.920> also<00:50:11.319> say<00:50:11.799> at<00:50:12.040> from<00:50:12.280> all<00:50:12.480> School 00:50:12.789 --> 00:50:12.799 align:start position:0% could also say at from all School 00:50:12.799 --> 00:50:16.789 align:start position:0% could also say at from all School settings<00:50:13.160> as<00:50:13.440> defined<00:50:13.799> in<00:50:14.000> 5310<00:50:14.880> 103<00:50:15.880> okay 00:50:16.789 --> 00:50:16.799 align:start position:0% settings as defined in 5310 103 okay 00:50:16.799 --> 00:50:19.789 align:start position:0% settings as defined in 5310 103 okay yeah<00:50:17.079> I<00:50:17.559> I<00:50:17.720> like 00:50:19.789 --> 00:50:19.799 align:start position:0% yeah I I like 00:50:19.799 --> 00:50:22.910 align:start position:0% yeah I I like that<00:50:20.799> because<00:50:21.000> if<00:50:21.599> there's<00:50:22.599> I<00:50:22.640> mean<00:50:22.760> we're 00:50:22.910 --> 00:50:22.920 align:start position:0% that because if there's I mean we're 00:50:22.920 --> 00:50:24.510 align:start position:0% that because if there's I mean we're just<00:50:23.079> taking<00:50:23.400> the<00:50:23.559> question<00:50:23.920> out<00:50:24.079> of<00:50:24.200> it<00:50:24.400> and 00:50:24.510 --> 00:50:24.520 align:start position:0% just taking the question out of it and 00:50:24.520 --> 00:50:27.750 align:start position:0% just taking the question out of it and it's<00:50:24.720> so<00:50:24.960> straightforward<00:50:25.640> and<00:50:25.839> clear<00:50:27.040> that 00:50:27.750 --> 00:50:27.760 align:start position:0% it's so straightforward and clear that 00:50:27.760 --> 00:50:29.150 align:start position:0% it's so straightforward and clear that we<00:50:28.040> could 00:50:29.150 --> 00:50:29.160 align:start position:0% we could 00:50:29.160 --> 00:50:31.670 align:start position:0% we could potentially<00:50:30.160> really<00:50:30.640> do<00:50:30.880> what<00:50:31.040> we<00:50:31.200> wanted<00:50:31.520> to 00:50:31.670 --> 00:50:31.680 align:start position:0% potentially really do what we wanted to 00:50:31.680 --> 00:50:40.789 align:start position:0% potentially really do what we wanted to do<00:50:31.920> and<00:50:32.040> that<00:50:32.160> would<00:50:32.280> be<00:50:32.520> protect<00:50:33.160> children 00:50:40.789 --> 00:50:40.799 align:start position:0% 00:50:40.799 --> 00:50:44.549 align:start position:0% yeah<00:50:41.799> the<00:50:42.040> time<00:50:42.280> that<00:50:42.440> you<00:50:42.559> have<00:50:42.799> spent 00:50:44.549 --> 00:50:44.559 align:start position:0% yeah the time that you have spent 00:50:44.559 --> 00:50:48.870 align:start position:0% yeah the time that you have spent in<00:50:45.559> making<00:50:46.000> this<00:50:46.400> not<00:50:46.839> so<00:50:47.880> discombobulated 00:50:48.870 --> 00:50:48.880 align:start position:0% in making this not so discombobulated 00:50:48.880 --> 00:50:52.069 align:start position:0% in making this not so discombobulated and<00:50:49.880> going<00:50:50.160> so<00:50:50.319> many<00:50:50.520> different<00:50:50.799> directions 00:50:52.069 --> 00:50:52.079 align:start position:0% and going so many different directions 00:50:52.079 --> 00:50:56.950 align:start position:0% and going so many different directions is<00:50:53.079> greatly<00:50:53.680> appreciated<00:50:54.680> Jenny<00:50:55.400> and<00:50:56.760> worked 00:50:56.950 --> 00:50:56.960 align:start position:0% is greatly appreciated Jenny and worked 00:50:56.960 --> 00:50:58.870 align:start position:0% is greatly appreciated Jenny and worked on<00:50:57.079> it<00:50:57.280> this<00:50:57.400> is<00:50:57.839> yeah<00:50:57.960> and<00:50:58.040> I<00:50:58.240> touch<00:50:58.520> Spas<00:50:58.760> with 00:50:58.870 --> 00:50:58.880 align:start position:0% on it this is yeah and I touch Spas with 00:50:58.880 --> 00:51:03.750 align:start position:0% on it this is yeah and I touch Spas with Emily<00:50:59.160> and<00:50:59.280> Sarah<00:50:59.559> on<00:50:59.680> it<00:50:59.799> too<00:50:59.960> a<00:51:00.040> little<00:51:00.240> bit 00:51:03.750 --> 00:51:03.760 align:start position:0% 00:51:03.760 --> 00:51:07.030 align:start position:0% so<00:51:04.760> end<00:51:04.920> it<00:51:05.000> will<00:51:05.160> be<00:51:05.319> so 00:51:07.030 --> 00:51:07.040 align:start position:0% so end it will be so 00:51:07.040 --> 00:51:10.990 align:start position:0% so end it will be so helpful<00:51:08.200> okay<00:51:09.200> are<00:51:09.480> not<00:51:09.799> happy<00:51:10.280> with<00:51:10.799> what 00:51:10.990 --> 00:51:11.000 align:start position:0% helpful okay are not happy with what 00:51:11.000 --> 00:51:14.069 align:start position:0% helpful okay are not happy with what we've<00:51:11.240> done<00:51:11.520> over<00:51:11.760> the<00:51:12.079> last<00:51:13.079> long<00:51:13.640> period<00:51:13.920> of 00:51:14.069 --> 00:51:14.079 align:start position:0% we've done over the last long period of 00:51:14.079 --> 00:51:16.030 align:start position:0% we've done over the last long period of time<00:51:14.280> they<00:51:14.400> feel<00:51:14.640> that<00:51:14.839> we've<00:51:15.440> been<00:51:15.680> sitting 00:51:16.030 --> 00:51:16.040 align:start position:0% time they feel that we've been sitting 00:51:16.040 --> 00:51:19.150 align:start position:0% time they feel that we've been sitting on<00:51:16.200> the<00:51:16.480> fence<00:51:17.480> this<00:51:17.680> will<00:51:18.359> provide<00:51:18.720> them<00:51:18.960> with 00:51:19.150 --> 00:51:19.160 align:start position:0% on the fence this will provide them with 00:51:19.160 --> 00:51:21.589 align:start position:0% on the fence this will provide them with something<00:51:20.119> very 00:51:21.589 --> 00:51:21.599 align:start position:0% something very 00:51:21.599 --> 00:51:24.990 align:start position:0% something very helpful<00:51:22.599> hope<00:51:22.839> I<00:51:22.960> hope 00:51:24.990 --> 00:51:25.000 align:start position:0% helpful hope I hope 00:51:25.000 --> 00:51:28.030 align:start position:0% helpful hope I hope so<00:51:26.000> okay<00:51:26.319> so<00:51:26.640> shall<00:51:26.960> prioritize<00:51:27.599> protecting 00:51:28.030 --> 00:51:28.040 align:start position:0% so okay so shall prioritize protecting 00:51:28.040 --> 00:51:29.470 align:start position:0% so okay so shall prioritize protecting children<00:51:28.359> from<00:51:28.480> the<00:51:28.599> harmful<00:51:29.040> effects<00:51:29.319> of 00:51:29.470 --> 00:51:29.480 align:start position:0% children from the harmful effects of 00:51:29.480 --> 00:51:31.270 align:start position:0% children from the harmful effects of illicit<00:51:29.960> pornography<00:51:30.720> over<00:51:31.000> other 00:51:31.270 --> 00:51:31.280 align:start position:0% illicit pornography over other 00:51:31.280 --> 00:51:32.710 align:start position:0% illicit pornography over other considerations<00:51:31.920> and<00:51:32.119> evaluating 00:51:32.710 --> 00:51:32.720 align:start position:0% considerations and evaluating 00:51:32.720 --> 00:51:34.109 align:start position:0% considerations and evaluating instructional 00:51:34.109 --> 00:51:34.119 align:start position:0% instructional 00:51:34.119 --> 00:51:36.589 align:start position:0% instructional materials<00:51:35.119> that<00:51:35.520> once<00:51:35.720> again<00:51:36.040> from<00:51:36.160> the<00:51:36.319> law 00:51:36.589 --> 00:51:36.599 align:start position:0% materials that once again from the law 00:51:36.599 --> 00:51:44.710 align:start position:0% materials that once again from the law so<00:51:36.760> that<00:51:36.880> would<00:51:37.040> be 00:51:44.710 --> 00:51:44.720 align:start position:0% 00:51:44.720 --> 00:51:53.309 align:start position:0% highlighted<00:51:45.720> if<00:51:45.880> anybody<00:51:46.200> has<00:51:46.400> anything 00:51:53.309 --> 00:51:53.319 align:start position:0% 00:51:53.319 --> 00:51:56.829 align:start position:0% there<00:51:54.480> okay<00:51:55.480> I'll<00:51:55.839> I'll<00:51:56.040> keep<00:51:56.200> going<00:51:56.640> you<00:51:56.720> guys 00:51:56.829 --> 00:51:56.839 align:start position:0% there okay I'll I'll keep going you guys 00:51:56.839 --> 00:51:59.390 align:start position:0% there okay I'll I'll keep going you guys told<00:51:56.960> me<00:51:57.520> stop<00:51:58.520> and<00:51:58.599> then<00:51:58.760> on<00:51:58.880> the<00:51:59.040> next<00:51:59.240> one 00:51:59.390 --> 00:51:59.400 align:start position:0% told me stop and then on the next one 00:51:59.400 --> 00:52:01.470 align:start position:0% told me stop and then on the next one would<00:51:59.640> need<00:51:59.839> to<00:52:00.559> objective<00:52:01.040> sensitive 00:52:01.470 --> 00:52:01.480 align:start position:0% would need to objective sensitive 00:52:01.480 --> 00:52:03.230 align:start position:0% would need to objective sensitive materials<00:52:01.920> probably<00:52:02.160> needs<00:52:02.359> to<00:52:02.480> be 00:52:03.230 --> 00:52:03.240 align:start position:0% materials probably needs to be 00:52:03.240 --> 00:52:05.870 align:start position:0% materials probably needs to be bolded<00:52:04.240> and<00:52:04.400> that's<00:52:04.720> also<00:52:05.000> from<00:52:05.200> the 00:52:05.870 --> 00:52:05.880 align:start position:0% bolded and that's also from the 00:52:05.880 --> 00:52:15.190 align:start position:0% bolded and that's also from the law<00:52:06.880> as 00:52:15.190 --> 00:52:15.200 align:start position:0% 00:52:15.200 --> 00:52:18.109 align:start position:0% well<00:52:16.200> CL<00:52:16.640> and<00:52:16.760> then<00:52:16.920> the<00:52:17.079> next<00:52:17.319> part<00:52:17.599> I<00:52:17.839> I 00:52:18.109 --> 00:52:18.119 align:start position:0% well CL and then the next part I I 00:52:18.119 --> 00:52:19.630 align:start position:0% well CL and then the next part I I worded<00:52:18.520> this<00:52:18.680> different<00:52:18.960> than<00:52:19.160> law<00:52:19.400> but<00:52:19.480> I 00:52:19.630 --> 00:52:19.640 align:start position:0% worded this different than law but I 00:52:19.640 --> 00:52:22.589 align:start position:0% worded this different than law but I really<00:52:19.839> didn't<00:52:20.240> it<00:52:20.400> just<00:52:21.240> I<00:52:21.400> simplified<00:52:22.000> it 00:52:22.589 --> 00:52:22.599 align:start position:0% really didn't it just I simplified it 00:52:22.599 --> 00:52:24.390 align:start position:0% really didn't it just I simplified it includes<00:52:23.040> employees<00:52:23.520> students<00:52:23.920> parents<00:52:24.240> and 00:52:24.390 --> 00:52:24.400 align:start position:0% includes employees students parents and 00:52:24.400 --> 00:52:26.510 align:start position:0% includes employees students parents and governing<00:52:24.760> board<00:52:25.040> members<00:52:25.559> of<00:52:25.760> the<00:52:25.920> relevant 00:52:26.510 --> 00:52:26.520 align:start position:0% governing board members of the relevant 00:52:26.520 --> 00:52:28.549 align:start position:0% governing board members of the relevant Lea<00:52:27.040> that's<00:52:27.200> the<00:52:27.319> part<00:52:27.480> I<00:52:27.599> added<00:52:27.839> and<00:52:28.240> combine 00:52:28.549 --> 00:52:28.559 align:start position:0% Lea that's the part I added and combine 00:52:28.559 --> 00:52:31.990 align:start position:0% Lea that's the part I added and combine them<00:52:29.200> together<00:52:30.200> as<00:52:30.480> individuals<00:52:31.440> who<00:52:31.720> may 00:52:31.990 --> 00:52:32.000 align:start position:0% them together as individuals who may 00:52:32.000 --> 00:52:34.829 align:start position:0% them together as individuals who may initiate<00:52:32.440> a<00:52:32.599> sensitive<00:52:33.040> material 00:52:34.829 --> 00:52:34.839 align:start position:0% initiate a sensitive material 00:52:34.839 --> 00:52:37.109 align:start position:0% initiate a sensitive material review<00:52:35.839> and<00:52:36.000> that<00:52:36.160> is<00:52:36.280> in<00:52:36.440> the<00:52:36.559> law<00:52:36.760> it<00:52:36.839> spells 00:52:37.109 --> 00:52:37.119 align:start position:0% review and that is in the law it spells 00:52:37.119 --> 00:52:41.430 align:start position:0% review and that is in the law it spells out<00:52:37.319> who<00:52:37.520> can<00:52:38.240> do<00:52:38.480> the 00:52:41.430 --> 00:52:41.440 align:start position:0% 00:52:41.440 --> 00:52:44.670 align:start position:0% review<00:52:42.440> we<00:52:42.559> want<00:52:42.680> to<00:52:43.079> start<00:52:43.440> that<00:52:43.599> out<00:52:43.880> with 00:52:44.670 --> 00:52:44.680 align:start position:0% review we want to start that out with 00:52:44.680 --> 00:52:46.630 align:start position:0% review we want to start that out with individuals<00:52:45.440> who<00:52:45.599> may<00:52:45.799> initiate<00:52:46.160> a<00:52:46.240> sensitive 00:52:46.630 --> 00:52:46.640 align:start position:0% individuals who may initiate a sensitive 00:52:46.640 --> 00:52:50.109 align:start position:0% individuals who may initiate a sensitive materials<00:52:47.040> review<00:52:47.520> include 00:52:50.109 --> 00:52:50.119 align:start position:0% materials review include 00:52:50.119 --> 00:52:52.349 align:start position:0% materials review include employees 00:52:52.349 --> 00:52:52.359 align:start position:0% employees 00:52:52.359 --> 00:52:55.829 align:start position:0% employees sure<00:52:53.359> whatever<00:52:53.760> makes<00:52:53.960> it<00:52:54.119> easiest<00:52:54.599> to<00:52:55.280> to 00:52:55.829 --> 00:52:55.839 align:start position:0% sure whatever makes it easiest to to 00:52:55.839 --> 00:53:04.549 align:start position:0% sure whatever makes it easiest to to understand 00:53:04.549 --> 00:53:04.559 align:start position:0% 00:53:04.559 --> 00:53:08.390 align:start position:0% there<00:53:04.720> was<00:53:05.480> on<00:53:05.720> number<00:53:06.079> two 00:53:08.390 --> 00:53:08.400 align:start position:0% there was on number two 00:53:08.400 --> 00:53:09.990 align:start position:0% there was on number two I 00:53:09.990 --> 00:53:10.000 align:start position:0% I 00:53:10.000 --> 00:53:13.190 align:start position:0% I the<00:53:11.000> sensitive 00:53:13.190 --> 00:53:13.200 align:start position:0% the sensitive 00:53:13.200 --> 00:53:18.109 align:start position:0% the sensitive materials<00:53:14.200> should<00:53:14.520> that<00:53:14.760> be<00:53:15.119> like<00:53:15.359> number<00:53:16.079> one 00:53:18.109 --> 00:53:18.119 align:start position:0% materials should that be like number one 00:53:18.119 --> 00:53:22.230 align:start position:0% materials should that be like number one uh<00:53:19.119> or<00:53:19.359> should<00:53:19.599> that<00:53:19.799> be<00:53:19.960> a<00:53:20.200> subset<00:53:21.240> of 00:53:22.230 --> 00:53:22.240 align:start position:0% uh or should that be a subset of 00:53:22.240 --> 00:53:25.950 align:start position:0% uh or should that be a subset of instructional<00:53:23.599> materials<00:53:24.599> it<00:53:24.960> it<00:53:25.240> seems<00:53:25.760> like 00:53:25.950 --> 00:53:25.960 align:start position:0% instructional materials it it seems like 00:53:25.960 --> 00:53:28.589 align:start position:0% instructional materials it it seems like it's<00:53:26.119> just<00:53:26.280> a 00:53:28.589 --> 00:53:28.599 align:start position:0% 00:53:28.599 --> 00:53:30.109 align:start position:0% clarification 00:53:30.109 --> 00:53:30.119 align:start position:0% clarification 00:53:30.119 --> 00:53:33.349 align:start position:0% clarification that<00:53:31.119> I'm<00:53:31.240> not<00:53:31.440> sure<00:53:31.760> it<00:53:32.000> comes<00:53:32.359> off<00:53:32.599> of 00:53:33.349 --> 00:53:33.359 align:start position:0% that I'm not sure it comes off of 00:53:33.359 --> 00:53:36.030 align:start position:0% that I'm not sure it comes off of sensitive 00:53:36.030 --> 00:53:36.040 align:start position:0% 00:53:36.040 --> 00:53:38.990 align:start position:0% materials<00:53:37.040> which<00:53:37.280> is<00:53:37.799> the<00:53:38.359> number<00:53:38.680> three 00:53:38.990 --> 00:53:39.000 align:start position:0% materials which is the number three 00:53:39.000 --> 00:53:43.109 align:start position:0% materials which is the number three heading<00:53:39.440> up 00:53:43.109 --> 00:53:43.119 align:start position:0% 00:53:43.119 --> 00:53:46.270 align:start position:0% there<00:53:44.119> uh<00:53:45.000> I<00:53:45.200> I<00:53:45.280> see<00:53:45.520> what<00:53:45.599> you're<00:53:45.799> saying 00:53:46.270 --> 00:53:46.280 align:start position:0% there uh I I see what you're saying 00:53:46.280 --> 00:53:48.150 align:start position:0% there uh I I see what you're saying because<00:53:46.440> you're<00:53:46.559> saying<00:53:46.799> number<00:53:47.040> two<00:53:47.280> may 00:53:48.150 --> 00:53:48.160 align:start position:0% because you're saying number two may 00:53:48.160 --> 00:53:51.190 align:start position:0% because you're saying number two may not<00:53:49.160> should<00:53:49.440> number<00:53:49.680> two<00:53:49.960> be<00:53:50.119> a<00:53:50.480> subset<00:53:51.000> of 00:53:51.190 --> 00:53:51.200 align:start position:0% not should number two be a subset of 00:53:51.200 --> 00:53:54.510 align:start position:0% not should number two be a subset of number<00:53:51.520> one<00:53:52.240> because<00:53:52.559> that's<00:53:52.839> dealing<00:53:53.520> with 00:53:54.510 --> 00:53:54.520 align:start position:0% number one because that's dealing with 00:53:54.520 --> 00:53:57.870 align:start position:0% number one because that's dealing with instructional<00:53:55.160> materials 00:53:57.870 --> 00:53:57.880 align:start position:0% instructional materials 00:53:57.880 --> 00:54:00.630 align:start position:0% instructional materials and<00:53:58.480> then<00:53:58.640> as<00:53:58.760> we<00:53:58.920> go<00:53:59.040> on<00:53:59.200> four<00:53:59.599> five<00:53:59.880> six<00:54:00.200> seven 00:54:00.630 --> 00:54:00.640 align:start position:0% and then as we go on four five six seven 00:54:00.640 --> 00:54:01.630 align:start position:0% and then as we go on four five six seven it's 00:54:01.630 --> 00:54:01.640 align:start position:0% it's 00:54:01.640 --> 00:54:04.750 align:start position:0% it's not<00:54:02.640> as<00:54:02.880> much<00:54:03.520> instructional<00:54:04.079> material<00:54:04.520> so 00:54:04.750 --> 00:54:04.760 align:start position:0% not as much instructional material so 00:54:04.760 --> 00:54:06.670 align:start position:0% not as much instructional material so under<00:54:05.079> the<00:54:05.359> instructional<00:54:06.040> or<00:54:06.240> should<00:54:06.480> that 00:54:06.670 --> 00:54:06.680 align:start position:0% under the instructional or should that 00:54:06.680 --> 00:54:08.990 align:start position:0% under the instructional or should that can<00:54:06.799> be<00:54:07.240> combined<00:54:07.799> in<00:54:08.000> some<00:54:08.240> way 00:54:08.990 --> 00:54:09.000 align:start position:0% can be combined in some way 00:54:09.000 --> 00:54:12.150 align:start position:0% can be combined in some way instructional 00:54:12.150 --> 00:54:12.160 align:start position:0% 00:54:12.160 --> 00:54:15.230 align:start position:0% materials<00:54:13.640> determine<00:54:14.640> I<00:54:14.720> think<00:54:14.880> these<00:54:15.040> were 00:54:15.230 --> 00:54:15.240 align:start position:0% materials determine I think these were 00:54:15.240 --> 00:54:17.950 align:start position:0% materials determine I think these were just<00:54:15.440> intended<00:54:15.839> to<00:54:16.000> be<00:54:16.359> the<00:54:16.559> key<00:54:16.880> components 00:54:17.950 --> 00:54:17.960 align:start position:0% just intended to be the key components 00:54:17.960 --> 00:54:21.589 align:start position:0% just intended to be the key components that<00:54:18.960> they<00:54:19.240> added<00:54:19.559> to<00:54:19.760> the<00:54:20.079> law<00:54:21.079> so<00:54:21.400> if<00:54:21.520> you 00:54:21.589 --> 00:54:21.599 align:start position:0% that they added to the law so if you 00:54:21.599 --> 00:54:22.910 align:start position:0% that they added to the law so if you wanted<00:54:21.880> to<00:54:22.200> I<00:54:22.280> guess<00:54:22.440> if<00:54:22.520> you<00:54:22.599> wanted<00:54:22.799> to 00:54:22.910 --> 00:54:22.920 align:start position:0% wanted to I guess if you wanted to 00:54:22.920 --> 00:54:25.950 align:start position:0% wanted to I guess if you wanted to structure<00:54:23.240> them<00:54:23.440> somehow<00:54:24.119> that<00:54:24.280> could<00:54:24.960> happen 00:54:25.950 --> 00:54:25.960 align:start position:0% structure them somehow that could happen 00:54:25.960 --> 00:54:27.630 align:start position:0% structure them somehow that could happen um 00:54:27.630 --> 00:54:27.640 align:start position:0% um 00:54:27.640 --> 00:54:29.150 align:start position:0% um kind<00:54:27.799> of<00:54:28.000> independent<00:54:28.599> thought<00:54:28.839> I<00:54:28.960> guess 00:54:29.150 --> 00:54:29.160 align:start position:0% kind of independent thought I guess 00:54:29.160 --> 00:54:31.230 align:start position:0% kind of independent thought I guess number<00:54:29.480> four<00:54:30.000> is 00:54:31.230 --> 00:54:31.240 align:start position:0% number four is 00:54:31.240 --> 00:54:35.950 align:start position:0% number four is also<00:54:32.240> instructional<00:54:33.400> material<00:54:34.400> but<00:54:34.559> number 00:54:35.950 --> 00:54:35.960 align:start position:0% also instructional material but number 00:54:35.960 --> 00:54:38.630 align:start position:0% also instructional material but number three<00:54:36.960> refers<00:54:37.440> to<00:54:37.680> maybe<00:54:37.960> more<00:54:38.200> than<00:54:38.400> just 00:54:38.630 --> 00:54:38.640 align:start position:0% three refers to maybe more than just 00:54:38.640 --> 00:54:41.150 align:start position:0% three refers to maybe more than just instructional<00:54:39.240> material<00:54:39.880> or<00:54:40.760> I<00:54:40.839> mean<00:54:41.000> it 00:54:41.150 --> 00:54:41.160 align:start position:0% instructional material or I mean it 00:54:41.160 --> 00:54:42.990 align:start position:0% instructional material or I mean it could<00:54:41.359> be<00:54:42.079> just<00:54:42.359> a<00:54:42.480> book<00:54:42.640> that's<00:54:42.799> on<00:54:42.880> the 00:54:42.990 --> 00:54:43.000 align:start position:0% could be just a book that's on the 00:54:43.000 --> 00:54:46.510 align:start position:0% could be just a book that's on the library<00:54:43.359> shelf<00:54:43.760> or<00:54:44.559> whatever<00:54:45.559> so<00:54:45.960> I<00:54:46.240> I<00:54:46.359> was 00:54:46.510 --> 00:54:46.520 align:start position:0% library shelf or whatever so I I was 00:54:46.520 --> 00:54:48.589 align:start position:0% library shelf or whatever so I I was just<00:54:46.839> wanting<00:54:47.280> to<00:54:47.640> since<00:54:47.880> you<00:54:48.040> started<00:54:48.400> out 00:54:48.589 --> 00:54:48.599 align:start position:0% just wanting to since you started out 00:54:48.599 --> 00:54:51.870 align:start position:0% just wanting to since you started out with<00:54:48.760> instructional<00:54:49.520> materials<00:54:50.520> that<00:54:50.880> are 00:54:51.870 --> 00:54:51.880 align:start position:0% with instructional materials that are 00:54:51.880 --> 00:54:54.030 align:start position:0% with instructional materials that are either<00:54:52.200> objective<00:54:52.599> or<00:54:52.799> subjective<00:54:53.280> are 00:54:54.030 --> 00:54:54.040 align:start position:0% either objective or subjective are 00:54:54.040 --> 00:54:57.150 align:start position:0% either objective or subjective are removed<00:54:55.040> and<00:54:56.440> these<00:54:56.599> instructional 00:54:57.150 --> 00:54:57.160 align:start position:0% removed and these instructional 00:54:57.160 --> 00:54:59.829 align:start position:0% removed and these instructional materials<00:54:58.000> may<00:54:58.240> not<00:54:58.440> be<00:54:58.720> exclusively<00:54:59.359> Library 00:54:59.829 --> 00:54:59.839 align:start position:0% materials may not be exclusively Library 00:54:59.839 --> 00:55:03.870 align:start position:0% materials may not be exclusively Library materials<00:55:00.319> they<00:55:00.440> could<00:55:00.599> be<00:55:00.920> anywhere 00:55:03.870 --> 00:55:03.880 align:start position:0% materials they could be anywhere 00:55:03.880 --> 00:55:07.829 align:start position:0% materials they could be anywhere and<00:55:04.880> if<00:55:05.880> it<00:55:06.400> constitutes<00:55:07.400> objective 00:55:07.829 --> 00:55:07.839 align:start position:0% and if it constitutes objective 00:55:07.839 --> 00:55:10.589 align:start position:0% and if it constitutes objective sensitive<00:55:08.280> material<00:55:08.599> no<00:55:08.760> further<00:55:09.040> review<00:55:09.359> is 00:55:10.589 --> 00:55:10.599 align:start position:0% sensitive material no further review is 00:55:10.599 --> 00:55:14.230 align:start position:0% sensitive material no further review is necessary<00:55:11.680> um<00:55:12.680> so<00:55:12.920> then<00:55:13.079> there's<00:55:13.799> those<00:55:14.000> are 00:55:14.230 --> 00:55:14.240 align:start position:0% necessary um so then there's those are 00:55:14.240 --> 00:55:15.750 align:start position:0% necessary um so then there's those are instructional<00:55:14.960> then<00:55:15.079> we're<00:55:15.240> ready<00:55:15.400> to<00:55:15.559> move 00:55:15.750 --> 00:55:15.760 align:start position:0% instructional then we're ready to move 00:55:15.760 --> 00:55:16.589 align:start position:0% instructional then we're ready to move on 00:55:16.589 --> 00:55:16.599 align:start position:0% on 00:55:16.599 --> 00:55:22.069 align:start position:0% on to<00:55:17.599> uh<00:55:18.119> the<00:55:18.280> number 00:55:22.069 --> 00:55:22.079 align:start position:0% 00:55:22.079 --> 00:55:24.549 align:start position:0% three<00:55:23.079> which 00:55:24.549 --> 00:55:24.559 align:start position:0% three which 00:55:24.559 --> 00:55:27.190 align:start position:0% three which generally<00:55:25.559> that<00:55:25.760> would<00:55:26.359> refer<00:55:26.680> to<00:55:26.839> not<00:55:27.000> just 00:55:27.190 --> 00:55:27.200 align:start position:0% generally that would refer to not just 00:55:27.200 --> 00:55:31.029 align:start position:0% generally that would refer to not just instructional<00:55:28.079> but<00:55:29.079> just<00:55:29.680> regular<00:55:30.559> whatever 00:55:31.029 --> 00:55:31.039 align:start position:0% instructional but just regular whatever 00:55:31.039 --> 00:55:34.430 align:start position:0% instructional but just regular whatever magazines<00:55:31.640> on<00:55:31.760> the<00:55:31.920> library<00:55:32.319> shelf<00:55:32.839> or<00:55:33.839> videos 00:55:34.430 --> 00:55:34.440 align:start position:0% magazines on the library shelf or videos 00:55:34.440 --> 00:55:37.670 align:start position:0% magazines on the library shelf or videos or<00:55:35.280> you<00:55:35.400> know<00:55:35.760> whatever<00:55:36.319> kinds<00:55:36.520> of<00:55:36.720> things 00:55:37.670 --> 00:55:37.680 align:start position:0% or you know whatever kinds of things 00:55:37.680 --> 00:55:39.190 align:start position:0% or you know whatever kinds of things that<00:55:37.839> may<00:55:38.000> not<00:55:38.160> be 00:55:39.190 --> 00:55:39.200 align:start position:0% that may not be 00:55:39.200 --> 00:55:41.109 align:start position:0% that may not be instruction<00:55:40.200> you<00:55:40.280> could<00:55:40.440> change<00:55:40.720> the<00:55:40.880> heading 00:55:41.109 --> 00:55:41.119 align:start position:0% instruction you could change the heading 00:55:41.119 --> 00:55:43.069 align:start position:0% instruction you could change the heading to<00:55:41.319> sensitive<00:55:41.839> instructional<00:55:42.480> materials<00:55:42.960> and 00:55:43.069 --> 00:55:43.079 align:start position:0% to sensitive instructional materials and 00:55:43.079 --> 00:55:44.510 align:start position:0% to sensitive instructional materials and then<00:55:43.200> it<00:55:43.359> includes<00:55:43.839> both<00:55:44.000> of<00:55:44.160> them<00:55:44.319> and<00:55:44.440> you 00:55:44.510 --> 00:55:44.520 align:start position:0% then it includes both of them and you 00:55:44.520 --> 00:55:45.589 align:start position:0% then it includes both of them and you don't<00:55:44.760> have 00:55:45.589 --> 00:55:45.599 align:start position:0% don't have 00:55:45.599 --> 00:55:48.470 align:start position:0% don't have that<00:55:46.599> dilemma<00:55:47.119> with<00:55:47.520> it<00:55:47.640> doesn't<00:55:47.960> fit<00:55:48.160> under 00:55:48.470 --> 00:55:48.480 align:start position:0% that dilemma with it doesn't fit under 00:55:48.480 --> 00:55:51.309 align:start position:0% that dilemma with it doesn't fit under sensitive 00:55:51.309 --> 00:55:51.319 align:start position:0% 00:55:51.319 --> 00:55:53.589 align:start position:0% materials<00:55:52.319> so<00:55:52.559> then<00:55:52.680> your<00:55:52.839> heading<00:55:53.160> covers 00:55:53.589 --> 00:55:53.599 align:start position:0% materials so then your heading covers 00:55:53.599 --> 00:55:55.190 align:start position:0% materials so then your heading covers both<00:55:53.920> instructional<00:55:54.520> materials<00:55:54.960> and 00:55:55.190 --> 00:55:55.200 align:start position:0% both instructional materials and 00:55:55.200 --> 00:55:56.990 align:start position:0% both instructional materials and sensitive<00:55:55.680> materials 00:55:56.990 --> 00:55:57.000 align:start position:0% sensitive materials 00:55:57.000 --> 00:55:59.190 align:start position:0% sensitive materials that's<00:55:57.200> the<00:55:57.400> title<00:55:57.680> of<00:55:57.799> the<00:55:57.960> law<00:55:58.559> anyway<00:55:59.000> is 00:55:59.190 --> 00:55:59.200 align:start position:0% that's the title of the law anyway is 00:55:59.200 --> 00:56:01.950 align:start position:0% that's the title of the law anyway is sensitive<00:55:59.680> instructional<00:56:00.640> materials<00:56:01.640> oh 00:56:01.950 --> 00:56:01.960 align:start position:0% sensitive instructional materials oh 00:56:01.960 --> 00:56:06.109 align:start position:0% sensitive instructional materials oh okay<00:56:02.960> okay<00:56:03.720> so<00:56:04.000> is<00:56:04.280> there<00:56:04.480> some<00:56:04.799> place<00:56:05.760> in<00:56:05.920> the 00:56:06.109 --> 00:56:06.119 align:start position:0% okay okay so is there some place in the 00:56:06.119 --> 00:56:09.589 align:start position:0% okay okay so is there some place in the law<00:56:06.520> that<00:56:06.839> just<00:56:07.079> deals<00:56:08.079> with<00:56:09.079> sensitive 00:56:09.589 --> 00:56:09.599 align:start position:0% law that just deals with sensitive 00:56:09.599 --> 00:56:12.789 align:start position:0% law that just deals with sensitive materials<00:56:10.079> that<00:56:10.240> may<00:56:10.440> not<00:56:10.640> be<00:56:10.799> used<00:56:11.119> in 00:56:12.789 --> 00:56:12.799 align:start position:0% materials that may not be used in 00:56:12.799 --> 00:56:16.190 align:start position:0% materials that may not be used in instruction<00:56:13.799> that<00:56:14.000> somehow<00:56:14.480> find<00:56:14.839> their<00:56:15.079> way 00:56:16.190 --> 00:56:16.200 align:start position:0% instruction that somehow find their way 00:56:16.200 --> 00:56:19.069 align:start position:0% instruction that somehow find their way into<00:56:17.200> some<00:56:17.559> setting<00:56:18.039> no<00:56:18.200> they<00:56:18.319> shouldn't<00:56:18.680> be 00:56:19.069 --> 00:56:19.079 align:start position:0% into some setting no they shouldn't be 00:56:19.079 --> 00:56:20.349 align:start position:0% into some setting no they shouldn't be they<00:56:19.200> shouldn't<00:56:19.440> be<00:56:19.559> in<00:56:19.640> the<00:56:19.760> school<00:56:19.960> setting 00:56:20.349 --> 00:56:20.359 align:start position:0% they shouldn't be in the school setting 00:56:20.359 --> 00:56:22.190 align:start position:0% they shouldn't be in the school setting at<00:56:20.520> all<00:56:21.039> if<00:56:21.200> they're 00:56:22.190 --> 00:56:22.200 align:start position:0% at all if they're 00:56:22.200 --> 00:56:26.829 align:start position:0% at all if they're sensitive<00:56:23.599> yeah<00:56:24.599> I<00:56:24.760> agree<00:56:25.680> so<00:56:26.400> but<00:56:26.520> they<00:56:26.680> may 00:56:26.829 --> 00:56:26.839 align:start position:0% sensitive yeah I agree so but they may 00:56:26.839 --> 00:56:29.190 align:start position:0% sensitive yeah I agree so but they may not<00:56:27.039> be<00:56:27.240> instructional<00:56:28.079> they<00:56:28.240> may<00:56:28.480> have<00:56:28.760> found 00:56:29.190 --> 00:56:29.200 align:start position:0% not be instructional they may have found 00:56:29.200 --> 00:56:32.309 align:start position:0% not be instructional they may have found their<00:56:29.440> way<00:56:29.760> into<00:56:30.440> some<00:56:30.839> you<00:56:31.319> know 00:56:32.309 --> 00:56:32.319 align:start position:0% their way into some you know 00:56:32.319 --> 00:56:34.470 align:start position:0% their way into some you know instructional<00:56:32.880> material<00:56:33.280> is<00:56:33.520> very<00:56:33.799> broad<00:56:34.359> it 00:56:34.470 --> 00:56:34.480 align:start position:0% instructional material is very broad it 00:56:34.480 --> 00:56:36.230 align:start position:0% instructional material is very broad it includes<00:56:34.880> reading<00:56:35.200> materials<00:56:35.720> handouts 00:56:36.230 --> 00:56:36.240 align:start position:0% includes reading materials handouts 00:56:36.240 --> 00:56:38.589 align:start position:0% includes reading materials handouts videos<00:56:36.680> digital<00:56:37.039> materials<00:56:37.559> websites<00:56:38.160> online 00:56:38.589 --> 00:56:38.599 align:start position:0% videos digital materials websites online 00:56:38.599 --> 00:56:41.309 align:start position:0% videos digital materials websites online applications<00:56:39.200> and<00:56:39.440> live<00:56:40.200> presentations<00:56:41.200> it 00:56:41.309 --> 00:56:41.319 align:start position:0% applications and live presentations it 00:56:41.319 --> 00:56:43.710 align:start position:0% applications and live presentations it goes<00:56:41.520> on<00:56:41.760> and<00:56:42.400> makes<00:56:42.599> it<00:56:42.880> very<00:56:43.160> broad<00:56:43.520> to 00:56:43.710 --> 00:56:43.720 align:start position:0% goes on and makes it very broad to 00:56:43.720 --> 00:56:45.470 align:start position:0% goes on and makes it very broad to include<00:56:44.200> everything<00:56:44.599> that<00:56:44.760> could<00:56:44.920> be<00:56:45.039> in 00:56:45.470 --> 00:56:45.480 align:start position:0% include everything that could be in 00:56:45.480 --> 00:56:48.829 align:start position:0% include everything that could be in there<00:56:46.480> and<00:56:46.640> I<00:56:46.760> think<00:56:47.440> Randy<00:56:48.039> the<00:56:48.319> the<00:56:48.720> the 00:56:48.829 --> 00:56:48.839 align:start position:0% there and I think Randy the the the 00:56:48.839 --> 00:56:51.470 align:start position:0% there and I think Randy the the the point<00:56:49.039> in<00:56:49.200> putting<00:56:49.480> it<00:56:49.799> the<00:56:50.280> top<00:56:50.559> piece<00:56:50.960> in<00:56:51.319> and 00:56:51.470 --> 00:56:51.480 align:start position:0% point in putting it the top piece in and 00:56:51.480 --> 00:56:53.309 align:start position:0% point in putting it the top piece in and not<00:56:51.680> just<00:56:51.839> starting<00:56:52.359> here<00:56:52.760> putting<00:56:53.000> that<00:56:53.160> one 00:56:53.309 --> 00:56:53.319 align:start position:0% not just starting here putting that one 00:56:53.319 --> 00:56:56.630 align:start position:0% not just starting here putting that one and<00:56:53.480> two<00:56:53.799> in<00:56:54.720> is<00:56:54.880> to<00:56:55.079> say<00:56:55.480> look<00:56:55.960> you<00:56:56.359> you<00:56:56.440> bear 00:56:56.630 --> 00:56:56.640 align:start position:0% and two in is to say look you you bear 00:56:56.640 --> 00:56:58.630 align:start position:0% and two in is to say look you you bear the<00:56:56.799> responsibility<00:56:57.520> here<00:56:57.760> here's<00:56:57.960> your 00:56:58.630 --> 00:56:58.640 align:start position:0% the responsibility here here's your 00:56:58.640 --> 00:57:00.750 align:start position:0% the responsibility here here's your protections<00:56:59.400> now<00:56:59.640> if<00:56:59.760> we<00:56:59.920> have<00:57:00.039> a<00:57:00.400> you<00:57:00.480> know 00:57:00.750 --> 00:57:00.760 align:start position:0% protections now if we have a you know 00:57:00.760 --> 00:57:01.910 align:start position:0% protections now if we have a you know something<00:57:01.039> that<00:57:01.200> does<00:57:01.359> make<00:57:01.559> it<00:57:01.680> through 00:57:01.910 --> 00:57:01.920 align:start position:0% something that does make it through 00:57:01.920 --> 00:57:08.470 align:start position:0% something that does make it through here's<00:57:02.160> how<00:57:02.359> we<00:57:03.160> work<00:57:03.440> with<00:57:03.599> it 00:57:08.470 --> 00:57:08.480 align:start position:0% 00:57:08.480 --> 00:57:11.109 align:start position:0% right<00:57:09.480> you<00:57:09.599> know<00:57:09.839> I<00:57:09.960> would<00:57:10.280> I<00:57:10.359> would<00:57:10.640> just 00:57:11.109 --> 00:57:11.119 align:start position:0% right you know I would I would just 00:57:11.119 --> 00:57:14.230 align:start position:0% right you know I would I would just think<00:57:11.640> you<00:57:11.799> know<00:57:12.640> I'll<00:57:12.839> just<00:57:13.079> say<00:57:13.359> it<00:57:13.720> and<00:57:14.039> and 00:57:14.230 --> 00:57:14.240 align:start position:0% think you know I'll just say it and and 00:57:14.240 --> 00:57:17.309 align:start position:0% think you know I'll just say it and and if<00:57:14.599> it<00:57:15.000> nobody<00:57:15.400> else<00:57:15.720> is<00:57:16.240> with<00:57:16.400> me<00:57:16.839> I'm<00:57:17.039> fine 00:57:17.309 --> 00:57:17.319 align:start position:0% if it nobody else is with me I'm fine 00:57:17.319 --> 00:57:18.990 align:start position:0% if it nobody else is with me I'm fine with<00:57:17.480> that<00:57:17.960> I'm<00:57:18.039> just<00:57:18.160> wondering<00:57:18.520> should 00:57:18.990 --> 00:57:19.000 align:start position:0% with that I'm just wondering should 00:57:19.000 --> 00:57:21.349 align:start position:0% with that I'm just wondering should number<00:57:19.319> three<00:57:19.599> be<00:57:19.799> number 00:57:21.349 --> 00:57:21.359 align:start position:0% number three be number 00:57:21.359 --> 00:57:24.510 align:start position:0% number three be number one<00:57:22.359> so<00:57:22.640> that<00:57:23.240> we've<00:57:23.440> said<00:57:23.760> this<00:57:23.880> is<00:57:24.079> the<00:57:24.319> the 00:57:24.510 --> 00:57:24.520 align:start position:0% one so that we've said this is the the 00:57:24.520 --> 00:57:27.470 align:start position:0% one so that we've said this is the the priority<00:57:25.520> in<00:57:25.720> all<00:57:25.880> of<00:57:26.039> this<00:57:26.480> is<00:57:26.799> protecting 00:57:27.470 --> 00:57:27.480 align:start position:0% priority in all of this is protecting 00:57:27.480 --> 00:57:30.430 align:start position:0% priority in all of this is protecting children<00:57:28.480> no<00:57:28.720> matter<00:57:29.240> how<00:57:29.480> else<00:57:29.920> you're 00:57:30.430 --> 00:57:30.440 align:start position:0% children no matter how else you're 00:57:30.440 --> 00:57:32.150 align:start position:0% children no matter how else you're evaluating<00:57:30.920> you're<00:57:31.079> saying<00:57:31.400> but<00:57:31.640> this<00:57:31.760> is<00:57:31.880> a 00:57:32.150 --> 00:57:32.160 align:start position:0% evaluating you're saying but this is a 00:57:32.160 --> 00:57:35.150 align:start position:0% evaluating you're saying but this is a critical<00:57:32.599> part<00:57:32.839> of<00:57:33.680> the<00:57:33.880> body<00:57:34.280> of<00:57:34.559> literature 00:57:35.150 --> 00:57:35.160 align:start position:0% critical part of the body of literature 00:57:35.160 --> 00:57:37.630 align:start position:0% critical part of the body of literature of<00:57:35.359> the<00:57:35.680> 21st 00:57:37.630 --> 00:57:37.640 align:start position:0% of the 21st 00:57:37.640 --> 00:57:40.029 align:start position:0% of the 21st century<00:57:38.640> you<00:57:38.799> know<00:57:39.119> whatever<00:57:39.480> somebody<00:57:39.839> might 00:57:40.029 --> 00:57:40.039 align:start position:0% century you know whatever somebody might 00:57:40.039 --> 00:57:43.069 align:start position:0% century you know whatever somebody might say<00:57:40.920> uh<00:57:41.680> the<00:57:41.880> priority<00:57:42.480> you're<00:57:42.640> talking<00:57:42.960> the 00:57:43.069 --> 00:57:43.079 align:start position:0% say uh the priority you're talking the 00:57:43.079 --> 00:57:46.910 align:start position:0% say uh the priority you're talking the order<00:57:43.440> of<00:57:43.559> it<00:57:44.079> is<00:57:44.480> order<00:57:45.039> exactly<00:57:45.599> okay<00:57:46.599> so 00:57:46.910 --> 00:57:46.920 align:start position:0% order of it is order exactly okay so 00:57:46.920 --> 00:57:51.510 align:start position:0% order of it is order exactly okay so then<00:57:48.119> the<00:57:49.119> one<00:57:49.520> two<00:57:49.799> and<00:57:50.000> four<00:57:51.000> that<00:57:51.119> are<00:57:51.319> all 00:57:51.510 --> 00:57:51.520 align:start position:0% then the one two and four that are all 00:57:51.520 --> 00:57:53.990 align:start position:0% then the one two and four that are all referring<00:57:51.920> to<00:57:52.119> instructional<00:57:52.680> materials<00:57:53.520> are 00:57:53.990 --> 00:57:54.000 align:start position:0% referring to instructional materials are 00:57:54.000 --> 00:57:56.829 align:start position:0% referring to instructional materials are all<00:57:55.000> also<00:57:55.640> it<00:57:55.799> just<00:57:56.200> seems<00:57:56.400> like<00:57:56.559> we've<00:57:56.720> kind 00:57:56.829 --> 00:57:56.839 align:start position:0% all also it just seems like we've kind 00:57:56.839 --> 00:58:01.069 align:start position:0% all also it just seems like we've kind of<00:57:57.359> inserted<00:57:58.359> that<00:57:59.319> priority<00:58:00.319> sentence<00:58:00.760> so<00:58:00.920> if 00:58:01.069 --> 00:58:01.079 align:start position:0% of inserted that priority sentence so if 00:58:01.079 --> 00:58:02.390 align:start position:0% of inserted that priority sentence so if it's<00:58:01.280> up<00:58:01.400> there<00:58:01.520> at<00:58:01.640> the 00:58:02.390 --> 00:58:02.400 align:start position:0% it's up there at the 00:58:02.400 --> 00:58:06.349 align:start position:0% it's up there at the top<00:58:03.400> uh<00:58:04.000> this<00:58:04.960> we've<00:58:05.240> stated<00:58:05.880> what's 00:58:06.349 --> 00:58:06.359 align:start position:0% top uh this we've stated what's 00:58:06.359 --> 00:58:11.589 align:start position:0% top uh this we've stated what's important<00:58:07.359> what's<00:58:07.680> critical<00:58:08.119> to<00:58:08.319> the<00:58:08.480> law<00:58:08.960> and 00:58:11.589 --> 00:58:11.599 align:start position:0% 00:58:11.599 --> 00:58:13.710 align:start position:0% to 00:58:13.710 --> 00:58:13.720 align:start position:0% to 00:58:13.720 --> 00:58:17.430 align:start position:0% to good<00:58:14.720> well-meaning<00:58:15.240> parents<00:58:16.079> and<00:58:16.839> leaders 00:58:17.430 --> 00:58:17.440 align:start position:0% good well-meaning parents and leaders 00:58:17.440 --> 00:58:19.549 align:start position:0% good well-meaning parents and leaders who<00:58:17.640> want<00:58:17.799> to<00:58:18.079> just<00:58:18.799> that<00:58:19.000> this<00:58:19.079> is<00:58:19.280> why<00:58:19.400> we're 00:58:19.549 --> 00:58:19.559 align:start position:0% who want to just that this is why we're 00:58:19.559 --> 00:58:22.670 align:start position:0% who want to just that this is why we're doing<00:58:19.799> all<00:58:20.000> this<00:58:20.520> is<00:58:20.680> to<00:58:20.839> protect<00:58:21.440> kids<00:58:22.440> rather 00:58:22.670 --> 00:58:22.680 align:start position:0% doing all this is to protect kids rather 00:58:22.680 --> 00:58:24.069 align:start position:0% doing all this is to protect kids rather than<00:58:22.880> just<00:58:23.079> inserting<00:58:23.480> it<00:58:23.599> in<00:58:23.720> the<00:58:23.799> middle 00:58:24.069 --> 00:58:24.079 align:start position:0% than just inserting it in the middle 00:58:24.079 --> 00:58:27.349 align:start position:0% than just inserting it in the middle someplace<00:58:24.599> and<00:58:24.799> then<00:58:25.240> go<00:58:25.400> ahead<00:58:26.240> with<00:58:26.680> two 00:58:27.349 --> 00:58:27.359 align:start position:0% someplace and then go ahead with two 00:58:27.359 --> 00:58:31.950 align:start position:0% someplace and then go ahead with two three<00:58:27.880> four<00:58:28.319> all<00:58:28.520> of<00:58:28.640> them<00:58:28.920> instructional 00:58:31.950 --> 00:58:31.960 align:start position:0% 00:58:31.960 --> 00:58:34.870 align:start position:0% material<00:58:32.960> I<00:58:33.039> would<00:58:33.280> support<00:58:33.799> that<00:58:34.640> yeah<00:58:34.760> I 00:58:34.870 --> 00:58:34.880 align:start position:0% material I would support that yeah I 00:58:34.880 --> 00:58:42.990 align:start position:0% material I would support that yeah I would 00:58:42.990 --> 00:58:43.000 align:start position:0% 00:58:43.000 --> 00:58:44.549 align:start position:0% too 00:58:44.549 --> 00:58:44.559 align:start position:0% too 00:58:44.559 --> 00:58:47.549 align:start position:0% too okay<00:58:45.559> with<00:58:45.760> that<00:58:45.960> being<00:58:46.240> said<00:58:46.559> I<00:58:46.680> wonder<00:58:47.160> if 00:58:47.549 --> 00:58:47.559 align:start position:0% okay with that being said I wonder if 00:58:47.559 --> 00:58:52.349 align:start position:0% okay with that being said I wonder if the<00:58:47.920> nine<00:58:48.920> should<00:58:49.240> come<00:58:49.440> up<00:58:49.960> under<00:58:50.960> four<00:58:51.720> maybe 00:58:52.349 --> 00:58:52.359 align:start position:0% the nine should come up under four maybe 00:58:52.359 --> 00:58:54.470 align:start position:0% the nine should come up under four maybe uh<00:58:52.559> let's<00:58:52.720> see<00:58:53.000> or<00:58:53.880> yeah<00:58:54.039> I'm<00:58:54.119> just<00:58:54.240> trying<00:58:54.400> to 00:58:54.470 --> 00:58:54.480 align:start position:0% uh let's see or yeah I'm just trying to 00:58:54.480 --> 00:58:55.670 align:start position:0% uh let's see or yeah I'm just trying to figure<00:58:54.680> out<00:58:54.799> how<00:58:54.880> to<00:58:55.200> you're<00:58:55.359> trying<00:58:55.559> to 00:58:55.670 --> 00:58:55.680 align:start position:0% figure out how to you're trying to 00:58:55.680 --> 00:58:57.670 align:start position:0% figure out how to you're trying to organiz<00:58:56.400> according 00:58:57.670 --> 00:58:57.680 align:start position:0% organiz according 00:58:57.680 --> 00:59:00.750 align:start position:0% organiz according to<00:58:58.680> things<00:58:58.920> you're<00:58:59.160> talking<00:58:59.480> about<00:59:00.119> right 00:59:00.750 --> 00:59:00.760 align:start position:0% to things you're talking about right 00:59:00.760 --> 00:59:06.190 align:start position:0% to things you're talking about right yeah<00:59:01.119> yeah<00:59:01.559> so<00:59:01.880> I<00:59:01.960> think<00:59:02.160> that's 00:59:06.190 --> 00:59:06.200 align:start position:0% 00:59:06.200 --> 00:59:08.990 align:start position:0% great<00:59:07.200> so<00:59:07.400> it<00:59:07.480> would<00:59:07.640> be<00:59:07.880> I<00:59:07.960> think<00:59:08.119> under<00:59:08.520> four 00:59:08.990 --> 00:59:09.000 align:start position:0% great so it would be I think under four 00:59:09.000 --> 00:59:10.470 align:start position:0% great so it would be I think under four maybe<00:59:09.280> and<00:59:09.400> then<00:59:09.520> get<00:59:09.720> into<00:59:10.079> the<00:59:10.240> other 00:59:10.470 --> 00:59:10.480 align:start position:0% maybe and then get into the other 00:59:10.480 --> 00:59:15.670 align:start position:0% maybe and then get into the other components<00:59:11.079> of 00:59:15.670 --> 00:59:15.680 align:start position:0% 00:59:15.680 --> 00:59:19.109 align:start position:0% things<00:59:16.680> yeah<00:59:16.880> something<00:59:17.200> like<00:59:17.400> that<00:59:17.799> yeah<00:59:18.799> now 00:59:19.109 --> 00:59:19.119 align:start position:0% things yeah something like that yeah now 00:59:19.119 --> 00:59:21.990 align:start position:0% things yeah something like that yeah now I<00:59:19.680> on<00:59:19.960> that<00:59:20.200> one<00:59:20.480> I<00:59:20.599> left<00:59:20.880> D<00:59:21.440> open<00:59:21.799> because<00:59:21.920> I 00:59:21.990 --> 00:59:22.000 align:start position:0% I on that one I left D open because I 00:59:22.000 --> 00:59:24.270 align:start position:0% I on that one I left D open because I don't<00:59:22.200> remember<00:59:22.520> if<00:59:22.680> we<00:59:22.880> had<00:59:23.039> any<00:59:23.319> other<00:59:23.640> items 00:59:24.270 --> 00:59:24.280 align:start position:0% don't remember if we had any other items 00:59:24.280 --> 00:59:26.430 align:start position:0% don't remember if we had any other items I<00:59:24.400> don't<00:59:24.640> remember<00:59:24.920> if<00:59:25.039> we<00:59:25.200> had<00:59:25.440> health<00:59:25.680> educ 00:59:26.430 --> 00:59:26.440 align:start position:0% I don't remember if we had health educ 00:59:26.440 --> 00:59:29.150 align:start position:0% I don't remember if we had health educ items<00:59:26.799> that<00:59:26.880> needed<00:59:27.160> to<00:59:27.280> be<00:59:27.440> referenced<00:59:28.160> there 00:59:29.150 --> 00:59:29.160 align:start position:0% items that needed to be referenced there 00:59:29.160 --> 00:59:30.589 align:start position:0% items that needed to be referenced there I've<00:59:29.359> also<00:59:29.599> been<00:59:29.760> trying<00:59:29.960> to<00:59:30.119> think<00:59:30.280> of<00:59:30.440> what 00:59:30.589 --> 00:59:30.599 align:start position:0% I've also been trying to think of what 00:59:30.599 --> 00:59:31.990 align:start position:0% I've also been trying to think of what the<00:59:30.720> other<00:59:30.880> ones<00:59:31.079> are<00:59:31.400> because<00:59:31.599> I<00:59:31.680> feel<00:59:31.839> like 00:59:31.990 --> 00:59:32.000 align:start position:0% the other ones are because I feel like 00:59:32.000 --> 00:59:33.549 align:start position:0% the other ones are because I feel like there<00:59:32.160> might<00:59:32.319> be<00:59:32.440> one 00:59:33.549 --> 00:59:33.559 align:start position:0% there might be one 00:59:33.559 --> 00:59:37.150 align:start position:0% there might be one missing<00:59:34.559> I<00:59:34.680> know<00:59:35.200> concurrent<00:59:36.200> medical 00:59:37.150 --> 00:59:37.160 align:start position:0% missing I know concurrent medical 00:59:37.160 --> 00:59:40.230 align:start position:0% missing I know concurrent medical courses<00:59:38.160> family<00:59:38.559> consumer<00:59:39.119> science<00:59:40.000> these 00:59:40.230 --> 00:59:40.240 align:start position:0% courses family consumer science these 00:59:40.240 --> 00:59:42.109 align:start position:0% courses family consumer science these are<00:59:40.480> the<00:59:40.599> ones<00:59:40.799> in<00:59:41.000> the<00:59:41.160> law<00:59:41.559> once<00:59:41.760> again<00:59:41.960> this 00:59:42.109 --> 00:59:42.119 align:start position:0% are the ones in the law once again this 00:59:42.119 --> 00:59:43.829 align:start position:0% are the ones in the law once again this needs<00:59:42.319> to<00:59:42.440> be<00:59:42.640> highlighted<00:59:43.280> all<00:59:43.440> of<00:59:43.599> these 00:59:43.829 --> 00:59:43.839 align:start position:0% needs to be highlighted all of these 00:59:43.839 --> 00:59:46.750 align:start position:0% needs to be highlighted all of these Provisions<00:59:44.720> are<00:59:45.000> in<00:59:45.200> the<00:59:45.400> law<00:59:45.839> but<00:59:46.039> D<00:59:46.440> I<00:59:46.520> can't 00:59:46.750 --> 00:59:46.760 align:start position:0% Provisions are in the law but D I can't 00:59:46.760 --> 00:59:49.670 align:start position:0% Provisions are in the law but D I can't remember<00:59:47.079> if<00:59:47.559> we<00:59:48.559> had<00:59:48.720> it<00:59:48.839> some<00:59:49.119> with<00:59:49.280> it<00:59:49.440> I'll 00:59:49.670 --> 00:59:49.680 align:start position:0% remember if we had it some with it I'll 00:59:49.680 --> 00:59:52.150 align:start position:0% remember if we had it some with it I'll look<00:59:49.839> it<00:59:49.920> up 00:59:52.150 --> 00:59:52.160 align:start position:0% 00:59:52.160 --> 00:59:54.430 align:start position:0% r277<00:59:53.160> I<00:59:53.240> just<00:59:53.400> didn't<00:59:53.680> look<00:59:53.839> it<00:59:53.960> up<00:59:54.119> the<00:59:54.240> other 00:59:54.430 --> 00:59:54.440 align:start position:0% r277 I just didn't look it up the other 00:59:54.440 --> 01:00:05.630 align:start position:0% r277 I just didn't look it up the other day<00:59:54.559> I<00:59:54.680> should<00:59:54.839> have 01:00:05.630 --> 01:00:05.640 align:start position:0% 01:00:05.640 --> 01:00:07.230 align:start position:0% anyways<01:00:06.000> we<01:00:06.119> can<01:00:06.400> we<01:00:06.520> can<01:00:06.640> move<01:00:06.799> on<01:00:06.960> I'll<01:00:07.119> look 01:00:07.230 --> 01:00:07.240 align:start position:0% anyways we can we can move on I'll look 01:00:07.240 --> 01:00:08.430 align:start position:0% anyways we can we can move on I'll look for<01:00:07.400> that<01:00:07.520> I<01:00:07.599> don't<01:00:07.680> know<01:00:07.799> if<01:00:07.920> others<01:00:08.240> have 01:00:08.430 --> 01:00:08.440 align:start position:0% for that I don't know if others have 01:00:08.440 --> 01:00:12.029 align:start position:0% for that I don't know if others have that<01:00:08.599> too 01:00:12.029 --> 01:00:12.039 align:start position:0% 01:00:12.039 --> 01:00:14.549 align:start position:0% but<01:00:13.039> I<01:00:13.240> also<01:00:13.480> think<01:00:13.680> we<01:00:13.799> could<01:00:14.039> simplify<01:00:14.480> it 01:00:14.549 --> 01:00:14.559 align:start position:0% but I also think we could simplify it 01:00:14.559 --> 01:00:16.109 align:start position:0% but I also think we could simplify it and<01:00:14.680> just<01:00:14.799> say<01:00:15.000> concurrent<01:00:15.440> enrollment<01:00:15.920> which 01:00:16.109 --> 01:00:16.119 align:start position:0% and just say concurrent enrollment which 01:00:16.119 --> 01:00:21.309 align:start position:0% and just say concurrent enrollment which provide<01:00:16.599> which<01:00:16.920> requires<01:00:17.520> parental 01:00:21.309 --> 01:00:21.319 align:start position:0% 01:00:21.319 --> 01:00:30.029 align:start position:0% consent<01:00:22.319> without<01:00:22.599> overe<01:00:22.880> explaining<01:00:23.400> it 01:00:30.029 --> 01:00:30.039 align:start position:0% 01:00:30.039 --> 01:00:32.029 align:start position:0% because<01:00:30.280> we<01:00:30.400> already<01:00:30.640> say<01:00:31.640> it<01:00:31.720> doesn't 01:00:32.029 --> 01:00:32.039 align:start position:0% because we already say it doesn't 01:00:32.039 --> 01:00:35.069 align:start position:0% because we already say it doesn't include<01:00:32.760> so<01:00:33.760> if<01:00:33.960> we<01:00:34.079> wanted<01:00:34.319> just<01:00:34.440> to<01:00:34.720> cut<01:00:34.920> some 01:00:35.069 --> 01:00:35.079 align:start position:0% include so if we wanted just to cut some 01:00:35.079 --> 01:00:36.990 align:start position:0% include so if we wanted just to cut some of<01:00:35.240> this 01:00:36.990 --> 01:00:37.000 align:start position:0% of this 01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:39.349 align:start position:0% of this down<01:00:38.000> yeah<01:00:38.280> that's<01:00:38.480> the<01:00:38.640> language<01:00:39.000> from<01:00:39.200> the 01:00:39.349 --> 01:00:39.359 align:start position:0% down yeah that's the language from the 01:00:39.359 --> 01:00:41.990 align:start position:0% down yeah that's the language from the law<01:00:39.799> let<01:00:39.920> me<01:00:40.039> see<01:00:40.240> if<01:00:40.480> that<01:00:40.680> let's<01:00:40.839> see<01:00:41.280> the 01:00:41.990 --> 01:00:42.000 align:start position:0% law let me see if that let's see the 01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:45.390 align:start position:0% law let me see if that let's see the current<01:00:43.000> current<01:00:43.240> enr<01:00:44.240> that<01:00:44.760> they<01:00:44.960> select 01:00:45.390 --> 01:00:45.400 align:start position:0% current current enr that they select 01:00:45.400 --> 01:00:48.670 align:start position:0% current current enr that they select under<01:00:45.720> 53<01:00:46.280> G10<01:00:46.799> 402<01:00:47.520> which<01:00:47.640> is<01:00:47.760> the<01:00:47.960> health 01:00:48.670 --> 01:00:48.680 align:start position:0% under 53 G10 402 which is the health 01:00:48.680 --> 01:00:51.029 align:start position:0% under 53 G10 402 which is the health curriculum<01:00:49.680> Health<01:00:50.119> that's<01:00:50.280> it<01:00:50.559> I<01:00:50.640> knew<01:00:50.920> there 01:00:51.029 --> 01:00:51.039 align:start position:0% curriculum Health that's it I knew there 01:00:51.039 --> 01:00:53.190 align:start position:0% curriculum Health that's it I knew there was<01:00:51.200> another<01:00:51.480> one<01:00:52.039> it's<01:00:52.280> missing<01:00:52.720> it<01:00:52.839> says 01:00:53.190 --> 01:00:53.200 align:start position:0% was another one it's missing it says 01:00:53.200 --> 01:00:56.990 align:start position:0% was another one it's missing it says that<01:00:53.319> an<01:00:53.480> Lea<01:00:54.000> selects<01:00:54.480> under<01:00:54.880> 53<01:00:55.400> G10 01:00:56.990 --> 01:00:57.000 align:start position:0% that an Lea selects under 53 G10 01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:08.029 align:start position:0% that an Lea selects under 53 G10 -42<01:00:58.000> that's<01:00:58.200> the<01:00:58.319> way<01:00:58.480> the<01:00:58.599> health<01:00:58.880> curriculum 01:01:08.029 --> 01:01:08.039 align:start position:0% 01:01:08.039 --> 01:01:12.309 align:start position:0% reads<01:01:09.039> do<01:01:09.200> we<01:01:09.400> reference<01:01:09.880> that<01:01:10.000> in<01:01:10.119> our 01:01:12.309 --> 01:01:12.319 align:start position:0% reads do we reference that in our 01:01:12.319 --> 01:01:14.950 align:start position:0% reads do we reference that in our rule<01:01:13.319> or<01:01:13.480> is<01:01:13.559> it<01:01:13.760> just<01:01:13.880> in<01:01:14.039> 402<01:01:14.640> where<01:01:14.799> they 01:01:14.950 --> 01:01:14.960 align:start position:0% rule or is it just in 402 where they 01:01:14.960 --> 01:01:17.190 align:start position:0% rule or is it just in 402 where they reference 01:01:17.190 --> 01:01:17.200 align:start position:0% reference 01:01:17.200 --> 01:01:19.510 align:start position:0% reference it<01:01:18.200> I<01:01:18.280> don't<01:01:18.480> know<01:01:18.680> the<01:01:18.839> answer<01:01:19.079> to<01:01:19.240> that<01:01:19.359> one 01:01:19.510 --> 01:01:19.520 align:start position:0% it I don't know the answer to that one 01:01:19.520 --> 01:01:21.589 align:start position:0% it I don't know the answer to that one I'm<01:01:19.680> sorry<01:01:20.440> you're<01:01:20.760> okay<01:01:21.000> I'm<01:01:21.160> just<01:01:21.319> looking 01:01:21.589 --> 01:01:21.599 align:start position:0% I'm sorry you're okay I'm just looking 01:01:21.599 --> 01:01:23.430 align:start position:0% I'm sorry you're okay I'm just looking at<01:01:21.720> it<01:01:21.960> that's<01:01:22.280> I<01:01:22.400> just<01:01:22.559> had<01:01:22.760> wondered<01:01:23.079> if<01:01:23.200> we 01:01:23.430 --> 01:01:23.440 align:start position:0% at it that's I just had wondered if we 01:01:23.440 --> 01:01:27.109 align:start position:0% at it that's I just had wondered if we actually 01:01:27.109 --> 01:01:27.119 align:start position:0% 01:01:27.119 --> 01:01:29.670 align:start position:0% let<01:01:27.240> me<01:01:27.400> check<01:01:27.640> on<01:01:28.000> that<01:01:29.000> yeah<01:01:29.119> I'm<01:01:29.280> looking 01:01:29.670 --> 01:01:29.680 align:start position:0% let me check on that yeah I'm looking 01:01:29.680 --> 01:01:35.150 align:start position:0% let me check on that yeah I'm looking too<01:01:30.680> that's<01:01:30.920> fine<01:01:31.160> we<01:01:31.319> could<01:01:31.520> we're<01:01:31.960> fine 01:01:35.150 --> 01:01:35.160 align:start position:0% 01:01:35.160 --> 01:01:39.950 align:start position:0% there<01:01:36.160> because<01:01:36.400> not<01:01:37.039> all 01:01:39.950 --> 01:01:39.960 align:start position:0% there because not all 01:01:39.960 --> 01:01:42.950 align:start position:0% there because not all yeah<01:01:40.960> I<01:01:41.440> I<01:01:41.520> don't<01:01:41.920> think<01:01:42.119> we<01:01:42.200> want<01:01:42.319> to<01:01:42.480> open<01:01:42.720> it 01:01:42.950 --> 01:01:42.960 align:start position:0% yeah I I don't think we want to open it 01:01:42.960 --> 01:01:43.670 align:start position:0% yeah I I don't think we want to open it that 01:01:43.670 --> 01:01:43.680 align:start position:0% that 01:01:43.680 --> 01:01:45.750 align:start position:0% that broad<01:01:44.680> I<01:01:44.760> don't<01:01:44.920> know<01:01:45.039> if<01:01:45.160> that<01:01:45.280> makes<01:01:45.520> sense 01:01:45.750 --> 01:01:45.760 align:start position:0% broad I don't know if that makes sense 01:01:45.760 --> 01:01:47.789 align:start position:0% broad I don't know if that makes sense like<01:01:46.000> are<01:01:46.119> we<01:01:46.280> talking<01:01:46.599> about<01:01:47.119> all<01:01:47.480> Health 01:01:47.789 --> 01:01:47.799 align:start position:0% like are we talking about all Health 01:01:47.799 --> 01:01:49.470 align:start position:0% like are we talking about all Health curriculum<01:01:48.240> can<01:01:48.400> be<01:01:48.520> sensitive<01:01:48.960> materials 01:01:49.470 --> 01:01:49.480 align:start position:0% curriculum can be sensitive materials 01:01:49.480 --> 01:01:51.630 align:start position:0% curriculum can be sensitive materials just<01:01:49.599> because<01:01:49.880> it's<01:01:50.039> Health<01:01:50.440> curriculum<01:01:51.440> or 01:01:51.630 --> 01:01:51.640 align:start position:0% just because it's Health curriculum or 01:01:51.640 --> 01:01:53.150 align:start position:0% just because it's Health curriculum or are<01:01:51.720> we<01:01:51.880> talking<01:01:52.200> about<01:01:52.640> needs<01:01:52.839> to<01:01:52.960> be 01:01:53.150 --> 01:01:53.160 align:start position:0% are we talking about needs to be 01:01:53.160 --> 01:01:56.990 align:start position:0% are we talking about needs to be selected<01:01:53.599> under<01:01:54.319> 53<01:01:54.839> G10<01:01:55.440> D4<01:01:56.119> to<01:01:56.359> it<01:01:56.520> has<01:01:56.680> to<01:01:56.839> be 01:01:56.990 --> 01:01:57.000 align:start position:0% selected under 53 G10 D4 to it has to be 01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:59.549 align:start position:0% selected under 53 G10 D4 to it has to be selected<01:01:57.520> in<01:01:57.760> that<01:01:58.160> in<01:01:58.319> that<01:01:58.520> whole<01:01:58.760> big 01:01:59.549 --> 01:01:59.559 align:start position:0% selected in that in that whole big 01:01:59.559 --> 01:02:02.150 align:start position:0% selected in that in that whole big process<01:02:00.559> of<01:02:00.920> with<01:02:01.079> the<01:02:01.240> open<01:02:01.520> meeting<01:02:01.920> and 01:02:02.150 --> 01:02:02.160 align:start position:0% process of with the open meeting and 01:02:02.160 --> 01:02:04.430 align:start position:0% process of with the open meeting and everything<01:02:03.160> has<01:02:03.279> to<01:02:03.480> go<01:02:03.599> through<01:02:03.760> a<01:02:03.960> very 01:02:04.430 --> 01:02:04.440 align:start position:0% everything has to go through a very 01:02:04.440 --> 01:02:10.190 align:start position:0% everything has to go through a very specific<01:02:05.039> process<01:02:05.559> in<01:02:06.319> in<01:02:06.520> that<01:02:06.760> code 01:02:10.190 --> 01:02:10.200 align:start position:0% 01:02:10.200 --> 01:02:13.309 align:start position:0% section<01:02:11.200> I<01:02:11.279> just<01:02:11.400> wouldn't<01:02:11.640> leave<01:02:11.799> it<01:02:12.000> open 01:02:13.309 --> 01:02:13.319 align:start position:0% section I just wouldn't leave it open 01:02:13.319 --> 01:02:16.390 align:start position:0% section I just wouldn't leave it open to<01:02:14.319> yep<01:02:14.640> that<01:02:14.799> would<01:02:15.119> that<01:02:15.279> looks 01:02:16.390 --> 01:02:16.400 align:start position:0% to yep that would that looks 01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:19.230 align:start position:0% to yep that would that looks better<01:02:17.400> M<01:02:17.720> Earl<01:02:18.039> when<01:02:18.160> you<01:02:18.279> say<01:02:18.520> leave<01:02:18.720> it<01:02:18.880> open 01:02:19.230 --> 01:02:19.240 align:start position:0% better M Earl when you say leave it open 01:02:19.240 --> 01:02:21.549 align:start position:0% better M Earl when you say leave it open do<01:02:19.359> you<01:02:19.440> mean<01:02:19.760> by<01:02:20.039> not<01:02:20.240> including<01:02:20.720> the<01:02:20.880> code 01:02:21.549 --> 01:02:21.559 align:start position:0% do you mean by not including the code 01:02:21.559 --> 01:02:24.870 align:start position:0% do you mean by not including the code there<01:02:22.000> Orting<01:02:23.000> need<01:02:23.160> to<01:02:24.039> include<01:02:24.400> the<01:02:24.559> code 01:02:24.870 --> 01:02:24.880 align:start position:0% there Orting need to include the code 01:02:24.880 --> 01:02:26.510 align:start position:0% there Orting need to include the code because<01:02:25.119> otherwise<01:02:25.440> it<01:02:25.520> leaves<01:02:26.000> too<01:02:26.240> open 01:02:26.510 --> 01:02:26.520 align:start position:0% because otherwise it leaves too open 01:02:26.520 --> 01:02:27.910 align:start position:0% because otherwise it leaves too open it's<01:02:26.680> just<01:02:26.880> like<01:02:27.000> you<01:02:27.119> can<01:02:27.279> do<01:02:27.520> sensitive 01:02:27.910 --> 01:02:27.920 align:start position:0% it's just like you can do sensitive 01:02:27.920 --> 01:02:29.870 align:start position:0% it's just like you can do sensitive materials<01:02:28.440> as<01:02:28.559> long<01:02:28.760> as<01:02:28.880> it's<01:02:29.039> in<01:02:29.160> your<01:02:29.319> health 01:02:29.870 --> 01:02:29.880 align:start position:0% materials as long as it's in your health 01:02:29.880 --> 01:02:31.950 align:start position:0% materials as long as it's in your health curriculum<01:02:30.880> but<01:02:31.039> that's<01:02:31.240> not<01:02:31.440> the<01:02:31.559> case<01:02:31.839> it 01:02:31.950 --> 01:02:31.960 align:start position:0% curriculum but that's not the case it 01:02:31.960 --> 01:02:33.230 align:start position:0% curriculum but that's not the case it has<01:02:32.079> to<01:02:32.240> go<01:02:32.400> through<01:02:32.599> the<01:02:32.799> process<01:02:33.119> that 01:02:33.230 --> 01:02:33.240 align:start position:0% has to go through the process that 01:02:33.240 --> 01:02:36.190 align:start position:0% has to go through the process that Michelle<01:02:33.599> was<01:02:33.720> just<01:02:33.920> talking<01:02:34.440> about<01:02:35.440> okay<01:02:36.000> and 01:02:36.190 --> 01:02:36.200 align:start position:0% Michelle was just talking about okay and 01:02:36.200 --> 01:02:40.230 align:start position:0% Michelle was just talking about okay and vetted<01:02:37.119> thoroughly<01:02:38.119> okay<01:02:38.359> so<01:02:39.279> so<01:02:39.480> the<01:02:39.559> 402<01:02:40.119> I 01:02:40.230 --> 01:02:40.240 align:start position:0% vetted thoroughly okay so so the 402 I 01:02:40.240 --> 01:02:44.029 align:start position:0% vetted thoroughly okay so so the 402 I have<01:02:40.400> that<01:02:40.520> one<01:02:40.920> open<01:02:41.279> right 01:02:44.029 --> 01:02:44.039 align:start position:0% 01:02:44.039 --> 01:02:52.029 align:start position:0% now<01:02:45.039> that<01:02:45.160> one's<01:02:45.440> pretty<01:02:46.079> detailed<01:02:47.079> so<01:02:47.839> great 01:02:52.029 --> 01:02:52.039 align:start position:0% 01:02:52.039 --> 01:02:54.549 align:start position:0% reference<01:02:53.039> do<01:02:53.240> we<01:02:53.440> have<01:02:53.680> that<01:02:53.920> anywhere<01:02:54.440> I'm 01:02:54.549 --> 01:02:54.559 align:start position:0% reference do we have that anywhere I'm 01:02:54.559 --> 01:02:56.789 align:start position:0% reference do we have that anywhere I'm not<01:02:54.799> actually<01:02:55.440> am<01:02:55.520> I<01:02:56.039> missing<01:02:56.319> it<01:02:56.520> I'm<01:02:56.640> not 01:02:56.789 --> 01:02:56.799 align:start position:0% not actually am I missing it I'm not 01:02:56.799 --> 01:02:59.789 align:start position:0% not actually am I missing it I'm not seeing<01:02:57.079> it<01:02:57.200> in<01:02:57.640> code<01:02:57.960> there<01:02:58.160> that<01:02:58.359> references 01:02:59.789 --> 01:02:59.799 align:start position:0% seeing it in code there that references 01:02:59.799 --> 01:03:01.990 align:start position:0% seeing it in code there that references it<01:03:00.799> I<01:03:00.880> know<01:03:01.119> I<01:03:01.240> looked<01:03:01.440> at<01:03:01.559> it<01:03:01.680> during<01:03:01.880> the 01:03:01.990 --> 01:03:02.000 align:start position:0% it I know I looked at it during the 01:03:02.000 --> 01:03:05.029 align:start position:0% it I know I looked at it during the legislative<01:03:02.920> session<01:03:03.920> yeah<01:03:04.319> in<01:03:04.480> the<01:03:04.640> bill 01:03:05.029 --> 01:03:05.039 align:start position:0% legislative session yeah in the bill 01:03:05.039 --> 01:03:07.710 align:start position:0% legislative session yeah in the bill it's<01:03:05.279> line<01:03:05.680> 71<01:03:06.359> of<01:03:06.480> the<01:03:06.599> bill<01:03:06.960> okay<01:03:07.200> that's<01:03:07.599> all 01:03:07.710 --> 01:03:07.720 align:start position:0% it's line 71 of the bill okay that's all 01:03:07.720 --> 01:03:09.710 align:start position:0% it's line 71 of the bill okay that's all right<01:03:08.000> thank<01:03:08.200> you<01:03:08.960> I<01:03:09.079> knew<01:03:09.279> there<01:03:09.400> was<01:03:09.559> one 01:03:09.710 --> 01:03:09.720 align:start position:0% right thank you I knew there was one 01:03:09.720 --> 01:03:11.269 align:start position:0% right thank you I knew there was one more<01:03:10.000> that's<01:03:10.200> why<01:03:10.319> I 01:03:11.269 --> 01:03:11.279 align:start position:0% more that's why I 01:03:11.279 --> 01:03:14.230 align:start position:0% more that's why I was<01:03:12.279> 71<01:03:12.880> it's<01:03:13.039> just<01:03:13.200> not<01:03:13.359> a<01:03:13.520> new<01:03:13.760> one<01:03:14.119> that 01:03:14.230 --> 01:03:14.240 align:start position:0% was 71 it's just not a new one that 01:03:14.240 --> 01:03:16.349 align:start position:0% was 71 it's just not a new one that one's<01:03:14.520> not<01:03:14.680> a<01:03:14.799> new<01:03:15.000> one<01:03:15.559> Ah<01:03:15.880> that's<01:03:16.079> probably 01:03:16.349 --> 01:03:16.359 align:start position:0% one's not a new one Ah that's probably 01:03:16.359 --> 01:03:17.549 align:start position:0% one's not a new one Ah that's probably why<01:03:16.440> I<01:03:16.559> didn't 01:03:17.549 --> 01:03:17.559 align:start position:0% why I didn't 01:03:17.559 --> 01:03:20.589 align:start position:0% why I didn't okay<01:03:18.559> so<01:03:18.880> that<01:03:19.160> well<01:03:19.960> that<01:03:20.079> one<01:03:20.200> doesn't<01:03:20.480> need 01:03:20.589 --> 01:03:20.599 align:start position:0% okay so that well that one doesn't need 01:03:20.599 --> 01:03:23.390 align:start position:0% okay so that well that one doesn't need to<01:03:20.720> be<01:03:20.960> highlighted<01:03:21.720> then<01:03:22.720> that<01:03:22.960> specific 01:03:23.390 --> 01:03:23.400 align:start position:0% to be highlighted then that specific 01:03:23.400 --> 01:03:29.349 align:start position:0% to be highlighted then that specific line<01:03:23.799> is<01:03:23.960> not<01:03:24.200> highlighted<01:03:25.200> yeah 01:03:29.349 --> 01:03:29.359 align:start position:0% 01:03:29.359 --> 01:03:34.230 align:start position:0% okay<01:03:29.760> that's<01:03:29.920> where<01:03:30.079> I<01:03:30.200> missed 01:03:34.230 --> 01:03:34.240 align:start position:0% 01:03:34.240 --> 01:03:36.589 align:start position:0% it<01:03:35.240> and<01:03:35.520> I<01:03:35.640> just<01:03:35.760> like<01:03:35.960> I<01:03:36.039> want<01:03:36.160> to<01:03:36.279> make<01:03:36.400> sure 01:03:36.589 --> 01:03:36.599 align:start position:0% it and I just like I want to make sure 01:03:36.599 --> 01:03:37.829 align:start position:0% it and I just like I want to make sure that<01:03:36.720> we<01:03:36.839> don't 01:03:37.829 --> 01:03:37.839 align:start position:0% that we don't 01:03:37.839 --> 01:03:41.349 align:start position:0% that we don't over<01:03:38.839> create<01:03:39.359> o<01:03:39.640> overly<01:03:40.480> create<01:03:40.880> guidelines 01:03:41.349 --> 01:03:41.359 align:start position:0% over create o overly create guidelines 01:03:41.359 --> 01:03:44.549 align:start position:0% over create o overly create guidelines for<01:03:41.960> these<01:03:42.680> leas<01:03:43.319> so<01:03:43.520> that 01:03:44.549 --> 01:03:44.559 align:start position:0% for these leas so that 01:03:44.559 --> 01:03:47.549 align:start position:0% for these leas so that they<01:03:45.559> still<01:03:46.359> I<01:03:46.480> just<01:03:46.920> like<01:03:47.079> I<01:03:47.160> don't<01:03:47.319> know<01:03:47.440> if 01:03:47.549 --> 01:03:47.559 align:start position:0% they still I just like I don't know if 01:03:47.559 --> 01:03:48.990 align:start position:0% they still I just like I don't know if we<01:03:47.640> need<01:03:47.799> to<01:03:47.960> overe<01:03:48.200> explain<01:03:48.520> the<01:03:48.599> concurrent 01:03:48.990 --> 01:03:49.000 align:start position:0% we need to overe explain the concurrent 01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:50.349 align:start position:0% we need to overe explain the concurrent enrollment<01:03:49.400> for<01:03:49.520> example<01:03:49.960> I<01:03:50.039> just<01:03:50.119> want<01:03:50.200> to 01:03:50.349 --> 01:03:50.359 align:start position:0% enrollment for example I just want to 01:03:50.359 --> 01:03:52.430 align:start position:0% enrollment for example I just want to make<01:03:50.480> sure<01:03:50.799> that<01:03:51.559> one<01:03:51.839> it's<01:03:52.039> something<01:03:52.279> that 01:03:52.430 --> 01:03:52.440 align:start position:0% make sure that one it's something that 01:03:52.440 --> 01:03:56.190 align:start position:0% make sure that one it's something that they<01:03:52.599> actually<01:03:52.839> read<01:03:53.119> and<01:03:53.440> use<01:03:54.440> and<01:03:55.200> um<01:03:55.839> too 01:03:56.190 --> 01:03:56.200 align:start position:0% they actually read and use and um too 01:03:56.200 --> 01:03:58.510 align:start position:0% they actually read and use and um too that<01:03:56.440> we<01:03:56.760> like<01:03:57.039> again<01:03:57.359> they<01:03:57.559> have<01:03:57.960> they<01:03:58.160> have 01:03:58.510 --> 01:03:58.520 align:start position:0% that we like again they have they have 01:03:58.520 --> 01:04:00.309 align:start position:0% that we like again they have they have counsel<01:03:58.960> to<01:03:59.200> go<01:03:59.359> through<01:03:59.559> the<01:03:59.720> law<01:03:59.920> and<01:04:00.039> see 01:04:00.309 --> 01:04:00.319 align:start position:0% counsel to go through the law and see 01:04:00.319 --> 01:04:01.349 align:start position:0% counsel to go through the law and see these<01:04:00.520> different 01:04:01.349 --> 01:04:01.359 align:start position:0% these different 01:04:01.359 --> 01:04:04.750 align:start position:0% these different pieces<01:04:02.680> but<01:04:03.680> I'm<01:04:03.839> trying<01:04:04.039> to<01:04:04.200> simplify<01:04:04.640> it 01:04:04.750 --> 01:04:04.760 align:start position:0% pieces but I'm trying to simplify it 01:04:04.760 --> 01:04:07.470 align:start position:0% pieces but I'm trying to simplify it where<01:04:04.960> we 01:04:07.470 --> 01:04:07.480 align:start position:0% 01:04:07.480 --> 01:04:10.589 align:start position:0% can<01:04:08.480> you<01:04:08.640> know 01:04:10.589 --> 01:04:10.599 align:start position:0% can you know 01:04:10.599 --> 01:04:14.950 align:start position:0% can you know I<01:04:11.599> the<01:04:11.839> concurrent<01:04:12.359> enrollment<01:04:13.000> is<01:04:13.240> such<01:04:13.559> a<01:04:13.799> an 01:04:14.950 --> 01:04:14.960 align:start position:0% I the concurrent enrollment is such a an 01:04:14.960 --> 01:04:17.829 align:start position:0% I the concurrent enrollment is such a an interesting<01:04:15.960> kind<01:04:16.119> of<01:04:16.319> Realm<01:04:16.640> of<01:04:16.799> its 01:04:17.829 --> 01:04:17.839 align:start position:0% interesting kind of Realm of its 01:04:17.839 --> 01:04:22.950 align:start position:0% interesting kind of Realm of its own<01:04:18.839> um<01:04:19.319> yeah<01:04:19.960> I<01:04:20.160> I<01:04:20.279> know<01:04:20.640> that<01:04:21.279> you<01:04:21.640> I've<01:04:21.960> had 01:04:22.950 --> 01:04:22.960 align:start position:0% own um yeah I I know that you I've had 01:04:22.960 --> 01:04:25.109 align:start position:0% own um yeah I I know that you I've had my<01:04:23.200> students<01:04:23.720> that<01:04:23.880> have<01:04:24.440> my<01:04:24.599> kids<01:04:24.839> that<01:04:24.960> have 01:04:25.109 --> 01:04:25.119 align:start position:0% my students that have my kids that have 01:04:25.119 --> 01:04:28.470 align:start position:0% my students that have my kids that have done<01:04:25.400> that<01:04:25.760> and<01:04:26.000> and<01:04:26.119> we<01:04:26.279> did<01:04:26.559> have<01:04:26.799> the<01:04:27.480> form 01:04:28.470 --> 01:04:28.480 align:start position:0% done that and and we did have the form 01:04:28.480 --> 01:04:30.269 align:start position:0% done that and and we did have the form and<01:04:28.720> I'm<01:04:29.079> I'm 01:04:30.269 --> 01:04:30.279 align:start position:0% and I'm I'm 01:04:30.279 --> 01:04:33.510 align:start position:0% and I'm I'm also<01:04:31.279> uh<01:04:31.480> aware<01:04:31.960> of<01:04:32.359> of<01:04:32.559> courses<01:04:33.039> that<01:04:33.200> are 01:04:33.510 --> 01:04:33.520 align:start position:0% also uh aware of of courses that are 01:04:33.520 --> 01:04:36.789 align:start position:0% also uh aware of of courses that are that<01:04:34.200> absolutely<01:04:34.799> are<01:04:35.160> offering<01:04:35.799> sensitive 01:04:36.789 --> 01:04:36.799 align:start position:0% that absolutely are offering sensitive 01:04:36.799 --> 01:04:39.109 align:start position:0% that absolutely are offering sensitive things<01:04:37.000> that<01:04:37.160> would<01:04:37.319> fall<01:04:37.520> under<01:04:37.839> sensitive 01:04:39.109 --> 01:04:39.119 align:start position:0% things that would fall under sensitive 01:04:39.119 --> 01:04:42.109 align:start position:0% things that would fall under sensitive materials<01:04:40.119> that<01:04:40.319> you<01:04:40.400> know<01:04:40.640> 15<01:04:41.079> 16<01:04:41.440> 17<01:04:41.920> year 01:04:42.109 --> 01:04:42.119 align:start position:0% materials that you know 15 16 17 year 01:04:42.119 --> 01:04:45.109 align:start position:0% materials that you know 15 16 17 year olds<01:04:42.319> are<01:04:42.760> doing<01:04:43.760> yeah<01:04:44.480> it's<01:04:44.599> just<01:04:44.760> sort<01:04:44.920> of 01:04:45.109 --> 01:04:45.119 align:start position:0% olds are doing yeah it's just sort of 01:04:45.119 --> 01:04:47.470 align:start position:0% olds are doing yeah it's just sort of like<01:04:45.480> all<01:04:45.599> of<01:04:45.799> these<01:04:46.000> leas<01:04:46.599> have<01:04:46.880> policies<01:04:47.319> on 01:04:47.470 --> 01:04:47.480 align:start position:0% like all of these leas have policies on 01:04:47.480 --> 01:04:49.069 align:start position:0% like all of these leas have policies on it<01:04:47.760> right<01:04:47.960> they<01:04:48.079> already<01:04:48.400> they<01:04:48.520> work<01:04:48.720> with<01:04:48.880> the 01:04:49.069 --> 01:04:49.079 align:start position:0% it right they already they work with the 01:04:49.079 --> 01:04:51.029 align:start position:0% it right they already they work with the con<01:04:49.680> concurrent<01:04:50.279> enrollment<01:04:50.720> I<01:04:50.799> don't<01:04:50.920> think 01:04:51.029 --> 01:04:51.039 align:start position:0% con concurrent enrollment I don't think 01:04:51.039 --> 01:04:53.789 align:start position:0% con concurrent enrollment I don't think we<01:04:51.160> need<01:04:51.319> to<01:04:51.559> overly<01:04:52.039> explain<01:04:52.440> it<01:04:52.559> to<01:04:52.799> them<01:04:53.680> and 01:04:53.789 --> 01:04:53.799 align:start position:0% we need to overly explain it to them and 01:04:53.799 --> 01:04:55.670 align:start position:0% we need to overly explain it to them and so<01:04:54.039> I<01:04:54.200> just<01:04:54.520> saying<01:04:54.960> like<01:04:55.160> concurrent 01:04:55.670 --> 01:04:55.680 align:start position:0% so I just saying like concurrent 01:04:55.680 --> 01:04:57.549 align:start position:0% so I just saying like concurrent enrollment<01:04:56.119> which<01:04:56.440> requires<01:04:57.079> parental 01:04:57.549 --> 01:04:57.559 align:start position:0% enrollment which requires parental 01:04:57.559 --> 01:04:59.230 align:start position:0% enrollment which requires parental consent<01:04:57.960> and<01:04:58.119> include<01:04:58.480> the<01:04:58.599> code<01:04:58.880> there<01:04:59.000> is 01:04:59.230 --> 01:04:59.240 align:start position:0% consent and include the code there is 01:04:59.240 --> 01:05:01.630 align:start position:0% consent and include the code there is plenty<01:04:59.720> but<01:05:00.480> it's<01:05:00.680> also<01:05:01.039> fine<01:05:01.200> if<01:05:01.319> we<01:05:01.400> want<01:05:01.520> to 01:05:01.630 --> 01:05:01.640 align:start position:0% plenty but it's also fine if we want to 01:05:01.640 --> 01:05:04.230 align:start position:0% plenty but it's also fine if we want to leave<01:05:01.799> it<01:05:01.960> as<01:05:02.200> is<01:05:03.200> I<01:05:03.319> he<01:05:03.520> actually<01:05:03.760> on<01:05:03.920> this<01:05:04.039> one 01:05:04.230 --> 01:05:04.240 align:start position:0% leave it as is I he actually on this one 01:05:04.240 --> 01:05:05.710 align:start position:0% leave it as is I he actually on this one want<01:05:04.359> to<01:05:04.480> leave<01:05:04.599> it<01:05:04.760> as<01:05:05.000> is<01:05:05.200> because<01:05:05.400> I<01:05:05.480> want<01:05:05.559> to 01:05:05.710 --> 01:05:05.720 align:start position:0% want to leave it as is because I want to 01:05:05.720 --> 01:05:08.309 align:start position:0% want to leave it as is because I want to draw<01:05:05.960> attention<01:05:06.440> let<01:05:06.680> people<01:05:06.960> know<01:05:07.279> that<01:05:08.079> it 01:05:08.309 --> 01:05:08.319 align:start position:0% draw attention let people know that it 01:05:08.319 --> 01:05:10.109 align:start position:0% draw attention let people know that it it<01:05:08.559> actually<01:05:09.319> some<01:05:09.480> of<01:05:09.599> these<01:05:09.799> contain 01:05:10.109 --> 01:05:10.119 align:start position:0% it actually some of these contain 01:05:10.119 --> 01:05:11.390 align:start position:0% it actually some of these contain sensitive<01:05:10.559> materials<01:05:11.000> there's<01:05:11.160> two 01:05:11.390 --> 01:05:11.400 align:start position:0% sensitive materials there's two 01:05:11.400 --> 01:05:13.950 align:start position:0% sensitive materials there's two Provisions<01:05:11.880> you<01:05:12.039> have<01:05:12.119> to<01:05:12.279> provide<01:05:12.559> a<01:05:12.960> notice 01:05:13.950 --> 01:05:13.960 align:start position:0% Provisions you have to provide a notice 01:05:13.960 --> 01:05:16.990 align:start position:0% Provisions you have to provide a notice and<01:05:14.839> um<01:05:15.160> of<01:05:15.359> the<01:05:16.119> right<01:05:16.319> a<01:05:16.440> notice<01:05:16.760> of<01:05:16.880> the 01:05:16.990 --> 01:05:17.000 align:start position:0% and um of the right a notice of the 01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:18.349 align:start position:0% and um of the right a notice of the materials<01:05:17.440> and<01:05:17.559> then<01:05:17.680> you<01:05:17.799> have<01:05:17.920> to<01:05:18.039> have<01:05:18.160> a 01:05:18.349 --> 01:05:18.359 align:start position:0% materials and then you have to have a 01:05:18.359 --> 01:05:22.670 align:start position:0% materials and then you have to have a consent<01:05:19.279> so<01:05:19.440> if<01:05:19.520> we<01:05:19.760> simplify<01:05:20.200> it<01:05:20.359> too<01:05:20.640> much<01:05:21.680> um 01:05:22.670 --> 01:05:22.680 align:start position:0% consent so if we simplify it too much um 01:05:22.680 --> 01:05:23.750 align:start position:0% consent so if we simplify it too much um I<01:05:22.799> just<01:05:22.960> worry<01:05:23.240> that<01:05:23.319> we're<01:05:23.440> going<01:05:23.520> to<01:05:23.640> be 01:05:23.750 --> 01:05:23.760 align:start position:0% I just worry that we're going to be 01:05:23.760 --> 01:05:26.910 align:start position:0% I just worry that we're going to be missing<01:05:24.039> a<01:05:24.240> piece<01:05:24.599> there<01:05:25.319> so 01:05:26.910 --> 01:05:26.920 align:start position:0% missing a piece there so 01:05:26.920 --> 01:05:30.309 align:start position:0% missing a piece there so well<01:05:27.119> even<01:05:27.480> in<01:05:28.119> in<01:05:28.279> like<01:05:28.440> a<01:05:28.839> language<01:05:29.839> um<01:05:30.119> an 01:05:30.309 --> 01:05:30.319 align:start position:0% well even in in like a language um an 01:05:30.319 --> 01:05:33.109 align:start position:0% well even in in like a language um an English<01:05:30.880> class<01:05:31.799> uh<01:05:31.960> there<01:05:32.039> was<01:05:32.200> a<01:05:32.440> subject 01:05:33.109 --> 01:05:33.119 align:start position:0% English class uh there was a subject 01:05:33.119 --> 01:05:35.829 align:start position:0% English class uh there was a subject here<01:05:33.720> you<01:05:33.839> know<01:05:33.960> even<01:05:34.319> suu<01:05:35.119> that<01:05:35.319> that<01:05:35.480> was 01:05:35.829 --> 01:05:35.839 align:start position:0% here you know even suu that that was 01:05:35.839 --> 01:05:36.870 align:start position:0% here you know even suu that that was pretty 01:05:36.870 --> 01:05:36.880 align:start position:0% pretty 01:05:36.880 --> 01:05:41.470 align:start position:0% pretty explicit<01:05:37.880> you<01:05:38.000> know<01:05:38.960> and<01:05:39.680> I'm<01:05:39.839> not<01:05:40.119> sure<01:05:40.720> that 01:05:41.470 --> 01:05:41.480 align:start position:0% explicit you know and I'm not sure that 01:05:41.480 --> 01:05:43.630 align:start position:0% explicit you know and I'm not sure that parents<01:05:42.079> they<01:05:42.200> sign<01:05:42.559> the<01:05:42.680> form<01:05:43.119> and<01:05:43.319> they<01:05:43.440> let 01:05:43.630 --> 01:05:43.640 align:start position:0% parents they sign the form and they let 01:05:43.640 --> 01:05:46.150 align:start position:0% parents they sign the form and they let the<01:05:43.799> child<01:05:44.079> go<01:05:44.319> and<01:05:44.480> the<01:05:44.720> and<01:05:44.839> the<01:05:45.000> child<01:05:45.920> goes 01:05:46.150 --> 01:05:46.160 align:start position:0% the child go and the and the child goes 01:05:46.160 --> 01:05:48.870 align:start position:0% the child go and the and the child goes to<01:05:46.400> class<01:05:46.839> and<01:05:47.160> and<01:05:47.319> then<01:05:48.279> you<01:05:48.400> know<01:05:48.599> they<01:05:48.720> are 01:05:48.870 --> 01:05:48.880 align:start position:0% to class and and then you know they are 01:05:48.880 --> 01:05:49.870 align:start position:0% to class and and then you know they are writing 01:05:49.870 --> 01:05:49.880 align:start position:0% writing 01:05:49.880 --> 01:05:54.230 align:start position:0% writing about<01:05:50.880> pretty<01:05:51.200> sensitive<01:05:52.039> things<01:05:53.000> so<01:05:53.319> I<01:05:53.599> I<01:05:54.079> I 01:05:54.230 --> 01:05:54.240 align:start position:0% about pretty sensitive things so I I I 01:05:54.240 --> 01:05:56.910 align:start position:0% about pretty sensitive things so I I I guess<01:05:54.440> I<01:05:54.559> do<01:05:54.839> like<01:05:55.279> that<01:05:55.680> and 01:05:56.910 --> 01:05:56.920 align:start position:0% guess I do like that and 01:05:56.920 --> 01:06:00.230 align:start position:0% guess I do like that and maybe<01:05:57.920> but<01:05:58.039> I<01:05:58.480> understand<01:05:59.000> member<01:05:59.640> um<01:05:59.839> real 01:06:00.230 --> 01:06:00.240 align:start position:0% maybe but I understand member um real 01:06:00.240 --> 01:06:01.589 align:start position:0% maybe but I understand member um real what<01:06:00.319> you're 01:06:01.589 --> 01:06:01.599 align:start position:0% what you're 01:06:01.599 --> 01:06:06.230 align:start position:0% what you're saying<01:06:02.599> is<01:06:02.760> there<01:06:03.440> way<01:06:03.760> to<01:06:04.240> include 01:06:06.230 --> 01:06:06.240 align:start position:0% saying is there way to include 01:06:06.240 --> 01:06:10.670 align:start position:0% saying is there way to include unique<01:06:07.240> space<01:06:07.799> though<01:06:08.680> yeah<01:06:09.119> I<01:06:09.240> just<01:06:09.520> I<01:06:09.640> want<01:06:10.559> I 01:06:10.670 --> 01:06:10.680 align:start position:0% unique space though yeah I just I want I 01:06:10.680 --> 01:06:14.269 align:start position:0% unique space though yeah I just I want I don't<01:06:10.920> want<01:06:11.119> to<01:06:11.319> be<01:06:12.000> overly<01:06:12.559> guiding<01:06:13.400> eleas<01:06:14.200> I 01:06:14.269 --> 01:06:14.279 align:start position:0% don't want to be overly guiding eleas I 01:06:14.279 --> 01:06:15.710 align:start position:0% don't want to be overly guiding eleas I want<01:06:14.440> to<01:06:14.760> make<01:06:14.880> sure<01:06:15.079> they<01:06:15.440> understand<01:06:15.559> the 01:06:15.710 --> 01:06:15.720 align:start position:0% want to make sure they understand the 01:06:15.720 --> 01:06:18.069 align:start position:0% want to make sure they understand the law<01:06:16.039> make<01:06:16.160> sure<01:06:16.359> they<01:06:16.520> know<01:06:16.680> the<01:06:16.839> new<01:06:17.079> pieces 01:06:18.069 --> 01:06:18.079 align:start position:0% law make sure they know the new pieces 01:06:18.079 --> 01:06:20.910 align:start position:0% law make sure they know the new pieces but<01:06:18.200> I<01:06:18.319> don't<01:06:18.480> want<01:06:18.599> to<01:06:18.760> be<01:06:19.160> like<01:06:20.160> you<01:06:20.319> know 01:06:20.910 --> 01:06:20.920 align:start position:0% but I don't want to be like you know 01:06:20.920 --> 01:06:22.630 align:start position:0% but I don't want to be like you know overly<01:06:21.400> guiding<01:06:21.799> them<01:06:22.000> so<01:06:22.160> that<01:06:22.319> they<01:06:22.440> can 01:06:22.630 --> 01:06:22.640 align:start position:0% overly guiding them so that they can 01:06:22.640 --> 01:06:25.589 align:start position:0% overly guiding them so that they can create<01:06:22.920> their<01:06:23.160> policies<01:06:23.680> and<01:06:24.119> yeah<01:06:24.400> they<01:06:24.960> they 01:06:25.589 --> 01:06:25.599 align:start position:0% create their policies and yeah they they 01:06:25.599 --> 01:06:27.630 align:start position:0% create their policies and yeah they they they<01:06:26.039> understand<01:06:26.240> all<01:06:26.359> of<01:06:26.520> these<01:06:26.760> pieces<01:06:27.200> and 01:06:27.630 --> 01:06:27.640 align:start position:0% they understand all of these pieces and 01:06:27.640 --> 01:06:30.269 align:start position:0% they understand all of these pieces and they<01:06:27.839> have<01:06:28.760> um<01:06:29.279> folks<01:06:29.599> that<01:06:29.760> help<01:06:30.079> them 01:06:30.269 --> 01:06:30.279 align:start position:0% they have um folks that help them 01:06:30.279 --> 01:06:33.109 align:start position:0% they have um folks that help them interpret<01:06:30.839> the<01:06:31.240> the<01:06:31.359> laws<01:06:31.839> but<01:06:32.720> that's<01:06:33.039> I'm 01:06:33.109 --> 01:06:33.119 align:start position:0% interpret the the laws but that's I'm 01:06:33.119 --> 01:06:34.910 align:start position:0% interpret the the laws but that's I'm just<01:06:33.240> trying<01:06:33.520> to<01:06:33.680> simplify<01:06:34.200> but<01:06:34.359> I<01:06:34.480> also<01:06:34.680> don't 01:06:34.910 --> 01:06:34.920 align:start position:0% just trying to simplify but I also don't 01:06:34.920 --> 01:06:35.990 align:start position:0% just trying to simplify but I also don't care<01:06:35.240> either 01:06:35.990 --> 01:06:36.000 align:start position:0% care either 01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:39.109 align:start position:0% care either way<01:06:37.000> so<01:06:37.359> my<01:06:37.599> concern<01:06:38.119> with<01:06:38.279> it<01:06:38.520> is<01:06:38.680> that<01:06:38.880> it's 01:06:39.109 --> 01:06:39.119 align:start position:0% way so my concern with it is that it's 01:06:39.119 --> 01:06:40.990 align:start position:0% way so my concern with it is that it's long<01:06:39.480> enough<01:06:40.079> that<01:06:40.240> I'm<01:06:40.359> not<01:06:40.520> sure<01:06:40.760> I'm<01:06:40.880> going 01:06:40.990 --> 01:06:41.000 align:start position:0% long enough that I'm not sure I'm going 01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:43.670 align:start position:0% long enough that I'm not sure I'm going to<01:06:41.119> read<01:06:41.359> it<01:06:42.279> is<01:06:42.400> there<01:06:42.720> just<01:06:43.039> three<01:06:43.240> or<01:06:43.400> four 01:06:43.670 --> 01:06:43.680 align:start position:0% to read it is there just three or four 01:06:43.680 --> 01:06:45.549 align:start position:0% to read it is there just three or four words<01:06:44.000> we<01:06:44.160> could<01:06:44.359> cut<01:06:44.520> out<01:06:44.799> just<01:06:44.960> to<01:06:45.160> make<01:06:45.359> it 01:06:45.549 --> 01:06:45.559 align:start position:0% words we could cut out just to make it 01:06:45.559 --> 01:06:49.510 align:start position:0% words we could cut out just to make it just<01:06:45.799> a<01:06:45.960> little<01:06:46.240> bit<01:06:47.359> more<01:06:48.359> congruent<01:06:49.039> with 01:06:49.510 --> 01:06:49.520 align:start position:0% just a little bit more congruent with 01:06:49.520 --> 01:06:51.069 align:start position:0% just a little bit more congruent with what<01:06:49.720> how<01:06:49.839> much<01:06:50.039> we're<01:06:50.200> saying<01:06:50.520> about<01:06:50.799> all<01:06:50.960> the 01:06:51.069 --> 01:06:51.079 align:start position:0% what how much we're saying about all the 01:06:51.079 --> 01:06:53.829 align:start position:0% what how much we're saying about all the other<01:06:51.359> things<01:06:51.799> that<01:06:51.920> are<01:06:52.160> in<01:06:52.440> this<01:06:53.359> sensitive 01:06:53.829 --> 01:06:53.839 align:start position:0% other things that are in this sensitive 01:06:53.839 --> 01:06:56.390 align:start position:0% other things that are in this sensitive material<01:06:54.319> section<01:06:54.720> I<01:06:54.760> mean<01:06:55.359> I<01:06:55.760> be<01:06:55.920> happy<01:06:56.160> to 01:06:56.390 --> 01:06:56.400 align:start position:0% material section I mean I be happy to 01:06:56.400 --> 01:07:00.269 align:start position:0% material section I mean I be happy to lose<01:06:57.400> three<01:06:57.720> words<01:06:58.319> some<01:06:58.839> just<01:06:59.000> so<01:06:59.799> it<01:06:59.960> was 01:07:00.269 --> 01:07:00.279 align:start position:0% lose three words some just so it was 01:07:00.279 --> 01:07:04.430 align:start position:0% lose three words some just so it was like<01:07:00.839> three<01:07:01.200> lines<01:07:01.599> instead<01:07:01.920> of<01:07:02.119> four<01:07:03.240> or<01:07:04.240> we 01:07:04.430 --> 01:07:04.440 align:start position:0% like three lines instead of four or we 01:07:04.440 --> 01:07:06.950 align:start position:0% like three lines instead of four or we could<01:07:04.720> say<01:07:05.520> concurrent<01:07:06.000> enrollment 01:07:06.950 --> 01:07:06.960 align:start position:0% could say concurrent enrollment 01:07:06.960 --> 01:07:09.750 align:start position:0% could say concurrent enrollment sensitive<01:07:07.480> materials<01:07:08.440> beware 01:07:09.750 --> 01:07:09.760 align:start position:0% sensitive materials beware 01:07:09.760 --> 01:07:13.670 align:start position:0% sensitive materials beware parents<01:07:10.760> I<01:07:10.839> don't<01:07:10.960> know<01:07:11.160> what<01:07:11.240> do<01:07:11.319> you 01:07:13.670 --> 01:07:13.680 align:start position:0% 01:07:13.680 --> 01:07:16.230 align:start position:0% think<01:07:14.680> perfect 01:07:16.230 --> 01:07:16.240 align:start position:0% think perfect 01:07:16.240 --> 01:07:19.390 align:start position:0% think perfect perfect<01:07:17.240> yeah<01:07:17.480> ient<01:07:18.000> enrollment<01:07:18.640> course<01:07:19.119> for 01:07:19.390 --> 01:07:19.400 align:start position:0% perfect yeah ient enrollment course for 01:07:19.400 --> 01:07:21.510 align:start position:0% perfect yeah ient enrollment course for which<01:07:19.599> a<01:07:19.799> parent<01:07:20.440> receives<01:07:20.720> notice<01:07:21.279> and 01:07:21.510 --> 01:07:21.520 align:start position:0% which a parent receives notice and 01:07:21.520 --> 01:07:32.829 align:start position:0% which a parent receives notice and provides<01:07:22.119> consent 01:07:32.829 --> 01:07:32.839 align:start position:0% 01:07:32.839 --> 01:07:36.190 align:start position:0% okay<01:07:33.039> so<01:07:33.559> here's<01:07:34.440> here's<01:07:35.440> uh<01:07:35.680> a<01:07:35.760> little<01:07:35.920> bit<01:07:36.039> of 01:07:36.190 --> 01:07:36.200 align:start position:0% okay so here's here's uh a little bit of 01:07:36.200 --> 01:07:39.430 align:start position:0% okay so here's here's uh a little bit of nuance<01:07:36.720> that<01:07:37.039> I<01:07:37.279> I<01:07:37.400> do<01:07:37.640> believe<01:07:38.440> exists 01:07:39.430 --> 01:07:39.440 align:start position:0% nuance that I I do believe exists 01:07:39.440 --> 01:07:42.390 align:start position:0% nuance that I I do believe exists between<01:07:40.000> concurrent<01:07:40.559> enrollment<01:07:41.279> CL 01:07:42.390 --> 01:07:42.400 align:start position:0% between concurrent enrollment CL 01:07:42.400 --> 01:07:44.269 align:start position:0% between concurrent enrollment CL courses<01:07:43.400> and 01:07:44.269 --> 01:07:44.279 align:start position:0% courses and 01:07:44.279 --> 01:07:46.670 align:start position:0% courses and the<01:07:45.279> the<01:07:45.480> K 01:07:46.670 --> 01:07:46.680 align:start position:0% the the K 01:07:46.680 --> 01:07:50.349 align:start position:0% the the K K12<01:07:47.680> education<01:07:48.200> room<01:07:48.599> where<01:07:48.760> they<01:07:48.960> where<01:07:49.119> they 01:07:50.349 --> 01:07:50.359 align:start position:0% K12 education room where they where they 01:07:50.359 --> 01:07:54.150 align:start position:0% K12 education room where they where they cross<01:07:51.359> they<01:07:51.520> don't<01:07:52.319> colleges<01:07:52.960> don't<01:07:53.520> have<01:07:53.760> to 01:07:54.150 --> 01:07:54.160 align:start position:0% cross they don't colleges don't have to 01:07:54.160 --> 01:07:56.910 align:start position:0% cross they don't colleges don't have to filter 01:07:56.910 --> 01:07:56.920 align:start position:0% filter 01:07:56.920 --> 01:07:59.470 align:start position:0% filter content<01:07:57.920> we<01:07:58.079> are<01:07:58.319> creating<01:07:58.680> an<01:07:58.880> environment 01:07:59.470 --> 01:07:59.480 align:start position:0% content we are creating an environment 01:07:59.480 --> 01:08:00.349 align:start position:0% content we are creating an environment where 01:08:00.349 --> 01:08:00.359 align:start position:0% where 01:08:00.359 --> 01:08:03.870 align:start position:0% where even<01:08:01.359> um<01:08:01.720> kids<01:08:02.000> can<01:08:02.200> earn<01:08:02.720> college<01:08:03.160> credit<01:08:03.559> now 01:08:03.870 --> 01:08:03.880 align:start position:0% even um kids can earn college credit now 01:08:03.880 --> 01:08:06.710 align:start position:0% even um kids can earn college credit now before<01:08:04.880> you<01:08:05.000> know<01:08:05.559> nth 01:08:06.710 --> 01:08:06.720 align:start position:0% before you know nth 01:08:06.720 --> 01:08:09.589 align:start position:0% before you know nth grade<01:08:07.720> and<01:08:08.000> kids<01:08:08.200> are<01:08:08.319> getting<01:08:08.680> Associates 01:08:09.589 --> 01:08:09.599 align:start position:0% grade and kids are getting Associates 01:08:09.599 --> 01:08:12.390 align:start position:0% grade and kids are getting Associates degrees<01:08:10.599> when<01:08:10.839> they<01:08:11.119> graduate<01:08:12.119> uh<01:08:12.240> the 01:08:12.390 --> 01:08:12.400 align:start position:0% degrees when they graduate uh the 01:08:12.400 --> 01:08:14.390 align:start position:0% degrees when they graduate uh the majority<01:08:12.799> of<01:08:12.960> their<01:08:13.200> courses<01:08:13.720> are 01:08:14.390 --> 01:08:14.400 align:start position:0% majority of their courses are 01:08:14.400 --> 01:08:17.189 align:start position:0% majority of their courses are transitioning<01:08:15.119> into<01:08:15.400> the<01:08:15.599> college<01:08:16.000> realm<01:08:17.000> so 01:08:17.189 --> 01:08:17.199 align:start position:0% transitioning into the college realm so 01:08:17.199 --> 01:08:20.390 align:start position:0% transitioning into the college realm so you<01:08:17.520> have<01:08:17.839> two<01:08:18.759> academic<01:08:19.199> Realms<01:08:19.799> battling 01:08:20.390 --> 01:08:20.400 align:start position:0% you have two academic Realms battling 01:08:20.400 --> 01:08:23.910 align:start position:0% you have two academic Realms battling for<01:08:20.719> what<01:08:21.000> you<01:08:21.199> can<01:08:21.440> and<01:08:21.679> can't<01:08:22.279> do<01:08:23.279> and<01:08:23.400> it's<01:08:23.560> a 01:08:23.910 --> 01:08:23.920 align:start position:0% for what you can and can't do and it's a 01:08:23.920 --> 01:08:26.829 align:start position:0% for what you can and can't do and it's a problem<01:08:24.880> if<01:08:25.040> we<01:08:25.199> believe<01:08:25.520> believe<01:08:25.839> that<01:08:26.560> we're 01:08:26.829 --> 01:08:26.839 align:start position:0% problem if we believe believe that we're 01:08:26.839 --> 01:08:29.149 align:start position:0% problem if we believe believe that we're trying<01:08:27.120> to<01:08:27.359> protect<01:08:27.759> our<01:08:28.000> children<01:08:28.640> from<01:08:29.040> you 01:08:29.149 --> 01:08:29.159 align:start position:0% trying to protect our children from you 01:08:29.159 --> 01:08:32.590 align:start position:0% trying to protect our children from you know<01:08:29.960> because<01:08:30.199> of<01:08:30.359> age<01:08:31.040> appropriate<01:08:32.040> material 01:08:32.590 --> 01:08:32.600 align:start position:0% know because of age appropriate material 01:08:32.600 --> 01:08:37.470 align:start position:0% know because of age appropriate material and<01:08:33.279> content<01:08:34.279> so<01:08:34.880> we<01:08:35.120> have<01:08:35.239> to<01:08:35.440> be<01:08:35.759> very<01:08:36.480> clear 01:08:37.470 --> 01:08:37.480 align:start position:0% and content so we have to be very clear 01:08:37.480 --> 01:08:40.590 align:start position:0% and content so we have to be very clear in<01:08:37.679> the<01:08:38.080> expectation<01:08:39.080> and<01:08:39.279> that<01:08:39.600> standard<01:08:40.400> has 01:08:40.590 --> 01:08:40.600 align:start position:0% in the expectation and that standard has 01:08:40.600 --> 01:08:45.829 align:start position:0% in the expectation and that standard has to<01:08:40.839> be<01:08:41.319> met<01:08:42.040> by<01:08:43.040> a<01:08:43.319> higher<01:08:43.719> ed<01:08:44.640> and<01:08:44.839> if<01:08:45.040> they 01:08:45.829 --> 01:08:45.839 align:start position:0% to be met by a higher ed and if they 01:08:45.839 --> 01:08:48.390 align:start position:0% to be met by a higher ed and if they can't<01:08:46.839> um<01:08:47.279> then<01:08:47.480> I<01:08:47.560> think<01:08:47.799> we<01:08:48.000> have<01:08:48.120> to 01:08:48.390 --> 01:08:48.400 align:start position:0% can't um then I think we have to 01:08:48.400 --> 01:08:50.590 align:start position:0% can't um then I think we have to reassess<01:08:49.120> the<01:08:49.359> partnership<01:08:50.040> that<01:08:50.199> we<01:08:50.400> have 01:08:50.590 --> 01:08:50.600 align:start position:0% reassess the partnership that we have 01:08:50.600 --> 01:08:52.030 align:start position:0% reassess the partnership that we have with<01:08:50.839> these 01:08:52.030 --> 01:08:52.040 align:start position:0% with these 01:08:52.040 --> 01:08:56.189 align:start position:0% with these universities<01:08:53.040> if<01:08:53.199> we're<01:08:53.719> if<01:08:53.839> we're<01:08:54.120> going<01:08:54.400> to 01:08:56.189 --> 01:08:56.199 align:start position:0% universities if we're if we're going to 01:08:56.199 --> 01:09:01.669 align:start position:0% universities if we're if we're going to make<01:08:56.440> it<01:08:56.640> so<01:08:57.159> you<01:08:57.319> know<01:08:57.920> SEC<01:08:58.719> um<01:08:59.560> High 01:09:01.669 --> 01:09:01.679 align:start position:0% make it so you know SEC um High 01:09:01.679 --> 01:09:05.829 align:start position:0% make it so you know SEC um High School<01:09:02.679> is<01:09:03.000> protected<01:09:03.839> but<01:09:04.120> but<01:09:04.319> we<01:09:04.679> in<01:09:05.679> you 01:09:05.829 --> 01:09:05.839 align:start position:0% School is protected but but we in you 01:09:05.839 --> 01:09:07.550 align:start position:0% School is protected but but we in you know<01:09:06.159> on<01:09:06.319> the<01:09:06.480> other<01:09:06.759> hand<01:09:07.000> we're<01:09:07.400> we're 01:09:07.550 --> 01:09:07.560 align:start position:0% know on the other hand we're we're 01:09:07.560 --> 01:09:09.789 align:start position:0% know on the other hand we're we're funneling<01:09:08.199> children<01:09:08.600> more<01:09:08.799> and<01:09:08.920> more 01:09:09.789 --> 01:09:09.799 align:start position:0% funneling children more and more 01:09:09.799 --> 01:09:12.390 align:start position:0% funneling children more and more towards<01:09:10.799> you<01:09:10.920> know<01:09:11.159> these<01:09:11.520> colleges<01:09:12.120> so<01:09:12.239> that 01:09:12.390 --> 01:09:12.400 align:start position:0% towards you know these colleges so that 01:09:12.400 --> 01:09:14.789 align:start position:0% towards you know these colleges so that they<01:09:12.520> can<01:09:12.679> earn<01:09:13.159> college 01:09:14.789 --> 01:09:14.799 align:start position:0% they can earn college 01:09:14.799 --> 01:09:17.950 align:start position:0% they can earn college credit<01:09:15.799> and<01:09:15.960> we're<01:09:16.199> stripping 01:09:17.950 --> 01:09:17.960 align:start position:0% credit and we're stripping 01:09:17.960 --> 01:09:20.470 align:start position:0% credit and we're stripping away<01:09:18.960> we're<01:09:19.159> we're<01:09:19.400> speaking<01:09:19.799> two<01:09:20.040> things<01:09:20.319> at 01:09:20.470 --> 01:09:20.480 align:start position:0% away we're we're speaking two things at 01:09:20.480 --> 01:09:23.910 align:start position:0% away we're we're speaking two things at the<01:09:20.640> same<01:09:21.080> time<01:09:22.080> well<01:09:22.719> I<01:09:22.839> think<01:09:23.400> the<01:09:23.520> one<01:09:23.719> part 01:09:23.910 --> 01:09:23.920 align:start position:0% the same time well I think the one part 01:09:23.920 --> 01:09:25.990 align:start position:0% the same time well I think the one part that's<01:09:24.120> the<01:09:24.239> most<01:09:24.480> important<01:09:24.880> though<01:09:25.000> is<01:09:25.080> that 01:09:25.990 --> 01:09:26.000 align:start position:0% that's the most important though is that 01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:28.630 align:start position:0% that's the most important though is that requiring<01:09:26.799> parental<01:09:27.279> consent<01:09:27.920> so<01:09:28.199> it's<01:09:28.480> the 01:09:28.630 --> 01:09:28.640 align:start position:0% requiring parental consent so it's the 01:09:28.640 --> 01:09:30.510 align:start position:0% requiring parental consent so it's the Parents<01:09:29.120> Choice<01:09:29.480> if<01:09:29.640> they<01:09:29.759> are<01:09:30.080> okay<01:09:30.359> with 01:09:30.510 --> 01:09:30.520 align:start position:0% Parents Choice if they are okay with 01:09:30.520 --> 01:09:31.910 align:start position:0% Parents Choice if they are okay with their<01:09:30.679> students<01:09:31.040> seeing<01:09:31.319> those<01:09:31.480> sensitive 01:09:31.910 --> 01:09:31.920 align:start position:0% their students seeing those sensitive 01:09:31.920 --> 01:09:33.829 align:start position:0% their students seeing those sensitive materials<01:09:32.440> and<01:09:32.960> in<01:09:33.080> order<01:09:33.359> to<01:09:33.520> get<01:09:33.679> that 01:09:33.829 --> 01:09:33.839 align:start position:0% materials and in order to get that 01:09:33.839 --> 01:09:36.149 align:start position:0% materials and in order to get that college<01:09:34.199> credit<01:09:34.600> so<01:09:35.279> I'm<01:09:35.480> comfortable<01:09:36.000> with 01:09:36.149 --> 01:09:36.159 align:start position:0% college credit so I'm comfortable with 01:09:36.159 --> 01:09:38.030 align:start position:0% college credit so I'm comfortable with it<01:09:36.359> because<01:09:36.600> it<01:09:37.040> does<01:09:37.239> it<01:09:37.400> leaves<01:09:37.640> it<01:09:37.759> up<01:09:37.880> to 01:09:38.030 --> 01:09:38.040 align:start position:0% it because it does it leaves it up to 01:09:38.040 --> 01:09:40.749 align:start position:0% it because it does it leaves it up to the<01:09:38.159> parents<01:09:38.480> to<01:09:38.759> decide<01:09:39.199> and<01:09:39.359> so<01:09:40.319> um<01:09:40.520> as<01:09:40.600> long 01:09:40.749 --> 01:09:40.759 align:start position:0% the parents to decide and so um as long 01:09:40.759 --> 01:09:42.630 align:start position:0% the parents to decide and so um as long as<01:09:40.880> they're<01:09:41.080> aware<01:09:41.560> and<01:09:41.839> they<01:09:42.000> come<01:09:42.199> home<01:09:42.440> with 01:09:42.630 --> 01:09:42.640 align:start position:0% as they're aware and they come home with 01:09:42.640 --> 01:09:44.269 align:start position:0% as they're aware and they come home with their<01:09:43.000> paper<01:09:43.359> and<01:09:43.480> they<01:09:43.600> make<01:09:43.719> sure<01:09:43.920> they<01:09:44.040> sign 01:09:44.269 --> 01:09:44.279 align:start position:0% their paper and they make sure they sign 01:09:44.279 --> 01:09:46.269 align:start position:0% their paper and they make sure they sign it<01:09:44.799> and<01:09:44.960> give<01:09:45.120> their<01:09:45.359> consent<01:09:45.679> in<01:09:45.839> the<01:09:45.960> two 01:09:46.269 --> 01:09:46.279 align:start position:0% it and give their consent in the two 01:09:46.279 --> 01:09:48.789 align:start position:0% it and give their consent in the two ways<01:09:47.279> it's<01:09:47.520> that<01:09:47.799> parents<01:09:48.199> choice<01:09:48.520> if<01:09:48.679> they 01:09:48.789 --> 01:09:48.799 align:start position:0% ways it's that parents choice if they 01:09:48.799 --> 01:09:50.630 align:start position:0% ways it's that parents choice if they are<01:09:49.040> okay<01:09:49.199> with<01:09:49.400> their<01:09:49.560> children<01:09:49.920> doing<01:09:50.319> so 01:09:50.630 --> 01:09:50.640 align:start position:0% are okay with their children doing so 01:09:50.640 --> 01:09:53.390 align:start position:0% are okay with their children doing so and<01:09:50.799> getting<01:09:51.560> in<01:09:52.239> regard<01:09:52.679> so<01:09:52.960> in<01:09:53.080> getting 01:09:53.390 --> 01:09:53.400 align:start position:0% and getting in regard so in getting 01:09:53.400 --> 01:09:55.430 align:start position:0% and getting in regard so in getting college<01:09:53.719> credit<01:09:54.120> which<01:09:54.360> by<01:09:54.480> the<01:09:54.600> way<01:09:54.760> is<01:09:54.920> like 01:09:55.430 --> 01:09:55.440 align:start position:0% college credit which by the way is like 01:09:55.440 --> 01:09:58.790 align:start position:0% college credit which by the way is like Mega<01:09:55.800> Discount<01:09:56.239> for<01:09:56.400> them<01:09:56.560> to<01:09:56.719> do<01:09:56.960> that<01:09:57.840> um 01:09:58.790 --> 01:09:58.800 align:start position:0% Mega Discount for them to do that um 01:09:58.800 --> 01:10:01.430 align:start position:0% Mega Discount for them to do that um absolutely<01:09:59.800> what<01:10:00.320> yeah<01:10:00.640> absolutely<01:10:01.080> and<01:10:01.199> I<01:10:01.360> I 01:10:01.430 --> 01:10:01.440 align:start position:0% absolutely what yeah absolutely and I I 01:10:01.440 --> 01:10:02.830 align:start position:0% absolutely what yeah absolutely and I I know<01:10:01.640> people<01:10:01.840> can<01:10:02.000> use<01:10:02.199> their<01:10:02.360> brain<01:10:02.600> and<01:10:02.719> they 01:10:02.830 --> 01:10:02.840 align:start position:0% know people can use their brain and they 01:10:02.840 --> 01:10:04.550 align:start position:0% know people can use their brain and they can<01:10:03.000> get<01:10:03.120> the<01:10:03.280> signatures<01:10:03.760> that<01:10:03.880> they<01:10:04.000> need<01:10:04.400> if 01:10:04.550 --> 01:10:04.560 align:start position:0% can get the signatures that they need if 01:10:04.560 --> 01:10:06.590 align:start position:0% can get the signatures that they need if it<01:10:04.719> is<01:10:05.000> not 01:10:06.590 --> 01:10:06.600 align:start position:0% it is not 01:10:06.600 --> 01:10:09.110 align:start position:0% it is not disclosed<01:10:07.600> and<01:10:07.760> if<01:10:07.920> that<01:10:08.120> quality<01:10:08.520> check<01:10:08.880> does 01:10:09.110 --> 01:10:09.120 align:start position:0% disclosed and if that quality check does 01:10:09.120 --> 01:10:13.110 align:start position:0% disclosed and if that quality check does not<01:10:09.679> exist<01:10:10.679> in<01:10:10.920> higher<01:10:11.640> education<01:10:12.640> because 01:10:13.110 --> 01:10:13.120 align:start position:0% not exist in higher education because 01:10:13.120 --> 01:10:15.870 align:start position:0% not exist in higher education because they<01:10:13.320> don't<01:10:13.800> perceive<01:10:14.520> their<01:10:14.840> materials<01:10:15.679> as 01:10:15.870 --> 01:10:15.880 align:start position:0% they don't perceive their materials as 01:10:15.880 --> 01:10:18.950 align:start position:0% they don't perceive their materials as being<01:10:16.360> sensitive<01:10:17.080> that<01:10:17.239> will<01:10:17.440> be<01:10:17.679> left<01:10:18.120> off<01:10:18.360> of 01:10:18.950 --> 01:10:18.960 align:start position:0% being sensitive that will be left off of 01:10:18.960 --> 01:10:23.750 align:start position:0% being sensitive that will be left off of that<01:10:19.960> um<01:10:20.480> that<01:10:20.760> paper<01:10:21.239> that<01:10:21.440> is<01:10:21.960> signed<01:10:22.960> so<01:10:23.560> I 01:10:23.750 --> 01:10:23.760 align:start position:0% that um that paper that is signed so I 01:10:23.760 --> 01:10:26.229 align:start position:0% that um that paper that is signed so I guess<01:10:24.040> what<01:10:24.199> I'm<01:10:24.440> trying<01:10:24.679> to<01:10:24.880> get<01:10:25.000> at<01:10:25.400> is<01:10:25.920> can 01:10:26.229 --> 01:10:26.239 align:start position:0% guess what I'm trying to get at is can 01:10:26.239 --> 01:10:28.550 align:start position:0% guess what I'm trying to get at is can we<01:10:26.520> build<01:10:27.000> in<01:10:27.600> a 01:10:28.550 --> 01:10:28.560 align:start position:0% we build in a 01:10:28.560 --> 01:10:32.030 align:start position:0% we build in a checkpoint<01:10:29.560> that<01:10:29.840> requires<01:10:30.640> that<01:10:31.400> that 01:10:32.030 --> 01:10:32.040 align:start position:0% checkpoint that requires that that 01:10:32.040 --> 01:10:35.350 align:start position:0% checkpoint that requires that that communication<01:10:32.880> to<01:10:33.480> occur<01:10:34.480> uh<01:10:34.640> between<01:10:34.920> the 01:10:35.350 --> 01:10:35.360 align:start position:0% communication to occur uh between the 01:10:35.360 --> 01:10:37.669 align:start position:0% communication to occur uh between the college<01:10:36.360> and<01:10:36.560> the<01:10:36.719> high<01:10:36.920> school<01:10:37.320> and<01:10:37.480> the 01:10:37.669 --> 01:10:37.679 align:start position:0% college and the high school and the 01:10:37.679 --> 01:10:41.830 align:start position:0% college and the high school and the parent<01:10:38.840> understands<01:10:39.840> this<01:10:40.040> is<01:10:40.920> their<01:10:41.320> child 01:10:41.830 --> 01:10:41.840 align:start position:0% parent understands this is their child 01:10:41.840 --> 01:10:44.229 align:start position:0% parent understands this is their child entering<01:10:42.280> in<01:10:42.520> that<01:10:42.679> realm<01:10:43.040> is<01:10:43.239> not<01:10:43.600> protected 01:10:44.229 --> 01:10:44.239 align:start position:0% entering in that realm is not protected 01:10:44.239 --> 01:10:46.709 align:start position:0% entering in that realm is not protected under<01:10:44.640> this<01:10:44.920> law 01:10:46.709 --> 01:10:46.719 align:start position:0% under this law 01:10:46.719 --> 01:10:48.910 align:start position:0% under this law anymore<01:10:47.719> they've<01:10:47.920> signed<01:10:48.320> away<01:10:48.679> that 01:10:48.910 --> 01:10:48.920 align:start position:0% anymore they've signed away that 01:10:48.920 --> 01:10:52.070 align:start position:0% anymore they've signed away that protection<01:10:49.440> to<01:10:49.679> their<01:10:50.239> minor<01:10:51.239> and<01:10:51.679> have<01:10:51.880> we 01:10:52.070 --> 01:10:52.080 align:start position:0% protection to their minor and have we 01:10:52.080 --> 01:10:55.310 align:start position:0% protection to their minor and have we made<01:10:52.280> it<01:10:52.560> clear<01:10:53.000> enough<01:10:53.640> in<01:10:53.920> this<01:10:54.560> guidance 01:10:55.310 --> 01:10:55.320 align:start position:0% made it clear enough in this guidance 01:10:55.320 --> 01:10:57.430 align:start position:0% made it clear enough in this guidance policy<01:10:56.199> that<01:10:56.480> that 01:10:57.430 --> 01:10:57.440 align:start position:0% policy that that 01:10:57.440 --> 01:11:01.430 align:start position:0% policy that that Lea<01:10:58.440> has<01:10:58.679> to<01:10:59.080> disclose<01:10:59.880> that<01:11:00.560> understanding 01:11:01.430 --> 01:11:01.440 align:start position:0% Lea has to disclose that understanding 01:11:01.440 --> 01:11:04.830 align:start position:0% Lea has to disclose that understanding that<01:11:01.719> checkpoint<01:11:02.440> has<01:11:02.600> to<01:11:02.760> be<01:11:02.960> built<01:11:03.840> in 01:11:04.830 --> 01:11:04.840 align:start position:0% that checkpoint has to be built in 01:11:04.840 --> 01:11:07.830 align:start position:0% that checkpoint has to be built in because<01:11:05.719> we're<01:11:06.000> we're<01:11:06.360> parents<01:11:06.880> like<01:11:07.159> we<01:11:07.719> we 01:11:07.830 --> 01:11:07.840 align:start position:0% because we're we're parents like we we 01:11:07.840 --> 01:11:11.149 align:start position:0% because we're we're parents like we we sign<01:11:08.159> a<01:11:08.320> billion<01:11:08.760> papers<01:11:09.239> in 01:11:11.149 --> 01:11:11.159 align:start position:0% sign a billion papers in 01:11:11.159 --> 01:11:13.550 align:start position:0% sign a billion papers in August<01:11:12.159> you<01:11:12.320> know<01:11:12.600> and<01:11:12.800> things<01:11:13.000> slip<01:11:13.360> through 01:11:13.550 --> 01:11:13.560 align:start position:0% August you know and things slip through 01:11:13.560 --> 01:11:17.310 align:start position:0% August you know and things slip through the<01:11:14.000> cracks<01:11:15.040> and<01:11:16.040> and<01:11:16.360> I<01:11:16.640> I<01:11:16.760> think<01:11:17.040> that 01:11:17.310 --> 01:11:17.320 align:start position:0% the cracks and and I I think that 01:11:17.320 --> 01:11:20.870 align:start position:0% the cracks and and I I think that parents<01:11:18.320> have<01:11:19.040> we've<01:11:19.360> existed<01:11:19.719> in<01:11:19.840> a<01:11:20.000> realm 01:11:20.870 --> 01:11:20.880 align:start position:0% parents have we've existed in a realm 01:11:20.880 --> 01:11:24.430 align:start position:0% parents have