method before this book gets in the school? For that follow-up in October, we searched through
 42 secondary schools' online school catalogs throughout seven different districts. We visited
 eight different school libraries to confirm that the books we found on their catalogs
 were actually in the schools, and then our team read in full 22 books that we did find
 that were considered to be questionable. I just want to jump in really quick and reiterate,
 when we read these books, we were reading them for this specific language in the statute of
 objective standards. We reviewed any book that came up in our random review, and we didn't look
 for literary merit or any of the potential factors outside of that statute. Thanks.
 Yep. And to that point, when we talk about sexual conduct and nudity, we were looking for the words
 that are specifically defined in statute, and you can see those on your screen, and we found 153 counts
 of those instances within the 22 books. And to be clear, those were not images. They were words that
 were typed on the page that described the acts. And there was same thing with nudity. It was words
 describing nudity. And then even though it's not in code, just to give a more robust review of the
 books, we did count F words and C words and domestic violence and found 800 counts of language and 112
 counts of domestic violence in those 22 books. So that brings us to those relevant recommendations
 from the June audit, which is that what Leah said that the legislature could consider that could consider
 the policy question of having library book selection processes that are more sort of throughout the
 state so that everyone has sort of the same opportunity to choose books safely for students. And that goes
 for classroom libraries as well. And if you have any questions, we'll be happy to address them.