we've existed in a realm where<01:11:21.400> um<01:11:22.199> the<01:11:22.400> sexualization<01:11:23.400> hasn't<01:11:23.800> been 01:11:24.430 --> 01:11:24.440 align:start position:0% where um the sexualization hasn't been 01:11:24.440 --> 01:11:27.630 align:start position:0% where um the sexualization hasn't been at<01:11:24.640> at<01:11:24.719> the<01:11:24.840> Forefront<01:11:25.520> like<01:11:25.640> it<01:11:25.760> is<01:11:26.120> now<01:11:27.120> but 01:11:27.630 --> 01:11:27.640 align:start position:0% at at the Forefront like it is now but 01:11:27.640 --> 01:11:29.910 align:start position:0% at at the Forefront like it is now but and<01:11:27.840> so<01:11:28.280> we're<01:11:28.679> we're<01:11:28.920> Generations<01:11:29.560> like<01:11:29.760> oh 01:11:29.910 --> 01:11:29.920 align:start position:0% and so we're we're Generations like oh 01:11:29.920 --> 01:11:31.070 align:start position:0% and so we're we're Generations like oh we<01:11:30.000> live<01:11:30.159> in<01:11:30.239> a<01:11:30.360> different<01:11:30.600> world<01:11:30.800> we<01:11:30.880> got<01:11:30.960> to 01:11:31.070 --> 01:11:31.080 align:start position:0% we live in a different world we got to 01:11:31.080 --> 01:11:33.149 align:start position:0% we live in a different world we got to be<01:11:31.199> real<01:11:31.400> careful<01:11:31.760> about<01:11:32.480> what<01:11:32.640> is<01:11:32.840> being 01:11:33.149 --> 01:11:33.159 align:start position:0% be real careful about what is being 01:11:33.159 --> 01:11:36.270 align:start position:0% be real careful about what is being presented<01:11:34.159> and<01:11:34.600> as<01:11:34.800> we<01:11:34.920> should<01:11:35.520> with 01:11:36.270 --> 01:11:36.280 align:start position:0% presented and as we should with 01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:38.470 align:start position:0% presented and as we should with minors 01:11:38.470 --> 01:11:38.480 align:start position:0% minors 01:11:38.480 --> 01:11:42.510 align:start position:0% minors um<01:11:39.480> and<01:11:40.239> and<01:11:40.480> our<01:11:40.679> our<01:11:40.880> higher<01:11:41.280> ed<01:11:42.080> takes<01:11:42.320> the 01:11:42.510 --> 01:11:42.520 align:start position:0% um and and our our higher ed takes the 01:11:42.520 --> 01:11:47.629 align:start position:0% um and and our our higher ed takes the Liberty<01:11:42.960> to<01:11:44.080> present<01:11:45.080> those<01:11:45.840> topics<01:11:46.840> and<01:11:47.040> so 01:11:47.629 --> 01:11:47.639 align:start position:0% Liberty to present those topics and so 01:11:47.639 --> 01:11:49.270 align:start position:0% Liberty to present those topics and so again<01:11:47.960> we're<01:11:48.199> we're<01:11:48.320> at<01:11:48.440> the<01:11:48.560> battle<01:11:48.800> of<01:11:48.920> wits 01:11:49.270 --> 01:11:49.280 align:start position:0% again we're we're at the battle of wits 01:11:49.280 --> 01:11:51.550 align:start position:0% again we're we're at the battle of wits here<01:11:49.480> now<01:11:49.719> between<01:11:50.080> higher<01:11:50.440> end<01:11:50.800> and<01:11:51.120> and<01:11:51.320> high 01:11:51.550 --> 01:11:51.560 align:start position:0% here now between higher end and and high 01:11:51.560 --> 01:11:54.229 align:start position:0% here now between higher end and and high school<01:11:52.199> children<01:11:52.840> regardless<01:11:53.480> of<01:11:53.639> a<01:11:53.840> paper 01:11:54.229 --> 01:11:54.239 align:start position:0% school children regardless of a paper 01:11:54.239 --> 01:11:56.470 align:start position:0% school children regardless of a paper that<01:11:54.360> is<01:11:54.520> signed 01:11:56.470 --> 01:11:56.480 align:start position:0% that is signed 01:11:56.480 --> 01:12:00.070 align:start position:0% that is signed do<01:11:57.080> have<01:11:57.280> we<01:11:57.719> communicated<01:11:58.719> to<01:11:59.080> parents<01:11:59.880> that 01:12:00.070 --> 01:12:00.080 align:start position:0% do have we communicated to parents that 01:12:00.080 --> 01:12:03.189 align:start position:0% do have we communicated to parents that when<01:12:00.320> their<01:12:00.600> minor<01:12:01.360> enters<01:12:01.800> in<01:12:02.480> higher<01:12:02.840> ed 01:12:03.189 --> 01:12:03.199 align:start position:0% when their minor enters in higher ed 01:12:03.199 --> 01:12:06.310 align:start position:0% when their minor enters in higher ed settings<01:12:03.920> they<01:12:04.080> will<01:12:04.400> be<01:12:04.960> exposed<01:12:05.600> to 01:12:06.310 --> 01:12:06.320 align:start position:0% settings they will be exposed to 01:12:06.320 --> 01:12:08.950 align:start position:0% settings they will be exposed to sensitive<01:12:06.840> materials<01:12:07.840> that<01:12:08.040> would<01:12:08.239> be<01:12:08.800> that 01:12:08.950 --> 01:12:08.960 align:start position:0% sensitive materials that would be that 01:12:08.960 --> 01:12:10.870 align:start position:0% sensitive materials that would be that we<01:12:09.080> could<01:12:09.320> prosecute<01:12:09.880> through<01:12:10.320> by<01:12:10.679> through 01:12:10.870 --> 01:12:10.880 align:start position:0% we could prosecute through by through 01:12:10.880 --> 01:12:11.990 align:start position:0% we could prosecute through by through the 01:12:11.990 --> 01:12:12.000 align:start position:0% the 01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:15.950 align:start position:0% the law<01:12:13.199> um<01:12:14.199> and<01:12:14.400> that<01:12:14.719> that<01:12:14.960> could<01:12:15.679> and<01:12:15.800> they're 01:12:15.950 --> 01:12:15.960 align:start position:0% law um and that that could and they're 01:12:15.960 --> 01:12:18.470 align:start position:0% law um and that that could and they're going<01:12:16.040> to<01:12:16.159> have<01:12:16.239> to<01:12:16.320> deal<01:12:16.520> with<01:12:16.639> that 01:12:18.470 --> 01:12:18.480 align:start position:0% going to have to deal with that 01:12:18.480 --> 01:12:20.790 align:start position:0% going to have to deal with that situation<01:12:19.480> and<01:12:19.600> so<01:12:19.960> back 01:12:20.790 --> 01:12:20.800 align:start position:0% situation and so back 01:12:20.800 --> 01:12:24.669 align:start position:0% situation and so back to<01:12:22.239> 5A<01:12:23.239> and<01:12:23.360> I'm<01:12:23.520> glad<01:12:23.719> we<01:12:23.880> have<01:12:24.040> numbers<01:12:24.440> and 01:12:24.669 --> 01:12:24.679 align:start position:0% to 5A and I'm glad we have numbers and 01:12:24.679 --> 01:12:27.910 align:start position:0% to 5A and I'm glad we have numbers and and<01:12:24.800> letters<01:12:25.400> to<01:12:26.400> guide<01:12:26.600> us<01:12:26.800> back<01:12:27.040> do<01:12:27.199> we<01:12:27.320> feel 01:12:27.910 --> 01:12:27.920 align:start position:0% and letters to guide us back do we feel 01:12:27.920 --> 01:12:30.390 align:start position:0% and letters to guide us back do we feel that<01:12:28.920> what's<01:12:29.239> written<01:12:29.600> here<01:12:29.920> concurrent 01:12:30.390 --> 01:12:30.400 align:start position:0% that what's written here concurrent 01:12:30.400 --> 01:12:33.430 align:start position:0% that what's written here concurrent enrollment<01:12:31.080> course<01:12:32.080> for<01:12:32.360> which<01:12:32.520> a<01:12:32.719> parent 01:12:33.430 --> 01:12:33.440 align:start position:0% enrollment course for which a parent 01:12:33.440 --> 01:12:37.070 align:start position:0% enrollment course for which a parent receives<01:12:33.880> notice<01:12:34.520> and<01:12:34.760> provides<01:12:35.920> consent<01:12:36.920> I 01:12:37.070 --> 01:12:37.080 align:start position:0% receives notice and provides consent I 01:12:37.080 --> 01:12:39.750 align:start position:0% receives notice and provides consent I think<01:12:37.320> we're<01:12:37.639> still<01:12:38.239> leaving<01:12:38.920> off<01:12:39.480> the 01:12:39.750 --> 01:12:39.760 align:start position:0% think we're still leaving off the 01:12:39.760 --> 01:12:42.950 align:start position:0% think we're still leaving off the controversy<01:12:40.840> here<01:12:41.840> and<01:12:42.000> maybe<01:12:42.320> controversy 01:12:42.950 --> 01:12:42.960 align:start position:0% controversy here and maybe controversy 01:12:42.960 --> 01:12:45.950 align:start position:0% controversy here and maybe controversy is<01:12:43.080> not<01:12:43.239> the<01:12:43.400> right<01:12:43.639> word<01:12:44.639> we<01:12:44.800> are<01:12:45.480> we<01:12:45.639> are 01:12:45.950 --> 01:12:45.960 align:start position:0% is not the right word we are we are 01:12:45.960 --> 01:12:48.990 align:start position:0% is not the right word we are we are we've<01:12:46.199> kind<01:12:46.320> of<01:12:46.679> stripped<01:12:47.120> out 01:12:48.990 --> 01:12:49.000 align:start position:0% we've kind of stripped out 01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:51.310 align:start position:0% we've kind of stripped out the<01:12:50.000> well<01:12:50.159> the<01:12:50.360> point<01:12:50.560> of<01:12:50.679> it<01:12:50.840> being<01:12:51.040> in<01:12:51.159> the 01:12:51.310 --> 01:12:51.320 align:start position:0% the well the point of it being in the 01:12:51.320 --> 01:12:52.910 align:start position:0% the well the point of it being in the law<01:12:51.960> right<01:12:52.120> the<01:12:52.199> point<01:12:52.360> of<01:12:52.480> it<01:12:52.600> being<01:12:52.719> in<01:12:52.840> the 01:12:52.910 --> 01:12:52.920 align:start position:0% law right the point of it being in the 01:12:52.920 --> 01:12:54.390 align:start position:0% law right the point of it being in the law<01:12:53.159> is<01:12:53.320> that<01:12:53.400> it<01:12:53.560> contains<01:12:53.960> sense<01:12:54.239> to 01:12:54.390 --> 01:12:54.400 align:start position:0% law is that it contains sense to 01:12:54.400 --> 01:12:55.790 align:start position:0% law is that it contains sense to material<01:12:54.800> so<01:12:54.920> I<01:12:54.960> think 01:12:55.790 --> 01:12:55.800 align:start position:0% material so I think 01:12:55.800 --> 01:12:57.270 align:start position:0% material so I think if<01:12:55.920> we're<01:12:56.040> going<01:12:56.159> to<01:12:56.320> simplify<01:12:56.840> the<01:12:56.960> end<01:12:57.159> it's 01:12:57.270 --> 01:12:57.280 align:start position:0% if we're going to simplify the end it's 01:12:57.280 --> 01:12:58.830 align:start position:0% if we're going to simplify the end it's got<01:12:57.400> to<01:12:57.520> say<01:12:57.719> concurrent<01:12:58.080> enrollment<01:12:58.520> course 01:12:58.830 --> 01:12:58.840 align:start position:0% got to say concurrent enrollment course 01:12:58.840 --> 01:13:02.070 align:start position:0% got to say concurrent enrollment course for<01:12:59.360> which<01:13:00.360> or<01:13:00.679> concurrent<01:13:01.600> enrollment 01:13:02.070 --> 01:13:02.080 align:start position:0% for which or concurrent enrollment 01:13:02.080 --> 01:13:04.870 align:start position:0% for which or concurrent enrollment course<01:13:02.400> that<01:13:02.600> contains<01:13:03.159> sensitive<01:13:03.880> materials 01:13:04.870 --> 01:13:04.880 align:start position:0% course that contains sensitive materials 01:13:04.880 --> 01:13:06.790 align:start position:0% course that contains sensitive materials for<01:13:05.159> which<01:13:05.320> a<01:13:05.520> parent<01:13:06.000> receives<01:13:06.239> notice<01:13:06.600> and 01:13:06.790 --> 01:13:06.800 align:start position:0% for which a parent receives notice and 01:13:06.800 --> 01:13:08.669 align:start position:0% for which a parent receives notice and provides<01:13:07.320> consent<01:13:08.000> if<01:13:08.080> we're<01:13:08.239> gonna<01:13:08.600> that 01:13:08.669 --> 01:13:08.679 align:start position:0% provides consent if we're gonna that 01:13:08.679 --> 01:13:12.070 align:start position:0% provides consent if we're gonna that works<01:13:08.880> for<01:13:09.040> me<01:13:09.800> yeah<01:13:10.600> that's<01:13:10.920> that<01:13:11.000> works<01:13:11.199> for 01:13:12.070 --> 01:13:12.080 align:start position:0% works for me yeah that's that works for 01:13:12.080 --> 01:13:15.709 align:start position:0% works for me yeah that's that works for me<01:13:13.080> good<01:13:13.320> thought<01:13:13.560> so<01:13:13.679> it's<01:13:13.880> after<01:13:14.560> yeah<01:13:15.560> did 01:13:15.709 --> 01:13:15.719 align:start position:0% me good thought so it's after yeah did 01:13:15.719 --> 01:13:17.870 align:start position:0% me good thought so it's after yeah did you<01:13:15.880> get<01:13:16.040> that<01:13:16.239> for<01:13:16.560> wh<01:13:16.960> uh<01:13:17.120> let's<01:13:17.280> see<01:13:17.440> so<01:13:17.639> a 01:13:17.870 --> 01:13:17.880 align:start position:0% you get that for wh uh let's see so a 01:13:17.880 --> 01:13:19.350 align:start position:0% you get that for wh uh let's see so a concurrent<01:13:18.320> enrollment<01:13:18.760> course<01:13:19.159> that 01:13:19.350 --> 01:13:19.360 align:start position:0% concurrent enrollment course that 01:13:19.360 --> 01:13:27.470 align:start position:0% concurrent enrollment course that contains<01:13:19.960> sensitive<01:13:20.480> materials 01:13:27.470 --> 01:13:27.480 align:start position:0% 01:13:27.480 --> 01:13:28.629 align:start position:0% and<01:13:27.600> I<01:13:27.719> and<01:13:27.800> I<01:13:27.920> hear<01:13:28.080> what<01:13:28.199> you're<01:13:28.360> saying 01:13:28.629 --> 01:13:28.639 align:start position:0% and I and I hear what you're saying 01:13:28.639 --> 01:13:31.870 align:start position:0% and I and I hear what you're saying member<01:13:28.960> green<01:13:30.040> um<01:13:31.040> I<01:13:31.159> guess<01:13:31.320> there<01:13:31.520> just 01:13:31.870 --> 01:13:31.880 align:start position:0% member green um I guess there just 01:13:31.880 --> 01:13:34.350 align:start position:0% member green um I guess there just there's<01:13:32.120> no<01:13:32.320> way<01:13:32.520> for<01:13:32.719> us<01:13:32.840> to<01:13:33.080> be<01:13:33.239> able<01:13:33.480> to 01:13:34.350 --> 01:13:34.360 align:start position:0% there's no way for us to be able to 01:13:34.360 --> 01:13:36.110 align:start position:0% there's no way for us to be able to control<01:13:34.840> some<01:13:35.040> of<01:13:35.280> that<01:13:35.480> those<01:13:35.679> pieces 01:13:36.110 --> 01:13:36.120 align:start position:0% control some of that those pieces 01:13:36.120 --> 01:13:38.470 align:start position:0% control some of that those pieces unfortunately<01:13:36.880> but<01:13:37.120> what<01:13:37.239> is<01:13:37.360> in<01:13:37.520> the<01:13:37.679> law<01:13:38.080> is 01:13:38.470 --> 01:13:38.480 align:start position:0% unfortunately but what is in the law is 01:13:38.480 --> 01:13:40.470 align:start position:0% unfortunately but what is in the law is is<01:13:38.800> good<01:13:39.080> I<01:13:39.199> think<01:13:39.600> in<01:13:39.800> making<01:13:40.080> sure<01:13:40.320> that 01:13:40.470 --> 01:13:40.480 align:start position:0% is good I think in making sure that 01:13:40.480 --> 01:13:43.270 align:start position:0% is good I think in making sure that there's<01:13:40.760> checkpoints<01:13:41.400> in<01:13:41.560> order<01:13:41.840> to<01:13:42.800> um<01:13:43.000> allow 01:13:43.270 --> 01:13:43.280 align:start position:0% there's checkpoints in order to um allow 01:13:43.280 --> 01:13:44.550 align:start position:0% there's checkpoints in order to um allow students<01:13:43.639> to<01:13:43.760> take<01:13:43.960> those<01:13:44.159> concurrent 01:13:44.550 --> 01:13:44.560 align:start position:0% students to take those concurrent 01:13:44.560 --> 01:13:46.070 align:start position:0% students to take those concurrent enrollment<01:13:44.960> courses<01:13:45.400> but<01:13:45.520> a<01:13:45.600> lot<01:13:45.760> of<01:13:45.840> it<01:13:45.960> is 01:13:46.070 --> 01:13:46.080 align:start position:0% enrollment courses but a lot of it is 01:13:46.080 --> 01:13:49.590 align:start position:0% enrollment courses but a lot of it is sort<01:13:46.239> of<01:13:46.360> out<01:13:46.480> of<01:13:46.600> our<01:13:46.719> hands<01:13:47.000> unfortunately<01:13:47.679> I 01:13:49.590 --> 01:13:49.600 align:start position:0% sort of out of our hands unfortunately I 01:13:49.600 --> 01:13:53.590 align:start position:0% sort of out of our hands unfortunately I think<01:13:50.600> I<01:13:50.719> think<01:13:51.560> that<01:13:52.560> I<01:13:52.639> think<01:13:52.840> it<01:13:53.159> has<01:13:53.400> been 01:13:53.590 --> 01:13:53.600 align:start position:0% think I think that I think it has been 01:13:53.600 --> 01:13:56.390 align:start position:0% think I think that I think it has been out<01:13:53.760> of<01:13:53.920> our<01:13:54.239> our<01:13:54.440> hands<01:13:54.800> because<01:13:55.239> a 01:13:56.390 --> 01:13:56.400 align:start position:0% out of our our hands because a 01:13:56.400 --> 01:14:00.030 align:start position:0% out of our our hands because a new<01:13:57.400> it's<01:13:57.560> like<01:13:57.719> a<01:13:57.880> new<01:13:58.199> realm<01:13:58.639> that's<01:13:59.600> been 01:14:00.030 --> 01:14:00.040 align:start position:0% new it's like a new realm that's been 01:14:00.040 --> 01:14:04.750 align:start position:0% new it's like a new realm that's been created<01:14:00.800> or<01:14:01.600> developed<01:14:02.800> um<01:14:03.800> and<01:14:04.000> I<01:14:04.080> think<01:14:04.440> any 01:14:04.750 --> 01:14:04.760 align:start position:0% created or developed um and I think any 01:14:04.760 --> 01:14:05.629 align:start position:0% created or developed um and I think any new 01:14:05.629 --> 01:14:05.639 align:start position:0% new 01:14:05.639 --> 01:14:08.709 align:start position:0% new realm<01:14:06.639> has 01:14:08.709 --> 01:14:08.719 align:start position:0% realm has 01:14:08.719 --> 01:14:12.470 align:start position:0% realm has a<01:14:09.719> a<01:14:09.920> chaotic<01:14:10.480> moment<01:14:11.440> where<01:14:11.920> like<01:14:12.120> oh<01:14:12.320> okay 01:14:12.470 --> 01:14:12.480 align:start position:0% a a chaotic moment where like oh okay 01:14:12.480 --> 01:14:13.790 align:start position:0% a a chaotic moment where like oh okay this<01:14:12.600> is<01:14:12.719> what<01:14:12.800> we're<01:14:12.960> dealing<01:14:13.239> with<01:14:13.400> and<01:14:13.600> hey 01:14:13.790 --> 01:14:13.800 align:start position:0% this is what we're dealing with and hey 01:14:13.800 --> 01:14:15.830 align:start position:0% this is what we're dealing with and hey maybe<01:14:14.080> this<01:14:14.239> is<01:14:14.920> this<01:14:15.080> might<01:14:15.239> be<01:14:15.400> taking<01:14:15.679> it 01:14:15.830 --> 01:14:15.840 align:start position:0% maybe this is this might be taking it 01:14:15.840 --> 01:14:18.709 align:start position:0% maybe this is this might be taking it too<01:14:16.080> far<01:14:16.600> and<01:14:17.600> is<01:14:17.800> this<01:14:18.000> really<01:14:18.199> the<01:14:18.360> direction 01:14:18.709 --> 01:14:18.719 align:start position:0% too far and is this really the direction 01:14:18.719 --> 01:14:20.390 align:start position:0% too far and is this really the direction we<01:14:18.840> want<01:14:18.960> to<01:14:19.239> go<01:14:19.440> and<01:14:19.560> I<01:14:19.760> kind<01:14:19.880> of<01:14:20.040> feel<01:14:20.239> like 01:14:20.390 --> 01:14:20.400 align:start position:0% we want to go and I kind of feel like 01:14:20.400 --> 01:14:24.510 align:start position:0% we want to go and I kind of feel like we're<01:14:20.840> there<01:14:21.840> I<01:14:21.960> do<01:14:22.159> feel<01:14:22.440> like<01:14:23.080> you<01:14:23.360> know<01:14:24.360> the 01:14:24.510 --> 01:14:24.520 align:start position:0% we're there I do feel like you know the 01:14:24.520 --> 01:14:26.830 align:start position:0% we're there I do feel like you know the way<01:14:24.719> that<01:14:25.120> we<01:14:25.239> are<01:14:25.639> providing<01:14:26.080> students<01:14:26.480> a<01:14:26.639> way 01:14:26.830 --> 01:14:26.840 align:start position:0% way that we are providing students a way 01:14:26.840 --> 01:14:30.470 align:start position:0% way that we are providing students a way to<01:14:27.480> get<01:14:28.480> this<01:14:28.719> credit<01:14:29.120> is<01:14:29.360> very<01:14:29.639> helpful<01:14:30.360> it 01:14:30.470 --> 01:14:30.480 align:start position:0% to get this credit is very helpful it 01:14:30.480 --> 01:14:33.070 align:start position:0% to get this credit is very helpful it saves<01:14:30.760> a<01:14:30.880> lot<01:14:31.000> of<01:14:31.159> money<01:14:31.719> it<01:14:31.920> it<01:14:32.360> it<01:14:32.480> launches 01:14:33.070 --> 01:14:33.080 align:start position:0% saves a lot of money it it it launches 01:14:33.080 --> 01:14:35.870 align:start position:0% saves a lot of money it it it launches them<01:14:33.480> into<01:14:34.480> their<01:14:34.719> career<01:14:35.080> sooner<01:14:35.520> so<01:14:35.760> you 01:14:35.870 --> 01:14:35.880 align:start position:0% them into their career sooner so you 01:14:35.880 --> 01:14:38.110 align:start position:0% them into their career sooner so you know<01:14:36.000> I<01:14:36.120> see<01:14:36.320> all<01:14:36.760> the<01:14:37.000> positives<01:14:37.520> but<01:14:37.880> it's 01:14:38.110 --> 01:14:38.120 align:start position:0% know I see all the positives but it's 01:14:38.120 --> 01:14:43.750 align:start position:0% know I see all the positives but it's also<01:14:38.480> been<01:14:38.760> like<01:14:39.760> we<01:14:39.920> are<01:14:40.280> still<01:14:41.199> dealing<01:14:42.320> with 01:14:43.750 --> 01:14:43.760 align:start position:0% also been like we are still dealing with 01:14:43.760 --> 01:14:46.310 align:start position:0% also been like we are still dealing with miners<01:14:44.760> that<01:14:44.960> deserve<01:14:45.360> the<01:14:45.560> right<01:14:45.760> to<01:14:46.000> be 01:14:46.310 --> 01:14:46.320 align:start position:0% miners that deserve the right to be 01:14:46.320 --> 01:14:48.350 align:start position:0% miners that deserve the right to be protected<01:14:46.760> and<01:14:46.920> be<01:14:47.120> given<01:14:47.520> a<01:14:47.719> high<01:14:47.960> quality 01:14:48.350 --> 01:14:48.360 align:start position:0% protected and be given a high quality 01:14:48.360 --> 01:14:50.870 align:start position:0% protected and be given a high quality academic<01:14:49.080> setting<01:14:50.080> where<01:14:50.280> they're<01:14:50.520> just<01:14:50.679> not 01:14:50.870 --> 01:14:50.880 align:start position:0% academic setting where they're just not 01:14:50.880 --> 01:14:54.669 align:start position:0% academic setting where they're just not vulnerable<01:14:51.440> to<01:14:52.080> the<01:14:52.239> the<01:14:52.400> whims<01:14:52.840> of<01:14:53.400> of<01:14:53.679> change 01:14:54.669 --> 01:14:54.679 align:start position:0% vulnerable to the the whims of of change 01:14:54.679 --> 01:14:57.910 align:start position:0% vulnerable to the the whims of of change you<01:14:54.800> know<01:14:55.199> unregulated<01:14:56.199> so<01:14:57.199> it's<01:14:57.440> just 01:14:57.910 --> 01:14:57.920 align:start position:0% you know unregulated so it's just 01:14:57.920 --> 01:14:59.270 align:start position:0% you know unregulated so it's just addressing 01:14:59.270 --> 01:14:59.280 align:start position:0% addressing 01:14:59.280 --> 01:15:01.030 align:start position:0% addressing those 01:15:01.030 --> 01:15:01.040 align:start position:0% those 01:15:01.040 --> 01:15:04.070 align:start position:0% those yeah<01:15:02.040> I<01:15:02.120> don't<01:15:02.320> know<01:15:03.000> the<01:15:03.159> philosophy<01:15:03.800> I<01:15:03.920> guess 01:15:04.070 --> 01:15:04.080 align:start position:0% yeah I don't know the philosophy I guess 01:15:04.080 --> 01:15:06.709 align:start position:0% yeah I don't know the philosophy I guess of<01:15:04.199> the<01:15:04.360> matter<01:15:05.000> so<01:15:05.679> sure<01:15:06.080> Booth<01:15:06.400> I<01:15:06.480> don't<01:15:06.600> know 01:15:06.709 --> 01:15:06.719 align:start position:0% of the matter so sure Booth I don't know 01:15:06.719 --> 01:15:08.950 align:start position:0% of the matter so sure Booth I don't know if<01:15:06.800> he<01:15:06.920> knows<01:15:07.280> but<01:15:07.679> superintendent<01:15:08.639> Deputy 01:15:08.950 --> 01:15:08.960 align:start position:0% if he knows but superintendent Deputy 01:15:08.960 --> 01:15:10.470 align:start position:0% if he knows but superintendent Deputy superintendent<01:15:09.560> Patty<01:15:09.800> Norman<01:15:10.080> had<01:15:10.199> her<01:15:10.320> hand 01:15:10.470 --> 01:15:10.480 align:start position:0% superintendent Patty Norman had her hand 01:15:10.480 --> 01:15:11.750 align:start position:0% superintendent Patty Norman had her hand up<01:15:10.639> I<01:15:10.719> don't<01:15:10.800> know<01:15:10.920> if<01:15:11.000> she<01:15:11.159> had<01:15:11.360> something<01:15:11.600> to 01:15:11.750 --> 01:15:11.760 align:start position:0% up I don't know if she had something to 01:15:11.760 --> 01:15:12.790 align:start position:0% up I don't know if she had something to add<01:15:12.000> or 01:15:12.790 --> 01:15:12.800 align:start position:0% add or 01:15:12.800 --> 01:15:15.830 align:start position:0% add or something<01:15:13.800> good<01:15:14.239> I<01:15:14.400> now<01:15:14.639> see<01:15:14.920> that 01:15:15.830 --> 01:15:15.840 align:start position:0% something good I now see that 01:15:15.840 --> 01:15:19.350 align:start position:0% something good I now see that hand<01:15:16.840> yeah<01:15:17.280> um<01:15:18.000> yeah<01:15:18.199> thank<01:15:18.400> you<01:15:18.800> um<01:15:19.040> I<01:15:19.159> was 01:15:19.350 --> 01:15:19.360 align:start position:0% hand yeah um yeah thank you um I was 01:15:19.360 --> 01:15:21.550 align:start position:0% hand yeah um yeah thank you um I was going<01:15:19.520> to<01:15:19.760> ask<01:15:19.920> for<01:15:20.239> a<01:15:20.360> legal<01:15:20.760> interpretation 01:15:21.550 --> 01:15:21.560 align:start position:0% going to ask for a legal interpretation 01:15:21.560 --> 01:15:23.229 align:start position:0% going to ask for a legal interpretation on<01:15:21.719> something<01:15:22.080> but<01:15:22.239> then<01:15:22.400> I<01:15:22.600> I<01:15:22.719> didn't<01:15:22.960> know<01:15:23.120> if 01:15:23.229 --> 01:15:23.239 align:start position:0% on something but then I I didn't know if 01:15:23.239 --> 01:15:26.709 align:start position:0% on something but then I I didn't know if it<01:15:23.360> was<01:15:23.600> actually<01:15:23.960> relevant<01:15:25.040> and<01:15:25.159> so<01:15:25.719> uh<01:15:26.520> um 01:15:26.709 --> 01:15:26.719 align:start position:0% it was actually relevant and so uh um 01:15:26.719 --> 01:15:28.310 align:start position:0% it was actually relevant and so uh um Vice<01:15:27.000> chair<01:15:27.280> green<01:15:27.600> you<01:15:27.719> bring<01:15:27.960> up<01:15:28.120> an 01:15:28.310 --> 01:15:28.320 align:start position:0% Vice chair green you bring up an 01:15:28.320 --> 01:15:31.189 align:start position:0% Vice chair green you bring up an interesting<01:15:29.159> uh<01:15:29.320> quandry<01:15:30.239> which<01:15:30.400> is<01:15:30.639> the<01:15:30.880> fact 01:15:31.189 --> 01:15:31.199 align:start position:0% interesting uh quandry which is the fact 01:15:31.199 --> 01:15:34.390 align:start position:0% interesting uh quandry which is the fact that<01:15:31.560> um<01:15:31.880> does<01:15:32.159> parent<01:15:32.560> permission<01:15:33.560> um<01:15:34.120> and<01:15:34.280> I 01:15:34.390 --> 01:15:34.400 align:start position:0% that um does parent permission um and I 01:15:34.400 --> 01:15:36.830 align:start position:0% that um does parent permission um and I guess<01:15:34.560> this<01:15:34.679> is<01:15:34.840> a<01:15:35.120> a<01:15:35.280> question<01:15:35.520> for<01:15:35.719> AAG<01:15:36.239> abuse 01:15:36.830 --> 01:15:36.840 align:start position:0% guess this is a a question for AAG abuse 01:15:36.840 --> 01:15:38.950 align:start position:0% guess this is a a question for AAG abuse does<01:15:37.120> parent<01:15:37.480> permission 01:15:38.950 --> 01:15:38.960 align:start position:0% does parent permission 01:15:38.960 --> 01:15:41.830 align:start position:0% does parent permission um<01:15:39.960> uh<01:15:40.239> I<01:15:40.320> don't<01:15:40.440> know<01:15:40.639> like<01:15:40.960> proceed<01:15:41.560> it's<01:15:41.719> the 01:15:41.830 --> 01:15:41.840 align:start position:0% um uh I don't know like proceed it's the 01:15:41.840 --> 01:15:45.390 align:start position:0% um uh I don't know like proceed it's the wrong<01:15:42.080> word<01:15:42.920> uh<01:15:43.320> the<01:15:43.679> ability<01:15:44.679> for<01:15:45.000> something 01:15:45.390 --> 01:15:45.400 align:start position:0% wrong word uh the ability for something 01:15:45.400 --> 01:15:47.270 align:start position:0% wrong word uh the ability for something that's<01:15:45.639> not<01:15:45.880> legal<01:15:46.239> according<01:15:46.560> to<01:15:46.760> an<01:15:46.920> age 01:15:47.270 --> 01:15:47.280 align:start position:0% that's not legal according to an age 01:15:47.280 --> 01:15:48.990 align:start position:0% that's not legal according to an age become<01:15:47.679> legal<01:15:48.239> I<01:15:48.320> don't<01:15:48.440> know<01:15:48.560> if<01:15:48.679> that's<01:15:48.840> kind 01:15:48.990 --> 01:15:49.000 align:start position:0% become legal I don't know if that's kind 01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:50.470 align:start position:0% become legal I don't know if that's kind of<01:15:49.159> what<01:15:49.239> you're<01:15:49.440> asking<01:15:49.800> like<01:15:49.960> if<01:15:50.120> something 01:15:50.470 --> 01:15:50.480 align:start position:0% of what you're asking like if something 01:15:50.480 --> 01:15:52.189 align:start position:0% of what you're asking like if something couldn't<01:15:50.760> be<01:15:50.920> done<01:15:51.199> because<01:15:51.400> of<01:15:51.560> the<01:15:51.679> age<01:15:51.920> of<01:15:52.040> a 01:15:52.189 --> 01:15:52.199 align:start position:0% couldn't be done because of the age of a 01:15:52.199 --> 01:15:54.350 align:start position:0% couldn't be done because of the age of a student<01:15:52.800> but<01:15:52.960> now<01:15:53.159> it<01:15:53.360> can<01:15:53.560> be<01:15:53.760> done<01:15:54.159> in 01:15:54.350 --> 01:15:54.360 align:start position:0% student but now it can be done in 01:15:54.360 --> 01:15:56.550 align:start position:0% student but now it can be done in college<01:15:54.679> if<01:15:55.040> parent<01:15:55.239> gives<01:15:55.520> permission<01:15:56.360> where 01:15:56.550 --> 01:15:56.560 align:start position:0% college if parent gives permission where 01:15:56.560 --> 01:15:59.950 align:start position:0% college if parent gives permission where does<01:15:56.719> the<01:15:56.880> law<01:15:57.159> lie<01:15:57.440> on<01:15:57.719> that<01:15:58.480> um<01:15:58.760> yep<01:15:59.360> exactly 01:15:59.950 --> 01:15:59.960 align:start position:0% does the law lie on that um yep exactly 01:15:59.960 --> 01:16:02.550 align:start position:0% does the law lie on that um yep exactly so<01:16:00.360> so<01:16:00.560> to<01:16:00.719> me<01:16:01.199> in<01:16:01.480> in<01:16:01.679> in<01:16:01.800> a<01:16:01.960> different<01:16:02.199> realm 01:16:02.550 --> 01:16:02.560 align:start position:0% so so to me in in in a different realm 01:16:02.560 --> 01:16:04.310 align:start position:0% so so to me in in in a different realm I'd<01:16:02.719> be<01:16:02.840> talking<01:16:03.120> about<01:16:03.360> status<01:16:03.719> offenses 01:16:04.310 --> 01:16:04.320 align:start position:0% I'd be talking about status offenses 01:16:04.320 --> 01:16:05.990 align:start position:0% I'd be talking about status offenses because<01:16:04.520> of<01:16:04.639> the<01:16:04.800> age<01:16:04.960> of<01:16:05.080> a<01:16:05.239> child<01:16:05.639> this<01:16:05.840> thing 01:16:05.990 --> 01:16:06.000 align:start position:0% because of the age of a child this thing 01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:08.310 align:start position:0% because of the age of a child this thing is<01:16:06.199> wrong<01:16:06.920> and<01:16:07.120> so<01:16:07.440> or<01:16:07.600> that<01:16:07.800> they<01:16:07.920> have<01:16:08.080> done 01:16:08.310 --> 01:16:08.320 align:start position:0% is wrong and so or that they have done 01:16:08.320 --> 01:16:10.390 align:start position:0% is wrong and so or that they have done but<01:16:08.480> now<01:16:09.080> something<01:16:09.320> that's<01:16:09.520> being<01:16:09.760> done<01:16:10.040> to 01:16:10.390 --> 01:16:10.400 align:start position:0% but now something that's being done to 01:16:10.400 --> 01:16:13.629 align:start position:0% but now something that's being done to them<01:16:11.120> um<01:16:11.360> because<01:16:11.719> of<01:16:11.880> their<01:16:12.120> age<01:16:12.480> is<01:16:12.679> wrong<01:16:13.440> I 01:16:13.629 --> 01:16:13.639 align:start position:0% them um because of their age is wrong I 01:16:13.639 --> 01:16:15.430 align:start position:0% them um because of their age is wrong I I<01:16:13.840> I<01:16:13.960> don't<01:16:14.120> know<01:16:14.360> where<01:16:14.560> where<01:16:14.760> that<01:16:14.920> lies<01:16:15.320> and 01:16:15.430 --> 01:16:15.440 align:start position:0% I I don't know where where that lies and 01:16:15.440 --> 01:16:18.750 align:start position:0% I I don't know where where that lies and so<01:16:15.639> it's<01:16:15.800> just<01:16:15.960> an<01:16:16.159> interesting<01:16:17.000> point<01:16:17.639> um<01:16:18.600> as 01:16:18.750 --> 01:16:18.760 align:start position:0% so it's just an interesting point um as 01:16:18.760 --> 01:16:20.149 align:start position:0% so it's just an interesting point um as as<01:16:18.880> you're<01:16:19.199> speaking<01:16:19.600> through<01:16:19.840> it<01:16:19.960> so<01:16:20.080> I 01:16:20.149 --> 01:16:20.159 align:start position:0% as you're speaking through it so I 01:16:20.159 --> 01:16:22.870 align:start position:0% as you're speaking through it so I didn't<01:16:20.320> know<01:16:20.520> if<01:16:20.760> if<01:16:20.960> a<01:16:21.080> ag<01:16:21.360> abuse<01:16:21.800> had<01:16:22.040> any 01:16:22.870 --> 01:16:22.880 align:start position:0% didn't know if if a ag abuse had any 01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:25.629 align:start position:0% didn't know if if a ag abuse had any background<01:16:23.280> on<01:16:23.440> that<01:16:23.560> or<01:16:23.920> not<01:16:25.000> I<01:16:25.120> don't<01:16:25.480> it's 01:16:25.629 --> 01:16:25.639 align:start position:0% background on that or not I don't it's 01:16:25.639 --> 01:16:27.550 align:start position:0% background on that or not I don't it's just<01:16:25.840> the<01:16:26.120> statute<01:16:26.600> says<01:16:26.840> that<01:16:27.000> if<01:16:27.120> the<01:16:27.239> parent 01:16:27.550 --> 01:16:27.560 align:start position:0% just the statute says that if the parent 01:16:27.560 --> 01:16:29.550 align:start position:0% just the statute says that if the parent gives<01:16:27.840> consent<01:16:28.199> by<01:16:28.360> enrolling<01:16:28.840> their<01:16:29.080> child 01:16:29.550 --> 01:16:29.560 align:start position:0% gives consent by enrolling their child 01:16:29.560 --> 01:16:31.870 align:start position:0% gives consent by enrolling their child then<01:16:30.080> then<01:16:30.239> it's 01:16:31.870 --> 01:16:31.880 align:start position:0% then then it's 01:16:31.880 --> 01:16:34.950 align:start position:0% then then it's okay<01:16:32.880> and<01:16:33.120> I<01:16:33.239> think<01:16:33.560> that's<01:16:34.000> I<01:16:34.159> guess<01:16:34.400> this<01:16:34.560> is 01:16:34.950 --> 01:16:34.960 align:start position:0% okay and I think that's I guess this is 01:16:34.960 --> 01:16:41.149 align:start position:0% okay and I think that's I guess this is is<01:16:35.199> my<01:16:35.480> concern<01:16:36.040> then<01:16:36.239> is<01:16:36.480> that<01:16:37.120> it's<01:16:37.360> like 01:16:41.149 --> 01:16:41.159 align:start position:0% 01:16:41.159 --> 01:16:44.390 align:start position:0% okay<01:16:42.159> then<01:16:42.480> then<01:16:42.800> parents<01:16:43.280> really<01:16:43.520> need<01:16:43.760> to 01:16:44.390 --> 01:16:44.400 align:start position:0% okay then then parents really need to 01:16:44.400 --> 01:16:46.669 align:start position:0% okay then then parents really need to understand<01:16:44.960> the<01:16:45.080> setting<01:16:45.480> that<01:16:45.719> they<01:16:46.480> are 01:16:46.669 --> 01:16:46.679 align:start position:0% understand the setting that they are 01:16:46.679 --> 01:16:49.510 align:start position:0% understand the setting that they are sending<01:16:47.159> their<01:16:47.360> children<01:16:47.800> to<01:16:48.639> whether 01:16:49.510 --> 01:16:49.520 align:start position:0% sending their children to whether 01:16:49.520 --> 01:16:51.229 align:start position:0% sending their children to whether whether<01:16:49.800> the<01:16:50.040> controversy<01:16:50.719> and<01:16:50.960> this 01:16:51.229 --> 01:16:51.239 align:start position:0% whether the controversy and this 01:16:51.239 --> 01:16:55.270 align:start position:0% whether the controversy and this conflict<01:16:52.040> exists<01:16:52.480> or<01:16:53.040> not<01:16:54.040> they<01:16:54.320> have<01:16:54.480> to 01:16:55.270 --> 01:16:55.280 align:start position:0% conflict exists or not they have to 01:16:55.280 --> 01:16:58.590 align:start position:0% conflict exists or not they have to understand<01:16:55.840> that<01:16:56.840> and<01:16:57.239> and<01:16:57.440> then<01:16:58.000> we<01:16:58.280> we<01:16:58.400> don't 01:16:58.590 --> 01:16:58.600 align:start position:0% understand that and and then we we don't 01:16:58.600 --> 01:17:01.510 align:start position:0% understand that and and then we we don't have<01:16:58.760> any<01:16:58.960> control<01:16:59.320> over<01:16:59.560> higher<01:16:59.840> ed<01:17:00.639> but<01:17:00.880> do 01:17:01.510 --> 01:17:01.520 align:start position:0% have any control over higher ed but do 01:17:01.520 --> 01:17:06.390 align:start position:0% have any control over higher ed but do we<01:17:02.520> we<01:17:03.080> should<01:17:04.080> like<01:17:04.320> to<01:17:04.679> to<01:17:04.880> the<01:17:05.120> extent<01:17:05.719> that 01:17:06.390 --> 01:17:06.400 align:start position:0% we we should like to to the extent that 01:17:06.400 --> 01:17:09.430 align:start position:0% we we should like to to the extent that if<01:17:06.639> they<01:17:06.760> are<01:17:07.000> doing<01:17:07.679> if<01:17:07.960> if<01:17:08.159> they<01:17:08.360> are<01:17:08.679> now 01:17:09.430 --> 01:17:09.440 align:start position:0% if they are doing if if they are now 01:17:09.440 --> 01:17:13.470 align:start position:0% if they are doing if if they are now tailoring<01:17:10.400> their<01:17:11.400> business<01:17:12.400> their<01:17:12.760> offerings 01:17:13.470 --> 01:17:13.480 align:start position:0% tailoring their business their offerings 01:17:13.480 --> 01:17:18.390 align:start position:0% tailoring their business their offerings to<01:17:14.320> miners<01:17:15.000> that<01:17:15.320> have<01:17:16.320> protections<01:17:17.239> by 01:17:18.390 --> 01:17:18.400 align:start position:0% to miners that have protections by 01:17:18.400 --> 01:17:22.870 align:start position:0% to miners that have protections by law<01:17:19.400> in<01:17:20.000> theory<01:17:21.000> they<01:17:21.239> you<01:17:21.360> know<01:17:22.199> and<01:17:22.480> I<01:17:22.639> guess 01:17:22.870 --> 01:17:22.880 align:start position:0% law in theory they you know and I guess 01:17:22.880 --> 01:17:25.750 align:start position:0% law in theory they you know and I guess this<01:17:23.040> is<01:17:23.520> this<01:17:23.639> is<01:17:23.880> maybe<01:17:24.320> something<01:17:24.600> that<01:17:25.040> can 01:17:25.750 --> 01:17:25.760 align:start position:0% this is this is maybe something that can 01:17:25.760 --> 01:17:27.590 align:start position:0% this is this is maybe something that can look<01:17:26.000> into<01:17:26.360> more<01:17:26.679> what<01:17:26.840> that<01:17:27.000> looks<01:17:27.239> like<01:17:27.360> for 01:17:27.590 --> 01:17:27.600 align:start position:0% look into more what that looks like for 01:17:27.600 --> 01:17:32.750 align:start position:0% look into more what that looks like for higher<01:17:27.960> red<01:17:28.320> because<01:17:28.800> I<01:17:29.040> do<01:17:29.840> see<01:17:31.199> um<01:17:32.199> this<01:17:32.320> is 01:17:32.750 --> 01:17:32.760 align:start position:0% higher red because I do see um this is 01:17:32.760 --> 01:17:39.350 align:start position:0% higher red because I do see um this is interesting<01:17:33.760> a<01:17:33.880> new<01:17:34.080> frontier 01:17:39.350 --> 01:17:39.360 align:start position:0% 01:17:39.360 --> 01:17:41.910 align:start position:0% here<01:17:40.360> it's<01:17:40.560> kind<01:17:40.719> of 01:17:41.910 --> 01:17:41.920 align:start position:0% here it's kind of 01:17:41.920 --> 01:17:44.430 align:start position:0% here it's kind of like<01:17:42.920> can<01:17:43.080> a<01:17:43.239> par<01:17:43.520> you<01:17:43.639> know<01:17:43.880> and<01:17:44.120> and<01:17:44.360> I'm 01:17:44.430 --> 01:17:44.440 align:start position:0% like can a par you know and and I'm 01:17:44.440 --> 01:17:46.270 align:start position:0% like can a par you know and and I'm going<01:17:44.560> to<01:17:44.760> take<01:17:44.960> this<01:17:45.280> way<01:17:45.520> off<01:17:45.719> into<01:17:46.040> left 01:17:46.270 --> 01:17:46.280 align:start position:0% going to take this way off into left 01:17:46.280 --> 01:17:50.629 align:start position:0% going to take this way off into left field<01:17:46.760> here<01:17:47.760> but<01:17:47.960> it's<01:17:48.360> like<01:17:49.360> can 01:17:50.629 --> 01:17:50.639 align:start position:0% field here but it's like can 01:17:50.639 --> 01:17:54.590 align:start position:0% field here but it's like can parents<01:17:51.639> have<01:17:52.080> sign<01:17:52.400> a<01:17:52.600> paper<01:17:52.960> and<01:17:53.239> have<01:17:53.639> them 01:17:54.590 --> 01:17:54.600 align:start position:0% parents have sign a paper and have them 01:17:54.600 --> 01:17:58.030 align:start position:0% parents have sign a paper and have them you<01:17:54.719> know<01:17:54.840> you<01:17:54.960> know<01:17:56.000> be<01:17:57.000> sell<01:17:57.320> their<01:17:57.480> children 01:17:58.030 --> 01:17:58.040 align:start position:0% you know you know be sell their children 01:17:58.040 --> 01:18:00.110 align:start position:0% you know you know be sell their children you<01:17:58.159> know<01:17:58.360> for<01:17:58.800> the<01:17:58.960> sex<01:17:59.199> trait<01:17:59.440> or<01:17:59.600> whatever 01:18:00.110 --> 01:18:00.120 align:start position:0% you know for the sex trait or whatever 01:18:00.120 --> 01:18:02.629 align:start position:0% you know for the sex trait or whatever because<01:18:00.679> they<01:18:00.920> signed<01:18:01.520> that<01:18:01.800> paper<01:18:02.199> I<01:18:02.360> know 01:18:02.629 --> 01:18:02.639 align:start position:0% because they signed that paper I know 01:18:02.639 --> 01:18:05.270 align:start position:0% because they signed that paper I know that<01:18:02.840> took<01:18:03.080> good<01:18:03.440> way<01:18:03.920> out<01:18:04.239> there<01:18:04.920> I<01:18:05.000> don't 01:18:05.270 --> 01:18:05.280 align:start position:0% that took good way out there I don't 01:18:05.280 --> 01:18:08.310 align:start position:0% that took good way out there I don't like<01:18:05.639> that<01:18:06.480> but<01:18:06.639> it<01:18:06.800> just<01:18:07.040> begs<01:18:07.400> the<01:18:07.639> argument 01:18:08.310 --> 01:18:08.320 align:start position:0% like that but it just begs the argument 01:18:08.320 --> 01:18:12.189 align:start position:0% like that but it just begs the argument like<01:18:08.760> where<01:18:09.480> where<01:18:09.679> do<01:18:09.880> we<01:18:10.360> start 01:18:12.189 --> 01:18:12.199 align:start position:0% like where where do we start 01:18:12.199 --> 01:18:17.070 align:start position:0% like where where do we start um<01:18:13.199> making<01:18:13.520> it<01:18:14.040> that<01:18:14.159> a<01:18:14.440> signature<01:18:15.520> can 01:18:17.070 --> 01:18:17.080 align:start position:0% um making it that a signature can 01:18:17.080 --> 01:18:18.950 align:start position:0% um making it that a signature can allow 01:18:18.950 --> 01:18:18.960 align:start position:0% allow 01:18:18.960 --> 01:18:22.870 align:start position:0% allow explicit<01:18:19.960> circumstances<01:18:20.880> to<01:18:21.080> be<01:18:21.320> legally 01:18:22.870 --> 01:18:22.880 align:start position:0% explicit circumstances to be legally 01:18:22.880 --> 01:18:26.350 align:start position:0% explicit circumstances to be legally presented<01:18:23.880> and<01:18:24.239> um<01:18:24.480> Reg<01:18:24.800> ulated<01:18:25.560> and<01:18:25.840> provided 01:18:26.350 --> 01:18:26.360 align:start position:0% presented and um Reg ulated and provided 01:18:26.360 --> 01:18:27.070 align:start position:0% presented and um Reg ulated and provided to 01:18:27.070 --> 01:18:27.080 align:start position:0% to 01:18:27.080 --> 01:18:30.070 align:start position:0% to miners<01:18:28.080> but<01:18:28.960> I<01:18:29.120> like<01:18:29.360> what<01:18:29.480> we've<01:18:29.719> done 01:18:30.070 --> 01:18:30.080 align:start position:0% miners but I like what we've done 01:18:30.080 --> 01:18:32.590 align:start position:0% miners but I like what we've done bringing<01:18:30.360> it<01:18:30.520> back<01:18:30.639> to<01:18:30.840> 5A<01:18:31.760> I<01:18:31.960> like<01:18:32.320> adding 01:18:32.590 --> 01:18:32.600 align:start position:0% bringing it back to 5A I like adding 01:18:32.600 --> 01:18:34.229 align:start position:0% bringing it back to 5A I like adding what<01:18:32.800> we've<01:18:33.000> added<01:18:33.320> and<01:18:33.520> and<01:18:33.639> we<01:18:33.760> can<01:18:33.960> probably 01:18:34.229 --> 01:18:34.239 align:start position:0% what we've added and and we can probably 01:18:34.239 --> 01:18:35.629 align:start position:0% what we've added and and we can probably move 01:18:35.629 --> 01:18:35.639 align:start position:0% move 01:18:35.639 --> 01:18:46.590 align:start position:0% move on<01:18:36.639> all<01:18:36.840> right<01:18:37.639> let's<01:18:38.280> let's 01:18:46.590 --> 01:18:46.600 align:start position:0% 01:18:46.600 --> 01:18:50.870 align:start position:0% continue<01:18:47.600> chair<01:18:47.920> Booth<01:18:48.239> one<01:18:48.360> other<01:18:48.679> thing<01:18:49.880> um 01:18:50.870 --> 01:18:50.880 align:start position:0% continue chair Booth one other thing um 01:18:50.880 --> 01:18:54.149 align:start position:0% continue chair Booth one other thing um number<01:18:51.360> five<01:18:52.199> it<01:18:52.679> it<01:18:52.960> needs<01:18:53.400> something<01:18:53.760> to<01:18:53.920> it 01:18:54.149 --> 01:18:54.159 align:start position:0% number five it it needs something to it 01:18:54.159 --> 01:18:56.310 align:start position:0% number five it it needs something to it because<01:18:54.320> it<01:18:54.440> reads<01:18:54.880> now<01:18:55.120> sens<01:18:55.600> M<01:18:55.920> sensitive 01:18:56.310 --> 01:18:56.320 align:start position:0% because it reads now sens M sensitive 01:18:56.320 --> 01:18:59.110 align:start position:0% because it reads now sens M sensitive materials<01:18:56.800> do<01:18:57.000> not<01:18:57.199> include<01:18:57.920> if<01:18:58.000> I<01:18:58.159> skip<01:18:58.520> a 01:18:59.110 --> 01:18:59.120 align:start position:0% materials do not include if I skip a 01:18:59.120 --> 01:19:01.229 align:start position:0% materials do not include if I skip a sensitive<01:18:59.600> materials<01:19:00.040> do<01:19:00.239> not<01:19:00.440> include<01:19:00.880> four 01:19:01.229 --> 01:19:01.239 align:start position:0% sensitive materials do not include four 01:19:01.239 --> 01:19:03.310 align:start position:0% sensitive materials do not include four medical<01:19:01.639> courses<01:19:02.080> for<01:19:02.360> family<01:19:02.679> and<01:19:02.920> consumer 01:19:03.310 --> 01:19:03.320 align:start position:0% medical courses for family and consumer 01:19:03.320 --> 01:19:05.750 align:start position:0% medical courses for family and consumer science<01:19:03.719> courses<01:19:04.520> if<01:19:04.639> we<01:19:04.800> go<01:19:04.920> to<01:19:05.080> the<01:19:05.320> statute 01:19:05.750 --> 01:19:05.760 align:start position:0% science courses if we go to the statute 01:19:05.760 --> 01:19:08.189 align:start position:0% science courses if we go to the statute it<01:19:05.880> says<01:19:06.159> sensitive<01:19:06.800> material<01:19:07.800> does<01:19:08.000> not 01:19:08.189 --> 01:19:08.199 align:start position:0% it says sensitive material does not 01:19:08.199 --> 01:19:10.669 align:start position:0% it says sensitive material does not include<01:19:08.600> an<01:19:08.840> instructional<01:19:09.520> material<01:19:10.440> and 01:19:10.669 --> 01:19:10.679 align:start position:0% include an instructional material and 01:19:10.679 --> 01:19:13.310 align:start position:0% include an instructional material and then<01:19:11.199> for<01:19:11.520> medical<01:19:11.960> courses<01:19:12.840> and<01:19:12.960> so<01:19:13.080> I<01:19:13.159> don't 01:19:13.310 --> 01:19:13.320 align:start position:0% then for medical courses and so I don't 01:19:13.320 --> 01:19:16.830 align:start position:0% then for medical courses and so I don't know<01:19:13.560> it<01:19:13.679> needs<01:19:14.000> something<01:19:14.679> because<01:19:14.880> it<01:19:15.600> um<01:19:16.600> I 01:19:16.830 --> 01:19:16.840 align:start position:0% know it needs something because it um I 01:19:16.840 --> 01:19:20.470 align:start position:0% know it needs something because it um I I<01:19:17.280> just<01:19:17.400> to<01:19:17.600> make<01:19:17.719> it<01:19:17.880> a<01:19:18.320> make<01:19:18.440> it<01:19:18.600> complete 01:19:20.470 --> 01:19:20.480 align:start position:0% I just to make it a make it complete 01:19:20.480 --> 01:19:23.550 align:start position:0% I just to make it a make it complete sorry<01:19:21.480> good<01:19:22.120> thank 01:19:23.550 --> 01:19:23.560 align:start position:0% sorry good thank 01:19:23.560 --> 01:19:28.910 align:start position:0% sorry good thank you<01:19:24.560> good 01:19:28.910 --> 01:19:28.920 align:start position:0% 01:19:28.920 --> 01:19:36.270 align:start position:0% Point<01:19:29.920> any 01:19:36.270 --> 01:19:36.280 align:start position:0% 01:19:36.280 --> 01:19:38.870 align:start position:0% other<01:19:37.280> probably<01:19:37.840> would<01:19:38.040> want<01:19:38.159> to<01:19:38.320> get<01:19:38.480> rid<01:19:38.639> of 01:19:38.870 --> 01:19:38.880 align:start position:0% other probably would want to get rid of 01:19:38.880 --> 01:19:41.669 align:start position:0% other probably would want to get rid of the<01:19:39.320> space<01:19:39.760> between<01:19:40.080> three<01:19:40.280> and<01:19:40.480> four<01:19:41.480> and 01:19:41.669 --> 01:19:41.679 align:start position:0% the space between three and four and 01:19:41.679 --> 01:19:46.550 align:start position:0% the space between three and four and between<01:19:42.120> D<01:19:42.400> and 01:19:46.550 --> 01:19:46.560 align:start position:0% 01:19:46.560 --> 01:19:48.310 align:start position:0% six 01:19:48.310 --> 01:19:48.320 align:start position:0% six 01:19:48.320 --> 01:20:02.310 align:start position:0% six okay<01:19:49.320> anything<01:19:49.920> else<01:19:50.920> on<01:19:51.239> six<01:19:51.520> s89 01:20:02.310 --> 01:20:02.320 align:start position:0% 01:20:02.320 --> 01:20:04.270 align:start position:0% I'm<01:20:02.480> reading<01:20:02.880> through<01:20:03.120> that<01:20:03.440> organizations 01:20:04.270 --> 01:20:04.280 align:start position:0% I'm reading through that organizations 01:20:04.280 --> 01:20:10.990 align:start position:0% I'm reading through that organizations without<01:20:04.520> an<01:20:05.239> apostrophe<01:20:06.239> on 01:20:10.990 --> 01:20:11.000 align:start position:0% 01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:14.270 align:start position:0% nine<01:20:12.000> are<01:20:12.199> we<01:20:12.480> okay<01:20:12.639> with<01:20:12.800> the<01:20:13.480> parentheses<01:20:14.040> on 01:20:14.270 --> 01:20:14.280 align:start position:0% nine are we okay with the parentheses on 01:20:14.280 --> 01:20:18.470 align:start position:0% nine are we okay with the parentheses on seven<01:20:14.679> then<01:20:15.600> is<01:20:15.920> is<01:20:16.080> that<01:20:17.000> the<01:20:17.199> best<01:20:17.440> way 01:20:18.470 --> 01:20:18.480 align:start position:0% seven then is is that the best way 01:20:18.480 --> 01:20:37.149 align:start position:0% seven then is is that the best way to<01:20:19.480> reference<01:20:20.080> that 01:20:37.149 --> 01:20:37.159 align:start position:0% 01:20:37.159 --> 01:20:38.950 align:start position:0% uh<01:20:37.320> Jenny<01:20:37.760> you're 01:20:38.950 --> 01:20:38.960 align:start position:0% uh Jenny you're 01:20:38.960 --> 01:20:42.550 align:start position:0% uh Jenny you're muted<01:20:39.960> if<01:20:40.080> you<01:20:40.199> wanted<01:20:40.520> to<01:20:40.760> talk<01:20:41.639> sorry<01:20:42.320> I 01:20:42.550 --> 01:20:42.560 align:start position:0% muted if you wanted to talk sorry I 01:20:42.560 --> 01:20:44.470 align:start position:0% muted if you wanted to talk sorry I trying<01:20:42.880> I'm<01:20:43.400> trying<01:20:43.600> to<01:20:43.760> grab<01:20:44.000> my<01:20:44.239> I<01:20:44.360> just 01:20:44.470 --> 01:20:44.480 align:start position:0% trying I'm trying to grab my I just 01:20:44.480 --> 01:20:46.189 align:start position:0% trying I'm trying to grab my I just realized<01:20:44.960> my<01:20:45.199> my<01:20:45.320> computer<01:20:45.639> was<01:20:45.760> gonna<01:20:45.960> die<01:20:46.120> I 01:20:46.189 --> 01:20:46.199 align:start position:0% realized my my computer was gonna die I 01:20:46.199 --> 01:20:48.870 align:start position:0% realized my my computer was gonna die I had<01:20:46.320> to<01:20:46.440> do<01:20:46.600> the<01:20:46.719> quick<01:20:46.880> run<01:20:47.080> to<01:20:47.239> grab<01:20:47.480> the<01:20:47.880> cord 01:20:48.870 --> 01:20:48.880 align:start position:0% had to do the quick run to grab the cord 01:20:48.880 --> 01:20:52.830 align:start position:0% had to do the quick run to grab the cord so<01:20:49.120> what<01:20:49.280> was<01:20:49.440> the 01:20:52.830 --> 01:20:52.840 align:start position:0% 01:20:52.840 --> 01:20:59.149 align:start position:0% question<01:20:53.840> let's<01:20:54.159> see 01:20:59.149 --> 01:20:59.159 align:start position:0% 01:20:59.159 --> 01:21:01.470 align:start position:0% number<01:20:59.920> no<01:21:00.120> limitation<01:21:00.639> on<01:21:00.880> submissions 01:21:01.470 --> 01:21:01.480 align:start position:0% number no limitation on submissions 01:21:01.480 --> 01:21:02.870 align:start position:0% number no limitation on submissions unless<01:21:01.880> an<01:21:02.040> individual<01:21:02.400> makes<01:21:02.679> three 01:21:02.870 --> 01:21:02.880 align:start position:0% unless an individual makes three 01:21:02.880 --> 01:21:05.390 align:start position:0% unless an individual makes three unsuccessful 01:21:05.390 --> 01:21:05.400 align:start position:0% unsuccessful 01:21:05.400 --> 01:21:07.790 align:start position:0% unsuccessful challenges<01:21:06.400> in<01:21:06.800> you're<01:21:06.960> asking<01:21:07.239> if<01:21:07.360> it<01:21:07.480> needs 01:21:07.790 --> 01:21:07.800 align:start position:0% challenges in you're asking if it needs 01:21:07.800 --> 01:21:11.750 align:start position:0% challenges in you're asking if it needs the 01:21:11.750 --> 01:21:11.760 align:start position:0% 01:21:11.760 --> 01:21:14.350 align:start position:0% parentheses<01:21:12.760> is<01:21:12.920> that<01:21:13.080> your<01:21:13.360> question<01:21:13.719> Emily 01:21:14.350 --> 01:21:14.360 align:start position:0% parentheses is that your question Emily 01:21:14.360 --> 01:21:16.950 align:start position:0% parentheses is that your question Emily um 01:21:16.950 --> 01:21:16.960 align:start position:0% um 01:21:16.960 --> 01:21:20.149 align:start position:0% um yes<01:21:17.960> I<01:21:18.600> I<01:21:18.760> know<01:21:18.920> it's<01:21:19.280> it's<01:21:19.400> like<01:21:19.520> a 01:21:20.149 --> 01:21:20.159 align:start position:0% yes I I know it's it's like a 01:21:20.159 --> 01:21:22.149 align:start position:0% yes I I know it's it's like a grammatical<01:21:21.159> right<01:21:21.320> it<01:21:21.440> doesn't<01:21:21.679> matter<01:21:21.880> to 01:21:22.149 --> 01:21:22.159 align:start position:0% grammatical right it doesn't matter to 01:21:22.159 --> 01:21:25.149 align:start position:0% grammatical right it doesn't matter to me<01:21:22.440> how<01:21:22.600> it's<01:21:23.159> worded<01:21:23.639> that's<01:21:23.840> just<01:21:24.080> how<01:21:24.239> it<01:21:24.960> is 01:21:25.149 --> 01:21:25.159 align:start position:0% me how it's worded that's just how it is 01:21:25.159 --> 01:21:25.950 align:start position:0% me how it's worded that's just how it is in 01:21:25.950 --> 01:21:25.960 align:start position:0% in 01:21:25.960 --> 01:21:28.189 align:start position:0% in the<01:21:26.960> I<01:21:27.040> don't<01:21:27.199> know<01:21:27.320> that<01:21:27.480> it's<01:21:27.679> exactly<01:21:28.040> like 01:21:28.189 --> 01:21:28.199 align:start position:0% the I don't know that it's exactly like 01:21:28.199 --> 01:21:29.669 align:start position:0% the I don't know that it's exactly like that<01:21:28.320> in<01:21:28.400> the<01:21:28.520> law<01:21:28.760> but<01:21:28.920> I<01:21:29.080> think<01:21:29.199> I<01:21:29.320> tried<01:21:29.560> to 01:21:29.669 --> 01:21:29.679 align:start position:0% that in the law but I think I tried to 01:21:29.679 --> 01:21:31.149 align:start position:0% that in the law but I think I tried to condense<01:21:30.120> down<01:21:30.360> no<01:21:30.520> limitation<01:21:30.960> on 01:21:31.149 --> 01:21:31.159 align:start position:0% condense down no limitation on 01:21:31.159 --> 01:21:32.950 align:start position:0% condense down no limitation on submissions<01:21:31.719> unless<01:21:32.080> an<01:21:32.239> individual<01:21:32.679> makes 01:21:32.950 --> 01:21:32.960 align:start position:0% submissions unless an individual makes 01:21:32.960 --> 01:21:35.790 align:start position:0% submissions unless an individual makes three<01:21:33.320> unsuccessful<01:21:34.199> challenges<01:21:35.199> inclusive 01:21:35.790 --> 01:21:35.800 align:start position:0% three unsuccessful challenges inclusive 01:21:35.800 --> 01:21:38.270 align:start position:0% three unsuccessful challenges inclusive of<01:21:35.920> a<01:21:36.120> direct<01:21:36.960> review<01:21:37.280> or<01:21:37.480> appeal<01:21:37.960> during<01:21:38.159> a 01:21:38.270 --> 01:21:38.280 align:start position:0% of a direct review or appeal during a 01:21:38.280 --> 01:21:39.390 align:start position:0% of a direct review or appeal during a school<01:21:38.520> year<01:21:38.679> yeah<01:21:38.800> I<01:21:38.880> think<01:21:39.000> it's<01:21:39.199> fine 01:21:39.390 --> 01:21:39.400 align:start position:0% school year yeah I think it's fine 01:21:39.400 --> 01:21:49.189 align:start position:0% school year yeah I think it's fine without<01:21:39.760> those<01:21:40.120> I<01:21:40.239> just<01:21:41.239> yeah<01:21:41.760> is<01:21:41.880> it<01:21:42.000> a<01:21:42.159> comma 01:21:49.189 --> 01:21:49.199 align:start position:0% 01:21:49.199 --> 01:21:53.550 align:start position:0% then<01:21:50.199> great<01:21:51.120> any<01:21:51.639> other<01:21:52.639> points<01:21:53.120> anyone<01:21:53.360> want 01:21:53.550 --> 01:21:53.560 align:start position:0% then great any other points anyone want 01:21:53.560 --> 01:21:55.669 align:start position:0% then great any other points anyone want to<01:21:53.679> bring<01:21:53.920> up<01:21:54.080> on 01:21:55.669 --> 01:21:55.679 align:start position:0% to bring up on 01:21:55.679 --> 01:21:58.669 align:start position:0% to bring up on sensitive 01:21:58.669 --> 01:21:58.679 align:start position:0% 01:21:58.679 --> 01:22:01.149 align:start position:0% materials<01:21:59.679> I<01:21:59.800> want<01:22:00.000> to<01:22:00.280> add<01:22:00.520> one<01:22:00.760> when<01:22:00.880> we<01:22:01.040> get 01:22:01.149 --> 01:22:01.159 align:start position:0% materials I want to add one when we get 01:22:01.159 --> 01:22:02.110 align:start position:0% materials I want to add one when we get to<01:22:01.360> that 01:22:02.110 --> 01:22:02.120 align:start position:0% to that 01:22:02.120 --> 01:22:04.590 align:start position:0% to that point 01:22:04.590 --> 01:22:04.600 align:start position:0% point 01:22:04.600 --> 01:22:08.310 align:start position:0% point Okay<01:22:05.600> add<01:22:06.080> like<01:22:06.239> a<01:22:06.400> number<01:22:06.719> 10<01:22:07.639> yeah<01:22:07.880> a<01:22:08.040> number 01:22:08.310 --> 01:22:08.320 align:start position:0% Okay add like a number 10 yeah a number 01:22:08.320 --> 01:22:12.750 align:start position:0% Okay add like a number 10 yeah a number 10<01:22:09.199> okay<01:22:09.760> please<01:22:10.159> go<01:22:10.320> ahead<01:22:11.040> yeah<01:22:11.159> it<01:22:11.239> would<01:22:11.400> be 01:22:12.750 --> 01:22:12.760 align:start position:0% 10 okay please go ahead yeah it would be 01:22:12.760 --> 01:22:15.950 align:start position:0% 10 okay please go ahead yeah it would be exposing<01:22:13.760> students<01:22:14.280> to<01:22:14.560> sensitive 01:22:15.950 --> 01:22:15.960 align:start position:0% exposing students to sensitive 01:22:15.960 --> 01:22:18.950 align:start position:0% exposing students to sensitive materials<01:22:16.960> is<01:22:17.120> a<01:22:17.360> conduct<01:22:17.800> prohibited<01:22:18.360> by 01:22:18.950 --> 01:22:18.960 align:start position:0% materials is a conduct prohibited by 01:22:18.960 --> 01:22:22.229 align:start position:0% materials is a conduct prohibited by Educators<01:22:19.800> in<01:22:20.120> rule<01:22:20.800> R 01:22:22.229 --> 01:22:22.239 align:start position:0% Educators in rule R 01:22:22.239 --> 01:22:25.709 align:start position:0% Educators in rule R 2771<01:22:23.239> r217 01:22:25.709 --> 01:22:25.719 align:start position:0% 2771 r217 01:22:25.719 --> 01:22:27.590 align:start position:0% 2771 r217 maybe<01:22:25.960> there's<01:22:26.120> a<01:22:26.239> better<01:22:26.440> way<01:22:26.560> to<01:22:26.679> word<01:22:27.080> that 01:22:27.590 --> 01:22:27.600 align:start position:0% maybe there's a better way to word that 01:22:27.600 --> 01:22:29.110 align:start position:0% maybe there's a better way to word that I<01:22:27.679> don't<01:22:27.840> know<01:22:28.000> if<01:22:28.120> it's 01:22:29.110 --> 01:22:29.120 align:start position:0% I don't know if it's 01:22:29.120 --> 01:22:32.470 align:start position:0% I don't know if it's just<01:22:30.120> but<01:22:30.360> I<01:22:30.600> I<01:22:30.840> that<01:22:30.960> is<01:22:31.120> in<01:22:31.280> our<01:22:31.440> rule<01:22:32.280> um 01:22:32.470 --> 01:22:32.480 align:start position:0% just but I I that is in our rule um 01:22:32.480 --> 01:22:35.189 align:start position:0% just but I I that is in our rule um let's<01:22:32.639> see<01:22:32.920> proh 01:22:35.189 --> 01:22:35.199 align:start position:0% let's see proh 01:22:35.199 --> 01:22:37.070 align:start position:0% let's see proh prohibited<01:22:36.199> let's<01:22:36.360> see<01:22:36.480> exposing<01:22:36.840> students 01:22:37.070 --> 01:22:37.080 align:start position:0% prohibited let's see exposing students 01:22:37.080 --> 01:22:38.470 align:start position:0% prohibited let's see exposing students to<01:22:37.199> sense<01:22:37.400> materials<01:22:37.760> is<01:22:37.880> a<01:22:38.080> conduct 01:22:38.470 --> 01:22:38.480 align:start position:0% to sense materials is a conduct 01:22:38.480 --> 01:22:39.750 align:start position:0% to sense materials is a conduct prohibited<01:22:38.960> by 01:22:39.750 --> 01:22:39.760 align:start position:0% prohibited by 01:22:39.760 --> 01:22:44.070 align:start position:0% prohibited by Educators<01:22:40.760> in<01:22:41.000> board<01:22:41.360> rule<01:22:41.760> r277<01:22:42.800> 217<01:22:43.800> and 01:22:44.070 --> 01:22:44.080 align:start position:0% Educators in board rule r277 217 and 01:22:44.080 --> 01:22:45.590 align:start position:0% Educators in board rule r277 217 and people<01:22:44.320> can 01:22:45.590 --> 01:22:45.600 align:start position:0% people can 01:22:45.600 --> 01:22:49.470 align:start position:0% people can decide<01:22:46.600> prohibited<01:22:47.280> for<01:22:47.719> educators 01:22:49.470 --> 01:22:49.480 align:start position:0% decide prohibited for educators 01:22:49.480 --> 01:22:55.149 align:start position:0% decide prohibited for educators or<01:22:50.480> can<01:22:50.719> that<01:22:51.000> prohibited<01:22:51.639> I<01:22:51.719> don't<01:22:52.320> know<01:22:53.320> it 01:22:55.149 --> 01:22:55.159 align:start position:0% or can that prohibited I don't know it 01:22:55.159 --> 01:22:56.430 align:start position:0% or can that prohibited I don't know it yeah<01:22:55.320> I<01:22:55.400> don't 01:22:56.430 --> 01:22:56.440 align:start position:0% yeah I don't 01:22:56.440 --> 01:22:59.030 align:start position:0% yeah I don't know<01:22:57.440> we<01:22:57.600> just<01:22:57.719> need<01:22:57.880> to<01:22:58.080> reference<01:22:58.560> the<01:22:58.679> rule 01:22:59.030 --> 01:22:59.040 align:start position:0% know we just need to reference the rule 01:22:59.040 --> 01:23:00.790 align:start position:0% know we just need to reference the rule because<01:22:59.199> it's<01:22:59.360> in<01:22:59.560> there<01:22:59.679> so<01:22:59.880> they're<01:23:00.360> broadly 01:23:00.790 --> 01:23:00.800 align:start position:0% because it's in there so they're broadly 01:23:00.800 --> 01:23:04.350 align:start position:0% because it's in there so they're broadly aware<01:23:01.159> that<01:23:01.320> it<01:23:01.719> it's<01:23:01.880> under<01:23:02.199> their<01:23:03.120> code<01:23:03.360> of 01:23:04.350 --> 01:23:04.360 align:start position:0% aware that it it's under their code of 01:23:04.360 --> 01:23:07.430 align:start position:0% aware that it it's under their code of conduct<01:23:05.360> you<01:23:05.480> could<01:23:05.679> just<01:23:06.000> say<01:23:07.000> exposing 01:23:07.430 --> 01:23:07.440 align:start position:0% conduct you could just say exposing 01:23:07.440 --> 01:23:09.910 align:start position:0% conduct you could just say exposing students<01:23:07.760> to<01:23:07.920> sense<01:23:08.159> the 01:23:09.910 --> 01:23:09.920 align:start position:0% students to sense the 01:23:09.920 --> 01:23:13.189 align:start position:0% students to sense the material<01:23:10.920> is<01:23:11.239> prohibited<01:23:12.000> and<01:23:12.159> then<01:23:12.840> mention 01:23:13.189 --> 01:23:13.199 align:start position:0% material is prohibited and then mention 01:23:13.199 --> 01:23:15.229 align:start position:0% material is prohibited and then mention the 01:23:15.229 --> 01:23:15.239 align:start position:0% the 01:23:15.239 --> 01:23:25.189 align:start position:0% the rule<01:23:16.239> I<01:23:16.320> don't<01:23:16.520> know<01:23:16.679> if<01:23:16.920> that 01:23:25.189 --> 01:23:25.199 align:start position:0% 01:23:25.199 --> 01:23:27.950 align:start position:0% I<01:23:25.320> also<01:23:25.679> have<01:23:25.800> a<01:23:25.960> question<01:23:26.199> on<01:23:26.440> number 01:23:27.950 --> 01:23:27.960 align:start position:0% I also have a question on number 01:23:27.960 --> 01:23:32.990 align:start position:0% I also have a question on number nine<01:23:28.960> go<01:23:29.320> ahead<01:23:30.320> I'm<01:23:30.520> wondering 01:23:32.990 --> 01:23:33.000 align:start position:0% nine go ahead I'm wondering 01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:35.990 align:start position:0% nine go ahead I'm wondering um<01:23:34.000> if<01:23:34.159> we<01:23:34.280> should<01:23:34.560> put 01:23:35.990 --> 01:23:36.000 align:start position:0% um if we should put 01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:38.310 align:start position:0% um if we should put contracted<01:23:37.000> professional<01:23:37.520> organ<01:23:38.000> or 01:23:38.310 --> 01:23:38.320 align:start position:0% contracted professional organ or 01:23:38.320 --> 01:23:39.550 align:start position:0% contracted professional organ or contracted 01:23:39.550 --> 01:23:39.560 align:start position:0% contracted 01:23:39.560 --> 01:23:42.149 align:start position:0% contracted organizations<01:23:40.560> it<01:23:40.679> just<01:23:40.800> seems<01:23:41.080> so<01:23:41.320> broad 01:23:42.149 --> 01:23:42.159 align:start position:0% organizations it just seems so broad 01:23:42.159 --> 01:23:44.590 align:start position:0% organizations it just seems so broad because<01:23:43.159> if<01:23:43.320> it's<01:23:43.600> contracted<01:23:44.199> it's<01:23:44.320> in<01:23:44.440> a 01:23:44.590 --> 01:23:44.600 align:start position:0% because if it's contracted it's in a 01:23:44.600 --> 01:23:48.070 align:start position:0% because if it's contracted it's in a different<01:23:45.000> realm<01:23:46.080> right<01:23:47.080> so<01:23:47.239> is<01:23:47.360> a<01:23:47.600> contract 01:23:48.070 --> 01:23:48.080 align:start position:0% different realm right so is a contract 01:23:48.080 --> 01:23:51.189 align:start position:0% different realm right so is a contract supered<01:23:48.800> Utah<01:23:49.239> La<01:23:49.520> though<01:23:50.520> it<01:23:50.719> wouldn't 01:23:51.189 --> 01:23:51.199 align:start position:0% supered Utah La though it wouldn't 01:23:51.199 --> 01:23:53.590 align:start position:0% supered Utah La though it wouldn't matter<01:23:52.199> professional<01:23:52.679> organizations<01:23:53.440> could 01:23:53.590 --> 01:23:53.600 align:start position:0% matter professional organizations could 01:23:53.600 --> 01:23:56.229 align:start position:0% matter professional organizations could be<01:23:53.840> like<01:23:54.520> you<01:23:54.679> know<01:23:54.880> so<01:23:55.120> I'm<01:23:55.280> just<01:23:55.440> saying<01:23:55.800> like 01:23:56.229 --> 01:23:56.239 align:start position:0% be like you know so I'm just saying like 01:23:56.239 --> 01:23:57.790 align:start position:0% be like you know so I'm just saying like within<01:23:56.480> the<01:23:56.639> law<01:23:56.960> when<01:23:57.080> we're<01:23:57.280> picking<01:23:57.520> sens 01:23:57.790 --> 01:23:57.800 align:start position:0% within the law when we're picking sens 01:23:57.800 --> 01:24:00.990 align:start position:0% within the law when we're picking sens of<01:23:57.960> materials<01:23:58.440> it's<01:23:58.560> only<01:23:58.840> the<01:23:59.000> contracted 01:24:00.990 --> 01:24:01.000 align:start position:0% of materials it's only the contracted 01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:03.030 align:start position:0% of materials it's only the contracted organizations<01:24:02.000> that<01:24:02.159> would 01:24:03.030 --> 01:24:03.040 align:start position:0% organizations that would 01:24:03.040 --> 01:24:05.550 align:start position:0% organizations that would apply<01:24:04.040> I'm<01:24:04.199> not<01:24:04.320> sure<01:24:04.600> you<01:24:04.719> want<01:24:04.880> to<01:24:05.080> limit<01:24:05.360> it 01:24:05.550 --> 01:24:05.560 align:start position:0% apply I'm not sure you want to limit it 01:24:05.560 --> 01:24:07.510 align:start position:0% apply I'm not sure you want to limit it to<01:24:05.800> that<01:24:06.080> I<01:24:06.199> think<01:24:06.360> it's<01:24:06.600> like<01:24:06.760> if<01:24:06.920> a<01:24:07.080> library 01:24:07.510 --> 01:24:07.520 align:start position:0% to that I think it's like if a library 01:24:07.520 --> 01:24:09.390 align:start position:0% to that I think it's like if a library organization<01:24:08.239> you<01:24:08.360> didn't<01:24:08.639> have<01:24:08.760> a<01:24:08.960> contract 01:24:09.390 --> 01:24:09.400 align:start position:0% organization you didn't have a contract 01:24:09.400 --> 01:24:11.189 align:start position:0% organization you didn't have a contract with<01:24:09.560> them<01:24:09.760> the<01:24:09.960> professional<01:24:10.440> Librarians 01:24:11.189 --> 01:24:11.199 align:start position:0% with them the professional Librarians 01:24:11.199 --> 01:24:13.229 align:start position:0% with them the professional Librarians organization<01:24:11.920> recommended<01:24:12.520> a<01:24:12.679> certain<01:24:13.000> book 01:24:13.229 --> 01:24:13.239 align:start position:0% organization recommended a certain book 01:24:13.239 --> 01:24:16.750 align:start position:0% organization recommended a certain book be<01:24:13.440> in<01:24:13.560> your<01:24:14.159> library<01:24:15.159> if<01:24:15.320> Utah<01:24:15.800> law<01:24:16.480> under 01:24:16.750 --> 01:24:16.760 align:start position:0% be in your library if Utah law under 01:24:16.760 --> 01:24:18.950 align:start position:0% be in your library if Utah law under Utah<01:24:17.159> law<01:24:17.360> it<01:24:17.440> was<01:24:17.600> found<01:24:17.800> to<01:24:17.920> be<01:24:18.040> a<01:24:18.159> sensitive 01:24:18.950 --> 01:24:18.960 align:start position:0% Utah law it was found to be a sensitive 01:24:18.960 --> 01:24:21.430 align:start position:0% Utah law it was found to be a sensitive material<01:24:19.960> um<01:24:20.120> it<01:24:20.280> still<01:24:20.560> couldn't<01:24:20.880> be<01:24:21.120> put<01:24:21.280> in 01:24:21.430 --> 01:24:21.440 align:start position:0% material um it still couldn't be put in 01:24:21.440 --> 01:24:23.430 align:start position:0% material um it still couldn't be put in the<01:24:21.560> library<01:24:22.080> just<01:24:22.280> because<01:24:22.560> the<01:24:22.719> Librarians 01:24:23.430 --> 01:24:23.440 align:start position:0% the library just because the Librarians 01:24:23.440 --> 01:24:25.430 align:start position:0% the library just because the Librarians Association<01:24:24.400> said<01:24:24.600> that<01:24:24.719> it<01:24:24.840> was<01:24:25.040> something 01:24:25.430 --> 01:24:25.440 align:start position:0% Association said that it was something 01:24:25.440 --> 01:24:28.030 align:start position:0% Association said that it was something that<01:24:25.600> was<01:24:25.800> a<01:24:26.280> a<01:24:26.520> book<01:24:26.840> that<01:24:26.960> was<01:24:27.199> recommended<01:24:27.960> I 01:24:28.030 --> 01:24:28.040 align:start position:0% that was a a book that was recommended I 01:24:28.040 --> 01:24:30.830 align:start position:0% that was a a book that was recommended I think<01:24:28.239> is<01:24:28.520> what<01:24:28.719> is<01:24:28.920> meant<01:24:29.199> by<01:24:29.360> number<01:24:29.840> nine 01:24:30.830 --> 01:24:30.840 align:start position:0% think is what is meant by number nine 01:24:30.840 --> 01:24:35.149 align:start position:0% think is what is meant by number nine but<01:24:31.000> it's<01:24:31.120> only<01:24:31.320> if<01:24:31.440> they<01:24:31.639> put<01:24:31.800> it<01:24:31.960> in 01:24:35.149 --> 01:24:35.159 align:start position:0% 01:24:35.159 --> 01:24:37.390 align:start position:0% right<01:24:36.159> but<01:24:36.280> I<01:24:36.360> don't<01:24:36.520> think<01:24:36.679> you<01:24:36.920> contract 01:24:37.390 --> 01:24:37.400 align:start position:0% right but I don't think you contract 01:24:37.400 --> 01:24:38.910 align:start position:0% right but I don't think you contract with<01:24:37.600> those<01:24:37.800> organizations<01:24:38.560> is<01:24:38.719> what<01:24:38.840> I'm 01:24:38.910 --> 01:24:38.920 align:start position:0% with those organizations is what I'm 01:24:38.920 --> 01:24:40.350 align:start position:0% with those organizations is what I'm saying<01:24:39.159> we<01:24:39.280> don't<01:24:39.440> have<01:24:39.679> contracts<01:24:40.159> with 01:24:40.350 --> 01:24:40.360 align:start position:0% saying we don't have contracts with 01:24:40.360 --> 01:24:41.189 align:start position:0% saying we don't have contracts with those 01:24:41.189 --> 01:24:41.199 align:start position:0% those 01:24:41.199 --> 01:24:43.350 align:start position:0% those organizations 01:24:43.350 --> 01:24:43.360 align:start position:0% organizations 01:24:43.360 --> 01:24:46.590 align:start position:0% organizations right<01:24:44.360> I<01:24:45.360> I'm<01:24:45.520> trying<01:24:45.760> to<01:24:45.960> remember<01:24:46.320> what<01:24:46.480> the 01:24:46.590 --> 01:24:46.600 align:start position:0% right I I'm trying to remember what the 01:24:46.600 --> 01:24:48.669 align:start position:0% right I I'm trying to remember what the law<01:24:46.880> says<01:24:47.199> about<01:24:47.639> the<01:24:48.119> professional 01:24:48.669 --> 01:24:48.679 align:start position:0% law says about the professional 01:24:48.679 --> 01:24:52.750 align:start position:0% law says about the professional organizations 01:24:52.750 --> 01:24:52.760 align:start position:0% 01:24:52.760 --> 01:24:55.350 align:start position:0% piece<01:24:53.760> the<01:24:53.920> law<01:24:54.119> does 01:24:55.350 --> 01:24:55.360 align:start position:0% piece the law does 01:24:55.360 --> 01:24:59.750 align:start position:0% piece the law does not<01:24:56.360> mention<01:24:56.760> it<01:24:57.880> nope<01:24:58.880> okay<01:24:59.080> so<01:24:59.280> do<01:24:59.360> we<01:24:59.560> feel 01:24:59.750 --> 01:24:59.760 align:start position:0% not mention it nope okay so do we feel 01:24:59.760 --> 01:25:01.390 align:start position:0% not mention it nope okay so do we feel like<01:24:59.840> it<01:24:59.920> need<01:25:00.320> this<01:25:00.480> an<01:25:00.600> addition<01:25:01.080> we'll<01:25:01.280> have 01:25:01.390 --> 01:25:01.400 align:start position:0% like it need this an addition we'll have 01:25:01.400 --> 01:25:03.870 align:start position:0% like it need this an addition we'll have to<01:25:01.600> decide<01:25:01.840> if<01:25:01.960> it<01:25:02.080> goes<01:25:02.239> in<01:25:02.440> here<01:25:02.560> or<01:25:02.719> not<01:25:03.600> okay 01:25:03.870 --> 01:25:03.880 align:start position:0% to decide if it goes in here or not okay 01:25:03.880 --> 01:25:06.229 align:start position:0% to decide if it goes in here or not okay but<01:25:04.320> we<01:25:04.480> are<01:25:04.600> seeing<01:25:05.080> a<01:25:05.199> lot<01:25:05.360> of<01:25:05.880> these 01:25:06.229 --> 01:25:06.239 align:start position:0% but we are seeing a lot of these 01:25:06.239 --> 01:25:08.990 align:start position:0% but we are seeing a lot of these professional<01:25:06.719> organizations<01:25:07.719> referenced<01:25:08.719> in 01:25:08.990 --> 01:25:09.000 align:start position:0% professional organizations referenced in 01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:12.950 align:start position:0% professional organizations referenced in place<01:25:09.440> of<01:25:10.040> law<01:25:11.040> that's<01:25:11.280> why<01:25:11.440> that's<01:25:11.639> in<01:25:11.960> there 01:25:12.950 --> 01:25:12.960 align:start position:0% place of law that's why that's in there 01:25:12.960 --> 01:25:15.030 align:start position:0% place of law that's why that's in there when<01:25:13.119> I<01:25:13.239> looked<01:25:13.480> through<01:25:13.920> a<01:25:14.239> a<01:25:14.400> variety<01:25:14.760> of 01:25:15.030 --> 01:25:15.040 align:start position:0% when I looked through a a variety of 01:25:15.040 --> 01:25:17.750 align:start position:0% when I looked through a a variety of different<01:25:16.040> uh<01:25:16.320> recommendations<01:25:17.320> that<01:25:17.480> was 01:25:17.750 --> 01:25:17.760 align:start position:0% different uh recommendations that was 01:25:17.760 --> 01:25:21.070 align:start position:0% different uh recommendations that was one<01:25:18.080> that<01:25:18.920> um<01:25:19.920> often<01:25:20.280> they<01:25:20.400> would<01:25:20.800> they<01:25:20.880> would 01:25:21.070 --> 01:25:21.080 align:start position:0% one that um often they would they would 01:25:21.080 --> 01:25:24.030 align:start position:0% one that um often they would they would cite<01:25:21.400> the<01:25:21.600> recommendations<01:25:22.600> of<01:25:23.080> like<01:25:23.280> the<01:25:23.480> Ala 01:25:24.030 --> 01:25:24.040 align:start position:0% cite the recommendations of like the Ala 01:25:24.040 --> 01:25:25.149 align:start position:0% cite the recommendations of like the Ala and<01:25:24.360> other 01:25:25.149 --> 01:25:25.159 align:start position:0% and other 01:25:25.159 --> 01:25:27.510 align:start position:0% and other organizations<01:25:26.159> that<01:25:26.280> were<01:25:26.520> in<01:25:27.320> that 01:25:27.510 --> 01:25:27.520 align:start position:0% organizations that were in that 01:25:27.520 --> 01:25:29.910 align:start position:0% organizations that were in that contradicted<01:25:28.520> um<01:25:28.679> elements<01:25:29.000> of<01:25:29.159> Utah<01:25:29.520> law<01:25:29.760> or 01:25:29.910 --> 01:25:29.920 align:start position:0% contradicted um elements of Utah law or 01:25:29.920 --> 01:25:33.229 align:start position:0% contradicted um elements of Utah law or their<01:25:30.159> recommendations<01:25:31.320> did 01:25:33.229 --> 01:25:33.239 align:start position:0% their recommendations did 01:25:33.239 --> 01:25:38.070 align:start position:0% their recommendations did um<01:25:34.239> so<01:25:34.880> was<01:25:35.080> this<01:25:35.440> in<01:25:35.679> Utah<01:25:36.639> policy<01:25:37.639> like<01:25:37.960> are 01:25:38.070 --> 01:25:38.080 align:start position:0% um so was this in Utah policy like are 01:25:38.080 --> 01:25:40.030 align:start position:0% um so was this in Utah policy like are you<01:25:38.159> seeing<01:25:38.440> this<01:25:38.600> in<01:25:38.719> Utah<01:25:39.159> policies<01:25:39.719> or<01:25:39.880> is 01:25:40.030 --> 01:25:40.040 align:start position:0% you seeing this in Utah policies or is 01:25:40.040 --> 01:25:42.830 align:start position:0% you seeing this in Utah policies or is this<01:25:40.400> yeah<01:25:41.040> yep<01:25:41.960> it<01:25:42.080> might<01:25:42.239> be<01:25:42.360> a<01:25:42.440> little<01:25:42.639> too 01:25:42.830 --> 01:25:42.840 align:start position:0% this yeah yep it might be a little too 01:25:42.840 --> 01:25:45.790 align:start position:0% this yeah yep it might be a little too narrow<01:25:43.199> for<01:25:43.360> me<01:25:44.239> I<01:25:44.440> guess<01:25:44.719> this 01:25:45.790 --> 01:25:45.800 align:start position:0% narrow for me I guess this 01:25:45.800 --> 01:25:48.950 align:start position:0% narrow for me I guess this part<01:25:46.800> since<01:25:47.000> it's<01:25:47.159> outside<01:25:47.480> of<01:25:47.560> the<01:25:47.719> law<01:25:48.719> when 01:25:48.950 --> 01:25:48.960 align:start position:0% part since it's outside of the law when 01:25:48.960 --> 01:25:51.270 align:start position:0% part since it's outside of the law when is<01:25:49.119> it<01:25:49.880> so<01:25:50.040> I<01:25:50.159> just<01:25:50.520> I<01:25:50.639> guess<01:25:50.760> I<01:25:50.880> asked<01:25:51.119> the 01:25:51.270 --> 01:25:51.280 align:start position:0% is it so I just I guess I asked the 01:25:51.280 --> 01:25:53.550 align:start position:0% is it so I just I guess I asked the question<01:25:51.639> when<01:25:52.080> do<01:25:52.360> those<01:25:52.600> organizations 01:25:53.550 --> 01:25:53.560 align:start position:0% question when do those organizations 01:25:53.560 --> 01:25:56.229 align:start position:0% question when do those organizations they<01:25:54.320> recommendations<01:25:55.040> Trump<01:25:55.520> Utah<01:25:55.960> law 01:25:56.229 --> 01:25:56.239 align:start position:0% they recommendations Trump Utah law 01:25:56.239 --> 01:25:57.390 align:start position:0% they recommendations Trump Utah law that's<01:25:56.360> all<01:25:56.480> it's<01:25:56.639> stating<01:25:56.960> is<01:25:57.119> you<01:25:57.199> still 01:25:57.390 --> 01:25:57.400 align:start position:0% that's all it's stating is you still 01:25:57.400 --> 01:26:00.510 align:start position:0% that's all it's stating is you still have<01:25:57.520> to<01:25:57.639> adhere<01:25:57.920> to<01:25:58.040> Utah<01:25:58.679> law<01:25:59.679> right<01:26:00.239> I<01:26:00.360> guess 01:26:00.510 --> 01:26:00.520 align:start position:0% have to adhere to Utah law right I guess 01:26:00.520 --> 01:26:03.790 align:start position:0% have to adhere to Utah law right I guess that's<01:26:00.719> just<01:26:00.880> sort<01:26:01.040> of<01:26:01.199> assumed<01:26:01.760> I<01:26:02.520> I<01:26:03.520> I<01:26:03.600> don't 01:26:03.790 --> 01:26:03.800 align:start position:0% that's just sort of assumed I I I don't 01:26:03.800 --> 01:26:05.229 align:start position:0% that's just sort of assumed I I I don't think<01:26:03.920> it's<01:26:04.400> important<01:26:04.719> to<01:26:04.840> put<01:26:04.960> it<01:26:05.040> in<01:26:05.119> the 01:26:05.229 --> 01:26:05.239 align:start position:0% think it's important to put it in the 01:26:05.239 --> 01:26:07.470 align:start position:0% think it's important to put it in the guidelines<01:26:05.600> if<01:26:05.719> it<01:26:05.840> isn't<01:26:06.080> in<01:26:06.199> the 01:26:07.470 --> 01:26:07.480 align:start position:0% guidelines if it isn't in the 01:26:07.480 --> 01:26:10.629 align:start position:0% guidelines if it isn't in the law<01:26:08.480> for<01:26:08.719> me<01:26:09.600> um<01:26:09.800> it's<01:26:09.920> just<01:26:10.040> a<01:26:10.159> little 01:26:10.629 --> 01:26:10.639 align:start position:0% law for me um it's just a little 01:26:10.639 --> 01:26:13.189 align:start position:0% law for me um it's just a little narrowing<01:26:11.639> and<01:26:12.280> I<01:26:12.400> think<01:26:12.560> could<01:26:12.760> maybe<01:26:12.960> be<01:26:13.119> a 01:26:13.189 --> 01:26:13.199 align:start position:0% narrowing and I think could maybe be a 01:26:13.199 --> 01:26:16.070 align:start position:0% narrowing and I think could maybe be a little<01:26:13.360> bit<01:26:13.679> confusing<01:26:14.679> since<01:26:15.679> there's<01:26:15.920> so 01:26:16.070 --> 01:26:16.080 align:start position:0% little bit confusing since there's so 01:26:16.080 --> 01:26:17.430 align:start position:0% little bit confusing since there's so much<01:26:16.280> that<01:26:16.440> come<01:26:16.639> with<01:26:16.800> those<01:26:17.040> professional 01:26:17.430 --> 01:26:17.440 align:start position:0% much that come with those professional 01:26:17.440 --> 01:26:20.070 align:start position:0% much that come with those professional organizations<01:26:18.400> or<01:26:19.159> Professional<01:26:19.600> Standards 01:26:20.070 --> 01:26:20.080 align:start position:0% organizations or Professional Standards 01:26:20.080 --> 01:26:22.030 align:start position:0% organizations or Professional Standards I<01:26:20.159> don't<01:26:20.280> know<01:26:20.600> it's<01:26:20.800> just<01:26:21.520> maybe<01:26:21.800> a<01:26:21.880> little 01:26:22.030 --> 01:26:22.040 align:start position:0% I don't know it's just maybe a little 01:26:22.040 --> 01:26:24.590 align:start position:0% I don't know it's just maybe a little too<01:26:22.239> narrow<01:26:22.560> for<01:26:22.679> me<01:26:22.840> on<01:26:23.040> this<01:26:23.239> part<01:26:24.360> I<01:26:24.480> don't 01:26:24.590 --> 01:26:24.600 align:start position:0% too narrow for me on this part I don't 01:26:24.600 --> 01:26:26.030 align:start position:0% too narrow for me on this part I don't think<01:26:24.760> it's<01:26:24.920> saying<01:26:25.159> you<01:26:25.280> can't<01:26:25.560> consider<01:26:25.880> it 01:26:26.030 --> 01:26:26.040 align:start position:0% think it's saying you can't consider it 01:26:26.040 --> 01:26:27.709 align:start position:0% think it's saying you can't consider it I<01:26:26.159> just<01:26:26.280> said<01:26:26.760> it's<01:26:26.920> just<01:26:27.040> saying<01:26:27.280> it<01:26:27.400> doesn't 01:26:27.709 --> 01:26:27.719 align:start position:0% I just said it's just saying it doesn't 01:26:27.719 --> 01:26:29.629 align:start position:0% I just said it's just saying it doesn't supersede<01:26:28.280> the 01:26:29.629 --> 01:26:29.639 align:start position:0% supersede the 01:26:29.639 --> 01:26:32.750 align:start position:0% supersede the law<01:26:30.639> right<01:26:31.159> it's<01:26:31.360> just<01:26:31.639> it's<01:26:31.920> just<01:26:32.040> saying<01:26:32.639> but 01:26:32.750 --> 01:26:32.760 align:start position:0% law right it's just it's just saying but 01:26:32.760 --> 01:26:34.990 align:start position:0% law right it's just it's just saying but that's<01:26:33.119> that<01:26:33.239> should<01:26:33.400> be<01:26:33.600> given<01:26:34.080> right<01:26:34.440> so 01:26:34.990 --> 01:26:35.000 align:start position:0% that's that should be given right so 01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.229 align:start position:0% that's that should be given right so well<01:26:35.119> you<01:26:35.199> would<01:26:35.360> think<01:26:35.639> that<01:26:35.840> but<01:26:35.960> I<01:26:36.040> don't 01:26:36.229 --> 01:26:36.239 align:start position:0% well you would think that but I don't 01:26:36.239 --> 01:26:38.109 align:start position:0% well you would think that but I don't think<01:26:36.400> that's<01:26:36.800> I<01:26:36.920> guess<01:26:37.080> putting<01:26:37.320> it<01:26:37.440> in<01:26:37.560> there 01:26:38.109 --> 01:26:38.119 align:start position:0% think that's I guess putting it in there 01:26:38.119 --> 01:26:41.390 align:start position:0% think that's I guess putting it in there know<01:26:38.520> makes<01:26:38.639> it<01:26:39.119> feel<01:26:40.119> yeah<01:26:40.400> why<01:26:40.520> I<01:26:40.600> know<01:26:40.960> I 01:26:41.390 --> 01:26:41.400 align:start position:0% know makes it feel yeah why I know I 01:26:41.400 --> 01:26:43.270 align:start position:0% know makes it feel yeah why I know I understand<01:26:41.600> that<01:26:41.840> and<01:26:42.239> that's<01:26:42.480> like<01:26:42.880> why<01:26:43.159> I 01:26:43.270 --> 01:26:43.280 align:start position:0% understand that and that's like why I 01:26:43.280 --> 01:26:45.790 align:start position:0% understand that and that's like why I just<01:26:43.520> I<01:26:43.600> want<01:26:43.719> to<01:26:43.840> make<01:26:44.000> sure<01:26:44.239> that<01:26:44.360> we're<01:26:44.800> not 01:26:45.790 --> 01:26:45.800 align:start position:0% just I want to make sure that we're not 01:26:45.800 --> 01:26:49.990 align:start position:0% just I want to make sure that we're not overg<01:26:46.560> guiding<01:26:47.520> alas<01:26:48.360> in<01:26:48.600> this<01:26:49.480> you<01:26:49.600> know<01:26:49.880> I 01:26:49.990 --> 01:26:50.000 align:start position:0% overg guiding alas in this you know I 01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:50.830 align:start position:0% overg guiding alas in this you know I could 01:26:50.830 --> 01:26:50.840 align:start position:0% could 01:26:50.840 --> 01:26:54.550 align:start position:0% could see<01:26:51.840> a<01:26:52.000> friendly<01:26:52.600> reminder 01:26:54.550 --> 01:26:54.560 align:start position:0% see a friendly reminder 01:26:54.560 --> 01:26:56.390 align:start position:0% see a friendly reminder that<01:26:54.760> Utah<01:26:55.239> law 01:26:56.390 --> 01:26:56.400 align:start position:0% that Utah law 01:26:56.400 --> 01:26:58.750 align:start position:0% that Utah law supersedes 01:26:58.750 --> 01:26:58.760 align:start position:0% supersedes 01:26:58.760 --> 01:27:00.750 align:start position:0% supersedes everything<01:26:59.760> so<01:26:59.960> as<01:27:00.119> you're<01:27:00.360> considering 01:27:00.750 --> 01:27:00.760 align:start position:0% everything so as you're considering 01:27:00.760 --> 01:27:02.629 align:start position:0% everything so as you're considering sensitive 01:27:02.629 --> 01:27:02.639 align:start position:0% sensitive 01:27:02.639 --> 01:27:05.510 align:start position:0% sensitive materials<01:27:03.639> coming<01:27:04.000> from<01:27:04.400> whatever 01:27:05.510 --> 01:27:05.520 align:start position:0% materials coming from whatever 01:27:05.520 --> 01:27:09.629 align:start position:0% materials coming from whatever sources<01:27:06.520> um<01:27:07.320> the<01:27:07.480> law<01:27:07.760> is<01:27:07.960> the<01:27:08.360> law<01:27:09.360> if<01:27:09.480> we 01:27:09.629 --> 01:27:09.639 align:start position:0% sources um the law is the law if we 01:27:09.639 --> 01:27:11.270 align:start position:0% sources um the law is the law if we wanted<01:27:09.960> to<01:27:10.199> say 01:27:11.270 --> 01:27:11.280 align:start position:0% wanted to say 01:27:11.280 --> 01:27:14.590 align:start position:0% wanted to say that<01:27:12.280> singling<01:27:13.040> out<01:27:14.040> professional 01:27:14.590 --> 01:27:14.600 align:start position:0% that singling out professional 01:27:14.600 --> 01:27:17.669 align:start position:0% that singling out professional organizations<01:27:15.960> or 01:27:17.669 --> 01:27:17.679 align:start position:0% organizations or 01:27:17.679 --> 01:27:21.990 align:start position:0% organizations or whatever<01:27:18.760> seems<01:27:20.119> um<01:27:21.119> yeah<01:27:21.560> professional 01:27:21.990 --> 01:27:22.000 align:start position:0% whatever seems um yeah professional 01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:25.030 align:start position:0% whatever seems um yeah professional organizations<01:27:22.880> and<01:27:23.679> AR<01:27:24.199> teachers<01:27:24.639> and<01:27:24.800> our 01:27:25.030 --> 01:27:25.040 align:start position:0% organizations and AR teachers and our 01:27:25.040 --> 01:27:26.990 align:start position:0% organizations and AR teachers and our parents 01:27:26.990 --> 01:27:27.000 align:start position:0% parents 01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:29.830 align:start position:0% parents and<01:27:28.000> everybody<01:27:28.840> student<01:27:29.280> I<01:27:29.360> think<01:27:29.520> you<01:27:29.639> could 01:27:29.830 --> 01:27:29.840 align:start position:0% and everybody student I think you could 01:27:29.840 --> 01:27:31.470 align:start position:0% and everybody student I think you could say<01:27:30.119> then<01:27:30.560> how<01:27:30.679> about<01:27:30.840> you<01:27:30.960> tell<01:27:31.239> law 01:27:31.470 --> 01:27:31.480 align:start position:0% say then how about you tell law 01:27:31.480 --> 01:27:34.390 align:start position:0% say then how about you tell law supersedes<01:27:32.159> recommendations<01:27:32.880> coming<01:27:33.320> from<01:27:34.320> I 01:27:34.390 --> 01:27:34.400 align:start position:0% supersedes recommendations coming from I 01:27:34.400 --> 01:27:39.310 align:start position:0% supersedes recommendations coming from I don't<01:27:34.560> know<01:27:34.840> however<01:27:35.000> you<01:27:35.080> want<01:27:35.159> to<01:27:35.320> title 01:27:39.310 --> 01:27:39.320 align:start position:0% 01:27:39.320 --> 01:27:43.430 align:start position:0% that<01:27:40.320> Utah<01:27:40.880> La<01:27:41.520> Reigns 01:27:43.430 --> 01:27:43.440 align:start position:0% that Utah La Reigns 01:27:43.440 --> 01:27:45.750 align:start position:0% that Utah La Reigns Supreme<01:27:44.440> yeah<01:27:44.560> it<01:27:44.679> just<01:27:44.800> seems<01:27:45.119> so<01:27:45.360> obvious<01:27:45.639> to 01:27:45.750 --> 01:27:45.760 align:start position:0% Supreme yeah it just seems so obvious to 01:27:45.760 --> 01:27:48.550 align:start position:0% Supreme yeah it just seems so obvious to me<01:27:45.880> I<01:27:45.960> just<01:27:46.119> like<01:27:46.719> I<01:27:47.520> I<01:27:47.600> don't<01:27:47.719> want<01:27:47.840> to<01:27:47.960> be<01:27:48.239> and 01:27:48.550 --> 01:27:48.560 align:start position:0% me I just like I I don't want to be and 01:27:48.560 --> 01:27:50.390 align:start position:0% me I just like I I don't want to be and I<01:27:48.639> don't<01:27:48.760> want<01:27:48.880> to<01:27:49.040> be<01:27:49.560> overly<01:27:49.960> guiding 01:27:50.390 --> 01:27:50.400 align:start position:0% I don't want to be overly guiding 01:27:50.400 --> 01:27:53.430 align:start position:0% I don't want to be overly guiding because<01:27:50.600> I<01:27:50.679> want<01:27:50.760> to<01:27:50.920> make<01:27:51.080> sure<01:27:51.440> that<01:27:52.360> we<01:27:53.199> give 01:27:53.430 --> 01:27:53.440 align:start position:0% because I want to make sure that we give 01:27:53.440 --> 01:27:56.109 align:start position:0% because I want to make sure that we give trust<01:27:53.679> in<01:27:53.800> our<01:27:54.600> to<01:27:55.159> create<01:27:55.440> the<01:27:55.600> policies 01:27:56.109 --> 01:27:56.119 align:start position:0% trust in our to create the policies 01:27:56.119 --> 01:27:58.550 align:start position:0% trust in our to create the policies within<01:27:56.360> the<01:27:56.520> law<01:27:57.480> this<01:27:57.600> is<01:27:57.800> one<01:27:58.040> area<01:27:58.400> I've 01:27:58.550 --> 01:27:58.560 align:start position:0% within the law this is one area I've 01:27:58.560 --> 01:28:00.830 align:start position:0% within the law this is one area I've seen<01:27:59.119> I've<01:27:59.480> seen<01:27:59.800> the<01:27:59.960> violation<01:28:00.520> over<01:28:00.679> and 01:28:00.830 --> 01:28:00.840 align:start position:0% seen I've seen the violation over and 01:28:00.840 --> 01:28:02.990 align:start position:0% seen I've seen the violation over and over<01:28:01.159> though<01:28:01.520> and<01:28:01.679> hopefully<01:28:02.000> the<01:28:02.199> law<01:28:02.679> clears 01:28:02.990 --> 01:28:03.000 align:start position:0% over though and hopefully the law clears 01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:05.590 align:start position:0% over though and hopefully the law clears it<01:28:03.119> up<01:28:03.360> this<01:28:03.480> year<01:28:03.760> but<01:28:04.320> this<01:28:04.440> is<01:28:04.840> one<01:28:05.119> where 01:28:05.590 --> 01:28:05.600 align:start position:0% it up this year but this is one where 01:28:05.600 --> 01:28:07.550 align:start position:0% it up this year but this is one where often<01:28:06.119> these<01:28:06.320> recommendations<01:28:07.000> or<01:28:07.159> outside 01:28:07.550 --> 01:28:07.560 align:start position:0% often these recommendations or outside 01:28:07.560 --> 01:28:10.910 align:start position:0% often these recommendations or outside entities<01:28:07.960> are<01:28:08.840> providing<01:28:09.840> um<01:28:10.320> feedback<01:28:10.719> on 01:28:10.910 --> 01:28:10.920 align:start position:0% entities are providing um feedback on 01:28:10.920 --> 01:28:13.510 align:start position:0% entities are providing um feedback on things<01:28:11.320> and<01:28:12.159> they<01:28:12.360> conflict<01:28:12.880> with<01:28:13.159> various 01:28:13.510 --> 01:28:13.520 align:start position:0% things and they conflict with various 01:28:13.520 --> 01:28:15.870 align:start position:0% things and they conflict with various components<01:28:13.920> of<01:28:14.040> Utah<01:28:14.480> law<01:28:15.000> I<01:28:15.239> I<01:28:15.360> think<01:28:15.800> it 01:28:15.870 --> 01:28:15.880 align:start position:0% components of Utah law I I think it 01:28:15.880 --> 01:28:17.910 align:start position:0% components of Utah law I I think it doesn't<01:28:16.199> even<01:28:16.440> matter<01:28:16.719> if<01:28:16.840> a<01:28:17.080> parent<01:28:17.400> says<01:28:17.760> hey 01:28:17.910 --> 01:28:17.920 align:start position:0% doesn't even matter if a parent says hey 01:28:17.920 --> 01:28:20.229 align:start position:0% doesn't even matter if a parent says hey you<01:28:18.040> should<01:28:18.320> have<01:28:18.600> your<01:28:18.800> kids<01:28:19.239> our<01:28:19.800> you<01:28:19.920> know 01:28:20.229 --> 01:28:20.239 align:start position:0% you should have your kids our you know 01:28:20.239 --> 01:28:22.709 align:start position:0% you should have your kids our you know English<01:28:20.560> students<01:28:20.960> read<01:28:21.280> this<01:28:21.520> book<01:28:22.440> like<01:28:22.600> it 01:28:22.709 --> 01:28:22.719 align:start position:0% English students read this book like it 01:28:22.719 --> 01:28:24.189 align:start position:0% English students read this book like it all<01:28:22.880> has<01:28:23.000> to<01:28:23.159> be<01:28:23.320> within<01:28:23.560> the<01:28:23.679> law<01:28:23.840> doesn't 01:28:24.189 --> 01:28:24.199 align:start position:0% all has to be within the law doesn't 01:28:24.199 --> 01:28:26.590 align:start position:0% all has to be within the law doesn't matter<01:28:24.400> who<01:28:24.560> recommends<01:28:25.080> it<01:28:26.000> just<01:28:26.159> feels<01:28:26.440> like 01:28:26.590 --> 01:28:26.600 align:start position:0% matter who recommends it just feels like 01:28:26.600 --> 01:28:27.830 align:start position:0% matter who recommends it just feels like we're<01:28:26.800> calling<01:28:27.080> out<01:28:27.400> professional 01:28:27.830 --> 01:28:27.840 align:start position:0% we're calling out professional 01:28:27.840 --> 01:28:30.270 align:start position:0% we're calling out professional organizations<01:28:28.440> in<01:28:28.560> a<01:28:28.719> way<01:28:29.000> that<01:28:30.000> I<01:28:30.119> don't 01:28:30.270 --> 01:28:30.280 align:start position:0% organizations in a way that I don't 01:28:30.280 --> 01:28:31.910 align:start position:0% organizations in a way that I don't think<01:28:30.440> is<01:28:30.679> necessary<01:28:31.280> and<01:28:31.600> when<01:28:31.719> they're 01:28:31.910 --> 01:28:31.920 align:start position:0% think is necessary and when they're 01:28:31.920 --> 01:28:35.470 align:start position:0% think is necessary and when they're creating<01:28:32.280> their 01:28:35.470 --> 01:28:35.480 align:start position:0% 01:28:35.480 --> 01:28:40.030 align:start position:0% [Music] 01:28:40.030 --> 01:28:40.040 align:start position:0% 01:28:40.040 --> 01:28:44.390 align:start position:0% guidelines<01:28:41.040> I<01:28:41.440> think<01:28:42.440> and<01:28:43.040> uh<01:28:44.040> I've<01:28:44.159> spent 01:28:44.390 --> 01:28:44.400 align:start position:0% guidelines I think and uh I've spent 01:28:44.400 --> 01:28:46.550 align:start position:0% guidelines I think and uh I've spent some<01:28:44.600> time<01:28:44.760> thinking<01:28:45.000> about<01:28:45.199> this<01:28:45.320> one 01:28:46.550 --> 01:28:46.560 align:start position:0% some time thinking about this one 01:28:46.560 --> 01:28:50.910 align:start position:0% some time thinking about this one too<01:28:47.560> um<01:28:47.760> I<01:28:47.840> think<01:28:48.159> what's<01:28:48.440> happening<01:28:49.280> it<01:28:49.920> seems 01:28:50.910 --> 01:28:50.920 align:start position:0% too um I think what's happening it seems 01:28:50.920 --> 01:28:52.550 align:start position:0% too um I think what's happening it seems is<01:28:51.119> that 01:28:52.550 --> 01:28:52.560 align:start position:0% is that 01:28:52.560 --> 01:28:56.149 align:start position:0% is that these<01:28:53.560> um<01:28:53.719> teach<01:28:54.080> ERS<01:28:54.480> and 01:28:56.149 --> 01:28:56.159 align:start position:0% these um teach ERS and 01:28:56.159 --> 01:29:00.390 align:start position:0% these um teach ERS and Librarians<01:28:57.159> go<01:28:57.360> to<01:28:57.639> these<01:28:58.560> um 01:29:00.390 --> 01:29:00.400 align:start position:0% Librarians go to these um 01:29:00.400 --> 01:29:02.629 align:start position:0% Librarians go to these um conventions 01:29:02.629 --> 01:29:02.639 align:start position:0% conventions 01:29:02.639 --> 01:29:08.390 align:start position:0% conventions or<01:29:03.639> these<01:29:03.840> meetings<01:29:04.520> and<01:29:04.719> then 01:29:08.390 --> 01:29:08.400 align:start position:0% 01:29:08.400 --> 01:29:11.669 align:start position:0% um<01:29:09.400> they're<01:29:09.639> they're<01:29:09.760> being<01:29:10.480> told<01:29:11.480> and 01:29:11.669 --> 01:29:11.679 align:start position:0% um they're they're being told and 01:29:11.679 --> 01:29:14.189 align:start position:0% um they're they're being told and trained<01:29:12.159> on<01:29:12.719> on<01:29:13.320> how<01:29:13.440> to 01:29:14.189 --> 01:29:14.199 align:start position:0% trained on on how to 01:29:14.199 --> 01:29:18.950 align:start position:0% trained on on how to do<01:29:15.199> you<01:29:15.320> know<01:29:15.960> their<01:29:16.239> job<01:29:17.000> bring<01:29:17.560> in<01:29:18.560> bringing 01:29:18.950 --> 01:29:18.960 align:start position:0% do you know their job bring in bringing 01:29:18.960 --> 01:29:21.310 align:start position:0% do you know their job bring in bringing materials<01:29:19.440> bringing<01:29:19.840> books 01:29:21.310 --> 01:29:21.320 align:start position:0% materials bringing books 01:29:21.320 --> 01:29:23.550 align:start position:0% materials bringing books and<01:29:22.320> it's<01:29:22.600> I<01:29:22.679> think<01:29:22.840> it's<01:29:23.000> safe<01:29:23.159> to<01:29:23.280> say<01:29:23.440> that 01:29:23.550 --> 01:29:23.560 align:start position:0% and it's I think it's safe to say that 01:29:23.560 --> 01:29:27.109 align:start position:0% and it's I think it's safe to say that there's<01:29:23.800> part<01:29:24.360> of<01:29:25.000> every<01:29:25.600> industry<01:29:26.600> that 01:29:27.109 --> 01:29:27.119 align:start position:0% there's part of every industry that 01:29:27.119 --> 01:29:30.270 align:start position:0% there's part of every industry that exists<01:29:28.119> where<01:29:28.600> they<01:29:28.760> have<01:29:28.880> a<01:29:29.080> product<01:29:29.360> to 01:29:30.270 --> 01:29:30.280 align:start position:0% exists where they have a product to 01:29:30.280 --> 01:29:32.790 align:start position:0% exists where they have a product to offer 01:29:32.790 --> 01:29:32.800 align:start position:0% offer 01:29:32.800 --> 01:29:37.229 align:start position:0% offer and<01:29:33.800> and<01:29:34.040> I<01:29:34.119> think<01:29:34.400> sensitive<01:29:35.040> materials<01:29:36.040> is<01:29:36.840> a 01:29:37.229 --> 01:29:37.239 align:start position:0% and and I think sensitive materials is a 01:29:37.239 --> 01:29:41.229 align:start position:0% and and I think sensitive materials is a realm<01:29:38.440> of<01:29:39.440> the<01:29:39.600> part<01:29:39.760> of<01:29:39.880> our<01:29:40.080> industry<01:29:40.520> that 01:29:41.229 --> 01:29:41.239 align:start position:0% realm of the part of our industry that 01:29:41.239 --> 01:29:44.950 align:start position:0% realm of the part of our industry that exists<01:29:42.239> which<01:29:42.400> has<01:29:42.560> found<01:29:42.800> a<01:29:43.000> way<01:29:43.719> into<01:29:44.719> our 01:29:44.950 --> 01:29:44.960 align:start position:0% exists which has found a way into our 01:29:44.960 --> 01:29:47.709 align:start position:0% exists which has found a way into our public<01:29:45.679> education<01:29:46.679> and<01:29:47.440> what<01:29:47.560> we're 01:29:47.709 --> 01:29:47.719 align:start position:0% public education and what we're 01:29:47.719 --> 01:29:50.030 align:start position:0% public education and what we're realizing<01:29:48.719> is<01:29:48.880> that<01:29:49.119> it's<01:29:49.400> kind 01:29:50.030 --> 01:29:50.040 align:start position:0% realizing is that it's kind 01:29:50.040 --> 01:29:54.790 align:start position:0% realizing is that it's kind of<01:29:51.040> got<01:29:51.239> away<01:29:51.520> from<01:29:52.000> us<01:29:53.000> and<01:29:53.119> so<01:29:53.400> now<01:29:54.520> these 01:29:54.790 --> 01:29:54.800 align:start position:0% of got away from us and so now these 01:29:54.800 --> 01:29:57.310 align:start position:0% of got away from us and so now these people<01:29:55.040> in<01:29:55.239> these<01:29:55.400> positions<01:29:55.760> are<01:29:56.000> put<01:29:56.639> in<01:29:56.800> the 01:29:57.310 --> 01:29:57.320 align:start position:0% people in these positions are put in the 01:29:57.320 --> 01:30:00.790 align:start position:0% people in these positions are put in the middle<01:29:58.320> because<01:29:58.560> they're<01:29:58.800> being<01:29:59.639> Guided<01:30:00.119> by 01:30:00.790 --> 01:30:00.800 align:start position:0% middle because they're being Guided by 01:30:00.800 --> 01:30:01.870 align:start position:0% middle because they're being Guided by the 01:30:01.870 --> 01:30:01.880 align:start position:0% the 01:30:01.880 --> 01:30:06.109 align:start position:0% the organizations<01:30:03.000> that<01:30:04.000> help<01:30:04.679> fill<01:30:05.440> the 01:30:06.109 --> 01:30:06.119 align:start position:0% organizations that help fill the 01:30:06.119 --> 01:30:08.070 align:start position:0% organizations that help fill the libraries<01:30:07.119> and<01:30:07.199> then<01:30:07.320> they<01:30:07.440> bring<01:30:07.679> back<01:30:07.840> a 01:30:08.070 --> 01:30:08.080 align:start position:0% libraries and then they bring back a 01:30:08.080 --> 01:30:11.590 align:start position:0% libraries and then they bring back a product<01:30:08.760> that<01:30:08.880> is<01:30:09.040> now<01:30:09.199> in<01:30:09.600> violation<01:30:10.600> of<01:30:10.760> Utah 01:30:11.590 --> 01:30:11.600 align:start position:0% product that is now in violation of Utah 01:30:11.600 --> 01:30:16.790 align:start position:0% product that is now in violation of Utah law<01:30:12.600> and<01:30:12.800> so<01:30:13.480> what<01:30:13.679> we<01:30:13.920> have<01:30:14.080> to<01:30:14.280> do<01:30:14.719> here<01:30:15.719> is 01:30:16.790 --> 01:30:16.800 align:start position:0% law and so what we have to do here is 01:30:16.800 --> 01:30:21.189 align:start position:0% law and so what we have to do here is clarify<01:30:17.800> what<01:30:18.719> they<01:30:18.920> can<01:30:19.080> and<01:30:19.280> can't<01:30:19.679> do<01:30:20.679> so<01:30:21.080> I 01:30:21.189 --> 01:30:21.199 align:start position:0% clarify what they can and can't do so I 01:30:21.199 --> 01:30:25.030 align:start position:0% clarify what they can and can't do so I would<01:30:21.440> rather<01:30:21.679> see<01:30:21.920> it<01:30:22.280> as<01:30:23.280> helping<01:30:24.280> them<01:30:24.880> be 01:30:25.030 --> 01:30:25.040 align:start position:0% would rather see it as helping them be 01:30:25.040 --> 01:30:25.990 align:start position:0% would rather see it as helping them be able<01:30:25.280> to 01:30:25.990 --> 01:30:26.000 align:start position:0% able to 01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.430 align:start position:0% able to make<01:30:27.000> those<01:30:27.760> tough<01:30:28.280> decisions<01:30:29.719> around<01:30:30.719> an<01:30:31.080> an 01:30:31.430 --> 01:30:31.440 align:start position:0% make those tough decisions around an an 01:30:31.440 --> 01:30:36.189 align:start position:0% make those tough decisions around an an a<01:30:31.679> specific<01:30:32.600> part<01:30:33.480> of<01:30:33.639> the<01:30:34.280> industry<01:30:35.280> that<01:30:35.520> is 01:30:36.189 --> 01:30:36.199 align:start position:0% a specific part of the industry that is 01:30:36.199 --> 01:30:39.709 align:start position:0% a specific part of the industry that is tailoring<01:30:37.199> their<01:30:37.760> product<01:30:38.760> for<01:30:39.000> with<01:30:39.119> a<01:30:39.320> very 01:30:39.709 --> 01:30:39.719 align:start position:0% tailoring their product for with a very 01:30:39.719 --> 01:30:43.790 align:start position:0% tailoring their product for with a very specific<01:30:40.719> um<01:30:41.480> intent<01:30:41.840> and<01:30:42.440> purpose<01:30:43.440> and<01:30:43.600> we've 01:30:43.790 --> 01:30:43.800 align:start position:0% specific um intent and purpose and we've 01:30:43.800 --> 01:30:46.430 align:start position:0% specific um intent and purpose and we've acknowledged<01:30:44.320> in<01:30:44.520> this<01:30:44.719> law<01:30:45.600> that<01:30:46.080> there<01:30:46.199> are 01:30:46.430 --> 01:30:46.440 align:start position:0% acknowledged in this law that there are 01:30:46.440 --> 01:30:48.870 align:start position:0% acknowledged in this law that there are lines<01:30:46.760> that<01:30:46.880> are<01:30:47.159> crossed<01:30:48.159> where<01:30:48.320> it<01:30:48.480> takes<01:30:48.679> it 01:30:48.870 --> 01:30:48.880 align:start position:0% lines that are crossed where it takes it 01:30:48.880 --> 01:30:53.070 align:start position:0% lines that are crossed where it takes it too<01:30:49.199> far<01:30:50.199> and<01:30:50.760> and<01:30:51.040> it<01:30:51.560> um<01:30:52.520> and<01:30:52.639> they<01:30:52.760> can<01:30:52.880> be 01:30:53.070 --> 01:30:53.080 align:start position:0% too far and and it um and they can be 01:30:53.080 --> 01:30:55.669 align:start position:0% too far and and it um and they can be prosecuted<01:30:54.000> so<01:30:54.119> for<01:30:54.239> me<01:30:54.400> I<01:30:54.480> don't<01:30:55.080> necessarily 01:30:55.669 --> 01:30:55.679 align:start position:0% prosecuted so for me I don't necessarily 01:30:55.679 --> 01:30:58.270 align:start position:0% prosecuted so for me I don't necessarily see<01:30:55.920> that<01:30:56.040> it<01:30:56.119> would<01:30:56.280> be<01:30:57.000> micromanaging<01:30:57.960> I<01:30:58.119> I 01:30:58.270 --> 01:30:58.280 align:start position:0% see that it would be micromanaging I I 01:30:58.280 --> 01:30:59.790 align:start position:0% see that it would be micromanaging I I actually<01:30:58.560> rather<01:30:58.800> see 01:30:59.790 --> 01:30:59.800 align:start position:0% actually rather see 01:30:59.800 --> 01:31:03.950 align:start position:0% actually rather see that<01:31:00.800> they<01:31:01.440> understand<01:31:02.320> that<01:31:02.560> there<01:31:02.960> are 01:31:03.950 --> 01:31:03.960 align:start position:0% that they understand that there are 01:31:03.960 --> 01:31:06.430 align:start position:0% that they understand that there are lines<01:31:04.480> that<01:31:04.840> are 01:31:06.430 --> 01:31:06.440 align:start position:0% lines that are 01:31:06.440 --> 01:31:10.790 align:start position:0% lines that are crossed<01:31:07.840> with<01:31:08.840> um<01:31:09.360> in<01:31:09.560> this<01:31:09.719> realm<01:31:10.320> and<01:31:10.400> so<01:31:10.600> we 01:31:10.790 --> 01:31:10.800 align:start position:0% crossed with um in this realm and so we 01:31:10.800 --> 01:31:14.030 align:start position:0% crossed with um in this realm and so we clarify<01:31:11.400> that<01:31:11.560> for<01:31:11.800> them<01:31:12.719> so<01:31:12.920> that<01:31:13.119> they<01:31:13.280> know 01:31:14.030 --> 01:31:14.040 align:start position:0% clarify that for them so that they know 01:31:14.040 --> 01:31:15.629 align:start position:0% clarify that for them so that they know they<01:31:14.280> they<01:31:14.440> have<01:31:14.560> an 01:31:15.629 --> 01:31:15.639 align:start position:0% they they have an 01:31:15.639 --> 01:31:18.590 align:start position:0% they they have an expectation<01:31:16.960> and<01:31:17.960> and<01:31:18.080> they<01:31:18.199> know<01:31:18.360> how<01:31:18.440> to 01:31:18.590 --> 01:31:18.600 align:start position:0% expectation and and they know how to 01:31:18.600 --> 01:31:22.310 align:start position:0% expectation and and they know how to sort<01:31:18.920> that<01:31:19.080> out<01:31:19.840> when<01:31:20.840> the<01:31:21.080> organizations<01:31:21.760> are 01:31:22.310 --> 01:31:22.320 align:start position:0% sort that out when the organizations are 01:31:22.320 --> 01:31:24.590 align:start position:0% sort that out when the organizations are saying<01:31:23.320> you<01:31:23.440> should<01:31:23.639> do<01:31:23.800> this<01:31:24.159> you<01:31:24.239> should<01:31:24.400> do 01:31:24.590 --> 01:31:24.600 align:start position:0% saying you should do this you should do 01:31:24.600 --> 01:31:26.109 align:start position:0% saying you should do this you should do this<01:31:25.080> you<01:31:25.159> should<01:31:25.360> bring<01:31:25.520> in<01:31:25.719> this<01:31:25.880> you<01:31:25.960> should 01:31:26.109 --> 01:31:26.119 align:start position:0% this you should bring in this you should 01:31:26.119 --> 01:31:28.830 align:start position:0% this you should bring in this you should bring<01:31:26.280> in<01:31:26.480> this<01:31:26.920> and<01:31:27.040> it's<01:31:27.320> like<01:31:28.320> well<01:31:28.480> if<01:31:28.639> the 01:31:28.830 --> 01:31:28.840 align:start position:0% bring in this and it's like well if the 01:31:28.840 --> 01:31:33.629 align:start position:0% bring in this and it's like well if the product<01:31:29.320> could<01:31:30.119> could<01:31:30.719> work<01:31:31.719> I<01:31:31.960> could<01:31:32.800> but<01:31:33.480> it 01:31:33.629 --> 01:31:33.639 align:start position:0% product could could work I could but it 01:31:33.639 --> 01:31:36.270 align:start position:0% product could could work I could but it doesn't<01:31:34.320> so<01:31:34.520> I<01:31:34.719> can't<01:31:35.239> so<01:31:35.400> let<01:31:35.520> me<01:31:35.719> give<01:31:35.840> you<01:31:36.040> a 01:31:36.270 --> 01:31:36.280 align:start position:0% doesn't so I can't so let me give you a 01:31:36.280 --> 01:31:37.709 align:start position:0% doesn't so I can't so let me give you a specific<01:31:36.800> example<01:31:37.159> I'm<01:31:37.239> not<01:31:37.360> going<01:31:37.480> to<01:31:37.600> tell 01:31:37.709 --> 01:31:37.719 align:start position:0% specific example I'm not going to tell 01:31:37.719 --> 01:31:39.350 align:start position:0% specific example I'm not going to tell you<01:31:37.840> the<01:31:38.040> district<01:31:38.560> large<01:31:38.880> District<01:31:39.199> in<01:31:39.280> the 01:31:39.350 --> 01:31:39.360 align:start position:0% you the district large District in the 01:31:39.360 --> 01:31:41.070 align:start position:0% you the district large District in the state<01:31:39.520> of<01:31:39.639> Utah<01:31:39.960> I'm<01:31:40.040> reading<01:31:40.400> right<01:31:40.560> now 01:31:41.070 --> 01:31:41.080 align:start position:0% state of Utah I'm reading right now 01:31:41.080 --> 01:31:42.390 align:start position:0% state of Utah I'm reading right now Library<01:31:41.480> materials<01:31:41.960> selection 01:31:42.390 --> 01:31:42.400 align:start position:0% Library materials selection 01:31:42.400 --> 01:31:44.709 align:start position:0% Library materials selection reconsideration<01:31:43.320> and<01:31:43.480> deselection 01:31:44.709 --> 01:31:44.719 align:start position:0% reconsideration and deselection 01:31:44.719 --> 01:31:47.030 align:start position:0% reconsideration and deselection guidelines<01:31:45.719> Library<01:31:46.320> School<01:31:46.679> library 01:31:47.030 --> 01:31:47.040 align:start position:0% guidelines Library School library 01:31:47.040 --> 01:31:48.990 align:start position:0% guidelines Library School library collections<01:31:47.560> we<01:31:47.760> affirmed<01:31:48.280> the<01:31:48.520> American 01:31:48.990 --> 01:31:49.000 align:start position:0% collections we affirmed the American 01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.790 align:start position:0% collections we affirmed the American Library<01:31:49.480> association's<01:31:50.360> Bill<01:31:50.600> of<01:31:50.840> Rights<01:31:51.560> and 01:31:51.790 --> 01:31:51.800 align:start position:0% Library association's Bill of Rights and 01:31:51.800 --> 01:31:54.430 align:start position:0% Library association's Bill of Rights and interpretation<01:31:52.400> of<01:31:52.560> school<01:31:52.840> libraries 01:31:54.430 --> 01:31:54.440 align:start position:0% interpretation of school libraries 01:31:54.440 --> 01:31:55.750 align:start position:0% interpretation of school libraries and<01:31:54.560> then<01:31:54.719> when<01:31:54.840> you<01:31:54.960> go<01:31:55.040> to<01:31:55.199> Bill<01:31:55.360> of<01:31:55.639> their 01:31:55.750 --> 01:31:55.760 align:start position:0% and then when you go to Bill of their 01:31:55.760 --> 01:31:57.590 align:start position:0% and then when you go to Bill of their Bill<01:31:55.960> of<01:31:56.159> Rights<01:31:56.480> there's<01:31:56.800> components<01:31:57.320> within 01:31:57.590 --> 01:31:57.600 align:start position:0% Bill of Rights there's components within 01:31:57.600 --> 01:32:01.229 align:start position:0% Bill of Rights there's components within there<01:31:58.040> that<01:31:58.400> allow<01:31:58.800> for<01:31:59.440> access<01:31:59.760> to<01:32:00.000> all<01:32:00.920> not 01:32:01.229 --> 01:32:01.239 align:start position:0% there that allow for access to all not 01:32:01.239 --> 01:32:04.310 align:start position:0% there that allow for access to all not depending<01:32:01.600> on<01:32:01.880> any<01:32:02.159> age<01:32:03.159> right<01:32:03.719> all<01:32:03.920> materials 01:32:04.310 --> 01:32:04.320 align:start position:0% depending on any age right all materials 01:32:04.320 --> 01:32:06.430 align:start position:0% depending on any age right all materials should<01:32:04.480> be<01:32:04.880> accessible<01:32:05.880> so<01:32:06.119> and<01:32:06.239> I'm<01:32:06.360> not 01:32:06.430 --> 01:32:06.440 align:start position:0% should be accessible so and I'm not 01:32:06.440 --> 01:32:08.070 align:start position:0% should be accessible so and I'm not going<01:32:06.560> to<01:32:06.679> go<01:32:07.239> to<01:32:07.480> other<01:32:07.679> things<01:32:07.840> with<01:32:08.000> the 01:32:08.070 --> 01:32:08.080 align:start position:0% going to go to other things with the 01:32:08.080 --> 01:32:09.510 align:start position:0% going to go to other things with the Bill<01:32:08.239> of<01:32:08.400> Rights<01:32:08.639> some<01:32:08.800> other<01:32:09.000> issues<01:32:09.360> with 01:32:09.510 --> 01:32:09.520 align:start position:0% Bill of Rights some other issues with 01:32:09.520 --> 01:32:11.470 align:start position:0% Bill of Rights some other issues with that<01:32:09.719> but<01:32:10.000> this<01:32:10.119> is<01:32:10.320> the<01:32:10.600> this<01:32:10.679> is<01:32:10.840> the<01:32:11.040> point 01:32:11.470 --> 01:32:11.480 align:start position:0% that but this is the this is the point 01:32:11.480 --> 01:32:15.550 align:start position:0% that but this is the this is the point is<01:32:11.679> letting<01:32:12.239> districts<01:32:12.800> know<01:32:13.800> that<01:32:14.119> this<01:32:15.119> Utah 01:32:15.550 --> 01:32:15.560 align:start position:0% is letting districts know that this Utah 01:32:15.560 --> 01:32:17.790 align:start position:0% is letting districts know that this Utah law<01:32:15.840> supersedes<01:32:16.520> these<01:32:16.679> other<01:32:16.960> organizations 01:32:17.790 --> 01:32:17.800 align:start position:0% law supersedes these other organizations 01:32:17.800 --> 01:32:19.149 align:start position:0% law supersedes these other organizations that<01:32:17.960> are<01:32:18.119> out<01:32:18.320> there<01:32:18.520> with<01:32:18.639> a<01:32:18.800> different 01:32:19.149 --> 01:32:19.159 align:start position:0% that are out there with a different 01:32:19.159 --> 01:32:24.109 align:start position:0% that are out there with a different vested<01:32:19.920> interest<01:32:20.920> um<01:32:21.639> so<01:32:21.920> maybe<01:32:22.239> we<01:32:22.400> could<01:32:22.639> say 01:32:24.109 --> 01:32:24.119 align:start position:0% vested interest um so maybe we could say 01:32:24.119 --> 01:32:29.030 align:start position:0% vested interest um so maybe we could say Utah<01:32:24.840> in<01:32:25.239> Utah<01:32:25.920> public<01:32:26.639> education<01:32:27.639> Utah<01:32:28.239> law 01:32:29.030 --> 01:32:29.040 align:start position:0% Utah in Utah public education Utah law 01:32:29.040 --> 01:32:33.910 align:start position:0% Utah in Utah public education Utah law supersedes<01:32:30.040> any<01:32:30.719> other 01:32:33.910 --> 01:32:33.920 align:start position:0% 01:32:33.920 --> 01:32:36.470 align:start position:0% recommendations<01:32:34.920> just<01:32:35.239> as<01:32:35.360> a<01:32:35.520> little<01:32:36.199> I<01:32:36.280> would 01:32:36.470 --> 01:32:36.480 align:start position:0% recommendations just as a little I would 01:32:36.480 --> 01:32:38.709 align:start position:0% recommendations just as a little I would just<01:32:36.679> rather<01:32:37.199> yeah<01:32:37.560> any<01:32:37.880> recommendations<01:32:38.520> and 01:32:38.709 --> 01:32:38.719 align:start position:0% just rather yeah any recommendations and 01:32:38.719 --> 01:32:40.430 align:start position:0% just rather yeah any recommendations and take<01:32:38.960> off<01:32:39.199> professional<01:32:39.600> organizations<01:32:40.320> I 01:32:40.430 --> 01:32:40.440 align:start position:0% take off professional organizations I 01:32:40.440 --> 01:32:42.669 align:start position:0% take off professional organizations I just<01:32:41.000> I<01:32:41.080> want<01:32:41.199> to<01:32:41.360> stay<01:32:41.639> within<01:32:42.239> what<01:32:42.400> is<01:32:42.520> in 01:32:42.669 --> 01:32:42.679 align:start position:0% just I want to stay within what is in 01:32:42.679 --> 01:32:46.430 align:start position:0% just I want to stay within what is in the<01:32:42.840> law<01:32:43.600> and<01:32:43.960> not<01:32:44.239> try<01:32:44.840> to<01:32:45.840> bring<01:32:46.080> up<01:32:46.280> things 01:32:46.430 --> 01:32:46.440 align:start position:0% the law and not try to bring up things 01:32:46.440 --> 01:32:48.270 align:start position:0% the law and not try to bring up things that<01:32:46.600> we've<01:32:46.760> seen<01:32:46.960> issues<01:32:47.320> with<01:32:47.440> or<01:32:47.600> whatever 01:32:48.270 --> 01:32:48.280 align:start position:0% that we've seen issues with or whatever 01:32:48.280 --> 01:32:50.750 align:start position:0% that we've seen issues with or whatever let's<01:32:48.480> leave<01:32:48.760> that<01:32:48.920> to<01:32:49.080> the<01:32:49.639> legislator 01:32:50.750 --> 01:32:50.760 align:start position:0% let's leave that to the legislator 01:32:50.760 --> 01:32:53.030 align:start position:0% let's leave that to the legislator legislation<01:32:51.760> if<01:32:51.880> they<01:32:52.000> want<01:32:52.119> to<01:32:52.480> pass<01:32:52.760> future 01:32:53.030 --> 01:32:53.040 align:start position:0% legislation if they want to pass future 01:32:53.040 --> 01:32:54.750 align:start position:0% legislation if they want to pass future ones<01:32:53.280> I<01:32:53.360> just<01:32:53.480> don't<01:32:53.600> want 01:32:54.750 --> 01:32:54.760 align:start position:0% ones I just don't want 01:32:54.760 --> 01:32:56.109 align:start position:0% ones I just don't want get<01:32:55.040> I<01:32:55.119> don't<01:32:55.199> want<01:32:55.280> to<01:32:55.400> be<01:32:55.639> back<01:32:55.760> here<01:32:55.880> in<01:32:56.000> a 01:32:56.109 --> 01:32:56.119 align:start position:0% get I don't want to be back here in a 01:32:56.119 --> 01:32:57.709 align:start position:0% get I don't want to be back here in a year<01:32:56.400> though<01:32:56.840> that's<01:32:57.000> where<01:32:57.119> I<01:32:57.199> don't<01:32:57.480> I<01:32:57.560> know 01:32:57.709 --> 01:32:57.719 align:start position:0% year though that's where I don't I know 01:32:57.719 --> 01:33:00.189 align:start position:0% year though that's where I don't I know but<01:32:57.800> I<01:32:57.880> don't<01:32:58.000> want<01:32:58.080> to<01:32:58.239> get<01:32:58.480> overly 01:33:00.189 --> 01:33:00.199 align:start position:0% but I don't want to get overly 01:33:00.199 --> 01:33:04.189 align:start position:0% but I don't want to get overly um<01:33:01.199> guiding<01:33:01.719> because<01:33:02.040> it<01:33:02.239> it<01:33:02.679> just<01:33:03.679> it<01:33:03.840> causes 01:33:04.189 --> 01:33:04.199 align:start position:0% um guiding because it it just it causes 01:33:04.199 --> 01:33:06.270 align:start position:0% um guiding because it it just it causes a<01:33:04.320> little<01:33:04.480> bit<01:33:04.639> of<01:33:04.840> confusion<01:33:05.560> and<01:33:06.000> it's 01:33:06.270 --> 01:33:06.280 align:start position:0% a little bit of confusion and it's 01:33:06.280 --> 01:33:07.750 align:start position:0% a little bit of confusion and it's harder<01:33:06.520> to<01:33:06.719> interpret<01:33:07.199> when<01:33:07.320> they're<01:33:07.520> looking 01:33:07.750 --> 01:33:07.760 align:start position:0% harder to interpret when they're looking 01:33:07.760 --> 01:33:08.990 align:start position:0% harder to interpret when they're looking at<01:33:07.840> the<01:33:07.960> law<01:33:08.159> and<01:33:08.239> they're<01:33:08.440> looking<01:33:08.639> at<01:33:08.760> our 01:33:08.990 --> 01:33:09.000 align:start position:0% at the law and they're looking at our 01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:10.350 align:start position:0% at the law and they're looking at our guidelines<01:33:09.440> I<01:33:09.520> want<01:33:09.639> to<01:33:09.800> make<01:33:10.000> sure<01:33:10.199> that 01:33:10.350 --> 01:33:10.360 align:start position:0% guidelines I want to make sure that 01:33:10.360 --> 01:33:13.390 align:start position:0% guidelines I want to make sure that those<01:33:10.600> match<01:33:10.880> in<01:33:11.040> that<01:33:11.560> way<01:33:12.560> I<01:33:12.679> would<01:33:12.920> add<01:33:13.199> on 01:33:13.390 --> 01:33:13.400 align:start position:0% those match in that way I would add on 01:33:13.400 --> 01:33:14.750 align:start position:0% those match in that way I would add on this<01:33:13.520> one<01:33:13.760> including<01:33:14.320> professional 01:33:14.750 --> 01:33:14.760 align:start position:0% this one including professional 01:33:14.760 --> 01:33:16.430 align:start position:0% this one including professional organizations<01:33:15.520> I<01:33:15.639> just<01:33:15.800> think<01:33:16.080> that's<01:33:16.280> where 01:33:16.430 --> 01:33:16.440 align:start position:0% organizations I just think that's where 01:33:16.440 --> 01:33:19.109 align:start position:0% organizations I just think that's where we're<01:33:16.600> seeing<01:33:17.040> the<01:33:17.639> the<01:33:18.119> overstretch 01:33:19.109 --> 01:33:19.119 align:start position:0% we're seeing the the overstretch 01:33:19.119 --> 01:33:20.390 align:start position:0% we're seeing the the overstretch otherwise<01:33:19.560> it<01:33:19.719> wouldn't<01:33:19.960> you're<01:33:20.119> right<01:33:20.280> it 01:33:20.390 --> 01:33:20.400 align:start position:0% otherwise it wouldn't you're right it 01:33:20.400 --> 01:33:22.149 align:start position:0% otherwise it wouldn't you're right it wouldn't<01:33:20.679> be<01:33:20.880> wouldn't<01:33:21.119> be<01:33:21.320> necessary<01:33:22.000> but 01:33:22.149 --> 01:33:22.159 align:start position:0% wouldn't be wouldn't be necessary but 01:33:22.159 --> 01:33:24.550 align:start position:0% wouldn't be wouldn't be necessary but that<01:33:22.280> is<01:33:22.480> where<01:33:23.159> the<01:33:23.400> the<01:33:23.520> real<01:33:23.840> we're<01:33:24.000> in<01:33:24.119> it's 01:33:24.550 --> 01:33:24.560 align:start position:0% that is where the the real we're in it's 01:33:24.560 --> 01:33:25.910 align:start position:0% that is where the the real we're in it's there<01:33:24.960> maybe<01:33:25.159> we<01:33:25.239> need<01:33:25.400> to<01:33:25.560> just<01:33:25.679> make<01:33:25.840> a 01:33:25.910 --> 01:33:25.920 align:start position:0% there maybe we need to just make a 01:33:25.920 --> 01:33:27.790 align:start position:0% there maybe we need to just make a motion<01:33:26.280> take<01:33:26.400> a<01:33:26.520> vote<01:33:26.719> I<01:33:26.800> don't 01:33:27.790 --> 01:33:27.800 align:start position:0% motion take a vote I don't 01:33:27.800 --> 01:33:32.189 align:start position:0% motion take a vote I don't know<01:33:28.800> so<01:33:29.440> I<01:33:30.040> I<01:33:30.280> think<01:33:30.480> that<01:33:31.400> you<01:33:31.520> have 01:33:32.189 --> 01:33:32.199 align:start position:0% know so I I think that you have 01:33:32.199 --> 01:33:34.109 align:start position:0% know so I I think that you have a 01:33:34.109 --> 01:33:34.119 align:start position:0% a 01:33:34.119 --> 01:33:36.750 align:start position:0% a yeah<01:33:35.119> this<01:33:35.239> is<01:33:35.360> where<01:33:35.560> the<01:33:35.760> controversy<01:33:36.520> is 01:33:36.750 --> 01:33:36.760 align:start position:0% yeah this is where the controversy is 01:33:36.760 --> 01:33:39.750 align:start position:0% yeah this is where the controversy is this<01:33:36.840> is<01:33:36.960> where<01:33:37.119> the<01:33:37.280> disconnect<01:33:38.159> is<01:33:39.159> we<01:33:39.480> we 01:33:39.750 --> 01:33:39.760 align:start position:0% this is where the disconnect is we we 01:33:39.760 --> 01:33:42.470 align:start position:0% this is where the disconnect is we we are<01:33:39.960> at<01:33:40.119> the<01:33:40.280> mercy<01:33:40.840> of 01:33:42.470 --> 01:33:42.480 align:start position:0% are at the mercy of 01:33:42.480 --> 01:33:44.709 align:start position:0% are at the mercy of Industry<01:33:43.480> the<01:33:43.600> school<01:33:43.920> system<01:33:44.239> is<01:33:44.360> one<01:33:44.480> of<01:33:44.560> the 01:33:44.709 --> 01:33:44.719 align:start position:0% Industry the school system is one of the 01:33:44.719 --> 01:33:48.550 align:start position:0% Industry the school system is one of the biggest<01:33:45.040> industries<01:33:45.880> in<01:33:46.880> in<01:33:47.000> the<01:33:47.320> US<01:33:48.320> we<01:33:48.440> are 01:33:48.550 --> 01:33:48.560 align:start position:0% biggest industries in in the US we are 01:33:48.560 --> 01:33:49.830 align:start position:0% biggest industries in in the US we are at<01:33:48.679> the<01:33:48.800> mercy<01:33:49.119> of 01:33:49.830 --> 01:33:49.840 align:start position:0% at the mercy of 01:33:49.840 --> 01:33:52.390 align:start position:0% at the mercy of Industry<01:33:50.840> where<01:33:51.040> our<01:33:51.280> products<01:33:51.719> come<01:33:51.960> from 01:33:52.390 --> 01:33:52.400 align:start position:0% Industry where our products come from 01:33:52.400 --> 01:33:54.709 align:start position:0% Industry where our products come from the<01:33:52.520> materials<01:33:53.000> that<01:33:53.159> we<01:33:53.880> we<01:33:54.080> present<01:33:54.400> to<01:33:54.520> our 01:33:54.709 --> 01:33:54.719 align:start position:0% the materials that we we present to our 01:33:54.719 --> 01:33:57.149 align:start position:0% the materials that we we present to our children<01:33:55.239> come<01:33:55.679> from<01:33:55.920> the<01:33:56.119> industries<01:33:56.880> that 01:33:57.149 --> 01:33:57.159 align:start position:0% children come from the industries that 01:33:57.159 --> 01:34:00.310 align:start position:0% children come from the industries that exist<01:33:58.159> and<01:33:58.320> the<01:33:58.480> professional<01:33:59.320> organizations 01:34:00.310 --> 01:34:00.320 align:start position:0% exist and the professional organizations 01:34:00.320 --> 01:34:01.790 align:start position:0% exist and the professional organizations if<01:34:00.560> professional<01:34:01.000> organizations<01:34:01.560> are 01:34:01.790 --> 01:34:01.800 align:start position:0% if professional organizations are 01:34:01.800 --> 01:34:03.870 align:start position:0% if professional organizations are creating<01:34:02.159> Bill<01:34:02.360> of<01:34:02.560> Rights<01:34:03.320> that<01:34:03.679> still 01:34:03.870 --> 01:34:03.880 align:start position:0% creating Bill of Rights that still 01:34:03.880 --> 01:34:04.709 align:start position:0% creating Bill of Rights that still doesn't 01:34:04.709 --> 01:34:04.719 align:start position:0% doesn't 01:34:04.719 --> 01:34:08.430 align:start position:0% doesn't Trump<01:34:05.719> the<01:34:06.000> the<01:34:06.159> law<01:34:07.119> of<01:34:07.400> of<01:34:07.560> the 01:34:08.430 --> 01:34:08.440 align:start position:0% Trump the the law of of the 01:34:08.440 --> 01:34:10.669 align:start position:0% Trump the the law of of the land<01:34:09.440> as<01:34:09.560> much<01:34:09.760> as<01:34:09.920> they<01:34:10.040> want<01:34:10.159> it<01:34:10.280> to<01:34:10.440> they<01:34:10.560> can 01:34:10.669 --> 01:34:10.679 align:start position:0% land as much as they want it to they can 01:34:10.679 --> 01:34:12.070 align:start position:0% land as much as they want it to they can have<01:34:10.800> the<01:34:10.920> Bill<01:34:11.080> of<01:34:11.199> Rights<01:34:11.400> that's<01:34:11.600> great<01:34:11.920> but 01:34:12.070 --> 01:34:12.080 align:start position:0% have the Bill of Rights that's great but 01:34:12.080 --> 01:34:14.790 align:start position:0% have the Bill of Rights that's great but there's<01:34:12.400> a<01:34:12.600> a<01:34:12.800> higher<01:34:13.239> level<01:34:13.560> Bill<01:34:13.760> of<01:34:13.960> Rights 01:34:14.790 --> 01:34:14.800 align:start position:0% there's a a higher level Bill of Rights 01:34:14.800 --> 01:34:18.270 align:start position:0% there's a a higher level Bill of Rights that<01:34:15.119> oversees<01:34:16.080> them<01:34:17.080> and<01:34:17.199> Utah<01:34:17.600> law<01:34:17.920> applies 01:34:18.270 --> 01:34:18.280 align:start position:0% that oversees them and Utah law applies 01:34:18.280 --> 01:34:20.430 align:start position:0% that oversees them and Utah law applies to<01:34:18.480> that<01:34:18.760> so<01:34:18.960> they<01:34:19.080> can<01:34:19.199> make<01:34:19.320> it<01:34:19.440> fluffy<01:34:20.280> and 01:34:20.430 --> 01:34:20.440 align:start position:0% to that so they can make it fluffy and 01:34:20.440 --> 01:34:21.870 align:start position:0% to that so they can make it fluffy and and<01:34:20.560> if<01:34:20.719> teachers<01:34:21.239> in<01:34:21.560> in<01:34:21.719> these 01:34:21.870 --> 01:34:21.880 align:start position:0% and if teachers in in these 01:34:21.880 --> 01:34:24.189 align:start position:0% and if teachers in in these organizations<01:34:22.600> they<01:34:22.719> don't<01:34:23.239> understand<01:34:23.480> that 01:34:24.189 --> 01:34:24.199 align:start position:0% organizations they don't understand that 01:34:24.199 --> 01:34:26.790 align:start position:0% organizations they don't understand that confusion<01:34:25.199> is<01:34:25.480> there<01:34:25.800> and<01:34:25.960> then<01:34:26.320> again<01:34:26.560> we're 01:34:26.790 --> 01:34:26.800 align:start position:0% confusion is there and then again we're 01:34:26.800 --> 01:34:29.430 align:start position:0% confusion is there and then again we're back<01:34:26.960> in<01:34:27.080> the<01:34:27.280> place<01:34:27.520> where<01:34:27.679> we've<01:34:28.000> pitted<01:34:28.880> our 01:34:29.430 --> 01:34:29.440 align:start position:0% back in the place where we've pitted our 01:34:29.440 --> 01:34:33.149 align:start position:0% back in the place where we've pitted our Librarians<01:34:30.560> against<01:34:31.560> this<01:34:31.920> issue<01:34:32.920> and<01:34:33.040> I'm 01:34:33.149 --> 01:34:33.159 align:start position:0% Librarians against this issue and I'm 01:34:33.159 --> 01:34:35.430 align:start position:0% Librarians against this issue and I'm not<01:34:33.320> sure<01:34:33.560> we<01:34:33.719> want<01:34:33.920> to<01:34:34.159> do<01:34:34.400> that<01:34:34.760> I<01:34:34.920> don't<01:34:35.199> want 01:34:35.430 --> 01:34:35.440 align:start position:0% not sure we want to do that I don't want 01:34:35.440 --> 01:34:39.430 align:start position:0% not sure we want to do that I don't want to<01:34:35.719> do<01:34:36.080> that<01:34:36.840> that's<01:34:37.119> what<01:34:37.360> has<01:34:37.560> been 01:34:39.430 --> 01:34:39.440 align:start position:0% to do that that's what has been 01:34:39.440 --> 01:34:41.910 align:start position:0% to do that that's what has been happening<01:34:40.440> so<01:34:40.760> and<01:34:40.960> and<01:34:41.119> yeah<01:34:41.280> we<01:34:41.400> can<01:34:41.639> get 01:34:41.910 --> 01:34:41.920 align:start position:0% happening so and and yeah we can get 01:34:41.920 --> 01:34:46.070 align:start position:0% happening so and and yeah we can get some<01:34:42.920> feedback<01:34:43.400> here<01:34:43.560> sorry<01:34:43.840> choth<01:34:44.440> you 01:34:46.070 --> 01:34:46.080 align:start position:0% some feedback here sorry choth you 01:34:46.080 --> 01:34:49.830 align:start position:0% some feedback here sorry choth you were<01:34:47.080> calling<01:34:47.400> on<01:34:47.679> someone<01:34:48.080> to<01:34:49.080> to 01:34:49.830 --> 01:34:49.840 align:start position:0% were calling on someone to to 01:34:49.840 --> 01:34:52.229 align:start position:0% were calling on someone to to speak<01:34:50.840> that's<01:34:51.119> great<01:34:51.480> thank<01:34:51.679> you<01:34:51.840> for<01:34:52.000> your 01:34:52.229 --> 01:34:52.239 align:start position:0% speak that's great thank you for your 01:34:52.239 --> 01:34:55.109 align:start position:0% speak that's great thank you for your comment<01:34:53.119> uh<01:34:53.239> davine 01:34:55.109 --> 01:34:55.119 align:start position:0% comment uh davine 01:34:55.119 --> 01:34:57.590 align:start position:0% comment uh davine um<01:34:56.119> I<01:34:56.199> don't<01:34:56.320> know<01:34:56.480> if<01:34:56.600> it<01:34:56.679> would<01:34:56.840> be<01:34:57.080> okay<01:34:57.280> if<01:34:57.400> I 01:34:57.590 --> 01:34:57.600 align:start position:0% um I don't know if it would be okay if I 01:34:57.600 --> 01:34:59.030 align:start position:0% um I don't know if it would be okay if I provide<01:34:57.880> just<01:34:57.960> a<01:34:58.040> little<01:34:58.199> bit<01:34:58.320> of<01:34:58.560> context 01:34:59.030 --> 01:34:59.040 align:start position:0% provide just a little bit of context 01:34:59.040 --> 01:35:02.390 align:start position:0% provide just a little bit of context about<01:34:59.320> the<01:34:59.679> training<01:35:00.679> that<01:35:00.880> Librarians<01:35:01.679> do 01:35:02.390 --> 01:35:02.400 align:start position:0% about the training that Librarians do 01:35:02.400 --> 01:35:04.390 align:start position:0% about the training that Librarians do get<01:35:02.719> and<01:35:02.920> and<01:35:03.080> I've<01:35:03.199> been<01:35:03.360> a<01:35:03.480> part<01:35:03.639> of<01:35:03.800> these 01:35:04.390 --> 01:35:04.400 align:start position:0% get and and I've been a part of these 01:35:04.400 --> 01:35:06.910 align:start position:0% get and and I've been a part of these trainings<01:35:05.400> um<01:35:05.840> you<01:35:05.960> know<01:35:06.239> since<01:35:06.480> I<01:35:06.600> was<01:35:06.760> a 01:35:06.910 --> 01:35:06.920 align:start position:0% trainings um you know since I was a 01:35:06.920 --> 01:35:09.870 align:start position:0% trainings um you know since I was a librarian<01:35:07.920> um<01:35:08.080> age<01:35:08.560> appropriateness<01:35:09.320> and 01:35:09.870 --> 01:35:09.880 align:start position:0% librarian um age appropriateness and 01:35:09.880 --> 01:35:12.510 align:start position:0% librarian um age appropriateness and developmentally<01:35:10.760> appropriate<01:35:11.560> is<01:35:11.920> always<01:35:12.280> a 01:35:12.510 --> 01:35:12.520 align:start position:0% developmentally appropriate is always a 01:35:12.520 --> 01:35:15.669 align:start position:0% developmentally appropriate is always a part<01:35:12.719> of<01:35:13.000> those<01:35:13.679> trainings<01:35:14.679> and<01:35:15.119> while<01:35:15.360> we<01:35:15.480> do 01:35:15.669 --> 01:35:15.679 align:start position:0% part of those trainings and while we do 01:35:15.679 --> 01:35:18.550 align:start position:0% part of those trainings and while we do have<01:35:15.840> the<01:35:16.000> American<01:35:16.440> Library<01:35:17.360> we<01:35:17.679> as<01:35:17.840> in<01:35:18.239> our 01:35:18.550 --> 01:35:18.560 align:start position:0% have the American Library we as in our 01:35:18.560 --> 01:35:20.149 align:start position:0% have the American Library we as in our country<01:35:19.000> has<01:35:19.199> the<01:35:19.360> American<01:35:19.679> Library 01:35:20.149 --> 01:35:20.159 align:start position:0% country has the American Library 01:35:20.159 --> 01:35:22.390 align:start position:0% country has the American Library Association<01:35:21.040> there<01:35:21.280> also<01:35:21.560> is<01:35:21.719> the<01:35:21.880> American 01:35:22.390 --> 01:35:22.400 align:start position:0% Association there also is the American 01:35:22.400 --> 01:35:24.470 align:start position:0% Association there also is the American Association<01:35:22.880> of<01:35:23.000> school<01:35:23.280> library 01:35:24.470 --> 01:35:24.480 align:start position:0% Association of school library 01:35:24.480 --> 01:35:28.030 align:start position:0% Association of school library and<01:35:24.719> they're<01:35:25.400> they<01:35:25.600> do<01:35:25.920> call<01:35:26.239> out<01:35:27.040> explicitly 01:35:28.030 --> 01:35:28.040 align:start position:0% and they're they do call out explicitly 01:35:28.040 --> 01:35:30.229 align:start position:0% and they're they do call out explicitly um<01:35:28.280> that<01:35:28.440> we<01:35:28.639> select<01:35:29.080> materials<01:35:29.600> for<01:35:29.800> schools 01:35:30.229 --> 01:35:30.239 align:start position:0% um that we select materials for schools 01:35:30.239 --> 01:35:32.189 align:start position:0% um that we select materials for schools we<01:35:30.400> know<01:35:30.719> that<01:35:30.920> school<01:35:31.280> materials<01:35:32.000> is 01:35:32.189 --> 01:35:32.199 align:start position:0% we know that school materials is 01:35:32.199 --> 01:35:33.830 align:start position:0% we know that school materials is different<01:35:32.480> than<01:35:32.719> public<01:35:33.040> material<01:35:33.600> Public 01:35:33.830 --> 01:35:33.840 align:start position:0% different than public material Public 01:35:33.840 --> 01:35:37.669 align:start position:0% different than public material Public Library<01:35:34.520> materials<01:35:35.520> and<01:35:35.760> so<01:35:36.560> I<01:35:36.679> would<01:35:37.159> I<01:35:37.239> would 01:35:37.669 --> 01:35:37.679 align:start position:0% Library materials and so I would I would 01:35:37.679 --> 01:35:40.030 align:start position:0% Library materials and so I would I would expect<01:35:38.280> that<01:35:38.520> in<01:35:38.719> a<01:35:39.000> policy<01:35:39.480> that<01:35:39.719> may 01:35:40.030 --> 01:35:40.040 align:start position:0% expect that in a policy that may 01:35:40.040 --> 01:35:41.590 align:start position:0% expect that in a policy that may reference<01:35:40.480> the<01:35:40.639> library<01:35:41.040> Bill<01:35:41.239> of<01:35:41.360> Rights 01:35:41.590 --> 01:35:41.600 align:start position:0% reference the library Bill of Rights 01:35:41.600 --> 01:35:43.669 align:start position:0% reference the library Bill of Rights because<01:35:41.760> there<01:35:41.880> is<01:35:42.040> a<01:35:42.600> intellectual<01:35:43.199> Freedom 01:35:43.669 --> 01:35:43.679 align:start position:0% because there is a intellectual Freedom 01:35:43.679 --> 01:35:46.030 align:start position:0% because there is a intellectual Freedom First<01:35:44.000> Amendment<01:35:44.639> like 01:35:46.030 --> 01:35:46.040 align:start position:0% First Amendment like 01:35:46.040 --> 01:35:48.950 align:start position:0% First Amendment like um<01:35:47.040> um<01:35:47.320> I<01:35:47.400> don't<01:35:47.520> know<01:35:47.880> passion<01:35:48.320> I<01:35:48.560> would<01:35:48.719> say 01:35:48.950 --> 01:35:48.960 align:start position:0% um um I don't know passion I would say 01:35:48.960 --> 01:35:51.669 align:start position:0% um um I don't know passion I would say that<01:35:49.159> a<01:35:49.280> lot<01:35:49.400> of<01:35:49.600> librarians<01:35:50.280> have<01:35:50.600> but<01:35:51.280> it<01:35:51.480> as 01:35:51.669 --> 01:35:51.679 align:start position:0% that a lot of librarians have but it as 01:35:51.679 --> 01:35:54.430 align:start position:0% that a lot of librarians have but it as part<01:35:51.880> of<01:35:52.000> a<01:35:52.320> policy<01:35:53.239> I'm<01:35:53.639> almost<01:35:54.000> I<01:35:54.199> I<01:35:54.239> don't 01:35:54.430 --> 01:35:54.440 align:start position:0% part of a policy I'm almost I I don't 01:35:54.440 --> 01:35:56.109 align:start position:0% part of a policy I'm almost I I don't know<01:35:54.679> that<01:35:54.880> I've<01:35:55.040> seen<01:35:55.280> a<01:35:55.520> policy<01:35:55.920> that 01:35:56.109 --> 01:35:56.119 align:start position:0% know that I've seen a policy that 01:35:56.119 --> 01:35:58.750 align:start position:0% know that I've seen a policy that doesn't<01:35:56.480> include<01:35:56.960> age<01:35:57.440> appropriateness<01:35:58.360> in<01:35:58.520> a 01:35:58.750 --> 01:35:58.760 align:start position:0% doesn't include age appropriateness in a 01:35:58.760 --> 01:36:00.550 align:start position:0% doesn't include age appropriateness in a policy<01:35:59.360> and<01:35:59.480> so<01:35:59.880> hopefully<01:36:00.239> that<01:36:00.360> just 01:36:00.550 --> 01:36:00.560 align:start position:0% policy and so hopefully that just 01:36:00.560 --> 01:36:02.229 align:start position:0% policy and so hopefully that just provides<01:36:00.880> a<01:36:01.000> little<01:36:01.159> bit<01:36:01.320> of<01:36:01.480> context<01:36:02.000> that 01:36:02.229 --> 01:36:02.239 align:start position:0% provides a little bit of context that 01:36:02.239 --> 01:36:04.590 align:start position:0% provides a little bit of context that that<01:36:02.480> is<01:36:02.760> really<01:36:03.040> important<01:36:03.480> to<01:36:03.840> selecting<01:36:04.320> of 01:36:04.590 --> 01:36:04.600 align:start position:0% that is really important to selecting of 01:36:04.600 --> 01:36:08.790 align:start position:0% that is really important to selecting of mat<01:36:05.080> materials<01:36:05.639> in<01:36:05.760> a<01:36:05.960> K12<01:36:07.320> environment<01:36:08.320> um 01:36:08.790 --> 01:36:08.800 align:start position:0% mat materials in a K12 environment um 01:36:08.800 --> 01:36:11.310 align:start position:0% mat materials in a K12 environment um and<01:36:09.600> and<01:36:09.800> maybe<01:36:10.239> that<01:36:10.400> is<01:36:10.520> a<01:36:10.719> piece<01:36:11.040> that<01:36:11.159> we 01:36:11.310 --> 01:36:11.320 align:start position:0% and and maybe that is a piece that we 01:36:11.320 --> 01:36:13.229 align:start position:0% and and maybe that is a piece that we add<01:36:11.600> here<01:36:11.880> is<01:36:12.080> just<01:36:12.239> that<01:36:12.400> it's<01:36:12.600> age 01:36:13.229 --> 01:36:13.239 align:start position:0% add here is just that it's age 01:36:13.239 --> 01:36:15.790 align:start position:0% add here is just that it's age appropriate<01:36:14.239> along<01:36:14.639> with<01:36:14.920> compliance<01:36:15.480> with 01:36:15.790 --> 01:36:15.800 align:start position:0% appropriate along with compliance with 01:36:15.800 --> 01:36:20.350 align:start position:0% appropriate along with compliance with law<01:36:16.800> just<01:36:17.159> couple<01:36:17.400> two 01:36:20.350 --> 01:36:20.360 align:start position:0% 01:36:20.360 --> 01:36:25.709 align:start position:0% cents<01:36:21.440> so<01:36:22.440> I'm<01:36:22.920> feeling 01:36:25.709 --> 01:36:25.719 align:start position:0% 01:36:25.719 --> 01:36:28.870 align:start position:0% that<01:36:26.719> at<01:36:26.880> the<01:36:27.159> district<01:36:27.679> level<01:36:28.040> at<01:36:28.199> the<01:36:28.400> local 01:36:28.870 --> 01:36:28.880 align:start position:0% that at the district level at the local 01:36:28.880 --> 01:36:32.510 align:start position:0% that at the district level at the local District<01:36:29.679> level 01:36:32.510 --> 01:36:32.520 align:start position:0% District level 01:36:32.520 --> 01:36:36.510 align:start position:0% District level um<01:36:33.520> there<01:36:33.719> is<01:36:33.920> a<01:36:34.199> desire<01:36:35.159> I<01:36:35.320> believe<01:36:35.960> to<01:36:36.159> be 01:36:36.510 --> 01:36:36.520 align:start position:0% um there is a desire I believe to be 01:36:36.520 --> 01:36:42.270 align:start position:0% um there is a desire I believe to be compliant<01:36:37.119> with<01:36:37.280> the<01:36:37.920> law<01:36:38.920> they<01:36:39.400> know<01:36:40.520> that 01:36:42.270 --> 01:36:42.280 align:start position:0% compliant with the law they know that 01:36:42.280 --> 01:36:44.950 align:start position:0% compliant with the law they know that non-compliance<01:36:43.280> is<01:36:43.480> not<01:36:43.679> a<01:36:43.800> real<01:36:44.119> option<01:36:44.840> I 01:36:44.950 --> 01:36:44.960 align:start position:0% non-compliance is not a real option I 01:36:44.960 --> 01:36:49.270 align:start position:0% non-compliance is not a real option I mean<01:36:45.159> it's<01:36:45.360> G<01:36:45.480> to<01:36:46.119> eventually<01:36:46.719> come<01:36:47.280> around<01:36:48.280> uh 01:36:49.270 --> 01:36:49.280 align:start position:0% mean it's G to eventually come around uh 01:36:49.280 --> 01:36:51.669 align:start position:0% mean it's G to eventually come around uh whether<01:36:49.639> they<01:36:49.920> agree<01:36:50.520> with<01:36:50.719> the<01:36:50.920> law<01:36:51.360> whether 01:36:51.669 --> 01:36:51.679 align:start position:0% whether they agree with the law whether 01:36:51.679 --> 01:36:55.109 align:start position:0% whether they agree with the law whether the<01:36:52.000> law<01:36:52.440> agrees<01:36:52.960> with 01:36:55.109 --> 01:36:55.119 align:start position:0% the law agrees with 01:36:55.119 --> 01:36:58.550 align:start position:0% the law agrees with the<01:36:56.119> high<01:36:56.320> school<01:36:56.600> libraries<01:36:57.360> Association<01:36:58.199> or 01:36:58.550 --> 01:36:58.560 align:start position:0% the high school libraries Association or 01:36:58.560 --> 01:37:01.030 align:start position:0% the high school libraries Association or the<01:36:59.239> American<01:36:59.639> Library<01:37:00.119> Association 01:37:01.030 --> 01:37:01.040 align:start position:0% the American Library Association 01:37:01.040 --> 01:37:05.750 align:start position:0% the American Library Association whatever<01:37:01.880> the<01:37:02.040> law<01:37:02.400> is<01:37:02.600> the<01:37:02.760> law<01:37:03.080> and<01:37:03.280> until<01:37:03.719> it 01:37:05.750 --> 01:37:05.760 align:start position:0% whatever the law is the law and until it 01:37:05.760 --> 01:37:10.629 align:start position:0% whatever the law is the law and until it changes<01:37:07.159> um<01:37:08.159> we<01:37:08.360> need<01:37:09.280> a<01:37:09.560> friendly<01:37:09.880> little 01:37:10.629 --> 01:37:10.639 align:start position:0% changes um we need a friendly little 01:37:10.639 --> 01:37:12.629 align:start position:0% changes um we need a friendly little reminder 01:37:12.629 --> 01:37:12.639 align:start position:0% reminder 01:37:12.639 --> 01:37:16.350 align:start position:0% reminder that<01:37:13.639> the<01:37:13.840> law<01:37:14.159> does<01:37:14.760> Trump 01:37:16.350 --> 01:37:16.360 align:start position:0% that the law does Trump 01:37:16.360 --> 01:37:19.470 align:start position:0% that the law does Trump anything 01:37:19.470 --> 01:37:19.480 align:start position:0% 01:37:19.480 --> 01:37:21.470 align:start position:0% else<01:37:20.480> you<01:37:20.600> know<01:37:20.760> I'm<01:37:20.880> not<01:37:21.040> trying<01:37:21.239> to<01:37:21.360> be 01:37:21.470 --> 01:37:21.480 align:start position:0% else you know I'm not trying to be 01:37:21.480 --> 01:37:25.669 align:start position:0% else you know I'm not trying to be unreasonable<01:37:22.360> but 01:37:25.669 --> 01:37:25.679 align:start position:0% 01:37:25.679 --> 01:37:28.270 align:start position:0% we're<01:37:25.920> living<01:37:26.159> in<01:37:26.320> a<01:37:26.480> fantasy<01:37:26.960> world<01:37:27.440> if 01:37:28.270 --> 01:37:28.280 align:start position:0% we're living in a fantasy world if 01:37:28.280 --> 01:37:31.030 align:start position:0% we're living in a fantasy world if they're<01:37:29.159> thinking<01:37:29.639> that<01:37:30.000> but<01:37:30.400> this<01:37:30.560> is<01:37:30.800> what 01:37:31.030 --> 01:37:31.040 align:start position:0% they're thinking that but this is what 01:37:31.040 --> 01:37:33.229 align:start position:0% they're thinking that but this is what such<01:37:31.320> and<01:37:31.600> such<01:37:31.760> or<01:37:31.920> so<01:37:32.119> and<01:37:32.320> so 01:37:33.229 --> 01:37:33.239 align:start position:0% such and such or so and so 01:37:33.239 --> 01:37:36.430 align:start position:0% such and such or so and so says<01:37:34.560> um<01:37:35.560> because<01:37:35.840> they've<01:37:36.040> got<01:37:36.159> to<01:37:36.280> be 01:37:36.430 --> 01:37:36.440 align:start position:0% says um because they've got to be 01:37:36.440 --> 01:37:39.470 align:start position:0% says um because they've got to be compliant<01:37:37.080> or<01:37:37.280> they're<01:37:37.440> going<01:37:37.560> to<01:37:37.719> have 01:37:39.470 --> 01:37:39.480 align:start position:0% compliant or they're going to have 01:37:39.480 --> 01:37:42.390 align:start position:0% compliant or they're going to have lawsuits<01:37:40.480> I<01:37:40.599> had<01:37:40.719> a<01:37:40.880> lady<01:37:41.400> come<01:37:41.560> up<01:37:41.719> to<01:37:41.840> me<01:37:42.080> on 01:37:42.390 --> 01:37:42.400 align:start position:0% lawsuits I had a lady come up to me on 01:37:42.400 --> 01:37:45.189 align:start position:0% lawsuits I had a lady come up to me on Saturday<01:37:43.400> who<01:37:43.599> said<01:37:44.159> this<01:37:44.360> book<01:37:44.599> is<01:37:44.760> still<01:37:45.040> in 01:37:45.189 --> 01:37:45.199 align:start position:0% Saturday who said this book is still in 01:37:45.199 --> 01:37:46.790 align:start position:0% Saturday who said this book is still in this<01:37:45.400> Library<01:37:45.880> we've<01:37:46.119> gone<01:37:46.280> through<01:37:46.480> the 01:37:46.790 --> 01:37:46.800 align:start position:0% this Library we've gone through the 01:37:46.800 --> 01:37:50.950 align:start position:0% this Library we've gone through the process<01:37:47.800> it<01:37:48.119> is<01:37:49.119> clearly 01:37:50.950 --> 01:37:50.960 align:start position:0% process it is clearly 01:37:50.960 --> 01:37:54.750 align:start position:0% process it is clearly um<01:37:51.960> against<01:37:52.320> the<01:37:52.520> law<01:37:53.520> so<01:37:53.840> what<01:37:53.960> is<01:37:54.119> my<01:37:54.360> option 01:37:54.750 --> 01:37:54.760 align:start position:0% um against the law so what is my option 01:37:54.760 --> 01:37:58.470 align:start position:0% um against the law so what is my option do<01:37:55.000> I<01:37:55.360> go<01:37:55.719> to<01:37:55.960> the<01:37:56.159> police<01:37:56.920> and<01:37:57.159> ask<01:37:57.480> the<01:37:57.679> police 01:37:58.470 --> 01:37:58.480 align:start position:0% do I go to the police and ask the police 01:37:58.480 --> 01:38:01.990 align:start position:0% do I go to the police and ask the police to<01:37:58.880> go<01:37:59.199> and<01:37:59.520> arrest<01:38:00.520> the<01:38:00.719> principal<01:38:01.639> go<01:38:01.800> and 01:38:01.990 --> 01:38:02.000 align:start position:0% to go and arrest the principal go and 01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:04.669 align:start position:0% to go and arrest the principal go and arrest<01:38:02.560> the<01:38:02.760> librarian<01:38:03.440> go<01:38:03.599> and<01:38:03.800> arrest<01:38:04.280> the 01:38:04.669 --> 01:38:04.679 align:start position:0% arrest the librarian go and arrest the 01:38:04.679 --> 01:38:08.709 align:start position:0% arrest the librarian go and arrest the whatever<01:38:05.679> I<01:38:06.040> said<01:38:07.040> you<01:38:07.239> know<01:38:07.719> the<01:38:07.920> law<01:38:08.360> is<01:38:08.520> the 01:38:08.709 --> 01:38:08.719 align:start position:0% whatever I said you know the law is the 01:38:08.719 --> 01:38:12.550 align:start position:0% whatever I said you know the law is the law<01:38:09.280> I<01:38:10.280> if<01:38:10.639> you<01:38:10.880> are<01:38:11.280> certain<01:38:11.800> that<01:38:12.000> it<01:38:12.360> that 01:38:12.550 --> 01:38:12.560 align:start position:0% law I if you are certain that it that 01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:15.790 align:start position:0% law I if you are certain that it that this<01:38:12.760> particular<01:38:13.280> book<01:38:14.159> I<01:38:14.280> would<01:38:14.800> definitely 01:38:15.790 --> 01:38:15.800 align:start position:0% this particular book I would definitely 01:38:15.800 --> 01:38:17.990 align:start position:0% this particular book I would definitely go<01:38:16.000> and<01:38:16.280> talk<01:38:16.639> with<01:38:16.840> the<01:38:17.040> principal<01:38:17.520> and<01:38:17.679> say 01:38:17.990 --> 01:38:18.000 align:start position:0% go and talk with the principal and say 01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:20.229 align:start position:0% go and talk with the principal and say this<01:38:18.119> is<01:38:18.320> against<01:38:18.599> the<01:38:18.760> law<01:38:19.480> what<01:38:19.800> what<01:38:19.960> as<01:38:20.080> a 01:38:20.229 --> 01:38:20.239 align:start position:0% this is against the law what what as a 01:38:20.239 --> 01:38:24.910 align:start position:0% this is against the law what what as a Law<01:38:20.480> buying<01:38:20.880> citizen<01:38:21.280> should<01:38:21.480> I<01:38:21.639> be<01:38:21.800> doing 01:38:24.910 --> 01:38:24.920 align:start position:0% 01:38:24.920 --> 01:38:26.669 align:start position:0% H<01:38:25.159> how<01:38:25.280> would<01:38:25.480> you<01:38:25.760> how<01:38:25.920> would 01:38:26.669 --> 01:38:26.679 align:start position:0% H how would you how would 01:38:26.679 --> 01:38:30.030 align:start position:0% H how would you how would you<01:38:27.679> respond<01:38:28.199> to<01:38:28.400> a<01:38:28.719> parent<01:38:29.040> like<01:38:29.280> that<01:38:29.800> who 01:38:30.030 --> 01:38:30.040 align:start position:0% you respond to a parent like that who 01:38:30.040 --> 01:38:33.189 align:start position:0% you respond to a parent like that who came<01:38:30.360> up<01:38:30.520> to<01:38:30.719> you<01:38:30.960> in<01:38:31.119> a<01:38:31.880> candidate<01:38:32.360> meet<01:38:32.599> and 01:38:33.189 --> 01:38:33.199 align:start position:0% came up to you in a candidate meet and 01:38:33.199 --> 01:38:37.910 align:start position:0% came up to you in a candidate meet and greet<01:38:34.560> um<01:38:35.599> with<01:38:36.599> 10<01:38:36.880> other<01:38:37.199> parents<01:38:37.560> standing 01:38:37.910 --> 01:38:37.920 align:start position:0% greet um with 10 other parents standing 01:38:37.920 --> 01:38:40.149 align:start position:0% greet um with 10 other parents standing around<01:38:38.119> in<01:38:38.239> the<01:38:38.360> group<01:38:38.560> listening<01:38:38.960> in<01:38:39.520> to<01:38:39.679> hear 01:38:40.149 --> 01:38:40.159 align:start position:0% around in the group listening in to hear 01:38:40.159 --> 01:38:43.189 align:start position:0% around in the group listening in to hear what<01:38:40.400> wisdom<01:38:40.840> is<01:38:41.080> coming<01:38:41.599> from<01:38:42.599> well<01:38:42.880> all<01:38:43.080> I 01:38:43.189 --> 01:38:43.199 align:start position:0% what wisdom is coming from well all I 01:38:43.199 --> 01:38:45.470 align:start position:0% what wisdom is coming from well all I could<01:38:43.400> say<01:38:43.679> was<01:38:43.920> the<01:38:44.080> law<01:38:44.280> is<01:38:44.440> the 01:38:45.470 --> 01:38:45.480 align:start position:0% could say was the law is the 01:38:45.480 --> 01:38:49.589 align:start position:0% could say was the law is the law<01:38:46.480> and<01:38:47.119> uh<01:38:47.960> so<01:38:48.199> if<01:38:48.320> you're<01:38:48.599> sure<01:38:49.040> and<01:38:49.239> certain 01:38:49.589 --> 01:38:49.599 align:start position:0% law and uh so if you're sure and certain 01:38:49.599 --> 01:38:51.910 align:start position:0% law and uh so if you're sure and certain that<01:38:49.800> this<01:38:49.960> is<01:38:50.760> you<01:38:50.880> need<01:38:51.040> to<01:38:51.159> go<01:38:51.360> talk<01:38:51.520> to<01:38:51.719> that 01:38:51.910 --> 01:38:51.920 align:start position:0% that this is you need to go talk to that 01:38:51.920 --> 01:38:54.950 align:start position:0% that this is you need to go talk to that principal<01:38:52.400> or<01:38:52.599> you<01:38:52.760> whoever<01:38:53.080> it<01:38:53.199> is<01:38:53.560> that<01:38:54.480> is 01:38:54.950 --> 01:38:54.960 align:start position:0% principal or you whoever it is that is 01:38:54.960 --> 01:38:58.470 align:start position:0% principal or you whoever it is that is upholding<01:38:55.840> that<01:38:56.199> particular<01:38:56.760> book<01:38:57.040> that<01:38:57.480> you 01:38:58.470 --> 01:38:58.480 align:start position:0% upholding that particular book that you 01:38:58.480 --> 01:39:03.109 align:start position:0% upholding that particular book that you are<01:38:58.719> sure<01:38:59.040> is<01:38:59.239> against<01:38:59.560> the<01:38:59.719> law<01:39:00.560> I<01:39:00.679> don't 01:39:03.109 --> 01:39:03.119 align:start position:0% 01:39:03.119 --> 01:39:05.589 align:start position:0% know<01:39:04.119> not<01:39:04.280> trying<01:39:04.520> to<01:39:04.599> be<01:39:04.800> obstinate<01:39:05.360> I<01:39:05.480> just 01:39:05.589 --> 01:39:05.599 align:start position:0% know not trying to be obstinate I just 01:39:05.599 --> 01:39:07.189 align:start position:0% know not trying to be obstinate I just don't<01:39:05.960> didn't<01:39:06.159> know<01:39:06.280> how<01:39:06.400> to<01:39:06.560> handle<01:39:06.920> that 01:39:07.189 --> 01:39:07.199 align:start position:0% don't didn't know how to handle that 01:39:07.199 --> 01:39:09.310 align:start position:0% don't didn't know how to handle that Saturday<01:39:08.159> I<01:39:08.280> still 01:39:09.310 --> 01:39:09.320 align:start position:0% Saturday I still 01:39:09.320 --> 01:39:12.350 align:start position:0% Saturday I still don't<01:39:10.320> without<01:39:11.080> except<01:39:11.400> to<01:39:11.599> say<01:39:11.880> that<01:39:12.040> the<01:39:12.159> law 01:39:12.350 --> 01:39:12.360 align:start position:0% don't without except to say that the law 01:39:12.360 --> 01:39:13.669 align:start position:0% don't without except to say that the law is<01:39:12.480> the 01:39:13.669 --> 01:39:13.679 align:start position:0% is the 01:39:13.679 --> 01:39:19.750 align:start position:0% is the law<01:39:14.679> for<01:39:14.880> me<01:39:15.679> I'm<01:39:15.840> gonna<01:39:16.080> be 01:39:19.750 --> 01:39:19.760 align:start position:0% 01:39:19.760 --> 01:39:23.470 align:start position:0% compliant<01:39:20.760> and<01:39:21.320> and<01:39:21.520> I<01:39:21.639> think<01:39:21.920> this<01:39:22.199> is<01:39:23.199> this 01:39:23.470 --> 01:39:23.480 align:start position:0% compliant and and I think this is this 01:39:23.480 --> 01:39:26.709 align:start position:0% compliant and and I think this is this is<01:39:23.679> what's<01:39:23.880> been<01:39:24.080> so<01:39:24.599> difficult<01:39:25.199> about 01:39:26.709 --> 01:39:26.719 align:start position:0% is what's been so difficult about 01:39:26.719 --> 01:39:30.589 align:start position:0% is what's been so difficult about this<01:39:27.719> this<01:39:28.000> subject<01:39:29.000> for<01:39:29.560> quite<01:39:29.760> a<01:39:29.960> while<01:39:30.320> now 01:39:30.589 --> 01:39:30.599 align:start position:0% this this subject for quite a while now 01:39:30.599 --> 01:39:35.750 align:start position:0% this this subject for quite a while now and<01:39:31.440> and<01:39:31.599> if<01:39:31.760> I<01:39:31.960> may<01:39:32.599> um<01:39:34.040> just<01:39:35.040> highlight<01:39:35.560> that 01:39:35.750 --> 01:39:35.760 align:start position:0% and and if I may um just highlight that 01:39:35.760 --> 01:39:38.030 align:start position:0% and and if I may um just highlight that I<01:39:35.960> I<01:39:36.080> do<01:39:36.320> feel<01:39:36.719> that<01:39:36.920> a<01:39:37.119> part<01:39:37.280> of<01:39:37.520> that 01:39:38.030 --> 01:39:38.040 align:start position:0% I I do feel that a part of that 01:39:38.040 --> 01:39:41.589 align:start position:0% I I do feel that a part of that disconnect<01:39:38.960> is<01:39:39.560> um<01:39:40.560> who 01:39:41.589 --> 01:39:41.599 align:start position:0% disconnect is um who 01:39:41.599 --> 01:39:45.709 align:start position:0% disconnect is um who whose<01:39:42.599> voice<01:39:42.880> or<01:39:43.239> authority<01:39:44.239> kind<01:39:44.400> of<01:39:44.560> Reigns 01:39:45.709 --> 01:39:45.719 align:start position:0% whose voice or authority kind of Reigns 01:39:45.719 --> 01:39:50.109 align:start position:0% whose voice or authority kind of Reigns Supreme<01:39:46.960> um<01:39:47.960> not<01:39:48.599> not<01:39:48.800> in<01:39:48.960> a<01:39:49.360> tyrannical 01:39:50.109 --> 01:39:50.119 align:start position:0% Supreme um not not in a tyrannical 01:39:50.119 --> 01:39:52.669 align:start position:0% Supreme um not not in a tyrannical whatever<01:39:50.599> way<01:39:50.840> but<01:39:51.000> in<01:39:51.239> a<01:39:51.639> a<01:39:51.840> way<01:39:52.080> that<01:39:52.239> we<01:39:52.400> can 01:39:52.669 --> 01:39:52.679 align:start position:0% whatever way but in a a way that we can 01:39:52.679 --> 01:39:54.430 align:start position:0% whatever way but in a a way that we can acknowledge 01:39:54.430 --> 01:39:54.440 align:start position:0% acknowledge 01:39:54.440 --> 01:39:57.310 align:start position:0% acknowledge that<01:39:54.599> we<01:39:54.719> can<01:39:54.960> have<01:39:55.199> quality<01:39:55.639> checks<01:39:56.119> so<01:39:56.360> that 01:39:57.310 --> 01:39:57.320 align:start position:0% that we can have quality checks so that 01:39:57.320 --> 01:39:58.430 align:start position:0% that we can have quality checks so that we<01:39:57.480> can 01:39:58.430 --> 01:39:58.440 align:start position:0% we can 01:39:58.440 --> 01:40:00.510 align:start position:0% we can keep<01:39:59.440> you<01:39:59.560> know<01:39:59.719> doing<01:40:00.000> what<01:40:00.119> we're<01:40:00.280> supposed 01:40:00.510 --> 01:40:00.520 align:start position:0% keep you know doing what we're supposed 01:40:00.520 --> 01:40:04.149 align:start position:0% keep you know doing what we're supposed to<01:40:00.639> be<01:40:00.800> doing<01:40:01.760> keeping<01:40:02.560> kids<01:40:02.960> safe<01:40:03.880> and 01:40:04.149 --> 01:40:04.159 align:start position:0% to be doing keeping kids safe and 01:40:04.159 --> 01:40:08.629 align:start position:0% to be doing keeping kids safe and educating<01:40:05.159> them<01:40:06.440> so<01:40:07.440> I<01:40:07.560> don't<01:40:07.760> know<01:40:08.159> I<01:40:08.400> I'm 01:40:08.629 --> 01:40:08.639 align:start position:0% educating them so I don't know I I'm 01:40:08.639 --> 01:40:13.390 align:start position:0% educating them so I don't know I I'm still<01:40:09.119> of<01:40:09.760> the<01:40:09.960> opinion<01:40:10.480> that<01:40:11.239> on<01:40:12.199> nine<01:40:13.199> in 01:40:13.390 --> 01:40:13.400 align:start position:0% still of the opinion that on nine in 01:40:13.400 --> 01:40:17.350 align:start position:0% still of the opinion that on nine in public<01:40:13.840> education<01:40:14.840> Utah<01:40:15.320> law<01:40:15.639> supersedes<01:40:16.639> any 01:40:17.350 --> 01:40:17.360 align:start position:0% public education Utah law supersedes any 01:40:17.360 --> 01:40:20.270 align:start position:0% public education Utah law supersedes any recommendations<01:40:18.360> um<01:40:18.679> I<01:40:18.760> feel<01:40:19.119> that<01:40:19.800> it<01:40:19.920> is<01:40:20.040> an 01:40:20.270 --> 01:40:20.280 align:start position:0% recommendations um I feel that it is an 01:40:20.280 --> 01:40:21.629 align:start position:0% recommendations um I feel that it is an incomplete 01:40:21.629 --> 01:40:21.639 align:start position:0% incomplete 01:40:21.639 --> 01:40:24.669 align:start position:0% incomplete statement<01:40:22.639> um<01:40:23.360> I'm<01:40:23.560> okay<01:40:23.760> to<01:40:23.960> call<01:40:24.320> maybe<01:40:24.520> for 01:40:24.669 --> 01:40:24.679 align:start position:0% statement um I'm okay to call maybe for 01:40:24.679 --> 01:40:28.070 align:start position:0% statement um I'm okay to call maybe for a<01:40:24.840> vote<01:40:25.080> to<01:40:25.440> keep<01:40:26.440> in<01:40:27.239> by<01:40:27.520> professional 01:40:28.070 --> 01:40:28.080 align:start position:0% a vote to keep in by professional 01:40:28.080 --> 01:40:30.510 align:start position:0% a vote to keep in by professional organizations<01:40:29.080> and<01:40:29.199> if<01:40:29.320> I<01:40:29.440> may<01:40:29.719> just<01:40:30.080> hammer 01:40:30.510 --> 01:40:30.520 align:start position:0% organizations and if I may just hammer 01:40:30.520 --> 01:40:33.830 align:start position:0% organizations and if I may just hammer down<01:40:31.320> one<01:40:31.560> more<01:40:32.560> just<01:40:32.800> my<01:40:33.000> thought<01:40:33.239> is<01:40:33.440> I<01:40:33.599> think 01:40:33.830 --> 01:40:33.840 align:start position:0% down one more just my thought is I think 01:40:33.840 --> 01:40:35.790 align:start position:0% down one more just my thought is I think out<01:40:34.119> loud<01:40:34.360> and<01:40:34.599> I<01:40:34.840> I'd<01:40:35.040> like<01:40:35.440> whatever 01:40:35.790 --> 01:40:35.800 align:start position:0% out loud and I I'd like whatever 01:40:35.800 --> 01:40:38.910 align:start position:0% out loud and I I'd like whatever feedback<01:40:36.239> is<01:40:36.880> welcome<01:40:37.880> by<01:40:38.159> professional 01:40:38.910 --> 01:40:38.920 align:start position:0% feedback is welcome by professional 01:40:38.920 --> 01:40:41.990 align:start position:0% feedback is welcome by professional organizations<01:40:39.920> our<01:40:40.679> our 01:40:41.990 --> 01:40:42.000 align:start position:0% organizations our our 01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:46.910 align:start position:0% organizations our our libraries<01:40:43.360> are<01:40:44.360> there's<01:40:44.679> relationships<01:40:45.400> that 01:40:46.910 --> 01:40:46.920 align:start position:0% libraries are there's relationships that 01:40:46.920 --> 01:40:50.990 align:start position:0% libraries are there's relationships that exist<01:40:48.080> with<01:40:49.080> with<01:40:49.320> the<01:40:49.599> libraries<01:40:50.599> they<01:40:50.800> have 01:40:50.990 --> 01:40:51.000 align:start position:0% exist with with the libraries they have 01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:54.470 align:start position:0% exist with with the libraries they have a<01:40:51.280> place<01:40:51.719> where<01:40:52.040> they<01:40:52.639> acquire<01:40:53.360> their<01:40:53.599> books 01:40:54.470 --> 01:40:54.480 align:start position:0% a place where they acquire their books 01:40:54.480 --> 01:40:58.510 align:start position:0% a place where they acquire their books they<01:40:54.760> have<01:40:55.040> funding<01:40:55.920> that<01:40:56.119> allows<01:40:56.560> them<01:40:57.440> to 01:40:58.510 --> 01:40:58.520 align:start position:0% they have funding that allows them to 01:40:58.520 --> 01:41:03.430 align:start position:0% they have funding that allows them to acquire<01:40:59.520> those<01:41:00.040> books<01:41:01.040> if<01:41:01.880> those<01:41:02.880> organ 01:41:03.430 --> 01:41:03.440 align:start position:0% acquire those books if those organ 01:41:03.440 --> 01:41:05.109 align:start position:0% acquire those books if those organ professional 01:41:05.109 --> 01:41:05.119 align:start position:0% professional 01:41:05.119 --> 01:41:09.790 align:start position:0% professional organizations<01:41:06.119> um<01:41:07.119> provide<01:41:07.639> those<01:41:08.520> Services 01:41:09.790 --> 01:41:09.800 align:start position:0% organizations um provide those Services 01:41:09.800 --> 01:41:12.270 align:start position:0% organizations um provide those Services through<01:41:10.800> documents 01:41:12.270 --> 01:41:12.280 align:start position:0% through documents 01:41:12.280 --> 01:41:16.030 align:start position:0% through documents trainings<01:41:13.360> guidance<01:41:14.360> and<01:41:14.599> then<01:41:14.840> the<01:41:15.080> product 01:41:16.030 --> 01:41:16.040 align:start position:0% trainings guidance and then the product 01:41:16.040 --> 01:41:20.830 align:start position:0% trainings guidance and then the product itself<01:41:17.040> are<01:41:17.760> Distributing<01:41:18.760> and<01:41:19.639> um<01:41:20.199> products 01:41:20.830 --> 01:41:20.840 align:start position:0% itself are Distributing and um products 01:41:20.840 --> 01:41:21.750 align:start position:0% itself are Distributing and um products that 01:41:21.750 --> 01:41:21.760 align:start position:0% that 01:41:21.760 --> 01:41:25.750 align:start position:0% that violate<01:41:22.760> a<01:41:22.960> law<01:41:23.639> that<01:41:23.800> we<01:41:24.080> have<01:41:24.480> in 01:41:25.750 --> 01:41:25.760 align:start position:0% violate a law that we have in 01:41:25.760 --> 01:41:28.870 align:start position:0% violate a law that we have in place<01:41:26.760> the 01:41:28.870 --> 01:41:28.880 align:start position:0% place the 01:41:28.880 --> 01:41:32.669 align:start position:0% place the organization<01:41:29.880> the<01:41:30.520> vendor<01:41:31.520> the 01:41:32.669 --> 01:41:32.679 align:start position:0% organization the vendor the 01:41:32.679 --> 01:41:36.510 align:start position:0% organization the vendor the provider<01:41:33.679> is<01:41:34.000> the<01:41:34.599> problem<01:41:35.599> if<01:41:35.800> there<01:41:36.080> are 01:41:36.510 --> 01:41:36.520 align:start position:0% provider is the problem if there are 01:41:36.520 --> 01:41:37.709 align:start position:0% provider is the problem if there are other 01:41:37.709 --> 01:41:37.719 align:start position:0% other 01:41:37.719 --> 01:41:42.390 align:start position:0% other ways<01:41:38.719> and<01:41:38.960> other<01:41:40.000> avenues<01:41:41.000> where 01:41:42.390 --> 01:41:42.400 align:start position:0% ways and other avenues where 01:41:42.400 --> 01:41:44.950 align:start position:0% ways and other avenues where recommendations<01:41:43.400> fall<01:41:43.719> outside<01:41:44.159> of<01:41:44.679> I'd<01:41:44.840> like 01:41:44.950 --> 01:41:44.960 align:start position:0% recommendations fall outside of I'd like 01:41:44.960 --> 01:41:47.950 align:start position:0% recommendations fall outside of I'd like to<01:41:45.080> know<01:41:45.360> right<01:41:45.520> now<01:41:46.440> um<01:41:47.119> but<01:41:47.360> my 01:41:47.950 --> 01:41:47.960 align:start position:0% to know right now um but my 01:41:47.960 --> 01:41:50.790 align:start position:0% to know right now um but my understanding<01:41:48.920> as<01:41:49.040> a<01:41:49.320> transactional 01:41:50.790 --> 01:41:50.800 align:start position:0% understanding as a transactional 01:41:50.800 --> 01:41:54.510 align:start position:0% understanding as a transactional relationship<01:41:51.800> in<01:41:52.000> an<01:41:52.239> industry 01:41:54.510 --> 01:41:54.520 align:start position:0% relationship in an industry 01:41:54.520 --> 01:41:57.229 align:start position:0% relationship in an industry that<01:41:54.760> is<01:41:55.239> what<01:41:55.480> we're<01:41:55.719> dealing<01:41:56.199> with<01:41:56.920> that's 01:41:57.229 --> 01:41:57.239 align:start position:0% that is what we're dealing with that's 01:41:57.239 --> 01:42:02.229 align:start position:0% that is what we're dealing with that's where<01:41:57.440> the<01:41:57.719> problem<01:41:58.159> comes<01:41:58.599> from<01:41:59.480> now<01:41:59.880> we<01:42:00.560> am<01:42:00.719> I 01:42:02.229 --> 01:42:02.239 align:start position:0% where the problem comes from now we am I 01:42:02.239 --> 01:42:05.470 align:start position:0% where the problem comes from now we am I correct<01:42:03.280> or<01:42:04.280> is<01:42:04.400> it<01:42:04.520> broader<01:42:04.880> than<01:42:05.040> that<01:42:05.280> I'm 01:42:05.470 --> 01:42:05.480 align:start position:0% correct or is it broader than that I'm 01:42:05.480 --> 01:42:08.070 align:start position:0% correct or is it broader than that I'm I'm<01:42:05.560> open<01:42:05.760> to<01:42:05.920> any<01:42:06.679> we<01:42:06.880> have<01:42:07.320> just<01:42:07.520> so<01:42:07.719> many 01:42:08.070 --> 01:42:08.080 align:start position:0% I'm open to any we have just so many 01:42:08.080 --> 01:42:09.990 align:start position:0% I'm open to any we have just so many processes<01:42:08.639> in<01:42:08.880> place<01:42:09.199> to<01:42:09.440> approve<01:42:09.760> any 01:42:09.990 --> 01:42:10.000 align:start position:0% processes in place to approve any 01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:14.629 align:start position:0% processes in place to approve any materials<01:42:11.159> that<01:42:12.159> I<01:42:12.280> mean<01:42:13.040> if<01:42:13.199> something<01:42:13.960> is 01:42:14.629 --> 01:42:14.639 align:start position:0% materials that I mean if something is 01:42:14.639 --> 01:42:16.390 align:start position:0% materials that I mean if something is recommended<01:42:15.320> it<01:42:15.480> still<01:42:15.719> has<01:42:15.840> to<01:42:16.040> go<01:42:16.199> through 01:42:16.390 --> 01:42:16.400 align:start position:0% recommended it still has to go through 01:42:16.400 --> 01:42:19.270 align:start position:0% recommended it still has to go through the<01:42:16.599> process<01:42:17.280> of<01:42:17.440> being<01:42:17.679> approved<01:42:18.239> so<01:42:18.840> in<01:42:19.040> any 01:42:19.270 --> 01:42:19.280 align:start position:0% the process of being approved so in any 01:42:19.280 --> 01:42:21.910 align:start position:0% the process of being approved so in any case<01:42:19.520> with<01:42:19.639> all<01:42:19.800> of<01:42:19.920> our<01:42:20.360> instructional<01:42:20.960> and 01:42:21.910 --> 01:42:21.920 align:start position:0% case with all of our instructional and 01:42:21.920 --> 01:42:24.030 align:start position:0% case with all of our instructional and um<01:42:22.920> our 01:42:24.030 --> 01:42:24.040 align:start position:0% um our 01:42:24.040 --> 01:42:25.750 align:start position:0% um our materials<01:42:24.599> for<01:42:25.080> any<01:42:25.320> standards<01:42:25.639> or 01:42:25.750 --> 01:42:25.760 align:start position:0% materials for any standards or 01:42:25.760 --> 01:42:27.109 align:start position:0% materials for any standards or curriculum<01:42:26.239> all<01:42:26.320> of<01:42:26.480> those<01:42:26.639> have<01:42:26.760> to<01:42:26.920> go 01:42:27.109 --> 01:42:27.119 align:start position:0% curriculum all of those have to go 01:42:27.119 --> 01:42:31.229 align:start position:0% curriculum all of those have to go through<01:42:27.360> so<01:42:27.520> many<01:42:27.920> processes<01:42:28.920> in<01:42:29.040> order<01:42:29.320> to<01:42:29.440> be 01:42:31.229 --> 01:42:31.239 align:start position:0% through so many processes in order to be 01:42:31.239 --> 01:42:33.950 align:start position:0% through so many processes in order to be approved<01:42:32.239> and<01:42:32.560> I'm<01:42:32.880> I'm<01:42:33.000> sure<01:42:33.360> that<01:42:33.560> things 01:42:33.950 --> 01:42:33.960 align:start position:0% approved and I'm I'm sure that things 01:42:33.960 --> 01:42:37.629 align:start position:0% approved and I'm I'm sure that things slip<01:42:34.320> through<01:42:34.440> the<01:42:34.599> cracks<01:42:35.159> um<01:42:35.960> but<01:42:36.560> I<01:42:36.719> just 01:42:37.629 --> 01:42:37.639 align:start position:0% slip through the cracks um but I just 01:42:37.639 --> 01:42:39.790 align:start position:0% slip through the cracks um but I just again<01:42:38.040> I<01:42:38.159> just<01:42:38.480> for<01:42:38.760> like<01:42:38.920> the<01:42:39.000> 90s<01:42:39.599> I<01:42:39.679> just 01:42:39.790 --> 01:42:39.800 align:start position:0% again I just for like the 90s I just 01:42:39.800 --> 01:42:42.350 align:start position:0% again I just for like the 90s I just don't<01:42:39.960> want<01:42:40.080> to<01:42:40.320> overly<01:42:40.800> guide<01:42:41.119> folks<01:42:41.480> and<01:42:41.679> so 01:42:42.350 --> 01:42:42.360 align:start position:0% don't want to overly guide folks and so 01:42:42.360 --> 01:42:44.470 align:start position:0% don't want to overly guide folks and so just<01:42:42.480> feels<01:42:42.840> really<01:42:43.119> vague<01:42:43.639> at<01:42:43.800> this<01:42:44.000> point<01:42:44.199> to 01:42:44.470 --> 01:42:44.480 align:start position:0% just feels really vague at this point to 01:42:44.480 --> 01:42:45.950 align:start position:0% just feels really vague at this point to include<01:42:44.800> it<01:42:44.960> and<01:42:45.159> put<01:42:45.320> something<01:42:45.599> in<01:42:45.760> there 01:42:45.950 --> 01:42:45.960 align:start position:0% include it and put something in there 01:42:45.960 --> 01:42:48.470 align:start position:0% include it and put something in there that<01:42:46.119> isn't<01:42:46.679> in<01:42:46.800> the<01:42:46.960> law<01:42:47.679> and<01:42:47.920> called<01:42:48.199> out<01:42:48.320> in 01:42:48.470 --> 01:42:48.480 align:start position:0% that isn't in the law and called out in 01:42:48.480 --> 01:42:50.390 align:start position:0% that isn't in the law and called out in the<01:42:48.599> law<01:42:48.920> but<01:42:49.159> I'm<01:42:49.400> happy<01:42:49.599> to<01:42:49.719> vote<01:42:49.960> on<01:42:50.080> it<01:42:50.199> too 01:42:50.390 --> 01:42:50.400 align:start position:0% the law but I'm happy to vote on it too 01:42:50.400 --> 01:42:52.310 align:start position:0% the law but I'm happy to vote on it too if<01:42:50.480> we<01:42:50.599> want<01:42:50.679> to<01:42:50.840> move<01:42:51.000> on<01:42:51.159> from<01:42:51.360> this<01:42:51.599> piece 01:42:52.310 --> 01:42:52.320 align:start position:0% if we want to move on from this piece 01:42:52.320 --> 01:42:55.070 align:start position:0% if we want to move on from this piece yeah<01:42:52.599> I<01:42:53.239> would<01:42:53.440> add<01:42:54.000> including<01:42:54.639> professional 01:42:55.070 --> 01:42:55.080 align:start position:0% yeah I would add including professional 01:42:55.080 --> 01:42:56.910 align:start position:0% yeah I would add including professional organizations<01:42:55.760> at<01:42:55.880> the<01:42:56.000> end<01:42:56.159> of<01:42:56.360> here<01:42:56.800> and 01:42:56.910 --> 01:42:56.920 align:start position:0% organizations at the end of here and 01:42:56.920 --> 01:43:00.990 align:start position:0% organizations at the end of here and then<01:42:57.040> I<01:42:57.119> would<01:42:57.280> call<01:42:57.480> a<01:42:58.119> vote<01:42:59.119> okay<01:42:59.920> so<01:43:00.159> we<01:43:00.360> have 01:43:00.990 --> 01:43:01.000 align:start position:0% then I would call a vote okay so we have 01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:05.709 align:start position:0% then I would call a vote okay so we have uh<01:43:02.000> a<01:43:02.239> motion<01:43:02.840> to<01:43:03.239> add<01:43:03.639> from<01:43:04.000> professional 01:43:05.709 --> 01:43:05.719 align:start position:0% uh a motion to add from professional 01:43:05.719 --> 01:43:07.910 align:start position:0% uh a motion to add from professional organizations<01:43:06.719> and<01:43:07.199> I<01:43:07.320> would<01:43:07.560> actually 01:43:07.910 --> 01:43:07.920 align:start position:0% organizations and I would actually 01:43:07.920 --> 01:43:10.310 align:start position:0% organizations and I would actually instead<01:43:08.239> of<01:43:08.400> from<01:43:08.760> I<01:43:08.840> would<01:43:09.000> just<01:43:09.239> put 01:43:10.310 --> 01:43:10.320 align:start position:0% instead of from I would just put 01:43:10.320 --> 01:43:13.189 align:start position:0% instead of from I would just put including<01:43:11.320> so<01:43:11.520> that<01:43:11.639> it's<01:43:11.840> broader<01:43:12.840> so<01:43:13.040> it's 01:43:13.189 --> 01:43:13.199 align:start position:0% including so that it's broader so it's 01:43:13.199 --> 01:43:17.229 align:start position:0% including so that it's broader so it's including<01:43:13.800> professional 01:43:17.229 --> 01:43:17.239 align:start position:0% 01:43:17.239 --> 01:43:19.790 align:start position:0% organizations<01:43:18.239> and<01:43:18.520> all<01:43:18.760> to<01:43:18.920> me<01:43:19.159> all<01:43:19.480> this<01:43:19.639> is 01:43:19.790 --> 01:43:19.800 align:start position:0% organizations and all to me all this is 01:43:19.800 --> 01:43:21.070 align:start position:0% organizations and all to me all this is stating<01:43:20.199> is 01:43:21.070 --> 01:43:21.080 align:start position:0% stating is 01:43:21.080 --> 01:43:24.270 align:start position:0% stating is that<01:43:22.080> you<01:43:22.239> can<01:43:22.599> you<01:43:22.760> can<01:43:23.360> right<01:43:23.520> if<01:43:23.599> it's<01:43:23.760> age 01:43:24.270 --> 01:43:24.280 align:start position:0% that you can you can right if it's age 01:43:24.280 --> 01:43:26.870 align:start position:0% that you can you can right if it's age appropriate<01:43:25.280> right<01:43:25.639> it's<01:43:25.840> in<01:43:26.119> if<01:43:26.400> whatever 01:43:26.870 --> 01:43:26.880 align:start position:0% appropriate right it's in if whatever 01:43:26.880 --> 01:43:28.390 align:start position:0% appropriate right it's in if whatever that<01:43:27.119> they<01:43:27.239> can<01:43:27.840> look<01:43:28.040> at<01:43:28.159> those 01:43:28.390 --> 01:43:28.400 align:start position:0% that they can look at those 01:43:28.400 --> 01:43:29.910 align:start position:0% that they can look at those recommendations<01:43:29.040> but<01:43:29.159> they<01:43:29.239> don't<01:43:29.440> supersede 01:43:29.910 --> 01:43:29.920 align:start position:0% recommendations but they don't supersede 01:43:29.920 --> 01:43:31.229 align:start position:0% recommendations but they don't supersede the<01:43:30.000> law<01:43:30.239> that's<01:43:30.360> all<01:43:30.520> that's<01:43:30.679> stating<01:43:31.080> it's 01:43:31.229 --> 01:43:31.239 align:start position:0% the law that's all that's stating it's 01:43:31.239 --> 01:43:33.189 align:start position:0% the law that's all that's stating it's not<01:43:31.920> saying<01:43:32.239> don't<01:43:32.599> listen<01:43:32.880> to<01:43:33.000> any 01:43:33.189 --> 01:43:33.199 align:start position:0% not saying don't listen to any 01:43:33.199 --> 01:43:34.750 align:start position:0% not saying don't listen to any organizations<01:43:33.920> don't<01:43:34.119> heed<01:43:34.440> anything 01:43:34.750 --> 01:43:34.760 align:start position:0% organizations don't heed anything 01:43:34.760 --> 01:43:36.470 align:start position:0% organizations don't heed anything outside<01:43:35.239> other<01:43:35.480> than<01:43:35.840> you<01:43:35.960> know<01:43:36.119> whatever 01:43:36.470 --> 01:43:36.480 align:start position:0% outside other than you know whatever 01:43:36.480 --> 01:43:37.950 align:start position:0% outside other than you know whatever it's<01:43:36.599> just<01:43:36.760> saying<01:43:37.000> that<01:43:37.159> they<01:43:37.280> can't<01:43:37.719> take 01:43:37.950 --> 01:43:37.960 align:start position:0% it's just saying that they can't take 01:43:37.960 --> 01:43:38.990 align:start position:0% it's just saying that they can't take precedence 01:43:38.990 --> 01:43:39.000 align:start position:0% precedence 01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:46.310 align:start position:0% precedence over<01:43:40.000> so<01:43:41.320> he<01:43:42.320> any<01:43:42.560> other<01:43:42.840> questions<01:43:43.280> before<01:43:43.560> we 01:43:46.310 --> 01:43:46.320 align:start position:0% 01:43:46.320 --> 01:43:50.470 align:start position:0% vote<01:43:47.320> all<01:43:47.520> right<01:43:48.440> let's<01:43:48.679> vote<01:43:49.440> those<01:43:49.679> in<01:43:49.960> favor 01:43:50.470 --> 01:43:50.480 align:start position:0% vote all right let's vote those in favor 01:43:50.480 --> 01:43:53.270 align:start position:0% vote all right let's vote those in favor of<01:43:51.199> adding<01:43:51.679> including<01:43:52.360> professional<01:43:52.719> organiz 01:43:53.270 --> 01:43:53.280 align:start position:0% of adding including professional organiz 01:43:53.280 --> 01:43:58.750 align:start position:0% of adding including professional organiz ation<01:43:53.840> say<01:43:54.920> I<01:43:55.920> I<01:43:56.840> I 01:43:58.750 --> 01:43:58.760 align:start position:0% ation say I I I 01:43:58.760 --> 01:44:00.709 align:start position:0% ation say I I I I<01:43:59.760> those 01:44:00.709 --> 01:44:00.719 align:start position:0% I those 01:44:00.719 --> 01:44:03.109 align:start position:0% I those opposed 01:44:03.109 --> 01:44:03.119 align:start position:0% opposed 01:44:03.119 --> 01:44:09.070 align:start position:0% opposed no<01:44:04.119> okay<01:44:04.400> that<01:44:04.639> passes<01:44:05.159> three<01:44:05.599> to 01:44:09.070 --> 01:44:09.080 align:start position:0% 01:44:09.080 --> 01:44:13.950 align:start position:0% one<01:44:10.080> the<01:44:10.719> no<01:44:11.080> vote<01:44:11.400> being<01:44:12.080> uh<01:44:12.239> board<01:44:12.480> member 01:44:13.950 --> 01:44:13.960 align:start position:0% one the no vote being uh board member 01:44:13.960 --> 01:44:17.510 align:start position:0% one the no vote being uh board member real<01:44:14.960> all<01:44:15.280> right<01:44:16.280> so<01:44:16.719> there's<01:44:16.960> just<01:44:17.280> I<01:44:17.360> have 01:44:17.510 --> 01:44:17.520 align:start position:0% real all right so there's just I have 01:44:17.520 --> 01:44:19.470 align:start position:0% real all right so there's just I have one<01:44:17.679> other<01:44:17.960> question<01:44:18.599> and<01:44:18.760> that<01:44:18.880> would<01:44:19.040> be<01:44:19.239> an 01:44:19.470 --> 01:44:19.480 align:start position:0% one other question and that would be an 01:44:19.480 --> 01:44:23.109 align:start position:0% one other question and that would be an 11<01:44:20.040> possibly<01:44:20.880> adding<01:44:21.880> um<01:44:22.119> and<01:44:22.320> maybe<01:44:22.719> Patty 01:44:23.109 --> 01:44:23.119 align:start position:0% 11 possibly adding um and maybe Patty 01:44:23.119 --> 01:44:25.270 align:start position:0% 11 possibly adding um and maybe Patty can<01:44:23.239> speak<01:44:23.440> to<01:44:23.599> this<01:44:23.760> I'm<01:44:23.920> not<01:44:24.080> sure<01:44:24.679> just<01:44:24.880> the 01:44:25.270 --> 01:44:25.280 align:start position:0% can speak to this I'm not sure just the 01:44:25.280 --> 01:44:28.390 align:start position:0% can speak to this I'm not sure just the local<01:44:25.639> boards<01:44:26.639> local<01:44:26.960> leas<01:44:27.719> often<01:44:28.040> have<01:44:28.239> their 01:44:28.390 --> 01:44:28.400 align:start position:0% local boards local leas often have their 01:44:28.400 --> 01:44:31.790 align:start position:0% local boards local leas often have their own<01:44:28.679> code<01:44:28.920> of<01:44:29.400> conduct<01:44:30.400> right<01:44:31.239> would<01:44:31.440> we<01:44:31.599> want 01:44:31.790 --> 01:44:31.800 align:start position:0% own code of conduct right would we want 01:44:31.800 --> 01:44:34.229 align:start position:0% own code of conduct right would we want to<01:44:32.000> reference<01:44:32.400> that<01:44:32.560> here<01:44:32.760> just<01:44:32.880> saying<01:44:33.719> um 01:44:34.229 --> 01:44:34.239 align:start position:0% to reference that here just saying um 01:44:34.239 --> 01:44:35.629 align:start position:0% to reference that here just saying um maybe<01:44:34.560> something 01:44:35.629 --> 01:44:35.639 align:start position:0% maybe something 01:44:35.639 --> 01:44:39.750 align:start position:0% maybe something like<01:44:36.639> um<01:44:37.440> reference<01:44:38.159> Lea's<01:44:39.080> policy<01:44:39.520> on 01:44:39.750 --> 01:44:39.760 align:start position:0% like um reference Lea's policy on 01:44:39.760 --> 01:44:42.310 align:start position:0% like um reference Lea's policy on educator<01:44:40.320> standards<01:44:40.880> or<01:44:41.360> code<01:44:41.560> of<01:44:41.760> conduct<01:44:42.159> or 01:44:42.310 --> 01:44:42.320 align:start position:0% educator standards or code of conduct or 01:44:42.320 --> 01:44:44.229 align:start position:0% educator standards or code of conduct or whatever<01:44:42.679> because<01:44:42.920> there<01:44:43.639> in<01:44:43.800> addition<01:44:44.080> to 01:44:44.229 --> 01:44:44.239 align:start position:0% whatever because there in addition to 01:44:44.239 --> 01:44:47.790 align:start position:0% whatever because there in addition to ours<01:44:45.080> a<01:44:45.159> lot<01:44:45.280> of<01:44:45.400> local<01:44:46.199> um<01:44:47.119> leas<01:44:47.560> have<01:44:47.679> their 01:44:47.790 --> 01:44:47.800 align:start position:0% ours a lot of local um leas have their 01:44:47.800 --> 01:44:50.589 align:start position:0% ours a lot of local um leas have their own<01:44:48.000> code<01:44:48.239> of<01:44:48.920> conduct<01:44:49.920> would<01:44:50.080> we<01:44:50.239> want 01:44:50.589 --> 01:44:50.599 align:start position:0% own code of conduct would we want 01:44:50.599 --> 01:44:52.870 align:start position:0% own code of conduct would we want difference<01:44:51.159> both<01:44:52.159> yeah<01:44:52.320> so<01:44:52.440> they<01:44:52.560> all<01:44:52.719> have 01:44:52.870 --> 01:44:52.880 align:start position:0% difference both yeah so they all have 01:44:52.880 --> 01:44:55.270 align:start position:0% difference both yeah so they all have that<01:44:53.400> educator<01:44:54.000> the<01:44:54.119> teacher<01:44:54.679> the<01:44:54.800> educator 01:44:55.270 --> 01:44:55.280 align:start position:0% that educator the teacher the educator 01:44:55.280 --> 01:44:57.350 align:start position:0% that educator the teacher the educator standards<01:44:55.800> on<01:44:56.040> that<01:44:56.480> but<01:44:56.599> are<01:44:56.760> you<01:44:56.960> referring 01:44:57.350 --> 01:44:57.360 align:start position:0% standards on that but are you referring 01:44:57.360 --> 01:45:00.990 align:start position:0% standards on that but are you referring to<01:44:57.560> the<01:44:57.719> HR<01:44:58.280> code<01:44:58.480> of<01:44:58.679> conduct<01:44:59.679> um<01:44:59.880> for<01:45:00.639> uh 01:45:00.990 --> 01:45:01.000 align:start position:0% to the HR code of conduct um for uh 01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:02.790 align:start position:0% to the HR code of conduct um for uh employment<01:45:02.000> is<01:45:02.119> that<01:45:02.239> what<01:45:02.400> you're<01:45:02.520> referring 01:45:02.790 --> 01:45:02.800 align:start position:0% employment is that what you're referring 01:45:02.800 --> 01:45:04.390 align:start position:0% employment is that what you're referring to<01:45:03.040> that's<01:45:03.199> all<01:45:03.360> I'm<01:45:03.560> I'm<01:45:03.760> asking<01:45:04.119> if<01:45:04.239> we 01:45:04.390 --> 01:45:04.400 align:start position:0% to that's all I'm I'm asking if we 01:45:04.400 --> 01:45:06.270 align:start position:0% to that's all I'm I'm asking if we probably<01:45:04.719> need<01:45:04.880> to<01:45:05.000> include<01:45:05.320> that<01:45:05.440> into<01:45:05.840> or<01:45:06.040> if 01:45:06.270 --> 01:45:06.280 align:start position:0% probably need to include that into or if 01:45:06.280 --> 01:45:09.229 align:start position:0% probably need to include that into or if the<01:45:06.599> r277<01:45:07.599> 217<01:45:08.320> is 01:45:09.229 --> 01:45:09.239 align:start position:0% the r277 217 is 01:45:09.239 --> 01:45:11.669 align:start position:0% the r277 217 is enough<01:45:10.239> the<01:45:10.560> general<01:45:10.920> code<01:45:11.119> of<01:45:11.280> conduct 01:45:11.669 --> 01:45:11.679 align:start position:0% enough the general code of conduct 01:45:11.679 --> 01:45:14.470 align:start position:0% enough the general code of conduct doesn't<01:45:12.239> um<01:45:12.760> address<01:45:13.239> sensitive<01:45:13.800> materials 01:45:14.470 --> 01:45:14.480 align:start position:0% doesn't um address sensitive materials 01:45:14.480 --> 01:45:15.950 align:start position:0% doesn't um address sensitive materials so<01:45:14.719> I<01:45:14.840> think<01:45:15.119> that<01:45:15.239> you<01:45:15.320> would<01:45:15.480> be<01:45:15.639> going 01:45:15.950 --> 01:45:15.960 align:start position:0% so I think that you would be going 01:45:15.960 --> 01:45:18.270 align:start position:0% so I think that you would be going beyond<01:45:16.760> what<01:45:17.080> a<01:45:17.239> general<01:45:17.560> code<01:45:17.719> of<01:45:17.920> conduct 01:45:18.270 --> 01:45:18.280 align:start position:0% beyond what a general code of conduct 01:45:18.280 --> 01:45:20.790 align:start position:0% beyond what a general code of conduct would<01:45:18.480> have<01:45:18.639> in<01:45:18.800> it<01:45:19.760> I<01:45:19.880> just<01:45:20.040> know<01:45:20.280> that<01:45:20.440> in<01:45:20.560> our 01:45:20.790 --> 01:45:20.800 align:start position:0% would have in it I just know that in our 01:45:20.800 --> 01:45:23.790 align:start position:0% would have in it I just know that in our previous<01:45:21.239> model<01:45:21.719> policy<01:45:22.280> it<01:45:22.440> referenced 01:45:23.790 --> 01:45:23.800 align:start position:0% previous model policy it referenced 01:45:23.800 --> 01:45:28.550 align:start position:0% previous model policy it referenced people<01:45:24.599> um<01:45:25.239> referring<01:45:25.679> to<01:45:25.880> their<01:45:26.440> own<01:45:27.440> um<01:45:27.639> leas 01:45:28.550 --> 01:45:28.560 align:start position:0% people um referring to their own um leas 01:45:28.560 --> 01:45:30.189 align:start position:0% people um referring to their own um leas standards<01:45:29.000> or<01:45:29.199> something<01:45:29.599> so<01:45:29.800> I<01:45:29.880> just<01:45:30.000> didn't 01:45:30.189 --> 01:45:30.199 align:start position:0% standards or something so I just didn't 01:45:30.199 --> 01:45:33.470 align:start position:0% standards or something so I just didn't know<01:45:30.320> if<01:45:30.440> that<01:45:30.560> needed<01:45:30.800> to<01:45:30.960> be<01:45:31.080> included 01:45:33.470 --> 01:45:33.480 align:start position:0% know if that needed to be included 01:45:33.480 --> 01:45:36.510 align:start position:0% know if that needed to be included here<01:45:34.480> and<01:45:34.599> if<01:45:34.760> not<01:45:35.080> that's<01:45:35.360> fine<01:45:36.199> yeah<01:45:36.320> I<01:45:36.400> would 01:45:36.510 --> 01:45:36.520 align:start position:0% here and if not that's fine yeah I would 01:45:36.520 --> 01:45:38.750 align:start position:0% here and if not that's fine yeah I would think<01:45:36.719> those<01:45:36.880> were<01:45:37.199> employment<01:45:38.199> um 01:45:38.750 --> 01:45:38.760 align:start position:0% think those were employment um 01:45:38.760 --> 01:45:43.830 align:start position:0% think those were employment um employment<01:45:39.360> parts<01:45:40.320> that<01:45:40.440> maybe<01:45:40.880> are<01:45:41.080> in 01:45:43.830 --> 01:45:43.840 align:start position:0% 01:45:43.840 --> 01:45:46.270 align:start position:0% there<01:45:44.840> okay 01:45:46.270 --> 01:45:46.280 align:start position:0% there okay 01:45:46.280 --> 01:45:48.870 align:start position:0% there okay no<01:45:47.280> yeah<01:45:47.480> well<01:45:47.679> I'm<01:45:47.840> just<01:45:48.000> saying<01:45:48.480> um<01:45:48.639> I<01:45:48.719> don't 01:45:48.870 --> 01:45:48.880 align:start position:0% no yeah well I'm just saying um I don't 01:45:48.880 --> 01:45:51.350 align:start position:0% no yeah well I'm just saying um I don't know<01:45:49.239> that<01:45:49.639> that<01:45:49.920> the<01:45:50.560> that<01:45:50.679> the<01:45:50.800> state<01:45:51.000> board 01:45:51.350 --> 01:45:51.360 align:start position:0% know that that the that the state board 01:45:51.360 --> 01:45:54.070 align:start position:0% know that that the that the state board has<01:45:51.599> before<01:45:52.239> um<01:45:52.480> talked<01:45:53.040> about<01:45:53.320> the<01:45:53.719> you<01:45:53.840> know 01:45:54.070 --> 01:45:54.080 align:start position:0% has before um talked about the you know 01:45:54.080 --> 01:45:56.149 align:start position:0% has before um talked about the you know the<01:45:54.440> employment<01:45:55.000> piece<01:45:55.199> of<01:45:55.320> it<01:45:55.480> the<01:45:55.599> HR<01:45:56.000> piece 01:45:56.149 --> 01:45:56.159 align:start position:0% the employment piece of it the HR piece 01:45:56.159 --> 01:45:57.790 align:start position:0% the employment piece of it the HR piece of<01:45:56.320> it<01:45:56.560> because<01:45:56.719> that's<01:45:56.920> very<01:45:57.280> distinctly 01:45:57.790 --> 01:45:57.800 align:start position:0% of it because that's very distinctly 01:45:57.800 --> 01:46:00.510 align:start position:0% of it because that's very distinctly different<01:45:58.040> at<01:45:58.199> leas<01:45:59.040> and<01:45:59.159> that's<01:45:59.360> where<01:46:00.360> would 01:46:00.510 --> 01:46:00.520 align:start position:0% different at leas and that's where would 01:46:00.520 --> 01:46:02.990 align:start position:0% different at leas and that's where would they<01:46:00.679> have<01:46:00.800> a<01:46:01.040> different<01:46:01.719> uh<01:46:01.960> would<01:46:02.119> they<01:46:02.280> have 01:46:02.990 --> 01:46:03.000 align:start position:0% they have a different uh would they have 01:46:03.000 --> 01:46:07.390 align:start position:0% they have a different uh would they have a<01:46:04.000> yeah<01:46:04.320> okay<01:46:04.960> it<01:46:05.159> you're<01:46:05.320> just<01:46:05.840> saying<01:46:06.840> become 01:46:07.390 --> 01:46:07.400 align:start position:0% a yeah okay it you're just saying become 01:46:07.400 --> 01:46:09.790 align:start position:0% a yeah okay it you're just saying become yeah<01:46:07.679> they<01:46:07.800> can<01:46:08.119> become<01:46:08.400> more<01:46:08.679> restrictive<01:46:09.679> um 01:46:09.790 --> 01:46:09.800 align:start position:0% yeah they can become more restrictive um 01:46:09.800 --> 01:46:12.070 align:start position:0% yeah they can become more restrictive um but<01:46:09.920> they<01:46:10.040> can't<01:46:10.280> become<01:46:10.599> less<01:46:11.080> restrictive 01:46:12.070 --> 01:46:12.080 align:start position:0% but they can't become less restrictive 01:46:12.080 --> 01:46:13.950 align:start position:0% but they can't become less restrictive on<01:46:12.320> that<01:46:12.760> so<01:46:12.960> they<01:46:13.080> would<01:46:13.239> take<01:46:13.360> the<01:46:13.480> educator 01:46:13.950 --> 01:46:13.960 align:start position:0% on that so they would take the educator 01:46:13.960 --> 01:46:16.189 align:start position:0% on that so they would take the educator standards<01:46:14.520> and<01:46:15.080> you<01:46:15.159> know<01:46:15.599> the<01:46:15.719> things<01:46:15.920> within 01:46:16.189 --> 01:46:16.199 align:start position:0% standards and you know the things within 01:46:16.199 --> 01:46:18.070 align:start position:0% standards and you know the things within all<01:46:16.320> of<01:46:16.480> that<01:46:16.760> so<01:46:17.080> they<01:46:17.280> be<01:46:17.440> can<01:46:17.639> become<01:46:17.880> more 01:46:18.070 --> 01:46:18.080 align:start position:0% all of that so they be can become more 01:46:18.080 --> 01:46:20.070 align:start position:0% all of that so they be can become more restrictive<01:46:18.520> but<01:46:18.679> not<01:46:18.880> less<01:46:19.679> okay<01:46:19.920> just 01:46:20.070 --> 01:46:20.080 align:start position:0% restrictive but not less okay just 01:46:20.080 --> 01:46:21.589 align:start position:0% restrictive but not less okay just because<01:46:20.280> it<01:46:20.360> was<01:46:20.480> in<01:46:20.599> our<01:46:20.920> previous<01:46:21.239> model 01:46:21.589 --> 01:46:21.599 align:start position:0% because it was in our previous model 01:46:21.599 --> 01:46:23.070 align:start position:0% because it was in our previous model policy<01:46:21.880> a<01:46:22.040> reference<01:46:22.360> to<01:46:22.480> it<01:46:22.560> I<01:46:22.639> didn't<01:46:22.960> know 01:46:23.070 --> 01:46:23.080 align:start position:0% policy a reference to it I didn't know 01:46:23.080 --> 01:46:24.709 align:start position:0% policy a reference to it I didn't know if<01:46:23.159> we<01:46:23.280> needed<01:46:23.480> to<01:46:23.639> reference<01:46:23.960> it<01:46:24.159> again<01:46:24.560> I'm 01:46:24.709 --> 01:46:24.719 align:start position:0% if we needed to reference it again I'm 01:46:24.719 --> 01:46:28.270 align:start position:0% if we needed to reference it again I'm good<01:46:24.880> with<01:46:25.080> stopping<01:46:25.440> at<01:46:25.599> 10<01:46:26.080> there<01:46:27.080> okay<01:46:28.080> all 01:46:28.270 --> 01:46:28.280 align:start position:0% good with stopping at 10 there okay all 01:46:28.280 --> 01:46:31.430 align:start position:0% good with stopping at 10 there okay all right<01:46:28.599> so<01:46:28.880> now<01:46:29.199> we're<01:46:29.400> moving<01:46:29.719> on<01:46:29.880> to<01:46:30.119> a<01:46:30.320> new 01:46:31.430 --> 01:46:31.440 align:start position:0% right so now we're moving on to a new 01:46:31.440 --> 01:46:33.470 align:start position:0% right so now we're moving on to a new section<01:46:32.440> this<01:46:32.599> would 01:46:33.470 --> 01:46:33.480 align:start position:0% section this would 01:46:33.480 --> 01:46:36.709 align:start position:0% section this would be<01:46:34.480> Roman<01:46:34.880> numeral<01:46:35.280> four<01:46:35.719> or<01:46:35.960> whatever<01:46:36.440> we're 01:46:36.709 --> 01:46:36.719 align:start position:0% be Roman numeral four or whatever we're 01:46:36.719 --> 01:46:37.750 align:start position:0% be Roman numeral four or whatever we're we're 01:46:37.750 --> 01:46:37.760 align:start position:0% we're 01:46:37.760 --> 01:46:38.980 align:start position:0% we're on 01:46:38.980 --> 01:46:38.990 align:start position:0% on 01:46:38.990 --> 01:46:40.950 align:start position:0% on [Music] 01:46:40.950 --> 01:46:40.960 align:start position:0% [Music] 01:46:40.960 --> 01:46:43.189 align:start position:0% [Music] um<01:46:41.960> what's<01:46:42.159> the<01:46:42.320> difference<01:46:42.679> between<01:46:43.040> so 01:46:43.189 --> 01:46:43.199 align:start position:0% um what's the difference between so 01:46:43.199 --> 01:46:45.149 align:start position:0% um what's the difference between so we've<01:46:43.440> called<01:46:43.800> the<01:46:44.000> previous<01:46:44.360> one<01:46:44.639> sensitive 01:46:45.149 --> 01:46:45.159 align:start position:0% we've called the previous one sensitive 01:46:45.159 --> 01:46:48.510 align:start position:0% we've called the previous one sensitive Mater<01:46:45.639> what<01:46:46.000> or<01:46:46.440> in<01:46:46.920> sensitive<01:46:47.400> instructional 01:46:48.510 --> 01:46:48.520 align:start position:0% Mater what or in sensitive instructional 01:46:48.520 --> 01:46:51.390 align:start position:0% Mater what or in sensitive instructional materials<01:46:49.520> now<01:46:49.840> this<01:46:50.000> is 01:46:51.390 --> 01:46:51.400 align:start position:0% materials now this is 01:46:51.400 --> 01:46:54.109 align:start position:0% materials now this is called<01:46:52.400> so<01:46:52.599> we've<01:46:53.000> had<01:46:53.159> so<01:46:53.320> far<01:46:53.639> Library 01:46:54.109 --> 01:46:54.119 align:start position:0% called so we've had so far Library 01:46:54.119 --> 01:46:57.030 align:start position:0% called so we've had so far Library materials<01:46:54.880> and<01:46:55.719> something<01:46:56.040> else<01:46:56.320> up<01:46:56.560> above 01:46:57.030 --> 01:46:57.040 align:start position:0% materials and something else up above 01:46:57.040 --> 01:46:59.830 align:start position:0% materials and something else up above and<01:46:57.280> sensitive<01:46:57.760> instructional<01:46:58.840> materials 01:46:59.830 --> 01:46:59.840 align:start position:0% and sensitive instructional materials 01:46:59.840 --> 01:47:12.350 align:start position:0% and sensitive instructional materials and<01:47:00.000> now<01:47:00.320> this<01:47:00.880> next 01:47:12.350 --> 01:47:12.360 align:start position:0% 01:47:12.360 --> 01:47:16.750 align:start position:0% title 01:47:16.750 --> 01:47:16.760 align:start position:0% 01:47:16.760 --> 01:47:26.990 align:start position:0% okay<01:47:17.760> now<01:47:18.080> this<01:47:18.440> is 01:47:26.990 --> 01:47:27.000 align:start position:0% 01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:30.390 align:start position:0% oh<01:47:27.199> so<01:47:27.440> this<01:47:27.560> is<01:47:27.840> under<01:47:28.280> that<01:47:28.960> same<01:47:29.320> thing<01:47:30.280> is 01:47:30.390 --> 01:47:30.400 align:start position:0% oh so this is under that same thing is 01:47:30.400 --> 01:47:32.430 align:start position:0% oh so this is under that same thing is that<01:47:30.679> right<01:47:31.440> I'm<01:47:31.599> just<01:47:31.760> wondering<01:47:32.119> if<01:47:32.280> that's 01:47:32.430 --> 01:47:32.440 align:start position:0% that right I'm just wondering if that's 01:47:32.440 --> 01:47:33.950 align:start position:0% that right I'm just wondering if that's what<01:47:32.599> we<01:47:32.679> would<01:47:32.920> rather<01:47:33.159> do<01:47:33.360> if<01:47:33.480> we<01:47:33.639> have<01:47:33.760> a 01:47:33.950 --> 01:47:33.960 align:start position:0% what we would rather do if we have a 01:47:33.960 --> 01:47:37.870 align:start position:0% what we would rather do if we have a large<01:47:34.840> C<01:47:35.239> I<01:47:35.320> think<01:47:35.440> it<01:47:35.560> needs<01:47:35.760> to<01:47:35.960> be<01:47:36.239> that<01:47:36.920> yeah 01:47:37.870 --> 01:47:37.880 align:start position:0% large C I think it needs to be that yeah 01:47:37.880 --> 01:47:39.109 align:start position:0% large C I think it needs to be that yeah sounds 01:47:39.109 --> 01:47:39.119 align:start position:0% sounds 01:47:39.119 --> 01:47:41.910 align:start position:0% sounds good<01:47:40.119> all<01:47:40.320> right<01:47:40.920> do<01:47:41.040> you<01:47:41.119> want<01:47:41.239> to<01:47:41.400> walk<01:47:41.679> us 01:47:41.910 --> 01:47:41.920 align:start position:0% good all right do you want to walk us 01:47:41.920 --> 01:47:45.229 align:start position:0% good all right do you want to walk us through<01:47:42.199> this<01:47:42.400> Jenny<01:47:42.960> this<01:47:43.119> section<01:47:44.080> sure<01:47:45.080> we 01:47:45.229 --> 01:47:45.239 align:start position:0% through this Jenny this section sure we 01:47:45.239 --> 01:47:46.870 align:start position:0% through this Jenny this section sure we can<01:47:45.440> do<01:47:45.719> that 01:47:46.870 --> 01:47:46.880 align:start position:0% can do that 01:47:46.880 --> 01:47:49.390 align:start position:0% can do that um<01:47:47.880> let<01:47:48.000> me<01:47:48.199> get<01:47:48.360> to<01:47:48.560> where<01:47:48.760> I'm<01:47:48.880> not<01:47:49.080> on<01:47:49.239> the 01:47:49.390 --> 01:47:49.400 align:start position:0% um let me get to where I'm not on the 01:47:49.400 --> 01:47:50.990 align:start position:0% um let me get to where I'm not on the same<01:47:49.679> document 01:47:50.990 --> 01:47:51.000 align:start position:0% same document 01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:54.350 align:start position:0% same document with<01:47:52.000> so<01:47:52.239> you<01:47:52.480> have<01:47:53.239> you<01:47:53.400> have<01:47:53.639> really<01:47:54.199> and 01:47:54.350 --> 01:47:54.360 align:start position:0% with so you have you have really and 01:47:54.360 --> 01:47:55.550 align:start position:0% with so you have you have really and I'll<01:47:54.520> just<01:47:54.639> talk<01:47:54.800> to<01:47:54.920> this<01:47:55.000> you<01:47:55.119> have<01:47:55.280> three 01:47:55.550 --> 01:47:55.560 align:start position:0% I'll just talk to this you have three 01:47:55.560 --> 01:47:57.270 align:start position:0% I'll just talk to this you have three components<01:47:56.040> to<01:47:56.199> the<01:47:56.360> sensitive<01:47:56.760> materials 01:47:57.270 --> 01:47:57.280 align:start position:0% components to the sensitive materials 01:47:57.280 --> 01:47:59.470 align:start position:0% components to the sensitive materials review<01:47:58.119> you<01:47:58.280> have<01:47:58.400> an<01:47:58.560> initial 01:47:59.470 --> 01:47:59.480 align:start position:0% review you have an initial 01:47:59.480 --> 01:48:03.270 align:start position:0% review you have an initial review<01:48:00.480> that<01:48:00.639> then<01:48:00.880> goes<01:48:01.119> into<01:48:01.520> a<01:48:01.760> full<01:48:02.280> review 01:48:03.270 --> 01:48:03.280 align:start position:0% review that then goes into a full review 01:48:03.280 --> 01:48:04.510 align:start position:0% review that then goes into a full review well<01:48:03.440> I<01:48:03.560> guess<01:48:03.719> maybe<01:48:03.960> there's<01:48:04.199> two 01:48:04.510 --> 01:48:04.520 align:start position:0% well I guess maybe there's two 01:48:04.520 --> 01:48:06.149 align:start position:0% well I guess maybe there's two components<01:48:04.960> and<01:48:05.119> then<01:48:05.239> the<01:48:05.320> full<01:48:05.560> review<01:48:05.880> has 01:48:06.149 --> 01:48:06.159 align:start position:0% components and then the full review has 01:48:06.159 --> 01:48:07.470 align:start position:0% components and then the full review has two<01:48:06.360> pieces<01:48:06.679> to<01:48:06.840> that<01:48:07.000> you<01:48:07.119> have<01:48:07.280> the 01:48:07.470 --> 01:48:07.480 align:start position:0% two pieces to that you have the 01:48:07.480 --> 01:48:09.070 align:start position:0% two pieces to that you have the objective<01:48:07.880> sensitive<01:48:08.320> materials<01:48:08.800> and<01:48:08.920> the 01:48:09.070 --> 01:48:09.080 align:start position:0% objective sensitive materials and the 01:48:09.080 --> 01:48:11.350 align:start position:0% objective sensitive materials and the subjective<01:48:09.599> sensitive<01:48:10.040> materials<01:48:11.040> so<01:48:11.199> the 01:48:11.350 --> 01:48:11.360 align:start position:0% subjective sensitive materials so the 01:48:11.360 --> 01:48:13.310 align:start position:0% subjective sensitive materials so the first<01:48:11.560> thing<01:48:11.679> we're<01:48:11.840> looking<01:48:12.119> at<01:48:12.400> is<01:48:13.119> the 01:48:13.310 --> 01:48:13.320 align:start position:0% first thing we're looking at is the 01:48:13.320 --> 01:48:16.629 align:start position:0% first thing we're looking at is the initial<01:48:13.719> review<01:48:14.599> underneath<01:48:15.480> the<01:48:16.199> sensitive 01:48:16.629 --> 01:48:16.639 align:start position:0% initial review underneath the sensitive 01:48:16.639 --> 01:48:18.750 align:start position:0% initial review underneath the sensitive materials 01:48:18.750 --> 01:48:18.760 align:start position:0% materials 01:48:18.760 --> 01:48:21.390 align:start position:0% materials review<01:48:19.760> okay<01:48:19.920> so<01:48:20.159> then<01:48:20.560> underneath<01:48:21.080> there<01:48:21.239> you 01:48:21.390 --> 01:48:21.400 align:start position:0% review okay so then underneath there you 01:48:21.400 --> 01:48:24.350 align:start position:0% review okay so then underneath there you have<01:48:22.320> in<01:48:22.480> our<01:48:22.960> rule<01:48:23.360> we're<01:48:23.520> going<01:48:23.719> to<01:48:23.960> add<01:48:24.199> that 01:48:24.350 --> 01:48:24.360 align:start position:0% have in our rule we're going to add that 01:48:24.360 --> 01:48:26.109 align:start position:0% have in our rule we're going to add that your<01:48:24.560> it's<01:48:24.760> reviewed<01:48:25.199> by<01:48:25.320> at<01:48:25.440> least<01:48:25.639> two 01:48:26.109 --> 01:48:26.119 align:start position:0% your it's reviewed by at least two 01:48:26.119 --> 01:48:28.669 align:start position:0% your it's reviewed by at least two employees<01:48:27.119> makes<01:48:27.360> an<01:48:27.599> initial<01:48:28.040> determination 01:48:28.669 --> 01:48:28.679 align:start position:0% employees makes an initial determination 01:48:28.679 --> 01:48:30.149 align:start position:0% employees makes an initial determination related<01:48:29.040> to<01:48:29.199> plausible<01:48:29.639> claim<01:48:29.920> that<01:48:30.040> the 01:48:30.149 --> 01:48:30.159 align:start position:0% related to plausible claim that the 01:48:30.159 --> 01:48:32.030 align:start position:0% related to plausible claim that the material<01:48:30.760> constitutes<01:48:31.400> and<01:48:31.560> this<01:48:31.679> needs<01:48:31.920> to 01:48:32.030 --> 01:48:32.040 align:start position:0% material constitutes and this needs to 01:48:32.040 --> 01:48:34.629 align:start position:0% material constitutes and this needs to be<01:48:32.280> CH<01:48:32.520> changed<01:48:32.920> it's<01:48:33.080> not<01:48:33.920> constitutes 01:48:34.629 --> 01:48:34.639 align:start position:0% be CH changed it's not constitutes 01:48:34.639 --> 01:48:37.109 align:start position:0% be CH changed it's not constitutes objective<01:48:35.119> sensitive<01:48:35.520> materials<01:48:35.920> in<01:48:36.040> the<01:48:36.159> law 01:48:37.109 --> 01:48:37.119 align:start position:0% objective sensitive materials in the law 01:48:37.119 --> 01:48:39.750 align:start position:0% objective sensitive materials in the law subjective<01:48:38.119> oh<01:48:38.280> no<01:48:38.520> sorry<01:48:39.239> it's<01:48:39.480> just 01:48:39.750 --> 01:48:39.760 align:start position:0% subjective oh no sorry it's just 01:48:39.760 --> 01:48:41.550 align:start position:0% subjective oh no sorry it's just sensitive<01:48:40.199> materials<01:48:40.840> if<01:48:41.080> they<01:48:41.199> think<01:48:41.360> it 01:48:41.550 --> 01:48:41.560 align:start position:0% sensitive materials if they think it 01:48:41.560 --> 01:48:43.629 align:start position:0% sensitive materials if they think it constitutes<01:48:42.119> sensitive<01:48:42.520> materials<01:48:43.400> and<01:48:43.520> I 01:48:43.629 --> 01:48:43.639 align:start position:0% constitutes sensitive materials and I 01:48:43.639 --> 01:48:45.750 align:start position:0% constitutes sensitive materials and I can<01:48:43.760> draw<01:48:44.040> you<01:48:44.159> to<01:48:44.440> that<01:48:44.840> line<01:48:45.159> if<01:48:45.280> I<01:48:45.400> can<01:48:45.560> find 01:48:45.750 --> 01:48:45.760 align:start position:0% can draw you to that line if I can find 01:48:45.760 --> 01:48:51.149 align:start position:0% can draw you to that line if I can find it<01:48:45.960> real<01:48:46.480> quick<01:48:47.480> so<01:48:47.679> that<01:48:47.800> we're<01:48:48.440> on<01:48:49.440> the 01:48:51.149 --> 01:48:51.159 align:start position:0% it real quick so that we're on the 01:48:51.159 --> 01:48:55.189 align:start position:0% it real quick so that we're on the same<01:48:52.159> visions 01:48:55.189 --> 01:48:55.199 align:start position:0% 01:48:55.199 --> 01:48:57.870 align:start position:0% so<01:48:55.440> it'd<01:48:55.599> be<01:48:55.760> around<01:48:56.040> one<01:48:56.840> n 01:48:57.870 --> 01:48:57.880 align:start position:0% so it'd be around one n 01:48:57.880 --> 01:49:00.189 align:start position:0% so it'd be around one n 118<01:48:58.880> just<01:48:59.000> so<01:48:59.199> I'm<01:48:59.360> making<01:48:59.560> sure<01:48:59.760> I'm<01:48:59.920> getting 01:49:00.189 --> 01:49:00.199 align:start position:0% 118 just so I'm making sure I'm getting 01:49:00.199 --> 01:49:03.270 align:start position:0% 118 just so I'm making sure I'm getting that<01:49:00.840> right<01:49:01.840> so<01:49:02.040> it's<01:49:02.320> if<01:49:02.480> it's<01:49:02.599> a<01:49:02.800> sensitive 01:49:03.270 --> 01:49:03.280 align:start position:0% that right so it's if it's a sensitive 01:49:03.280 --> 01:49:04.950 align:start position:0% that right so it's if it's a sensitive material<01:49:03.800> and<01:49:03.880> then<01:49:04.000> I<01:49:04.119> think<01:49:04.239> you<01:49:04.360> can<01:49:04.520> strike 01:49:04.950 --> 01:49:04.960 align:start position:0% material and then I think you can strike 01:49:04.960 --> 01:49:06.030 align:start position:0% material and then I think you can strike or 01:49:06.030 --> 01:49:06.040 align:start position:0% or 01:49:06.040 --> 01:49:09.390 align:start position:0% or not<01:49:07.040> because<01:49:07.239> it<01:49:07.599> it's<01:49:07.760> just<01:49:08.280> is<01:49:08.440> it<01:49:09.119> right<01:49:09.280> we 01:49:09.390 --> 01:49:09.400 align:start position:0% not because it it's just is it right we 01:49:09.400 --> 01:49:12.229 align:start position:0% not because it it's just is it right we don't<01:49:09.560> have<01:49:09.639> to<01:49:09.760> put<01:49:09.920> or<01:49:10.199> not<01:49:10.560> in 01:49:12.229 --> 01:49:12.239 align:start position:0% don't have to put or not in 01:49:12.239 --> 01:49:16.430 align:start position:0% don't have to put or not in there<01:49:13.239> and<01:49:13.440> then<01:49:14.239> on<01:49:15.239> and<01:49:15.360> then<01:49:15.520> it's<01:49:15.719> may<01:49:16.040> use 01:49:16.430 --> 01:49:16.440 align:start position:0% there and then on and then it's may use 01:49:16.440 --> 01:49:18.350 align:start position:0% there and then on and then it's may use excerts<01:49:16.960> or<01:49:17.119> other<01:49:17.360> evidence<01:49:17.760> to<01:49:17.920> support<01:49:18.239> the 01:49:18.350 --> 01:49:18.360 align:start position:0% excerts or other evidence to support the 01:49:18.360 --> 01:49:20.350 align:start position:0% excerts or other evidence to support the allegation<01:49:18.920> that's<01:49:19.119> from<01:49:19.280> the<01:49:19.400> law<01:49:20.119> if<01:49:20.199> a 01:49:20.350 --> 01:49:20.360 align:start position:0% allegation that's from the law if a 01:49:20.360 --> 01:49:21.990 align:start position:0% allegation that's from the law if a plausible<01:49:20.800> claim<01:49:21.040> is<01:49:21.199> substantiated<01:49:21.880> then 01:49:21.990 --> 01:49:22.000 align:start position:0% plausible claim is substantiated then 01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:23.350 align:start position:0% plausible claim is substantiated then the<01:49:22.119> instruction<01:49:22.440> materal<01:49:22.679> material<01:49:23.119> is 01:49:23.350 --> 01:49:23.360 align:start position:0% the instruction materal material is 01:49:23.360 --> 01:49:24.790 align:start position:0% the instruction materal material is immediately 01:49:24.790 --> 01:49:24.800 align:start position:0% immediately 01:49:24.800 --> 01:49:27.310 align:start position:0% immediately removed<01:49:25.800> from<01:49:26.000> the<01:49:26.119> student<01:49:26.560> access<01:49:26.920> in<01:49:27.080> all 01:49:27.310 --> 01:49:27.320 align:start position:0% removed from the student access in all 01:49:27.320 --> 01:49:29.109 align:start position:0% removed from the student access in all School<01:49:27.679> settings<01:49:28.239> and<01:49:28.360> then<01:49:28.480> we<01:49:28.599> need<01:49:28.760> to<01:49:28.920> add 01:49:29.109 --> 01:49:29.119 align:start position:0% School settings and then we need to add 01:49:29.119 --> 01:49:31.589 align:start position:0% School settings and then we need to add at<01:49:29.239> the<01:49:29.360> end<01:49:29.520> of<01:49:29.679> that<01:49:30.080> until<01:49:30.520> the<01:49:30.760> full<01:49:31.080> review 01:49:31.589 --> 01:49:31.599 align:start position:0% at the end of that until the full review 01:49:31.599 --> 01:49:32.510 align:start position:0% at the end of that until the full review is 01:49:32.510 --> 01:49:32.520 align:start position:0% is 01:49:32.520 --> 01:49:35.270 align:start position:0% is completed<01:49:33.520> so<01:49:33.719> until<01:49:34.000> the<01:49:34.119> full<01:49:34.360> review<01:49:34.679> is 01:49:35.270 --> 01:49:35.280 align:start position:0% completed so until the full review is 01:49:35.280 --> 01:49:40.109 align:start position:0% completed so until the full review is completed<01:49:36.280> and<01:49:36.440> that's<01:49:36.599> on<01:49:36.800> line 01:49:40.109 --> 01:49:40.119 align:start position:0% 01:49:40.119 --> 01:49:43.709 align:start position:0% 126<01:49:41.119> okay<01:49:41.960> okay<01:49:42.560> that's<01:49:42.880> that's<01:49:43.080> the<01:49:43.280> initial 01:49:43.709 --> 01:49:43.719 align:start position:0% 126 okay okay that's that's the initial 01:49:43.719 --> 01:49:46.430 align:start position:0% 126 okay okay that's that's the initial review<01:49:44.400> that's<01:49:44.560> what<01:49:44.760> takes<01:49:45.119> place<01:49:45.880> so<01:49:46.239> and<01:49:46.360> I 01:49:46.430 --> 01:49:46.440 align:start position:0% review that's what takes place so and I 01:49:46.440 --> 01:49:47.750 align:start position:0% review that's what takes place so and I don't<01:49:46.560> know<01:49:46.679> if<01:49:46.800> there's 01:49:47.750 --> 01:49:47.760 align:start position:0% don't know if there's 01:49:47.760 --> 01:49:51.709 align:start position:0% don't know if there's any<01:49:48.760> changes<01:49:49.719> modifications<01:49:50.400> to<01:49:50.639> that<01:49:51.400> so<01:49:51.599> do 01:49:51.709 --> 01:49:51.719 align:start position:0% any changes modifications to that so do 01:49:51.719 --> 01:49:54.430 align:start position:0% any changes modifications to that so do we<01:49:51.880> want<01:49:52.159> that<01:49:52.360> last<01:49:53.000> line<01:49:53.679> that<01:49:53.880> last<01:49:54.080> bullet 01:49:54.430 --> 01:49:54.440 align:start position:0% we want that last line that last bullet 01:49:54.440 --> 01:49:56.070 align:start position:0% we want that last line that last bullet point<01:49:54.639> full<01:49:54.880> review<01:49:55.159> is<01:49:55.360> initiated<01:49:55.800> after<01:49:55.960> the 01:49:56.070 --> 01:49:56.080 align:start position:0% point full review is initiated after the 01:49:56.080 --> 01:49:57.950 align:start position:0% point full review is initiated after the completion<01:49:56.599> or<01:49:56.800> do<01:49:56.920> we<01:49:57.080> just<01:49:57.199> move<01:49:57.400> on<01:49:57.599> now<01:49:57.800> to 01:49:57.950 --> 01:49:57.960 align:start position:0% completion or do we just move on now to 01:49:57.960 --> 01:49:59.510 align:start position:0% completion or do we just move on now to the<01:49:58.080> full 01:49:59.510 --> 01:49:59.520 align:start position:0% the full 01:49:59.520 --> 01:50:02.109 align:start position:0% the full review<01:50:00.520> I<01:50:00.679> think<01:50:00.880> you<01:50:01.000> need<01:50:01.239> to<01:50:01.800> I<01:50:01.880> think<01:50:02.000> it 01:50:02.109 --> 01:50:02.119 align:start position:0% review I think you need to I think it 01:50:02.119 --> 01:50:03.229 align:start position:0% review I think you need to I think it needs<01:50:02.280> to<01:50:02.400> be 01:50:03.229 --> 01:50:03.239 align:start position:0% needs to be 01:50:03.239 --> 01:50:05.990 align:start position:0% needs to be stated<01:50:04.239> just<01:50:04.800> what<01:50:04.920> you're<01:50:05.119> articulating<01:50:05.840> is 01:50:05.990 --> 01:50:06.000 align:start position:0% stated just what you're articulating is 01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:07.950 align:start position:0% stated just what you're articulating is that<01:50:06.400> after<01:50:06.800> that<01:50:06.920> you've<01:50:07.119> done<01:50:07.320> the<01:50:07.480> initial 01:50:07.950 --> 01:50:07.960 align:start position:0% that after that you've done the initial 01:50:07.960 --> 01:50:09.510 align:start position:0% that after that you've done the initial then<01:50:08.119> you<01:50:08.239> go<01:50:08.360> to<01:50:08.480> the<01:50:08.679> full 01:50:09.510 --> 01:50:09.520 align:start position:0% then you go to the full 01:50:09.520 --> 01:50:12.390 align:start position:0% then you go to the full review 01:50:12.390 --> 01:50:12.400 align:start position:0% review 01:50:12.400 --> 01:50:16.350 align:start position:0% review okay<01:50:13.400> anybody<01:50:14.000> want<01:50:14.159> to<01:50:14.400> disagree<01:50:14.800> with<01:50:15.239> me<01:50:16.239> we 01:50:16.350 --> 01:50:16.360 align:start position:0% okay anybody want to disagree with me we 01:50:16.360 --> 01:50:17.149 align:start position:0% okay anybody want to disagree with me we don't 01:50:17.149 --> 01:50:17.159 align:start position:0% don't 01:50:17.159 --> 01:50:24.350 align:start position:0% don't have<01:50:18.159> okay<01:50:18.560> um<01:50:19.320> if<01:50:19.800> if<01:50:19.920> I<01:50:20.480> may<01:50:21.480> clarify 01:50:24.350 --> 01:50:24.360 align:start position:0% have okay um if if I may clarify 01:50:24.360 --> 01:50:27.709 align:start position:0% have okay um if if I may clarify by<01:50:24.800> at<01:50:24.960> least<01:50:25.400> two<01:50:25.760> Lea<01:50:26.280> employees<01:50:26.960> that's<01:50:27.239> in 01:50:27.709 --> 01:50:27.719 align:start position:0% by at least two Lea employees that's in 01:50:27.719 --> 01:50:29.830 align:start position:0% by at least two Lea employees that's in in<01:50:27.880> the 01:50:29.830 --> 01:50:29.840 align:start position:0% in the 01:50:29.840 --> 01:50:34.830 align:start position:0% in the rule<01:50:30.840> so<01:50:31.199> it<01:50:31.480> two<01:50:32.239> do<01:50:32.400> we<01:50:32.679> need<01:50:33.480> three<01:50:34.159> is<01:50:34.400> too 01:50:34.830 --> 01:50:34.840 align:start position:0% rule so it two do we need three is too 01:50:34.840 --> 01:50:39.550 align:start position:0% rule so it two do we need three is too good<01:50:35.080> do<01:50:35.199> we<01:50:35.360> know<01:50:36.000> uh<01:50:37.000> how<01:50:37.119> we<01:50:37.280> landed<01:50:37.679> on 01:50:39.550 --> 01:50:39.560 align:start position:0% good do we know uh how we landed on 01:50:39.560 --> 01:50:43.470 align:start position:0% good do we know uh how we landed on two<01:50:40.560> I<01:50:40.719> do<01:50:41.040> the<01:50:41.159> law<01:50:41.400> didn't<01:50:41.840> State<01:50:42.199> any<01:50:42.560> at<01:50:42.719> all 01:50:43.470 --> 01:50:43.480 align:start position:0% two I do the law didn't State any at all 01:50:43.480 --> 01:50:45.950 align:start position:0% two I do the law didn't State any at all and<01:50:44.199> and<01:50:44.400> staff<01:50:44.719> felt<01:50:44.960> like<01:50:45.119> it<01:50:45.239> was<01:50:45.440> really 01:50:45.950 --> 01:50:45.960 align:start position:0% and and staff felt like it was really 01:50:45.960 --> 01:50:48.149 align:start position:0% and and staff felt like it was really difficult<01:50:46.119> to<01:50:46.280> put<01:50:46.440> it<01:50:46.560> on<01:50:46.800> one<01:50:47.119> employee<01:50:47.760> by 01:50:48.149 --> 01:50:48.159 align:start position:0% difficult to put it on one employee by 01:50:48.159 --> 01:50:50.270 align:start position:0% difficult to put it on one employee by themselves<01:50:49.040> so<01:50:49.239> that's<01:50:49.440> why<01:50:49.599> they<01:50:49.800> put<01:50:50.159> at 01:50:50.270 --> 01:50:50.280 align:start position:0% themselves so that's why they put at 01:50:50.280 --> 01:50:53.910 align:start position:0% themselves so that's why they put at least<01:50:50.599> two<01:50:50.880> in<01:50:51.000> the<01:50:51.239> proposed<01:50:51.960> draft<01:50:52.280> of<01:50:52.400> the 01:50:53.910 --> 01:50:53.920 align:start position:0% least two in the proposed draft of the 01:50:53.920 --> 01:50:57.069 align:start position:0% least two in the proposed draft of the rule<01:50:54.920> okay<01:50:55.159> do<01:50:55.679> stat<01:50:56.000> doesn't<01:50:56.320> say<01:50:56.639> anything 01:50:57.069 --> 01:50:57.079 align:start position:0% rule okay do stat doesn't say anything 01:50:57.079 --> 01:50:59.310 align:start position:0% rule okay do stat doesn't say anything at<01:50:57.199> all<01:50:57.560> regarding<01:50:58.119> who<01:50:58.400> does 01:50:59.310 --> 01:50:59.320 align:start position:0% at all regarding who does 01:50:59.320 --> 01:51:04.430 align:start position:0% at all regarding who does that<01:51:00.800> okay<01:51:01.800> um<01:51:02.639> do<01:51:02.840> we<01:51:03.040> like<01:51:03.280> to<01:51:03.760> do<01:51:03.880> we<01:51:04.079> like 01:51:04.430 --> 01:51:04.440 align:start position:0% that okay um do we like to do we like 01:51:04.440 --> 01:51:12.270 align:start position:0% that okay um do we like to do we like the<01:51:05.360> the<01:51:06.360> check<01:51:06.920> of 01:51:12.270 --> 01:51:12.280 align:start position:0% 01:51:12.280 --> 01:51:16.109 align:start position:0% three<01:51:13.280> any<01:51:13.599> feedback<01:51:14.119> from<01:51:14.360> anyone<01:51:15.079> well<01:51:15.599> how 01:51:16.109 --> 01:51:16.119 align:start position:0% three any feedback from anyone well how 01:51:16.119 --> 01:51:18.430 align:start position:0% three any feedback from anyone well how some<01:51:16.320> districts<01:51:16.719> have<01:51:16.880> been<01:51:17.040> doing<01:51:17.400> this<01:51:18.159> this 01:51:18.430 --> 01:51:18.440 align:start position:0% some districts have been doing this this 01:51:18.440 --> 01:51:21.310 align:start position:0% some districts have been doing this this this<01:51:18.639> initial<01:51:19.159> review<01:51:20.159> has<01:51:20.320> it<01:51:20.560> primarily<01:51:21.239> I 01:51:21.310 --> 01:51:21.320 align:start position:0% this initial review has it primarily I 01:51:21.320 --> 01:51:22.830 align:start position:0% this initial review has it primarily I don't<01:51:21.480> know<01:51:21.679> the<01:51:21.800> numbers<01:51:22.199> on<01:51:22.400> what<01:51:22.679> they've 01:51:22.830 --> 01:51:22.840 align:start position:0% don't know the numbers on what they've 01:51:22.840 --> 01:51:24.310 align:start position:0% don't know the numbers on what they've been<01:51:22.960> using<01:51:23.239> has<01:51:23.360> it<01:51:23.480> been<01:51:23.639> just<01:51:23.800> a<01:51:23.920> couple<01:51:24.159> of 01:51:24.310 --> 01:51:24.320 align:start position:0% been using has it been just a couple of 01:51:24.320 --> 01:51:26.629 align:start position:0% been using has it been just a couple of people<01:51:25.040> has<01:51:25.159> it<01:51:25.239> been<01:51:25.360> a<01:51:25.480> larger<01:51:25.920> group<01:51:26.560> I 01:51:26.629 --> 01:51:26.639 align:start position:0% people has it been a larger group I 01:51:26.639 --> 01:51:28.069 align:start position:0% people has it been a larger group I don't<01:51:26.800> know<01:51:26.920> if<01:51:27.040> anyone<01:51:27.360> can<01:51:27.520> speak<01:51:27.760> to<01:51:27.920> that 01:51:28.069 --> 01:51:28.079 align:start position:0% don't know if anyone can speak to that 01:51:28.079 --> 01:51:30.830 align:start position:0% don't know if anyone can speak to that maybe<01:51:28.440> deina<01:51:29.440> knows<01:51:29.800> I'm<01:51:29.960> not 01:51:30.830 --> 01:51:30.840 align:start position:0% maybe deina knows I'm not 01:51:30.840 --> 01:51:33.589 align:start position:0% maybe deina knows I'm not sure<01:51:31.840> so<01:51:32.159> I<01:51:32.239> don't<01:51:32.440> know<01:51:32.679> that<01:51:32.880> an<01:51:33.119> initial 01:51:33.589 --> 01:51:33.599 align:start position:0% sure so I don't know that an initial 01:51:33.599 --> 01:51:35.870 align:start position:0% sure so I don't know that an initial review<01:51:34.199> has<01:51:34.400> been<01:51:35.159> I<01:51:35.239> mean<01:51:35.440> because<01:51:35.599> it's<01:51:35.719> part 01:51:35.870 --> 01:51:35.880 align:start position:0% review has been I mean because it's part 01:51:35.880 --> 01:51:39.709 align:start position:0% review has been I mean because it's part of<01:51:36.040> this<01:51:36.199> newer<01:51:36.639> law<01:51:37.239> that<01:51:37.480> that<01:51:37.719> has<01:51:38.000> been<01:51:39.000> um 01:51:39.709 --> 01:51:39.719 align:start position:0% of this newer law that that has been um 01:51:39.719 --> 01:51:44.430 align:start position:0% of this newer law that that has been um taking<01:51:40.320> place<01:51:40.719> so<01:51:41.199> far<01:51:42.199> um<01:51:42.719> but<01:51:43.719> I<01:51:43.760> mean<01:51:44.079> my 01:51:44.430 --> 01:51:44.440 align:start position:0% taking place so far um but I mean my 01:51:44.440 --> 01:51:46.830 align:start position:0% taking place so far um but I mean my recommendation<01:51:45.280> has<01:51:45.480> been<01:51:46.159> that<01:51:46.440> this 01:51:46.830 --> 01:51:46.840 align:start position:0% recommendation has been that this 01:51:46.840 --> 01:51:48.870 align:start position:0% recommendation has been that this shouldn't<01:51:47.320> just<01:51:47.520> be<01:51:47.719> on<01:51:47.960> one<01:51:48.199> person<01:51:48.760> I've 01:51:48.870 --> 01:51:48.880 align:start position:0% shouldn't just be on one person I've 01:51:48.880 --> 01:51:51.790 align:start position:0% shouldn't just be on one person I've been<01:51:49.040> saying<01:51:49.320> that<01:51:49.639> for<01:51:50.079> two<01:51:50.360> years<01:51:50.679> now<01:51:51.599> that 01:51:51.790 --> 01:51:51.800 align:start position:0% been saying that for two years now that 01:51:51.800 --> 01:51:54.990 align:start position:0% been saying that for two years now that it's<01:51:51.960> just<01:51:52.119> better<01:51:52.639> to<01:51:52.880> have<01:51:53.480> a<01:51:54.199> a<01:51:54.400> group<01:51:54.760> make 01:51:54.990 --> 01:51:55.000 align:start position:0% it's just better to have a a group make 01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:56.950 align:start position:0% it's just better to have a a group make that<01:51:55.280> call<01:51:55.880> together<01:51:56.159> and<01:51:56.360> make<01:51:56.480> sure<01:51:56.760> we're 01:51:56.950 --> 01:51:56.960 align:start position:0% that call together and make sure we're 01:51:56.960 --> 01:51:58.830 align:start position:0% that call together and make sure we're bouncing<01:51:57.400> ideas<01:51:57.800> off<01:51:57.960> of<01:51:58.119> one<01:51:58.320> another<01:51:58.679> and 01:51:58.830 --> 01:51:58.840 align:start position:0% bouncing ideas off of one another and 01:51:58.840 --> 01:52:02.069 align:start position:0% bouncing ideas off of one another and make<01:51:58.960> sure<01:51:59.199> we're<01:51:59.520> all<01:51:59.679> on<01:51:59.840> the<01:52:00.000> same<01:52:00.400> page<01:52:01.400> um 01:52:02.069 --> 01:52:02.079 align:start position:0% make sure we're all on the same page um 01:52:02.079 --> 01:52:03.870 align:start position:0% make sure we're all on the same page um that<01:52:02.280> has<01:52:02.400> been<01:52:02.599> my<01:52:02.800> recommendation<01:52:03.440> for<01:52:03.639> two 01:52:03.870 --> 01:52:03.880 align:start position:0% that has been my recommendation for two 01:52:03.880 --> 01:52:05.430 align:start position:0% that has been my recommendation for two years 01:52:05.430 --> 01:52:05.440 align:start position:0% years 01:52:05.440 --> 01:52:07.709 align:start position:0% years but<01:52:06.440> I<01:52:06.480> don't<01:52:06.599> know<01:52:06.880> yeah<01:52:07.000> I<01:52:07.159> like<01:52:07.360> that<01:52:07.520> it's 01:52:07.709 --> 01:52:07.719 align:start position:0% but I don't know yeah I like that it's 01:52:07.719 --> 01:52:10.030 align:start position:0% but I don't know yeah I like that it's not<01:52:08.000> one<01:52:08.400> I<01:52:08.719> I<01:52:08.840> think<01:52:09.159> I<01:52:09.280> agree<01:52:09.599> with<01:52:09.760> that<01:52:09.960> I 01:52:10.030 --> 01:52:10.040 align:start position:0% not one I I think I agree with that I 01:52:10.040 --> 01:52:13.470 align:start position:0% not one I I think I agree with that I think<01:52:10.560> one<01:52:10.800> person<01:52:11.119> that's<01:52:11.360> too<01:52:11.840> much 01:52:13.470 --> 01:52:13.480 align:start position:0% think one person that's too much 01:52:13.480 --> 01:52:17.229 align:start position:0% think one person that's too much um<01:52:14.480> have<01:52:14.679> we<01:52:15.239> do<01:52:15.520> did<01:52:15.800> have<01:52:15.880> we<01:52:16.280> received<01:52:16.560> any 01:52:17.229 --> 01:52:17.239 align:start position:0% um have we do did have we received any 01:52:17.239 --> 01:52:21.229 align:start position:0% um have we do did have we received any feedback<01:52:18.239> from<01:52:18.920> having<01:52:19.280> two<01:52:19.960> people<01:52:20.960> and<01:52:21.119> do 01:52:21.229 --> 01:52:21.239 align:start position:0% feedback from having two people and do 01:52:21.239 --> 01:52:23.589 align:start position:0% feedback from having two people and do we<01:52:21.360> feel<01:52:21.639> like<01:52:22.000> three<01:52:22.880> could<01:52:23.079> be<01:52:23.320> more 01:52:23.589 --> 01:52:23.599 align:start position:0% we feel like three could be more 01:52:23.599 --> 01:52:27.990 align:start position:0% we feel like three could be more beneficial<01:52:24.320> or<01:52:24.520> does<01:52:24.719> that<01:52:25.119> add<01:52:25.320> a<01:52:25.560> level 01:52:27.990 --> 01:52:28.000 align:start position:0% 01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:33.069 align:start position:0% of<01:52:29.239> chaos<01:52:30.239> so<01:52:30.599> I<01:52:30.719> think<01:52:30.960> at<01:52:31.320> this<01:52:31.719> point<01:52:32.719> I<01:52:32.800> mean 01:52:33.069 --> 01:52:33.079 align:start position:0% of chaos so I think at this point I mean 01:52:33.079 --> 01:52:36.149 align:start position:0% of chaos so I think at this point I mean most<01:52:33.320> of<01:52:33.639> our<01:52:34.639> Librarians<01:52:35.239> and<01:52:35.440> employees<01:52:35.960> and 01:52:36.149 --> 01:52:36.159 align:start position:0% most of our Librarians and employees and 01:52:36.159 --> 01:52:38.109 align:start position:0% most of our Librarians and employees and administrators<01:52:36.760> that<01:52:36.880> are<01:52:37.040> not<01:52:37.560> working<01:52:37.880> in 01:52:38.109 --> 01:52:38.119 align:start position:0% administrators that are not working in 01:52:38.119 --> 01:52:41.189 align:start position:0% administrators that are not working in isolation<01:52:38.840> with<01:52:39.079> this<01:52:40.000> um<01:52:40.320> the<01:52:40.480> feedback<01:52:41.040> I 01:52:41.189 --> 01:52:41.199 align:start position:0% isolation with this um the feedback I 01:52:41.199 --> 01:52:44.109 align:start position:0% isolation with this um the feedback I have<01:52:41.480> gotten<01:52:42.280> honestly<01:52:42.840> was<01:52:43.440> asking<01:52:43.840> for 01:52:44.109 --> 01:52:44.119 align:start position:0% have gotten honestly was asking for 01:52:44.119 --> 01:52:46.750 align:start position:0% have gotten honestly was asking for three<01:52:45.119> just<01:52:45.320> so<01:52:45.639> that<01:52:45.880> if<01:52:46.040> there<01:52:46.199> was<01:52:46.480> needed 01:52:46.750 --> 01:52:46.760 align:start position:0% three just so that if there was needed 01:52:46.760 --> 01:52:50.430 align:start position:0% three just so that if there was needed to<01:52:46.880> be<01:52:47.000> a<01:52:47.280> tiebreaker<01:52:48.280> there<01:52:48.560> you<01:52:48.719> had<01:52:49.079> a<01:52:50.079> yeah 01:52:50.430 --> 01:52:50.440 align:start position:0% to be a tiebreaker there you had a yeah 01:52:50.440 --> 01:52:53.189 align:start position:0% to be a tiebreaker there you had a yeah a<01:52:50.560> tiebreaker<01:52:51.239> but<01:52:51.480> that<01:52:51.639> was<01:52:52.079> I<01:52:52.159> mean<01:52:52.719> and<01:52:53.040> we 01:52:53.189 --> 01:52:53.199 align:start position:0% a tiebreaker but that was I mean and we 01:52:53.199 --> 01:52:54.270 align:start position:0% a tiebreaker but that was I mean and we I've<01:52:53.320> been<01:52:53.480> think<01:52:53.639> we've<01:52:53.760> been<01:52:53.880> thinking<01:52:54.119> and 01:52:54.270 --> 01:52:54.280 align:start position:0% I've been think we've been thinking and 01:52:54.280 --> 01:52:55.870 align:start position:0% I've been think we've been thinking and talking<01:52:54.599> a<01:52:54.719> lot<01:52:54.920> about<01:52:55.159> like<01:52:55.320> the<01:52:55.480> level<01:52:55.719> of 01:52:55.870 --> 01:52:55.880 align:start position:0% talking a lot about like the level of 01:52:55.880 --> 01:52:58.550 align:start position:0% talking a lot about like the level of Burden<01:52:56.239> this<01:52:56.440> places<01:52:56.800> on<01:52:56.960> leas<01:52:57.679> to<01:52:57.920> have<01:52:58.320> more 01:52:58.550 --> 01:52:58.560 align:start position:0% Burden this places on leas to have more 01:52:58.560 --> 01:53:00.270 align:start position:0% Burden this places on leas to have more than<01:52:58.760> one<01:52:59.040> person<01:52:59.360> review<01:52:59.719> it<01:52:59.920> but<01:53:00.040> I<01:53:00.119> just 01:53:00.270 --> 01:53:00.280 align:start position:0% than one person review it but I just 01:53:00.280 --> 01:53:02.589 align:start position:0% than one person review it but I just think<01:53:00.480> it's<01:53:00.599> a<01:53:00.800> protection<01:53:01.800> that's<01:53:02.040> needed<01:53:02.440> to 01:53:02.589 --> 01:53:02.599 align:start position:0% think it's a protection that's needed to 01:53:02.599 --> 01:53:04.830 align:start position:0% think it's a protection that's needed to make<01:53:02.760> sure<01:53:03.360> we're<01:53:03.760> doing<01:53:04.119> what's<01:53:04.400> best<01:53:04.599> for 01:53:04.830 --> 01:53:04.840 align:start position:0% make sure we're doing what's best for 01:53:04.840 --> 01:53:09.510 align:start position:0% make sure we're doing what's best for kids<01:53:05.119> as<01:53:05.239> far<01:53:05.440> as<01:53:05.560> the<01:53:05.679> law<01:53:06.119> is<01:53:06.320> concerned 01:53:09.510 --> 01:53:09.520 align:start position:0% 01:53:09.520 --> 01:53:12.870 align:start position:0% so<01:53:10.520> so<01:53:10.840> if<01:53:11.079> we<01:53:12.079> and<01:53:12.239> and<01:53:12.360> I<01:53:12.440> don't<01:53:12.560> know<01:53:12.719> what 01:53:12.870 --> 01:53:12.880 align:start position:0% so so if we and and I don't know what 01:53:12.880 --> 01:53:16.149 align:start position:0% so so if we and and I don't know what other<01:53:13.079> board<01:53:13.719> members<01:53:14.040> filed<01:53:14.520> if<01:53:14.719> we<01:53:15.719> wanted 01:53:16.149 --> 01:53:16.159 align:start position:0% other board members filed if we wanted 01:53:16.159 --> 01:53:18.310 align:start position:0% other board members filed if we wanted that<01:53:16.280> to<01:53:16.480> be<01:53:16.679> three<01:53:17.440> technically<01:53:17.960> we'd<01:53:18.199> have 01:53:18.310 --> 01:53:18.320 align:start position:0% that to be three technically we'd have 01:53:18.320 --> 01:53:23.589 align:start position:0% that to be three technically we'd have to<01:53:18.480> change<01:53:18.800> that<01:53:18.920> in<01:53:19.000> the<01:53:19.159> rule<01:53:19.880> is<01:53:20.040> that<01:53:20.280> right 01:53:23.589 --> 01:53:23.599 align:start position:0% 01:53:23.599 --> 01:53:27.350 align:start position:0% yes<01:53:24.040> I<01:53:24.159> think<01:53:24.360> so<01:53:25.360> yeah<01:53:25.840> and<01:53:26.079> I<01:53:26.440> I<01:53:27.119> understand 01:53:27.350 --> 01:53:27.360 align:start position:0% yes I think so yeah and I I understand 01:53:27.360 --> 01:53:29.589 align:start position:0% yes I think so yeah and I I understand the<01:53:28.079> odd<01:53:28.400> number 01:53:29.589 --> 01:53:29.599 align:start position:0% the odd number 01:53:29.599 --> 01:53:32.030 align:start position:0% the odd number piece<01:53:30.599> I<01:53:30.719> just<01:53:30.880> always<01:53:31.079> get<01:53:31.400> concerned<01:53:31.800> about 01:53:32.030 --> 01:53:32.040 align:start position:0% piece I just always get concerned about 01:53:32.040 --> 01:53:34.950 align:start position:0% piece I just always get concerned about the<01:53:32.199> resources<01:53:32.840> the<01:53:33.040> time<01:53:33.639> and<01:53:33.880> staff 01:53:34.950 --> 01:53:34.960 align:start position:0% the resources the time and staff 01:53:34.960 --> 01:53:37.310 align:start position:0% the resources the time and staff and<01:53:35.960> the<01:53:36.079> hours<01:53:36.360> and<01:53:36.520> hours<01:53:36.760> that<01:53:36.920> they<01:53:37.040> spend 01:53:37.310 --> 01:53:37.320 align:start position:0% and the hours and hours that they spend 01:53:37.320 --> 01:53:39.790 align:start position:0% and the hours and hours that they spend on<01:53:37.480> this<01:53:37.679> and<01:53:37.840> so<01:53:38.719> I<01:53:38.840> guess<01:53:39.040> my<01:53:39.199> view<01:53:39.480> is<01:53:39.719> is 01:53:39.790 --> 01:53:39.800 align:start position:0% on this and so I guess my view is is 01:53:39.800 --> 01:53:44.830 align:start position:0% on this and so I guess my view is is there<01:53:40.000> a<01:53:40.199> way<01:53:40.800> to<01:53:41.000> make<01:53:41.159> it<01:53:41.360> fair<01:53:41.880> but<01:53:42.400> also<01:53:43.840> um 01:53:44.830 --> 01:53:44.840 align:start position:0% there a way to make it fair but also um 01:53:44.840 --> 01:53:47.350 align:start position:0% there a way to make it fair but also um not<01:53:45.119> be<01:53:45.480> a<01:53:45.679> huge<01:53:45.960> burden<01:53:46.280> on<01:53:46.400> our<01:53:46.599> leas<01:53:47.159> with 01:53:47.350 --> 01:53:47.360 align:start position:0% not be a huge burden on our leas with 01:53:47.360 --> 01:53:50.069 align:start position:0% not be a huge burden on our leas with time<01:53:47.719> and<01:53:47.920> resources<01:53:48.520> to<01:53:48.679> do<01:53:48.920> these<01:53:49.719> because<01:53:49.960> I 01:53:50.069 --> 01:53:50.079 align:start position:0% time and resources to do these because I 01:53:50.079 --> 01:53:51.229 align:start position:0% time and resources to do these because I feel<01:53:50.280> like<01:53:50.480> that's<01:53:50.679> something<01:53:50.960> that<01:53:51.079> we've 01:53:51.229 --> 01:53:51.239 align:start position:0% feel like that's something that we've 01:53:51.239 --> 01:53:53.229 align:start position:0% feel like that's something that we've heard<01:53:51.480> from<01:53:51.639> all<01:53:51.760> of<01:53:51.880> our<01:53:52.119> district<01:53:52.679> and<01:53:52.760> laas 01:53:53.229 --> 01:53:53.239 align:start position:0% heard from all of our district and laas 01:53:53.239 --> 01:53:55.470 align:start position:0% heard from all of our district and laas about<01:53:53.599> how<01:53:53.760> much<01:53:53.960> time<01:53:54.840> and<01:53:54.960> that<01:53:55.119> includes 01:53:55.470 --> 01:53:55.480 align:start position:0% about how much time and that includes 01:53:55.480 --> 01:53:57.550 align:start position:0% about how much time and that includes money<01:53:55.800> because<01:53:55.920> it's<01:53:56.079> staff<01:53:56.320> hours<01:53:57.199> but<01:53:57.360> also 01:53:57.550 --> 01:53:57.560 align:start position:0% money because it's staff hours but also 01:53:57.560 --> 01:53:59.149 align:start position:0% money because it's staff hours but also how<01:53:57.719> hard<01:53:57.880> it<01:53:58.000> is<01:53:58.079> to<01:53:58.239> get<01:53:58.400> parents<01:53:58.719> to<01:53:58.920> commit 01:53:59.149 --> 01:53:59.159 align:start position:0% how hard it is to get parents to commit 01:53:59.159 --> 01:54:00.709 align:start position:0% how hard it is to get parents to commit to<01:53:59.360> a<01:53:59.440> lot<01:53:59.560> of<01:53:59.679> the<01:53:59.840> time<01:54:00.000> that<01:54:00.119> it<01:54:00.199> takes<01:54:00.480> to<01:54:00.599> do 01:54:00.709 --> 01:54:00.719 align:start position:0% to a lot of the time that it takes to do 01:54:00.719 --> 01:54:02.910 align:start position:0% to a lot of the time that it takes to do the<01:54:00.880> review<01:54:01.239> as<01:54:01.360> well<01:54:02.159> so<01:54:02.440> I<01:54:02.520> don't<01:54:02.639> know<01:54:02.760> what 01:54:02.910 --> 01:54:02.920 align:start position:0% the review as well so I don't know what 01:54:02.920 --> 01:54:06.030 align:start position:0% the review as well so I don't know what that<01:54:03.040> looks<01:54:03.280> like<01:54:03.599> but<01:54:04.520> I<01:54:04.639> feel<01:54:04.920> like 01:54:06.030 --> 01:54:06.040 align:start position:0% that looks like but I feel like 01:54:06.040 --> 01:54:09.950 align:start position:0% that looks like but I feel like um<01:54:07.040> whatever<01:54:07.440> can<01:54:07.639> be<01:54:07.920> the<01:54:08.119> least<01:54:09.119> of<01:54:09.239> a<01:54:09.400> burden 01:54:09.950 --> 01:54:09.960 align:start position:0% um whatever can be the least of a burden 01:54:09.960 --> 01:54:13.390 align:start position:0% um whatever can be the least of a burden to<01:54:10.639> uh<01:54:11.400> the<01:54:11.719> eleas<01:54:12.199> and<01:54:12.360> the<01:54:12.480> parents<01:54:12.800> as<01:54:12.960> well 01:54:13.390 --> 01:54:13.400 align:start position:0% to uh the eleas and the parents as well 01:54:13.400 --> 01:54:15.189 align:start position:0% to uh the eleas and the parents as well and<01:54:13.599> deina<01:54:13.960> you<01:54:14.119> probably<01:54:14.320> have<01:54:14.400> an<01:54:14.599> answer 01:54:15.189 --> 01:54:15.199 align:start position:0% and deina you probably have an answer 01:54:15.199 --> 01:54:16.629 align:start position:0% and deina you probably have an answer because<01:54:15.400> you<01:54:15.840> you<01:54:16.079> probably<01:54:16.280> thought<01:54:16.480> about 01:54:16.629 --> 01:54:16.639 align:start position:0% because you you probably thought about 01:54:16.639 --> 01:54:18.550 align:start position:0% because you you probably thought about it<01:54:16.800> way<01:54:16.920> more<01:54:17.079> than<01:54:17.199> I 01:54:18.550 --> 01:54:18.560 align:start position:0% it way more than I 01:54:18.560 --> 01:54:21.310 align:start position:0% it way more than I have<01:54:19.560> I'm<01:54:19.719> sleep<01:54:20.159> eating<01:54:20.560> dreaming 01:54:21.310 --> 01:54:21.320 align:start position:0% have I'm sleep eating dreaming 01:54:21.320 --> 01:54:24.669 align:start position:0% have I'm sleep eating dreaming vacationing<01:54:21.960> HB<01:54:22.440> 29<01:54:22.960> just 01:54:24.669 --> 01:54:24.679 align:start position:0% vacationing HB 29 just 01:54:24.679 --> 01:54:29.030 align:start position:0% vacationing HB 29 just kidding<01:54:25.679> um<01:54:26.280> so<01:54:26.920> this<01:54:27.520> this<01:54:27.760> section<01:54:28.480> is<01:54:28.760> about 01:54:29.030 --> 01:54:29.040 align:start position:0% kidding um so this this section is about 01:54:29.040 --> 01:54:31.709 align:start position:0% kidding um so this this section is about the<01:54:29.199> initial<01:54:29.679> review<01:54:30.360> so<01:54:30.760> we<01:54:30.880> know<01:54:31.199> that<01:54:31.520> we 01:54:31.709 --> 01:54:31.719 align:start position:0% the initial review so we know that we 01:54:31.719 --> 01:54:34.030 align:start position:0% the initial review so we know that we can<01:54:31.960> use<01:54:32.280> excerpts<01:54:32.840> to<01:54:33.040> make<01:54:33.280> that 01:54:34.030 --> 01:54:34.040 align:start position:0% can use excerpts to make that 01:54:34.040 --> 01:54:37.390 align:start position:0% can use excerpts to make that determination<01:54:35.040> and<01:54:35.239> so<01:54:35.960> I<01:54:36.119> think<01:54:36.679> it's<01:54:37.119> way 01:54:37.390 --> 01:54:37.400 align:start position:0% determination and so I think it's way 01:54:37.400 --> 01:54:40.430 align:start position:0% determination and so I think it's way less<01:54:37.719> extensive<01:54:38.199> of<01:54:38.400> a<01:54:38.599> review<01:54:39.239> than<01:54:40.159> than<01:54:40.320> the 01:54:40.430 --> 01:54:40.440 align:start position:0% less extensive of a review than than the 01:54:40.440 --> 01:54:43.229 align:start position:0% less extensive of a review than than the full<01:54:40.719> review<01:54:41.119> would<01:54:41.320> be<01:54:42.119> um<01:54:42.360> which<01:54:42.800> is<01:54:43.040> going 01:54:43.229 --> 01:54:43.239 align:start position:0% full review would be um which is going 01:54:43.239 --> 01:54:45.270 align:start position:0% full review would be um which is going to<01:54:43.400> require<01:54:43.840> more<01:54:44.199> individuals<01:54:44.880> so<01:54:45.040> I<01:54:45.119> would 01:54:45.270 --> 01:54:45.280 align:start position:0% to require more individuals so I would 01:54:45.280 --> 01:54:47.830 align:start position:0% to require more individuals so I would just<01:54:45.560> like<01:54:46.000> maybe<01:54:46.440> think<01:54:46.800> think<01:54:47.320> about<01:54:47.599> that<01:54:47.760> a 01:54:47.830 --> 01:54:47.840 align:start position:0% just like maybe think think about that a 01:54:47.840 --> 01:54:49.870 align:start position:0% just like maybe think think about that a little<01:54:48.040> bit<01:54:48.320> just<01:54:48.480> that<01:54:48.719> this<01:54:48.920> could<01:54:49.119> be<01:54:49.800> I 01:54:49.870 --> 01:54:49.880 align:start position:0% little bit just that this could be I 01:54:49.880 --> 01:54:54.229 align:start position:0% little bit just that this could be I mean<01:54:50.840> staff<01:54:51.639> not<01:54:51.920> USB<01:54:52.639> staff<01:54:52.920> but<01:54:53.480> Lea<01:54:54.040> staff 01:54:54.229 --> 01:54:54.239 align:start position:0% mean staff not USB staff but Lea staff 01:54:54.239 --> 01:54:55.709 align:start position:0% mean staff not USB staff but Lea staff are<01:54:54.480> already<01:54:54.960> like<01:54:55.159> having<01:54:55.480> these 01:54:55.709 --> 01:54:55.719 align:start position:0% are already like having these 01:54:55.719 --> 01:54:58.270 align:start position:0% are already like having these discussions<01:54:56.280> amongst<01:54:56.800> themselves<01:54:57.679> um<01:54:58.040> with 01:54:58.270 --> 01:54:58.280 align:start position:0% discussions amongst themselves um with 01:54:58.280 --> 01:55:02.390 align:start position:0% discussions amongst themselves um with just<01:54:58.400> a<01:54:58.639> page<01:54:59.040> or<01:54:59.360> a<01:54:59.520> paragraph<01:55:00.679> So<01:55:01.679> I<01:55:01.880> feel 01:55:02.390 --> 01:55:02.400 align:start position:0% just a page or a paragraph So I feel 01:55:02.400 --> 01:55:04.669 align:start position:0% just a page or a paragraph So I feel exactly<01:55:02.880> the<01:55:03.000> same<01:55:03.239> way<01:55:03.520> about<01:55:03.800> adding<01:55:04.159> burden 01:55:04.669 --> 01:55:04.679 align:start position:0% exactly the same way about adding burden 01:55:04.679 --> 01:55:09.030 align:start position:0% exactly the same way about adding burden to<01:55:05.560> um<01:55:05.920> Librarians<01:55:06.920> um<01:55:07.440> but<01:55:07.719> I<01:55:08.199> I<01:55:08.599> think<01:55:08.880> and 01:55:09.030 --> 01:55:09.040 align:start position:0% to um Librarians um but I I think and 01:55:09.040 --> 01:55:10.629 align:start position:0% to um Librarians um but I I think and I've<01:55:09.159> heard<01:55:09.400> from<01:55:09.560> the<01:55:09.679> field<01:55:10.079> that<01:55:10.400> this 01:55:10.629 --> 01:55:10.639 align:start position:0% I've heard from the field that this 01:55:10.639 --> 01:55:14.189 align:start position:0% I've heard from the field that this gives<01:55:10.920> them<01:55:11.880> um<01:55:12.880> some<01:55:13.199> peace<01:55:13.440> of<01:55:13.639> mind<01:55:14.000> that 01:55:14.189 --> 01:55:14.199 align:start position:0% gives them um some peace of mind that 01:55:14.199 --> 01:55:15.910 align:start position:0% gives them um some peace of mind that it's<01:55:14.360> not<01:55:14.560> just<01:55:14.760> going<01:55:14.880> to<01:55:15.000> be<01:55:15.280> them<01:55:15.560> and<01:55:15.800> I 01:55:15.910 --> 01:55:15.920 align:start position:0% it's not just going to be them and I 01:55:15.920 --> 01:55:17.910 align:start position:0% it's not just going to be them and I think<01:55:16.040> there's<01:55:16.280> some<01:55:16.599> public<01:55:17.599> um<01:55:17.760> I<01:55:17.800> think 01:55:17.910 --> 01:55:17.920 align:start position:0% think there's some public um I think 01:55:17.920 --> 01:55:19.189 align:start position:0% think there's some public um I think it's<01:55:18.079> important<01:55:18.360> that<01:55:18.480> the<01:55:18.599> public<01:55:18.840> knows 01:55:19.189 --> 01:55:19.199 align:start position:0% it's important that the public knows 01:55:19.199 --> 01:55:24.030 align:start position:0% it's important that the public knows that<01:55:20.159> as<01:55:20.400> well<01:55:21.239> because<01:55:21.599> there<01:55:21.840> has<01:55:22.040> been<01:55:22.760> some 01:55:24.030 --> 01:55:24.040 align:start position:0% that as well because there has been some 01:55:24.040 --> 01:55:27.830 align:start position:0% that as well because there has been some um<01:55:25.040> I<01:55:25.119> don't<01:55:25.280> know<01:55:25.960> vocal<01:55:26.840> like<01:55:27.320> did<01:55:27.639> this 01:55:27.830 --> 01:55:27.840 align:start position:0% um I don't know vocal like did this 01:55:27.840 --> 01:55:29.830 align:start position:0% um I don't know vocal like did this person<01:55:28.159> make<01:55:28.440> this<01:55:28.639> decision<01:55:29.159> one<01:55:29.400> way<01:55:29.520> or<01:55:29.719> the 01:55:29.830 --> 01:55:29.840 align:start position:0% person make this decision one way or the 01:55:29.840 --> 01:55:31.629 align:start position:0% person make this decision one way or the other<01:55:30.159> right<01:55:30.320> it<01:55:30.440> could<01:55:30.560> be<01:55:30.840> either<01:55:31.199> direction 01:55:31.629 --> 01:55:31.639 align:start position:0% other right it could be either direction 01:55:31.639 --> 01:55:33.830 align:start position:0% other right it could be either direction and<01:55:31.920> you<01:55:32.079> make<01:55:32.280> someone<01:55:32.560> mad<01:55:32.840> on<01:55:33.000> this<01:55:33.199> side<01:55:33.679> of 01:55:33.830 --> 01:55:33.840 align:start position:0% and you make someone mad on this side of 01:55:33.840 --> 01:55:35.430 align:start position:0% and you make someone mad on this side of the<01:55:34.079> aisle<01:55:34.360> and<01:55:34.520> you<01:55:34.599> make<01:55:34.760> someone<01:55:35.040> mad<01:55:35.280> on 01:55:35.430 --> 01:55:35.440 align:start position:0% the aisle and you make someone mad on 01:55:35.440 --> 01:55:37.950 align:start position:0% the aisle and you make someone mad on this<01:55:35.599> side<01:55:35.760> of<01:55:35.840> the<01:55:36.000> aisle<01:55:36.360> and<01:55:36.520> so<01:55:37.239> I<01:55:37.320> think 01:55:37.950 --> 01:55:37.960 align:start position:0% this side of the aisle and so I think 01:55:37.960 --> 01:55:39.510 align:start position:0% this side of the aisle and so I think having<01:55:38.320> that<01:55:38.480> protection<01:55:38.840> of<01:55:39.000> more<01:55:39.159> than<01:55:39.320> one 01:55:39.510 --> 01:55:39.520 align:start position:0% having that protection of more than one 01:55:39.520 --> 01:55:41.390 align:start position:0% having that protection of more than one person<01:55:39.880> whether<01:55:40.079> it<01:55:40.199> is<01:55:40.320> two<01:55:40.520> or<01:55:40.719> three<01:55:41.280> I 01:55:41.390 --> 01:55:41.400 align:start position:0% person whether it is two or three I 01:55:41.400 --> 01:55:44.030 align:start position:0% person whether it is two or three I think<01:55:41.599> is<01:55:41.840> important<01:55:42.320> for<01:55:42.599> that<01:55:42.800> rationale<01:55:43.360> as 01:55:44.030 --> 01:55:44.040 align:start position:0% think is important for that rationale as 01:55:44.040 --> 01:55:47.030 align:start position:0% think is important for that rationale as well<01:55:45.040> I<01:55:45.159> feel<01:55:45.440> we<01:55:45.560> should<01:55:45.880> support<01:55:46.599> those<01:55:46.880> who 01:55:47.030 --> 01:55:47.040 align:start position:0% well I feel we should support those who 01:55:47.040 --> 01:55:51.470 align:start position:0% well I feel we should support those who are<01:55:47.360> in<01:55:47.599> the<01:55:48.480> in<01:55:48.599> the<01:55:48.760> hot<01:55:49.239> seat<01:55:50.239> um<01:55:50.719> because<01:55:51.079> I 01:55:51.470 --> 01:55:51.480 align:start position:0% are in the in the hot seat um because I 01:55:51.480 --> 01:55:54.270 align:start position:0% are in the in the hot seat um because I can<01:55:51.679> really<01:55:51.920> feel<01:55:52.440> feel<01:55:53.440> I've<01:55:53.639> been<01:55:53.840> feeling 01:55:54.270 --> 01:55:54.280 align:start position:0% can really feel feel I've been feeling 01:55:54.280 --> 01:55:57.430 align:start position:0% can really feel feel I've been feeling the<01:55:54.520> heat<01:55:55.199> intensely<01:55:56.159> in<01:55:56.320> the<01:55:56.560> last<01:55:57.119> little 01:55:57.430 --> 01:55:57.440 align:start position:0% the heat intensely in the last little 01:55:57.440 --> 01:56:00.669 align:start position:0% the heat intensely in the last little while<01:55:58.079> and<01:55:58.280> just<01:55:58.480> one<01:55:58.639> or 01:56:00.669 --> 01:56:00.679 align:start position:0% while and just one or 01:56:00.679 --> 01:56:05.669 align:start position:0% while and just one or two<01:56:01.679> people<01:56:02.360> to<01:56:03.360> take<01:56:03.599> the<01:56:03.760> heat<01:56:04.040> with<01:56:04.400> me<01:56:05.400> has 01:56:05.669 --> 01:56:05.679 align:start position:0% two people to take the heat with me has 01:56:05.679 --> 01:56:09.430 align:start position:0% two people to take the heat with me has made<01:56:05.920> it<01:56:06.440> possible<01:56:06.920> to<01:56:07.679> move<01:56:07.960> on<01:56:08.920> and<01:56:09.079> to<01:56:09.360> and 01:56:09.430 --> 01:56:09.440 align:start position:0% made it possible to move on and to and 01:56:09.440 --> 01:56:12.669 align:start position:0% made it possible to move on and to and to<01:56:09.639> continue<01:56:10.000> to<01:56:10.239> function<01:56:11.159> and<01:56:11.280> so<01:56:12.239> if<01:56:12.520> that 01:56:12.669 --> 01:56:12.679 align:start position:0% to continue to function and so if that 01:56:12.679 --> 01:56:15.189 align:start position:0% to continue to function and so if that would<01:56:12.880> be<01:56:13.400> I'm<01:56:13.520> thinking<01:56:13.800> of<01:56:13.960> the<01:56:14.199> librarian 01:56:15.189 --> 01:56:15.199 align:start position:0% would be I'm thinking of the librarian 01:56:15.199 --> 01:56:17.629 align:start position:0% would be I'm thinking of the librarian or<01:56:15.639> those<01:56:16.040> individuals<01:56:17.040> I<01:56:17.119> don't<01:56:17.280> want<01:56:17.360> to<01:56:17.520> put 01:56:17.629 --> 01:56:17.639 align:start position:0% or those individuals I don't want to put 01:56:17.639 --> 01:56:21.149 align:start position:0% or those individuals I don't want to put a<01:56:18.079> burden<01:56:19.079> on<01:56:19.400> leas<01:56:20.360> that's<01:56:20.599> the<01:56:20.760> furthest 01:56:21.149 --> 01:56:21.159 align:start position:0% a burden on leas that's the furthest 01:56:21.159 --> 01:56:23.510 align:start position:0% a burden on leas that's the furthest thing<01:56:21.360> from<01:56:21.560> my<01:56:21.719> mind<01:56:22.000> so<01:56:22.400> I<01:56:22.639> really<01:56:22.960> resonate 01:56:23.510 --> 01:56:23.520 align:start position:0% thing from my mind so I really resonate 01:56:23.520 --> 01:56:27.470 align:start position:0% thing from my mind so I really resonate with<01:56:23.719> what<01:56:24.199> Sarah<01:56:24.679> is<01:56:25.000> saying<01:56:26.000> uh<01:56:26.239> but<01:56:26.560> I<01:56:27.040> also 01:56:27.470 --> 01:56:27.480 align:start position:0% with what Sarah is saying uh but I also 01:56:27.480 --> 01:56:30.709 align:start position:0% with what Sarah is saying uh but I also don't<01:56:27.719> want<01:56:28.280> that<01:56:29.280> individual<01:56:29.800> to<01:56:29.920> feel<01:56:30.520> it's 01:56:30.709 --> 01:56:30.719 align:start position:0% don't want that individual to feel it's 01:56:30.719 --> 01:56:33.550 align:start position:0% don't want that individual to feel it's me<01:56:31.040> against<01:56:31.360> the<01:56:31.520> world<01:56:32.520> and 01:56:33.550 --> 01:56:33.560 align:start position:0% me against the world and 01:56:33.560 --> 01:56:36.589 align:start position:0% me against the world and feeling<01:56:34.840> um 01:56:36.589 --> 01:56:36.599 align:start position:0% feeling um 01:56:36.599 --> 01:56:39.790 align:start position:0% feeling um unsafe<01:56:37.599> literally<01:56:38.320> I<01:56:38.400> mean<01:56:39.079> some<01:56:39.360> people 01:56:39.790 --> 01:56:39.800 align:start position:0% unsafe literally I mean some people 01:56:39.800 --> 01:56:42.229 align:start position:0% unsafe literally I mean some people people<01:56:40.079> will<01:56:40.280> say<01:56:40.599> things<01:56:40.920> that<01:56:41.079> are<01:56:41.360> just 01:56:42.229 --> 01:56:42.239 align:start position:0% people will say things that are just 01:56:42.239 --> 01:56:47.470 align:start position:0% people will say things that are just so<01:56:43.360> weird<01:56:44.639> and<01:56:45.639> excuse<01:56:46.000> me<01:56:46.280> for<01:56:46.400> using<01:56:46.920> a<01:56:47.119> word 01:56:47.470 --> 01:56:47.480 align:start position:0% so weird and excuse me for using a word 01:56:47.480 --> 01:56:51.430 align:start position:0% so weird and excuse me for using a word like<01:56:47.719> that<01:56:48.520> that<01:56:48.639> are<01:56:48.960> so<01:56:49.679> um<01:56:50.440> inappropriate 01:56:51.430 --> 01:56:51.440 align:start position:0% like that that are so um inappropriate 01:56:51.440 --> 01:56:55.510 align:start position:0% like that that are so um inappropriate and<01:56:51.639> it<01:56:51.840> does<01:56:52.440> tend<01:56:52.719> to<01:56:52.920> make<01:56:53.079> you<01:56:53.280> feel<01:56:54.280> like 01:56:55.510 --> 01:56:55.520 align:start position:0% and it does tend to make you feel like 01:56:55.520 --> 01:56:58.350 align:start position:0% and it does tend to make you feel like wow<01:56:56.520> maybe<01:56:56.840> I<01:56:56.920> should<01:56:57.280> just<01:56:57.520> be<01:56:57.760> done<01:56:58.159> with 01:56:58.350 --> 01:56:58.360 align:start position:0% wow maybe I should just be done with 01:56:58.360 --> 01:57:00.109 align:start position:0% wow maybe I should just be done with this<01:56:58.560> and<01:56:58.880> move<01:56:59.119> on 01:57:00.109 --> 01:57:00.119 align:start position:0% this and move on 01:57:00.119 --> 01:57:04.990 align:start position:0% this and move on to<01:57:01.119> my<01:57:01.800> grandkids<01:57:02.800> or<01:57:03.159> move<01:57:03.800> go<01:57:04.079> back<01:57:04.280> home<01:57:04.480> and 01:57:04.990 --> 01:57:05.000 align:start position:0% to my grandkids or move go back home and 01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:07.510 align:start position:0% to my grandkids or move go back home and not<01:57:05.199> be<01:57:05.320> a<01:57:05.440> librarian<01:57:06.119> anymore<01:57:07.040> you<01:57:07.159> know<01:57:07.360> I 01:57:07.510 --> 01:57:07.520 align:start position:0% not be a librarian anymore you know I 01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:10.350 align:start position:0% not be a librarian anymore you know I just<01:57:07.840> I<01:57:07.960> just<01:57:08.199> want<01:57:08.480> to<01:57:08.800> protect<01:57:09.719> and<01:57:09.960> provide 01:57:10.350 --> 01:57:10.360 align:start position:0% just I just want to protect and provide 01:57:10.360 --> 01:57:14.229 align:start position:0% just I just want to protect and provide support<01:57:10.719> so<01:57:10.880> if<01:57:11.040> three<01:57:11.360> will<01:57:11.599> do<01:57:11.960> that<01:57:12.960> and<01:57:13.679> and 01:57:14.229 --> 01:57:14.239 align:start position:0% support so if three will do that and and 01:57:14.239 --> 01:57:16.430 align:start position:0% support so if three will do that and and from<01:57:14.400> the<01:57:14.560> field<01:57:14.840> they're<01:57:15.040> saying<01:57:15.320> that<01:57:15.639> I<01:57:16.320> I 01:57:16.430 --> 01:57:16.440 align:start position:0% from the field they're saying that I I 01:57:16.440 --> 01:57:19.870 align:start position:0% from the field they're saying that I I would<01:57:17.040> recommend<01:57:17.560> that<01:57:17.760> we<01:57:18.560> look 01:57:19.870 --> 01:57:19.880 align:start position:0% would recommend that we look 01:57:19.880 --> 01:57:22.910 align:start position:0% would recommend that we look at<01:57:20.880> making<01:57:21.360> this<01:57:21.719> uh<01:57:22.320> something<01:57:22.639> to<01:57:22.760> be 01:57:22.910 --> 01:57:22.920 align:start position:0% at making this uh something to be 01:57:22.920 --> 01:57:25.550 align:start position:0% at making this uh something to be considered<01:57:23.400> by<01:57:23.599> the<01:57:23.920> board<01:57:24.199> and<01:57:24.400> board<01:57:24.679> rule 01:57:25.550 --> 01:57:25.560 align:start position:0% considered by the board and board rule 01:57:25.560 --> 01:57:27.790 align:start position:0% considered by the board and board rule as<01:57:25.960> an<01:57:26.119> amendment<01:57:26.840> at<01:57:27.000> some<01:57:27.239> point<01:57:27.520> in<01:57:27.639> the 01:57:27.790 --> 01:57:27.800 align:start position:0% as an amendment at some point in the 01:57:27.800 --> 01:57:31.030 align:start position:0% as an amendment at some point in the near 01:57:31.030 --> 01:57:31.040 align:start position:0% 01:57:31.040 --> 01:57:33.470 align:start position:0% future<01:57:32.040> that's<01:57:32.239> not<01:57:32.400> emotion<01:57:33.079> but<01:57:33.239> that's 01:57:33.470 --> 01:57:33.480 align:start position:0% future that's not emotion but that's 01:57:33.480 --> 01:57:36.510 align:start position:0% future that's not emotion but that's just<01:57:34.079> my<01:57:34.400> expression<01:57:35.000> of<01:57:35.520> Elise<01:57:35.960> has<01:57:36.079> her<01:57:36.280> hand 01:57:36.510 --> 01:57:36.520 align:start position:0% just my expression of Elise has her hand 01:57:36.520 --> 01:57:37.750 align:start position:0% just my expression of Elise has her hand up<01:57:36.719> I<01:57:36.800> don't<01:57:36.920> know<01:57:37.040> if<01:57:37.119> you<01:57:37.239> can<01:57:37.360> see<01:57:37.560> it 01:57:37.750 --> 01:57:37.760 align:start position:0% up I don't know if you can see it 01:57:37.760 --> 01:57:40.709 align:start position:0% up I don't know if you can see it because<01:57:37.920> she<01:57:38.880> having<01:57:39.040> to<01:57:39.199> raise<01:57:39.400> it<01:57:39.520> up<01:57:39.880> I<01:57:40.560> it's 01:57:40.709 --> 01:57:40.719 align:start position:0% because she having to raise it up I it's 01:57:40.719 --> 01:57:43.390 align:start position:0% because she having to raise it up I it's her<01:57:40.920> hand<01:57:41.360> literally<01:57:42.360> please<01:57:42.880> please<01:57:43.159> go 01:57:43.390 --> 01:57:43.400 align:start position:0% her hand literally please please go 01:57:43.400 --> 01:57:44.109 align:start position:0% her hand literally please please go right 01:57:44.109 --> 01:57:44.119 align:start position:0% right 01:57:44.119 --> 01:57:47.910 align:start position:0% right ahead<01:57:45.119> my<01:57:45.320> literal<01:57:45.679> hand<01:57:46.599> um<01:57:47.360> I<01:57:47.440> just<01:57:47.599> want<01:57:47.840> a 01:57:47.910 --> 01:57:47.920 align:start position:0% ahead my literal hand um I just want a 01:57:47.920 --> 01:57:50.149 align:start position:0% ahead my literal hand um I just want a little<01:57:48.079> bit<01:57:48.239> of<01:57:48.400> context<01:57:48.920> so<01:57:49.280> the<01:57:49.440> first<01:57:49.800> is<01:57:50.000> is 01:57:50.149 --> 01:57:50.159 align:start position:0% little bit of context so the first is is 01:57:50.159 --> 01:57:52.310 align:start position:0% little bit of context so the first is is that<01:57:50.400> this<01:57:50.520> is<01:57:50.719> within<01:57:50.960> the<01:57:51.079> rule<01:57:51.400> that<01:57:51.560> we<01:57:51.760> are 01:57:52.310 --> 01:57:52.320 align:start position:0% that this is within the rule that we are 01:57:52.320 --> 01:57:55.069 align:start position:0% that this is within the rule that we are amending<01:57:53.079> as<01:57:53.239> a<01:57:53.440> committee<01:57:53.880> right<01:57:54.079> now<01:57:54.760> so<01:57:54.960> if 01:57:55.069 --> 01:57:55.079 align:start position:0% amending as a committee right now so if 01:57:55.079 --> 01:57:56.589 align:start position:0% amending as a committee right now so if we<01:57:55.159> wanted<01:57:55.400> to<01:57:55.560> change<01:57:55.760> it<01:57:55.840> to<01:57:56.000> three<01:57:56.280> that<01:57:56.400> is 01:57:56.589 --> 01:57:56.599 align:start position:0% we wanted to change it to three that is 01:57:56.599 --> 01:57:58.750 align:start position:0% we wanted to change it to three that is perfectly<01:57:57.000> within<01:57:57.239> your<01:57:57.440> power<01:57:58.280> um<01:57:58.400> to<01:57:58.560> do 01:57:58.750 --> 01:57:58.760 align:start position:0% perfectly within your power um to do 01:57:58.760 --> 01:58:03.350 align:start position:0% perfectly within your power um to do that<01:57:59.280> today<01:58:00.280> um<01:58:00.440> the<01:58:00.599> second<01:58:00.920> part<01:58:01.280> is<01:58:01.920> that<01:58:02.800> um 01:58:03.350 --> 01:58:03.360 align:start position:0% that today um the second part is that um 01:58:03.360 --> 01:58:04.910 align:start position:0% that today um the second part is that um the<01:58:03.560> same<01:58:03.840> conversation<01:58:04.400> happened<01:58:04.719> I<01:58:04.800> think 01:58:04.910 --> 01:58:04.920 align:start position:0% the same conversation happened I think 01:58:04.920 --> 01:58:06.990 align:start position:0% the same conversation happened I think it<01:58:05.040> was<01:58:05.199> Michelle<01:58:05.679> and<01:58:05.880> Angie<01:58:06.280> and<01:58:06.400> I 01:58:06.990 --> 01:58:07.000 align:start position:0% it was Michelle and Angie and I 01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.189 align:start position:0% it was Michelle and Angie and I discussing<01:58:07.599> this<01:58:07.880> issue<01:58:08.880> um<01:58:09.480> and<01:58:09.639> we<01:58:09.760> have 01:58:10.189 --> 01:58:10.199 align:start position:0% discussing this issue um and we have 01:58:10.199 --> 01:58:12.189 align:start position:0% discussing this issue um and we have also<01:58:10.480> brought<01:58:10.760> this<01:58:10.920> up<01:58:11.239> with<01:58:11.520> attorneys<01:58:12.000> from 01:58:12.189 --> 01:58:12.199 align:start position:0% also brought this up with attorneys from 01:58:12.199 --> 01:58:16.270 align:start position:0% also brought this up with attorneys from the<01:58:12.320> field<01:58:12.840> as<01:58:13.040> well<01:58:13.480> as<01:58:14.159> um<01:58:15.280> superintendent 01:58:16.270 --> 01:58:16.280 align:start position:0% the field as well as um superintendent 01:58:16.280 --> 01:58:18.310 align:start position:0% the field as well as um superintendent and<01:58:16.599> the<01:58:16.719> feeling<01:58:17.159> was<01:58:17.440> supportive<01:58:18.000> of<01:58:18.159> this 01:58:18.310 --> 01:58:18.320 align:start position:0% and the feeling was supportive of this 01:58:18.320 --> 01:58:21.510 align:start position:0% and the feeling was supportive of this language<01:58:18.760> with<01:58:18.920> the<01:58:19.760> at<01:58:20.000> least<01:58:20.440> two<01:58:21.199> that<01:58:21.320> way 01:58:21.510 --> 01:58:21.520 align:start position:0% language with the at least two that way 01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:23.229 align:start position:0% language with the at least two that way it<01:58:21.679> gives<01:58:22.119> for<01:58:22.280> our<01:58:22.400> smaller<01:58:22.760> districts<01:58:23.079> that 01:58:23.229 --> 01:58:23.239 align:start position:0% it gives for our smaller districts that 01:58:23.239 --> 01:58:25.030 align:start position:0% it gives for our smaller districts that don't<01:58:23.440> really<01:58:23.800> have<01:58:24.079> as<01:58:24.239> much<01:58:24.360> of<01:58:24.480> a<01:58:24.679> problem 01:58:25.030 --> 01:58:25.040 align:start position:0% don't really have as much of a problem 01:58:25.040 --> 01:58:28.629 align:start position:0% don't really have as much of a problem maybe<01:58:25.400> or<01:58:25.560> if<01:58:25.760> they<01:58:26.360> don't<01:58:27.079> um<01:58:27.400> feel<01:58:28.280> like<01:58:28.440> it's 01:58:28.629 --> 01:58:28.639 align:start position:0% maybe or if they don't um feel like it's 01:58:28.639 --> 01:58:30.229 align:start position:0% maybe or if they don't um feel like it's as<01:58:28.760> much<01:58:28.880> of<01:58:29.000> an<01:58:29.119> issue<01:58:29.400> they<01:58:29.560> can<01:58:29.760> just<01:58:29.880> do<01:58:30.119> the 01:58:30.229 --> 01:58:30.239 align:start position:0% as much of an issue they can just do the 01:58:30.239 --> 01:58:31.790 align:start position:0% as much of an issue they can just do the two<01:58:30.480> with<01:58:30.599> the<01:58:30.719> resources<01:58:31.239> that<01:58:31.400> they<01:58:31.560> have 01:58:31.790 --> 01:58:31.800 align:start position:0% two with the resources that they have 01:58:31.800 --> 01:58:33.830 align:start position:0% two with the resources that they have but<01:58:31.960> those<01:58:32.199> larger<01:58:32.639> districts<01:58:33.079> or<01:58:33.400> if<01:58:33.719> there 01:58:33.830 --> 01:58:33.840 align:start position:0% but those larger districts or if there 01:58:33.840 --> 01:58:36.270 align:start position:0% but those larger districts or if there is<01:58:34.000> more<01:58:34.320> heat<01:58:34.679> coming<01:58:35.440> from<01:58:35.639> the<01:58:35.800> public<01:58:36.079> for 01:58:36.270 --> 01:58:36.280 align:start position:0% is more heat coming from the public for 01:58:36.280 --> 01:58:38.189 align:start position:0% is more heat coming from the public for whatever<01:58:36.679> reason<01:58:37.239> then<01:58:37.440> they<01:58:37.560> can<01:58:37.760> definitely 01:58:38.189 --> 01:58:38.199 align:start position:0% whatever reason then they can definitely 01:58:38.199 --> 01:58:40.589 align:start position:0% whatever reason then they can definitely do<01:58:38.480> three<01:58:39.119> so<01:58:39.320> that<01:58:39.440> was<01:58:39.599> kind<01:58:39.760> of<01:58:40.159> the<01:58:40.480> the 01:58:40.589 --> 01:58:40.599 align:start position:0% do three so that was kind of the the 01:58:40.599 --> 01:58:42.870 align:start position:0% do three so that was kind of the the thinking<01:58:40.960> behind<01:58:41.239> that<01:58:41.400> that<01:58:41.560> the<01:58:42.159> at<01:58:42.400> least 01:58:42.870 --> 01:58:42.880 align:start position:0% thinking behind that that the at least 01:58:42.880 --> 01:58:45.430 align:start position:0% thinking behind that that the at least two<01:58:43.719> gives<01:58:43.920> a<01:58:44.079> nod<01:58:44.360> to<01:58:44.560> three<01:58:44.840> would<01:58:45.119> probably 01:58:45.430 --> 01:58:45.440 align:start position:0% two gives a nod to three would probably 01:58:45.440 --> 01:58:47.470 align:start position:0% two gives a nod to three would probably be<01:58:45.639> great<01:58:45.880> but<01:58:46.079> if<01:58:46.199> you<01:58:46.400> can't<01:58:46.719> two<01:58:47.000> is<01:58:47.199> also 01:58:47.470 --> 01:58:47.480 align:start position:0% be great but if you can't two is also 01:58:47.480 --> 01:58:49.109 align:start position:0% be great but if you can't two is also legal 01:58:49.109 --> 01:58:49.119 align:start position:0% legal 01:58:49.119 --> 01:58:51.750 align:start position:0% legal so<01:58:50.119> I<01:58:50.400> I<01:58:50.560> appreciate<01:58:51.119> that<01:58:51.360> background 01:58:51.750 --> 01:58:51.760 align:start position:0% so I I appreciate that background 01:58:51.760 --> 01:58:52.550 align:start position:0% so I I appreciate that background information 01:58:52.550 --> 01:58:52.560 align:start position:0% information 01:58:52.560 --> 01:58:56.229 align:start position:0% information thank<01:58:52.719> you<01:58:52.920> so<01:58:53.159> much<01:58:53.880> so<01:58:54.239> here's<01:58:54.480> the<01:58:55.239> members 01:58:56.229 --> 01:58:56.239 align:start position:0% thank you so much so here's the members 01:58:56.239 --> 01:58:58.550 align:start position:0% thank you so much so here's the members what<01:58:56.360> if<01:58:56.480> we<01:58:56.599> gave<01:58:56.760> them<01:58:56.960> an 01:58:58.550 --> 01:58:58.560 align:start position:0% what if we gave them an 01:58:58.560 --> 01:59:01.510 align:start position:0% what if we gave them an option<01:58:59.560> two<01:58:59.760> or<01:58:59.920> three<01:59:00.199> so<01:59:00.280> if<01:59:00.360> we<01:59:00.480> said<01:59:00.760> two<01:59:01.119> or 01:59:01.510 --> 01:59:01.520 align:start position:0% option two or three so if we said two or 01:59:01.520 --> 01:59:03.950 align:start position:0% option two or three so if we said two or three<01:59:02.400> and<01:59:02.560> that<01:59:02.719> way<01:59:02.920> smaller<01:59:03.280> leas<01:59:03.760> if<01:59:03.880> they 01:59:03.950 --> 01:59:03.960 align:start position:0% three and that way smaller leas if they 01:59:03.960 --> 01:59:05.310 align:start position:0% three and that way smaller leas if they need<01:59:04.119> to<01:59:04.199> be<01:59:04.360> more<01:59:04.520> flexible<01:59:05.000> they<01:59:05.079> can<01:59:05.239> at 01:59:05.310 --> 01:59:05.320 align:start position:0% need to be more flexible they can at 01:59:05.320 --> 01:59:07.629 align:start position:0% need to be more flexible they can at least<01:59:05.520> have<01:59:05.679> two<01:59:06.239> or<01:59:06.840> if<01:59:07.000> they<01:59:07.159> feel<01:59:07.400> like<01:59:07.520> they 01:59:07.629 --> 01:59:07.639 align:start position:0% least have two or if they feel like they 01:59:07.639 --> 01:59:10.149 align:start position:0% least have two or if they feel like they need<01:59:07.760> to<01:59:07.880> have<01:59:08.159> three<01:59:09.119> based<01:59:09.400> on<01:59:09.599> some<01:59:09.760> of<01:59:09.880> the 01:59:10.149 --> 01:59:10.159 align:start position:0% need to have three based on some of the 01:59:10.159 --> 01:59:11.629 align:start position:0% need to have three based on some of the instances<01:59:10.679> we've<01:59:10.880> talked<01:59:11.119> about<01:59:11.360> then<01:59:11.520> they 01:59:11.629 --> 01:59:11.639 align:start position:0% instances we've talked about then they 01:59:11.639 --> 01:59:13.950 align:start position:0% instances we've talked about then they could<01:59:11.800> have 01:59:13.950 --> 01:59:13.960 align:start position:0% could have 01:59:13.960 --> 01:59:17.550 align:start position:0% could have three<01:59:14.960> I<01:59:15.119> like 01:59:17.550 --> 01:59:17.560 align:start position:0% 01:59:17.560 --> 01:59:20.470 align:start position:0% that<01:59:18.560> yeah<01:59:18.719> we<01:59:18.840> can<01:59:19.000> do<01:59:19.159> that<01:59:20.000> the<01:59:20.199> way<01:59:20.320> it's 01:59:20.470 --> 01:59:20.480 align:start position:0% that yeah we can do that the way it's 01:59:20.480 --> 01:59:23.189 align:start position:0% that yeah we can do that the way it's worded<01:59:20.920> now<01:59:21.280> is<01:59:21.400> it<01:59:21.560> says<01:59:22.199> can<01:59:22.320> be<01:59:22.639> by<01:59:22.840> at<01:59:22.960> least 01:59:23.189 --> 01:59:23.199 align:start position:0% worded now is it says can be by at least 01:59:23.199 --> 01:59:25.550 align:start position:0% worded now is it says can be by at least two<01:59:23.560> which<01:59:23.920> implies<01:59:24.400> that<01:59:24.520> you<01:59:24.599> could<01:59:24.800> have 01:59:25.550 --> 01:59:25.560 align:start position:0% two which implies that you could have 01:59:25.560 --> 01:59:28.109 align:start position:0% two which implies that you could have three<01:59:26.239> five<01:59:27.239> right<01:59:27.480> I<01:59:27.560> think<01:59:27.719> you<01:59:27.840> would<01:59:28.000> want 01:59:28.109 --> 01:59:28.119 align:start position:0% three five right I think you would want 01:59:28.119 --> 01:59:31.790 align:start position:0% three five right I think you would want to<01:59:29.079> go<01:59:29.280> low<01:59:29.480> but<01:59:29.599> we<01:59:29.679> can<01:59:29.800> add<01:59:30.320> two<01:59:30.599> or<01:59:30.840> three<01:59:31.679> it 01:59:31.790 --> 01:59:31.800 align:start position:0% to go low but we can add two or three it 01:59:31.800 --> 01:59:36.550 align:start position:0% to go low but we can add two or three it just<01:59:32.040> is<01:59:32.199> it<01:59:32.320> becomes<01:59:32.679> restrictive 01:59:36.550 --> 01:59:36.560 align:start position:0% 01:59:36.560 --> 01:59:39.950 align:start position:0% though<01:59:37.599> I<01:59:38.599> be<01:59:38.800> more<01:59:39.000> than<01:59:39.239> that<01:59:39.599> though<01:59:39.719> to<01:59:39.840> be 01:59:39.950 --> 01:59:39.960 align:start position:0% though I be more than that though to be 01:59:39.960 --> 01:59:41.830 align:start position:0% though I be more than that though to be honest<01:59:40.159> with<01:59:40.400> I<01:59:40.520> take<01:59:40.719> back<01:59:40.920> what<01:59:41.040> I<01:59:41.199> said<01:59:41.599> then 01:59:41.830 --> 01:59:41.840 align:start position:0% honest with I take back what I said then 01:59:41.840 --> 01:59:43.310 align:start position:0% honest with I take back what I said then oh<01:59:42.000> yeah<01:59:42.280> okay<01:59:42.480> whatever<01:59:42.920> gives<01:59:43.119> them 01:59:43.310 --> 01:59:43.320 align:start position:0% oh yeah okay whatever gives them 01:59:43.320 --> 01:59:45.270 align:start position:0% oh yeah okay whatever gives them flexibility<01:59:44.040> based<01:59:44.280> on<01:59:44.440> their<01:59:44.560> own<01:59:44.800> needs 01:59:45.270 --> 01:59:45.280 align:start position:0% flexibility based on their own needs 01:59:45.280 --> 01:59:47.870 align:start position:0% flexibility based on their own needs right<01:59:45.639> if<01:59:45.800> they're<01:59:45.920> a<01:59:46.159> district<01:59:46.599> that<01:59:47.599> only 01:59:47.870 --> 01:59:47.880 align:start position:0% right if they're a district that only 01:59:47.880 --> 01:59:50.990 align:start position:0% right if they're a district that only gets<01:59:48.199> one<01:59:48.560> book<01:59:48.880> like<01:59:49.119> Salt<01:59:49.440> Lake<01:59:50.000> has<01:59:50.239> had<01:59:50.719> so 01:59:50.990 --> 01:59:51.000 align:start position:0% gets one book like Salt Lake has had so 01:59:51.000 --> 01:59:53.390 align:start position:0% gets one book like Salt Lake has had so few<01:59:51.280> books<01:59:52.159> brought<01:59:52.440> forward<01:59:52.800> for<01:59:53.040> review 01:59:53.390 --> 01:59:53.400 align:start position:0% few books brought forward for review 01:59:53.400 --> 01:59:54.990 align:start position:0% few books brought forward for review that<01:59:53.520> it's<01:59:53.679> not<01:59:53.840> a<01:59:53.960> huge<01:59:54.280> time<01:59:54.440> and<01:59:54.639> resource 01:59:54.990 --> 01:59:55.000 align:start position:0% that it's not a huge time and resource 01:59:55.000 --> 01:59:57.149 align:start position:0% that it's not a huge time and resource for<01:59:55.239> them<01:59:56.079> then<01:59:56.280> they<01:59:56.400> should<01:59:56.719> maybe<01:59:56.960> only 01:59:57.149 --> 01:59:57.159 align:start position:0% for them then they should maybe only 01:59:57.159 --> 01:59:59.229 align:start position:0% for them then they should maybe only have<01:59:57.320> two<01:59:57.520> or<01:59:57.679> they<01:59:57.800> are<01:59:58.199> happy<01:59:58.520> having<01:59:58.840> five 01:59:59.229 --> 01:59:59.239 align:start position:0% have two or they are happy having five 01:59:59.239 --> 02:00:01.470 align:start position:0% have two or they are happy having five just<01:59:59.360> to<01:59:59.520> be<01:59:59.679> safe<02:00:00.520> so<02:00:00.760> whatever<02:00:01.119> is<02:00:01.239> going<02:00:01.360> to 02:00:01.470 --> 02:00:01.480 align:start position:0% just to be safe so whatever is going to 02:00:01.480 --> 02:00:03.229 align:start position:0% just to be safe so whatever is going to give<02:00:01.599> them<02:00:01.760> the<02:00:01.880> most<02:00:02.079> flexibility<02:00:02.800> I<02:00:02.920> think 02:00:03.229 --> 02:00:03.239 align:start position:0% give them the most flexibility I think 02:00:03.239 --> 02:00:04.750 align:start position:0% give them the most flexibility I think but<02:00:03.440> definitely<02:00:03.760> the<02:00:03.880> minimum<02:00:04.239> of<02:00:04.400> two<02:00:04.679> I 02:00:04.750 --> 02:00:04.760 align:start position:0% but definitely the minimum of two I 02:00:04.760 --> 02:00:08.149 align:start position:0% but definitely the minimum of two I think<02:00:04.960> is<02:00:05.760> is<02:00:06.000> important<02:00:06.520> there<02:00:07.480> I<02:00:07.639> think<02:00:08.000> that 02:00:08.149 --> 02:00:08.159 align:start position:0% think is is important there I think that 02:00:08.159 --> 02:00:10.669 align:start position:0% think is is important there I think that looks<02:00:08.480> great<02:00:08.760> reviewed<02:00:09.280> by<02:00:09.560> at<02:00:09.719> least<02:00:10.079> two<02:00:10.560> and 02:00:10.669 --> 02:00:10.679 align:start position:0% looks great reviewed by at least two and 02:00:10.679 --> 02:00:12.950 align:start position:0% looks great reviewed by at least two and then<02:00:10.880> they<02:00:11.000> can<02:00:11.840> go<02:00:12.079> upwards<02:00:12.440> from<02:00:12.679> there<02:00:12.840> if 02:00:12.950 --> 02:00:12.960 align:start position:0% then they can go upwards from there if 02:00:12.960 --> 02:00:15.390 align:start position:0% then they can go upwards from there if they<02:00:13.079> feel<02:00:13.320> the<02:00:13.440> need<02:00:14.159> but<02:00:14.360> I<02:00:14.679> really 02:00:15.390 --> 02:00:15.400 align:start position:0% they feel the need but I really 02:00:15.400 --> 02:00:17.870 align:start position:0% they feel the need but I really appreciate<02:00:16.400> the<02:00:16.599> fact<02:00:16.840> that<02:00:17.040> the<02:00:17.239> librarian 02:00:17.870 --> 02:00:17.880 align:start position:0% appreciate the fact that the librarian 02:00:17.880 --> 02:00:20.030 align:start position:0% appreciate the fact that the librarian doesn't<02:00:18.159> have<02:00:18.280> to<02:00:18.400> feel<02:00:18.760> it's<02:00:18.920> me<02:00:19.159> against<02:00:19.440> the 02:00:20.030 --> 02:00:20.040 align:start position:0% doesn't have to feel it's me against the 02:00:20.040 --> 02:00:22.910 align:start position:0% doesn't have to feel it's me against the world<02:00:21.040> without<02:00:21.360> any 02:00:22.910 --> 02:00:22.920 align:start position:0% world without any 02:00:22.920 --> 02:00:26.709 align:start position:0% world without any other<02:00:23.520> people<02:00:23.920> to<02:00:24.920> commiserate<02:00:25.599> with<02:00:25.840> and<02:00:26.520> and 02:00:26.709 --> 02:00:26.719 align:start position:0% other people to commiserate with and and 02:00:26.719 --> 02:00:30.229 align:start position:0% other people to commiserate with and and discuss<02:00:27.239> with<02:00:27.440> and<02:00:28.360> and<02:00:28.840> uh<02:00:29.560> go<02:00:29.760> through<02:00:30.000> the 02:00:30.229 --> 02:00:30.239 align:start position:0% discuss with and and uh go through the 02:00:30.239 --> 02:00:33.430 align:start position:0% discuss with and and uh go through the review<02:00:30.960> process<02:00:31.960> that's<02:00:32.239> good<02:00:32.639> let's<02:00:32.960> let's 02:00:33.430 --> 02:00:33.440 align:start position:0% review process that's good let's let's 02:00:33.440 --> 02:00:37.030 align:start position:0% review process that's good let's let's uh 02:00:37.030 --> 02:00:37.040 align:start position:0% 02:00:37.040 --> 02:00:39.470 align:start position:0% continue<02:00:38.040> so<02:00:38.239> that's<02:00:38.400> the<02:00:38.560> initial<02:00:39.000> review 02:00:39.470 --> 02:00:39.480 align:start position:0% continue so that's the initial review 02:00:39.480 --> 02:00:42.950 align:start position:0% continue so that's the initial review we're<02:00:39.679> now<02:00:39.880> ready<02:00:40.079> to<02:00:40.199> look<02:00:40.360> at<02:00:40.599> the<02:00:41.320> full 02:00:42.950 --> 02:00:42.960 align:start position:0% we're now ready to look at the full 02:00:42.960 --> 02:00:46.189 align:start position:0% we're now ready to look at the full review<02:00:43.960> okay<02:00:44.679> so<02:00:44.880> under<02:00:45.119> the<02:00:45.239> full 02:00:46.189 --> 02:00:46.199 align:start position:0% review okay so under the full 02:00:46.199 --> 02:00:48.430 align:start position:0% review okay so under the full review<02:00:47.199> keep<02:00:47.400> in<02:00:47.560> mind<02:00:47.800> it<02:00:47.960> goes<02:00:48.119> to<02:00:48.320> the 02:00:48.430 --> 02:00:48.440 align:start position:0% review keep in mind it goes to the 02:00:48.440 --> 02:00:49.750 align:start position:0% review keep in mind it goes to the through<02:00:48.639> the<02:00:48.840> objective<02:00:49.320> sensitive 02:00:49.750 --> 02:00:49.760 align:start position:0% through the objective sensitive 02:00:49.760 --> 02:00:52.910 align:start position:0% through the objective sensitive materials<02:00:50.280> review<02:00:50.719> first<02:00:51.599> right<02:00:52.000> so<02:00:52.199> just 02:00:52.910 --> 02:00:52.920 align:start position:0% materials review first right so just 02:00:52.920 --> 02:00:54.709 align:start position:0% materials review first right so just that's<02:00:53.079> what<02:00:53.199> you<02:00:53.280> got<02:00:53.360> to<02:00:53.480> have<02:00:53.599> in<02:00:53.719> mind<02:00:54.520> so 02:00:54.709 --> 02:00:54.719 align:start position:0% that's what you got to have in mind so 02:00:54.719 --> 02:00:57.470 align:start position:0% that's what you got to have in mind so under<02:00:55.040> this<02:00:56.040> um<02:00:56.159> determine<02:00:56.639> a<02:00:56.800> transparent 02:00:57.470 --> 02:00:57.480 align:start position:0% under this um determine a transparent 02:00:57.480 --> 02:00:59.149 align:start position:0% under this um determine a transparent process<02:00:57.880> including<02:00:58.239> a<02:00:58.440> time<02:00:58.679> frame<02:00:58.880> for 02:00:59.149 --> 02:00:59.159 align:start position:0% process including a time frame for 02:00:59.159 --> 02:01:01.629 align:start position:0% process including a time frame for evaluating<02:00:59.679> the<02:00:59.960> allegation<02:01:00.960> selection 02:01:01.629 --> 02:01:01.639 align:start position:0% evaluating the allegation selection 02:01:01.639 --> 02:01:03.910 align:start position:0% evaluating the allegation selection process<02:01:02.079> structure<02:01:02.560> and<02:01:02.840> documentation<02:01:03.679> for 02:01:03.910 --> 02:01:03.920 align:start position:0% process structure and documentation for 02:01:03.920 --> 02:01:04.709 align:start position:0% process structure and documentation for the 02:01:04.709 --> 02:01:04.719 align:start position:0% the 02:01:04.719 --> 02:01:07.350 align:start position:0% the review<02:01:05.719> and<02:01:05.840> I<02:01:06.000> spoke<02:01:06.239> with<02:01:06.440> Emily<02:01:06.880> yesterday 02:01:07.350 --> 02:01:07.360 align:start position:0% review and I spoke with Emily yesterday 02:01:07.360 --> 02:01:08.629 align:start position:0% review and I spoke with Emily yesterday I<02:01:07.440> don't<02:01:07.560> know<02:01:07.679> if<02:01:07.760> she<02:01:08.000> has<02:01:08.239> different 02:01:08.629 --> 02:01:08.639 align:start position:0% I don't know if she has different 02:01:08.639 --> 02:01:11.350 align:start position:0% I don't know if she has different language<02:01:09.239> but<02:01:10.199> also<02:01:10.440> want<02:01:10.560> to<02:01:10.760> make<02:01:10.880> sure<02:01:11.159> that 02:01:11.350 --> 02:01:11.360 align:start position:0% language but also want to make sure that 02:01:11.360 --> 02:01:14.390 align:start position:0% language but also want to make sure that these<02:01:12.040> individuals<02:01:13.040> have<02:01:13.560> training<02:01:14.119> on<02:01:14.280> the 02:01:14.390 --> 02:01:14.400 align:start position:0% these individuals have training on the 02:01:14.400 --> 02:01:16.030 align:start position:0% these individuals have training on the current<02:01:14.719> legal<02:01:15.040> requirements<02:01:15.560> so<02:01:15.719> it's<02:01:15.840> not 02:01:16.030 --> 02:01:16.040 align:start position:0% current legal requirements so it's not 02:01:16.040 --> 02:01:18.390 align:start position:0% current legal requirements so it's not just<02:01:16.199> here<02:01:16.400> if<02:01:16.520> you're<02:01:16.840> coming<02:01:17.079> to<02:01:17.280> here<02:01:18.280> you 02:01:18.390 --> 02:01:18.400 align:start position:0% just here if you're coming to here you 02:01:18.400 --> 02:01:19.589 align:start position:0% just here if you're coming to here you know<02:01:18.520> what<02:01:18.599> I<02:01:18.639> mean<02:01:18.800> come<02:01:18.880> and<02:01:19.000> do<02:01:19.239> this<02:01:19.480> and 02:01:19.589 --> 02:01:19.599 align:start position:0% know what I mean come and do this and 02:01:19.599 --> 02:01:21.310 align:start position:0% know what I mean come and do this and then<02:01:19.800> it's<02:01:20.000> not<02:01:20.639> here's<02:01:20.880> the<02:01:21.040> legal 02:01:21.310 --> 02:01:21.320 align:start position:0% then it's not here's the legal 02:01:21.320 --> 02:01:22.990 align:start position:0% then it's not here's the legal requirements<02:01:22.040> maybe<02:01:22.280> most<02:01:22.480> districts<02:01:22.840> are 02:01:22.990 --> 02:01:23.000 align:start position:0% requirements maybe most districts are 02:01:23.000 --> 02:01:25.229 align:start position:0% requirements maybe most districts are doing<02:01:23.320> that<02:01:23.880> but<02:01:24.079> I<02:01:24.239> think<02:01:24.560> in<02:01:24.719> spilling<02:01:25.119> that 02:01:25.229 --> 02:01:25.239 align:start position:0% doing that but I think in spilling that 02:01:25.239 --> 02:01:27.830 align:start position:0% doing that but I think in spilling that out<02:01:25.440> I<02:01:25.520> don't<02:01:25.760> think<02:01:26.239> we<02:01:27.239> uh<02:01:27.360> that<02:01:27.520> there's 02:01:27.830 --> 02:01:27.840 align:start position:0% out I don't think we uh that there's 02:01:27.840 --> 02:01:29.430 align:start position:0% out I don't think we uh that there's harm<02:01:28.079> in<02:01:28.199> that<02:01:28.360> to<02:01:28.520> just<02:01:28.679> make<02:01:28.840> sure<02:01:29.040> that<02:01:29.199> that 02:01:29.430 --> 02:01:29.440 align:start position:0% harm in that to just make sure that that 02:01:29.440 --> 02:01:30.950 align:start position:0% harm in that to just make sure that that and<02:01:29.520> maybe<02:01:29.719> that's<02:01:29.960> part<02:01:30.119> of<02:01:30.199> the 02:01:30.950 --> 02:01:30.960 align:start position:0% and maybe that's part of the 02:01:30.960 --> 02:01:33.990 align:start position:0% and maybe that's part of the structure<02:01:31.960> but<02:01:32.199> that<02:01:32.360> they're<02:01:32.639> just<02:01:33.159> um 02:01:33.990 --> 02:01:34.000 align:start position:0% structure but that they're just um 02:01:34.000 --> 02:01:35.870 align:start position:0% structure but that they're just um receive<02:01:34.520> training<02:01:34.880> on<02:01:35.040> the<02:01:35.199> current<02:01:35.520> legal 02:01:35.870 --> 02:01:35.880 align:start position:0% receive training on the current legal 02:01:35.880 --> 02:01:37.669 align:start position:0% receive training on the current legal requirements<02:01:36.400> so<02:01:36.520> I'd<02:01:36.719> add<02:01:36.920> that<02:01:37.079> in<02:01:37.360> Emily 02:01:37.669 --> 02:01:37.679 align:start position:0% requirements so I'd add that in Emily 02:01:37.679 --> 02:01:39.390 align:start position:0% requirements so I'd add that in Emily did<02:01:37.880> you<02:01:38.000> have<02:01:38.119> a<02:01:38.280> different<02:01:38.560> language<02:01:39.000> maybe 02:01:39.390 --> 02:01:39.400 align:start position:0% did you have a different language maybe 02:01:39.400 --> 02:01:40.629 align:start position:0% did you have a different language maybe or<02:01:39.560> is<02:01:39.840> that 02:01:40.629 --> 02:01:40.639 align:start position:0% or is that 02:01:40.639 --> 02:01:43.589 align:start position:0% or is that work<02:01:41.639> uh<02:01:41.840> no<02:01:42.239> that<02:01:42.560> that<02:01:42.679> was<02:01:42.880> my<02:01:43.079> concern<02:01:43.480> and 02:01:43.589 --> 02:01:43.599 align:start position:0% work uh no that that was my concern and 02:01:43.599 --> 02:01:47.669 align:start position:0% work uh no that that was my concern and I<02:01:43.760> just<02:01:43.960> thought<02:01:44.239> that<02:01:44.960> it<02:01:45.400> would<02:01:46.400> add 02:01:47.669 --> 02:01:47.679 align:start position:0% I just thought that it would add 02:01:47.679 --> 02:01:52.229 align:start position:0% I just thought that it would add a<02:01:48.679> a<02:01:48.920> level<02:01:49.280> of<02:01:50.000> quality<02:01:50.520> that 02:01:52.229 --> 02:01:52.239 align:start position:0% a a level of quality that 02:01:52.239 --> 02:01:54.629 align:start position:0% a a level of quality that everybody<02:01:53.239> that's<02:01:53.639> involved<02:01:54.119> with<02:01:54.320> this 02:01:54.629 --> 02:01:54.639 align:start position:0% everybody that's involved with this 02:01:54.639 --> 02:01:57.270 align:start position:0% everybody that's involved with this process<02:01:55.320> kind<02:01:55.440> of<02:01:55.599> like<02:01:55.719> a<02:01:56.119> standard<02:01:57.119> yeah 02:01:57.270 --> 02:01:57.280 align:start position:0% process kind of like a standard yeah 02:01:57.280 --> 02:02:00.910 align:start position:0% process kind of like a standard yeah they<02:01:57.840> understand<02:01:58.400> and<02:01:58.480> it<02:01:58.639> makes<02:01:58.840> it<02:01:59.599> in<02:01:59.920> my 02:02:00.910 --> 02:02:00.920 align:start position:0% they understand and it makes it in my 02:02:00.920 --> 02:02:03.870 align:start position:0% they understand and it makes it in my opinion<02:02:01.320> it<02:02:01.520> makes<02:02:01.960> things<02:02:02.960> uh<02:02:03.079> more 02:02:03.870 --> 02:02:03.880 align:start position:0% opinion it makes things uh more 02:02:03.880 --> 02:02:06.310 align:start position:0% opinion it makes things uh more efficient<02:02:04.880> because<02:02:05.280> they've<02:02:05.480> done<02:02:05.840> that 02:02:06.310 --> 02:02:06.320 align:start position:0% efficient because they've done that 02:02:06.320 --> 02:02:07.709 align:start position:0% efficient because they've done that training 02:02:07.709 --> 02:02:07.719 align:start position:0% training 02:02:07.719 --> 02:02:12.790 align:start position:0% training before<02:02:08.719> they<02:02:09.520> they<02:02:09.719> start<02:02:10.679> um<02:02:11.560> reviewing<02:02:12.560> so 02:02:12.790 --> 02:02:12.800 align:start position:0% before they they start um reviewing so 02:02:12.800 --> 02:02:14.189 align:start position:0% before they they start um reviewing so it's<02:02:12.960> at<02:02:13.079> the<02:02:13.159> front<02:02:13.360> of<02:02:13.480> their<02:02:13.679> mind<02:02:14.040> they 02:02:14.189 --> 02:02:14.199 align:start position:0% it's at the front of their mind they 02:02:14.199 --> 02:02:15.830 align:start position:0% it's at the front of their mind they know<02:02:14.599> they<02:02:14.719> know<02:02:14.920> what<02:02:15.040> the<02:02:15.119> law<02:02:15.400> is<02:02:15.560> they<02:02:15.679> know 02:02:15.830 --> 02:02:15.840 align:start position:0% know they know what the law is they know 02:02:15.840 --> 02:02:18.310 align:start position:0% know they know what the law is they know what<02:02:15.960> they<02:02:16.040> need<02:02:16.159> to<02:02:16.280> be<02:02:16.440> looking<02:02:16.880> for<02:02:17.880> and 02:02:18.310 --> 02:02:18.320 align:start position:0% what they need to be looking for and 02:02:18.320 --> 02:02:21.069 align:start position:0% what they need to be looking for and when<02:02:18.560> that<02:02:18.960> happens<02:02:19.960> if<02:02:20.159> anything<02:02:20.599> jumps<02:02:20.920> out 02:02:21.069 --> 02:02:21.079 align:start position:0% when that happens if anything jumps out 02:02:21.079 --> 02:02:22.350 align:start position:0% when that happens if anything jumps out of<02:02:21.199> the<02:02:21.400> page 02:02:22.350 --> 02:02:22.360 align:start position:0% of the page 02:02:22.360 --> 02:02:24.629 align:start position:0% of the page they're<02:02:22.599> aware<02:02:22.920> of<02:02:23.079> it<02:02:23.679> I<02:02:23.800> just<02:02:23.960> think<02:02:24.199> it<02:02:24.480> it 02:02:24.629 --> 02:02:24.639 align:start position:0% they're aware of it I just think it it 02:02:24.639 --> 02:02:27.589 align:start position:0% they're aware of it I just think it it makes<02:02:24.960> it<02:02:25.079> gives<02:02:25.760> quality<02:02:26.760> um<02:02:27.079> helps<02:02:27.360> things 02:02:27.589 --> 02:02:27.599 align:start position:0% makes it gives quality um helps things 02:02:27.599 --> 02:02:32.629 align:start position:0% makes it gives quality um helps things be<02:02:27.800> more<02:02:28.199> efficient<02:02:29.639> and<02:02:30.639> for<02:02:31.159> every<02:02:32.159> Library 02:02:32.629 --> 02:02:32.639 align:start position:0% be more efficient and for every Library 02:02:32.639 --> 02:02:35.990 align:start position:0% be more efficient and for every Library throughout<02:02:32.920> the<02:02:33.000> state<02:02:33.159> of<02:02:33.280> Utah<02:02:34.119> they<02:02:34.560> they 02:02:35.990 --> 02:02:36.000 align:start position:0% throughout the state of Utah they they 02:02:36.000 --> 02:02:39.550 align:start position:0% throughout the state of Utah they they understand<02:02:37.000> um<02:02:37.599> what<02:02:37.760> it<02:02:38.000> is<02:02:38.440> that<02:02:39.040> is<02:02:39.440> is 02:02:39.550 --> 02:02:39.560 align:start position:0% understand um what it is that is is 02:02:39.560 --> 02:02:40.910 align:start position:0% understand um what it is that is is needed<02:02:39.880> and<02:02:40.119> required<02:02:40.480> and<02:02:40.639> what<02:02:40.760> they're 02:02:40.910 --> 02:02:40.920 align:start position:0% needed and required and what they're 02:02:40.920 --> 02:02:43.229 align:start position:0% needed and required and what they're looking<02:02:41.239> for<02:02:41.840> so<02:02:42.280> yeah<02:02:42.599> I<02:02:42.679> would<02:02:42.840> love<02:02:43.040> if<02:02:43.119> we 02:02:43.229 --> 02:02:43.239 align:start position:0% looking for so yeah I would love if we 02:02:43.239 --> 02:02:45.910 align:start position:0% looking for so yeah I would love if we could<02:02:43.400> add<02:02:43.560> that<02:02:43.840> so<02:02:44.000> after<02:02:44.599> structure<02:02:45.599> if<02:02:45.719> we 02:02:45.910 --> 02:02:45.920 align:start position:0% could add that so after structure if we 02:02:45.920 --> 02:02:47.950 align:start position:0% could add that so after structure if we could<02:02:46.119> add<02:02:46.400> training<02:02:46.840> on<02:02:47.000> the<02:02:47.159> current<02:02:47.520> legal 02:02:47.950 --> 02:02:47.960 align:start position:0% could add training on the current legal 02:02:47.960 --> 02:02:59.750 align:start position:0% could add training on the current legal requirement 02:02:59.750 --> 02:02:59.760 align:start position:0% 02:02:59.760 --> 02:03:04.390 align:start position:0% okay<02:03:00.760> and<02:03:00.960> then<02:03:01.599> designate<02:03:02.360> an<02:03:02.840> laa<02:03:03.840> contact 02:03:04.390 --> 02:03:04.400 align:start position:0% okay and then designate an laa contact 02:03:04.400 --> 02:03:06.149 align:start position:0% okay and then designate an laa contact person<02:03:04.719> for<02:03:04.920> reporting<02:03:05.320> and<02:03:05.520> corresponding 02:03:06.149 --> 02:03:06.159 align:start position:0% person for reporting and corresponding 02:03:06.159 --> 02:03:07.910 align:start position:0% person for reporting and corresponding with<02:03:06.320> the<02:03:06.480> State<02:03:06.800> Library<02:03:07.280> specialist<02:03:07.840> I 02:03:07.910 --> 02:03:07.920 align:start position:0% with the State Library specialist I 02:03:07.920 --> 02:03:09.310 align:start position:0% with the State Library specialist I didn't<02:03:08.119> know<02:03:08.239> if<02:03:08.360> we<02:03:08.560> wanted<02:03:08.800> to<02:03:08.960> spell<02:03:09.199> out 02:03:09.310 --> 02:03:09.320 align:start position:0% didn't know if we wanted to spell out 02:03:09.320 --> 02:03:11.310 align:start position:0% didn't know if we wanted to spell out Library<02:03:09.679> specialist<02:03:10.119> we<02:03:10.360> put 02:03:11.310 --> 02:03:11.320 align:start position:0% Library specialist we put 02:03:11.320 --> 02:03:13.030 align:start position:0% Library specialist we put superintendent<02:03:12.320> but<02:03:12.440> where<02:03:12.639> this<02:03:12.760> is 02:03:13.030 --> 02:03:13.040 align:start position:0% superintendent but where this is 02:03:13.040 --> 02:03:14.430 align:start position:0% superintendent but where this is guidance<02:03:13.440> it<02:03:13.520> would<02:03:13.679> be<02:03:13.800> coming<02:03:14.079> from<02:03:14.239> our 02:03:14.430 --> 02:03:14.440 align:start position:0% guidance it would be coming from our 02:03:14.440 --> 02:03:16.629 align:start position:0% guidance it would be coming from our library<02:03:14.880> specialist<02:03:15.719> deina<02:03:16.079> do<02:03:16.199> you<02:03:16.440> I<02:03:16.480> don't 02:03:16.629 --> 02:03:16.639 align:start position:0% library specialist deina do you I don't 02:03:16.639 --> 02:03:19.470 align:start position:0% library specialist deina do you I don't know<02:03:16.920> or<02:03:17.079> Michelle<02:03:17.599> someone<02:03:17.920> have<02:03:18.159> a<02:03:19.159> it<02:03:19.280> needs 02:03:19.470 --> 02:03:19.480 align:start position:0% know or Michelle someone have a it needs 02:03:19.480 --> 02:03:25.069 align:start position:0% know or Michelle someone have a it needs to<02:03:19.599> be<02:03:19.800> this<02:03:19.960> language<02:03:20.360> on<02:03:20.599> that<02:03:20.719> one 02:03:25.069 --> 02:03:25.079 align:start position:0% 02:03:25.079 --> 02:03:26.950 align:start position:0% I<02:03:25.159> don't<02:03:25.400> have<02:03:25.599> any<02:03:25.880> guidance<02:03:26.239> on<02:03:26.520> that<02:03:26.639> one<02:03:26.880> I 02:03:26.950 --> 02:03:26.960 align:start position:0% I don't have any guidance on that one I 02:03:26.960 --> 02:03:28.910 align:start position:0% I don't have any guidance on that one I think<02:03:27.159> it's<02:03:27.440> fine<02:03:27.599> to<02:03:27.760> say<02:03:27.960> the<02:03:28.119> State<02:03:28.360> Library 02:03:28.910 --> 02:03:28.920 align:start position:0% think it's fine to say the State Library 02:03:28.920 --> 02:03:31.350 align:start position:0% think it's fine to say the State Library specialist<02:03:29.520> even<02:03:29.840> though<02:03:30.000> the<02:03:30.079> rule<02:03:30.440> says 02:03:31.350 --> 02:03:31.360 align:start position:0% specialist even though the rule says 02:03:31.360 --> 02:03:32.990 align:start position:0% specialist even though the rule says superintendent<02:03:32.320> because<02:03:32.560> it's<02:03:32.800> just 02:03:32.990 --> 02:03:33.000 align:start position:0% superintendent because it's just 02:03:33.000 --> 02:03:37.229 align:start position:0% superintendent because it's just drilling<02:03:33.520> down<02:03:33.800> in<02:03:33.960> the<02:03:34.440> guidance<02:03:35.440> okay<02:03:36.440> okay 02:03:37.229 --> 02:03:37.239 align:start position:0% drilling down in the guidance okay okay 02:03:37.239 --> 02:03:39.149 align:start position:0% drilling down in the guidance okay okay and<02:03:37.360> I<02:03:37.480> was<02:03:37.639> just<02:03:37.840> going<02:03:37.960> to<02:03:38.079> say<02:03:38.320> my<02:03:38.639> title<02:03:38.960> is 02:03:39.149 --> 02:03:39.159 align:start position:0% and I was just going to say my title is 02:03:39.159 --> 02:03:41.030 align:start position:0% and I was just going to say my title is library<02:03:39.639> media<02:03:40.040> specialist<02:03:40.639> but<02:03:40.800> I<02:03:40.880> don't 02:03:41.030 --> 02:03:41.040 align:start position:0% library media specialist but I don't 02:03:41.040 --> 02:03:43.750 align:start position:0% library media specialist but I don't think<02:03:41.199> it<02:03:41.360> matters<02:03:41.840> but<02:03:42.079> just<02:03:42.880> if<02:03:43.159> if<02:03:43.280> it<02:03:43.559> if<02:03:43.679> it 02:03:43.750 --> 02:03:43.760 align:start position:0% think it matters but just if if it if it 02:03:43.760 --> 02:03:45.870 align:start position:0% think it matters but just if if it if it does<02:03:44.119> yeah<02:03:44.239> we<02:03:44.360> can<02:03:44.679> put<02:03:44.840> that 02:03:45.870 --> 02:03:45.880 align:start position:0% does yeah we can put that 02:03:45.880 --> 02:03:50.390 align:start position:0% does yeah we can put that in<02:03:46.880> good<02:03:47.079> okay<02:03:47.920> and<02:03:48.079> then<02:03:48.239> the<02:03:48.400> next<02:03:48.639> one<02:03:49.400> and 02:03:50.390 --> 02:03:50.400 align:start position:0% in good okay and then the next one and 02:03:50.400 --> 02:03:52.709 align:start position:0% in good okay and then the next one and designate<02:03:50.960> three<02:03:51.159> or<02:03:51.280> more<02:03:51.800> members 02:03:52.709 --> 02:03:52.719 align:start position:0% designate three or more members 02:03:52.719 --> 02:03:55.350 align:start position:0% designate three or more members including<02:03:53.280> one<02:03:53.760> parent<02:03:54.239> and<02:03:54.440> may<02:03:54.679> include<02:03:55.079> the 02:03:55.350 --> 02:03:55.360 align:start position:0% including one parent and may include the 02:03:55.360 --> 02:03:58.069 align:start position:0% including one parent and may include the design<02:03:56.360> designes<02:03:57.079> from<02:03:57.280> the<02:03:57.400> initial<02:03:57.760> review 02:03:58.069 --> 02:03:58.079 align:start position:0% design designes from the initial review 02:03:58.079 --> 02:03:59.790 align:start position:0% design designes from the initial review for<02:03:58.239> the<02:03:58.400> objective<02:03:58.800> sensitive<02:03:59.280> materials 02:03:59.790 --> 02:03:59.800 align:start position:0% for the objective sensitive materials 02:03:59.800 --> 02:04:02.189 align:start position:0% for the objective sensitive materials review<02:04:00.760> using<02:04:01.119> the<02:04:01.320> objective<02:04:01.719> sensitive 02:04:02.189 --> 02:04:02.199 align:start position:0% review using the objective sensitive 02:04:02.199 --> 02:04:04.149 align:start position:0% review using the objective sensitive material<02:04:02.679> standards<02:04:03.520> now<02:04:03.679> maybe<02:04:03.880> you<02:04:04.000> guys 02:04:04.149 --> 02:04:04.159 align:start position:0% material standards now maybe you guys 02:04:04.159 --> 02:04:05.790 align:start position:0% material standards now maybe you guys can<02:04:04.280> figure<02:04:04.559> way<02:04:04.679> to<02:04:04.920> write 02:04:05.790 --> 02:04:05.800 align:start position:0% can figure way to write 02:04:05.800 --> 02:04:08.750 align:start position:0% can figure way to write that<02:04:06.800> non-repetitive<02:04:07.599> there<02:04:07.760> but<02:04:08.000> I<02:04:08.280> it<02:04:08.440> it<02:04:08.559> is 02:04:08.750 --> 02:04:08.760 align:start position:0% that non-repetitive there but I it it is 02:04:08.760 --> 02:04:10.830 align:start position:0% that non-repetitive there but I it it is the<02:04:09.000> objective<02:04:09.480> sensitive<02:04:09.920> materials<02:04:10.360> review 02:04:10.830 --> 02:04:10.840 align:start position:0% the objective sensitive materials review 02:04:10.840 --> 02:04:12.229 align:start position:0% the objective sensitive materials review and<02:04:10.960> you<02:04:11.079> have<02:04:11.199> to<02:04:11.280> use<02:04:11.520> the<02:04:11.679> standard<02:04:12.000> and<02:04:12.159> the 02:04:12.229 --> 02:04:12.239 align:start position:0% and you have to use the standard and the 02:04:12.239 --> 02:04:14.950 align:start position:0% and you have to use the standard and the standard<02:04:12.559> is<02:04:12.679> just<02:04:12.840> listed<02:04:13.559> there<02:04:14.559> um<02:04:14.719> just 02:04:14.950 --> 02:04:14.960 align:start position:0% standard is just listed there um just 02:04:14.960 --> 02:04:17.830 align:start position:0% standard is just listed there um just calling<02:04:15.360> out<02:04:16.360> you<02:04:16.520> can<02:04:16.719> use<02:04:17.040> and<02:04:17.280> I<02:04:17.559> I<02:04:17.639> heard 02:04:17.830 --> 02:04:17.840 align:start position:0% calling out you can use and I I heard 02:04:17.840 --> 02:04:19.229 align:start position:0% calling out you can use and I I heard this<02:04:17.960> when<02:04:18.079> I<02:04:18.159> reached<02:04:18.360> out<02:04:18.480> to<02:04:18.639> a<02:04:18.719> few<02:04:18.920> people 02:04:19.229 --> 02:04:19.239 align:start position:0% this when I reached out to a few people 02:04:19.239 --> 02:04:20.830 align:start position:0% this when I reached out to a few people that<02:04:19.760> if<02:04:19.880> we're<02:04:20.000> going<02:04:20.119> to<02:04:20.239> have<02:04:20.320> an<02:04:20.480> initial 02:04:20.830 --> 02:04:20.840 align:start position:0% that if we're going to have an initial 02:04:20.840 --> 02:04:22.629 align:start position:0% that if we're going to have an initial review<02:04:21.320> that 02:04:22.629 --> 02:04:22.639 align:start position:0% review that 02:04:22.639 --> 02:04:26.149 align:start position:0% review that it<02:04:23.639> just<02:04:23.840> that<02:04:24.040> for<02:04:24.199> the<02:04:24.360> resources<02:04:25.159> purpose 02:04:26.149 --> 02:04:26.159 align:start position:0% it just that for the resources purpose 02:04:26.159 --> 02:04:27.750 align:start position:0% it just that for the resources purpose you<02:04:26.280> know<02:04:26.480> making<02:04:26.719> sure<02:04:26.920> there's<02:04:27.119> at<02:04:27.239> least<02:04:27.559> a 02:04:27.750 --> 02:04:27.760 align:start position:0% you know making sure there's at least a 02:04:27.760 --> 02:04:31.030 align:start position:0% you know making sure there's at least a a<02:04:27.880> parent<02:04:28.239> on<02:04:28.400> this<02:04:28.639> and<02:04:28.880> then<02:04:29.880> um<02:04:30.480> it<02:04:30.679> could<02:04:30.840> be 02:04:31.030 --> 02:04:31.040 align:start position:0% a parent on this and then um it could be 02:04:31.040 --> 02:04:33.229 align:start position:0% a parent on this and then um it could be the<02:04:31.199> two<02:04:31.760> employees<02:04:32.360> or<02:04:32.480> it<02:04:32.599> could<02:04:32.719> be<02:04:32.880> two<02:04:33.040> new 02:04:33.229 --> 02:04:33.239 align:start position:0% the two employees or it could be two new 02:04:33.239 --> 02:04:35.430 align:start position:0% the two employees or it could be two new ones<02:04:33.599> the<02:04:33.760> district<02:04:34.079> can<02:04:34.719> decide<02:04:35.000> on<02:04:35.159> that<02:04:35.320> so 02:04:35.430 --> 02:04:35.440 align:start position:0% ones the district can decide on that so 02:04:35.440 --> 02:04:37.149 align:start position:0% ones the district can decide on that so we're<02:04:35.599> not<02:04:35.760> stretching<02:04:36.280> resources<02:04:36.840> in<02:04:37.000> some 02:04:37.149 --> 02:04:37.159 align:start position:0% we're not stretching resources in some 02:04:37.159 --> 02:04:39.470 align:start position:0% we're not stretching resources in some of<02:04:37.280> our<02:04:37.440> smaller<02:04:38.440> eleas<02:04:39.040> to<02:04:39.199> where<02:04:39.320> they're 02:04:39.470 --> 02:04:39.480 align:start position:0% of our smaller eleas to where they're 02:04:39.480 --> 02:04:40.589 align:start position:0% of our smaller eleas to where they're having<02:04:39.679> to<02:04:39.800> come<02:04:39.920> up<02:04:40.079> with<02:04:40.199> all<02:04:40.360> these 02:04:40.589 --> 02:04:40.599 align:start position:0% having to come up with all these 02:04:40.599 --> 02:04:45.549 align:start position:0% having to come up with all these different<02:04:41.320> um<02:04:42.320> groups 02:04:45.549 --> 02:04:45.559 align:start position:0% 02:04:45.559 --> 02:04:48.109 align:start position:0% so<02:04:46.559> any 02:04:48.109 --> 02:04:48.119 align:start position:0% so any 02:04:48.119 --> 02:04:53.350 align:start position:0% so any any<02:04:49.119> okay<02:04:50.320> um<02:04:51.320> and<02:04:51.480> then<02:04:51.800> on<02:04:52.040> the<02:04:52.320> so<02:04:52.960> under<02:04:53.239> the 02:04:53.350 --> 02:04:53.360 align:start position:0% any okay um and then on the so under the 02:04:53.360 --> 02:04:55.069 align:start position:0% any okay um and then on the so under the objective<02:04:53.800> they<02:04:53.920> may<02:04:54.159> use<02:04:54.440> excerpts<02:04:54.920> or 02:04:55.069 --> 02:04:55.079 align:start position:0% objective they may use excerpts or 02:04:55.079 --> 02:04:56.830 align:start position:0% objective they may use excerpts or evidence<02:04:55.480> to<02:04:55.639> support<02:04:56.000> the<02:04:56.159> allegations 02:04:56.830 --> 02:04:56.840 align:start position:0% evidence to support the allegations 02:04:56.840 --> 02:04:58.950 align:start position:0% evidence to support the allegations submitted<02:04:57.239> during<02:04:57.440> the<02:04:57.559> initial 02:04:58.950 --> 02:04:58.960 align:start position:0% submitted during the initial 02:04:58.960 --> 02:05:02.310 align:start position:0% submitted during the initial review<02:04:59.960> um<02:05:00.320> if<02:05:00.480> the<02:05:00.639> instructional<02:05:01.320> material 02:05:02.310 --> 02:05:02.320 align:start position:0% review um if the instructional material 02:05:02.320 --> 02:05:04.310 align:start position:0% review um if the instructional material constitutes<02:05:02.960> objective<02:05:03.360> sensitive<02:05:03.880> material 02:05:04.310 --> 02:05:04.320 align:start position:0% constitutes objective sensitive material 02:05:04.320 --> 02:05:06.910 align:start position:0% constitutes objective sensitive material the<02:05:04.440> review<02:05:04.880> process<02:05:05.320> is<02:05:05.639> completed<02:05:06.639> and<02:05:06.800> the 02:05:06.910 --> 02:05:06.920 align:start position:0% the review process is completed and the 02:05:06.920 --> 02:05:08.870 align:start position:0% the review process is completed and the instructional<02:05:07.360> material<02:05:07.960> is<02:05:08.360> immediately 02:05:08.870 --> 02:05:08.880 align:start position:0% instructional material is immediately 02:05:08.880 --> 02:05:11.390 align:start position:0% instructional material is immediately removed<02:05:09.280> from<02:05:09.480> all<02:05:09.679> School<02:05:10.280> settings<02:05:11.280> and 02:05:11.390 --> 02:05:11.400 align:start position:0% removed from all School settings and 02:05:11.400 --> 02:05:13.270 align:start position:0% removed from all School settings and should<02:05:11.639> that<02:05:11.880> objective<02:05:12.400> sensitive<02:05:12.880> material 02:05:13.270 --> 02:05:13.280 align:start position:0% should that objective sensitive material 02:05:13.280 --> 02:05:17.030 align:start position:0% should that objective sensitive material be<02:05:13.920> uh<02:05:14.520> bolded<02:05:15.119> as<02:05:15.280> we<02:05:15.440> did<02:05:15.760> earlier<02:05:16.159> in<02:05:16.280> the 02:05:17.030 --> 02:05:17.040 align:start position:0% be uh bolded as we did earlier in the 02:05:17.040 --> 02:05:19.149 align:start position:0% be uh bolded as we did earlier in the document<02:05:18.040> yeah<02:05:18.280> probably<02:05:18.559> anywhere<02:05:18.920> we<02:05:19.040> have 02:05:19.149 --> 02:05:19.159 align:start position:0% document yeah probably anywhere we have 02:05:19.159 --> 02:05:28.470 align:start position:0% document yeah probably anywhere we have it<02:05:19.280> in<02:05:19.480> here<02:05:19.639> it<02:05:19.800> probably<02:05:20.040> needs<02:05:20.280> to<02:05:20.400> be<02:05:20.679> that 02:05:28.470 --> 02:05:28.480 align:start position:0% 02:05:28.480 --> 02:05:31.189 align:start position:0% um<02:05:29.480> and<02:05:29.679> then<02:05:29.840> report<02:05:30.239> the<02:05:30.400> outcomes<02:05:30.920> to<02:05:31.079> the 02:05:31.189 --> 02:05:31.199 align:start position:0% um and then report the outcomes to the 02:05:31.199 --> 02:05:32.470 align:start position:0% um and then report the outcomes to the submitter<02:05:31.599> and<02:05:31.719> the 02:05:32.470 --> 02:05:32.480 align:start position:0% submitter and the 02:05:32.480 --> 02:05:35.430 align:start position:0% submitter and the public<02:05:33.480> and<02:05:33.599> then<02:05:33.880> this<02:05:34.040> is<02:05:34.440> this<02:05:34.639> next<02:05:35.000> part 02:05:35.430 --> 02:05:35.440 align:start position:0% public and then this is this next part 02:05:35.440 --> 02:05:36.549 align:start position:0% public and then this is this next part and<02:05:35.559> I<02:05:35.639> know<02:05:35.800> it's<02:05:35.920> going<02:05:36.040> to<02:05:36.159> take<02:05:36.280> us<02:05:36.440> a 02:05:36.549 --> 02:05:36.559 align:start position:0% and I know it's going to take us a 02:05:36.559 --> 02:05:38.229 align:start position:0% and I know it's going to take us a little<02:05:36.840> discussion 02:05:38.229 --> 02:05:38.239 align:start position:0% little discussion 02:05:38.239 --> 02:05:42.069 align:start position:0% little discussion but<02:05:39.239> um<02:05:39.679> I<02:05:39.840> have<02:05:40.000> the<02:05:40.119> Lea<02:05:40.599> design<02:05:41.480> reports<02:05:41.960> the 02:05:42.069 --> 02:05:42.079 align:start position:0% but um I have the Lea design reports the 02:05:42.079 --> 02:05:44.229 align:start position:0% but um I have the Lea design reports the determination<02:05:42.599> to<02:05:43.040> State<02:05:43.320> library<02:05:43.760> media 02:05:44.229 --> 02:05:44.239 align:start position:0% determination to State library media 02:05:44.239 --> 02:05:46.149 align:start position:0% determination to State library media specialist<02:05:44.760> within<02:05:45.480> and<02:05:45.679> I<02:05:45.760> think<02:05:45.880> in<02:05:46.000> our 02:05:46.149 --> 02:05:46.159 align:start position:0% specialist within and I think in our 02:05:46.159 --> 02:05:50.350 align:start position:0% specialist within and I think in our rule<02:05:46.480> we<02:05:46.639> have<02:05:46.920> 10<02:05:47.400> 20<02:05:48.079> days<02:05:49.079> after<02:05:49.520> and<02:05:49.880> and 02:05:50.350 --> 02:05:50.360 align:start position:0% rule we have 10 20 days after and and 02:05:50.360 --> 02:05:51.830 align:start position:0% rule we have 10 20 days after and and okay<02:05:50.520> so<02:05:50.760> here's<02:05:51.000> where<02:05:51.320> I'm<02:05:51.440> going<02:05:51.639> going 02:05:51.830 --> 02:05:51.840 align:start position:0% okay so here's where I'm going going 02:05:51.840 --> 02:05:54.910 align:start position:0% okay so here's where I'm going going with<02:05:51.960> this<02:05:52.119> we<02:05:52.239> may<02:05:52.440> have 02:05:54.910 --> 02:05:54.920 align:start position:0% 02:05:54.920 --> 02:05:57.549 align:start position:0% to<02:05:55.920> the<02:05:56.159> question 02:05:57.549 --> 02:05:57.559 align:start position:0% to the question 02:05:57.559 --> 02:06:01.950 align:start position:0% to the question becomes<02:05:58.559> after<02:05:59.040> the<02:05:59.440> the<02:06:00.559> um<02:06:01.559> what's<02:06:01.800> the 02:06:01.950 --> 02:06:01.960 align:start position:0% becomes after the the um what's the 02:06:01.960 --> 02:06:04.669 align:start position:0% becomes after the the um what's the language<02:06:02.320> in<02:06:02.520> the<02:06:02.920> law<02:06:03.920> sorry<02:06:04.280> I'm<02:06:04.400> looking 02:06:04.669 --> 02:06:04.679 align:start position:0% language in the law sorry I'm looking 02:06:04.679 --> 02:06:06.950 align:start position:0% language in the law sorry I'm looking here<02:06:04.920> a<02:06:05.079> final<02:06:05.520> determination<02:06:06.280> is<02:06:06.480> what<02:06:06.599> it 02:06:06.950 --> 02:06:06.960 align:start position:0% here a final determination is what it 02:06:06.960 --> 02:06:08.069 align:start position:0% here a final determination is what it says<02:06:07.159> in<02:06:07.320> the 02:06:08.069 --> 02:06:08.079 align:start position:0% says in the 02:06:08.079 --> 02:06:11.870 align:start position:0% says in the law<02:06:09.079> it's<02:06:09.320> included<02:06:10.079> after<02:06:10.520> so<02:06:10.719> it's<02:06:10.840> on<02:06:11.159> line 02:06:11.870 --> 02:06:11.880 align:start position:0% law it's included after so it's on line 02:06:11.880 --> 02:06:14.470 align:start position:0% law it's included after so it's on line just<02:06:12.520> so<02:06:12.719> for<02:06:12.920> those<02:06:13.079> of<02:06:13.199> you<02:06:13.280> are<02:06:13.480> following 02:06:14.470 --> 02:06:14.480 align:start position:0% just so for those of you are following 02:06:14.480 --> 02:06:16.390 align:start position:0% just so for those of you are following line 02:06:16.390 --> 02:06:16.400 align:start position:0% line 02:06:16.400 --> 02:06:20.750 align:start position:0% line 146<02:06:17.840> um<02:06:18.840> that's<02:06:19.320> all<02:06:19.679> wrapped<02:06:20.280> together<02:06:20.599> so 02:06:20.750 --> 02:06:20.760 align:start position:0% 146 um that's all wrapped together so 02:06:20.760 --> 02:06:23.109 align:start position:0% 146 um that's all wrapped together so you<02:06:20.960> have<02:06:21.800> it's<02:06:22.040> section 02:06:23.109 --> 02:06:23.119 align:start position:0% you have it's section 02:06:23.119 --> 02:06:26.549 align:start position:0% you have it's section four<02:06:24.119> which<02:06:24.360> has<02:06:24.520> to<02:06:24.719> do<02:06:24.920> with<02:06:25.239> the<02:06:25.559> initial 02:06:26.549 --> 02:06:26.559 align:start position:0% four which has to do with the initial 02:06:26.559 --> 02:06:28.470 align:start position:0% four which has to do with the initial the<02:06:26.760> objective<02:06:27.239> the<02:06:27.440> subjective<02:06:28.040> and<02:06:28.159> then<02:06:28.280> on 02:06:28.470 --> 02:06:28.480 align:start position:0% the objective the subjective and then on 02:06:28.480 --> 02:06:32.629 align:start position:0% the objective the subjective and then on line<02:06:29.159> D<02:06:30.159> or<02:06:30.559> 145<02:06:31.159> 146<02:06:31.599> it<02:06:31.719> says<02:06:31.960> communicate 02:06:32.629 --> 02:06:32.639 align:start position:0% line D or 145 146 it says communicate 02:06:32.639 --> 02:06:35.189 align:start position:0% line D or 145 146 it says communicate the<02:06:33.000> you<02:06:33.119> know<02:06:33.360> the<02:06:33.520> allegation<02:06:34.320> and<02:06:34.520> the<02:06:34.679> Lea 02:06:35.189 --> 02:06:35.199 align:start position:0% the you know the allegation and the Lea 02:06:35.199 --> 02:06:36.990 align:start position:0% the you know the allegation and the Lea final<02:06:35.520> determination<02:06:36.119> regarding<02:06:36.559> the 02:06:36.990 --> 02:06:37.000 align:start position:0% final determination regarding the 02:06:37.000 --> 02:06:38.069 align:start position:0% final determination regarding the allegation<02:06:37.400> and<02:06:37.599> the<02:06:37.679> challenge 02:06:38.069 --> 02:06:38.079 align:start position:0% allegation and the challenge 02:06:38.079 --> 02:06:39.790 align:start position:0% allegation and the challenge instructional 02:06:39.790 --> 02:06:39.800 align:start position:0% instructional 02:06:39.800 --> 02:06:42.990 align:start position:0% instructional material<02:06:40.800> I'm<02:06:41.440> here's<02:06:42.440> and<02:06:42.599> this<02:06:42.679> isn't<02:06:42.920> going 02:06:42.990 --> 02:06:43.000 align:start position:0% material I'm here's and this isn't going 02:06:43.000 --> 02:06:44.390 align:start position:0% material I'm here's and this isn't going to<02:06:43.119> make<02:06:43.320> much<02:06:43.520> sense<02:06:43.760> because<02:06:43.920> my<02:06:44.040> language 02:06:44.390 --> 02:06:44.400 align:start position:0% to make much sense because my language 02:06:44.400 --> 02:06:46.189 align:start position:0% to make much sense because my language here<02:06:44.639> but<02:06:45.040> I'm<02:06:45.199> trying<02:06:45.400> to<02:06:45.559> figure<02:06:45.800> out<02:06:46.040> when 02:06:46.189 --> 02:06:46.199 align:start position:0% here but I'm trying to figure out when 02:06:46.199 --> 02:06:49.390 align:start position:0% here but I'm trying to figure out when do<02:06:46.400> they<02:06:46.639> report<02:06:47.119> to 02:06:49.390 --> 02:06:49.400 align:start position:0% do they report to 02:06:49.400 --> 02:06:52.189 align:start position:0% do they report to us<02:06:50.400> right<02:06:50.679> does<02:06:50.840> it<02:06:51.000> go<02:06:51.159> through<02:06:51.599> appeal<02:06:51.960> after 02:06:52.189 --> 02:06:52.199 align:start position:0% us right does it go through appeal after 02:06:52.199 --> 02:06:54.030 align:start position:0% us right does it go through appeal after appeal<02:06:52.559> after<02:06:52.800> appeal<02:06:53.119> after<02:06:53.360> appeal<02:06:53.760> or<02:06:53.920> is 02:06:54.030 --> 02:06:54.040 align:start position:0% appeal after appeal after appeal or is 02:06:54.040 --> 02:06:56.709 align:start position:0% appeal after appeal after appeal or is it<02:06:54.239> when<02:06:54.520> they<02:06:54.679> finish<02:06:55.360> this<02:06:55.639> initial 02:06:56.709 --> 02:06:56.719 align:start position:0% it when they finish this initial 02:06:56.719 --> 02:06:58.870 align:start position:0% it when they finish this initial process<02:06:57.719> that<02:06:58.000> they<02:06:58.280> that<02:06:58.440> would<02:06:58.599> be<02:06:58.719> the 02:06:58.870 --> 02:06:58.880 align:start position:0% process that they that would be the 02:06:58.880 --> 02:07:01.310 align:start position:0% process that they that would be the final<02:06:59.159> determination<02:06:59.880> so<02:07:00.119> it's<02:07:00.320> sent<02:07:00.639> to<02:07:00.840> us 02:07:01.310 --> 02:07:01.320 align:start position:0% final determination so it's sent to us 02:07:01.320 --> 02:07:04.709 align:start position:0% final determination so it's sent to us an<02:07:01.520> appeal<02:07:01.840> can<02:07:02.000> still<02:07:02.320> take<02:07:02.920> place<02:07:03.920> but<02:07:04.480> is 02:07:04.709 --> 02:07:04.719 align:start position:0% an appeal can still take place but is 02:07:04.719 --> 02:07:06.310 align:start position:0% an appeal can still take place but is this<02:07:04.920> where<02:07:05.159> that<02:07:05.360> final 02:07:06.310 --> 02:07:06.320 align:start position:0% this where that final 02:07:06.320 --> 02:07:10.629 align:start position:0% this where that final determination<02:07:07.320> um<02:07:08.320> is<02:07:09.280> uh<02:07:09.639> recognized<02:07:10.480> if 02:07:10.629 --> 02:07:10.639 align:start position:0% determination um is uh recognized if 02:07:10.639 --> 02:07:12.069 align:start position:0% determination um is uh recognized if that<02:07:10.840> makes 02:07:12.069 --> 02:07:12.079 align:start position:0% that makes 02:07:12.079 --> 02:07:14.470 align:start position:0% that makes sense<02:07:13.079> from<02:07:13.239> a<02:07:13.360> legal<02:07:13.800> perspective<02:07:14.360> they 02:07:14.470 --> 02:07:14.480 align:start position:0% sense from a legal perspective they 02:07:14.480 --> 02:07:16.109 align:start position:0% sense from a legal perspective they wouldn't<02:07:14.719> be<02:07:14.920> reporting<02:07:15.360> it<02:07:15.559> until<02:07:15.840> all<02:07:15.960> of 02:07:16.109 --> 02:07:16.119 align:start position:0% wouldn't be reporting it until all of 02:07:16.119 --> 02:07:18.310 align:start position:0% wouldn't be reporting it until all of their<02:07:16.320> appeals<02:07:16.800> had<02:07:17.079> expired<02:07:17.760> which<02:07:17.920> includes 02:07:18.310 --> 02:07:18.320 align:start position:0% their appeals had expired which includes 02:07:18.320 --> 02:07:20.189 align:start position:0% their appeals had expired which includes the<02:07:18.480> opportunity<02:07:19.079> to<02:07:19.280> appeal<02:07:19.639> if<02:07:19.760> a<02:07:19.920> person 02:07:20.189 --> 02:07:20.199 align:start position:0% the opportunity to appeal if a person 02:07:20.199 --> 02:07:22.149 align:start position:0% the opportunity to appeal if a person chose<02:07:20.559> not<02:07:20.760> to<02:07:21.000> appeal 02:07:22.149 --> 02:07:22.159 align:start position:0% chose not to appeal 02:07:22.159 --> 02:07:24.870 align:start position:0% chose not to appeal so<02:07:22.440> until<02:07:22.880> the<02:07:23.239> the<02:07:23.440> appeals<02:07:24.119> process<02:07:24.599> was 02:07:24.870 --> 02:07:24.880 align:start position:0% so until the the appeals process was 02:07:24.880 --> 02:07:27.430 align:start position:0% so until the the appeals process was completed<02:07:25.639> at<02:07:25.760> the<02:07:26.000> district<02:07:26.520> level<02:07:27.320> they 02:07:27.430 --> 02:07:27.440 align:start position:0% completed at the district level they 02:07:27.440 --> 02:07:29.109 align:start position:0% completed at the district level they wouldn't<02:07:27.719> be<02:07:27.920> reporting<02:07:28.440> it<02:07:28.559> to<02:07:28.719> the<02:07:28.880> State 02:07:29.109 --> 02:07:29.119 align:start position:0% wouldn't be reporting it to the State 02:07:29.119 --> 02:07:31.430 align:start position:0% wouldn't be reporting it to the State Board<02:07:29.360> of<02:07:29.840> Education<02:07:30.840> so<02:07:31.040> then<02:07:31.199> we're<02:07:31.320> going 02:07:31.430 --> 02:07:31.440 align:start position:0% Board of Education so then we're going 02:07:31.440 --> 02:07:33.830 align:start position:0% Board of Education so then we're going to<02:07:31.679> run<02:07:31.880> into<02:07:32.239> problems<02:07:32.559> of<02:07:32.920> just<02:07:33.119> one<02:07:33.480> appeal 02:07:33.830 --> 02:07:33.840 align:start position:0% to run into problems of just one appeal 02:07:33.840 --> 02:07:35.030 align:start position:0% to run into problems of just one appeal after<02:07:34.040> another<02:07:34.360> appeal<02:07:34.639> after<02:07:34.840> another 02:07:35.030 --> 02:07:35.040 align:start position:0% after another appeal after another 02:07:35.040 --> 02:07:36.870 align:start position:0% after another appeal after another appeal<02:07:35.360> because<02:07:35.480> it<02:07:35.639> doesn't<02:07:36.360> they<02:07:36.480> can<02:07:36.639> just 02:07:36.870 --> 02:07:36.880 align:start position:0% appeal because it doesn't they can just 02:07:36.880 --> 02:07:39.549 align:start position:0% appeal because it doesn't they can just continue<02:07:37.239> to<02:07:37.559> appeal<02:07:38.280> so<02:07:38.480> then<02:07:38.679> it<02:07:38.920> it's<02:07:39.320> it 02:07:39.549 --> 02:07:39.559 align:start position:0% continue to appeal so then it it's it 02:07:39.559 --> 02:07:41.709 align:start position:0% continue to appeal so then it it's it actually<02:07:39.920> subverts<02:07:40.480> or<02:07:40.760> or<02:07:40.920> goes<02:07:41.159> around<02:07:41.440> the 02:07:41.709 --> 02:07:41.719 align:start position:0% actually subverts or or goes around the 02:07:41.719 --> 02:07:44.549 align:start position:0% actually subverts or or goes around the law<02:07:42.719> and<02:07:42.880> becomes<02:07:43.199> a<02:07:43.360> game<02:07:43.760> instead<02:07:44.079> of<02:07:44.239> an 02:07:44.549 --> 02:07:44.559 align:start position:0% law and becomes a game instead of an 02:07:44.559 --> 02:07:47.870 align:start position:0% law and becomes a game instead of an actual<02:07:45.599> outcome<02:07:46.599> their<02:07:46.920> process<02:07:47.320> should<02:07:47.559> say 02:07:47.870 --> 02:07:47.880 align:start position:0% actual outcome their process should say 02:07:47.880 --> 02:07:50.390 align:start position:0% actual outcome their process should say what<02:07:48.040> their<02:07:48.239> final<02:07:48.599> appeal<02:07:49.079> is<02:07:49.800> so<02:07:50.040> they<02:07:50.159> can't 02:07:50.390 --> 02:07:50.400 align:start position:0% what their final appeal is so they can't 02:07:50.400 --> 02:07:52.109 align:start position:0% what their final appeal is so they can't keep<02:07:50.679> appealing<02:07:51.040> forever<02:07:51.599> their<02:07:51.800> process 02:07:52.109 --> 02:07:52.119 align:start position:0% keep appealing forever their process 02:07:52.119 --> 02:07:53.709 align:start position:0% keep appealing forever their process should<02:07:52.360> say<02:07:52.599> this<02:07:52.800> appeal<02:07:53.079> is<02:07:53.239> the<02:07:53.400> final 02:07:53.709 --> 02:07:53.719 align:start position:0% should say this appeal is the final 02:07:53.719 --> 02:07:55.709 align:start position:0% should say this appeal is the final administrative 02:07:55.709 --> 02:07:55.719 align:start position:0% administrative 02:07:55.719 --> 02:07:58.069 align:start position:0% administrative appeal<02:07:56.719> okay<02:07:57.000> so<02:07:57.320> then<02:07:57.480> we<02:07:57.559> would<02:07:57.760> have<02:07:57.880> to 02:07:58.069 --> 02:07:58.079 align:start position:0% appeal okay so then we would have to 02:07:58.079 --> 02:07:59.589 align:start position:0% appeal okay so then we would have to spell<02:07:58.440> that<02:07:58.639> out<02:07:58.920> the<02:07:59.000> only<02:07:59.159> reason<02:07:59.360> why<02:07:59.520> I'm 02:07:59.589 --> 02:07:59.599 align:start position:0% spell that out the only reason why I'm 02:07:59.599 --> 02:08:00.990 align:start position:0% spell that out the only reason why I'm saying<02:07:59.840> that<02:08:00.000> is<02:08:00.159> because<02:08:00.360> it<02:08:00.480> allows<02:08:00.840> for 02:08:00.990 --> 02:08:01.000 align:start position:0% saying that is because it allows for 02:08:01.000 --> 02:08:02.950 align:start position:0% saying that is because it allows for them<02:08:01.119> to<02:08:01.360> continue<02:08:01.719> to<02:08:02.000> appeal<02:08:02.679> and 02:08:02.950 --> 02:08:02.960 align:start position:0% them to continue to appeal and 02:08:02.960 --> 02:08:07.470 align:start position:0% them to continue to appeal and reconsider<02:08:04.320> right<02:08:05.320> so<02:08:06.000> the<02:08:06.199> initial<02:08:07.199> what's 02:08:07.470 --> 02:08:07.480 align:start position:0% reconsider right so the initial what's 02:08:07.480 --> 02:08:09.390 align:start position:0% reconsider right so the initial what's that<02:08:07.719> sorry<02:08:08.040> Michelle<02:08:08.520> I<02:08:08.599> don't<02:08:08.760> see<02:08:09.000> where<02:08:09.159> a 02:08:09.390 --> 02:08:09.400 align:start position:0% that sorry Michelle I don't see where a 02:08:09.400 --> 02:08:11.709 align:start position:0% that sorry Michelle I don't see where a continued<02:08:10.000> appeal<02:08:10.360> and<02:08:10.559> appeal<02:08:10.880> and<02:08:11.119> appeal 02:08:11.709 --> 02:08:11.719 align:start position:0% continued appeal and appeal and appeal 02:08:11.719 --> 02:08:14.149 align:start position:0% continued appeal and appeal and appeal happens<02:08:12.719> there's<02:08:13.000> only<02:08:13.280> the<02:08:13.440> appeal<02:08:13.760> to<02:08:13.960> their 02:08:14.149 --> 02:08:14.159 align:start position:0% happens there's only the appeal to their 02:08:14.159 --> 02:08:16.510 align:start position:0% happens there's only the appeal to their board<02:08:15.159> and<02:08:15.320> their<02:08:15.520> board<02:08:15.760> makes<02:08:16.000> the<02:08:16.159> final 02:08:16.510 --> 02:08:16.520 align:start position:0% board and their board makes the final 02:08:16.520 --> 02:08:19.629 align:start position:0% board and their board makes the final determination<02:08:17.360> for<02:08:17.639> the<02:08:17.880> for<02:08:18.159> that 02:08:19.629 --> 02:08:19.639 align:start position:0% determination for the for that 02:08:19.639 --> 02:08:22.669 align:start position:0% determination for the for that Lea<02:08:20.639> okay<02:08:21.280> and<02:08:21.559> and<02:08:21.840> maybe<02:08:22.040> I<02:08:22.159> just<02:08:22.280> need<02:08:22.480> some 02:08:22.669 --> 02:08:22.679 align:start position:0% Lea okay and and maybe I just need some 02:08:22.679 --> 02:08:25.870 align:start position:0% Lea okay and and maybe I just need some clarification<02:08:23.480> then<02:08:23.679> on 02:08:25.870 --> 02:08:25.880 align:start position:0% clarification then on 02:08:25.880 --> 02:08:29.109 align:start position:0% clarification then on line<02:08:26.880> it's<02:08:27.119> line<02:08:27.639> 149<02:08:28.320> is<02:08:28.480> where<02:08:28.639> they're<02:08:28.880> able 02:08:29.109 --> 02:08:29.119 align:start position:0% line it's line 149 is where they're able 02:08:29.119 --> 02:08:32.149 align:start position:0% line it's line 149 is where they're able to<02:08:29.400> appeal<02:08:29.760> to<02:08:29.920> their<02:08:30.119> local<02:08:30.520> governing 02:08:32.149 --> 02:08:32.159 align:start position:0% to appeal to their local governing 02:08:32.159 --> 02:08:36.109 align:start position:0% to appeal to their local governing board<02:08:33.159> yes<02:08:33.679> but<02:08:34.239> down<02:08:34.559> here<02:08:34.800> on<02:08:35.040> line<02:08:35.320> 155<02:08:36.040> it 02:08:36.109 --> 02:08:36.119 align:start position:0% board yes but down here on line 155 it 02:08:36.119 --> 02:08:38.030 align:start position:0% board yes but down here on line 155 it says<02:08:36.280> an<02:08:36.440> laa<02:08:36.920> governing<02:08:37.199> board<02:08:37.520> may<02:08:37.760> not 02:08:38.030 --> 02:08:38.040 align:start position:0% says an laa governing board may not 02:08:38.040 --> 02:08:40.109 align:start position:0% says an laa governing board may not enact<02:08:38.400> rules<02:08:38.719> or<02:08:39.000> policies<02:08:39.440> that<02:08:39.639> prevent<02:08:39.960> an 02:08:40.109 --> 02:08:40.119 align:start position:0% enact rules or policies that prevent an 02:08:40.119 --> 02:08:42.990 align:start position:0% enact rules or policies that prevent an LA<02:08:40.480> governing<02:08:40.840> board<02:08:41.239> from<02:08:42.239> revisiting<02:08:42.840> a 02:08:42.990 --> 02:08:43.000 align:start position:0% LA governing board from revisiting a 02:08:43.000 --> 02:08:44.870 align:start position:0% LA governing board from revisiting a previous<02:08:43.480> decision<02:08:44.239> reviewing<02:08:44.679> a 02:08:44.870 --> 02:08:44.880 align:start position:0% previous decision reviewing a 02:08:44.880 --> 02:08:46.790 align:start position:0% previous decision reviewing a recommendation<02:08:45.800> considering<02:08:46.199> a<02:08:46.320> challenge 02:08:46.790 --> 02:08:46.800 align:start position:0% recommendation considering a challenge 02:08:46.800 --> 02:08:49.470 align:start position:0% recommendation considering a challenge material<02:08:47.800> if<02:08:47.960> the<02:08:48.079> Lea<02:08:48.559> governing<02:08:48.920> board 02:08:49.470 --> 02:08:49.480 align:start position:0% material if the Lea governing board 02:08:49.480 --> 02:08:52.030 align:start position:0% material if the Lea governing board receives<02:08:49.719> additional<02:08:50.119> information<02:08:50.880> so 02:08:52.030 --> 02:08:52.040 align:start position:0% receives additional information so 02:08:52.040 --> 02:08:54.229 align:start position:0% receives additional information so that<02:08:52.239> you're<02:08:52.400> not<02:08:52.679> considering<02:08:53.239> that<02:08:53.800> as<02:08:54.040> an 02:08:54.229 --> 02:08:54.239 align:start position:0% that you're not considering that as an 02:08:54.239 --> 02:08:58.229 align:start position:0% that you're not considering that as an imposs<02:08:54.760> appeal<02:08:55.119> that's<02:08:55.320> something 02:08:58.229 --> 02:08:58.239 align:start position:0% 02:08:58.239 --> 02:09:00.510 align:start position:0% separate<02:08:59.239> that's<02:08:59.440> a<02:08:59.599> good<02:08:59.840> question<02:09:00.280> but<02:09:00.400> I 02:09:00.510 --> 02:09:00.520 align:start position:0% separate that's a good question but I 02:09:00.520 --> 02:09:02.270 align:start position:0% separate that's a good question but I see<02:09:00.719> that<02:09:00.880> as<02:09:01.040> being<02:09:01.320> something<02:09:01.800> something 02:09:02.270 --> 02:09:02.280 align:start position:0% see that as being something something 02:09:02.280 --> 02:09:05.030 align:start position:0% see that as being something something separate<02:09:03.040> because<02:09:03.320> it<02:09:03.440> says<02:09:03.880> or<02:09:04.400> if<02:09:04.679> the<02:09:04.800> only 02:09:05.030 --> 02:09:05.040 align:start position:0% separate because it says or if the only 02:09:05.040 --> 02:09:06.750 align:start position:0% separate because it says or if the only way<02:09:05.199> they<02:09:05.320> can<02:09:05.480> do<02:09:05.639> that<02:09:05.800> is<02:09:06.040> if<02:09:06.199> the<02:09:06.320> Lea 02:09:06.750 --> 02:09:06.760 align:start position:0% way they can do that is if the Lea 02:09:06.760 --> 02:09:08.350 align:start position:0% way they can do that is if the Lea governing<02:09:07.119> board<02:09:07.639> receives<02:09:07.880> additional 02:09:08.350 --> 02:09:08.360 align:start position:0% governing board receives additional 02:09:08.360 --> 02:09:10.750 align:start position:0% governing board receives additional information<02:09:09.000> regarding<02:09:09.480> the 02:09:10.750 --> 02:09:10.760 align:start position:0% information regarding the 02:09:10.760 --> 02:09:14.109 align:start position:0% information regarding the material<02:09:11.760> okay<02:09:12.119> or<02:09:12.400> revisiting<02:09:13.000> a<02:09:13.199> previous 02:09:14.109 --> 02:09:14.119 align:start position:0% material okay or revisiting a previous 02:09:14.119 --> 02:09:16.589 align:start position:0% material okay or revisiting a previous decision<02:09:15.119> would<02:09:15.480> that<02:09:15.639> not<02:09:15.880> apply<02:09:16.280> to<02:09:16.440> the 02:09:16.589 --> 02:09:16.599 align:start position:0% decision would that not apply to the 02:09:16.599 --> 02:09:18.430 align:start position:0% decision would that not apply to the appeal 02:09:18.430 --> 02:09:18.440 align:start position:0% appeal 02:09:18.440 --> 02:09:21.709 align:start position:0% appeal then<02:09:19.440> yes<02:09:19.639> it<02:09:19.960> would<02:09:20.960> do<02:09:21.079> you<02:09:21.159> see<02:09:21.480> what<02:09:21.559> I'm 02:09:21.709 --> 02:09:21.719 align:start position:0% then yes it would do you see what I'm 02:09:21.719 --> 02:09:23.270 align:start position:0% then yes it would do you see what I'm saying<02:09:22.040> then<02:09:22.280> so<02:09:22.440> it<02:09:22.599> it<02:09:22.719> leaves<02:09:23.040> this 02:09:23.270 --> 02:09:23.280 align:start position:0% saying then so it it leaves this 02:09:23.280 --> 02:09:25.589 align:start position:0% saying then so it it leaves this continuous<02:09:23.960> loop<02:09:24.400> open<02:09:24.719> at<02:09:24.840> least<02:09:25.040> in<02:09:25.199> my<02:09:25.360> mind 02:09:25.589 --> 02:09:25.599 align:start position:0% continuous loop open at least in my mind 02:09:25.599 --> 02:09:30.350 align:start position:0% continuous loop open at least in my mind maybe<02:09:25.880> I'm<02:09:26.159> misreading 02:09:30.350 --> 02:09:30.360 align:start position:0% 02:09:30.360 --> 02:09:33.189 align:start position:0% this<02:09:31.360> that<02:09:31.520> does<02:09:31.760> make<02:09:31.920> it<02:09:32.520> difficult<02:09:32.760> I 02:09:33.189 --> 02:09:33.199 align:start position:0% this that does make it difficult I 02:09:33.199 --> 02:09:35.350 align:start position:0% this that does make it difficult I understand<02:09:33.360> where<02:09:33.520> you're<02:09:33.679> coming<02:09:34.040> from<02:09:34.960> so 02:09:35.350 --> 02:09:35.360 align:start position:0% understand where you're coming from so 02:09:35.360 --> 02:09:38.149 align:start position:0% understand where you're coming from so putting<02:09:35.679> it<02:09:36.000> a<02:09:36.239> timeline<02:09:36.719> when<02:09:36.880> a<02:09:37.480> an<02:09:37.679> appeal 02:09:38.149 --> 02:09:38.159 align:start position:0% putting it a timeline when a an appeal 02:09:38.159 --> 02:09:41.629 align:start position:0% putting it a timeline when a an appeal has<02:09:38.320> been<02:09:39.280> decided<02:09:40.280> when<02:09:40.480> the<02:09:40.599> Lea<02:09:41.079> board<02:09:41.440> has 02:09:41.629 --> 02:09:41.639 align:start position:0% has been decided when the Lea board has 02:09:41.639 --> 02:09:44.510 align:start position:0% has been decided when the Lea board has decided<02:09:42.079> an 02:09:44.510 --> 02:09:44.520 align:start position:0% 02:09:44.520 --> 02:09:47.470 align:start position:0% appeal<02:09:45.520> and<02:09:46.000> is<02:09:46.400> is<02:09:46.559> there<02:09:46.760> a<02:09:46.960> good 02:09:47.470 --> 02:09:47.480 align:start position:0% appeal and is is there a good 02:09:47.480 --> 02:09:49.709 align:start position:0% appeal and is is there a good recommendation<02:09:48.040> for<02:09:48.239> the 02:09:49.709 --> 02:09:49.719 align:start position:0% recommendation for the 02:09:49.719 --> 02:09:51.870 align:start position:0% recommendation for the timeline<02:09:50.719> that's<02:09:50.920> where<02:09:51.520> that's<02:09:51.639> where<02:09:51.760> I'm 02:09:51.870 --> 02:09:51.880 align:start position:0% timeline that's where that's where I'm 02:09:51.880 --> 02:09:54.910 align:start position:0% timeline that's where that's where I'm struggling<02:09:52.520> what's<02:09:52.760> reasonable<02:09:53.760> yeah<02:09:54.159> if<02:09:54.320> it 02:09:54.910 --> 02:09:54.920 align:start position:0% struggling what's reasonable yeah if it 02:09:54.920 --> 02:09:57.870 align:start position:0% struggling what's reasonable yeah if it if<02:09:55.320> if<02:09:55.520> it<02:09:55.760> we<02:09:56.040> title<02:09:56.400> it<02:09:56.639> as<02:09:56.800> an<02:09:57.040> initial 02:09:57.870 --> 02:09:57.880 align:start position:0% if if it we title it as an initial 02:09:57.880 --> 02:10:01.069 align:start position:0% if if it we title it as an initial appeal<02:09:58.880> and<02:09:59.040> once<02:09:59.400> that's<02:09:59.719> finished<02:10:00.440> if<02:10:00.679> if<02:10:00.840> it 02:10:01.069 --> 02:10:01.079 align:start position:0% appeal and once that's finished if if it 02:10:01.079 --> 02:10:04.830 align:start position:0% appeal and once that's finished if if it if<02:10:01.159> it<02:10:01.360> happens<02:10:01.679> at<02:10:01.840> all<02:10:02.840> right<02:10:03.239> then<02:10:04.000> that's 02:10:04.830 --> 02:10:04.840 align:start position:0% if it happens at all right then that's 02:10:04.840 --> 02:10:06.709 align:start position:0% if it happens at all right then that's where<02:10:05.000> it<02:10:05.159> comes<02:10:05.400> to<02:10:05.599> us<02:10:05.920> otherwise<02:10:06.480> because 02:10:06.709 --> 02:10:06.719 align:start position:0% where it comes to us otherwise because 02:10:06.719 --> 02:10:09.709 align:start position:0% where it comes to us otherwise because of<02:10:06.880> the<02:10:07.000> way<02:10:07.159> the<02:10:07.520> laws<02:10:08.320> written<02:10:09.320> it<02:10:09.520> just 02:10:09.709 --> 02:10:09.719 align:start position:0% of the way the laws written it just 02:10:09.719 --> 02:10:12.830 align:start position:0% of the way the laws written it just could<02:10:09.880> be<02:10:10.119> Revisited<02:10:11.000> time<02:10:11.199> and<02:10:11.400> time<02:10:11.840> again 02:10:12.830 --> 02:10:12.840 align:start position:0% could be Revisited time and time again 02:10:12.840 --> 02:10:14.629 align:start position:0% could be Revisited time and time again right<02:10:13.360> yeah<02:10:13.520> and<02:10:13.639> then<02:10:13.800> it's<02:10:13.960> like<02:10:14.119> a<02:10:14.480> it's 02:10:14.629 --> 02:10:14.639 align:start position:0% right yeah and then it's like a it's 02:10:14.639 --> 02:10:16.990 align:start position:0% right yeah and then it's like a it's just<02:10:14.800> a<02:10:15.000> circle<02:10:15.960> yeah<02:10:16.119> then<02:10:16.239> we<02:10:16.360> end<02:10:16.559> up<02:10:16.760> with<02:10:16.880> a 02:10:16.990 --> 02:10:17.000 align:start position:0% just a circle yeah then we end up with a 02:10:17.000 --> 02:10:22.990 align:start position:0% just a circle yeah then we end up with a new<02:10:17.159> law<02:10:17.559> next<02:10:17.840> year<02:10:18.599> and<02:10:18.760> I<02:10:19.199> yeah 02:10:22.990 --> 02:10:23.000 align:start position:0% 02:10:23.000 --> 02:10:24.910 align:start position:0% and<02:10:23.199> and<02:10:23.360> so<02:10:23.559> I<02:10:23.679> think<02:10:23.880> I<02:10:23.960> think<02:10:24.119> you're<02:10:24.400> right 02:10:24.910 --> 02:10:24.920 align:start position:0% and and so I think I think you're right 02:10:24.920 --> 02:10:26.270 align:start position:0% and and so I think I think you're right remember<02:10:25.199> Earl<02:10:25.440> I<02:10:25.520> just<02:10:25.639> I'm<02:10:25.760> wondering<02:10:26.119> what 02:10:26.270 --> 02:10:26.280 align:start position:0% remember Earl I just I'm wondering what 02:10:26.280 --> 02:10:29.109 align:start position:0% remember Earl I just I'm wondering what that<02:10:26.800> timeline<02:10:27.239> looks<02:10:27.520> like<02:10:27.920> that's 02:10:29.109 --> 02:10:29.119 align:start position:0% that timeline looks like that's 02:10:29.119 --> 02:10:30.950 align:start position:0% that timeline looks like that's reasonable<02:10:30.119> I<02:10:30.239> don't<02:10:30.440> I<02:10:30.520> don't<02:10:30.679> know<02:10:30.840> and 02:10:30.950 --> 02:10:30.960 align:start position:0% reasonable I don't I don't know and 02:10:30.960 --> 02:10:32.549 align:start position:0% reasonable I don't I don't know and that's<02:10:31.079> where<02:10:31.239> I<02:10:31.320> was<02:10:31.480> struggling<02:10:32.040> I<02:10:32.280> I<02:10:32.400> have 02:10:32.549 --> 02:10:32.559 align:start position:0% that's where I was struggling I I have 02:10:32.559 --> 02:10:33.910 align:start position:0% that's where I was struggling I I have some<02:10:32.760> language<02:10:33.239> here<02:10:33.440> and<02:10:33.559> I<02:10:33.639> have<02:10:33.760> some 02:10:33.910 --> 02:10:33.920 align:start position:0% some language here and I have some 02:10:33.920 --> 02:10:35.990 align:start position:0% some language here and I have some language<02:10:34.239> down<02:10:34.440> below<02:10:34.880> and<02:10:35.000> it<02:10:35.199> just<02:10:35.520> I<02:10:35.639> could 02:10:35.990 --> 02:10:36.000 align:start position:0% language down below and it just I could 02:10:36.000 --> 02:10:38.470 align:start position:0% language down below and it just I could never<02:10:37.000> settle<02:10:37.440> it<02:10:37.639> exactly<02:10:38.079> that's<02:10:38.239> why<02:10:38.400> I 02:10:38.470 --> 02:10:38.480 align:start position:0% never settle it exactly that's why I 02:10:38.480 --> 02:10:40.030 align:start position:0% never settle it exactly that's why I went<02:10:38.679> back<02:10:38.840> up<02:10:38.960> and<02:10:39.079> said<02:10:39.360> where<02:10:39.559> does<02:10:39.719> it 02:10:40.030 --> 02:10:40.040 align:start position:0% went back up and said where does it 02:10:40.040 --> 02:10:42.069 align:start position:0% went back up and said where does it actually<02:10:40.400> say<02:10:40.679> that<02:10:40.840> it<02:10:41.079> has<02:10:41.199> to<02:10:41.360> be<02:10:41.520> sent<02:10:41.840> to 02:10:42.069 --> 02:10:42.079 align:start position:0% actually say that it has to be sent to 02:10:42.079 --> 02:10:45.270 align:start position:0% actually say that it has to be sent to the<02:10:42.199> state<02:10:42.960> board<02:10:43.960> and<02:10:44.119> that's<02:10:44.360> under<02:10:44.679> the<02:10:44.920> top 02:10:45.270 --> 02:10:45.280 align:start position:0% the state board and that's under the top 02:10:45.280 --> 02:10:46.990 align:start position:0% the state board and that's under the top section<02:10:45.599> not<02:10:45.719> under<02:10:45.960> the<02:10:46.119> appeal<02:10:46.719> and<02:10:46.840> that's 02:10:46.990 --> 02:10:47.000 align:start position:0% section not under the appeal and that's 02:10:47.000 --> 02:10:48.669 align:start position:0% section not under the appeal and that's why<02:10:47.119> I<02:10:47.239> was<02:10:47.719> trying<02:10:47.960> to<02:10:48.079> figure<02:10:48.360> that<02:10:48.480> out 02:10:48.669 --> 02:10:48.679 align:start position:0% why I was trying to figure that out 02:10:48.679 --> 02:10:52.589 align:start position:0% why I was trying to figure that out Michelle<02:10:49.239> if<02:10:49.360> a<02:10:49.559> final<02:10:49.880> determination 02:10:52.589 --> 02:10:52.599 align:start position:0% Michelle if a final determination 02:10:52.599 --> 02:10:54.149 align:start position:0% Michelle if a final determination where<02:10:52.840> that<02:10:53.119> where<02:10:53.320> that<02:10:53.520> actually<02:10:53.920> it<02:10:54.000> would 02:10:54.149 --> 02:10:54.159 align:start position:0% where that where that actually it would 02:10:54.159 --> 02:10:57.030 align:start position:0% where that where that actually it would be<02:10:54.320> when<02:10:54.440> the<02:10:54.559> Lea<02:10:55.199> board<02:10:55.840> makes<02:10:56.239> an<02:10:56.760> a 02:10:57.030 --> 02:10:57.040 align:start position:0% be when the Lea board makes an a 02:10:57.040 --> 02:10:59.030 align:start position:0% be when the Lea board makes an a determination<02:10:58.040> so<02:10:58.400> it<02:10:58.480> would<02:10:58.679> have<02:10:58.800> to<02:10:58.880> be 02:10:59.030 --> 02:10:59.040 align:start position:0% determination so it would have to be 02:10:59.040 --> 02:11:00.229 align:start position:0% determination so it would have to be every<02:10:59.360> time<02:10:59.599> that<02:10:59.719> they<02:10:59.840> made<02:11:00.000> a 02:11:00.229 --> 02:11:00.239 align:start position:0% every time that they made a 02:11:00.239 --> 02:11:01.950 align:start position:0% every time that they made a determination<02:11:00.960> they<02:11:01.079> would<02:11:01.239> need<02:11:01.400> to<02:11:01.639> within 02:11:01.950 --> 02:11:01.960 align:start position:0% determination they would need to within 02:11:01.960 --> 02:11:08.030 align:start position:0% determination they would need to within 10<02:11:02.280> days<02:11:03.280> inform<02:11:03.800> the<02:11:04.119> library<02:11:04.559> media 02:11:08.030 --> 02:11:08.040 align:start position:0% 02:11:08.040 --> 02:11:13.189 align:start position:0% specialist 02:11:13.189 --> 02:11:13.199 align:start position:0% 02:11:13.199 --> 02:11:15.470 align:start position:0% okay 02:11:15.470 --> 02:11:15.480 align:start position:0% okay 02:11:15.480 --> 02:11:17.990 align:start position:0% okay after<02:11:16.480> initial<02:11:16.880> determination<02:11:17.559> appeal<02:11:17.920> but 02:11:17.990 --> 02:11:18.000 align:start position:0% after initial determination appeal but 02:11:18.000 --> 02:11:19.709 align:start position:0% after initial determination appeal but it<02:11:18.119> doesn't<02:11:18.440> that's<02:11:18.599> my<02:11:18.840> language<02:11:19.360> I<02:11:19.440> just<02:11:19.559> was 02:11:19.709 --> 02:11:19.719 align:start position:0% it doesn't that's my language I just was 02:11:19.719 --> 02:11:21.470 align:start position:0% it doesn't that's my language I just was trying<02:11:19.920> to<02:11:20.040> figure<02:11:20.239> out<02:11:20.480> the<02:11:20.679> complication 02:11:21.470 --> 02:11:21.480 align:start position:0% trying to figure out the complication 02:11:21.480 --> 02:11:24.189 align:start position:0% trying to figure out the complication there<02:11:21.719> it<02:11:21.800> doesn't<02:11:22.119> have<02:11:22.199> to<02:11:22.440> be<02:11:23.079> there<02:11:24.079> I 02:11:24.189 --> 02:11:24.199 align:start position:0% there it doesn't have to be there I 02:11:24.199 --> 02:11:26.189 align:start position:0% there it doesn't have to be there I think<02:11:24.320> it<02:11:24.480> should<02:11:24.760> say<02:11:24.960> after<02:11:25.239> a<02:11:25.400> final 02:11:26.189 --> 02:11:26.199 align:start position:0% think it should say after a final 02:11:26.199 --> 02:11:28.549 align:start position:0% think it should say after a final determination<02:11:27.199> what<02:11:27.320> it<02:11:27.440> needs<02:11:27.639> to<02:11:27.800> be<02:11:28.280> and 02:11:28.549 --> 02:11:28.559 align:start position:0% determination what it needs to be and 02:11:28.559 --> 02:11:30.270 align:start position:0% determination what it needs to be and stick<02:11:28.840> with<02:11:29.000> what<02:11:29.079> it<02:11:29.280> says<02:11:29.440> in<02:11:29.639> the<02:11:29.800> code 02:11:30.270 --> 02:11:30.280 align:start position:0% stick with what it says in the code 02:11:30.280 --> 02:11:32.189 align:start position:0% stick with what it says in the code after<02:11:30.480> a<02:11:30.639> final<02:11:31.000> determination<02:11:31.800> has<02:11:31.960> been 02:11:32.189 --> 02:11:32.199 align:start position:0% after a final determination has been 02:11:32.199 --> 02:11:52.310 align:start position:0% after a final determination has been made 02:11:52.310 --> 02:11:52.320 align:start position:0% 02:11:52.320 --> 02:11:54.310 align:start position:0% you<02:11:52.480> do<02:11:52.639> want<02:11:52.800> it<02:11:52.920> to<02:11:53.000> say<02:11:53.320> determination<02:11:54.119> so 02:11:54.310 --> 02:11:54.320 align:start position:0% you do want it to say determination so 02:11:54.320 --> 02:11:56.470 align:start position:0% you do want it to say determination so that<02:11:54.480> they're<02:11:54.679> telling<02:11:55.000> you<02:11:55.280> either<02:11:55.599> way<02:11:56.280> they 02:11:56.470 --> 02:11:56.480 align:start position:0% that they're telling you either way they 02:11:56.480 --> 02:11:58.510 align:start position:0% that they're telling you either way they have<02:11:56.599> to<02:11:56.920> inform<02:11:57.280> you<02:11:57.520> either<02:11:57.800> way<02:11:58.079> whether<02:11:58.360> it 02:11:58.510 --> 02:11:58.520 align:start position:0% have to inform you either way whether it 02:11:58.520 --> 02:12:01.870 align:start position:0% have to inform you either way whether it was<02:11:59.400> found<02:11:59.679> to<02:11:59.880> be<02:12:00.599> need<02:12:00.840> to<02:12:01.000> be<02:12:01.199> removed<02:12:01.679> or 02:12:01.870 --> 02:12:01.880 align:start position:0% was found to be need to be removed or 02:12:01.880 --> 02:12:05.189 align:start position:0% was found to be need to be removed or whether<02:12:02.119> it<02:12:02.280> was<02:12:03.520> stayed<02:12:04.520> they<02:12:04.639> need<02:12:04.840> to 02:12:05.189 --> 02:12:05.199 align:start position:0% whether it was stayed they need to 02:12:05.199 --> 02:12:06.910 align:start position:0% whether it was stayed they need to inform<02:12:05.559> the<02:12:05.679> library<02:12:06.040> media<02:12:06.440> specialist 02:12:06.910 --> 02:12:06.920 align:start position:0% inform the library media specialist 02:12:06.920 --> 02:12:08.390 align:start position:0% inform the library media specialist either<02:12:07.199> way<02:12:07.480> because<02:12:07.679> it<02:12:07.800> says<02:12:08.079> that<02:12:08.239> they 02:12:08.390 --> 02:12:08.400 align:start position:0% either way because it says that they 02:12:08.400 --> 02:12:12.430 align:start position:0% either way because it says that they have<02:12:08.520> to<02:12:08.679> inform<02:12:09.000> of<02:12:09.199> the<02:12:09.719> the 02:12:12.430 --> 02:12:12.440 align:start position:0% 02:12:12.440 --> 02:12:14.549 align:start position:0% determination<02:12:13.440> not<02:12:13.719> just<02:12:14.119> whether<02:12:14.400> they 02:12:14.549 --> 02:12:14.559 align:start position:0% determination not just whether they 02:12:14.559 --> 02:12:16.830 align:start position:0% determination not just whether they uphold<02:12:15.000> the<02:12:15.280> objective<02:12:15.760> sensitive<02:12:16.320> material 02:12:16.830 --> 02:12:16.840 align:start position:0% uphold the objective sensitive material 02:12:16.840 --> 02:12:18.830 align:start position:0% uphold the objective sensitive material of<02:12:17.040> determination<02:12:17.840> you<02:12:17.960> need<02:12:18.159> to<02:12:18.280> know<02:12:18.559> either 02:12:18.830 --> 02:12:18.840 align:start position:0% of determination you need to know either 02:12:18.840 --> 02:12:21.790 align:start position:0% of determination you need to know either way<02:12:19.360> if<02:12:19.520> they<02:12:19.679> overturned<02:12:20.199> it<02:12:20.400> as<02:12:20.599> well<02:12:21.639> yeah 02:12:21.790 --> 02:12:21.800 align:start position:0% way if they overturned it as well yeah 02:12:21.800 --> 02:12:24.149 align:start position:0% way if they overturned it as well yeah so<02:12:22.079> you<02:12:22.760> and<02:12:22.840> I'm<02:12:22.960> just<02:12:23.079> trying<02:12:23.280> to<02:12:23.400> make<02:12:23.559> sure 02:12:24.149 --> 02:12:24.159 align:start position:0% so you and I'm just trying to make sure 02:12:24.159 --> 02:12:26.589 align:start position:0% so you and I'm just trying to make sure so<02:12:24.480> anytime<02:12:25.079> there's<02:12:25.280> a<02:12:25.639> as<02:12:26.040> a<02:12:26.239> final 02:12:26.589 --> 02:12:26.599 align:start position:0% so anytime there's a as a final 02:12:26.599 --> 02:12:32.589 align:start position:0% so anytime there's a as a final determination<02:12:27.239> is<02:12:27.440> sent<02:12:28.199> on<02:12:29.480> yes 02:12:32.589 --> 02:12:32.599 align:start position:0% 02:12:32.599 --> 02:12:35.910 align:start position:0% okay<02:12:33.599> so<02:12:34.000> we<02:12:34.119> wouldn't<02:12:34.440> put<02:12:34.719> the<02:12:35.280> appeal<02:12:35.719> in 02:12:35.910 --> 02:12:35.920 align:start position:0% okay so we wouldn't put the appeal in 02:12:35.920 --> 02:12:37.589 align:start position:0% okay so we wouldn't put the appeal in there<02:12:36.199> it<02:12:36.280> would<02:12:36.480> just<02:12:36.679> be<02:12:36.920> we<02:12:37.159> just<02:12:37.280> have<02:12:37.440> to 02:12:37.589 --> 02:12:37.599 align:start position:0% there it would just be we just have to 02:12:37.599 --> 02:12:41.310 align:start position:0% there it would just be we just have to indicate<02:12:38.119> that<02:12:38.800> if<02:12:38.920> a<02:12:39.119> pill<02:12:39.800> occurs<02:12:40.800> then<02:12:41.040> that 02:12:41.310 --> 02:12:41.320 align:start position:0% indicate that if a pill occurs then that 02:12:41.320 --> 02:12:43.229 align:start position:0% indicate that if a pill occurs then that final<02:12:41.679> determination<02:12:42.280> is<02:12:42.400> sent 02:12:43.229 --> 02:12:43.239 align:start position:0% final determination is sent 02:12:43.239 --> 02:12:46.189 align:start position:0% final determination is sent on<02:12:44.239> yes<02:12:44.800> am<02:12:44.880> I<02:12:45.159> saying<02:12:45.440> that<02:12:45.639> right<02:12:45.880> and<02:12:46.000> maybe 02:12:46.189 --> 02:12:46.199 align:start position:0% on yes am I saying that right and maybe 02:12:46.199 --> 02:12:48.709 align:start position:0% on yes am I saying that right and maybe we'll<02:12:46.360> have<02:12:46.639> to<02:12:47.639> anytime<02:12:48.040> there's<02:12:48.199> a<02:12:48.400> final 02:12:48.709 --> 02:12:48.719 align:start position:0% we'll have to anytime there's a final 02:12:48.719 --> 02:12:50.430 align:start position:0% we'll have to anytime there's a final determination<02:12:49.639> yeah<02:12:49.800> anytime<02:12:50.159> there's<02:12:50.320> a 02:12:50.430 --> 02:12:50.440 align:start position:0% determination yeah anytime there's a 02:12:50.440 --> 02:12:52.069 align:start position:0% determination yeah anytime there's a final<02:12:50.679> determination<02:12:51.559> which<02:12:51.760> may<02:12:51.920> be 02:12:52.069 --> 02:12:52.079 align:start position:0% final determination which may be 02:12:52.079 --> 02:12:55.350 align:start position:0% final determination which may be multiple<02:12:52.559> times<02:12:52.840> on<02:12:53.040> one 02:12:55.350 --> 02:12:55.360 align:start position:0% multiple times on one 02:12:55.360 --> 02:12:58.549 align:start position:0% multiple times on one material<02:12:56.360> so<02:12:56.840> let's 02:12:58.549 --> 02:12:58.559 align:start position:0% material so let's 02:12:58.559 --> 02:13:01.750 align:start position:0% material so let's see<02:12:59.559> if<02:12:59.719> they<02:12:59.880> rear<02:13:00.480> revisit<02:13:01.000> it<02:13:01.239> like<02:13:01.400> you 02:13:01.750 --> 02:13:01.760 align:start position:0% see if they rear revisit it like you 02:13:01.760 --> 02:13:03.910 align:start position:0% see if they rear revisit it like you mentioned<02:13:02.360> down<02:13:02.599> further<02:13:03.040> in<02:13:03.199> this<02:13:03.599> in<02:13:03.679> the 02:13:03.910 --> 02:13:03.920 align:start position:0% mentioned down further in this in the 02:13:03.920 --> 02:13:06.589 align:start position:0% mentioned down further in this in the bill<02:13:04.920> if<02:13:05.079> they<02:13:05.239> revisit<02:13:05.719> it<02:13:05.880> and<02:13:06.000> made<02:13:06.159> a<02:13:06.280> final 02:13:06.589 --> 02:13:06.599 align:start position:0% bill if they revisit it and made a final 02:13:06.599 --> 02:13:08.549 align:start position:0% bill if they revisit it and made a final determination<02:13:07.239> on<02:13:07.400> that<02:13:07.599> revisiting<02:13:08.199> it<02:13:08.440> they 02:13:08.549 --> 02:13:08.559 align:start position:0% determination on that revisiting it they 02:13:08.559 --> 02:13:10.790 align:start position:0% determination on that revisiting it they would<02:13:08.719> need<02:13:08.880> to<02:13:09.079> inform<02:13:09.760> at<02:13:09.960> 10<02:13:10.199> days<02:13:10.480> after 02:13:10.790 --> 02:13:10.800 align:start position:0% would need to inform at 10 days after 02:13:10.800 --> 02:13:13.030 align:start position:0% would need to inform at 10 days after that 02:13:13.030 --> 02:13:13.040 align:start position:0% that 02:13:13.040 --> 02:13:17.470 align:start position:0% that determination 02:13:17.470 --> 02:13:17.480 align:start position:0% 02:13:17.480 --> 02:13:22.709 align:start position:0% okay<02:13:18.480> I<02:13:18.960> I<02:13:19.760> all<02:13:19.960> right<02:13:20.760> so<02:13:21.199> let's<02:13:22.119> are<02:13:22.280> we<02:13:22.440> done 02:13:22.709 --> 02:13:22.719 align:start position:0% okay I I all right so let's are we done 02:13:22.719 --> 02:13:23.870 align:start position:0% okay I I all right so let's are we done thinking<02:13:23.040> through 02:13:23.870 --> 02:13:23.880 align:start position:0% thinking through 02:13:23.880 --> 02:13:25.990 align:start position:0% thinking through that<02:13:24.880> I<02:13:24.960> think<02:13:25.079> it's<02:13:25.239> going<02:13:25.360> to<02:13:25.480> come<02:13:25.599> up<02:13:25.840> again 02:13:25.990 --> 02:13:26.000 align:start position:0% that I think it's going to come up again 02:13:26.000 --> 02:13:27.709 align:start position:0% that I think it's going to come up again in<02:13:26.119> the<02:13:26.280> next<02:13:26.559> piece<02:13:26.800> so<02:13:27.000> we<02:13:27.119> may<02:13:27.320> have<02:13:27.440> to 02:13:27.709 --> 02:13:27.719 align:start position:0% in the next piece so we may have to 02:13:27.719 --> 02:13:28.910 align:start position:0% in the next piece so we may have to revisit 02:13:28.910 --> 02:13:28.920 align:start position:0% revisit 02:13:28.920 --> 02:13:32.390 align:start position:0% revisit this<02:13:29.920> I<02:13:30.040> do<02:13:30.280> have<02:13:30.480> one<02:13:30.679> other<02:13:31.040> question<02:13:31.920> if 02:13:32.390 --> 02:13:32.400 align:start position:0% this I do have one other question if 02:13:32.400 --> 02:13:33.910 align:start position:0% this I do have one other question if someone 02:13:33.910 --> 02:13:33.920 align:start position:0% someone 02:13:33.920 --> 02:13:36.830 align:start position:0% someone actually<02:13:34.920> purchased<02:13:35.440> the<02:13:35.599> material<02:13:36.440> should 02:13:36.830 --> 02:13:36.840 align:start position:0% actually purchased the material should 02:13:36.840 --> 02:13:39.109 align:start position:0% actually purchased the material should they<02:13:37.239> be<02:13:37.639> on<02:13:38.079> and<02:13:38.239> this<02:13:38.360> is<02:13:38.520> just<02:13:38.760> kind<02:13:38.880> of<02:13:39.000> one 02:13:39.109 --> 02:13:39.119 align:start position:0% they be on and this is just kind of one 02:13:39.119 --> 02:13:41.390 align:start position:0% they be on and this is just kind of one of<02:13:39.320> those<02:13:40.079> conflict<02:13:40.520> of 02:13:41.390 --> 02:13:41.400 align:start position:0% of those conflict of 02:13:41.400 --> 02:13:43.910 align:start position:0% of those conflict of interest<02:13:42.400> and<02:13:42.559> maybe<02:13:43.199> we<02:13:43.440> need<02:13:43.599> to<02:13:43.760> think 02:13:43.910 --> 02:13:43.920 align:start position:0% interest and maybe we need to think 02:13:43.920 --> 02:13:45.549 align:start position:0% interest and maybe we need to think about<02:13:44.159> that<02:13:44.320> a<02:13:44.400> little<02:13:44.559> bit<02:13:44.840> if<02:13:45.079> someone 02:13:45.549 --> 02:13:45.559 align:start position:0% about that a little bit if someone 02:13:45.559 --> 02:13:49.390 align:start position:0% about that a little bit if someone actually<02:13:46.559> purchased<02:13:47.119> the<02:13:47.400> items<02:13:48.400> can<02:13:48.719> they<02:13:48.960> be 02:13:49.390 --> 02:13:49.400 align:start position:0% actually purchased the items can they be 02:13:49.400 --> 02:13:55.629 align:start position:0% actually purchased the items can they be on<02:13:50.079> a<02:13:51.360> um<02:13:52.320> vetting<02:13:53.679> review<02:13:54.679> panel<02:13:55.320> does<02:13:55.480> that 02:13:55.629 --> 02:13:55.639 align:start position:0% on a um vetting review panel does that 02:13:55.639 --> 02:13:56.669 align:start position:0% on a um vetting review panel does that make 02:13:56.669 --> 02:13:56.679 align:start position:0% make 02:13:56.679 --> 02:13:59.109 align:start position:0% make sense<02:13:57.679> so<02:13:57.800> you<02:13:57.920> mean<02:13:58.079> if<02:13:58.239> the<02:13:58.400> librarian 02:13:59.109 --> 02:13:59.119 align:start position:0% sense so you mean if the librarian 02:13:59.119 --> 02:14:00.990 align:start position:0% sense so you mean if the librarian ordered<02:13:59.480> the<02:13:59.639> materials<02:14:00.199> the<02:14:00.360> librarian 02:14:00.990 --> 02:14:01.000 align:start position:0% ordered the materials the librarian 02:14:01.000 --> 02:14:02.270 align:start position:0% ordered the materials the librarian couldn't<02:14:01.280> be<02:14:01.440> on 02:14:02.270 --> 02:14:02.280 align:start position:0% couldn't be on 02:14:02.280 --> 02:14:05.950 align:start position:0% couldn't be on thew<02:14:03.280> committee<02:14:04.040> I<02:14:04.159> would<02:14:04.400> think<02:14:04.719> so<02:14:05.599> because 02:14:05.950 --> 02:14:05.960 align:start position:0% thew committee I would think so because 02:14:05.960 --> 02:14:07.709 align:start position:0% thew committee I would think so because there<02:14:06.280> to<02:14:06.440> me<02:14:06.599> there<02:14:06.719> would<02:14:06.880> be<02:14:07.000> an<02:14:07.199> inherent 02:14:07.709 --> 02:14:07.719 align:start position:0% there to me there would be an inherent 02:14:07.719 --> 02:14:09.109 align:start position:0% there to me there would be an inherent conflict<02:14:08.119> of<02:14:08.239> interest<02:14:08.599> because<02:14:08.880> they 02:14:09.109 --> 02:14:09.119 align:start position:0% conflict of interest because they 02:14:09.119 --> 02:14:11.109 align:start position:0% conflict of interest because they secured<02:14:09.599> the<02:14:09.719> items<02:14:10.079> in<02:14:10.199> the<02:14:10.400> first<02:14:10.719> place<02:14:11.040> you 02:14:11.109 --> 02:14:11.119 align:start position:0% secured the items in the first place you 02:14:11.119 --> 02:14:14.189 align:start position:0% secured the items in the first place you would<02:14:11.320> want<02:14:11.520> an<02:14:12.280> independent<02:14:13.159> entity 02:14:14.189 --> 02:14:14.199 align:start position:0% would want an independent entity 02:14:14.199 --> 02:14:17.510 align:start position:0% would want an independent entity to<02:14:15.199> um<02:14:16.000> because<02:14:16.320> they<02:14:16.840> they<02:14:17.040> made<02:14:17.320> the 02:14:17.510 --> 02:14:17.520 align:start position:0% to um because they they made the 02:14:17.520 --> 02:14:20.350 align:start position:0% to um because they they made the recommendation<02:14:18.280> coming<02:14:18.599> into<02:14:18.960> the<02:14:19.119> school<02:14:20.119> or 02:14:20.350 --> 02:14:20.360 align:start position:0% recommendation coming into the school or 02:14:20.360 --> 02:14:22.589 align:start position:0% recommendation coming into the school or if<02:14:20.520> another<02:14:21.119> group<02:14:21.400> made<02:14:21.639> a<02:14:21.840> recommendation 02:14:22.589 --> 02:14:22.599 align:start position:0% if another group made a recommendation 02:14:22.599 --> 02:14:24.870 align:start position:0% if another group made a recommendation they<02:14:22.760> couldn't<02:14:23.079> be<02:14:23.320> on<02:14:23.679> the<02:14:24.239> so<02:14:24.480> maybe<02:14:24.719> we've 02:14:24.870 --> 02:14:24.880 align:start position:0% they couldn't be on the so maybe we've 02:14:24.880 --> 02:14:26.790 align:start position:0% they couldn't be on the so maybe we've got<02:14:24.960> to<02:14:25.159> State<02:14:25.480> something<02:14:25.760> in<02:14:25.920> here 02:14:26.790 --> 02:14:26.800 align:start position:0% got to State something in here 02:14:26.800 --> 02:14:31.189 align:start position:0% got to State something in here about<02:14:27.800> um<02:14:28.760> panel<02:14:29.119> members<02:14:29.679> cannot<02:14:30.040> have<02:14:30.159> a 02:14:31.189 --> 02:14:31.199 align:start position:0% about um panel members cannot have a 02:14:31.199 --> 02:14:33.350 align:start position:0% about um panel members cannot have a conflict<02:14:32.199> maybe<02:14:32.440> that's<02:14:32.599> up<02:14:32.760> in<02:14:32.880> the<02:14:33.000> general 02:14:33.350 --> 02:14:33.360 align:start position:0% conflict maybe that's up in the general 02:14:33.360 --> 02:14:35.310 align:start position:0% conflict maybe that's up in the general Provisions<02:14:33.760> or<02:14:33.960> something<02:14:34.320> because<02:14:34.440> it<02:14:34.559> could 02:14:35.310 --> 02:14:35.320 align:start position:0% Provisions or something because it could 02:14:35.320 --> 02:14:37.189 align:start position:0% Provisions or something because it could impact<02:14:35.719> all<02:14:35.880> three<02:14:36.079> of<02:14:36.199> these<02:14:36.400> areas<02:14:36.880> right<02:14:37.119> if 02:14:37.189 --> 02:14:37.199 align:start position:0% impact all three of these areas right if 02:14:37.199 --> 02:14:38.549 align:start position:0% impact all three of these areas right if you're<02:14:37.360> putting<02:14:37.679> someone<02:14:37.960> on<02:14:38.119> there<02:14:38.320> that 02:14:38.549 --> 02:14:38.559 align:start position:0% you're putting someone on there that 02:14:38.559 --> 02:14:40.950 align:start position:0% you're putting someone on there that actually<02:14:39.559> made<02:14:39.800> the<02:14:40.000> decision<02:14:40.360> to<02:14:40.559> put<02:14:40.719> the 02:14:40.950 --> 02:14:40.960 align:start position:0% actually made the decision to put the 02:14:40.960 --> 02:14:42.390 align:start position:0% actually made the decision to put the item<02:14:41.320> into<02:14:41.639> the 02:14:42.390 --> 02:14:42.400 align:start position:0% item into the 02:14:42.400 --> 02:14:45.390 align:start position:0% item into the school<02:14:43.400> we<02:14:43.559> end<02:14:43.760> up<02:14:43.920> with<02:14:44.040> a<02:14:44.280> problem<02:14:44.679> if<02:14:44.840> we're 02:14:45.390 --> 02:14:45.400 align:start position:0% school we end up with a problem if we're 02:14:45.400 --> 02:14:48.149 align:start position:0% school we end up with a problem if we're having<02:14:45.679> that<02:14:45.880> person<02:14:46.159> make<02:14:46.320> a<02:14:46.520> decision<02:14:47.159> to 02:14:48.149 --> 02:14:48.159 align:start position:0% having that person make a decision to 02:14:48.159 --> 02:14:50.030 align:start position:0% having that person make a decision to whether<02:14:48.320> or<02:14:48.440> not<02:14:48.599> it<02:14:48.760> stays<02:14:49.639> because<02:14:49.880> they 02:14:50.030 --> 02:14:50.040 align:start position:0% whether or not it stays because they 02:14:50.040 --> 02:14:53.669 align:start position:0% whether or not it stays because they made<02:14:50.239> the<02:14:50.360> initial<02:14:50.679> decision<02:14:51.119> for<02:14:51.239> it<02:14:51.320> to<02:14:51.480> be 02:14:53.669 --> 02:14:53.679 align:start position:0% made the initial decision for it to be 02:14:53.679 --> 02:14:58.229 align:start position:0% made the initial decision for it to be there<02:14:54.679> does<02:14:54.840> that<02:14:55.040> make 02:14:58.229 --> 02:14:58.239 align:start position:0% 02:14:58.239 --> 02:15:00.069 align:start position:0% sense 02:15:00.069 --> 02:15:00.079 align:start position:0% sense 02:15:00.079 --> 02:15:04.069 align:start position:0% sense yeah<02:15:01.079> yeah<02:15:01.239> this<02:15:01.400> a<02:15:02.079> part<02:15:02.760> so<02:15:03.000> let<02:15:03.599> anyways<02:15:03.960> we 02:15:04.069 --> 02:15:04.079 align:start position:0% yeah yeah this a part so let anyways we 02:15:04.079 --> 02:15:06.030 align:start position:0% yeah yeah this a part so let anyways we can<02:15:04.239> come<02:15:04.520> back<02:15:04.719> to<02:15:04.920> that<02:15:05.199> but<02:15:05.639> I<02:15:05.719> don't<02:15:05.880> know 02:15:06.030 --> 02:15:06.040 align:start position:0% can come back to that but I don't know 02:15:06.040 --> 02:15:08.189 align:start position:0% can come back to that but I don't know if<02:15:06.760> at<02:15:07.000> least<02:15:07.199> will<02:15:07.320> you<02:15:07.440> just<02:15:07.599> star<02:15:08.000> that 02:15:08.189 --> 02:15:08.199 align:start position:0% if at least will you just star that 02:15:08.199 --> 02:15:09.510 align:start position:0% if at least will you just star that maybe<02:15:08.400> make<02:15:08.559> a<02:15:08.679> note<02:15:08.960> somewhere<02:15:09.280> at<02:15:09.400> the 02:15:09.510 --> 02:15:09.520 align:start position:0% maybe make a note somewhere at the 02:15:09.520 --> 02:15:11.229 align:start position:0% maybe make a note somewhere at the bottom<02:15:09.800> or<02:15:09.960> something<02:15:10.360> just<02:15:10.559> that<02:15:10.840> conflict 02:15:11.229 --> 02:15:11.239 align:start position:0% bottom or something just that conflict 02:15:11.239 --> 02:15:13.549 align:start position:0% bottom or something just that conflict of<02:15:11.559> interest<02:15:12.559> making<02:15:12.880> sure<02:15:13.119> we<02:15:13.280> kind<02:15:13.400> of 02:15:13.549 --> 02:15:13.559 align:start position:0% of interest making sure we kind of 02:15:13.559 --> 02:15:16.430 align:start position:0% of interest making sure we kind of address<02:15:14.000> that<02:15:14.159> at<02:15:14.320> some<02:15:14.920> point<02:15:15.920> and<02:15:16.079> at<02:15:16.239> least 02:15:16.430 --> 02:15:16.440 align:start position:0% address that at some point and at least 02:15:16.440 --> 02:15:18.669 align:start position:0% address that at some point and at least put<02:15:16.599> in<02:15:16.719> the<02:15:16.880> chat<02:15:17.599> the<02:15:17.800> question<02:15:18.159> of<02:15:18.440> if<02:15:18.520> it 02:15:18.669 --> 02:15:18.679 align:start position:0% put in the chat the question of if it 02:15:18.679 --> 02:15:24.030 align:start position:0% put in the chat the question of if it needs<02:15:18.920> to<02:15:19.040> be<02:15:19.199> in<02:15:19.280> the<02:15:19.440> rule 02:15:24.030 --> 02:15:24.040 align:start position:0% 02:15:24.040 --> 02:15:25.910 align:start position:0% I<02:15:24.280> I<02:15:24.400> think<02:15:24.559> it<02:15:24.719> would<02:15:24.960> need 02:15:25.910 --> 02:15:25.920 align:start position:0% I I think it would need 02:15:25.920 --> 02:15:28.510 align:start position:0% I I think it would need to<02:15:26.920> just<02:15:27.400> just<02:15:27.639> that<02:15:27.880> that<02:15:28.040> they're<02:15:28.360> they're 02:15:28.510 --> 02:15:28.520 align:start position:0% to just just that that they're they're 02:15:28.520 --> 02:15:29.870 align:start position:0% to just just that that they're they're really<02:15:28.800> we<02:15:28.960> don't<02:15:29.040> want<02:15:29.159> to<02:15:29.280> conflict<02:15:29.639> in<02:15:29.760> this 02:15:29.870 --> 02:15:29.880 align:start position:0% really we don't want to conflict in this 02:15:29.880 --> 02:15:31.229 align:start position:0% really we don't want to conflict in this area<02:15:30.119> because<02:15:30.239> that<02:15:30.400> puts<02:15:30.639> that<02:15:30.800> person<02:15:31.040> at 02:15:31.229 --> 02:15:31.239 align:start position:0% area because that puts that person at 02:15:31.239 --> 02:15:35.790 align:start position:0% area because that puts that person at risk<02:15:31.520> too<02:15:32.199> right<02:15:33.239> um<02:15:34.239> so<02:15:34.880> okay<02:15:35.400> I<02:15:35.480> think<02:15:35.639> it 02:15:35.790 --> 02:15:35.800 align:start position:0% risk too right um so okay I think it 02:15:35.800 --> 02:15:38.589 align:start position:0% risk too right um so okay I think it also<02:15:36.159> really<02:15:36.480> highlights<02:15:37.320> how<02:15:37.599> all<02:15:37.719> of 02:15:38.589 --> 02:15:38.599 align:start position:0% also really highlights how all of 02:15:38.599 --> 02:15:41.229 align:start position:0% also really highlights how all of this<02:15:39.599> it<02:15:39.760> helps<02:15:40.040> us<02:15:40.199> further<02:15:40.840> understand<02:15:41.079> how 02:15:41.229 --> 02:15:41.239 align:start position:0% this it helps us further understand how 02:15:41.239 --> 02:15:43.510 align:start position:0% this it helps us further understand how all<02:15:41.360> of<02:15:41.520> this<02:15:41.639> is<02:15:41.920> happening<02:15:42.320> in<02:15:42.440> the<02:15:42.639> first 02:15:43.510 --> 02:15:43.520 align:start position:0% all of this is happening in the first 02:15:43.520 --> 02:15:47.189 align:start position:0% all of this is happening in the first place<02:15:44.520> like<02:15:44.840> like<02:15:45.199> if<02:15:45.360> we're<02:15:45.639> sincerely 02:15:47.189 --> 02:15:47.199 align:start position:0% place like like if we're sincerely 02:15:47.199 --> 02:15:51.750 align:start position:0% place like like if we're sincerely missing<02:15:48.639> um<02:15:49.639> the<02:15:49.840> ability<02:15:50.639> to 02:15:51.750 --> 02:15:51.760 align:start position:0% missing um the ability to 02:15:51.760 --> 02:15:53.709 align:start position:0% missing um the ability to check<02:15:52.079> what<02:15:52.239> is<02:15:52.719> coming 02:15:53.709 --> 02:15:53.719 align:start position:0% check what is coming 02:15:53.719 --> 02:15:55.990 align:start position:0% check what is coming in<02:15:54.719> um<02:15:54.840> it<02:15:54.960> helps<02:15:55.199> us<02:15:55.639> understand<02:15:55.800> that<02:15:55.920> a 02:15:55.990 --> 02:15:56.000 align:start position:0% in um it helps us understand that a 02:15:56.000 --> 02:15:59.030 align:start position:0% in um it helps us understand that a little<02:15:56.159> bit<02:15:56.480> better<02:15:57.480> and<02:15:57.599> then<02:15:57.880> again<02:15:58.719> helps 02:15:59.030 --> 02:15:59.040 align:start position:0% little bit better and then again helps 02:15:59.040 --> 02:16:02.149 align:start position:0% little bit better and then again helps us<02:15:59.239> be<02:15:59.360> able<02:15:59.880> to<02:16:00.880> put<02:16:01.320> put<02:16:01.480> things<02:16:01.679> in<02:16:01.920> place 02:16:02.149 --> 02:16:02.159 align:start position:0% us be able to put put things in place 02:16:02.159 --> 02:16:04.350 align:start position:0% us be able to put put things in place that<02:16:02.360> allow<02:16:03.040> you<02:16:03.159> know<02:16:03.360> quality<02:16:03.719> materials<02:16:04.159> to 02:16:04.350 --> 02:16:04.360 align:start position:0% that allow you know quality materials to 02:16:04.360 --> 02:16:05.430 align:start position:0% that allow you know quality materials to continue<02:16:04.719> to 02:16:05.430 --> 02:16:05.440 align:start position:0% continue to 02:16:05.440 --> 02:16:09.149 align:start position:0% continue to be<02:16:06.440> um<02:16:06.719> put<02:16:07.000> into<02:16:07.239> our<02:16:07.559> our<02:16:07.800> libraries 02:16:09.149 --> 02:16:09.159 align:start position:0% be um put into our our libraries 02:16:09.159 --> 02:16:12.189 align:start position:0% be um put into our our libraries so<02:16:10.159> anyway<02:16:10.719> I<02:16:11.119> I<02:16:11.280> kind<02:16:11.400> of 02:16:12.189 --> 02:16:12.199 align:start position:0% so anyway I I kind of 02:16:12.199 --> 02:16:15.790 align:start position:0% so anyway I I kind of see<02:16:13.199> that<02:16:13.360> being<02:16:13.559> a<02:16:13.800> conflict<02:16:14.199> of<02:16:14.800> interest 02:16:15.790 --> 02:16:15.800 align:start position:0% see that being a conflict of interest 02:16:15.800 --> 02:16:18.709 align:start position:0% see that being a conflict of interest being<02:16:16.040> on<02:16:16.239> that<02:16:16.679> panel<02:16:17.679> so<02:16:18.000> I<02:16:18.199> I<02:16:18.280> would<02:16:18.440> also 02:16:18.709 --> 02:16:18.719 align:start position:0% being on that panel so I I would also 02:16:18.719 --> 02:16:20.870 align:start position:0% being on that panel so I I would also like<02:16:18.880> to<02:16:19.760> not<02:16:20.000> just<02:16:20.159> let<02:16:20.360> this<02:16:20.520> fall<02:16:20.719> into 02:16:20.870 --> 02:16:20.880 align:start position:0% like to not just let this fall into 02:16:20.880 --> 02:16:22.589 align:start position:0% like to not just let this fall into under<02:16:21.040> the<02:16:21.159> radar<02:16:21.559> but<02:16:22.079> do<02:16:22.159> we<02:16:22.280> need<02:16:22.400> to 02:16:22.589 --> 02:16:22.599 align:start position:0% under the radar but do we need to 02:16:22.599 --> 02:16:23.750 align:start position:0% under the radar but do we need to address<02:16:22.920> that 02:16:23.750 --> 02:16:23.760 align:start position:0% address that 02:16:23.760 --> 02:16:26.069 align:start position:0% address that now<02:16:24.760> and<02:16:24.920> when<02:16:25.040> we<02:16:25.199> say<02:16:25.360> we'll<02:16:25.559> think<02:16:25.800> about 02:16:26.069 --> 02:16:26.079 align:start position:0% now and when we say we'll think about 02:16:26.079 --> 02:16:28.990 align:start position:0% now and when we say we'll think about that<02:16:26.360> like<02:16:26.480> when<02:16:26.599> do<02:16:26.719> we<02:16:26.840> get<02:16:27.040> back<02:16:27.199> to<02:16:27.760> it<02:16:28.760> no 02:16:28.990 --> 02:16:29.000 align:start position:0% that like when do we get back to it no 02:16:29.000 --> 02:16:30.750 align:start position:0% that like when do we get back to it no that's<02:16:29.159> what<02:16:29.280> I'm<02:16:29.440> saying<02:16:29.760> it<02:16:30.000> starts<02:16:30.480> so<02:16:30.639> that 02:16:30.750 --> 02:16:30.760 align:start position:0% that's what I'm saying it starts so that 02:16:30.760 --> 02:16:32.990 align:start position:0% that's what I'm saying it starts so that it<02:16:31.040> we<02:16:31.119> can<02:16:31.280> put<02:16:31.440> it<02:16:31.520> in<02:16:31.639> the<02:16:31.760> right 02:16:32.990 --> 02:16:33.000 align:start position:0% it we can put it in the right 02:16:33.000 --> 02:16:35.910 align:start position:0% it we can put it in the right place<02:16:34.000> okay<02:16:34.479> does<02:16:34.679> that<02:16:34.840> make<02:16:35.080> sense<02:16:35.399> I<02:16:35.559> just 02:16:35.910 --> 02:16:35.920 align:start position:0% place okay does that make sense I just 02:16:35.920 --> 02:16:37.750 align:start position:0% place okay does that make sense I just asked<02:16:36.160> it<02:16:36.319> at<02:16:36.439> least<02:16:36.639> did<02:16:36.719> you<02:16:36.880> add<02:16:37.000> it<02:16:37.080> to<02:16:37.240> the 02:16:37.750 --> 02:16:37.760 align:start position:0% asked it at least did you add it to the 02:16:37.760 --> 02:16:39.950 align:start position:0% asked it at least did you add it to the bottom<02:16:38.760> she<02:16:38.960> just<02:16:39.120> added<02:16:39.439> to<02:16:39.559> the<02:16:39.639> bottom<02:16:39.840> of 02:16:39.950 --> 02:16:39.960 align:start position:0% bottom she just added to the bottom of 02:16:39.960 --> 02:16:44.190 align:start position:0% bottom she just added to the bottom of the<02:16:40.080> document<02:16:40.439> so<02:16:40.599> we<02:16:40.719> don't<02:16:41.200> lose<02:16:41.719> it 02:16:44.190 --> 02:16:44.200 align:start position:0% the document so we don't lose it 02:16:44.200 --> 02:16:49.429 align:start position:0% the document so we don't lose it okay<02:16:45.200> okay<02:16:45.479> I<02:16:45.559> see<02:16:45.800> it<02:16:46.000> thank 02:16:49.429 --> 02:16:49.439 align:start position:0% 02:16:49.439 --> 02:16:51.469 align:start position:0% you<02:16:50.439> okay 02:16:51.469 --> 02:16:51.479 align:start position:0% you okay 02:16:51.479 --> 02:16:54.309 align:start position:0% you okay where<02:16:51.679> are<02:16:52.399> we<02:16:53.399> so<02:16:53.599> let<02:16:53.719> me<02:16:53.840> read<02:16:54.040> that<02:16:54.160> again 02:16:54.309 --> 02:16:54.319 align:start position:0% where are we so let me read that again 02:16:54.319 --> 02:16:57.910 align:start position:0% where are we so let me read that again the<02:16:54.439> Lea<02:16:54.840> design<02:16:55.519> reports<02:16:56.280> the<02:16:56.920> determination 02:16:57.910 --> 02:16:57.920 align:start position:0% the Lea design reports the determination 02:16:57.920 --> 02:17:00.070 align:start position:0% the Lea design reports the determination to<02:16:58.280> the<02:16:58.439> State<02:16:58.760> library<02:16:59.200> media<02:16:59.599> specialist 02:17:00.070 --> 02:17:00.080 align:start position:0% to the State library media specialist 02:17:00.080 --> 02:17:01.509 align:start position:0% to the State library media specialist within<02:17:00.319> 10<02:17:00.559> days<02:17:00.840> after<02:17:01.080> a<02:17:01.240> final 02:17:01.509 --> 02:17:01.519 align:start position:0% within 10 days after a final 02:17:01.519 --> 02:17:04.669 align:start position:0% within 10 days after a final determination<02:17:02.280> was<02:17:02.960> made<02:17:03.960> okay<02:17:04.160> I<02:17:04.280> feel<02:17:04.519> good 02:17:04.669 --> 02:17:04.679 align:start position:0% determination was made okay I feel good 02:17:04.679 --> 02:17:06.190 align:start position:0% determination was made okay I feel good about<02:17:04.920> that<02:17:05.080> we'll<02:17:05.280> just<02:17:05.439> have<02:17:05.559> to<02:17:05.760> indicate 02:17:06.190 --> 02:17:06.200 align:start position:0% about that we'll just have to indicate 02:17:06.200 --> 02:17:07.709 align:start position:0% about that we'll just have to indicate that<02:17:06.359> there's<02:17:06.639> different<02:17:07.080> times<02:17:07.359> when<02:17:07.519> a 02:17:07.709 --> 02:17:07.719 align:start position:0% that there's different times when a 02:17:07.719 --> 02:17:11.389 align:start position:0% that there's different times when a determination<02:17:08.319> can<02:17:08.479> be<02:17:08.639> made<02:17:09.000> right<02:17:09.160> final 02:17:11.389 --> 02:17:11.399 align:start position:0% determination can be made right final 02:17:11.399 --> 02:17:13.750 align:start position:0% determination can be made right final determination<02:17:12.399> okay<02:17:13.120> if<02:17:13.240> the<02:17:13.399> objective 02:17:13.750 --> 02:17:13.760 align:start position:0% determination okay if the objective 02:17:13.760 --> 02:17:15.750 align:start position:0% determination okay if the objective sense<02:17:14.000> of<02:17:14.120> material<02:17:14.479> standard<02:17:14.880> is<02:17:15.080> not<02:17:15.319> a<02:17:15.479> pill 02:17:15.750 --> 02:17:15.760 align:start position:0% sense of material standard is not a pill 02:17:15.760 --> 02:17:20.150 align:start position:0% sense of material standard is not a pill you<02:17:15.880> want<02:17:15.960> to<02:17:16.240> add<02:17:16.479> in<02:17:16.920> each<02:17:17.359> time<02:17:17.800> or<02:17:18.639> uh<02:17:19.639> every 02:17:20.150 --> 02:17:20.160 align:start position:0% you want to add in each time or uh every 02:17:20.160 --> 02:17:23.030 align:start position:0% you want to add in each time or uh every time<02:17:20.519> a<02:17:20.920> fin<02:17:21.160> determination<02:17:22.160> I<02:17:22.240> don't 02:17:23.030 --> 02:17:23.040 align:start position:0% time a fin determination I don't 02:17:23.040 --> 02:17:27.589 align:start position:0% time a fin determination I don't know<02:17:24.040> within<02:17:24.399> 10<02:17:24.760> days<02:17:25.840> each<02:17:26.840> time<02:17:27.120> a<02:17:27.280> final 02:17:27.589 --> 02:17:27.599 align:start position:0% know within 10 days each time a final 02:17:27.599 --> 02:17:29.629 align:start position:0% know within 10 days each time a final determination<02:17:28.280> has<02:17:28.439> been 02:17:29.629 --> 02:17:29.639 align:start position:0% determination has been 02:17:29.639 --> 02:17:33.110 align:start position:0% determination has been made<02:17:30.639> so<02:17:30.840> that<02:17:31.000> they<02:17:31.399> understand<02:17:31.599> that<02:17:32.120> there 02:17:33.110 --> 02:17:33.120 align:start position:0% made so that they understand that there 02:17:33.120 --> 02:17:42.389 align:start position:0% made so that they understand that there are<02:17:33.880> it<02:17:34.000> may<02:17:34.200> be 02:17:42.389 --> 02:17:42.399 align:start position:0% 02:17:42.399 --> 02:17:45.309 align:start position:0% several<02:17:43.399> after<02:17:43.760> each<02:17:44.040> final<02:17:44.319> determination 02:17:45.309 --> 02:17:45.319 align:start position:0% several after each final determination 02:17:45.319 --> 02:17:47.990 align:start position:0% several after each final determination is<02:17:45.479> that<02:17:45.719> what<02:17:46.639> yeah<02:17:46.840> something<02:17:47.120> like 02:17:47.990 --> 02:17:48.000 align:start position:0% is that what yeah something like 02:17:48.000 --> 02:17:51.389 align:start position:0% is that what yeah something like that<02:17:49.000> is<02:17:49.240> made 02:17:51.389 --> 02:17:51.399 align:start position:0% that is made 02:17:51.399 --> 02:17:55.669 align:start position:0% that is made or<02:17:51.679> has<02:17:51.880> been 02:17:55.669 --> 02:17:55.679 align:start position:0% 02:17:55.679 --> 02:17:58.709 align:start position:0% made<02:17:56.679> yeah<02:17:57.120> we<02:17:57.280> do<02:17:57.439> need<02:17:57.639> the 02:17:58.709 --> 02:17:58.719 align:start position:0% made yeah we do need the 02:17:58.719 --> 02:18:03.429 align:start position:0% made yeah we do need the has<02:17:59.719> or 02:18:03.429 --> 02:18:03.439 align:start position:0% 02:18:03.439 --> 02:18:05.150 align:start position:0% is 02:18:05.150 --> 02:18:05.160 align:start position:0% is 02:18:05.160 --> 02:18:07.669 align:start position:0% is okay<02:18:06.160> if<02:18:06.359> the<02:18:06.519> objective<02:18:06.920> sense<02:18:07.160> to<02:18:07.319> material 02:18:07.669 --> 02:18:07.679 align:start position:0% okay if the objective sense to material 02:18:07.679 --> 02:18:10.990 align:start position:0% okay if the objective sense to material standard<02:18:08.000> is<02:18:08.240> not<02:18:08.599> upheld<02:18:09.599> initiated<02:18:10.200> sub<02:18:10.800> yep 02:18:10.990 --> 02:18:11.000 align:start position:0% standard is not upheld initiated sub yep 02:18:11.000 --> 02:18:12.270 align:start position:0% standard is not upheld initiated sub yep that's<02:18:11.120> when<02:18:11.240> you<02:18:11.359> go<02:18:11.479> on<02:18:11.559> to<02:18:11.679> the<02:18:11.840> next<02:18:12.040> one 02:18:12.270 --> 02:18:12.280 align:start position:0% that's when you go on to the next one 02:18:12.280 --> 02:18:13.950 align:start position:0% that's when you go on to the next one the<02:18:12.359> Lea<02:18:12.760> shall<02:18:13.000> facilitate<02:18:13.439> the<02:18:13.559> prompt 02:18:13.950 --> 02:18:13.960 align:start position:0% the Lea shall facilitate the prompt 02:18:13.960 --> 02:18:15.270 align:start position:0% the Lea shall facilitate the prompt return<02:18:14.160> or<02:18:14.319> disposal<02:18:14.719> of<02:18:14.840> materials 02:18:15.270 --> 02:18:15.280 align:start position:0% return or disposal of materials 02:18:15.280 --> 02:18:17.830 align:start position:0% return or disposal of materials identified<02:18:15.760> for<02:18:16.359> removal<02:18:17.359> sensitive 02:18:17.830 --> 02:18:17.840 align:start position:0% identified for removal sensitive 02:18:17.840 --> 02:18:19.549 align:start position:0% identified for removal sensitive materials<02:18:18.240> removed<02:18:18.760> and<02:18:18.960> Michelle<02:18:19.359> brought 02:18:19.549 --> 02:18:19.559 align:start position:0% materials removed and Michelle brought 02:18:19.559 --> 02:18:21.910 align:start position:0% materials removed and Michelle brought up<02:18:20.439> I<02:18:20.800> I'd<02:18:20.960> attach<02:18:21.280> this<02:18:21.439> because<02:18:21.559> it's<02:18:21.679> had<02:18:21.800> a 02:18:21.910 --> 02:18:21.920 align:start position:0% up I I'd attach this because it's had a 02:18:21.920 --> 02:18:25.270 align:start position:0% up I I'd attach this because it's had a change<02:18:22.160> in<02:18:22.280> the<02:18:22.800> law<02:18:23.800> but<02:18:24.319> um<02:18:24.800> she<02:18:24.960> said<02:18:25.160> it 02:18:25.270 --> 02:18:25.280 align:start position:0% change in the law but um she said it 02:18:25.280 --> 02:18:26.750 align:start position:0% change in the law but um she said it would<02:18:25.479> probably<02:18:25.760> be<02:18:25.880> better<02:18:26.080> to<02:18:26.280> reference 02:18:26.750 --> 02:18:26.760 align:start position:0% would probably be better to reference 02:18:26.760 --> 02:18:28.270 align:start position:0% would probably be better to reference because<02:18:26.960> you<02:18:27.160> actually<02:18:27.399> have<02:18:27.519> to<02:18:27.639> show<02:18:27.880> harm 02:18:28.270 --> 02:18:28.280 align:start position:0% because you actually have to show harm 02:18:28.280 --> 02:18:30.870 align:start position:0% because you actually have to show harm in<02:18:28.479> this<02:18:28.599> one<02:18:28.880> is<02:18:29.000> that<02:18:29.200> right<02:18:29.639> Michelle<02:18:30.639> for 02:18:30.870 --> 02:18:30.880 align:start position:0% in this one is that right Michelle for 02:18:30.880 --> 02:18:33.910 align:start position:0% in this one is that right Michelle for this<02:18:31.840> yes<02:18:32.840> there<02:18:33.040> you<02:18:33.200> have<02:18:33.319> to<02:18:33.439> be<02:18:33.559> able<02:18:33.760> to 02:18:33.910 --> 02:18:33.920 align:start position:0% this yes there you have to be able to 02:18:33.920 --> 02:18:37.110 align:start position:0% this yes there you have to be able to show<02:18:34.200> that<02:18:34.399> there<02:18:34.840> was<02:18:35.840> medical<02:18:36.319> or<02:18:36.559> emotional 02:18:37.110 --> 02:18:37.120 align:start position:0% show that there was medical or emotional 02:18:37.120 --> 02:18:39.549 align:start position:0% show that there was medical or emotional harm<02:18:37.439> to<02:18:37.639> the<02:18:37.840> student<02:18:38.280> or<02:18:38.479> to<02:18:38.639> the<02:18:38.840> child<02:18:39.439> the 02:18:39.549 --> 02:18:39.559 align:start position:0% harm to the student or to the child the 02:18:39.559 --> 02:18:42.549 align:start position:0% harm to the student or to the child the minor<02:18:40.080> for<02:18:40.359> doing<02:18:40.679> it<02:18:41.479> so<02:18:41.760> it<02:18:42.000> may<02:18:42.200> be<02:18:42.359> better 02:18:42.549 --> 02:18:42.559 align:start position:0% minor for doing it so it may be better 02:18:42.559 --> 02:18:45.790 align:start position:0% minor for doing it so it may be better to<02:18:42.760> reference<02:18:43.160> our<02:18:43.760> educator<02:18:44.800> standards 02:18:45.790 --> 02:18:45.800 align:start position:0% to reference our educator standards 02:18:45.800 --> 02:18:47.549 align:start position:0% to reference our educator standards right<02:18:46.040> there<02:18:46.439> so 02:18:47.549 --> 02:18:47.559 align:start position:0% right there so 02:18:47.559 --> 02:18:50.830 align:start position:0% right there so r277<02:18:48.559> 217 02:18:50.830 --> 02:18:50.840 align:start position:0% r277 217 02:18:50.840 --> 02:18:52.469 align:start position:0% r277 217 because<02:18:51.000> they<02:18:51.160> can't<02:18:51.599> provide<02:18:52.000> them<02:18:52.240> with 02:18:52.469 --> 02:18:52.479 align:start position:0% because they can't provide them with 02:18:52.479 --> 02:18:55.509 align:start position:0% because they can't provide them with these<02:18:52.719> materials<02:18:53.559> according<02:18:53.920> to<02:18:54.120> our<02:18:54.840> legal 02:18:55.509 --> 02:18:55.519 align:start position:0% these materials according to our legal 02:18:55.519 --> 02:19:00.629 align:start position:0% these materials according to our legal standard 02:19:00.629 --> 02:19:00.639 align:start position:0% 02:19:00.639 --> 02:19:03.030 align:start position:0% so<02:19:01.639> let<02:19:01.719> me<02:19:01.840> see<02:19:01.960> if<02:19:02.040> I<02:19:02.160> had<02:19:02.280> any<02:19:02.439> other<02:19:02.599> notes<02:19:02.960> I 02:19:03.030 --> 02:19:03.040 align:start position:0% so let me see if I had any other notes I 02:19:03.040 --> 02:19:04.709 align:start position:0% so let me see if I had any other notes I think<02:19:03.240> that<02:19:03.359> was<02:19:03.519> it<02:19:03.679> on<02:19:03.880> that<02:19:04.080> section<02:19:04.359> for<02:19:04.519> me 02:19:04.709 --> 02:19:04.719 align:start position:0% think that was it on that section for me 02:19:04.719 --> 02:19:07.950 align:start position:0% think that was it on that section for me I<02:19:04.800> don't<02:19:04.920> know<02:19:05.040> if<02:19:05.160> others<02:19:05.479> had<02:19:05.639> notes<02:19:05.920> on 02:19:07.950 --> 02:19:07.960 align:start position:0% I don't know if others had notes on 02:19:07.960 --> 02:19:10.270 align:start position:0% I don't know if others had notes on there<02:19:08.960> board<02:19:09.280> members<02:19:09.679> do<02:19:09.760> you<02:19:09.920> have<02:19:10.080> any 02:19:10.270 --> 02:19:10.280 align:start position:0% there board members do you have any 02:19:10.280 --> 02:19:11.509 align:start position:0% there board members do you have any other 02:19:11.509 --> 02:19:11.519 align:start position:0% other 02:19:11.519 --> 02:19:14.070 align:start position:0% other additional<02:19:12.519> so<02:19:12.800> address<02:19:13.280> the<02:19:13.519> conflict<02:19:13.920> of 02:19:14.070 --> 02:19:14.080 align:start position:0% additional so address the conflict of 02:19:14.080 --> 02:19:15.469 align:start position:0% additional so address the conflict of interest<02:19:14.439> I<02:19:14.519> still<02:19:14.760> think<02:19:14.960> that<02:19:15.040> needs<02:19:15.240> to<02:19:15.359> go 02:19:15.469 --> 02:19:15.479 align:start position:0% interest I still think that needs to go 02:19:15.479 --> 02:19:17.270 align:start position:0% interest I still think that needs to go up<02:19:15.599> in<02:19:15.719> the<02:19:15.880> general<02:19:16.319> because<02:19:16.519> it<02:19:16.679> applies<02:19:17.040> to 02:19:17.270 --> 02:19:17.280 align:start position:0% up in the general because it applies to 02:19:17.280 --> 02:19:19.549 align:start position:0% up in the general because it applies to all<02:19:17.479> of<02:19:17.679> the 02:19:19.549 --> 02:19:19.559 align:start position:0% all of the 02:19:19.559 --> 02:19:22.110 align:start position:0% all of the sections<02:19:20.559> um 02:19:22.110 --> 02:19:22.120 align:start position:0% sections um 02:19:22.120 --> 02:19:27.270 align:start position:0% sections um what's<02:19:22.319> the<02:19:22.479> language<02:19:22.920> we<02:19:23.040> would<02:19:23.240> want 02:19:27.270 --> 02:19:27.280 align:start position:0% 02:19:27.280 --> 02:19:30.030 align:start position:0% there<02:19:28.280> so<02:19:28.479> someone<02:19:28.840> that<02:19:29.000> has<02:19:29.200> secured<02:19:29.800> the 02:19:30.030 --> 02:19:30.040 align:start position:0% there so someone that has secured the 02:19:30.040 --> 02:19:31.190 align:start position:0% there so someone that has secured the something<02:19:30.399> I<02:19:30.479> don't<02:19:30.639> know<02:19:30.800> I'm<02:19:30.920> getting<02:19:31.120> the 02:19:31.190 --> 02:19:31.200 align:start position:0% something I don't know I'm getting the 02:19:31.200 --> 02:19:32.790 align:start position:0% something I don't know I'm getting the language<02:19:31.599> right 02:19:32.790 --> 02:19:32.800 align:start position:0% language right 02:19:32.800 --> 02:19:35.790 align:start position:0% language right but<02:19:33.800> anybody<02:19:34.240> that's 02:19:35.790 --> 02:19:35.800 align:start position:0% but anybody that's 02:19:35.800 --> 02:19:39.790 align:start position:0% but anybody that's um<02:19:36.800> an<02:19:37.000> individual<02:19:37.639> that<02:19:37.880> has<02:19:38.399> secured<02:19:39.399> the 02:19:39.790 --> 02:19:39.800 align:start position:0% um an individual that has secured the 02:19:39.800 --> 02:19:42.070 align:start position:0% um an individual that has secured the the<02:19:40.519> challenged 02:19:42.070 --> 02:19:42.080 align:start position:0% the challenged 02:19:42.080 --> 02:19:44.830 align:start position:0% the challenged materials<02:19:43.080> may<02:19:43.359> not<02:19:43.719> participate<02:19:44.399> in<02:19:44.679> the 02:19:44.830 --> 02:19:44.840 align:start position:0% materials may not participate in the 02:19:44.840 --> 02:19:46.030 align:start position:0% materials may not participate in the review 02:19:46.030 --> 02:19:46.040 align:start position:0% review 02:19:46.040 --> 02:19:48.910 align:start position:0% review process<02:19:47.040> a<02:19:47.280> review<02:19:47.760> process<02:19:48.200> any<02:19:48.479> review 02:19:48.910 --> 02:19:48.920 align:start position:0% process a review process any review 02:19:48.920 --> 02:19:52.389 align:start position:0% process a review process any review process<02:19:49.319> maybe<02:19:49.560> that's<02:19:49.760> the<02:19:49.920> better 02:19:52.389 --> 02:19:52.399 align:start position:0% process maybe that's the better 02:19:52.399 --> 02:19:54.510 align:start position:0% process maybe that's the better is<02:19:52.640> the<02:19:52.800> word 02:19:54.510 --> 02:19:54.520 align:start position:0% is the word 02:19:54.520 --> 02:19:56.510 align:start position:0% is the word procured<02:19:55.520> yeah 02:19:56.510 --> 02:19:56.520 align:start position:0% procured yeah 02:19:56.520 --> 02:19:59.469 align:start position:0% procured yeah probably<02:19:57.520> well<02:19:57.640> I<02:19:57.760> don't<02:19:58.120> is<02:19:58.240> it<02:19:58.479> is<02:19:58.600> it<02:19:59.200> is<02:19:59.319> it 02:19:59.469 --> 02:19:59.479 align:start position:0% probably well I don't is it is it is it 02:19:59.479 --> 02:20:03.830 align:start position:0% probably well I don't is it is it is it always<02:20:00.000> procured<02:20:01.000> I<02:20:01.200> I<02:20:01.280> don't<02:20:01.680> know<02:20:02.680> who<02:20:03.680> what 02:20:03.830 --> 02:20:03.840 align:start position:0% always procured I I don't know who what 02:20:03.840 --> 02:20:05.990 align:start position:0% always procured I I don't know who what would<02:20:04.000> the<02:20:04.160> word<02:20:04.399> be<02:20:04.680> because<02:20:05.399> let's<02:20:05.600> say<02:20:05.800> it's 02:20:05.990 --> 02:20:06.000 align:start position:0% would the word be because let's say it's 02:20:06.000 --> 02:20:07.950 align:start position:0% would the word be because let's say it's not<02:20:06.240> purchased<02:20:06.840> let's<02:20:07.000> say<02:20:07.120> it's<02:20:07.319> donated<02:20:07.800> is 02:20:07.950 --> 02:20:07.960 align:start position:0% not purchased let's say it's donated is 02:20:07.960 --> 02:20:10.349 align:start position:0% not purchased let's say it's donated is that<02:20:08.280> procuring<02:20:08.800> maybe<02:20:09.040> it 02:20:10.349 --> 02:20:10.359 align:start position:0% that procuring maybe it 02:20:10.359 --> 02:20:14.270 align:start position:0% that procuring maybe it is<02:20:11.359> deina<02:20:11.800> what<02:20:12.000> language<02:20:12.880> said 02:20:14.270 --> 02:20:14.280 align:start position:0% is deina what language said 02:20:14.280 --> 02:20:18.389 align:start position:0% is deina what language said approved<02:20:15.439> approved<02:20:16.439> challenge<02:20:17.399> materials 02:20:18.389 --> 02:20:18.399 align:start position:0% approved approved challenge materials 02:20:18.399 --> 02:20:22.550 align:start position:0% approved approved challenge materials initially<02:20:19.040> approved 02:20:22.550 --> 02:20:22.560 align:start position:0% 02:20:22.560 --> 02:20:25.510 align:start position:0% um<02:20:23.560> I<02:20:24.160> I<02:20:24.319> like 02:20:25.510 --> 02:20:25.520 align:start position:0% um I I like 02:20:25.520 --> 02:20:29.870 align:start position:0% um I I like procured<02:20:26.520> um<02:20:27.319> Librarians<02:20:28.280> are<02:20:29.280> I<02:20:29.359> mean<02:20:29.800> I 02:20:29.870 --> 02:20:29.880 align:start position:0% procured um Librarians are I mean I 02:20:29.880 --> 02:20:32.389 align:start position:0% procured um Librarians are I mean I think<02:20:30.000> we<02:20:30.120> did<02:20:30.280> a<02:20:30.479> math<02:20:31.120> calculation<02:20:32.120> you<02:20:32.240> know 02:20:32.389 --> 02:20:32.399 align:start position:0% think we did a math calculation you know 02:20:32.399 --> 02:20:33.990 align:start position:0% think we did a math calculation you know a<02:20:32.479> couple<02:20:32.760> years<02:20:33.080> back<02:20:33.319> it<02:20:33.399> would<02:20:33.560> be 02:20:33.990 --> 02:20:34.000 align:start position:0% a couple years back it would be 02:20:34.000 --> 02:20:35.469 align:start position:0% a couple years back it would be physically<02:20:34.479> impossible<02:20:35.040> for<02:20:35.240> every 02:20:35.469 --> 02:20:35.479 align:start position:0% physically impossible for every 02:20:35.479 --> 02:20:37.950 align:start position:0% physically impossible for every librarian<02:20:36.040> to<02:20:36.200> read<02:20:36.520> every<02:20:37.120> material<02:20:37.680> that 02:20:37.950 --> 02:20:37.960 align:start position:0% librarian to read every material that 02:20:37.960 --> 02:20:43.590 align:start position:0% librarian to read every material that comes<02:20:38.200> into<02:20:38.479> the<02:20:39.000> library<02:20:40.000> and<02:20:40.240> so<02:20:41.120> um<02:20:42.600> they 02:20:43.590 --> 02:20:43.600 align:start position:0% comes into the library and so um they 02:20:43.600 --> 02:20:46.630 align:start position:0% comes into the library and so um they they<02:20:44.240> probably<02:20:45.240> I<02:20:45.600> I<02:20:45.840> I<02:20:45.920> don't<02:20:46.160> know<02:20:46.359> that<02:20:46.520> they 02:20:46.630 --> 02:20:46.640 align:start position:0% they probably I I I don't know that they 02:20:46.640 --> 02:20:49.510 align:start position:0% they probably I I I don't know that they know<02:20:47.000> every<02:20:47.319> single<02:20:47.800> content<02:20:48.800> that's<02:20:49.359> that's 02:20:49.510 --> 02:20:49.520 align:start position:0% know every single content that's that's 02:20:49.520 --> 02:20:52.429 align:start position:0% know every single content that's that's in<02:20:49.640> a<02:20:49.840> book<02:20:50.120> and<02:20:50.240> they<02:20:50.359> do<02:20:50.720> their<02:20:50.920> best<02:20:51.319> but<02:20:52.160> um 02:20:52.429 --> 02:20:52.439 align:start position:0% in a book and they do their best but um 02:20:52.439 --> 02:20:53.990 align:start position:0% in a book and they do their best but um and<02:20:52.520> so<02:20:52.720> that's<02:20:52.840> why<02:20:52.960> I<02:20:53.080> like<02:20:53.640> because<02:20:53.800> I<02:20:53.880> don't 02:20:53.990 --> 02:20:54.000 align:start position:0% and so that's why I like because I don't 02:20:54.000 --> 02:20:55.150 align:start position:0% and so that's why I like because I don't know<02:20:54.120> that<02:20:54.240> they're<02:20:54.479> approving<02:20:54.960> it 02:20:55.150 --> 02:20:55.160 align:start position:0% know that they're approving it 02:20:55.160 --> 02:20:57.469 align:start position:0% know that they're approving it necessarily<02:20:55.720> that's<02:20:55.840> why<02:20:56.000> I<02:20:56.080> like<02:20:56.479> procured 02:20:57.469 --> 02:20:57.479 align:start position:0% necessarily that's why I like procured 02:20:57.479 --> 02:20:59.469 align:start position:0% necessarily that's why I like procured um<02:20:57.880> the<02:20:58.000> other<02:20:58.200> thing<02:20:58.319> to<02:20:58.439> think<02:20:58.760> about<02:20:59.200> is 02:20:59.469 --> 02:20:59.479 align:start position:0% um the other thing to think about is 02:20:59.479 --> 02:21:03.670 align:start position:0% um the other thing to think about is that<02:21:00.560> this<02:21:01.560> potentially<02:21:02.359> May<02:21:02.760> remove<02:21:03.359> any 02:21:03.670 --> 02:21:03.680 align:start position:0% that this potentially May remove any 02:21:03.680 --> 02:21:08.150 align:start position:0% that this potentially May remove any Librarian<02:21:04.560> from<02:21:05.319> participating<02:21:06.120> in<02:21:06.319> a<02:21:07.160> review 02:21:08.150 --> 02:21:08.160 align:start position:0% Librarian from participating in a review 02:21:08.160 --> 02:21:10.830 align:start position:0% Librarian from participating in a review and<02:21:08.399> that<02:21:08.640> I<02:21:08.760> say<02:21:09.080> that<02:21:09.319> because<02:21:10.080> let's<02:21:10.319> say<02:21:10.640> a 02:21:10.830 --> 02:21:10.840 align:start position:0% and that I say that because let's say a 02:21:10.840 --> 02:21:14.349 align:start position:0% and that I say that because let's say a book<02:21:11.040> was<02:21:11.200> purchased<02:21:11.640> in<02:21:11.840> this<02:21:12.560> Library<02:21:13.560> um 02:21:14.349 --> 02:21:14.359 align:start position:0% book was purchased in this Library um 02:21:14.359 --> 02:21:16.349 align:start position:0% book was purchased in this Library um it's<02:21:14.880> it's<02:21:15.120> often<02:21:15.520> times<02:21:15.760> that<02:21:15.920> the<02:21:16.040> books<02:21:16.240> are 02:21:16.349 --> 02:21:16.359 align:start position:0% it's it's often times that the books are 02:21:16.359 --> 02:21:18.110 align:start position:0% it's it's often times that the books are purchased<02:21:16.800> across<02:21:17.120> the<02:21:17.280> district<02:21:17.640> so<02:21:17.920> every 02:21:18.110 --> 02:21:18.120 align:start position:0% purchased across the district so every 02:21:18.120 --> 02:21:21.309 align:start position:0% purchased across the district so every school<02:21:18.479> may<02:21:18.720> have<02:21:18.960> that<02:21:19.200> book<02:21:20.200> um<02:21:20.399> and 02:21:21.309 --> 02:21:21.319 align:start position:0% school may have that book um and 02:21:21.319 --> 02:21:23.830 align:start position:0% school may have that book um and so<02:21:22.319> by<02:21:22.560> saying<02:21:22.920> that<02:21:23.080> the<02:21:23.240> person<02:21:23.560> who 02:21:23.830 --> 02:21:23.840 align:start position:0% so by saying that the person who 02:21:23.840 --> 02:21:26.190 align:start position:0% so by saying that the person who procured<02:21:24.319> the<02:21:24.479> materials<02:21:25.399> are<02:21:25.560> we<02:21:25.840> also 02:21:26.190 --> 02:21:26.200 align:start position:0% procured the materials are we also 02:21:26.200 --> 02:21:28.550 align:start position:0% procured the materials are we also saying<02:21:26.600> that<02:21:26.800> if<02:21:26.920> it<02:21:27.040> was<02:21:27.200> challenged<02:21:27.600> at<02:21:27.840> this 02:21:28.550 --> 02:21:28.560 align:start position:0% saying that if it was challenged at this 02:21:28.560 --> 02:21:31.510 align:start position:0% saying that if it was challenged at this school<02:21:29.520> then<02:21:29.800> any<02:21:30.080> librarian<02:21:30.960> who<02:21:31.160> has<02:21:31.359> that 02:21:31.510 --> 02:21:31.520 align:start position:0% school then any librarian who has that 02:21:31.520 --> 02:21:33.469 align:start position:0% school then any librarian who has that book<02:21:31.680> in<02:21:31.840> their<02:21:32.000> library<02:21:32.760> because<02:21:33.000> they<02:21:33.120> chose 02:21:33.469 --> 02:21:33.479 align:start position:0% book in their library because they chose 02:21:33.479 --> 02:21:34.510 align:start position:0% book in their library because they chose that<02:21:33.640> book<02:21:33.800> wouldn't<02:21:34.040> be<02:21:34.160> able<02:21:34.319> to 02:21:34.510 --> 02:21:34.520 align:start position:0% that book wouldn't be able to 02:21:34.520 --> 02:21:37.309 align:start position:0% that book wouldn't be able to participate<02:21:35.040> in<02:21:35.120> a<02:21:35.319> review<02:21:35.840> process<02:21:36.760> did<02:21:37.040> they 02:21:37.309 --> 02:21:37.319 align:start position:0% participate in a review process did they 02:21:37.319 --> 02:21:38.750 align:start position:0% participate in a review process did they well<02:21:37.520> I<02:21:37.600> think<02:21:37.760> it's<02:21:37.920> just<02:21:38.160> that<02:21:38.359> did<02:21:38.600> they 02:21:38.750 --> 02:21:38.760 align:start position:0% well I think it's just that did they 02:21:38.760 --> 02:21:41.870 align:start position:0% well I think it's just that did they choose<02:21:39.120> the<02:21:39.280> book<02:21:39.479> to<02:21:39.640> be<02:21:39.880> there<02:21:40.840> and<02:21:41.479> I<02:21:41.680> I<02:21:41.760> just 02:21:41.870 --> 02:21:41.880 align:start position:0% choose the book to be there and I I just 02:21:41.880 --> 02:21:43.910 align:start position:0% choose the book to be there and I I just have<02:21:42.000> to<02:21:42.120> argue<02:21:42.439> one<02:21:42.600> point<02:21:42.880> it<02:21:43.040> used<02:21:43.319> to<02:21:43.479> be 02:21:43.910 --> 02:21:43.920 align:start position:0% have to argue one point it used to be 02:21:43.920 --> 02:21:45.910 align:start position:0% have to argue one point it used to be that<02:21:44.040> you're<02:21:44.280> right<02:21:44.600> we<02:21:44.720> couldn't<02:21:45.000> have<02:21:45.560> read 02:21:45.910 --> 02:21:45.920 align:start position:0% that you're right we couldn't have read 02:21:45.920 --> 02:21:48.550 align:start position:0% that you're right we couldn't have read all<02:21:46.120> the<02:21:46.280> materials<02:21:47.000> right<02:21:48.000> and<02:21:48.200> and<02:21:48.319> gotten 02:21:48.550 --> 02:21:48.560 align:start position:0% all the materials right and and gotten 02:21:48.560 --> 02:21:50.750 align:start position:0% all the materials right and and gotten through<02:21:48.760> everything<02:21:49.359> anymore<02:21:49.960> though<02:21:50.319> there 02:21:50.750 --> 02:21:50.760 align:start position:0% through everything anymore though there 02:21:50.760 --> 02:21:53.070 align:start position:0% through everything anymore though there is<02:21:51.160> there<02:21:51.319> are 02:21:53.070 --> 02:21:53.080 align:start position:0% is there are 02:21:53.080 --> 02:21:56.750 align:start position:0% is there are um<02:21:54.080> uh<02:21:54.319> what<02:21:54.640> summaries<02:21:55.640> of<02:21:55.960> most<02:21:56.359> books<02:21:56.640> that 02:21:56.750 --> 02:21:56.760 align:start position:0% um uh what summaries of most books that 02:21:56.760 --> 02:21:58.469 align:start position:0% um uh what summaries of most books that we're<02:21:56.920> having<02:21:57.200> concerns<02:21:57.680> with 02:21:58.469 --> 02:21:58.479 align:start position:0% we're having concerns with 02:21:58.479 --> 02:22:01.429 align:start position:0% we're having concerns with so<02:21:59.479> I<02:21:59.600> don't<02:22:00.160> I<02:22:00.240> think<02:22:00.439> a<02:22:00.680> Librarians<02:22:01.200> got<02:22:01.319> to 02:22:01.429 --> 02:22:01.439 align:start position:0% so I don't I think a Librarians got to 02:22:01.439 --> 02:22:04.030 align:start position:0% so I don't I think a Librarians got to be<02:22:01.560> more<02:22:01.840> Vigilant<02:22:02.800> and<02:22:03.040> I'm<02:22:03.120> sure<02:22:03.399> they<02:22:03.560> are 02:22:04.030 --> 02:22:04.040 align:start position:0% be more Vigilant and I'm sure they are 02:22:04.040 --> 02:22:06.230 align:start position:0% be more Vigilant and I'm sure they are about<02:22:04.359> what's<02:22:04.640> being<02:22:05.280> secured<02:22:05.760> for<02:22:06.080> the 02:22:06.230 --> 02:22:06.240 align:start position:0% about what's being secured for the 02:22:06.240 --> 02:22:08.750 align:start position:0% about what's being secured for the school<02:22:06.720> itself<02:22:07.720> and<02:22:07.880> it<02:22:08.000> there's<02:22:08.240> easy<02:22:08.560> ways 02:22:08.750 --> 02:22:08.760 align:start position:0% school itself and it there's easy ways 02:22:08.760 --> 02:22:10.910 align:start position:0% school itself and it there's easy ways to<02:22:08.960> do<02:22:09.160> that<02:22:09.359> now<02:22:09.600> where<02:22:09.800> I<02:22:09.920> think<02:22:10.399> it<02:22:10.520> may<02:22:10.720> not 02:22:10.910 --> 02:22:10.920 align:start position:0% to do that now where I think it may not 02:22:10.920 --> 02:22:13.309 align:start position:0% to do that now where I think it may not have<02:22:11.080> been<02:22:11.240> the<02:22:11.399> case<02:22:11.640> just<02:22:11.800> a<02:22:11.920> few<02:22:12.160> years 02:22:13.309 --> 02:22:13.319 align:start position:0% have been the case just a few years 02:22:13.319 --> 02:22:16.190 align:start position:0% have been the case just a few years ago<02:22:14.319> I<02:22:14.640> I<02:22:14.760> think<02:22:14.960> they<02:22:15.120> are<02:22:15.479> probably<02:22:15.840> being 02:22:16.190 --> 02:22:16.200 align:start position:0% ago I I think they are probably being 02:22:16.200 --> 02:22:20.270 align:start position:0% ago I I think they are probably being more<02:22:16.960> um<02:22:17.479> taking<02:22:17.800> more<02:22:18.120> time<02:22:18.479> to<02:22:18.680> do<02:22:19.000> that<02:22:19.840> um 02:22:20.270 --> 02:22:20.280 align:start position:0% more um taking more time to do that um 02:22:20.280 --> 02:22:22.270 align:start position:0% more um taking more time to do that um and<02:22:20.560> but<02:22:20.680> a<02:22:20.840> summary<02:22:21.280> doesn't<02:22:21.680> always<02:22:22.040> tell 02:22:22.270 --> 02:22:22.280 align:start position:0% and but a summary doesn't always tell 02:22:22.280 --> 02:22:24.230 align:start position:0% and but a summary doesn't always tell you<02:22:22.560> everything<02:22:23.160> I've<02:22:23.319> had<02:22:23.479> Librarians<02:22:24.040> tell 02:22:24.230 --> 02:22:24.240 align:start position:0% you everything I've had Librarians tell 02:22:24.240 --> 02:22:26.030 align:start position:0% you everything I've had Librarians tell me<02:22:24.479> that<02:22:24.720> they<02:22:24.840> read<02:22:25.040> a<02:22:25.200> summary<02:22:25.640> the<02:22:25.760> book 02:22:26.030 --> 02:22:26.040 align:start position:0% me that they read a summary the book 02:22:26.040 --> 02:22:29.030 align:start position:0% me that they read a summary the book came<02:22:26.800> and<02:22:26.960> then<02:22:27.080> it<02:22:27.280> had<02:22:27.920> more<02:22:28.280> content<02:22:28.800> than 02:22:29.030 --> 02:22:29.040 align:start position:0% came and then it had more content than 02:22:29.040 --> 02:22:31.870 align:start position:0% came and then it had more content than they<02:22:29.600> knew<02:22:30.600> um<02:22:30.800> and<02:22:30.920> I<02:22:31.040> had<02:22:31.240> experience<02:22:31.720> with 02:22:31.870 --> 02:22:31.880 align:start position:0% they knew um and I had experience with 02:22:31.880 --> 02:22:33.070 align:start position:0% they knew um and I had experience with that<02:22:32.000> where<02:22:32.120> I<02:22:32.200> got<02:22:32.319> a<02:22:32.399> book<02:22:32.560> from<02:22:32.680> Barnes<02:22:32.920> & 02:22:33.070 --> 02:22:33.080 align:start position:0% that where I got a book from Barnes & 02:22:33.080 --> 02:22:34.270 align:start position:0% that where I got a book from Barnes & Noble<02:22:33.359> and<02:22:33.479> I<02:22:33.600> gave<02:22:33.720> it<02:22:33.840> away<02:22:34.000> to<02:22:34.120> my 02:22:34.270 --> 02:22:34.280 align:start position:0% Noble and I gave it away to my 02:22:34.280 --> 02:22:36.830 align:start position:0% Noble and I gave it away to my Librarians<02:22:35.040> and<02:22:35.359> I<02:22:35.920> they<02:22:36.040> were<02:22:36.240> titering<02:22:36.680> in 02:22:36.830 --> 02:22:36.840 align:start position:0% Librarians and I they were titering in 02:22:36.840 --> 02:22:38.790 align:start position:0% Librarians and I they were titering in the<02:22:36.960> back<02:22:37.600> like<02:22:37.880> and<02:22:38.040> I<02:22:38.280> returned<02:22:38.520> the<02:22:38.600> book<02:22:38.720> to 02:22:38.790 --> 02:22:38.800 align:start position:0% the back like and I returned the book to 02:22:38.800 --> 02:22:40.510 align:start position:0% the back like and I returned the book to Barnes<02:22:39.040> &<02:22:39.160> Noble<02:22:39.439> this<02:22:39.560> was<02:22:39.960> three<02:22:40.160> or<02:22:40.319> four 02:22:40.510 --> 02:22:40.520 align:start position:0% Barnes & Noble this was three or four 02:22:40.520 --> 02:22:43.110 align:start position:0% Barnes & Noble this was three or four years<02:22:40.720> ago<02:22:41.439> so<02:22:41.760> it<02:22:41.960> happens<02:22:42.359> where<02:22:42.560> a<02:22:42.720> summary 02:22:43.110 --> 02:22:43.120 align:start position:0% years ago so it happens where a summary 02:22:43.120 --> 02:22:45.950 align:start position:0% years ago so it happens where a summary doesn't<02:22:43.680> give<02:22:43.880> you<02:22:44.160> a<02:22:44.479> great<02:22:45.439> it<02:22:45.560> doesn't<02:22:45.840> give 02:22:45.950 --> 02:22:45.960 align:start position:0% doesn't give you a great it doesn't give 02:22:45.960 --> 02:22:47.389 align:start position:0% doesn't give you a great it doesn't give you<02:22:46.080> a<02:22:46.200> full<02:22:46.479> complete<02:22:46.800> view<02:22:46.960> of<02:22:47.080> what's<02:22:47.240> in 02:22:47.389 --> 02:22:47.399 align:start position:0% you a full complete view of what's in 02:22:47.399 --> 02:22:50.030 align:start position:0% you a full complete view of what's in the<02:22:47.560> book<02:22:48.319> um<02:22:48.520> I<02:22:48.640> agree<02:22:48.880> with<02:22:49.080> that<02:22:49.359> I<02:22:49.520> Al<02:22:49.760> I<02:22:49.880> was 02:22:50.030 --> 02:22:50.040 align:start position:0% the book um I agree with that I Al I was 02:22:50.040 --> 02:22:51.830 align:start position:0% the book um I agree with that I Al I was pointing<02:22:50.280> out<02:22:50.560> out<02:22:50.760> sorry<02:22:51.040> I'm<02:22:51.160> here<02:22:51.399> by<02:22:51.560> heill 02:22:51.830 --> 02:22:51.840 align:start position:0% pointing out out sorry I'm here by heill 02:22:51.840 --> 02:22:56.070 align:start position:0% pointing out out sorry I'm here by heill Air<02:22:52.040> Force<02:22:52.800> Base<02:22:53.800> was<02:22:54.040> that<02:22:54.680> they're<02:22:55.680> they<02:22:55.800> may 02:22:56.070 --> 02:22:56.080 align:start position:0% Air Force Base was that they're they may 02:22:56.080 --> 02:22:58.469 align:start position:0% Air Force Base was that they're they may not<02:22:57.080> the<02:22:57.240> idea<02:22:57.520> that<02:22:57.640> they<02:22:57.720> don't<02:22:57.960> have<02:22:58.160> any 02:22:58.469 --> 02:22:58.479 align:start position:0% not the idea that they don't have any 02:22:58.479 --> 02:23:00.349 align:start position:0% not the idea that they don't have any knowledge<02:22:58.800> about<02:22:59.080> the<02:22:59.200> book<02:22:59.560> and<02:22:59.680> that<02:22:59.840> it's 02:23:00.349 --> 02:23:00.359 align:start position:0% knowledge about the book and that it's 02:23:00.359 --> 02:23:02.550 align:start position:0% knowledge about the book and that it's there's<02:23:00.560> no<02:23:01.080> accountability<02:23:02.080> and<02:23:02.200> I'm<02:23:02.319> not 02:23:02.550 --> 02:23:02.560 align:start position:0% there's no accountability and I'm not 02:23:02.560 --> 02:23:03.990 align:start position:0% there's no accountability and I'm not say<02:23:02.760> I'm<02:23:02.880> not<02:23:03.000> saying<02:23:03.200> you're<02:23:03.359> saying<02:23:03.680> that 02:23:03.990 --> 02:23:04.000 align:start position:0% say I'm not saying you're saying that 02:23:04.000 --> 02:23:07.030 align:start position:0% say I'm not saying you're saying that but<02:23:04.600> the<02:23:04.800> idea<02:23:05.160> that<02:23:05.720> we<02:23:05.920> live<02:23:06.120> in<02:23:06.200> a<02:23:06.399> time<02:23:06.720> when 02:23:07.030 --> 02:23:07.040 align:start position:0% but the idea that we live in a time when 02:23:07.040 --> 02:23:09.150 align:start position:0% but the idea that we live in a time when it's<02:23:07.280> easy<02:23:07.560> to<02:23:07.840> access<02:23:08.280> information<02:23:08.880> about 02:23:09.150 --> 02:23:09.160 align:start position:0% it's easy to access information about 02:23:09.160 --> 02:23:11.750 align:start position:0% it's easy to access information about things<02:23:09.399> and<02:23:09.560> it's<02:23:09.800> not<02:23:10.800> you<02:23:10.920> can<02:23:11.120> easily<02:23:11.439> say 02:23:11.750 --> 02:23:11.760 align:start position:0% things and it's not you can easily say 02:23:11.760 --> 02:23:15.030 align:start position:0% things and it's not you can easily say these<02:23:11.960> books<02:23:12.280> are<02:23:12.520> on<02:23:12.720> the<02:23:12.960> high<02:23:13.960> concern<02:23:14.560> list 02:23:15.030 --> 02:23:15.040 align:start position:0% these books are on the high concern list 02:23:15.040 --> 02:23:17.510 align:start position:0% these books are on the high concern list we<02:23:15.160> should<02:23:15.359> be<02:23:15.520> aware<02:23:15.760> of<02:23:15.960> these<02:23:16.439> so<02:23:17.200> um<02:23:17.399> there 02:23:17.510 --> 02:23:17.520 align:start position:0% we should be aware of these so um there 02:23:17.520 --> 02:23:18.670 align:start position:0% we should be aware of these so um there just<02:23:17.640> shouldn't<02:23:17.920> be<02:23:18.080> things<02:23:18.279> slipping 02:23:18.670 --> 02:23:18.680 align:start position:0% just shouldn't be things slipping 02:23:18.680 --> 02:23:21.910 align:start position:0% just shouldn't be things slipping through<02:23:19.279> like<02:23:19.399> there<02:23:19.520> were<02:23:19.720> a<02:23:19.840> few<02:23:20.000> years<02:23:20.160> ago 02:23:21.910 --> 02:23:21.920 align:start position:0% through like there were a few years ago 02:23:21.920 --> 02:23:24.230 align:start position:0% through like there were a few years ago and<02:23:22.080> I<02:23:22.240> just<02:23:22.399> want<02:23:22.560> to<02:23:23.319> I<02:23:23.479> just<02:23:23.640> want<02:23:23.840> us<02:23:24.000> to 02:23:24.230 --> 02:23:24.240 align:start position:0% and I just want to I just want us to 02:23:24.240 --> 02:23:26.030 align:start position:0% and I just want to I just want us to Think<02:23:24.520> Through<02:23:25.200> you<02:23:25.319> know<02:23:25.640> what<02:23:25.840> this 02:23:26.030 --> 02:23:26.040 align:start position:0% Think Through you know what this 02:23:26.040 --> 02:23:28.870 align:start position:0% Think Through you know what this sentence<02:23:26.479> means<02:23:26.960> if<02:23:27.120> it<02:23:27.359> is<02:23:27.560> going<02:23:27.800> to<02:23:28.600> say 02:23:28.870 --> 02:23:28.880 align:start position:0% sentence means if it is going to say 02:23:28.880 --> 02:23:30.750 align:start position:0% sentence means if it is going to say that<02:23:29.000> no<02:23:29.240> librarian<02:23:29.760> could<02:23:29.920> be<02:23:30.040> a<02:23:30.160> part<02:23:30.359> of<02:23:30.560> the 02:23:30.750 --> 02:23:30.760 align:start position:0% that no librarian could be a part of the 02:23:30.760 --> 02:23:33.469 align:start position:0% that no librarian could be a part of the process<02:23:31.720> so<02:23:31.960> I<02:23:32.279> totally<02:23:32.920> understand<02:23:33.120> exactly 02:23:33.469 --> 02:23:33.479 align:start position:0% process so I totally understand exactly 02:23:33.479 --> 02:23:35.670 align:start position:0% process so I totally understand exactly what<02:23:33.560> you're<02:23:33.720> saying<02:23:33.960> Jenny<02:23:34.240> and<02:23:34.359> I<02:23:34.560> agree<02:23:35.399> um 02:23:35.670 --> 02:23:35.680 align:start position:0% what you're saying Jenny and I agree um 02:23:35.680 --> 02:23:37.910 align:start position:0% what you're saying Jenny and I agree um it's<02:23:35.880> really<02:23:36.200> the<02:23:36.359> selection<02:23:37.240> of<02:23:37.399> books<02:23:37.680> is 02:23:37.910 --> 02:23:37.920 align:start position:0% it's really the selection of books is 02:23:37.920 --> 02:23:41.269 align:start position:0% it's really the selection of books is really<02:23:38.240> really<02:23:38.520> important<02:23:39.040> to<02:23:40.000> um<02:23:40.479> Librarians 02:23:41.269 --> 02:23:41.279 align:start position:0% really really important to um Librarians 02:23:41.279 --> 02:23:44.950 align:start position:0% really really important to um Librarians and<02:23:41.479> to<02:23:41.680> the<02:23:41.800> school<02:23:42.479> needs<02:23:42.840> of<02:23:43.040> the<02:23:43.240> of<02:23:43.359> the 02:23:44.950 --> 02:23:44.960 align:start position:0% and to the school needs of the of the 02:23:44.960 --> 02:23:47.389 align:start position:0% and to the school needs of the of the students<02:23:45.960> dep<02:23:46.279> be<02:23:46.399> superintendent<02:23:46.920> Norman 02:23:47.389 --> 02:23:47.399 align:start position:0% students dep be superintendent Norman 02:23:47.399 --> 02:23:49.830 align:start position:0% students dep be superintendent Norman you<02:23:47.560> had<02:23:47.680> a<02:23:48.000> comment<02:23:48.960> yeah<02:23:49.200> this<02:23:49.359> one<02:23:49.560> went 02:23:49.830 --> 02:23:49.840 align:start position:0% you had a comment yeah this one went 02:23:49.840 --> 02:23:51.870 align:start position:0% you had a comment yeah this one went back<02:23:50.000> to<02:23:50.120> the<02:23:50.240> or<02:23:50.439> original<02:23:50.920> word<02:23:51.399> as<02:23:51.520> I<02:23:51.640> looked 02:23:51.870 --> 02:23:51.880 align:start position:0% back to the or original word as I looked 02:23:51.880 --> 02:23:54.910 align:start position:0% back to the or original word as I looked it<02:23:52.000> up<02:23:52.359> uh<02:23:52.520> the<02:23:52.640> word<02:23:52.920> procured<02:23:53.640> in<02:23:54.240> Webster's 02:23:54.910 --> 02:23:54.920 align:start position:0% it up uh the word procured in Webster's 02:23:54.920 --> 02:23:57.670 align:start position:0% it up uh the word procured in Webster's Dictionary<02:23:55.520> just<02:23:55.800> Miriam<02:23:56.279> Webster<02:23:57.279> um<02:23:57.520> it 02:23:57.670 --> 02:23:57.680 align:start position:0% Dictionary just Miriam Webster um it 02:23:57.680 --> 02:24:00.750 align:start position:0% Dictionary just Miriam Webster um it means<02:23:58.000> to<02:23:58.319> obtain<02:23:59.240> something<02:23:59.960> or<02:24:00.479> uh<02:24:00.640> let's 02:24:00.750 --> 02:24:00.760 align:start position:0% means to obtain something or uh let's 02:24:00.760 --> 02:24:02.349 align:start position:0% means to obtain something or uh let's see<02:24:00.960> to<02:24:01.120> get<02:24:01.319> possession<02:24:01.680> of<02:24:01.840> something<02:24:02.120> to 02:24:02.349 --> 02:24:02.359 align:start position:0% see to get possession of something to 02:24:02.359 --> 02:24:04.830 align:start position:0% see to get possession of something to obtain<02:24:02.800> something<02:24:03.439> by<02:24:03.720> particular<02:24:04.240> care<02:24:04.600> and 02:24:04.830 --> 02:24:04.840 align:start position:0% obtain something by particular care and 02:24:04.840 --> 02:24:08.990 align:start position:0% obtain something by particular care and effort<02:24:05.720> so<02:24:06.240> um<02:24:07.160> it<02:24:07.720> in<02:24:07.960> for<02:24:08.279> some<02:24:08.520> reason<02:24:08.760> in<02:24:08.880> my 02:24:08.990 --> 02:24:09.000 align:start position:0% effort so um it in for some reason in my 02:24:09.000 --> 02:24:11.110 align:start position:0% effort so um it in for some reason in my head<02:24:09.160> I<02:24:09.240> was<02:24:09.399> thinking<02:24:09.800> purchase<02:24:10.720> and<02:24:10.840> so<02:24:11.000> I 02:24:11.110 --> 02:24:11.120 align:start position:0% head I was thinking purchase and so I 02:24:11.120 --> 02:24:12.469 align:start position:0% head I was thinking purchase and so I just<02:24:11.200> wanted<02:24:11.439> to<02:24:11.520> make<02:24:11.640> sure<02:24:11.800> it<02:24:11.920> didn't<02:24:12.120> mean 02:24:12.469 --> 02:24:12.479 align:start position:0% just wanted to make sure it didn't mean 02:24:12.479 --> 02:24:14.870 align:start position:0% just wanted to make sure it didn't mean purchase<02:24:13.040> but<02:24:13.160> it's<02:24:13.359> the<02:24:13.600> person<02:24:14.000> who<02:24:14.479> gets 02:24:14.870 --> 02:24:14.880 align:start position:0% purchase but it's the person who gets 02:24:14.880 --> 02:24:17.710 align:start position:0% purchase but it's the person who gets possession<02:24:15.479> of<02:24:15.640> the<02:24:15.800> thing<02:24:16.080> and<02:24:16.240> or<02:24:16.720> obtains 02:24:17.710 --> 02:24:17.720 align:start position:0% possession of the thing and or obtains 02:24:17.720 --> 02:24:20.870 align:start position:0% possession of the thing and or obtains that<02:24:18.520> there<02:24:18.840> for<02:24:19.120> that<02:24:19.279> word<02:24:19.840> and<02:24:20.200> I<02:24:20.479> the<02:24:20.600> word 02:24:20.870 --> 02:24:20.880 align:start position:0% that there for that word and I the word 02:24:20.880 --> 02:24:23.230 align:start position:0% that there for that word and I the word secured<02:24:21.560> um<02:24:21.720> has<02:24:21.880> a<02:24:22.080> different<02:24:22.359> meaning<02:24:23.000> about 02:24:23.230 --> 02:24:23.240 align:start position:0% secured um has a different meaning about 02:24:23.240 --> 02:24:25.910 align:start position:0% secured um has a different meaning about the<02:24:23.520> security<02:24:24.279> of<02:24:24.520> something<02:24:25.240> and<02:24:25.319> so<02:24:25.640> I<02:24:25.800> just 02:24:25.910 --> 02:24:25.920 align:start position:0% the security of something and so I just 02:24:25.920 --> 02:24:28.110 align:start position:0% the security of something and so I just going<02:24:26.160> back<02:24:26.279> to<02:24:26.439> that<02:24:26.760> initial<02:24:27.279> question<02:24:28.000> that 02:24:28.110 --> 02:24:28.120 align:start position:0% going back to that initial question that 02:24:28.120 --> 02:24:29.230 align:start position:0% going back to that initial question that was<02:24:28.359> on<02:24:28.479> there<02:24:28.640> and<02:24:28.720> then<02:24:28.840> I<02:24:28.920> think<02:24:29.040> the 02:24:29.230 --> 02:24:29.240 align:start position:0% was on there and then I think the 02:24:29.240 --> 02:24:30.389 align:start position:0% was on there and then I think the secondary<02:24:29.800> question<02:24:30.080> that<02:24:30.160> you're 02:24:30.389 --> 02:24:30.399 align:start position:0% secondary question that you're 02:24:30.399 --> 02:24:32.429 align:start position:0% secondary question that you're discussing<02:24:31.000> now<02:24:31.319> is<02:24:31.520> whether<02:24:31.720> the<02:24:31.880> librarian 02:24:32.429 --> 02:24:32.439 align:start position:0% discussing now is whether the librarian 02:24:32.439 --> 02:24:36.710 align:start position:0% discussing now is whether the librarian can<02:24:32.600> be<02:24:32.760> a<02:24:32.880> part<02:24:33.040> of<02:24:33.600> that<02:24:33.720> final<02:24:34.319> that<02:24:34.840> uh 02:24:36.710 --> 02:24:36.720 align:start position:0% can be a part of that final that uh 02:24:36.720 --> 02:24:39.190 align:start position:0% can be a part of that final that uh review<02:24:37.720> thank 02:24:39.190 --> 02:24:39.200 align:start position:0% review thank 02:24:39.200 --> 02:24:42.910 align:start position:0% review thank you<02:24:40.200> any<02:24:40.760> comments<02:24:41.319> from<02:24:41.800> and<02:24:42.000> one<02:24:42.160> more<02:24:42.399> thing 02:24:42.910 --> 02:24:42.920 align:start position:0% you any comments from and one more thing 02:24:42.920 --> 02:24:45.110 align:start position:0% you any comments from and one more thing because<02:24:43.160> I'm<02:24:43.319> the<02:24:43.479> timekeeper<02:24:44.120> here<02:24:44.680> we<02:24:44.880> have 02:24:45.110 --> 02:24:45.120 align:start position:0% because I'm the timekeeper here we have 02:24:45.120 --> 02:24:49.870 align:start position:0% because I'm the timekeeper here we have 14<02:24:45.640> minutes<02:24:46.399> left<02:24:46.760> till<02:24:47.240> noon<02:24:48.240> and<02:24:48.600> um<02:24:49.000> we<02:24:49.279> are 02:24:49.870 --> 02:24:49.880 align:start position:0% 14 minutes left till noon and um we are 02:24:49.880 --> 02:24:53.150 align:start position:0% 14 minutes left till noon and um we are doing<02:24:50.160> good<02:24:50.520> this<02:24:50.640> is<02:24:50.880> good<02:24:51.240> good<02:24:51.479> work<02:24:51.880> so<02:24:52.600> um 02:24:53.150 --> 02:24:53.160 align:start position:0% doing good this is good good work so um 02:24:53.160 --> 02:24:55.510 align:start position:0% doing good this is good good work so um going<02:24:53.479> through<02:24:53.880> this<02:24:54.640> uh<02:24:54.840> we<02:24:54.960> haven't<02:24:55.240> got<02:24:55.399> to 02:24:55.510 --> 02:24:55.520 align:start position:0% going through this uh we haven't got to 02:24:55.520 --> 02:24:57.349 align:start position:0% going through this uh we haven't got to the<02:24:55.600> rule<02:24:55.960> yet<02:24:56.160> or<02:24:56.359> the<02:24:56.520> second<02:24:56.800> item<02:24:57.040> on<02:24:57.200> the 02:24:57.349 --> 02:24:57.359 align:start position:0% the rule yet or the second item on the 02:24:57.359 --> 02:24:59.429 align:start position:0% the rule yet or the second item on the agenda<02:24:57.920> as<02:24:58.080> well<02:24:58.479> so<02:24:58.600> I<02:24:58.720> just<02:24:58.800> wanted<02:24:59.040> to<02:24:59.160> give 02:24:59.429 --> 02:24:59.439 align:start position:0% agenda as well so I just wanted to give 02:24:59.439 --> 02:25:01.710 align:start position:0% agenda as well so I just wanted to give like<02:24:59.640> a<02:24:59.840> time<02:25:00.399> so<02:25:00.600> that<02:25:00.760> you<02:25:00.880> can<02:25:01.319> discuss 02:25:01.710 --> 02:25:01.720 align:start position:0% like a time so that you can discuss 02:25:01.720 --> 02:25:03.469 align:start position:0% like a time so that you can discuss maybe<02:25:02.000> where<02:25:02.160> you<02:25:02.279> want<02:25:02.399> to<02:25:02.560> go<02:25:02.720> with<02:25:02.920> this 02:25:03.469 --> 02:25:03.479 align:start position:0% maybe where you want to go with this 02:25:03.479 --> 02:25:05.950 align:start position:0% maybe where you want to go with this finish<02:25:03.920> this<02:25:04.120> up<02:25:04.600> um<02:25:05.040> if<02:25:05.319> if<02:25:05.439> people<02:25:05.640> can<02:25:05.760> stay 02:25:05.950 --> 02:25:05.960 align:start position:0% finish this up um if if people can stay 02:25:05.960 --> 02:25:08.550 align:start position:0% finish this up um if if people can stay on<02:25:06.080> a<02:25:06.160> little<02:25:06.359> bit<02:25:06.640> longer<02:25:07.640> um<02:25:08.000> anyways<02:25:08.319> I<02:25:08.479> just 02:25:08.550 --> 02:25:08.560 align:start position:0% on a little bit longer um anyways I just 02:25:08.560 --> 02:25:11.429 align:start position:0% on a little bit longer um anyways I just want<02:25:08.880> I<02:25:08.960> thought<02:25:09.040> it<02:25:09.120> was<02:25:09.240> scheduled<02:25:09.600> till 02:25:11.429 --> 02:25:11.439 align:start position:0% want I thought it was scheduled till 02:25:11.439 --> 02:25:14.389 align:start position:0% want I thought it was scheduled till 1<02:25:12.439> yeah<02:25:12.640> I<02:25:12.760> thought<02:25:12.880> it<02:25:13.000> was<02:25:13.200> one 02:25:14.389 --> 02:25:14.399 align:start position:0% 1 yeah I thought it was one 02:25:14.399 --> 02:25:18.910 align:start position:0% 1 yeah I thought it was one too<02:25:15.399> that's<02:25:15.640> what<02:25:15.760> it<02:25:16.200> said<02:25:17.200> on<02:25:17.600> the 02:25:18.910 --> 02:25:18.920 align:start position:0% too that's what it said on the 02:25:18.920 --> 02:25:20.830 align:start position:0% too that's what it said on the invitation<02:25:19.920> n 02:25:20.830 --> 02:25:20.840 align:start position:0% invitation n 02:25:20.840 --> 02:25:23.269 align:start position:0% invitation n have<02:25:20.960> it<02:25:21.080> on<02:25:21.200> the<02:25:21.479> calendar<02:25:21.920> invite<02:25:22.439> from<02:25:22.920> 9: 02:25:23.269 --> 02:25:23.279 align:start position:0% have it on the calendar invite from 9: 02:25:23.279 --> 02:25:25.110 align:start position:0% have it on the calendar invite from 9: to<02:25:23.479> noon<02:25:23.800> let's<02:25:24.000> double<02:25:24.240> check<02:25:24.520> with<02:25:24.720> Jerry 02:25:25.110 --> 02:25:25.120 align:start position:0% to noon let's double check with Jerry 02:25:25.120 --> 02:25:28.469 align:start position:0% to noon let's double check with Jerry and<02:25:25.479> Andrea<02:25:26.479> let<02:25:26.720> check<02:25:26.880> on<02:25:27.080> Civic<02:25:27.399> clerk<02:25:27.800> too 02:25:28.469 --> 02:25:28.479 align:start position:0% and Andrea let check on Civic clerk too 02:25:28.479 --> 02:25:31.870 align:start position:0% and Andrea let check on Civic clerk too okay<02:25:28.760> and<02:25:28.880> see<02:25:29.120> what<02:25:29.279> the<02:25:29.479> public<02:25:30.120> notice<02:25:30.880> was 02:25:31.870 --> 02:25:31.880 align:start position:0% okay and see what the public notice was 02:25:31.880 --> 02:25:33.389 align:start position:0% okay and see what the public notice was I'll<02:25:32.080> do<02:25:32.279> that<02:25:32.479> really 02:25:33.389 --> 02:25:33.399 align:start position:0% I'll do that really 02:25:33.399 --> 02:25:36.349 align:start position:0% I'll do that really quick<02:25:34.399> so<02:25:34.640> one<02:25:34.800> other<02:25:35.359> just<02:25:35.640> item<02:25:35.920> with<02:25:36.080> this<02:25:36.279> I 02:25:36.349 --> 02:25:36.359 align:start position:0% quick so one other just item with this I 02:25:36.359 --> 02:25:38.429 align:start position:0% quick so one other just item with this I don't<02:25:36.560> think<02:25:36.680> it<02:25:36.920> eliminates<02:25:37.880> Librarians 02:25:38.429 --> 02:25:38.439 align:start position:0% don't think it eliminates Librarians 02:25:38.439 --> 02:25:40.429 align:start position:0% don't think it eliminates Librarians while<02:25:38.600> we're<02:25:38.720> kind<02:25:38.840> of<02:25:38.960> looking<02:25:39.200> at<02:25:39.359> the<02:25:39.520> other 02:25:40.429 --> 02:25:40.439 align:start position:0% while we're kind of looking at the other 02:25:40.439 --> 02:25:42.429 align:start position:0% while we're kind of looking at the other but<02:25:40.640> I<02:25:40.760> think<02:25:41.439> if<02:25:41.600> if<02:25:41.720> you're<02:25:41.840> saying<02:25:42.160> one 02:25:42.429 --> 02:25:42.439 align:start position:0% but I think if if you're saying one 02:25:42.439 --> 02:25:44.309 align:start position:0% but I think if if you're saying one person<02:25:42.760> is<02:25:42.960> purchasing<02:25:43.399> for<02:25:43.600> the 02:25:44.309 --> 02:25:44.319 align:start position:0% person is purchasing for the 02:25:44.319 --> 02:25:47.910 align:start position:0% person is purchasing for the district<02:25:45.319> then<02:25:46.399> um<02:25:47.399> which<02:25:47.520> is<02:25:47.680> the 02:25:47.910 --> 02:25:47.920 align:start position:0% district then um which is the 02:25:47.920 --> 02:25:49.790 align:start position:0% district then um which is the possibility<02:25:48.640> right<02:25:49.319> that<02:25:49.479> someone's 02:25:49.790 --> 02:25:49.800 align:start position:0% possibility right that someone's 02:25:49.800 --> 02:25:51.429 align:start position:0% possibility right that someone's purchasing<02:25:50.399> some<02:25:50.600> books<02:25:50.800> for<02:25:50.960> the<02:25:51.080> district 02:25:51.429 --> 02:25:51.439 align:start position:0% purchasing some books for the district 02:25:51.439 --> 02:25:53.950 align:start position:0% purchasing some books for the district but<02:25:51.600> whoever<02:25:52.120> did<02:25:52.319> the<02:25:52.479> initial<02:25:53.319> securing<02:25:53.800> of 02:25:53.950 --> 02:25:53.960 align:start position:0% but whoever did the initial securing of 02:25:53.960 --> 02:25:56.990 align:start position:0% but whoever did the initial securing of it<02:25:54.680> um<02:25:55.640> just<02:25:55.800> really<02:25:56.000> shouldn't<02:25:56.319> be<02:25:56.479> on<02:25:56.680> there 02:25:56.990 --> 02:25:57.000 align:start position:0% it um just really shouldn't be on there 02:25:57.000 --> 02:25:58.510 align:start position:0% it um just really shouldn't be on there and<02:25:57.160> it<02:25:57.399> I<02:25:57.479> think<02:25:57.600> it's<02:25:57.760> to<02:25:57.920> protect<02:25:58.319> that 02:25:58.510 --> 02:25:58.520 align:start position:0% and it I think it's to protect that 02:25:58.520 --> 02:26:01.269 align:start position:0% and it I think it's to protect that person<02:25:58.760> too<02:25:59.000> to<02:25:59.080> be<02:25:59.240> honest<02:25:59.560> with<02:26:00.040> you<02:26:01.040> yes 02:26:01.269 --> 02:26:01.279 align:start position:0% person too to be honest with you yes 02:26:01.279 --> 02:26:03.070 align:start position:0% person too to be honest with you yes you're<02:26:01.680> correct<02:26:02.120> there<02:26:02.319> it<02:26:02.439> could<02:26:02.600> be<02:26:02.800> that<02:26:02.920> a 02:26:03.070 --> 02:26:03.080 align:start position:0% you're correct there it could be that a 02:26:03.080 --> 02:26:05.429 align:start position:0% you're correct there it could be that a district<02:26:03.520> at<02:26:03.640> the<02:26:03.800> secondary<02:26:04.359> level<02:26:05.200> It's 02:26:05.429 --> 02:26:05.439 align:start position:0% district at the secondary level It's 02:26:05.439 --> 02:26:08.389 align:start position:0% district at the secondary level It's usually<02:26:05.840> the<02:26:06.000> school<02:26:06.760> librarian<02:26:07.760> purchasing 02:26:08.389 --> 02:26:08.399 align:start position:0% usually the school librarian purchasing 02:26:08.399 --> 02:26:10.429 align:start position:0% usually the school librarian purchasing procuring<02:26:08.960> books<02:26:09.240> for<02:26:09.479> that<02:26:09.680> library<02:26:10.160> at<02:26:10.279> the 02:26:10.429 --> 02:26:10.439 align:start position:0% procuring books for that library at the 02:26:10.439 --> 02:26:14.830 align:start position:0% procuring books for that library at the elementary<02:26:11.000> level<02:26:11.399> it<02:26:11.880> varies<02:26:13.279> um<02:26:14.279> so<02:26:14.720> we 02:26:14.830 --> 02:26:14.840 align:start position:0% elementary level it varies um so we 02:26:14.840 --> 02:26:16.150 align:start position:0% elementary level it varies um so we might<02:26:15.080> have<02:26:15.200> a<02:26:15.359> district<02:26:15.720> person<02:26:16.040> that 02:26:16.150 --> 02:26:16.160 align:start position:0% might have a district person that 02:26:16.160 --> 02:26:18.990 align:start position:0% might have a district person that purchases<02:26:16.640> for<02:26:16.840> the<02:26:17.000> entire<02:26:18.000> um<02:26:18.160> Elementary 02:26:18.990 --> 02:26:19.000 align:start position:0% purchases for the entire um Elementary 02:26:19.000 --> 02:26:20.790 align:start position:0% purchases for the entire um Elementary libraries<02:26:19.479> and<02:26:19.640> we<02:26:19.760> might<02:26:20.000> have<02:26:20.359> a<02:26:20.479> school 02:26:20.790 --> 02:26:20.800 align:start position:0% libraries and we might have a school 02:26:20.800 --> 02:26:23.230 align:start position:0% libraries and we might have a school librarian<02:26:21.359> that<02:26:21.479> purchases<02:26:21.960> for<02:26:22.120> their<02:26:22.279> own 02:26:23.230 --> 02:26:23.240 align:start position:0% librarian that purchases for their own 02:26:23.240 --> 02:26:26.269 align:start position:0% librarian that purchases for their own my<02:26:23.640> what<02:26:23.760> I<02:26:23.880> was<02:26:24.479> referencing<02:26:25.479> was<02:26:25.880> that<02:26:26.120> if 02:26:26.269 --> 02:26:26.279 align:start position:0% my what I was referencing was that if 02:26:26.279 --> 02:26:27.750 align:start position:0% my what I was referencing was that if this<02:26:26.399> was<02:26:26.560> a<02:26:26.720> book<02:26:26.960> that<02:26:27.080> was<02:26:27.240> in<02:26:27.439> every 02:26:27.750 --> 02:26:27.760 align:start position:0% this was a book that was in every 02:26:27.760 --> 02:26:30.550 align:start position:0% this was a book that was in every Library<02:26:28.680> would<02:26:28.840> it<02:26:29.000> be<02:26:29.279> considered<02:26:29.920> that<02:26:30.200> no 02:26:30.550 --> 02:26:30.560 align:start position:0% Library would it be considered that no 02:26:30.560 --> 02:26:32.389 align:start position:0% Library would it be considered that no because<02:26:30.880> any<02:26:31.120> librarian<02:26:31.680> that<02:26:31.840> had<02:26:32.000> that<02:26:32.200> book 02:26:32.389 --> 02:26:32.399 align:start position:0% because any librarian that had that book 02:26:32.399 --> 02:26:33.309 align:start position:0% because any librarian that had that book that<02:26:32.560> they<02:26:32.640> wouldn't<02:26:32.880> be<02:26:32.960> able<02:26:33.120> to 02:26:33.309 --> 02:26:33.319 align:start position:0% that they wouldn't be able to 02:26:33.319 --> 02:26:35.389 align:start position:0% that they wouldn't be able to participate<02:26:33.920> in<02:26:34.040> a<02:26:34.200> review<02:26:34.640> process<02:26:35.279> and 02:26:35.389 --> 02:26:35.399 align:start position:0% participate in a review process and 02:26:35.399 --> 02:26:36.750 align:start position:0% participate in a review process and maybe<02:26:35.640> I'm<02:26:35.800> belaboring<02:26:36.319> a<02:26:36.439> point<02:26:36.640> that 02:26:36.750 --> 02:26:36.760 align:start position:0% maybe I'm belaboring a point that 02:26:36.760 --> 02:26:39.070 align:start position:0% maybe I'm belaboring a point that doesn't<02:26:37.000> need<02:26:37.120> to<02:26:37.240> be<02:26:37.399> belabored<02:26:37.920> I<02:26:38.080> just<02:26:38.720> I 02:26:39.070 --> 02:26:39.080 align:start position:0% doesn't need to be belabored I just I 02:26:39.080 --> 02:26:41.590 align:start position:0% doesn't need to be belabored I just I just<02:26:40.080> I<02:26:40.200> just<02:26:40.319> don't<02:26:40.479> want<02:26:40.600> to<02:26:40.840> eliminate<02:26:41.399> them 02:26:41.590 --> 02:26:41.600 align:start position:0% just I just don't want to eliminate them 02:26:41.600 --> 02:26:42.510 align:start position:0% just I just don't want to eliminate them from<02:26:41.760> the 02:26:42.510 --> 02:26:42.520 align:start position:0% from the 02:26:42.520 --> 02:26:45.910 align:start position:0% from the conversation<02:26:43.520> um<02:26:43.880> as<02:26:44.040> a<02:26:44.359> whole<02:26:45.359> if<02:26:45.520> that<02:26:45.680> makes 02:26:45.910 --> 02:26:45.920 align:start position:0% conversation um as a whole if that makes 02:26:45.920 --> 02:26:47.910 align:start position:0% conversation um as a whole if that makes sense<02:26:46.399> like<02:26:46.600> I<02:26:46.680> don't<02:26:46.840> want<02:26:46.960> to<02:26:47.560> I<02:26:47.640> wouldn't 02:26:47.910 --> 02:26:47.920 align:start position:0% sense like I don't want to I wouldn't 02:26:47.920 --> 02:26:50.190 align:start position:0% sense like I don't want to I wouldn't want<02:26:48.120> to<02:26:48.319> create<02:26:48.560> a<02:26:48.800> generalization<02:26:49.680> that<02:26:49.800> no 02:26:50.190 --> 02:26:50.200 align:start position:0% want to create a generalization that no 02:26:50.200 --> 02:26:52.269 align:start position:0% want to create a generalization that no library<02:26:50.600> and<02:26:50.920> and<02:26:51.120> would<02:26:51.359> this<02:26:51.600> sentence<02:26:52.040> do 02:26:52.269 --> 02:26:52.279 align:start position:0% library and and would this sentence do 02:26:52.279 --> 02:26:54.349 align:start position:0% library and and would this sentence do that<02:26:52.600> I'm<02:26:53.040> I'm 02:26:54.349 --> 02:26:54.359 align:start position:0% that I'm I'm 02:26:54.359 --> 02:26:56.710 align:start position:0% that I'm I'm wondering<02:26:55.359> I<02:26:55.640> think<02:26:55.800> it's<02:26:56.040> that<02:26:56.240> initial 02:26:56.710 --> 02:26:56.720 align:start position:0% wondering I think it's that initial 02:26:56.720 --> 02:26:58.389 align:start position:0% wondering I think it's that initial procurement<02:26:57.399> piece<02:26:57.720> if<02:26:57.840> they're<02:26:58.040> the<02:26:58.200> ones 02:26:58.389 --> 02:26:58.399 align:start position:0% procurement piece if they're the ones 02:26:58.399 --> 02:27:01.510 align:start position:0% procurement piece if they're the ones that<02:26:58.560> brought<02:26:58.760> it<02:26:58.960> in<02:26:59.800> then<02:27:00.800> they<02:27:00.960> already<02:27:01.279> did 02:27:01.510 --> 02:27:01.520 align:start position:0% that brought it in then they already did 02:27:01.520 --> 02:27:02.870 align:start position:0% that brought it in then they already did the<02:27:01.680> review 02:27:02.870 --> 02:27:02.880 align:start position:0% the review 02:27:02.880 --> 02:27:06.990 align:start position:0% the review already<02:27:04.359> right<02:27:05.359> so<02:27:05.680> that's<02:27:06.240> concern<02:27:06.800> that's 02:27:06.990 --> 02:27:07.000 align:start position:0% already right so that's concern that's 02:27:07.000 --> 02:27:08.750 align:start position:0% already right so that's concern that's something<02:27:07.359> I've<02:27:07.520> been<02:27:07.720> trying<02:27:08.000> to<02:27:08.200> figure<02:27:08.520> out 02:27:08.750 --> 02:27:08.760 align:start position:0% something I've been trying to figure out 02:27:08.760 --> 02:27:10.910 align:start position:0% something I've been trying to figure out the<02:27:08.920> whole<02:27:09.160> time<02:27:09.520> like<02:27:09.760> we<02:27:10.439> you<02:27:10.600> know<02:27:10.760> a 02:27:10.910 --> 02:27:10.920 align:start position:0% the whole time like we you know a 02:27:10.920 --> 02:27:12.910 align:start position:0% the whole time like we you know a business<02:27:11.279> has<02:27:11.439> a<02:27:11.640> purchasing 02:27:12.910 --> 02:27:12.920 align:start position:0% business has a purchasing 02:27:12.920 --> 02:27:15.190 align:start position:0% business has a purchasing department<02:27:13.920> and<02:27:14.120> what<02:27:14.319> they<02:27:14.439> do<02:27:14.680> is<02:27:14.840> they<02:27:15.000> go 02:27:15.190 --> 02:27:15.200 align:start position:0% department and what they do is they go 02:27:15.200 --> 02:27:17.230 align:start position:0% department and what they do is they go in<02:27:15.479> and<02:27:15.760> and<02:27:15.880> they<02:27:16.040> look<02:27:16.200> at<02:27:16.359> their<02:27:16.600> inventory 02:27:17.230 --> 02:27:17.240 align:start position:0% in and and they look at their inventory 02:27:17.240 --> 02:27:20.590 align:start position:0% in and and they look at their inventory needs<02:27:17.640> and<02:27:17.920> they<02:27:18.200> they<02:27:18.319> make<02:27:18.640> their<02:27:19.359> their<02:27:19.800> um 02:27:20.590 --> 02:27:20.600 align:start position:0% needs and they they make their their um 02:27:20.600 --> 02:27:23.230 align:start position:0% needs and they they make their their um their<02:27:20.920> purchases<02:27:21.680> that<02:27:21.840> they<02:27:21.960> send<02:27:22.279> out<02:27:22.920> when 02:27:23.230 --> 02:27:23.240 align:start position:0% their purchases that they send out when 02:27:23.240 --> 02:27:24.910 align:start position:0% their purchases that they send out when that<02:27:23.479> is<02:27:23.920> received<02:27:24.160> and<02:27:24.279> you<02:27:24.399> have<02:27:24.560> your 02:27:24.910 --> 02:27:24.920 align:start position:0% that is received and you have your 02:27:24.920 --> 02:27:27.469 align:start position:0% that is received and you have your receiving<02:27:25.560> department<02:27:26.560> they<02:27:26.720> scan<02:27:27.080> it<02:27:27.319> that 02:27:27.469 --> 02:27:27.479 align:start position:0% receiving department they scan it that 02:27:27.479 --> 02:27:29.230 align:start position:0% receiving department they scan it that they<02:27:27.600> got<02:27:27.760> it<02:27:27.880> from<02:27:28.000> the<02:27:28.160> delivery<02:27:28.520> man<02:27:29.000> then 02:27:29.230 --> 02:27:29.240 align:start position:0% they got it from the delivery man then 02:27:29.240 --> 02:27:32.349 align:start position:0% they got it from the delivery man then they<02:27:30.080> they<02:27:30.479> scan<02:27:31.240> that<02:27:31.439> inventory<02:27:32.080> and<02:27:32.240> they 02:27:32.349 --> 02:27:32.359 align:start position:0% they they scan that inventory and they 02:27:32.359 --> 02:27:35.349 align:start position:0% they they scan that inventory and they go<02:27:32.560> stock<02:27:32.920> the<02:27:33.040> shelves<02:27:33.840> so<02:27:34.680> I<02:27:34.760> would<02:27:34.960> assume 02:27:35.349 --> 02:27:35.359 align:start position:0% go stock the shelves so I would assume 02:27:35.359 --> 02:27:37.910 align:start position:0% go stock the shelves so I would assume that<02:27:35.560> there<02:27:35.920> is<02:27:36.920> that<02:27:37.160> there's<02:27:37.359> that<02:27:37.600> level 02:27:37.910 --> 02:27:37.920 align:start position:0% that there is that there's that level 02:27:37.920 --> 02:27:41.110 align:start position:0% that there is that there's that level that<02:27:38.160> exists<02:27:39.000> there<02:27:40.000> there's<02:27:40.399> somebody<02:27:40.920> that 02:27:41.110 --> 02:27:41.120 align:start position:0% that exists there there's somebody that 02:27:41.120 --> 02:27:45.590 align:start position:0% that exists there there's somebody that is<02:27:41.720> creating<02:27:42.399> an<02:27:42.640> order<02:27:43.640> for<02:27:44.640> the<02:27:44.920> inventory 02:27:45.590 --> 02:27:45.600 align:start position:0% is creating an order for the inventory 02:27:45.600 --> 02:27:47.590 align:start position:0% is creating an order for the inventory that's<02:27:45.880> coming<02:27:46.200> to<02:27:46.439> the<02:27:46.600> schools<02:27:47.319> as<02:27:47.439> it 02:27:47.590 --> 02:27:47.600 align:start position:0% that's coming to the schools as it 02:27:47.600 --> 02:27:51.110 align:start position:0% that's coming to the schools as it relates<02:27:48.080> specifically<02:27:48.680> to<02:27:49.560> library<02:27:50.240> books 02:27:51.110 --> 02:27:51.120 align:start position:0% relates specifically to library books 02:27:51.120 --> 02:27:53.710 align:start position:0% relates specifically to library books and<02:27:51.640> and<02:27:51.840> materials<02:27:52.800> and<02:27:52.960> I<02:27:53.120> guess<02:27:53.359> this<02:27:53.520> does 02:27:53.710 --> 02:27:53.720 align:start position:0% and and materials and I guess this does 02:27:53.720 --> 02:27:56.309 align:start position:0% and and materials and I guess this does fall<02:27:54.000> into<02:27:54.319> other<02:27:54.600> books<02:27:55.040> that<02:27:55.880> are<02:27:56.080> being 02:27:56.309 --> 02:27:56.319 align:start position:0% fall into other books that are being 02:27:56.319 --> 02:27:59.750 align:start position:0% fall into other books that are being ordered<02:27:57.120> but<02:27:57.359> as<02:27:57.479> far<02:27:57.640> as<02:27:57.760> the<02:27:58.160> Librarians 02:27:59.750 --> 02:27:59.760 align:start position:0% ordered but as far as the Librarians 02:27:59.760 --> 02:28:03.790 align:start position:0% ordered but as far as the Librarians go<02:28:00.760> um<02:28:01.560> who<02:28:02.120> is 02:28:03.790 --> 02:28:03.800 align:start position:0% go um who is 02:28:03.800 --> 02:28:07.870 align:start position:0% go um who is the<02:28:04.800> who<02:28:05.040> is<02:28:05.200> the<02:28:05.439> purchasing 02:28:07.870 --> 02:28:07.880 align:start position:0% the who is the purchasing 02:28:07.880 --> 02:28:12.150 align:start position:0% the who is the purchasing department<02:28:08.880> who's<02:28:09.160> a<02:28:09.399> purchasing<02:28:10.040> manager 02:28:12.150 --> 02:28:12.160 align:start position:0% department who's a purchasing manager 02:28:12.160 --> 02:28:15.550 align:start position:0% department who's a purchasing manager that<02:28:13.160> looks<02:28:13.479> at<02:28:13.840> what<02:28:14.160> inventory<02:28:14.800> needs<02:28:15.160> to<02:28:15.359> be 02:28:15.550 --> 02:28:15.560 align:start position:0% that looks at what inventory needs to be 02:28:15.560 --> 02:28:18.830 align:start position:0% that looks at what inventory needs to be ordered<02:28:16.319> and<02:28:16.520> goes<02:28:16.760> in<02:28:17.040> and<02:28:17.439> selects<02:28:18.439> we<02:28:18.600> need 02:28:18.830 --> 02:28:18.840 align:start position:0% ordered and goes in and selects we need 02:28:18.840 --> 02:28:21.670 align:start position:0% ordered and goes in and selects we need 30<02:28:19.240> books<02:28:19.520> of<02:28:19.800> this<02:28:20.200> we<02:28:20.319> need<02:28:20.680> seven<02:28:21.040> books<02:28:21.359> of 02:28:21.670 --> 02:28:21.680 align:start position:0% 30 books of this we need seven books of 02:28:21.680 --> 02:28:24.910 align:start position:0% 30 books of this we need seven books of that<02:28:22.080> we<02:28:22.279> need<02:28:22.920> this<02:28:23.920> if<02:28:24.120> that<02:28:24.279> doesn't<02:28:24.640> come 02:28:24.910 --> 02:28:24.920 align:start position:0% that we need this if that doesn't come 02:28:24.920 --> 02:28:27.710 align:start position:0% that we need this if that doesn't come organically<02:28:25.800> from<02:28:26.040> an<02:28:26.200> order<02:28:26.520> form<02:28:26.880> from<02:28:27.040> a 02:28:27.710 --> 02:28:27.720 align:start position:0% organically from an order form from a 02:28:27.720 --> 02:28:32.630 align:start position:0% organically from an order form from a librarian<02:28:28.720> is<02:28:29.120> that<02:28:29.640> list<02:28:30.760> procured<02:28:31.760> from<02:28:32.399> an 02:28:32.630 --> 02:28:32.640 align:start position:0% librarian is that list procured from an 02:28:32.640 --> 02:28:34.230 align:start position:0% librarian is that list procured from an outside 02:28:34.230 --> 02:28:34.240 align:start position:0% outside 02:28:34.240 --> 02:28:37.910 align:start position:0% outside organization<02:28:35.240> or 02:28:37.910 --> 02:28:37.920 align:start position:0% 02:28:37.920 --> 02:28:40.790 align:start position:0% vendor<02:28:38.920> actually<02:28:39.640> put<02:28:39.760> a<02:28:39.920> pause<02:28:40.200> on<02:28:40.399> that<02:28:40.560> for 02:28:40.790 --> 02:28:40.800 align:start position:0% vendor actually put a pause on that for 02:28:40.800 --> 02:28:43.150 align:start position:0% vendor actually put a pause on that for just<02:28:40.960> one<02:28:41.240> second<02:28:41.640> and<02:28:41.880> check<02:28:42.200> with<02:28:42.439> Andrea<02:28:43.000> to 02:28:43.150 --> 02:28:43.160 align:start position:0% just one second and check with Andrea to 02:28:43.160 --> 02:28:45.429 align:start position:0% just one second and check with Andrea to see<02:28:43.399> if<02:28:43.800> she<02:28:44.120> has<02:28:44.359> some<02:28:44.600> information<02:28:45.120> on<02:28:45.319> the 02:28:45.429 --> 02:28:45.439 align:start position:0% see if she has some information on the 02:28:45.439 --> 02:28:49.550 align:start position:0% see if she has some information on the length<02:28:45.720> of<02:28:45.880> this<02:28:46.160> meeting<02:28:47.160> yes<02:28:47.800> it<02:28:48.040> was<02:28:48.720> um 02:28:49.550 --> 02:28:49.560 align:start position:0% length of this meeting yes it was um 02:28:49.560 --> 02:28:52.150 align:start position:0% length of this meeting yes it was um public 02:28:52.150 --> 02:28:52.160 align:start position:0% 02:28:52.160 --> 02:28:55.710 align:start position:0% um<02:28:52.319> noted<02:28:52.800> to<02:28:53.040> go<02:28:53.240> until<02:28:53.600> 100<02:28:53.920> pm.<02:28:54.520> so<02:28:55.439> and<02:28:55.600> we 02:28:55.710 --> 02:28:55.720 align:start position:0% um noted to go until 100 pm. so and we 02:28:55.720 --> 02:28:58.550 align:start position:0% um noted to go until 100 pm. so and we should<02:28:55.920> be<02:28:56.080> able<02:28:56.279> to<02:28:56.520> do<02:28:56.960> that<02:28:57.960> okay<02:28:58.240> great 02:28:58.550 --> 02:28:58.560 align:start position:0% should be able to do that okay great 02:28:58.560 --> 02:29:01.030 align:start position:0% should be able to do that okay great thank<02:28:58.720> you<02:28:58.840> for<02:28:59.040> that<02:28:59.600> clarification<02:29:00.600> back<02:29:00.800> to 02:29:01.030 --> 02:29:01.040 align:start position:0% thank you for that clarification back to 02:29:01.040 --> 02:29:03.429 align:start position:0% thank you for that clarification back to your<02:29:01.640> question<02:29:02.040> Emily<02:29:02.560> thank<02:29:02.720> you<02:29:02.920> I'm<02:29:03.319> for 02:29:03.429 --> 02:29:03.439 align:start position:0% your question Emily thank you I'm for 02:29:03.439 --> 02:29:05.630 align:start position:0% your question Emily thank you I'm for the<02:29:03.520> interrup<02:29:03.960> I<02:29:04.040> was<02:29:04.160> gonna<02:29:04.960> on<02:29:05.240> on<02:29:05.399> member 02:29:05.630 --> 02:29:05.640 align:start position:0% the interrup I was gonna on on member 02:29:05.640 --> 02:29:07.590 align:start position:0% the interrup I was gonna on on member Green's<02:29:06.080> comment<02:29:06.399> so<02:29:06.760> I<02:29:06.880> always<02:29:07.080> think<02:29:07.319> about 02:29:07.590 --> 02:29:07.600 align:start position:0% Green's comment so I always think about 02:29:07.600 --> 02:29:10.269 align:start position:0% Green's comment so I always think about some<02:29:07.880> of<02:29:08.040> the<02:29:08.160> Librarians<02:29:08.760> that<02:29:09.600> I've<02:29:10.120> um 02:29:10.269 --> 02:29:10.279 align:start position:0% some of the Librarians that I've um 02:29:10.279 --> 02:29:12.469 align:start position:0% some of the Librarians that I've um talked<02:29:10.560> to<02:29:10.720> from<02:29:10.960> different<02:29:11.200> leas<02:29:11.760> and<02:29:12.279> one 02:29:12.469 --> 02:29:12.479 align:start position:0% talked to from different leas and one 02:29:12.479 --> 02:29:14.309 align:start position:0% talked to from different leas and one librarian<02:29:13.000> says<02:29:13.200> that<02:29:13.359> if<02:29:13.479> a<02:29:13.760> student<02:29:14.160> comes 02:29:14.309 --> 02:29:14.319 align:start position:0% librarian says that if a student comes 02:29:14.319 --> 02:29:16.349 align:start position:0% librarian says that if a student comes in<02:29:14.479> and<02:29:14.680> requests<02:29:15.040> a<02:29:15.200> book<02:29:15.880> you<02:29:16.000> know<02:29:16.200> a 02:29:16.349 --> 02:29:16.359 align:start position:0% in and requests a book you know a 02:29:16.359 --> 02:29:17.870 align:start position:0% in and requests a book you know a student<02:29:16.680> can<02:29:16.840> come<02:29:16.960> in<02:29:17.080> and<02:29:17.200> request<02:29:17.520> a<02:29:17.640> book 02:29:17.870 --> 02:29:17.880 align:start position:0% student can come in and request a book 02:29:17.880 --> 02:29:20.070 align:start position:0% student can come in and request a book and<02:29:18.040> just<02:29:18.160> to<02:29:18.920> give<02:29:19.279> respect<02:29:19.600> to<02:29:19.720> these 02:29:20.070 --> 02:29:20.080 align:start position:0% and just to give respect to these 02:29:20.080 --> 02:29:22.269 align:start position:0% and just to give respect to these Librarians<02:29:20.600> is<02:29:21.120> this<02:29:21.439> one<02:29:21.680> librarian<02:29:22.120> in 02:29:22.269 --> 02:29:22.279 align:start position:0% Librarians is this one librarian in 02:29:22.279 --> 02:29:24.110 align:start position:0% Librarians is this one librarian in particular<02:29:22.720> says<02:29:23.200> that<02:29:23.319> she<02:29:23.479> reads<02:29:23.880> every 02:29:24.110 --> 02:29:24.120 align:start position:0% particular says that she reads every 02:29:24.120 --> 02:29:25.950 align:start position:0% particular says that she reads every single<02:29:24.479> book<02:29:24.680> that's<02:29:24.880> ever<02:29:25.160> requested<02:29:25.720> before 02:29:25.950 --> 02:29:25.960 align:start position:0% single book that's ever requested before 02:29:25.960 --> 02:29:28.349 align:start position:0% single book that's ever requested before she<02:29:26.200> considers<02:29:27.200> putting<02:29:27.439> it<02:29:27.560> in<02:29:27.680> the<02:29:27.800> library 02:29:28.349 --> 02:29:28.359 align:start position:0% she considers putting it in the library 02:29:28.359 --> 02:29:30.349 align:start position:0% she considers putting it in the library right<02:29:28.920> so<02:29:29.080> she's<02:29:29.359> really<02:29:29.600> thorough<02:29:30.080> about 02:29:30.349 --> 02:29:30.359 align:start position:0% right so she's really thorough about 02:29:30.359 --> 02:29:33.469 align:start position:0% right so she's really thorough about that<02:29:30.640> process<02:29:31.080> and<02:29:31.240> so<02:29:31.920> I<02:29:32.040> do<02:29:32.240> Wonder<02:29:32.720> on<02:29:33.000> this 02:29:33.469 --> 02:29:33.479 align:start position:0% that process and so I do Wonder on this 02:29:33.479 --> 02:29:36.750 align:start position:0% that process and so I do Wonder on this procurement<02:29:34.160> part<02:29:35.160> because<02:29:35.680> every<02:29:36.080> Lea<02:29:36.560> every 02:29:36.750 --> 02:29:36.760 align:start position:0% procurement part because every Lea every 02:29:36.760 --> 02:29:38.030 align:start position:0% procurement part because every Lea every district<02:29:37.080> is<02:29:37.200> going<02:29:37.319> to<02:29:37.399> have<02:29:37.520> a<02:29:37.680> different 02:29:38.030 --> 02:29:38.040 align:start position:0% district is going to have a different 02:29:38.040 --> 02:29:39.550 align:start position:0% district is going to have a different process<02:29:38.319> on<02:29:38.479> how<02:29:38.640> they<02:29:38.760> buy<02:29:38.960> them<02:29:39.120> a<02:29:39.240> lot<02:29:39.359> of<02:29:39.439> it 02:29:39.550 --> 02:29:39.560 align:start position:0% process on how they buy them a lot of it 02:29:39.560 --> 02:29:41.389 align:start position:0% process on how they buy them a lot of it comes<02:29:39.760> down<02:29:39.920> to<02:29:40.080> budget<02:29:40.720> how<02:29:40.880> much<02:29:41.120> budget 02:29:41.389 --> 02:29:41.399 align:start position:0% comes down to budget how much budget 02:29:41.399 --> 02:29:43.590 align:start position:0% comes down to budget how much budget does<02:29:41.600> that<02:29:41.800> librarian<02:29:42.479> have<02:29:43.120> and<02:29:43.279> how<02:29:43.399> much 02:29:43.590 --> 02:29:43.600 align:start position:0% does that librarian have and how much 02:29:43.600 --> 02:29:45.429 align:start position:0% does that librarian have and how much budget<02:29:43.840> do<02:29:43.960> they<02:29:44.160> have<02:29:44.279> to<02:29:44.399> spend<02:29:44.760> each<02:29:45.000> year 02:29:45.429 --> 02:29:45.439 align:start position:0% budget do they have to spend each year 02:29:45.439 --> 02:29:47.830 align:start position:0% budget do they have to spend each year right<02:29:45.680> and<02:29:45.840> that<02:29:46.040> that'll<02:29:46.319> vary<02:29:46.640> from<02:29:47.000> laa<02:29:47.479> to 02:29:47.830 --> 02:29:47.840 align:start position:0% right and that that'll vary from laa to 02:29:47.840 --> 02:29:53.269 align:start position:0% right and that that'll vary from laa to laa<02:29:48.840> and<02:29:49.040> so<02:29:50.080> if<02:29:50.319> there<02:29:51.080> is<02:29:52.080> is<02:29:52.200> there<02:29:52.600> there 02:29:53.269 --> 02:29:53.279 align:start position:0% laa and so if there is is there there 02:29:53.279 --> 02:29:54.670 align:start position:0% laa and so if there is is there there there<02:29:53.479> isn't<02:29:53.800> anything<02:29:54.080> in<02:29:54.200> the<02:29:54.319> law<02:29:54.560> that 02:29:54.670 --> 02:29:54.680 align:start position:0% there isn't anything in the law that 02:29:54.680 --> 02:29:56.710 align:start position:0% there isn't anything in the law that talks<02:29:55.000> about<02:29:55.439> who<02:29:55.920> can<02:29:56.120> and<02:29:56.319> cannot 02:29:56.710 --> 02:29:56.720 align:start position:0% talks about who can and cannot 02:29:56.720 --> 02:29:59.190 align:start position:0% talks about who can and cannot participate<02:29:57.240> in<02:29:57.399> these<02:29:57.560> reviews<02:29:58.200> right<02:29:59.080> and 02:29:59.190 --> 02:29:59.200 align:start position:0% participate in these reviews right and 02:29:59.200 --> 02:30:00.590 align:start position:0% participate in these reviews right and so<02:29:59.479> again<02:29:59.720> I<02:29:59.800> just<02:29:59.920> don't<02:30:00.080> want<02:30:00.200> to<02:30:00.279> be 02:30:00.590 --> 02:30:00.600 align:start position:0% so again I just don't want to be 02:30:00.600 --> 02:30:03.790 align:start position:0% so again I just don't want to be narrowing<02:30:01.600> because<02:30:02.359> there<02:30:02.600> might<02:30:02.840> be<02:30:03.520> even 02:30:03.790 --> 02:30:03.800 align:start position:0% narrowing because there might be even 02:30:03.800 --> 02:30:05.630 align:start position:0% narrowing because there might be even though<02:30:04.040> the<02:30:04.240> main<02:30:04.640> person<02:30:05.120> the<02:30:05.240> main 02:30:05.630 --> 02:30:05.640 align:start position:0% though the main person the main 02:30:05.640 --> 02:30:09.510 align:start position:0% though the main person the main librarian<02:30:06.640> um<02:30:07.080> of<02:30:07.479> that<02:30:08.160> maybe<02:30:08.520> the 02:30:09.510 --> 02:30:09.520 align:start position:0% librarian um of that maybe the 02:30:09.520 --> 02:30:11.230 align:start position:0% librarian um of that maybe the specialist<02:30:10.000> of<02:30:10.120> the<02:30:10.319> district<02:30:10.680> or<02:30:10.880> the 02:30:11.230 --> 02:30:11.240 align:start position:0% specialist of the district or the 02:30:11.240 --> 02:30:12.630 align:start position:0% specialist of the district or the librarian<02:30:11.680> in<02:30:11.760> the<02:30:11.880> school<02:30:12.080> or<02:30:12.240> whatever<02:30:12.520> it 02:30:12.630 --> 02:30:12.640 align:start position:0% librarian in the school or whatever it 02:30:12.640 --> 02:30:16.070 align:start position:0% librarian in the school or whatever it may<02:30:12.880> be<02:30:13.520> may<02:30:14.000> be<02:30:15.000> overall<02:30:15.439> responsible<02:30:15.920> for 02:30:16.070 --> 02:30:16.080 align:start position:0% may be may be overall responsible for 02:30:16.080 --> 02:30:17.309 align:start position:0% may be may be overall responsible for all<02:30:16.200> the<02:30:16.319> materials<02:30:16.800> doesn't<02:30:17.000> mean<02:30:17.160> it's 02:30:17.309 --> 02:30:17.319 align:start position:0% all the materials doesn't mean it's 02:30:17.319 --> 02:30:18.790 align:start position:0% all the materials doesn't mean it's something<02:30:17.520> that<02:30:17.680> they<02:30:17.840> can't<02:30:18.120> participating 02:30:18.790 --> 02:30:18.800 align:start position:0% something that they can't participating 02:30:18.800 --> 02:30:20.670 align:start position:0% something that they can't participating in<02:30:18.920> the<02:30:19.080> review<02:30:19.479> process<02:30:19.760> and<02:30:20.040> have<02:30:20.160> a 02:30:20.670 --> 02:30:20.680 align:start position:0% in the review process and have a 02:30:20.680 --> 02:30:22.309 align:start position:0% in the review process and have a unbiased<02:30:21.319> view<02:30:21.520> of<02:30:21.720> those<02:30:22.000> different 02:30:22.309 --> 02:30:22.319 align:start position:0% unbiased view of those different 02:30:22.319 --> 02:30:23.630 align:start position:0% unbiased view of those different materials<02:30:22.800> that<02:30:22.920> may<02:30:23.120> come<02:30:23.279> through<02:30:23.439> on<02:30:23.520> a 02:30:23.630 --> 02:30:23.640 align:start position:0% materials that may come through on a 02:30:23.640 --> 02:30:25.870 align:start position:0% materials that may come through on a lower<02:30:23.960> level<02:30:24.600> let's<02:30:24.800> say<02:30:24.920> it's<02:30:25.040> a<02:30:25.279> District 02:30:25.870 --> 02:30:25.880 align:start position:0% lower level let's say it's a District 02:30:25.880 --> 02:30:27.349 align:start position:0% lower level let's say it's a District Library<02:30:26.279> specialist<02:30:26.720> and<02:30:26.840> then<02:30:26.960> it's<02:30:27.120> someone 02:30:27.349 --> 02:30:27.359 align:start position:0% Library specialist and then it's someone 02:30:27.359 --> 02:30:29.550 align:start position:0% Library specialist and then it's someone that<02:30:27.520> is<02:30:28.240> um<02:30:28.439> at<02:30:28.560> a<02:30:28.880> at<02:30:29.000> a<02:30:29.080> school<02:30:29.359> that 02:30:29.550 --> 02:30:29.560 align:start position:0% that is um at a at a school that 02:30:29.560 --> 02:30:31.790 align:start position:0% that is um at a at a school that actually<02:30:29.800> purchased<02:30:30.240> it<02:30:30.520> so<02:30:31.200> if<02:30:31.479> this<02:30:31.600> is 02:30:31.790 --> 02:30:31.800 align:start position:0% actually purchased it so if this is 02:30:31.800 --> 02:30:34.110 align:start position:0% actually purchased it so if this is again<02:30:32.040> just<02:30:32.240> back<02:30:32.439> to<02:30:32.600> my<02:30:33.240> initial<02:30:33.640> piece<02:30:33.920> was 02:30:34.110 --> 02:30:34.120 align:start position:0% again just back to my initial piece was 02:30:34.120 --> 02:30:35.750 align:start position:0% again just back to my initial piece was like<02:30:34.600> if<02:30:34.760> it's<02:30:34.920> something<02:30:35.200> that<02:30:35.319> isn't<02:30:35.520> in<02:30:35.640> the 02:30:35.750 --> 02:30:35.760 align:start position:0% like if it's something that isn't in the 02:30:35.760 --> 02:30:39.070 align:start position:0% like if it's something that isn't in the law<02:30:36.279> and<02:30:37.080> we<02:30:37.920> I<02:30:38.040> feel<02:30:38.279> like<02:30:38.479> this<02:30:38.600> is<02:30:38.760> just<02:30:38.880> a 02:30:39.070 --> 02:30:39.080 align:start position:0% law and we I feel like this is just a 02:30:39.080 --> 02:30:42.150 align:start position:0% law and we I feel like this is just a guiding<02:30:39.439> document<02:30:39.800> to<02:30:40.000> help<02:30:40.520> our<02:30:41.160> leas 02:30:42.150 --> 02:30:42.160 align:start position:0% guiding document to help our leas 02:30:42.160 --> 02:30:44.110 align:start position:0% guiding document to help our leas understand<02:30:42.359> the<02:30:42.520> law<02:30:43.200> if<02:30:43.359> it's<02:30:43.560> something 02:30:44.110 --> 02:30:44.120 align:start position:0% understand the law if it's something 02:30:44.120 --> 02:30:47.070 align:start position:0% understand the law if it's something that<02:30:44.439> is<02:30:44.640> too<02:30:44.880> narrowing<02:30:45.800> I<02:30:46.200> I<02:30:46.319> would<02:30:46.720> say<02:30:46.960> we 02:30:47.070 --> 02:30:47.080 align:start position:0% that is too narrowing I I would say we 02:30:47.080 --> 02:30:48.630 align:start position:0% that is too narrowing I I would say we could<02:30:47.240> just<02:30:47.439> exclude<02:30:47.800> it<02:30:47.960> in<02:30:48.120> that<02:30:48.279> sense 02:30:48.630 --> 02:30:48.640 align:start position:0% could just exclude it in that sense 02:30:48.640 --> 02:30:50.710 align:start position:0% could just exclude it in that sense because<02:30:49.160> I<02:30:49.240> don't<02:30:49.359> want<02:30:49.439> to<02:30:49.560> be 02:30:50.710 --> 02:30:50.720 align:start position:0% because I don't want to be 02:30:50.720 --> 02:30:52.950 align:start position:0% because I don't want to be on<02:30:51.000> what<02:30:51.160> the<02:30:51.279> situation<02:30:51.760> is<02:30:51.880> at 02:30:52.950 --> 02:30:52.960 align:start position:0% on what the situation is at 02:30:52.960 --> 02:30:57.950 align:start position:0% on what the situation is at eacha<02:30:53.960> as 02:30:57.950 --> 02:30:57.960 align:start position:0% 02:30:57.960 --> 02:31:00.150 align:start position:0% well<02:30:58.960> I<02:30:59.160> I<02:30:59.240> think<02:30:59.359> it<02:30:59.439> would<02:30:59.600> need<02:30:59.720> to<02:30:59.840> go<02:30:59.960> into 02:31:00.150 --> 02:31:00.160 align:start position:0% well I I think it would need to go into 02:31:00.160 --> 02:31:03.269 align:start position:0% well I I think it would need to go into our<02:31:00.359> Rule<02:31:01.000> and<02:31:01.200> I<02:31:01.560> I<02:31:01.720> actually<02:31:02.040> do<02:31:02.479> like<02:31:02.720> this 02:31:03.269 --> 02:31:03.279 align:start position:0% our Rule and I I actually do like this 02:31:03.279 --> 02:31:05.590 align:start position:0% our Rule and I I actually do like this provision<02:31:04.279> um<02:31:04.800> just<02:31:04.960> for<02:31:05.160> that<02:31:05.319> it's<02:31:05.439> an 02:31:05.590 --> 02:31:05.600 align:start position:0% provision um just for that it's an 02:31:05.600 --> 02:31:07.110 align:start position:0% provision um just for that it's an accountability<02:31:06.319> factor<02:31:06.680> it's<02:31:06.840> like<02:31:07.000> if 02:31:07.110 --> 02:31:07.120 align:start position:0% accountability factor it's like if 02:31:07.120 --> 02:31:09.910 align:start position:0% accountability factor it's like if you're<02:31:07.200> going<02:31:07.319> to<02:31:07.439> put<02:31:07.560> it<02:31:07.840> in<02:31:08.840> um<02:31:09.479> once<02:31:09.720> again 02:31:09.910 --> 02:31:09.920 align:start position:0% you're going to put it in um once again 02:31:09.920 --> 02:31:11.990 align:start position:0% you're going to put it in um once again I<02:31:10.000> think<02:31:10.120> it's<02:31:10.240> a<02:31:10.399> protection<02:31:10.840> for<02:31:11.080> those<02:31:11.359> that 02:31:11.990 --> 02:31:12.000 align:start position:0% I think it's a protection for those that 02:31:12.000 --> 02:31:14.550 align:start position:0% I think it's a protection for those that are<02:31:12.960> procuring<02:31:13.399> or<02:31:13.960> you<02:31:14.040> know<02:31:14.160> getting<02:31:14.399> the 02:31:14.550 --> 02:31:14.560 align:start position:0% are procuring or you know getting the 02:31:14.560 --> 02:31:16.510 align:start position:0% are procuring or you know getting the materials<02:31:15.200> it<02:31:15.359> it<02:31:15.479> allows<02:31:16.080> to<02:31:16.319> other 02:31:16.510 --> 02:31:16.520 align:start position:0% materials it it allows to other 02:31:16.520 --> 02:31:18.670 align:start position:0% materials it it allows to other employees<02:31:16.960> to<02:31:17.080> say<02:31:17.359> yes<02:31:17.640> we<02:31:18.080> this<02:31:18.319> this<02:31:18.439> is 02:31:18.670 --> 02:31:18.680 align:start position:0% employees to say yes we this this is 02:31:18.680 --> 02:31:22.389 align:start position:0% employees to say yes we this this is good<02:31:19.040> or<02:31:19.359> no<02:31:20.040> yeah<02:31:21.040> so<02:31:21.439> I<02:31:21.840> understand<02:31:22.040> that<02:31:22.200> but 02:31:22.389 --> 02:31:22.399 align:start position:0% good or no yeah so I understand that but 02:31:22.399 --> 02:31:24.190 align:start position:0% good or no yeah so I understand that but how<02:31:22.520> do<02:31:22.640> you<02:31:22.800> determine<02:31:23.279> who<02:31:23.439> is<02:31:23.600> the<02:31:23.800> person 02:31:24.190 --> 02:31:24.200 align:start position:0% how do you determine who is the person 02:31:24.200 --> 02:31:27.190 align:start position:0% how do you determine who is the person responsible<02:31:25.080> right<02:31:25.800> because<02:31:26.640> overall<02:31:27.040> there 02:31:27.190 --> 02:31:27.200 align:start position:0% responsible right because overall there 02:31:27.200 --> 02:31:29.469 align:start position:0% responsible right because overall there might<02:31:27.359> be<02:31:27.560> individuals<02:31:28.240> above<02:31:28.840> that<02:31:29.240> the 02:31:29.469 --> 02:31:29.479 align:start position:0% might be individuals above that the 02:31:29.479 --> 02:31:31.190 align:start position:0% might be individuals above that the library<02:31:29.960> specialist<02:31:30.359> that<02:31:30.520> brought<02:31:30.720> it<02:31:30.840> in 02:31:31.190 --> 02:31:31.200 align:start position:0% library specialist that brought it in 02:31:31.200 --> 02:31:32.830 align:start position:0% library specialist that brought it in that<02:31:31.359> could<02:31:31.520> be<02:31:31.760> considered<02:31:32.240> responsible<02:31:32.720> and 02:31:32.830 --> 02:31:32.840 align:start position:0% that could be considered responsible and 02:31:32.840 --> 02:31:36.110 align:start position:0% that could be considered responsible and it<02:31:32.960> just<02:31:33.120> is<02:31:33.960> Right<02:31:34.960> interpretation<02:31:35.920> yeah<02:31:36.040> it 02:31:36.110 --> 02:31:36.120 align:start position:0% it just is Right interpretation yeah it 02:31:36.120 --> 02:31:37.870 align:start position:0% it just is Right interpretation yeah it wouldn't<02:31:36.359> exclude<02:31:36.840> that<02:31:37.000> librarian<02:31:37.560> then<02:31:37.760> if 02:31:37.870 --> 02:31:37.880 align:start position:0% wouldn't exclude that librarian then if 02:31:37.880 --> 02:31:39.349 align:start position:0% wouldn't exclude that librarian then if someone<02:31:38.120> else<02:31:38.319> put<02:31:38.520> it<02:31:38.640> in<02:31:38.880> right<02:31:39.040> it<02:31:39.120> would 02:31:39.349 --> 02:31:39.359 align:start position:0% someone else put it in right it would 02:31:39.359 --> 02:31:42.389 align:start position:0% someone else put it in right it would exclude<02:31:39.920> the<02:31:40.840> district<02:31:41.319> person<02:31:41.960> though<02:31:42.160> from 02:31:42.389 --> 02:31:42.399 align:start position:0% exclude the district person though from 02:31:42.399 --> 02:31:43.630 align:start position:0% exclude the district person though from participating<02:31:42.960> but<02:31:43.120> not<02:31:43.279> the<02:31:43.359> local 02:31:43.630 --> 02:31:43.640 align:start position:0% participating but not the local 02:31:43.640 --> 02:31:45.469 align:start position:0% participating but not the local librarian<02:31:44.160> if<02:31:44.319> that<02:31:44.600> if<02:31:44.720> the<02:31:44.920> district<02:31:45.240> person 02:31:45.469 --> 02:31:45.479 align:start position:0% librarian if that if the district person 02:31:45.479 --> 02:31:47.190 align:start position:0% librarian if that if the district person is<02:31:45.600> the<02:31:45.680> one<02:31:45.800> that<02:31:45.920> put<02:31:46.080> it<02:31:46.160> in<02:31:46.600> so<02:31:46.800> it's<02:31:47.000> that 02:31:47.190 --> 02:31:47.200 align:start position:0% is the one that put it in so it's that 02:31:47.200 --> 02:31:50.670 align:start position:0% is the one that put it in so it's that initial<02:31:48.120> procurement<02:31:49.120> um<02:31:50.000> I<02:31:50.080> was<02:31:50.160> thinking<02:31:50.600> in 02:31:50.670 --> 02:31:50.680 align:start position:0% initial procurement um I was thinking in 02:31:50.680 --> 02:31:52.870 align:start position:0% initial procurement um I was thinking in the<02:31:50.880> reverse<02:31:51.560> in<02:31:51.680> the<02:31:51.840> reverse<02:31:52.319> like<02:31:52.479> if<02:31:52.600> it's 02:31:52.870 --> 02:31:52.880 align:start position:0% the reverse in the reverse like if it's 02:31:52.880 --> 02:31:55.429 align:start position:0% the reverse in the reverse like if it's the<02:31:53.640> if<02:31:53.800> it's<02:31:54.200> the<02:31:54.560> district<02:31:54.920> person<02:31:55.240> is 02:31:55.429 --> 02:31:55.439 align:start position:0% the if it's the district person is 02:31:55.439 --> 02:31:56.990 align:start position:0% the if it's the district person is actually<02:31:55.880> responsible<02:31:56.439> for<02:31:56.640> all<02:31:56.880> the 02:31:56.990 --> 02:31:57.000 align:start position:0% actually responsible for all the 02:31:57.000 --> 02:31:58.750 align:start position:0% actually responsible for all the Librarians<02:31:57.520> and<02:31:57.640> all<02:31:57.920> their<02:31:58.080> schools<02:31:58.479> within 02:31:58.750 --> 02:31:58.760 align:start position:0% Librarians and all their schools within 02:31:58.760 --> 02:32:01.510 align:start position:0% Librarians and all their schools within that<02:31:59.080> District<02:31:59.439> or<02:31:59.800> Lea<02:32:00.800> then<02:32:01.000> does<02:32:01.160> that<02:32:01.319> mean 02:32:01.510 --> 02:32:01.520 align:start position:0% that District or Lea then does that mean 02:32:01.520 --> 02:32:04.349 align:start position:0% that District or Lea then does that mean they're<02:32:01.800> also<02:32:02.160> ex<02:32:02.840> excluded<02:32:03.840> because<02:32:04.080> they're 02:32:04.349 --> 02:32:04.359 align:start position:0% they're also ex excluded because they're 02:32:04.359 --> 02:32:05.429 align:start position:0% they're also ex excluded because they're technically<02:32:04.880> the<02:32:04.960> ones<02:32:05.160> that<02:32:05.240> are 02:32:05.429 --> 02:32:05.439 align:start position:0% technically the ones that are 02:32:05.439 --> 02:32:07.550 align:start position:0% technically the ones that are responsible<02:32:05.880> for<02:32:06.040> the<02:32:06.200> decisions<02:32:06.680> that<02:32:07.080> the 02:32:07.550 --> 02:32:07.560 align:start position:0% responsible for the decisions that the 02:32:07.560 --> 02:32:09.510 align:start position:0% responsible for the decisions that the leas<02:32:08.040> at<02:32:08.160> the<02:32:08.240> lower<02:32:08.720> or<02:32:08.840> the<02:32:08.960> Librarians<02:32:09.439> at 02:32:09.510 --> 02:32:09.520 align:start position:0% leas at the lower or the Librarians at 02:32:09.520 --> 02:32:11.150 align:start position:0% leas at the lower or the Librarians at the<02:32:09.640> lower<02:32:09.880> levels<02:32:10.240> make<02:32:10.560> and<02:32:10.680> so<02:32:10.880> that's<02:32:11.040> why 02:32:11.150 --> 02:32:11.160 align:start position:0% the lower levels make and so that's why 02:32:11.160 --> 02:32:13.510 align:start position:0% the lower levels make and so that's why it's<02:32:11.279> just<02:32:11.479> like<02:32:12.040> it<02:32:12.200> becomes<02:32:12.520> a<02:32:12.640> little<02:32:12.800> bit 02:32:13.510 --> 02:32:13.520 align:start position:0% it's just like it becomes a little bit 02:32:13.520 --> 02:32:16.590 align:start position:0% it's just like it becomes a little bit um<02:32:13.960> confusing<02:32:14.399> on<02:32:14.680> who<02:32:15.359> that 02:32:16.590 --> 02:32:16.600 align:start position:0% um confusing on who that 02:32:16.600 --> 02:32:19.389 align:start position:0% um confusing on who that means<02:32:17.600> well<02:32:17.760> and<02:32:17.960> that's<02:32:18.399> that's<02:32:18.560> why<02:32:18.680> I 02:32:19.389 --> 02:32:19.399 align:start position:0% means well and that's that's why I 02:32:19.399 --> 02:32:21.510 align:start position:0% means well and that's that's why I that's<02:32:19.560> why<02:32:19.960> keep<02:32:20.200> asking<02:32:20.479> the<02:32:20.720> question<02:32:21.240> I 02:32:21.510 --> 02:32:21.520 align:start position:0% that's why keep asking the question I 02:32:21.520 --> 02:32:22.990 align:start position:0% that's why keep asking the question I I'd<02:32:21.720> really<02:32:21.960> like<02:32:22.120> it<02:32:22.240> to<02:32:22.359> be<02:32:22.520> answered<02:32:22.880> if 02:32:22.990 --> 02:32:23.000 align:start position:0% I'd really like it to be answered if 02:32:23.000 --> 02:32:26.269 align:start position:0% I'd really like it to be answered if somebody<02:32:23.600> here<02:32:23.880> could<02:32:24.160> answer<02:32:24.680> this<02:32:25.680> there's 02:32:26.269 --> 02:32:26.279 align:start position:0% somebody here could answer this there's 02:32:26.279 --> 02:32:28.950 align:start position:0% somebody here could answer this there's we<02:32:26.479> have<02:32:26.640> a<02:32:26.800> purchasing<02:32:27.760> department<02:32:28.760> they 02:32:28.950 --> 02:32:28.960 align:start position:0% we have a purchasing department they 02:32:28.960 --> 02:32:32.190 align:start position:0% we have a purchasing department they have<02:32:29.080> a<02:32:29.359> name<02:32:30.040> that<02:32:30.240> they<02:32:30.680> sign<02:32:31.680> when<02:32:31.960> they 02:32:32.190 --> 02:32:32.200 align:start position:0% have a name that they sign when they 02:32:32.200 --> 02:32:34.510 align:start position:0% have a name that they sign when they purchase<02:32:32.600> an<02:32:32.800> order<02:32:33.359> we<02:32:33.520> have<02:32:33.680> a<02:32:34.120> receiving 02:32:34.510 --> 02:32:34.520 align:start position:0% purchase an order we have a receiving 02:32:34.520 --> 02:32:36.990 align:start position:0% purchase an order we have a receiving department<02:32:35.359> they<02:32:35.560> sign<02:32:36.000> when<02:32:36.160> they<02:32:36.439> receive 02:32:36.990 --> 02:32:37.000 align:start position:0% department they sign when they receive 02:32:37.000 --> 02:32:39.389 align:start position:0% department they sign when they receive the<02:32:37.160> order<02:32:38.120> we<02:32:38.319> have<02:32:38.560> people<02:32:38.840> that<02:32:38.960> stock<02:32:39.279> the 02:32:39.389 --> 02:32:39.399 align:start position:0% the order we have people that stock the 02:32:39.399 --> 02:32:42.510 align:start position:0% the order we have people that stock the shelves<02:32:40.319> they<02:32:40.479> have<02:32:40.680> a<02:32:40.920> a<02:32:41.120> number<02:32:41.800> we<02:32:42.000> know<02:32:42.319> who 02:32:42.510 --> 02:32:42.520 align:start position:0% shelves they have a a number we know who 02:32:42.520 --> 02:32:45.550 align:start position:0% shelves they have a a number we know who stocks<02:32:42.960> the<02:32:43.560> shelves<02:32:44.560> this<02:32:44.840> exists<02:32:45.319> within 02:32:45.550 --> 02:32:45.560 align:start position:0% stocks the shelves this exists within 02:32:45.560 --> 02:32:50.469 align:start position:0% stocks the shelves this exists within the<02:32:45.680> school<02:32:46.040> system<02:32:47.120> who<02:32:48.120> orders<02:32:48.800> the<02:32:49.000> books 02:32:50.469 --> 02:32:50.479 align:start position:0% the school system who orders the books 02:32:50.479 --> 02:32:52.750 align:start position:0% the school system who orders the books if<02:32:50.640> we<02:32:50.840> don't<02:32:51.120> order<02:32:51.439> the<02:32:51.640> books<02:32:52.399> what 02:32:52.750 --> 02:32:52.760 align:start position:0% if we don't order the books what 02:32:52.760 --> 02:32:55.469 align:start position:0% if we don't order the books what organization<02:32:53.760> gives<02:32:54.040> us<02:32:54.279> the<02:32:54.479> list<02:32:54.960> of<02:32:55.160> books 02:32:55.469 --> 02:32:55.479 align:start position:0% organization gives us the list of books 02:32:55.479 --> 02:32:58.070 align:start position:0% organization gives us the list of books that<02:32:55.600> we 02:32:58.070 --> 02:32:58.080 align:start position:0% 02:32:58.080 --> 02:32:59.990 align:start position:0% receive<02:32:59.080> that's<02:32:59.319> kind<02:32:59.439> of<02:32:59.560> what<02:32:59.640> I<02:32:59.720> was<02:32:59.800> saying 02:32:59.990 --> 02:33:00.000 align:start position:0% receive that's kind of what I was saying 02:33:00.000 --> 02:33:01.750 align:start position:0% receive that's kind of what I was saying is<02:33:00.319> sometimes<02:33:00.640> a<02:33:00.760> student<02:33:01.080> can<02:33:01.279> request<02:33:01.640> a 02:33:01.750 --> 02:33:01.760 align:start position:0% is sometimes a student can request a 02:33:01.760 --> 02:33:03.590 align:start position:0% is sometimes a student can request a book<02:33:02.040> be<02:33:02.359> added<02:33:02.640> to<02:33:02.760> the<02:33:02.880> library<02:33:03.240> in<02:33:03.399> some 02:33:03.590 --> 02:33:03.600 align:start position:0% book be added to the library in some 02:33:03.600 --> 02:33:06.230 align:start position:0% book be added to the library in some cases<02:33:03.880> so<02:33:04.040> I<02:33:04.160> just<02:33:04.240> think<02:33:04.439> it's<02:33:05.359> it<02:33:05.800> all<02:33:05.960> of<02:33:06.080> our 02:33:06.230 --> 02:33:06.240 align:start position:0% cases so I just think it's it all of our 02:33:06.240 --> 02:33:09.110 align:start position:0% cases so I just think it's it all of our laas<02:33:06.640> are<02:33:06.800> so<02:33:07.040> different<02:33:07.560> different<02:33:08.120> sizes 02:33:09.110 --> 02:33:09.120 align:start position:0% laas are so different different sizes 02:33:09.120 --> 02:33:10.469 align:start position:0% laas are so different different sizes different 02:33:10.469 --> 02:33:10.479 align:start position:0% different 02:33:10.479 --> 02:33:14.030 align:start position:0% different situations<02:33:11.479> um<02:33:12.479> and<02:33:13.000> and<02:33:13.240> is<02:33:13.359> it<02:33:13.479> the<02:33:13.640> person 02:33:14.030 --> 02:33:14.040 align:start position:0% situations um and and is it the person 02:33:14.040 --> 02:33:17.230 align:start position:0% situations um and and is it the person who<02:33:15.000> is<02:33:15.160> the<02:33:15.439> budget<02:33:15.880> manager<02:33:16.479> of<02:33:16.600> that<02:33:16.760> Lea 02:33:17.230 --> 02:33:17.240 align:start position:0% who is the budget manager of that Lea 02:33:17.240 --> 02:33:18.910 align:start position:0% who is the budget manager of that Lea that's<02:33:17.479> responsible<02:33:18.120> or<02:33:18.279> is<02:33:18.359> it<02:33:18.520> the<02:33:18.680> person 02:33:18.910 --> 02:33:18.920 align:start position:0% that's responsible or is it the person 02:33:18.920 --> 02:33:20.349 align:start position:0% that's responsible or is it the person that<02:33:19.080> put<02:33:19.240> in<02:33:19.359> the<02:33:19.479> order<02:33:19.920> and<02:33:20.040> everyone's 02:33:20.349 --> 02:33:20.359 align:start position:0% that put in the order and everyone's 02:33:20.359 --> 02:33:23.830 align:start position:0% that put in the order and everyone's gonna<02:33:20.600> have<02:33:20.720> a<02:33:20.840> different<02:33:21.520> process 02:33:23.830 --> 02:33:23.840 align:start position:0% gonna have a different process 02:33:23.840 --> 02:33:25.710 align:start position:0% gonna have a different process their<02:33:24.840> I<02:33:24.920> don't<02:33:25.080> want<02:33:25.200> to<02:33:25.359> cause<02:33:25.560> that 02:33:25.710 --> 02:33:25.720 align:start position:0% their I don't want to cause that 02:33:25.720 --> 02:33:28.790 align:start position:0% their I don't want to cause that confusion<02:33:26.600> could<02:33:26.720> we<02:33:26.880> have<02:33:27.040> your<02:33:27.240> comment 02:33:28.790 --> 02:33:28.800 align:start position:0% confusion could we have your comment 02:33:28.800 --> 02:33:32.230 align:start position:0% confusion could we have your comment please<02:33:29.800> just<02:33:30.160> just<02:33:30.319> in<02:33:30.640> response<02:33:31.240> to<02:33:31.600> the<02:33:32.000> The 02:33:32.230 --> 02:33:32.240 align:start position:0% please just just in response to the The 02:33:32.240 --> 02:33:35.469 align:start position:0% please just just in response to the The Who<02:33:32.600> on<02:33:32.920> this<02:33:33.600> uh<02:33:34.600> and<02:33:34.840> but<02:33:35.000> I<02:33:35.120> it<02:33:35.200> was<02:33:35.359> just 02:33:35.469 --> 02:33:35.479 align:start position:0% Who on this uh and but I it was just 02:33:35.479 --> 02:33:37.110 align:start position:0% Who on this uh and but I it was just answered<02:33:35.920> as<02:33:36.120> as<02:33:36.240> I<02:33:36.319> was<02:33:36.479> putting<02:33:36.720> my<02:33:36.880> hand 02:33:37.110 --> 02:33:37.120 align:start position:0% answered as as I was putting my hand 02:33:37.120 --> 02:33:39.269 align:start position:0% answered as as I was putting my hand down<02:33:37.399> which<02:33:37.560> is<02:33:37.720> it's<02:33:37.880> a<02:33:38.000> multitude<02:33:38.479> of<02:33:38.680> people 02:33:39.269 --> 02:33:39.279 align:start position:0% down which is it's a multitude of people 02:33:39.279 --> 02:33:42.870 align:start position:0% down which is it's a multitude of people it<02:33:39.439> depends<02:33:39.880> on<02:33:40.560> because<02:33:41.080> this<02:33:41.439> entire<02:33:41.960> and<02:33:42.399> um 02:33:42.870 --> 02:33:42.880 align:start position:0% it depends on because this entire and um 02:33:42.880 --> 02:33:44.070 align:start position:0% it depends on because this entire and um because<02:33:43.160> this 02:33:44.070 --> 02:33:44.080 align:start position:0% because this 02:33:44.080 --> 02:33:46.990 align:start position:0% because this entire<02:33:45.080> guideline<02:33:45.680> or<02:33:45.920> this<02:33:46.120> entire<02:33:46.560> guiding 02:33:46.990 --> 02:33:47.000 align:start position:0% entire guideline or this entire guiding 02:33:47.000 --> 02:33:48.830 align:start position:0% entire guideline or this entire guiding document<02:33:47.439> is<02:33:47.640> instructional<02:33:48.200> materials<02:33:48.680> it's 02:33:48.830 --> 02:33:48.840 align:start position:0% document is instructional materials it's 02:33:48.840 --> 02:33:51.190 align:start position:0% document is instructional materials it's not<02:33:49.000> just<02:33:49.160> Library<02:33:49.800> materials<02:33:50.600> so<02:33:50.800> if<02:33:50.880> we<02:33:51.040> look 02:33:51.190 --> 02:33:51.200 align:start position:0% not just Library materials so if we look 02:33:51.200 --> 02:33:52.870 align:start position:0% not just Library materials so if we look at<02:33:51.359> it<02:33:51.520> it<02:33:51.680> could<02:33:51.800> be<02:33:51.960> a<02:33:52.080> teacher<02:33:52.600> they<02:33:52.720> could 02:33:52.870 --> 02:33:52.880 align:start position:0% at it it could be a teacher they could 02:33:52.880 --> 02:33:55.950 align:start position:0% at it it could be a teacher they could be<02:33:53.000> ordering<02:33:53.520> off<02:33:54.200> um<02:33:54.840> what<02:33:55.160> oh<02:33:55.640> what<02:33:55.760> are 02:33:55.950 --> 02:33:55.960 align:start position:0% be ordering off um what oh what are 02:33:55.960 --> 02:33:57.630 align:start position:0% be ordering off um what oh what are those<02:33:56.120> book<02:33:56.319> orders<02:33:56.680> that<02:33:56.840> come<02:33:57.040> home<02:33:57.279> for<02:33:57.520> you 02:33:57.630 --> 02:33:57.640 align:start position:0% those book orders that come home for you 02:33:57.640 --> 02:33:58.990 align:start position:0% those book orders that come home for you know<02:33:57.880> and<02:33:58.040> they're<02:33:58.279> ordering<02:33:58.640> books<02:33:58.840> for 02:33:58.990 --> 02:33:59.000 align:start position:0% know and they're ordering books for 02:33:59.000 --> 02:34:00.790 align:start position:0% know and they're ordering books for their<02:33:59.200> classroom<02:33:59.680> or<02:34:00.000> or<02:34:00.200> whatnot<02:34:00.479> so<02:34:00.640> there 02:34:00.790 --> 02:34:00.800 align:start position:0% their classroom or or whatnot so there 02:34:00.800 --> 02:34:04.349 align:start position:0% their classroom or or whatnot so there could<02:34:00.920> be<02:34:01.080> a<02:34:01.240> variety<02:34:01.640> of<02:34:01.800> people<02:34:02.080> on<02:34:02.560> there<02:34:03.479> um 02:34:04.349 --> 02:34:04.359 align:start position:0% could be a variety of people on there um 02:34:04.359 --> 02:34:06.150 align:start position:0% could be a variety of people on there um I<02:34:04.640> I<02:34:04.720> think<02:34:04.920> and<02:34:05.040> I'm<02:34:05.160> wondering<02:34:05.439> to<02:34:05.640> be<02:34:05.880> know 02:34:06.150 --> 02:34:06.160 align:start position:0% I I think and I'm wondering to be know 02:34:06.160 --> 02:34:09.349 align:start position:0% I I think and I'm wondering to be know if<02:34:06.279> you<02:34:06.479> have<02:34:06.680> any<02:34:07.359> um<02:34:07.720> more<02:34:08.120> information<02:34:09.120> on 02:34:09.349 --> 02:34:09.359 align:start position:0% if you have any um more information on 02:34:09.359 --> 02:34:12.230 align:start position:0% if you have any um more information on the<02:34:09.960> on<02:34:10.160> the<02:34:10.359> on<02:34:10.479> the<02:34:10.680> process<02:34:11.240> specifically 02:34:12.230 --> 02:34:12.240 align:start position:0% the on the on the process specifically 02:34:12.240 --> 02:34:14.269 align:start position:0% the on the on the process specifically for<02:34:12.840> procuring<02:34:13.399> I<02:34:13.479> know<02:34:13.640> that<02:34:13.800> the<02:34:13.880> librarian 02:34:14.269 --> 02:34:14.279 align:start position:0% for procuring I know that the librarian 02:34:14.279 --> 02:34:15.910 align:start position:0% for procuring I know that the librarian doesn't<02:34:14.520> procure<02:34:14.880> all<02:34:15.000> the<02:34:15.120> materials<02:34:15.640> all<02:34:15.760> of 02:34:15.910 --> 02:34:15.920 align:start position:0% doesn't procure all the materials all of 02:34:15.920 --> 02:34:17.790 align:start position:0% doesn't procure all the materials all of the<02:34:16.040> instructional<02:34:16.640> materials<02:34:17.399> I<02:34:17.520> know<02:34:17.680> that 02:34:17.790 --> 02:34:17.800 align:start position:0% the instructional materials I know that 02:34:17.800 --> 02:34:19.550 align:start position:0% the instructional materials I know that the<02:34:17.920> classroom<02:34:18.319> teacher<02:34:18.680> doesn't<02:34:19.160> do<02:34:19.359> that<02:34:19.479> as 02:34:19.550 --> 02:34:19.560 align:start position:0% the classroom teacher doesn't do that as 02:34:19.560 --> 02:34:20.910 align:start position:0% the classroom teacher doesn't do that as well<02:34:19.720> as<02:34:19.840> well<02:34:20.200> and<02:34:20.319> I<02:34:20.399> know<02:34:20.560> that<02:34:20.760> the 02:34:20.910 --> 02:34:20.920 align:start position:0% well as well and I know that the 02:34:20.920 --> 02:34:23.230 align:start position:0% well as well and I know that the district<02:34:21.479> actually<02:34:21.920> is<02:34:22.200> the<02:34:22.319> one<02:34:22.560> who<02:34:22.960> does 02:34:23.230 --> 02:34:23.240 align:start position:0% district actually is the one who does 02:34:23.240 --> 02:34:24.710 align:start position:0% district actually is the one who does like<02:34:23.439> let's<02:34:23.600> say<02:34:23.800> curriculum<02:34:24.359> and<02:34:24.439> then<02:34:24.600> they 02:34:24.710 --> 02:34:24.720 align:start position:0% like let's say curriculum and then they 02:34:24.720 --> 02:34:26.790 align:start position:0% like let's say curriculum and then they do<02:34:25.240> other<02:34:25.560> materials<02:34:26.080> as<02:34:26.200> well<02:34:26.359> so<02:34:26.560> there 02:34:26.790 --> 02:34:26.800 align:start position:0% do other materials as well so there 02:34:26.800 --> 02:34:29.630 align:start position:0% do other materials as well so there there's<02:34:27.160> different<02:34:27.439> levels<02:34:27.800> of<02:34:28.000> who<02:34:28.640> procures 02:34:29.630 --> 02:34:29.640 align:start position:0% there's different levels of who procures 02:34:29.640 --> 02:34:32.830 align:start position:0% there's different levels of who procures um<02:34:30.160> and<02:34:30.800> uh<02:34:31.319> and<02:34:31.560> and<02:34:31.720> what<02:34:31.920> that<02:34:32.120> looks<02:34:32.439> like 02:34:32.830 --> 02:34:32.840 align:start position:0% um and uh and and what that looks like 02:34:32.840 --> 02:34:35.830 align:start position:0% um and uh and and what that looks like that<02:34:33.000> might<02:34:33.160> be<02:34:33.399> something<02:34:34.000> that<02:34:34.680> uh<02:34:35.680> in 02:34:35.830 --> 02:34:35.840 align:start position:0% that might be something that uh in 02:34:35.840 --> 02:34:37.269 align:start position:0% that might be something that uh in looking<02:34:36.080> at<02:34:36.240> this<02:34:36.439> maybe<02:34:36.680> we<02:34:36.760> can<02:34:36.920> just<02:34:37.040> think 02:34:37.269 --> 02:34:37.279 align:start position:0% looking at this maybe we can just think 02:34:37.279 --> 02:34:38.950 align:start position:0% looking at this maybe we can just think that<02:34:37.439> through<02:34:37.640> a<02:34:37.720> little<02:34:37.920> bit<02:34:38.080> more<02:34:38.640> I<02:34:38.760> know 02:34:38.950 --> 02:34:38.960 align:start position:0% that through a little bit more I know 02:34:38.960 --> 02:34:41.950 align:start position:0% that through a little bit more I know that<02:34:39.160> it<02:34:39.600> it<02:34:40.600> all<02:34:40.760> of<02:34:40.880> you<02:34:41.000> are<02:34:41.200> amazing<02:34:41.680> board 02:34:41.950 --> 02:34:41.960 align:start position:0% that it it all of you are amazing board 02:34:41.960 --> 02:34:43.790 align:start position:0% that it it all of you are amazing board members<02:34:42.600> um<02:34:43.040> but<02:34:43.160> I<02:34:43.279> don't<02:34:43.399> know<02:34:43.560> that<02:34:43.680> we're 02:34:43.790 --> 02:34:43.800 align:start position:0% members um but I don't know that we're 02:34:43.800 --> 02:34:45.670 align:start position:0% members um but I don't know that we're going<02:34:43.880> to<02:34:44.000> get<02:34:44.120> through<02:34:44.399> this<02:34:44.720> and<02:34:44.920> the<02:34:45.040> rule 02:34:45.670 --> 02:34:45.680 align:start position:0% going to get through this and the rule 02:34:45.680 --> 02:34:48.630 align:start position:0% going to get through this and the rule in<02:34:45.840> the<02:34:46.040> next<02:34:46.279> hour<02:34:47.000> but<02:34:47.240> you<02:34:47.399> could<02:34:48.080> but<02:34:48.359> um 02:34:48.630 --> 02:34:48.640 align:start position:0% in the next hour but you could but um 02:34:48.640 --> 02:34:50.269 align:start position:0% in the next hour but you could but um but<02:34:48.880> with<02:34:49.040> that<02:34:49.160> being<02:34:49.359> said<02:34:49.720> maybe<02:34:49.920> we<02:34:50.040> can 02:34:50.269 --> 02:34:50.279 align:start position:0% but with that being said maybe we can 02:34:50.279 --> 02:34:52.910 align:start position:0% but with that being said maybe we can just<02:34:50.800> uh<02:34:51.000> put<02:34:51.160> a<02:34:51.319> placeholder<02:34:51.880> on<02:34:52.040> that<02:34:52.160> one<02:34:52.399> or 02:34:52.910 --> 02:34:52.920 align:start position:0% just uh put a placeholder on that one or 02:34:52.920 --> 02:34:54.230 align:start position:0% just uh put a placeholder on that one or uh 02:34:54.230 --> 02:34:54.240 align:start position:0% uh 02:34:54.240 --> 02:34:56.750 align:start position:0% uh do<02:34:55.240> because<02:34:55.680> I<02:34:55.720> don't<02:34:55.840> know<02:34:56.000> that<02:34:56.120> we<02:34:56.279> as<02:34:56.479> staff 02:34:56.750 --> 02:34:56.760 align:start position:0% do because I don't know that we as staff 02:34:56.760 --> 02:34:59.670 align:start position:0% do because I don't know that we as staff have<02:34:56.920> that<02:34:57.080> full<02:34:57.680> information<02:34:58.680> yeah<02:34:59.120> and<02:34:59.240> I 02:34:59.670 --> 02:34:59.680 align:start position:0% have that full information yeah and I 02:34:59.680 --> 02:35:01.030 align:start position:0% have that full information yeah and I understand<02:34:59.840> what<02:34:59.960> member<02:35:00.319> real<02:35:00.479> is<02:35:00.560> saying<02:35:00.880> as 02:35:01.030 --> 02:35:01.040 align:start position:0% understand what member real is saying as 02:35:01.040 --> 02:35:03.389 align:start position:0% understand what member real is saying as far<02:35:01.240> as<02:35:01.600> like<02:35:02.160> there's<02:35:02.399> just<02:35:02.560> so<02:35:02.760> many<02:35:02.960> moving 02:35:03.389 --> 02:35:03.399 align:start position:0% far as like there's just so many moving 02:35:03.399 --> 02:35:06.670 align:start position:0% far as like there's just so many moving parts<02:35:03.680> to<02:35:03.880> this<02:35:04.160> I<02:35:04.359> absolutely<02:35:05.040> agree<02:35:06.040> I<02:35:06.240> I 02:35:06.670 --> 02:35:06.680 align:start position:0% parts to this I absolutely agree I I 02:35:06.680 --> 02:35:10.269 align:start position:0% parts to this I absolutely agree I I understand<02:35:07.359> this<02:35:08.359> at<02:35:08.479> the<02:35:08.640> end<02:35:08.840> of<02:35:09.040> the 02:35:10.269 --> 02:35:10.279 align:start position:0% understand this at the end of the 02:35:10.279 --> 02:35:13.230 align:start position:0% understand this at the end of the day<02:35:11.279> in<02:35:11.600> in<02:35:11.680> a<02:35:11.840> business<02:35:12.399> you<02:35:12.640> know<02:35:13.040> who 02:35:13.230 --> 02:35:13.240 align:start position:0% day in in a business you know who 02:35:13.240 --> 02:35:15.110 align:start position:0% day in in a business you know who ordered 02:35:15.110 --> 02:35:15.120 align:start position:0% ordered 02:35:15.120 --> 02:35:18.230 align:start position:0% ordered product<02:35:16.120> you<02:35:16.439> know<02:35:16.880> who<02:35:17.120> placed<02:35:17.520> the<02:35:17.680> order 02:35:18.230 --> 02:35:18.240 align:start position:0% product you know who placed the order 02:35:18.240 --> 02:35:21.349 align:start position:0% product you know who placed the order you<02:35:18.560> know<02:35:18.960> what<02:35:19.200> inventory<02:35:20.080> you<02:35:20.279> need<02:35:21.120> you 02:35:21.349 --> 02:35:21.359 align:start position:0% you know what inventory you need you 02:35:21.359 --> 02:35:23.950 align:start position:0% you know what inventory you need you know<02:35:21.720> what's<02:35:22.080> coming<02:35:22.520> in<02:35:23.520> and<02:35:23.720> those 02:35:23.950 --> 02:35:23.960 align:start position:0% know what's coming in and those 02:35:23.960 --> 02:35:28.030 align:start position:0% know what's coming in and those structures<02:35:24.960> exist<02:35:25.800> in<02:35:26.120> every<02:35:26.560> single<02:35:27.040> school 02:35:28.030 --> 02:35:28.040 align:start position:0% structures exist in every single school 02:35:28.040 --> 02:35:31.230 align:start position:0% structures exist in every single school so<02:35:28.399> that's<02:35:29.240> yes<02:35:30.080> maybe<02:35:30.359> it's<02:35:30.560> cumbersome<02:35:31.080> at 02:35:31.230 --> 02:35:31.240 align:start position:0% so that's yes maybe it's cumbersome at 02:35:31.240 --> 02:35:32.950 align:start position:0% so that's yes maybe it's cumbersome at first<02:35:31.520> but<02:35:31.680> they<02:35:31.880> already<02:35:32.319> have<02:35:32.520> all<02:35:32.640> of<02:35:32.800> that 02:35:32.950 --> 02:35:32.960 align:start position:0% first but they already have all of that 02:35:32.960 --> 02:35:35.309 align:start position:0% first but they already have all of that in<02:35:33.160> place<02:35:33.560> because<02:35:33.800> their<02:35:34.000> building<02:35:34.319> is 02:35:35.309 --> 02:35:35.319 align:start position:0% in place because their building is 02:35:35.319 --> 02:35:38.670 align:start position:0% in place because their building is operating<02:35:36.319> somebody<02:35:36.880> already<02:35:37.479> has<02:35:37.800> that<02:35:38.479> as 02:35:38.670 --> 02:35:38.680 align:start position:0% operating somebody already has that as 02:35:38.680 --> 02:35:40.190 align:start position:0% operating somebody already has that as their<02:35:38.960> job 02:35:40.190 --> 02:35:40.200 align:start position:0% their job 02:35:40.200 --> 02:35:42.269 align:start position:0% their job description 02:35:42.269 --> 02:35:42.279 align:start position:0% description 02:35:42.279 --> 02:35:45.870 align:start position:0% description period<02:35:43.279> and<02:35:43.479> so<02:35:44.479> for<02:35:44.720> me<02:35:45.040> it 02:35:45.870 --> 02:35:45.880 align:start position:0% period and so for me it 02:35:45.880 --> 02:35:47.429 align:start position:0% period and so for me it seems 02:35:47.429 --> 02:35:47.439 align:start position:0% seems 02:35:47.439 --> 02:35:50.230 align:start position:0% seems manageable<02:35:48.439> and<02:35:49.319> EXP 02:35:50.230 --> 02:35:50.240 align:start position:0% manageable and EXP 02:35:50.240 --> 02:35:52.790 align:start position:0% manageable and EXP expected<02:35:51.240> if<02:35:51.359> you<02:35:51.520> don't<02:35:51.920> have<02:35:52.240> those<02:35:52.520> you're 02:35:52.790 --> 02:35:52.800 align:start position:0% expected if you don't have those you're 02:35:52.800 --> 02:35:55.230 align:start position:0% expected if you don't have those you're probably<02:35:53.080> not<02:35:53.520> functioning<02:35:54.120> very<02:35:54.399> well<02:35:55.120> but 02:35:55.230 --> 02:35:55.240 align:start position:0% probably not functioning very well but 02:35:55.240 --> 02:35:57.429 align:start position:0% probably not functioning very well but our<02:35:55.399> schools<02:35:55.720> are<02:35:55.960> functioning<02:35:56.920> bookshelves 02:35:57.429 --> 02:35:57.439 align:start position:0% our schools are functioning bookshelves 02:35:57.439 --> 02:35:59.910 align:start position:0% our schools are functioning bookshelves are<02:35:57.680> full<02:35:58.160> curriculum<02:35:58.680> is<02:35:58.840> in<02:35:59.040> classroom 02:35:59.910 --> 02:35:59.920 align:start position:0% are full curriculum is in classroom 02:35:59.920 --> 02:36:04.070 align:start position:0% are full curriculum is in classroom people<02:36:00.240> are<02:36:00.600> already<02:36:01.279> doing<02:36:02.000> this<02:36:03.000> um<02:36:03.439> yes 02:36:04.070 --> 02:36:04.080 align:start position:0% people are already doing this um yes 02:36:04.080 --> 02:36:07.150 align:start position:0% people are already doing this um yes deina<02:36:05.080> I<02:36:05.200> just<02:36:05.399> was<02:36:05.640> going<02:36:05.760> to<02:36:05.920> add<02:36:06.359> also<02:36:07.040> you 02:36:07.150 --> 02:36:07.160 align:start position:0% deina I just was going to add also you 02:36:07.160 --> 02:36:08.750 align:start position:0% deina I just was going to add also you know<02:36:07.439> some<02:36:07.600> of<02:36:07.720> our<02:36:07.920> Librarians<02:36:08.520> are 02:36:08.750 --> 02:36:08.760 align:start position:0% know some of our Librarians are 02:36:08.760 --> 02:36:12.469 align:start position:0% know some of our Librarians are inheriting<02:36:09.439> their<02:36:09.680> Library<02:36:10.600> so<02:36:11.600> um<02:36:12.000> the<02:36:12.160> books 02:36:12.469 --> 02:36:12.479 align:start position:0% inheriting their Library so um the books 02:36:12.479 --> 02:36:15.710 align:start position:0% inheriting their Library so um the books that<02:36:12.600> are<02:36:12.880> in<02:36:13.160> the<02:36:13.399> library<02:36:14.200> are<02:36:14.640> from<02:36:14.960> a 02:36:15.710 --> 02:36:15.720 align:start position:0% that are in the library are from a 02:36:15.720 --> 02:36:19.230 align:start position:0% that are in the library are from a predecessor<02:36:16.720> um<02:36:17.120> and<02:36:17.319> so<02:36:17.960> they<02:36:18.399> that<02:36:18.520> may<02:36:18.800> also 02:36:19.230 --> 02:36:19.240 align:start position:0% predecessor um and so they that may also 02:36:19.240 --> 02:36:20.469 align:start position:0% predecessor um and so they that may also like<02:36:19.600> make<02:36:19.760> this<02:36:19.920> a<02:36:20.000> little<02:36:20.120> bit<02:36:20.240> more 02:36:20.469 --> 02:36:20.479 align:start position:0% like make this a little bit more 02:36:20.479 --> 02:36:22.950 align:start position:0% like make this a little bit more complicated<02:36:21.160> I'll<02:36:21.359> just<02:36:21.680> say<02:36:21.960> that<02:36:22.439> except 02:36:22.950 --> 02:36:22.960 align:start position:0% complicated I'll just say that except 02:36:22.960 --> 02:36:24.990 align:start position:0% complicated I'll just say that except for<02:36:23.600> that<02:36:23.760> actually<02:36:24.040> clears<02:36:24.359> it<02:36:24.520> up<02:36:24.760> because 02:36:24.990 --> 02:36:25.000 align:start position:0% for that actually clears it up because 02:36:25.000 --> 02:36:26.990 align:start position:0% for that actually clears it up because they<02:36:25.080> are<02:36:25.279> not<02:36:25.520> the<02:36:25.680> initial<02:36:26.359> person<02:36:26.680> that<02:36:26.840> put 02:36:26.990 --> 02:36:27.000 align:start position:0% they are not the initial person that put 02:36:27.000 --> 02:36:29.469 align:start position:0% they are not the initial person that put it<02:36:27.120> in<02:36:27.479> do<02:36:27.640> that<02:36:27.800> make<02:36:28.000> sense<02:36:29.000> they<02:36:29.120> didn't<02:36:29.359> put 02:36:29.469 --> 02:36:29.479 align:start position:0% it in do that make sense they didn't put 02:36:29.479 --> 02:36:31.910 align:start position:0% it in do that make sense they didn't put it<02:36:29.600> in<02:36:29.720> so<02:36:30.279> this<02:36:30.439> to<02:36:30.600> me<02:36:30.920> is<02:36:31.160> that<02:36:31.359> initial 02:36:31.910 --> 02:36:31.920 align:start position:0% it in so this to me is that initial 02:36:31.920 --> 02:36:33.550 align:start position:0% it in so this to me is that initial person<02:36:32.319> and<02:36:32.439> if<02:36:32.640> a<02:36:32.800> student<02:36:33.120> comes<02:36:33.319> in<02:36:33.439> and 02:36:33.550 --> 02:36:33.560 align:start position:0% person and if a student comes in and 02:36:33.560 --> 02:36:35.269 align:start position:0% person and if a student comes in and says<02:36:34.160> get<02:36:34.319> me<02:36:34.520> this 02:36:35.269 --> 02:36:35.279 align:start position:0% says get me this 02:36:35.279 --> 02:36:38.230 align:start position:0% says get me this book<02:36:36.279> the<02:36:36.439> student<02:36:36.800> didn't<02:36:37.120> get<02:36:37.359> the<02:36:37.520> book<02:36:38.040> The 02:36:38.230 --> 02:36:38.240 align:start position:0% book the student didn't get the book The 02:36:38.240 --> 02:36:41.190 align:start position:0% book the student didn't get the book The Adult<02:36:38.640> got<02:36:38.880> the<02:36:39.040> book<02:36:39.920> and<02:36:40.760> has<02:36:41.000> the 02:36:41.190 --> 02:36:41.200 align:start position:0% Adult got the book and has the 02:36:41.200 --> 02:36:42.830 align:start position:0% Adult got the book and has the measurement<02:36:41.680> tool<02:36:41.960> to<02:36:42.120> know<02:36:42.319> whether<02:36:42.520> or<02:36:42.640> not 02:36:42.830 --> 02:36:42.840 align:start position:0% measurement tool to know whether or not 02:36:42.840 --> 02:36:46.269 align:start position:0% measurement tool to know whether or not it's<02:36:43.000> something<02:36:43.279> they<02:36:43.399> can<02:36:43.640> actually<02:36:44.200> get<02:36:45.279> so 02:36:46.269 --> 02:36:46.279 align:start position:0% it's something they can actually get so 02:36:46.279 --> 02:36:47.950 align:start position:0% it's something they can actually get so I<02:36:46.359> still<02:36:46.560> think<02:36:46.720> it's<02:36:46.920> that<02:36:47.120> initial<02:36:47.720> right<02:36:47.840> if 02:36:47.950 --> 02:36:47.960 align:start position:0% I still think it's that initial right if 02:36:47.960 --> 02:36:50.389 align:start position:0% I still think it's that initial right if you<02:36:48.200> have<02:36:48.359> inherited<02:36:48.840> a<02:36:48.960> library<02:36:50.000> you're<02:36:50.200> not 02:36:50.389 --> 02:36:50.399 align:start position:0% you have inherited a library you're not 02:36:50.399 --> 02:36:52.830 align:start position:0% you have inherited a library you're not the<02:36:50.600> initial<02:36:51.279> person<02:36:52.279> right<02:36:52.399> and<02:36:52.520> as<02:36:52.600> you<02:36:52.720> go 02:36:52.830 --> 02:36:52.840 align:start position:0% the initial person right and as you go 02:36:52.840 --> 02:36:54.150 align:start position:0% the initial person right and as you go through<02:36:53.000> the<02:36:53.080> deselection<02:36:53.760> process<02:36:54.040> or 02:36:54.150 --> 02:36:54.160 align:start position:0% through the deselection process or 02:36:54.160 --> 02:36:56.110 align:start position:0% through the deselection process or whatever<02:36:54.399> you'll<02:36:54.560> be<02:36:54.680> able<02:36:54.880> to<02:36:55.520> identify 02:36:56.110 --> 02:36:56.120 align:start position:0% whatever you'll be able to identify 02:36:56.120 --> 02:36:58.190 align:start position:0% whatever you'll be able to identify those<02:36:56.560> those<02:36:56.800> items<02:36:57.319> but<02:36:57.720> it's<02:36:58.000> who's 02:36:58.190 --> 02:36:58.200 align:start position:0% those those items but it's who's 02:36:58.200 --> 02:37:02.950 align:start position:0% those those items but it's who's bringing<02:36:58.520> a<02:36:58.680> in<02:36:58.920> is<02:36:59.080> the<02:36:59.279> is<02:36:59.399> the<02:36:59.560> concern 02:37:02.950 --> 02:37:02.960 align:start position:0% 02:37:02.960 --> 02:37:05.830 align:start position:0% here<02:37:03.960> I<02:37:04.240> I<02:37:04.279> mean<02:37:04.479> we<02:37:04.640> can<02:37:04.880> call<02:37:05.160> this<02:37:05.279> one<02:37:05.560> to<02:37:05.680> a 02:37:05.830 --> 02:37:05.840 align:start position:0% here I I mean we can call this one to a 02:37:05.840 --> 02:37:08.469 align:start position:0% here I I mean we can call this one to a vote 02:37:08.469 --> 02:37:08.479 align:start position:0% 02:37:08.479 --> 02:37:12.349 align:start position:0% again<02:37:09.479> okay<02:37:09.920> what<02:37:10.040> would<02:37:10.200> you<02:37:10.439> what<02:37:10.560> are<02:37:10.640> you 02:37:12.349 --> 02:37:12.359 align:start position:0% again okay what would you what are you 02:37:12.359 --> 02:37:14.150 align:start position:0% again okay what would you what are you proposing 02:37:14.150 --> 02:37:14.160 align:start position:0% proposing 02:37:14.160 --> 02:37:19.150 align:start position:0% proposing um<02:37:15.160> proposing<02:37:15.760> that<02:37:16.000> we<02:37:16.640> we<02:37:16.920> list<02:37:17.439> that<02:37:18.319> as<02:37:19.040> as 02:37:19.150 --> 02:37:19.160 align:start position:0% um proposing that we we list that as as 02:37:19.160 --> 02:37:23.550 align:start position:0% um proposing that we we list that as as an<02:37:19.520> Amendment<02:37:20.000> there<02:37:20.279> to 02:37:23.550 --> 02:37:23.560 align:start position:0% 02:37:23.560 --> 02:37:27.349 align:start position:0% add<02:37:24.560> that<02:37:25.200> that<02:37:25.399> level<02:37:25.840> that 02:37:27.349 --> 02:37:27.359 align:start position:0% add that that level that 02:37:27.359 --> 02:37:30.670 align:start position:0% add that that level that if<02:37:28.359> can<02:37:28.520> you<02:37:28.640> see<02:37:28.840> it<02:37:28.960> okay<02:37:29.439> and<02:37:29.600> I<02:37:29.840> have<02:37:30.279> I<02:37:30.439> have 02:37:30.670 --> 02:37:30.680 align:start position:0% if can you see it okay and I have I have 02:37:30.680 --> 02:37:32.870 align:start position:0% if can you see it okay and I have I have you<02:37:30.800> know<02:37:31.240> I<02:37:31.720> I'm<02:37:31.840> a<02:37:31.960> little 02:37:32.870 --> 02:37:32.880 align:start position:0% you know I I'm a little 02:37:32.880 --> 02:37:36.429 align:start position:0% you know I I'm a little conflicted<02:37:33.880> but<02:37:34.880> at<02:37:35.000> the<02:37:35.120> end<02:37:35.279> of<02:37:35.399> the<02:37:35.600> day<02:37:36.080> it 02:37:36.429 --> 02:37:36.439 align:start position:0% conflicted but at the end of the day it 02:37:36.439 --> 02:37:39.070 align:start position:0% conflicted but at the end of the day it it<02:37:36.760> this<02:37:36.920> thing's<02:37:37.479> run<02:37:37.800> away<02:37:38.080> with 02:37:39.070 --> 02:37:39.080 align:start position:0% it this thing's run away with 02:37:39.080 --> 02:37:41.309 align:start position:0% it this thing's run away with everybody<02:37:40.080> so<02:37:40.279> we'll<02:37:40.439> rain<02:37:40.720> it<02:37:40.800> in<02:37:41.000> until<02:37:41.200> we 02:37:41.309 --> 02:37:41.319 align:start position:0% everybody so we'll rain it in until we 02:37:41.319 --> 02:37:43.590 align:start position:0% everybody so we'll rain it in until we can<02:37:41.439> figure<02:37:41.680> it<02:37:41.840> out<02:37:42.800> and<02:37:42.920> get<02:37:43.040> a<02:37:43.160> hold<02:37:43.359> on 02:37:43.590 --> 02:37:43.600 align:start position:0% can figure it out and get a hold on 02:37:43.600 --> 02:37:46.190 align:start position:0% can figure it out and get a hold on what's<02:37:43.800> going<02:37:44.000> on<02:37:44.800> yeah<02:37:45.000> I<02:37:45.160> totally<02:37:45.640> I<02:37:45.720> am<02:37:45.880> like 02:37:46.190 --> 02:37:46.200 align:start position:0% what's going on yeah I totally I am like 02:37:46.200 --> 02:37:48.429 align:start position:0% what's going on yeah I totally I am like 100%<02:37:46.840> there<02:37:47.080> with<02:37:47.240> you<02:37:47.640> remember<02:37:47.920> green<02:37:48.240> like 02:37:48.429 --> 02:37:48.439 align:start position:0% 100% there with you remember green like 02:37:48.439 --> 02:37:50.429 align:start position:0% 100% there with you remember green like I<02:37:48.560> get<02:37:48.680> it<02:37:48.880> like<02:37:49.000> we<02:37:49.080> should<02:37:49.720> the<02:37:49.840> person<02:37:50.120> that 02:37:50.429 --> 02:37:50.439 align:start position:0% I get it like we should the person that 02:37:50.439 --> 02:37:51.790 align:start position:0% I get it like we should the person that and<02:37:50.600> they<02:37:50.720> should<02:37:50.880> not<02:37:51.040> be<02:37:51.160> allowed<02:37:51.439> to 02:37:51.790 --> 02:37:51.800 align:start position:0% and they should not be allowed to 02:37:51.800 --> 02:37:54.630 align:start position:0% and they should not be allowed to participate<02:37:52.800> all<02:37:53.000> I'm<02:37:53.200> saying<02:37:53.520> is<02:37:53.720> that<02:37:54.479> all 02:37:54.630 --> 02:37:54.640 align:start position:0% participate all I'm saying is that all 02:37:54.640 --> 02:37:57.309 align:start position:0% participate all I'm saying is that all of<02:37:54.800> these<02:37:54.960> leas<02:37:55.520> have<02:37:55.680> so<02:37:56.080> it's<02:37:56.279> just<02:37:56.920> it<02:37:57.080> it<02:37:57.200> is 02:37:57.309 --> 02:37:57.319 align:start position:0% of these leas have so it's just it it is 02:37:57.319 --> 02:38:00.389 align:start position:0% of these leas have so it's just it it is a<02:37:57.479> little<02:37:57.640> bit<02:37:58.040> confusing<02:37:59.040> as<02:37:59.200> a<02:37:59.479> guideline<02:38:00.160> to 02:38:00.389 --> 02:38:00.399 align:start position:0% a little bit confusing as a guideline to 02:38:00.399 --> 02:38:02.870 align:start position:0% a little bit confusing as a guideline to the<02:38:00.560> law<02:38:01.120> for<02:38:01.359> leas<02:38:01.880> to<02:38:02.080> interpret<02:38:02.600> what<02:38:02.760> that 02:38:02.870 --> 02:38:02.880 align:start position:0% the law for leas to interpret what that 02:38:02.880 --> 02:38:04.830 align:start position:0% the law for leas to interpret what that means<02:38:03.279> and<02:38:03.439> that's<02:38:03.720> my<02:38:03.960> point<02:38:04.279> not<02:38:04.520> that<02:38:04.720> we 02:38:04.830 --> 02:38:04.840 align:start position:0% means and that's my point not that we 02:38:04.840 --> 02:38:07.190 align:start position:0% means and that's my point not that we shouldn't<02:38:05.200> allow<02:38:06.200> the<02:38:06.359> person<02:38:06.640> who<02:38:06.920> had<02:38:07.080> the 02:38:07.190 --> 02:38:07.200 align:start position:0% shouldn't allow the person who had the 02:38:07.200 --> 02:38:10.389 align:start position:0% shouldn't allow the person who had the book<02:38:07.479> to<02:38:07.680> be<02:38:08.040> on<02:38:08.279> the<02:38:09.200> um<02:38:09.600> I<02:38:09.720> get<02:38:09.920> that<02:38:10.160> I<02:38:10.240> get 02:38:10.389 --> 02:38:10.399 align:start position:0% book to be on the um I get that I get 02:38:10.399 --> 02:38:12.070 align:start position:0% book to be on the um I get that I get the<02:38:10.560> part<02:38:10.760> that<02:38:10.920> they<02:38:11.040> shouldn't<02:38:11.359> be<02:38:11.800> allowed 02:38:12.070 --> 02:38:12.080 align:start position:0% the part that they shouldn't be allowed 02:38:12.080 --> 02:38:13.550 align:start position:0% the part that they shouldn't be allowed to<02:38:12.240> participate<02:38:12.640> in<02:38:12.720> the<02:38:12.800> review<02:38:13.120> process<02:38:13.479> and 02:38:13.550 --> 02:38:13.560 align:start position:0% to participate in the review process and 02:38:13.560 --> 02:38:15.309 align:start position:0% to participate in the review process and I<02:38:13.680> totally<02:38:13.960> get<02:38:14.080> what<02:38:14.160> member<02:38:14.399> Earl's<02:38:14.720> saying 02:38:15.309 --> 02:38:15.319 align:start position:0% I totally get what member Earl's saying 02:38:15.319 --> 02:38:18.110 align:start position:0% I totally get what member Earl's saying I'm<02:38:15.479> just<02:38:15.960> saying<02:38:16.960> with<02:38:17.160> these<02:38:17.439> guidelines<02:38:18.000> I 02:38:18.110 --> 02:38:18.120 align:start position:0% I'm just saying with these guidelines I 02:38:18.120 --> 02:38:21.309 align:start position:0% I'm just saying with these guidelines I want<02:38:18.359> to<02:38:18.640> be<02:38:19.720> able<02:38:20.000> to<02:38:20.279> give 02:38:21.309 --> 02:38:21.319 align:start position:0% want to be able to give 02:38:21.319 --> 02:38:24.190 align:start position:0% want to be able to give elas<02:38:22.319> no<02:38:22.600> room<02:38:22.920> for<02:38:23.200> having<02:38:23.800> weird 02:38:24.190 --> 02:38:24.200 align:start position:0% elas no room for having weird 02:38:24.200 --> 02:38:25.790 align:start position:0% elas no room for having weird interpretations<02:38:24.920> of<02:38:25.080> how<02:38:25.240> the<02:38:25.399> guidelines 02:38:25.790 --> 02:38:25.800 align:start position:0% interpretations of how the guidelines 02:38:25.800 --> 02:38:28.309 align:start position:0% interpretations of how the guidelines are<02:38:25.960> written<02:38:26.920> and<02:38:27.600> I<02:38:27.680> want<02:38:27.880> them<02:38:28.000> to<02:38:28.120> be 02:38:28.309 --> 02:38:28.319 align:start position:0% are written and I want them to be 02:38:28.319 --> 02:38:30.070 align:start position:0% are written and I want them to be helpful<02:38:28.720> not<02:38:28.920> confusing<02:38:29.359> and<02:38:29.560> this<02:38:29.760> Falls 02:38:30.070 --> 02:38:30.080 align:start position:0% helpful not confusing and this Falls 02:38:30.080 --> 02:38:32.110 align:start position:0% helpful not confusing and this Falls more<02:38:30.240> into<02:38:30.479> the<02:38:30.640> confusing<02:38:31.359> part<02:38:31.560> for<02:38:31.760> me<02:38:32.000> than 02:38:32.110 --> 02:38:32.120 align:start position:0% more into the confusing part for me than 02:38:32.120 --> 02:38:39.269 align:start position:0% more into the confusing part for me than it<02:38:32.240> does<02:38:32.399> on<02:38:32.560> the<02:38:32.680> helpful 02:38:39.269 --> 02:38:39.279 align:start position:0% 02:38:39.279 --> 02:38:42.230 align:start position:0% part<02:38:40.279> so<02:38:40.560> how<02:38:40.720> would<02:38:40.920> we<02:38:41.160> change<02:38:41.600> it<02:38:41.920> so<02:38:42.120> that 02:38:42.230 --> 02:38:42.240 align:start position:0% part so how would we change it so that 02:38:42.240 --> 02:38:43.710 align:start position:0% part so how would we change it so that it<02:38:42.479> was<02:38:42.720> wouldn't<02:38:43.000> be 02:38:43.710 --> 02:38:43.720 align:start position:0% it was wouldn't be 02:38:43.720 --> 02:38:46.710 align:start position:0% it was wouldn't be confusing<02:38:44.720> CH<02:38:45.120> Elise<02:38:45.560> has<02:38:45.720> her<02:38:45.920> hand<02:38:46.160> up<02:38:46.520> maybe 02:38:46.710 --> 02:38:46.720 align:start position:0% confusing CH Elise has her hand up maybe 02:38:46.720 --> 02:38:47.950 align:start position:0% confusing CH Elise has her hand up maybe she<02:38:46.880> has<02:38:47.040> the 02:38:47.950 --> 02:38:47.960 align:start position:0% she has the 02:38:47.960 --> 02:38:50.830 align:start position:0% she has the solution<02:38:48.960> that<02:38:49.040> would<02:38:49.160> be<02:38:49.479> awesome<02:38:50.040> go<02:38:50.279> right 02:38:50.830 --> 02:38:50.840 align:start position:0% solution that would be awesome go right 02:38:50.840 --> 02:38:54.309 align:start position:0% solution that would be awesome go right ahead<02:38:51.840> um<02:38:52.080> one<02:38:52.560> option<02:38:53.560> like<02:38:53.960> we<02:38:54.080> had<02:38:54.200> a 02:38:54.309 --> 02:38:54.319 align:start position:0% ahead um one option like we had a 02:38:54.319 --> 02:38:56.190 align:start position:0% ahead um one option like we had a similar<02:38:54.720> discussion<02:38:55.200> about<02:38:55.479> getting<02:38:55.760> rid<02:38:55.960> of 02:38:56.190 --> 02:38:56.200 align:start position:0% similar discussion about getting rid of 02:38:56.200 --> 02:38:58.150 align:start position:0% similar discussion about getting rid of materials<02:38:56.880> after<02:38:57.120> they've<02:38:57.319> been<02:38:57.520> deemed<02:38:57.880> to 02:38:58.150 --> 02:38:58.160 align:start position:0% materials after they've been deemed to 02:38:58.160 --> 02:39:00.670 align:start position:0% materials after they've been deemed to not<02:38:58.800> be<02:38:59.000> allowed<02:38:59.319> in<02:38:59.479> the<02:38:59.600> schools<02:39:00.399> what<02:39:00.560> we 02:39:00.670 --> 02:39:00.680 align:start position:0% not be allowed in the schools what we 02:39:00.680 --> 02:39:02.990 align:start position:0% not be allowed in the schools what we did<02:39:00.880> was<02:39:01.120> added<02:39:01.560> to<02:39:01.760> the<02:39:02.000> requirement<02:39:02.720> that<02:39:02.880> an 02:39:02.990 --> 02:39:03.000 align:start position:0% did was added to the requirement that an 02:39:03.000 --> 02:39:05.510 align:start position:0% did was added to the requirement that an Lea<02:39:03.439> shall<02:39:03.760> adopt<02:39:04.120> a<02:39:04.359> policy<02:39:04.920> they<02:39:05.040> need<02:39:05.200> to 02:39:05.510 --> 02:39:05.520 align:start position:0% Lea shall adopt a policy they need to 02:39:05.520 --> 02:39:08.830 align:start position:0% Lea shall adopt a policy they need to consider<02:39:06.399> XYZ<02:39:07.240> about<02:39:08.160> getting<02:39:08.399> rid<02:39:08.600> of<02:39:08.720> the 02:39:08.830 --> 02:39:08.840 align:start position:0% consider XYZ about getting rid of the 02:39:08.840 --> 02:39:10.710 align:start position:0% consider XYZ about getting rid of the materials<02:39:09.399> maybe<02:39:09.600> we<02:39:09.840> put<02:39:10.000> in<02:39:10.120> a<02:39:10.319> similar 02:39:10.710 --> 02:39:10.720 align:start position:0% materials maybe we put in a similar 02:39:10.720 --> 02:39:13.230 align:start position:0% materials maybe we put in a similar Clause<02:39:11.279> that<02:39:11.560> in<02:39:11.840> developing<02:39:12.359> an<02:39:12.760> individual 02:39:13.230 --> 02:39:13.240 align:start position:0% Clause that in developing an individual 02:39:13.240 --> 02:39:18.429 align:start position:0% Clause that in developing an individual laa<02:39:14.399> policy<02:39:15.399> they<02:39:15.560> shall<02:39:16.439> consider<02:39:17.439> you<02:39:17.600> know 02:39:18.429 --> 02:39:18.439 align:start position:0% laa policy they shall consider you know 02:39:18.439 --> 02:39:20.870 align:start position:0% laa policy they shall consider you know who<02:39:19.080> the<02:39:19.240> the<02:39:19.520> person<02:39:19.760> not<02:39:19.920> be<02:39:20.160> on<02:39:20.720> their 02:39:20.870 --> 02:39:20.880 align:start position:0% who the the person not be on their 02:39:20.880 --> 02:39:22.030 align:start position:0% who the the person not be on their committees<02:39:21.279> and<02:39:21.399> then<02:39:21.560> that<02:39:21.680> way<02:39:21.840> they<02:39:21.920> can 02:39:22.030 --> 02:39:22.040 align:start position:0% committees and then that way they can 02:39:22.040 --> 02:39:23.070 align:start position:0% committees and then that way they can make<02:39:22.200> that<02:39:22.319> determination<02:39:22.840> because<02:39:22.960> they 02:39:23.070 --> 02:39:23.080 align:start position:0% make that determination because they 02:39:23.080 --> 02:39:24.950 align:start position:0% make that determination because they have<02:39:23.160> a<02:39:23.240> better<02:39:23.479> handle<02:39:23.800> on<02:39:24.080> who<02:39:24.319> is<02:39:24.600> actually 02:39:24.950 --> 02:39:24.960 align:start position:0% have a better handle on who is actually 02:39:24.960 --> 02:39:26.349 align:start position:0% have a better handle on who is actually so<02:39:25.040> I<02:39:25.160> guess<02:39:25.319> we<02:39:25.399> could<02:39:25.560> frame<02:39:25.840> it<02:39:25.960> as<02:39:26.080> someone 02:39:26.349 --> 02:39:26.359 align:start position:0% so I guess we could frame it as someone 02:39:26.359 --> 02:39:29.550 align:start position:0% so I guess we could frame it as someone that<02:39:26.520> has<02:39:26.920> a<02:39:27.120> conflict<02:39:27.640> of<02:39:28.319> interest<02:39:29.319> kind<02:39:29.439> of 02:39:29.550 --> 02:39:29.560 align:start position:0% that has a conflict of interest kind of 02:39:29.560 --> 02:39:30.790 align:start position:0% that has a conflict of interest kind of a<02:39:29.760> thing<02:39:30.000> is<02:39:30.120> that<02:39:30.240> what<02:39:30.319> you're<02:39:30.479> thinking 02:39:30.790 --> 02:39:30.800 align:start position:0% a thing is that what you're thinking 02:39:30.800 --> 02:39:32.670 align:start position:0% a thing is that what you're thinking yeah<02:39:30.960> that<02:39:31.080> maybe<02:39:31.520> in<02:39:31.640> an<02:39:31.760> Lea<02:39:32.120> policy<02:39:32.520> they 02:39:32.670 --> 02:39:32.680 align:start position:0% yeah that maybe in an Lea policy they 02:39:32.680 --> 02:39:34.429 align:start position:0% yeah that maybe in an Lea policy they need<02:39:32.840> to<02:39:33.000> have<02:39:33.120> a<02:39:33.279> conflict<02:39:33.640> of<02:39:33.840> interest 02:39:34.429 --> 02:39:34.439 align:start position:0% need to have a conflict of interest 02:39:34.439 --> 02:39:37.790 align:start position:0% need to have a conflict of interest clause<02:39:35.040> in<02:39:35.279> their<02:39:36.000> policy<02:39:37.000> and<02:39:37.319> we<02:39:37.439> can<02:39:37.600> leave 02:39:37.790 --> 02:39:37.800 align:start position:0% clause in their policy and we can leave 02:39:37.800 --> 02:39:39.349 align:start position:0% clause in their policy and we can leave it<02:39:38.000> at<02:39:38.120> the<02:39:38.240> LA's<02:39:38.720> decision<02:39:38.960> on<02:39:39.120> what<02:39:39.240> that 02:39:39.349 --> 02:39:39.359 align:start position:0% it at the LA's decision on what that 02:39:39.359 --> 02:39:40.469 align:start position:0% it at the LA's decision on what that looks<02:39:39.560> like 02:39:40.469 --> 02:39:40.479 align:start position:0% looks like 02:39:40.479 --> 02:39:43.630 align:start position:0% looks like but<02:39:41.479> I<02:39:41.680> I<02:39:41.760> feel<02:39:42.080> better<02:39:42.319> about<02:39:42.640> that<02:39:43.160> local 02:39:43.630 --> 02:39:43.640 align:start position:0% but I I feel better about that local 02:39:43.640 --> 02:39:45.230 align:start position:0% but I I feel better about that local control<02:39:44.080> is<02:39:44.200> a<02:39:44.399> good 02:39:45.230 --> 02:39:45.240 align:start position:0% control is a good 02:39:45.240 --> 02:39:48.870 align:start position:0% control is a good thing<02:39:46.240> but<02:39:46.439> to<02:39:47.000> specify<02:39:47.760> specifically<02:39:48.720> this 02:39:48.870 --> 02:39:48.880 align:start position:0% thing but to specify specifically this 02:39:48.880 --> 02:39:50.550 align:start position:0% thing but to specify specifically this must<02:39:49.120> be<02:39:49.479> included 02:39:50.550 --> 02:39:50.560 align:start position:0% must be included 02:39:50.560 --> 02:39:52.950 align:start position:0% must be included so<02:39:51.560> take<02:39:51.800> care<02:39:51.920> of 02:39:52.950 --> 02:39:52.960 align:start position:0% so take care of 02:39:52.960 --> 02:39:59.469 align:start position:0% so take care of business<02:39:53.960> I<02:39:54.120> like<02:39:54.840> that<02:39:55.840> how<02:39:55.960> do<02:39:56.080> you<02:39:56.200> feel 02:39:59.469 --> 02:39:59.479 align:start position:0% 02:39:59.479 --> 02:40:03.230 align:start position:0% Emily 02:40:03.230 --> 02:40:03.240 align:start position:0% 02:40:03.240 --> 02:40:06.230 align:start position:0% um<02:40:04.240> I<02:40:04.439> guess 02:40:06.230 --> 02:40:06.240 align:start position:0% um I guess 02:40:06.240 --> 02:40:09.230 align:start position:0% um I guess I'm<02:40:07.240> I<02:40:07.319> mean<02:40:07.600> it<02:40:07.800> it's<02:40:07.960> an 02:40:09.230 --> 02:40:09.240 align:start position:0% I'm I mean it it's an 02:40:09.240 --> 02:40:12.710 align:start position:0% I'm I mean it it's an option<02:40:10.240> I<02:40:10.680> my<02:40:11.080> my<02:40:11.319> goal<02:40:11.600> is 02:40:12.710 --> 02:40:12.720 align:start position:0% option I my my goal is 02:40:12.720 --> 02:40:15.870 align:start position:0% option I my my goal is to<02:40:13.720> really<02:40:14.000> be<02:40:14.160> able<02:40:14.359> to 02:40:15.870 --> 02:40:15.880 align:start position:0% to really be able to 02:40:15.880 --> 02:40:20.710 align:start position:0% to really be able to isolate<02:40:16.880> why<02:40:17.120> this<02:40:17.240> has<02:40:17.439> become<02:40:17.720> a<02:40:17.960> problem 02:40:20.710 --> 02:40:20.720 align:start position:0% isolate why this has become a problem 02:40:20.720 --> 02:40:25.630 align:start position:0% isolate why this has become a problem how<02:40:21.200> that<02:40:21.439> material<02:40:22.200> is<02:40:23.600> ordered<02:40:24.640> and 02:40:25.630 --> 02:40:25.640 align:start position:0% how that material is ordered and 02:40:25.640 --> 02:40:27.950 align:start position:0% how that material is ordered and received<02:40:26.200> and<02:40:26.520> paid 02:40:27.950 --> 02:40:27.960 align:start position:0% received and paid 02:40:27.960 --> 02:40:32.469 align:start position:0% received and paid for<02:40:28.960> is<02:40:29.200> the<02:40:29.520> problem<02:40:29.840> for<02:40:30.080> me<02:40:31.080> and<02:40:31.359> a<02:40:32.240> and 02:40:32.469 --> 02:40:32.479 align:start position:0% for is the problem for me and a and 02:40:32.479 --> 02:40:36.110 align:start position:0% for is the problem for me and a and somebody<02:40:32.920> is<02:40:33.200> responsible<02:40:33.920> for<02:40:34.520> that<02:40:35.520> or<02:40:35.880> has 02:40:36.110 --> 02:40:36.120 align:start position:0% somebody is responsible for that or has 02:40:36.120 --> 02:40:38.110 align:start position:0% somebody is responsible for that or has the 02:40:38.110 --> 02:40:38.120 align:start position:0% the 02:40:38.120 --> 02:40:41.269 align:start position:0% the responsibility<02:40:39.120> for<02:40:39.600> that<02:40:40.600> and<02:40:40.800> and<02:40:41.000> that's 02:40:41.269 --> 02:40:41.279 align:start position:0% responsibility for that and and that's 02:40:41.279 --> 02:40:43.670 align:start position:0% responsibility for that and and that's where<02:40:41.720> I<02:40:42.560> if<02:40:42.680> no<02:40:42.800> one's<02:40:43.000> going<02:40:43.120> to<02:40:43.279> ever<02:40:43.439> be 02:40:43.670 --> 02:40:43.680 align:start position:0% where I if no one's going to ever be 02:40:43.680 --> 02:40:45.150 align:start position:0% where I if no one's going to ever be responsible<02:40:44.200> for<02:40:44.399> anything<02:40:44.800> we'll<02:40:44.960> we'll 02:40:45.150 --> 02:40:45.160 align:start position:0% responsible for anything we'll we'll 02:40:45.160 --> 02:40:47.389 align:start position:0% responsible for anything we'll we'll just<02:40:45.319> play<02:40:45.560> this<02:40:45.680> sing<02:40:45.880> and<02:40:46.080> dance<02:40:46.319> all<02:40:46.560> day 02:40:47.389 --> 02:40:47.399 align:start position:0% just play this sing and dance all day 02:40:47.399 --> 02:40:48.830 align:start position:0% just play this sing and dance all day well<02:40:47.680> I<02:40:47.760> think<02:40:47.960> that<02:40:48.120> if<02:40:48.240> we<02:40:48.359> do<02:40:48.479> it<02:40:48.600> in<02:40:48.680> the 02:40:48.830 --> 02:40:48.840 align:start position:0% well I think that if we do it in the 02:40:48.840 --> 02:40:51.110 align:start position:0% well I think that if we do it in the conflict<02:40:49.439> interest<02:40:49.840> way<02:40:50.120> though<02:40:50.520> it<02:40:50.760> does 02:40:51.110 --> 02:40:51.120 align:start position:0% conflict interest way though it does 02:40:51.120 --> 02:40:53.190 align:start position:0% conflict interest way though it does allow<02:40:51.479> for<02:40:51.960> all<02:40:52.120> the<02:40:52.279> different<02:40:52.560> scenarios<02:40:53.040> of 02:40:53.190 --> 02:40:53.200 align:start position:0% allow for all the different scenarios of 02:40:53.200 --> 02:40:55.550 align:start position:0% allow for all the different scenarios of who<02:40:53.399> that<02:40:53.600> person<02:40:53.840> is<02:40:54.000> you're<02:40:54.200> talking 02:40:55.550 --> 02:40:55.560 align:start position:0% who that person is you're talking 02:40:55.560 --> 02:40:59.030 align:start position:0% who that person is you're talking about<02:40:56.560> because<02:40:56.920> we<02:40:57.080> can't<02:40:57.439> we<02:40:57.600> can't<02:40:57.960> say<02:40:58.760> in<02:40:58.880> a 02:40:59.030 --> 02:40:59.040 align:start position:0% about because we can't we can't say in a 02:40:59.040 --> 02:41:01.230 align:start position:0% about because we can't we can't say in a narrow<02:40:59.479> way<02:40:59.880> who<02:41:00.120> that<02:41:00.279> is<02:41:00.439> at<02:41:00.600> each<02:41:00.760> laa 02:41:01.230 --> 02:41:01.240 align:start position:0% narrow way who that is at each laa 02:41:01.240 --> 02:41:02.349 align:start position:0% narrow way who that is at each laa because<02:41:01.359> they<02:41:01.520> could<02:41:01.800> name<02:41:02.080> something 02:41:02.349 --> 02:41:02.359 align:start position:0% because they could name something 02:41:02.359 --> 02:41:03.550 align:start position:0% because they could name something different<02:41:02.680> they<02:41:02.800> could<02:41:02.960> be<02:41:03.080> in<02:41:03.200> a<02:41:03.359> different 02:41:03.550 --> 02:41:03.560 align:start position:0% different they could be in a different 02:41:03.560 --> 02:41:05.590 align:start position:0% different they could be in a different role<02:41:03.840> and<02:41:03.960> so<02:41:04.560> I<02:41:04.640> think<02:41:04.840> putting<02:41:05.080> it<02:41:05.160> in<02:41:05.359> is 02:41:05.590 --> 02:41:05.600 align:start position:0% role and so I think putting it in is 02:41:05.600 --> 02:41:08.070 align:start position:0% role and so I think putting it in is like<02:41:06.319> the<02:41:06.840> you<02:41:06.960> know<02:41:07.120> no<02:41:07.240> one<02:41:07.399> with<02:41:07.560> a<02:41:07.720> conflict 02:41:08.070 --> 02:41:08.080 align:start position:0% like the you know no one with a conflict 02:41:08.080 --> 02:41:10.630 align:start position:0% like the you know no one with a conflict of<02:41:08.240> interest<02:41:08.760> in<02:41:08.920> the<02:41:09.240> materials<02:41:10.240> it<02:41:10.359> you<02:41:10.479> know 02:41:10.630 --> 02:41:10.640 align:start position:0% of interest in the materials it you know 02:41:10.640 --> 02:41:13.190 align:start position:0% of interest in the materials it you know can<02:41:10.800> be<02:41:11.000> on<02:41:11.160> part<02:41:11.279> of<02:41:11.399> the<02:41:11.520> review<02:41:12.040> processes 02:41:13.190 --> 02:41:13.200 align:start position:0% can be on part of the review processes 02:41:13.200 --> 02:41:15.830 align:start position:0% can be on part of the review processes is<02:41:14.200> allows<02:41:14.680> for<02:41:15.080> all<02:41:15.240> of<02:41:15.359> the<02:41:15.520> different 02:41:15.830 --> 02:41:15.840 align:start position:0% is allows for all of the different 02:41:15.840 --> 02:41:17.590 align:start position:0% is allows for all of the different scenarios<02:41:16.319> of<02:41:16.520> who<02:41:16.720> that<02:41:16.920> person<02:41:17.160> is<02:41:17.319> that's 02:41:17.590 --> 02:41:17.600 align:start position:0% scenarios of who that person is that's 02:41:17.600 --> 02:41:20.070 align:start position:0% scenarios of who that person is that's responsible<02:41:18.040> at<02:41:18.160> each<02:41:18.359> Lea 02:41:20.070 --> 02:41:20.080 align:start position:0% responsible at each Lea 02:41:20.080 --> 02:41:21.990 align:start position:0% responsible at each Lea rather<02:41:20.319> than<02:41:20.479> trying<02:41:20.680> to<02:41:20.920> determine<02:41:21.359> who<02:41:21.560> that 02:41:21.990 --> 02:41:22.000 align:start position:0% rather than trying to determine who that 02:41:22.000 --> 02:41:25.630 align:start position:0% rather than trying to determine who that is<02:41:23.000> so<02:41:23.240> if<02:41:23.359> I<02:41:23.479> were<02:41:23.640> to<02:41:24.160> yeah<02:41:24.880> if<02:41:25.000> I<02:41:25.080> were<02:41:25.240> to<02:41:25.399> run 02:41:25.630 --> 02:41:25.640 align:start position:0% is so if I were to yeah if I were to run 02:41:25.640 --> 02:41:28.230 align:start position:0% is so if I were to yeah if I were to run through<02:41:26.240> does<02:41:26.439> the<02:41:26.760> conflict<02:41:27.319> of 02:41:28.230 --> 02:41:28.240 align:start position:0% through does the conflict of 02:41:28.240 --> 02:41:32.230 align:start position:0% through does the conflict of interest<02:41:29.240> is<02:41:29.399> a<02:41:29.640> conflict<02:41:30.080> of<02:41:30.840> interest<02:41:31.840> um 02:41:32.230 --> 02:41:32.240 align:start position:0% interest is a conflict of interest um 02:41:32.240 --> 02:41:34.349 align:start position:0% interest is a conflict of interest um does<02:41:32.399> that<02:41:32.600> fall 02:41:34.349 --> 02:41:34.359 align:start position:0% does that fall 02:41:34.359 --> 02:41:39.550 align:start position:0% does that fall under<02:41:35.359> your<02:41:35.560> job<02:41:36.040> aent<02:41:37.040> to<02:41:37.399> procure<02:41:38.399> a<02:41:38.640> list<02:41:39.479> I 02:41:39.550 --> 02:41:39.560 align:start position:0% under your job aent to procure a list I 02:41:39.560 --> 02:41:41.070 align:start position:0% under your job aent to procure a list I mean<02:41:39.720> a<02:41:39.880> parent<02:41:40.160> could<02:41:40.319> donate<02:41:40.640> a<02:41:40.760> pile<02:41:40.960> of 02:41:41.070 --> 02:41:41.080 align:start position:0% mean a parent could donate a pile of 02:41:41.080 --> 02:41:42.550 align:start position:0% mean a parent could donate a pile of books<02:41:41.279> to<02:41:41.399> the<02:41:41.520> library<02:41:41.920> and<02:41:42.080> they<02:41:42.200> could<02:41:42.439> that 02:41:42.550 --> 02:41:42.560 align:start position:0% books to the library and they could that 02:41:42.560 --> 02:41:44.309 align:start position:0% books to the library and they could that could<02:41:42.680> be<02:41:42.800> the<02:41:42.920> parent<02:41:43.279> right<02:41:43.520> it<02:41:43.640> could<02:41:43.800> be<02:41:44.120> so 02:41:44.309 --> 02:41:44.319 align:start position:0% could be the parent right it could be so 02:41:44.319 --> 02:41:46.230 align:start position:0% could be the parent right it could be so many<02:41:44.600> different<02:41:44.880> scenarios<02:41:45.560> based<02:41:45.800> on<02:41:46.000> who 02:41:46.230 --> 02:41:46.240 align:start position:0% many different scenarios based on who 02:41:46.240 --> 02:41:48.389 align:start position:0% many different scenarios based on who brought<02:41:46.479> the<02:41:46.640> book<02:41:46.840> in<02:41:47.720> and<02:41:47.920> I'm<02:41:48.040> not<02:41:48.160> saying 02:41:48.389 --> 02:41:48.399 align:start position:0% brought the book in and I'm not saying 02:41:48.399 --> 02:41:49.910 align:start position:0% brought the book in and I'm not saying we<02:41:48.520> shouldn't<02:41:48.720> hold<02:41:48.920> anyone<02:41:49.279> responsible<02:41:49.760> I'm 02:41:49.910 --> 02:41:49.920 align:start position:0% we shouldn't hold anyone responsible I'm 02:41:49.920 --> 02:41:52.790 align:start position:0% we shouldn't hold anyone responsible I'm just<02:41:50.040> saying<02:41:50.720> we<02:41:50.960> can't<02:41:51.680> narrowly<02:41:52.240> Define 02:41:52.790 --> 02:41:52.800 align:start position:0% just saying we can't narrowly Define 02:41:52.800 --> 02:41:54.590 align:start position:0% just saying we can't narrowly Define that<02:41:53.040> in<02:41:53.160> a<02:41:53.359> way<02:41:53.600> in<02:41:53.760> these<02:41:54.000> guidelin<02:41:54.399> that's 02:41:54.590 --> 02:41:54.600 align:start position:0% that in a way in these guidelin that's 02:41:54.600 --> 02:41:57.590 align:start position:0% that in a way in these guidelin that's going<02:41:54.680> to<02:41:54.800> be<02:41:55.000> helpful<02:41:55.800> so<02:41:56.120> just<02:41:56.319> saying<02:41:57.120> that 02:41:57.590 --> 02:41:57.600 align:start position:0% going to be helpful so just saying that 02:41:57.600 --> 02:41:59.950 align:start position:0% going to be helpful so just saying that any<02:41:57.920> individual<02:41:58.920> that<02:41:59.040> may<02:41:59.279> have<02:41:59.399> a<02:41:59.600> conflict 02:41:59.950 --> 02:41:59.960 align:start position:0% any individual that may have a conflict 02:41:59.960 --> 02:42:02.230 align:start position:0% any individual that may have a conflict of<02:42:00.120> interests<02:42:00.880> with<02:42:01.040> a<02:42:01.240> procurement<02:42:01.840> of<02:42:02.080> the 02:42:02.230 --> 02:42:02.240 align:start position:0% of interests with a procurement of the 02:42:02.240 --> 02:42:04.670 align:start position:0% of interests with a procurement of the book<02:42:03.240> would<02:42:03.479> not<02:42:03.640> be<02:42:03.800> allowed<02:42:04.080> to<02:42:04.240> participate 02:42:04.670 --> 02:42:04.680 align:start position:0% book would not be allowed to participate 02:42:04.680 --> 02:42:06.870 align:start position:0% book would not be allowed to participate in<02:42:04.800> the<02:42:04.920> review<02:42:05.359> process<02:42:06.040> leaves<02:42:06.359> that<02:42:06.560> more 02:42:06.870 --> 02:42:06.880 align:start position:0% in the review process leaves that more 02:42:06.880 --> 02:42:08.630 align:start position:0% in the review process leaves that more open<02:42:07.200> for<02:42:07.439> all<02:42:07.560> of<02:42:07.680> the<02:42:07.840> different<02:42:08.120> scenarios 02:42:08.630 --> 02:42:08.640 align:start position:0% open for all of the different scenarios 02:42:08.640 --> 02:42:12.070 align:start position:0% open for all of the different scenarios at<02:42:08.800> the<02:42:08.920> different 02:42:12.070 --> 02:42:12.080 align:start position:0% 02:42:12.080 --> 02:42:14.790 align:start position:0% leas<02:42:13.080> okay 02:42:14.790 --> 02:42:14.800 align:start position:0% leas okay 02:42:14.800 --> 02:42:17.269 align:start position:0% leas okay so<02:42:15.800> I<02:42:15.960> liked<02:42:16.240> what<02:42:16.399> you<02:42:16.600> just<02:42:16.800> said<02:42:17.120> because 02:42:17.269 --> 02:42:17.279 align:start position:0% so I liked what you just said because 02:42:17.279 --> 02:42:19.630 align:start position:0% so I liked what you just said because you<02:42:17.399> were<02:42:17.760> you're<02:42:18.720> your<02:42:18.840> verbal<02:42:19.160> real<02:42:19.319> izing 02:42:19.630 --> 02:42:19.640 align:start position:0% you were you're your verbal real izing 02:42:19.640 --> 02:42:21.550 align:start position:0% you were you're your verbal real izing where<02:42:19.880> my<02:42:20.279> conf<02:42:20.760> where<02:42:20.880> I'm<02:42:21.000> trying<02:42:21.200> to<02:42:21.319> sort 02:42:21.550 --> 02:42:21.560 align:start position:0% where my conf where I'm trying to sort 02:42:21.560 --> 02:42:25.030 align:start position:0% where my conf where I'm trying to sort it<02:42:21.720> out<02:42:22.720> with<02:42:22.920> the<02:42:23.160> conflict<02:42:23.560> of<02:42:23.800> interest 02:42:25.030 --> 02:42:25.040 align:start position:0% it out with the conflict of interest 02:42:25.040 --> 02:42:28.910 align:start position:0% it out with the conflict of interest concept<02:42:26.040> how<02:42:26.279> can<02:42:26.960> procuring<02:42:27.960> the<02:42:28.160> materials 02:42:28.910 --> 02:42:28.920 align:start position:0% concept how can procuring the materials 02:42:28.920 --> 02:42:30.870 align:start position:0% concept how can procuring the materials be<02:42:29.120> a<02:42:29.359> conflict<02:42:29.760> of<02:42:29.960> interest<02:42:30.319> if<02:42:30.520> that's<02:42:30.640> your 02:42:30.870 --> 02:42:30.880 align:start position:0% be a conflict of interest if that's your 02:42:30.880 --> 02:42:34.349 align:start position:0% be a conflict of interest if that's your job 02:42:34.349 --> 02:42:34.359 align:start position:0% 02:42:34.359 --> 02:42:36.950 align:start position:0% description<02:42:35.359> well<02:42:35.520> it's<02:42:35.680> not<02:42:35.840> a<02:42:36.040> conflict<02:42:36.479> of 02:42:36.950 --> 02:42:36.960 align:start position:0% description well it's not a conflict of 02:42:36.960 --> 02:42:40.429 align:start position:0% description well it's not a conflict of interest<02:42:37.960> with<02:42:38.560> actually<02:42:39.560> doing<02:42:40.000> the<02:42:40.160> work 02:42:40.429 --> 02:42:40.439 align:start position:0% interest with actually doing the work 02:42:40.439 --> 02:42:42.710 align:start position:0% interest with actually doing the work that<02:42:40.560> you<02:42:40.760> do<02:42:41.520> but<02:42:41.640> it<02:42:41.760> is<02:42:41.920> a<02:42:42.120> conflict<02:42:42.560> of 02:42:42.710 --> 02:42:42.720 align:start position:0% that you do but it is a conflict of 02:42:42.720 --> 02:42:47.230 align:start position:0% that you do but it is a conflict of interest<02:42:43.560> with<02:42:44.200> this<02:42:44.439> review 02:42:47.230 --> 02:42:47.240 align:start position:0% 02:42:47.240 --> 02:42:49.790 align:start position:0% process<02:42:48.240> does<02:42:48.439> that<02:42:48.640> make<02:42:48.840> sense 02:42:49.790 --> 02:42:49.800 align:start position:0% process does that make sense 02:42:49.800 --> 02:42:52.510 align:start position:0% process does that make sense so<02:42:50.040> so<02:42:50.160> it's<02:42:50.240> a<02:42:50.439> conflict<02:42:50.840> of<02:42:51.000> the<02:42:51.200> review 02:42:52.510 --> 02:42:52.520 align:start position:0% so so it's a conflict of the review 02:42:52.520 --> 02:42:55.590 align:start position:0% so so it's a conflict of the review process<02:42:53.520> exactly<02:42:53.960> your<02:42:54.319> job<02:42:54.720> was<02:42:54.840> to<02:42:55.200> I<02:42:55.319> can't 02:42:55.590 --> 02:42:55.600 align:start position:0% process exactly your job was to I can't 02:42:55.600 --> 02:42:57.349 align:start position:0% process exactly your job was to I can't participate<02:42:56.080> in<02:42:56.200> this<02:42:56.359> review<02:42:56.800> process 02:42:57.349 --> 02:42:57.359 align:start position:0% participate in this review process 02:42:57.359 --> 02:43:01.990 align:start position:0% participate in this review process because<02:42:58.120> my<02:42:58.439> job<02:42:59.240> or<02:42:59.479> what<02:42:59.680> I<02:42:59.840> did<02:43:00.080> in<02:43:00.319> my<02:43:01.000> job 02:43:01.990 --> 02:43:02.000 align:start position:0% because my job or what I did in my job 02:43:02.000 --> 02:43:04.910 align:start position:0% because my job or what I did in my job uh<02:43:02.760> doesn't<02:43:03.120> allow<02:43:03.359> me<02:43:03.520> to<02:43:03.760> make<02:43:04.040> a<02:43:04.319> unbiased 02:43:04.910 --> 02:43:04.920 align:start position:0% uh doesn't allow me to make a unbiased 02:43:04.920 --> 02:43:06.910 align:start position:0% uh doesn't allow me to make a unbiased decision<02:43:05.439> regarding<02:43:06.080> the<02:43:06.240> review<02:43:06.600> of<02:43:06.720> this 02:43:06.910 --> 02:43:06.920 align:start position:0% decision regarding the review of this 02:43:06.920 --> 02:43:09.309 align:start position:0% decision regarding the review of this sensitive<02:43:07.359> material<02:43:08.240> what<02:43:08.359> if<02:43:08.560> it<02:43:08.760> said<02:43:09.160> an 02:43:09.309 --> 02:43:09.319 align:start position:0% sensitive material what if it said an 02:43:09.319 --> 02:43:11.590 align:start position:0% sensitive material what if it said an individual<02:43:09.880> that<02:43:10.120> initially<02:43:10.800> okay<02:43:11.120> an 02:43:11.590 --> 02:43:11.600 align:start position:0% individual that initially okay an 02:43:11.600 --> 02:43:14.710 align:start position:0% individual that initially okay an individual<02:43:12.600> uh<02:43:13.240> sorry<02:43:13.520> I<02:43:13.640> had<02:43:13.760> it<02:43:14.040> and<02:43:14.160> then<02:43:14.319> I 02:43:14.710 --> 02:43:14.720 align:start position:0% individual uh sorry I had it and then I 02:43:14.720 --> 02:43:17.830 align:start position:0% individual uh sorry I had it and then I just<02:43:14.880> got<02:43:15.040> interrupted<02:43:15.560> by<02:43:16.120> someone<02:43:17.120> that<02:43:17.640> an 02:43:17.830 --> 02:43:17.840 align:start position:0% just got interrupted by someone that an 02:43:17.840 --> 02:43:20.790 align:start position:0% just got interrupted by someone that an Lea<02:43:18.240> shall<02:43:18.560> develop<02:43:19.319> a 02:43:20.790 --> 02:43:20.800 align:start position:0% Lea shall develop a 02:43:20.800 --> 02:43:24.030 align:start position:0% Lea shall develop a policy<02:43:22.000> um<02:43:23.000> yeah<02:43:23.279> write<02:43:23.439> it<02:43:23.560> down<02:43:23.680> there<02:43:23.880> a 02:43:24.030 --> 02:43:24.040 align:start position:0% policy um yeah write it down there a 02:43:24.040 --> 02:43:25.750 align:start position:0% policy um yeah write it down there a possibility<02:43:24.479> an<02:43:24.600> Alia<02:43:24.920> shall<02:43:25.120> develop<02:43:25.479> a 02:43:25.750 --> 02:43:25.760 align:start position:0% possibility an Alia shall develop a 02:43:25.760 --> 02:43:30.230 align:start position:0% possibility an Alia shall develop a possibility<02:43:26.760> or<02:43:27.240> sorry<02:43:28.240> a<02:43:28.479> policy<02:43:29.240> a 02:43:30.230 --> 02:43:30.240 align:start position:0% possibility or sorry a policy a 02:43:30.240 --> 02:43:34.150 align:start position:0% possibility or sorry a policy a policy<02:43:31.240> related<02:43:31.680> to<02:43:31.960> conflict<02:43:32.439> of<02:43:33.160> interest 02:43:34.150 --> 02:43:34.160 align:start position:0% policy related to conflict of interest 02:43:34.160 --> 02:43:36.349 align:start position:0% policy related to conflict of interest and<02:43:34.479> procurement<02:43:35.279> in 02:43:36.349 --> 02:43:36.359 align:start position:0% and procurement in 02:43:36.359 --> 02:43:40.309 align:start position:0% and procurement in association<02:43:37.560> with<02:43:38.560> the<02:43:38.760> review<02:43:39.399> committees<02:43:40.240> I 02:43:40.309 --> 02:43:40.319 align:start position:0% association with the review committees I 02:43:40.319 --> 02:43:41.990 align:start position:0% association with the review committees I don't<02:43:40.479> know<02:43:40.800> something<02:43:41.080> like 02:43:41.990 --> 02:43:42.000 align:start position:0% don't know something like 02:43:42.000 --> 02:43:44.550 align:start position:0% don't know something like that<02:43:43.000> there's<02:43:43.240> another<02:43:43.640> type<02:43:43.840> of<02:43:44.080> conflict<02:43:44.439> of 02:43:44.550 --> 02:43:44.560 align:start position:0% that there's another type of conflict of 02:43:44.560 --> 02:43:46.349 align:start position:0% that there's another type of conflict of interests<02:43:44.920> for<02:43:45.120> example<02:43:45.520> the<02:43:45.680> parent<02:43:45.960> who<02:43:46.160> put 02:43:46.349 --> 02:43:46.359 align:start position:0% interests for example the parent who put 02:43:46.359 --> 02:43:48.590 align:start position:0% interests for example the parent who put the<02:43:46.520> challenge<02:43:47.120> there<02:43:47.680> has<02:43:47.880> a<02:43:48.040> conflict<02:43:48.439> of 02:43:48.590 --> 02:43:48.600 align:start position:0% the challenge there has a conflict of 02:43:48.600 --> 02:43:49.950 align:start position:0% the challenge there has a conflict of interests<02:43:49.200> and 02:43:49.950 --> 02:43:49.960 align:start position:0% interests and 02:43:49.960 --> 02:43:53.389 align:start position:0% interests and they<02:43:50.960> should<02:43:51.240> be<02:43:51.359> on<02:43:52.319> so<02:43:52.640> if<02:43:52.720> you<02:43:52.840> broadened<02:43:53.279> it 02:43:53.389 --> 02:43:53.399 align:start position:0% they should be on so if you broadened it 02:43:53.399 --> 02:43:55.269 align:start position:0% they should be on so if you broadened it to<02:43:53.640> conflict<02:43:54.000> of<02:43:54.200> interest<02:43:54.560> it<02:43:54.680> would 02:43:55.269 --> 02:43:55.279 align:start position:0% to conflict of interest it would 02:43:55.279 --> 02:43:57.469 align:start position:0% to conflict of interest it would Encompass<02:43:56.120> both<02:43:56.359> the<02:43:56.560> person<02:43:56.800> who<02:43:57.080> procured 02:43:57.469 --> 02:43:57.479 align:start position:0% Encompass both the person who procured 02:43:57.479 --> 02:43:59.710 align:start position:0% Encompass both the person who procured it<02:43:57.760> and<02:43:58.120> the<02:43:58.279> person<02:43:58.560> who<02:43:58.760> is<02:43:59.040> objecting<02:43:59.520> to 02:43:59.710 --> 02:43:59.720 align:start position:0% it and the person who is objecting to 02:43:59.720 --> 02:44:02.230 align:start position:0% it and the person who is objecting to the<02:44:00.040> materials<02:44:01.040> not<02:44:01.279> being<02:44:01.520> allowed<02:44:01.840> to<02:44:01.960> be<02:44:02.080> on 02:44:02.230 --> 02:44:02.240 align:start position:0% the materials not being allowed to be on 02:44:02.240 --> 02:44:06.030 align:start position:0% the materials not being allowed to be on the<02:44:02.399> review 02:44:06.030 --> 02:44:06.040 align:start position:0% 02:44:06.040 --> 02:44:10.070 align:start position:0% process<02:44:07.040> okay<02:44:07.399> I<02:44:07.800> I<02:44:08.120> I<02:44:08.240> think 02:44:10.070 --> 02:44:10.080 align:start position:0% process okay I I I think 02:44:10.080 --> 02:44:14.590 align:start position:0% process okay I I I think that<02:44:11.080> yeah<02:44:11.279> that's<02:44:11.479> exactly<02:44:11.840> what<02:44:11.920> I<02:44:12.040> was 02:44:14.590 --> 02:44:14.600 align:start position:0% 02:44:14.600 --> 02:44:19.990 align:start position:0% saying<02:44:15.800> beautiful<02:44:16.800> how<02:44:16.920> do<02:44:17.040> you<02:44:17.160> feel<02:44:17.439> Emily 02:44:19.990 --> 02:44:20.000 align:start position:0% saying beautiful how do you feel Emily 02:44:20.000 --> 02:44:23.110 align:start position:0% saying beautiful how do you feel Emily better<02:44:21.279> good<02:44:22.279> all 02:44:23.110 --> 02:44:23.120 align:start position:0% better good all 02:44:23.120 --> 02:44:26.550 align:start position:0% better good all right<02:44:24.120> okay<02:44:24.359> so<02:44:25.000> the<02:44:25.560> then<02:44:25.920> the<02:44:26.240> so<02:44:26.399> we're 02:44:26.550 --> 02:44:26.560 align:start position:0% right okay so the then the so we're 02:44:26.560 --> 02:44:28.110 align:start position:0% right okay so the then the so we're looking<02:44:26.760> at<02:44:26.880> using<02:44:27.279> that<02:44:27.439> second<02:44:27.760> piece<02:44:27.960> of 02:44:28.110 --> 02:44:28.120 align:start position:0% looking at using that second piece of 02:44:28.120 --> 02:44:29.750 align:start position:0% looking at using that second piece of language 02:44:29.750 --> 02:44:29.760 align:start position:0% language 02:44:29.760 --> 02:44:32.389 align:start position:0% language then<02:44:30.760> and<02:44:30.920> it<02:44:31.040> could<02:44:31.200> be<02:44:31.520> more<02:44:31.760> expansive<02:44:32.279> than 02:44:32.389 --> 02:44:32.399 align:start position:0% then and it could be more expansive than 02:44:32.399 --> 02:44:34.190 align:start position:0% then and it could be more expansive than that<02:44:32.560> too<02:44:33.000> possibly<02:44:33.520> right<02:44:33.720> someone<02:44:34.000> who's 02:44:34.190 --> 02:44:34.200 align:start position:0% that too possibly right someone who's 02:44:34.200 --> 02:44:36.469 align:start position:0% that too possibly right someone who's outp<02:44:34.560> posting<02:44:34.880> something<02:44:35.279> on<02:44:36.080> you<02:44:36.200> know<02:44:36.319> an 02:44:36.469 --> 02:44:36.479 align:start position:0% outp posting something on you know an 02:44:36.479 --> 02:44:38.590 align:start position:0% outp posting something on you know an employee<02:44:37.000> would<02:44:37.200> not<02:44:37.680> would<02:44:37.840> be<02:44:38.040> discounted 02:44:38.590 --> 02:44:38.600 align:start position:0% employee would not would be discounted 02:44:38.600 --> 02:44:40.070 align:start position:0% employee would not would be discounted too<02:44:38.880> if<02:44:38.960> they're<02:44:39.160> out<02:44:39.279> there<02:44:39.439> saying<02:44:39.720> oh<02:44:39.920> I 02:44:40.070 --> 02:44:40.080 align:start position:0% too if they're out there saying oh I 02:44:40.080 --> 02:44:42.670 align:start position:0% too if they're out there saying oh I love<02:44:40.479> X<02:44:40.720> Y<02:44:40.840> and<02:44:40.960> Z<02:44:41.279> and<02:44:42.040> then<02:44:42.160> they<02:44:42.279> get<02:44:42.439> on<02:44:42.560> the 02:44:42.670 --> 02:44:42.680 align:start position:0% love X Y and Z and then they get on the 02:44:42.680 --> 02:44:44.910 align:start position:0% love X Y and Z and then they get on the committee<02:44:43.439> and<02:44:43.800> they're<02:44:44.000> not<02:44:44.240> really<02:44:44.479> fair<02:44:44.760> in 02:44:44.910 --> 02:44:44.920 align:start position:0% committee and they're not really fair in 02:44:44.920 --> 02:44:49.750 align:start position:0% committee and they're not really fair in their<02:44:45.680> evaluation 02:44:49.750 --> 02:44:49.760 align:start position:0% 02:44:49.760 --> 02:44:52.750 align:start position:0% would<02:44:49.960> that<02:44:50.080> be 02:44:52.750 --> 02:44:52.760 align:start position:0% 02:44:52.760 --> 02:44:54.870 align:start position:0% accurate<02:44:53.760> okay<02:44:54.080> that's<02:44:54.240> what<02:44:54.359> I<02:44:54.439> would<02:44:54.600> move 02:44:54.870 --> 02:44:54.880 align:start position:0% accurate okay that's what I would move 02:44:54.880 --> 02:44:58.030 align:start position:0% accurate okay that's what I would move is<02:44:55.080> that<02:44:56.000> that<02:44:56.439> the<02:44:56.520> parentheses<02:44:57.200> part 02:44:58.030 --> 02:44:58.040 align:start position:0% is that that the parentheses part 02:44:58.040 --> 02:45:03.950 align:start position:0% is that that the parentheses part replace<02:44:58.520> the<02:44:58.640> other<02:44:58.920> part 02:45:03.950 --> 02:45:03.960 align:start position:0% 02:45:03.960 --> 02:45:09.790 align:start position:0% so<02:45:04.960> okay 02:45:09.790 --> 02:45:09.800 align:start position:0% 02:45:09.800 --> 02:45:16.349 align:start position:0% so<02:45:10.800> can<02:45:10.920> I<02:45:11.160> read<02:45:11.560> this<02:45:12.560> please<02:45:13.279> do<02:45:14.680> an<02:45:15.680> Lea 02:45:16.349 --> 02:45:16.359 align:start position:0% so can I read this please do an Lea 02:45:16.359 --> 02:45:19.309 align:start position:0% so can I read this please do an Lea shall<02:45:16.680> develop<02:45:17.080> a<02:45:17.520> policy<02:45:18.520> related<02:45:19.080> to 02:45:19.309 --> 02:45:19.319 align:start position:0% shall develop a policy related to 02:45:19.319 --> 02:45:22.590 align:start position:0% shall develop a policy related to conflict<02:45:19.760> of<02:45:20.040> interest<02:45:20.560> and<02:45:20.840> procurement<02:45:21.800> in 02:45:22.590 --> 02:45:22.600 align:start position:0% conflict of interest and procurement in 02:45:22.600 --> 02:45:25.710 align:start position:0% conflict of interest and procurement in association<02:45:23.600> with<02:45:23.760> the<02:45:24.000> Review<02:45:24.720> Committee 02:45:25.710 --> 02:45:25.720 align:start position:0% association with the Review Committee 02:45:25.720 --> 02:45:28.990 align:start position:0% association with the Review Committee example<02:45:26.600> those<02:45:26.960> responsible<02:45:27.439> for 02:45:28.990 --> 02:45:29.000 align:start position:0% example those responsible for 02:45:29.000 --> 02:45:32.150 align:start position:0% example those responsible for procurement<02:45:30.000> and<02:45:30.160> we'll<02:45:30.399> finish<02:45:30.840> that 02:45:32.150 --> 02:45:32.160 align:start position:0% procurement and we'll finish that 02:45:32.160 --> 02:45:35.469 align:start position:0% procurement and we'll finish that part<02:45:33.160> okay<02:45:33.359> so<02:45:34.000> the<02:45:34.120> gist<02:45:34.359> of<02:45:34.479> it<02:45:34.600> an<02:45:34.760> laa<02:45:35.200> shall 02:45:35.469 --> 02:45:35.479 align:start position:0% part okay so the gist of it an laa shall 02:45:35.479 --> 02:45:38.429 align:start position:0% part okay so the gist of it an laa shall develop<02:45:35.920> a<02:45:36.160> policy<02:45:36.800> related<02:45:37.319> to<02:45:37.680> conflict<02:45:38.120> of 02:45:38.429 --> 02:45:38.439 align:start position:0% develop a policy related to conflict of 02:45:38.439 --> 02:45:41.349 align:start position:0% develop a policy related to conflict of interest<02:45:39.439> and<02:45:39.720> procurement<02:45:40.359> in<02:45:40.600> association 02:45:41.349 --> 02:45:41.359 align:start position:0% interest and procurement in association 02:45:41.359 --> 02:45:44.150 align:start position:0% interest and procurement in association with<02:45:41.520> the<02:45:41.720> Review 02:45:44.150 --> 02:45:44.160 align:start position:0% 02:45:44.160 --> 02:45:46.070 align:start position:0% Committee<02:45:45.160> maybe<02:45:45.399> it<02:45:45.479> needs<02:45:45.680> to<02:45:45.800> be<02:45:45.920> an 02:45:46.070 --> 02:45:46.080 align:start position:0% Committee maybe it needs to be an 02:45:46.080 --> 02:45:48.389 align:start position:0% Committee maybe it needs to be an association<02:45:46.760> with<02:45:47.040> membership<02:45:47.960> of<02:45:48.200> the 02:45:48.389 --> 02:45:48.399 align:start position:0% association with membership of the 02:45:48.399 --> 02:45:50.349 align:start position:0% association with membership of the review<02:45:49.040> membership<02:45:49.640> in<02:45:49.760> on<02:45:49.920> a<02:45:50.040> Review 02:45:50.349 --> 02:45:50.359 align:start position:0% review membership in on a Review 02:45:50.359 --> 02:45:51.429 align:start position:0% review membership in on a Review Committee<02:45:50.680> or<02:45:50.760> something<02:45:50.920> so<02:45:51.080> it's<02:45:51.200> real 02:45:51.429 --> 02:45:51.439 align:start position:0% Committee or something so it's real 02:45:51.439 --> 02:45:53.670 align:start position:0% Committee or something so it's real specific<02:45:51.880> not<02:45:52.160> just<02:45:52.640> associating<02:45:53.279> with<02:45:53.399> them 02:45:53.670 --> 02:45:53.680 align:start position:0% specific not just associating with them 02:45:53.680 --> 02:45:57.910 align:start position:0% specific not just associating with them but<02:45:54.800> yeah<02:45:55.800> first<02:45:56.240> procurement<02:45:56.840> be<02:45:57.120> left<02:45:57.520> out 02:45:57.910 --> 02:45:57.920 align:start position:0% but yeah first procurement be left out 02:45:57.920 --> 02:46:00.309 align:start position:0% but yeah first procurement be left out because<02:45:58.120> it's<02:45:58.279> in<02:45:58.439> the<02:45:59.000> examples<02:46:00.000> like<02:46:00.160> it 02:46:00.309 --> 02:46:00.319 align:start position:0% because it's in the examples like it 02:46:00.319 --> 02:46:02.230 align:start position:0% because it's in the examples like it just<02:46:00.479> says<02:46:00.960> related<02:46:01.359> to<02:46:01.479> a<02:46:01.640> conflict<02:46:02.040> of 02:46:02.230 --> 02:46:02.240 align:start position:0% just says related to a conflict of 02:46:02.240 --> 02:46:03.510 align:start position:0% just says related to a conflict of interest<02:46:02.720> in 02:46:03.510 --> 02:46:03.520 align:start position:0% interest in 02:46:03.520 --> 02:46:06.309 align:start position:0% interest in association<02:46:04.520> with<02:46:04.680> a<02:46:04.960> Review<02:46:05.319> Committee 02:46:06.309 --> 02:46:06.319 align:start position:0% association with a Review Committee 02:46:06.319 --> 02:46:08.230 align:start position:0% association with a Review Committee those<02:46:06.720> responsible<02:46:07.200> for<02:46:07.479> procurement<02:46:07.920> or<02:46:08.080> the 02:46:08.230 --> 02:46:08.240 align:start position:0% those responsible for procurement or the 02:46:08.240 --> 02:46:09.830 align:start position:0% those responsible for procurement or the individual<02:46:08.680> who<02:46:08.800> brought<02:46:09.040> the<02:46:09.200> challenge<02:46:09.720> so 02:46:09.830 --> 02:46:09.840 align:start position:0% individual who brought the challenge so 02:46:09.840 --> 02:46:13.190 align:start position:0% individual who brought the challenge so you're<02:46:10.000> leaving<02:46:10.439> those<02:46:10.720> a<02:46:10.920> list<02:46:11.200> of 02:46:13.190 --> 02:46:13.200 align:start position:0% you're leaving those a list of 02:46:13.200 --> 02:46:15.469 align:start position:0% you're leaving those a list of examples<02:46:14.200> that<02:46:14.399> could<02:46:14.560> be<02:46:14.720> a<02:46:14.880> conflict<02:46:15.279> of 02:46:15.469 --> 02:46:15.479 align:start position:0% examples that could be a conflict of 02:46:15.479 --> 02:46:26.910 align:start position:0% examples that could be a conflict of interest 02:46:26.910 --> 02:46:26.920 align:start position:0% 02:46:26.920 --> 02:46:38.590 align:start position:0% response<02:46:27.920> I'm 02:46:38.590 --> 02:46:38.600 align:start position:0% 02:46:38.600 --> 02:46:41.030 align:start position:0% thinking<02:46:39.600> so<02:46:39.800> it's<02:46:40.000> kind<02:46:40.120> of<02:46:40.279> like<02:46:40.479> jury 02:46:41.030 --> 02:46:41.040 align:start position:0% thinking so it's kind of like jury 02:46:41.040 --> 02:46:43.349 align:start position:0% thinking so it's kind of like jury selection<02:46:42.040> is<02:46:42.279> what 02:46:43.349 --> 02:46:43.359 align:start position:0% selection is what 02:46:43.359 --> 02:46:49.070 align:start position:0% selection is what we're<02:46:44.359> talking<02:46:44.760> about 02:46:49.070 --> 02:46:49.080 align:start position:0% 02:46:49.080 --> 02:46:50.510 align:start position:0% just<02:46:49.200> hoping<02:46:49.439> in<02:46:49.560> another<02:46:49.840> year<02:46:50.040> we<02:46:50.160> have<02:46:50.359> very 02:46:50.510 --> 02:46:50.520 align:start position:0% just hoping in another year we have very 02:46:50.520 --> 02:46:54.269 align:start position:0% just hoping in another year we have very few<02:46:50.720> of<02:46:51.080> these<02:46:52.080> I<02:46:52.560> I'm<02:46:52.720> hoping<02:46:53.040> that<02:46:53.319> the<02:46:53.720> the 02:46:54.269 --> 02:46:54.279 align:start position:0% few of these I I'm hoping that the the 02:46:54.279 --> 02:46:56.269 align:start position:0% few of these I I'm hoping that the the preemptive<02:46:54.960> stuff<02:46:55.200> at<02:46:55.359> the<02:46:55.520> beginning 02:46:56.269 --> 02:46:56.279 align:start position:0% preemptive stuff at the beginning 02:46:56.279 --> 02:46:59.710 align:start position:0% preemptive stuff at the beginning reflects<02:46:57.359> in<02:46:58.359> the<02:46:58.560> rest<02:46:58.760> of<02:46:58.960> this<02:46:59.319> right<02:46:59.560> that 02:46:59.710 --> 02:46:59.720 align:start position:0% reflects in the rest of this right that 02:46:59.720 --> 02:47:00.950 align:start position:0% reflects in the rest of this right that we<02:46:59.840> have<02:47:00.000> all<02:47:00.160> this<02:47:00.279> other<02:47:00.520> stuff<02:47:00.720> but<02:47:00.840> we 02:47:00.950 --> 02:47:00.960 align:start position:0% we have all this other stuff but we 02:47:00.960 --> 02:47:02.230 align:start position:0% we have all this other stuff but we don't<02:47:01.160> really<02:47:01.359> have<02:47:01.479> to<02:47:01.600> use<02:47:01.760> it<02:47:01.920> because<02:47:02.080> we 02:47:02.230 --> 02:47:02.240 align:start position:0% don't really have to use it because we 02:47:02.240 --> 02:47:04.389 align:start position:0% don't really have to use it because we figured<02:47:02.520> out<02:47:02.760> that<02:47:02.920> we<02:47:03.040> get<02:47:03.200> to<02:47:03.840> have<02:47:03.960> a<02:47:04.080> say<02:47:04.279> in 02:47:04.389 --> 02:47:04.399 align:start position:0% figured out that we get to have a say in 02:47:04.399 --> 02:47:06.070 align:start position:0% figured out that we get to have a say in what<02:47:04.520> goes<02:47:04.680> in<02:47:04.800> our<02:47:05.000> schools<02:47:05.680> and<02:47:05.800> we're<02:47:05.960> in 02:47:06.070 --> 02:47:06.080 align:start position:0% what goes in our schools and we're in 02:47:06.080 --> 02:47:08.910 align:start position:0% what goes in our schools and we're in charge<02:47:06.359> of<02:47:06.760> that<02:47:07.760> here's<02:47:08.279> and<02:47:08.479> here's<02:47:08.760> one 02:47:08.910 --> 02:47:08.920 align:start position:0% charge of that here's and here's one 02:47:08.920 --> 02:47:11.150 align:start position:0% charge of that here's and here's one more<02:47:09.279> concern<02:47:09.800> that<02:47:09.960> comes<02:47:10.279> back<02:47:10.479> to 02:47:11.150 --> 02:47:11.160 align:start position:0% more concern that comes back to 02:47:11.160 --> 02:47:13.790 align:start position:0% more concern that comes back to procurement<02:47:12.160> which<02:47:12.439> I<02:47:12.680> I<02:47:12.880> still<02:47:13.240> haven't 02:47:13.790 --> 02:47:13.800 align:start position:0% procurement which I I still haven't 02:47:13.800 --> 02:47:17.230 align:start position:0% procurement which I I still haven't received<02:47:14.040> an<02:47:14.279> answer<02:47:14.640> to<02:47:15.520> and<02:47:16.520> I'd<02:47:16.760> like<02:47:17.000> an 02:47:17.230 --> 02:47:17.240 align:start position:0% received an answer to and I'd like an 02:47:17.240 --> 02:47:19.030 align:start position:0% received an answer to and I'd like an answer<02:47:17.640> and<02:47:17.760> if<02:47:17.880> it's<02:47:18.040> not<02:47:18.240> today<02:47:18.600> if<02:47:18.880> if 02:47:19.030 --> 02:47:19.040 align:start position:0% answer and if it's not today if if 02:47:19.040 --> 02:47:21.469 align:start position:0% answer and if it's not today if if anybody<02:47:19.479> that<02:47:20.240> that<02:47:20.439> knows<02:47:20.840> this<02:47:21.080> can<02:47:21.240> get 02:47:21.469 --> 02:47:21.479 align:start position:0% anybody that that knows this can get 02:47:21.479 --> 02:47:24.230 align:start position:0% anybody that that knows this can get back<02:47:21.720> to 02:47:24.230 --> 02:47:24.240 align:start position:0% 02:47:24.240 --> 02:47:28.950 align:start position:0% us<02:47:25.240> are<02:47:25.720> we<02:47:26.319> physically<02:47:27.080> procuring<02:47:28.080> our<02:47:28.439> order 02:47:28.950 --> 02:47:28.960 align:start position:0% us are we physically procuring our order 02:47:28.960 --> 02:47:32.030 align:start position:0% us are we physically procuring our order forms<02:47:29.680> for<02:47:30.000> the<02:47:30.200> books<02:47:30.520> that<02:47:30.680> come<02:47:30.840> to<02:47:31.040> our 02:47:32.030 --> 02:47:32.040 align:start position:0% forms for the books that come to our 02:47:32.040 --> 02:47:36.230 align:start position:0% forms for the books that come to our libraries<02:47:33.479> or<02:47:34.479> do<02:47:34.760> we 02:47:36.230 --> 02:47:36.240 align:start position:0% libraries or do we 02:47:36.240 --> 02:47:39.910 align:start position:0% libraries or do we receive<02:47:37.359> procured<02:47:38.439> orders<02:47:39.439> that<02:47:39.560> are 02:47:39.910 --> 02:47:39.920 align:start position:0% receive procured orders that are 02:47:39.920 --> 02:47:43.830 align:start position:0% receive procured orders that are delivered<02:47:40.640> automatically<02:47:41.600> to<02:47:41.920> the 02:47:43.830 --> 02:47:43.840 align:start position:0% delivered automatically to the 02:47:43.840 --> 02:47:46.910 align:start position:0% delivered automatically to the schools<02:47:44.840> if<02:47:45.120> that<02:47:45.439> if<02:47:45.600> the<02:47:45.840> second<02:47:46.359> is<02:47:46.640> the 02:47:46.910 --> 02:47:46.920 align:start position:0% schools if that if the second is the 02:47:46.920 --> 02:47:49.830 align:start position:0% schools if that if the second is the case<02:47:47.439> as<02:47:47.680> a<02:47:48.000> standard 02:47:49.830 --> 02:47:49.840 align:start position:0% case as a standard 02:47:49.840 --> 02:47:52.790 align:start position:0% case as a standard in<02:47:50.000> our<02:47:50.240> working<02:47:50.680> relationship<02:47:51.520> with<02:47:51.720> these 02:47:52.790 --> 02:47:52.800 align:start position:0% in our working relationship with these 02:47:52.800 --> 02:47:56.269 align:start position:0% in our working relationship with these vendors<02:47:53.800> then<02:47:54.000> in<02:47:54.319> essence<02:47:55.319> it's<02:47:56.040> the 02:47:56.269 --> 02:47:56.279 align:start position:0% vendors then in essence it's the 02:47:56.279 --> 02:48:00.389 align:start position:0% vendors then in essence it's the Distributors<02:47:57.200> that<02:47:57.359> can't<02:47:57.600> be<02:47:57.720> on<02:47:57.880> the 02:48:00.389 --> 02:48:00.399 align:start position:0% 02:48:00.399 --> 02:48:04.429 align:start position:0% committee<02:48:01.399> okay<02:48:01.800> let's<02:48:02.240> get 02:48:04.429 --> 02:48:04.439 align:start position:0% committee okay let's get 02:48:04.439 --> 02:48:07.910 align:start position:0% committee okay let's get some<02:48:05.439> from<02:48:05.960> deina<02:48:06.960> what<02:48:07.080> do<02:48:07.200> you<02:48:07.399> have<02:48:07.520> to<02:48:07.680> say 02:48:07.910 --> 02:48:07.920 align:start position:0% some from deina what do you have to say 02:48:07.920 --> 02:48:08.910 align:start position:0% some from deina what do you have to say to 02:48:08.910 --> 02:48:08.920 align:start position:0% to 02:48:08.920 --> 02:48:12.429 align:start position:0% to that<02:48:09.920> I<02:48:10.080> think<02:48:10.399> the<02:48:10.680> standard<02:48:11.359> generally<02:48:12.160> is 02:48:12.429 --> 02:48:12.439 align:start position:0% that I think the standard generally is 02:48:12.439 --> 02:48:15.469 align:start position:0% that I think the standard generally is that<02:48:13.000> books<02:48:13.279> are<02:48:13.479> being<02:48:14.279> it's<02:48:14.439> not<02:48:14.600> a<02:48:14.840> list<02:48:15.200> or 02:48:15.469 --> 02:48:15.479 align:start position:0% that books are being it's not a list or 02:48:15.479 --> 02:48:17.590 align:start position:0% that books are being it's not a list or like<02:48:15.720> a<02:48:15.960> box<02:48:16.200> of<02:48:16.399> books<02:48:16.680> that<02:48:16.800> shows<02:48:17.120> up<02:48:17.279> at<02:48:17.439> the 02:48:17.590 --> 02:48:17.600 align:start position:0% like a box of books that shows up at the 02:48:17.600 --> 02:48:21.910 align:start position:0% like a box of books that shows up at the library<02:48:18.880> it's<02:48:19.359> the<02:48:19.560> standard<02:48:20.040> is<02:48:20.279> that<02:48:21.160> the 02:48:21.910 --> 02:48:21.920 align:start position:0% library it's the standard is that the 02:48:21.920 --> 02:48:26.389 align:start position:0% library it's the standard is that the Librarians<02:48:22.960> Educators<02:48:23.960> District<02:48:24.880> people<02:48:25.840> use 02:48:26.389 --> 02:48:26.399 align:start position:0% Librarians Educators District people use 02:48:26.399 --> 02:48:28.670 align:start position:0% Librarians Educators District people use the<02:48:26.560> selection<02:48:27.160> criteria<02:48:27.760> of<02:48:27.920> their<02:48:28.160> policy 02:48:28.670 --> 02:48:28.680 align:start position:0% the selection criteria of their policy 02:48:28.680 --> 02:48:31.630 align:start position:0% the selection criteria of their policy to<02:48:28.880> select<02:48:29.319> books<02:48:29.600> for<02:48:29.800> their<02:48:30.399> libraries<02:48:31.399> um 02:48:31.630 --> 02:48:31.640 align:start position:0% to select books for their libraries um 02:48:31.640 --> 02:48:34.990 align:start position:0% to select books for their libraries um and<02:48:31.880> classroom 02:48:34.990 --> 02:48:35.000 align:start position:0% 02:48:35.000 --> 02:48:37.389 align:start position:0% libraries<02:48:36.000> do<02:48:36.160> we 02:48:37.389 --> 02:48:37.399 align:start position:0% libraries do we 02:48:37.399 --> 02:48:41.830 align:start position:0% libraries do we know<02:48:38.399> do<02:48:38.640> we<02:48:39.160> do<02:48:39.920> districts<02:48:40.600> ever 02:48:41.830 --> 02:48:41.840 align:start position:0% know do we do districts ever 02:48:41.840 --> 02:48:49.710 align:start position:0% know do we do districts ever receive<02:48:43.080> orders<02:48:44.560> procured<02:48:45.560> from<02:48:46.240> vendors 02:48:49.710 --> 02:48:49.720 align:start position:0% 02:48:49.720 --> 02:48:55.670 align:start position:0% that<02:48:49.960> they<02:48:50.160> did<02:48:50.479> not<02:48:51.080> solicit 02:48:55.670 --> 02:48:55.680 align:start position:0% 02:48:55.680 --> 02:48:58.469 align:start position:0% themselves<02:48:56.680> I'm<02:48:56.840> trying<02:48:57.040> to<02:48:57.240> think<02:48:57.680> in<02:48:57.920> my 02:48:58.469 --> 02:48:58.479 align:start position:0% themselves I'm trying to think in my 02:48:58.479 --> 02:49:03.670 align:start position:0% themselves I'm trying to think in my library<02:48:59.479> I<02:49:00.080> had<02:49:01.520> um<02:49:02.520> a<02:49:02.720> local<02:49:03.080> bookstore 02:49:03.670 --> 02:49:03.680 align:start position:0% library I had um a local bookstore 02:49:03.680 --> 02:49:05.990 align:start position:0% library I had um a local bookstore donate<02:49:04.160> books<02:49:04.439> to<02:49:04.600> me<02:49:05.120> but<02:49:05.399> I<02:49:05.600> would<02:49:05.800> go 02:49:05.990 --> 02:49:06.000 align:start position:0% donate books to me but I would go 02:49:06.000 --> 02:49:08.030 align:start position:0% donate books to me but I would go through<02:49:06.279> that<02:49:06.479> book<02:49:06.800> that<02:49:07.000> box<02:49:07.439> differently 02:49:08.030 --> 02:49:08.040 align:start position:0% through that book that box differently 02:49:08.040 --> 02:49:10.790 align:start position:0% through that book that box differently than<02:49:08.240> I<02:49:08.319> would<02:49:08.560> go<02:49:08.840> through<02:49:09.800> a<02:49:10.040> box<02:49:10.319> of<02:49:10.479> books 02:49:10.790 --> 02:49:10.800 align:start position:0% than I would go through a box of books 02:49:10.800 --> 02:49:12.349 align:start position:0% than I would go through a box of books and<02:49:10.920> that<02:49:11.000> was<02:49:11.160> rare<02:49:11.560> I<02:49:11.600> would<02:49:11.760> say<02:49:11.960> in<02:49:12.120> five 02:49:12.349 --> 02:49:12.359 align:start position:0% and that was rare I would say in five 02:49:12.359 --> 02:49:14.790 align:start position:0% and that was rare I would say in five years<02:49:12.560> in<02:49:12.800> that<02:49:12.960> Library<02:49:13.720> I<02:49:13.920> probably<02:49:14.240> got<02:49:14.439> two 02:49:14.790 --> 02:49:14.800 align:start position:0% years in that Library I probably got two 02:49:14.800 --> 02:49:18.110 align:start position:0% years in that Library I probably got two boxes<02:49:15.160> of<02:49:15.359> books<02:49:15.760> from<02:49:16.040> them<02:49:17.040> um<02:49:17.319> there's<02:49:17.680> no 02:49:18.110 --> 02:49:18.120 align:start position:0% boxes of books from them um there's no 02:49:18.120 --> 02:49:21.429 align:start position:0% boxes of books from them um there's no procurement<02:49:19.000> like<02:49:19.239> I<02:49:20.040> maybe<02:49:21.040> this<02:49:21.200> never 02:49:21.429 --> 02:49:21.439 align:start position:0% procurement like I maybe this never 02:49:21.439 --> 02:49:22.830 align:start position:0% procurement like I maybe this never happened<02:49:21.720> to<02:49:21.840> me<02:49:22.080> and<02:49:22.239> as<02:49:22.359> a<02:49:22.479> district 02:49:22.830 --> 02:49:22.840 align:start position:0% happened to me and as a district 02:49:22.840 --> 02:49:24.790 align:start position:0% happened to me and as a district librarian<02:49:23.600> I<02:49:23.760> never<02:49:24.160> had<02:49:24.359> any<02:49:24.520> of<02:49:24.640> my 02:49:24.790 --> 02:49:24.800 align:start position:0% librarian I never had any of my 02:49:24.800 --> 02:49:26.190 align:start position:0% librarian I never had any of my libraries<02:49:25.279> that<02:49:25.399> I<02:49:25.479> knew<02:49:25.720> of<02:49:25.920> that<02:49:26.000> were 02:49:26.190 --> 02:49:26.200 align:start position:0% libraries that I knew of that were 02:49:26.200 --> 02:49:27.910 align:start position:0% libraries that I knew of that were getting<02:49:26.520> like<02:49:26.760> boxes<02:49:27.080> of<02:49:27.239> books<02:49:27.399> sent<02:49:27.600> to<02:49:27.760> them 02:49:27.910 --> 02:49:27.920 align:start position:0% getting like boxes of books sent to them 02:49:27.920 --> 02:49:32.590 align:start position:0% getting like boxes of books sent to them from<02:49:28.120> vendors<02:49:28.600> or<02:49:29.640> Publishers<02:49:31.000> um<02:49:32.000> Saina<02:49:32.479> what 02:49:32.590 --> 02:49:32.600 align:start position:0% from vendors or Publishers um Saina what 02:49:32.600 --> 02:49:34.550 align:start position:0% from vendors or Publishers um Saina what about<02:49:32.840> the<02:49:32.960> book<02:49:33.160> bundles<02:49:33.840> I<02:49:33.920> know<02:49:34.200> a<02:49:34.319> couple 02:49:34.550 --> 02:49:34.560 align:start position:0% about the book bundles I know a couple 02:49:34.560 --> 02:49:36.309 align:start position:0% about the book bundles I know a couple years<02:49:34.760> ago<02:49:35.000> those<02:49:35.080> were<02:49:35.279> real<02:49:35.520> popular<02:49:36.000> bundle 02:49:36.309 --> 02:49:36.319 align:start position:0% years ago those were real popular bundle 02:49:36.319 --> 02:49:37.950 align:start position:0% years ago those were real popular bundle a<02:49:36.439> whole<02:49:36.560> bunch<02:49:36.720> of<02:49:36.880> books<02:49:37.080> and<02:49:37.200> you<02:49:37.319> bought<02:49:37.560> a 02:49:37.950 --> 02:49:37.960 align:start position:0% a whole bunch of books and you bought a 02:49:37.960 --> 02:49:41.070 align:start position:0% a whole bunch of books and you bought a certain<02:49:38.960> grouping<02:49:39.720> are<02:49:39.960> those<02:49:40.200> not<02:49:40.680> taking 02:49:41.070 --> 02:49:41.080 align:start position:0% certain grouping are those not taking 02:49:41.080 --> 02:49:41.950 align:start position:0% certain grouping are those not taking place 02:49:41.950 --> 02:49:41.960 align:start position:0% place 02:49:41.960 --> 02:49:44.510 align:start position:0% place anymore<02:49:42.960> I'm<02:49:43.160> not<02:49:43.399> hearing<02:49:43.880> about<02:49:44.200> the<02:49:44.399> I 02:49:44.510 --> 02:49:44.520 align:start position:0% anymore I'm not hearing about the I 02:49:44.520 --> 02:49:46.349 align:start position:0% anymore I'm not hearing about the I never<02:49:44.840> actually<02:49:45.160> have<02:49:45.479> ever<02:49:45.760> experienced 02:49:46.349 --> 02:49:46.359 align:start position:0% never actually have ever experienced 02:49:46.359 --> 02:49:48.229 align:start position:0% never actually have ever experienced that<02:49:46.600> myself<02:49:47.080> as<02:49:47.200> a<02:49:47.319> district<02:49:47.680> librarian 02:49:48.229 --> 02:49:48.239 align:start position:0% that myself as a district librarian 02:49:48.239 --> 02:49:51.750 align:start position:0% that myself as a district librarian supervisor<02:49:48.960> libraries<02:49:49.720> or<02:49:50.399> in<02:49:50.560> the<02:49:50.720> library<02:49:51.600> I 02:49:51.750 --> 02:49:51.760 align:start position:0% supervisor libraries or in the library I 02:49:51.760 --> 02:49:53.469 align:start position:0% supervisor libraries or in the library I have<02:49:52.000> heard<02:49:52.359> about<02:49:52.640> what<02:49:52.760> you're<02:49:53.080> talking 02:49:53.469 --> 02:49:53.479 align:start position:0% have heard about what you're talking 02:49:53.479 --> 02:49:56.309 align:start position:0% have heard about what you're talking about<02:49:54.239> um<02:49:54.439> but<02:49:54.680> I<02:49:54.960> personally<02:49:55.399> have<02:49:55.600> not<02:49:56.080> in<02:49:56.160> a 02:49:56.309 --> 02:49:56.319 align:start position:0% about um but I personally have not in a 02:49:56.319 --> 02:49:58.309 align:start position:0% about um but I personally have not in a large<02:49:56.720> District<02:49:57.399> that<02:49:57.560> was<02:49:57.720> not<02:49:57.960> something 02:49:58.309 --> 02:49:58.319 align:start position:0% large District that was not something 02:49:58.319 --> 02:50:00.750 align:start position:0% large District that was not something that<02:49:58.479> was<02:49:58.760> common<02:49:59.200> place<02:49:59.920> and<02:50:00.080> do<02:50:00.239> we<02:50:00.439> give 02:50:00.750 --> 02:50:00.760 align:start position:0% that was common place and do we give 02:50:00.760 --> 02:50:02.630 align:start position:0% that was common place and do we give recommendation<02:50:01.560> at<02:50:01.720> the<02:50:01.840> state<02:50:02.120> level<02:50:02.439> that 02:50:02.630 --> 02:50:02.640 align:start position:0% recommendation at the state level that 02:50:02.640 --> 02:50:05.150 align:start position:0% recommendation at the state level that that's<02:50:02.960> probably<02:50:03.239> not<02:50:03.359> a<02:50:03.520> really<02:50:03.760> great<02:50:04.160> idea 02:50:05.150 --> 02:50:05.160 align:start position:0% that's probably not a really great idea 02:50:05.160 --> 02:50:09.190 align:start position:0% that's probably not a really great idea right<02:50:05.479> no<02:50:06.120> okay<02:50:06.920> okay<02:50:07.680> so<02:50:07.960> it's<02:50:08.279> safe<02:50:08.520> to<02:50:08.760> say 02:50:09.190 --> 02:50:09.200 align:start position:0% right no okay okay so it's safe to say 02:50:09.200 --> 02:50:13.150 align:start position:0% right no okay okay so it's safe to say then<02:50:10.120> that<02:50:10.760> in<02:50:11.080> our<02:50:11.760> our<02:50:12.000> local<02:50:12.359> school 02:50:13.150 --> 02:50:13.160 align:start position:0% then that in our our local school 02:50:13.160 --> 02:50:16.870 align:start position:0% then that in our our local school districts<02:50:14.160> there<02:50:14.399> are<02:50:14.960> specific<02:50:15.720> people<02:50:16.720> that 02:50:16.870 --> 02:50:16.880 align:start position:0% districts there are specific people that 02:50:16.880 --> 02:50:19.750 align:start position:0% districts there are specific people that are<02:50:17.359> physically<02:50:18.080> procuring<02:50:18.840> ing 02:50:19.750 --> 02:50:19.760 align:start position:0% are physically procuring ing 02:50:19.760 --> 02:50:23.429 align:start position:0% are physically procuring ing orders<02:50:20.760> of<02:50:21.080> books<02:50:21.640> that<02:50:21.840> are<02:50:22.120> delivered<02:50:22.920> and 02:50:23.429 --> 02:50:23.439 align:start position:0% orders of books that are delivered and 02:50:23.439 --> 02:50:26.750 align:start position:0% orders of books that are delivered and received<02:50:23.960> at<02:50:24.200> their 02:50:26.750 --> 02:50:26.760 align:start position:0% 02:50:26.760 --> 02:50:29.229 align:start position:0% schools<02:50:27.760> as<02:50:27.920> opposed<02:50:28.239> to<02:50:28.560> publisher<02:50:29.000> is<02:50:29.120> that 02:50:29.229 --> 02:50:29.239 align:start position:0% schools as opposed to publisher is that 02:50:29.239 --> 02:50:31.710 align:start position:0% schools as opposed to publisher is that what<02:50:29.359> you're<02:50:29.920> you're<02:50:30.279> referencing<02:50:30.960> that<02:50:31.439> yes 02:50:31.710 --> 02:50:31.720 align:start position:0% what you're you're referencing that yes 02:50:31.720 --> 02:50:35.190 align:start position:0% what you're you're referencing that yes we<02:50:31.920> have<02:50:32.640> staff<02:50:33.120> Educators<02:50:34.080> Librarians<02:50:35.080> that 02:50:35.190 --> 02:50:35.200 align:start position:0% we have staff Educators Librarians that 02:50:35.200 --> 02:50:37.309 align:start position:0% we have staff Educators Librarians that are<02:50:35.520> purchasing<02:50:36.080> books<02:50:36.680> I<02:50:36.800> would<02:50:36.920> say<02:50:37.120> that's 02:50:37.309 --> 02:50:37.319 align:start position:0% are purchasing books I would say that's 02:50:37.319 --> 02:50:40.309 align:start position:0% are purchasing books I would say that's the<02:50:37.479> norm<02:50:38.279> it's<02:50:38.560> individuals<02:50:39.319> at<02:50:39.560> schools<02:50:40.080> and 02:50:40.309 --> 02:50:40.319 align:start position:0% the norm it's individuals at schools and 02:50:40.319 --> 02:50:42.269 align:start position:0% the norm it's individuals at schools and districts<02:50:40.800> that<02:50:40.920> are<02:50:41.080> purchasing<02:50:41.640> materials 02:50:42.269 --> 02:50:42.279 align:start position:0% districts that are purchasing materials 02:50:42.279 --> 02:50:45.990 align:start position:0% districts that are purchasing materials using<02:50:42.760> selection<02:50:43.279> criteria<02:50:44.080> policies<02:50:45.080> to<02:50:45.279> do 02:50:45.990 --> 02:50:46.000 align:start position:0% using selection criteria policies to do 02:50:46.000 --> 02:50:49.190 align:start position:0% using selection criteria policies to do so<02:50:47.000> okay 02:50:49.190 --> 02:50:49.200 align:start position:0% so okay 02:50:49.200 --> 02:50:52.070 align:start position:0% so okay thank<02:50:49.439> you<02:50:50.040> you 02:50:52.070 --> 02:50:52.080 align:start position:0% thank you you 02:50:52.080 --> 02:50:54.590 align:start position:0% thank you you bet<02:50:53.080> okay<02:50:53.239> so<02:50:53.520> I'm<02:50:53.680> good<02:50:53.840> with<02:50:53.960> the<02:50:54.080> way<02:50:54.200> it<02:50:54.319> is 02:50:54.590 --> 02:50:54.600 align:start position:0% bet okay so I'm good with the way it is 02:50:54.600 --> 02:50:56.590 align:start position:0% bet okay so I'm good with the way it is right<02:50:54.760> now<02:50:55.279> it<02:50:55.399> may<02:50:55.600> get<02:50:55.760> a<02:50:55.880> little<02:50:56.040> bit<02:50:56.200> of<02:50:56.319> a 02:50:56.590 --> 02:50:56.600 align:start position:0% right now it may get a little bit of a 02:50:56.600 --> 02:50:59.830 align:start position:0% right now it may get a little bit of a tweet<02:50:57.040> by<02:50:57.720> Next<02:50:58.720> by<02:50:58.880> board<02:50:59.120> meeting<02:50:59.520> but<02:50:59.720> I 02:50:59.830 --> 02:50:59.840 align:start position:0% tweet by Next by board meeting but I 02:50:59.840 --> 02:51:02.389 align:start position:0% tweet by Next by board meeting but I think<02:51:00.439> I'm<02:51:00.920> comfortable<02:51:01.359> with<02:51:01.560> this 02:51:02.389 --> 02:51:02.399 align:start position:0% think I'm comfortable with this 02:51:02.399 --> 02:51:06.309 align:start position:0% think I'm comfortable with this currently<02:51:03.399> great<02:51:04.080> let's<02:51:05.080> a<02:51:05.200> little<02:51:05.399> bit<02:51:06.080> and<02:51:06.239> I 02:51:06.309 --> 02:51:06.319 align:start position:0% currently great let's a little bit and I 02:51:06.319 --> 02:51:09.190 align:start position:0% currently great let's a little bit and I was<02:51:06.439> gonna<02:51:06.640> say<02:51:07.040> uh<02:51:07.239> Vice<02:51:07.760> chair<02:51:08.200> green<02:51:08.960> if<02:51:09.080> you 02:51:09.190 --> 02:51:09.200 align:start position:0% was gonna say uh Vice chair green if you 02:51:09.200 --> 02:51:11.750 align:start position:0% was gonna say uh Vice chair green if you would<02:51:09.399> like<02:51:09.920> uh<02:51:10.120> more<02:51:10.960> like<02:51:11.359> further 02:51:11.750 --> 02:51:11.760 align:start position:0% would like uh more like further 02:51:11.760 --> 02:51:14.030 align:start position:0% would like uh more like further information<02:51:12.160> on<02:51:12.319> that<02:51:12.560> question<02:51:13.560> uh<02:51:13.720> we<02:51:13.840> can 02:51:14.030 --> 02:51:14.040 align:start position:0% information on that question uh we can 02:51:14.040 --> 02:51:15.950 align:start position:0% information on that question uh we can get<02:51:14.200> some<02:51:14.520> before<02:51:14.880> the<02:51:15.040> next<02:51:15.319> meeting<02:51:15.720> we<02:51:15.840> can 02:51:15.950 --> 02:51:15.960 align:start position:0% get some before the next meeting we can 02:51:15.960 --> 02:51:17.910 align:start position:0% get some before the next meeting we can get<02:51:16.080> with<02:51:16.239> Adam<02:51:16.479> herd<02:51:16.960> as<02:51:17.120> well<02:51:17.680> about 02:51:17.910 --> 02:51:17.920 align:start position:0% get with Adam herd as well about 02:51:17.920 --> 02:51:20.190 align:start position:0% get with Adam herd as well about procurement<02:51:18.640> or<02:51:19.080> even<02:51:19.279> with<02:51:19.399> the 02:51:20.190 --> 02:51:20.200 align:start position:0% procurement or even with the 02:51:20.200 --> 02:51:22.870 align:start position:0% procurement or even with the Librarians<02:51:21.200> okay<02:51:21.840> yeah<02:51:22.040> that<02:51:22.160> would<02:51:22.319> be<02:51:22.560> great 02:51:22.870 --> 02:51:22.880 align:start position:0% Librarians okay yeah that would be great 02:51:22.880 --> 02:51:25.710 align:start position:0% Librarians okay yeah that would be great I<02:51:22.960> think<02:51:23.160> it's<02:51:23.720> yeah<02:51:24.000> that<02:51:24.120> would<02:51:24.279> be<02:51:24.439> very 02:51:25.710 --> 02:51:25.720 align:start position:0% I think it's yeah that would be very 02:51:25.720 --> 02:51:29.389 align:start position:0% I think it's yeah that would be very helpful<02:51:26.960> thanks<02:51:27.960> thank<02:51:28.120> you<02:51:28.560> right<02:51:28.920> so<02:51:29.160> the 02:51:29.389 --> 02:51:29.399 align:start position:0% helpful thanks thank you right so the 02:51:29.399 --> 02:51:33.190 align:start position:0% helpful thanks thank you right so the next<02:51:30.520> um<02:51:31.520> part<02:51:31.720> of<02:51:31.880> it<02:51:32.279> how<02:51:32.439> much<02:51:32.640> more<02:51:32.840> of<02:51:33.040> this 02:51:33.190 --> 02:51:33.200 align:start position:0% next um part of it how much more of this 02:51:33.200 --> 02:51:36.710 align:start position:0% next um part of it how much more of this do<02:51:33.359> we<02:51:33.640> have<02:51:34.640> how<02:51:34.720> many<02:51:34.920> more 02:51:36.710 --> 02:51:36.720 align:start position:0% do we have how many more 02:51:36.720 --> 02:51:39.910 align:start position:0% do we have how many more sections<02:51:37.720> okay<02:51:37.960> sensitive<02:51:38.520> material 02:51:39.910 --> 02:51:39.920 align:start position:0% sections okay sensitive material 02:51:39.920 --> 02:51:45.349 align:start position:0% sections okay sensitive material review<02:51:40.920> so<02:51:41.239> how<02:51:41.880> the<02:51:42.080> last<02:51:42.560> title<02:51:42.960> was 02:51:45.349 --> 02:51:45.359 align:start position:0% 02:51:45.359 --> 02:51:52.070 align:start position:0% what<02:51:46.359> let's<02:51:46.720> see 02:51:52.070 --> 02:51:52.080 align:start position:0% 02:51:52.080 --> 02:51:54.229 align:start position:0% oh<02:51:52.279> now<02:51:52.680> we're<02:51:53.680> yeah<02:51:53.800> it<02:51:53.840> should<02:51:54.000> have<02:51:54.080> been 02:51:54.229 --> 02:51:54.239 align:start position:0% oh now we're yeah it should have been 02:51:54.239 --> 02:51:56.190 align:start position:0% oh now we're yeah it should have been the<02:51:54.359> objective<02:51:55.279> material<02:51:55.720> review<02:51:56.000> and<02:51:56.120> this 02:51:56.190 --> 02:51:56.200 align:start position:0% the objective material review and this 02:51:56.200 --> 02:51:58.790 align:start position:0% the objective material review and this one<02:51:56.439> subjective<02:51:57.000> so<02:51:57.200> this<02:51:57.319> is<02:51:58.279> if<02:51:58.399> it<02:51:58.520> doesn't 02:51:58.790 --> 02:51:58.800 align:start position:0% one subjective so this is if it doesn't 02:51:58.800 --> 02:52:02.030 align:start position:0% one subjective so this is if it doesn't pass<02:51:59.040> the<02:51:59.120> one<02:51:59.279> it<02:51:59.399> moves<02:52:00.200> on<02:52:01.200> or<02:52:01.439> if<02:52:01.520> it<02:52:01.680> become 02:52:02.030 --> 02:52:02.040 align:start position:0% pass the one it moves on or if it become 02:52:02.040 --> 02:52:05.229 align:start position:0% pass the one it moves on or if it become if<02:52:02.160> it<02:52:02.399> is<02:52:03.319> identified<02:52:03.920> as<02:52:04.000> a<02:52:04.200> subjective<02:52:05.160> I 02:52:05.229 --> 02:52:05.239 align:start position:0% if it is identified as a subjective I 02:52:05.239 --> 02:52:07.229 align:start position:0% if it is identified as a subjective I mean<02:52:05.359> an<02:52:05.720> objective<02:52:06.439> sensitive<02:52:06.920> material 02:52:07.229 --> 02:52:07.239 align:start position:0% mean an objective sensitive material 02:52:07.239 --> 02:52:09.269 align:start position:0% mean an objective sensitive material then<02:52:07.359> it's<02:52:07.560> removed<02:52:08.560> and<02:52:08.680> if<02:52:08.840> not<02:52:09.040> then<02:52:09.160> it 02:52:09.269 --> 02:52:09.279 align:start position:0% then it's removed and if not then it 02:52:09.279 --> 02:52:10.910 align:start position:0% then it's removed and if not then it goes<02:52:09.439> through<02:52:09.760> this<02:52:10.040> process<02:52:10.399> this<02:52:10.560> is 02:52:10.910 --> 02:52:10.920 align:start position:0% goes through this process this is 02:52:10.920 --> 02:52:13.389 align:start position:0% goes through this process this is secondary<02:52:11.920> so<02:52:12.200> determine<02:52:12.640> a<02:52:12.840> transparent 02:52:13.389 --> 02:52:13.399 align:start position:0% secondary so determine a transparent 02:52:13.399 --> 02:52:14.750 align:start position:0% secondary so determine a transparent process<02:52:13.880> okay<02:52:14.000> we<02:52:14.080> need<02:52:14.200> to<02:52:14.319> include<02:52:14.640> that 02:52:14.750 --> 02:52:14.760 align:start position:0% process okay we need to include that 02:52:14.760 --> 02:52:17.070 align:start position:0% process okay we need to include that other<02:52:14.960> language<02:52:15.399> here<02:52:15.600> about<02:52:16.560> training<02:52:16.920> on 02:52:17.070 --> 02:52:17.080 align:start position:0% other language here about training on 02:52:17.080 --> 02:52:23.229 align:start position:0% other language here about training on the<02:52:17.200> Law<02:52:17.560> whatever<02:52:17.840> we<02:52:17.960> had<02:52:18.120> up<02:52:18.279> above 02:52:23.229 --> 02:52:23.239 align:start position:0% 02:52:23.239 --> 02:52:26.590 align:start position:0% so 02:52:26.590 --> 02:52:26.600 align:start position:0% 02:52:26.600 --> 02:52:29.670 align:start position:0% yep<02:52:27.600> and<02:52:27.760> then<02:52:28.160> allow<02:52:28.640> student<02:52:29.120> access<02:52:29.479> with 02:52:29.670 --> 02:52:29.680 align:start position:0% yep and then allow student access with 02:52:29.680 --> 02:52:32.510 align:start position:0% yep and then allow student access with parent<02:52:30.000> consent<02:52:30.600> that's<02:52:30.840> with<02:52:31.040> the<02:52:31.520> law 02:52:32.510 --> 02:52:32.520 align:start position:0% parent consent that's with the law 02:52:32.520 --> 02:52:34.830 align:start position:0% parent consent that's with the law determine<02:52:33.120> who<02:52:33.319> will<02:52:33.560> review<02:52:34.000> the<02:52:34.120> material 02:52:34.830 --> 02:52:34.840 align:start position:0% determine who will review the material 02:52:34.840 --> 02:52:37.190 align:start position:0% determine who will review the material ensuring<02:52:35.680> School<02:52:36.080> Community<02:52:36.560> parents<02:52:37.000> are 02:52:37.190 --> 02:52:37.200 align:start position:0% ensuring School Community parents are 02:52:37.200 --> 02:52:38.990 align:start position:0% ensuring School Community parents are included<02:52:37.600> in<02:52:37.720> the<02:52:37.960> process<02:52:38.399> and<02:52:38.560> that's<02:52:38.880> the 02:52:38.990 --> 02:52:39.000 align:start position:0% included in the process and that's the 02:52:39.000 --> 02:52:40.469 align:start position:0% included in the process and that's the only<02:52:39.160> thing<02:52:39.279> it<02:52:39.399> spells<02:52:39.720> out<02:52:39.920> there<02:52:40.040> and<02:52:40.239> each 02:52:40.469 --> 02:52:40.479 align:start position:0% only thing it spells out there and each 02:52:40.479 --> 02:52:43.550 align:start position:0% only thing it spells out there and each district<02:52:40.880> has<02:52:41.000> their<02:52:41.200> own<02:52:41.840> nuances<02:52:42.520> on<02:52:43.399> how 02:52:43.550 --> 02:52:43.560 align:start position:0% district has their own nuances on how 02:52:43.560 --> 02:52:46.910 align:start position:0% district has their own nuances on how they're<02:52:43.760> doing<02:52:44.479> that<02:52:45.479> um<02:52:46.200> and<02:52:46.319> then<02:52:46.479> use<02:52:46.720> the 02:52:46.910 --> 02:52:46.920 align:start position:0% they're doing that um and then use the 02:52:46.920 --> 02:52:49.710 align:start position:0% they're doing that um and then use the subjective<02:52:47.439> sensitive<02:52:47.880> material<02:52:48.720> standard 02:52:49.710 --> 02:52:49.720 align:start position:0% subjective sensitive material standard 02:52:49.720 --> 02:52:51.309 align:start position:0% subjective sensitive material standard and<02:52:49.840> then<02:52:50.040> I<02:52:50.160> just<02:52:50.439> put<02:52:50.600> the<02:52:50.720> standard<02:52:51.160> right 02:52:51.309 --> 02:52:51.319 align:start position:0% and then I just put the standard right 02:52:51.319 --> 02:52:52.670 align:start position:0% and then I just put the standard right there<02:52:51.479> so<02:52:51.640> it's<02:52:51.800> spelled 02:52:52.670 --> 02:52:52.680 align:start position:0% there so it's spelled 02:52:52.680 --> 02:52:56.469 align:start position:0% there so it's spelled out<02:52:53.680> um<02:52:54.399> and<02:52:54.560> then<02:52:54.720> may<02:52:54.920> use<02:52:55.200> other<02:52:55.520> criteria 02:52:56.469 --> 02:52:56.479 align:start position:0% out um and then may use other criteria 02:52:56.479 --> 02:52:59.229 align:start position:0% out um and then may use other criteria like<02:52:56.760> violence<02:52:57.160> vulgarity<02:52:57.720> self<02:52:58.120> harm<02:52:58.439> Etc<02:52:58.960> so 02:52:59.229 --> 02:52:59.239 align:start position:0% like violence vulgarity self harm Etc so 02:52:59.239 --> 02:53:02.150 align:start position:0% like violence vulgarity self harm Etc so they<02:52:59.319> can<02:52:59.520> include<02:53:00.279> more<02:53:00.600> components<02:53:01.279> into 02:53:02.150 --> 02:53:02.160 align:start position:0% they can include more components into 02:53:02.160 --> 02:53:04.710 align:start position:0% they can include more components into that<02:53:02.359> review<02:53:03.080> because<02:53:03.239> that's<02:53:03.399> a<02:53:03.720> broader 02:53:04.710 --> 02:53:04.720 align:start position:0% that review because that's a broader 02:53:04.720 --> 02:53:07.830 align:start position:0% that review because that's a broader review<02:53:05.720> um<02:53:06.600> than<02:53:06.840> the<02:53:07.120> than<02:53:07.239> the<02:53:07.359> first<02:53:07.560> ones 02:53:07.830 --> 02:53:07.840 align:start position:0% review um than the than the first ones 02:53:07.840 --> 02:53:10.469 align:start position:0% review um than the than the first ones they're<02:53:08.000> looking<02:53:08.160> for<02:53:08.640> very<02:53:08.920> specific<02:53:09.479> things 02:53:10.469 --> 02:53:10.479 align:start position:0% they're looking for very specific things 02:53:10.479 --> 02:53:12.670 align:start position:0% they're looking for very specific things um<02:53:11.479> if<02:53:11.600> the<02:53:11.760> instruction<02:53:12.160> material 02:53:12.670 --> 02:53:12.680 align:start position:0% um if the instruction material 02:53:12.680 --> 02:53:14.110 align:start position:0% um if the instruction material constitutes<02:53:13.239> subjective<02:53:13.640> sensitive 02:53:14.110 --> 02:53:14.120 align:start position:0% constitutes subjective sensitive 02:53:14.120 --> 02:53:16.190 align:start position:0% constitutes subjective sensitive material<02:53:15.080> ensure<02:53:15.479> the<02:53:15.600> material<02:53:15.960> is 02:53:16.190 --> 02:53:16.200 align:start position:0% material ensure the material is 02:53:16.200 --> 02:53:19.309 align:start position:0% material ensure the material is inaccessible<02:53:17.200> so<02:53:17.439> if<02:53:17.560> it<02:53:17.880> is<02:53:18.840> okay<02:53:19.000> so<02:53:19.160> we 02:53:19.309 --> 02:53:19.319 align:start position:0% inaccessible so if it is okay so we 02:53:19.319 --> 02:53:20.429 align:start position:0% inaccessible so if it is okay so we probably<02:53:19.640> need<02:53:19.840> if<02:53:19.960> the<02:53:20.080> instruction 02:53:20.429 --> 02:53:20.439 align:start position:0% probably need if the instruction 02:53:20.439 --> 02:53:22.229 align:start position:0% probably need if the instruction material<02:53:20.920> constitutes<02:53:21.560> so<02:53:21.720> maybe<02:53:22.040> is 02:53:22.229 --> 02:53:22.239 align:start position:0% material constitutes so maybe is 02:53:22.239 --> 02:53:24.070 align:start position:0% material constitutes so maybe is determined<02:53:23.200> because<02:53:23.399> that's<02:53:23.600> the<02:53:23.720> language 02:53:24.070 --> 02:53:24.080 align:start position:0% determined because that's the language 02:53:24.080 --> 02:53:25.469 align:start position:0% determined because that's the language we've<02:53:24.279> been 02:53:25.469 --> 02:53:25.479 align:start position:0% we've been 02:53:25.479 --> 02:53:29.710 align:start position:0% we've been using<02:53:26.479> is<02:53:26.640> determin<02:53:27.239> subject<02:53:27.960> is<02:53:28.800> if<02:53:29.000> the<02:53:29.640> how 02:53:29.710 --> 02:53:29.720 align:start position:0% using is determin subject is if the how 02:53:29.720 --> 02:53:31.110 align:start position:0% using is determin subject is if the how do<02:53:29.840> we<02:53:29.960> word<02:53:30.160> that<02:53:30.319> if<02:53:30.439> the<02:53:30.640> subjective 02:53:31.110 --> 02:53:31.120 align:start position:0% do we word that if the subjective 02:53:31.120 --> 02:53:32.830 align:start position:0% do we word that if the subjective sensitive<02:53:31.640> material 02:53:32.830 --> 02:53:32.840 align:start position:0% sensitive material 02:53:32.840 --> 02:53:36.550 align:start position:0% sensitive material is<02:53:33.840> determined<02:53:34.359> to<02:53:34.479> be<02:53:34.800> okay<02:53:35.040> that 02:53:36.550 --> 02:53:36.560 align:start position:0% is determined to be okay that 02:53:36.560 --> 02:53:39.190 align:start position:0% is determined to be okay that works<02:53:37.560> if<02:53:37.840> that's<02:53:38.080> the<02:53:38.239> case<02:53:38.520> then<02:53:38.720> it<02:53:38.920> we<02:53:39.040> need 02:53:39.190 --> 02:53:39.200 align:start position:0% works if that's the case then it we need 02:53:39.200 --> 02:53:40.309 align:start position:0% works if that's the case then it we need to<02:53:39.359> ensure<02:53:39.640> that<02:53:39.760> the<02:53:39.840> material<02:53:40.200> is 02:53:40.309 --> 02:53:40.319 align:start position:0% to ensure that the material is 02:53:40.319 --> 02:53:41.990 align:start position:0% to ensure that the material is inaccessible<02:53:40.920> to<02:53:41.080> students<02:53:41.399> in<02:53:41.520> the<02:53:41.680> school 02:53:41.990 --> 02:53:42.000 align:start position:0% inaccessible to students in the school 02:53:42.000 --> 02:53:43.710 align:start position:0% inaccessible to students in the school setting<02:53:42.479> including<02:53:42.800> the<02:53:42.920> determination<02:53:43.560> of 02:53:43.710 --> 02:53:43.720 align:start position:0% setting including the determination of 02:53:43.720 --> 02:53:46.670 align:start position:0% setting including the determination of the<02:53:43.880> parent<02:53:44.600> consent<02:53:45.600> the<02:53:45.720> Lea<02:53:46.160> design 02:53:46.670 --> 02:53:46.680 align:start position:0% the parent consent the Lea design 02:53:46.680 --> 02:53:48.590 align:start position:0% the parent consent the Lea design reports<02:53:47.080> the<02:53:47.279> determination<02:53:47.800> to<02:53:48.000> the<02:53:48.160> state 02:53:48.590 --> 02:53:48.600 align:start position:0% reports the determination to the state 02:53:48.600 --> 02:53:51.510 align:start position:0% reports the determination to the state library<02:53:49.239> media<02:53:50.239> specialist<02:53:50.760> within<02:53:51.040> 10<02:53:51.279> days 02:53:51.510 --> 02:53:51.520 align:start position:0% library media specialist within 10 days 02:53:51.520 --> 02:53:53.389 align:start position:0% library media specialist within 10 days of<02:53:51.680> the<02:53:51.920> final<02:53:52.279> determination<02:53:53.000> we<02:53:53.120> need<02:53:53.239> to 02:53:53.389 --> 02:53:53.399 align:start position:0% of the final determination we need to 02:53:53.399 --> 02:53:56.150 align:start position:0% of the final determination we need to put<02:53:53.560> the<02:53:53.720> final<02:53:54.120> in 02:53:56.150 --> 02:53:56.160 align:start position:0% put the final in 02:53:56.160 --> 02:53:58.790 align:start position:0% put the final in there<02:53:57.160> um<02:53:57.640> report<02:53:58.000> the<02:53:58.120> outcomes<02:53:58.560> to<02:53:58.720> the 02:53:58.790 --> 02:53:58.800 align:start position:0% there um report the outcomes to the 02:53:58.800 --> 02:54:00.670 align:start position:0% there um report the outcomes to the submitter<02:53:59.200> and<02:53:59.399> public<02:53:59.920> and<02:54:00.040> then<02:54:00.160> the<02:54:00.239> Ala 02:54:00.670 --> 02:54:00.680 align:start position:0% submitter and public and then the Ala 02:54:00.680 --> 02:54:02.750 align:start position:0% submitter and public and then the Ala shall<02:54:00.960> facilitate<02:54:01.520> the<02:54:01.640> prompt<02:54:02.160> return<02:54:02.560> same 02:54:02.750 --> 02:54:02.760 align:start position:0% shall facilitate the prompt return same 02:54:02.760 --> 02:54:04.710 align:start position:0% shall facilitate the prompt return same thing<02:54:02.880> as<02:54:03.040> up<02:54:03.239> above<02:54:03.479> and<02:54:03.560> then<02:54:03.640> we<02:54:03.760> need<02:54:03.920> to 02:54:04.710 --> 02:54:04.720 align:start position:0% thing as up above and then we need to 02:54:04.720 --> 02:54:09.950 align:start position:0% thing as up above and then we need to change<02:54:05.080> the<02:54:05.279> reference<02:54:05.720> from<02:54:05.920> 50<02:54:06.439> 78b<02:54:07.399> to 02:54:09.950 --> 02:54:09.960 align:start position:0% change the reference from 50 78b to 02:54:09.960 --> 02:54:12.070 align:start position:0% change the reference from 50 78b to r277<02:54:10.960> one 02:54:12.070 --> 02:54:12.080 align:start position:0% r277 one 02:54:12.080 --> 02:54:14.150 align:start position:0% r277 one 217 02:54:14.150 --> 02:54:14.160 align:start position:0% 217 02:54:14.160 --> 02:54:18.750 align:start position:0% 217 217<02:54:15.160> okay<02:54:15.600> any<02:54:16.160> questions<02:54:16.640> there 02:54:18.750 --> 02:54:18.760 align:start position:0% 217 okay any questions there 02:54:18.760 --> 02:54:20.110 align:start position:0% 217 okay any questions there that's<02:54:19.000> similar<02:54:19.319> to<02:54:19.479> the<02:54:19.560> other<02:54:19.720> one<02:54:19.920> except 02:54:20.110 --> 02:54:20.120 align:start position:0% that's similar to the other one except 02:54:20.120 --> 02:54:25.309 align:start position:0% that's similar to the other one except for<02:54:20.760> broad<02:54:21.279> changes<02:54:22.359> the<02:54:23.359> the<02:54:23.960> group<02:54:24.960> um<02:54:25.200> and 02:54:25.309 --> 02:54:25.319 align:start position:0% for broad changes the the group um and 02:54:25.319 --> 02:54:27.269 align:start position:0% for broad changes the the group um and it<02:54:25.479> also<02:54:25.800> and<02:54:25.960> adds<02:54:26.239> subjective<02:54:26.800> in<02:54:26.960> there 02:54:27.269 --> 02:54:27.279 align:start position:0% it also and adds subjective in there 02:54:27.279 --> 02:54:29.910 align:start position:0% it also and adds subjective in there right<02:54:27.920> yeah<02:54:28.120> subjective<02:54:28.720> as<02:54:28.840> well<02:54:28.960> as<02:54:29.080> it<02:54:29.600> adds 02:54:29.910 --> 02:54:29.920 align:start position:0% right yeah subjective as well as it adds 02:54:29.920 --> 02:54:34.670 align:start position:0% right yeah subjective as well as it adds that<02:54:30.239> broader<02:54:31.239> analysis<02:54:32.120> right 02:54:34.670 --> 02:54:34.680 align:start position:0% that broader analysis right 02:54:34.680 --> 02:54:38.229 align:start position:0% that broader analysis right um<02:54:35.680> okay<02:54:36.359> uh<02:54:36.560> we<02:54:36.680> need<02:54:36.920> to<02:54:37.160> take<02:54:37.359> a<02:54:37.640> five<02:54:37.920> minute 02:54:38.229 --> 02:54:38.239 align:start position:0% um okay uh we need to take a five minute 02:54:38.239 --> 02:54:43.870 align:start position:0% um okay uh we need to take a five minute break<02:54:39.239> okay<02:54:40.239> so<02:54:40.600> that<02:54:41.600> can<02:54:42.000> share<02:54:42.520> the<02:54:42.880> dock 02:54:43.870 --> 02:54:43.880 align:start position:0% break okay so that can share the dock 02:54:43.880 --> 02:54:47.750 align:start position:0% break okay so that can share the dock and<02:54:44.720> uh<02:54:45.720> so<02:54:46.239> let's<02:54:46.560> take<02:54:46.840> five<02:54:47.080> minutes<02:54:47.399> and<02:54:47.640> we 02:54:47.750 --> 02:54:47.760 align:start position:0% and uh so let's take five minutes and we 02:54:47.760 --> 02:54:49.510 align:start position:0% and uh so let's take five minutes and we will 02:54:49.510 --> 02:54:49.520 align:start position:0% will 02:54:49.520 --> 02:54:54.110 align:start position:0% will reconvene<02:54:50.520> uh<02:54:51.279> at 02:54:54.110 --> 02:54:54.120 align:start position:0% reconvene uh at 02:54:54.120 --> 02:54:57.630 align:start position:0% reconvene uh at 12 02:54:57.630 --> 02:54:57.640 align:start position:0% 02:54:57.640 --> 02:55:00.070 align:start position:0% 202<02:54:58.640> or 02:55:00.070 --> 02:55:00.080 align:start position:0% 202 or 02:55:00.080 --> 02:55:02.590 align:start position:0% 202 or thereabouts<02:55:01.080> knowing<02:55:01.600> this 02:55:02.590 --> 02:55:02.600 align:start position:0% thereabouts knowing this 02:55:02.600 --> 02:55:05.389 align:start position:0% thereabouts knowing this group<02:55:03.600> who<02:55:03.760> knows<02:55:04.040> when 02:55:05.389 --> 02:55:05.399 align:start position:0% group who knows when 02:55:05.399 --> 02:55:09.790 align:start position:0% group who knows when it'll<02:55:06.399> sounds<02:55:07.120> good<02:55:08.120> thank<02:55:08.399> you<02:55:09.200> okay<02:55:09.600> thank 02:55:09.790 --> 02:55:09.800 align:start position:0% it'll sounds good thank you okay thank 02:55:09.800 --> 02:55:17.309 align:start position:0% it'll sounds good thank you okay thank you<02:55:10.479> see<02:55:10.720> you<02:55:10.840> in 02:55:17.309 --> 02:55:17.319 align:start position:0% 02:55:17.319 --> 02:55:47.229 align:start position:0% five 02:55:47.229 --> 02:55:47.239 align:start position:0% 02:55:47.239 --> 02:56:17.229 align:start position:0% e 02:56:17.229 --> 02:56:17.239 align:start position:0% 02:56:17.239 --> 02:56:47.229 align:start position:0% e 02:56:47.229 --> 02:56:47.239 align:start position:0% 02:56:47.239 --> 02:57:17.150 align:start position:0% e 02:57:17.150 --> 02:57:17.160 align:start position:0% 02:57:17.160 --> 02:57:47.110 align:start position:0% e 02:57:47.110 --> 02:57:47.120 align:start position:0% 02:57:47.120 --> 02:58:17.110 align:start position:0% e 02:58:17.110 --> 02:58:17.120 align:start position:0% 02:58:17.120 --> 02:58:47.030 align:start position:0% e 02:58:47.030 --> 02:58:47.040 align:start position:0% 02:58:47.040 --> 02:59:17.030 align:start position:0% e 02:59:17.030 --> 02:59:17.040 align:start position:0% 02:59:17.040 --> 02:59:47.030 align:start position:0% e 02:59:47.030 --> 02:59:47.040 align:start position:0% 02:59:47.040 --> 03:00:16.950 align:start position:0% e 03:00:16.950 --> 03:00:16.960 align:start position:0% 03:00:16.960 --> 03:00:46.910 align:start position:0% e 03:00:46.910 --> 03:00:46.920 align:start position:0% 03:00:46.920 --> 03:01:16.910 align:start position:0% e 03:01:16.910 --> 03:01:16.920 align:start position:0% 03:01:16.920 --> 03:02:05.630 align:start position:0% e<03:01:17.880> e 03:02:05.630 --> 03:02:05.640 align:start position:0% 03:02:05.640 --> 03:02:09.190 align:start position:0% how<03:02:05.800> are<03:02:05.920> we<03:02:06.080> doing<03:02:06.399> are<03:02:06.520> we<03:02:06.680> getting 03:02:09.190 --> 03:02:09.200 align:start position:0% 03:02:09.200 --> 03:02:12.030 align:start position:0% close<03:02:10.200> good<03:02:10.760> I'm<03:02:10.960> back<03:02:11.160> we<03:02:11.239> are<03:02:11.479> good<03:02:11.880> thank 03:02:12.030 --> 03:02:12.040 align:start position:0% close good I'm back we are good thank 03:02:12.040 --> 03:02:14.389 align:start position:0% close good I'm back we are good thank you<03:02:12.279> everyone 03:02:14.389 --> 03:02:14.399 align:start position:0% you everyone 03:02:14.399 --> 03:02:20.389 align:start position:0% you everyone terrific<03:02:15.399> all<03:02:15.880> right<03:02:16.880> we've<03:02:17.239> got 03:02:20.389 --> 03:02:20.399 align:start position:0% 03:02:20.399 --> 03:02:26.670 align:start position:0% two<03:02:20.720> board 03:02:26.670 --> 03:02:26.680 align:start position:0% 03:02:26.680 --> 03:02:29.950 align:start position:0% members<03:02:27.680> but<03:02:27.840> I'm<03:02:27.960> not<03:02:28.160> seeing<03:02:28.800> everybody<03:02:29.399> for 03:02:29.950 --> 03:02:29.960 align:start position:0% members but I'm not seeing everybody for 03:02:29.960 --> 03:02:35.469 align:start position:0% members but I'm not seeing everybody for some<03:02:30.960> did<03:02:31.120> we<03:02:31.279> lose 03:02:35.469 --> 03:02:35.479 align:start position:0% 03:02:35.479 --> 03:02:38.630 align:start position:0% Emily<03:02:36.479> oh<03:02:36.760> I<03:02:36.880> don't 03:02:38.630 --> 03:02:38.640 align:start position:0% Emily oh I don't 03:02:38.640 --> 03:02:42.110 align:start position:0% Emily oh I don't know<03:02:39.640> I'm<03:02:40.239> here<03:02:41.239> thanks 03:02:42.110 --> 03:02:42.120 align:start position:0% know I'm here thanks 03:02:42.120 --> 03:02:44.030 align:start position:0% know I'm here thanks Sarah 03:02:44.030 --> 03:02:44.040 align:start position:0% Sarah 03:02:44.040 --> 03:02:50.229 align:start position:0% Sarah alrighty<03:02:45.040> let's<03:02:46.000> uh<03:02:47.000> continue 03:02:50.229 --> 03:02:50.239 align:start position:0% 03:02:50.239 --> 03:02:52.590 align:start position:0% where<03:02:50.439> were<03:02:50.840> we<03:02:51.840> I<03:02:51.960> think<03:02:52.080> we're<03:02:52.279> on<03:02:52.439> the 03:02:52.590 --> 03:02:52.600 align:start position:0% where were we I think we're on the 03:02:52.600 --> 03:02:54.550 align:start position:0% where were we I think we're on the subjective<03:02:53.040> senstive<03:02:53.600> materials<03:02:54.279> if<03:02:54.439> there 03:02:54.550 --> 03:02:54.560 align:start position:0% subjective senstive materials if there 03:02:54.560 --> 03:02:55.990 align:start position:0% subjective senstive materials if there was<03:02:54.800> I<03:02:54.880> don't<03:02:55.000> know<03:02:55.120> if<03:02:55.239> there's<03:02:55.520> anybody<03:02:55.880> that 03:02:55.990 --> 03:02:56.000 align:start position:0% was I don't know if there's anybody that 03:02:56.000 --> 03:03:09.510 align:start position:0% was I don't know if there's anybody that had<03:02:56.120> a<03:02:56.279> recommendation 03:03:09.510 --> 03:03:09.520 align:start position:0% 03:03:09.520 --> 03:03:12.389 align:start position:0% there<03:03:10.520> are<03:03:10.680> we<03:03:10.840> sharing<03:03:11.239> the<03:03:11.399> screen<03:03:11.800> again 03:03:12.389 --> 03:03:12.399 align:start position:0% there are we sharing the screen again 03:03:12.399 --> 03:03:15.710 align:start position:0% there are we sharing the screen again I'm<03:03:12.560> not<03:03:13.479> yeah<03:03:13.680> Elise<03:03:14.080> will<03:03:14.200> you<03:03:14.319> share<03:03:14.720> again 03:03:15.710 --> 03:03:15.720 align:start position:0% I'm not yeah Elise will you share again 03:03:15.720 --> 03:03:20.229 align:start position:0% I'm not yeah Elise will you share again thank<03:03:15.960> you 03:03:20.229 --> 03:03:20.239 align:start position:0% 03:03:20.239 --> 03:03:34.469 align:start position:0% right<03:03:20.640> thank 03:03:34.469 --> 03:03:34.479 align:start position:0% 03:03:34.479 --> 03:03:37.229 align:start position:0% you<03:03:35.479> I<03:03:35.600> didn't<03:03:35.880> have<03:03:36.040> any<03:03:36.200> other<03:03:36.399> changes<03:03:37.000> oh 03:03:37.229 --> 03:03:37.239 align:start position:0% you I didn't have any other changes oh 03:03:37.239 --> 03:03:40.229 align:start position:0% you I didn't have any other changes oh other<03:03:37.520> than<03:03:37.880> oh<03:03:38.080> yeah<03:03:38.479> OT<03:03:38.920> doesn't<03:03:39.840> nope 03:03:40.229 --> 03:03:40.239 align:start position:0% other than oh yeah OT doesn't nope 03:03:40.239 --> 03:03:41.630 align:start position:0% other than oh yeah OT doesn't nope that's<03:03:40.399> all<03:03:40.560> I<03:03:40.720> had<03:03:40.920> I'm<03:03:41.040> just<03:03:41.200> looking<03:03:41.439> back 03:03:41.630 --> 03:03:41.640 align:start position:0% that's all I had I'm just looking back 03:03:41.640 --> 03:03:44.630 align:start position:0% that's all I had I'm just looking back at<03:03:41.840> my<03:03:42.040> notes<03:03:42.439> from<03:03:42.800> what<03:03:42.920> I<03:03:43.239> sent<03:03:44.239> was<03:03:44.439> making 03:03:44.630 --> 03:03:44.640 align:start position:0% at my notes from what I sent was making 03:03:44.640 --> 03:03:46.190 align:start position:0% at my notes from what I sent was making sure<03:03:44.800> we<03:03:44.920> had<03:03:45.040> the<03:03:45.160> training<03:03:45.560> requirement<03:03:46.000> in 03:03:46.190 --> 03:03:46.200 align:start position:0% sure we had the training requirement in 03:03:46.200 --> 03:03:49.269 align:start position:0% sure we had the training requirement in there<03:03:47.160> unless<03:03:47.399> there's<03:03:48.040> that<03:03:48.479> someone<03:03:48.880> has 03:03:49.269 --> 03:03:49.279 align:start position:0% there unless there's that someone has 03:03:49.279 --> 03:03:55.910 align:start position:0% there unless there's that someone has not<03:03:49.479> we<03:03:49.600> can<03:03:49.720> go<03:03:49.840> to<03:03:50.000> the 03:03:55.910 --> 03:03:55.920 align:start position:0% 03:03:55.920 --> 03:03:58.990 align:start position:0% appeals<03:03:56.920> so<03:03:57.160> on<03:03:57.319> the<03:03:57.520> appeals<03:03:58.319> um<03:03:58.520> employee 03:03:58.990 --> 03:03:59.000 align:start position:0% appeals so on the appeals um employee 03:03:59.000 --> 03:04:00.309 align:start position:0% appeals so on the appeals um employee student<03:03:59.319> parent<03:03:59.600> and<03:03:59.760> governing<03:04:00.080> board 03:04:00.309 --> 03:04:00.319 align:start position:0% student parent and governing board 03:04:00.319 --> 03:04:02.309 align:start position:0% student parent and governing board members<03:04:00.680> of<03:04:00.800> a<03:04:00.960> relevant<03:04:01.279> Lea<03:04:01.720> May<03:04:01.920> initiate 03:04:02.309 --> 03:04:02.319 align:start position:0% members of a relevant Lea May initiate 03:04:02.319 --> 03:04:05.309 align:start position:0% members of a relevant Lea May initiate an<03:04:02.520> appeal<03:04:03.000> regardless<03:04:03.680> of<03:04:04.640> if<03:04:04.800> the<03:04:04.920> material 03:04:05.309 --> 03:04:05.319 align:start position:0% an appeal regardless of if the material 03:04:05.319 --> 03:04:06.790 align:start position:0% an appeal regardless of if the material was<03:04:05.479> retained<03:04:05.880> or<03:04:06.040> removed<03:04:06.560> this<03:04:06.640> is 03:04:06.790 --> 03:04:06.800 align:start position:0% was retained or removed this is 03:04:06.800 --> 03:04:08.950 align:start position:0% was retained or removed this is according<03:04:07.120> to<03:04:07.319> law<03:04:07.840> the<03:04:07.960> laa<03:04:08.359> governing<03:04:08.680> board 03:04:08.950 --> 03:04:08.960 align:start position:0% according to law the laa governing board 03:04:08.960 --> 03:04:11.429 align:start position:0% according to law the laa governing board reviews<03:04:09.399> the<03:04:09.560> appeal<03:04:10.479> shall<03:04:10.840> vote<03:04:11.080> in<03:04:11.239> a 03:04:11.429 --> 03:04:11.439 align:start position:0% reviews the appeal shall vote in a 03:04:11.439 --> 03:04:13.790 align:start position:0% reviews the appeal shall vote in a public<03:04:11.760> board<03:04:12.560> board<03:04:12.840> meeting<03:04:13.160> to<03:04:13.359> decide<03:04:13.680> the 03:04:13.790 --> 03:04:13.800 align:start position:0% public board board meeting to decide the 03:04:13.800 --> 03:04:16.229 align:start position:0% public board board meeting to decide the outcome<03:04:14.120> of<03:04:14.239> a<03:04:14.399> sensitive<03:04:14.960> material<03:04:15.479> review 03:04:16.229 --> 03:04:16.239 align:start position:0% outcome of a sensitive material review 03:04:16.239 --> 03:04:18.429 align:start position:0% outcome of a sensitive material review appeal<03:04:17.239> clearly 03:04:18.429 --> 03:04:18.439 align:start position:0% appeal clearly 03:04:18.439 --> 03:04:20.429 align:start position:0% appeal clearly identifying<03:04:19.439> the<03:04:19.560> board's<03:04:19.920> rationale<03:04:20.319> for 03:04:20.429 --> 03:04:20.439 align:start position:0% identifying the board's rationale for 03:04:20.439 --> 03:04:21.830 align:start position:0% identifying the board's rationale for the<03:04:20.600> decision<03:04:21.239> and<03:04:21.359> the<03:04:21.479> board's 03:04:21.830 --> 03:04:21.840 align:start position:0% the decision and the board's 03:04:21.840 --> 03:04:24.269 align:start position:0% the decision and the board's determination<03:04:22.439> for<03:04:22.720> each<03:04:23.000> component<03:04:23.439> of<03:04:23.560> the 03:04:24.269 --> 03:04:24.279 align:start position:0% determination for each component of the 03:04:24.279 --> 03:04:27.150 align:start position:0% determination for each component of the statutory<03:04:25.279> and<03:04:25.880> of<03:04:26.080> the<03:04:26.200> statutory<03:04:26.800> and<03:04:26.960> any 03:04:27.150 --> 03:04:27.160 align:start position:0% statutory and of the statutory and any 03:04:27.160 --> 03:04:28.870 align:start position:0% statutory and of the statutory and any additional<03:04:27.600> policy<03:04:27.960> standards<03:04:28.520> the<03:04:28.640> board 03:04:28.870 --> 03:04:28.880 align:start position:0% additional policy standards the board 03:04:28.880 --> 03:04:31.269 align:start position:0% additional policy standards the board uses<03:04:29.239> to<03:04:29.399> reach<03:04:29.680> the<03:04:29.800> board's 03:04:31.269 --> 03:04:31.279 align:start position:0% uses to reach the board's 03:04:31.279 --> 03:04:33.429 align:start position:0% uses to reach the board's conclusion<03:04:32.279> I<03:04:32.439> put<03:04:32.600> this<03:04:32.720> on<03:04:32.880> here<03:04:33.040> originally 03:04:33.429 --> 03:04:33.439 align:start position:0% conclusion I put this on here originally 03:04:33.439 --> 03:04:41.750 align:start position:0% conclusion I put this on here originally because<03:04:33.560> I<03:04:33.880> this<03:04:34.040> next 03:04:41.750 --> 03:04:41.760 align:start position:0% 03:04:41.760 --> 03:04:45.429 align:start position:0% PR<03:04:42.760> oh<03:04:42.920> no<03:04:43.120> she<03:04:43.279> froze<03:04:43.840> are<03:04:43.960> you<03:04:44.200> frozen<03:04:45.200> board 03:04:45.429 --> 03:04:45.439 align:start position:0% PR oh no she froze are you frozen board 03:04:45.439 --> 03:04:49.750 align:start position:0% PR oh no she froze are you frozen board member<03:04:45.680> Earl<03:04:46.120> you're<03:04:46.439> yeah<03:04:46.600> you're<03:04:46.760> Frozen 03:04:49.750 --> 03:04:49.760 align:start position:0% 03:04:49.760 --> 03:04:52.229 align:start position:0% she<03:04:49.960> gets<03:04:50.160> frozen<03:04:50.520> in<03:04:51.120> decent<03:04:51.479> looking<03:04:51.800> faces 03:04:52.229 --> 03:04:52.239 align:start position:0% she gets frozen in decent looking faces 03:04:52.239 --> 03:04:53.950 align:start position:0% she gets frozen in decent looking faces I<03:04:52.359> always<03:04:52.520> get<03:04:52.640> Frozen<03:04:52.960> in<03:04:53.120> weird<03:04:53.359> ones<03:04:53.840> you 03:04:53.950 --> 03:04:53.960 align:start position:0% I always get Frozen in weird ones you 03:04:53.960 --> 03:04:56.790 align:start position:0% I always get Frozen in weird ones you look<03:04:54.319> very<03:04:54.720> sophisticated<03:04:55.479> though<03:04:55.720> I<03:04:55.880> know<03:04:56.560> um 03:04:56.790 --> 03:04:56.800 align:start position:0% look very sophisticated though I know um 03:04:56.800 --> 03:04:58.990 align:start position:0% look very sophisticated though I know um all<03:04:56.960> of<03:04:57.200> this<03:04:57.600> is<03:04:57.840> the<03:04:58.040> new<03:04:58.600> Final 03:04:58.990 --> 03:04:59.000 align:start position:0% all of this is the new Final 03:04:59.000 --> 03:05:00.790 align:start position:0% all of this is the new Final determination<03:04:59.880> we<03:04:59.960> need<03:05:00.080> to<03:05:00.239> use<03:05:00.520> that 03:05:00.790 --> 03:05:00.800 align:start position:0% determination we need to use that 03:05:00.800 --> 03:05:04.110 align:start position:0% determination we need to use that language<03:05:01.760> of<03:05:01.960> the<03:05:02.520> appeal<03:05:03.520> you<03:05:03.720> might<03:05:03.880> have<03:05:04.000> to 03:05:04.110 --> 03:05:04.120 align:start position:0% language of the appeal you might have to 03:05:04.120 --> 03:05:05.870 align:start position:0% language of the appeal you might have to start<03:05:04.359> over<03:05:04.720> because<03:05:04.840> you<03:05:04.960> were<03:05:05.160> frozen<03:05:05.600> for<03:05:05.760> a 03:05:05.870 --> 03:05:05.880 align:start position:0% start over because you were frozen for a 03:05:05.880 --> 03:05:08.910 align:start position:0% start over because you were frozen for a long<03:05:06.160> time<03:05:06.439> oh<03:05:06.880> my<03:05:07.080> goodness<03:05:07.720> thank<03:05:07.920> you<03:05:08.080> so 03:05:08.910 --> 03:05:08.920 align:start position:0% long time oh my goodness thank you so 03:05:08.920 --> 03:05:12.630 align:start position:0% long time oh my goodness thank you so sorry<03:05:09.920> okay<03:05:10.120> tell<03:05:10.319> me<03:05:10.479> where<03:05:10.640> I<03:05:10.760> was<03:05:10.920> at<03:05:11.239> so<03:05:12.239> I 03:05:12.630 --> 03:05:12.640 align:start position:0% sorry okay tell me where I was at so I 03:05:12.640 --> 03:05:14.630 align:start position:0% sorry okay tell me where I was at so I we<03:05:12.800> need<03:05:13.000> to<03:05:13.239> probably<03:05:14.000> originally<03:05:14.439> when<03:05:14.560> I 03:05:14.630 --> 03:05:14.640 align:start position:0% we need to probably originally when I 03:05:14.640 --> 03:05:16.150 align:start position:0% we need to probably originally when I was<03:05:14.800> looking<03:05:15.040> at<03:05:15.200> that<03:05:15.359> appeal<03:05:15.800> piece<03:05:16.000> I<03:05:16.080> was 03:05:16.150 --> 03:05:16.160 align:start position:0% was looking at that appeal piece I was 03:05:16.160 --> 03:05:17.990 align:start position:0% was looking at that appeal piece I was trying<03:05:16.359> to<03:05:16.479> figure<03:05:16.680> out<03:05:16.920> how<03:05:17.800> that 03:05:17.990 --> 03:05:18.000 align:start position:0% trying to figure out how that 03:05:18.000 --> 03:05:20.630 align:start position:0% trying to figure out how that notification<03:05:18.800> came<03:05:19.439> about<03:05:19.840> so<03:05:20.040> I<03:05:20.160> think<03:05:20.359> that 03:05:20.630 --> 03:05:20.640 align:start position:0% notification came about so I think that 03:05:20.640 --> 03:05:22.550 align:start position:0% notification came about so I think that may<03:05:21.080> contact<03:05:21.520> State<03:05:21.760> Board<03:05:22.000> member<03:05:22.279> can<03:05:22.399> be 03:05:22.550 --> 03:05:22.560 align:start position:0% may contact State Board member can be 03:05:22.560 --> 03:05:24.389 align:start position:0% may contact State Board member can be taken<03:05:22.840> off<03:05:23.120> it<03:05:23.239> doesn't<03:05:23.600> fit 03:05:24.389 --> 03:05:24.399 align:start position:0% taken off it doesn't fit 03:05:24.399 --> 03:05:27.630 align:start position:0% taken off it doesn't fit under<03:05:25.399> uh<03:05:25.680> clearly<03:05:26.160> identifying<03:05:27.160> it<03:05:27.279> doesn't 03:05:27.630 --> 03:05:27.640 align:start position:0% under uh clearly identifying it doesn't 03:05:27.640 --> 03:05:31.950 align:start position:0% under uh clearly identifying it doesn't work<03:05:28.200> there<03:05:29.200> so<03:05:29.479> that<03:05:29.640> can<03:05:29.800> be<03:05:30.319> removed<03:05:31.319> um<03:05:31.760> but 03:05:31.950 --> 03:05:31.960 align:start position:0% work there so that can be removed um but 03:05:31.960 --> 03:05:36.870 align:start position:0% work there so that can be removed um but I<03:05:32.120> would<03:05:32.520> add<03:05:33.520> something<03:05:33.960> about<03:05:34.279> sending<03:05:35.200> the 03:05:36.870 --> 03:05:36.880 align:start position:0% I would add something about sending the 03:05:36.880 --> 03:05:41.429 align:start position:0% I would add something about sending the um<03:05:37.880> final<03:05:38.479> determination<03:05:39.479> to<03:05:40.359> the<03:05:41.000> that<03:05:41.279> that 03:05:41.429 --> 03:05:41.439 align:start position:0% um final determination to the that that 03:05:41.439 --> 03:05:48.510 align:start position:0% um final determination to the that that piece<03:05:42.120> wherever<03:05:42.479> we<03:05:42.680> have<03:05:42.960> that 03:05:48.510 --> 03:05:48.520 align:start position:0% 03:05:48.520 --> 03:05:54.790 align:start position:0% within<03:05:48.920> 10<03:05:49.239> days<03:05:49.479> and<03:05:49.680> all<03:05:49.880> that<03:05:50.080> stuff<03:05:51.080> like 03:05:54.790 --> 03:05:54.800 align:start position:0% 03:05:54.800 --> 03:06:20.950 align:start position:0% before<03:05:55.800> the<03:05:56.000> determination 03:06:20.950 --> 03:06:20.960 align:start position:0% 03:06:20.960 --> 03:06:23.150 align:start position:0% I<03:06:21.080> think<03:06:21.239> she's<03:06:21.479> Frozen<03:06:21.960> again<03:06:22.600> my<03:06:22.840> question 03:06:23.150 --> 03:06:23.160 align:start position:0% I think she's Frozen again my question 03:06:23.160 --> 03:06:24.469 align:start position:0% I think she's Frozen again my question while<03:06:23.359> we're<03:06:23.520> waiting<03:06:23.720> for<03:06:23.800> her<03:06:23.920> to<03:06:24.040> come<03:06:24.239> back 03:06:24.469 --> 03:06:24.479 align:start position:0% while we're waiting for her to come back 03:06:24.479 --> 03:06:26.349 align:start position:0% while we're waiting for her to come back are<03:06:24.720> all<03:06:24.840> of<03:06:25.040> these<03:06:25.200> the<03:06:25.359> new<03:06:25.640> pieces<03:06:26.040> from<03:06:26.239> the 03:06:26.349 --> 03:06:26.359 align:start position:0% are all of these the new pieces from the 03:06:26.359 --> 03:06:30.429 align:start position:0% are all of these the new pieces from the new 03:06:30.429 --> 03:06:30.439 align:start position:0% 03:06:30.439 --> 03:06:33.070 align:start position:0% law<03:06:31.439> the<03:06:31.640> appeals<03:06:32.120> process<03:06:32.520> section<03:06:32.840> is<03:06:32.960> that 03:06:33.070 --> 03:06:33.080 align:start position:0% law the appeals process section is that 03:06:33.080 --> 03:06:34.790 align:start position:0% law the appeals process section is that all 03:06:34.790 --> 03:06:34.800 align:start position:0% all 03:06:34.800 --> 03:06:40.950 align:start position:0% all new<03:06:35.800> and<03:06:35.960> she's<03:06:36.239> still 03:06:40.950 --> 03:06:40.960 align:start position:0% 03:06:40.960 --> 03:06:44.830 align:start position:0% frozen<03:06:41.960> and<03:06:42.399> Sarah<03:06:42.840> I<03:06:42.920> don't<03:06:43.160> know<03:06:44.120> if<03:06:44.319> this<03:06:44.479> is 03:06:44.830 --> 03:06:44.840 align:start position:0% frozen and Sarah I don't know if this is 03:06:44.840 --> 03:06:50.269 align:start position:0% frozen and Sarah I don't know if this is new<03:06:45.560> specifically<03:06:46.560> I'm<03:06:46.720> so<03:06:46.960> sorry 03:06:50.269 --> 03:06:50.279 align:start position:0% 03:06:50.279 --> 03:06:51.990 align:start position:0% I<03:06:50.359> believe<03:06:50.680> some<03:06:50.840> of<03:06:50.960> it<03:06:51.200> is<03:06:51.399> and<03:06:51.560> some<03:06:51.720> of<03:06:51.840> it 03:06:51.990 --> 03:06:52.000 align:start position:0% I believe some of it is and some of it 03:06:52.000 --> 03:06:53.150 align:start position:0% I believe some of it is and some of it is 03:06:53.150 --> 03:06:53.160 align:start position:0% is 03:06:53.160 --> 03:06:57.110 align:start position:0% is not<03:06:54.160> which<03:06:54.279> is<03:06:54.640> totally 03:06:57.110 --> 03:06:57.120 align:start position:0% 03:06:57.120 --> 03:07:01.590 align:start position:0% unhelpful<03:06:58.120> thank 03:07:01.590 --> 03:07:01.600 align:start position:0% 03:07:01.600 --> 03:07:06.670 align:start position:0% you<03:07:02.600> so<03:07:03.359> hi<03:07:03.840> I'm<03:07:04.080> back 03:07:06.670 --> 03:07:06.680 align:start position:0% you so hi I'm back 03:07:06.680 --> 03:07:11.469 align:start position:0% you so hi I'm back sorry<03:07:07.680> okay<03:07:08.439> before<03:07:09.080> before<03:07:09.359> it<03:07:10.200> said<03:07:11.200> before 03:07:11.469 --> 03:07:11.479 align:start position:0% sorry okay before before it said before 03:07:11.479 --> 03:07:13.269 align:start position:0% sorry okay before before it said before it<03:07:11.640> said<03:07:11.960> parents<03:07:12.279> who<03:07:12.399> are<03:07:12.640> reflective<03:07:13.120> of 03:07:13.269 --> 03:07:13.279 align:start position:0% it said parents who are reflective of 03:07:13.279 --> 03:07:15.830 align:start position:0% it said parents who are reflective of the<03:07:13.439> members<03:07:13.800> of<03:07:13.960> the<03:07:14.080> school's<03:07:14.840> Community 03:07:15.830 --> 03:07:15.840 align:start position:0% the members of the school's Community 03:07:15.840 --> 03:07:17.670 align:start position:0% the members of the school's Community were<03:07:16.239> supposed<03:07:16.560> to<03:07:16.640> be<03:07:16.840> part<03:07:17.000> of<03:07:17.120> it<03:07:17.319> but<03:07:17.600> they 03:07:17.670 --> 03:07:17.680 align:start position:0% were supposed to be part of it but they 03:07:17.680 --> 03:07:19.590 align:start position:0% were supposed to be part of it but they were<03:07:17.920> part<03:07:18.120> of<03:07:18.319> the<03:07:18.560> sensitive<03:07:19.000> materials 03:07:19.590 --> 03:07:19.600 align:start position:0% were part of the sensitive materials 03:07:19.600 --> 03:07:21.870 align:start position:0% were part of the sensitive materials review<03:07:20.040> not<03:07:20.279> the<03:07:20.520> subjective<03:07:21.279> sensitive 03:07:21.870 --> 03:07:21.880 align:start position:0% review not the subjective sensitive 03:07:21.880 --> 03:07:24.870 align:start position:0% review not the subjective sensitive material<03:07:22.479> review<03:07:23.040> and<03:07:23.160> so<03:07:23.439> that's<03:07:23.720> why<03:07:24.439> Elise 03:07:24.870 --> 03:07:24.880 align:start position:0% material review and so that's why Elise 03:07:24.880 --> 03:07:26.750 align:start position:0% material review and so that's why Elise is<03:07:25.040> saying<03:07:25.359> part<03:07:25.600> of<03:07:25.760> it<03:07:25.920> is<03:07:26.080> new<03:07:26.319> and<03:07:26.479> part<03:07:26.640> of 03:07:26.750 --> 03:07:26.760 align:start position:0% is saying part of it is new and part of 03:07:26.760 --> 03:07:30.229 align:start position:0% is saying part of it is new and part of it<03:07:26.920> is<03:07:27.640> not<03:07:28.640> okay<03:07:29.600> yeah<03:07:29.760> I<03:07:29.840> just<03:07:29.920> want<03:07:30.040> to 03:07:30.229 --> 03:07:30.239 align:start position:0% it is not okay yeah I just want to 03:07:30.239 --> 03:07:31.830 align:start position:0% it is not okay yeah I just want to designate<03:07:30.760> which<03:07:30.920> parts<03:07:31.160> are<03:07:31.319> new<03:07:31.520> so<03:07:31.680> they 03:07:31.830 --> 03:07:31.840 align:start position:0% designate which parts are new so they 03:07:31.840 --> 03:07:33.229 align:start position:0% designate which parts are new so they know<03:07:32.040> which<03:07:32.239> parts<03:07:32.439> of<03:07:32.560> their<03:07:32.760> policy<03:07:33.080> to 03:07:33.229 --> 03:07:33.239 align:start position:0% know which parts of their policy to 03:07:33.239 --> 03:07:35.750 align:start position:0% know which parts of their policy to update<03:07:33.720> now<03:07:33.920> we<03:07:34.000> need<03:07:34.120> to<03:07:34.279> go<03:07:34.520> back<03:07:34.880> and<03:07:35.239> do<03:07:35.520> the 03:07:35.750 --> 03:07:35.760 align:start position:0% update now we need to go back and do the 03:07:35.760 --> 03:07:38.349 align:start position:0% update now we need to go back and do the highlights<03:07:36.239> that<03:07:36.439> we<03:07:36.760> started<03:07:37.760> a<03:07:37.920> long<03:07:38.160> time 03:07:38.349 --> 03:07:38.359 align:start position:0% highlights that we started a long time 03:07:38.359 --> 03:07:40.950 align:start position:0% highlights that we started a long time ago<03:07:38.880> and<03:07:39.000> then<03:07:39.160> we<03:07:39.319> kind<03:07:39.439> of<03:07:39.600> got<03:07:40.000> sidetracked 03:07:40.950 --> 03:07:40.960 align:start position:0% ago and then we kind of got sidetracked 03:07:40.960 --> 03:07:42.830 align:start position:0% ago and then we kind of got sidetracked and<03:07:41.080> I'd<03:07:41.279> also<03:07:41.600> trust<03:07:42.080> staff<03:07:42.359> to<03:07:42.479> do<03:07:42.640> that 03:07:42.830 --> 03:07:42.840 align:start position:0% and I'd also trust staff to do that 03:07:42.840 --> 03:07:45.349 align:start position:0% and I'd also trust staff to do that after<03:07:43.279> staff<03:07:43.520> could<03:07:43.640> do<03:07:43.880> that<03:07:44.399> most<03:07:44.640> of<03:07:44.760> it<03:07:45.080> is 03:07:45.349 --> 03:07:45.359 align:start position:0% after staff could do that most of it is 03:07:45.359 --> 03:07:46.830 align:start position:0% after staff could do that most of it is highlighted<03:07:45.880> there's<03:07:46.080> just<03:07:46.200> a<03:07:46.319> handful<03:07:46.720> of 03:07:46.830 --> 03:07:46.840 align:start position:0% highlighted there's just a handful of 03:07:46.840 --> 03:07:47.990 align:start position:0% highlighted there's just a handful of things<03:07:47.000> that<03:07:47.120> aren't 03:07:47.990 --> 03:07:48.000 align:start position:0% things that aren't 03:07:48.000 --> 03:07:52.830 align:start position:0% things that aren't so<03:07:49.000> excellent<03:07:49.520> point<03:07:50.439> we<03:07:50.800> certainly<03:07:51.800> trust 03:07:52.830 --> 03:07:52.840 align:start position:0% so excellent point we certainly trust 03:07:52.840 --> 03:07:56.070 align:start position:0% so excellent point we certainly trust staff<03:07:53.840> they're<03:07:54.319> awesome<03:07:55.319> okay<03:07:55.640> and<03:07:55.760> then<03:07:55.920> the 03:07:56.070 --> 03:07:56.080 align:start position:0% staff they're awesome okay and then the 03:07:56.080 --> 03:07:57.630 align:start position:0% staff they're awesome okay and then the other<03:07:56.399> part<03:07:56.560> of<03:07:56.720> this<03:07:56.840> so<03:07:57.040> the<03:07:57.160> end<03:07:57.319> of<03:07:57.479> this 03:07:57.630 --> 03:07:57.640 align:start position:0% other part of this so the end of this 03:07:57.640 --> 03:07:59.750 align:start position:0% other part of this so the end of this would<03:07:57.760> be<03:07:57.920> the<03:07:58.000> laa<03:07:58.399> governing<03:07:58.720> board<03:07:59.000> may<03:07:59.200> not 03:07:59.750 --> 03:07:59.760 align:start position:0% would be the laa governing board may not 03:07:59.760 --> 03:08:01.550 align:start position:0% would be the laa governing board may not enact<03:08:00.239> rules<03:08:00.520> or<03:08:00.720> policies<03:08:01.080> that<03:08:01.239> prevent<03:08:01.479> the 03:08:01.550 --> 03:08:01.560 align:start position:0% enact rules or policies that prevent the 03:08:01.560 --> 03:08:03.150 align:start position:0% enact rules or policies that prevent the LA<03:08:01.880> governing<03:08:02.160> board<03:08:02.399> from<03:08:02.680> and<03:08:02.800> then<03:08:02.920> it 03:08:03.150 --> 03:08:03.160 align:start position:0% LA governing board from and then it 03:08:03.160 --> 03:08:04.790 align:start position:0% LA governing board from and then it lists<03:08:03.520> those<03:08:03.760> three<03:08:04.000> things<03:08:04.279> there<03:08:04.520> which<03:08:04.640> are 03:08:04.790 --> 03:08:04.800 align:start position:0% lists those three things there which are 03:08:04.800 --> 03:08:05.870 align:start position:0% lists those three things there which are also<03:08:05.040> in<03:08:05.160> our 03:08:05.870 --> 03:08:05.880 align:start position:0% also in our 03:08:05.880 --> 03:08:08.830 align:start position:0% also in our rule<03:08:06.960> so<03:08:07.960> and<03:08:08.080> then<03:08:08.239> the<03:08:08.359> other<03:08:08.600> because<03:08:08.760> I'm 03:08:08.830 --> 03:08:08.840 align:start position:0% rule so and then the other because I'm 03:08:08.840 --> 03:08:10.950 align:start position:0% rule so and then the other because I'm trying<03:08:09.040> to<03:08:09.160> think<03:08:09.319> what<03:08:09.439> an<03:08:09.560> Lea<03:08:10.000> needs<03:08:10.279> to<03:08:10.439> do 03:08:10.950 --> 03:08:10.960 align:start position:0% trying to think what an Lea needs to do 03:08:10.960 --> 03:08:12.590 align:start position:0% trying to think what an Lea needs to do not<03:08:11.200> what<03:08:11.319> we<03:08:11.560> need<03:08:11.680> to<03:08:11.840> do<03:08:12.040> but<03:08:12.279> on<03:08:12.439> the 03:08:12.590 --> 03:08:12.600 align:start position:0% not what we need to do but on the 03:08:12.600 --> 03:08:14.630 align:start position:0% not what we need to do but on the Statewide<03:08:13.200> remove<03:08:13.720> well<03:08:14.080> actually<03:08:14.520> if 03:08:14.630 --> 03:08:14.640 align:start position:0% Statewide remove well actually if 03:08:14.640 --> 03:08:16.429 align:start position:0% Statewide remove well actually if there's<03:08:14.840> any<03:08:15.399> I'll<03:08:15.640> wait<03:08:15.960> if<03:08:16.080> there's<03:08:16.279> any 03:08:16.429 --> 03:08:16.439 align:start position:0% there's any I'll wait if there's any 03:08:16.439 --> 03:08:20.309 align:start position:0% there's any I'll wait if there's any changes<03:08:16.800> in<03:08:17.000> that 03:08:20.309 --> 03:08:20.319 align:start position:0% 03:08:20.319 --> 03:08:21.150 align:start position:0% any 03:08:21.150 --> 03:08:21.160 align:start position:0% any 03:08:21.160 --> 03:08:26.110 align:start position:0% any changes<03:08:22.160> sing<03:08:22.720> No<03:08:23.720> Okay<03:08:24.560> hands<03:08:24.960> we<03:08:25.080> can<03:08:25.239> go<03:08:25.359> on 03:08:26.110 --> 03:08:26.120 align:start position:0% changes sing No Okay hands we can go on 03:08:26.120 --> 03:08:28.309 align:start position:0% changes sing No Okay hands we can go on okay<03:08:26.319> and<03:08:26.439> then<03:08:26.560> on<03:08:26.720> the<03:08:26.880> Statewide<03:08:27.439> REM<03:08:28.040> State 03:08:28.309 --> 03:08:28.319 align:start position:0% okay and then on the Statewide REM State 03:08:28.319 --> 03:08:31.269 align:start position:0% okay and then on the Statewide REM State superintendent<03:08:29.120> will<03:08:29.359> notify<03:08:29.960> local<03:08:30.279> elas<03:08:31.120> of 03:08:31.269 --> 03:08:31.279 align:start position:0% superintendent will notify local elas of 03:08:31.279 --> 03:08:33.630 align:start position:0% superintendent will notify local elas of a<03:08:31.439> Statewide<03:08:31.880> removal<03:08:32.399> of<03:08:32.680> sensitive 03:08:33.630 --> 03:08:33.640 align:start position:0% a Statewide removal of sensitive 03:08:33.640 --> 03:08:35.910 align:start position:0% a Statewide removal of sensitive material<03:08:34.120> within<03:08:34.399> 10<03:08:34.680> days<03:08:34.920> of<03:08:35.040> the<03:08:35.200> threshold 03:08:35.910 --> 03:08:35.920 align:start position:0% material within 10 days of the threshold 03:08:35.920 --> 03:08:37.710 align:start position:0% material within 10 days of the threshold oh<03:08:36.239> of<03:08:36.399> the<03:08:36.520> threshold<03:08:37.040> be<03:08:37.279> yes<03:08:37.479> of<03:08:37.600> the 03:08:37.710 --> 03:08:37.720 align:start position:0% oh of the threshold be yes of the 03:08:37.720 --> 03:08:38.990 align:start position:0% oh of the threshold be yes of the threshold<03:08:38.160> being 03:08:38.990 --> 03:08:39.000 align:start position:0% threshold being 03:08:39.000 --> 03:08:40.830 align:start position:0% threshold being met 03:08:40.830 --> 03:08:40.840 align:start position:0% met 03:08:40.840 --> 03:08:43.349 align:start position:0% met um<03:08:41.840> and<03:08:41.960> I<03:08:42.080> put<03:08:42.279> State<03:08:42.560> superintendent<03:08:43.160> that's 03:08:43.349 --> 03:08:43.359 align:start position:0% um and I put State superintendent that's 03:08:43.359 --> 03:08:45.190 align:start position:0% um and I put State superintendent that's probably<03:08:43.640> where<03:08:43.760> it<03:08:43.840> needs<03:08:44.120> to<03:08:44.479> stay<03:08:45.080> would 03:08:45.190 --> 03:08:45.200 align:start position:0% probably where it needs to stay would 03:08:45.200 --> 03:08:48.030 align:start position:0% probably where it needs to stay would you<03:08:45.399> agree<03:08:45.880> instead<03:08:46.239> the<03:08:46.319> library<03:08:46.800> specialist 03:08:48.030 --> 03:08:48.040 align:start position:0% you agree instead the library specialist 03:08:48.040 --> 03:08:49.990 align:start position:0% you agree instead the library specialist because<03:08:48.200> it<03:08:48.359> could<03:08:48.520> be<03:08:48.920> it<03:08:49.080> could<03:08:49.279> be<03:08:49.520> someone 03:08:49.990 --> 03:08:50.000 align:start position:0% because it could be it could be someone 03:08:50.000 --> 03:08:54.830 align:start position:0% because it could be it could be someone besides<03:08:50.520> deina<03:08:51.040> that<03:08:51.680> notifies 03:08:54.830 --> 03:08:54.840 align:start position:0% 03:08:54.840 --> 03:08:57.150 align:start position:0% right<03:08:55.840> I<03:08:56.080> I<03:08:56.160> don't<03:08:56.319> know<03:08:56.560> does<03:08:56.720> it<03:08:56.880> should<03:08:57.040> we 03:08:57.150 --> 03:08:57.160 align:start position:0% right I I don't know does it should we 03:08:57.160 --> 03:08:58.389 align:start position:0% right I I don't know does it should we just<03:08:57.279> leave<03:08:57.479> State 03:08:58.389 --> 03:08:58.399 align:start position:0% just leave State 03:08:58.399 --> 03:09:00.630 align:start position:0% just leave State superintendent<03:08:59.399> or<03:08:59.600> do<03:08:59.760> we<03:08:59.880> want<03:09:00.160> that<03:09:00.319> more 03:09:00.630 --> 03:09:00.640 align:start position:0% superintendent or do we want that more 03:09:00.640 --> 03:09:06.110 align:start position:0% superintendent or do we want that more specific<03:09:01.120> I<03:09:01.239> guess<03:09:01.399> is<03:09:01.560> my 03:09:06.110 --> 03:09:06.120 align:start position:0% 03:09:06.120 --> 03:09:08.150 align:start position:0% question<03:09:07.120> I<03:09:07.239> would<03:09:07.439> think<03:09:07.600> you<03:09:07.720> would<03:09:07.920> want<03:09:08.040> it 03:09:08.150 --> 03:09:08.160 align:start position:0% question I would think you would want it 03:09:08.160 --> 03:09:10.070 align:start position:0% question I would think you would want it to<03:09:08.279> be<03:09:08.479> State<03:09:08.840> superintendent<03:09:09.640> so<03:09:09.800> that<03:09:10.000> they 03:09:10.070 --> 03:09:10.080 align:start position:0% to be State superintendent so that they 03:09:10.080 --> 03:09:12.190 align:start position:0% to be State superintendent so that they could<03:09:10.239> do<03:09:10.399> it<03:09:10.560> through<03:09:10.760> their<03:09:11.080> Communications 03:09:12.190 --> 03:09:12.200 align:start position:0% could do it through their Communications 03:09:12.200 --> 03:09:16.630 align:start position:0% could do it through their Communications policy<03:09:13.200> okay<03:09:14.160> okay<03:09:15.160> thank<03:09:15.319> you<03:09:15.520> and<03:09:15.680> then<03:09:16.560> the 03:09:16.630 --> 03:09:16.640 align:start position:0% policy okay okay thank you and then the 03:09:16.640 --> 03:09:18.830 align:start position:0% policy okay okay thank you and then the Lea<03:09:17.000> notific<03:09:17.520> a<03:09:17.680> for<03:09:17.840> Statewide<03:09:18.319> removal<03:09:18.720> of 03:09:18.830 --> 03:09:18.840 align:start position:0% Lea notific a for Statewide removal of 03:09:18.840 --> 03:09:20.950 align:start position:0% Lea notific a for Statewide removal of senstive<03:09:19.200> materials<03:09:19.560> applies<03:09:19.800> to<03:09:19.960> all<03:09:20.080> leas 03:09:20.950 --> 03:09:20.960 align:start position:0% senstive materials applies to all leas 03:09:20.960 --> 03:09:23.550 align:start position:0% senstive materials applies to all leas and<03:09:21.160> all<03:09:21.359> School<03:09:21.840> settings<03:09:22.840> if<03:09:23.040> the<03:09:23.239> St 03:09:23.550 --> 03:09:23.560 align:start position:0% and all School settings if the St 03:09:23.560 --> 03:09:25.630 align:start position:0% and all School settings if the St Statewide<03:09:24.080> removal<03:09:24.479> is<03:09:24.600> overturned<03:09:25.479> as 03:09:25.630 --> 03:09:25.640 align:start position:0% Statewide removal is overturned as 03:09:25.640 --> 03:09:29.790 align:start position:0% Statewide removal is overturned as outlined<03:09:26.080> in<03:09:26.840> our<03:09:27.319> code<03:09:28.319> um<03:09:28.800> an<03:09:28.960> Ela<03:09:29.439> shall 03:09:29.790 --> 03:09:29.800 align:start position:0% outlined in our code um an Ela shall 03:09:29.800 --> 03:09:32.710 align:start position:0% outlined in our code um an Ela shall choose<03:09:30.120> to<03:09:30.920> may<03:09:31.200> choose<03:09:31.520> to<03:09:31.840> return<03:09:32.080> the<03:09:32.399> given 03:09:32.710 --> 03:09:32.720 align:start position:0% choose to may choose to return the given 03:09:32.720 --> 03:09:36.309 align:start position:0% choose to may choose to return the given material<03:09:33.080> to<03:09:33.359> student<03:09:33.800> access<03:09:34.319> or<03:09:34.880> may<03:09:35.319> choose 03:09:36.309 --> 03:09:36.319 align:start position:0% material to student access or may choose 03:09:36.319 --> 03:09:38.110 align:start position:0% material to student access or may choose to<03:09:36.560> uphold<03:09:36.880> their<03:09:37.040> determination<03:09:37.640> to<03:09:37.840> remove 03:09:38.110 --> 03:09:38.120 align:start position:0% to uphold their determination to remove 03:09:38.120 --> 03:09:39.630 align:start position:0% to uphold their determination to remove a<03:09:38.279> sensitive<03:09:38.720> material<03:09:39.080> from<03:09:39.239> the<03:09:39.359> school 03:09:39.630 --> 03:09:39.640 align:start position:0% a sensitive material from the school 03:09:39.640 --> 03:09:41.510 align:start position:0% a sensitive material from the school setting<03:09:40.040> in<03:09:40.200> their 03:09:41.510 --> 03:09:41.520 align:start position:0% setting in their 03:09:41.520 --> 03:09:45.150 align:start position:0% setting in their Lea<03:09:42.520> so<03:09:42.920> those<03:09:43.080> are<03:09:43.239> the<03:09:43.399> options<03:09:43.760> and 03:09:45.150 --> 03:09:45.160 align:start position:0% Lea so those are the options and 03:09:45.160 --> 03:09:47.790 align:start position:0% Lea so those are the options and that's<03:09:46.160> that's<03:09:46.520> the<03:09:46.680> items<03:09:47.000> I<03:09:47.160> have<03:09:47.520> unless 03:09:47.790 --> 03:09:47.800 align:start position:0% that's that's the items I have unless 03:09:47.800 --> 03:09:56.990 align:start position:0% that's that's the items I have unless anybody<03:09:48.160> else<03:09:48.439> had<03:09:48.600> something<03:09:48.800> to<03:09:49.040> add<03:09:49.239> to 03:09:56.990 --> 03:09:57.000 align:start position:0% 03:09:57.000 --> 03:09:59.830 align:start position:0% it<03:09:58.000> I<03:09:58.479> I<03:09:58.560> think<03:09:58.720> it<03:09:58.840> looks 03:09:59.830 --> 03:09:59.840 align:start position:0% it I I think it looks 03:09:59.840 --> 03:10:03.190 align:start position:0% it I I think it looks good<03:10:00.840> okay<03:10:01.040> we<03:10:01.160> could<03:10:01.399> probably<03:10:01.840> vote 03:10:03.190 --> 03:10:03.200 align:start position:0% good okay we could probably vote 03:10:03.200 --> 03:10:04.910 align:start position:0% good okay we could probably vote then<03:10:04.200> all 03:10:04.910 --> 03:10:04.920 align:start position:0% then all 03:10:04.920 --> 03:10:07.710 align:start position:0% then all right<03:10:05.920> you<03:10:06.080> want<03:10:06.239> to<03:10:06.439> make<03:10:06.600> a<03:10:06.720> motion<03:10:07.479> yeah 03:10:07.710 --> 03:10:07.720 align:start position:0% right you want to make a motion yeah 03:10:07.720 --> 03:10:09.510 align:start position:0% right you want to make a motion yeah I'll<03:10:07.880> make<03:10:08.040> a<03:10:08.200> motion<03:10:08.640> that<03:10:08.880> we<03:10:09.120> what<03:10:09.200> did<03:10:09.359> we 03:10:09.510 --> 03:10:09.520 align:start position:0% I'll make a motion that we what did we 03:10:09.520 --> 03:10:11.429 align:start position:0% I'll make a motion that we what did we title<03:10:09.920> this<03:10:10.120> after<03:10:10.359> all<03:10:10.760> at<03:10:10.880> the<03:10:10.960> end<03:10:11.160> did<03:10:11.279> we 03:10:11.429 --> 03:10:11.439 align:start position:0% title this after all at the end did we 03:10:11.439 --> 03:10:13.110 align:start position:0% title this after all at the end did we change<03:10:11.680> the<03:10:11.800> title<03:10:12.080> at 03:10:13.110 --> 03:10:13.120 align:start position:0% change the title at 03:10:13.120 --> 03:10:17.389 align:start position:0% change the title at all<03:10:14.120> I<03:10:14.279> make<03:10:14.439> a<03:10:14.600> motion<03:10:15.000> that<03:10:15.800> the<03:10:16.800> committee 03:10:17.389 --> 03:10:17.399 align:start position:0% all I make a motion that the committee 03:10:17.399 --> 03:10:18.950 align:start position:0% all I make a motion that the committee moves<03:10:17.760> the<03:10:17.920> instructional<03:10:18.399> materials 03:10:18.950 --> 03:10:18.960 align:start position:0% moves the instructional materials 03:10:18.960 --> 03:10:20.269 align:start position:0% moves the instructional materials guidance 03:10:20.269 --> 03:10:20.279 align:start position:0% guidance 03:10:20.279 --> 03:10:23.790 align:start position:0% guidance document<03:10:21.279> uh<03:10:21.680> on<03:10:22.080> first<03:10:22.640> draft<03:10:23.040> one<03:10:23.319> on<03:10:23.520> first 03:10:23.790 --> 03:10:23.800 align:start position:0% document uh on first draft one on first 03:10:23.800 --> 03:10:26.630 align:start position:0% document uh on first draft one on first reading<03:10:24.080> and<03:10:24.200> forwards<03:10:24.560> it<03:10:24.640> to<03:10:24.800> the<03:10:24.880> board<03:10:25.640> for 03:10:26.630 --> 03:10:26.640 align:start position:0% reading and forwards it to the board for 03:10:26.640 --> 03:10:30.910 align:start position:0% reading and forwards it to the board for a<03:10:26.840> second<03:10:27.080> and<03:10:27.239> final<03:10:27.760> reading<03:10:28.760> oh<03:10:29.040> yeah<03:10:29.920> Elise 03:10:30.910 --> 03:10:30.920 align:start position:0% a second and final reading oh yeah Elise 03:10:30.920 --> 03:10:32.790 align:start position:0% a second and final reading oh yeah Elise all<03:10:31.040> right<03:10:31.160> do<03:10:31.239> you<03:10:31.600> also<03:10:31.920> need<03:10:32.080> to<03:10:32.279> include 03:10:32.790 --> 03:10:32.800 align:start position:0% all right do you also need to include 03:10:32.800 --> 03:10:35.469 align:start position:0% all right do you also need to include that<03:10:33.319> um<03:10:33.600> giving<03:10:33.960> staff<03:10:34.319> direction<03:10:34.880> to<03:10:35.120> make 03:10:35.469 --> 03:10:35.479 align:start position:0% that um giving staff direction to make 03:10:35.479 --> 03:10:39.190 align:start position:0% that um giving staff direction to make Technical<03:10:36.640> and<03:10:37.640> including<03:10:38.359> giving<03:10:38.760> staff 03:10:39.190 --> 03:10:39.200 align:start position:0% Technical and including giving staff 03:10:39.200 --> 03:10:42.429 align:start position:0% Technical and including giving staff direction<03:10:39.680> to<03:10:39.880> make<03:10:40.319> technical<03:10:41.439> grammatical 03:10:42.429 --> 03:10:42.439 align:start position:0% direction to make technical grammatical 03:10:42.439 --> 03:10:44.469 align:start position:0% direction to make technical grammatical and<03:10:42.800> highlighting 03:10:44.469 --> 03:10:44.479 align:start position:0% and highlighting 03:10:44.479 --> 03:10:47.910 align:start position:0% and highlighting changes<03:10:45.479> does<03:10:45.640> that<03:10:45.920> work<03:10:46.880> we<03:10:47.040> have<03:10:47.399> a<03:10:47.520> motion 03:10:47.910 --> 03:10:47.920 align:start position:0% changes does that work we have a motion 03:10:47.920 --> 03:10:50.990 align:start position:0% changes does that work we have a motion before<03:10:48.359> us<03:10:49.359> that<03:10:49.520> was<03:10:49.760> very<03:10:50.000> well 03:10:50.990 --> 03:10:51.000 align:start position:0% before us that was very well 03:10:51.000 --> 03:10:53.990 align:start position:0% before us that was very well articulated<03:10:52.000> and<03:10:52.120> it<03:10:52.399> included<03:10:53.399> the<03:10:53.640> staff 03:10:53.990 --> 03:10:54.000 align:start position:0% articulated and it included the staff 03:10:54.000 --> 03:10:55.389 align:start position:0% articulated and it included the staff making<03:10:54.439> those 03:10:55.389 --> 03:10:55.399 align:start position:0% making those 03:10:55.399 --> 03:10:57.030 align:start position:0% making those technical 03:10:57.030 --> 03:10:57.040 align:start position:0% technical 03:10:57.040 --> 03:10:58.550 align:start position:0% technical um 03:10:58.550 --> 03:10:58.560 align:start position:0% um 03:10:58.560 --> 03:11:02.630 align:start position:0% um adjustments<03:10:59.560> to<03:10:59.800> make<03:11:00.439> it<03:11:01.439> in<03:11:01.960> perfect 03:11:02.630 --> 03:11:02.640 align:start position:0% adjustments to make it in perfect 03:11:02.640 --> 03:11:05.790 align:start position:0% adjustments to make it in perfect condition<03:11:03.000> for<03:11:03.760> the<03:11:03.880> full<03:11:04.479> board's<03:11:05.479> review 03:11:05.790 --> 03:11:05.800 align:start position:0% condition for the full board's review 03:11:05.800 --> 03:11:06.510 align:start position:0% condition for the full board's review and 03:11:06.510 --> 03:11:06.520 align:start position:0% and 03:11:06.520 --> 03:11:09.670 align:start position:0% and approval<03:11:07.520> uh<03:11:07.880> any<03:11:08.239> further<03:11:08.680> discussion 03:11:09.670 --> 03:11:09.680 align:start position:0% approval uh any further discussion 03:11:09.680 --> 03:11:11.110 align:start position:0% approval uh any further discussion regarding<03:11:10.239> this 03:11:11.110 --> 03:11:11.120 align:start position:0% regarding this 03:11:11.120 --> 03:11:16.309 align:start position:0% regarding this motion<03:11:12.120> if<03:11:12.319> not<03:11:13.120> all<03:11:13.319> those<03:11:13.520> in<03:11:13.760> favor<03:11:14.120> say<03:11:14.640> I<03:11:15.640> I 03:11:16.309 --> 03:11:16.319 align:start position:0% motion if not all those in favor say I I 03:11:16.319 --> 03:11:18.870 align:start position:0% motion if not all those in favor say I I I<03:11:17.080> hi 03:11:18.870 --> 03:11:18.880 align:start position:0% I hi 03:11:18.880 --> 03:11:22.190 align:start position:0% I hi I<03:11:19.040> heard<03:11:19.479> four<03:11:20.160> voices<03:11:21.160> that's<03:11:21.479> unanimous 03:11:22.190 --> 03:11:22.200 align:start position:0% I heard four voices that's unanimous 03:11:22.200 --> 03:11:26.990 align:start position:0% I heard four voices that's unanimous thank<03:11:22.359> you<03:11:22.520> very 03:11:26.990 --> 03:11:27.000 align:start position:0% 03:11:27.000 --> 03:11:29.590 align:start position:0% much<03:11:28.000> all<03:11:28.160> right<03:11:28.439> so<03:11:28.600> we've<03:11:28.800> done<03:11:29.040> that<03:11:29.200> one<03:11:29.439> do 03:11:29.590 --> 03:11:29.600 align:start position:0% much all right so we've done that one do 03:11:29.600 --> 03:11:39.110 align:start position:0% much all right so we've done that one do we<03:11:29.680> want<03:11:29.800> to<03:11:29.960> look<03:11:30.120> at<03:11:30.239> the<03:11:30.359> rule 03:11:39.110 --> 03:11:39.120 align:start position:0% 03:11:39.120 --> 03:11:42.710 align:start position:0% now<03:11:40.120> is<03:11:40.279> that<03:11:40.479> where<03:11:40.680> we<03:11:40.800> should<03:11:41.479> head<03:11:42.479> that's 03:11:42.710 --> 03:11:42.720 align:start position:0% now is that where we should head that's 03:11:42.720 --> 03:11:44.349 align:start position:0% now is that where we should head that's what's<03:11:43.160> uh<03:11:43.279> the<03:11:43.439> second<03:11:43.760> the<03:11:43.880> next<03:11:44.080> part<03:11:44.239> on 03:11:44.349 --> 03:11:44.359 align:start position:0% what's uh the second the next part on 03:11:44.359 --> 03:11:46.950 align:start position:0% what's uh the second the next part on the<03:11:44.520> agenda<03:11:45.080> is<03:11:45.239> moving<03:11:45.840> from<03:11:46.359> this<03:11:46.640> guidance 03:11:46.950 --> 03:11:46.960 align:start position:0% the agenda is moving from this guidance 03:11:46.960 --> 03:11:48.910 align:start position:0% the agenda is moving from this guidance docu<03:11:47.479> to<03:11:47.640> the 03:11:48.910 --> 03:11:48.920 align:start position:0% docu to the 03:11:48.920 --> 03:11:52.670 align:start position:0% docu to the rule<03:11:49.920> let's<03:11:50.200> look<03:11:50.399> at<03:11:50.560> it 03:11:52.670 --> 03:11:52.680 align:start position:0% rule let's look at it 03:11:52.680 --> 03:11:54.830 align:start position:0% rule let's look at it okay<03:11:53.680> all<03:11:53.840> right<03:11:54.000> Elis<03:11:54.319> is<03:11:54.439> going<03:11:54.520> to<03:11:54.680> be 03:11:54.830 --> 03:11:54.840 align:start position:0% okay all right Elis is going to be 03:11:54.840 --> 03:11:56.950 align:start position:0% okay all right Elis is going to be pulling<03:11:55.399> that<03:11:55.680> up<03:11:56.000> and<03:11:56.160> Elise<03:11:56.560> do<03:11:56.640> you<03:11:56.720> want<03:11:56.800> to 03:11:56.950 --> 03:11:56.960 align:start position:0% pulling that up and Elise do you want to 03:11:56.960 --> 03:11:59.990 align:start position:0% pulling that up and Elise do you want to give<03:11:57.120> any<03:11:57.600> uh<03:11:57.800> background<03:11:58.640> uh<03:11:59.200> moving<03:11:59.600> forward 03:11:59.990 --> 03:12:00.000 align:start position:0% give any uh background uh moving forward 03:12:00.000 --> 03:12:03.030 align:start position:0% give any uh background uh moving forward with<03:12:00.160> the<03:12:00.319> rule<03:12:00.960> where<03:12:01.120> we're<03:12:01.359> at<03:12:01.600> and<03:12:01.760> what's 03:12:03.030 --> 03:12:03.040 align:start position:0% with the rule where we're at and what's 03:12:03.040 --> 03:12:06.790 align:start position:0% with the rule where we're at and what's uploaded<03:12:04.040> okay<03:12:04.760> so<03:12:05.279> um<03:12:05.800> if<03:12:05.920> you<03:12:06.120> recall<03:12:06.600> last 03:12:06.790 --> 03:12:06.800 align:start position:0% uploaded okay so um if you recall last 03:12:06.800 --> 03:12:09.510 align:start position:0% uploaded okay so um if you recall last time<03:12:07.040> we<03:12:07.200> started<03:12:07.880> with<03:12:08.319> draft<03:12:08.760> one<03:12:09.279> board 03:12:09.510 --> 03:12:09.520 align:start position:0% time we started with draft one board 03:12:09.520 --> 03:12:12.510 align:start position:0% time we started with draft one board member<03:12:09.840> Earl<03:12:10.279> brought<03:12:10.560> forward<03:12:10.920> draft<03:12:11.520> two 03:12:12.510 --> 03:12:12.520 align:start position:0% member Earl brought forward draft two 03:12:12.520 --> 03:12:14.110 align:start position:0% member Earl brought forward draft two and<03:12:12.680> that's<03:12:12.920> what<03:12:13.359> the<03:12:13.560> committee<03:12:13.920> was 03:12:14.110 --> 03:12:14.120 align:start position:0% and that's what the committee was 03:12:14.120 --> 03:12:17.190 align:start position:0% and that's what the committee was working<03:12:14.520> on<03:12:14.920> when<03:12:15.120> we<03:12:16.080> ended<03:12:16.560> adjourned<03:12:16.960> the 03:12:17.190 --> 03:12:17.200 align:start position:0% working on when we ended adjourned the 03:12:17.200 --> 03:12:20.070 align:start position:0% working on when we ended adjourned the meeting<03:12:17.600> last<03:12:17.880> time<03:12:18.279> so<03:12:19.040> um<03:12:19.160> in<03:12:19.359> Civic<03:12:19.680> clerk 03:12:20.070 --> 03:12:20.080 align:start position:0% meeting last time so um in Civic clerk 03:12:20.080 --> 03:12:22.349 align:start position:0% meeting last time so um in Civic clerk there<03:12:20.279> is<03:12:20.520> that<03:12:20.720> original<03:12:21.239> draft<03:12:21.760> that<03:12:22.120> board 03:12:22.349 --> 03:12:22.359 align:start position:0% there is that original draft that board 03:12:22.359 --> 03:12:24.510 align:start position:0% there is that original draft that board member<03:12:22.640> Earl<03:12:23.120> provided<03:12:23.760> and<03:12:23.880> then<03:12:24.040> there's<03:12:24.279> an 03:12:24.510 --> 03:12:24.520 align:start position:0% member Earl provided and then there's an 03:12:24.520 --> 03:12:26.630 align:start position:0% member Earl provided and then there's an additional<03:12:24.960> draft<03:12:25.399> two<03:12:25.840> that<03:12:26.000> includes<03:12:26.520> the 03:12:26.630 --> 03:12:26.640 align:start position:0% additional draft two that includes the 03:12:26.640 --> 03:12:28.030 align:start position:0% additional draft two that includes the Amendments<03:12:27.120> that<03:12:27.239> were<03:12:27.399> made<03:12:27.680> by<03:12:27.880> the 03:12:28.030 --> 03:12:28.040 align:start position:0% Amendments that were made by the 03:12:28.040 --> 03:12:30.469 align:start position:0% Amendments that were made by the committee<03:12:28.560> before<03:12:29.399> officially<03:12:29.960> adopting 03:12:30.469 --> 03:12:30.479 align:start position:0% committee before officially adopting 03:12:30.479 --> 03:12:32.510 align:start position:0% committee before officially adopting draft<03:12:30.880> two<03:12:31.680> so<03:12:31.880> that's<03:12:32.040> the<03:12:32.160> one<03:12:32.279> we<03:12:32.399> were 03:12:32.510 --> 03:12:32.520 align:start position:0% draft two so that's the one we were 03:12:32.520 --> 03:12:34.070 align:start position:0% draft two so that's the one we were going<03:12:32.640> to<03:12:32.760> start<03:12:33.080> with<03:12:33.439> as<03:12:33.560> long<03:12:33.720> as<03:12:33.840> that's 03:12:34.070 --> 03:12:34.080 align:start position:0% going to start with as long as that's 03:12:34.080 --> 03:12:36.950 align:start position:0% going to start with as long as that's okay<03:12:34.279> with<03:12:34.439> everyone<03:12:35.439> that's 03:12:36.950 --> 03:12:36.960 align:start position:0% okay with everyone that's 03:12:36.960 --> 03:12:40.510 align:start position:0% okay with everyone that's great<03:12:37.960> let's<03:12:38.200> do<03:12:38.479> that<03:12:39.399> I<03:12:39.520> think<03:12:39.960> we<03:12:40.279> do<03:12:40.399> we 03:12:40.510 --> 03:12:40.520 align:start position:0% great let's do that I think we do we 03:12:40.520 --> 03:12:41.870 align:start position:0% great let's do that I think we do we need<03:12:40.680> an<03:12:40.840> official<03:12:41.399> we<03:12:41.479> don't<03:12:41.560> need<03:12:41.720> an 03:12:41.870 --> 03:12:41.880 align:start position:0% need an official we don't need an 03:12:41.880 --> 03:12:43.630 align:start position:0% need an official we don't need an official<03:12:42.200> motion<03:12:42.479> for<03:12:42.680> that<03:12:42.920> right<03:12:43.399> that<03:12:43.520> we 03:12:43.630 --> 03:12:43.640 align:start position:0% official motion for that right that we 03:12:43.640 --> 03:12:47.950 align:start position:0% official motion for that right that we would<03:12:43.800> be<03:12:43.920> working<03:12:44.200> from<03:12:44.399> that<03:12:44.560> draft 03:12:47.950 --> 03:12:47.960 align:start position:0% 03:12:47.960 --> 03:12:54.150 align:start position:0% okay<03:12:48.960> okay<03:12:49.319> good<03:12:49.640> let's<03:12:49.880> go 03:12:54.150 --> 03:12:54.160 align:start position:0% 03:12:54.160 --> 03:12:56.389 align:start position:0% ahead<03:12:55.160> at<03:12:55.319> least<03:12:55.520> do<03:12:55.600> you<03:12:55.680> want<03:12:55.840> me<03:12:55.960> to<03:12:56.080> share 03:12:56.389 --> 03:12:56.399 align:start position:0% ahead at least do you want me to share 03:12:56.399 --> 03:12:58.630 align:start position:0% ahead at least do you want me to share are<03:12:56.520> you<03:12:56.640> gonna<03:12:56.920> share<03:12:57.319> to<03:12:57.760> and<03:12:57.920> make<03:12:58.120> edits<03:12:58.479> as 03:12:58.630 --> 03:12:58.640 align:start position:0% are you gonna share to and make edits as 03:12:58.640 --> 03:13:01.150 align:start position:0% are you gonna share to and make edits as we<03:12:58.800> go<03:12:59.200> we<03:12:59.319> still<03:12:59.560> have<03:12:59.680> the<03:13:00.080> instructional 03:13:01.150 --> 03:13:01.160 align:start position:0% we go we still have the instructional 03:13:01.160 --> 03:13:09.510 align:start position:0% we go we still have the instructional material 03:13:09.510 --> 03:13:09.520 align:start position:0% 03:13:09.520 --> 03:13:14.070 align:start position:0% up<03:13:10.520> can<03:13:10.640> you<03:13:10.720> see<03:13:10.880> it<03:13:11.439> now<03:13:12.439> yeah<03:13:12.680> we<03:13:12.840> can<03:13:13.479> okay 03:13:14.070 --> 03:13:14.080 align:start position:0% up can you see it now yeah we can okay 03:13:14.080 --> 03:13:18.070 align:start position:0% up can you see it now yeah we can okay all<03:13:14.200> right<03:13:14.399> I'll<03:13:14.760> go<03:13:14.920> back<03:13:15.040> to<03:13:15.120> the<03:13:15.239> beginning 03:13:18.070 --> 03:13:18.080 align:start position:0% all right I'll go back to the beginning 03:13:18.080 --> 03:13:22.030 align:start position:0% all right I'll go back to the beginning I<03:13:18.279> believe<03:13:18.800> that<03:13:19.000> we<03:13:19.120> were<03:13:19.760> in<03:13:20.760> can<03:13:21.000> we<03:13:21.239> go<03:13:21.560> up<03:13:21.920> I 03:13:22.030 --> 03:13:22.040 align:start position:0% I believe that we were in can we go up I 03:13:22.040 --> 03:13:24.710 align:start position:0% I believe that we were in can we go up I just<03:13:22.279> have<03:13:22.920> a<03:13:23.080> couple<03:13:23.359> of<03:13:23.640> things<03:13:23.960> to<03:13:24.279> possibly 03:13:24.710 --> 03:13:24.720 align:start position:0% just have a couple of things to possibly 03:13:24.720 --> 03:13:26.429 align:start position:0% just have a couple of things to possibly add<03:13:25.080> because<03:13:25.279> of<03:13:25.399> the<03:13:25.520> guidance<03:13:25.920> document<03:13:26.319> so 03:13:26.429 --> 03:13:26.439 align:start position:0% add because of the guidance document so 03:13:26.439 --> 03:13:31.710 align:start position:0% add because of the guidance document so if<03:13:26.560> you<03:13:27.239> go<03:13:27.439> down<03:13:27.600> to<03:13:28.080> 45<03:13:29.000> roughly<03:13:30.000> line<03:13:30.399> 45<03:13:31.399> so 03:13:31.710 --> 03:13:31.720 align:start position:0% if you go down to 45 roughly line 45 so 03:13:31.720 --> 03:13:35.830 align:start position:0% if you go down to 45 roughly line 45 so write<03:13:32.520> uh<03:13:32.720> no<03:13:33.680> yes<03:13:34.040> right<03:13:34.279> there<03:13:35.040> where<03:13:35.520> at<03:13:35.680> the 03:13:35.830 --> 03:13:35.840 align:start position:0% write uh no yes right there where at the 03:13:35.840 --> 03:13:39.469 align:start position:0% write uh no yes right there where at the third<03:13:36.520> section<03:13:37.520> just<03:13:37.720> where<03:13:37.920> it<03:13:38.080> says<03:13:39.040> can<03:13:39.239> I 03:13:39.469 --> 03:13:39.479 align:start position:0% third section just where it says can I 03:13:39.479 --> 03:13:42.269 align:start position:0% third section just where it says can I ask<03:13:39.800> specifically<03:13:40.479> what<03:13:40.640> is<03:13:40.840> the<03:13:41.160> federal<03:13:41.680> law 03:13:42.269 --> 03:13:42.279 align:start position:0% ask specifically what is the federal law 03:13:42.279 --> 03:13:45.550 align:start position:0% ask specifically what is the federal law that<03:13:42.399> we're<03:13:42.680> referencing<03:13:43.920> here<03:13:44.920> what<03:13:45.160> federal 03:13:45.550 --> 03:13:45.560 align:start position:0% that we're referencing here what federal 03:13:45.560 --> 03:13:52.269 align:start position:0% that we're referencing here what federal law<03:13:45.840> is<03:13:46.080> relevant 03:13:52.269 --> 03:13:52.279 align:start position:0% 03:13:52.279 --> 03:13:55.349 align:start position:0% or<03:13:52.560> laws<03:13:53.279> I<03:13:53.880> what<03:13:54.279> I<03:13:54.479> I<03:13:54.600> just<03:13:54.840> hate<03:13:55.080> to<03:13:55.200> put 03:13:55.349 --> 03:13:55.359 align:start position:0% or laws I what I I just hate to put 03:13:55.359 --> 03:13:56.830 align:start position:0% or laws I what I I just hate to put federal<03:13:55.680> law<03:13:55.840> in<03:13:55.960> there<03:13:56.120> but<03:13:56.239> not<03:13:56.600> actually 03:13:56.830 --> 03:13:56.840 align:start position:0% federal law in there but not actually 03:13:56.840 --> 03:13:58.389 align:start position:0% federal law in there but not actually know<03:13:57.040> what<03:13:57.160> it<03:13:57.279> is<03:13:57.439> we<03:13:57.600> know<03:13:57.760> what<03:13:57.880> it<03:13:58.000> is<03:13:58.200> with 03:13:58.389 --> 03:13:58.399 align:start position:0% know what it is we know what it is with 03:13:58.399 --> 03:14:00.630 align:start position:0% know what it is we know what it is with state<03:13:58.680> law<03:13:59.000> because<03:13:59.200> we<03:13:59.319> can<03:13:59.560> I<03:14:00.040> articulate 03:14:00.630 --> 03:14:00.640 align:start position:0% state law because we can I articulate 03:14:00.640 --> 03:14:03.229 align:start position:0% state law because we can I articulate those<03:14:00.880> what<03:14:01.040> federal<03:14:01.520> law<03:14:02.520> tells<03:14:02.800> us<03:14:03.080> what 03:14:03.229 --> 03:14:03.239 align:start position:0% those what federal law tells us what 03:14:03.239 --> 03:14:05.710 align:start position:0% those what federal law tells us what goes<03:14:03.439> in<03:14:04.000> libraries<03:14:05.000> or<03:14:05.239> instruction 03:14:05.710 --> 03:14:05.720 align:start position:0% goes in libraries or instruction 03:14:05.720 --> 03:14:08.870 align:start position:0% goes in libraries or instruction materials<03:14:06.760> Constitution<03:14:07.760> the<03:14:08.000> Constitution 03:14:08.870 --> 03:14:08.880 align:start position:0% materials Constitution the Constitution 03:14:08.880 --> 03:14:10.429 align:start position:0% materials Constitution the Constitution and<03:14:09.040> what<03:14:09.200> in<03:14:09.359> the 03:14:10.429 --> 03:14:10.439 align:start position:0% and what in the 03:14:10.439 --> 03:14:12.670 align:start position:0% and what in the Constitution<03:14:11.439> there<03:14:11.560> are<03:14:11.840> First<03:14:12.120> Amendment 03:14:12.670 --> 03:14:12.680 align:start position:0% Constitution there are First Amendment 03:14:12.680 --> 03:14:16.190 align:start position:0% Constitution there are First Amendment rights<03:14:13.399> of<03:14:13.800> access<03:14:14.319> to<03:14:14.560> it<03:14:14.920> that<03:14:15.560> apply<03:14:15.960> more 03:14:16.190 --> 03:14:16.200 align:start position:0% rights of access to it that apply more 03:14:16.200 --> 03:14:18.710 align:start position:0% rights of access to it that apply more to<03:14:16.439> secondary<03:14:17.279> educ<03:14:17.560> or<03:14:17.760> higher<03:14:18.120> education 03:14:18.710 --> 03:14:18.720 align:start position:0% to secondary educ or higher education 03:14:18.720 --> 03:14:20.510 align:start position:0% to secondary educ or higher education than<03:14:18.840> they<03:14:18.960> do<03:14:19.160> to<03:14:19.359> public<03:14:19.720> education<03:14:20.399> but 03:14:20.510 --> 03:14:20.520 align:start position:0% than they do to public education but 03:14:20.520 --> 03:14:22.710 align:start position:0% than they do to public education but there<03:14:20.640> have<03:14:20.800> been<03:14:21.000> some<03:14:21.239> challenges<03:14:21.960> on 03:14:22.710 --> 03:14:22.720 align:start position:0% there have been some challenges on 03:14:22.720 --> 03:14:25.349 align:start position:0% there have been some challenges on removal<03:14:23.239> of<03:14:23.479> books<03:14:24.000> based<03:14:24.239> on 03:14:25.349 --> 03:14:25.359 align:start position:0% removal of books based on 03:14:25.359 --> 03:14:29.670 align:start position:0% removal of books based on constitutional<03:14:26.680> um<03:14:27.760> challenges<03:14:28.760> so<03:14:29.520> you 03:14:29.670 --> 03:14:29.680 align:start position:0% constitutional um challenges so you 03:14:29.680 --> 03:14:32.349 align:start position:0% constitutional um challenges so you could<03:14:29.880> choose<03:14:30.359> and<03:14:30.560> say<03:14:31.160> this<03:14:31.319> rule<03:14:31.600> is<03:14:31.840> really 03:14:32.349 --> 03:14:32.359 align:start position:0% could choose and say this rule is really 03:14:32.359 --> 03:14:34.389 align:start position:0% could choose and say this rule is really intended<03:14:32.880> to<03:14:33.120> make<03:14:33.399> things<03:14:33.720> consistent<03:14:34.239> with 03:14:34.389 --> 03:14:34.399 align:start position:0% intended to make things consistent with 03:14:34.399 --> 03:14:37.670 align:start position:0% intended to make things consistent with state<03:14:34.720> law<03:14:35.600> I<03:14:35.680> think<03:14:35.960> that's<03:14:36.840> this<03:14:37.000> rule<03:14:37.560> yeah 03:14:37.670 --> 03:14:37.680 align:start position:0% state law I think that's this rule yeah 03:14:37.680 --> 03:14:39.309 align:start position:0% state law I think that's this rule yeah i'<03:14:37.840> like<03:14:38.000> to<03:14:38.120> sit<03:14:38.439> because<03:14:38.640> the<03:14:38.760> plurality 03:14:39.309 --> 03:14:39.319 align:start position:0% i' like to sit because the plurality 03:14:39.319 --> 03:14:43.150 align:start position:0% i' like to sit because the plurality ruling<03:14:40.239> with<03:14:40.520> pico<03:14:41.359> isn't<03:14:41.760> really<03:14:42.680> it's<03:14:42.840> a 03:14:43.150 --> 03:14:43.160 align:start position:0% ruling with pico isn't really it's a 03:14:43.160 --> 03:14:47.190 align:start position:0% ruling with pico isn't really it's a kind<03:14:43.279> of<03:14:43.399> a<03:14:43.800> conglomeration<03:14:44.640> of<03:14:44.920> things 03:14:47.190 --> 03:14:47.200 align:start position:0% kind of a conglomeration of things 03:14:47.200 --> 03:14:49.710 align:start position:0% kind of a conglomeration of things clear<03:14:48.000> on<03:14:48.479> what<03:14:48.720> federal<03:14:49.080> law<03:14:49.239> we're<03:14:49.439> really 03:14:49.710 --> 03:14:49.720 align:start position:0% clear on what federal law we're really 03:14:49.720 --> 03:14:51.389 align:start position:0% clear on what federal law we're really referencing<03:14:50.239> so<03:14:50.399> I<03:14:50.479> would<03:14:50.680> actually<03:14:50.920> just<03:14:51.080> say 03:14:51.389 --> 03:14:51.399 align:start position:0% referencing so I would actually just say 03:14:51.399 --> 03:14:58.950 align:start position:0% referencing so I would actually just say consistent<03:14:51.840> with<03:14:52.040> state<03:14:52.640> law<03:14:53.640> Utah 03:14:58.950 --> 03:14:58.960 align:start position:0% 03:14:58.960 --> 03:15:02.510 align:start position:0% law<03:14:59.960> that's<03:15:00.120> what<03:15:00.279> the<03:15:00.359> rules<03:15:00.800> intended<03:15:01.239> to<03:15:01.520> do 03:15:02.510 --> 03:15:02.520 align:start position:0% law that's what the rules intended to do 03:15:02.520 --> 03:15:04.590 align:start position:0% law that's what the rules intended to do um<03:15:03.160> unless<03:15:03.439> there's<03:15:03.680> any<03:15:03.960> clarification<03:15:04.520> we 03:15:04.590 --> 03:15:04.600 align:start position:0% um unless there's any clarification we 03:15:04.600 --> 03:15:05.710 align:start position:0% um unless there's any clarification we need<03:15:04.720> to<03:15:04.840> make<03:15:05.000> with<03:15:05.120> federal<03:15:05.399> law<03:15:05.560> but<03:15:05.640> I 03:15:05.710 --> 03:15:05.720 align:start position:0% need to make with federal law but I 03:15:05.720 --> 03:15:07.190 align:start position:0% need to make with federal law but I don't<03:15:05.840> think<03:15:05.960> we<03:15:06.160> actually<03:15:06.399> do<03:15:06.640> any<03:15:06.880> federal 03:15:07.190 --> 03:15:07.200 align:start position:0% don't think we actually do any federal 03:15:07.200 --> 03:15:10.269 align:start position:0% don't think we actually do any federal law<03:15:07.359> in<03:15:07.720> here<03:15:08.720> I<03:15:08.920> think<03:15:09.600> I<03:15:09.720> think<03:15:09.920> that<03:15:10.120> there 03:15:10.269 --> 03:15:10.279 align:start position:0% law in here I think I think that there 03:15:10.279 --> 03:15:12.429 align:start position:0% law in here I think I think that there is<03:15:10.439> a<03:15:10.640> federal<03:15:11.160> law<03:15:11.479> that 03:15:12.429 --> 03:15:12.439 align:start position:0% is a federal law that 03:15:12.439 --> 03:15:14.469 align:start position:0% is a federal law that addresses 03:15:14.469 --> 03:15:14.479 align:start position:0% addresses 03:15:14.479 --> 03:15:18.670 align:start position:0% addresses um<03:15:15.479> a<03:15:15.920> a<03:15:16.160> substance<03:15:16.680> or<03:15:17.160> or<03:15:17.399> materials<03:15:18.040> that 03:15:18.670 --> 03:15:18.680 align:start position:0% um a a substance or or materials that 03:15:18.680 --> 03:15:22.030 align:start position:0% um a a substance or or materials that can<03:15:19.560> encourage<03:15:20.080> or<03:15:20.239> lead<03:15:20.439> to<03:15:20.720> prant 03:15:22.030 --> 03:15:22.040 align:start position:0% can encourage or lead to prant 03:15:22.040 --> 03:15:25.150 align:start position:0% can encourage or lead to prant behavior<03:15:23.040> and<03:15:23.160> I<03:15:23.279> know<03:15:23.399> that<03:15:23.600> Utah<03:15:24.319> law<03:15:24.720> also 03:15:25.150 --> 03:15:25.160 align:start position:0% behavior and I know that Utah law also 03:15:25.160 --> 03:15:28.110 align:start position:0% behavior and I know that Utah law also references<03:15:26.199> that<03:15:27.199> however<03:15:27.399> I<03:15:27.479> do<03:15:27.640> not<03:15:27.920> have 03:15:28.110 --> 03:15:28.120 align:start position:0% references that however I do not have 03:15:28.120 --> 03:15:29.950 align:start position:0% references that however I do not have that<03:15:28.319> right<03:15:28.439> in<03:15:28.560> front<03:15:28.760> of<03:15:28.920> me<03:15:29.479> so<03:15:29.680> I<03:15:29.760> don't 03:15:29.950 --> 03:15:29.960 align:start position:0% that right in front of me so I don't 03:15:29.960 --> 03:15:33.070 align:start position:0% that right in front of me so I don't know<03:15:30.120> if<03:15:30.319> that's<03:15:30.560> what<03:15:30.760> was<03:15:30.920> intended 03:15:33.070 --> 03:15:33.080 align:start position:0% know if that's what was intended 03:15:33.080 --> 03:15:36.469 align:start position:0% know if that's what was intended with<03:15:34.080> what<03:15:34.239> they<03:15:34.359> mean<03:15:34.640> by<03:15:34.840> federal<03:15:35.279> law<03:15:36.199> as<03:15:36.319> it 03:15:36.469 --> 03:15:36.479 align:start position:0% with what they mean by federal law as it 03:15:36.479 --> 03:15:40.189 align:start position:0% with what they mean by federal law as it relates<03:15:36.840> to<03:15:37.319> sensitive<03:15:38.319> um<03:15:38.720> material<03:15:39.359> so<03:15:40.080> but 03:15:40.189 --> 03:15:40.199 align:start position:0% relates to sensitive um material so but 03:15:40.199 --> 03:15:41.710 align:start position:0% relates to sensitive um material so but we<03:15:40.359> don't<03:15:40.720> and<03:15:40.880> and<03:15:41.040> I'm<03:15:41.120> just<03:15:41.239> going<03:15:41.359> to<03:15:41.439> argue 03:15:41.710 --> 03:15:41.720 align:start position:0% we don't and and I'm just going to argue 03:15:41.720 --> 03:15:44.189 align:start position:0% we don't and and I'm just going to argue that<03:15:41.840> we<03:15:41.960> don't<03:15:42.199> actually<03:15:42.560> use<03:15:42.880> that<03:15:43.120> in<03:15:43.359> our 03:15:44.189 --> 03:15:44.199 align:start position:0% that we don't actually use that in our 03:15:44.199 --> 03:15:47.630 align:start position:0% that we don't actually use that in our Ru<03:15:44.600> making<03:15:45.080> here<03:15:46.080> so<03:15:46.479> other<03:15:46.680> than<03:15:47.000> Utah<03:15:47.399> law 03:15:47.630 --> 03:15:47.640 align:start position:0% Ru making here so other than Utah law 03:15:47.640 --> 03:15:49.550 align:start position:0% Ru making here so other than Utah law that's<03:15:47.800> where<03:15:47.920> we're 03:15:49.550 --> 03:15:49.560 align:start position:0% that's where we're 03:15:49.560 --> 03:15:52.030 align:start position:0% that's where we're referencing<03:15:50.560> I'm<03:15:50.720> trying<03:15:50.960> to<03:15:51.120> see<03:15:51.600> um<03:15:51.760> as<03:15:51.920> part 03:15:52.030 --> 03:15:52.040 align:start position:0% referencing I'm trying to see um as part 03:15:52.040 --> 03:15:53.910 align:start position:0% referencing I'm trying to see um as part of<03:15:52.160> the<03:15:52.239> elementary<03:15:52.800> secondary<03:15:53.359> Education 03:15:53.910 --> 03:15:53.920 align:start position:0% of the elementary secondary Education 03:15:53.920 --> 03:15:55.269 align:start position:0% of the elementary secondary Education Act<03:15:54.120> there<03:15:54.239> are<03:15:54.399> some<03:15:54.560> things<03:15:54.760> about<03:15:55.040> school 03:15:55.269 --> 03:15:55.279 align:start position:0% Act there are some things about school 03:15:55.279 --> 03:15:58.229 align:start position:0% Act there are some things about school library<03:15:55.760> programs<03:15:56.760> in<03:15:56.960> there<03:15:57.479> um<03:15:57.920> but<03:15:58.080> that's 03:15:58.229 --> 03:15:58.239 align:start position:0% library programs in there um but that's 03:15:58.239 --> 03:16:00.389 align:start position:0% library programs in there um but that's more<03:15:58.439> through<03:15:58.640> literacy<03:15:59.120> and<03:15:59.359> standards<03:16:00.080> of 03:16:00.389 --> 03:16:00.399 align:start position:0% more through literacy and standards of 03:16:00.399 --> 03:16:02.070 align:start position:0% more through literacy and standards of school<03:16:00.680> library<03:16:01.120> standards<03:16:01.560> is<03:16:01.680> that<03:16:01.800> correct 03:16:02.070 --> 03:16:02.080 align:start position:0% school library standards is that correct 03:16:02.080 --> 03:16:03.870 align:start position:0% school library standards is that correct deina<03:16:02.520> it's<03:16:02.640> not<03:16:02.800> necessarily<03:16:03.239> about<03:16:03.479> federal 03:16:03.870 --> 03:16:03.880 align:start position:0% deina it's not necessarily about federal 03:16:03.880 --> 03:16:06.269 align:start position:0% deina it's not necessarily about federal law<03:16:04.279> is<03:16:04.399> that 03:16:06.269 --> 03:16:06.279 align:start position:0% law is that 03:16:06.279 --> 03:16:10.229 align:start position:0% law is that correct<03:16:07.520> um<03:16:08.520> as<03:16:08.720> far<03:16:09.000> as<03:16:09.479> what<03:16:09.680> this<03:16:09.840> was 03:16:10.229 --> 03:16:10.239 align:start position:0% correct um as far as what this was 03:16:10.239 --> 03:16:12.229 align:start position:0% correct um as far as what this was referencing 03:16:12.229 --> 03:16:12.239 align:start position:0% referencing 03:16:12.239 --> 03:16:15.110 align:start position:0% referencing in<03:16:13.239> yeah<03:16:13.479> I'm<03:16:13.680> not 03:16:15.110 --> 03:16:15.120 align:start position:0% in yeah I'm not 03:16:15.120 --> 03:16:17.950 align:start position:0% in yeah I'm not sure<03:16:16.120> I<03:16:16.279> where<03:16:16.520> this<03:16:16.680> came<03:16:16.840> from<03:16:17.040> from 03:16:17.950 --> 03:16:17.960 align:start position:0% sure I where this came from from 03:16:17.960 --> 03:16:22.630 align:start position:0% sure I where this came from from originally<03:16:18.960> um<03:16:19.600> I<03:16:19.760> know<03:16:20.600> that<03:16:21.319> in 03:16:22.630 --> 03:16:22.640 align:start position:0% originally um I know that in 03:16:22.640 --> 03:16:24.870 align:start position:0% originally um I know that in conversations<03:16:23.640> out<03:16:23.880> there<03:16:24.120> there's<03:16:24.479> talk<03:16:24.680> of 03:16:24.870 --> 03:16:24.880 align:start position:0% conversations out there there's talk of 03:16:24.880 --> 03:16:27.870 align:start position:0% conversations out there there's talk of the<03:16:25.000> Miller<03:16:25.359> test<03:16:25.760> the<03:16:26.199> obscenity<03:16:27.199> test<03:16:27.640> and 03:16:27.870 --> 03:16:27.880 align:start position:0% the Miller test the obscenity test and 03:16:27.880 --> 03:16:29.910 align:start position:0% the Miller test the obscenity test and pran<03:16:28.319> interest<03:16:28.760> and<03:16:29.000> all<03:16:29.120> of<03:16:29.319> that<03:16:29.600> like<03:16:29.720> the 03:16:29.910 --> 03:16:29.920 align:start position:0% pran interest and all of that like the 03:16:29.920 --> 03:16:32.950 align:start position:0% pran interest and all of that like the three<03:16:30.319> prongs<03:16:30.680> of<03:16:30.800> the<03:16:30.920> Miller<03:16:31.279> test<03:16:31.720> that<03:16:32.720> um 03:16:32.950 --> 03:16:32.960 align:start position:0% three prongs of the Miller test that um 03:16:32.960 --> 03:16:35.510 align:start position:0% three prongs of the Miller test that um but<03:16:33.080> it's<03:16:33.239> not<03:16:33.439> actually<03:16:33.720> federal<03:16:34.080> law 03:16:35.510 --> 03:16:35.520 align:start position:0% but it's not actually federal law 03:16:35.520 --> 03:16:39.429 align:start position:0% but it's not actually federal law it's<03:16:36.520> yeah<03:16:37.520> so<03:16:37.920> I<03:16:38.000> would<03:16:38.199> just<03:16:38.359> recommend<03:16:38.800> we 03:16:39.429 --> 03:16:39.439 align:start position:0% it's yeah so I would just recommend we 03:16:39.439 --> 03:16:41.710 align:start position:0% it's yeah so I would just recommend we just<03:16:39.680> have<03:16:40.040> yeah<03:16:40.319> current<03:16:40.880> Utah<03:16:41.279> code<03:16:41.560> or 03:16:41.710 --> 03:16:41.720 align:start position:0% just have yeah current Utah code or 03:16:41.720 --> 03:16:44.189 align:start position:0% just have yeah current Utah code or state<03:16:41.960> law<03:16:42.199> or<03:16:42.399> whatever<03:16:43.399> and<03:16:43.560> I<03:16:43.640> would<03:16:43.920> also 03:16:44.189 --> 03:16:44.199 align:start position:0% state law or whatever and I would also 03:16:44.199 --> 03:16:45.910 align:start position:0% state law or whatever and I would also add<03:16:44.399> in<03:16:44.560> here<03:16:44.720> just<03:16:44.880> because<03:16:45.120> of<03:16:45.279> our<03:16:45.479> guidance 03:16:45.910 --> 03:16:45.920 align:start position:0% add in here just because of our guidance 03:16:45.920 --> 03:16:48.590 align:start position:0% add in here just because of our guidance document<03:16:47.000> 53g 03:16:48.590 --> 03:16:48.600 align:start position:0% document 53g 03:16:48.600 --> 03:16:52.469 align:start position:0% document 53g 4402<03:16:49.600> which<03:16:49.760> is<03:16:50.000> just<03:16:50.319> about<03:16:50.640> instruction 03:16:52.469 --> 03:16:52.479 align:start position:0% 4402 which is just about instruction 03:16:52.479 --> 03:16:55.870 align:start position:0% 4402 which is just about instruction materials<03:16:53.479> um<03:16:54.319> so<03:16:54.640> at<03:16:54.880> the<03:16:54.960> end<03:16:55.160> of<03:16:55.279> that<03:16:55.479> where 03:16:55.870 --> 03:16:55.880 align:start position:0% materials um so at the end of that where 03:16:55.880 --> 03:16:59.110 align:start position:0% materials um so at the end of that where yeah<03:16:56.120> yeah<03:16:56.600> that's<03:16:56.800> it<03:16:57.040> 53<03:16:57.520> G4 03:16:59.110 --> 03:16:59.120 align:start position:0% yeah yeah that's it 53 G4 03:16:59.120 --> 03:17:03.830 align:start position:0% yeah yeah that's it 53 G4 402<03:17:00.120> and<03:17:00.359> 53<03:17:01.080> G5<03:17:02.080> 404<03:17:03.040> those<03:17:03.160> are<03:17:03.359> those<03:17:03.560> two 03:17:03.830 --> 03:17:03.840 align:start position:0% 402 and 53 G5 404 those are those two 03:17:03.840 --> 03:17:05.870 align:start position:0% 402 and 53 G5 404 those are those two pieces<03:17:04.120> of<03:17:04.319> code<03:17:04.640> that<03:17:04.800> talk<03:17:05.080> about<03:17:05.479> vetting 03:17:05.870 --> 03:17:05.880 align:start position:0% pieces of code that talk about vetting 03:17:05.880 --> 03:17:08.550 align:start position:0% pieces of code that talk about vetting instructional<03:17:06.840> materials<03:17:07.840> that<03:17:08.080> protective 03:17:08.550 --> 03:17:08.560 align:start position:0% instructional materials that protective 03:17:08.560 --> 03:17:11.189 align:start position:0% instructional materials that protective thing<03:17:08.720> at<03:17:08.840> the<03:17:08.960> first<03:17:09.239> of<03:17:09.399> our<03:17:09.960> guidance 03:17:11.189 --> 03:17:11.199 align:start position:0% thing at the first of our guidance 03:17:11.199 --> 03:17:14.150 align:start position:0% thing at the first of our guidance document<03:17:12.199> and<03:17:12.359> then<03:17:13.319> somewhere<03:17:13.760> here<03:17:13.920> we<03:17:14.000> need 03:17:14.150 --> 03:17:14.160 align:start position:0% document and then somewhere here we need 03:17:14.160 --> 03:17:17.710 align:start position:0% document and then somewhere here we need to<03:17:14.319> reference<03:17:14.880> the<03:17:15.080> library<03:17:15.760> platform 03:17:17.710 --> 03:17:17.720 align:start position:0% to reference the library platform 03:17:17.720 --> 03:17:21.110 align:start position:0% to reference the library platform so<03:17:18.720> I<03:17:19.319> it<03:17:19.880> I<03:17:19.960> don't<03:17:20.080> know<03:17:20.199> if<03:17:20.319> it's<03:17:20.560> right<03:17:20.760> after 03:17:21.110 --> 03:17:21.120 align:start position:0% so I it I don't know if it's right after 03:17:21.120 --> 03:17:22.790 align:start position:0% so I it I don't know if it's right after that<03:17:21.399> or<03:17:21.640> what<03:17:21.800> that<03:17:21.960> we<03:17:22.080> put<03:17:22.319> something<03:17:22.600> like 03:17:22.790 --> 03:17:22.800 align:start position:0% that or what that we put something like 03:17:22.800 --> 03:17:25.110 align:start position:0% that or what that we put something like shall<03:17:23.199> provide<03:17:23.600> an<03:17:23.840> online<03:17:24.359> platform<03:17:24.920> for 03:17:25.110 --> 03:17:25.120 align:start position:0% shall provide an online platform for 03:17:25.120 --> 03:17:29.510 align:start position:0% shall provide an online platform for Library<03:17:25.600> materials<03:17:26.359> consistent<03:17:27.560> with<03:17:28.560> 53g 03:17:29.510 --> 03:17:29.520 align:start position:0% Library materials consistent with 53g 03:17:29.520 --> 03:17:31.870 align:start position:0% Library materials consistent with 53g 4402<03:17:30.520> and<03:17:30.600> then<03:17:30.720> we<03:17:30.800> don't<03:17:31.040> have<03:17:31.160> to<03:17:31.680> put 03:17:31.870 --> 03:17:31.880 align:start position:0% 4402 and then we don't have to put 03:17:31.880 --> 03:17:33.510 align:start position:0% 4402 and then we don't have to put anything<03:17:32.199> else<03:17:32.479> in 03:17:33.510 --> 03:17:33.520 align:start position:0% anything else in 03:17:33.520 --> 03:17:36.590 align:start position:0% anything else in there<03:17:34.520> so<03:17:34.840> I<03:17:34.920> can<03:17:35.040> read<03:17:35.279> that<03:17:35.439> again<03:17:35.880> are<03:17:36.000> you 03:17:36.590 --> 03:17:36.600 align:start position:0% there so I can read that again are you 03:17:36.600 --> 03:17:39.269 align:start position:0% there so I can read that again are you ready<03:17:37.600> yes<03:17:38.199> shall 03:17:39.269 --> 03:17:39.279 align:start position:0% ready yes shall 03:17:39.279 --> 03:17:42.550 align:start position:0% ready yes shall provide<03:17:40.279> an<03:17:40.479> online 03:17:42.550 --> 03:17:42.560 align:start position:0% provide an online 03:17:42.560 --> 03:17:45.189 align:start position:0% provide an online platform<03:17:43.560> for<03:17:43.880> Library 03:17:45.189 --> 03:17:45.199 align:start position:0% platform for Library 03:17:45.199 --> 03:17:48.030 align:start position:0% platform for Library materials<03:17:46.199> consistent<03:17:47.120> with<03:17:47.399> is<03:17:47.520> that<03:17:47.760> how<03:17:47.920> we 03:17:48.030 --> 03:17:48.040 align:start position:0% materials consistent with is that how we 03:17:48.040 --> 03:17:50.950 align:start position:0% materials consistent with is that how we say<03:17:48.319> that<03:17:48.880> or<03:17:49.160> as<03:17:49.399> described<03:17:50.359> I<03:17:50.439> don't<03:17:50.800> however 03:17:50.950 --> 03:17:50.960 align:start position:0% say that or as described I don't however 03:17:50.960 --> 03:17:53.269 align:start position:0% say that or as described I don't however you<03:17:51.080> want<03:17:51.160> to<03:17:51.319> say<03:17:51.560> that 03:17:53.269 --> 03:17:53.279 align:start position:0% you want to say that 03:17:53.279 --> 03:18:00.309 align:start position:0% you want to say that 53g<03:17:54.279> 4 03:18:00.309 --> 03:18:00.319 align:start position:0% 03:18:00.319 --> 03:18:04.710 align:start position:0% 402<03:18:01.319> is<03:18:01.439> it<03:18:01.680> platform<03:18:02.120> or<03:18:02.600> database<03:18:03.600> it<03:18:03.920> says 03:18:04.710 --> 03:18:04.720 align:start position:0% 402 is it platform or database it says 03:18:04.720 --> 03:18:07.710 align:start position:0% 402 is it platform or database it says platform<03:18:05.720> in<03:18:05.920> the<03:18:06.160> law<03:18:06.760> but<03:18:06.880> it<03:18:07.040> probably<03:18:07.399> is<03:18:07.560> a 03:18:07.710 --> 03:18:07.720 align:start position:0% platform in the law but it probably is a 03:18:07.720 --> 03:18:09.950 align:start position:0% platform in the law but it probably is a database<03:18:08.199> but<03:18:08.279> it<03:18:08.399> says<03:18:09.120> the<03:18:09.239> law<03:18:09.439> says 03:18:09.950 --> 03:18:09.960 align:start position:0% database but it says the law says 03:18:09.960 --> 03:18:12.070 align:start position:0% database but it says the law says platform<03:18:10.960> because<03:18:11.120> it<03:18:11.279> feels<03:18:11.520> like<03:18:11.680> it<03:18:11.800> should 03:18:12.070 --> 03:18:12.080 align:start position:0% platform because it feels like it should 03:18:12.080 --> 03:18:14.710 align:start position:0% platform because it feels like it should be<03:18:12.840> like 03:18:14.710 --> 03:18:14.720 align:start position:0% be like 03:18:14.720 --> 03:18:17.269 align:start position:0% be like yeah<03:18:15.720> I<03:18:15.840> think<03:18:16.040> the<03:18:16.199> reason<03:18:16.439> they<03:18:16.560> Ed<03:18:16.880> platform 03:18:17.269 --> 03:18:17.279 align:start position:0% yeah I think the reason they Ed platform 03:18:17.279 --> 03:18:18.870 align:start position:0% yeah I think the reason they Ed platform is<03:18:17.520> because<03:18:17.800> they<03:18:17.920> want<03:18:18.279> the<03:18:18.720> the 03:18:18.870 --> 03:18:18.880 align:start position:0% is because they want the the 03:18:18.880 --> 03:18:22.070 align:start position:0% is because they want the the forward-facing<03:18:19.680> part<03:18:20.680> of<03:18:20.880> the<03:18:21.160> database<03:18:21.920> to 03:18:22.070 --> 03:18:22.080 align:start position:0% forward-facing part of the database to 03:18:22.080 --> 03:18:25.110 align:start position:0% forward-facing part of the database to be<03:18:22.319> usable<03:18:22.920> by<03:18:23.080> the<03:18:23.399> parents<03:18:24.399> and<03:18:24.680> and<03:18:24.880> they 03:18:25.110 --> 03:18:25.120 align:start position:0% be usable by the parents and and they 03:18:25.120 --> 03:18:30.429 align:start position:0% be usable by the parents and and they call<03:18:25.319> it<03:18:25.439> an<03:18:25.640> online<03:18:26.080> platform<03:18:26.560> too<03:18:27.239> they<03:18:27.399> do 03:18:30.429 --> 03:18:30.439 align:start position:0% 03:18:30.439 --> 03:18:32.389 align:start position:0% interesting<03:18:31.439> I<03:18:31.560> just<03:18:31.680> want<03:18:31.840> to<03:18:32.080> make<03:18:32.239> sure 03:18:32.389 --> 03:18:32.399 align:start position:0% interesting I just want to make sure 03:18:32.399 --> 03:18:34.710 align:start position:0% interesting I just want to make sure we've<03:18:32.600> got<03:18:32.840> the<03:18:33.000> components<03:18:33.560> of<03:18:33.800> that<03:18:34.040> in<03:18:34.359> here 03:18:34.710 --> 03:18:34.720 align:start position:0% we've got the components of that in here 03:18:34.720 --> 03:18:39.030 align:start position:0% we've got the components of that in here so<03:18:35.439> okay<03:18:35.640> that's<03:18:35.800> all<03:18:35.960> I<03:18:36.319> had<03:18:36.520> on<03:18:36.920> that 03:18:39.030 --> 03:18:39.040 align:start position:0% so okay that's all I had on that 03:18:39.040 --> 03:18:43.349 align:start position:0% so okay that's all I had on that piece<03:18:40.040> okay<03:18:40.399> any<03:18:40.640> other<03:18:41.000> board<03:18:41.279> members<03:18:41.760> have 03:18:43.349 --> 03:18:43.359 align:start position:0% piece okay any other board members have 03:18:43.359 --> 03:18:45.870 align:start position:0% piece okay any other board members have additional<03:18:44.359> thoughts<03:18:44.640> or<03:18:44.880> ideas<03:18:45.560> that<03:18:45.680> need 03:18:45.870 --> 03:18:45.880 align:start position:0% additional thoughts or ideas that need 03:18:45.880 --> 03:18:48.429 align:start position:0% additional thoughts or ideas that need to<03:18:46.040> be<03:18:46.279> considered<03:18:46.920> or<03:18:47.199> added<03:18:47.960> the<03:18:48.120> other<03:18:48.279> one 03:18:48.429 --> 03:18:48.439 align:start position:0% to be considered or added the other one 03:18:48.439 --> 03:18:50.189 align:start position:0% to be considered or added the other one we<03:18:48.520> need<03:18:48.680> to<03:18:48.800> do<03:18:49.040> because<03:18:49.279> we<03:18:49.479> designate<03:18:50.040> what 03:18:50.189 --> 03:18:50.199 align:start position:0% we need to do because we designate what 03:18:50.199 --> 03:18:53.550 align:start position:0% we need to do because we designate what happens<03:18:50.520> in<03:18:50.640> an<03:18:50.920> initial<03:18:51.800> review<03:18:52.800> and<03:18:52.960> in<03:18:53.239> a 03:18:53.550 --> 03:18:53.560 align:start position:0% happens in an initial review and in a 03:18:53.560 --> 03:18:55.750 align:start position:0% happens in an initial review and in a subjective<03:18:54.239> materials<03:18:54.760> review<03:18:55.279> but<03:18:55.439> we<03:18:55.600> just 03:18:55.750 --> 03:18:55.760 align:start position:0% subjective materials review but we just 03:18:55.760 --> 03:18:58.469 align:start position:0% subjective materials review but we just put<03:18:56.000> into<03:18:56.439> our<03:18:57.439> thing<03:18:57.760> we<03:18:57.880> just<03:18:58.000> need<03:18:58.120> to<03:18:58.279> have 03:18:58.469 --> 03:18:58.479 align:start position:0% put into our thing we just need to have 03:18:58.479 --> 03:18:59.910 align:start position:0% put into our thing we just need to have something<03:18:59.000> about 03:18:59.910 --> 03:18:59.920 align:start position:0% something about 03:18:59.920 --> 03:19:01.830 align:start position:0% something about designating<03:19:00.920> whatever<03:19:01.239> the<03:19:01.319> language<03:19:01.680> is 03:19:01.830 --> 03:19:01.840 align:start position:0% designating whatever the language is 03:19:01.840 --> 03:19:03.389 align:start position:0% designating whatever the language is three<03:19:02.040> or<03:19:02.160> more<03:19:02.359> members<03:19:02.800> including<03:19:03.160> one 03:19:03.389 --> 03:19:03.399 align:start position:0% three or more members including one 03:19:03.399 --> 03:19:05.189 align:start position:0% three or more members including one parent<03:19:03.720> for<03:19:03.920> the<03:19:04.080> objective<03:19:04.439> senstive<03:19:04.920> M 03:19:05.189 --> 03:19:05.199 align:start position:0% parent for the objective senstive M 03:19:05.199 --> 03:19:07.790 align:start position:0% parent for the objective senstive M material<03:19:05.640> review<03:19:06.560> and<03:19:06.720> may<03:19:06.920> include<03:19:07.239> designes 03:19:07.790 --> 03:19:07.800 align:start position:0% material review and may include designes 03:19:07.800 --> 03:19:09.389 align:start position:0% material review and may include designes from<03:19:07.960> the<03:19:08.120> initial<03:19:08.439> review<03:19:08.960> just<03:19:09.120> whatever 03:19:09.389 --> 03:19:09.399 align:start position:0% from the initial review just whatever 03:19:09.399 --> 03:19:10.830 align:start position:0% from the initial review just whatever our<03:19:09.600> language<03:19:10.000> was<03:19:10.160> from<03:19:10.279> the<03:19:10.439> guidance 03:19:10.830 --> 03:19:10.840 align:start position:0% our language was from the guidance 03:19:10.840 --> 03:19:13.950 align:start position:0% our language was from the guidance document<03:19:11.840> because<03:19:12.160> we<03:19:12.479> we<03:19:12.760> init<03:19:13.239> we 03:19:13.950 --> 03:19:13.960 align:start position:0% document because we we init we 03:19:13.960 --> 03:19:15.550 align:start position:0% document because we we init we articulate<03:19:14.560> it<03:19:14.680> in<03:19:14.840> these<03:19:15.080> other<03:19:15.319> two 03:19:15.550 --> 03:19:15.560 align:start position:0% articulate it in these other two 03:19:15.560 --> 03:19:18.389 align:start position:0% articulate it in these other two Provisions<03:19:16.040> but<03:19:16.199> not<03:19:16.399> that<03:19:16.720> middle<03:19:17.239> one<03:19:18.239> does 03:19:18.389 --> 03:19:18.399 align:start position:0% Provisions but not that middle one does 03:19:18.399 --> 03:19:20.189 align:start position:0% Provisions but not that middle one does that<03:19:18.560> make 03:19:20.189 --> 03:19:20.199 align:start position:0% that make 03:19:20.199 --> 03:19:36.910 align:start position:0% that make sense 03:19:36.910 --> 03:19:36.920 align:start position:0% 03:19:36.920 --> 03:19:40.630 align:start position:0% yeah 03:19:40.630 --> 03:19:40.640 align:start position:0% 03:19:40.640 --> 03:19:42.990 align:start position:0% okay<03:19:41.640> I<03:19:41.760> know<03:19:41.960> at<03:19:42.120> leise<03:19:42.319> we're<03:19:42.520> do<03:19:42.760> your 03:19:42.990 --> 03:19:43.000 align:start position:0% okay I know at leise we're do your 03:19:43.000 --> 03:19:44.750 align:start position:0% okay I know at leise we're do your Hightech<03:19:43.520> skills 03:19:44.750 --> 03:19:44.760 align:start position:0% Hightech skills 03:19:44.760 --> 03:19:48.030 align:start position:0% Hightech skills here<03:19:45.760> so<03:19:46.000> it's<03:19:46.199> under 03:19:48.030 --> 03:19:48.040 align:start position:0% here so it's under 03:19:48.040 --> 03:19:51.670 align:start position:0% here so it's under keep<03:19:48.279> going<03:19:48.720> down<03:19:49.720> it<03:19:49.840> would<03:19:50.000> be<03:19:50.160> under<03:19:50.880> um<03:19:51.479> the 03:19:51.670 --> 03:19:51.680 align:start position:0% keep going down it would be under um the 03:19:51.680 --> 03:19:53.990 align:start position:0% keep going down it would be under um the subjective<03:19:52.439> or<03:19:52.640> the<03:19:52.840> objective<03:19:53.319> materials 03:19:53.990 --> 03:19:54.000 align:start position:0% subjective or the objective materials 03:19:54.000 --> 03:19:57.469 align:start position:0% subjective or the objective materials review<03:19:55.000> keep<03:19:55.239> going<03:19:55.960> down<03:19:56.399> right<03:19:56.600> there 03:19:57.469 --> 03:19:57.479 align:start position:0% review keep going down right there 03:19:57.479 --> 03:20:01.349 align:start position:0% review keep going down right there up<03:19:58.479> yep<03:19:59.239> designate<03:19:59.760> three<03:19:59.960> or<03:20:00.120> more<03:20:00.840> Yep<03:20:01.160> that 03:20:01.349 --> 03:20:01.359 align:start position:0% up yep designate three or more Yep that 03:20:01.359 --> 03:20:03.110 align:start position:0% up yep designate three or more Yep that section<03:20:01.720> right 03:20:03.110 --> 03:20:03.120 align:start position:0% section right 03:20:03.120 --> 03:20:05.950 align:start position:0% section right there<03:20:04.120> and<03:20:04.239> I<03:20:04.439> put<03:20:04.680> the<03:20:05.399> thing<03:20:05.560> in<03:20:05.720> there<03:20:05.840> so 03:20:05.950 --> 03:20:05.960 align:start position:0% there and I put the thing in there so 03:20:05.960 --> 03:20:19.469 align:start position:0% there and I put the thing in there so that<03:20:06.080> we<03:20:06.199> could<03:20:06.399> reference<03:20:06.880> it<03:20:07.399> so 03:20:19.469 --> 03:20:19.479 align:start position:0% 03:20:19.479 --> 03:20:23.469 align:start position:0% yep 03:20:23.469 --> 03:20:23.479 align:start position:0% 03:20:23.479 --> 03:20:25.510 align:start position:0% perfect<03:20:24.479> and<03:20:24.680> then<03:20:24.800> I<03:20:24.880> don't<03:20:25.040> know<03:20:25.160> if<03:20:25.279> we<03:20:25.359> need 03:20:25.510 --> 03:20:25.520 align:start position:0% perfect and then I don't know if we need 03:20:25.520 --> 03:20:28.790 align:start position:0% perfect and then I don't know if we need to<03:20:25.720> State<03:20:26.120> this<03:20:26.800> I<03:20:26.880> feel<03:20:27.040> like<03:20:27.199> we 03:20:28.790 --> 03:20:28.800 align:start position:0% to State this I feel like we 03:20:28.800 --> 03:20:31.389 align:start position:0% to State this I feel like we do<03:20:29.800> you<03:20:30.000> guys<03:20:30.199> can<03:20:30.399> argue<03:20:30.840> whether<03:20:31.000> or<03:20:31.120> not 03:20:31.389 --> 03:20:31.399 align:start position:0% do you guys can argue whether or not 03:20:31.399 --> 03:20:34.670 align:start position:0% do you guys can argue whether or not like<03:20:31.560> the<03:20:31.640> end<03:20:31.840> of<03:20:32.080> this<03:20:32.800> piece<03:20:33.479> it<03:20:33.720> just<03:20:33.880> says 03:20:34.670 --> 03:20:34.680 align:start position:0% like the end of this piece it just says 03:20:34.680 --> 03:20:36.830 align:start position:0% like the end of this piece it just says sensitive<03:20:35.199> materials<03:20:35.680> removed<03:20:36.120> from<03:20:36.359> student 03:20:36.830 --> 03:20:36.840 align:start position:0% sensitive materials removed from student 03:20:36.840 --> 03:20:38.790 align:start position:0% sensitive materials removed from student access<03:20:37.199> may<03:20:37.399> not<03:20:37.560> be<03:20:37.640> sold<03:20:37.920> or<03:20:38.120> distributed<03:20:38.640> to 03:20:38.790 --> 03:20:38.800 align:start position:0% access may not be sold or distributed to 03:20:38.800 --> 03:20:40.710 align:start position:0% access may not be sold or distributed to a<03:20:38.920> minor<03:20:39.680> just<03:20:39.960> that 03:20:40.710 --> 03:20:40.720 align:start position:0% a minor just that 03:20:40.720 --> 03:20:44.469 align:start position:0% a minor just that simple<03:20:41.720> which<03:20:41.880> I<03:20:41.960> know<03:20:42.160> seems<03:20:42.520> obvious<03:20:43.120> but<03:20:44.120> um 03:20:44.469 --> 03:20:44.479 align:start position:0% simple which I know seems obvious but um 03:20:44.479 --> 03:20:47.710 align:start position:0% simple which I know seems obvious but um oh<03:20:44.640> we<03:20:44.760> already<03:20:44.920> have<03:20:45.040> it<03:20:45.199> there<03:20:45.600> okay 03:20:47.710 --> 03:20:47.720 align:start position:0% oh we already have it there okay 03:20:47.720 --> 03:20:49.269 align:start position:0% oh we already have it there okay oh<03:20:47.880> no<03:20:48.080> you<03:20:48.359> oh<03:20:48.520> sorry<03:20:48.720> you<03:20:48.840> pulled<03:20:49.040> it<03:20:49.120> over 03:20:49.269 --> 03:20:49.279 align:start position:0% oh no you oh sorry you pulled it over 03:20:49.279 --> 03:20:52.309 align:start position:0% oh no you oh sorry you pulled it over from<03:20:49.439> the<03:20:49.520> other<03:20:49.720> document<03:20:50.080> that's<03:20:50.279> why<03:20:51.319> okay 03:20:52.309 --> 03:20:52.319 align:start position:0% from the other document that's why okay 03:20:52.319 --> 03:20:53.790 align:start position:0% from the other document that's why okay yeah<03:20:52.479> that<03:20:52.640> does<03:20:52.800> seem<03:20:53.080> pretty<03:20:53.279> obvious<03:20:53.640> but 03:20:53.790 --> 03:20:53.800 align:start position:0% yeah that does seem pretty obvious but 03:20:53.800 --> 03:20:56.150 align:start position:0% yeah that does seem pretty obvious but if<03:20:54.040> we<03:20:54.120> need<03:20:54.239> to<03:20:54.399> put<03:20:54.520> it<03:20:54.640> in<03:20:54.840> there<03:20:55.439> I<03:20:55.560> think<03:20:55.760> it 03:20:56.150 --> 03:20:56.160 align:start position:0% if we need to put it in there I think it 03:20:56.160 --> 03:20:57.750 align:start position:0% if we need to put it in there I think it it<03:20:56.319> would<03:20:56.479> be<03:20:56.640> worth<03:20:56.880> repeating<03:20:57.479> where<03:20:57.640> it's 03:20:57.750 --> 03:20:57.760 align:start position:0% it would be worth repeating where it's 03:20:57.760 --> 03:20:59.990 align:start position:0% it would be worth repeating where it's in<03:20:57.880> our<03:20:58.080> guidance<03:20:58.520> document 03:20:59.990 --> 03:21:00.000 align:start position:0% in our guidance document 03:21:00.000 --> 03:21:02.070 align:start position:0% in our guidance document okay<03:21:01.000> sounds 03:21:02.070 --> 03:21:02.080 align:start position:0% okay sounds 03:21:02.080 --> 03:21:04.790 align:start position:0% okay sounds good<03:21:03.080> all<03:21:03.279> right<03:21:03.840> anything<03:21:04.199> else<03:21:04.560> board 03:21:04.790 --> 03:21:04.800 align:start position:0% good all right anything else board 03:21:04.800 --> 03:21:07.309 align:start position:0% good all right anything else board member<03:21:05.040> real<03:21:05.479> board<03:21:05.760> member 03:21:07.309 --> 03:21:07.319 align:start position:0% member real board member 03:21:07.319 --> 03:21:11.189 align:start position:0% member real board member green<03:21:08.319> I<03:21:08.640> the<03:21:08.760> other<03:21:09.399> item<03:21:10.399> is<03:21:10.680> now<03:21:10.800> we<03:21:10.920> need<03:21:11.040> to 03:21:11.189 --> 03:21:11.199 align:start position:0% green I the other item is now we need to 03:21:11.199 --> 03:21:14.790 align:start position:0% green I the other item is now we need to reference<03:21:12.160> um<03:21:12.840> our<03:21:13.160> guidance<03:21:14.040> Incorporated 03:21:14.790 --> 03:21:14.800 align:start position:0% reference um our guidance Incorporated 03:21:14.800 --> 03:21:19.309 align:start position:0% reference um our guidance Incorporated in<03:21:14.960> the<03:21:15.080> rule<03:21:15.680> how<03:21:15.840> we<03:21:16.040> do<03:21:16.199> that<03:21:16.319> with 03:21:19.309 --> 03:21:19.319 align:start position:0% 03:21:19.319 --> 03:21:21.389 align:start position:0% others<03:21:20.319> and<03:21:20.439> it<03:21:20.560> would<03:21:20.720> have<03:21:20.840> a<03:21:21.040> separate 03:21:21.389 --> 03:21:21.399 align:start position:0% others and it would have a separate 03:21:21.399 --> 03:21:23.429 align:start position:0% others and it would have a separate section<03:21:21.960> and<03:21:22.319> you<03:21:22.439> could<03:21:22.720> actually<03:21:22.960> do<03:21:23.199> that 03:21:23.429 --> 03:21:23.439 align:start position:0% section and you could actually do that 03:21:23.439 --> 03:21:25.630 align:start position:0% section and you could actually do that after<03:21:23.720> we're<03:21:23.960> done<03:21:24.680> do<03:21:24.800> you<03:21:24.880> know<03:21:25.000> what<03:21:25.120> I<03:21:25.199> mean 03:21:25.630 --> 03:21:25.640 align:start position:0% after we're done do you know what I mean 03:21:25.640 --> 03:21:27.950 align:start position:0% after we're done do you know what I mean if<03:21:25.760> we<03:21:25.920> just<03:21:26.080> made<03:21:26.319> the<03:21:26.479> motion<03:21:27.080> or<03:21:27.479> amendment 03:21:27.950 --> 03:21:27.960 align:start position:0% if we just made the motion or amendment 03:21:27.960 --> 03:21:30.910 align:start position:0% if we just made the motion or amendment that<03:21:28.080> you<03:21:28.399> incorporate<03:21:29.040> by<03:21:29.720> reference<03:21:30.720> and 03:21:30.910 --> 03:21:30.920 align:start position:0% that you incorporate by reference and 03:21:30.920 --> 03:21:33.110 align:start position:0% that you incorporate by reference and put<03:21:31.080> a<03:21:31.239> section<03:21:31.600> in<03:21:31.840> here<03:21:32.560> if<03:21:32.680> we<03:21:32.800> just<03:21:32.960> had 03:21:33.110 --> 03:21:33.120 align:start position:0% put a section in here if we just had 03:21:33.120 --> 03:21:35.630 align:start position:0% put a section in here if we just had something<03:21:33.399> typed<03:21:33.800> like<03:21:34.000> that<03:21:34.359> so<03:21:35.279> so<03:21:35.439> does 03:21:35.630 --> 03:21:35.640 align:start position:0% something typed like that so so does 03:21:35.640 --> 03:21:37.990 align:start position:0% something typed like that so so does that<03:21:35.800> change<03:21:36.040> it<03:21:36.239> from<03:21:36.399> being<03:21:36.720> guidance<03:21:37.479> to 03:21:37.990 --> 03:21:38.000 align:start position:0% that change it from being guidance to 03:21:38.000 --> 03:21:41.830 align:start position:0% that change it from being guidance to being<03:21:39.000> a<03:21:39.720> requirement<03:21:40.720> well<03:21:40.880> we<03:21:41.199> put<03:21:41.319> it<03:21:41.439> in<03:21:41.600> as 03:21:41.830 --> 03:21:41.840 align:start position:0% being a requirement well we put it in as 03:21:41.840 --> 03:21:44.670 align:start position:0% being a requirement well we put it in as res<03:21:42.840> we<03:21:42.960> put<03:21:43.080> it<03:21:43.199> in<03:21:43.359> as<03:21:43.479> a<03:21:43.640> resource<03:21:44.239> just<03:21:44.439> like 03:21:44.670 --> 03:21:44.680 align:start position:0% res we put it in as a resource just like 03:21:44.680 --> 03:21:47.590 align:start position:0% res we put it in as a resource just like we<03:21:44.800> did<03:21:45.000> with<03:21:45.160> our<03:21:45.319> reading<03:21:45.600> rule<03:21:46.000> last<03:21:46.239> month 03:21:47.590 --> 03:21:47.600 align:start position:0% we did with our reading rule last month 03:21:47.600 --> 03:21:51.070 align:start position:0% we did with our reading rule last month it's<03:21:47.760> a<03:21:47.960> resource<03:21:48.359> for<03:21:48.600> districts<03:21:49.040> to<03:21:49.279> use 03:21:51.070 --> 03:21:51.080 align:start position:0% it's a resource for districts to use 03:21:51.080 --> 03:21:54.229 align:start position:0% it's a resource for districts to use um<03:21:52.080> and<03:21:52.880> it<03:21:53.000> just<03:21:53.319> it's<03:21:53.680> and<03:21:53.800> we<03:21:54.080> just 03:21:54.229 --> 03:21:54.239 align:start position:0% um and it just it's and we just 03:21:54.239 --> 03:21:56.349 align:start position:0% um and it just it's and we just incorporate<03:21:55.120> or<03:21:55.560> talk<03:21:55.800> about<03:21:55.960> it<03:21:56.080> being 03:21:56.349 --> 03:21:56.359 align:start position:0% incorporate or talk about it being 03:21:56.359 --> 03:21:58.510 align:start position:0% incorporate or talk about it being guidance<03:21:56.800> document<03:21:57.680> just<03:21:57.880> like<03:21:58.000> we<03:21:58.120> did<03:21:58.319> with 03:21:58.510 --> 03:21:58.520 align:start position:0% guidance document just like we did with 03:21:58.520 --> 03:22:00.389 align:start position:0% guidance document just like we did with the<03:21:58.800> reading<03:21:59.120> materials<03:21:59.600> checklist<03:22:00.160> and<03:22:00.279> the 03:22:00.389 --> 03:22:00.399 align:start position:0% the reading materials checklist and the 03:22:00.399 --> 03:22:02.110 align:start position:0% the reading materials checklist and the reading<03:22:00.680> materials 03:22:02.110 --> 03:22:02.120 align:start position:0% reading materials 03:22:02.120 --> 03:22:04.990 align:start position:0% reading materials um<03:22:03.120> uh<03:22:03.279> what<03:22:03.439> is<03:22:03.520> it<03:22:03.920> the<03:22:04.040> two<03:22:04.239> pieces<03:22:04.640> we 03:22:04.990 --> 03:22:05.000 align:start position:0% um uh what is it the two pieces we 03:22:05.000 --> 03:22:07.189 align:start position:0% um uh what is it the two pieces we incorporated<03:22:05.600> in<03:22:05.760> there<03:22:06.120> they're<03:22:06.640> resources 03:22:07.189 --> 03:22:07.199 align:start position:0% incorporated in there they're resources 03:22:07.199 --> 03:22:08.790 align:start position:0% incorporated in there they're resources for<03:22:07.439> districts<03:22:07.880> I<03:22:07.960> don't<03:22:08.160> have<03:22:08.319> the<03:22:08.439> language 03:22:08.790 --> 03:22:08.800 align:start position:0% for districts I don't have the language 03:22:08.800 --> 03:22:10.870 align:start position:0% for districts I don't have the language in<03:22:08.880> front<03:22:09.080> of<03:22:09.160> me<03:22:09.319> but<03:22:09.600> how<03:22:09.760> does<03:22:09.960> that 03:22:10.870 --> 03:22:10.880 align:start position:0% in front of me but how does that 03:22:10.880 --> 03:22:13.630 align:start position:0% in front of me but how does that look<03:22:11.880> superintendent<03:22:12.840> May<03:22:13.199> provide<03:22:13.479> a 03:22:13.630 --> 03:22:13.640 align:start position:0% look superintendent May provide a 03:22:13.640 --> 03:22:16.790 align:start position:0% look superintendent May provide a guidance<03:22:14.080> document<03:22:14.479> for<03:22:14.640> use<03:22:14.880> by<03:22:15.040> an<03:22:15.560> Lea<03:22:16.600> in 03:22:16.790 --> 03:22:16.800 align:start position:0% guidance document for use by an Lea in 03:22:16.800 --> 03:22:18.750 align:start position:0% guidance document for use by an Lea in developing<03:22:17.199> an<03:22:17.319> ela's<03:22:18.080> policy<03:22:18.520> and 03:22:18.750 --> 03:22:18.760 align:start position:0% developing an ela's policy and 03:22:18.760 --> 03:22:20.309 align:start position:0% developing an ela's policy and accompanying<03:22:19.239> procedures<03:22:19.760> described<03:22:20.160> in 03:22:20.309 --> 03:22:20.319 align:start position:0% accompanying procedures described in 03:22:20.319 --> 03:22:22.469 align:start position:0% accompanying procedures described in subsection<03:22:20.880> one<03:22:21.520> that<03:22:21.640> would<03:22:21.800> be<03:22:21.960> great<03:22:22.239> now 03:22:22.469 --> 03:22:22.479 align:start position:0% subsection one that would be great now 03:22:22.479 --> 03:22:24.150 align:start position:0% subsection one that would be great now my<03:22:22.680> question<03:22:23.040> is<03:22:23.279> this<03:22:23.760> what<03:22:23.880> is<03:22:24.040> the 03:22:24.150 --> 03:22:24.160 align:start position:0% my question is this what is the 03:22:24.160 --> 03:22:25.750 align:start position:0% my question is this what is the difference<03:22:24.600> between<03:22:24.920> doing<03:22:25.199> that<03:22:25.479> and 03:22:25.750 --> 03:22:25.760 align:start position:0% difference between doing that and 03:22:25.760 --> 03:22:27.630 align:start position:0% difference between doing that and actually<03:22:26.239> providing<03:22:26.640> an<03:22:26.840> incorporated 03:22:27.630 --> 03:22:27.640 align:start position:0% actually providing an incorporated 03:22:27.640 --> 03:22:29.670 align:start position:0% actually providing an incorporated document<03:22:28.359> because<03:22:28.840> all<03:22:29.040> those<03:22:29.199> others<03:22:29.479> we 03:22:29.670 --> 03:22:29.680 align:start position:0% document because all those others we 03:22:29.680 --> 03:22:32.429 align:start position:0% document because all those others we provide<03:22:29.960> an<03:22:30.160> incorporated 03:22:32.429 --> 03:22:32.439 align:start position:0% provide an incorporated 03:22:32.439 --> 03:22:35.070 align:start position:0% provide an incorporated document<03:22:33.439> makes<03:22:33.720> the<03:22:33.880> Incorporated<03:22:34.640> document 03:22:35.070 --> 03:22:35.080 align:start position:0% document makes the Incorporated document 03:22:35.080 --> 03:22:37.349 align:start position:0% document makes the Incorporated document be<03:22:35.359> a<03:22:35.479> rule<03:22:35.880> in<03:22:36.000> and<03:22:36.199> of<03:22:36.439> itself<03:22:36.840> it<03:22:37.040> has<03:22:37.239> the 03:22:37.349 --> 03:22:37.359 align:start position:0% be a rule in and of itself it has the 03:22:37.359 --> 03:22:39.389 align:start position:0% be a rule in and of itself it has the same<03:22:37.560> force<03:22:37.840> of<03:22:38.040> law<03:22:38.319> as<03:22:38.439> a<03:22:38.560> rule<03:22:39.040> where<03:22:39.279> this 03:22:39.389 --> 03:22:39.399 align:start position:0% same force of law as a rule where this 03:22:39.399 --> 03:22:40.510 align:start position:0% same force of law as a rule where this is 03:22:40.510 --> 03:22:40.520 align:start position:0% is 03:22:40.520 --> 03:22:42.830 align:start position:0% is guidance<03:22:41.520> yeah<03:22:41.680> we<03:22:41.760> want<03:22:41.840> to<03:22:41.960> make<03:22:42.120> sure<03:22:42.640> do 03:22:42.830 --> 03:22:42.840 align:start position:0% guidance yeah we want to make sure do 03:22:42.840 --> 03:22:45.910 align:start position:0% guidance yeah we want to make sure do that<03:22:43.760> so<03:22:44.000> those<03:22:44.160> others<03:22:44.439> were<03:22:44.720> guidance<03:22:45.120> too 03:22:45.910 --> 03:22:45.920 align:start position:0% that so those others were guidance too 03:22:45.920 --> 03:22:48.229 align:start position:0% that so those others were guidance too should<03:22:46.160> we<03:22:46.680> should<03:22:46.920> we<03:22:47.120> do<03:22:47.239> we<03:22:47.359> need<03:22:47.479> to<03:22:47.920> CH 03:22:48.229 --> 03:22:48.239 align:start position:0% should we should we do we need to CH 03:22:48.239 --> 03:22:50.229 align:start position:0% should we should we do we need to CH change<03:22:48.600> those<03:22:48.800> to<03:22:49.040> guidance<03:22:49.439> for<03:22:49.720> districts 03:22:50.229 --> 03:22:50.239 align:start position:0% change those to guidance for districts 03:22:50.239 --> 03:22:52.510 align:start position:0% change those to guidance for districts or<03:22:50.479> resources<03:22:51.160> because<03:22:51.319> they're<03:22:51.479> not<03:22:51.800> put<03:22:52.000> in 03:22:52.510 --> 03:22:52.520 align:start position:0% or resources because they're not put in 03:22:52.520 --> 03:22:57.030 align:start position:0% or resources because they're not put in as<03:22:53.520> um<03:22:54.080> does<03:22:54.279> that<03:22:54.479> make<03:22:55.239> sense<03:22:56.239> I<03:22:56.359> think<03:22:56.560> one 03:22:57.030 --> 03:22:57.040 align:start position:0% as um does that make sense I think one 03:22:57.040 --> 03:22:58.950 align:start position:0% as um does that make sense I think one difference<03:22:58.040> with<03:22:58.239> like<03:22:58.399> the<03:22:58.520> counseling 03:22:58.950 --> 03:22:58.960 align:start position:0% difference with like the counseling 03:22:58.960 --> 03:23:01.710 align:start position:0% difference with like the counseling rules<03:22:59.359> for<03:22:59.640> example<03:23:00.439> there<03:23:00.560> was<03:23:00.800> material<03:23:01.479> in 03:23:01.710 --> 03:23:01.720 align:start position:0% rules for example there was material in 03:23:01.720 --> 03:23:03.510 align:start position:0% rules for example there was material in those<03:23:01.920> Incorporated<03:23:02.560> documents<03:23:03.080> that<03:23:03.239> was 03:23:03.510 --> 03:23:03.520 align:start position:0% those Incorporated documents that was 03:23:03.520 --> 03:23:06.670 align:start position:0% those Incorporated documents that was not<03:23:03.840> included<03:23:04.279> in<03:23:04.399> the<03:23:04.680> rule<03:23:05.680> whereas<03:23:06.439> this 03:23:06.670 --> 03:23:06.680 align:start position:0% not included in the rule whereas this 03:23:06.680 --> 03:23:09.110 align:start position:0% not included in the rule whereas this guidance<03:23:07.160> is<03:23:07.399> kind<03:23:07.520> of<03:23:07.640> a<03:23:07.920> summary<03:23:08.720> of<03:23:08.960> the 03:23:09.110 --> 03:23:09.120 align:start position:0% guidance is kind of a summary of the 03:23:09.120 --> 03:23:11.910 align:start position:0% guidance is kind of a summary of the rule<03:23:09.680> and<03:23:09.840> the<03:23:09.960> law<03:23:10.279> itself<03:23:10.960> and 03:23:11.910 --> 03:23:11.920 align:start position:0% rule and the law itself and 03:23:11.920 --> 03:23:14.550 align:start position:0% rule and the law itself and so<03:23:12.920> I<03:23:13.000> don't<03:23:13.199> know<03:23:13.439> that<03:23:13.560> it<03:23:13.840> NE<03:23:14.160> necessarily 03:23:14.550 --> 03:23:14.560 align:start position:0% so I don't know that it NE necessarily 03:23:14.560 --> 03:23:16.950 align:start position:0% so I don't know that it NE necessarily needs<03:23:14.800> to<03:23:14.880> be<03:23:15.000> because<03:23:15.120> there's<03:23:15.279> no<03:23:15.439> no<03:23:16.000> no<03:23:16.560> new 03:23:16.950 --> 03:23:16.960 align:start position:0% needs to be because there's no no no new 03:23:16.960 --> 03:23:19.870 align:start position:0% needs to be because there's no no no new information<03:23:17.840> in<03:23:18.000> the<03:23:18.120> guidance<03:23:18.880> document 03:23:19.870 --> 03:23:19.880 align:start position:0% information in the guidance document 03:23:19.880 --> 03:23:22.550 align:start position:0% information in the guidance document okay<03:23:20.359> okay<03:23:21.279> I<03:23:21.399> just<03:23:21.520> want<03:23:21.640> to<03:23:21.800> make<03:23:21.960> sure<03:23:22.439> if 03:23:22.550 --> 03:23:22.560 align:start position:0% okay okay I just want to make sure if 03:23:22.560 --> 03:23:24.349 align:start position:0% okay okay I just want to make sure if we're<03:23:22.840> following<03:23:23.399> that<03:23:23.640> type<03:23:23.800> of<03:23:24.000> pattern 03:23:24.349 --> 03:23:24.359 align:start position:0% we're following that type of pattern 03:23:24.359 --> 03:23:26.070 align:start position:0% we're following that type of pattern that<03:23:24.560> we're<03:23:24.920> doing<03:23:25.199> that<03:23:25.359> with<03:23:25.560> other<03:23:25.840> things 03:23:26.070 --> 03:23:26.080 align:start position:0% that we're doing that with other things 03:23:26.080 --> 03:23:27.429 align:start position:0% that we're doing that with other things too<03:23:26.399> then<03:23:26.600> because<03:23:26.800> that's<03:23:27.000> what<03:23:27.120> we've<03:23:27.279> been 03:23:27.429 --> 03:23:27.439 align:start position:0% too then because that's what we've been 03:23:27.439 --> 03:23:29.550 align:start position:0% too then because that's what we've been doing<03:23:27.760> over<03:23:27.960> the<03:23:28.120> last<03:23:28.319> several<03:23:28.640> months<03:23:29.319> is 03:23:29.550 --> 03:23:29.560 align:start position:0% doing over the last several months is 03:23:29.560 --> 03:23:32.590 align:start position:0% doing over the last several months is incorporating<03:23:30.399> documents<03:23:31.120> in<03:23:32.120> but<03:23:32.279> I<03:23:32.399> see 03:23:32.590 --> 03:23:32.600 align:start position:0% incorporating documents in but I see 03:23:32.600 --> 03:23:34.229 align:start position:0% incorporating documents in but I see what<03:23:32.680> you're<03:23:32.800> saying<03:23:33.040> because<03:23:33.279> it's<03:23:33.439> not<03:23:33.680> new 03:23:34.229 --> 03:23:34.239 align:start position:0% what you're saying because it's not new 03:23:34.239 --> 03:23:36.110 align:start position:0% what you're saying because it's not new information<03:23:34.920> it's<03:23:35.080> more<03:23:35.239> of<03:23:35.359> a<03:23:35.520> resource<03:23:35.880> for 03:23:36.110 --> 03:23:36.120 align:start position:0% information it's more of a resource for 03:23:36.120 --> 03:23:37.510 align:start position:0% information it's more of a resource for the<03:23:36.279> information<03:23:36.720> that's 03:23:37.510 --> 03:23:37.520 align:start position:0% the information that's 03:23:37.520 --> 03:23:39.269 align:start position:0% the information that's available<03:23:38.520> am<03:23:38.600> I<03:23:38.760> accurate<03:23:39.120> am<03:23:39.199> I 03:23:39.269 --> 03:23:39.279 align:start position:0% available am I accurate am I 03:23:39.279 --> 03:23:41.429 align:start position:0% available am I accurate am I articulating<03:23:39.880> that 03:23:41.429 --> 03:23:41.439 align:start position:0% articulating that 03:23:41.439 --> 03:23:43.830 align:start position:0% articulating that accurately<03:23:42.439> that's<03:23:42.600> how<03:23:42.840> I<03:23:43.080> see<03:23:43.319> it<03:23:43.600> I<03:23:43.680> don't 03:23:43.830 --> 03:23:43.840 align:start position:0% accurately that's how I see it I don't 03:23:43.840 --> 03:23:46.750 align:start position:0% accurately that's how I see it I don't know<03:23:44.199> if<03:23:44.560> AG<03:23:45.040> abuse<03:23:45.479> has<03:23:45.760> a<03:23:45.880> different<03:23:46.160> opinion 03:23:46.750 --> 03:23:46.760 align:start position:0% know if AG abuse has a different opinion 03:23:46.760 --> 03:23:49.830 align:start position:0% know if AG abuse has a different opinion but<03:23:47.239> that's<03:23:47.399> how<03:23:47.520> I<03:23:47.640> see<03:23:48.040> it<03:23:49.040> definitely<03:23:49.439> see<03:23:49.640> a 03:23:49.830 --> 03:23:49.840 align:start position:0% but that's how I see it definitely see a 03:23:49.840 --> 03:23:51.510 align:start position:0% but that's how I see it definitely see a distinction<03:23:50.359> when<03:23:50.479> you<03:23:50.640> put<03:23:50.920> point<03:23:51.120> it<03:23:51.239> out 03:23:51.510 --> 03:23:51.520 align:start position:0% distinction when you put point it out 03:23:51.520 --> 03:23:53.110 align:start position:0% distinction when you put point it out like 03:23:53.110 --> 03:23:53.120 align:start position:0% like 03:23:53.120 --> 03:23:55.710 align:start position:0% like that<03:23:54.120> okayy<03:23:54.760> all<03:23:54.920> right<03:23:55.160> I<03:23:55.239> just<03:23:55.359> want<03:23:55.479> to<03:23:55.600> make 03:23:55.710 --> 03:23:55.720 align:start position:0% that okayy all right I just want to make 03:23:55.720 --> 03:23:57.790 align:start position:0% that okayy all right I just want to make sure<03:23:55.960> we're<03:23:56.239> we're<03:23:56.600> consistent<03:23:57.399> though 03:23:57.790 --> 03:23:57.800 align:start position:0% sure we're we're consistent though 03:23:57.800 --> 03:23:59.630 align:start position:0% sure we're we're consistent though because<03:23:58.199> the<03:23:58.439> document<03:23:58.920> that<03:23:59.080> we<03:23:59.239> had<03:23:59.439> last 03:23:59.630 --> 03:23:59.640 align:start position:0% because the document that we had last 03:23:59.640 --> 03:24:02.710 align:start position:0% because the document that we had last time<03:23:59.800> was<03:23:59.960> a<03:24:00.120> resource<03:24:00.680> it<03:24:00.840> wasn't<03:24:01.520> a<03:24:02.520> right 03:24:02.710 --> 03:24:02.720 align:start position:0% time was a resource it wasn't a right 03:24:02.720 --> 03:24:04.150 align:start position:0% time was a resource it wasn't a right and<03:24:02.880> I'm<03:24:03.040> talking<03:24:03.319> the<03:24:03.399> reading<03:24:03.680> rule<03:24:03.960> so<03:24:04.080> I 03:24:04.150 --> 03:24:04.160 align:start position:0% and I'm talking the reading rule so I 03:24:04.160 --> 03:24:05.630 align:start position:0% and I'm talking the reading rule so I was<03:24:04.279> trying<03:24:04.439> to<03:24:04.560> follow<03:24:04.880> the<03:24:05.040> same<03:24:05.319> pattern 03:24:05.630 --> 03:24:05.640 align:start position:0% was trying to follow the same pattern 03:24:05.640 --> 03:24:07.510 align:start position:0% was trying to follow the same pattern that<03:24:05.800> we<03:24:06.000> used<03:24:06.399> with<03:24:06.640> that<03:24:07.000> in<03:24:07.120> other<03:24:07.319> words 03:24:07.510 --> 03:24:07.520 align:start position:0% that we used with that in other words 03:24:07.520 --> 03:24:10.070 align:start position:0% that we used with that in other words it's<03:24:07.720> not<03:24:07.960> you<03:24:08.160> have<03:24:08.319> to<03:24:08.520> use<03:24:08.840> this<03:24:09.800> it's<03:24:09.920> a 03:24:10.070 --> 03:24:10.080 align:start position:0% it's not you have to use this it's a 03:24:10.080 --> 03:24:11.910 align:start position:0% it's not you have to use this it's a resource<03:24:10.720> but<03:24:10.840> then<03:24:10.960> when<03:24:11.080> we<03:24:11.239> incorporate<03:24:11.760> it 03:24:11.910 --> 03:24:11.920 align:start position:0% resource but then when we incorporate it 03:24:11.920 --> 03:24:13.790 align:start position:0% resource but then when we incorporate it as<03:24:12.040> a<03:24:12.399> as<03:24:12.479> a<03:24:12.720> reference<03:24:13.439> that<03:24:13.600> way 03:24:13.790 --> 03:24:13.800 align:start position:0% as a as a reference that way 03:24:13.800 --> 03:24:15.469 align:start position:0% as a as a reference that way incorporated<03:24:14.359> into<03:24:14.560> the<03:24:14.640> rule<03:24:14.920> did<03:24:15.040> it<03:24:15.199> now 03:24:15.469 --> 03:24:15.479 align:start position:0% incorporated into the rule did it now 03:24:15.479 --> 03:24:17.030 align:start position:0% incorporated into the rule did it now become 03:24:17.030 --> 03:24:17.040 align:start position:0% become 03:24:17.040 --> 03:24:19.830 align:start position:0% become I<03:24:17.279> have<03:24:17.439> to<03:24:17.640> use<03:24:17.840> it<03:24:18.279> does<03:24:18.479> that<03:24:18.640> make<03:24:18.880> sense 03:24:19.830 --> 03:24:19.840 align:start position:0% I have to use it does that make sense 03:24:19.840 --> 03:24:22.469 align:start position:0% I have to use it does that make sense yeah<03:24:20.720> I<03:24:20.840> have<03:24:21.000> that<03:24:21.160> same<03:24:21.439> question<03:24:22.120> yeah<03:24:22.279> so 03:24:22.469 --> 03:24:22.479 align:start position:0% yeah I have that same question yeah so 03:24:22.479 --> 03:24:25.030 align:start position:0% yeah I have that same question yeah so that's<03:24:22.680> I'm<03:24:22.800> a<03:24:22.920> little<03:24:23.120> bit<03:24:23.359> confused<03:24:23.760> on<03:24:24.040> that 03:24:25.030 --> 03:24:25.040 align:start position:0% that's I'm a little bit confused on that 03:24:25.040 --> 03:24:27.550 align:start position:0% that's I'm a little bit confused on that Deputy<03:24:25.520> superintendent<03:24:26.040> Norman<03:24:26.439> did<03:24:26.560> you<03:24:27.439> was 03:24:27.550 --> 03:24:27.560 align:start position:0% Deputy superintendent Norman did you was 03:24:27.560 --> 03:24:30.189 align:start position:0% Deputy superintendent Norman did you was that<03:24:27.760> hand<03:24:28.000> up<03:24:28.160> or<03:24:28.319> not<03:24:29.279> it<03:24:29.479> was<03:24:29.720> up<03:24:29.920> but<03:24:30.040> it's 03:24:30.189 --> 03:24:30.199 align:start position:0% that hand up or not it was up but it's 03:24:30.199 --> 03:24:33.110 align:start position:0% that hand up or not it was up but it's not<03:24:30.439> answering<03:24:31.080> that<03:24:31.840> question<03:24:32.439> so<03:24:32.720> I<03:24:32.840> put<03:24:32.960> it 03:24:33.110 --> 03:24:33.120 align:start position:0% not answering that question so I put it 03:24:33.120 --> 03:24:37.510 align:start position:0% not answering that question so I put it back<03:24:33.359> down<03:24:34.359> okay<03:24:34.880> all 03:24:37.510 --> 03:24:37.520 align:start position:0% 03:24:37.520 --> 03:24:39.870 align:start position:0% right<03:24:38.520> anyone<03:24:38.920> want<03:24:39.120> to<03:24:39.319> answer<03:24:39.600> that 03:24:39.870 --> 03:24:39.880 align:start position:0% right anyone want to answer that 03:24:39.880 --> 03:24:43.070 align:start position:0% right anyone want to answer that question<03:24:40.439> or<03:24:40.720> want<03:24:41.399> to<03:24:42.399> I<03:24:42.479> want<03:24:42.560> to<03:24:42.720> make<03:24:42.840> sure 03:24:43.070 --> 03:24:43.080 align:start position:0% question or want to I want to make sure 03:24:43.080 --> 03:24:44.950 align:start position:0% question or want to I want to make sure that<03:24:43.199> we're<03:24:43.439> clear<03:24:43.760> that<03:24:43.960> we<03:24:44.120> could<03:24:44.399> provide<03:24:44.720> a 03:24:44.950 --> 03:24:44.960 align:start position:0% that we're clear that we could provide a 03:24:44.960 --> 03:24:46.630 align:start position:0% that we're clear that we could provide a guidance<03:24:45.439> document<03:24:45.840> but<03:24:45.960> it<03:24:46.040> doesn't<03:24:46.479> mean 03:24:46.630 --> 03:24:46.640 align:start position:0% guidance document but it doesn't mean 03:24:46.640 --> 03:24:52.030 align:start position:0% guidance document but it doesn't mean that<03:24:46.800> it's<03:24:47.800> in<03:24:48.000> the<03:24:48.160> same<03:24:48.399> level<03:24:48.680> as<03:24:48.800> the<03:24:48.960> rule 03:24:52.030 --> 03:24:52.040 align:start position:0% 03:24:52.040 --> 03:24:55.070 align:start position:0% right<03:24:53.040> I<03:24:53.279> I<03:24:53.359> can<03:24:53.560> say<03:24:54.239> my<03:24:54.720> understanding<03:24:54.960> and 03:24:55.070 --> 03:24:55.080 align:start position:0% right I I can say my understanding and 03:24:55.080 --> 03:24:56.870 align:start position:0% right I I can say my understanding and so<03:24:55.279> hopefully<03:24:55.600> by<03:24:55.760> saying<03:24:56.040> it<03:24:56.160> out<03:24:56.399> loud<03:24:56.680> then 03:24:56.870 --> 03:24:56.880 align:start position:0% so hopefully by saying it out loud then 03:24:56.880 --> 03:24:58.830 align:start position:0% so hopefully by saying it out loud then there's<03:24:57.040> a<03:24:57.199> clarification<03:24:57.880> on<03:24:58.040> it<03:24:58.560> if<03:24:58.680> there's 03:24:58.830 --> 03:24:58.840 align:start position:0% there's a clarification on it if there's 03:24:58.840 --> 03:25:00.269 align:start position:0% there's a clarification on it if there's a<03:24:59.040> guidance<03:24:59.479> document<03:24:59.920> that's<03:25:00.120> not 03:25:00.269 --> 03:25:00.279 align:start position:0% a guidance document that's not 03:25:00.279 --> 03:25:01.710 align:start position:0% a guidance document that's not Incorporated<03:25:00.840> by<03:25:01.000> rule<03:25:01.279> it<03:25:01.399> has<03:25:01.520> that 03:25:01.710 --> 03:25:01.720 align:start position:0% Incorporated by rule it has that 03:25:01.720 --> 03:25:03.630 align:start position:0% Incorporated by rule it has that flexibility<03:25:02.359> and<03:25:02.479> so<03:25:02.680> those<03:25:02.840> are<03:25:03.040> created<03:25:03.479> but 03:25:03.630 --> 03:25:03.640 align:start position:0% flexibility and so those are created but 03:25:03.640 --> 03:25:06.229 align:start position:0% flexibility and so those are created but when<03:25:03.800> it<03:25:04.040> is<03:25:04.640> incorporated<03:25:05.359> by<03:25:05.560> rule<03:25:05.920> has<03:25:06.040> the 03:25:06.229 --> 03:25:06.239 align:start position:0% when it is incorporated by rule has the 03:25:06.239 --> 03:25:09.150 align:start position:0% when it is incorporated by rule has the effective<03:25:06.600> Rule<03:25:06.880> and<03:25:07.000> so<03:25:07.279> that's<03:25:07.680> that<03:25:08.279> us<03:25:08.880> um 03:25:09.150 --> 03:25:09.160 align:start position:0% effective Rule and so that's that us um 03:25:09.160 --> 03:25:10.309 align:start position:0% effective Rule and so that's that us um I<03:25:09.239> think<03:25:09.399> that<03:25:09.479> would<03:25:09.600> be<03:25:09.720> a<03:25:09.880> good 03:25:10.309 --> 03:25:10.319 align:start position:0% I think that would be a good 03:25:10.319 --> 03:25:12.189 align:start position:0% I think that would be a good clarification<03:25:11.319> if<03:25:11.439> you're<03:25:11.560> meaning<03:25:11.920> it<03:25:12.040> to 03:25:12.189 --> 03:25:12.199 align:start position:0% clarification if you're meaning it to 03:25:12.199 --> 03:25:14.510 align:start position:0% clarification if you're meaning it to have<03:25:12.399> the<03:25:12.560> same<03:25:13.239> um<03:25:13.520> like<03:25:13.880> everything<03:25:14.279> within 03:25:14.510 --> 03:25:14.520 align:start position:0% have the same um like everything within 03:25:14.520 --> 03:25:16.870 align:start position:0% have the same um like everything within it<03:25:14.720> has<03:25:14.880> to<03:25:15.000> be<03:25:15.160> done<03:25:15.359> and<03:25:15.520> followed<03:25:16.439> then<03:25:16.760> it 03:25:16.870 --> 03:25:16.880 align:start position:0% it has to be done and followed then it 03:25:16.880 --> 03:25:18.830 align:start position:0% it has to be done and followed then it should<03:25:17.120> be<03:25:17.359> incorporated<03:25:17.920> by<03:25:18.080> rule<03:25:18.600> if<03:25:18.720> it's 03:25:18.830 --> 03:25:18.840 align:start position:0% should be incorporated by rule if it's 03:25:18.840 --> 03:25:20.750 align:start position:0% should be incorporated by rule if it's more<03:25:19.080> like<03:25:19.319> the<03:25:19.720> um<03:25:19.920> let's<03:25:20.080> say<03:25:20.239> the<03:25:20.359> AI 03:25:20.750 --> 03:25:20.760 align:start position:0% more like the um let's say the AI 03:25:20.760 --> 03:25:22.590 align:start position:0% more like the um let's say the AI framework<03:25:21.640> that<03:25:21.760> is<03:25:21.880> something<03:25:22.160> that's<03:25:22.359> more 03:25:22.590 --> 03:25:22.600 align:start position:0% framework that is something that's more 03:25:22.600 --> 03:25:24.670 align:start position:0% framework that is something that's more flexible<03:25:23.199> and<03:25:23.359> it's<03:25:23.720> not<03:25:23.920> Incorporated<03:25:24.520> by 03:25:24.670 --> 03:25:24.680 align:start position:0% flexible and it's not Incorporated by 03:25:24.680 --> 03:25:26.030 align:start position:0% flexible and it's not Incorporated by reference<03:25:25.040> into<03:25:25.319> anything<03:25:25.760> but<03:25:25.880> it's 03:25:26.030 --> 03:25:26.040 align:start position:0% reference into anything but it's 03:25:26.040 --> 03:25:29.309 align:start position:0% reference into anything but it's something<03:25:26.279> that<03:25:26.399> the<03:25:26.479> board<03:25:26.720> will 03:25:29.309 --> 03:25:29.319 align:start position:0% 03:25:29.319 --> 03:25:33.070 align:start position:0% approve<03:25:30.319> so<03:25:31.199> while<03:25:31.720> and<03:25:31.880> while<03:25:32.000> I'm<03:25:32.279> talking 03:25:33.070 --> 03:25:33.080 align:start position:0% approve so while and while I'm talking 03:25:33.080 --> 03:25:34.670 align:start position:0% approve so while and while I'm talking um<03:25:33.239> while<03:25:33.399> I'm<03:25:33.560> talking<03:25:34.000> we<03:25:34.160> have<03:25:34.319> do<03:25:34.479> have<03:25:34.560> a 03:25:34.670 --> 03:25:34.680 align:start position:0% um while I'm talking we have do have a 03:25:34.680 --> 03:25:36.830 align:start position:0% um while I'm talking we have do have a board<03:25:34.880> member<03:25:35.160> that<03:25:35.279> needs<03:25:35.479> to<03:25:35.600> leave<03:25:35.960> by<03:25:36.160> 1250 03:25:36.830 --> 03:25:36.840 align:start position:0% board member that needs to leave by 1250 03:25:36.840 --> 03:25:40.070 align:start position:0% board member that needs to leave by 1250 which<03:25:36.960> is<03:25:37.080> in<03:25:37.279> three<03:25:37.520> minutes<03:25:38.479> and<03:25:38.800> um<03:25:39.560> I<03:25:39.840> as<03:25:39.960> a 03:25:40.070 --> 03:25:40.080 align:start position:0% which is in three minutes and um I as a 03:25:40.080 --> 03:25:43.229 align:start position:0% which is in three minutes and um I as a board<03:25:40.680> or<03:25:41.080> chair<03:25:41.960> um<03:25:42.239> committee<03:25:42.840> you<03:25:42.960> would<03:25:43.120> be 03:25:43.229 --> 03:25:43.239 align:start position:0% board or chair um committee you would be 03:25:43.239 --> 03:25:46.309 align:start position:0% board or chair um committee you would be able<03:25:43.479> to<03:25:43.840> either<03:25:44.080> finish<03:25:44.479> this<03:25:44.720> or<03:25:45.040> ask<03:25:45.279> for<03:25:45.680> a 03:25:46.309 --> 03:25:46.319 align:start position:0% able to either finish this or ask for a 03:25:46.319 --> 03:25:47.990 align:start position:0% able to either finish this or ask for a another<03:25:46.560> special<03:25:46.920> session<03:25:47.399> or<03:25:47.600> moving<03:25:47.880> that 03:25:47.990 --> 03:25:48.000 align:start position:0% another special session or moving that 03:25:48.000 --> 03:25:49.469 align:start position:0% another special session or moving that forward<03:25:48.279> I<03:25:48.359> just<03:25:48.439> wanted<03:25:48.680> to<03:25:48.840> time<03:25:49.120> wise<03:25:49.319> we 03:25:49.469 --> 03:25:49.479 align:start position:0% forward I just wanted to time wise we 03:25:49.479 --> 03:25:51.229 align:start position:0% forward I just wanted to time wise we have<03:25:49.600> a<03:25:50.080> a<03:25:50.239> Committee<03:25:50.560> Member<03:25:50.800> that<03:25:50.920> needs<03:25:51.120> to 03:25:51.229 --> 03:25:51.239 align:start position:0% have a a Committee Member that needs to 03:25:51.239 --> 03:25:53.510 align:start position:0% have a a Committee Member that needs to leave<03:25:51.439> at 03:25:53.510 --> 03:25:53.520 align:start position:0% leave at 03:25:53.520 --> 03:25:57.750 align:start position:0% leave at 12:50<03:25:54.520> so<03:25:55.279> um<03:25:56.080> how<03:25:56.640> close<03:25:56.960> are<03:25:57.199> we<03:25:57.439> are<03:25:57.600> we 03:25:57.750 --> 03:25:57.760 align:start position:0% 12:50 so um how close are we are we 03:25:57.760 --> 03:26:01.030 align:start position:0% 12:50 so um how close are we are we ready<03:25:58.080> to<03:25:58.359> vote<03:25:58.680> on<03:25:58.920> this<03:25:59.560> I<03:25:59.800> have<03:26:00.359> I<03:26:00.520> have<03:26:00.840> just 03:26:01.030 --> 03:26:01.040 align:start position:0% ready to vote on this I have I have just 03:26:01.040 --> 03:26:05.229 align:start position:0% ready to vote on this I have I have just two<03:26:01.279> more<03:26:02.199> items<03:26:03.199> that<03:26:03.800> and<03:26:04.000> one<03:26:04.160> of<03:26:04.279> them<03:26:04.399> is<03:26:04.520> a 03:26:05.229 --> 03:26:05.239 align:start position:0% two more items that and one of them is a 03:26:05.239 --> 03:26:07.510 align:start position:0% two more items that and one of them is a clarification<03:26:06.239> we<03:26:06.399> need<03:26:06.600> to<03:26:06.840> put<03:26:07.040> in<03:26:07.239> here 03:26:07.510 --> 03:26:07.520 align:start position:0% clarification we need to put in here 03:26:07.520 --> 03:26:09.710 align:start position:0% clarification we need to put in here final<03:26:08.000> determination<03:26:09.000> because<03:26:09.319> we<03:26:09.439> don't 03:26:09.710 --> 03:26:09.720 align:start position:0% final determination because we don't 03:26:09.720 --> 03:26:11.150 align:start position:0% final determination because we don't reference<03:26:10.279> that 03:26:11.150 --> 03:26:11.160 align:start position:0% reference that 03:26:11.160 --> 03:26:17.870 align:start position:0% reference that anywhere<03:26:12.160> and<03:26:12.399> so<03:26:13.399> um<03:26:13.720> I'm<03:26:14.279> on<03:26:15.279> section<03:26:15.680> four 03:26:17.870 --> 03:26:17.880 align:start position:0% anywhere and so um I'm on section four 03:26:17.880 --> 03:26:21.429 align:start position:0% anywhere and so um I'm on section four four<03:26:18.880> so<03:26:19.160> 44<03:26:20.160> here<03:26:20.359> on<03:26:20.479> the<03:26:20.640> determination 03:26:21.429 --> 03:26:21.439 align:start position:0% four so 44 here on the determination 03:26:21.439 --> 03:26:23.710 align:start position:0% four so 44 here on the determination where<03:26:21.560> it<03:26:21.720> says<03:26:22.520> determination<03:26:23.239> it<03:26:23.359> needs<03:26:23.600> to 03:26:23.710 --> 03:26:23.720 align:start position:0% where it says determination it needs to 03:26:23.720 --> 03:26:27.150 align:start position:0% where it says determination it needs to say<03:26:24.000> final<03:26:24.399> determination 03:26:27.150 --> 03:26:27.160 align:start position:0% say final determination 03:26:27.160 --> 03:26:30.590 align:start position:0% say final determination there<03:26:28.160> otherwise<03:26:28.720> it's<03:26:29.160> it's<03:26:29.680> it's<03:26:29.840> not 03:26:30.590 --> 03:26:30.600 align:start position:0% there otherwise it's it's it's not 03:26:30.600 --> 03:26:34.950 align:start position:0% there otherwise it's it's it's not clear<03:26:31.600> and<03:26:31.760> then<03:26:32.199> I<03:26:32.399> have<03:26:32.520> a<03:26:32.960> question<03:26:33.760> on<03:26:34.760> so 03:26:34.950 --> 03:26:34.960 align:start position:0% clear and then I have a question on so 03:26:34.960 --> 03:26:37.830 align:start position:0% clear and then I have a question on so if<03:26:35.080> you<03:26:35.199> go<03:26:35.359> up<03:26:35.520> to<03:26:35.720> one<03:26:36.040> of<03:26:36.279> this 03:26:37.830 --> 03:26:37.840 align:start position:0% if you go up to one of this 03:26:37.840 --> 03:26:40.429 align:start position:0% if you go up to one of this section<03:26:38.840> in<03:26:39.040> just<03:26:39.199> a<03:26:39.399> second<03:26:39.640> when<03:26:39.800> you're 03:26:40.429 --> 03:26:40.439 align:start position:0% section in just a second when you're 03:26:40.439 --> 03:26:43.030 align:start position:0% section in just a second when you're ready<03:26:41.439> no<03:26:41.640> no<03:26:41.760> no<03:26:41.920> back<03:26:42.080> down<03:26:42.279> sorry<03:26:42.680> it's<03:26:42.800> of 03:26:43.030 --> 03:26:43.040 align:start position:0% ready no no no back down sorry it's of 03:26:43.040 --> 03:26:44.910 align:start position:0% ready no no no back down sorry it's of section<03:26:43.319> four<03:26:43.640> one<03:26:43.800> of<03:26:44.000> section<03:26:44.239> four<03:26:44.800> this 03:26:44.910 --> 03:26:44.920 align:start position:0% section four one of section four this 03:26:44.920 --> 03:26:47.110 align:start position:0% section four one of section four this doesn't<03:26:45.279> make<03:26:45.560> sense<03:26:46.439> it<03:26:46.560> says<03:26:46.800> for 03:26:47.110 --> 03:26:47.120 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense it says for 03:26:47.120 --> 03:26:49.910 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense it says for challenges<03:26:47.720> prior<03:26:48.080> to<03:26:48.520> July<03:26:48.840> 1st<03:26:49.120> 2024<03:26:49.720> in<03:26:49.840> the 03:26:49.910 --> 03:26:49.920 align:start position:0% challenges prior to July 1st 2024 in the 03:26:49.920 --> 03:26:52.670 align:start position:0% challenges prior to July 1st 2024 in the Lea<03:26:50.319> shall<03:26:50.640> report<03:26:50.960> to<03:26:51.160> the<03:26:51.520> board<03:26:52.199> a<03:26:52.319> removal 03:26:52.670 --> 03:26:52.680 align:start position:0% Lea shall report to the board a removal 03:26:52.680 --> 03:26:54.670 align:start position:0% Lea shall report to the board a removal of<03:26:52.800> the<03:26:52.920> material<03:26:53.800> based<03:26:54.080> on<03:26:54.239> the<03:26:54.359> objective 03:26:54.670 --> 03:26:54.680 align:start position:0% of the material based on the objective 03:26:54.680 --> 03:26:56.990 align:start position:0% of the material based on the objective sensitive<03:26:55.160> material<03:26:55.920> final<03:26:56.319> determination 03:26:56.990 --> 03:26:57.000 align:start position:0% sensitive material final determination 03:26:57.000 --> 03:26:59.710 align:start position:0% sensitive material final determination we<03:26:57.120> need<03:26:57.279> to<03:26:57.520> Final<03:26:57.840> in<03:26:58.160> there<03:26:59.160> of<03:26:59.399> which<03:26:59.600> the 03:26:59.710 --> 03:26:59.720 align:start position:0% we need to Final in there of which the 03:26:59.720 --> 03:27:01.790 align:start position:0% we need to Final in there of which the ELA<03:27:00.199> has<03:27:00.399> sufficient<03:27:00.880> information<03:27:01.399> to 03:27:01.790 --> 03:27:01.800 align:start position:0% ELA has sufficient information to 03:27:01.800 --> 03:27:04.150 align:start position:0% ELA has sufficient information to support<03:27:02.800> the<03:27:03.000> Lea<03:27:03.479> has<03:27:03.680> sufficient 03:27:04.150 --> 03:27:04.160 align:start position:0% support the Lea has sufficient 03:27:04.160 --> 03:27:05.870 align:start position:0% support the Lea has sufficient information<03:27:04.640> to<03:27:04.840> support<03:27:05.199> the<03:27:05.319> determination 03:27:05.870 --> 03:27:05.880 align:start position:0% information to support the determination 03:27:05.880 --> 03:27:08.550 align:start position:0% information to support the determination of<03:27:06.040> whether<03:27:06.239> a<03:27:06.439> removed<03:27:06.840> material<03:27:07.239> meets<03:27:07.600> the 03:27:08.550 --> 03:27:08.560 align:start position:0% of whether a removed material meets the 03:27:08.560 --> 03:27:11.950 align:start position:0% of whether a removed material meets the threshold<03:27:09.560> the<03:27:09.720> Lea<03:27:10.199> does<03:27:10.359> not<03:27:10.600> do<03:27:10.880> that<03:27:11.840> that 03:27:11.950 --> 03:27:11.960 align:start position:0% threshold the Lea does not do that that 03:27:11.960 --> 03:27:14.830 align:start position:0% threshold the Lea does not do that that doesn't<03:27:12.279> make<03:27:12.520> sense<03:27:13.120> we<03:27:13.960> determine<03:27:14.479> that<03:27:14.680> not 03:27:14.830 --> 03:27:14.840 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense we determine that not 03:27:14.840 --> 03:27:19.309 align:start position:0% doesn't make sense we determine that not the<03:27:14.960> ELA<03:27:15.520> so<03:27:15.720> something<03:27:16.199> needs<03:27:16.359> to<03:27:16.520> change 03:27:19.309 --> 03:27:19.319 align:start position:0% 03:27:19.319 --> 03:27:21.550 align:start position:0% there<03:27:20.319> or<03:27:20.560> does<03:27:20.760> that<03:27:20.920> just<03:27:21.080> mean<03:27:21.279> that<03:27:21.399> they 03:27:21.550 --> 03:27:21.560 align:start position:0% there or does that just mean that they 03:27:21.560 --> 03:27:23.309 align:start position:0% there or does that just mean that they followed<03:27:21.960> the 03:27:23.309 --> 03:27:23.319 align:start position:0% followed the 03:27:23.319 --> 03:27:26.309 align:start position:0% followed the process<03:27:24.319> the<03:27:24.479> leas<03:27:25.160> who<03:27:25.359> has<03:27:25.600> the<03:27:25.760> information 03:27:26.309 --> 03:27:26.319 align:start position:0% process the leas who has the information 03:27:26.319 --> 03:27:28.630 align:start position:0% process the leas who has the information of<03:27:26.560> what<03:27:26.920> the<03:27:27.120> rationale<03:27:27.760> was<03:27:27.960> for<03:27:28.199> their 03:27:28.630 --> 03:27:28.640 align:start position:0% of what the rationale was for their 03:27:28.640 --> 03:27:30.590 align:start position:0% of what the rationale was for their decision<03:27:29.080> that<03:27:29.199> they<03:27:29.359> made<03:27:29.560> in<03:27:29.720> the<03:27:29.960> past<03:27:30.520> the 03:27:30.590 --> 03:27:30.600 align:start position:0% decision that they made in the past the 03:27:30.600 --> 03:27:32.550 align:start position:0% decision that they made in the past the board<03:27:31.000> doesn't<03:27:31.319> have<03:27:31.439> the<03:27:31.640> rationale<03:27:32.239> of<03:27:32.439> what 03:27:32.550 --> 03:27:32.560 align:start position:0% board doesn't have the rationale of what 03:27:32.560 --> 03:27:34.510 align:start position:0% board doesn't have the rationale of what the<03:27:32.760> decision<03:27:33.120> was<03:27:33.279> in<03:27:33.760> that<03:27:33.920> doesn't<03:27:34.399> that 03:27:34.510 --> 03:27:34.520 align:start position:0% the decision was in that doesn't that 03:27:34.520 --> 03:27:35.750 align:start position:0% the decision was in that doesn't that doesn't<03:27:34.760> have<03:27:34.920> anything<03:27:35.160> to<03:27:35.279> do<03:27:35.439> with<03:27:35.560> the 03:27:35.750 --> 03:27:35.760 align:start position:0% doesn't have anything to do with the 03:27:35.760 --> 03:27:37.349 align:start position:0% doesn't have anything to do with the threshold<03:27:36.319> is<03:27:36.439> what<03:27:36.560> I'm<03:27:36.680> saying<03:27:36.920> so<03:27:37.080> maybe 03:27:37.349 --> 03:27:37.359 align:start position:0% threshold is what I'm saying so maybe 03:27:37.359 --> 03:27:38.990 align:start position:0% threshold is what I'm saying so maybe that<03:27:37.520> we<03:27:37.640> just<03:27:37.760> need<03:27:37.880> to<03:27:38.000> change<03:27:38.279> threshold<03:27:38.760> to 03:27:38.990 --> 03:27:39.000 align:start position:0% that we just need to change threshold to 03:27:39.000 --> 03:27:40.830 align:start position:0% that we just need to change threshold to something<03:27:39.319> else<03:27:39.680> the<03:27:39.800> threshold<03:27:40.319> is<03:27:40.439> on<03:27:40.640> our 03:27:40.830 --> 03:27:40.840 align:start position:0% something else the threshold is on our 03:27:40.840 --> 03:27:48.110 align:start position:0% something else the threshold is on our end<03:27:41.120> not<03:27:41.359> theirs 03:27:48.110 --> 03:27:48.120 align:start position:0% 03:27:48.120 --> 03:27:50.110 align:start position:0% but<03:27:48.319> wouldn't<03:27:48.600> this<03:27:48.760> be<03:27:49.000> things<03:27:49.479> prior<03:27:49.800> to 03:27:50.110 --> 03:27:50.120 align:start position:0% but wouldn't this be things prior to 03:27:50.120 --> 03:27:52.710 align:start position:0% but wouldn't this be things prior to this<03:27:50.520> new<03:27:50.760> law<03:27:51.080> so<03:27:51.239> it<03:27:51.359> would 03:27:52.710 --> 03:27:52.720 align:start position:0% this new law so it would 03:27:52.720 --> 03:27:55.110 align:start position:0% this new law so it would be<03:27:53.720> that 03:27:55.110 --> 03:27:55.120 align:start position:0% be that 03:27:55.120 --> 03:27:57.389 align:start position:0% be that the<03:27:56.120> of<03:27:56.279> which<03:27:56.439> the<03:27:56.520> LA<03:27:56.840> has<03:27:57.000> sufficient 03:27:57.389 --> 03:27:57.399 align:start position:0% the of which the LA has sufficient 03:27:57.399 --> 03:27:59.510 align:start position:0% the of which the LA has sufficient information<03:27:57.800> to<03:27:58.479> support<03:27:58.960> the<03:27:59.160> final 03:27:59.510 --> 03:27:59.520 align:start position:0% information to support the final 03:27:59.520 --> 03:28:03.349 align:start position:0% information to support the final determination<03:28:00.319> for<03:28:00.640> purposes 03:28:03.349 --> 03:28:03.359 align:start position:0% determination for purposes 03:28:03.359 --> 03:28:06.110 align:start position:0% determination for purposes of<03:28:04.359> final<03:28:04.720> determination<03:28:05.439> as<03:28:05.560> to<03:28:05.760> whether<03:28:05.960> it 03:28:06.110 --> 03:28:06.120 align:start position:0% of final determination as to whether it 03:28:06.120 --> 03:28:09.349 align:start position:0% of final determination as to whether it was<03:28:06.640> objective<03:28:07.640> yeah<03:28:07.880> senstive<03:28:08.399> material<03:28:09.199> to 03:28:09.349 --> 03:28:09.359 align:start position:0% was objective yeah senstive material to 03:28:09.359 --> 03:28:10.950 align:start position:0% was objective yeah senstive material to be<03:28:09.520> the<03:28:09.640> threshold<03:28:10.080> is<03:28:10.239> not<03:28:10.399> even<03:28:10.600> in<03:28:10.760> there 03:28:10.950 --> 03:28:10.960 align:start position:0% be the threshold is not even in there 03:28:10.960 --> 03:28:12.030 align:start position:0% be the threshold is not even in there that<03:28:11.080> doesn't<03:28:11.319> have<03:28:11.479> anything<03:28:11.680> to<03:28:11.800> do<03:28:11.920> with 03:28:12.030 --> 03:28:12.040 align:start position:0% that doesn't have anything to do with 03:28:12.040 --> 03:28:13.510 align:start position:0% that doesn't have anything to do with them<03:28:12.239> that's<03:28:12.399> why<03:28:12.479> I<03:28:12.640> like<03:28:12.800> I'm<03:28:12.920> confused<03:28:13.359> what 03:28:13.510 --> 03:28:13.520 align:start position:0% them that's why I like I'm confused what 03:28:13.520 --> 03:28:15.710 align:start position:0% them that's why I like I'm confused what we're<03:28:14.239> we<03:28:14.359> didn't<03:28:14.600> quite<03:28:14.840> get<03:28:15.000> that<03:28:15.439> worked 03:28:15.710 --> 03:28:15.720 align:start position:0% we're we didn't quite get that worked 03:28:15.720 --> 03:28:17.830 align:start position:0% we're we didn't quite get that worked out<03:28:15.840> all<03:28:15.960> the<03:28:16.000> way<03:28:16.199> way<03:28:16.399> I 03:28:17.830 --> 03:28:17.840 align:start position:0% out all the way way I 03:28:17.840 --> 03:28:20.349 align:start position:0% out all the way way I guess<03:28:18.840> sorry<03:28:19.479> can<03:28:19.680> someone<03:28:20.000> repeat<03:28:20.239> the 03:28:20.349 --> 03:28:20.359 align:start position:0% guess sorry can someone repeat the 03:28:20.359 --> 03:28:22.870 align:start position:0% guess sorry can someone repeat the change<03:28:20.600> that<03:28:20.720> needs<03:28:20.880> to<03:28:20.960> be<03:28:21.199> made<03:28:22.199> I<03:28:22.359> missed<03:28:22.600> it 03:28:22.870 --> 03:28:22.880 align:start position:0% change that needs to be made I missed it 03:28:22.880 --> 03:28:24.910 align:start position:0% change that needs to be made I missed it for<03:28:23.160> the<03:28:23.279> final<03:28:23.560> dur<03:28:23.840> determination<03:28:24.600> of 03:28:24.910 --> 03:28:24.920 align:start position:0% for the final dur determination of 03:28:24.920 --> 03:28:28.910 align:start position:0% for the final dur determination of whether<03:28:25.920> it<03:28:26.080> meets<03:28:26.520> the<03:28:26.800> objective<03:28:27.520> sensitive 03:28:28.910 --> 03:28:28.920 align:start position:0% whether it meets the objective sensitive 03:28:28.920 --> 03:28:32.990 align:start position:0% whether it meets the objective sensitive materials<03:28:29.920> yeah<03:28:30.479> whether<03:28:30.920> it<03:28:31.439> is<03:28:32.439> meets<03:28:32.800> the 03:28:32.990 --> 03:28:33.000 align:start position:0% materials yeah whether it is meets the 03:28:33.000 --> 03:28:35.950 align:start position:0% materials yeah whether it is meets the criteria<03:28:33.520> or<03:28:34.000> something<03:28:35.000> yeah<03:28:35.239> criteria<03:28:35.720> is<03:28:35.800> a 03:28:35.950 --> 03:28:35.960 align:start position:0% criteria or something yeah criteria is a 03:28:35.960 --> 03:28:38.590 align:start position:0% criteria or something yeah criteria is a good<03:28:36.120> way<03:28:36.239> to<03:28:36.439> put<03:28:36.680> it<03:28:37.680> and<03:28:37.840> then<03:28:38.279> and<03:28:38.399> then 03:28:38.590 --> 03:28:38.600 align:start position:0% good way to put it and then and then 03:28:38.600 --> 03:28:42.269 align:start position:0% good way to put it and then and then delete<03:28:39.160> the<03:28:40.120> yeah<03:28:41.120> the 03:28:42.269 --> 03:28:42.279 align:start position:0% delete the yeah the 03:28:42.279 --> 03:28:44.469 align:start position:0% delete the yeah the rest<03:28:43.279> um<03:28:43.520> I'm<03:28:43.600> wondering<03:28:43.920> if<03:28:44.000> we<03:28:44.120> could<03:28:44.239> change 03:28:44.469 --> 03:28:44.479 align:start position:0% rest um I'm wondering if we could change 03:28:44.479 --> 03:28:46.750 align:start position:0% rest um I'm wondering if we could change the<03:28:44.600> word<03:28:44.840> it<03:28:45.040> of<03:28:45.239> whether<03:28:45.479> it<03:28:45.680> so<03:28:45.800> that<03:28:45.920> it<03:28:46.359> it 03:28:46.750 --> 03:28:46.760 align:start position:0% the word it of whether it so that it it 03:28:46.760 --> 03:28:48.990 align:start position:0% the word it of whether it so that it it we<03:28:46.880> know<03:28:47.040> what<03:28:47.120> we're<03:28:47.279> speaking<03:28:47.760> to<03:28:48.479> is<03:28:48.720> is<03:28:48.800> it 03:28:48.990 --> 03:28:49.000 align:start position:0% we know what we're speaking to is is it 03:28:49.000 --> 03:28:52.910 align:start position:0% we know what we're speaking to is is it the<03:28:49.120> removal<03:28:49.800> is<03:28:49.880> it<03:28:50.120> the<03:28:50.760> material<03:28:51.319> is<03:28:51.439> it<03:28:51.920> the 03:28:52.910 --> 03:28:52.920 align:start position:0% the removal is it the material is it the 03:28:52.920 --> 03:28:55.189 align:start position:0% the removal is it the material is it the whether<03:28:53.199> the<03:28:53.399> material<03:28:53.840> meets<03:28:54.319> the<03:28:54.680> objective 03:28:55.189 --> 03:28:55.199 align:start position:0% whether the material meets the objective 03:28:55.199 --> 03:28:58.309 align:start position:0% whether the material meets the objective sensitive<03:28:55.800> material 03:28:58.309 --> 03:28:58.319 align:start position:0% sensitive material 03:28:58.319 --> 03:29:00.110 align:start position:0% sensitive material criteria 03:29:00.110 --> 03:29:00.120 align:start position:0% criteria 03:29:00.120 --> 03:29:03.870 align:start position:0% criteria yep<03:29:01.600> that's<03:29:02.600> done<03:29:02.920> whether<03:29:03.160> the<03:29:03.319> material 03:29:03.870 --> 03:29:03.880 align:start position:0% yep that's done whether the material 03:29:03.880 --> 03:29:05.710 align:start position:0% yep that's done whether the material previously 03:29:05.710 --> 03:29:05.720 align:start position:0% previously 03:29:05.720 --> 03:29:13.429 align:start position:0% previously removed<03:29:06.720> that's<03:29:06.960> making<03:29:07.199> it<03:29:07.479> really 03:29:13.429 --> 03:29:13.439 align:start position:0% 03:29:13.439 --> 03:29:18.630 align:start position:0% wordy<03:29:14.439> that<03:29:14.960> yeah<03:29:16.199> ify<03:29:17.199> okay<03:29:18.160> that's<03:29:18.520> that's 03:29:18.630 --> 03:29:18.640 align:start position:0% wordy that yeah ify okay that's that's 03:29:18.640 --> 03:29:20.830 align:start position:0% wordy that yeah ify okay that's that's what<03:29:18.760> I<03:29:18.880> had<03:29:19.000> on<03:29:19.160> my<03:29:19.359> list<03:29:19.760> so<03:29:20.279> and<03:29:20.439> if<03:29:20.600> I<03:29:20.720> guess 03:29:20.830 --> 03:29:20.840 align:start position:0% what I had on my list so and if I guess 03:29:20.840 --> 03:29:22.070 align:start position:0% what I had on my list so and if I guess if<03:29:20.960> we<03:29:21.080> miss<03:29:21.319> something<03:29:21.560> we<03:29:21.640> can<03:29:21.800> make<03:29:21.960> an 03:29:22.070 --> 03:29:22.080 align:start position:0% if we miss something we can make an 03:29:22.080 --> 03:29:23.550 align:start position:0% if we miss something we can make an amendment<03:29:22.399> during<03:29:22.640> the<03:29:22.720> board<03:29:22.960> meeting<03:29:23.319> but 03:29:23.550 --> 03:29:23.560 align:start position:0% amendment during the board meeting but 03:29:23.560 --> 03:29:25.990 align:start position:0% amendment during the board meeting but that's<03:29:23.720> where<03:29:23.840> I'm<03:29:24.000> at<03:29:25.000> are<03:29:25.120> we<03:29:25.319> ready<03:29:25.560> to<03:29:25.720> move 03:29:25.990 --> 03:29:26.000 align:start position:0% that's where I'm at are we ready to move 03:29:26.000 --> 03:29:28.429 align:start position:0% that's where I'm at are we ready to move this<03:29:26.120> forward<03:29:26.399> to<03:29:26.560> the 03:29:28.429 --> 03:29:28.439 align:start position:0% this forward to the 03:29:28.439 --> 03:29:33.469 align:start position:0% this forward to the board<03:29:29.439> yes<03:29:30.399> yeah<03:29:30.520> I<03:29:30.640> believe<03:29:30.960> so<03:29:31.800> all<03:29:32.000> right<03:29:32.479> so 03:29:33.469 --> 03:29:33.479 align:start position:0% board yes yeah I believe so all right so 03:29:33.479 --> 03:29:35.550 align:start position:0% board yes yeah I believe so all right so would<03:29:33.680> you<03:29:33.800> like<03:29:33.960> to<03:29:34.120> make<03:29:34.239> a<03:29:34.359> motion<03:29:35.239> I'd<03:29:35.399> like 03:29:35.550 --> 03:29:35.560 align:start position:0% would you like to make a motion I'd like 03:29:35.560 --> 03:29:37.870 align:start position:0% would you like to make a motion I'd like to<03:29:35.720> make<03:29:35.880> a<03:29:36.040> motion<03:29:36.439> that<03:29:36.560> we<03:29:36.720> move<03:29:37.080> draft<03:29:37.479> two 03:29:37.870 --> 03:29:37.880 align:start position:0% to make a motion that we move draft two 03:29:37.880 --> 03:29:40.750 align:start position:0% to make a motion that we move draft two as<03:29:38.120> amended<03:29:38.880> What's<03:29:39.080> the<03:29:39.279> title<03:29:39.600> of 03:29:40.750 --> 03:29:40.760 align:start position:0% as amended What's the title of 03:29:40.760 --> 03:29:42.309 align:start position:0% as amended What's the title of it 03:29:42.309 --> 03:29:42.319 align:start position:0% it 03:29:42.319 --> 03:29:46.150 align:start position:0% it um<03:29:43.319> sensitive<03:29:43.840> materials<03:29:44.359> draft<03:29:44.800> two<03:29:45.720> are 03:29:46.150 --> 03:29:46.160 align:start position:0% um sensitive materials draft two are 03:29:46.160 --> 03:29:47.710 align:start position:0% um sensitive materials draft two are sorry<03:29:46.520> I'd<03:29:46.680> like<03:29:46.800> to<03:29:46.920> make<03:29:47.040> a<03:29:47.160> motion<03:29:47.439> that<03:29:47.600> we 03:29:47.710 --> 03:29:47.720 align:start position:0% sorry I'd like to make a motion that we 03:29:47.720 --> 03:29:51.070 align:start position:0% sorry I'd like to make a motion that we move<03:29:48.080> r277<03:29:49.080> 628<03:29:49.760> sensitive<03:29:50.199> materials<03:29:50.720> draft 03:29:51.070 --> 03:29:51.080 align:start position:0% move r277 628 sensitive materials draft 03:29:51.080 --> 03:29:52.429 align:start position:0% move r277 628 sensitive materials draft 2<03:29:51.319> for<03:29:51.640> to<03:29:51.760> the 03:29:52.429 --> 03:29:52.439 align:start position:0% 2 for to the 03:29:52.439 --> 03:29:56.790 align:start position:0% 2 for to the board<03:29:53.439> um<03:29:54.359> for<03:29:54.880> second<03:29:55.239> and<03:29:55.479> final<03:29:55.800> reading 03:29:56.790 --> 03:29:56.800 align:start position:0% board um for second and final reading 03:29:56.800 --> 03:29:58.870 align:start position:0% board um for second and final reading did<03:29:56.960> I<03:29:57.080> get<03:29:57.239> close<03:29:57.479> on<03:29:57.640> that<03:29:57.800> as<03:29:57.920> amended<03:29:58.720> as 03:29:58.870 --> 03:29:58.880 align:start position:0% did I get close on that as amended as 03:29:58.880 --> 03:30:02.030 align:start position:0% did I get close on that as amended as amend<03:29:59.239> amended<03:29:59.800> as<03:30:00.000> amended<03:30:00.600> and<03:30:00.920> if<03:30:01.800> I<03:30:01.880> don't 03:30:02.030 --> 03:30:02.040 align:start position:0% amend amended as amended and if I don't 03:30:02.040 --> 03:30:03.469 align:start position:0% amend amended as amended and if I don't know<03:30:02.160> if<03:30:02.239> we<03:30:02.319> need<03:30:02.439> to<03:30:02.520> do<03:30:02.680> do<03:30:02.800> we<03:30:02.920> do<03:30:03.080> technical 03:30:03.469 --> 03:30:03.479 align:start position:0% know if we need to do do we do technical 03:30:03.479 --> 03:30:05.469 align:start position:0% know if we need to do do we do technical changes<03:30:03.880> if<03:30:04.000> there<03:30:04.120> need<03:30:04.279> to<03:30:04.399> be<03:30:04.560> on<03:30:04.720> this<03:30:05.239> any 03:30:05.469 --> 03:30:05.479 align:start position:0% changes if there need to be on this any 03:30:05.479 --> 03:30:08.590 align:start position:0% changes if there need to be on this any any<03:30:05.720> technical<03:30:06.160> changes<03:30:06.960> that<03:30:07.080> need<03:30:07.239> to<03:30:07.399> be 03:30:08.590 --> 03:30:08.600 align:start position:0% any technical changes that need to be 03:30:08.600 --> 03:30:12.510 align:start position:0% any technical changes that need to be made<03:30:09.600> great<03:30:09.840> so<03:30:10.080> we<03:30:10.199> have<03:30:10.359> a<03:30:10.520> motion<03:30:11.239> before<03:30:11.600> us 03:30:12.510 --> 03:30:12.520 align:start position:0% made great so we have a motion before us 03:30:12.520 --> 03:30:13.349 align:start position:0% made great so we have a motion before us that 03:30:13.349 --> 03:30:13.359 align:start position:0% that 03:30:13.359 --> 03:30:19.910 align:start position:0% that we<03:30:14.359> send<03:30:15.359> R2<03:30:15.960> 277<03:30:16.920> 628<03:30:17.920> sensitive<03:30:18.920> materials 03:30:19.910 --> 03:30:19.920 align:start position:0% we send R2 277 628 sensitive materials 03:30:19.920 --> 03:30:21.429 align:start position:0% we send R2 277 628 sensitive materials draft 03:30:21.429 --> 03:30:21.439 align:start position:0% draft 03:30:21.439 --> 03:30:25.910 align:start position:0% draft two<03:30:22.439> to<03:30:23.000> the<03:30:23.199> board<03:30:23.520> for<03:30:24.120> its<03:30:24.479> final<03:30:25.120> as 03:30:25.910 --> 03:30:25.920 align:start position:0% two to the board for its final as 03:30:25.920 --> 03:30:29.229 align:start position:0% two to the board for its final as amended<03:30:26.920> uh<03:30:27.600> to<03:30:27.800> the<03:30:27.920> board<03:30:28.160> for<03:30:28.520> their<03:30:28.720> final 03:30:29.229 --> 03:30:29.239 align:start position:0% amended uh to the board for their final 03:30:29.239 --> 03:30:33.229 align:start position:0% amended uh to the board for their final approval<03:30:30.239> with<03:30:30.560> any<03:30:30.920> technical<03:30:31.399> changes<03:30:32.239> that 03:30:33.229 --> 03:30:33.239 align:start position:0% approval with any technical changes that 03:30:33.239 --> 03:30:37.590 align:start position:0% approval with any technical changes that uh<03:30:33.720> staff<03:30:34.080> needs<03:30:34.520> to<03:30:35.319> take<03:30:35.600> care<03:30:35.840> of<03:30:36.720> all<03:30:37.080> those 03:30:37.590 --> 03:30:37.600 align:start position:0% uh staff needs to take care of all those 03:30:37.600 --> 03:30:39.150 align:start position:0% uh staff needs to take care of all those is<03:30:37.720> there<03:30:37.840> any<03:30:38.160> further 03:30:39.150 --> 03:30:39.160 align:start position:0% is there any further 03:30:39.160 --> 03:30:43.070 align:start position:0% is there any further discussion<03:30:40.160> no<03:30:40.800> seeing<03:30:41.319> none<03:30:42.319> those<03:30:42.560> in<03:30:42.800> favor 03:30:43.070 --> 03:30:43.080 align:start position:0% discussion no seeing none those in favor 03:30:43.080 --> 03:30:46.710 align:start position:0% discussion no seeing none those in favor say<03:30:43.439> I<03:30:44.239> I<03:30:44.720> I<03:30:45.279> I 03:30:46.710 --> 03:30:46.720 align:start position:0% say I I I I 03:30:46.720 --> 03:30:51.830 align:start position:0% say I I I I hi<03:30:47.720> we<03:30:47.920> had<03:30:48.439> four<03:30:49.560> responses<03:30:50.560> and<03:30:51.000> it<03:30:51.439> passes 03:30:51.830 --> 03:30:51.840 align:start position:0% hi we had four responses and it passes 03:30:51.840 --> 03:30:54.229 align:start position:0% hi we had four responses and it passes unanimously<03:30:52.680> thank<03:30:52.840> you<03:30:53.040> very<03:30:53.279> much<03:30:53.880> and<03:30:54.080> I'm 03:30:54.229 --> 03:30:54.239 align:start position:0% unanimously thank you very much and I'm 03:30:54.239 --> 03:30:58.830 align:start position:0% unanimously thank you very much and I'm going<03:30:54.520> to<03:30:55.120> uh<03:30:55.720> pass<03:30:56.279> the<03:30:56.720> leadership<03:30:57.720> to<03:30:58.720> uh 03:30:58.830 --> 03:30:58.840 align:start position:0% going to uh pass the leadership to uh 03:30:58.840 --> 03:31:00.990 align:start position:0% going to uh pass the leadership to uh board<03:30:59.080> member<03:30:59.359> green<03:30:59.960> to<03:31:00.160> finish<03:31:00.479> this<03:31:00.680> up 03:31:00.990 --> 03:31:01.000 align:start position:0% board member green to finish this up 03:31:01.000 --> 03:31:04.510 align:start position:0% board member green to finish this up thank<03:31:01.160> you<03:31:01.319> very<03:31:01.800> much<03:31:02.800> thank<03:31:03.000> you<03:31:03.120> Sher 03:31:04.510 --> 03:31:04.520 align:start position:0% thank you very much thank you Sher 03:31:04.520 --> 03:31:08.670 align:start position:0% thank you very much thank you Sher boo<03:31:05.520> all<03:31:05.760> right<03:31:06.600> well<03:31:07.319> we<03:31:07.520> do<03:31:07.840> have<03:31:08.080> one<03:31:08.279> more 03:31:08.670 --> 03:31:08.680 align:start position:0% boo all right well we do have one more 03:31:08.680 --> 03:31:10.590 align:start position:0% boo all right well we do have one more agenda<03:31:09.160> item 03:31:10.590 --> 03:31:10.600 align:start position:0% agenda item 03:31:10.600 --> 03:31:13.469 align:start position:0% agenda item that<03:31:11.600> make<03:31:11.760> a<03:31:11.920> motion<03:31:12.319> to<03:31:12.640> just<03:31:12.840> put<03:31:12.960> it<03:31:13.080> on<03:31:13.239> our 03:31:13.469 --> 03:31:13.479 align:start position:0% that make a motion to just put it on our 03:31:13.479 --> 03:31:16.990 align:start position:0% that make a motion to just put it on our next<03:31:14.160> standards<03:31:14.600> and<03:31:14.840> assessment<03:31:15.279> meeting<03:31:15.920> is 03:31:16.990 --> 03:31:17.000 align:start position:0% next standards and assessment meeting is 03:31:17.000 --> 03:31:19.670 align:start position:0% next standards and assessment meeting is that<03:31:18.000> yep<03:31:18.160> so<03:31:18.319> we<03:31:18.479> have<03:31:18.680> that<03:31:18.880> as<03:31:19.040> our<03:31:19.439> our 03:31:19.670 --> 03:31:19.680 align:start position:0% that yep so we have that as our our 03:31:19.680 --> 03:31:22.670 align:start position:0% that yep so we have that as our our third<03:31:20.040> item<03:31:20.359> on<03:31:20.479> our<03:31:20.760> agenda<03:31:21.479> and<03:31:21.760> we<03:31:21.960> can<03:31:22.560> we 03:31:22.670 --> 03:31:22.680 align:start position:0% third item on our agenda and we can we 03:31:22.680 --> 03:31:25.870 align:start position:0% third item on our agenda and we can we can<03:31:22.880> move<03:31:23.359> make<03:31:24.359> that<03:31:24.600> motion<03:31:25.080> to<03:31:25.520> move<03:31:25.760> that 03:31:25.870 --> 03:31:25.880 align:start position:0% can move make that motion to move that 03:31:25.880 --> 03:31:27.229 align:start position:0% can move make that motion to move that to<03:31:26.040> our<03:31:26.199> next<03:31:26.359> board 03:31:27.229 --> 03:31:27.239 align:start position:0% to our next board 03:31:27.239 --> 03:31:29.429 align:start position:0% to our next board meeting<03:31:28.239> our<03:31:28.439> standards<03:31:28.800> and<03:31:29.000> assessment 03:31:29.429 --> 03:31:29.439 align:start position:0% meeting our standards and assessment 03:31:29.439 --> 03:31:35.150 align:start position:0% meeting our standards and assessment meeting<03:31:30.279> so<03:31:31.279> okay<03:31:32.279> okay<03:31:33.279> all 03:31:35.150 --> 03:31:35.160 align:start position:0% meeting so okay okay all 03:31:35.160 --> 03:31:38.429 align:start position:0% meeting so okay okay all right<03:31:36.160> does<03:31:36.359> that<03:31:36.520> need<03:31:36.640> to<03:31:36.720> be<03:31:36.880> voted 03:31:38.429 --> 03:31:38.439 align:start position:0% right does that need to be voted 03:31:38.439 --> 03:31:49.550 align:start position:0% right does that need to be voted on<03:31:39.439> yes<03:31:39.960> probably<03:31:40.920> yeah 03:31:49.550 --> 03:31:49.560 align:start position:0% 03:31:49.560 --> 03:31:51.189 align:start position:0% I<03:31:49.680> think<03:31:49.840> you<03:31:49.960> might<03:31:50.120> be<03:31:50.279> muted<03:31:50.720> board<03:31:50.960> member 03:31:51.189 --> 03:31:51.199 align:start position:0% I think you might be muted board member 03:31:51.199 --> 03:31:53.429 align:start position:0% I think you might be muted board member green<03:31:51.520> if 03:31:53.429 --> 03:31:53.439 align:start position:0% green if 03:31:53.439 --> 03:31:57.429 align:start position:0% green if you're<03:31:54.439> wow<03:31:54.920> I<03:31:55.080> must<03:31:55.279> have<03:31:55.439> muted<03:31:56.120> myself<03:31:57.120> um 03:31:57.429 --> 03:31:57.439 align:start position:0% you're wow I must have muted myself um 03:31:57.439 --> 03:32:00.670 align:start position:0% you're wow I must have muted myself um yeah<03:31:57.680> so<03:31:58.040> we<03:31:58.279> have<03:31:58.640> a<03:31:58.840> motion<03:31:59.319> to<03:31:59.800> move<03:32:00.319> our 03:32:00.670 --> 03:32:00.680 align:start position:0% yeah so we have a motion to move our 03:32:00.680 --> 03:32:02.189 align:start position:0% yeah so we have a motion to move our third<03:32:01.000> agenda<03:32:01.359> item<03:32:01.560> for<03:32:01.720> the<03:32:01.880> access 03:32:02.189 --> 03:32:02.199 align:start position:0% third agenda item for the access 03:32:02.199 --> 03:32:05.550 align:start position:0% third agenda item for the access committee<03:32:02.720> back<03:32:02.960> to<03:32:03.880> our<03:32:04.319> well<03:32:04.560> forward<03:32:05.199> to 03:32:05.550 --> 03:32:05.560 align:start position:0% committee back to our well forward to 03:32:05.560 --> 03:32:08.349 align:start position:0% committee back to our well forward to our<03:32:06.199> May<03:32:06.760> standards<03:32:07.239> and<03:32:07.399> assessment 03:32:08.349 --> 03:32:08.359 align:start position:0% our May standards and assessment 03:32:08.359 --> 03:32:12.150 align:start position:0% our May standards and assessment meeting<03:32:09.359> um<03:32:10.000> any<03:32:10.359> other<03:32:10.680> discussion<03:32:11.120> to<03:32:11.319> that 03:32:12.150 --> 03:32:12.160 align:start position:0% meeting um any other discussion to that 03:32:12.160 --> 03:32:15.189 align:start position:0% meeting um any other discussion to that the<03:32:12.279> clarification<03:32:13.040> is<03:32:13.279> just<03:32:13.680> on<03:32:14.680> discussion 03:32:15.189 --> 03:32:15.199 align:start position:0% the clarification is just on discussion 03:32:15.199 --> 03:32:18.550 align:start position:0% the clarification is just on discussion around<03:32:16.040> um<03:32:16.359> a 03:32:18.550 --> 03:32:18.560 align:start position:0% around um a 03:32:18.560 --> 03:32:21.229 align:start position:0% around um a possible<03:32:19.560> um<03:32:19.760> Student<03:32:20.239> Success<03:32:20.920> right 03:32:21.229 --> 03:32:21.239 align:start position:0% possible um Student Success right 03:32:21.239 --> 03:32:22.510 align:start position:0% possible um Student Success right because<03:32:21.439> we<03:32:21.560> had<03:32:21.680> another<03:32:22.000> motion<03:32:22.279> that<03:32:22.399> came 03:32:22.510 --> 03:32:22.520 align:start position:0% because we had another motion that came 03:32:22.520 --> 03:32:24.030 align:start position:0% because we had another motion that came out<03:32:22.640> of<03:32:22.760> committee<03:32:23.120> that's<03:32:23.279> not<03:32:23.479> involving 03:32:24.030 --> 03:32:24.040 align:start position:0% out of committee that's not involving 03:32:24.040 --> 03:32:28.670 align:start position:0% out of committee that's not involving that<03:32:24.840> am<03:32:24.920> I<03:32:25.120> right<03:32:26.040> yeah<03:32:26.600> um<03:32:26.920> by<03:32:27.040> shl<03:32:27.640> if<03:32:27.800> you<03:32:28.439> uh 03:32:28.670 --> 03:32:28.680 align:start position:0% that am I right yeah um by shl if you uh 03:32:28.680 --> 03:32:31.309 align:start position:0% that am I right yeah um by shl if you uh if<03:32:28.800> we<03:32:28.920> can<03:32:29.160> have<03:32:29.439> at<03:32:29.600> least<03:32:30.080> you'll<03:32:30.359> scroll<03:32:31.000> us 03:32:31.309 --> 03:32:31.319 align:start position:0% if we can have at least you'll scroll us 03:32:31.319 --> 03:32:34.510 align:start position:0% if we can have at least you'll scroll us we<03:32:31.520> see<03:32:31.880> motion<03:32:32.239> member<03:32:32.800> or<03:32:33.199> that<03:32:33.960> so<03:32:34.160> we<03:32:34.279> took 03:32:34.510 --> 03:32:34.520 align:start position:0% we see motion member or that so we took 03:32:34.520 --> 03:32:36.229 align:start position:0% we see motion member or that so we took the<03:32:34.640> notes<03:32:35.160> and<03:32:35.319> if<03:32:35.439> you'll<03:32:35.600> scroll<03:32:35.880> down<03:32:36.080> just 03:32:36.229 --> 03:32:36.239 align:start position:0% the notes and if you'll scroll down just 03:32:36.239 --> 03:32:39.110 align:start position:0% the notes and if you'll scroll down just a<03:32:36.319> little<03:32:36.479> bit<03:32:36.640> more<03:32:37.520> uh<03:32:37.800> we<03:32:38.040> took<03:32:38.560> the<03:32:38.720> notes 03:32:39.110 --> 03:32:39.120 align:start position:0% a little bit more uh we took the notes 03:32:39.120 --> 03:32:40.790 align:start position:0% a little bit more uh we took the notes of<03:32:39.399> everything<03:32:39.720> that<03:32:39.920> was<03:32:40.080> stated<03:32:40.399> during<03:32:40.640> the 03:32:40.790 --> 03:32:40.800 align:start position:0% of everything that was stated during the 03:32:40.800 --> 03:32:42.830 align:start position:0% of everything that was stated during the committee<03:32:41.160> meeting<03:32:41.520> talking<03:32:41.920> about<03:32:42.479> um<03:32:42.680> and 03:32:42.830 --> 03:32:42.840 align:start position:0% committee meeting talking about um and 03:32:42.840 --> 03:32:44.269 align:start position:0% committee meeting talking about um and then<03:32:43.120> you<03:32:43.239> know<03:32:43.399> for<03:32:43.560> the<03:32:43.640> future<03:32:43.920> meeting 03:32:44.269 --> 03:32:44.279 align:start position:0% then you know for the future meeting 03:32:44.279 --> 03:32:46.990 align:start position:0% then you know for the future meeting what<03:32:44.399> it<03:32:44.520> might<03:32:44.760> look<03:32:45.000> like<03:32:45.720> um<03:32:45.960> um<03:32:46.880> and 03:32:46.990 --> 03:32:47.000 align:start position:0% what it might look like um um and 03:32:47.000 --> 03:32:48.389 align:start position:0% what it might look like um um and whatnot<03:32:47.319> so<03:32:47.520> all<03:32:47.640> of<03:32:47.760> that's<03:32:48.000> within<03:32:48.279> this 03:32:48.389 --> 03:32:48.399 align:start position:0% whatnot so all of that's within this 03:32:48.399 --> 03:32:50.790 align:start position:0% whatnot so all of that's within this motion's<03:32:48.880> document<03:32:49.399> as<03:32:49.640> just<03:32:49.880> a<03:32:50.120> a<03:32:50.279> preview<03:32:50.640> of 03:32:50.790 --> 03:32:50.800 align:start position:0% motion's document as just a a preview of 03:32:50.800 --> 03:32:52.630 align:start position:0% motion's document as just a a preview of what<03:32:50.920> was<03:32:51.080> talked<03:32:51.359> about<03:32:51.680> last<03:32:51.920> time<03:32:52.399> so<03:32:52.560> I 03:32:52.630 --> 03:32:52.640 align:start position:0% what was talked about last time so I 03:32:52.640 --> 03:32:55.429 align:start position:0% what was talked about last time so I think<03:32:52.840> the<03:32:53.000> motion<03:32:53.479> was<03:32:54.319> um<03:32:54.800> so<03:32:55.080> we<03:32:55.239> had<03:32:55.359> the 03:32:55.429 --> 03:32:55.439 align:start position:0% think the motion was um so we had the 03:32:55.439 --> 03:32:57.590 align:start position:0% think the motion was um so we had the Sunset<03:32:55.880> date<03:32:56.279> the<03:32:56.439> second<03:32:56.720> one<03:32:57.000> was<03:32:57.319> that<03:32:57.439> you 03:32:57.590 --> 03:32:57.600 align:start position:0% Sunset date the second one was that you 03:32:57.600 --> 03:32:59.030 align:start position:0% Sunset date the second one was that you had<03:32:57.720> a<03:32:57.840> motion<03:32:58.239> that<03:32:58.399> the<03:32:58.520> standards<03:32:58.880> and 03:32:59.030 --> 03:32:59.040 align:start position:0% had a motion that the standards and 03:32:59.040 --> 03:33:00.510 align:start position:0% had a motion that the standards and assessment<03:32:59.399> committee<03:32:59.680> work<03:32:59.840> on<03:32:59.960> a<03:33:00.160> policy 03:33:00.510 --> 03:33:00.520 align:start position:0% assessment committee work on a policy 03:33:00.520 --> 03:33:02.309 align:start position:0% assessment committee work on a policy for<03:33:00.680> a<03:33:00.800> committee<03:33:01.239> focused<03:33:01.640> on<03:33:01.920> Student 03:33:02.309 --> 03:33:02.319 align:start position:0% for a committee focused on Student 03:33:02.319 --> 03:33:04.070 align:start position:0% for a committee focused on Student Success<03:33:02.760> opportunity<03:33:03.520> and<03:33:03.680> merit-based 03:33:04.070 --> 03:33:04.080 align:start position:0% Success opportunity and merit-based 03:33:04.080 --> 03:33:06.189 align:start position:0% Success opportunity and merit-based policies<03:33:04.800> so<03:33:05.040> that<03:33:05.160> would<03:33:05.319> be<03:33:05.479> the<03:33:05.880> motion 03:33:06.189 --> 03:33:06.199 align:start position:0% policies so that would be the motion 03:33:06.199 --> 03:33:08.469 align:start position:0% policies so that would be the motion that<03:33:06.279> would<03:33:06.359> be<03:33:06.479> the<03:33:06.600> motion<03:33:07.239> okay<03:33:07.720> I<03:33:08.000> I'll 03:33:08.469 --> 03:33:08.479 align:start position:0% that would be the motion okay I I'll 03:33:08.479 --> 03:33:10.990 align:start position:0% that would be the motion okay I I'll formally<03:33:08.920> make<03:33:09.120> that<03:33:09.399> the<03:33:09.800> the<03:33:10.439> item<03:33:10.680> on<03:33:10.840> our 03:33:10.990 --> 03:33:11.000 align:start position:0% formally make that the the item on our 03:33:11.000 --> 03:33:12.630 align:start position:0% formally make that the the item on our agenda<03:33:11.399> that<03:33:11.600> the<03:33:11.720> standards<03:33:12.080> and<03:33:12.239> assessment 03:33:12.630 --> 03:33:12.640 align:start position:0% agenda that the standards and assessment 03:33:12.640 --> 03:33:14.389 align:start position:0% agenda that the standards and assessment committee<03:33:12.960> work<03:33:13.279> on<03:33:13.479> a<03:33:13.760> policy<03:33:14.080> for<03:33:14.279> the 03:33:14.389 --> 03:33:14.399 align:start position:0% committee work on a policy for the 03:33:14.399 --> 03:33:16.510 align:start position:0% committee work on a policy for the committee<03:33:14.760> focused<03:33:15.479> for<03:33:15.880> committee<03:33:16.160> focused 03:33:16.510 --> 03:33:16.520 align:start position:0% committee focused for committee focused 03:33:16.520 --> 03:33:18.550 align:start position:0% committee focused for committee focused on<03:33:16.720> Student<03:33:17.080> Success<03:33:17.640> opportunity<03:33:18.160> and<03:33:18.279> Merit 03:33:18.550 --> 03:33:18.560 align:start position:0% on Student Success opportunity and Merit 03:33:18.560 --> 03:33:20.910 align:start position:0% on Student Success opportunity and Merit based<03:33:18.920> policies<03:33:19.880> be<03:33:20.040> moved<03:33:20.279> to<03:33:20.439> our<03:33:20.560> standards 03:33:20.910 --> 03:33:20.920 align:start position:0% based policies be moved to our standards 03:33:20.920 --> 03:33:23.510 align:start position:0% based policies be moved to our standards and<03:33:21.160> assessment<03:33:21.560> meeting<03:33:21.880> in 03:33:23.510 --> 03:33:23.520 align:start position:0% and assessment meeting in 03:33:23.520 --> 03:33:25.630 align:start position:0% and assessment meeting in May<03:33:24.520> all 03:33:25.630 --> 03:33:25.640 align:start position:0% May all 03:33:25.640 --> 03:33:29.269 align:start position:0% May all right<03:33:26.640> um<03:33:27.000> any<03:33:27.239> further 03:33:29.269 --> 03:33:29.279 align:start position:0% right um any further 03:33:29.279 --> 03:33:31.910 align:start position:0% right um any further discussion<03:33:30.279> okay<03:33:30.479> everybody 03:33:31.910 --> 03:33:31.920 align:start position:0% discussion okay everybody 03:33:31.920 --> 03:33:37.550 align:start position:0% discussion okay everybody vote<03:33:32.920> Yes<03:33:33.880> favor<03:33:34.920> yes 03:33:37.550 --> 03:33:37.560 align:start position:0% vote Yes favor yes 03:33:37.560 --> 03:33:41.710 align:start position:0% vote Yes favor yes yes<03:33:38.560> all<03:33:38.760> right<03:33:39.760> I<03:33:39.880> think<03:33:40.040> that<03:33:40.160> looks<03:33:40.640> good<03:33:41.640> I 03:33:41.710 --> 03:33:41.720 align:start position:0% yes all right I think that looks good I 03:33:41.720 --> 03:33:43.229 align:start position:0% yes all right I think that looks good I know<03:33:41.840> it's<03:33:41.960> not<03:33:42.160> appropriate<03:33:42.640> to<03:33:42.800> clap<03:33:43.080> in 03:33:43.229 --> 03:33:43.239 align:start position:0% know it's not appropriate to clap in 03:33:43.239 --> 03:33:44.550 align:start position:0% know it's not appropriate to clap in these<03:33:43.399> meetings<03:33:43.800> but<03:33:43.960> I<03:33:44.080> just<03:33:44.239> feel<03:33:44.399> like 03:33:44.550 --> 03:33:44.560 align:start position:0% these meetings but I just feel like 03:33:44.560 --> 03:33:46.189 align:start position:0% these meetings but I just feel like there's<03:33:44.760> got<03:33:44.880> to<03:33:44.960> be<03:33:45.080> some<03:33:45.239> sort<03:33:45.399> of<03:33:45.880> trol 03:33:46.189 --> 03:33:46.199 align:start position:0% there's got to be some sort of trol 03:33:46.199 --> 03:33:48.510 align:start position:0% there's got to be some sort of trol clapping<03:33:46.560> so<03:33:46.720> I'm<03:33:46.840> doing<03:33:47.040> it<03:33:47.160> on 03:33:48.510 --> 03:33:48.520 align:start position:0% clapping so I'm doing it on 03:33:48.520 --> 03:33:51.630 align:start position:0% clapping so I'm doing it on my<03:33:49.520> all<03:33:49.640> right<03:33:49.920> awesome<03:33:50.560> thank<03:33:50.800> you<03:33:51.080> everybody 03:33:51.630 --> 03:33:51.640 align:start position:0% my all right awesome thank you everybody 03:33:51.640 --> 03:33:56.429 align:start position:0% my all right awesome thank you everybody we<03:33:51.840> appreciate<03:33:52.840> much<03:33:53.680> yeah<03:33:54.640> thank<03:33:55.000> you<03:33:56.000> we<03:33:56.120> do 03:33:56.429 --> 03:33:56.439 align:start position:0% we appreciate much yeah thank you we do 03:33:56.439 --> 03:33:59.150 align:start position:0% we appreciate much yeah thank you we do need<03:33:56.600> to<03:33:56.680> do<03:33:56.800> a<03:33:56.920> formal<03:33:57.239> motion<03:33:57.600> to<03:33:58.160> adjourn 03:33:59.150 --> 03:33:59.160 align:start position:0% need to do a formal motion to adjourn 03:33:59.160 --> 03:34:02.790 align:start position:0% need to do a formal motion to adjourn probably<03:33:59.840> okay<03:34:00.600> yeah<03:34:01.000> so<03:34:01.760> I<03:34:01.880> need<03:34:02.080> a<03:34:02.359> a<03:34:02.520> motion 03:34:02.790 --> 03:34:02.800 align:start position:0% probably okay yeah so I need a a motion 03:34:02.800 --> 03:34:07.590 align:start position:0% probably okay yeah so I need a a motion to<03:34:03.399> adjourn<03:34:04.399> so<03:34:04.800> moved<03:34:05.239> so<03:34:05.920> moved<03:34:06.920> thank<03:34:07.080> you 03:34:07.590 --> 03:34:07.600 align:start position:0% to adjourn so moved so moved thank you 03:34:07.600 --> 03:34:09.349 align:start position:0% to adjourn so moved so moved thank you all<03:34:07.720> right<03:34:08.279> have<03:34:08.399> a<03:34:08.560> good<03:34:08.840> day<03:34:09.040> thanks 03:34:09.349 --> 03:34:09.359 align:start position:0% all right have a good day thanks 03:34:09.359 --> 03:34:11.590 align:start position:0% all right have a good day thanks everyone<03:34:09.800> your<03:34:09.960> miracle<03:34:10.439> workers<03:34:11.160> member 03:34:11.590 --> 03:34:11.600 align:start position:0% everyone your miracle workers member 03:34:11.600 --> 03:34:13.670 align:start position:0% everyone your miracle workers member green<03:34:11.960> can<03:34:12.120> you<03:34:12.239> stay<03:34:12.439> on<03:34:12.600> for<03:34:12.840> just<03:34:13.080> one<03:34:13.319> more 03:34:13.670 --> 03:34:13.680 align:start position:0% green can you stay on for just one more 03:34:13.680 --> 03:34:18.150 align:start position:0% green can you stay on for just one more second<03:34:14.640> yes<03:34:14.960> I<03:34:15.120> can 03:34:18.150 --> 03:34:18.160 align:start position:0% 03:34:18.160 --> 03:34:22.750 align:start position:0% right<03:34:18.359> thanks 03:34:22.750 --> 03:34:22.760 align:start position:0% 03:34:22.760 --> 03:34:26.349 align:start position:0% everybody<03:34:23.760> um<03:34:24.000> Jerry<03:34:24.640> and<03:34:24.960> Alex<03:34:25.560> we<03:34:25.840> are 03:34:26.349 --> 03:34:26.359 align:start position:0% everybody um Jerry and Alex we are 03:34:26.359 --> 03:34:27.830 align:start position:0% everybody um Jerry and Alex we are officially<03:34:26.800> done<03:34:27.040> with<03:34:27.160> our<03:34:27.319> meeting<03:34:27.720> if 03:34:27.830 --> 03:34:27.840 align:start position:0% officially done with our meeting if 03:34:27.840 --> 03:34:31.429 align:start position:0% officially done with our meeting if you'll<03:34:28.080> stop<03:34:28.880> streaming<03:34:29.880> and<03:34:30.120> then<03:34:30.960> um<03:34:31.199> I<03:34:31.279> just 03:34:31.429 --> 03:34:31.439 align:start position:0% you'll stop streaming and then um I just 03:34:31.439 --> 03:34:33.590 align:start position:0% you'll stop streaming and then um I just have<03:34:31.560> a<03:34:31.800> question<03:34:32.319> really<03:34:32.600> quick<03:34:32.800> for<03:34:33.439> um 03:34:33.590 --> 03:34:33.600 align:start position:0% have a question really quick for um 03:34:33.600 --> 03:34:36.920 align:start position:0% have a question really quick for um member<03:34:33.960> green